The Lotus Eaters hosts Dan and Harry dissect Restore Britain, a new party with 60,000 members in days, led by Rupert Lowe, who demands mass deportations of illegal migrants from Albania, Pakistan, Somalia, and others, closing visas, banning the burka, halal/kosher slaughter, and restricting benefits to British citizens only. They contrast this with Reform UK’s cautious "boomer vote" strategy, mocking Matt Goodwin’s use of "racism" while citing grooming gang cases tied to immigration. The episode also attacks lab-grown meat—backed by Mr. Beast and Upside Foods, an Indian-led biotech firm—as a Rockefeller Foundation-engineered health threat, dismissing it as inferior to natural meat despite claims of identical taste. Ultimately, they frame both policies as elite-driven attempts to undermine British identity, culture, and autonomy. [Automatically generated summary]
And welcome to Podcast of the Lotus Eaters episode 1356 on Tuesday the 17th of February, year of our Lord 2026.
I'm joined by Harry.
Hello.
And also special guest Josh.
Hello.
So we're going to be talking about Restore Britain.
Apparently you have some policies.
We're going to find out about them.
Sorry if you're a bit oversaturated.
I know yesterday you guys talked about the policy for an hour.
No, we can have more.
We can have more.
The restoring must continue.
Well, it's nice to have some hope for a change in the country.
So I hope you'll forgive us for doing one segment today after a full podcast yesterday.
This is kind of a good news podcast.
Yeah.
Really, because you're talking about restore.
You're talking about how the word doesn't have as much power as it used to.
Yes.
And I'm using that word.
I'm talking about how beef's back on the menu, boys.
Well, that sounds good.
And also, I don't need to talk with the other two segments because Harry did it.
So perfect.
Nailed it.
We can go straight into reforming.
Reforming?
Yes.
No.
Restoring.
Oh, no.
We're already off the rails, boys.
Why do they all have to begin with RE?
I mean, do you also notice that they all are different shades of blue as well?
Very, yeah.
You've got the restore blue as well.
Yeah, that's the blue on screen right there.
So you've got the navy blue for restore.
You've got the Tory blue, and you've got the teal blue for reform.
So right-wingers have a choice of which blue they're voting for.
So I do actually like the word restore.
That is the right word.
But they all begin with RE.
I should have gone with a magisterial purple, which would also suit our branding as well.
And, you know, it'd be a good time.
I'm going to start a new party called the Reservatives.
I don't know what we stand for or what our policies are.
I just need to stick with the theming.
Anyway, it's really throwing me off.
So Restore Britain launched as a party only on Friday, and it has emerged that they've got 50,000 members already.
And from this announcement, a mere 24 hours later, they had 60,000 members, which puts them on par with the Liberal Democrats, who, as we know, are a well-established party, does well electorally.
And so if their membership and their polling, which as we can see here, the first poll that has been done suggests that they would get 10%, which again is on par with the Liberal Democrats.
But they only launched less than a week ago.
So there is a lot of space for them to climb up to challenge maybe reform Labour, the Tories, the Greens, whoever it might be in whichever constituency.
Although I'm not sure they're contesting everyone, we'll still need to see about that.
But I thought it'd be interesting to look at, well, what are they actually putting forward?
What do they believe?
And what are their policies?
And so that is what I'm going to do today.
And of course, they have explicitly said immigration is front and center of all of their policies, which makes perfect sense.
Yes, it is the main problem that Britain is facing at the minute.
And if you solve it, it is like a fix everything switch.
If you press it, the world just gets better.
It's wonderful.
It's that easy.
Of course, there are lots of other things that are wrong as well.
But this is the main one.
And I wanted to read through what they're actually proposing.
They do have a website, but Rupert's posts are actually the most useful because, of course, they've only just launched.
And so they're not going to have the most comprehensive policy platform going.
However, I'm sure that's going to continue.
And they did write up the paper on mass deportation.
We'll be getting to that.
Don't worry.
But yes, if you need any help writing policy, I'm available.
But he starts with this.
Illegal migrants gone.
All of them, without apology, every man, every woman, maybe every child.
He doesn't say that.
They will all be deported.
We have released the most comprehensive deportation policy ever produced in Britain, 100 pages of detailed steps to remove every single illegal migrant living in our country.
And in fact, there it is.
I think I meant to link our segment we did about it, but it's not there.
But we did have Harrison on the show and he talked about it.
And so if you want to find the summary, you just need to look on YouTube.
But the full document is also there.
And he carries on saying, This is step one.
These miscreants are the priority.
The sex pests will be removed.
The hotels will be closed.
The flights will begin.
I promise you that.
Legal migration, foreseeable future far.
More people will leave than enter.
Entire visa routes will be closed off from certain countries that are proven to supply us with sex pests, criminals, illegals, Islamists, and the rest.
This is vital.
And then he lists specifically Albania, Pakistan, Somalia, Eritrea, Afghanistan, which are some of the big ones really.
And I like to see this.
We will discriminate.
It's about time people actually say that.
And then he carries on to say, we must understand that legal immigration has done far more damage to Britain than illegal immigration, which is correct.
We've been pointing this out for a long time now.
It says, if a foreign national is entirely unable to speak English, then they will be asked to leave.
How can someone contribute if they cannot communicate?
A foreigner claiming benefits and living in social housing, again, they'll be asked to leave.
And so this is basically all the sorts of things we've been talking about.
Obviously, criminals gone.
Get rid of extremists as well.
He mentions Islamists.
Dual nationals will have their citizenship stripped and deported.
If an individual surrenders his second citizenship in an attempt to fraudulently remain in Britain, we will take the necessary steps to reverse the process and deport them.
Indefinite leave to remain will be abolished in its entirety.
The Boris wave will be reversed.
To my ears.
That's a great promise.
That's a big promise.
It is.
Millions of people gone.
If a country refuses to accept their deported citizens, we will threaten them.
Foreign aid, visas, remittances, and more.
Push to work with the Americans and others.
A deportation, NATO, do it once hard enough, and it won't have to be done again.
Third-party schemes like Rwanda are key.
It means that if we cannot ascertain where a foreign national is from, for whatever reason, they go to Rwanda.
I hear it's lovely this time of year.
I like the sark in there as well.
Paul Kagame is always interested in striking up a new deal as well.
Yeah, people think the art of the deal is synonymous with Donald Trump.
It's not actually.
It's Paul Kagame because he has played the West like a fiddle.
Has he had to do anything other than build one unused detention centre?
He's got a lot of money for a lot of nothing.
And even if Rwandans say no, just drive a ship round to the lawless bit of Somalia and just drop them off.
That's a hell of a disincentive for them to come here in the first place.
Russia capture pirates for them.
I mean, if they're not going to go home with their own rewill and they're not going to tell us where they're from and they're just pretending not to speak English or any other language, just drop them off in Somalia or Madagascar or something.
Pick like an Antarctic.
Incentives and Disincentives00:10:23
Perhaps.
Yeah, let's send you up.
Yeah.
You know.
Or the Northwest Passage.
Find the Northwest.
Well, we've already found it, but find another.
Rules and fees around spouse visas will be eased for individuals from non-red list countries, so basically Europe and North America.
Fraud will be brutally crushed, but hard-working British men and women have every right to bring their foreign spouse to Britain and raise a family, just so long as they're not on the red list.
So, Dan, your kind of preferred fit woman in migration is essentially what's being gestured to there.
Right, okay, fine.
It's originally the Addi G policy, but I mean, as long as we had his moments, right?
As long as we let the fit runs in, I'm happy.
So, what do we think of this?
I know it's a bit of a stupid question because, yes, absolutely bloody marvellous, sir.
Bloody marvellous.
Do you like it, Harry?
I think it's huge promises, and the promises are all fantastic.
It's following through.
If you are able to attain power, it's making sure that you've not diluted yourself on the process of gaining power so that none of this happens.
So, if they can follow through, incredible.
I'm always, even though it's only a few days, I'm always going to be the one killjoy in the room being just a little bit more reserved.
Well, that is true.
That, you know, making assertions doesn't necessarily mean it's going to happen for certain.
The world's a lot more complicated.
Of all of the politicians out there, though, in British politics, like Rutlow is the one who seems to actually have some proper follow-through.
Yeah, well, I'm conviction.
I at least believe he's presenting what he wants to do honestly and has every intention of doing it as well.
And he's surrounded by good chaps who are on side.
Yeah.
It's basically the Lotus Eaters party.
I mean, most of his staff have been on the Lotus Eaters at one point.
I mean, one of them was staff.
One of them is almost staff.
I mean, we're not going to get any better than this.
No, I agree.
So, another thing that he put out recently, which is interesting, I might have to use some euphemism for YouTube.
But it says, Restore Britain will not pretend that a man wearing a dress is a woman.
We're just not going to do that.
We'll not deny biological reality.
We'll not indulge this madness.
Men will be banned from women's sport, categorically and absolutely, obviously.
Yes.
Women's private spaces will be protected.
They'll be prosecuted, I imagine, if they enter it.
Biological men will not be placed in women's prisons under any circumstances.
It'd also be nice to see at some point banning female prison guards from male prisons as well, because we've seen what they've been up to, and it's not good.
Yeah.
It says any teacher or medical professional pushing the idea will be sacked and prosecuted.
Any doctor found to have given them surgery or puberty blockers will be struck off and put in prison.
