The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1348

Feb. 5, 2026 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:32:03

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1348

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
British Politics Chaos 00:14:20
	Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen.
	Welcome to the podcast of The Lotus Eaters for Thursday, the 5th of February, 2026.
	I'm joined by Nate and Luca, and today we're going to be talking about the absolute carnage that is British politics at the moment.
	A lot has happened in a very short amount of time.
	So, we're going to get into that.
	We will be talking about Rupert Lowe's rape gang inquiry.
	The media is not talking about this.
	Only Patrick Christie's, as I understand, even covered this in anything approaching mainstream media.
	Crickets.
	And some of the stuff that's come out of it has just been horrific.
	Yeah, it has genuine Epstein levels of horror.
	And then we're going to be examining the grey sludge that they intend to turn our country into and the future that they have promised us, which is really weird because it's the worst promise in the world.
	When you promise something to someone, you want to make it look like it's amazing, which is why I promise you, if you're a gold tier subscriber, you can go and look at our new beta test for our website.
	But how good does that look?
	Right?
	Go sign up to locities.com if you're a good, if you sign up for a gold tier subscriber, you can get in on the beta test as well.
	And you can see the website looks beautiful.
	Big redesign, brand new us for the new year.
	Been working on this for a long time, obviously, but it's being rolled out.
	So anyway, go do that, and we'll see you in a bit.
	So I love going back through just a couple of years ago.
	Anna Subri to feel normal, no psychodramas and scandals.
	The grown-ups are back in government, and people can just get on with their lives watching politics out of the corner of their eyes.
	Remember, Andrew Maher, you know what?
	It's this peace and stability.
	For the first time in many of our lives, actually, Britain looks like a little haven of peace and stability.
	Says Andrew Maher.
	And my favourite, probably my favourite, it's hard to pick a genuine favourite out of all this.
	It's nice, isn't it?
	The quiet from Otto English.
	Otto.
	It's been absolute chaos, right?
	It's been carnage.
	Speedrunning the collapse.
	It's crazy.
	Thing is, it was chaos pretty much immediately after everyone had tweeted these things out.
	Yeah, yeah, correct.
	There were loads of scandals pretty much immediately.
	And South.
	Well, the rudicon of stabbing, yeah.
	Yeah, it wasn't that.
	It was also Tulip Siddique.
	In the interest of time, I'm afraid that we've got to get on because there's loads to cover today, right?
	So Kimmy Bade Knock was raking over the Coles in Parliament.
	Watch a little bit of these clips just because they are very informative.
	So for anyone who doesn't know, the Epstein files have revealed that Peter Mandelson was a weird gay bumboy of Jeffrey Epstein.
	And I mean, literally, that's true, right?
	I'm not even...
	No lies.
	No, no, no.
	They had a weird relationship and it's really gross.
	And this came to light.
	And of course, Keir Starmer had appointed Peter Mandelson as the American British Ambassador to America, but also more than that, which we'll get into shortly.
	And so he's in trouble in Parliament.
	And man, Sama dealt with this really badly.
	If that was really the case, then he wouldn't mind if the ISC had a look.
	And let's be clear.
	He says the Cabinet Secretary makes it non-political, but that doesn't make it independent.
	What we want is an independent look.
	The ISC is independent.
	The Cabinet Secretary works for him.
	We know that there will be a cover-up because this implicates the Prime Minister and his Chief of Staff, Morgan McSweeney, a protégé of Peter Mandelson.
	The Prime Minister chose to inject Mandelson's poison into the heart of his government on the advice of Morgan McSweeney.
	His catastrophic lack of judgment, telling us now that he did know, has harmed the special relationship.
	It has endangered national security.
	It's not the humble address.
	Him.
	It's compromised our diplomacy and it has embarrassed our nation.
	After all of this, does he have the same full confidence in Morgan Mcsweeney that he had in Peter Mandelson rights?
	We need this.
	An essential part of my team.
	He helped me change the Labour Party and win an election.
	What a strange thing to say yeah.
	What an odd thing to say leaps up.
	Morgan Mcsweeney is an essential part of my team.
	What a okay, so peculiar thing.
	Yeah, essential means can't be the same without it, right?
	So Kier Starma's Labour government is not the same without Morgan Mcsweeney, Peter Mandelson's protege and the man who lobbied Starmer to bring Mandelson into the government.
	You don't understand.
	My government can't function without being plugged into the international paedophile network.
	That is word for word what he has said there.
	Basically right, and so the the?
	The question that everyone is focusing around now is that, did Starmer know that he was friends with Mandelson?
	Mr Speaker, I asked the prime minister a very specific question, did he know that Mandelson had continued his friendship with Epstein after the conviction he says?
	If he knew then what he knows now, what he did know?
	In january 2024, a journalist from the Financial Times informed the prime minister that Mandelson had stayed in Epstein's House even after that conviction for child prostitution.
	So did the prime minister conveniently forget this fact or did he decide it was a risk worth taking?
	Mr speaker, as um the house will expect, we went through a process.
	There was, there was a, there was a due diligence exercise and then there was security vetting by the security services.
	As you can see, meme mouthed yeah, but it wasn't very good then.
	If that was the case, thing is that was an abject failure, wasn't it?
	I remember at the time when Mandelson was appointed to America, like anon's on twitter were just saying he's still, and if anon's on twitter know, then people with access to the information of the British DEEP State knew correct and throughout this you could see.
	But can I reassure, his hands shaking, as Connor has pointed out here, like if you just just focus on his hands, he is absolutely wrecked here.
	Look at him holding his own hand, stop the shaking and things like that.
	So it's like, yeah, I mean that is just by government leaders.
	He knows how bad this is.
	So I think it's worth getting to.
	Um, you know the people in labor and their opinions on Peter Mandelson.
	Uh because, conveniently flipped instantly they, they weirdly they're deleting a lot of tweets.
	Oh weirdly, I mean, like Alasta Campbell from 2009, Mandelson's a class act.
	What, why would you?
	Why would you say in 2009 after, has he resigned once or twice?
	At that point, right for scandals like both he and Darling showed in different ways, the what it's authent, its authenticity, is what counts.
	So sorry, are you mental?
	But he wasn't not Mandelson, but connected to people.
	Yeah yeah uh, they all love Mandelson right, this?
	This is uh wonderful from Michael Gove.
	Why Peter Mandelson's the best choice from last year conservative everyone.
	Yeah yeah, exactly Dan Hodges in THE MAIL ruthless, cynical and cunning.
	Why Mandy is the perfect choice for the U.s ambassador.
	Sorry, what are we doing here folks, but this was amazing.
	Right now I can't show you the article because the article has been deleted, but this was published the day before yesterday and the day before the scandal broke, and it was Labor has a giant debt of politics to Peter Mandelson in the modern era from Adam Bolton people, Absolutely.
	There are people pointing out, like, well, you did go to Mandelson's wedding, right?
	Like, you were, you know, again, a really best friend of his.
	And I think it's worth pointing out that, oh, by the way, we've missed a link there, Samson.
	Oh, there we go.
	Mandelson has always known to be a serpent, right?
	This is how he was depicted in the 1990s in parody.
	Like, he is a snake.
	He has always been known to be a snake.
	And his nickname was the Prince of Darkness.
	And it was the Prince of Darkness when I was a kid.
	That was his nickname.
	He hasn't changed.
	He's remained the same and everyone knows it.
	So this whole like, oh my God, I can't believe Peter, the Prince of Darkness was an evil liar who was best friends with the most notorious international paedophile who used his connections for compromise and money off world leaders and various others.
	Like, we did know, right?
	Everyone knew that Peter Manson was a wrong'un, right?
	He's an obvious wrong'un.
	So anyway, like I said, a lot of people are deleting stuff quick.
	Here's just one example of West Streeting's fiancé just removing references to Waverford Manson.
	Just say, don't want that on there.
	Yeah, no, no kidding.
	No kidding.
	For some reason, you were all fine with this guy who you all knew was best buddies with Jeffrey Epstein.
	And you were just like, okay, well, that's weird.
	Doesn't that mean?
	No, no, we'll just have him come in and do things.
	That's totally normal.
	And so everyone is just like, right, okay, the Labour Party is a disgusting thing.
	The Labour Party is directly connected to Jeffrey Epstein and that network of bribery, compromised corruption, and paedophilia through Peter Mandelson.
	That's what everyone sees of the Blairite Labour Party as it stands now.
	And so obviously everyone is furious, right?
	Everyone is furious.
	And you can hear it in the tones of their voice.
	Look, this was our manifesto.
	One man, one word.
	Change.
	That's what we promised.
	That was the whole of what we as the Labour Party promised this country.
	Change.
	This looks more like the same.
	Should he step down?
	I think that he needs to think very hard about what is in the country's best interest and what is in his party's best interest.
	Which is obviously yes.
	You can tell here the anger in his voice.
	How dare you do this to us?
	And that is a Labour MP called Barry Gardner.
	But the point is actually well made.
	This is a continuity of Tony Blair's Labour Party.
	The serpent is still wrapped around the leader and is still worm-tonguing his way into his ear and still has the same connections to the disgusting, immoral, paedophilic network that he was always a part of.
	And of course, this all came out yesterday.
	Man, people were just like, okay, yeah, this is bad.
	One Labour MP behind the scenes said it's made things far, far worse.
	Couldn't believe some of his answers in the parliament.
	We were aghast.
	It seemed like being present at the political death of the Prime Minister, whether or not Morgan McSweeney goes first.
	And that seems to be what people are thinking because, of course.
	He's the link.
	He has to go as well.
	Oh, yeah.
	I mean, when Starma falls, a lot of them are going to go.
	Because the knives have just come out here, right?
	Starmer has made a lot of enemies in the Labour Party.
	Because remember, Starmer took it over when it was failing under Corbyn.
	And Starmer came in with, oh, no, we're going to restore politics to being appropriate and decent and proper.
	And this is clearly the opposite of this.
	And so he's really pissed off everyone, right?
	So obviously, he's pissed off the left, which is Gordon Brown, the Brownites.
	To be fair, one are they not pissed off?
	Sure, but this, but you know, he's really annoyed them.
	Yeah.
	Like Gordon Brown, for example, has decided, you know what, I'm going to give you some confidential info that I've been sitting on for decades about Peter Mandelson.
	Now that the time is right, it's like, okay, fair enough.
