Luca, Carl, and Firas dissect a fourth assassination attempt on Donald Trump by Cole Thomas Allen, whose Caltech engineering background and "libtard" manifesto reveal radicalization via one-sided propaganda. They contrast this with the Hove court case involving Ibrahim Al Shaif and others convicted of raping while filming, arguing that asylum seekers like Green Party co-leader Carla Denya's defenders ignore violent criminals such as Wayne Broadhurst's killer. The hosts critique Nigel Farage's weakness compared to Rupert Lowe, who advocates mass deportations and military veteran enforcement for Restore Britain, concluding that eroded civic values demand hardline measures to protect British culture from perceived migrant threats. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Scary Moment in California00:08:36
Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Load Seaters, episode 1405 for Monday, the 27th of April 2025.
I'm your host, Luca, joined today by Carl and Firas.
Hello.
And today we're going to be talking all about the latest, another, what is this, a third official assassination attempt?
The third one we know about, or the fourth, actually.
Right, so they're stacking up now.
So we're going to be discussing the latest assassination attempt on Trump.
We're then going to be talking about how evil just seems to.
Stalk our land unchecked.
Yeah, I mean, it's just, how would you deny it at this point?
Absolutely.
You can't.
You'd have to be a Green voter.
Yeah, or a traitor.
Or.
No.
What's the.
Repeat yourself.
Yes.
And then we're going to be talking about Rupert Lowe finally breaking the ban and having his first GB News appearance.
Before we discuss those things, though, I just want to remind you the third and final part of mine and Stelios' long, detailed discussion, all about Apollonius's of Rhodes, Argonautica, is now on the channel, ready for you to.
Take a look at.
Stelios and I had a great discussion about this, talking all about the supernatural powers of Medea, the giant bronze statue of Talos on Crete, and the absolute despair that the Argonauts fall into when they reach the shores of Libya, which seems to just be something that people have felt for over 2,000 years at this point.
Maybe they'll do that to you, man.
Yeah, that's just how it is.
So that's something to definitely check out if you're interested in the classics.
And also, of course, it is Monday, which means you have.
Realpolitik this afternoon?
Yes.
So I'm talking about the Israel UAE Morocco Indonesia relationship intended to sort of build up a shipping alliance to control global waterways and whether or not it is what it seems or it's actually less than advertised.
Okay.
Wonderful.
So if you're interested in that, then you can join Firas Live on the website at three o'clock.
With that all said, shall we get into today's news?
Yes.
So.
There's been another assassination attempt against President Trump, and you see that there's some kind of magician here.
I'm told that he's an Israeli magician trying to entertain Trump and Melania.
And then at some point, gunshots are heard, and the Secret Service shows up to evacuate Vance and Trump, and Robert Kennedy was there, and a bunch of others.
It was a bit of a Scary moment, one can say.
And it seems that the suspect tried to break through the security corridor.
Yeah, he really sprinted for it, didn't he?
Yeah, ran towards the ballroom.
Then shots were fired.
One of the Secret Service agents was hurt.
It's not clear yet if the suspect himself was hurt, but he breaks through the security corridor here, according to the Washington Post.
Is caught before he gets to the stairs.
If he'd crossed the stairs and got in to the actual entrance of the ballroom, Trump would have been right across from him.
A bit of an ambitious attempt, though, isn't it?
Yes.
A bit of a Hail Mary.
Very much so.
The suspect, we're going to talk about him a little bit more.
He had checked into the hotel as a guest one or two days before and then.
Executed his plan.
He had a bunch of knives, one or two handguns, and a shotgun.
So a hunting rifle rather than a combat rifle, essentially.
Yeah.
And the journalists were most affected.
This was the White House Correspondents' Dinner, a classic thing where they roast the president and make fun of him.
Actually, there is a theory that Trump decided to run for president because Obama had made fun of him.
Have you not seen it?
It was, yes.
You can see on his face.
He is not happy.
It was brutal and he was mad.
He was genuinely seething.
I'm not even sure why Obama was picking on him in the first place.
I think he thought he was an easy target.
Yeah.
And little did he know that there would be consequences.
Probably one of the worst miscalculations in political history.
Yes.
Yes.
So the facts are at around 8 35, shots were fired.
Trump gets rushed out.
The suspect runs through with his weapons.
And his name is Cole Thomas Allen from California.
He had traveled by train from California to DC because they don't check your baggage on train.
And so that was the easiest way to have weapons on him.
Yeah, he had to travel first to Chicago and then from Chicago to DC all by train.
So he wrote a manifesto, which we will get to in a little while.
But I just wanted to point out that right after the.
Shooting happened.
All of the journalists who were there, or a bunch of the journalists who were there.
There's no point talking over the thing because you can't eat.
Yeah, sure.
So they basically got busy taking the bottles of wine and champagne.
Yeah, I'm actually not going to resent them over that.
Like, no point wasting something.
Yeah, fair enough.
Fair enough.
There were quite a lot of raves needed after that evening.
Well, apparently the dinner was supposed to be.
Chateaubriand and lobster.
And so there were supposed to be 2,600 guests.
So there's a big pile of steak and lobster that's sort of waiting for somebody to consume it.
But the journalists made sure that the alcohol at least was not wasted.
Yeah.
Kash Patel didn't exactly cover himself in glory as the head of FBI.
So, is this during the shooting?
Yes.
So they can hear gunshots going.
They heard gunshots.
He saw the president being evacuated and just sat there.
Right.
Okay.
Well, I mean, technically, the head of the FBI is a bureaucratic role.
I wasn't expecting him to charge with a gun, but I was expecting him to sort of be a little more active, try to figure out what the hell's going on.
I mean, you know.
I saw a picture of Trump where everyone else is like, oh, no.
Trump's just there.
He was chill.
Yeah.
This is not my first rodeo.
Exactly.
Exactly.
Now, as to the shooter himself, he's a graduate of Caltech with a BA in mechanical engineering and with a master's from California State University.
Caltech is a very impressive school.
I don't know about California State, but he's a well educated guy.
He worked as a teaching assistant, worked in education, video game development, et cetera.
And you sort of see this pattern that Poso is pointing out that these shooters.
Actually, they are pretty intelligent and they're a product of the elite institutions that's been propagandized a decade now against Donald Trump, MAGA, America First, the right wing in general, and have decided, yeah, no, it's actually unjustified for me to not try and kill the president.
Exactly.
And this is happening more and more and more.
I mean, as he points out, the bomb, same thing.
He's looking at it, it's a person who's completely ensconced in the system as a product of the system and is now essentially those kind of radical terrorists that this system is producing.
And those institutions support, as we covered in Stelios' segment at the end of last week, when you've got people like Hassan Pike just getting puff pieces from the New York Times talking about the advantages of social murder.
Yeah, and Hassan constantly arguing for this to happen.
Yeah.
Yes.
Yes.
And you see this thread throughout because this guy had all of the correct opinions.
System Producing Terrorists00:15:07
Now, in the manifesto, this is a picture of the suspect having been caught.
Amazing that he didn't get shot.
It seems that he didn't.
It seems that he didn't, but what, and it's not clear if he shot the security service, the Secret Service guys, or they were shot accidentally as they opened fire, essentially.
And he kicks off with an apology to all of his parents and his loved ones and so on.
Doesn't expect forgiveness.
I find that to be quite important.
I find the total lack of forgiveness and lack of expectations of forgiveness important in understanding these people's worldview.
I think it's important to remember that he just.
Don't think that he's done anything wrong here.
Yes.
But if you don't think that, you do expect forgiveness.
Because you would expect to be seen as some kind of hero or some kind of martyr.
Yeah, I don't think that he thinks any of the people that he knows are going to condemn him for doing this.
Yeah.
And actually, the real moral flaw that he's exhibited here is failing to do the job properly, is what his friends and family will think.
His colleagues and things like that.
That's exactly right.
I don't think he thinks anything like we would think.
Right.
You already see some people posting about too bad he missed again.
Yeah, of course.
But he says that as a citizen, it's essentially his responsibility.
And he is no longer to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.
So basically, the traitor referring to the Russia idea and all of that stuff.
Yeah.
And the Epstein files and so on and so forth.
And the false conviction for rape for.
So, was it a conviction for rape?
It's a conviction for defaming a woman who accused him of rape, if I remember correctly.
And he says that he's going to target administration officials, but excluding Kash Patel.
Why?
Maybe because Patel is brown and therefore is not on the approved targets list.
But literally not including Mr. Patel.
Why not?
He's literally the director of the FBI.
He signs off on literally everything Trump does as a Trump loyalist.
Why would you exclude him?
I mean, you see down there that he says that one of the objections is that it's not his role as a black man to do this, or as a half white, half black person, he shouldn't be doing this.
And his answer is nobody else is doing it.
So, in his mind, being half black means that it's not his responsibility to act, or at least that's how I'm interpreting it.
He says that he's.
Sorry, so is the implication there that the honor of the kill should go to someone who is.
Actually, a full minority.
I think that's actually.
I think that's either that or to someone who is white because it's their responsibility to fix everything.
But in either case, he's not using racial terms.
So either as a half white person, he shouldn't have this privilege or actually it's the whites' problems to fix this, one or the other.
And I can't tell which one.
Whichever it is, it's mental.
Exactly.
Whichever it is.
Exactly.
I just love that he's actually like, as if he's writing a thesis, right?
Okay, well, I'm going to write out what my stated goal is and then I'm going to address any objections.
Yes.
Through my rebuttals.
It's like, dude, you're an insane assassin.
You don't need to actually argue your case.
Yes.
And then he says that as a Christian, how could you do this?
And he explains that, you know, turning the other cheek doesn't apply here.
Yeah, it was just a bit up.
Yeah, just objection one there.
Objection one, yeah.
Sorry, you just want to.
There it is.
