Harry, Stelios, and Nate dismantle the Home Office's knife crime plan as ineffective drivel while condemning the Carlos Brown Jr. verdict for prioritizing a mentally ill murderer over victim Irina Zarutska. They accuse mainstream media of suppressing this case to protect woke narratives and critique Democrats for ranking victims by oppression rather than humanity. The discussion further attacks Adam McKay's sexualized climate campaign and Megan Prescott's OnlyFans transition as failures harming young women, linking her exploitation to billionaire Leonid Radvinsky's AIPAC donations. Ultimately, the hosts argue that radicalized ideologies create incompatible groups, suppress responsible agency, and ignore root causes ranging from cultural decay to environmental costs. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Stopping Knife Crime00:14:55
Good afternoon, and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters, episode 1393.
I'm your host, Harry, joined today by Stelios and Nate.
And today we're going to be talking to you about the tragic fact of the Irina Zarutska murderer being too stupid to stand trial because that's how a healthy legal system works.
Nate's going to be telling us about the end of knife crime.
I can't wait for that.
Sounds like quite a miracle.
And I'm going to be talking to everybody about climate change for Gunas, the new approach.
To spreading awareness of the climate crisis, which I thought, frankly, was going to be a fun segment, but turns out to have been a lot darker than I was initially anticipating.
So look forward to that one.
Before we go.
They're becoming very sensitive.
What, by having sympathy for people who've obviously been taken advantage of throughout that?
We'll get into it, but it's like.
His T levels are dropping.
It's pretty dark.
Yeah, that's what it is, clearly.
What's going on there in Snap Fitness?
That's going to be quite a bizarre reference for anybody who.
Wasn't involved in the conversation we had before we went live.
Either way, before we get into the news, I just want to make you aware that tickets for Lotus Heaters Live are still available, so you can buy those through the website.
It will be this Saturday.
I hope you're looking forward to it.
If you already have tickets, it's going to be some great fun.
And if you don't have tickets yet, get them 7 till 10, 11th of April, this Saturday at the Mecca in Swindon.
Be there or be square.
And with that, I think we're starting with you telling us about the miracle that is the ultimate end of all knife crime ever, and we're all going to be living in peace and harmony.
Yes.
So, yeah, I wanted to do a little conversation about my mouse is not working.
About how the mouse doesn't work.
We do really.
Samson, we need a conversation about this right now.
Oh, he's coming.
He's coming.
All right, well, before we do that, subscribe to mine and Bo's channel.
You may not know it, but it's called The State of Politics.
State of Politics.
Did we just have a little Samson cameo in Samson's hand?
Please do.
Does that one work?
Oh, that one works.
It does work.
Excellent.
There you go.
Yeah, please do subscribe to my little channel.
Why not?
I've got to do a bit of plugging every now and then.
Yeah, this one doesn't work.
Yeah, no, it's rubbish.
Anyway, let's get into the actual segment.
The end of knife crime as we know it, ladies and gents.
The Home Office has announced they're going to end knife crime in a decade, basically.
It's fascinating.
Obviously, they're not going to do that, and it's just utter drivel and nonsense.
And our hard earned tax money has been spent on this.
And I just thought we'd go through it because it's a bit of fun, really.
I mean, it's not fun, but it is fun.
We've got to put light in the darkness, you know, all that kind of nonsense.
So, Home Office, they tweeted this out.
For too long, The national response to knife crime has lacked the scale and cohesion this threat demands.
This week, we published Protecting Lives, Building Hope.
Oh, God, are you feeling hopeful?
Not really.
Oh, right, okay.
Oh, I am feeling hopeful.
Oh, okay, he is.
Brilliant.
Okay.
I want to represent that perspective.
Okay, well, good.
Our plan to halve knife crime and to right this wrong, but we did not achieve this on our own.
We're going to slice through knife crime, we're going to stab knife crime.
Driving real change around this issue demands input from every part of the system.
The contributions of our coalition to tackle knife crime and their ongoing commitment and dedication to preventing violence cannot be understated.
Many have drawn on their own personal tragedy to ensure other families never have to feel the pain of losing a loved one to knife crime.
I mean, they're going to ban knives, aren't they?
Are we going to get to them?
Why are you pessimistic, Nate?
I know, honestly.
We've already had various different initiatives to try to not necessarily ban knives, but close enough to ban knives so butter knives can be an actionable offence now, carrying one of them in public.
Really?
An actual butter knife?
It has happened to somebody.
There's at least one documented case of it.
And there's those unpointed knives that you can buy now as well.
I don't know how that helps in particular because you can just get sliced with them instead of stabbed.
It's still got a sharp edge.
Yeah.
What?
Oh, I didn't even know that.
Anyway.
We live in clown country because, of course, all of the initiatives to try and prevent knife crime are being done to avoid one particular aspect of it.
We're going to get to that.
Don't you worry.
Their insight has proved invaluable in pursuit of our mission to tackle this issue throughout the country.
This plan goes further than ever before to ensure young people get the best start in life and to stop those at risk from turning to knife crime.
We know tackling violence will not be easy, but in our mission to protect lives and build hope, we will be unrelenting.
They've got a little image in this tweet.
Now, the demographic that perpetrate knife crime is strongly one demographic as the majority.
Are they going to pronounce knife crime as Islamophobic?
Because I can see that working in their minds.
No, unfortunately.
So they don't mean it?
No.
This whole thing's an exercise in complete futility.
But you can see that brilliant demographics.
I mean,.
There's the victims of knife crime there.
Definitely in the back, for sure.
Not really the perpetrators, though.
Maybe one of them.
Anyway, so the response to this has been very comical, as you can just see.
What?
They're only allowed a three inch knife now.
You might as well ban drugs while you ride it.
Yeah, brilliant.
And then there was something I found very, very funny as we scroll through this.
Again, the memes.
Let's ask them.
Yep.
So for those watching, not.
Not watching, just listening.
We're just getting through.
I just want to show you some of the memes because obviously, the response that anything the government puts out the Home Office, civil service, whatever is always just met with sheer ridicule.
It's like now, under any movie trailer on YouTube, for instance, people always do the it's morbid time meme.
Do people still do that?
I still do.
It's glorious.
I absolutely adore it.
I still do morbid time.
I've not seen morbid time in a year or so.
You need to get morbid.
You need more morbid in your life, mate.
All right.
Get morbid.
Get morbid.
I have morbid fascinations.
Right.
Anyway.
So, well, it's here.
We've got it.
This is the PDF.
Okay.
And it's fascinating stuff.
It's absolutely fascinating stuff.
So, you can see here the contents.
Our plan is a four step plan.
They're going to support young people, they're going to stop those at risk from turning to knife crime.
Well, that's it.
You've solved knife crime then, haven't you?
Yeah, but Nate, are you questioning the effectiveness of prevent?
Because it looks like they're going to prevent knife crime.
Yeah, well, number two just stops it all, look.
So we don't need number three and four, do we?
More youth centers is what we're going to get.
Way worse than that.
Way worse.
Because I saw a statistic the other day that was quite amazing, which was you might not know this, Nate.
Did you know that 90% of urban youth centers are closed right before they're about to prevent knife crime?
I did.
You know what?
I did actually see that.
It's one of the country's greatest tragedies, folks.
So.
That's a real statistic, by the way.
You can tell that to your friends.
So, we're going to go through this.
Their little plan here.
I say little because it is absolute nonsense.
So.
Where here's our plan.
So here is the four stage plan, right?
Support.
We're going to support young people so they get a better start in life.
Because that's right, ladies and gents.
If you have a bad start in life, you're going to go around stabbing people, apparently, according to the Home Office.
I mean, this is ridiculous.
That's an absurd statement.
And I'm sure, actually, if you looked into the demographics of it, in terms of people that are.
I don't know, like the most underserved in society are, by and large, white British sort of working class boys, men, yet they're not running around being the highest demographic stabbing people, are they?
Well, you do tend to find, and this is to steel man it ever so slightly, you do tend to find that.
Why are you steel manning me?
That's a true statement.
Well, no, no, for the most part.
But across different demographics, you do tend to find that socioeconomic status.
Does influence the amount of crime committed, but also based on demographics, that's still discrete to each demographic.
So, for instance, there's the famous graph from probably about 10 years ago now that disaggregated racial crimes based on socioeconomic status and found that rich black men in America were still incarcerated about as much as poor white men.
So, it did, there was a downward factor to that, but also it still starts off so much higher and remains higher.
Well, I'm going to be the most base one in this segment, I think.
So, I believe that disadvantaged white young boys don't typically go around stabbing people up.
So, supporting young people so they get a better start in life is absolutely absurd.
Number two, stop those at risk from turning to knife crime.
That's it.
They're just going to stop knife crime.
Police, they're going to police our streets to punish perpetrators and stop offending.
And then they're going to end the cycle of knife crime.
So.
No, no, just finish.
And then I have to.
Oh, no, I have to.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, I'll finish.
Yeah, before I say that, I would say that the support thing here is entirely equity based.
Oh, yeah.
The way that they're putting it.
Because what they're going to do is they're going to say, well, we're talking about supporting young people.
They don't mean young people of all stripes.
They talk about particular young people that they consider to be oppressed according to the oppression calculus.
