The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1283

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 28, 2025 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:35:48

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1283

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Low Seaters for the 28th of October 2025.
	This is podcast number 1283.
	I can't believe we've done that many already.
	And I am joined by Nate and Bo and we are going to be talking about Islamic no-go zones, when will China cross the Rubicon and Sadiq Khan's cover-up.
	I've also got some announcements to make.
	Stelios' course webinar will be Thursday at 6pm.
	So if you want to interrogate him about ancient Greek wisdom, that is the place to do it.
	And also, Samson really wants us to mention the fact that he's done a brokenomics about Warhammer with Dan.
	So if you want to see the man behind the studio, that is your way of doing it.
	And also learn about Warhammer as well.
	Hope it went well, Samson.
	How was it?
	I think it went well.
	I can't actually hear you.
	It should have gone well.
	I'm hoping you all enjoy it.
	There we go.
	The disembodied voice of God.
	You actually get to set a face reveal.
	Yeah.
	You only get it here on Lotus Eaters.
	But anyway.
	Oh, I'm getting some adjustments before we go live.
	Don't worry.
	We're getting a face reveal.
	Yeah.
	Put the camera out of focus.
	There we go.
	Brilliant.
	All right.
	So recently, UKIP announced that they were going to hold a rally or a protest, I suppose, in Whitechapel, which, if you know London or Britain more generally, is a pretty bold move.
	Oh, I know you're familiar with the area.
	Whitechapel, interesting place to do it, isn't it?
	Yeah, it's around my manor.
	East London.
	And it ends.
	London.
	No, I'm Essex, really, but still, East London is not a million miles away from where I was born and grew up.
	So yeah, Whitechapel's like the belly of the beast.
	All around there, Mile End, Bowchurch, all around there, upney.
	It's like it's completely and utterly colonised.
	Utterly.
	Muslim majority as well, isn't it?
	Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Whitechapel.
	All the shops are foreign-owned shops.
	And despite what people have a go at you for noticing the truth on Twitter if you say this, if you go there and you're white, you get dirty looks.
	You'll be one of the only white people in the street.
	And the filthy market they've got there most of the time, they look at you like, you're in the wrong bit of London, mate, aren't you?
	It's horrible.
	It's horrible.
	I've been to Whitechapel before.
	There was a weird white enclave in it of a pub that was quite nice.
	A blind around it.
	A blind boy go on Mile End Road, where the Craze did one of their things.
	It's also famous for the Whitechapel murders, Jack the Ripper, 1888, of course.
	Not exactly a good press, is it?
	Used to be a Jewish quarter back in the 19th century, early 20th century.
	Used to be very, very working class, then it was sort of a Jewish quarter, and now it's completely colonised by Muslims, Bangladeshis and Pakistanis and all sorts, actually.
	We'll be seeing some of that today.
	Such a shame, isn't it?
	Like, something with such a rich, a geographical location with such a rich cultural history just captured.
	It's weird, it's horrible.
	They announced this for the 25th of October, so it was only a few days ago.
	And then the Met Police decided to ban it.
	Oh, so they can ban protests.
	Yeah.
	Oh.
	Interesting, isn't it?
	But I thought all those protests.
	I thought Shabana Mahmood said.
	Oh.
	Oh.
	The Palestine protests, the George Floyd ones.
	All of those were fine.
	This must have been a new thing that they introduced recently.
	Because white boys, isn't it?
	White boys can't protest at the drop of a hat all the time.
	That's the issue, isn't it?
	And it's interesting as well that they just acknowledge over concerns of serious disorder from the middle of the middle.
	Oh, well, they will suggest that.
	Don't worry.
	So I was able to find an extract from Commander Nick John.
	And I'll scroll down here somewhere.
	Where is it?
	Here we go.
	Tower Hamlets has the largest percentage of Muslim residents anywhere in the UK.
	And the prospect of this protest taking place in the heart of the borough has been the cause of significant concern locally.
	It is our assessment that there is a realistic prospect of serious disorder if it were to go ahead in the proposed location.
	It's interesting here that they're acknowledging that, well, there's going to be a peaceful protest going on and there's going to be a violent response to it.
	So the police are willing to acknowledge that there is this problem when it suits them.
	But other times, less so.
	It's, you know, stash your weapons in the mosque.
	We're going to treat you with kid gloves.
	Of course, to be perfectly clear with this, it's not the UKPers that are going to start kicking off.
	No?
	Right.
	New Kippers are pretty milquetoast, pretty low-level patriot-type people.
	Sivnats?
	Sivnats, you might say.
	Yeah.
	They're not going to be like having running street battles with anyone that they started.
	That's not what that is.
	they've had plenty of rallies across the country and they've not done any of that they'd soon be dancing in the street quite frankly Actually doing anything.
	Physical with anyone.
	A significant concern.
	Yeah, from the Muslims not liking any white patriotic people walking through their territory.
	It basically amounts to that, doesn't it?
	It's exactly what it is.
	It's exactly what it is.
	Let's call it what it is.
	They explicitly say it's theirs.
	They have explicitly said it is there.
	You can find clips of people in London.
	It will usually be somewhere like Whitechapel, where they're like, this is our country now.
	This is our bit of London, at least, now.
	Just explicitly happy to say it.
	So another thing they mentioned is this is in addition to the disruption that two large protests taking place on a key arterial route through East London would cause.
	So they've added this additional justification.
	But that doesn't stop other protests, so it's a little bit...
	I was going to say there's some pretty central London protests that have been going on pretty much every single weekend for a couple of years.
	Not...
	Not really an excuse, is it?
	Yeah, no.
	I'll tell you what.
	It's a key arterial route.
	You can go round Whitechapel if you need to.