	You've got Richard Bergon and the Labour left, like speaking in Parliament, saying that Starmer deliberately turned a blind eye to the crimes of Mandelson because he was effective at suppressing the left in the Labour Party, which is probably true.
	You have John McDonnell coming out and going, no, I'm going to make sure that absolutely everything is out here because this is revenge.
	Blood is in the water.
	Blood is in the water.
	Starmer is vulnerable and they want to take their revenge because John McDonnell was the shadow chancellor of the exchequer.
	And Keir Starmer kicked out Jeremy Corbyn and nearly kicked him out.
	So brutal.
	Angela Rayner, Starma was like, Yeah, yeah, we'll release what you know, the what was it?
	The due diligence.
	Yeah, the due diligence.
	That was it.
	The due diligence report that we have on Mandelson.
	But we'll do it through our channels.
	And Angela Rayner's like, well, no, you should use the Intelligence Security Committee.
	And suddenly, what's Starmer's argument against it?
	Well, that might be terrible.
	That might make me look even worse.
	Yeah, exactly.
	That might be absolutely catastrophic to my case.
	So the Red Queen has come out and stuck the knife in, right?
	Good for her.
	Good for her, right?
	And then you've got other MPs who are just planning to release various files after Starmer has had to climb down on this because a bunch of backbenchers are really angry.
	There are questions of like Labour MPs suggesting that maybe one of the cabinet ministers should resign in order to sort of force Kier Starmer into a position where he has to essentially resign or call a general election.
	And also, remember, Nigel has been saying, oh, we've got a labor defection coming soon.
	Now's the time.
	Yeah, yeah, that's the same.
	Yeah, you will never get back to time.
	If you get a prominent, like, you know, blue labor, you know, strong defection, then again, more pressure on Keir Starmer to call an election.
	Especially because they're going to get destroyed if we actually have an election as well.
	So dead parliament walking.
	Absolutely.
	Probably about 300-plus Labour MPs who are going to get slaughtered in the elections.
	And so there was a crisis meeting in the Starma bunker.
	And in Street Source says Guido Fawkes that it's not all clear that McSweeney will survive.
	No, McSweeney.
	It's not clear that bloody Starma's going to survive.
	Imagine the sweat dripping under 10 Downing Street door.
Starma's Contact Controversy 00:13:11
	Oh my God.
	Yeah, exactly.
	This is basically the.
	I mean, look at the trending in the United Kingdom.
	Prince of Darkness.
	Like, this is absolute chaos and it's going on right now.
	And so just to be clear, Starmer has made no friends at all in the Labour Party, right?
	He shanked the left, he took over the NEC, kicked them all out, kicked anyone of any prominence out, and also kicked the former leader, Jeremy Corbyn, out, right?
	So that's the left is like, right, okay, Starmer is not our man.
	Then people got angry over him, David Lamb, being like, yeah, right, we're going to abolish jury's trials.
	A bunch of the labor, the blue labor types in the north were like, well, hang on a second.
	So rumor stirrings of a backbench revolt.
	Then people got angry that he blocked Burnham purely for careerist reasons.
	No, Burnham can't have Gordon and Denton because he is the most popular man in the Labour Party at the moment.
	And I, Kier Starmer, I'm the least popular person who has ever existed in human history.
	So am I wrong?
	Well, he's not a human.
	That's true.
	But the point being, he clearly did it for careerist reasons.
	And now Labour is going to lose Gordon and Denton in a time where they can't really be afforded to keep losing things, right?
	And then you have people angry over this.
	So Starmer is isolated.
	He is completely surrounded and he doesn't know who his allies are.
	And this is, I mean, he's even lost The Guardian, right?
	If you've even, if Kier Starmer has even lost The Guardian, just mental.
	This is their front page.
	It's over for Starmer.
	Say Labour MPs are made fury over Mandelson.
	They could have gone with anything.
	They could have gone with something that tried to support him or buttress him or something like that.
	No, gone.
	Remember Andrew Maher being like, yes, it's nice to have peace and stability back.
	No, Andrew Maher accepts.
	It's gone too far.
	There we are.
	Andrew Maher accepts, it's over.
	This is going to sound perhaps like a confession, even an embarrassing one.
	But here goes.
	I have always liked Keir Starmer.
	Worse, I think he is a fundamentally decent man in politics for the right reasons.
	So I say the following with genuine sadness.
	But I think we have entered the final stage of the Starmer Premiership.
	I don't know exactly how or when the end will come.
	Often these things are a surprise.
	And there are circumstances if nobody will he goes on and on.
	Can you possibly still say I think he's a decent man?
	Nobody believes this, Andrew.
	Because Andrew Maher and Keir Starmer are cut from exactly the same cloth.
	They believe in true 1997 Blairism.
	So I get that, but just publicly, the mood from the public, surely he would have a little bit more finger on the pulse that the public are they think Keir Starmer is a vile, degenerate now.
	I think that he thinks the public are just wrong.
	He genuinely believes in the politics that Starmer pronounces.
	Well, that's been the entire governing principle of Blairism, isn't it?
	Exactly.
	We've got loads to get through, but we'll have a little discussion at the end.
	So he's got Rosie Duffield.
	He's lost the TERFs.
	The TERFs in the Labour Party are like, yep, not happy about this.
	But he's also losing the minority MPs as well.
	Because obviously, Shibana Mahmood is actually an effective home office secretary who's cracking down on immigration.
	And so a bunch of the immigrant types are like, well, how dare you have a migrant crackdown?
	That's our constituency.
	And Shabana Mood's like, okay, but I've got to do what's good for the country.
	So he's losing everyone.
	He hasn't got anyone supporting him.
	Because why would you want to step up to support him for Peter Mandelson, a man whose very name is just dripping with slime and sleaze and always has been?
	What this has caused is a crumbling effect.
	And each crumble is a different faction of the Labour side.
	Correct.
	And they're all wondering why they were stitched together in the first place.
	Yeah.
	And so, I mean, Farage is like, yeah, look, this is definitely in its final weeks.
	This is not going to carry on for long.
	And correct, right?
	It's absolutely correct.
	How much are people paying attention to this?
	Well, only 5% are not aware of this.
	I think they definitely thought it would be the inverse.
	Yeah.
	And they were like, it's a lot.
	But they failed to understand that people remember Peter Mandelson.
	Peter Mandelson's famous in his day.
	And people care about children.
	And people, yeah, but I mean, obviously, they really underestimate that.
	They genuinely do.
	Absolutely.
	So about 44% of people, nearly half people, are following this closely.
	28% of people are following it, not very closely, but they're still following it.
	And 23% are aware, but not following it, with only 5% of people who are just like, what?
	i don't know what's happening so that's don't speak english yeah exactly So yeah, so that's not good.
	So Kier Starmer's defense is hinging on the security vetting, right?
	Starmer, oh, I forgot to put this bit earlier, but we'll put this.
	I am asking the Prime Minister something very specific, not about the generalities of the full extent.
	Can the Prime Minister tell us, did the official security vetting he received mention Mandelson's ongoing relationship with the paedophile, Jeffrey Epstein?
	Prime Minister?
	Yes, it did.
	It's over.
	And that's really.
	I hate Kemi, but that's really smart from Kemmy.
	I'll give her a devil.
	She did very well.
	Because she quite literally, it's really important to rein that home.
	His friendship with the paedophile, Jeffrey Epstein.
	It's like, yeah, let's not lose sight of that.
	You know, that's on record now.
	Yes.
	And Starmer just going, yeah, I knew.
	And I appointed him anyway.
	Even after the security setting.
	Buying admission.
	Yeah.
	The security.
	Like, this is why all the Labour MPs are like, well, that went badly.
	Yeah, it did.
	This is carnage.
	And this sort of been seen not just on the internet, BBC, GB News, all the ones who plug it away from social media.
	The whole country has seen that now.
	And the thing is, like, being friends with the paedophile is terrible.
	Don't know why you do it.
	Why would anyone be wanting to be friends with a pedophile?
	But Epstein was not just a paedophile.
	It's not just some guy in his basement downloading terrible images or abusing children.
	What it is, is a network.
	Epstein used this network for power, money, and influence.
	And this is the issue, right?
	The real issue that makes this really politically salient that is actually kind of getting lost in the oh, that guy's a paedophile.
	Not you, obviously, that guy.
	Not anyway, like in the smear of, and don't remember the righteous smear of it, is that Mandelson sent emails to Epstein giving him advance notice of an impending EU bailout of half a trillion euros.
	It's treasonous activity.
	Treason.
	And Starmer called him a traitor in the parliament.
	He called him a traitor.
	He sent him internal, sent Epstein internal government information about the state of the UK economy and lobbied the Treasury on banking policy at Epstein's suggestion.
	So Epstein and his network make demands.
	Mandelson makes it happen.
	Something comes down the pipeline in the British government.
	He passes that on to Epstein so he and his network can profit from it.
	This is him being a traitor.
	Starmer is right to call Mandelson a traitor.
	The question is, why was he so key to your government?
	Why is he not in prison yet?
	Why is he not in prison yet?
	Mandelson has been kicked out of the House of Lords.
	He's been kicked off of the Privy Council.
	He's been kicked out of the Labour Party.
	And I imagine is really quite alone at the moment, as he should be.
	But he always should have been because this is nothing new.
	Yeah.
	Everyone knew all of this.
	As Kemmy made him admit, he knew that he was buddies with Epstein.
	He stays at his houses.
	And now we've got the emails.
	My God.
	And we'll go through some, which is one of the emails in a bit.
	But it's not like this is new, right?
	11 months ago, it was questionable about foreign influence operations from China.
	As one person close to this says, quote, anyone with a good experience of China should know the company, the consultancy firm that Mandelson is working for, is working for the Chinese government.
	So either Lord Mandelson has a shallow knowledge of China, which is dangerous given he is the foreign diplomat and the work he does with Chinese companies, or he is willfully working with a United Front organization, which is unpardonable.
	So either we're led to believe that Mandelson is incompetent and doesn't understand the role of the Chinese government in these organizations they have outreaching them, or he is just a traitor.
	And the answer is, of course, as Kier Starmer has said, he is a traitor.
	And yet, this was all out in public.
	You put him in your cabinet.
	Court your government.
	Anyway, so the thing that this hinges on is the vetting process.
	And this is from the BBC's had live summary, so I'm just going to read from what I picked out of earlier, right?
	So in the vetting process, there were three questions.
	One, why is he continued contact with Epstein after Epstein was convicted?