And it will be, it says the vile flag will be banned from public sector buildings, especially schools.
I don't know which one he means here.
I presume the trans one.
What was it?
Like the inclusivity flag or whatever they're calling it these days.
Oh, the one that's got the little chevron with black and brown on as well.
And I love that everyone who's been looking at these policies and saying, oh, they're so extreme.
So what you're saying is people who hate us and want to kill us and rape us can't come here and we can't mutilate children anymore.
And this is where we've got to in Britain today.
This is where Alex Phillips is like in apoplectic rage on talk TV.
Things maybe 10 or 15 years ago people would have just thought normal.
That yes, we don't keep people who have committed crimes and that drains.
Everything that you've said so far was just absolute baseline normal until very recently.
And so it is truly a restoration of what is ultimately common sense.
And okay, this was a good one.
I was very happy to see this was that if someone breaks into your home, Restore Britain will make sure that you are able to use whatever force you deem necessary to protect yourself and your family, which has been a long time coming.
We've seen cases where an old man stabbed a home invader with a screwdriver, I think it was, and he got a pin knife.
There have been a few instances.
So every variation, I imagine.
And yeah, it's just favoring the criminals, isn't it?
I'm sorry, but you forfeit your life if you break into my home.
Again, that used to be just normal.
And it would be a good disincentive for people doing it in the first place if they're playing with their life.
And another one as well that was a pleasant surprise is he's talking about banning the Burker and the Nikab and things like that.
I think he also spoke about halal slaughter as well.
Halal and Kosher.
Halal and kosher both to be banned, which is very welcome.
It's not humane in the slightest.
I've seen some of the videos of how it's done and it's barbaric.
And of course, as Lowe rightly points out, we should be enforcing our own moral standards, which are higher than that.
And I think that that's fair.
And if we move on to the economy, this is on their website.
And some of the things are just Rupert Lowe saying stuff, which I think will become policy.
But they've just set up a party, so they haven't written it out on their website.
But I thought that this was interesting.
This was from August of 2025.
Scrap the IR 35, which treats contractors like employees for tax purposes without any of the rights.
That's a good idea.
I like that especially.
A bullish inheritance tax, which is obvious.
Like, yes, it's already taxed money.
Worst tax.
It's stealing pennies from dead people's eyes.
It's such a horrible tax because you need to, as soon as your loved one dies, you then need to start itemizing everything they own, working out the value.
And you're doing this while you're dealing with the fact that you've just lost somebody close to you.
It could be a partner.
It could be a parent.
It could be a I mean, it could even be a child if you're an older person and the child has got some assets.
You've got to itemize everything while you're planning their funeral, while you're getting over it, and then start negotiating with the tax office.
It's just an evil tax.
And also, just on a broader philosophical and psychological level, it's the government laying claim to everything that you own and basically suggesting you are only loaning this whilst you're alive.
And once you're dead, it returns to us.
Yeah, it's one of the most egregious taxes, and all of them are egregious, but this one in particular.
lowest corporation tax in europe so this i think the idea is be competitive and try and attract business from europe within the block and we know it works because this is what ireland did for years and years and years and And everyone relocated to Ireland.
Yeah, all the Googles and Amazons, they all moved their head offices to Ireland.
So it obviously works.
And the only reason Ireland stopped doing it is because of the EU nonsense.
So it's an obvious policy.
Also, the US as well, lots of it based there because they have lower corporation tax in many areas.
And then tax remittances.
Remittances are money sent abroad by people working, usually to their foreign families.
So it's a tax on foreigners sending money out of the country, basically.
Don't know why this hasn't been implemented already.
You can tax dead people, but you can't tax foreigners, apparently.
This is a good point.
The government, especially Labour, are always trying to come up with new ways to fill whatever fiscal black hole that they've just found behind the back of the SETI.
But they never consider this.
It's always, all right, we're going to have to destroy the farmers in Britain just so that we can make up, what was it, 500, half a day or a day's worth of NHS spending.
But the absolute travesty that is remittances using this country as a farm for money elsewhere in the in the world.
Just overlook that.
I heard the maddest one recently.
So the parachute regiment, in order to save money, they're having their parachutes taken away.
And then they were going to do it for all of them.
And then there was sufficient pushback, the government said, okay, half of you can have parachutes.
Well, the other half goes splat.
Well, no, I think I guess you've got to share a parachute, you know.
Can't all just get it.
Just hold on real tight.
I mean, it might be that, but I think it's because there's one power and two power and only one of them is going to be allowed to have parachutes anymore.
Silly.
They're either one's there for morals.
Or they go splat.
I don't know the details of how they're going to do it.
Yeah, the underfunding of our military is why we don't have much hard power anymore.
But how much money is sent?
Again, how much money is sent out of the country every single year is too much.
Anything is too much.
And also, of course, as he suggested with, you know, potentially deporting people to hostile foreign countries who don't want to accept them, just blocking any and all remittances going back to that country can be a great incentive for them to take these people.
Anything on the red coast is blocked.
You've always got to be concerned that these countries that you're sending these people back to are just going to say no.
A decent portion of India's GDP is through remittances.
So they're obviously going to have to play ball if we do go down that route.
So social benefits for Brits only, that's a good start.
Obviously, the welfare system is horrifying behemoth that needs to be tamed, but it is a decent start.
In terms of elections and democracy, the main thing they've got there is abolish mass postal voting.
We've seen how that works out in the United States, and it's not good.
It just causes unnecessary problems.
Media and institutions here, they talk about defunding the BBC and they talk in particular about people being prosecuted for not paying their license fee.
I don't pay my license fee.
The only way they could make that better is to start subsidising the other BBC.
Bowes Breakfast Club.
Oh, right.
You had me for a second there, Dan.
So here they have...
Personally, I think the BBC historically could be turned back into a great institution, but you would just need to reform it back up again and just drag everybody out and then put your own people back in.
Hosepipe Ban Blues00:03:37
I mean, that just makes sense.
And, of course, a lot of laxity with the license fee is also good.
I don't pay it either because I don't use it.
I don't watch television.
It's bad for you.
My mum was right all along.
My eyes went square too long ago.
I can see that, yeah.
So they talk about restoring the high street, and they specifically mention barbers, vape shops, dessert cafes and phone repair shops, which are all, of course, you know, a type of business that is prone to being a front for organised crime and money laundering.
Not all of them, of course.
People do need haircuts to smoke and eat desserts and repair their phones.
Not all of them, merely the vast majority of them.
I would say so.
I did see one in Swindon itself, just off of Manchester Road, otherwise known as Little Pakistan, which was kind of doubling up.
It was unfair on all the others, really, because it was a barbershop and a vape shop at the same time.
And that's just ridiculous.
You're taking it all for yourselves.
How much gear are you moving through there?
Do you want some fruity air with your skin fader?
They're not going to say it like that, though, are they?
And then foreign policy, they've got scrap foreign aid.
I agree with that.
Don't give free money to anyone, let alone foreign countries that are ungrateful for it as well.
And then the final one I wanted to mention was no more hose pipe bans and to automate the tube.
I love the hosepipe one.
I do love that because I get a hosepipe ban in my area every bloody summer for the entire period when I might actually want to use a hose pipe.
Despite the fact that on a year like this year, it's rained every single day so far.
And the announcement is almost the same.
Due to uncommon weather or something like that.
For the last seven or eight years, it's been uncommon weather.
No, build a bloody reservoir.
That's what I'm saying.
Water is not rare.
It falls from the sky.
It's about as abundant.
It's about 70% of the planet is water.
So much so that the streets of Swindon actually have pools of water on them because of how bad the infrastructure is.
Well, the funny one for me is whenever there's a hosepipe ban in my area in summer, when it's just it will always come after a big rainy spell, and I'll hear that there's a hosepipe ban and I'll walk by the local river, which will have burst its banks.
But Harry, those rivers are meant for sewage.
Oh, I'm sorry.
Somebody in the chat doesn't know what a hosepipe ban is.
You know those things that you attach, those tube-y things that you attach to the outdoor water pipe and then use it to water your garden water, yeah.
Every summer that gets banned in this country because we haven't built a new reservoir since 1991, despite increasing the population by 30 million.
And then I thought automating the tube was a good idea because, you know, each driver is expensive and half the time they're striking or doing something annoying or not turning up or they could have done that for you 25 years ago.
In the meantime, Elon Musk has automated literally cars, let alone something on a track.
Yeah, I mean, my Hornby train set when I was a kid, you know, the electricity went around, it was in a circuit, a circle.
It's quite easy to do that, you know?
Just program it to stop in the right places.
But yes, that is the extant policies so far.
I imagine that they're going to be coming out with lots more in the coming weeks and months once they've rightly established themselves.
But I wanted to give it a brief overview so everyone knows what they're actually getting in for.
Racism's Long Shadow00:16:19
Excellent.
Thank you, sir.
Right.
So, no, we'll just wait for the tabs to update.
Here we go.
So, first of all, before I get into my segment, I just wanted to say go and join Restore, because there's probably, they've apparently got 60,000 people, you said, in your segment.
They've got 60,000 people signed up.
I think about, you know, a good 60,000 people are probably going to watch this segment.
And are all of you signed up?
Because that is a kind of minimum standard.
Not that, you know, we're impartial here.
I'm not pushing anything.
But go and sign up to Restore.