	A number of different ways, north and south.
	That's not a thing.
	London's not strapped for roads, is it?
	It's not like there's one highway into the central London, like it's the 18th century.
	No, you can go either way round Whitechapel if you need to.
	That's fine.
	No, it's silly.
	I'll tell you what the Met Police could do with some ancient Greek virtue ethics.
	And you know the man to do it would be Stellios.
	He could school them in how to conduct themselves virtuously.
	And the good thing is that he has a course which you can sign up to to learn all about this.
	He is, of course, an expert on this thing and he worked incredibly hard.
	So it would be very good if you checked it out, both for you and him.
	A true expert, born in Athens, and he's got a PhD in philosophy.
	So a real-life modern-day Greek philosopher in the flesh.
	Few and far between.
	But anyway, unperturbed, they announced a different location.
	London Oratory.
	I don't really know where that is.
	I'm not that familiar with London.
	But it's not necessarily near Whitechapel, is it, Beau?
	I don't know.
	Where is that?
	SW7.
	There it is in the background, I presume.
	All right, okay.
	Oh, Crompton Road.
	Okay, yeah.
	Right, yeah.
	So it was a different location.
	Yeah, the other side of London.
	Anyway, go on.
	Nick Tenconi, who's the leader of UKIP, did point out the borough of Tower Hamlets is basically an Islamist no-go zone, which is clearly evident from what has happened here that if the police are saying you can't come through here and protest, you're not going to be safe, then by definition, this has to be true, doesn't it?
	It's very difficult not to describe it as theirs now.
	Yeah, of a conquered territory.
	And I actually asked him for a statement about this just because I was curious what he thought about it all.
	And he says, as a result of Islamist intimidation tactics and threats of violence from the unholy alliance of communists and Islamo-fascists, the Met police caved into a mob and banned us from marching on Saturday.
	White Chapel must now be declared a terrorist state.
	I think we would be lucky.
	Our message was of peace, love and unity and a declaration against Islamo-fascism and the caliphate.
	Our message is anti-Islamism, anti-extremism, and to denounce and reject radical Islam.
	The Met Police have declared it a no-go zone for patriots and Christians in response.
	This is absolutely dire.
	What we are seeing unfold in Britain is Islamist sectarianism and the threat of violence is so great from the Islamist Caliphate in Britain that the police have only one hand to play, which is to enforce segregation.
	This strategy is destined to bring about conflict and unrest.
	And I definitely agree with that last part there.
	Not wrong, is he?
	Yeah, that by enforcing segregation, all it does is deepen the sectarianism, basically.
	Segregation only works when they have reached a critical mass.
	Segregation only works when the violent group you're looking to segregate from, you know, the others is small.
	And also that they want to be.
	Once they reach critical mass and they are the majority, you can't do that anymore.
	So you need to nip it in the bud.
	You need to fix it now.
	It's not like Muslims are necessarily known for not wanting to spread Islam either through violent means.
	It is sort of written very explicitly in the Quran, isn't it?
	And played out in Middle Eastern politics all the time.
	It's fundamentally a proselytising religion.
	There's the in-group and the out-group, the Kafir.
	Absolutely, yeah.
	So by segregation, what it's basically doing is tying people's hands while the Muslims basically increased power in Britain.
	I must say that was a very strong statement from Nick there.
	A number of times, it's mostly tongue-in-cheek.
	It's mostly friendly jibing at Nick and the UKPers for being Sivnats and stuff.
	But they are.
	But he also does say pretty base stuff quite regularly as well, to give him his dues.
	To give him his dues.
	It does take some balls to say some of the things I've seen him saying.
	Still, Sivnats, not enough of me.
	But like that statement, for example, pretty strong.
	Like, good on him.
	Like, he could have pulled his punches much more.
	He's just said it as it is there.
	So credit for that.
	And it's also not exactly a small thing to walk through Whitechapel either.
	That is inviting trouble on yourselves.
	And although the police shouldn't have stopped them, they were right to say that there probably would have been serious violence.
	Probably, yeah.
	Yeah.
	Muslims can't help themselves.
	The police's job is to enforce the law.
	They should have been there to enforce the law.
	I agree.
	They should have allowed it to continue, allowed it to go ahead.
	And then those breaking the law come down on them like a ton of bricks.
	And then we can all report on it, and then...
	Oh, we can't do that, can they?
	Because...
	Because that would expose the client class.
	And it's not like the police haven't got the resources.
	If there's some football game.
	West Ham play Millwall in the FA Cup or something.
	Oh, the police suddenly turn out mounted police.
	Thousands and thousands of cops making sure the away fans don't kick off.
	Or the home fans kick off against the away fans, whatever.
	Yeah, suddenly the cops have got thousands of guys to line the streets to and from the station or whatever.
	Well, they had enough.
	But not for this.
	Not for Nick Tenconey and the UK.
	No, no, no, no.
	You just can't do it.
	They had enough police for the Epping protest, didn't they?
	Police there all the bloody time.
	Even some spare resources enough to shuttle in some counter-protesters.
	It's not exactly like hard up, Matt.
	It'd be like some game like QPR play Crystal Palace or whatever.
	Suddenly, thousands of cops.
	It's obviously a politically motivated decision.
	Obviously.
	So their protest went ahead without any problems.
	Anyway, just in a different location.
	But the interesting thing is the site of the original protest had an interesting turnout of people.
	You might notice before I've even played this video, the so-called gentleman in the background there, one is wearing a motorcycle helmet.
	Many are covering their face all in black.
	Sort of suggests they're looking for trouble, doesn't it?
	If they're concealing their identities and all dressed in black so they can't be recognised as easily.
	Sort of suggests that they're expecting mass violence and were prepared for it.