It's when you yourself are oppressed.
So, does that mean that he isn't oppressed by Trump?
Yeah, I get it.
I don't get it.
Maybe because he's half white.
I don't understand.
I'm not the fisherman executed without trial.
Right.
No, that's fascinating, right?
Because what they actually going through what he's saying here is actually brilliant, right?
Yes.
I'm not the fisherman executed without trial.
He means the drug mules from Venezuela, right?
That's what he's talking about.
That's what he's talking about.
They've got like, you know, six engines on their boat because they're just out fishing, bro.
And they've got barrels and barrels, and it's just like, he's Just a fishman execute without trial.
You believe all of the insane, like left wing narratives that are not true.
Yes.
This is the, like, I mean, look at this.
I'm not the person raped in a detention camp.
Okay.
I don't know what you're talking about, but.
So he thinks that ICE is raping illegal migrants.
Right.
I don't, I mean, I haven't seen a report of that, but like, the point is, it's just my Democrat feed on social media.
Pretty much.
Has radicalized me into thinking, well, I mean, no one else is trying to kill Trump.
And if all I ever hear is 100% negative, and I don't really think about any of these things, oh, it's a fascist administration, all this, why are we just standing around, like cooperating?
Exactly.
It's like, yes, there's a hyper narrative that doesn't connect to reality, and you've decided to live in the hyper narrative and you've taken an action based on that.
Correct.
Mentally.
I mean, you'll probably get a pardon, by the way.
You'll probably get a pardon from the next Democrat president.
It's quite possible.
He gets a pardon.
It's quite possible, yes.
Obama and Biden pardoned literal terrorists.
Yes, they did.
So did Clinton.
Yep.
So did Clinton.
The Democrats pardoned their own.
Yes, they do.
They do.
Not a school kid blown up, reference to Iran.
Child starved, reference to Gaza.
Teenage girl abused, okay.
Howard Lutnick's Epstein relationship.
We don't know what happened there.
But he starts with that narrative and then he continues.
And then he says that he absolutely did not expect to succeed because actually, he says that he is surprised at how crap the security is at the event.
And so am I after several assassination attempts.
Yeah, but your plan was terrible.
I'll run in there and then, like 100 meters across a crowded room, I'll try and shoot Trump.
He thought he was John Wick.
Yeah, that's a terrible plan.
He essentially thought that he was John Wick.
Expected security cameras at every bend, bugged hotel rooms, armed agents every 10 feet, metal detectors.
Nothing.
What I got is nothing.
Yep.
No security, no transport, no hotel, no event.
So that's one of the things that he points out.
Big sense of arrogance, walked into the hotel, didn't know, didn't get checked.
And yeah, he has a big bunch of rhetoric, and he had attended the No Kings prospect.
Now, eventually, people found his Blue Sky account.
Oh, they've removed it.
But they instantly removed it when it was found.
I tell you what, there should genuinely be a law against removing social media accounts in cases like this.
Completely.
Because, sorry, no, we can all see.
We want to know what was going on.
Yeah.
That said, the good folks at the post millennial had actually.
Gotten a big chunk of his social media.
Prepare to be shocked that he's a libtard.
He is completely libtard.
They would support the Antichrist if he spoke out enough anti immigrant, anti trans shit.
And then he goes, no, they just support the Antichrist.
That's his view.
He suggests random violence against people.
Retweeting Aaron Rupar with.
Responding with a guy with a shotgun, getting ready to obviously kill.
Best time to buy a gun is today or as soon as humanly possible, essentially.
What else?
There's probably a remarkable number of just calls for violence and assassinations on Blue Skies because they're not going to clamp down on it.
Big supporter of the Ukraine war.
Of course he is.
But it's just this nonstop everything Republicans do is bad and they are all evil people.
And they're doing terrible things, and therefore, you can see why he ends up in this position.
Exactly.
It's just a genuine process of radicalization where it's what I mean, this is what Saul Alinsky talks about in Rules for Radicals.
He's like, look, the process of radicalization means that you have to make sure that your enemy is 100% evil and you are 100% good.
And he actually uses the example of the American revolutionaries against the British.
Obviously, they were not telling the truth about.
The British Empire.
No, because we were 100% good and they were 100% evil.
Oh, exactly.
But the British Empire actually being really rather conformable to what the American revolutionaries actually think.
Yep.
And it's over a tax dispute, really, that this, and then ideologically that this springs up.
It's not the British Empire was being, you know, shooting their children or something, but they have to then make the propaganda, the argument 100% one way and 0% the other.
I can't imagine.
And that's.
George III is some tyrannical figure.
Yeah, exactly.
He just wasn't.
No, he just obviously wasn't.
And.
And they still say, you know, Americans will still say, oh, the British king was a tyrant.
It's like, no, he wasn't.
Anyway, but the point being, that's what's happening here.
And this is the natural corollary of having received a one sided narrative for years and years and years.
Well, why aren't we doing something about it?
And everyone's like, well, I don't know, because I can't possibly admit there's some decency on the other side, because then I'm the traitor and you'll all round on me.
And now I get it in the next.
So, yeah, no, I don't know why we're not doing anything.
And so eventually you get to this point.
And this isn't the first time we've been down this path.
Like the previous shooter doubtless would have been the same.
There is, and there are not just attempts, assassination attempts on Trump, but like other shootings and other attacks where it's just, you know, If you continually tell people white supremacy is the problem, it's white people then.
I'll go and kill a bunch of white people and things like this.
It's a common event in the United States.
I don't think it's a great leap to figure out how this guy would have reacted to Charlie Kirk's assassination.
No, no, no.
I mean, he probably tweeted about it.
Yeah, exactly.
And so it's just this endless stream of the same ideas, of the same claims, of the same ideas.
You know, stop playing by the rules, he says to Democrats, retweeting Mary Trump of all people.
Trump immediately hires Nazis.
Like, the ideas here are just so insane and extreme.
Not the oligarchy part.
Yes, it is an oligarchy.
Sure.
But no more so than under the Democrats.
You know, no more so than under the Democrats.
Of course, he's a Kamala supporter, expected her to actually win every state.
Exactly.
He was just a team blue partisan.
That's it.
There was nothing unique about his insights.
They weren't particularly.
They're crazy because everything that Democrats say has been crazy for a while now.
But he isn't some kind of extreme fringe figure.
No.
He's actually as mainstream in his Democrats' views as you could possibly be.
The extreme thing for him was that he took it all literally.
Exactly.
Right.
Whereas most of the time, when this kind of political back and forth is going on, We understand that beneath it is actually a kind of shed bedrock of citizenship and country, and that we're countrymen.
And yeah, okay, you might be saying all of these things, but I mean, they're not literally true.
This is just political rhetoric and the back and forth and the heat of the moment.
And this guy's like, oh, right, so he is literally Hitler.
Why aren't we killing him?
Exactly.
Oh, okay.
Exactly.
There's an old Nancy Pelosi interview talking about George W. Bush.
Oh, yeah.
Where, you know, a reporter points out to her that she's launched a bunch of lies against Bush and that they aren't accurate.
And she goes, Well, he's an adult.
He's in this game.
This is how it's played.
Yeah.
But it has real life consequences.
If you keep doing this for 20 years, you are going to radicalize people enough to become violent.
And this guy's opinions are just as mainstream as it gets.
And it reveals to us the erosion of the bedrock of shared sentiment of country and nation and purpose.
Right.
Exactly.
The bifurcation is so complete now.
A mainstream Democrat with completely kosher opinions on everything the Democrats have ever said.
Can become a shooter.
Exactly.
Oh, right.
Okay.
That's not insane, is it?
Exactly.
Exactly.
If he was like a Hassan Piker communist, I might understand it.
You know, I mean, well, you know, Hassan has been radicalizing his audience into something that's really far to the left, but that's not even what's happening here.
He's actually a Kamala donor.
Yeah.
He's just like, he just donated money to Kamala via Act Blue, which is, you know, $25.
Completely normal.
Exactly.
Millions of people would have done the same.
Exactly.
Exactly.
Big issues around the security there.
Yeah, it's a really interesting question, isn't it?
There always seems to be, though.
Yeah.
And basically, they didn't do the standard security that they would do for an event that involves the president, which is something that kind of keeps happening.
Because, as the Washington Post points out, when so many officials gather in one place for official functions, it's typical to have it labeled as a national special security event.
Sure.
And really.
It's weird that you don't.
Exactly.
In a situation where both the president and the vice president were attending, I wouldn't be surprised if Mike Johnson was there, meaning that the whole line of succession for the American government was there.
And so you would expect a very heavy security presence, but they decided not to do it because there was a possibility that Trump could have canceled.
Because he doesn't always attend these dinners, there was a possibility that he could have canceled.
Okay, but wouldn't you just do it if he was there?
And if he cancels, then he cancels.
And then they went ahead and claimed.
Well, you want a budget or something?
Sorry.
It's like, oh, well, you know, we don't want to get out everything, all the bunting and stuff.
Sorry, what?
Have you got something better to do?
You're the presidential security detail.
Well, they went ahead and claimed that it was a massive security success story.
I mean, yeah, Trump got in the hotel with Trump.
Trump's Security Detail Debates00:03:12
Yeah, the fact that he wasn't killed is great, I suppose.
Yes.
Well done.
Jesus.
Um.
You know, the suspect barely breached the perimeter.
Yeah, fair enough.
Fair enough.
How did he breach a perimeter?
Exactly.
Exactly.
It seems that they didn't shoot him, which isn't the first time that they missed their mark.
Has Trump got like a DEI security detail or something?
He replaced them after he took office.
He replaced the head of the Secret Service after he took office precisely to avoid this happening.
But it happened again.
But if you're Trump, you're a billionaire.
Why don't you just go look?
I want the most grizzled former Navy SEALs that exist in this country.