	Two, why was he reported to have stayed in one of Epstein's home when the financier was in prison?
	And three, was he associated with a charity founded by Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell that the financier had backed?
	And we haven't got the answers to these yet.
	But what possible answers could actually change the facts that the questions are based on?
	Nothing will vindicate this.
	Starmer says, I knew he had contact with Epstein after he was convicted, right?
	Okay.
	I knew that he stayed at one of Epstein's homes while he was in prison for soliciting sex with a minor, a trafficking minor, whatever it was.
	And then why was he associated with Ghislaine Maxwell's charity?
	Well, Starma's defense is, oh, he lied to us.
	It's like, well, did he deny that he was these things?
	Did he deny that he'd gone to his home?
	Did he deny that he'd kept in contact?
	You took the Prince of Darkness at his word.
	We'll get to that.
	Exactly, but it's a terrible defence because then it shows, I mean, we all know he's incompetent anyway, but now he's just freely admitting it to everyone else.
	It's like, oh, well, he just lied.
	It's like.
	But what was the like?
	Why has he continued contact with Epstein?
	Well, the point is he has contact with Epstein.
	The reason for it, oh, it was just I sent him a Christmas card.
	Who cares?
	Why are you sending Epstein Christmas cards?
	Whatever the answer, there is no good answer to that.
	The problem isn't it?
	It's not why did he continue contact?
	Did you continue contact?
	And the answer is yes, as Starmer has said.
	Therefore, boom, black mark.
	Why did he stay at the Epstein's homes?
	Not did he stay at Epstein's home.
	No, he did stay.
	We know he did.
	Therefore, he's obviously got close contact, familiarity.
	What could possibly be the answer to, oh, well, you know, I just did that because I didn't want to get a hotel.
	I didn't have my card on me, so I couldn't get a hotel.
	What kind of excuse are we coming out with here?
	And then, you know, why was he associated with the charity from Ghislaine Maxwell?
	It's like, who knows?
	But, like, even if Mandelson, the Prince of Darkness, tells lies over these, he still has to concede that all of these things were true.
	And that's the issue.
	That's the issue.
	And so, and so Starmer's entire claim is just, well, he lied to me, and I'm a f ⁇ ing idiot.
	I'm a total rube.
	It's day one in my job.
	And somehow the Prince of Darkness just fooled me and I just believed it.
	It's like, no, that's not acceptable, right?
	That's not acceptable.
	And everyone knows it.
	And this preposterous.
	Apparently, the housing secretary, Steve Reid, told BBC Radio 4 that Mandelson made out that his relationship with Epstein was over and barely existed.
	Why is he staying at his house then?
	Barely existed.
	It still exists then, doesn't it?
	I mean, this is from an exchange from Peter Manson and Jeffrey Epstein.
	I mean, it's from 2012, but like, literally, I've never left your side is like, I never left your side from Peter Manson.
	And they're basically just pledging fealty to one another.
	There's one, isn't it, where he calls him his best mate or something like that?
	It's crazy.
	And these emails go on for decades, obviously, but this was just the, you know, like saying, oh, I barely knew Epstein.
	You said, I never left your side.
	I was always there with advice and moral support.
	I never turned away.
	Like, sorry, that's not someone who barely knows anyone.
	Even if you've stopped speaking to that person, which you know, Keir Starmer knows that he hadn't because he kept staying at his apartments while he was in jail.
	Anyway, so Starmer gave his speech, and I didn't have time to clip it because it was literally just before the podcast.
	But it's a pretty weak speech.
	And Keir Starmer, as you can see from the thumbnail there, looks embattled.
	Absolutely embattled.
	And rightly so.
	He came out and said, I'm sorry for believing Mandelson's lies and I should not have appointed him.
	Okay, but that speaks to your judgment because like you say, you're the prime minister.
	Exactly.
	He's the prince of darkness.
	Like, Starma is kind of acting like he's the victim of this.
	Yeah.
	It's like, no, Starmer, you're the one who made the choice.
	Facilitated this.
	You're the prime minister.
	You made the choice.
	And if you were too stupid to believe Mandelson over lies that, honestly, I just don't even think can exonerate him given the questions that were asked.
	I mean, why are you...
Prime Minister's Embattled Defense 00:15:18
	Also, prime ministers have resigned over far less than this.
	What did Boris resign over?
	Well, it was bloody partique.
	It wasn't.
	You had a party.
	I mean, it should have been the Boris Wave and all the other treasonous things you did, but it was that.
	You forgot him.
	Exactly.
	Boris, and Keir Starmer was there.
	Boris isn't fit to lead.
	Boris isn't fit to lead.
	Well, because he had a party during lockdown.
	You had a party during lockdown.
	Communists have no honor.
	No.
	But the point is, if this was a conservative, they would have been out yesterday.
	And yet Keir Starmer is clearly determined to cling on by his fingernails no matter what happens, right?
	So obviously he impugns his own judgment here and says, yes, I am actually a moron of the highest order to believe literally the Prince of Darkness about his excuses.
	Then he starts going on the attack.
	He's like, yep, the online right, racist, Matt Goodwin and reform.
	He literally calls out Matt Goodwin by name, racists, and they're the divisive problem with this country.
	He attacks podcasters who point out a lack of ethnic integration in the country.
	Yeah, hey, Keir, how you doing?
	Just say what we see.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Yeah.
	We just live through it, mate.
	And then he goes on to talk about Gawthon and Denton, which is a great example of ethnic segregation.
	Like literally the west of it is Muslim and the east of it is English.
	And it's just like, okay, brilliant.
	Right.
	Then he attacks the left for being left wing and being too left wing on the Blairite project.
	He's doing everything he can, but it shows you who his enemies are.
	And it's everyone.
	Because I'm the least popular prime minister in existence, but my project is so perfect that damn you all for disagreeing with it.
	Correct.
	And then he makes an appeal to rally whatever is left of the center to say, I'm going to make an appeal to multiculturalism.
	I'm going to reject that whiteness is the same thing as Britishness.
	And he literally gives you the Blairite multi-culture spiel of bringing in all these people, making them integrate, and they will be just as British as you.
	And actually, you're just a racist, right?
	And then he promises more power to governments and quangos, more regulation to control the migrants.
	He promises to put money in their communities.
	He promises to pay them money to go into our communities.
	So you can see that he has just been like, right, give me the Anasubri sort of, you know, centrist Blairite types, the few of them that remain, and the migrants.
	I'm going to use them to pay them to change the country.
	That's his entire goal.
	And that's what he comes out.
	And it's just like, okay, and it's the thing called Pride in Place.
	That's the campaign that he's decided to try and launch as if he's got any political capital to launch any campaigns.
	And all the journalists are just like, okay, Keir, that's very interesting.
	As if the pastoralists are not scandal soon, shall we?
	Exactly.
	You can't just ignore this.
	This is an absolute disgrace.
	This is an incredible scandal.
	And you're at the heart of it.
	Also, just as if the last 30 years haven't been dedicated to deconstructing any sense of pride of place that we actually have in Britain.
	Yeah, pride in place is what, inner cities?
	Yeah.
	The way they look.
	They take such great pride in their place, don't they?
	You remember their plan is to diversify the shires.
	Oh, they want the cities in your local area, in your village, in your town, in your countryside.
	That's what they want for you.
	And Keir Starmer is basically promising to pay the migrants to go do that, to go there and then vote for him.
	It's like, right, so ethnic replacement as policy because Keir Starmer is on his last legs, right?
	So anyway, let's, I know this is going on, but let's talk about Morgan McSweeney a bit, right?
	So I'm just going to read from this BBC article.
	So from his early life, this is from a book called Get In, which is authored by a couple of guys.
	He dropped out of school and went to live in an Israeli kibbutz for six months, then returned to London to study at Middlesex University, leaving with a degree in politics and marketing.
	He joined Labour under Tony Blair, worked in a junior role at the party's headquarters.
	He started working for Steve Reid, who is now the housing secretary.
	But at the time, he was a councillor in Lambeth in South London, where he was trying to regain control of the party from the hard left.
	In 2006, McSweeney helped run the party's successful campaign to take control of the council, with Reid becoming the leader.
	His reputation as a skilled campaign and strategist was further cemented in Barking and Dagenham, where the far-right anti-immigrant British National Party was gaining support and hoping to win its first parliamentary seat in 2010.
	So you can see the two flanks of the Blairite project.
	No, we've got to crush the left and we've got to crush the right.
	His reputation, I know, I can't remember.
	He played a key role in this fight to defeat the BMP in the area, but his campaigns were not always a success.
	In 2015, he ran Blairite Liz Kendall's bid to become Labour leader, but she only got 4.5% of the votes and the contest was won by Jeremy Corbyn.
	In 2017, he became the director of a think tank called Labour Together, which opposed the direction of the party under Corbyn and went on to back Keir Starmer.
	They got fined nearly 15 grand for late and inaccurate reporting of donations.
	And during the time of the fine, McSweeney then left Labour Together to run Keir Starmer's 2020 leadership bid, becoming his chief of staff in opposition, where he played a key role in removing Corbyn's supporters from positions of power.
	The Times reported that it was he that masterminded what became Starmer's three-year plan: detoxifying the party, becoming an effective opposition when outflanking the Conservatives on crime, defense, and economy.
	And as Labour's campaign director, McSweeney was tasked with devising the party strategy for July's election, which wasn't a good one, just to be clear.
	Yeah, it wasn't that that made him win.
	No, exactly.
	They were going to get crushed if it wasn't for Nigel Farage.
	Nigel Farage delivered their victory.
	So Morgan McSweeney completely lucked into this victory.
	His strategy was obviously not a good one.
	But this saw left-wing figures sidelined and caused fierce rows with the trade union movement.
	Oh, yeah, that's another forgot to mention.
	There are so many people that Starmer has alienated.
	Yeah, the trade union.
	Oh, yeah, he's alienated everyone.
	So anyway, among the Labour MPs, he also selected his wife to be elected as a former councillor in Lambeth, who now represents Hamilton and Clyde Valley.
	And so this is why Keir Starmer leapt up and zone.
	Morgan McSweeney is essential to this.
	Because Morgan McSweeney is like an insane Blairite operative who is deeply connected.
	And Morgan McSweeney is the person who persuaded him to take on Mandelson.
	His former.
	And Mandelson McSweeney has described Mandelson as his mentor.
	McSweeney is Mandelson's protege.
