All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 18, 2023 - Lionel Nation
47:38
Russell Brand:: Deep State Retribution Explained
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Disaster can strike when least expected.
Wildfires, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes.
They can instantly turn your world upside down.
Dirty Man Underground Safes is a safeguard against chaos.
Hidden below, your valuables remain protected no matter what.
Prepare for the unexpected.
Use code DIRTY10 for 10% off and secure peace of mind for you and your family.
Dirty Man Safe.
When disaster hits, security isn't optional.
The storm is coming.
Markets are crashing.
Banks are closing.
When the economy collapses, how will you survive?
You need a plan.
Cash, gold, bitcoin.
Dirty Man Safes keep your assets hidden underground at a secret location ready for any crisis.
Don't wait for disaster to strike.
Get your Dirty Man safe today.
Use promo code Dirty10 for 10% off your order.
When uncertainty strikes, peace of mind is priceless.
Dirty Man underground safes protects what matters most.
Discreetly designed, these safes are where innovation meets reliability, keeping your valuables close yet secure.
Be ready for anything.
Use code DIRTY10 for 10% off today and take the first step towards safeguarding your future.
Dirty Man Safe.
Because protecting your family starts with protecting what you treasure.
Okay.
I'm going to tell you something, and I'm going to make this very, very clear.
The Russell Brand story is...
I don't want to say this in the wrong way.
Forget the subject matter.
The subject matter is horrible.
It is fantastic.
Fantastic.
In terms of what I love.
Complicated.
Layer upon layer of complexity.
Yes, but this, but that.
We've got a British common law.
You've got some American.
There was an allegation of a sexual battery here in Los Angeles.
You have an Absolutely fascinating example of outrage, but the question is, is there a crime?
Is there a charge?
Is there libel?
Is there slander?
How does the British media work with Ofcom and how this...
I was watching, by the way, kudos.
Way to go.
Excellent, excellent show.
I was watching a show, Sean Atwood, and a lawyer, counselor by the name of Jonathan Code, C-O-A-D.
Wonderful.
Wonderful.
Layer upon layer.
This is the stuff I love.
And the reason why is before we even get to the issue of even what happened.
We look at all of what we are specifically dealing with.
And it's not just about Russell Brand.
It's about everything.
And watch.
Watch in particular the Daily Mail.
They are pouring on.
They are coming out of the woodwork.
So you have again multiple issues.
And I'm so glad you're with us.
It's a sad, sad case.
Now let me get a couple of things out of the way.
So this may or may not help you.
Your questions are important.
Your questions are critical.
What you think, what you may want to know, what you may want to ask.
How does this, how does all of this work?
Let me remind you, dear friends, dear, dear friends, that, of course, we are live right now as we speak in New York City.
P.M. Eastern Time in New York City.
New York, New York, a town so nice they named it.
You heard that.
And I'm here to talk to you.
And if you have any questions, great.
If not, let me just pontificate inexorably.
Let me first of all, thank you for being here.
Please subscribe to the channel.
Hit that little bell so you're notified of live streams and new videos.
Like this video.
And let me say right off the bat, as we always do, because I love our sponsors and I make no exception to Our great friends at MyPatriotSupply and PrepareWithLionel.com.
PrepareWithLionel.com.
Ladies and gentlemen, you know and I know you are going to be in a position one day where you're going to need emergency food.
And right now, for those of you who have never even thought about this, who have thought, well, you know, it's a good idea.
Let me get into this.
Here's the perfect introductory means.
Right now, if you go to PrepareWithLionel.com, this deal, and I don't know how long it's going to be here, but you can save $200.
Off a three-month emergency food kit.
Three months, 90 days, 25 years shelf life, 21 varieties of breakfast, lunches, dinners, snacks, drinks.
120 pounds of food in six buckets, water-resistant, with reusable pouches.
State-of-the-art for emergency food.
You cannot replicate this on your own.
Prepare with Lionel.
Prepare with Lionel.
Prepare with Lionel.com.
Prepare with Lionel.com.
Do it now, dear friends.
Do it now.
Prepare with Lionel.com.
All right.
Now, let's get down to brass tacks.
Number one.
How do we do this?
What is the way that we do this?
How do we do this?
How?
We do this.
First issue is, what is the issue?
Let's see how many folks are really into this.
What is the issue?
Before we start, I'm a lawyer.