Sure, there'll be volunteers out there.
Yeah, exactly.
Yeah, exactly.
You know, surely you can find like 30, six foot two, unbelievably gruesome looking men who are like, yeah, I've killed dozens of people, obviously, for my country, and I'm here to protect the president, and I literally don't care about anything.
Like, you know, I saw one of the others, it's something, you know, five foot two woman with a finger on the gun.
It's like, so what are we doing here?
Now, you want absolute units who could literally strangle you to death with their bare hands.
What are you doing?
I mean, it is, you know.
The gentleman involved was actually featured in ABC for developing a brake mechanism for wheelchairs.
Okay.
That was with.
In 2017.
He was with JD Vance's wife in that as well.
She was featured in it too, which is a weird coincidence.
Really?
Oh, yeah.
In fact, you can probably see it.
No, this is just a 17 second clip.
Right, right.
In the full sort of two minute clip, you see Usha Vance at the end of it.
I don't know if she's married to Vance at that time, but just weird how it's actually a surprisingly small number of people involved in all of this.
But I've seen the schizo questions about this.
The schizoes have a lot of theories.
Yeah, and I'm just like, look, man, I think he might have just been a nut job.
That is the most sensible explanation.
He's not even a nut job.
That's the thing.
He's not even a nut job.
That is the most sensible explanation.
Yeah.
You see basically a reporter saying that Carolyn Levitt's husband told her to be very safe during the dinner.
And you see her then explaining that he was very serious and the call on Fox News was dropped.
But anyway, expressing concern for her safety at the dinner.
Why would you need to do that?
I don't know.
And this is another thing there was a Twitter account in 2023 that tweeted out.
His name, and that was the only tweet this Twitter account had posted.
And it's like, okay, what does this mean?
Trump, Matt Walsh is not convinced.
No, I mean, obviously, I don't.
Sensible Explanation Emerges00:05:59
I mean, which I actually agree with.
It's like with the shooting through the air and the Democrats, oh, it's staged.
It's like, well, the guy got shot and he shot two other people.
Yeah.
That's not staged, right?
Unless they were all like, yeah, okay, we all agree.
We'll all die.
So Trump gets a really good looking assassination attempt.
Of a risky thing to stage as well, if it's just another major wrong.
Yeah, exactly.
No one is that good to have a moving head in the ear.
That's just not a real possibility.
That said, Trump was slow moving away because he wanted to see what was going on.
We're a bit short on time, but if you listen to the whole thing, actually, it's sort of classic Trump.
It's the kind of Trump that makes people love Trump.
Because he's just going, no, they were rushing me, but I wanted to see what was going on.
I was standing tall, but not too tall, you know, in a situation like it's just.
Vintage Trump.
Genuinely excellent.
And then they're showing him the videos of the event afterwards, which is quite a funny thing.
But then he, Trump very correctly says that these kinds of differences should be resolved peacefully.
Then about the ballroom.
And then he turns it into the ballroom.
I mean, never let a crisis go to waste, I suppose.
Yeah.
And then he turns it to the ballroom.
Another Alinsky point.
And you see the whole MAGA sphere turning it into a ballroom discussion, which is ever so slightly pointless.
Yeah.
But then he also comes out in support of FISA, the sort of special warrants to.
Yeah, domestic spying program.
Exactly.
To allow people to just.
Which was used against him to spy on his campaign.
Yeah, didn't Obama use that against him?
Obama used it against him to spy on his campaign.
Now he's backing it.
So the system always gets what it wants, doesn't it?
It is genuinely scary.
It is genuinely scary.
And just as a final reminder, everything that this guy believed is approved by people like, you know, Ted Liu.
Obama says, we don't have the details about the motives.
I mean, he told us, he literally wrote a manifesto saying, I'm a libtard and I don't understand why all the libtards around me are going along with this.
Got better access to the information than Obama and we found out the motives.
It was in the papers.
We know exactly what the motives were.
Oh, yeah, Tim.
And it was basically the same stuff that people like Tim Waltz and people like CNN and Pamela and all of them say.
And this is just another Democrat basically believing the Democrats' propaganda.
That's really all there is to it.
Someone has to.
Well, somebody has to, I suppose, yes.
And again, as well, the other tragedy in it, apart from the fact that, you know, it could have gone terribly wrong and obviously someone was hurt in the process of it, is that, again, in a different age, this guy should have just gone to uni, you know, got his degree, made his video games, loved his family, had a, but he felt because of just this torrent of just slop and like Democrat slop propaganda just being leveraged at him that actually, no, that's not a good enough life for me.
I have to do something totally unreasonable.
Exactly.
And every time this happens, it's just a tragedy how people's minds have been poisoned like this.
Well, in a way, like he's not wrong if you just uncritically believe the things you're being told.
Oh, Trump is a fascist and we've been taken over by fascism and they're doing fascist things like setting up death camps and all this sort of stuff.
Well, then, yeah, if I thought that was happening, then I'd be like, okay, yeah, no, we probably do have to do something, right?
I wouldn't, you know, I wouldn't do the one lone man thing because I'd be like, okay, well, if everyone else isn't doing it, maybe I'm the person who's mad.
But the point is, it's actually not like.
An irrational action to think, right, okay, no, we have to do something to resist the government if you genuinely believe it.
It's just that the rest of them don't genuinely believe it.
Like Kamala Harris here.
Do you think Trump's a fascist?
Yes, yes, I do.
Well, why are you engaging in an election against him then?
You don't think that.
Like, why is he engaging in an election if he's a fascist?
Like, so it's just mad.
Exactly.
Exactly.
Anyway, there you have it.
Democrats are at it again.
Nothing surprising.
There's some great comments here.
The correspondence dinner is $15,000 a plate if.
If I were there, you bet your ass I'm making off with whatever I can.
That's what I was thinking.
They're not paying for it personally, the journalists.
Sure.
It's just going to go to waste, right?
I mean, I'm not even against that sort of stuff.
Bald Eagle says the fact that Blue Sky Reddit and other social media sites have zero legal consequence for deleting evidence connected to these psychopaths tells me all I need to know.
And not just that, they don't, like, again, the fact that Hassan Piker can call for murders over and over and over and be like the bell of the ball with the Washington Post, New York Times.
New York Times, yeah.
The paper of record.
And The fact that, you know, Twitch are like, yeah, well, he's critical to our business model, actually, is demanding the deaths of Republicans.
We actually can't survive as a company without him.
So we're never going to ban him.
It's like, okay, but that's crazy.
Yes.
And it obviously has effects.
Yes.
OPH UK says John woke.
Yeah, basically, genuinely.
The unfortunate part if Trump hired security, the media would have another dictator talk.
Yeah, I guess maybe.
Anyway, let's move on.
So I think it's evident in Britain at the moment that evil is stalking the land.
And this sounds like quite a medieval thing to say, but actually, I think it's just demonstrably true.
Samson, can we get the next one up, please?
I think it's just demonstrably true.
And I don't see how we can argue the case against it.
The most recent example of this just being I mean, this happens all the time, right?
Evil Stalking the Land00:06:06
So it's one of those things where it's every single day there is another asylum seeker rape or murder that is just horrific.
And you're just like, right, okay, these are events that, you know, when you go through the details of it, These are events that just would never have happened in England.
No.
Right?
When I was growing up, they never happened.
I mean, the worst.
It would be front page news for days rather than just a sort of in passing thing that happens every single other day.
It'd be weeks.
And like, so for example, the Dunblane massacre was one of those things that everyone's just like, my God, in the 90s.
Or Harold Shipman, right?
We've got like, you know, you hear like the one or two things, you're just like, wow, that's amazing.
How could that happen?
You know, Fred West, like you've got like a couple of things, but these things are happening so quickly and so fast and they're so awful that I genuinely think people are becoming a bit.
Just numb to what the case is.
Yes.
So, we're just going to go through this event.
And I just want you to keep an eye on these guys who just pure evil, genuine pure evil, right?
So, a woman had been separated from my friends on a night out when these three men found her staggering in the street, drunk, alone and, quote, incapacitated, Hove Crown Court heard.
Two of the men took her behind a beach hut where they raped her, and another went to a location moments later and captured footage of the attack.
So, two of them are raping her, one of them is filming it, and they're all laughing at her, by the way.
Ibrahim Al Shaif from Egypt.
Abdullah al Mahdi from Iran.
Both denied this, but they were found guilty because literally it's on video.
And then Egyptian national Karen al Danasurat was also found guilty on all four counts of rape as a secondary party by encouraging and filming the ordeal.
The footage showed the woman falling down twice, with prosecutors describing the attack as cynical, predatory, and callous.
I mean, it's just pure evil, right?
Al Shaif was shown smiling and sticking his tongue out during the assault, as well as slapping the woman in the face.
They spat in the woman's mouth and called her a dirty bitch.
The woman told the police that she remembered being spat on, kicked, and her throat being grabbed during the attack, as well as the men laughing.
Being cross examined from behind a screen in the court, she cried and said, It's the filmer's face I see every time I close my eyes laughing at me.
So, this isn't like a crime of passion or something like this, right?
This is a crime of humiliation.
This is a group of people who are in the country and we're paid to come into our country who have nothing but contempt.
For the native people.
And as soon as they find someone vulnerable, they're like, great, we can humiliate, we can rape, we can take from, and we can laugh in their face while they do it.
And we, for some reason, think there are going to be no consequences for this.
Exactly, as the motives are across the rape gangs.
Yeah, exactly.
Right.
And so they all knew each other.
They were all living in the same migrant hotel near Horsham in West Sussex.
They're going to be sentenced on the 15th of July.
And it's just mad that we're letting.
Monsters like this into our country.
Thank you, Robert Jenrick.
Yeah, but it's not just Jenrick.
I mean, these aren't Afghans, right?