They're going to frame it in terms of giving equality of opportunity.
But the criterion for equality of opportunity that they're going to use is equality of outcome.
So wherever there's going to be disparity of outcome, they're going to therefore say, well, they weren't.
Equal opportunities weren't present.
They need more benefits in youth clubs.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So you have to pay more.
Of course.
Which would harm some young people who do want to get a better start in life by, for instance, just not paying a crazy amount of taxes or starting with startups or something, trying to.
Have you considered that if everyone is poor and everyone is doing the same thing, therefore no one can be discriminated against?
Yeah, because if everyone is poor, there is no envy.
Supposedly, there won't be any envy.
Exactly.
You've got it.
So, here's how they're going to support young people so they get a better start in life and thus never turn to knife crime, apparently.
Putting trained youth workers, trusted adults, and safe spaces in the heart of communities to support young people.
They're doing the meme a youth club will stop the violence, ladies and gents.
They're doing the meme.
That's right.
That definitely won't become a location for those certain youths to congregate.
To then enact their knife crime against one another.
Definitely not.
I was going to say, I've never heard of, say, for instance, I don't know, like a YMCA just becoming a glorified drugs den.
Young men, there's no need to feel down.
I'm sure there's plenty of that going on there, too, Stellio.
Brilliant.
Right.
They're going to tackle the root cause of knife crime in schools.
Okay, well, again, there's certain parts of this entire PDF where if you just did that one thing as they're phrasing it, it would stop the entire knife crime.
I mean, obviously, it won't because they're not tackling the actual issue.
Obviously, demographic.
At any point in this, do they ever acknowledge the ethnic and demographic difference?
No, mate.
Because even the.
Don't skip ahead.
No, it's going to have to come on.
You won't be.
Conversation because, yeah, they will have to when they want to argue for more benefits.
No, well, let me get to it.
So, they say they're going to tackle the root cause of knife crime in schools, supporting families and carers to address the root causes, reducing access to violent material online.
So, that is just more censorship.
So, welcome to Censorship Britain.
We're going to have even more censorship now.
Um, next, they'll be like, I don't know, Ofcom will say that media can't have knife fights or Any form of violence in their shows.
Because that's what that is.
It's reducing access to violent material.
That's reminded me.
Didn't they do some edits to old James Bond posters recently where they removed guns from Amazon?
Yeah.
Bad.
That's bizarre.
And it reminds me, I think South Park took the mic as well when there were some re edits of, I think it was ET.
Yeah, ET, where they took all the guns out and they had walkie talkies.
Yeah, exactly the same kind of thing.
Bizarre.
So they're going to also deliver new behavior change communications campaigns.
Brilliant.
I don't think any of that will be successful, but call me.
A massive bigot, I guess.
So they're going to stop those at risk from turning to knife crime.
That's it.
You've solved the problem, then, haven't you?
I mean, you have really at that point, haven't you?
If you stop people turning to knife crime, you've stopped it.
I mean, if you just announce that you've stopped it, then, like, okay.
Have you stopped it?
Have you?
Oh, we're still asking people to just be nice.
I mean, the PDF says it.
So it all comes back to hug a hoodie, doesn't it?
Yeah.
It always just comes back to some variation of hug a hoodie.
Thank you, Danny Kruger, for that classic.
Yeah, absolute nonsense.
So, we will stop those at risk from turning to knife crime by strengthening early intervention with children at risk of being drawn into violence.
Who?
What children?
What demographics?
Who?
Anyone?
Children who really like reading Thomas the Tank Engine.
They have a propensity for violence.
Maybe.
Maybe.
They have a propensity for union busting.
And they're going to tackle county lines, violence, and exploitation.
Well, who is it who tends to be exploiting and trafficking across county lines?
Might be a crossover of certain demographics on certain things here.
Perhaps those with a taste for Greg's salsa drolls.
Violence and Union Busting00:14:48
I don't think I've ever had one of them.
Anyway, stopping young people from carrying knives.
You've solved it.
You've solved knife crime.
You're going to stop young people carrying knives.
You've solved it.
Unless you acknowledge the basic reality of who's committing this, stopping young people carrying knives, if you want to actively stop them, that requires stop and search.
Well, we're going to get to that.
And who complains about stop and search whenever it happens?
Mm hmm.
Yeah, well, exactly.
Unless you're just going to find some white nerd in a button up shirt and khakis walking down the street and just go, Excuse me, sir, sorry, we need to search you.
He's obviously not going to be carrying a knife.
Yeah.
Well, yeah, Doris getting her perm.
Yeah.
Highly, highly unlikely that she will have a knife and thus a complete waste of police resources.
Have you considered Monty Python Britain?
You won't.
True.
Thanks, of old ladies.
I'd rather stop Drizzy Dizzle.
Right?
I'd rather stop him.
Okay.
Because he's probably got a knife over little Doris.
Dizzy Drizzle's probably got a knife, let's be honest.
Okay.
And a terrible name.
So making schools safer from knife crime.
They're just going to make schools safer from knife crime.
Amazing.
So there is a little bit here.
Investing more of my cash.
Brilliant.
I mean, you could just stop importing these people.
That'd be brilliant.
And stop making me pay for them.
That'd be really good as well.
Nate, haven't you considered that the left's argument says that basically if you make a gesture of goodwill, People who are the recipients of your goodwill are going to respond with kindness?
No, no, because I view that as Gibbs, and they're probably just going to ask for more.
No, no.
So you're not willing to up your own personal taxes for Gibbs for other people on the non existent chance that it will stop them from committing crime?
No, I want New Britannia, a breakaway part of the country.
Because the problem is as well.
If you're only one demographic, that would be fantastic.
With certain groups, you start giving them stuff for free.
They're not going to go, oh, I should behave better.
They go, these guys are suckers.
Yes.
I'm going to rinse them.
It's interesting, isn't it?
Honor.
And sort of manners and I don't know, sort of decorum does tend to be quite specific to certain cultures.
I mean, we saw it in America with the murder of Austin Metcalf last year.
You know, who was stabbed at the school sports meetup where the black kid from the other school came.
Yeah, who just came and murdered him by provoking a confrontation.
And then they raised like a million dollars.
Yeah, exactly.
The family, who were already pretty well off if you saw the house that they were living in, like, this is an opportunity to.
Get some money.
Yeah, yeah, mad.
So, police, this is the third step in the plan.
We're going to police our streets to punish perpetrators and stop offending.
Okay, well, now we get into, hopefully, the opportunity where they will identify the demographics involved, right?
I mean, nah, man.
Knowing who's committing the crimes is kind of like the step one.
Yeah, well, it's not going to happen.
See, that's a police issue, though.
And frequently the issue isn't the police, but it's the bureaucracy, whether within the police or above that.
So, I don't see anything mentioning bureaucracy in this report, which seems a lot like an undergraduate's project.
Well, so this one I will spend a little bit more time on because I find this quite interesting.
We're putting 13,000 additional police personnel in neighborhood roles.
That is unlikely because people are leaving the police force en masse.
The good coppers are leaving the police force en masse.
And what you're actually hiring is Aisha.
And Lizzie, who can't do shit.
Lizzie, who's a bit dizzy.
Yeah.
Not to be mistaken for Dizzy Drizzle.
Or Mizzy.
Remember him, folks.
He started again.
Have you seen that?
Yeah.
Has he turned his life around?
No, no, he started being a little shit again.
Fantastic case study for what we're talking about, then.
Yeah.
Certain demographics.
Exactly.
But this 13,000, that's for the birds.
It's absolutely for the birds.
The whole police structure.
Needs completely dismantling and rebuilding from scratch.
It has been ideologically captured.
The whole thing is completely worthless.
They are unable to do anything.
And hence why we're in a massive crime ridden hellhole, basically.
Also, depending on the neighborhoods that they're going into, if they're actually going to be intelligent about it, typically you have a history of those neighborhoods then complaining about over policing and the powers that be then overturning their own policies.
So, the strength of initiative like this, I don't disagree that.
Just simply having a greater presence of authority figures within a neighborhood could potentially reduce the amount of crime that goes on there just because there's more opportunity to be caught.
It's whether then the powers that be will have the backbone to carry on those initiatives once they're put into place.
The thing is, this whole thing is absolute nonsense, anyway, from the police perspective, because you've only got to look at the response to the facial recognition camera system being just very good at capturing black criminal.
It was very good at capturing black criminals.
And that was deemed racist.
They were criminals.
They were actually criminals, but they were like, no, no, we've got to stop using this now because it's too effective for black people.
It's like, okay, but are they criminals?
Yes.
So what's the issue then?
Well, it's just catching too many of them.
So instead, they actually rewrote the algorithm and dumbed it down for black people.
Brilliant.
So now we're catching less criminals.
Yeah, yeah, literally.
The whole point is we've got to be equitable with how many criminals we catch with certain software.
Mental.
Actually, mental.
The replacement initiatives that they put in place are not only just completely ridiculous, but also purely symbolic.
So, one of the initiatives that actually came to my town, which ironically enough is not a town that has that much knife crime in it, was that a statue.
Low demographic.
The knife angel showed up.
Have you heard of the knife angel?
No.
Right.
What is this nonsense?
It is a statue of an angel.