What's the issue?
You come to me.
Let's talk about this.
Maybe I'm Mr. Code.
Counselor Code and I are going to be speaking.
We're going to be conversing.
Issue number one.
What would you like to do?
Liability.
Liability.
Very important word.
What is liability?
It means that you have faced something.
You face criminal prosecution, civil lawsuits, liability.
You can have something bad happen to you.
Give you an idea.
The issue is causation, liability, You know what I mean?
Liability.
Are you liable?
Are you going to pay?
Could you be made to pay for this?
Could you be made?
What is it?
That's it.
Number one.
So what is the liability that Russell Brand is looking at?
What is it?
Let's think.
Somebody keep track.
Liz, you're going to be our amanuensis.
You're going to be our factotum.
You're going to be our dimbox.
You're going to be our...
We're going to keep track of this.
We have a big bulletin board.
Number one, criminal law.
Is he looking at any kind of criminal sanctions?
Is he looking at anything criminal?
Does he?
What questions do you want to ask?
What's the most important question?
What's the first thing you ask?
What's critical?
Come on!
I'm answering the question.
Number one, statutes of limitations.
We're talking about cases between 2006 and 2013.
2006 and 2013.
We are talking...
The giants are about to win.
Bless your heart.
2006-2013.
Number one.
Civil criminal.
Civil.
Lawsuits.
Money.
Criminal.
Jail.
Big difference.
And listening to this very astute, very interesting media lawyer, Mr. Code, Jonathan Code, I was watching this.
Again, great show.
I really enjoyed this.
Apparently there's no statute of limitations in the UK from what I'm understanding.
He's a media lawyer.
We have them here, unfortunately.
The only time we really have no statute of limitations ever is murder, murder one, or something so egregious involving, depending upon your state, capital sexual battery or something along those lines.
So, for the most part, this is going to be something that we probably, probably would not be looking at Criminal cases.
No, no!
Let's just make a note of that.
This looks primarily civil.
Because look at this.
2006 and 2013.
We have 17 years.
Between 17 and 10 years.
Okay.
Now, that's number one.
Number two.
What's the charges?
What are we looking at?
What would you be looking at?
Number one, sexual battery.
You can call it the R word.
I don't want to say it because, as you know, certain algorithms regarding this wonderful platform that we are on, it does not like certain words.
Consequently, I stay away from certain words just because I can, just because I should, and just because I do.
It's that simple.
Certain words, I stay away from.
But sexual battery, Could suffice.
I think you know what the R word is that we don't want to get to.
And by the way, that word, depending upon what it is, it can be problematic and construed differently.
Okay, fine, fine, fine.
What are the elements?
What?
What are the elements?
What do you have to do?
What do you have to do?
To be guilty of this offense.
Number one, I'm giving you the most generic, overly broad, perhaps, but the most incredibly full-throated version of it.
It is the non-consensual, touching, Penetration.
Contact with.
I've seen versions of this where you do not necessarily need penetration.
You can have contact with.
It can be digital.
It can be using other genitals or what have you.
It does not necessarily have to be penile vaginal.
It can be elsewhere as well.
The idea is that it is something of Nature.
And, by the way, it can use, and I hate to be this blunt, but please, a little warning.
It can involve using items or weapons or what have you.
Okay?
But the number one issue, number one, is consent.
That's the issue.
That's where it is.
Consent.
Why?
Because this is the only behavior where human beings actually engage in it.
We engage in it normally, consensually.
What people involve themselves consensually is incredible.
You understand what I'm saying?
It's, how do I say this?
Let me see.
Let me change this a little bit.
Okay.
Oop, oop, oop, oop, oop, oop.
Pardon me, pardon me, pardon me, pardon me, pardon me, pardon me.
Okay.
And I'm stopping myself because I'm going to get too far ahead.
If two people are involved in something which seems to be conventional, usual, familiar, intromission, coitus,
whatever you want to call it, and at some point, if at some point one of the participants could be male, could be female, could be the same gender or whatever you want to call it, if somebody says, Enough.
Stop.
Stop this.
Consensus withdrawn.
You must withdraw.
Or you must stop.
That's it.
It's that simple.
It's almost like trespass in a weird way.
Trespass is, come in to my restaurant.
I don't like you.
You're making noise.
You're drunk.
Get out.
I granted you a license.
I consented to you being in here.