These are from Iran, Egypt, and Libya.
So these are the boat crossing monsters.
Didn't he start the hotel program?
Oh, God, he might have done actually, yeah.
It started under him, I believe.
Right, okay.
I'd have to double check.
But the point is whether they're in a hotel or army barracks, they're allowed to just roam around the country.
As opposed to being confined.
As opposed to being confined, because you don't know who these people are.
And at his trial, We got this picture.
Now, this is just amazing, right?
Now, I just want to be clear, right?
Evil is ugly.
Beauty is good.
This is just a fact of life.
And you see it all the time.
And the fact that, as you can see, people are like, no, this is the physiognomy of evil.
Why does this guy end up looking like the mouth of Sauron?
Because actually, evil is kind of predictable in this way.
It hides its eyes, because the eyes being the window to the soul, it has an evil looking grin.
Disgusting grin where it's weird and toothy and callous, right?
It's uncaring.
This, I mean, if I was on trial for anything like this, I can't imagine cracking a smile, right?
I can't even imagine.
And yet, this person doesn't care, right?
They don't care about you.
They literally are the very epitome of what it is to be evil.
I'm here to take from you mercilessly.
That's the point.
I mean, after they raped this girl, they went and had a barbecue, right?
They just completely.
It's like the woman at the hotel who was stabbed a dozen or 24 times or something, and they went back and had beers with them.
And so, right, okay.
For these people, human compassion isn't something that exists, right?
These are genuinely the sort of barbaric raiders who are here to harm you.
And we just give them the freedom of our country, right?
These are people without any kind of sense of conscience.
No, none of them.
There is no sense of right and wrong.
There is no sense of conscience.
There is no sense of respect.
There's nothing.
These are as morally broken as you can be.
Yes.
And they're being paid.
But it's worse than that, right?
If someone was morally deficient, then they could feel their deficiency.
Yes.
Right?
But these people don't feel their deficiency.
They revel in the evil, they revel in the harm.
This was fun for him, and he would do it again in a heartbeat.
Yes.
Right?
That's what this smile tells us.
And if you don't take that.
He's going to be another Axel Rudabacana.
Yeah.
And you know he's going to be a fucking nightmare in the prisons.
Yeah.
Excuse me.
I mean, he'll just join an Islamic gang where he'll fit right in.
Exactly.
Probably have a.
Position of prestige.
Exactly.
Look at me.
I got the news headlines.
Look at all this.
I was everywhere.
And just to be clear, it's not like this was his first crime.
Murderer Convicted in Absence00:13:26
No.
But we just didn't know.
The prosecutors in the court said he was convicted of murder in his absence in Egypt.
And the basis of his asylum claims, he fled the country to evade a lengthy custodial sentence.
Now, his defense barrister denies that, but I'm sorry, I'm not prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt.
No.
Actually, if you were.
Somehow in court for, I don't know, buying flowers and handing them out to, you know, old ladies or something, then maybe I'd be like, okay, maybe he didn't do it.
You know, maybe it was his brother.
But since you're in court for raping a vulnerable woman who was alone at night, I'm actually inclined to believe that, no, you probably are a murderer.
And again, I've seen your face and I'm not, I'm not inclined, I'm making judgments on that basis at this point.
So why was he here?
Right?
Why was he here?
How did he get here?
Well, he broke in on a small boat.
Threw his information away, and then we just brought him in as if this was a babe in the woods, like Moses sailing down the Euphrates on a basket, whatever it is.
Oh, the Nile.
Well, sorry, the Sargon ones, the Euphrates, isn't it?
The Nile on a basket, you know, and we'll just take him in.
No, these are predators who have come in knowing that we're stupid and we're giving them the keys to the kingdom.
Now, compare this monster, genuine monster, to his defenders, right?
Let's watch Zoe Gardner here.
And these experiences of being locked up and detained, we're not talking about people who have done harm to another person.
We're talking about asylum seekers who have entered the country through irregular means because there are no regular means.
And they are being paraded on our screens as a political football.
So, just a quick, I mean, let's just look at the difference there, right?
Now, if I were to describe the kind of physiognomy of Zoe Gardner.
I would liken her to a rabbit, right?
I would liken her to something out of like wind in the willows, right?
She's someone who is clearly an Englishwoman, product of England.
Nothing terrible, I hope, has ever happened to her.
And it's given her this remarkable innocence.
Yes.
I don't think she's ever really crossed anyone or hurt anyone.
I don't know anything about her.
But if I were to judge just by looking at her, do I think that she has vindictively hurt anyone?
Do I think she's fleeing another country because she murdered someone?
Do I think she's raped anyone?
No, of course not.
Look at her.
Right.
She is just a rabbit in the headlights.
And yet she finds herself defending the mouth of Sauron.
Yes.
Like, sorry, you don't know what you're talking about.
And she doesn't, she won't even concede that some of them might be of bad character.
Yeah.
Even as you get up, like, years and years of lists of all of the terrible examples that we've had.
Yeah.
And you shove it in her face, still she will not concede that, hang on, there might be a problem here from their end, how they treat us once they arrive on our shores.
She believes in holy victims.
Essentially, this is a sort of displacement of Christian sentiment.
Yes.
She believes that everybody who isn't white European is some kind of holy victim and must be elevated.
It is Christian fumes without Christian thought.
Yes.
And it's idiotic and evil.
What I want to focus on, though, is just the difference in the way they look.
You can see the predatory scars on this guy's face.
Yep.
Right, you can see the innocence in her face.
You, she doesn't understand.
No, they're about the same age.
She doesn't understand.
She will never understand.
Well, she might one day understand, but then it'll be far too late.
And you know, God, God forbid something terrible like what this man did would happen to her, even though she sat here going, They're not criminals, they're asylum seekers.
No, literally, criminal, literal murderer allowed in the country to escape justice.
And she's there in defense of it because of her naivety.
Part of the reason why we need a patriotic government like Restore is to save people like Zoe from themselves.
Yes, yes.
And this is a great point.
There's no point arguing with Zoe about any of these things, right?
She's not going to stop.
She's not going to stop.
I mean, what happens at, say, two in the morning when this man is looking through her door?
Yeah.
What does she do about this?
And what would have happened if he had gotten in?
God only knows.
God only knows.
What's his plan?
What's he thinking?
Zoe has no idea.
Yeah.
Zoe has no idea.
And what would she do if he turned up at a door?
And again, we have many, many stories at this point as well of women who have been terribly raped by migrants and then they've lied about the identity of their attackers in order to save the system, as opposed to just accept that this person was a terrible person and should be thrown in jail or, of course, have the death penalty.
I mean, it's genuinely terrifying for me, right?
Because as ridiculous as I find Zoe as a political commentator, I don't wish her any harm.
No, nor do I. Like, you know, I think, you know, she actually needs to be protected from herself.
Yeah.
And other people need to be protected from the sorts of things that are happening.
Here's a great example.
Just again, I can just pull off example after example after.
And these have all happened in the last week.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Right.
These are all coming in the last week.
Extreme.
Sorry, Carl, just go back up again.
There's where it says Migrant who sexually assaulted girl seven worked for Taliban before arriving in the United Kingdom.
Must read.
Fury over Green Party's.
Polanski's mad plan to hand 19 billion to migrants.
Yeah, so what that is, is Zach Polanski wants everyone to have UBI.
Yeah.
So you're going to be paying £1,600 a month just to foreigners who break into the country.
People like him.
Yeah, basically.
I mean, he wants it for everyone, he would argue.
So I, you know, I want literally everyone to get £1,600 a month, but especially these people.
But again, oh, we're just the innocent migrants, right?
Okay, he worked for the Taliban, which means he's complicit with all the crimes of the Taliban.
He gets here.
And then he sexually assaults a girl, right?
This is what he said in the court I like children, and she was a child.
All right.
So, migrant paedophiles are being allowed in, brought in, and someone like, say, Carla Denya.
Again, look at the face, right?
Look at the face.
I think they've got a picture of this guy in here.
There we go.
Right.
Look at him.
Right.
So, okay, Taliban paedophile let into the country, helped in.
He got in, he broke in via a small boat, as a lot of them do.
And so he was staying at the migrant hotel and he sexually assaulted a seven year old.
Right.
He kidnapped her, sexually assaulted her, and compared that.
Traumatizer for life.
Traumatizer for life.
Yeah.
Innocence destroyed, right?
Innocence destroyed, just like the previous woman.
Innocence destroyed, but she's like, every time I close my eyes, I can see him laughing at me, right?
Innocence destroyed, lives destroyed, ruined by this.
And then we go to say, Colour Denya, the former co leader of the Green Party.
The Green Party, we take a totally different approach to refugees because this is ultimately about what kind of society we want to live in.
And I'm clear that the majority of Brits want us to live in.
In a welcoming and civilized society.
So, we think the UK government needs to do three things.
Firstly, to create safe and legal routes for those fleeing danger, persecution, and war so that the smugglers with their small boats taking advantage of people in a desperate situation lose their business model.
Second, as if that's what this is about.
These are desperate people.
These are people here for a rape and pillaging jolly.
When she says you can have, we want to have a welcoming and civilized society.
No, no, you have to choose.
We either have a welcoming society or we have a civilized society.
You can't have both.
And again, look at the person themselves.
Look at her big, wide eyes, her soft face, her very neatly cut, very well done makeup.
She's someone who's never had a real problem in her life.
She is a product of a very safe place that has been very well settled for a long time with very sensible rules that everyone followed.
And she's like, okay, I just want the Taliban pedophile in the country.
I just want the Egyptian murderer in the country.
It's like, do you know, like, you know, you don't know.
I know you don't know someone who, with your kind of face, Who's lived in your kind of life does not know anything about what these kinds of men will do.
Yes.
You do not know anything about them.