Made out of knives handed into local police forces by supposedly former criminals, right?
And they went into.
Honest, Gov, I've turned my life around.
I'll make a statue now.
Yeah, and they brought it to town and they put it in the town centre and it stood there for about a week.
And the initiative was supposedly just the very presence of the knife angel in town was supposed to make people reconsider what they were doing in their lives.
And there was a little box where you could hand in.
Your knife, you could just anonymously drop it there.
Could you imagine a hardened criminal walking up in the rain like it's Hollywood?
You have your come to Jesus moment and you go big beam of light behind the angel.
Yeah, seeing the light?
I'm gonna turn it all around, gov. I'm gonna become an architect now.
And then they just throw the knife away, honestly, happily ever after.
It's ridiculous, absolutely nonsense.
So, um, so to get back to their bullet points here, we will police our streets to punish perpetrators and stop offending by.
Increasing the number of neighbourhood policing personnel.
We've already gone through that.
That's nonsense.
Cracking down on knife robberies.
Brilliant.
You should be doing that anyway.
Enhancing stop and search.
Fairly.
Fairly, ladies and gents.
Fairly to prevent knife crime.
Doris getting her purse.
About to get stop and search.
Dizzy drizzle.
Don't worry about it, mate.
Doris.
All right.
We've got to waste some police time because it's got to be fair.
Well, to be fair, she was pretty shifty.
Well, that's probably her limp.
All right.
Anyway, so that's this is absolute nonsense.
It's complete nonsense.
And for those that cry, well, that's a racism because stopping black people, you know, targets them, for instance.
Well, if you're black and you've got a problem with that, maybe you should have a bit of introspection for your quote unquote ethnic community and, you know, maybe just tell them they should probably stop carrying knives.
Like at the end of the day, if you care about certain demographics, which you should if you're black and you don't like the fact that they stop and search black people.
Then, well, I'd rather them be stopped and thus prevent some being killed than not be stopped and have, you know, a higher body count.
I mean, surely that's just basic common sense, isn't it?
Right?
Well, you'd think.
Yes.
Yeah.
But never mind.
I mean, cry about it, I guess.
So, mapping every knife offense to enforce and prevent knife crime where it's most likely to happen.
Well, that negates the previous point, actually, doesn't it?
It'd be good if they did do that, but they're not going to.
We know that.
Stopping knives getting onto our streets.
How?
That's just more infantilizing nonsense of society.
Well, it's going to be criminalizing further knives being bought by people who aren't going to use them to commit crimes.
Yeah, again, yeah, infantilizing nonsense.
Like, I'm not going to be able to buy, like, a box cutter blade, for instance, are very useful, right?
You can use them for lots of things, especially if you do mechanics and you've got to cut some wires, split some wires, things like that.
They're useful for everything.
I'm not going to be able to buy that now.
That's going to be a pain in the ass to buy.
Like this, stop making my life difficult because you've imported people that shouldn't be here that have a propensity to stab people up.
How about that?
Maybe.
Investing in the latest technology.
And also, that's not going to stop anything.
Because you can make a knife out of anything.
What do you think happens in prisons?
If someone actually wants to do this, they're going to do it anyway.
You can just get a toothbrush.
Not that I'm advising people to do that, obviously.
This is not advice.
I mean, it's not shanking advice.
But that's it.
You could just get glass again, not shanking advice, but that's just not going to work, is it really?
Yeah, it's just nonsense, it's absolute drivel.
Woke context aside, which I completely reject.
I do understand the idea that you know, in some respects, preventing crime or preventing the conditions that increase the chances of crime being perpetrated is a good thing, but the way they're going for it is just endless excuses for people that they are, yeah, and they neglect habituation because if you are being habituated into a system that Constantly makes endless excuses for your misbehavior, you aren't going to become a good citizen.
Sorry, you're not going to become a functioning member of society.
What this all fails to address is culture.
It's all about culture, right?
That's what it is.
We've allowed cultures to fester and rot amongst what was a great culture.
And then they're going to invest in latest technology to better prevent and detect knife crime.
So, this actually, it's in here, but we don't need to show you.
They're going to invest in more knife arches.
So, we're all going to be scanned.
So, pointless.
Again, like, brilliant.
I mean, I don't carry anything, obviously, but I still don't want to go through these dystopian.
Except my toothbrush.
Except my toothbrush, yeah.
Well, yeah, exactly.
It's not going to stop that either, is it?
Right.
But I don't want to live in a society where I'm in a dystopia where I'm being scanned constantly, whether it's facial recognition, surveillance stick.
Yeah.
I mean, what?
Or because you did something expressly opposed to the democratic mandate you were given, which was stop importing people.
What?
It's Clown World.
Anyway, so there's that.
And then just to round it all out, it's here.
They're going to end the cycle of knife crime.
How are they going to do that, then, guys?
How are they going to do it?
How do you reckon?
So, as we say here, we will end the cycle of knife crime by reforming the youth justice system.
Bring back Borstals.
That's what you should do.
Do you remember them?
Are you too young for it?
I'm too young for it.
You used to have Borstals, which is like a youth justice system, it was like a young offender's prison, basically.
Bring them back.
Bring back public beatings, stocks, flogging, bring all of that back.
I'm all for that, but they're not going to, obviously.
So that's.
Minority report.
Have they considered that?
Don't say that word.
Have they considered it?
Don't say that word in relation to this.
No, I don't want this.
Minorities reporting.
Come on now, that goes against barely stopping and searching.
What about mass remigration?
But they're not going to do that.
Come on.
Don't get me excited on the podcast.
Preventing repeat youth crime through early, consistent diversion and support, youth clubs.
Identifying and managing the highest risk knife offenders effectively.
But that contradicts the previous thing where you said you're going to do it fairly.
So that's nonsense.
And support prison levers away from reoffending.
That's time and time and time again.
That has been proven a moot point, something which actually doesn't really happen.
Rehabilitation tends not to occur.
Reoffending is huge.
Particularly massive.
Particularly as the severity of the crime increases as well.
If some guy's just, I don't know, like picked some sweets off of the aisle at Azta or something and legged it, yeah, you can convince him not to do it again.
Yeah.
If someone's a hardened murderer, yeah, it's going to be more difficult.
Yeah.
So, but there you go, ladies and gents.
The Home Office has decided this is the end of knife crime.
Well, good news to start the podcast off with them, boys.
Sorry, that went on for a little bit longer.
That's all right.
It was nice.
We have time.
Yeah, we can go for.
I'm normally quite short, though.
That's why.
So I think.
It's a good one.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So we can go through a few of the rumble rants.
JK Moody addresses one to you, Stelios.
So would you like to read this out?
Okay.
Shout to Stelios.
Keep using your MAGA.
I can't say that live.
MAGA.
Buried Charges and Forgotten Crimes00:15:58
As a sword against the ever growing third world mentality on this side of things, love.
I'm optimistic.
It will go away.
People will understand.
Would you like me to read through the rest of them or do you want to carry on?
You can read them.
All right.
Altric door.
Don't forget there was a youth center leader that used the youth center for gang recruitment and drug selling in the US.
That does not surprise me.
In fact, it seems like quite an ideal setting for something like that right under their noses.
It does, doesn't it?
That sounds like it.
Yeah, well, you bring a lot of criminals together and repeat offenders, and, you know, they might start doing more crime together.
Brilliant.
Binary surfer.
Some groups overindex in knife crime between five and eight times over, depending upon the group.
Most support initiatives.
Target groups at vastly lower over indexing, e.g., 1.1 times for poverty.
Ochigdor says this sounds like the airplane metal detector scene.
And then just, oh bloody hell, I've clicked off of something.
Apologies.
I need.
Samson, you've got to fix it.
Samson, let me scroll up first, please.
Samson, fix it, fix it.
There you go.
Binary surfer, our ancestors' response to armed violence, like knife crime, was to torture, kill, or mutilate the perpetrator.
For instance, Egyptians buried you alive with the victim for three to five days, then dug you up, and then burned you alive and impaled you.
That's.
Talk about making sure.
I mean, I'll consider that.
Before we start the segment, I want to say something to our fans because we have this special relation.
There's a new woke acronym that just dropped.
Yes, which is M M I W G 2 S L G B T Q Q I A.
And Grok is refusing to respond to me what it means.
Where have you found this?
Where have you seen this?
In Canada.
In Canada.
You'd expect that, you know, that's.
Yeah.
That's woke hell.
That's unsurprising.
Okay.
In two days, there's going to be a massive live event in Mecca, Swindon.
In Swindon, I repeat, because people were asking whether it's going to be somewhere else.
And the map, which.
They were hoping.
Yeah, they were hoping, but no, it's going to be in Mecca in Swindon.
The Mecca in Swindon, not Mecca.
What?
No, just.
It's making a Muslim joke.
Mecca, Swindon here, 11th of April, 7 to 10 p.m.
Everyone's going to be there apart from me.
Because I had a prior arrangement, that makes me really sad.
Nothing weird.
Next time I'll be there.
I'm going to be there as well.
It's definitely not that Stelios doesn't like you.
Definitely not.
Right.
Okay.
Let's move on.
I'm going to be there by the bar.
This is like buying all of our lovely fans' drinks.
Maybe.
Oh.
We'll make this cut here.