I've withdrawn that consent.
Get out.
Your license to be here is no longer valid.
Get out.
You are now trespassing.
Get out.
It just changed.
Just this moment.
I don't have to have a reason.
Now, what happens if the person does not know this?
What happens if in the course of something somebody does not know this?
What if somebody does not know that consent has been withdrawn or somebody says no?
Oftentimes you've heard people use things like safe words because during the course of particular activities, depending upon the degree of inebriety, depending upon a lot of other stuff, sometimes people might be confused.
It's like having It's like having...
What am I trying to say?
What am I trying to say?
It's like having hijacking drills on 9-11.
Very confusing.
So the question is, and this is a matter of fact, an issue of fact for the trier of fact, meaning the jury gets to hear this.
If they say...
Well, I don't think...
I didn't...
You've got to know that consent was withdrawn.
You've got to know this.
It's not like they're strangers.
If you're a stranger, if somebody comes up and throws you in the back of a car, you don't have to worry about this.
But two people who annoy each other...
Now, why do I say this?
Why do I say this?
There was a case years ago in California.
One of the most egregious examples I've ever heard in my life were two people who were boyfriend-girlfriend.
And what they did was...
During the course of their particular interlude, the girls said, I've got to go.
If I recall correctly, I've got to go.
The young man, her boyfriend, somebody they had been intimate before, he said, I thought she meant hurry up, wrap it up.
Time to go.
So he wrapped it up.
She meant, no, I meant I've got to go home now.
Stop.
Again, factors to consider.
They know each other.
They've shared intimacies before.
These aren't strangers.
It's okay.
No violence, no injury, no nothing.
Just the question of when did you withdraw consent?
When did you say stop?
Or did you say stop?
Or was he susceptible of even understanding that?
He was found guilty.
A jury said, no, that meant stop.
And he said, wait a minute, I didn't understand what that meant.
Plus, he's in the throes of whatever.
Maybe they've been drinking.
This sometimes can get a little interesting.
Why?
Because we're not talking about people who are strangers.
Stranger cases are completely different.
Stranger cases are different.
Stranger is different.
You're in a completely different, a totally different story when you're saying something to the effect of when you're thinking about consent and you're thinking, wait a minute.
These people don't even know each other or maybe they do know each other or whatever it is.
So that's the story.
Okay, that's number one.
Number two.
And this is something, I want you to forgive me, I want you to understand this, this is the issue.
This is the issue.
In order to deal with the notion of consent, you have to ask yourself, who is this person?
Russell Brand is a jerk.
Russell Brand is a loudmouth, You know, this vile, reprobate, drug addict, see here, this rake, this sybarite, who basically said that once he stopped drugs, he became a sex addict.
And he talked about 80...
Partners a month and he was crazy and he was out of control and that's what he was.
Do you hear this?
This is the most important thing in the world.
This is who he is.
Okay.
Number one.
Number two.
The people that In one particular case, we'll get to this in a moment, the girl who was 16 knew him for three months.
These aren't long relationships.
They end.
In the case of a girl who's 16 years old, read this, three months, the mother even said to her, you better tell him how old you are.
And I'm thinking, wait a minute.
What?
Now this doesn't excuse anything, but it is not against the law.
The age of consent in the UK is 16. Or 16 is not a violation of it.
Think about this.
Think about what we're talking about.
You've got the mother who says to her daughter, listen, I don't think this is a good idea.
This guy is a creep and I think you better let him know how old you are.
Because I don't think he...
Okay.
She even went to his...
I think one of the occasions when I think she brought her there Met him, and he kissed the mother on the lips, according to this Intercept article.
This is the weirdest thing.
That does not excuse anything.
But number one, it's not against the law, because it is not in violation of anything.
That's number one.
And number two, and this is important for you to understand, the mother and the parents were nowhere to be found, which I find to be so odd.
Now, that doesn't mean anything.
That doesn't mean Anything.
That doesn't excuse anything.
If it is indeed problematic.
Because later on, she says, yes, there were certain things that, behaviors that were done, that she said were done without my consent and without my permission.
So, clearly, clearly, you could say the case was made that The criminal sexual battery occurred in this case and with other women.
I think there's four women total.
Okay, fine.
What do you do?
You want to go to court with us?
You want to take this to trial?
That's number one.
And I'm going to throw out all the issues.