	So it's like, right, okay, that's weird and gross, isn't it?
	Right.
	And then you've got, of course, Mandelson getting really deeply involved in Starmer's government.
	He was directly involved in picking Labour's candidates for the 2024 general election.
	But he's not even the ambassador to the United States at that point.
	Yeah, he was nothing, essentially.
	He was Morgan McSweeney's, like, Emperor Palpatine, like Sith Lord to Morgan McSweeney's, like, you know, Sith apprentice.
	And this is what he's saying.
	He masterminded the 2025 September cabinet shuffle.
	Peter Mandelson is literally puppeteering, like Palpatine, Starmer's Labour Party.
	And this is why Starmer's like, oh no, Morgan McSweeney, and then obviously Mandelson or whoever are core to Starmer's government.
	They're just core to it, right?
	Look at just how embedded this is with cabinet ministers, with labor figures, with labor grandees and new labor grandees, MPs and ministers and government aides.
	Mandelson is at the heart of all of these decisions.
	Mandelson is Starmer's regime, basically.
	And then you've got really weird questions, really weird questions that wouldn't have otherwise been connected except through the position of paedophile friend and pervert advocate Peter Mandelson, which is a fifth Ukrainian rent boy who has been arrested for an attack on Starmer's private property.
	Yeah.
	Wow.
	Well, I hadn't heard about this.
	Me and Bo spoke about this.
	This is a weird thing that's been going on, but suddenly it makes it look like Mandelson has some sort of compromat on Starma.
	Why are these young, attractive boys attacking Starmer's properties?
	And is it anything connected to the guy who is best friends with the pedo trafficker?
	Don't know, but there's a real question.
	I mean, the person they arrested was 19.
	Yeah.
	Like, do we think that the whatever Starmer did was last year?
	Or do we think it was like three or four years ago or six years ago, right?
	Who knows?
	Anyway, the point being, like, there are a lot of unanswered questions there.
	And honestly, I would be shocked if Mandelson is not in some way involved in that.
	But then you've got the last thing is Rupert Lowe standing up in Parliament and saying, look, we all owe a great vote of thanks and gratitude to Elon Musk for exposing the Mandelson scandal.
	If it wasn't, old Twitter would have just suppressed all of this.
	The Epstein files would have gone nowhere.
	Nothing would have happened.
	And he got booed in Parliament for this.
	So the point is by the Blairite labour types, obviously.
	They're unrepentant.
	They are not sorry about this.
	And they have a plan to get out of it.
	And so basically, the Labour left, the disenfranchised trade unions, and the blue labor types, and the immigrant caucus in there, whatever you want to call it, all of these factions essentially need to get together and bring down Kier Starmer.
	And if that can't be done, A, you're incredibly weak.
	And B, he's got a plan that is just raw evil for the country.
	And he is just directly connected to raw evil anyway.
	Raw evil was controlling this Labour Party.
	Making all of the executive decisions that Starmer himself should have been making.
	So mental needs to be sorted, doesn't it, lads?
	I was going to say it's crazy that he's not had a vote of no confidence yet.
	No letters have been sort of drawn up.
	Nothing.
	I remember there were so many for the Conservatives.
	Like every other week, there was like, oh, yeah.
	No confidence motion.
	Blah, blah, blah.
	The Labour Party.
	And the reason I think that's the case is because the Labour Party knows this is probably the last Labour government.
	That's true.
	It's just ever, right?
	Who votes Labour after this?
	Like, almost no one.
	Like, their vote share has collapsed almost everywhere.
	So it's just like, yeah, you're done.
	There have been lots of super chats on this.
	I'm going to summarize by reading one or two just for the sake of time, I'm afraid.
	Logan says, I have you know the title of Dark Lord belongs to Tony Blair.
	No, no, no, no.
	This is like the Lord of Prince of Darkness has been his title for a long time.
	I don't think Tony Blair is as well connected as Mandelson.
	And Tony Blair, with Mandelson and Epstein, come up in the Epstein Files talking about him.
	And they don't really understand where Tony Blair's getting his money.
	So he's got his own network he's a part of.
	But anyway, it's a long thing to go through.
	But after reading the Epstein Files, I'm now convinced every conspiracy is true.
	All of them.
	I'm sorry I doubted you, Carl.
	Bigfoot is real.
	You know, I didn't Google Bigfoot in the Epstein Files.
	Should have done.
	But anyway, for the sake of time, let's move on.
	All right.
	So, ladies and gentlemen, as we've covered in the last segment, the Blairite consensus is collapsing.
	This paradigm that we've been imprisoned in for decades and decades now is falling apart around what will hopefully be the final Labour government.
	And I think it bears remembering that part of that paradigm was multiculturalism.
	And though this problem that we have did not begin with Tony Blair coming in in 97, in fact, the problem of the rape gangs began earlier than that, in even, you know, not quite long after 1950.
	Right.
	As soon as these immigrant communities started to arrive, people were speaking about this and they were derided, whether they were part of the National Front or whatever it was in the 70s, for being concerned about this sort of thing.
	And then the entire apparatus of the Blairite state has existed in a place to hide the heart of darkness at the center of their entire project.
	And that is the rape gangs, which have gone on for decades now and still continue to this day.
	And this has happened through red and blue, from Tory to Labour.
	They have all covered it up.
	They have all been complicit in it.
	And no one in those governments has really worked hard enough in order to shine a light on it and actually get some justice for these poor victims.
	And you alerted me to this, Carl, and I hadn't actually seen this clip before, but it is staggering and we should play it from George Osborne.
	This wasn't coming across the desks of cabinet ministers.
	I mean, I don't know whether you ever had any dealings with it.
	I didn't.
	I didn't directly.
	I mean, there was definitely, you know, there was the emerging prosecutions in places like Rotherham.
	And I guess there was a sense in conservative circles that, you know, this was embarrassing for Labour because these areas were run by Labour councils, that the Labour councils often had, drew a lot of support from the local Pakistani origin community, that they didn't want to kind of call it that.
	There was definitely, but we never thought that was something that you could sort of politically exploit, frankly.
	Really?
	I mean, I would have thought if you...
	Ed Bulls, really?
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	This is not something that should have been used to politically exploit your opponents.
	This is the worst scandal in British history.
	That's what's ever happened in the islands.
	Yes.
	We've never had anything this bad happen.
	Right.
	I really want that to come across for people who are listening at home.
	This is the worst thing.
	All of the tyrannies and monarchies and kings that we've had in the past never covered up something as bad as this.
	Hundreds of thousands of girls at the very minimum.
	Yes, absolutely.
	It's savage and it's disgusting.
	And so naturally, after Elon started tweeting very, you know, good for him, about it towards the end of the prior year, obviously this forced it back into the public sphere.
	And Westminster had to confront the fact that the richest, most powerful man in the world was saying the most followed man in the world has allowed, why have you allowed all this to happen?
	And so there was pressure put on Starma's government to have a national inquiry, not a local inquiry where it's going to be compromised by the demographics of those particular constituents.
	This is what Jess Phillips did.
	Was it Black Paul or somewhere?
	Black Burns, someone like that?
	They asked the government for an inquiry and she just kicked it back to them saying, no, you can do it.
	I said, no, no, the problem is they can't do it.
	They don't want to mark their own homework.
	Exactly.
	And so Starmer ended up pivoting on this and saying, oh, actually, all right, we will have a national inquiry.
	But as the BBC themselves were forced to admit, Sakiya Starmer has defended his decision to hold a national inquiry into grooming gangs after previously accusing those calling for one of jumping on the far-right bandwagon.
	There was so much of that.
	Well, there was a Labour MP that was caught saying it's a far-right dog whistle and all this racist dog whistling.
	Yeah.
	I accept that.
	Now do something about it.
	Yes.
	That doesn't defence, is it?
Birmingham, Bradford, and Beyond 00:08:10
	Yeah.
	And so we'll get another report, another paper, and this from one from the government will apparently take three years and will have a budget of £65 million.
	And so we can see where this is going.
	There is no even...
	TikTok, though, what's happened?
	Nothing's happened.
	Yeah, exactly.
	I had a look, and the last update there was on this was December of last year, just saying, oh, we've appointed a few people and something might happen in the UK.
	I did a statement here about that as well because there was conversations about who was heading the inquiry on the sort of hearing committees.
	And they were like, well, we don't want that person because they're connected.
	Change it.
	But everyone's just dragging their heels.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	Now, we at the Lotus Eaters, we did a roundtable talking or going through the trial transcripts for some of these rapists, and it was honestly the worst thing I have ever read.
	It was disgusting.
	And honestly, I don't even know if I can repeat some of these things on YouTube, which is why it's on the website behind the paywall.
	But you have as well now, of course, because of all of this, Rupert Lowe.
	And Sammy Woodhouse and these wonderful people have come forward and they have got a public-funded volunteers just contributing their own money and they've managed to accrue, basically get on its feet an independent inquiry.
	And now this is one that puts the survivors at the front of it.
	Obviously, because it is not official government inquiry.
	It doesn't have statutory powers or anything, but it's something.
	They can't summon people.
	But what they can do is give these victims a chance to speak about something that the entire system of authorities have made sure that they cannot speak about for decades upon decades.
	And it's worth noting that off the back of this and all that's come and the fact that we're a few days into the rape gang inquiry now, that I had a look on Google this morning.
	I took this screenshot, and you'll see here that only GB News yesterday and Patrick Christie's segment that you did on it have reported on this.
	The other ones are from last August and trying to discredit it from the London Evening Standard.
	I mean, it looks like there's an independent article here.
	India Today.
	Okay, great.
	Thanks, India Today.
	Actually, thanks.
	I appreciate it.
	But no one in Britain reads.
	Well, I mean, no one in Parliament reads India Today.
	Well, where is the Sun?
	Where is the Daily Mail?
	Where is The Telegraph, The Times, The Guardian, any of them.
	Where is the reporting from the BBC, which our taxpayer money goes into what we're supposed to believe is some national form of representation on television?
	Where is it for these crimes?
	And so, as I say, Patrick Christie's had a segment yesterday.
	It was very good.
	I was particularly impressed, I will say, with this lady here, CEO, Marilyn Hawes, who spoke very, very well on it and really put the anger across.
	And so we begin to sit down and have the trial.
	And some of the things that are coming out about it are abhorrent.
	But the important thing, of course, is that we know.
	The thing is, we have not actually had a lack of information about the nature of these crimes.