Samson, we'll make this cut here.
Yeah.
Right.
This is going to make you mad.
We are going to talk about the murder of Irina Zarutska.
And he seemed to have been, to have in a way got away with it.
He isn't released.
This is going to make you mad, but it's important to be very meticulous about what actually happened.
Which is preposterous, but he hasn't been released.
So let's see what happened.
On August 22, 2025, which is August last year, we had the Carlos Brown Jr., who is a career criminal, walking into this subway train, and he is seen here on footage, being alone for 20 minutes within the train, laughing ecstatically, talking to himself.
Yeah, sorry, Nick.
I was just going to say, remind me, wasn't he previously caught before a judge, then released?
Was it 18 times?
It was 14 times.
And what is preposterous in this case is that 14 times he was found capable of being tried, but now he was found incapable of being tried.
Now, where the stakes were a bit higher because he murdered Irina Zarutska, now he was incompetent of being tried.
Right.
So let's.
Yeah.
So there are.
Scenes showing him laughing on the train, and this is what his defense is appealing to in order to say he was actually mentally ill and he wasn't capable of understanding what he was doing, and therefore he should have the treatment of a mentally ill person instead of being tried for first degree murder.
Nobody contends that he's insane, that there's nothing going on up there, that he's listening to the voices, but the voices tell him to kill random white women.
It's interesting.
So, that should not be some kind of mitigating factor.
That should be, if anything, again, other people have pointed this out, aggravating because of the fact that now we know that he doesn't even have the capacity to understand that he did something wrong and therefore is far more likely to repeat offend if he's ever let out on the street.
Well, that's the thing, isn't it?
Is that when you have individuals, he's slightly different, but it's the defense that they have in Britain.
It's like, oh, well, he doesn't understand or he's this or he's mentally incapable, et cetera.
It's like, but that's.
That's even more of a reason, that's a larger reason to remove him from society entirely.
You know, that's someone which can never go back into society.
So then at that point, I mean, no one should have to pay for him, especially if they've committed anyone has committed such an egregious crime.
No, you just get rid.
Let's remind takeaway that someone's dead because of him.
Yeah, let's see what happened here.
Uh, this technology is failing us again.
Let's see, I'll use the mouse.
I think this one works.
Yeah, let's see here.
So Here we have the scene that we can't forget.
He was sat behind, out of nowhere.
He just stabbed her on the throat.
This picture, tragically, if you ever watched the footage, is actually after she has been stabbed.
This is the horrifying realization of what's just happened to her.
Yeah.
And that wasn't just it.
He left, and people just sat there.
They just sat there.
They just didn't help her.
They didn't ask her, Are you well?
They didn't call the ambulance.
They didn't call the police.
They just sat there.
They have no connection to her.
They have no sympathy for her.
Also, there were recordings where he shouted, I basically killed that white girl.
Yeah, I think he was saying, I got that white girl.
I got several times, yeah.
And there was outrage because the mainstream media completely tried to bury it.
And this is one of the cases where it's good that we do have alternative media because we wouldn't have heard about this story.
And this story has become rather symbolic in several ways, which we are going to talk about.
I think they even tried to bury the footage as well.
They tried to avoid the entire footage coming out.
I remember that at the time.
They were like trying to censor lots of things.
It's like, no, no, no, no.
You should watch this in its entirety.
This has to be out there.
I mean, it's brutal.
It's awful.
It's truly, truly awful.
But you have to see this kind of stuff to understand the problem.
Exactly.
And this is knife crime.
And I don't see how this is going to be solved by the proposals of the government you mentioned in your segment, which check it out before the segment that was uploaded just before.
So here we have N Wokeness saying that there were zero Associated Press stories about that, zero PBS stories, zero New York Times stories, zero NPR stories, zero.
Wall Street Journal, zero BBC stories, zero CNN, zero WAPO, zero Reuters, zero MSNBC.
And speaking of NPR, the previous, we should never forget that the previous CEO of NPR, who I think now has moved to Wikipedia, or it's the other way around, it's the previous CEO of Wikipedia who went to NPR, she was saying that a concern for facts very often gets in the way of building a consensus.
And this story is basically destroying the consensus that has been created.
In several elite, leftist elite circles.
And this is why they try to bury it, because it shows the absolute nonsense of their woke narrative.
And this is why they try to bury it.
And they aren't just saying now, well, okay, it's just another crime that happened, let's move on.
They keep attacking her memory in several ways.
We will mention some of them as the segment goes along.
Let me just tell you here what happened.
So there's an article here from the New York Post.
It talks about the Carlos Brown Jr., they mention him as.
Accused of slaughtering Irina Zarutska.
We saw the footage.
Maybe they're doing it for legal reasons, whatever, maybe.
But also, it's interesting, isn't it?
The phrasing crazed, deranged.
It's pointed, trying to limit his personal responsibility, his personal agency.
He is disgusted.
What about just you?
Absolutely.
And right now, there is an open question whether he was crazy or capable of meeting the threshold of moral responsibility in this case.
And, uh, they are presenting it as being a closed.
Question.
Why?
Because you can see the pattern.
When you have the slightest critic of progressivism, it's being presented as indicative of a wider epidemic of far right extremism.
When you have crimes committed by, you know, within quotation marks, the oppressed, according to the left, it's just an isolated incident of someone who has mental health issues and they're going to appeal to mental health in order to diminish the.
Punishment that they actually deserve.
I mean, according to this article here, right, it says, according to a motion filed April 7th, DeCarlos Brown Jr. was evaluated December 29th at Central Regional Hospital.
The subsequent report determined that he was not competent to stand trial, according to news reports.
His attorney has asked the court to delay his competency hearing.
So the argument goes that because he is not competent to stand trial, they're saying he's too low IQ.
He's too low IQ to understand the proceedings if they were to have him sit there and stand there.
Listening to witness testimony, listening to arguments being made, and listening to the judgments made by a jury.
So there's no point, so they'll have to take an alternative route for justice in this case.
But really, what you're basically saying is that he has the intellectual equivalence of a mad dog, a rabid dog.
And similarly, as you wouldn't put a rabid dog on trial if it's mauled somebody, you wouldn't put this man on trial either.
In which case, I would argue well, what do you do with a rabid dog then?
When it has mauled somebody to death, you would put it down.
And I do think that capital punishment needs to be heavily considered for a situation like this.
It's open and closed, isn't it?
Yeah, it's open and closed.
We have the footage of him.
There is no point wasting taxpayer money on incarcerating this man in a mental facility for the rest of his life.
This shows, I'd say, a complete double standard when it comes to forward looking considerations for punishment, which is caring about the common good and public security.
Because I agree with you, it's a separate issue.
Whether he had a good understanding of it or whether he was mad.
But the most important thing is you have to protect society from people who are like that.
Whose rights are more important at this point?
Yeah, exactly.
Whose safety is more important at this point?
Yeah.
You're signaling to your own citizens and also to the rest of the world that you are a society that will rather protect the criminal rather than the victim.
And obviously, within society, that's corrosive.
Outside of our own society, across the world, that turns you into a laughing stock.
That means that other countries just see you as being completely weak.
And it also habituates people who are pronounced to be oppressed into not acting as responsible citizens.
And then this functions as a justification for hey, they're not responsible citizens.
I need to tax you more in order to give more benefits to them, in order to increase their freedom, the basic capabilities, make them more responsible.
Which essentially completely misses the point of habituation.
That's why you need.
Uh, law and order, basically.
Right.
So let me tell you in a nutshell what happened here.
Harry, you're correct.
Yes.
He was evaluated last December 29, a central regional hospital.
And the report said that he doesn't mean the, he doesn't meet the threshold for the legal criteria for competency, which has three factors.
A, ability to comprehend the charges that are leveled against him.
B, ability of him to understand his role in the court proceedings.
And C, ability to assist his defense in a rational manner.
It's fascinating, though, isn't it?
Because, I mean, the footage and the audio shows him doing it and him admitting to doing it after the fact.
So he clearly understands what he did.
Well, he understood in that moment, but they might just be making the argument I'm sorry, Your Honor, my client is a 15 second African and is no longer the same man who actually committed that crime because he's completely forgotten he even did it.
So let me just say again he isn't going to be released out in society.
The question is, where is he going to be held?
And it's important to remember that.
When he exited the train, the subway, he was detained and he was indicted on two levels of charges state charges and federal charges.
So at this point, he may be deemed as psychologically incapable of standing trial on a state level, but that doesn't mean that he won't be standing trial on the federal level.
It could be, but it doesn't have to be.
But what happened is that his defense asked for essentially half a year of.
Postponement for him to be deemed to be re evaluated, which might delay things when it comes to the federal court.
They're hoping people forget.
And the most.
It's a filibustering tactic.
It's just forget, just we're going to try and bide some time so people's anger dies down.
Yeah.
And I'll be brief here a bit.
Because we are talking about a career criminal, someone who has committed several crimes and has a history of crimes ever since his childhood.
And it's a bit suspicious that in the previous 14 trials that were made, he was deemed capable.
But now that harsher penalties were on the menu, he's seen as being incapable of standing trial.
Politicizing Justice for Voters00:06:37
Which suggests that there is a pattern of making.
Constant excuses for criminals who come from oppressed groups.