He has given Ofcom, which is the Office of Communications.
This is the British version.
It's kind of like the FCC, sort of, but it's the Office of Communications.
It's the government-approved regulatory and competition authority for broadcasting, telecommunications, blah, blah, blah.
And you have to, before you issue one of these, but before you do an expose or whatever, you have to be given this This letter that says you have eight days to reply.
You have eight days.
You got eight.
This is what we say.
So they said, well, who are these people?
Well, we're letting you know these names so that maybe you can perhaps prepare a defense.
Well, his lawyers, I think, wisely said, we're not going to respond because we don't know anything or what have you.
Okay.
And again, I'm not a British lawyer.
I have no idea.
I'm not a barrister or a solicitor, what have you.
But that's a good move, which is what I've been saying the whole time.
You don't know anything.
I have no duty to respond.
I'm saying nothing.
You do whatever you want to do.
Put on your case.
I'll sit back and I'll decide if I want to sue you.
Now, can they sue the BBC or Dispatches or Channel 4 or 2 or 3 or whatever it was?
And according to the laws of the UK, Once they give you this information, and once they give you at least a chance to review this and respond, but as long as, and I'm paraphrasing, as long as the information or the subject matter is newsworthy, and as long as the media company has a good faith belief that it is valid, they're off the hook in terms of libel or defamation.
Which is kind of what our rules are as well.
We have that funky kind of New York Times against Sullivan, where in the case of a public figure, the public figure cannot sue unless he can prove malice.
It's a little different.
So what happens to Russell Brand?
Now, just so that you know this, and it doesn't matter, I'm not a Russell Brand fan, for whatever it's worth.
I don't care.
It has nothing to do with my appraisal of this.
None.
Nothing.
It has nothing to do.
I don't care who he is.
It doesn't matter.
The American in me, the constitutional scholar in me, provides this sense of, is this fair?
Is this fair?
That's something which I find fascinating.
This is Grumpy Mike's garden accessories.
Look at this.
Feeling lost in your garden?
Grumpy Mike's garden accessories will help you find your way out from soil to gnomes.
We've got you covered.
We love you.
This is the best one ever.
Thank you, Grumpy Mike.
You know, that looks familiar, that person.
Thank you so much for that.
I appreciate that.
I really do.
What happens to his career?
Look at Kevin Spacey.
Look at Kevin Spacey.
Kevin Spacey is just...
I don't know how many cases were totally proved against him.
I know some weren't.
Ashton Kutcher's...
That's a different story.
But you have the Weinstein case.
You've got this Masterson case.
Now, the career part is in some cases the least of which.
What is...
Is Russell Brand owed in terms of his due process?
First, you have four women who, let's say, I have not said anything between 10 and 17 years for a variety of reasons.
Now, let me go on the record and say something to you, dear friends.
If ever there is something that is true, well, If ever there's something I understand, it's somebody who says, I don't want to go on the record because I don't want to go through courts and I don't want to go through this nonsense.
I don't want to go through that.
I understand it.
I understand it.
Number two, I feel bad.
Number three, I have my own...
This is not like murder.
The victim can't speak, but this is a case unlike others where girls are going to think, but they're going to rip me apart.
They're going to say, well, why did you go?
Which is an interesting case.
Why?
Because consent is an issue.
It's an issue in this case.
So you've got girls 10, 17 years.
So anyway, so they're being asked now, what do you think?
Why didn't you come?
They said, well, we went.
She did make claims that were consistent at the time.
In one particular case, one of these women went to either a sexual battery treatment facility, saw medical attention, declined prosecution, but they said, we went to this doctor and there was evidence of X. Now let's assume there was evidence of,
when I say this very carefully, not extraordinary trauma, but evidence of contact, whatever it is.
Russell Brand says, I know her.
This was a girlfriend.
Maybe something, again, depending upon the level of trauma that we're talking about.
That's not in and of itself indicative of anything.
It is consistent in that people don't normally, after instances of having a moment of intimacy with somebody they've been with, call a rape crisis center.
But this goes to the circumstantial case.
Not direct evidence, this is circumstantial.
You also have a text message, which of course, provided it's authenticated, Provided somebody says, this is a true and accurate depiction of what happened at the time.
This is exactly what happened.
This statement was made.
This was his response.
What do you think?
It indicates, you know, no means no.
Again, you might say, that's good enough for me.