What I actually wanted to talk about is last night I was watching our good friend Nick, and he had this Basil the Great chap who hadn't heard of, but I quickly followed him.
and they got me thinking about something they got me thinking about here we go There's Basil.
Didn't know who he was before because I tend to gloss over the avatar people, but love this chap.
Anyway, so they were having a conversation.
It got me thinking.
And the thing that they were talking about was how reform is responding to restore.
And they're basically using that word.
They're not using that word, are they?
I'm afraid they are.
I'm afraid they are.
That's what I wanted to talk about.
Have we got the clips of good old Nigel on the reform announcements today speaking about why he had to kick Loan?
No, I can do one better than that.
I'm going to start you here.
If you're watching on YouTube, we might have to edit this out or at least bleep it, but we might have to edit it out because of copyright and stuff.
But, you know, the greatest film ever made, I'll just remind you of this.
You know what?
Fuck that, man.
I'm sick of this koala-hugging nigga.
Tell him he's...
For 400 years.
Don't worry.
It's kept us down.
What the fuck?
You know what?
Fuck that, man.
Right.
I was expecting the full retard clip, was I?
That is a good one, though.
Yes, honestly, best film ever made.
I love that film.
RDJ needs to bring that character back.
Yes.
What I'm actually referring to is, you know, Matt Goodwin.
and i don't like doing the whole punching right thing so i tend to avoid it but i'm i'm you'll be punching left anyway You'll be all right.
Yes, that's a good point.
I would be, would I?
Yes.
But so I'm not necessarily as such attacking Matt yet because, you know, well, anyway.
But the point is, is that he kind of goes into this whole kind of, you know, here it is.
Racism.
That's the white man's version of the word that Robert Downey Jr. was talking about.
The word racism has been used. to keep us down for 40 years.
Like every great atrocity that has happened to our people has been happening in the name of that word.
The grooming gangs, the ethnic replacement, the selective hiring, the, I mean, we're at the point now where most people cannot even acknowledge the existence of the British as an ethnicity.
And yeah, I mean, it's a form of psychological damage to a lot of people as well.
Yes.
Like, there's been work done into it where it's like people, like people brainwashed into all the progressive stuff experience insane neuroses every single day because they can't, sorry, neuroticism and psychological pain because they can't figure out how to navigate the various hierarchical stacks in the progressive stuff.
Well, there are two different things here.
On the one hand, you've got the white people that buy into this rubbish and they grapple with the reality of the world and the world as they think it should be.
And the dissonance between that causes those problems, as you outline.
But there are also the more malicious kind, which psychological research has indicated that there are people who use accusations of racism for deliberate resource extraction ends.
And we know that this happens and it plays out very widely.
But we can even prove it at an individual level that individuals who are high on dark triad traits like psychopathy, Machiavellianism, so basically employing deliberate strategies to get non-reciprocal resource transfer.
They're doing this on purpose.
And these are people who also are more likely to lie, cheat, and steal.
So they're dishonest, bad people using that word to take things from white people, basically.
That's what it's all about.
Even with white people, just think of the actual Patrick Bateman types, like at the beginning of American Psycho, where he's giving the impassioned little, we need to solve hunger and famine in Africa.
Like that, that's the kind of person who's like been in charge of this whole top-down process, pushing this onto you.
Doesn't believe that.
He's like actual Patrick Bateman types.
But I think we need to expunge this word.
So the moment that Goodwin here used that word, I wanted to, you know, metaphorically slap him.
And when he goes with a counterpunch, grab it, lean in over the shoulder like that and tell him that word has been keeping our people down for 40 years.
I mean, literally, I'll go into the argument more.
So anyway, this was a Twitter exchange.
Oh, yeah, go ahead.
I think that anyone who's allegedly on our side, whatever that means, that uses that word in that context should be out of the club.
No questions asked.
If someone says that's racist, no, out.
What if they've also written for Chatham House policy papers on how to contain the right and then also written for hope, not hate as well?
Interesting, isn't it?
That would certainly be a bit of an issue.
But anyway, so it's basically because Basil had pointed out that reforms on the ground people, or possibly candidates, most likely both, are not, you know, they're not British as their fundamental identity.
Well, before the 1950s, they would have been.
Yes.
And Matt, of course, just goes immediately to racism.
I won't go into the whole series of this exchange, but as Charlie Downe points out, you just authentically just go to racist.
You just go straight there.
And because everything that has happened to us has been done in the name of that word, it has got to be expunged.
Anyway, then Matt came back on that and then used the word racist several more times in this kind of long tweet.
Oh, Jesus.
Yeah, there's quite a bit.
Connor's got a rival here in the long tweet game.
I've seen Mucho Texto before, but my God.
I should have clocked where all the racists are, but I don't know.
Maybe if you've been paying attention, you're not sure.
Where I am sat, what you're doing looks like a direct rerun of what the National Front attempted in 1979, which your leader will remember.
0.6%.
Yeah, the funny thing is, right?
In the previous tweet, Matt Goodwin was saying about how, well, actually, the British Sikhs were the only ones to organise against the grooming gangs and bloody, bloody blah.
And then in the very next tweet, he's saying in response to all of this, is citing the National Front, who, whatever else you want to say about them, were actively opposed to all of this.
They were actually organizing locally against grooming gangs.
What do you think they were so angry about in the 60s and 70s?
I've gone back through the newspaper records and found all of the cases of Pakistani grooming happening as far back as the 1950s.
This didn't come up out of nowhere.
The National Front didn't come up out of nowhere.
They didn't just start because a few people showed up and opened corner shops on their streets and they just decided, I hate them for no reason.
Yeah.
So piss off, Matt.
Yeah, I mean, I mean, it is sort of cause and response on that.
Anyway, then, and again, and I won't go through it.
Then Connor came back on that and basically just said, look, us guys, we know you offline and we know what you've been saying offline.
We know what you actually believe or at least claim to believe offline.
And now you're just throwing around, you know, racist and anti-Semite.
I mean, this was a powerful wall of text calling out here in that he's basically saying that, listen, you're presenting yourself as this moderate, but actually you agree with us privately and it's all fake for politics, which obviously, yeah, most politicians are fake.
I just hate this because what is so the 35-year career of Nigel Farage has amounted to what exactly?
That we now get to be called racist by somebody wearing a turquoise rousette instead of somebody wearing a blue or a red one.
What a wonderful development.
We've got a new colour to be abused by.
Yeah.
But thanks.
These concerns, I mean, they are entirely genuine.
Before I go further, I mean, I'll just show this, you know, let's just remind ourselves of, you know, authentically, where is Farage on this stuff?
What does he believe about this?
It's a political impossibility to deport hundreds of thousands of people.
We simply can't do it.
At the moment, it's a political impossibility.
But is it your ambition?
No.
I'm not going to get dragged down the route of mass deportations or anything like that.
I mean, people are always going to come and go.
And we are a country that's engaged in international trade and we have relationships around the world through the Commonwealth, etc.
But yeah, we have to aim at a balanced migration policy.
But net zero still means hundreds of thousands of people coming into Britain, immigrants coming into Britain.
Isn't that too many?
It may well be, but we have to start somewhere.
Trump says in America that he wants mass deportations, we're talking about hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants are in Britain at the moment.
Some estimates say the number could even be in a million plus.
So do you support deporting all of those people?
It's impossible to do.
Literally impossible to do.
In terms of the atmosphere in Britain, are you concerned that there is a rising level of anti-white hatred?
I'm just concerned about a deeply divided society.
Yep.
He just doesn't see the issue.
And it's because if your brain is running on post-war liberal consensus, you can't see any issue here.
You can't understand what the problem here.
I mean, I'll explain what the problem is.
As Basil pointed out here, we are being ethnically replaced.
You can point to parts of this country now where, I mean, this one is 5.8% British.
And that's in Wembley.
Yes.
This isn't multiculturalism.
This isn't, you know, the occasional person coming in.
This is balkanization.
Well, the whole notion of multiculturalism has already gone out the window because there's not multiple cultures.
What actually happens is ethnic ghettos and no-go zones for the actual native population who get pushed out to the countryside.
As you can see from that great big circle around London, it's like a cancerous growth where it is growing out and consuming the rest of England.
And with enough time, it will.
And look, why this matters is because the ability to use the word racist to shut people up, to shut down serious concerns, it allowed the rape gangs to happen.
And as you just pointed out, for a period of like 40 years or whatever it was, it'll be coming up to 70 or 80 years.
70 years.
The minute people from that part of the world landed on our soil, they are doing the same things that they're doing now.
Yes, there's nothing to read home.
Yeah, this isn't something that just all of a sudden there was something in the air in the 1950s or in the 1970s or 80s or 90s or something.
And they just all of a sudden went from being peace-loving, integrated, assimilated shopkeepers.
Not that the Pakistanis were ever known for opening corner shops.
That's typically the Indians.
To all of a sudden forming these gangs.
It didn't just pop up out of nowhere.
They've been doing this since they came here in the first place.
And they've been protecting it within their own communities for that length of time.
In Forum's brain, any criticism of anyone who isn't white British must automatically be just this bizarre sort of his understanding of racism is just somebody who just has a rational hatred for no particular reason.
And they're coming out with this rhetoric literally the week after the end of Restore Britain's rape gang inquiry, which I covered a bit of last week and we announced when it first happened.
Some of the testimonies coming from that were horrifying and dreadful.