	We understand the procedure of them.
	We understand the commonalities of the victims and how they were brought into this world of darkness.
	And we also understand how the authorities covered it up.
	What we have been lacking for decades now is an actual authority to approach this without an ideological lens that requires it to somehow provide justice for the girls and simultaneously balance the preservation of multiculturalism.
	No one's lost their jobs.
	We're still paying for ex-police chiefs to have their pensions, for God's sake.
	I mean, it's an absolute travesty.
	How many people resigned over this?
	Nothing.
	But you are right.
	The ideological lens that is approached with it is the we have to preserve multiculturalism, as you rightly point out.
	And that means that the gory details of what has happened has been withheld from the public.
	So you get to hear what they say in the courts, but you don't get to hear what the actual detail of what they did is.
	And there's a lot hidden in the term grooming gang, right?
	There's many years of abuse, many thousands of rapes are locked up.
	And for some of the girls, it's literally hundreds in the case of that one girl hundreds of times.
	And you'd think, right, okay, the sheer quantity of human misery that is being covered up by the word grooming gang is it has to be unpacked.
	And that's what I think the value of the rape gang inquiry is.
	I absolutely agree.
	And as Rupert says here, we owe it to this country to say clearly and without fear, no ideology, no institution, no cultural excuse, no religion will ever again be allowed to stand in the way of justice.
	That is why we are here and that is why these hearings matter.
	And very well said.
	He's absolutely right.
	And I'll just say as well, there were some really good.
	I heard speeches from all three of the panelists, Sammy Woodhouse and Graham, the barrister in the center of it as well.
	And it was very strong.
	And so we have here a testimony from Maron West and his efforts to deliver change.
	And as he reports here, as the father of a rape gang survivor, I asked Jess Phillips to look into this.
	And as you say, Cal, she completely agreed with me and said, oh, yes, we can do that.
	We can do that in a couple of months.
	That was 18 months ago.
	Nothing has changed.
	She's the government minister for women.
	She says a little cretting, honestly.
	Just an awful, vile woman.
	She knows if she were to do this, it's political for her.
	She's going to lose her constituency in Birmingham Yardley next election.
	But she was going to lose it anyway.
	She was on the night.
	She couldn't even do a good thing on the way out.
	She still had to fight for the preservation of this corrupt auditor Twitter.
	And sorry, just to say, ladies and gentlemen, Graham Smith is the barrister.
	I just lost it in the notes there.
	And so we have, again, here, they called it the house, the party house.
	So there were constantly men coming, anywhere between 10 and 20 at any one time in the house.
	But one time on Eid, I remember him shouting at me, telling me I had to get friends out because his relatives were coming from Birmingham to celebrate Eid and they were expecting girls to be waiting here for them.
	And this speaks to the network of it.
	And this is something that we discussed in great detail on that roundtable.
	How many of your relatives could you invite?
	None.
	Obviously.
	I mean, just the entire communities, isn't it?
	They just need to be scooped up.
	That's the point.
	It's a community.
	David Starkey has been describing this as a clan issue.
	But it is, though.
	That is tribal culture.
	It is absolutely correct.
	But this is a binding agent in the clan.
	Yes.
	As in, they do all of this together because it essentially brings them close together, makes them all the same.
	And this is something that is just what they do.
	Yeah, it is.
	And so we also have here, we should hear from Maron West in this particular testimony.
	This is organised crime, and the network is massive.
	I believe they're all interlinked.
	She was trafficked across the country.
	I really want to talk to you about that.
	The network.
	So, I mean, again, a whole question to consider as a father, but how far around the country was your daughter Scarlett transported?
	Bradford, Birmingham, and London.
	Mostly Bradford.
	Right up and down the country.
	Yeah.
	So these gangs, the interlinks, do you think there's a network of gangs throughout the country?
	Absolutely.
	Muslim network of gangs.
	Muslim, yeah.
	And people talk about County Lions.
	Is it all linked?
	It's all interlinked.
Casting Out Anne Boleyn 00:14:57
	Again, in my experience.
	And we know this for a fact.
	Just to be clear, mechanically, this is identical to what Epstein did.
	If you actually read Virginia Guffery's book, or if you read any of the emails that Epstein sent, It's an ethnic network that views outsiders as, frankly, worthless.
	They said in their own language, but you know, exactly, yeah, exactly.
	Not only have the Groomings admitted it, Epstein admitted it in his emails, literally calling cattle and things like this.
	So this is about a particular Middle Eastern sort of attitude towards non-in-group women.
	It's like, no, they're there for to be sex slaves, basically.
	Right.
	And so again, I just, I really want to give these people the opportunity in as much as possible scope to use their own words to describe their experiences.
	In the serious case view, it was acknowledged that my criminal record should be squashed because I only have convictions aged between 13 and 18, which is exactly the years that I was abused.
	One of them is for possession of a lethal weapon in a public place, because one of the men were beating me in my house and there was a full night of horrible stuff going on, and he sent me in the kitchen to make him a pizza and as I was cutting the pizza, I just started threatening him with the knife and I karate, chopped his arm with it and he went.
	And then he came back and he started kicking the door.
	So I left the doorstep and I chased him to the car with the knife and at the same time a police van pulled up.
	So one of the neighbours must have rang, they must have heard the screaming and stuff, and the police instead let him drive away and they arrested me for possession of a lethal weapon in a public place because I left the doorstep.
	And this is consistent, because what it comes down to is the fact that well, for one thing, this entire entire calamity and this evil has happened because of fear of Blairite and you know sort of like post-war authorities and dealing with something if an accusation of racism can be dealt about, you know the outcome of it.
	And also as well because the authorities know deep down that the English people, the actual natives, are easier to govern, have more, a greater sense, a sense of consent for the authorities above them, and that these people are actually kind of ungovernable.
	Which is why during the Southport riots you got, please leave all of your weapons at the mosque.
	Because they realize that the where they take their moral authority from is not the police stations and the British institutions of the local community, it's within their own isolated institutions.
	It's why they deal with community leaders in these, in these communities.
	Yes, because it's the community leaders that have the real authority, like the patriarch of the mosque or whatever it is.
	It's not, not the police themselves.
	Sammy Woodhouse points out here.
	Heartbreaking testimony, again today at the rape gang inquiry hearings, police arrested and criminalized a child who was being gang raped, while allowing the perpetrators to go free.
	We've been working with her while she was in prison, only release.
	Yesterday she came to share her harrowing story.
	This is all to protect multiculturalism.
	Yes, Kierstama is promising.
	This is what they have to do to protect it.
	Everything that they have Done these past 30 years to tell you that they are preserving some sort of good moral order has been built on the altar of our own children.
	There is no number of defenceless, vulnerable, young white English girls that is too many for them to continue on this march through our country.
	It is truly evil.
	And so it's no surprise, really, that, as I say, we see so much support from the public.
	This has not come from the government.
	This has been done in spite of government obstruction, right?
	We can see here £650,000 near enough reached so far with over 20,000 supporters from across the country.
	And when you compare that with the £65 million budget that the official government inquiry is supposed to have, it just has the force of the government itself behind it.
	Yes.
	It just only serves to highlight how obviously the government are dragging their feet in this because the entire thing is ruinous to their own worldview and their own structure.
	And all the time that this goes on, they continue to talk about, oh, Yvette Cooper, in Sudan, rape is being systemically used as a weapon of war.
	I believe it.
	Where else is that happening?
	Yeah.
	Oh, in your own constituencies Yvette, the ones that you imported, right?
	Circa 1950, we didn't have this problem.
	This wasn't a thing.
	This is something that has been imported with the will of those in power against the consent of those beneath.
	And as Rupert and Connor point out here, you know, this is what it is.
	It is a systemic use of rape as a form of warfare against the English communities of this country.
	And the other thing as well, just to say, and I want to end with these two points, is that the entire justice system is so compromised that it's no wonder.
	And we just have to pretend when we see headlines like this, the British public just have to entertain the fantasy that there is no ethnic component to this.
	Right?
	If you had a son who raped someone and you were the mayor and you covered it up, it would be unthinkable, absolutely unthinkable for us to do that.
	But if it's Naheed Ejaz, then absolutely, you can have your Labour mayor mother cover it up.
	And it's exactly the same thing here.
	We see judges of obvious foreign Muslims.
	Yeah.
	I don't know what you're talking about.
	Just happens to basically be acquitting so many people of sexual assaults and crimes that should obviously have resulted in convictions.
	And so this is the state of things.
	And this is why it is deeply commendable that Rupert and Sammy Woodhouse and everyone involved in getting this inquiry on its legs and now having it broadcast out is so important.
	And if Sky News and the BBC and all of the newspapers aren't going to report on this, then you can be damn sure that we're going to have a good go because this is something that every household in Britain needs to know.
	Drunk Changeling says, forcing the native tribes to ever more remote locations via immigration while destroying the traditional food source, the pub.
	Well, this is the reason that they're like, right, we need to diversify the shires.
	This is the reason they know that we've retreated into the shires.
	It's like, no, no, no, you can't have your own place there.
	We've got to get you.
	Sigilstone says this with the last Labour government.
	Next week, Nigel announces defection to reform Kirstama.
	Maybe.
	Is Labour only upset because Epsley was not grooming British girls?
	No, they're upset because everyone's making a big deal out of it.
	That's the reason.
	There you go.
	No pinch that.
	All right, well, going along with this sort of theme, I thought we would talk about the sort of multicultural grey slop ooze society that they want for Britain.
	Few a whole sort of set of examples here, basically.
	With the overarching theme is that if everything is for everyone, it's for nobody at all.
	And it's very much the I say soul, but it's the, you know, it's culture, it's character, which, you know, you could sort of trickle down and say it's our soul being leeched out into everything, just taken from us, taken from us.
	And there's a few things which sort of spawn this on.
	I saw this, and it's fascinating, to be honest.
	BBC told to avoid clunky colourblind casting and preachy anti-colonial storylines and drama series.
	Who's told them that?
	I don't think they're capable of that.
	yeah yeah so there was former bafta chair and morrison ex-offcon so So nobody with any actual authority.
	So they commissioned their own report.
	Right.
	Yeah, I know, I know.
	Well, the take-home is that the BBC commissioned this report, an 80-page report, and it revealed audience complaints about a whole bunch of things, which, again, you didn't need to commission a report for that.
	Everyone has been saying this to you for goodness knows how long.