	And that's why they've turned out, isn't it?
	It's funny when patriotic alternative people used to, they don't even do it anymore, but when they used to cover their face, that's paramilitary, that's terrorist, that's terrifying.
	When Antifa did it, it's just no one says anything.
	Well, these are these people.
	Oh, okay.
	They're not necessarily.
	Oh, sorry.
	Right, yeah.
	All right.
	When a Muslim mob covers their face, don't mention it.
	Don't notice it.
	Okay.
	All right.
	Okay.
	Fine.
	Yeah.
	This all ends in the terrible sectarian violence, doesn't it?
	It's inevitable.
	Obviously.
	Obviously.
	Let's listen to this for a little bit.
	What's going on, my people?
	As you can see, I'm live and direct here with all the brothers behind me.
	That's the beginning of the turnout.
	What?
	A few hundred of the brothers?
	Everyone's ready.
	If not for violence or hate to stand ground on our own area, which is Tower Hamlet.
	I don't remember Tower Hamlets being built by Muslims.
	Oh.
	Strange, isn't it?
	Those arches traditionally.
	Islamic architecture, is it?
	What?
	I don't remember an act of parliament ceding that Tower Hamlets to anyone else.
	I don't recall that.
	Currency, do they?
	They exchange in Tower Hamlets, the Islamic area.
	They trade and barter.
	They don't even use currency.
	I wonder what the lefto people, someone like Owen Jones, what do they really think?
	Deeply.
	We'll be getting to that.
	Oh, do I?
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	All right, cool.
	Good.
	There's a very interesting exchange between the Islamic left and the ideological left that I wanted to have a look at quickly before we ended.
	So there are some more videos here.
	It's much of the same thing.
	Just masked men hanging about.
	They're also the usual left-wing idiots as well.
	Stand up to racism over there with their identical placards.
	Clearly an organic movement of people that are definitely not bust in to do this sort of thing.
	Probably by the state.
	But yes.
	Interesting also that the crowds segregated themselves from one another.
	Like the Muslims didn't want to stand next to the leftists, which, you know, is the most reasonable thing they've done so far.
	You know, especially downwind of them.
	But there are more here.
	And this one I'm going to play the audio.
	probably going to be a bit loud, but...
	If it wasn't for the architecture of the buildings in the background, you wouldn't know that that was London, would you?
	Yeah.
	Foreign flags, there was Palestinian and Bangladeshi flags there, letting off flares, chanting Allahu Akbar, mass men.
	Our streets, a mixture of our streets, a dirge of our streets and Al-Ru Akbar.
	Great.
	Thanks, Blair.
	Not the remix we wanted, really.
	Thanks, Cameron.
	Thanks for this.
	And Boris.
	Don't forget Boris.
	Yeah, all of them.
	All of them since Blair.
	All of them since Bloody Major.
	There are some more here.
	This one was very interesting.
	Yes, we are, bro.
	The Renault.
	Very revealing, isn't it?
	That the Muslims see themselves as separate from the left, even though the left are bending over backwards for them.
	And I don't blame them because who wants to be associated with people who've basically failed in life and blame everyone but themselves?
	That's basically what those stand-up to racism people are.
	The most weird-looking losers ever to Grace Britain, at least the homegrown people.
	And yeah, of course they don't want to be affiliated with you.
	As far as they're concerned, you're unbelievers.
	You're just as deserving of it as the UKIP protesters that they're protesting against.
	Well, protesting.
	I would interject ever so slightly and say they do, actually.
	They do want to be associated with them so far as it is useful.
	They are useful idiots of them, yes.
	But I was going to get to that because there's an interesting reaction, speaking of useful idiots.
	It has been deleted, but this was from Adna Hussein, who is an MP.
	And he said, I've copied some of this down, and he had a little interaction with Owen Jones.
	And I'm going to sort of title this the pragmatic Muslim.
	He's a Blackburn MP, by the way.
	Obviously, become quite a Muslim area, even though it need not be.
	Versus an ideological lunatic in Owen Jones.
	And he says, the average Brit, black, white, or brown, just wants to live peacefully, coexist with their neighbours, and live a decent life with dignity.
	The vast majority of Brits do not want Nazis crusading through our streets, nor equally the absurd counter-demonstrators calm down.
	So he's saying, like, he understands that this sort of thing, those videos I showed you both.
	Was that Adnan Hussein?
	Yes.
	You read the first line again, real quick.
	The average Brit, black, white, or brown, just wants to live peacefully, coexist with the British people.
	I don't believe you.
	I believe that.
	No, I don't believe that.
	No, it's not British.
	No.
	And they don't want to live peacefully.
	No, if history shows us anything, from Morocco to Algeria to Indonesia.
	No, they don't want to.
	They're not interested in that.
	Islam and the Hadiths and the Quran are not about that.
	No.
	Like the example of the life of Muhammad is not about living peacefully with the non-believers.
	It's obviously trying to pull the wool over people's eyes and trying to be like, well, you know, we're not as bad as people make us out to be.
	Those extremists, those people going out and, you know, doing things, ignore the fact that we broadly support them and we're just not doing it ourselves.
	But we're entirely different to that.
	Real quick say, imagine if you're a Muslim and you're one of the marchers and the stand-up to fascism people who you can only imagine are socialists.
	So you can only imagine are either full-blown atheists or atheists adjacent.
	That's an anathema to you as a Muslim.
	They're not even Christians, right?
	They're not even people of the book.
	They're terrible in the eyes of a Muslim.
	Marxist socialists and communists in Islamic countries have also caused lots of conflicts, haven't they?
	And the Muslims do have a long memory for this sort of thing.
	They're not going to forget that, wait a minute, these are the people that caused us a lot of problems in our own countries.