What do you do with this?
What if Russell Brand says, this is not what happened.
10 to 17 years ago.
10 to 17 years.
No, that's not what happened.
And then if it gets worse, what happens if he says, excuse me, each of these people, each of these women that you, I think, now, here's the thing.
If they reveal the identities of these women to Russell Brand, can he turn around and announce to the world who they are?
I don't know.
Do they have to tell him the names?
If he says, can you be specific?
You know who they are.
No, I don't.
The girl who was 16. I don't know who that is.
You mean there were other girls who were 16?
Yeah.
I'm a degenerate sex addict.
This is what he said.
So do you tell him?
And if you tell him, can he let people know?
Will that be viewed as some kind of retribution?
Issue after issue after issue.
What does he do?
Now he's got also Elon Musk, I think Tucker, and Andrew Tate coming, quote, in support of him.
Do you want Andrew Tate supporting you?
Do you?
I don't.
I sure as hell don't.
If I'm saying no thanks for that one.
This is, this, we haven't even gotten yet to the issues.
Look at it, watch the Daily Mail.
Look, it's exploding.
And the reason why is the Daily Mail understands this is a British case.
It's going to be interesting.
You've got kind of stars and all this.
Katy Perry is going to be saying, I don't know, it's a weird guy.
One of the things he certainly can say, Russell Brand, is I have a series and a history of drug addiction.
I said to the world, I told people specifically, I'm a sex addict, I'm this, I'm that.
But what happens to his career?
Does it matter?
This Masterson case, granted here, this is, what do you got, 30 years?
30?
30 years?
And if that jury sits there and says, I believe her, I believe that story, that's it.
What evidence is there?
Her word, his word.
There's oftentimes not DNA.
And not 10 to 17 years ago.
And if Russell Brand were to, quote, take the stand and say, of course there's a reasonable doubt as to my complicity because they keep coming back!
I don't understand this.
I didn't know what I was doing wrong.
Why would I think something is wrong if we've had a series of whatever it is.
Some of these interludes did not occur or occurred prior to the final termination.
So they had this event and came back.
Now that's not to pass judgment or cast aspersions on these women, but it goes to show you this goes to more doubt.
Ladies and gentlemen, let's hear it for the inopposite.
Smokey Bear says, only you can prevent forest fires.
Thank you, Smokey.
Thank you.
Only now, during one of the most serious conversations of all time, we have PSAs for forest fires.
Thank you.
This is how mondo this whole thing is.
What happens?
What's the responsibility of the victim?
Remember Jimmy Savile?
Oh no, BBC.
Remember Jimmy Savile?
Oh, God!
Prince Charles' buddy.
What they did...
Are they going to Weinstein him?
Are they going to Weinstein?
What they did to Harvey Weinstein was disgusting.
Disgusting.
Even though he's disgusting.
One of the reasons why they got Harvey Weinstein is because he looks so bad.
What they did to Harvey Weinstein was one of these things.
Let me give you an example of something.
Let's assume that you, on a number of occasions, you were involved in a number of bank robberies.
Bank robberies.
Bank robberies.
And you had this MO.
You wore a particular hat.
You used a particular type of firearm.
You said something.
You entered the bank in a particular way.
You did something unique.
Your modus operandi was very unique, idiosyncratic to say the least.
And all of a sudden, a series of those, we have this new case.
Then we have this guy who was on charge, this guy, for robbing a bank.
And he had a mask on.
Nobody can ID him.
But this guy who came in had the same type of weapon you used.
And this one, Had this person who was being charged wore the same hat.
Entered the bank one particular way.
Said the same thing.
So what they're going to do is they put people on who say, yeah, five years ago he robbed me and he had a gun and he wore the hat and he came in this way.
Wait a minute.
He did what?
He robbed another bank?
Oh yeah!
And the only reason we're telling you is not because we're telling you he's a bank robber, but just to show you his M.O. That he used a particular...
Wait a minute!
He robbed a bank?
Oh, a bunch of them!
Here's another one too.
Yeah, I got robbed.
Yeah, he robbed me too.
Wait a minute!
He robbed two other banks?
Three!
That's...
We're not telling you that he robbed other banks so that you'll convict him of this one.
We're just trying to connect his MO because we have an identity problem.
And the jury's going to say, screw that.
If this guy committed all those bankrupt, we're going to add one more to this.