	The ratings back that up.
	Everyone knows it.
	Everyone sees it because the BBC is the British broadcaster and you've not been catering to the British demographic.
	Maybe the quote-unquote new Britons, you know, vile terminology, but nonetheless.
	And they're not interested either.
	Because it's not their culture.
	It's not their history.
	No matter how many times you shoehorn these people into it, they're not going to care because they have no cultural sort of ancestral connection to this place.
	They're not bothered.
	So you can try and appease them as much as you like, but they're not going to care.
	And in fact, when they do care and they do get involved in these sorts of things, generally it's always just, you know, for the great crusade of representation.
	It's for basically chipping away at something that doesn't belong to them and appropriating and saying, this is ours now.
	I mean, I think if we just go back up to the picture a second, just, I mean, the point of all of this kind of thing is I genuinely have come to the conclusion that it's to dethrone the straight white man as the protagonist of Western civilization.
	Yeah, yeah, that's definitely a take.
	It is to make it so we are not the heroes of our own cultures.
	Yeah.
	I think that's the most insidious thing about this.
	I'll get to one of those examples in a minute, actually.
	love it um but this report will you hate it this um this The report itself wasn't very good anyway, because yet it says be cautious and careful over the clunky casting.
	But the reason why it's saying be cautious is basically you could do more harm than good by doing that.
	Actually, you could do more harm to the groups that you're looking to represent.
	That's right.
	They're the people.
	Sorry, what?
	Yeah.
	So that's what they took home from it.
	And the BBC will basically say their response was basically, yes, we'll be a bit more cautious and careful about it, but we're still going to do it.
	The last people we'd want to hurt are our immigrant clients.
	Of course.
	Of course.
	Well, also, they do it because they think that they've already won the long game as well.
	They do it because they feel like the present demographic settlement of the United Kingdom has been won.
	And actually, to reverse that in any way, it's honestly just unfathomable to them.
	Can't picture an idea where Britain returns to being a more homogenous nation.
	And so they think they can get away with this sort of thing with impunity because it speaks to the security they feel in their position.
	Yeah, it's the status quo.
	It's the terminal decline.
	This is the way it is.
	Nothing can be done.
	Our hands are tied.
	So we just need to crack on.
	Let's get on with it.
	Keep shoehorning in history, change history.
	Oh, like, I don't know, Black Anne Boleyn.
	Or what?
	Well, I raised a point as well when I tweeted out on X yesterday that people are saying, oh, it's the casting directors.
	It's the casting directors.
	It's the actors.
	It's the actors as well.
	Imagine if someone came to you and was like, Nate, we need you to play MLK in a biopic.
	You'd be like, I'm not sure I'm the guy.
	You know what I mean?
	I'm not sure that's what I want, actually.
	But they would say to you, they would say, oh, yes, but MLK's story was about race.
	Anne Boleyn's story isn't about race, Box.
	And it's the same when you come to the race swap of Mozart as well.
	It's like, okay, Mozart's life wasn't very, you know, it wasn't really, he wasn't probably thinking about race an awful lot whilst he was writing his music, but he is a product of European civilization.
	Northwestern Europeans.
	Yes.
	And that comes from the race of white people.
	I mean, having like a Greek or a Spaniard play Mozart would be weird.
	Yeah.
	You know, or like, you know, Anne Boleyn, that'd be weird.
	But like, that's not correct either.
	Yes.
	You know, it's literally, you do this on purpose because you want to take this away from us.
	Yeah, it's disinheriting people from their homeland.
	From their stories.
	Yeah.
	Stories of what they think.
	The very soul of their being.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	And it doesn't just extend to Black Anne Boleyn.
	We've got Indian Sir Isaac Newton.
	Again, all of these people are really well documented from the time we have.
	Right.
	We have paintings of them in their own lifetimes.
	We know exactly what they look like.
	Sir Isaac Newton was from a sleepy little Lincolnshire village.
	I don't expect there are any Indians there in the 17th century.
	In fact, we've probably got the census.
	You know, we probably know exactly who was living there.
	And again, the thing is, is that you can see this sort of pattern just disinheriting people.
	But we have to do this.
	We have to represent everyone here now.
	But remember, they view it the other way, right?
	You're thinking, oh, I'm losing something.
	But we are the enemy to them, right?
	We're the outgroup to them.
	They are thinking, oh, no, our minority communities are currently disenfranchised.
	They're not part of the culture.
	They don't have representation in the culture.
	Exactly.
	And therefore, we have to do this.
	Because otherwise, where are they in the story of these islands?
	And the answer is, well, they arrived after 1948.
	I don't know what to tell you.
	You weren't here for the first thousand years.
	Exactly.
	It's a very old island.
	Yeah.
	Sorry.
	And so they don't care that you're losing something.
	What they care is that their new client groups are gaining something.
	That's what this is all for.
	Yeah.
	And I'll just skip this.
	So this is... Arthur Hastings?
	So I like to...
	This is exhibit A of what is...
	It's a subsection of the Anglo-Saxons.
	I like to call it the Afro-Blackson.
	Okay.
	So is this at the Battle of Hastings?
	Yeah, but yeah, basically.
	So this was for King and Conqueror.
	Yeah, right.
	Oh, God.
Why We Exclude Others 00:09:15
	Preposterous.
	Absolute nonsense.
	Like, legitimate drivel.
	And again, the only reason you do this is for political reasons, right?
	There's never going to be an aesthetic reason that you'd have the black Viking or the Black Anglo-Saxon.
	You'd be like, well, that would be preposterous.
	If I want people to buy into what I'm trying to sell them, if I want them to suspend disbelief willingly, obviously I'm not going to put Chinese men in there or whatever.
	They're going to look like Northwestern Europeans.
	But it doesn't matter.
	It's not about the audience.
	It's not about your enjoyment of it.
	Well, it's about us imposing something upon you to take something away from you.
	And also, what actual culture and heritage is authentically yours, just washing over that to make it as pristine as possible.
	Like there did was that film, what's it, the woman king, where you know, they turned a bunch of slave owners into actual freedom fighters.
	Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Oh, not just slave owners.
	Yeah, the Dahomey, wasn't it?
	Yeah.
	It was the slave king of Dahomey.
	Oh, who would perform a virtualistic sacrifice of about a thousand slaves?
	I'm sorry.
	Absolutely shocking.
	Didn't mean to disrespect the slave king.
	Well, look, you know, oh, no, unironically.
	Mad, absolutely mad.
	I mean, you know, you can scroll down.
	I mean, this is just the cast.
	There's actually a hell of a lot more in there as well.
	But, you know, it's this sort of shoehorning it in, but no one likes it.
	No, no.
	As evidenced by, I mean, Rotten Tomatoes isn't a be-all-and-end all, but it does show you that people aren't interested in it.
	And then that takes us to a little bit more serious things, you know, which, I mean, this, I cannot, I can't.
	It's so difficult to articulate just how much this hurts me to see.
	And it's not, there's no exaggeration here.
	The thought of making the countryside less, they say less white.
	What they mean is just less English.
	Yes.
	And I can't.
	They want to give it to foreigners.
	How much that hurts and pains me to think of a less English countryside.
	Well, it's an attack.
	It's so awful.
	Yeah.
	It's an attack on the deep magic of England.
	The soul.
	Yeah.
	But like, what possible right could foreigners have to the shires of England?
	Right.
	What possible claim could they have?
	And the answer is they've got absolutely none.
	So this is being done by the British government against the English nation, but they are trying to actually destroy us with this.
	Like this, I'm with you.
	I can't describe the pain this causes me.
	It's really upsetting.
	Yeah, yeah, right.
	No, I'm really upset.
	Because we're in Wiltshire, we're in the shires, you know, and we're like the gateway to the southwest.
	I moved out of London for a reason.
	Exactly.
	And, you know, okay, I can let the cities go.
	I don't care about them.
	But this is existential, man.
	I can't stand this.
	I want to be able to walk my dogs and not worry about anything.
	No, I don't want knife crime or grooming gangs or whatever else.
	I can't describe how much I hate this, but honestly, if anything was going to radical.
	Carry on.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	It would be this.
	There was a line in this, which, again, a line in here, and then the BBC thing, which to me were married together, again, is the sort of spawning point of me doing this segment.
	And it was this: the plans followed DEFRA commissioned reports that claimed the countryside would become irrelevant in a multicultural society.
	Yes.
	As it was a white environment, principally enjoyed by the white middle class.
	I just thought to myself, exactly, and this is what I thought to myself: is that DEFRA, this report, and the government, when you make it for everyone, you make it for nobody.
	You cannot please everyone.
	Like, I don't see any report saying, well, you need to make a mosque more friendly to Christians, right?
	Those are two things which just culturally are completely opposed to one another.
	And, you know, the countryside is irrelevant to foreigners.
	It is irrelevant because it's not their history.
	It's not theirs.
	They don't belong there.
	You know, there's no reason for a Pakistani to go around and look at, I don't know, a random tour somewhere or, you know, an ancient medieval castle.
	They've got no connection to this remotely.
	And the thing is, that's the best possible argument for them being there anyway, right?
	Like, if I go to China or something, I'll go and look at some ancient thing from Chinese history.
	Like, so that's the best possible argument for them being there.
	Like, sorry, why have I got, like, you know, whoever, like, just random foreigners wandering around the fields as I'm walking my dog or taking my kids out for a walk or whatever, like that, right?
	Who the hell are these people?
	What do they think?
	What are the metaphysics they have of the universe?
	What are their opinions on, you know, like women who are not part of their group?
	How do they treat them?
	How do they think about dogs and animals?
	And how do they think about the countryside code?
	Have they ever even heard of it?
	Right?
	Do they care about throwing their rubbish on the floor?
	Like, this, this is like we have a psychic map that overlays the countryside.
	And that map is it's safe for us.
	This is ours.
	It's an extension of our own back gardens.
	This is where we live.
	And then when you walk past somebody, you say, morning, and you have a quick chat about the weather.
	And, you know, you carry on.
	And these people do not belong in this.
	They're not part of it.
	You don't know anything about them.
	Everyone you pass in the countryside is completely predictable.
	Yeah, so it's peaceful because you understand the temperaments of people around you.
	Exactly.
	You can basically read everyone's minds.
	And ruining that for us is literally to take away our home.
	It's the last bastion.
	The soul is the soul, right?