Let's see here.
This is Governor Roy Cooper, who was confronted by people who were asking him, Why did you have him on a list to release him?
And that's from even before.
He doesn't have any good answers.
Here we have now the symbolic aspect of this case, which shows that essentially the left wants to bury it and has a very deep animosity towards people who talk about this case, even her parents.
In his State of the Union address, Trump mentioned the parents of Irina Zarutska who were there, and the Republicans made a standing ovation for them.
They stood for them as a gesture of sympathy for her, and the Democrats refused to do so.
I support Ukraine, but not Ukrainian refugees that get killed.
It's whoever is.
Yeah, because apparently Ukrainian refugees aren't as oppressed as the Carlos Brown Jr. was.
Right, yeah.
I mean, it's just foolish, isn't it?
It's absolutely unfathomably evil.
It is unfathomably evil, absolutely.
At least they would have a basic level of decency and humanity to say, well, it's okay.
We can say all the narrative, you know, BS we're saying afterwards, but let us at least be courteous to the parents.
Let us just put this, even if it's an act.
Yeah, I mean, normal people would rightly say this isn't party political, but it is because it's their policies and their politics which have allowed it to occur.
So that's why they have to be political about it.
And it shows how the.
It's just disgusting.
And it shows how radical the Democrats have gotten because you could say that I can definitely think of a scenario where the Democrats would stand for her parents and then the Republicans will say, Yeah, you stand for that, but that's just an empty gesture.
Like, for instance, lighting the parliament with Ukraine's colors or whatever.
I can definitely think of that scenario, but they didn't do even that, which means that they think that their audience doesn't want them to do that because they have been completely radicalized and they have lost their party's.
The party to radicals, and here we have representative David Morales, who is from the Democrats.
He's saying that the mural for Irina Zarutska does not reflect his values and the values of the Democrats.
A fentanyl addict that's all good, mate.
Well, then you worry about it.
The translation is we don't care about white victims of crime, yeah, yeah, of course.
That is it, that's literally all it means.
Yeah, we've got to keep our client class, all right, we've got to keep our client class happy, that's all it is, and we don't want you to talk about it.
Because we will, and that's what they're doing essentially.
I think it's very simple to understand.
It's a very simple strategy.
They're dividing the population into several groups, they're ranking them in terms of who is more oppressed, and they're constantly saying that whoever's more oppressed needs to sort of be treated preferentially.
And when these groups are seen to be incompatible, because yeah, I mean, okay, you can't have Islamists and trans people together, right?
You can't have it.
When these incompatibilities become visible, The only way of holding incompatible groups together is by inventing a common enemy.
That's why we constantly hear about the far right.
And they constantly talk about far right, far right, far right, far right, extremist, extremist right.
But that's what they want.
And they don't like being reminded of data that suggests that their ideology is just completely insane and bad.
The facts are inconvenient.
Well, on that, and what Nate mentioned as well about them being a client group, is that.
He is probably thinking about his voter base, thinking, like, listen, there's probably a load of people in my voter base that actually sympathize with this guy who committed this because they just do hate white people and want to kill white people.
Also, there's a significant part of my voter base who, if they were in this situation, also probably would not be fit to stand trial because they would be too unintelligent or too mentally ill.
Bringing up the question, inevitably, of course, if he had never committed a single crime in his life, yet still had the same mental capacity that he did now, Why is he allowed to vote and yet is too stupid or mentally impaired to stand trial?
You're giving him one responsibility in one way, but then withholding any and all responsibility for his own actions in another situation.
But then again, a lot of people don't think that some of these populations are smart enough to be able to go out and get government issued ID.
And there is a disgusting non estate ideology behind this because, as you said, it keeps some people constantly into the position of not being agents.
Asks for more and more and more benefits to be given to them in order to make them agents.
But if they don't function as agents, they're constantly saying, Well, you haven't given enough.
So the solution for crime from the oppressed is to keep victimizing them and saying that it's evil whiteness.
Shame.
Yeah.
I'd be furious like this guy as well if they were taking down my mural.
That's awful.
Anyway, we did get two rumble rants.
Would you like to?
Yes, of course.
Your segment.
We've got a random name and cranky tax.
Yes, that's a random name.
Says, why are there a defense lawyer for people who are guilty without any doubt?
What's the purpose of that other than subverting justice?
Yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, you could say it's a misapplication of an even legal principle, but ultimately it results in just subverting justice, like you say.
I will say here that in some respects, it's an interesting thing of trying to establish to what degree they are responsible and then try to examine what led them to do this.
Headline Nudes and Sexualization00:05:19
But yeah, come on.
Whatever.
I'm not going to defend him.
Cranky Texan says if he went to trial, the whole world might see a jury of his peers refuse to convict him because of the racial solitary.
Solidarity.
Solidarity that the regime has promoted.
Maybe that's why they don't want a trial.
That could be part of it.
That could be.
Yeah, but you see, they are going to say, well, it's so symbolic.
We don't want this to be a trial because people are going to understand.
It might give everything else ammunition.
We don't want to promote it for the far right.
They love bringing that old one out.
Anyway, so on to the new phenomenon of the climate crisis for gooners.
Now, I thought that this was going to be a bit more of a fun segment to end the day on.
There is a little tinge of darkness to it, though, which we'll get onto.
But the first part is going to be somewhat fun because it's going to be talking about the bizarre phenomenon of OnlyFans models now being used by famous Hollywood director Adam McKay to try to explain the climate crisis to presumably young men gooning in their bedrooms all day.
It's a weird aspect of just like the increasing sexualization of everyday life, which of course also plays into the contradiction there that general culture and the way that things are advertised are becoming more and more sexual every day.
Where you have sites like OnlyFans advertising to young women that as soon as you can turn 18, you can become a porn star and make money and completely debase yourself, while at the same time in real life, people are having less and less sex.
So that's green propaganda for wankers.
You got it.
Right on the right.
Can we scroll down a little bit?
Well, do you want to see?
I was going to say she could.
Is this Bob?
I was going to say she could double up as Amelia.
No.
I don't see how.
No.
It's like Bob Hacker.
You can't put them together in the same style.
No, I.
I mean, she could.
No.
No.
She could.
This face.
Amelia's better.
Not with that face, just generally.
Let's not bring Amelia into the.
All right, let's not debase Amelia.
All right.
Sorry.
Come on.
Sorry.
Come on.
Amelia is, despite how she dresses, is a trad wife.
Probably.
And here's another image from the promotions here.
And I'll explain what this is in a moment.
So the article asks that, seeing as we need a genuine, genuine miracle to stop us all from sleepwalking into some kind of climate catastrophe, it asks, could that miracle be an environmental warning from a woman in her pants?
And this image here is supposed to be appealing to, I would assume, young men and empowered women to get them to pay attention to.
Climate crisis factoids.
Harry, what are you showing me?
Is this guy a dude on all fours with a pig mask?
He's supposed to.
With glass, and there's a woman dressed like the Pulp Fiction's Gimp there about to spank him?
Yes.
And this is all supposed to be explaining about how bankers, i.e., pigs, are.
Oh, it's supposed to be artsy.
It's supposed to be artsy explaining how bankers are making money through the climate crisis and funding efforts to stop climate and green initiatives.
That kind of stuff.
So, this is the state of desire of a new thing, a new program of shorts called Headline Nudes, N E W D S.
Oh, I see what they're doing there.
See, I got it.
There you go.
A new series of web videos by actor Megan Prescott, who I'll get into in a moment, not like that, filmmaker Brie Esrig, and climate narrative strategist Jessica Riches, released through the not for profit Yellow Dot Studios, which belongs to.
Adam McKay, creator of movies The Big Short and Don't Look Up, Headline Nudes is made up of bite sized videos in which the climate emergency is broken down and raunchily explained to us by a variety of OnlyFans models.
And so, what this is actually going off, if anybody has watched The Big Short, this seems to be going off of the scene in The Big Short that Adam McKay included, where there's the bit where Margot Robbie is in a bathtub explaining how mortgage backed securities work.
The plan seems to be how do you get Men in particular to pay attention to serious subjects.
Well, they're all goon brained these days, therefore you stick a sexy woman, and all for the sake of getting people to buy into climate alarmist narratives.
You know what would actually make men pay attention?
Especially in the Western world.
If they had people dressed as crusaders storming across the Middle East, waving a banner of climate change, that would at least, at the very least, prick up people's ears.
I mean, if you had based Instagram edits talking about it, then perhaps young men are.
What men really want.
This is a very strange thing.
Sidney Sweeney and TV Sleaze00:11:03
If there's a solution to it, I think it's Sidney Sweeney.
Because there's a category of posting, which is philosophy thirst posts.
Which I didn't start, but I hope I would have.
Philosophy.
Thirst posts.
Yeah, for instance, I've done some.
You throw Sidney Sweeney there and you put a quote by Philosopher.
You put Sidney Sweeney, everyone watches Sidney Sweeney, and then you put a quote by Plotinus or something.
Have you started doing this, have you?
I've done it twice.
It worked.
And this is what the hope, this is the affair that I'm sad to break it to you all, folks, but it seems that even the presenters of the Lotus Eaters are not immune to stooping so low as to the Classic marketers have to educate themselves.