There were cases of police officers taking the children away from their own parents and giving them to the care of the people who were abusing them.
And the reasons for that were manyfold, but part of it as well, heavily, was the worried about being called racist.
Worried about having their reputations destroyed because they were called racist, or embodying the ideology so strongly that they felt a similar kind of hatred towards white working class families and thought that they would be better off in the hands of foreigners, who themselves, again, as part of the other testimony that was coming out, were, like you see here, targeting these girls because they were white.
They have specific slur words for us.
What was it?
Gora basically means white trash.
And to go back to Matt's original tweet, surely these Sikh men might have been resisting the grooming gangs, but at the same time, the same moral justifications for their presence here are being used for the people doing it.
And so a country such as ours that has suffered things like that, why should we have to tolerate any of it?
To be honest, we know for certain that when Britain was purely British, things like that didn't go on.
It would not stop.
And people argue the toss about it, but it's not true.
We didn't do that to our own people.
And you can see what the same news looks like in a country where they don't have this kind of weird pathology infesting their brain, the sort of liberalism.
So this is the story covered in India.
And they're much more upfront about it.
They're much more to the point of what's going on.
They're happy to hate on Pakistan, aren't they?
Well, I suppose it's partly that.
But it's mainly because their brain isn't running on this fear of, oh no, what if I get called racist?
Because nobody else in the world.
I mean, I've travelled to many countries in the world.
And outside white countries, they simply don't understand the concept of racism.
I mean, they are just unapologetically for themselves first and everybody else second.
And they can't understand why you would think anything else.
They just don't understand what you need the white man's abstract thinking skills to even come up with the concept, however evil it may be, but it just doesn't occur to them because they don't think in those modes of being in the same way.
We're preoccupied with morality and abstractions.
Well, I mean, even when even though there is a definite streak of universality within Western thought that goes back, you know, a thousand plus years or whatever, it was still only yesterday that we started applying it to such an extent that we didn't also put ourselves first.
We were like, oh, we can create these abstract universal concepts and apply them to other peoples, but we are still the people who originated this coming from a long tradition, and we still do it mainly to benefit ourselves.
We put this on the Indians because by doing that, it benefits us.
We put it on the Africans because by doing that, it benefits us.
Our interests were still put first.
And somehow it got twisted around so much.
So anybody using this word has they have to be outside of the pale.
And it's not just the crimes as well.
Anglo-British Divide00:08:50
I mean, you know, this is the data.
Net fiscal contribution by ethnic group.
It's only positive for the whites.
Yeah, because the entire political system is set up to use this as cash cows for the foreigners, right?
Yeah.
We're atoning for the imagined sins of our ancestors, which, by the way, they were glorious.
To pay for ungrateful people who rape and murder us.
Yeah.
Of course we need to get rid of them.
What this chart should look like if you had a sensible immigration policy, would all of those lines should be higher than the white.
And the reason for that is if you're looking at a candidate who wants to come here and it's like, oh, okay, you're a Somalian single mum of five.
Well, have you got any skills?
No.
Okay, well, we're not going to let you in then.
Whereas if you're like a South Korean electrical engineer and you can command a high salary and we need you here for some particular reason, well, come in.
But that's the kind of thing.
Honestly, all of those lines should be higher than the white one because you would only ever want to take people in who are adding something that you can't get internally.
Also, they're about five times into the negative what the white is into the positive.
So they're, you know.
So what does it look about when we're a minority?
They're six times less productive for the economy than a white person.
And the sum.
Six times worse, basically.
Sums are breaking down now that we're down to like whatever it is, 74% white.
The country cannot fund itself without massive debt.
So as soon as we actually hit that point where we're a minority, obviously the country will not be their favourite.
And also we'll be left holding the bag and all the foreigners will leave because they have an obligation to the country and they don't care.
But they're not here to raid us.
What about the 0.1% GDP growth last year?
Is that not worth this?
I remember when, well, I don't remember, but I remember learning about the Viking invasion and had the Anglo-Saxons say, well, we can't be racist against them.
Welcome them in.
Pay them benefits.
England wouldn't exist.
Yes.
You know, our country, I hate to say it, was built on us favouring our own group and fighting the people that want to raid us for our wealth.
I mean, and coming back to Matt Goodwin's original point, because he was saying if you have any issue with Sikhs in the political system.
I mean, this is what reform doing.
I mean, a literal asylum seeker is a candidate in Portsmouth.
Wait, was that because I thought it was just because he was Bangladesh?
Was he also a different one, but they definitely had one who was a former asylum seeker as well.
I don't know if it is a particular one, but yeah.
But, you know, the problem with that is if they're putting forward people like that, then what they're kind of trying to engineer through that is also like a assimilation success story.
Yes.
Because if he gets in, they say, see, even the asylum seekers can assimilate into our way of life, which, I mean, if you don't do it yourself, Reform, that'll just be used by future governments as an excuse to bring more in.
And look, if I were going to move to another country, I wouldn't think of getting involved in their politics.
Especially if I was a refugee.
Well, yes.
I mean, the closest I can imagine is if, what if I moved to an Anglo-fellow Anglo country?
And there's only four other ones out there.
You know, if I moved to Texas or something, would I get involved in politics?
I mean, I might at a low level.
I might hand out some leaf.
Texas is basically Mexico in parts of.
Well, okay.
Australia.
Yeah.
Australia.
If I went to a fellow Anglo-country, I mean, I might get involved in a low level of politics, but it wouldn't occur to me to even run as a candidate in a fellow Anglo country, let alone if I went to Peru or Japan or something.
It just, why would you do that?
And I'm not scared of going to those countries.
You know, the wife and I have often talked about moving to somewhere nice and sunny in our retirement or something like that.
It's not because I'm afraid of going there because I think they're going to try and kill me just because they won't let me become a politician.
I just think it's normal to not be a politician.
So actually, I mean, coming back to the original point in the Sikhs, I don't particularly have an issue with the Sikhs.
Not particularly.
I mean, they tend to be pretty well behaved.
And my view on, you know, immigration groups tends to follow, as well as what I've said about you need to be a net positive for the country, because I like to follow the three-day rule, which is if I can go more than three days without hearing about how a member of your group has raped,
stabbed, murdered, driven a truck through a Christmas market or blown yourself up, if I can go more than three days, which I don't think is a particularly high bar for but we do have groups in this country who cannot clear that standard, which is a fairly minimal standard.
And so then we've got all these people in, you know, who are who are hostile to restore saying, oh, are we going to be putting whoever she is?
I mean, Dua Lipa.
I don't know.
I'm already going to support them.
You don't need to sell them to me.
Are we going to put Dua Lipa on the plane back to Albania?
Well, I mean, one, you've identified that she's from Albania and not from here.
So, no, she's not British.
She's Albanian and she would say so herself.
Even if she did nothing but make annoying music, I support deporting her to Albania.
Do you guys know who this person is?
Yes.
Sadly.
Fine, okay.
But yeah, but clearly, she's not British.
Right, but what this person, a lot of people who are pretending to attack Restore don't understand, is that it's not like you're a bad person just because you're not British.
You're just not British.
You can be a good person and not be British.
It's not the same thing.
And there's a whole bunch of examples.
Well, I mean, this tweeter goes on to list a whole bunch of people.
Well, this person is a British.
Who's this?
It doesn't look like a British person.
No, none of the people they've shown so far.
Well, yeah, he's Greek.
I mean, he's literally Greek.
I mean, even the royal families of Europe are probably not British.
Yeah.
Greek again.
He was Zoroastrian or something.
Yeah, Freddie Mercury was like, he was like a blue-eyes white dragon of ethnicities, being Zoroastrian.
People say he's Indian.
It's like, no, he was like, oh, he was a super rare Iranian.
But that doesn't mean he's British.
Just because you're not British doesn't mean you're evil or anything.
That's not what we're saying.
We're just saying that the British are a group.
Stop denying it.
Stop pretending that it's not a thing.
And some people have really been struggling with this.
Alex Phillips.
I mean, you can see her trying very, very hard not to understand it.
Shout out to Jard here.
Restore Britain believes British people are an ethnicity.
We are a race.
We are a demographic.
Every other political party has a nebulous view of Britain and British people.
Okay, so if British people are a race, my stepsister is not British then.
Or who's she?
I'm sorry, I just don't.
I don't understand.
If you're going to say it, just say the quiet part out loud, okay?
This is what I'm going to say to Restore Britain.
Just say the quiet part out loud.
Well, I don't know who her sister is, but.
A stepsister.
I mean, presumably if she's not, if your stepsister is not from Britain or any British ethnicity, then she's not British.
Yes.
But controversial.
You should just be turning it around to them.
Say, so you don't believe in genetics.
You're denying the scientific evidence that genetics exists.
You don't believe that the British people exist.
Therefore, you're a genetic denialist.
She's denying science.
Conspiracy theorist.
She's trying to get herself confused with if you're not British, then you're.
We're not saying if you're not British, you're an abomination or something.
We're just saying there are people who are British and also people who aren't British.
That is as far as the claim goes.
It's not very far out.
Yes.
So, I mean, this performative, you know, not pretending thing.
And, you know, Morgoff said it like this.
And I don't want to speak to Morgos because I don't know exactly how he meant it.
But he said, look, there are people living on this land who are here organically, and there are people who are here as a result of bureaucratic processes, as simple as that.