	It's not like they're isolated from that.
	And so they know that they have to use them as a vehicle towards political power.
	But they don't like them, obviously.
	But I just thought it was interesting that he recognises this and he's trying to calm the temperature and pull wool over people's eyes and say, listen, stop bringing it to people's attention that we're actually quite hostile to the native population.
	And then Owen Jones comes along and says, do you think the anti-fascists who mobilized at Cable Street were equally absurd to the fascists?
	And of course, Cable Street is a story of the left attacking the police at Cable Street.
	There was meant to be a march with Oswald Mosley leading it, but they didn't really turn up.
	And so the left just attacked the police.
	And in fact, I think they held a few police officers hostage, didn't they?
	That whole day was mad.
	And it was just leftists, communists, Marxists of various stripes going berserk.
	But it's been repainted.
	The revisionists, the commitraitor revisionists have made out that it's some glorious thing to stop fascism.
	Mosley and his mob just didn't even do anything that day.
	People said, look how the indigenous population, certainly not foreigners, turned out against fascism that day.
	And it was like, well, about a week later, Mosley and his guys did march to him into a massive support.
	So the whole narrative, the whole leftist narrative around Cable Street is liars, liars upon liars upon lies.
	And it's people like Owen Jones that will always bring it up.
	Cable Street.
	That's ridiculous.
	It's the same kind of rhetoric with Enoch Powell as well.
	These people, they're hugely popular.
	They're always like, oh.
	Cable Street?
	Enoch Powell.
	It's a thing like January the 6th.
	The actual reality is almost the exact opposite of what the left want you to think happened.
	Yeah.
	That's Cable Street.
	So he responded, peaceful protest by all means.
	I admit my initial post wasn't articulated clearly, but some of the imagery coming out of yesterday's counter-protest is exacerbating a situation which is already extremely volatile.
	So he understands that, listen, having lots of masked men chanting Allahu Akbar waving foreign flags scares people.
	And rightfully so, it should scare you because I don't think many of those people would hesitate if they're able to get away with it with being violent towards the native population.
	It's sort of why they were there in the first place.
	So he's basically trying to smooth things over, do a bit of PR so his people can take over the country.
	That's what's going on here.
	And then Owen Jones says, equating anti-fascists and fascists is really gruesome stuff.
	And the argument you're making here was deployed at Cable Street counter-demonstrators.
	He's just an idiot.
	Like he doesn't understand the situation he's in here.
	He's so possessed by ideology.
	Whereas the Muslim here, the MP, is being quite pragmatic.
	He understands the situation, is trying to navigate it.
	Owen's an idiot.
	Obviously, the left, if they're like Owen, are going to be outmaneuvered by Islam.
	and their entire movement's going to be taken over by them.
	If this is already started.
	The Greens, the Islamo-Communist Alliance, Jezbollah, the Islamo-Communist Alliance.
	They already are.
	But it's not quite bloomed yet, has it?
	They've not fully taken over.
	Jezbollar, I mean, Jeremy Corbyn's first appearances were all with Adnan Hussein solely around Islamists, basically, like Islamic people.
	So, I mean, it's getting there.
	I mean, we're only a few steps away from it.
	Surely Owen Jones is suffering from some cognitive dissonance, though.
	Because despite everything, I mean, I loathe the guy, but he's not actually stupid.
	Like, truly, truly like the mind of an 11-year-old stupid.
	He's not that.
	He isn't that.
	But you could be blinded by your ideology, right?
	Yeah.
	I think that's what's going on.
	One example I thought of is, if you remember a few years ago, in America, there was a Muslim Islamist shot up a gay nightclub.
	Was it in Orlando?
	That's about right.
	Anyway, and I remember, I remember this quite clearly, Owen Jones was on some show, and they were trying to discuss about the issues that Islam have with homosexuality.
	And he rage quit.
	He rage quit because they painted him into a corner easily saying, look, Islam's got profound issues with homosexuality.
	And he just couldn't deal with it.
	Just could not refute, or didn't want to either, either or.
	Just took his mic off and walked away.
	I mean, at what point will someone like Owen Jones, no matter how possessed they are by ideology, will have to accept that the alliance between socialism, leftism, whatever you want to say, Marxism, whatever it is, Trotskyism, and Islam, they're not bedfellows.
	Islam isn't interested ultimately in that.
	I wonder if ever, where they'll ever admit it, or Owen Jones is the type of person that will go to his grave insisting that we're on the same side, bruv.
	I don't know.
	When actual bloodshed is rife in the streets, I would imagine he will then realise that's...
	I mean, look, if all the examples throughout history is not enough to wake someone like him up, then, yeah, it would have to be actual bloodshed in his face, at his feet.
	But he would blame right-wing agitation.
	This has all been caused by the rights.
	Oh, yeah, true.
	Probably would.
	Almost certainly would.
	Yeah.
	So it carries on.
	He just says, I'm not here to cater to people's hurt feelings.
	This is Adnan Hussein.
	Lives are on the line.
	I wish to find the actual solution.
	I may be wrong, but I'm very entitled to my opinion.
	And I know many like me are feeling the same.
	What are lives on the line?
	What UKIP is going to start killing people?
	Yeah, exactly.
	Whose lives are you?
	What you want?
	What?
	It's just that it's upsetting their infiltration of Britain, isn't it?
	That's what's going on: our life, our cushy life in Britain, living off of the backs of people who built it for their ancestors only for it to be subverted.
	That's what it is.
	Not like Nick Tenconi's leading brown shirt billy club wielding paramilitary, is it?
	No.
	No Templar Knights there, for goodness sake.
	We did have a few Templar flags though.
	No, I did like that.
	And then he says, he goes on and on.