And were the comments about the quote or were they about Sidney Sweeney?
Were you really educating people?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
What were the comments about?
Like, you know, Sunju is looking fine or Plotinus seems to.
So this doesn't say they didn't actually about the quote.
So they weren't educated then.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
You got their attention though.
Stelios engagement farming with Sidney Sweeney.
You got their engagement.
You can't blame me for that.
To be fair, that has worked.
For me, one time when David Lynch died, and I posted a picture of one of the stars of Twin Peaks and said, Oh God, he had great taste in women.
And it was like my biggest hit tweet in months.
That was a good tweet.
That was a good tweet.
And I have to say to Russian.
And I have to say to Russian, because Russian says that I'm trying to copy you, I'm not because I'm introducing philosophy into the mix.
Shots fired at Russian.
There you go.
No, I'm not firing at Russian.
You know, it's because he is the general commander of Operation Scatter.
So, you know, the alliance is a special one.
Well, he's in charge of the government program alongside Serco to put migrants near my house.
Not exactly, but those who know know.
All right.
So the Chinese.
And Russian knows.
Okay.
But if you want an example of what this is, they give a little description of the first episode, the launch episode called, and I can't believe I'm having to read this The Son is Daddy, in which Megan Prescott, one of the big creators of this, Slowly removes her clothes while explaining that solar energy could meet our global energy demands with less land than is being used by the fossil fuel industry.
Or, in her words, quote, Daddy is a giver.
You see, their rook is with title.
I would title it When the Sun Doesn't Shine.
Yeah, but that wouldn't be perverted enough, would it?
Like, all of this is about hijacking.
That would totally be perverted.
It's just like where the sun doesn't shine.
This is about hijacking goon brains for a really strange and niche audience of young men who are potentially going to be interested in climate activism, but need porn to tell them how to.
I'm sure they have an affinity towards the place where the sun doesn't shine.
I mean, maybe.
Maybe.
But this was interesting because I was like, right, who are these people behind this?
I know who Adam McKay is, but it says.
It says actress Megan Prescott.
And I go, okay, so.
Mattress actress.
Well, nowadays, yes.
But it turns out, for anybody who remembers mid 2000s British television, that she was one of the actors from the old television program Skins.
And sadly, there was quite a dark story behind all of this, which kind of goes to show where culture is right now.
Because the OnlyFans models selling climate alarmism for gooners is one thing, but then you've got to remember there are real people behind all of these, and you've got to wonder how these people get themselves into the situations that they find themselves in right now.
And I think this is kind of a warning for young people, especially alongside all of the other warnings that young people, in particular young women, should have about getting involved in television and all of the absolute sleazeballs who are involved in TV and movies.
Just don't do it, and if you're a parent, don't let your kids go near it.
And if you are a producer or anything involved in this kind of stuff, you do have a responsibility for the things that you make these people do.
Because, frankly, it will affect the rest of their lives as well.
Was this the promise that feminism.
Well, yeah.
Was this the ultimate end goal that feminists.
That's sad.
The promise of feminism seems to have turned into convincing women that they only make good decisions.
And then when they make bad decisions and get taken advantage of by people, because it really.
Puts people in a position to be taken advantage of, that they don't have to take responsibility for those decisions.
Nobody gets punished for it.
And then they can just go and promote that stuff to other people as well.
So I'll just read through some of this because this was really bizarre and disturbing.
So it says at 16 years old, she was starring in Skins, but by the age of 23, she was working as a stripper.
She sums up her decision to enter into sex work, as they deem it, first stripping, now OnlyFans, perfectly.
She said, I'm going to profit off of my body because you taught me.
That it was profitable.
That doesn't mean you should.
No, no, it doesn't mean that you should.
Just because you can doesn't mean you should.
But it does go to show how starring in this TV show gave her the complete wrong impression and, in fact, in the end, encouraged her to go further down a bad path that she was set on.
She was put on a bad choice road at a very young age, at 16 years old, taken advantage of really by producers and writers and directors who are more than happy to.
Put her into sex scenes in a TV show for teenagers when she was still a teenager.
And then she ends up kind of gaslighting herself into thinking that that's a perfectly normal thing to do and life choice to continue going down.
Just to add and maybe do a bit of a no jumping to your defense in presumably what the comments will be like, i.e., you're simping for her.
I'm not so.
I'm saying.
I'm going to defend.
No, no, no.
I'm saying that the comments.
Yeah, yeah.
Go on, go on.
I'm going to defend what the comments may suggest.
I'm not either.
This is why you need the lawyer.
All right.
I'm suggesting that actually, Harry's completely right here is that, you know, at that age, your frontal lobe's not developed.
You are not developed.
You cannot make these kind of life choices where you're entering into TV and media, putting yourself in raunchy positions at 16, where the majority of the country, because this was very, very popular at the time, the majority of the country are going to be fantasizing about you.
You do not have the agency.
The cognitive ability to make those choices, which will have ramifications throughout your life, and inevitably that would have affected her.
So, I know that there may be one or two simp comments, but at least view it from a genuine psychological perspective and biological perspective.
You're not developed at that point in time, it's not to remove all agency from her, of course not.
She's continued down the path, she could have educated herself, but that inevitably would have put her on a really, really bad footing.
Well, yeah, and she's continued to go down that.
I'll read about it in a moment.
But again, you are right.
She was too young and stupid to make good decisions for herself, which is why it fell on the people around her to really ward her off that path, which has not happened.
And now you have even more of a culture of this.
Because as it points out, it talks about the show Skins.
You may not remember this.
I never actually watched it, but I have seen bits of it because people I know watched it.
And it says here it was first aired 18 years ago, still relevant now as it was back then.
And it was praised for.
Highlighting the reality of teenage life.
Few of us come of age neatly.
Instead, as shown in Skins, we're messy.
We're not only clumsily experimenting with drugs and sex, but also new identities as we try to figure out the people we want to become.
So it was incredibly subversive.
And everybody that I knew who watched Skins at the age that we were supposed to watch it when you're a teenager was not actually put off by it.
Instead, they thought it was cool.
It was glamorizing these degenerate, self destructive lifestyles.
And people tried to copy it.
I know people who wouldn't have done those things otherwise, who, after being exposed to it, then tried to copy it.
So I would say the show was a complete failure if it was trying to warn people off it.
But again, she made stupid decisions, even though she goes on in this article to say, Oh, you know, I was taken advantage of and all the producers pushed me to do things that I didn't want to do.
She then goes on to say, Oh, I would have done anything to be on that show.
Brilliant.
Oh, great.
So you're still just looking back and going, Oh, but it so empowered me.
I was so good.
I'm still 100% glad that I was on it, but it's a weird one.
I was so insecure.
So it gave you issues.
It gave you big issues.
I'd only had a boyfriend that was my age, but the actor playing my boyfriend was very nice, but he was 30.
This was before there were intimacy coordinators, before Me Too.
No one had the language of, are you comfortable?
Do you want to talk about how this scene is going to go?
So she's still kind of going back and defending her choice to be in it, but then lumping everybody else with the responsibility for the bad choices that she made and the bad choice that was getting involved in the show in the first place.
While at the same time, yeah, that is a bit creepy.
That is a really weird situation to put people in, especially when they're teenagers.
You can see it with other programs as well.
Was this on the BBC, wasn't it?
I think so, yeah, yeah.
But it was like, what a surprise.
It's like Game of Thrones, right?
Sexualizing children on the BBC, huh?
I know.
But it's like Game of Thrones, for instance.
Maisie Williams is what, like 11 when she started that program?
And then by the time of the last series, they couldn't wait to get her into an awkward sex scene.
Yeah.
Girl, that you've been working with ever since she was a really young child, the second they turn 18, these TV producers are like, We got you now.
It's really, really creepy.
But the very thing that made the show stand out was held against Prescott when at 18 she was auditioning for other roles.
She said, I had a hard time getting any acting work because of the association.
So I ended up doing part time work and zero contract jobs.
And then she was working at Weatherspoons.
And then she decided eventually to start getting into stripping and OnlyFans because it's the only thing that she felt that she could do, which now she is, despite the fact it was obviously a really bad decision.
And she criticizes the show and the BBC for putting her in that position in the first place.
She's now going out and doing activism, promoting the reorientation of public attitudes towards sex work so that she can then encourage what?
Other young women or the young girls who are too stupid to know what a bad decision they're making to make the same stupid decisions that they were, that she did, under the name of empowerment.
Hyper Reality in 202400:11:04
Well, misery loves company, doesn't it?
Well, same as idiots making terrible decisions.
Crabs in a bucket, people being taken advantage of.
Yeah, I mean, it's just sad.
But the interesting.
It's a self fulfilling.
Self perpetuating, and the interesting thing is they try and say that oh, it's all for empowerment, but it's not really, it's not really because what's happened is you've gone from one pimp to another over and over and over again.
First, it was the BBC, then it was whoever was owning these strip clubs, and now, as a company, and now she's pimping herself out, yeah, really.
Well, actually, OnlyFans is making the money off of it.
Oh, well, yeah, if she's doing that sort of stuff, and she can say that she's trying to do it for herself, but actually, she's just making lots and lots and lots of money for billionaires, like this Forbes article.