And I kind of quite tweeted that one and put it the way that I put it, which is to say, yeah, I mean, if you're here because, I don't know, you married in or there's some sort of deep connection, like the Hong Kongers or the Gurkhas or something like that, I don't really mind that that much.
I don't really have an issue with that.
And I know that I'm a bit squishy and a bit liberal on this subject, but for me, deporting as little as 10 to 15 million people is enough for me.
And the last and the last 5 million, I don't really care about.
The people who are organically here, it's fine.
My threshold's about 23.3 million.
People Who Are Organically Here00:03:35
Right.
It's a very specific number.
I've got very specific needs.
oh my and and and my my concern is with my concern with reform and their desperate attempts to call them all racist and stuff like that is that that by in going after the boomer vote the boomer vote is essentially like the the one ring you It belongs to the Tories.
And if you put it on, you'll start turning into the Tories.
It's a good analogy, actually, because the more boomers you attract, the more you default to the post-war liberal consensus of the Conservative Party.
Yes.
And I think they've been wearing the one ring for too long, and they are just turning into the Tories.
And, you know, and stop using that word because it has done incalculable harm to our nation.
That doesn't mean if you're not British, that, you know, we hate you.
It just means that you're not British, and we can recognise that.
And we could start to consider putting our own people forward for once.
Oh, cheers.
Oh, just one moment.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, one moment here.
I just need to say something.
Alex, not that one, the one who posted this originally.
If you're watching this, stop farting about with your church group.
We need to get back to business and get band practice sorted.
Use my drummer.
Okay.
Yeah.
We forgot to do the comments, didn't we?
Yeah, we'll do all these.
What now?
All the ones on the front.
Hayden W says, are you guys going to have pancakes today?
I completely forgot that it was pancake day.
I will now that I've remembered.
Yes.
I'm never going to say no to a pancake.
Dwight Power says pancakes are nice.
They're not even that bad for you, really, are they?
They're delicious.
unless you smother them in syrup and what have you.
Dwight Power says...
Bacon and maple syrup.
That's how you do them.
The Americans, you know, were onto something with that.
I mean, you know, sweet.
I'm a golden syrup man.
Sweet and savory tend not to go together in my mind, but you know, they're right there.
Rupert's timing couldn't have been any better.
Imagine how blackpilled we would be after today's reform cabinet announcement.
Are you not excited for Nadeem Zahawi in foreign office?
They put the foreigner in the foreign office.
I've got better works, Nigel.
No, I've got the list here for you.
These are the list of the last home secretaries.
Javid, Patel, Braverman, Schnapps, Cleverly, Cooper, Mahmood, and the next one of Nigel Farjaz's way will be Yusuf.
So of that list, only one of them was British.
Yeah, that's not what the office used to mean, mate.
Where were we?
It moved up.
Those silly nerf herders, nice Star Wars insult, reform, don't get to use that word.
Only we get to use that word because we were racist long before it was called self-foundation.
Racist hipsters.
Not quite the point I was making, but thank you for the money.
Dwight Power, Goodwin worked for Hope Not Hate and wrote a book on destroying the right wing.
You don't go from that to being an ultra-patriot.
Yeah, people do go from left to right, but not in that way, I don't think.
Not when you're already so deeply entrenched in the British deep state.
And normally when people go left to right, it's like growing up.
He was a grown man when he was doing this sort of stuff.
I think he might have even been older than me.
A name I can't pronounce says if Restore Britain is too similar to reform to remember, how about renaming it the Revenge Party?
Mood Problems in Meat00:15:24
That's the thing.
It's still beginning.
Don't lean into edgy narratives.
It needs to be presented as a political neutral anti-establishment party to bring in everybody who's disaffected with the regime.
That's my statement.
That's my thought on it.
I've never thought of race in terms of hate until race was used as an excuse to do bad things to our children, destroy our heritage, replace us while elites tell us to shut up for the sake of racial diversity.
Yeah, well, they opened Pandora's box, didn't they, by allowing it for the minorities.
Well, they hate us.
They hate us.
Just read the Epstein emails and you can see how much all of the elites involved with that hate us.
Well, I think some of them might, but I think most of the time the elite are just indifferent to the suffering of commoners.
It's not even that they care about us enough to hate us.
It's just they see us as something, a resource to be exploited.
But Jubs McGee says, we don't want low standards in the UK.
We want low standards, L-O-W-E.
Remember, aim high, vote low.
I like that.
Good wordplay there.
And Skittenhun says, Jake Munro, collab when?
Who's Jake Munro?
I don't know, sorry.
I'll look them up.
Alrighty then.
So, gonna end us off on some good news here, which is that you will not be eating zibugs.
You'll not be eating zasoy.
You will be eating real meat because the vegan and fake meat industry doesn't seem to be doing too well at the moment.
Now, of course, there's a chance that this all could be a blip.
There's a chance that perhaps it will be revived in the future.
But as it stands right now, we are seeing a huge limit to the ends of social engineer to the limit, sorry, a huge limit to how far social engineering can go when people are simply not interested and actively hostile to what you're pushing on us.
And this plays into something that Josh was talking about the other week with nudge policies and attempts to nudge people into certain behaviors are not necessarily as effective as you would expect and not as effective as all of the money being pumped into it would you would hope for.
And so that is where we're going with the fake meat right now, which we have to remember.
Fake meat just kind of popped up out of nowhere like 10-15 years ago.
Nobody was asking for this.
Vegetarians weren't clamoring for it, as far as I know.
This was something that was being pushed top down by elites from the get-go, as shown by the fact that Bill Gates was one of the early investors in it, put a lot of money into it and was basically propping up some of these companies like Beyond Meat, who are going to be the focus of our attention as we go on.
And it says here that, you know, he was saying that Bill Gates had been saying for a long time, wealthy nations should switch to synthetic beef as an alternative to real beef products.
And he gave all sorts of BS reasons for it.
Oh, the environment, oh, your gut health, oh, this and that.
But really, it was just because he wanted to control people from the top down.
Yeah, the main concerning thing about this isn't necessarily even the products themselves, although there are some health concerns about some of them.
It's the agenda behind it and the people pushing it.
Because in theory, if there was like some lab-grown beef that was just exactly the same as beef, but rather than from a cow, it had been grown with cells of a cow in a lab, you know, I wouldn't be that averse to it.
It'd be a little bit weird, but at the same time...
I am, because we'll get on to that in a minute.
Okay.
I mean, well, that's my take on it.
Maybe you're going to dissuade me later, but that's my take on it as well.
I mean, a cow is essentially a machine that turns grass into steaks.
And I mean, that is a good system.
I like it.
I like that.
I don't think there's any reason to mix up the already well-established over thousands of years system of how we produce that steak by going it through this very process of making fake steak, real fake steak.
The best case for it is that in a cow, that meat couldn't get parasites in it, which means that I have to cook it.
If I can eat the meat raw from a lab, because it has no parasites, then that could be good.
It would have to be perfect for me.
So if we can ever get to the point where I've got like a machine in my kitchen and I cut my grass and then I dump the grass into the top and it produces a chemically indistinguishable steak that, you know, the best steak-eating experts in the world could not tell the difference, then I'd be happy with it.
I don't think they're ever going to be able to do that, though.
You're not going to be able to make it completely indistinguishable.
A cow can do it, so I'm going to assume.
Yeah, but a cow's a living creature.
That's what you're eating.
The real cow is the point of what you're eating.
So the point like cow is to turn grass into steak.
My point here by me saying this is that I'm not necessarily even against the idea.
It's the agenda that makes me against this sort of thing.
And the intentions of the people behind it make it sinister.
I mean, that is a huge part of it as well.
Also, again, as they point out in here, one of the things is with all the fake meat, I remember corn.
Do you remember with the cue?
It's gross, yeah.
Yeah, it is gross.
People, because of all of these things that have been drip-fed into people's minds for decades at this point, the front-page headlines of red meat causes, I don't know, heart disease, red meat causes cancer, high meat, high-protein diet causes this or that health issue.
It's sponsored by the sugar industry.
Yeah, a lot of the time, if you actually read the studies that they're referring to, they are complete bunk nonsense science where they've not taken into account any of the other factors.
Just think about that old supersize me documentary where the guy was like, I ate McDonald's for every meal for a month, and I literally almost died by the end of that month.
And they left out the fact that he was an alcoholic going through alcohol withdrawals for that entire month as well.
They leave out all of these different factors to do with it.
Like, this man almost got heart disease after eating steak for an entire year.
They leave out the fact that he's also morbidly obese.
They don't factor that into the analysis.
And also, just the quality of the science in a lot of those studies is poor.
Like, the people in sort of health and nutrition side of things, they're just not that good scientists.
Well, to be honest.
That's a huge problem as well.
I'm sure there are some good ones, but from what I've seen, I'm a little bit underwhelmed.
Either way, they've been dripping this poison into your ear for a long time, right?
So people automatically kind of have this knee-jerk thing where they go, okay, red meat, real meat, equals unhealthy, because they associate it with fast food.
And they know from fast food is terrible because of documentaries like supersize me, not saying that fast food's good for you, but they automatically go, well, if it's vegetarian, if it's veggie meat, it must automatically be healthier for me than eating normal meat, right?
But the problem is, as many people have pointed out, and is anyone who's ever interacted with people who regularly eat this stuff, no.