	And it also, if I may just say as well, it speaks to the fact that since all of these foreigners have started coming here, you know, just after World War II, it's obviously, well, they've not been going, you know, they've not filled up the villages yet.
	Come on, get on with it.
	Get on with it.
	Yeah.
	It's about, no, the change isn't happening fast enough.
	Yeah.
	And so, you know.
	I hate the determination of it as well.
	You're not allowed.
	It's a horrible, isn't it?
	Yeah, it's so horrible.
	Like, they describe it as a white environment as if that means open frontier that needs to be colonized.
	Yeah.
	It's like, no, no, there are people using this.
	This is ours.
	We don't want this taken away from us, actually.
	What do you think you're doing?
	And it's like the last happy people in Britain.
	Yes.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Well, yeah.
	And the thing is, is that in an effort to make it relevant to foreigners that have come here, they will make those locations irrelevant to everyone because those foreigners are not interested, right?
	This grey ooze of diversity that they want to create on the English isles.
	It's just this awful, soulless blob of just terribleness.
	Foreigners aren't interested in going there.
	They're not interested.
	Unless you've come here on vacation and you're a tourist.
	But a tourist would go there, see a whole bunch of foreigners and go, wow, this isn't England.
	I don't want to come here again.
	But even if they were, it's like, okay, one, don't care.
	You've got countries of your own, right?
	Why is the landscape in your country not all so beautiful?
	I mean, if you think about it, right, India could be the most beautiful country on earth.
	It's gorgeous, tropical, you know, there's huge rainfall, but lovely weather.
	Elephants.
	Elephants, yeah, incredible wildlife.
	Holly has beautiful beaches.
	If it's a turd hole, if we were in charge of these countries, these would be the most beautiful places on earth.
	It just so happens we're in charge of this one and it's the most beautiful place on earth.
	Yeah.
	So please leave us alone.
	You know, that's all right.
	Well, I've got nothing against Americans coming over, for instance, and wanting to explore the medieval world.
	But they don't tend to throw rubbish everywhere.
	This is what I mean.
	So, you know, it's a multifaceted thing to look at.
	Like, if I go to a country, I go there because I want to experience the culture.
	Yeah.
	Right?
	Generally speaking, you know, I want to go there, experience the culture, have a look around, know the history.
	Come home from there.
	Thank God I'm not from there.
	Yeah, precisely.
	And then, yeah, come home with a new appreciation.
	There's no reason for people to come to England when it becomes this multicultural grey blob because it is literally for no one because you've removed the soul of England, which is its people.
	Yeah.
	Precisely.
	Precisely.
	And also, also the sort of psychic map what we generate when we are left to our own devices.
	Right?
	Like, it's just, no, no, we will create the sort of place that is the envy of the world.
	I mean, everyone wants to move to our countries.
	It's not the other way around.
	And it's because of the way that we live our lives.
	Honesty boxes for eggs, book swaps and telephone boxes.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	All those things go.
	Well, I mean, at the moment, for instance, you know, in Wiltshire, I can order because I've got a log burner, so I can order wood and it'll just turn up and they'll just leave it, you know, outside my back gates, for instance.
	Right.
	Well, what happens when my town is then flooded?
	We know those are stolen.
	There's loads of like money from the farm farm shops where it's like, serve yourself.
	Yeah.
	You know, you put them on things.
	Take some eggs.
	It's just some foreigners, some Turks or whatever, turn up and just take it.
	It's just like, what are we doing?
	I hate this.
	I hate these.
	How can you do this to us?
	So frustrating.
	And just a bit of a closing note here.
	I think it's interesting.
	Danny Finkelstein's sister.
	Yeah.
Acquittal Of Elbit Systems Vandals 00:09:14
	Permanent secretary of this.
	Yeah.
	The permanent secretary of DEFRA.
	Thanks, Doug.
	One who wants to flood the countryside and make it less white.
	Fascinating.
	Anyway, let's go to the video comments.
	The reason you don't care about the cities is the reason we're in this mess.
	I mean, you know what?
	That's a great point.
	They were our cities too.
	It's very easy to reclaim.
	But also, the English has never really been a city-dwelling folk.
	People went there to make money.
	Yeah.
	And then it always used to be.
	It was in the 90s and obviously a little bit before then as well.
	But it definitely was in the 90s where you'd see a lot of these, you'll remember it.
	A lot of these TV programs where it was people escaped to the countryside.
	I think it was even called Escape to the Countryside.
	And people were, yeah, no, I've made my money in the city.
	I want to buy a really nice house in the Shires.
	But that's how the English have always lived.
	We don't live in cities.
	Continentals live in cities.
	It's just an economic hub where you just make some money and then you'd leave.
	Exactly.
	We've always been uncomfortable with it.
	But the soul of England really is in the Shires.
	Apparently, we do not have any video comments, so I'll carry on.
	Ed Miliband, harnessing Enoch's spinning grave, says, hell is empty and the demons are in government.
	There's one common thread connecting Epstein, the Grim Gangs, and even trans policy that our elites are at best indifferent or at worst participants in the sacrifice, rape, and mutilation of children.
	What is to be done?
	Well, the law prevents me from saying anything.
	Alex says, Andrew Maher, revealing his fundamental respect for Starma, should have ejected him from the news broadcast as fundamentally biased.
	We all knew it before, that he was a toad and a liar, but him admitting it should have pushed him aside for hopefully someone better.
	Legacy Media and He's Clean's House.
	Well, the thing is, they won't because they are all cut from the same cloth.
	They're exactly the same.
	It's the same structure.
	Like, you know, Andrew Maher likes Keir Starmer because he sees himself in Keir Starmer.
	They have the same beliefs.
	I mean, I read Andrew's book on the 20th century British history, and he loves when it becomes diverse.
	Like, he gets the point.
	It's pure, I think it was written in 97, something like that, or like 2006 or something.
	But it was like, it's 20 years or something like this.
	It's a while back.
	But when it gets to the Blairite project, glowing praise.
	Glowing praise.
	And it's just, you worm, you absolute worm.
	Hayton.
	Russian says, he called himself the head of the Legion of Doom.
	How could I have known he was a bad guy?
	And a fifth Ukrainian rent boy has hit the Starma home.
	Yeah, I know.
	It's mental.
	It's mental.
	Henry says, the groan from MPs about due diligence was satisfying to hear.
	While I doubt any of the MPs other than Rupert Lowe truly rail against the bureaucratic managerialism, it was nice to hear them at least sound like they're not buying the old due diligence has failed.
	Therefore, I am blameless for appointing a spy for a powerful blackmailing nonce.
	Yeah, again, Starma is basically portraying himself as the victim of this, which is disgraceful.
	Bill Bo Baggins says, Starma has always been a cog in the international pedo elite.
	Don't forget that he refused to investigate Savile when he was head of the CPS.
	Let's not forget about the rent boys that keep burning his cars.
	Yeah, I know.
	That's such a weird, loose thread, isn't it?
	But I'm absolutely certain we will find it's compromat that.
	I mean, I genuinely think Morgan McSweeney and Mandelson have something on Starma.
	Why is the media not demonstrating as well?
	Exactly.
	Why don't they hear one report this has happened that's gone forever?
	Yeah, don't talk about that, guys.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Aurelius lamenting stoically says, his hands tremble with the fear of a man uncertain that the hinges of his doors and the bolts holding them closed will be torn from their moorings and justice might finally be done.
	The smothering oppression of a guilty man's conscience, too long and north.
	Well, the thing is, I think Starmer and his clique view themselves as the last chance that Blairism has.
	They realize that if they fail, multiculturalism is over.
	That's why they've been speedrunning a lot of the decisions.
	Absolutely.
	That's why they're acting with the fear of men who think that hell itself is snapping at their heels.
	Well, they're dangerous now.
	Yeah, exactly.
	They are genuinely dangerous.
	And this is why they haven't just removed Starmer as well.
	Yeah.
	Because this, you know, the Tower of Babel can end up collapsing here.
	And they know it.
	Henry says, Mandelson has always been the globalist Blairite attack dog against the old Labour left.
	Oh, yeah, absolutely.
	And the other token, hard-working northerner John Prescott, and then Big Ann Raynor, they were kept well away from power whenever Mandelson or his disciples have the Labour leader's ear.
	Yeah, they absolutely are genuinely a worm tongue for Labour.
	Under the old Blair Brown Scottish Mafia and now Starmer's North London Mafia, it's making me wonder about the desires for the global agenda.
	How much of Blairism came through Mandelson and who knows where it originated from?
	Well, they were again, it's kind of a zeitgeist, right?
	They all agree with the fundamental premises of what's going on.
	And so they're all glued together through it.
	Lars says, with a hot war raging and full conscription in force, the international supply of Ukrainian rent boys remains surprisingly high.
	Astute observation.
	Good point.
	Kemmy did well on PMQs.
	She should have had the stones to follow up with.
	I'm not going to.
	I'm not going to carry on with that.
	Sorry.
	Jimber says, release the rape gang files.
	Imagine some of those email trails.
	Well, I mean, the stuff that comes from the Mandelson inquiry that they did where they were checking on his background, I actually think it's going to be damning because apparently it was just consisted of a Google search.
	It's like, okay, but anyone involved in politics knows Wandson.
	Yeah, I know.
	Yeah.
	Anyone involved knows that Mandelson has got deep ties to very disgusting things.
	The least unknown quantity to ever be appointed.
	Exactly.
	Everyone knows.
	It's like open secret.
	So the idea that Kierstalma could have been that naive is just bent loads of sort of conventions to appoint him as the ambassador as well.
	Yeah.
	Went out of his way to do these very strange things that people were like, what are you doing, mate?
	Yep.
	Michael says, Luca, why isn't this on the BBC?
	And he's like, well, the organization that defended and still pays its own pedos.
	Yeah, the BBC does have a history of protecting pedos.
	I mean, Saturn, obviously.
	It's true.
	But then loads of their presenters just turn out to be nonces.
	And they put statues of nonces outside of their office.
	It's just really.
	You believe them when they tell you who they are.
	Well, I do.
	Genavi says, after Hurricane Milton, Governor DeSantis and President Biden worked together, which I was impressed by.
	I think for the UK, the young girls of Grooming Gangs is what should have brought the politicians of the country together.
	The problem is Labour are basically implicated in it all.
	And the Conservatives are just crap.
	And then what's more as well, they're more implicated as a party in the grooming gangs than they are actually in the Epstein thing.