Talks about how OnlyFans had been a money printing machine for its secretive billionaire owner, Leonid Radvinsky.
Investors were puzzled by an obscure debt fund's pitch to buy him out until they learned of his terminal cancer diagnosis.
Just to highlight here, the owner of OnlyFans, Leonid Radvinsky, a Ukrainian born individual, died a few weeks ago of cancer at the age of 43.
And if that doesn't seem like some kind of karmic divine retribution, I don't know what does.
But the interesting thing about this article, it talks about some of the history.
So there's a San Francisco based debt fund pulling together $5.5 billion for the sake of buying OnlyFans.
And what they're thinking of doing, it's a company called Architect, is as soon as they do, they've said that what they want to do is take it away from pornographic content.
They want it to be a PG place where you can connect with your favorite boxer or athlete, according to one of the investors who's involved.
In the proposal.
I mean, I'm not.
I mean, do it.
Genuinely do it.
I think it would be funny to see the fallout.
It will burn.
Oh, yeah.
So I'm pro doing it.
Definitely do it.
Listen to how much money it made in 2024 exploiting stupid young women and potentially your daughters, wives, mothers, right?
It generated $7.2 billion of revenue in 2024.
The company takes a 20% cut of every transaction, according to a British corporate filing.
And the funny thing is, They always call it a British company, and technically it is because it was started by a Brit, a guy called Tim Stokely.
But Leonard Radvinsky was the guy who bought it from him in 2018 and then pushed it into an adult content site, which was originally under Stokely not on the platform.
So it was originally just supposed to be something like Patreon.
You post videos, people can pay to see the videos directly.
The degenerate Ukrainian that.
Yeah.
This guy shows up and he goes, now it's a porn site.
And then, of course, during the pandemic, people are stuck at home.
They want to find ways of supplementing their incomes.
A load of people, because of the way that culture is now, they just shrug their shoulders and go, okay, that's what I'm doing now.
And the funny thing is, as well, a lot of these people, you know, these people are like, oh, I care about the climate.
They're probably very pro Gaza, they're probably pro Palestine, and such like that.
And they're like, I'm so empowered, I can use all of this money to do what I want and fund creative projects to make news about the climate emergency, yada, yada, yada.
When really, what you are actually doing, Was making money for Leonid Ravinsky, who was the largest donor to AIPAC in 2024 after he pledged $11 million to the Israel lobby.
So these people, they get sold on this idea of, I'm free, I'm empowered, I've been taken advantage of, but now I'm taking my own decisions back.
What we're actually doing is lining the pockets of a guy who is funding causes that you probably hate.
So these people are completely stupid and being completely taken advantage of.
How is.
And again, despite how sexualized literally everything is becoming, young people are having less actual sex with each other than ever.
How is pornographic material allowed under Judaism?
That's a good question.
Is that not?
I mean, I don't care about Judaism enough to do any research on it, but that seems a bit counterintuitive to.
It's strange.
But then again, there's also.
Doesn't seem very kosher.
There's also the effect that all of this has on young men.
And there was an interesting article.
I read Roreg Nationalist, friend of the show, of course, read his recent book, The Last Men, that referenced this kind of situation.
And he wrote an article that's included on InfoWars here, talking about the Hikiko Mori phenomenon.
Are you aware of this?
So, the Hikikomori is a situation in Japan where anywhere between estimates vary, but anywhere between about 1 and 10 million men, varying in age, below 40, over 40, have just completely retreated from society.
Oh, yeah, no, I do know about that.
They've completely retreated from society.
They are secluded.
They've become recluses, like hermit.
Yeah, they live in a room.
They never go outside.
They have all of their food delivered to them.
And this is related to low.
Testosterone.
But also, this is because increasingly people are able to completely detach themselves from reality and permanently live in a hyper reality.
They can set all at home playing video games, eating junk food, as Ren points out here, watching anime cartoons and pornography.
So they can completely substitute any kind of social life they have.
And through the use of pornography, now with OnlyFans girls, soon enough it'll probably be with AI chatbots and such.
So the OnlyFans girls are also going to get replaced by automation, amusingly enough.
I mean, modern day society is not made, it's not built for masculinity in general.
You know, we are men as a biological phenomenon and not, we're not being served in a modern society under any stretch at all.
And then there's the terrible food that people eat.
Every.
Literally everything is catered to destroying.
Everything is an endocrine disaster.
Biology.
Now everything is estrogenic.
Yeah.
And so.
They go down.
They eat that animal fat.
It's like.
Yeah.
Okay, brilliant.
I won't eat the building blocks of testosterone.
No, don't you worry about that.
Actually, I think I will, aren't I?
Just as much red meat and steak as I like.
I think I'll slap some butter on my dinner.
So young men are affected not only because it gives them an alternative to actually forming real life relationships and getting sexual pleasure.
They don't actually have to go out and meet women and have sex anymore.
They can just watch porn all day if they want.
But also, they look around in the kind of black pilled manner that you see with guys like Clav.
Your favorite, your greatest.
Just why can't people be normal?
Just stop it.
Stop being a thing.
Close it for a while and just go out and meet people and talk to women.
Society doesn't want you to be normal.
They're making gooning material for climate activism now.
I know that there are people trying to take advantage of my stupidity.
That doesn't mean I should be stupid.
No, that's.
That doesn't put them off the hook.
Well, that's.
Don't get me wrong.
I'm saying people should take responsibility for themselves.
Just my dudes, you have a life to seize.
Seize it.
That's right.
People have a responsibility for themselves, but also the people pushing this poison also need to be held responsible for what they're spreading across society.
Grab the bull by the horns.
Yeah, that's right.
But as I was saying, with like Clav and those guys, they're looking at the state of women as well.
And they're going like, well, any of these girls at any point might just make the decision that they want to be a bitch and they might want to go off and do OnlyFans or something like that.
That's a very black pilled view of the world, but it does influence men's behavior as well, which is why you're getting things like looks maxing.
So men are in control of their ability to even fund that lifestyle.
So if men just woke up one day and just realized that that's degenerate, absolute nonsense.
OnlyFans just simply wouldn't exist.
No, exactly.
There's dual responsibility here all the way around.
Guys, I'm not disagreeing with you.
I'm agreeing with you.
I just want to illustrate the issue of degrees.
So I do agree with you.
There are these problems.
I don't know to what extent, though, we are also in the sphere and online.
And to a very large extent, our own perspective can be sometimes distorted by what we are bombarded with.
And what I want to say, which may show some light at the end of the tunnel.
Is that it seems to me that people focus disproportionately on outliers.
So, for instance, clavicular.
He just, he isn't, yeah, he's extreme and all stupid and stuff.
He's also marketed to people.
Exactly.
I don't think he is representative of the average zoomer.
Oh, no, he's like, he's 1% of the.
Yeah.
Oh, no.
Also, Bonnie Blue and the other slag, Lily Phillips, they're not indicative of the average woman.
But there are people who want to, who may want to profit. from the idea that they are.
No, of course.
I'm just saying.
I agree.
I agree.
There's a hyper reality that is formed through exposure to the internet, but also everybody is drawn into that hyper reality because that's.
They are millionaires because there is a large.
They're disgusting.
Even though they're outliers in female groups, there is a large portion of men that are funding their lifestyles.
So if men took some responsibility for their behavior, which, you know, I'm not.
Men, that's not the point, but still, lonely fans, as I call it, wouldn't exist without men, right?
It just fundamentally wouldn't exist.
It's like a drug dealer wouldn't exist without drug addicts.
No, of course.
But also, again.
I mean, there are a syllabus, self perpetuate.
You've got.
You also have to put responsibility and consequences on the people pushing you.
Oh, absolutely.
Yeah, now.
I know you're not disagreeing with that.
Of course, of course.
Either way, I just thought it was an interesting little look into where society is taking us down and the effects.
On women who are being taken advantage of at a young age before they're really intelligent or developed enough to be making proper decisions for themselves, and also the way it's affecting men who are increasingly a large portion of them secluding themselves away from society because they have these alternatives to real life interaction and because they don't see the world as providing them anything that they need either.
So, yeah, I thought it would be the fun segment, it wasn't.
Cat Burglary and Rats in Walls00:03:09
Sorry, folks, but that's all.
Let's get on to the rumble rats.
I thought it was gonna be funny, but yeah, I understand it.
Yeah, and it's not a fun segment.
My segment on knife crime was funner than that.
Yeah, it actually was.
Random name asking what kind of people the Game of Thrones showrunners were.
Oh, yes, the pattern repeats.
Yes, yes, we're well aware of that.
Again, it was just weird.
Imagine you cast the show and you're going for young characters and you need young actors and you need like an 11 year old to play a young girl.
And you're like, okay, and then you work with this girl.
As she's getting older, you kind of act as a mentor or father figure or something.
And then as soon as they hit 18, you're like, right, get your clothes off.
Time to get them out, love.
That's just disturbing.
That's a random name.
Honestly, to me, all of this degeneracy is a blessing in disguise.
It's never been easier to find a person of high moral character.
Yeah, potentially.
Good for you.
I'm still struggling.
Yeah.
Anyway, do we have, it looks like we have quite a few video comments.
So let's go through those right now.
Brilliant.
This is riveted.
Right.
Okay.