	He's like, I've been against the Islamophobic menace posed by the far right, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	Who cares?
	And then one final thing I wanted to talk about was that there was a little spat.
	Smug face.
	I know.
	Oh, yeah, it carries on.
	Sorry.
	I don't know why those ones are there.
	But there was a little spat between Nick Tenconi and Narinda Kerr.
	I know you can fill that in.
	Why not?
	One of your favourites.
	And he was basically saying that she always dresses immodestly and she needs to grow up and things like that.
	We're a bit pressed for time, so I'm not going to play the clip.
	All right, then.
	Would you like to hear it?
	Sure, why not?
	Why not?
	Dunk on Narinda, real quick.
	She is trained.
	She knows exactly what she's doing.
	That's why she dresses the way she dresses.
	That's why she's happy to parade herself in what she wears with the full face of makeup.
	I don't know who's more vile, her or Carol Vorderman.
	Do you notice they both deploy the same tactics?
	They both want to be 20 years younger than they actually are.
	Do you notice this?
	Oh, I know.
	I actually have to look at it.
	Oh, I noticed the.
	You and I know what's going on, Dan, so I'll say it without saying it.
	But I actually had to Google their ages.
	It's time to grow up.
	I mean, it really, you're not 25, you're not 35 anymore, Narinda.
	It's really, it's disgusting.
	You're a yeah, I mean, yeah.
	Narinda Kerr, she's not even Muslim, is she?
	She's Sikh, I believe.
	So yeah, I don't know.
	Yeah, yeah, she's Sikh.
	Okay.
	So, um, so anyway, but yeah, the point is, she's a classic example of like a basically a paid shill.
	I don't believe she's got any real value set other than my career, Narinda.
	My career is in just stabbing at nativists.
	Yeah.
	Just that from any angle.
	Doesn't matter how outrageous or absurd the claim is.
	She does it relentlessly, doesn't it?
	Oh, good.
	Yeah, it doesn't matter how many times she has to bring up false revisionist history about the empire or the Atlantic slave trade or any of that or like per capita statistics.
	It doesn't matter.
	She's getting paid to essentially peddle falsehoods.
	And that's it.
	Despicable, despicable thing.
	You'll be pleased to hear that they're trying to get her arrested.
	Yeah.
	Well, she actually.
	She breached the section 14 placed on the stand-up to racism counter-protest because she turned up to the UKIP protest.
	And of course, she always is turning up to these stand-up to racism protests.
	I don't know whether she's actually formally affiliated, but I wouldn't be surprised.
	I wasn't able to find out.
	But the Met police didn't arrest her, and so they're trying to push to get her arrested because that is an arrestable offence.
	And they rightfully point out, had they entered Tower Hamlets, they would have been arrested.
	The UKIP protesters.
	And Nick here says the Met must arrest Narinda to prove they're not two-tiered.
	And I think that that's actually quite a fair point.
	That, well, hang on a minute.
	You know, if a right-wing protest has these conditions placed on it, how come a prominent person like this is a known agitator is able to get away with it and turn up a video here that I'm not going to play the audio of.
	My feelings on that is within.
	Sorry, go on.
	I'm just going to play it in the background.
	Within the current paradigm, what Nick Tenkone said there is right.
	But I, in fact, think the whole thing is just a bit thought police.
	Like, you hold these political opinions, so you can't go here or there.
	Wouldn't it be better to just let the chips fall where they may?
	Everyone can go everywhere.
	See what happens then.
	I think in a country where it was largely us Brits and maybe some Europeans, continentals thrown in, that would be fine, wouldn't it?
	That would work because we would follow the rules largely and things would remain civil, but we don't live in that world anymore, do we?
	And that's and unfortunately, you sort of have to it's sort of like uh Lee Kuan Yu, isn't it, of Singapore?
	When you rule over lots of minorities, you've got to use very strong authority to succeed.
	And that's why you've got this style of policing going on.
	I mean, look at the Austro-Hungarian Empire, look at the Ottoman Empire, look at Yugoslavia.
	Yeah, the only way you can hold that down is with authoritarianism.
	The only hope is that.
	But this is, I think, the first example where it's obvious that there is an Islamic no-go zone because, you know, native British people and, you know, British patriots are not able to protest in an area of Britain because it's dangerous for them.
	And this is unprecedented, really.
	This is the first time I can think of in British history where this sort of situation has happened.
	And so it's undeniable now that there is this no-go zone in Whitechapel, in a part of London, where if you're a native British person, you don't have the right to protest there anymore because, of course, it's dangerous for you, according to the police.
	And it is dangerous for you, but I don't think that should stop you from being able to protest there.
	It's for the police to actually police it for once.
	Well said.
	It's a bit more than just Whitechapel.
	Whitechapel's a relatively small area.
	It is, yeah.
	Travel bands.
	Chunks of London.
	Home office.
	Travel bans there.
	Okay.
	Whitechapel.
	The Habsification says, you boys better start doing your duty and getting married and have six to ten kids up those demographic numbers.
	Working on it.
	Yeah, working on it, working on it.
	GLE777 says, crazy how Owen is getting outsmarted by inbreds.
	Yeah.
	That's a fair point.
	That's a random name says, when he says, I'm here with all my brothers, I believe him after all, his nation is known as the capital of incest.
	They're literally his brothers.
	The hundreds of them.
	It's not fair.
	SC Penny One says, I'll never forgive Nate for recommending Alien Earth.
	I enjoyed it, actually.
	I only recommended it up until episode five and then it fell apart, guys.
	Calm down.
	It was okay.
	No, it was.
	No.
	It's okay.
	Overall, it's actually a terrible show.
	And I've reviewed it as a whole season.
	Terrible.
	Bloody awful.