	Because that's from like, no, it's the upper echelons of the Blairite establishment.
	It's not the backbenchers.
	But councillors.
	It's not local MPs.
	Whereas this is endemic throughout the entire party.
	And the fact that the Conservatives are like, well, we can't make political hair out of this.
	It's like, why?
	Because that would damage the Blairite project.
	They are a Blairite party.
	Cameron, sorry, Osborne, right?
	When Mandelson was like, who do I choose for my ambassador to the US?
	He was on the fence and was going to choose George Osborne.
	But it was McSweeney that said, no, you have to get Mandelson.
	So between Mandelson.
	How can George Osborne be his pick?
	Yeah, between Mandelson and Osborne, you just have to be compromised by China as well.
	Exactly.
	That's a prerequisite.
	I'll take the conservative former Chancellor of the Exchequer and now editor of the Evening Standard, please.
	Yeah, my labor.
	As my labor ambassador to the United States, what the fuck are we doing?
	Like, obviously.
	It's obvious.
	Kevin says, this ethnic component is filtered throughout society.
	Let's look at the acquittal of the Elbit systems vandals.
	There was irrefutable evidence of what they did, but they were acquitted.
	Why?
	Because their jury based their verdict on ideology behind the tack, not the crimes acquitted.
	Yeah, he's talking about the sledgehammer, right?
	Oh, yes.
	It's mental.
	The video is just Christmas.
	It's awful.
	But if a jury of your peers is a jury of woke leftoids who all agree that's what you should be doing, then you can break a woman's back and get away with it.
	It's mental.
	It's absolutely mental.
	Obviously, there are people being like, yeah, I proudly contributed to Rupert's call for an inquiry.
	It's like, well done.
	Cumbrian Kulak says, the silver lining to mass immigration, the attempted annihilation of us as an ethnos, whether incidental or deliberate, is that we will reinforce our sense of self and belonging out of necessity.
	Yeah, I mean, we got lazy, there's no doubt, and we got complacent.
	So, you know, on the plus side, at least we will have a better understanding of ourselves come the end of this.
	Kelane says, the grooming gangs are such a widespread and horrifying issue that I'm shocked that British people have not risen in open rebellion.
	I don't think people can really bring themselves to actually believe the depth of the problem.
	I genuinely think people hear and go, oh, yeah, that's bad, and assume it's like half a dozen somewhere in the north.
	And so they go, right, okay, well, that's not good.
	But I mean, those guys went to jail, so I guess.
	No, it's happening.
	I mean, like, what's come out of the inquiry?
Grooming Gangs Revelation 00:02:26
	Apparently, there's one in Swindon.
	I had no idea.
	You know, I had absolutely no idea.
	So it's just Ed Miliband again says, the neighborhood watch in Hot Fuzz are completely vindicated.
	Oh, absolutely.
	True.
	You know, after that film ends, it's 20 years, Hot Fuzz 2, whatever.
	There's going to be an asylum hotel in there because Nicholas Angels allowed one to be set up.
	Maria says that DEFRA sees the countryside as white middle class, also disinherits the majority of the countryside who are just working people who are linked to the soil across decades of our history.
	And centuries.
	DEFRA is just another communist enemy of the people.
	Completely true.
	And that's the thing that annoys me as well.
	It's like, of course, there are middle-class people in the countryside, but like there are normal people in the countryside.
	The thing is about the countryside, it doesn't adequately neatly fit into post-industrial class schemes because the working class are the industrial working class of cities, right?
	The manual laborers in the cities, and then the bourgeoisie in this frame are the capitalist production owners in the city.
	So you've got a direct class conflict.
	But that's it.
	It doesn't map to the yeoman farmer who owns a few acres and a bunch of cows, right?
	And there's a farm shop or these things that sort of spawn up around it to help facilitate the ecosphere of the countryside.
	Exactly.
	I don't get it either.
	I don't understand.
	Serfdom ended in this country in like the 11th or 12th century, something like that, right?
	So for 800 years, what we have been is free yeoman farmers with a very active land market where we have bought and sold land.
	We are not like, you know, the industrialized proletariat.
	We are not like, you know, the capitalist bourgeoisie.
	We are the free people of England.
	Michael says, I would fight for my tiny village and help run the commune when the collapse comes.
	I know my neighbours.
	I don't know my country anymore.
	And that's the way, that's the thing.
	People feel genuinely disenfranchised.
	Yeah.
	Totally disinherited.
	And we can't allow this to happen.
	We just can't allow this to be the way that things go.
	Quinn says, how is this multicultural project not tantamount to a cultural genocide?
	Well, it is.
	It is what it is.
	And the fact that they would never allow this for any other group as well.
	You're not allowed to suggest banning mosques or something like that, right?
	No, absolutely not.
	Oh, but that country pub.
People Feel Disenfranchised 00:02:43
	Yeah.
	Gone.
	That's not okay for Pakistanis.
	It's literally what they said.
	Literally what they said.
	Makes it uncomfortable.
	Banning dogs and whales and stuff like that.
	Yeah, they're like, oh, yeah.
	I think I tweeted it out and I said Muslims in Britain are going to find out real quick that the English much prefer dogs over there.
	Oh, yeah.
	Like, you have no idea.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Just dog all that.
	No, no, dog.
	Thanks.
	I mean, yeah, exactly.
	It's just don't make people choose, man, because you're not going to get the answer.
	That's not a position you want to put people in.
	You won't like the outcome.
	After this week, I'm no longer interested in getting our country back.
	I want retribution for every crime against us.
	Yeah, there's got to be a sort of process of de-blairization when we win.
	In the same way that there was denazification.
	Sorry, anyone involved in this, anyone involved, has got to essentially be exercised from any potential future that we have politically.
	Oh, absolutely.
	They can't be involved in anything.
	Absolutely anything.
	Well, this is why it's such a disaster.
	Farage taking in Boris's actual cabinet members.
	It's mad.
	It's absolutely mad.
	And like, you know, it's not that I even dislike Jemerick, but I'm sorry, man.
	I just don't think you've shown enough contrition for the damage you did.
	I don't think he's atoned for his sins, quite frankly.
	At all.
	Well, the thing is, as well, the sins keep happening because people keep being stabbed by the Afghans who let him.
	Exactly.
	What was the name of the chap the other day who got murdered in the street by the Afghan Wayne Broadhurst?
	That's right.
	Wayne Broadhurst.
	Yeah, literally, he's going to be a Jemrick wave.
	Well, that's what I mean.
	There was a rape.
	Like, every day there's a goddamn Afghan rape.
	That's going to be Jemrick.
	That's what annoyed me about Trigonometry did an interview with.
	I saw it.
	They didn't ask him anything about that.
	Didn't ask him anything about that.
	Very softball.
	I was like, that is weak source.
	Wasn't impressed.
	And especially as Constantine normally does actually ask piercing questions of people.
	No, no, he genuinely does, normally.
	And he will often fairly present a hard question.
	He didn't.
	And it was like, right, okay, that's disappointing.
	Omar says, imagine being a Ukrainian boy, minding your own business when you're nabbed off the street and being disappointed that you weren't sent to the front lines.
	Man, something's going on with those.
	It's so weird, isn't it?
	It's so weird.
	Pierce back doors.
	There's something going on there.
	really think they've got compromise and this is why I know that Stammer clearly feels politically reliant on Morgan McSweeney but there's got to be something else which is why it's a sense of fear to it as well yes yes Fear and urgency.
	The fact that he was straight up.
	It's like, no, Morgan McSweeney is essential to my government.
	It's like what?
Something's Going On There 00:02:24
	You're already in government.
	There is a reason that Starmer is there in particular and not anyone else from Labour.
	Yeah.
	Sven says, two emails mentioning Bigfoot and the Epstein files, referencing articles in Scientific American.
	One of the emails from Rupert Sheldrake.
	I don't know who that is.
	Right, so thank you for checking that.
	I knew that Bigfoot would come up.
	Bigfoot implicated in the Epstein files.
	Luca says, great choice, Luca, be a darling and grow that mustache back.
	Working on it.
	Colleen says this entire episode has been a black pill.
	It's making me legitimately enraged.
	Yeah, sorry, man, but these are the things that are happening.
	I wouldn't take it personally as a black pill.
	Sure, it's been defined by the corruption and the evil that's going on against us, but if anything, I think it shows that the things that kept that in place to begin with are now falling apart around us and that people are fighting back harder than ever.
	Yeah, I mean, yeah, I mean, on the plus side, like the fact that Rupert Lowe's Rape Gang Inquiry is going so well for disseminating information, and the fact that Starma is rickety last legs, and the fact that everyone is like one of the things about the diversification of the shires, that I noticed is how quickly everyone reacted to it, right?
	Because nobody cares that they're taking away the, oh, look, the new Doctor Who's a disabled lesbian training or something.
	Yeah, yeah, blah, blah, blah.
	Don't care.
	But they're saying they're like, oh, we're going to force migrants into the shires.
	Everyone...
	It was reflexive.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Yeah, reflexive, like, no, you're not.
	We don't want them.
	Yeah, you are definitely not.
	Yeah, well, they are not welcome.
	Yeah, exactly.
	And we will make sure they know that they're not welcome.
	You can turn off your TV if you don't like Doctor Who with the migrants coming into the villages.
	Exactly.
	And so the reaction was widespread.
	And this, I didn't think it was going to get that much coverage.
	Because I covered it the day it came out on my Account Daily channel.
	And a lot of people were pissed off.
	And then I saw everyone else around me, just everywhere.
	And everyone's normies just being like, I don't want this.
	It's like, yeah, I know.
	No one wants this.
	Because this hits to a genuinely existential thing.
	But anyway, we are out of time.
	So I think we're pre-recording Down's Broken Omics, so you can't join us for that live.
	So thanks for joining us, folks.
	We'll be back at the same time tomorrow.
	If you're a gold tier subscriber, go to the website, check out the new beta version, and let us know what you think.
	Help us test it before the public rollout.

Chapters

00:00:00 British Politics Chaos
00:14:20 Starma's Contact Controversy
00:27:32 Prime Minister's Embattled Defense
00:42:51 Birmingham, Bradford, and Beyond
00:51:02 Casting Out Anne Boleyn
01:05:59 Why We Exclude Others
01:15:15 Acquittal Of Elbit Systems Vandals
01:24:29 Grooming Gangs Revelation
01:26:55 People Feel Disenfranchised
01:29:38 Something's Going On There