It's incredibly highly processed.
And they say here, high in sodium, it's more expensive.
They're really bad for you.
They are ultra-processed foods.
I've known a few people.
My own missus for a while, okay, was vegetarian.
Sorry to hear that, yeah, for a few years.
Did she get better?
Yes.
Yes, she did.
Because for that time, she was eating fake meat products.
She had all these different problems.
Her skin would break out sometimes.
It put on a little bit.
No offense, sweetheart.
I'm sure you understand the point of this story.
She put on a little bit of weight and she had mood problems because of it, outside of the mood problems that women normally have.
Okay.
When she got pregnant, I said, there's no way you're eating a non-meat diet while you're pregnant with my daughter.
All right.
So she went, okay, fine.
I'll sacrifice it for the sake of our child's health.
Her little eyes lit up when she had her first steak after.
Yeah.
Unironically, she was thrilled after she ate her first proper meal again.
And then, along with the pregnancy, and it's consisted after she gave birth as well, all those lingering problems, all the skin breakouts, and all of that stuff.
She dropped, she dropped quite a few dress sizes.
Whilst being pregnant.
No, after the pregnancy and after continuing the actual meat.
People in the comments, make sure to credit Harry for this anecdote because he's going to be sleeping on the sofa for quite some time for this.
You know, all of those problems went away.
The mood problems as well.
I've seen it happen with a lot of other people as well.
So I was genuinely bad for you.
I was worried about my kids catching vegetarianism or something when they were little.
But I remember when they were quite young, they watched that film Zootopia, which is all about predators and preys.
And I sat them down after that and I explained to them, we are the top predator.
We're omnivores.
I went with predator.
Now, predator is true, but we are also omnivores, which means that part of our biology is designed to get all of these nutrients we need from.
If a steak isn't available, we can have an apple.
I accept that.
No, they're not substitutes for one another.
No, no, no.
If you can't get a steak, that's what I'm saying.
You can have an apple.
I mean, yeah, you can eat an apple, but you're not going to get the same stuff from an apple.
One thing that people also miss out is that most herbivores are also selectively carnivorous in some ways.
I didn't know that.
So you can see there are plenty of videos online of horses stomping on birds and then eating them and lots of ruminant animals.
Like, they'll just eat baby birds out of nests like the Chinese do sometimes.
And things like that.
Monkeys hunt other monkeys.
You know, monkeys are little bastards.
They really are.
Yeah.
And so our niche in the sort of dietary world is quite well occupied in that lots and lots of animals do eat meat and it's not quite as clear-cut as that.
Either way, though, so this stuff's really bad for you as well.
From my own anecdotal experience, it also tastes like complete rubbish.
They say, oh, I can't tell the difference.
And you know that's a lie because then you put it in your mouth and it feels like you're chewing on cardboard.
And these companies are always popping up.
The most recent one that I just saw was Redefine Meat, an Israeli meat alternative company, whose fake steak is a mix of soy and pea protein, which are not equivalent to animal protein.
They do not contain the same amino acid chains and are much lower quality.
Chickpeas, beetroot, nutritional yeast and coconut fat formed into steak-like shapes using a 3D printer.
Yeah, that's not.
That's not it.
My version of growing meat has to be something like the matrix, where you feed in the grass and you see the cow.
I mean, you probably wouldn't even need the head to press the cow symbol on this, but you see the body of the cow just growing in this in vitro tank, and then you slice it up at the end.
That's not what they're doing for the new lump-grown meat sort of stuff.
They're not going to be able to give you that kind of tactile experience that you would get from the Matrix meat that you're after.
I want to be able to open my pantry and see something hanging there, which is an in vitro tank for a cow.
I mean, you had me sold when you were basically saying when you mow your lawn, you get a steak at the end of it by pouring the clippings into some machine.
Well, that's how a cow does it, so I should be to do the same.
But either way, on the top-down agenda you also had a few years ago at the World Economic Forum this random guy who apparently is in charge of health decisions for millions of people across the world or at least wishes that he would be, Matthew Lau, saying that we could, could, to help the planet introduce a meat allergy by using Lone Star ticks to stop the consumption of meat.
I will hunt you down, Matthew Lau.
So ultimately, what I'm saying is that they just want subservient, weak slaves, because that's what this kind of thing does.
If you're deprived of this kind of food, you're going to be, I mean, steak helps for has loads of nutritional benefits.
The nutrition that you get from a steak is going to help maintain a healthy hormonal profile, which will mean healthy testosterone levels.
You get a lot of creatine in steak, which can help with muscle development.
Protein, all of these good things, they want you to not have that because they want you to be weak and sad and depressed, sat in your little pod so that they can control you.
It's a classic thing we've known for a job.
You can't have a steak if you need to.
You can.
You need to have fatty cuts.
Meat is the only food group that you can only eat and nothing else and not die.
As long as you go for the fatty cuts, if you switch over fully.
You've also got to throw some fish in there.
So sorry if you don't like fish, but yeah.
Either way, so there are all of these ones where it's the soy-based alternatives.
And now they've got the new one, which is more like what you're talking about, and you being a quasi-slave would be okay with and acceptable, which is the lab-grown meat being promoted by Mr. Beast, Mr. Beast, who is being compared to Bill Gates because he is promoting this.
This is very interesting because, again, when you talk about the sinister nature of it being promoted, being partly to do with who is promoting it and who is pushing it, you can see some sinister figures start to emerge in this lab-produced meat as well.
So, Mr. Beast, as part of a YouTube video, he went to some $200 million lab run by an Indian man, or at least he was shown around by an Indian man.
Going to a top-class food innovation lab has started a big debate in the video.
He started a visits facility operated by Upside Foods, a biotech company working on lab-grown meat that plans to offer real chicken without slaughtering a single bird.
He sampled both traditional and cultivated chicken during his visit and stated he could not tell the difference in taste.
As mentioned before, I've heard that one before, heard it plenty of time with these meat or fake meat or alternative meat substitutes, and it's never been true.
Maybe it's different this time, but I'm very skeptical.
Part of the skepticism is to do with this.
His involvement, particularly given his partnership with the Rockefeller Foundation on food innovation initiatives, has thrust the topic of cultivated meat into mainstream conversation.
So he's partnered with the Rockefeller Foundation, which you can see was announced on, if it will actually, there we go, was announced on the Rockefeller website.
The Rockefeller Foundation, of course, being a huge promoter of civil rights initiatives, human rights initiatives around the world.
They were the big funders of behavioral sciences and behavioral technologies like Nudge in the first place.
So I don't trust anything being promoted and pushed and funded by the Rockefeller Foundation because they are a very sinister organization.
And as you can see here, somehow, like so much else in America, currently headed by an Indian.
I mean, any enterprise that is pushed by a very wealthy, well-known family, beginning with R, should not be trusted.
Just the Rockefellers.
But there's more to do with this in this article as well, so I'll go through some more.
So here's the process of how it goes.
Beyond Meat Controversies00:15:27
The lab-grown meat, also known in scientific and industry circles as cultivated or cell-cultured meat, is produced in a laboratory from real animal cells instead of by raising and slaughtering livestock.
The process begins with the extracted cells from a living animal or an egg.
So in the example that they show on this, they take a natural chicken egg and extract the cells from it.
These cells are placed in a controlled environment containing a nutrient-rich growth medium, encouraging them to multiply and differentiate into the types of tissues found in conventional meat.
Over time, these cells develop into muscle and fat structures that resemble the texture and flavor of meat from a farmed animal.
So they basically just reproduce the conditions of an egg, is what they're doing.
Basically, is what they're going for.
But again, call me unscientific.
I am not a scientist, and I will admit that straight away.
But like basically, like producing a tumor of meat that you then eat that resembles, because there's a lot of hedging words in these processes whenever I see them written down.
Is that they always hedge, oh, it resembles kind of into the types of structures and tissues found in this meat.
I don't trust that it's going to be anywhere near the same quality, and I don't trust that it's actually going to taste or have the same texture.
I would imagine that the cells would be the same, but I don't know whether the difference between growing it in a lab would be the same as it occurring naturally.
Similar to how salt that you mine has so much more nutrients in it, and you know, fresh spring water has a lot more nutrients in it than things that have been refined through processes.
So, you know, salt created in a lab is just salt and nothing else.
Whereas salt you get from a salt mine has all of these additional things that are really good for you.
Same with water.
If you drink from like a mountain spring, that is so much better for you than if you just refined pure H2O because we need the additional stuff.
And I think that that's one of the things that people do need to be concerned about.
And similarly, with something like the food that I'm putting in my body, right?
We saw all of the controversy last year with ALA messing about with the hormone production of cows so that they can reduce the amount of CO2 that cows are producing each year for environmental reasons.
And the worry was that that was going to affect the actual makeup, the cellular makeup of the milk that you're drinking.
And it could cause hormonal issues and such.
When you're given a pure lab-controlled environment where potentially these scientists could alter the nutrient profile of this meat to meet anything that they want, they could maybe put in more nutrients of a certain kind, reduce certain nutrients of a different kind.
I don't want to give them the power to be able to do that personally because you don't know if they're just going to start one day going like, well, the lab-grown meat now has no protein in it and will give you mantits and is full of estrogen.
And even if they had the best intentions in the world, which we have many reasons to doubt, it's just the sheer difficulty of trying to emulate high-quality, naturally occurring food.