	Just completely wasted potential.
	It's like the gods.
	It definitely did.
	The most jarring thing of all was the cutting to the music at the end.
	That really didn't fit whatsoever, even though it was music by.
	To me, it was genre.
	It was like, what did I actually want to be?
	Was it jumping around?
	Was it thread?
	Was it a thought experiment on the human experience?
	What was it?
	It was like actual focus.
	Because it was the alien universe.
	I sort of enjoyed it at a certain baseline higher than I would else.
	Yeah, which is understandable.
	And then they kept cock teasing with the eyeball.
	I mean, I know.
	I wanted to hear it talk.
	Anyway.
	Out of context.
	So I don't know what any of that means.
	I've got to clap back on SC Penny.
	Okay, Dreadnought Logan says, Bo, you should say sorry to Lard for comparing it with Mike.
	Where did you compare, Mike?
	It must have been, it must have been on.
	There's that little channel, isn't there?
	What's it called again?
	State of Politics.
	Oh, yeah, the State of Politics.
	The State of Politics on YouTube.
	It would have been on that channel.
	I wonder who's about that.
	Who's on that channel?
	I couldn't tell you who's on that channel.
	Two handsome devils whose names I can't recall right now.
	I wouldn't get that for.
	No, homo.
	That's mine and Nate's channel, state of politics.
	Check it out.
	A bit uncensored, a bit much ruder.
	Dropped some F and C bombs on there as well if that's your thing.
	Especially about Mike.
	I don't remember, actually, but I must have called Mike Graham that Tabalard or something.
	I can't remember.
	Luca, I came in today and Luca was like, I've really enjoyed that.
	It was just 10 minutes of you going hard on Mike Brahman.
	I was going to say, that's pretty tame for you, Bo, calling it.
	Yeah.
	Oh, no.
	Probably dropped an F bomb in there as well.
	And a C-bomb.
	Yeah, do you know?
	Yeah, I believe we both did, to be fair.
	So I should say sorry to Lard.
	Lard is useful for something.
	Also, I got a new job as a city bus driver 28.82 Hurley.
	I don't know what that lasts.
	How are you?
	Yeah, £28.82 hourly.
	Well, right, okay.
	Oh, that's his wage hourly.
	That's not bad.
	Well, well done for getting a new job.
	Anyone getting a new job?
	Well done.
	Congrats.
	Might sack this in and become a bus driver by the sounds of it.
	Gimlio Gloin.
	Gloyne.
	Gloyen.
	Oh, is that Lord of the Rings?
	Lord of the Rings.
	Okay.
	Said, at this point, I'm afraid there has to be some escalation before the left comes to their senses.
	Yeah, that's what I said.
	If at all, yeah.
	But if they do, it's going to have to get worse.
	That's certainly true.
	Much, much worse.
	Okay.
	When will China cross the Rubicon, Bo Okay.
	So, let's talk about China real quick.
	China.
	Whether they are merely a strategic challenge.
	Or whether they are a full-blown threat to the West, to Britain, to the United States, to the way of life that isn't CCP aligned.
	Whether there is, in fact, a Cold War really going on between China and its ideological enemies.
	I would say there is.
	And increasingly so, it seems to me, or anyone that's honest with themselves, that they are sort of dialing up their aggression, at least in terms of rhetoric and diplomacy, at least towards Britain.
	They're dialing it up.
	I mean, I would say they've become full-blown piss takers, if I'm honest.
	Yeah, man, I'd agree with that.
	Taking the Michael now.
	They're actually, they threaten.
	They're threatening us.
	Again, diplomatically, rhetorically.
	Publicly, though?
	Publicly, though, yeah, right, right, yeah.
	Do what we want now.
	Make your foreign policy this or that.
	Build this or that there or there, or we'll cut off the money, effectively.
	Well, so here's the latest thing, or a few days, a few days ago, in a telegraph there you go.
	China vows to make Starma bow to Taiwan ownership demands.
	Sorry, who are you?
	Yeah.
	Who are we?
	What are you doing?
	Yeah.
	Who do you think you're talking to?
	Well, I think probably someone in their pocket.
	Yeah, right.
	What has happened here is that China has been allowed to get lots of leverage.
	Like, they own a decent amount of our water infrastructure, for example, and lots of other infrastructural things.
	And if you notice, you see Chinese tourists, for some reason, they're really interested in our infrastructure for some reason.
	Always taking photographs and videos and that sort of thing.
	It's almost like there's some sort of attempt to have leverage to make us do what they want.
	It's almost as though that were the case.
	It's definitely not like they've got a proxy who now effectively owns the Chagos Islands either.
	A strategic challenge.
	That's all they are.
	Anyway, so the whole story, I won't go into so much detail because I could do, should really do hours and hours of content about Formosa and Chiang Kai-shek and Taiwan and the Chinese civil war.
	In fact, on my own channel, History Bro, one of the earliest long series I did was about the life and career of Mao, Chairman Mao Zedong.
	And of course, in that, I talked all about, I mean, the civil war, the Chinese civil war that they had direct, well, before and after World War II.
	And ultimately, of course, the Chinese communists win that.
	And the nationalists, or really anyone that the communists didn't like, effectively fled to the island of Formosa, as it was then, now Taiwan.
	And that's sort of been the case ever since.
	Well, it has been the case ever since.
	And the United States, during the Cold War, has always insisted, like Japan, like South Korea, like West Germany, like a whole number of places, or all Western Europe, really, we got your back, the Americans say, you know, we won't let the communists, whether it's Soviet or CCP, we won't let them invade you.
	We'll go to full-blown war if we have to.
	We'll do a Korean war on your behalf if we have to.
	And that's been the case all about till today.