Here we go.
There we go.
What?
Lotus Eaters say hello to Peter Purrer.
That's sweet.
Premier Banana Cat.
And near Charlotte, I guess.
I love them.
Nice cuts.
I love them.
Very sweet.
On Tuesday, not one, but two cats broke into my house completely separately.
Might say you were cat burgled.
Twice over, apparently.
Way.
The police have no answer to this problem.
So I was going out of the house on Tuesday morning, just very early.
A cat was walking past us.
I opened the door, stopped for a second, looked past me, and then just ran straight into my house.
And then immediately regretted it and hid behind the sofa.
And I heard very frightened meows coming from behind me until we had to get the owner to come around and get her out.
And then later on, after I've put my daughter to bed, me and the missus are sat on the sofa talking.
And we started scratching at the walls.
And we're like, Bloody hell, what's going on?
Have we got like rats in the walls or something?
And then out again from behind the sofa pops another different cat that immediately.
How are they getting into your fucking house?
I don't know.
Just manifested.
I don't know.
We had all the windows and doors.
Cats always find a way.
Yeah, we had all the windows and doors closed for a while as well.
So it must have been behind there for hours.
And it immediately comes out and gives me a look like, well, you're going to let me out then, Chip?
Amazing.
So I just was like, all right, get off with it.
They're northern cats.
They're cheeky.
Yeah, they really are.
Anyway.
You see Mr. Power?
Shh!
I love gold.
Ceasefire Hopes and Patronage Networks00:09:27
Well, he was Middle Eastern.
The pension relative to inflation and the cost of living is basically diverged.
So we will be able to answer that in a second.
Just sort of to your point.
I forgot what I was going to say.
We can come back to it.
I hate when that happens, it does happen too often.
So I drew a Jedi sag on facing up Darth Harry.
Yeah, that's it.
I'm looking forward to seeing you Saturday.
Oh, great.
I didn't know you were going to be there.
That would be awesome.
And yeah, like in the Star Wars films, the Sith are the good guys.
So, for all of you wonderful folks out there, I'm going to BTFO Carl.
We've got another theme, baby.
This guy.
Yeah, I've had to get up at 4 in the morning to start the building.
How are they?
Six.
Yeah, I know, yeah.
Beautiful.
Just makes you proud to be British looking at that, doesn't it?
At the new year, I was watching the uprisings develop in Iran with 2CTV, a great source of information.
I was messaging with some Iranian friends who were cheering for Trump to get involved and mentioned to one friend that, to make the situation play out advantageously, all Israel had to do was keep quiet.
Obviously, they couldn't, and that's why I think everyone turned against Trump with Iran being so truculent.
I hope this latest ceasefire proves productive.
And Trump pulls off his next Venezuela and possible Cuba.
This could really strip China of political assets.
Well, they've already broke the ceasefire, so I don't think it really matters, to be honest.
Have they?
Was that with Lebanon?
Yeah, it's like bombings today.
Yeah, well, still, I do, for the sake of peace and for the sake of not wanting people to die, I do hope that the ceasefire and the talks and negotiations are productive as well.
Let's go through the website comments then.
Do you want to read through some of yours?
Oh, wait, this is the first ones are for Stelios' segment, but we'll go down to yours first.
Cool.
Tizzy Tizzle, brilliant.
The Home Office is determined to cut stabbing victims in half by 2027.
Lol.
Count Dankula is Athenian.
It says For millennia, it was common for basically everyone in Britain to carry a knife around with them.
Thief taker General Jonathan Wilde was slashed in the neck while interrogating a suspect in court as the possession of a knife. Was considered so normal it hadn't been confiscated.
Yet, with all of this, there has been no stabbing epidemics like what we have now in London.
I wonder what has changed in recent years to have caused this.
Yeah.
Well, yeah, I wonder, mate.
Sophie Liv says, just out of curiosity, as I'm coming to England tomorrow, do I need to bring a battle axe or how does this work?
I wouldn't.
Yeah, don't bring a battle axe.
Probably not going to get let in, I'm afraid.
Don't try and sneak it through customs.
HM Butterknife Permit Registry.
Says Nate, don't you're welcome.
We're looking to regulate trees next to combat paper cut crime.
Amazing, that's a good point.
They're just going to deforest the entire country, it'll be better for the wind farms anyway.
Sophie Liv, who always tries to trick me, if you're too mentally ill to stand trial, you're too mentally ill to be a normal society.
Spot on, Kevin Fox has answered your thing about the yeah, yeah, we'll get there.
We'll get there.
Omar Wad said, Irena's.
Irina's killer doesn't exactly look like a savvy little saver, and not all of these lawyers can be working pro bono.
It makes me wonder at how many patronage networks are involved with keeping dangerous lunatics on the street.
Yeah, it's so disgusting to think that every now and then there are criminals who just have massive fundraising behind them.
Patronage networks?
A lot of them.
Sadly, a lot of them.
Again, Omar Awad agrees with Sophie if his incompetent stand trial, while it definitely should be an aggravating factor.
I think it's even more damning of the people that let him roam free.
It's like a bomb disposal expert handing out unexplored ordinance.
It might not go off, but it would be criminally negligent.
This is the bane of activist judges.
Kevin Fox says, Stelios, MMIW plus missing and murdered indigenous women and girls, 2S to spirit, LGB, lesbian, gay, bisexual, T transgender, queer, questioning, intersexual, asexual, everything not covered above.
Including MAP minor attracted persons.
Why?
What?
Missing and murdered indigenous women and girls.
How is that?
They might have been gay.
I was going to say, is that anything?
Harry, keep up with the Times.
They might have.
Keep up with the Times.
They might have been gay.
They might be missing because they ran off together.
Annie Moss.
Women and girls, and they were pedos.
Oh.
Annie Moss says the federal government indicted the perp who killed Irina in October for violence against a railroad carrier and a mass transportation system resulting in death with a notice of special findings, meaning they could give the perp the death penalty.
I trust the feds more than the state that let the evil perp out many other times.
Yeah.
Depends on the always depends on the state, and yeah, one time I'm going to actually be rooting for the Fed on this in that case if they're going to give him the capital punishment.
Arizona, there's a rat in the U.S. Words, the words accused and allegedly are often used and used before the trial to avoid any possible legal fallout that could occur after a not guilty verdict.
The Kyle Rittenhouse trial is a good example of this, yeah, agree with you, and that's why I said probably they're doing it for legal reasons.
I don't know how you could find a man who's caught on camera doing it.
Tizzy Tizzle, people must stop using the term porn star or OnlyFans models as these are intended to glamorize and legitimize this industry to women.
The correct language is internet whore.
That's absolutely correct, and thank you for holding me accountable for that.
Jan Havi, this might sound judgmental, but I can't think of anyone less qualified to talk about climate science than OnlyFans models.
I'll also add the addendum there internet whores, I agree.
But, you know, they're so empowered, who's stopping them?
Omar Awad, the gooning tactic might be working as IQs are dropping, and it probably works on exactly the people that are bringing down the internet.
Average, who are exactly the sort of people who need to be involved in climate activism.
You're right there, Omar.
Michael Drebelbus, gooning for the environment, so a public toss off protest.
Gonna have to avoid the protest site that day.
Good point, good point.
Diogenes Nuts, the man with the name most relevant to this segment.
Al Gore couldn't convince millennial teens to care about global warming for the same reason this won't work either.
If it gets warmer and sea levels rise, that means more beaches and longer summers, my 14 year old ass.
Started burning recyclables to see more women in bikinis year round.
So, actually, the Guna tactic might go the opposite way.
You're right.
I couldn't wait for the ice caps to melt and beachfronts to move closer to Midwestern towns.
And then the rest of the comment is cut off.
Someone online, solar panel companies are destroying large swaths of important wildlands in my state, fields that support endangered birds like the short eared owls, while also catering to pollinators like bees and butterflies.
I hate them so much.
And for the record, my state gets hardly any sun.
And also, people talk about China.
It massively benefits China because I only just learned today that China produces and manufactures 92% of the solar panels in the world and about 84% of wind turbines.
Yeah, and you also need oil for the wind turbines as well.
Yeah.
You still need fossil fuels anyway.
And Arizona Desert Rat, tell me you know nothing about the amount of land solar farms take up without telling me you know nothing about the amount of land solar farms take up.
In Arizona, there have been several movements calling foul on solar farms, destroying normal farms.
Now the panels are getting set up on top of parking garages, over parking lots, playgrounds, and water canals, places we want shade.
This is all true.
And again, as was pointed out by Jan Havi, you can't expect much from internet whores on a subject like this, which is why it's all the more bizarre that.
A Hollywood director would be wanting to be involved in all of this in the first place while also promoting degeneracy to everybody.
What a surprise, right?
Imagine you have a climate conference in a porta potty party.
A porta potty party?
I don't know what I'm talking about.
I actually don't.
I'll tell you afterwards.
He's going to tell me afterwards.
I'm about to lose what little innocence I have left, folks.
I don't want to know.
Yeah.
And on that note, thank you, Nate, for joining us.
Go and check out the state of politics.
And thank you, Stelios, for joining us.
If you don't have a ticket yet, get a ticket for the Swindon Lotus Eaters Live this Saturday, 7 till 10.