He's guilty.
Not because I think there's any proof that he did this one, but if he did those, okay.
That's what they did to Weinstein.
They took women who testified against Weinstein.
The statute of limitations had passed.
They weren't even involved in this.
But that jury said, that son of a...
You can't do that.
People argue with somebody and they say, oh yeah?
And then if you're losing, let's say they don't know what to say.
Oh yeah?
Now what about at Christmas time?
When you got drunk with your uncle?
What?
What are you talking about?
Yeah, what about that?
What are we talking about?
We're not talking about, yeah, at the other time you...
Logic always says we talk about this case.
Now.
Regarding this.
We don't talk about other matters.
Now what happens when people like Andrew Tate, nobody cares about him, but are people not going to come?
How do you come to this support?
How do you, let me ask you, how do you support this fellow and say what exactly?
Well, I'm going to say I'm a good friend of Russell Brand, and he's a very talented guy.
He's a good friend of mine.
Do you know anything about this?
No, I don't know anything about this, but I think that I think the reason we're doing it is because he's a Trump supporter and because he said some pretty tough stuff about COVID.
Wait a minute.
You think this is a what?
Do you think this is some kind of a conspiracy theory?
Is that what you said?
Well, I'm not saying...
Wait a minute.
What?
That doesn't help.
That makes it worse.
Because if you come out and that's the argument, you're saying, this is nonsense.
To which I would respond, excuse me, I want you to meet somebody.
She's in her 30s, she's 33 years old now, but she was 16 years old.
Miss?
Yes.
Are you saying this happened?
Are you making this up?
Because Russell Brand Is a Trump supporter?
I don't know if he's a Trump supporter, or that he believes in Ivermectin or something.
Is that what you're saying?
Are you doing this?
Are you bringing this up now because of Russell Brand's politics?
Because the deep state contacted you and said, listen, I want you to come up and make this up?
The same thing happened during Sound of Freedom when they would say, well, you know these This is all that conspiracy business.
Wait a minute.
These little girls who were involved in being kidnapped and trafficked?
What?
This is part of a what?
So, you've got to ask yourself, what is Tucker going to say or whoever is coming out on his behalf?
What do you know about this case?
What?
How do you say, listen, I may not know about this case, but I like...
This is my favorite.
This is classically seen in reputation.
But he has a wonderful reputation in the community for peacefulness and blah, blah, blah.
Really?
Yes.
Oh, I didn't know that.
And then what you can do is you can impeach the testimony.
You can say, well, let me ask you something.
Did you know that...
Well, let me ask you, would your opinion of him in terms of peacefulness, would that change if I told you that he was convicted of starting a bar fight in Seattle and what?
And then you get that information in, not to impugn the integrity of this person in property and peace before the jury, you get it in.
Because you're trying to impeach the testimony of this person who claims he knows the reputation of the person.
And then you get back and forth, and it just blows up.
So my question is, what are you going to say?
How do you say you're a fan of Russell Brand?
What is it?
Tell me what the position is.
Elon Musk?
Andrew Tate, Dr. Crossett, what are you going to say?
Tell me.
I don't understand it.
What do you say?
What is your big deal?
How do you...
What?
I don't understand this.
Well, look, I don't know anything about this.
I don't know about the particular facts of the case, but I do know he's a hell of a guy.
Really?
Well, yeah, but...
So what does he do?
He's gonna be...
Look at the Daily Mail.
Look at the...
It's the most incredible thing.
They are just...
I mean, they're gonna outdo whatever the Times did, whatever this Channel 4 did.
Russell Brand accuser reveals the letter she wrote to the comedian after he allegedly assaulted her.
Against a wall in his L.A. home.
And adds, he's saying one thing, I know the demon underneath it.
And the worst pictures.
How about this one?
Life of the party.
Lauren Boebert, I know this has nothing to do with this, now blames her overly animated personality for sleazy behavior that got her and her lover kicked out of the Beetlejuice musical.
She's so toast.
It's not even funny.
But let's go on.
Uh.
okay now where is this?
Ooh, look at this one.
Yale University student acquitted of battery in 2018 launches a $110 million lawsuit.
Against his accuser after court.
This is interesting.
This reminds me of the old days of Mattress Girl.
But let me go down.
Let me see this.
Where is our friend?
That's not it.
Here we go.
Here we go.
Bombshell Brand claims.