The number of things that they would have to put into that would make it such an endeavor that it simply wouldn't be worth the money.
And I think it would have to be many, many, many, many years into the future before it could even rival the cost-effectiveness of doing it the natural way.
And again, when it's the people funding behavioral science who are putting money into this as well, I don't trust what the ultimate goals of such a thing is.
Again, call me cynical, call me unscientific, but that's my views on it.
I'm a scientist and I agree with you.
And it's the views of many consumers as well, because again, there are lots of different reports of the collapse of this kind of fake meat alternative meat industry over the past few years.
First of all, being the collapse, as reported here in the Telegraph, of the vegan boom, which is reporting on how all of these restaurants and all of these retailers are slowly dropping the plant-based alternative meats that they were putting up at the height in 2019 and 2020.
Here, because does everybody remember?
They're still on sale.
You don't see them being eaten by many people, but they do still sell them.
The Gregg's vegan sausage roll.
I remember when that launched, and it was a huge thing, and you couldn't get one for the life of you because everybody was interested in it.
Everybody was buying them.
You'd go in, they'd always be sold out.
Now you can't pay people to eat this stuff.
If you were vegan, why would you attempt to eat something that's like a proxy of sausage roll?
Because everybody knows that vegan diets are gross and awful.
But if you're vegan, you have chosen sadness as your life course.
So just embrace it.
Well, you've just got to eat the sad sausage roll, then, don't you?
You get the sad alternative.
Shouldn't you just be eating like a beetroot or something?
I don't know how it works.
When your missus was a vegetarian, what was the reason for it?
Oh, it was like ethical rubbish.
And she also did think it would be healthier for her, but it wasn't.
Oh, no, no, no.
Obviously.
Either way, so they say in here, released by the bakery chain in January 2019, the vegan alternative was so popular it was regarded in some corners of the internet as the UK's cultural moment of the year.
But seven years later, the vegan revolution is running out of steam.
Signs of veganism decline appeared in a recent report by the Good Food Institute Europe, which found that sales of plant-faced food in Britain fell by 4.5% to £898 million in the year to January 2025.
Separate data from the NIQ show that the share of households buying plant-based meat alternatives at least once a year has waned since 2022, with the organization highlighting a shift in flexitarian shoppers back into animal-based proteins.
So, what I would argue there is that during lockdown and during the height of the craze, that people went, oh, yeah, I'll give this a go.
And then they gave it a go.
And by about 2022, they realized this is shit.
Never again.
I feel terrible.
I'm bloated.
My skin keeps breaking out.
This is not good for me.
I'll go back to the classic.
I remember trying veganism once for about a few weeks because I was dating.
College trend, was it?
No, it was because I was dating a girl who was a vegan.
Yeah.
And I only did it more as like a, well, I just see what it's like.
I'm a bit bored.
I wasn't, I didn't care about it that much.
And it made me feel awful.
Like, you know, I went to the toilet far more than I wanted to.
I felt sick and lethargic.
And yeah, it's terrible.
Of course.
You feel it in your body.
Yeah, your body gives you pretty clear signals to these things, which is why vegans look and behave the way that they do.
But there's other evidence of the push, the huge push that this was.
There was Tesco, Marks and Spencer, Asda, Aldi all had and still do have.
You won't see people buying them, but they are there.
Plant-based ranges, KFC, Krispy Kreme, and Magnum all got involved in it.
KFC did like a fake chicken burger or something.
But Magnum got involved.
The ice cream people.
Apparently, so.
I would assume it's dairy-free ice cream.
Something like that.
Oh, I mean, there is a role for that because my daughter's allergic to dairy.
So, I mean, she'll literally die if she has a dairy ice cream.
So, I see that I see the purpose of something like that.
That's a rough gig for a child.
Sorry to hear that for you.
Wagamama, though, were among many of these restaurant chains that had a vegan option or more vegan options.
They've recently and quietly axed a string of vegan favourites from menus, including its Vigatsu Curry and Vegan K-Dogs.
Andy Hornby, the chief executive of the chain's owner, argued that interest from diners wasn't high enough to justify continuing the dish's inclusion.
So, just people weren't buying it because nobody asked for it in the first place.
Last year was a reckoning for businesses that sought to dominate the vegan market.
In April, Neat Burger, a vegan burger chain backed by Leo DiCaprio and Lewis Hamilton, shut all of its UK restaurants after suffering substantial losses.
The McDonald's plant burger, they did one of those, was pulled from Australian branches last July, while Domino's shrank its vegan offering as part of a November relaunch because nobody's buying this stuff because nobody wants it.
Meat-free menus are only a cost saver for restaurants if the vegan dishes sell and people just don't buy them, according to the Agriculture and Horticultural Development Board.
Cost has been a factor, they say, here, because they cost way more than actual normal meat.
So, that's another reason for people not to buy them.
My vision of this is that you put your grass tippings in, and then you get a lot more steaks a lot cheaper.
But if they're more expensive as well, literally, what's the point?
Yeah, and then everybody they point out in here as well just realized that they're really unhealthy compared to actual meat.
And what does this all result in if you look at the stocks and shares of such a thing?
Well, who or one of the big companies who are pushing this to begin with?
Who is the one that Bill Gates was funding and pushing himself?
Well, Beyond Meat was beyond meat.
Let's see what their shares are looking like today.
Oh, Oh dear 182 down to less than a dollar.
Yep.
That's pretty bad.
Brew markets put it pretty starkly here.
If you invested 10 grand in Beyond Meat in 2021, today you'd have $41.
Mind you, I wish I shorted it now.
Yeah, you'd be doing pretty well, wouldn't you?
Yeah, but you know, that's, and you can go and see that it's actually even worse than that if you go on a longer timeline to the beginning of when it was it was launched.
So 2021 was not even the peak of it.
The peak of it was during the huge hype of Beyond Meat when it was in July of 2019 and it hit a peak here of it says $239 per share.
And now it's worth 71 cents per share.
What a fall from grace.
And people have pointed to many reasons for this.
Again, people just didn't buy it.
People pointed out that there were lots of stories coming from stores like Walmart at the time where people working at these places learned that they weren't actually buying the product for Walmart to sell.
That Beyond Meat themselves were paying for Walmart to shelf their items, which does apparently happen with a lot of products when they're launching, but is basically just a test run after which, when it's proved that people will buy this stuff, then the chains start buying it themselves.
Never happened with Beyond Meat.
Never happened with a lot of these companies because there's no organic demand for them in the first place.
Ironically, I imagine also that I've heard from vegans and vegetarians that the sort of even the texture of meat after you've been a vegetarian or vegan for a long time is weird.
So emulating it through a more expensive, less healthy for you version is like the worst thing that they could do.
They're not the true-blooded vegans and vegetarians don't try and emulate meat.
They just eat plants.
Exactly, yes.
It's a bit like, oh, this is probably this.
Okay, the example leapt into my mind before I thought whether I should say it.
But it's a bit like, you know, lesbians doing the whole dildo thing.
It's like, if you're embracing it, you shouldn't be doing that.
Just be pure.
You know what I mean?
If you're a lesbian, no fake penis.
And if you're a vegetarian or vegan, no fake meat.
A guy I know told me that this is nothing to do with the lesbian stuff.
This is back to do with vegetarianism.
But you get if you're going to reject a thing, reject it properly.
So a guy I know told me that he went on a vegan diet for a year and a half.
And in that year and a half, for the first year, he said he went really, really strict with it.
He got wholesale products, all veggie stuff, and prepared the food himself.
He would do like a full cooking day on a Sunday and prepare all of his veggie meals for the rest of the week.
And he said he actually felt great because he'd been living really unhealthily before.
It was part of this bigger lifestyle change up that he did.
That he felt the best he'd ever felt.
And then about a year in, he got lazy and he switched to all the fake meat alternatives and he felt the worst he ever has his whole life.
So there is a dichotomy that you can say there.
But the best thing to come from Beyond Meat was this meme.
Oh, is that from Beyond Meat?
Yeah, that's it.
Yeah, this is the original.
This is the OG.
This is a classic right here.
So if nothing else, we can thank Beyond Meat for an OG classic meme right here.
So thank you for your contributions to meme culture.
I mean, that was probably worth 60 billion to be fair.
Yeah, that alone.
There are articles now talking about how the whole thing was being bought into because of narrative hype rather than any kind of profitability.
That's the entire economy, to be fair.
Yeah, but this company in particular, at its peak, the company was valued at more than $14 billion and never once turned a profit.
Still has never turned a profit.
That's a very extreme example.
This segment is making me so hungry.
I bet.
I haven't had any lunch yet.
And it gets even more.
Well, I haven't had a steak since 8 o'clock last night.
I've been like vegan for almost a day.
I'm going to have to have one of my emergency pepperamis.
Do you always have those with you?
Well, yeah, but what if you need some meat?
That's a good question.
Yes, the pepperami in your pocket, Dan.
Yes.
Dan's always on the lookout for emergency meat folks.
And it gets even better because as a result of the fact that people are now saying that when they were investing, that they may have been misled a little bit.
This company, Bronstein, Gerwitz and Grossman, are launching a class action against Beyond Meat for anybody who has acquired or purchased Beyond Meat Securities between the 27th of February 2025 and the 11th of November 2025.
They are launching a class action because they are saying that defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times because they were making it seem like they were doing way better according to this class action lawsuit than they actually were doing finance.