Again, it just carries on, doesn't it?
It just carries on.
Here's the terrorist from Hartlepool.
Look at this guy.
Look at the terrorist from Hartlepool.
I can't make the image any bigger for some reason.
But he murdered a pensioner and then he tried to murder an imam when he was in prison.
It's like, look, Ahmed Ali Alid.
Do you want more of him?
We want safe and legal routes.
We don't want him to come across on a boat like he did.
Look at his face, right?
Your life tells on your face.
Your face is the autobiography of your life.
If you end up with a face like this or like this, instead of a face like this, you've got to be able to see it, right?
You've got to be able to see it when you know, when it's around you, because it will be around you.
And it's around us all the time.
These things are terrible.
I mean, like, these are just mad, absolutely mad.
Migration is Britain's superpower.
We need to bring in as many of these people as we can.
It's like, are you mental?
I mean, like, think about the murder of Wayne Broadhurst.
Was it 22 year old?
Yeah, 22 year old Afghan migrant who this is one of Jenrick's boys brought in and just stabs him to death.
I mean, I can't play you the footage, obviously, but it's just the most harrowing thing.
And Wayne, look at him.
He's a normal bloke.
He doesn't have the kind of callousness in the face, the kind of cruelty in the face, right?
The kind of downturn, the sneer, the contempt for others, right?
He doesn't have that.
This soul behind the eyes and Wayne Broadhurst that isn't present.
In these other men.
I'm sorry.
It's important that we actually make judgments like this because these judgments are made for our own survival, for our own safety.
And then people are like, Carla Deng is just like, no, why did I?
Oh, no, aren't we all just, no, no, no, no.
And these things happen all day, every day, right?
Just, I mean, this is the Center for Migration Controls 2025 illegal migration crime audit.
And it's just, it just goes and goes and goes.
There are loads of examples.
Like, Afghan migrant.
Where is this guy from?
Does it even tell us where he's from?
Kuwaiti, yeah.
Again, you can see it in the expressions on the face, right?
They come from a totally different society.
They've led totally, and here's our boy again.
Like, they look like they would be cruel.
And it's not wrong for us to judge them on the way that they look, the expressions that they have, the lack of mercy, the lack of charity, the lack of concern for anyone else.
Again, this just keeps going on.
Do you think if you run into this guy, he's going to be kind?
I'm sorry, no.
We can make these judgments and we should make these judgments.
Anyway, like I said, this just goes on and on and on.
And for the sake of time, I'll stop it there.
But I'm sorry, I'm just done looking at these babes in the woods who are just like, well, they're asylum seekers.
Therefore, they're innocent and vulnerable and we need to protect them.
It's like, you don't know what you're talking about.
Have you ever been punched in the face?
Have you ever had a fight?
Have you ever had someone try and steal something from you where you've had to grapple off them?
Have you ever had someone make an advance on your person?
Where they just want to take something from you and they give you no sympathy.
And if that's a no, if you've never had this, then your opinion on this is not valid.
We do not need it.
Leave it there.
All right.
Do you want me to read the rumble rants from your segment?
Where we go?
Oh, from sorry.
So, $1 Tom Ratt says As a kid, I remember Leanne Tiernan.
Her killer lived less than a mile from me.
I remember Huntley's crimes and.
The Bolger murder, these don't mean anything to me, but.
Oh, the Bolger murder was.
Ian Huntley was a murderer.
Right.
And again, it was rare.
Yeah.
But the Bolger one was particularly awful.
It was a 10 year old child or something.
Two 10 year olds lured a three year old away and tortured him to death.
Horrible.
Yeah, it's horrific.
That's terrible.
They're still living in this country now, actually.
Right.
And their identity has been hidden.
Yeah, their identity has been protected.
I think it has been leaked, though.
But anyway.
But the thing is that these things are so rare that it was just like, no, I remember it very clearly.
Yeah.
To me, from when I was a kid.
To it, Carl and Firas, the answer is modern exile, indefinite custodial sentence after your main jail time until a third country agrees to take you, fixes a problem, foreign or domestic.
Modern Exile Sentencing Plans00:15:53
I mean, I'm not nearly that merciful.
No.
Not nearly.
No, nor am I. Let's just go into the other ones fast, all right, just because of the time.
Yep, sure.
Captain Hook for $5.
Thank you.
Says, I'm not in danger.
I am the danger.
Wow, these people are in danger, I tell you.
Yes.
Crank Texan for $5.
Thank you.
Says the members of the ruling class are not spiritual.
To them, religion is a control system for the masses.
The problem is that Christianity is not fit for purpose, so they're displacing it with Islam.
Maybe.
I mean, these people aren't the ruling class, though.
No.
These people are idiots.
And Fleet Lord Atvar says leftists, leftards, ain't no one liberal in that group for $5.
Thank you.
All right.
Well, after that segment, I feel like it makes sense to actually highlight.
You know what?
Maybe there is actually one party on the British landscape that might actually do something about all of this.
Yeah, on the plus side, there is one party leader who gets the gravity of the situation.
Right.
And honestly, there was nothing more demoralizing.
I particularly remember, you know, back when it was during lockdown and when we were all trapped in our homes, you know, the BLM stuff, just that cultural revolution swirling about.
And it just felt like every step that Britain took was a step towards furthering justice, more evil, more despair.
And the light at the end of the tunnel was, I just couldn't see it back then, you know, just five years ago.
I couldn't see it.
But since Restore Britain has come onto the horizon, I do.
And I feel like this actual.
This isn't just my belief as well.
I see it constantly surrounded by, you know, good people that I work with and people who are in our movement, right?
You see the, the optimism, the vitality, the, the vigor, right?
The, the, the, the requirement to just get stuck in there and do something to save the country.
And for a lot of those people as well, it's because they've had nothing to do, but just look on in horror, powerless for so long as all of this has been done to us.
And I think for a lot of people as well, I, I, You know, I see a lot on X how, you know, there's some accounts from Restore and there's some accounts from Reform that try to like sow this discontent and this rift between.
I actually, I kind of want to rise above that.
That's not me endorsing Reform.
They're useless and a busted flush and we shouldn't be supporting them.
But what I am saying is that for many of the Reform UK voters, right, they are just people living in fear and confusion like us.
And they are just simply trying to look for what they see as the surest horse to back that will actually alleviate so many of the problems that we're going through.
My point of view on this is that I'm not spending the next four years of my life campaigning for a party that I know is going to betray me at the end of it, right?
That's my position.
We've been through that too many times before, and we're not having the fell for it again awards, right?
That's really what this all amounts to.
And obviously, I'm not alone in this.
There are many others who feel this way too.
We could find here from one of the most recent Find Out Now polls, of course, Restore Britain ended up on 9%.
When prompted, Restore Britain on 9%.
When unprompted, they're on 4%.
Right.
But that's still amazing.
Yeah, prompted like every other party.
Yeah, every, yeah, yeah.
Once they're given a fair playing field.
Just to be clear, that's not giving an advantage.
That's giving them the same as everyone else.
Right.
And that's after a month.
And so there's been an enormous amount of frustration, actually, with the evolution of Restore and with the, as I say, the vitality and the energy bursting behind it.
I mean, you know, within just over a month, they've basically passed the oldest political party in the world in terms of their membership.
And you can feel like, There is a real possibility here that we can galvanize a nation and put forward the policies that will do such things as stop all of the things that you were talking about in your segment and all of the terrible crimes and murders.
And so, when you have a news organization like GB News that styles itself as the people's channel, right, and also that set itself up as saying, you know, it came about on the proviso, look, we recognize the fact that the BBC, Sky News, they're actually not giving your thoughts, your concerns, your representation.
Any legitimacy here.
We will be that for you.
We will be the home for you where you can come and you can trust us to not have some other agenda, right?
We're not actually politicking behind the scenes ourselves.
We're actually going to be more honest and open with you.
And just to be clear, I accept that politicking behind the scenes happens.
I just want to know who's interested in service of, right?
GB News, the position of GB News was ostensibly that, okay, this is the TV station for the people of Britain.
So, any politicking I would expect to be in the favour of the people of Britain, not instead a particular cabal that seeks to usurp the Tories or something.
Definitely.
And so we found, and honestly, I still to this day don't know why he admitted this.
Yeah.
But there was no pressure.
But David Bull, some months ago, said about the fact that, well, it's actually an editorial decision made by GB News to keep Rupert Lowe off the channel.
Yes.
And it's like, yeah, we got that.
We kind of got that when there was a strong hint given when Rupert Lowe was kicked from the party and his GB News appearances suddenly just dried up.
Yeah.
And also the fact that Charlie Downs, just some months ago, was also seen to be in the beginnings of having what was called Radio Britannia on GB News with Alice Grant.
And then again, Restore Britain came along and that opportunity seemed to have dried up.
And Charlie, in the end, was only being offered like 1 a.m. slots, as he tells it by the end.
So everyone knows GB News' position on this.
And this is not to single out particular presenters, or this is, as David Bull points out, this is an editorial standard.
That has been imposed on them from the top.
And who's GB News' top presenter?
Oh, is it Nigel Farage?
It just happens to be Nigel Farage.
Coincidence.
Yeah.
But also, as well, this speaks to the fact that not only is, because there are, I mean, between the fact that Nigel Farage has got a show, Lee Anderson has got a show, right?
It's obvious that it's very hard for GB News to navigate what is reform's interest and what are, like, the Ofcom approved interest.
And they have to balance all of these sorts of things.
And for a long time, it's been.
Quite easy for GB News to simply ignore Restore because they're never going to have just Ofcom knocking on the door saying, Excuse me, would you mind interviewing Rupert Lowe for the sake of impartiality?
Obviously, Ofcom were never going to come around and do that.
So they've had this protective shield for which is, but all it's made clear is that it's just a means to buy time.