Exclusive.
They are determined to get through this.
Russell Brand's pregnant wife is standing by her man through allegations of attack.
After being credited with reforming his wild ways.
And maybe this was between 10 and 17 years ago.
I don't know.
Russell Brand's ex-PA claims she felt sick to my stomach after the star allegedly showed intimate photos of women to his entourage and recognized her friend as she brands him a narcissist who was always in his underwear.
Well, that's...
Narcissist, perhaps.
Andrew Tate leads cries of support in defense of Russell Brand as the comedian's fans claim the allegations against him are part of a conspiracy.
That is going to blow up worse than anything.
Because I say, what?
That'll hurt him more because you know how people hate the conspiracy.
So, what is Katy Perry's big secret about Russell Brand?
How pop star said she knew the real truth about her ex-husband, but was keeping it locked in my sleep for a rainy day as she maintains her silence in wake of abuse allegations.
Rosa Brand had sex with a Filipino prostitute when he was 16 while his father slept with two hookers in the same hotel room while on holiday.
I don't know what the hell that has to do with anything.
Danny Minogue labels Russell Brand a vile predator who wouldn't take no for an answer in a resurfaced interview.
The moment Russell Brand was blasted by furious Sir Rod Stewart at GQ Men of the Year Awards after telling the audience he had a go on Pop Icon's daughter, Kimberly.
What's next for Russell Brand?
PR guru says a star could emerge from the accusation scandal unscathed thanks to loyal social media and podcast fanbase.
Okay.
And finally, I turn to drink and drugs after becoming the butt of Russell Brand's joke.
Granddaughter of Fawlty Towers actor Andrew Sachs.
Remember Manu Manalito?
Whatever his name was.
After scandal that eventually saw the comic sack from Radio 2. I mean, this is just...
Now, what does he do?
And will he do this?
We will see.
Ladies and gentlemen, Sal Manella says, Between the coast-to-coast and beyond expansion of the U.S. to the exponential growth of the federal government to the congressional usurpation of the president's authority, the founders would be lost today.
Sal, I could not have said it better myself.
I could not have said it better myself, dear friend.
I think you're absolutely correct with that one.
Thank you for that.
Indeed, the founders.
Mrs. L and I were listening today on the way back from our appointed rounds in the Yugo, a stretch, and we're listening to William Henry Harrison.
The life of William Henry Harrison.
Tippecanoe and Tyler, too.
Oh, my God.
Lived, what, 31 days?
Didn't wear a coat.
Bless his heart.
So, my friends, we're going to continue with this.
I am saying to you, and believe me when I say this, I am saying that this is one of the most fascinating cases that is so incredibly complicated.
By virtue of all of the layers of...
Well, I think I've made it very, very clear.
Thanks for watching.
Don't forget, my friends, my pillow, my pillow right now is getting cooler.
The opening of the windows is getting cooler.
The cool nights, you're going to need beautiful blankets and percales and the geyser sheets and the pillows and the duvets and the quilts and the slippers and the PJs and everything.
Go to mypillow.com promo code Lionel mypillow.com slash Lionel and get a free gift and luxuriate some of the finest products around.
Now, I also want you to do one favor for me and you have been terrific.
This is what I ask you.
This is what I ask you.
I want you to go to this and I want you to sign up right away for Mrs. L's YouTube channel right here.
Right here on our show.
Right here.
This is it.
This is critical.
This is it right now.
This is the link.
Mrs. L, right there.
Go right there and sign up immediately to her Lens Warriors.
What they are doing, you should see what they're doing now.
They're having these Caffeine.
Not caffeine.
These nicotine.
What is it?
Like cigarettes that are targeting kids with famous people's names on them.
I mean, granted, this is not as horrific as predation and trafficking, but it goes to show you how they're being targeted specifically.
So there you have it.
Please, right there, my friends.
Sign up right here.
All right, dear friends.
All right.
Listen, thank you so much.
Have a great and glorious day.
Thank you for your love and support and your just being who you are.
It means so much to us.
We're going to have more on this case.
Watch what happens and watch what, again, the levels of this.
This is what is so fantastic.
All right, dear friends.
Have a great and glorious day.
Don't ever change.
I mean that sincerely.
See you tomorrow at 8 a.m.
Until then, remember, the monkey's dead.
The show's over.
Sue you.
▲
Export Selection