	But all throughout those decades, China, as always, Beijing has always said, no, that island there, Taiwan, that's just part of China, the same way they deal with and talk about Tibet.
	There's no such thing as Tibet.
	That's just a bit of China.
	That's just our country.
	That's what they say.
	That's their position.
	And always has been.
	So it's not like this is new.
	It's not like suddenly the Chinese are claiming Taiwan out of nowhere.
	CCP out of nowhere.
	Steel chair.
	No, no.
	They've always said it.
	But now we're in the mid-2020s now, aren't we?
	We're in a position where the Chinese economy genuinely rivals the United States.
	Its industrial capacity genuinely rivals it.
	But only in a limited sense.
	The US is still quite far ahead, but the Chinese are catching up.
	And it's a point of concern for the Americans in that obviously China has a much, much larger labor force than they do.
	There are lots of things that are both to China's advantage and disadvantage that are different.
	And there's this uncertainty of, well, at the minute the US is the world hegemon, but it could be China.
	And, you know, given their relationship with China, if China does become hegemonic over the world, well, things aren't going to look good for the United States and their allies, which means us.
	The thing about China and its economy versus the States is, and just as a global power and a force, which I don't know if you're ever going to mention this in your segment, Bo, but, you know, China as an authoritarian regime is one unified focus.
	Sole focus.
	By decree, they demand this is going to happen.
	We're going to do this.
	So in terms of sort of strategy and battles and things like that, and just where they move their sort of economic focus and drive, it's just, it's very, very myopic.
	It's very singular, right?
	Whereas America has spent God knows how long now, at least a decade, quibbling over what woman is.
	Well, China is 92.5% ethnically Han Chinese and all of their leadership is Han Chinese.
	So China's basically a dictatorship of the Han over a small number of minority political forces either.
	No, because they've crushed them all, of course.
	Yeah, exactly.
	But this is what I mean.
	Like, that's a point of concern.
	No matter what an economy size is.
	Well, they versus the states.
	Their unity is their strength.
	I'm going to flip the diversity thing.
	No, because they're a monoculture that isn't quibbling amongst themselves, largely speaking.
	It's going to make them more formidable.
	By having more disparate ethnicities and groups, it makes you weaker as a country.
	Yeah, I mean, I've been having this argument on Twitter the last couple of days.
	I say argument.
	It's actually really interesting debate with random people on Twitter.
	I think it's very, I'm very, very interested in it.
	If America and China did have a full-blown conventional war, let's take nukes off the table.
	Let's just say they don't have a nuclear exchange.
	How would it go?
	Especially if it lasted for any amount of time.
	And it is interesting.
	You know, like, who controls the semiconductors in the world, right?
	It's mainly Taiwan, South Korea.
	The US has been allies of the United States and not China.
	Very explicitly so.
	But then, like, who manufactures the most steel in the world?
	China by a long, long way.
	But who manufactures the most armoured plate?
	The United States by a very, very long way.
	Who's got the biggest economy?
	Well, just in straight up terms, it's kind of a parity.
	Who's got the biggest air force?
	Well, the United States.
	Who's got the biggest navy, the biggest submarine program?
	Who controls space?
	Well, all the United States.
	But who could switch their industrial capacity quicker to pumping out insane volumes of shells?
	Make probably China, probably.
	So it's actually quite interesting.
	I did say on Twitter, I explicitly said, this is not what this segment was about, but this is a fascinating thing.
	I suspect, as long as it didn't last months and months, months and years, I suspect America would dominate it.
	I would agree.
	I suspect they would get their carrier groups over to the eastern Pacific without China being able to do much about it and game over.
	But then, who knows?
	You can point to the fact that even though the United States can win a hot war, a conventional hot war, they're very, very good at that.
	They are very, very good at that.
	But then winning the peace afterwards, they're kind of terrible at that, right?
	But anyway, to get back to the point you was making about homogeneity of China versus the diversity of the United States.
	Well, if you look back at the 30s and the 40s when Germany and Japan declared war on the United States, back then they still had segregation and met America.
	It's still a fully segregated society and all sorts of, you could point to all sorts of data points that America is a disparate, all the different states are almost like different countries and they won't be able to pull together and they won't be able to stomach large casualty lists.
	All that was wrong.
	All that was wrong.
	America did pull together as one and stomached quite large casualty lists.
	They did turn their economy into pumping out like a liberty ship every other day or whatever.
	Pumping out dozens of aircraft carriers or whatever.
	Making tens and tens of thousands of planes.
	They did do that.
	I mean, we live in a different world now and things are more...
	Okay.
	The point is, let's get back to the topic here.
	And Britain and what China's doing to us and Kierstarma at the moment.
	This headline, China warns UK of diplomatic rift unless MP Starmer backs claim over Taiwan.
	So blackmailing, but we're bullying.
	That's definitely sort of, that's quite belligerent.
	Like, you don't get to tell us what our foreign policy...
	Well, you do if Starmer's the Prime Minister.
	But in any normal state of Events, if you had a normal government, it's like that's the absolute bedrock of what a government is in some ways, is that you do have autonomy over your domestic policy and foreign policy.
	A foreign country doesn't get to tell you what your foreign policy is.
	That's the essence of being your own sovereign nation.
	It's interesting though, because normally these sorts of conversations and this diplomatic tussling goes on behind closed doors and they don't draw attention to it publicly.
	It's interesting that they're making such strong statements public in a way.
	I don't know whether it's power projection from China, which seems the most likely, or trying to undermine Britain on the national stage because those two things, although related, are slightly different.
	And of course, you know, we're quite a loyal ally of the United States, which China sees as their main enemy, really, don't they?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, that's the point I made on step politics when we spoke about this.