That's all they can really do buy time until it becomes inevitable that eventually Rupert is going to have to be welcomed on the show.
And Rupert has done it, right?
So we had this interview with Jacob Rees Mogg, who apparently invited Rupert on for a pre recorded interview.
And about, well, so it was quite strange because they hyped it up and said, oh, it's going to be coming out at 8 p.m.
And then they put it out right at the end of the show.
And then it was really just like this 10 minute interview at the end.
And they were like, oh, and you can get the rest of the interview later on, which it turns out even that may not have been entirely true.
So what's interesting about this is a couple of weeks ago, I can't remember who Moggs was on someone's show and they were asking him.
It was a right winger who he was talking to.
I wish I'd like bookmarked it or something because I just didn't think.
You know, I was just listening to it.
And Mogg was just categorical.
He was like, you know, restore Britain will go nowhere.
It's not going to do anything.
We don't need to worry about it.
And then a few weeks later, Moggs was like, well, I'm worried you're going to split the right wing vote.
It's like, well, I thought it wasn't going anywhere, Jacob.
Yep.
Right.
You can see that this does have legs.
It is beginning to march.
And I mean, this whole interview was genuinely, or the interview.
That we got to see was genuinely remarkable because you could see that Rupert has a kind of gravity and seriousness that Farage frankly doesn't.
And you could see that he was winning Mog over with the rhetoric.
This is what we need to do, Jacob.
We need to do this.
And you can see, well, I don't disagree with any of that.
I know you don't.
Sorry, anyway.
No, no, you're absolutely right.
So I thought we'd just play some of the clips and talk about them as we go.
We're bringing in new voters, but we're not necessarily dragging voters from Tories.
Or indeed from reform.
We are bringing some, and we had a defection yesterday in South Cornwall of a reform candidate, a very good man called Roger Tarrant, who joined us, deputy leader of the council down there, shares our view, businessman, got very frustrated with the way in which reform was dealing with it.
If you bring in new voters, that still doesn't get you to winning a majority, still leads to the same problem of the right to split.
It increases the common sense vote, not diminishes it.
But it doesn't work like that in the first past the post system.
There isn't a common sense vote.
There's a vote for reform.
There's a vote for restore.
There's a vote for the Tories.
Can we pause it there?
Because that is remarkable, right?
That is a remarkable opinion.
Because, I mean, you go back three years ago, there wasn't a vote for reform.
Where did it come from?
How did they arrive?
Or the Greens, really, for that.
Or the Greens, right?
It's not that the parties have the.
He's got a very sort of socialist view of democracy.
And what Rupert is actually arguing is a free market view of democracy.
It's like, no, no, no.
We're going to come out here and make our case.
And if the voters choose us, then you lose.
Yeah.
That's the problem.
And Mog is there.
No, well, we're all here and we all deserve a slice of the pie.
And therefore, we all deserve to have our bit carved up and have pacts and all this sort of thing.
And Rupert is like, no, I'm here to win and I can win.
And so Mog looks genuinely like he's on the back foot and kind of afraid of what's coming.
Yeah.
And the other thing as well is just to say that because we know for a fact that many of Restore, sorry, many of Reform UK's actual party members, Don't even particularly think that Nigel Farage is the person to lead their own party as well.
And this comes back to what I was saying towards the beginning of this.
When you have the fact that, um, many of these people are just good because even though, right, for a lot of the 20th century, it was just, well, I'm voting Labour, I'm voting Tory because I have to do this because otherwise the other one will win and that'll be even worse.
You can tell there is still some lingering of that line of thought within the political system itself.
People aren't, though there is a greater plurality.
And I think that our system is all the better for it in having this.
I do think that you can see there are a good number of people now that have jumped to reform from the Tories and they're thinking, okay, but no more splitting the vote from here, no more splitting the vote from here.
It's like, yeah, but.
You made all of these arguments against Farage.
Yeah.
And it's like, well, here we are now.
And actually, restore just looks like by far the most robust option.
And the one that's messaging is cutting through.
How do I know?
That Restore Britain's messaging is cutting through.
I know this because reform are adopting it, right?
This is how we know when we get to the point where Zia Youssef is just echoing Charlie Downs saying, well, it's actually about establishment versus anti establishment.
And I would be remiss not to just mention the grilling from Connor here, where he talks about the fact that those in Millbank Tower told him that they apparently monitor the Restore guys every day.
Dan and I covered some of this in the political chat we had the other day.
Apparently, and again, Connor has shown me the messages that his friends in Milbank Tower have been sending him.
There's essentially chaos in Milbank Tower because they can, I mean, when the person you thought you'd politically assassinated comes out in the polls at 9%, you're like, oh, wait, that's our vote.
We're down to 21, he's on 9, oh, no, he's eating us up.
And so, what's our strategy?
Be more milquetoast and centrist than he is?
It's not going to win.
No.
And sorry, go on, Feras.
I mean, they're completely stuck.
They're trying to pivot to the right with Nadim Zahawi and Nadine Doris.
Because it's not just about the message, it's about who the messenger is as well.
Exactly.
And you see, Nadim Zahawi, he welcomed that, what's her name?
Andrea Romero, the new head of the civil service, who is the Queen of Oak.
Oh, yes.
Yes, yes, yes.
Literally the Queen of Oak.
And Zahawi says, that's a great appointment.
Well, okay.
Why are you in this party?
Yeah.
Why does that party want you?
There's not even, from the likes of Zahawi or Doris, there's not even like a pivoting of image.
There's not even an attempt to like try and, oh, I saw the error.
Zahawi's just like, no, it's business as usual.
I'm the same old sleazebag.
Farage is the same, though.
Like Farage, Uh, there's a clip going around at the moment where he's like, no, I think Tony Blair is a good person to help with the vaccines.
He went out and banged his pots for the NHS and supported the vaccines.
Uh, he was like, I'm not an anti-immigration party.
I'm not a populist is another recent thing that he had an interview saying.
It's like, sorry, who are you?
What are you doing here?
You know, Rupert, like, like, and there's another one.
Oh, I think Keir Starmer's a good man.
Like, I don't dislike Keir Starmer.
Now he said that in, I think it was 2025.
It looked like because he was afraid of Starmer's tyrannical tendencies.
And instead, Rupert Lowe's like, no, I think Starmer's terrible.
I think he's a bad person.
I think all of these are terrible.
It's like, no, I want the straight talking, honest person who's got a kind of harder countenance about these things and looks like he's pressed to stand his own ground.
Yeah, exactly.
That's what I want.
And it's interesting as well because actually, when you compare Farage with Rupert Lowe, you see the fact that Farage, as you say, is someone who's like, oh, I think the Prime Minister's an all right guy, actually, in all of this.
But he doesn't actually work in Parliament across party to actually achieve any tangible victories.
Whereas Rupert Lowe will say, no, I think the Prime Minister's a terrible person.
But if anyone wants to help me with some things that are actually productive, Feel free to come and join me, as you know, he did with some of the Tory MPs turning up to the independent rape gang trial, right?
And I something Farage had promised but didn't do, yeah.
So that's you know, obviously a good thing from Rupert.
And Lewis Brackpool is quite right here, where he says, This all sounds well and good on paper, but the sentiment applies to restore Britain, not reform UK.
How can you honestly post this when you're the same party that's been absorbed by the establishment?
Yeah, and it's absolutely true.
So, um, reform can adopt restore's rhetoric.
But they can't wear it authentically.
And the other thing is, as well, even if they think that, oh, well, maybe by posturing to the right again, which we never had to do and left to our own devices, we showed ourselves to be more of the same.
But even if we do that, you're not going to claw back those 9% of voters because they're either made up of people who originally wanted to join reform, like Beau or Dan, and you decided were untenable, even though they're perfectly sensible, decent gentlemen.
Sorry, another thing Nigel said he would be to the left of the Tories come the next election on immigration.
I believe him.
Yeah, I believe him too, but why would you say it?
Like, Jesus Christ.
So, yeah, honestly, just mad.
Absolutely mad.
And the other thing, as well, this isn't really relevant to the GB News interview, but whilst a lot of the Scottish MPs and people are going around campaigning at the moment because of the elections that are going to be going on there, you have the guy who's the head of reform in Scotland, and he's just coming out and just saying, Oh, no, I'm still for the legals and everything.
Oh, Tory.
Yeah.
Right.
Farage Wave on Immigration00:15:01
I'm for the legals.
And it's like, dude, literally, like, Because I did a daily where I was talking about his debate with Anna Sawa.
It's like, dude, all the legals do is get on stage and call you racist.
Yeah.
Why do you even want those guys here when that's all they do?
The head of reform in Wales said the same thing.
Right.
He's like, oh, I'm for legal immigration.
Said in Scotland, I'm for legal immigration.
Well, sure, you would be in Wales and Scotland because you haven't had any, right?
We live in England where 90% of the legal immigrants have come.
We're not for it.
Personal highlight from the interview here for me, which we'll play.
About your policy for deportations and how you think you might.
Make that work?
Well, that's in our document.
We've shown people how we will do it.
We will create a hostile environment.
We've said we will detain and deport every person illegally arriving.
We will then find and deport those people living here illegally and deport them.
But the last hostile country.
We will then deport the 10,500 foreign criminals in our prisons.
And we will then turn our attention, unlike Farage, who said he's claimed that I said we'd deport whole communities of people with British passports.
I've never said that.
We will have a turn our attention then, as Sweden and Denmark are doing now, having pursued a very ill judged.
Policy of immigration in 2015, along with Merkel.
We will turn our attention to those people who came here, who are not contributing to Britain, who are costing the taxpayer money, and we will find a formula to encourage them to leave.
And not breaking the law, we'll find a formula which effectively encourages them to go home, which will ultimately save the taxpayer money.
So repatriation of people who have been awarded British passports?