It's an interesting selection of people though.
might be true but something about this firm i don't trust them maybe but it is interesting that people i did see other reports on this saying that they are trying to launch a class action So it would just be funny if after all this, Beyond Meat has to show for it that they misled people and then got sued for it.
It wasn't really meat after all.
I know, right?
So yeah, don't trust fake meat eat a steak.
We've got plenty of rumble rants in for that.
Blowing out.
Bill Gates wants to control what the jerky consumes.
Bill Gates is gay, according to that as a random name.
Bill Gates is a bundle of sticks.
Just people sending us money to insult Bill Gates.
I mean, I'm all for it.
It's a lucrative business.
More lucrative than that, apparently.
Writer Craig Allen's Expeditionary 4 series features an alien race that's bred a steak plant, grown like lettuces but produce butchery red equivalents to cow.
Can see that in the future.
Bill Gates and the Red Meat Allergy00:03:08
Lyme disease was a man-made tick carrying disease that escaped from Plum Island off of Long Island, New York.
I'm pretty sure Bill Gates helped to fund it to push the red meat allergy that Lyme disease causes.
I have no idea to verify any of that, somebody just paid me to say it.
Um, that's the the, the theory around the lone star tick, one that makes you allergic.
I'm pretty sure Lime disease existed um, before we could even lab engineer stuff, because it's been in, like the Scandinavias, and has slowly moved to Britain.
But i've had maybe 40 or 50 ticks in my life and removed them all without getting the disease.
And that's not because i'm some dirty weirdo that rolls around in bushes.
It's just that I do do that, though.
It's just that I go camping a lot and I wear shorts uh, when I do it, so you're bound to get them.
But Lyme's Him's disease is genuinely nasty.
So, people are saying that an Indian man makes sense running that lab, he's trying to save the cows.
If that's the reason, at least it's a more noble cause for him than just social engineering.
Except for the fact that the cows in India just look like you know, when you look at a kid and you just like, yeah, you're you're living in an impoverished environment.
You can just see it on their face.
That's what I get when I look at Indian cows.
It's like, you poor creatures.
You're supposed to be eaten.
To be fair, sorry.
If I was living in a country where they were like eating Jesus all the time, I would probably set up a fake Jesus company to try and get them to eat that instead.
But the slightly dodgy analogy, that one.
How do you produce a fake Jesus?
How do you produce 3D printing and is the farm just like the farm just like a load of men on crucifixes?
You just get ducked, random hippie dudes with long hair.
It's what you said.
You take a few cells from Jesus and you inspire it to grow and culture, whatever.
You know, whatever you said earlier.
You pray to the lab-grown Jesus Christ.
You try and find some genetics on that shroud that was supposedly on his face.
I forgot what I was going to say now.
Either way, Matt G. Hammond's asking if Indians and Muslims would eat lab-grown meat, beef.
That's a good question.
Or lab-grown pork.
Imagine Hindus probably still wouldn't eat it, but Muslims have no problem eating beef.
Also, the cows in India, loads of them die because of consumption of litter on the floor.
So they're worshipped as deities, but they're eating India's rubbish.
Oh, that's nasty.
They don't restrict them in any way.
You can have one just wandering across a main street in Delhi, and they won't try and corole it because they think it knows better.
But it doesn't because it's a cow.
Cows get hit all the time.
Sorry.
Dump seed oils and ingredients your grandmother wouldn't recognise and you'll feel even better.
True.
Is Beyond Meat a lesbian focus group?
Well, this is Dan's question.
I think there might be overlap there.
Dildos are fake meat, according to Ever Eden.
So we can call lesbians vegetarians.
Want to see my meat, says Dan, while reaching into his pockets.
You should see him in the men's toilets.
And also, can Harry do a whole segment as Patrick Bateman's impersonation was spot on?
Wondering About Video Comments00:04:27
Thank you.
One of my friends actually compared me to Patrick Bateman, but personality-wise, which I don't think is true at all.
That's something I would go around telling people.
Quite an insult, really.
Was it all the prostitutes you've murdered?
Well, I'm doing it for you.
Was it just your physique?
I'm doing that for a good cause, though, isn't it, really?
I'm cleaning up the streets.
Only fan stocks.
Short them now while Harry is still free.
Right.
Oh, we can do some comments, can't we?
Oh, yeah, that's me, isn't it?
Do we have any video comments?
Oh, yes.
Any video comments, Harry?
Other Harry?
What?
No.
Okay, not today.
Dirty Belter.
Interesting name.
I wonder what Restore Britain's policy will be on capital punishment.
I think they're in favour of it from everything that Rupert said and the people involved.
I think he's actually just said it, hasn't he?
Yeah.
So I would imagine that.
So capital gains, tax, and inheritance tax.
I mean, we literally told you about inheritance tax.
I presume you might have said that before we got to it.
While deporting those involved in the Islamic rape gangs will be good for the country, I feel that something more permanent is required for true justice to be had.
There is a bit of a problem there in that maybe future crimes like that while it's getting sorted, but you can't really prosecute people with a new sentence for past crimes.
I think that's not likely to happen as much as it might seem moral.
I'll read two more, shall I?
Restore Britain makes me feel like there's finally a real ray of hope against this modern evil, at least somewhere in the world.
That is true, yes.
I actually caught myself yesterday when I was preparing this and writing articles about it thinking, wow, actually, I feel optimistic for the first time.
Yes.
You know, I'm a pretty cynical person.
It was like a genetic switch had been switched.
It was an unfamiliar feeling.
It made me feel uncomfortable.
I'm like, can I go back to it?
I know what that feeling was.
And you probably, because at your age, you would never have felt it before.
The feeling that you were looking for is hope.
It felt weird.
I've got to get used to it.
You'll figure it out at some point.
Maybe.
I've not grown up with this hope.
No.
And Lancelot, with a message I wholeheartedly support, says, Restore Britain's pubs, which is definitely something that needs to be on there.
That's a random name.
Says, so many problems to be avoided.
Stop pretending that midwits are equal.
Nobody has a problem with a small number of foreigners joining the Anglosphere and integrating.
However, most do not integrate, and those are the ones that should be kicked out.
Afrea.
Yes.
I mean, that's kind of what I'm going with.
But everybody's now trying to pretend.
Well, not everybody, but reform supporters are trying to pretend that he's like goose-stepping, gas chambering or something.
No, it's obviously not that at all.
Michael Bardrobis says, I don't know, Dan, Nigel knows.
Notice how he stutters when he's asked about replacement.
He recognises the problem.
He's just too much of a pussy to say so.
I don't know.
Does he?
Well, in that clip that you've played, it's funny to watch his body language because he's kind of like acting like a sulky teenager who's being called out by his parents.
He's kind of like slouching like this.
I don't know.
It's impossible, though, isn't it?
Where were you last night, Nigel?
Yeah.
I don't know.
It's impossible to tell.
You smell a lot like cigarettes, Nigel.
Well, that's probably true.
Yeah, yeah.
What Nigel, what Nigel, seeing reforms support evaporate calls restore racist?
Colony shocked.
I mean, yes, I mean, that reform are currently doing everything to restore that the Tories did to reform.
Unironically, and it's so obvious they're just repeating what was said to them like two years ago.
Well, they're regime creatures.
Don't interrupt your enemy while they're making a mistake.
They're going to alienate their entire base who don't care for that sort of thing.
And it's going to migrate everyone to restore.
So Michael Drybalbus, the other thing they leave out about the super size meat fraud, he was eating something on the range of 5,000 to 10,000 calories per day.
Jesus Christ.
Big fat bastard.
So two to four times the recommended calorie intake.
Yeah, I forgot about that part.
That is crazy.
No wonder he felt terrible.
Omar Award, you can always tell that you'll get a good cut of meat if it comes from a healthy looking cow.
There are so many possible layers of obfuscation for lab-grown meat to be stripped of as much nutritional value as possible while still meeting the minimum standards for food products.
Nutritional Value Stripped00:01:49
Yeah, people have been saying, well, a lot of the nutritional value comes from the environment that the cow will have been raised and lived in.
So where are you going to get that value?
And they said, well, we could just basically inject it back into the meat.
But then the question comes, well, if you can do that for me, then it also means you can take nutritional value out of the meat.
And when we have such hostile elites who want to engineer us socially and now biologically as well, they're talking about giving us allergies to meat, right?
If we give them that level of control, it's no longer in the hands of farmers, independent farmers.
It's in the hands of scientists who are connected to the Rockefellers.
Do I want them in charge of my nutritional, the nutritional value of my food?
No.
No, I just don't.
I don't trust that they wouldn't just strip it of all nutritional value and just make it so it gives me on the bare minimum that I need to stay alive.
What you need is on your steak, your real steak, you need which farm specifically it's come from and what the cow's name was.
That's the only standard I need.
Need its temperament, it's its top five albums.
This cow was called Daisy, she was from Suffolk, and she was an insufferable bitch.
Yeah, oh, we've got one more $10.
You seriously need to show 620 of the YouTube video from Brandon Lehman warning what UK and America has immigrate.
Seriously, take a look.
I don't know exactly what you're trying to say there, but thank you for the $10.
We'll maybe give that a look in.
Right.
Well, I've got things to do, so we better wrap up.
Don't you go waving that around, Dan.
It's just like the Christmas party all over again.