Diddy Slaps NBC with $100M Lawsuit Over “Bad Boy” Doc
|
Time
Text
The storm is coming.
Markets are crashing.
Banks are closing.
When the economy collapses, how will you survive?
You need a plan.
Cash, gold, bitcoin, dirty man safes keep your assets hidden underground at a secret location ready for any crisis.
Don't wait for disaster to strike.
Get your Dirty Man safe today.
Use promo code DIRTY10 for 10% off your order.
When uncertainty strikes, peace of mind is priceless.
Dirty Man underground safes protects what matters most.
Discreetly designed, these safes are where innovation meets reliability, keeping your valuables close yet secure.
Be ready for anything.
Use code DIRTY10 for 10% off today.
And take the first step towards safeguarding your future.
Dirty Man Safe.
Because protecting your family starts with protecting what you treasure.
Disaster can strike when least expected.
Wildfires, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes.
They can instantly turn your world upside down.
Dirty Man Underground Safes is a safeguard against chaos.
Hidden below, your valuables remain protected no matter what.
Prepare for the unexpected.
Use code DIRTY10 for 10% off and secure peace of mind for you and your family.
Dirty man safe.
When disaster hits, security isn't optional.
Diddy.
Diddy.
Or didn't he?
Well, if he didn't, he's got a lot to explain.
Well, apparently what Diddy's done now, which is a very interesting thing, is he's on the offensive of sorts.
That's right, Sean Diddy Combs has initiated a $100 million defamation lawsuit against NBCUniversal, Peacock TV and production company Ample Entertainment alleging, among other things, that her documentary Diddy The Making of a Bad Boy contains false and defamatory statements that have caused him severe reputational and economic Imagine that!
This thing did!
The lawsuit, which is filed in New York State Court, asserts and alleges and avers that the documentary falsely accuses Diddy of heinous crimes, including serial murder and the R word, which rhymes with grape, and the trafficking of minors.
Now, without any credible evidence whatsoever to support these claims, he's alleging there's no evidence about it.
I mean, what are you doing?
You're out of your mind.
You're crazy.
There's no evidence of this.
Now, his attorneys argue that the documentary maliciously portrays him as a monster and draws unfounded comparisons, they allege, to Jeffrey Epstein.
Now, the lawsuit specifically challenges allegations suggesting that Mr. Combs and his involvement in the 2018 death of his former partner, Kim, Now,
the film features interviews with individuals such as singer Al B. Shore, who insinuates foul play in Porter's death, despite official findings, of course, of the contrary.
The documentary revisits heretofore debunked claims, including those from a previous lawsuit, alleging that Mr. Combs assaulted underage women.
Now, his legal team emphasizes that the women involved have publicly stated they were adults at the time and have refuted any misconduct.
Now the lawsuit contends that NBCUniversal and Ample Entertainment prioritize sensationalism and profit over truth and journalistic integrity, thereby exploiting the public's seemingly endless craving for scandal.
Now, the legal action comes as Mr. Combs faces separate federal charges of sex trafficking and racketeering to which he has pleaded not guilty.
He is currently detained at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, awaiting a trial scheduled for May.
Mr. Combs' attorneys have asserted that the defamatory statements in the documentary have not only damaged his reputation, but also jeopardized his right to a fair trial.
In response to the lawsuit, Combs' attorney, Erica Wolf, stated that NBCUniversal, Peacock TV, and Ample Entertainment, quote, made a conscious decision.
To lie in their own pockets at the expense of truth, decency, and basic standards of professional journalism.
She criticized the defendants for maliciously, this is a quote, maliciously and recklessly broadcasting outrageous lies, she says, in the documentary, accusing Combs of serious crimes without any supporting evidence whatsoever.
Now the lawsuit, the lawsuit seeks to hold the defendants accountable for the substantial harm, the harm, Now, as of now, NBCUniversal and Ample Entertainment have not publicly responded to the lawsuit.
The outcome of the legal battle could have serious implications for media portrayals of high-profile individuals and the responsibilities of content creators in ensuring accuracy and fairness.
This course, my friend, underscores the ongoing tension between public figures and media organizations, highlighting the challenges in balancing investigative journalism with the rights of individuals to protect their reputations.
As the legal proceedings unfold, they are likely to spark broader discussions about the ethical obligations of media outlets in reporting on sensitive And potentially defamatory and libelous objects and subjects.
What do you think about that?
Do you think there's anything to this?
Do you believe that there is any chance, any suggestion of the fact that Mr. Combs has had his reputation besmirched, sullied, and defamed by virtue of this latest version of this?
How does one separate?
All of the allegations, with all of the charges, and all of the claims made, and how, when you are charged with a multiplicity, a multiplicity of concomitant and simultaneous lawsuits, how are you able to say this added to this, as opposed to your reputation being so sullied, so destroyed, so damaged to begin with, that nothing added on could in any way affect it.