If they agree to go, because we make it worth their while to go.
About your part.
Sorry, one thing I'll just say as well I really hate this establishment threshold.
It's like, how could you think of taking someone's British passport away?
It's like, well, you were happy to give them one.
Yeah.
How is one more extreme than the other?
Absolutely.
This is the thing.
I've mentioned this before.
The conversation between immigrants living in Britain will at some point touch on the question Did you get the passport?
Yes.
It is not in any way implied or understood.
Have you actually become British and decided to adapt and actually absorb this culture and teach it to your children and have it replace yours?
This is not in any way implied, understood, or thought of.
The question is do you have a piece of paper that if you were to get a job offer in the UAE, for example, you would be able to take it on a higher salary threshold with slightly more legal protections than you would have if you were Egyptian, Pakistani, or Lebanese?
That's the implication.
Yeah, it's a means to an end.
Exactly.
And when you see these fully segregated communities, completely segregated, and say, well, they're just British, this is absurd.
Yes.
It's laughable.
And they don't even believe it themselves.
They don't believe it.
They don't believe it.
Was it Addis Sarwa's father who gave up his passport to go and become governor of the Punjab?
Yeah.
Yeah.
And Mog is sat here going, well, you wouldn't take away their legal right to stay here, would you?
I mean, well, Shabala Mahmoud is literally denaturalizing Englishmen, actually.
So, when we need to, we've got all of the justification we need to.
And Rupert's right.
Yeah, we're not going to be deporting people with British passports.
Yeah, no, that's correct.
They're not going to have British passports when they get deported.
Like, obviously.
Get on the plane.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So, obviously, all of that.
But one thing as well, I just want to draw attention to is that there is a real possibility, and I believe it truly, that Restore Britain can just outright win the next election.
Yes.
And that we actually, in a first-past-the-post system, are actually uniquely positioned to win it.
In a way that other patriotic European parties simply aren't right now, because they always have these grand coalitions of traitors spawning in against them.
And I actually think that if Britain can lead the way and actually show some actual patriotic policy in Europe, and where, I mean, just going off of this alone, obviously, yes, millions must go, and millions will go purely by this criteria alone.
And my goodness, I will not be able to wait to see those in particular who.
You know, do the TikToks waving the passports as of, ha, can't touch us now.
It's like, dude, just you wait.
You are right.
Millions will go because of this because a lot of the lure to bring these people here is you can claim money from the government.
The second that dries up, it's literally going to be people like Feras left who are like, Yeah, no, I pay my taxes actually, and I don't get any money from the bloody government.
I'm a sap, you know, I'm a sucker.
You're just like us, Feras.
I've paid an insane amount of taxes.
I've paid a lot of taxes.
You'd be like the average Englishman for us.
I'm fine.
That's what the corporation is.
I'm complaining about where it goes.
I'm not complaining about pay.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
But that's the point.
Millions of them will go, Oh, there's no point us being here.
Exactly.
Right.
There's no point.
That's what I was here for.
You want to give me a free house?
I can't live in central London on benefits anymore.
Okay, actually, I can be a rich man in Somalia.
Exactly.
Okay.
Maybe I'll try Canada or something.
They will leave.
Sorry, I actually thought I'd got a link up, but I haven't.
But Reform UK as well, just today, were posting about the fact that they were going to reverse migration as well now, all of a sudden.
I thought mass deportations were impossible.
I thought that was just not what you wanted your name attached to.
And this is the thing as well.
Cowards.
Yeah, exactly.
And so it's like, well, why would I trust you when you're in time?
Once again, this will happen as Restore Britain posts here.
As Restore Britain's mass deportation policy is implemented, there will be resistance or even riots.
Correct.
A Restore Britain government would use the full power of the state to enforce what the British people elected us to do mass deportations.
Don't like it?
Get out of the way.
Excellent.
Do we trust reform to have the same amount of confidence in its position, in the mandate?
The position they're stealing from someone else if they didn't believe in it themselves?
No, I don't.
Not particularly.
Idol will Boris Yu.
Yes.
Nigel Farage.
There'll probably be a Farage wave.
Yes.
Right.
Whereas actually, Rupert Lowe, based on what you were saying earlier about sort of inspiring other patriots all over the West, Rupert Lowe can be the man that Trump was supposed to be.
Absolutely.
Whereas Farage will be the man that Trump actually turned out to be.
And let's just hear how Restore Britain planned to basically decimate reforms councillors.
I think the spirit of what we're saying is people who come here who don't necessarily share our culture, who don't understand our culture.
Just read that line.
Who aren't.
Part of our fabric, we don't think it's really suitable for them to be in our parliament.
Anything controversial found here, gentlemen?
Well, I mean, Farage is literally going to have to find a bunch more candidates now.
As you say, he's the decimate reforms councillors.
That was very funny.
But I mean, there's nothing controversial about that at all.
Like, it just doesn't stand to reason that we should have any foreigner having any kind of executive power above us.
Make the affirmative argument.
In Pakistan, you have to surrender your foreign passport to have a position of authority over Pakistanis.
Yeah.
In Britain, you have to build Pakistan airports at Mirpur.
What's the argument for it?
No, no, tell me why I want someone born overseas to have a position of power in Britain.
Exactly.
Tell me why I want that.
And as soon as you make it, you reverse it.
It's like, why shouldn't they?
No, why should they?
Suddenly you realize there is no affirmative argument.
And actually, what we're doing is madness.
Absolutely mad.
Yeah, brutal.
And so, as always, though, I don't want to shy away from the other side of dialogue that's going on around on the internet.
After all, we are very online parties here.
And so let's talk about it, which is where they just talk about the fact that Rupert seems very proud of being a true Tory and that he's got an agreement, even though it's obviously the least charitable interpretation of what he was saying.
What I love about this is that Rupert's having a conversation with Jacob Reesmold, a lifelong Tory.
And what Rupert is saying is, I'm the real right winger here.
Yes.
Right?
That's what he's saying.
And I love it.
I'm an actual traditionalist.
I'm the actual heart of England.
My politics promotes that.
Because what Rupert is talking about, when he says, sort of like, hi Tory or true Tory, What he's talking about is I'm the most right wing thing England can produce.
Which is exactly what Alistair Campbell agreed.
Yeah, yeah.
That's exactly right.
That's exactly right.
It's exactly.
Fact check true, Alistair Campbell.
But that's the point, right?
Because what Rupert Lowe is thinking of is the kind of England that the Duke of Wellington is thinking of.
I bet on a moral and policy basis, if Rupert could go back and have a conversation with the Duke of Wellington, they'd agree on basically everything.
It's like, look, that's the most right wing, sort of aristocratic, traditional perspective that you can have.
It's not, I'm like a 20th century ideal.
Ideological party.
You know, it's like we're not fashion, not nasty.
No, no, no.
This is something completely different and on an entirely different plane of existence.
And so just being like, look, Jacob, I'm the real Tory here because Jacob is trying to lean into those aesthetics.
Yes.
Jacob, oh no, I'm the traditional right wing aristocrat.
So you don't realize how right wing Rupert is when it comes to this.
You're very wishy washy.
But you will.
Yeah, you will.
You're very wishy washy compared to Rupert.
And then look at this.
Restore Britain is nothing more than a Tory Trojan horse.
James, he is talking to Jacob Rees Mogg.
Who is defending a party that is literally stuffed with Conservative defectors?
And you're like, restore Britain and the Tory Trojan horse.
So, right, the party with a bunch of Tory ex government defectors.
I would have missed that Nadim Zahawi was the Tory Trojan horse.
I mean, it is.
Or Nadim Dorries, or.
Swell of Bravermen, or.
Yeah.
The list goes on.
Yeah, exactly.
It's like, look, you can't not list a Tory when you name someone in reform.
Yeah.
And so just, this is desperate, sad and dead.
But I don't even know what this is.
It's.
Hadfield says here, it's like, well, he won't call them Lib Dems because, as part of an agreement, which Rupert did say, but it was like, obviously, I just took it as I'm coming here on GP views and I'm not going to be very, very rude to your party on here.
Yeah, Jack, in his, I guess, I'll say innocence and ignorance on the subject, is mistaking Rupert Lowe promising to be polite for the purposes of conversation with some sort of formal electoral pact or something.
It's like, no, Jack, you are just naive.
Which, Doesn't make there obviously is no pact when Rupert in this very interview is shrugging, being like Tory after everything they did after 14 years, right?
And he's just drilling the Tory party throughout the entire interview.
So none of this really holds any particular weight.
And it's apparently the position from reform slander was so untenable that Ray Al Braverman, Sweller's husband, just decided to delete his account after Connor went nuclear on him.
And he's been a long term reformed supporter.
Well, Sweller was in the Tories, he was in reform.
Yeah.
Absolutely.
Can't even defend their position.
But then it all gets a little bit more complicated because it seemed like we'd had an hour's long interview and all had been very fair, and actually, you know, some legitimacy could be restored to GB News.
But then we saw only today, I believe this came out, that Rupert's, sorry, last night, I think it was, Rupert's GB News interview with Jacob Ruse Mogg.
As you know, Rupert has been banned from GB News for many months on Farage's instruction.
So we were pleasantly surprised when Jacob asked Rupert onto a show pre recorded.
What follows is not Jacob's fault.
It was agreed that the interview would go out entirely unedited.
A shorter clip went on Jacob's show, then the full interview would be online, we were told.
Jacob said so on his show too.
A longer clip did go online, but it was not the full interview.
We suspect this may happen, so our team recorded his interview.
We have the full recording.
A segment was cut out, replaced by a VPN ad, the only ad in the whole video.
What did that segment cover?
Jacob asked Rupert about what happened regarding reform's attempts to put him in prison.
Jacob raised how Rupert's guns were seized, how his home was raided by armed police late on the Friday night as a direct result of the reform allegations, and Rupert explained following Jacob's questioning that Farage had admitted their attempt to incriminate Rupert and imprison him on false allegations were entirely because he disagreed with Rupert's position on deporting foreign child rapists.
He said so publicly at a reform press conference.
Farage said it was brutal.
But it had to be done.
Rupert's position is that foreign rapists and their accomplices should be removed.
One of the British people obviously agree with.
That was a real mistake from Farage as well because he was restoring, it was only like a couple of weeks into restore.
And Farage had been trying to ignore it.
And a journalist brought it up.
And he was like, look, he said that he would deport entire communities, which he didn't say.
He said, if that meant entire communities have to go, then so be it.
He didn't say that.
But anyway, Then Farage was just like, well, and it was beyond the pale.
I think he literally said it was beyond the pale.
And so we did what had to be done.
And maybe that's a bit more brutal than most, but that's how it's going to be.
And it's like, okay, that's really stupid, Nigel.
Yeah.
Right.
A, you don't look like a tough guy, you look like a coward.
And you've just admitted that you made it all up out of a political motive rather than a motive of justice.
So he's an ex rapist.
Because he didn't threaten Zia Youssef.
And you were politically on the hook for something one of your MPs had said that you just wanted to get out of the way.
I mean, that was a really stupid admission.
And then leverage your power at GB News to silence Rupert Lowe and make sure that he was never allowed to make his case on air either until he's come away out of the wilderness with 1,300 supporters behind him and the fastest growing political party in Britain.
1,300?
You mean 130,000?
Sorry, 130,000.
That is exactly what I meant.
Yeah.
Yeah, 1,000.
Sorry, 130,000 members and the fastest growing political party in Britain.
9% in the polls.
Right.
And so, a Restore Britain government will immediately run a fast track recruitment campaign to bring thousands and thousands of British military veterans into immigration enforcement roles, field roles, if you will.
Excellent.
Looking forward to that being on the next Reform Party pledge.
Yeah, me too.
So, anyway, for the sake of time, I would encourage you, if you for some reason haven't already, do go and join Restore Britain on their main website.
Get involved.
We're involved, aren't we, in the London Brand?
I'm the organiser for Swindon.
Fast Track Veteran Recruitment00:03:36
Yeah.
Branches up and down the country now, over 400 of them, growing all the time, more and more people getting involved.
And we need each and every one of you because this is the movement and this is a time for it.
And we really do need to restore Britain.
Right.
So, Tom Ratt for $1 says, I hope you're right, but please can someone get restored to start writing policy, laying out the ideological basis?
Well, I mean, obviously, we have.
That's the thing.
Like the papers that are coming out, they've got what, four of them now?
Yeah.
And there's another one coming out soon.
But the point is, it's not just like back of the fag packet, like here's a page that we wrote.
No, these are properly well informed.
I mean, I was credited as helping in the very first one, the mass deportations one, because I was doing whatever I could to help, you know?
And so it is happening.
It's just this is not a quick process.
Yeah.
All right.
Yeah.
Sorry.
We have video comments.
Are there any, Samson?
Okay.
Zesty King says, left wing violence has unfortunately been normalized.
At Leeds last weekend, left wing protesters in the hundreds were chanting, Charlie Kirk shot in the neck.
British Nazis will be next.
That's lovely.
Right.
Do you want to?
Yep.
Thanks, Samson.
That's a very lovely kitten.
Peter Perr, come on.
This is supposed to be a political ad.
Come on, give me something here.
Such stoic silence.
Such brilliance.
I see it now.
Bet you're sick of seeing cats at this point after this weekend, aren't you, Samson?
The thing about agricultural robots is that they already exist.
They're called tractors and their attachments.
Seriously, though, if humanoid robots were as available as folks claim, some ethot would have already used one to make adult content by now.
This footage is a program running in a loop to control my mech's motors.
While robots for fun and entertainment are certainly possible, it's a bit harder actually making them useful.
Very cool.
Can you make Optimus Prime next?
I'd really love to see that.
A common argument I see for immigration is that they're saying, well, without them, we wouldn't be able to build anything.
Where would your infrastructure go?
And I can't help but note that with the ever increasing number of immigrants, it seems like manufacturing and infrastructure seems to go down with the ever increasing numbers of them.
It's actually very counterintuitive.
You're having a situation where the population is going up, but the industry is going down across every level.
I mean, if it helps, Britain had the same problem as Ireland here.
The reason is the most car.
Obviously, in 1920, very few people had cars.
In 2020, almost everyone has a car.
So the train system has been cut back for that.
I would reverse it.
Yeah, no, I agree.
I think having a really sort of prolific train system would be great.
Weird that we get so many cats on this podcast.
I do like cats.
This is adorable.
Obviously, newborn kitten there.
Hello, Mr. Frisky.
It's one of the cats in Blackadder.
Train System and Cat Jokes00:04:34
I didn't just pull that out.
I've got a cat who gave birth to a bunch of cats, and that expression, man, I remember seeing.
She's just laying there.
She's like, Yeah, I've just got to sit here and let them get on with it.
You're lovely, aren't you?
Is it friendly?
Oh.
Thank you.
I like cocktails.
Looks like a wonderful day out, Zesty.
Hope it was good.
All right.
Do you want to read any more from your segment or show up?
Yeah, Maria says Cash taking cover and observing was not a bad thing.
To leap up just makes Secret Service's job more difficult, which I agree with.
I mean, like, you know, it is a bureaucratic job.
He's not the front line, is he?
The shooter's comments suggest that he was acting as a canary to inform future would be assassins of how security works for presidential events, but he's clearly an idiot for making those weaknesses public knowledge.
That the security team can iron them out.
Well, you would think, but they shouldn't be there.
I mean, you'd think the presidential security around Trump would be just unbelievable and unbelievably good.
But when it comes to Trump, it kind of feels like the Secret Service are being intentionally incompetent with protecting him.
Yeah, I'm with you on that.
Like, I am not impressed with the security detail.
I mean, like, you know, the picture of him with his fist in the air.
And it's just like, these guys don't look very good at all.
No.
You know, like, sorry.
I don't mean to.
Cast aspersions, but Ed Middlebond harnessing Enoch Powell's spinning grave says medieval problems require medieval solutions.
This could have been your wife or daughter.
Yes.
And this is why I wanted to make the point.
It's not wrong to judge people by what they present themselves as.
And a lot of the presentation is unconscious.
Like Carla Denyer and Zoe Gardner, they can't change their soft looks.
If they were to go to Egypt or Libya or whatever, People would immediately clock and be like, oh my God.
But if you saw, like, I don't know, just some big, bulky guy with a rugged face, like, you know, like someone like Lee Anderson actually is a good guy.
Lee Anderson goes to Egypt.
He's not getting any trouble because he looks like he could be trouble, you know.
And the people there are good judges of character based on what the person's face looks like.
You have to learn to do the same, frankly.
Even the beggars know it, man.
Especially the beggars.
Well, everyone does.
Everyone does.
You can tell.
It's really.
Yeah.
Hope a hook left us a nice tip.
Go have a pint on me.
Oh, thank you very much.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Anglo poster says, Do you remember three to five years ago when the left called you a far right conspiracy theorist for saying that the small boats were even a thing?
They bent the knee on that.
After that, you were far right for believing they got free hotels and allowances.
They bent the knee on that.
Now they say the refugees are the victims and they were all perfectly safe women and children.
They will bend the knee on that too.
But how many people will be killed and raped before then?
Well, I mean, far too many.
But at least we will have held the line on all of these things because we've been right on all of it.
We're right on this.
And they're not going to be able to deny it forever.
Baron von Warhawk says the British police could drag Satan himself in chains and charge him with raping a baby, and these liberal white women will come out to defend the Prince of Darkness because he's a refugee from hell.
That is true, but they are also people who are very far away from the problem, right?
In their personal lives, they're very far away from the problem.
Ewan says, When is enough enough?
These monsters need to hang.
Well, we're going to get that restore Britain government.
So, and I mean, literally, that's one of the campaign promises referendum on the death penalty, which we're going to win.
Saw Rupert calling for it in Parliament, and the jeers were.
It's like, well, I know you guys are watching.
Keep jeering.
Yeah.
Keep jeering.
You jeered about Brexit.
And Brexit wasn't even a cut and dried issue.
Right.
It's like, yeah, they're probably, you know, the Brexit campaign, yeah, there probably will be a few problems.
We probably will have to take an economic hit, and people still voted for it.
Keep jeering because when it comes to hanging Axel Rudikabana or this fucking Egyptian twat, trust me, we're going to get like 65% be like, yes, hang them.
Because we are just going to slap up.
Look at this guy.
Look at what he did.
Look at this guy.
Look at what he did.
Do you want them hanged yet?
And the British public are like, yeah, hell yeah, I want these people hanged.
Why are they still here?
Public Wants Death Penalty00:00:52
What are we even waiting for?
I imagine if the death penalty came along, it would be the one thing that finally puts the left in charge, in favor of mass deportations, actually.
It's like they'd rather deport them than kill them.
So it would actually bring them around to that.
Just needs something more punitive.
I'll just read one comment from mine then.
Sophie Libbs says, You have truth and reality on your side.
You have the epic noble heroes' journey on your side.
You have Aragorn's spirit.
Come on, guys, push.
Yeah.
I saw Nick Dixon's breakdown of the interview, and he was saying, With all these non voters, it's like Aragorn summoning the army of the dead, being like, I summoned you to win this election, and then just rolling through.
So anyway, right.
Do come back at three o'clock, ladies and gentlemen, to join Firas for Realpolitik.
It's going to be a good one as always.
And we hope that you've enjoyed the show.
Enjoy the rest of your day and see you at 1 p.m. tomorrow.