	Was that these kind of comments being made public to me indicated just what we know of Kirstama, Labour, and the like and their sort of dealings with China.
	To me, it indicated that actually they had had these discussions behind closed doors.
	And just my own theory, anyway, is that they're making it public to apply pressure.
	I very much agree.
	Cheeky.
	Taking the piss.
	Really?
	Yeah, I mean, I would probably agree that ambassadors and diplomatic back channels and all that sort of thing go on sort of constantly, don't they?
	And so for the Chinese, it's the Chinese ambassador to the UK saying this stuff.
	So it must be, it is a very deliberate decision from them to do this, to say this publicly.
	I feel like maybe there's an element of it.
	I don't want to talk about this for too long, but maybe there's the element working into this of the recent spy, Chinese spy scandal, where it seemed like, or it seems almost certainly the case that our government just completely folded under pressure from the Chinese to like just put this thing to bed, just kill it.
	And we did.
	So now they think, like a bully or like in prison, a prison bitch, like, oh, we realize we can put our thumb on this dude and he's going to do what we want.
	So we keep doing it, of course.
	Like being blackmailed.
	Oh, you paid up once.
	You weren't able to stand up for yourself one time.
	So we just keep doing it.
	That's how that works.
	I feel like this is a continuation of that.
	They realize that they've got like the whip hand over Starmer.
	And so push it as far as you can.
	Classic commie stuff.
	Of course they push it as far as they can.
	They've got no shame.
	Of course they've got no shame whatsoever.
	Oh, here, the Daily Mail.
	China threatens Sir Kir Starma with breakdown in diplomatic links unless Britain backs Beijing over owning Taiwan.
	So threatening us over our foreign policy.
	Most literally choose us over the states.
	That's effectively what it is.
	Sort of kind of boils down to that, doesn't it?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, it really does.
	Yeah.
	I imagine it wouldn't go down too well in Washington if we did that right.
	Oh, no.
	No, no way.
	I'm being flippant.
	Of course it wouldn't.
	It would be catastrophic.
	What tiny remnant of the special relationship, if that ever existed past 1945, would be absolutely gone.
	But I mean, it's been a cornerstone of not just the United States, but all NATO, all sort of Western policy to sort of defend these certain places against the encroachment of.
	You know, there was British troops in Korea during the Korean War.
	There's some British special forces in Vietnam, for example.
	Right?
	Well, if you look at the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, we were right there with them, weren't we?
	We controlled Basra for a long, long time, right?
	We were there in Kandahar.
	Now, that's how the Chinese, how most analysts are almost certainly right, view it.
	It's not that Britain is any threat to China on sort of on any level, but what we are are a key, key ally of the United States.
	So if you undermine us, damage us in any way, at least by proxy, at least indirectly, damages the United States, undermines the United States.
	So in those terms, and we do a lot of business with China.
	We do something in the last year on the order of £90 billion worth of trade, import and export, with China.
	A couple of years ago, it was way over £100 billion.
	It's down a little bit now.
	But still, to us, that's a lot of money.
	To them, it's a drop in the ocean, right?
	But to us, it's quite a lot of money.
	And they're using it as leverage, obviously using it as leverage.
	That's common sense to do that, isn't it?
	If you're an arsehole.
	All states do that.
	Even Trump's been doing that with Britain and Europe.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, no, but I mean, if I was Prime Minister, I just wouldn't accept it.
	It's like if someone tried to blackmail me over something, I'd be like, no, no, fine, then let's just go full exposure.
	I'm not letting you blackmail me, whatever the dirt you've got on me or whatever.
	I'll just let the whole world know because I'm not being bullied and blackmailed.
	That's not going to happen.
	No, no, no, no.
	I'm not going to say sorry for something that I'm not sorry about, for example.
	This sort of thing.
	Keir Starmer should just be, oh, no, if you want to break all trade relations, he won't do this because he's a coward, a moral and political coward and a traitor.
	But any good prime minister would be like, no, no, no, if you need to cut off diplomatic relations with us, China, do what you've got to do.
	If you need to cut off all your trade with us, do what you're going to do.
	But we're going to set our own foreign policy.
	Thank you very much.
	Now, we're going to decide what we think about Taiwan.
	Thank you very much.
	But that's not the leaders we've got.
	So that probably, well, almost certainly won't happen.
	I mean, we'll see if over the coming days, weeks, months.
	I wonder if we do formally, under Kier, formally change our foreign policy towards Taiwan.
	Imagine if that would be so humiliating if they came out one day, the FCO, the Foreign Commonwealth Office came out and say, we support Beijing's claim.
	I'd be very surprised if they did that, to be honest.
	Yeah, so would I. Well, I don't know if I would, though.
	I actually don't think I would.
	Not with Kirstama.
	I wouldn't be surprised.
	Look at the Chagos Islands thing.
	Yeah.
	I mean, I can't believe Trump didn't veto that.
	It was mental.
	But yeah, Trump actually ended up going along with it, which I find interesting.
	There must have been something more going on that we weren't.
	Well, he wasn't paying for it, was he?
	That's true as well.
	Yeah, so again, so they're just trying to put all sorts of pressure on us, of all people.
	Like, it really matters what the Foreign and Commonwealth Office position is on Taiwan.
	Ultimately, I mean, ultimately, when we come down to brass tax, it doesn't really matter.
	Right?
	Well, I can, you know, stick up some sort of defense for our influence on foreign powers in that we're still one of the top five militaries in the world.
	Yeah, we're one of only what, seven nations that have got nukes.
	That too.
	This matters.
	This gives you negotiating power, even if, you know, we're no longer the British Empire.
	We still have hard power.
	And I think China respects hard power a lot more than soft power.
	There's only a very small number of countries in the world that have got nukes, a submarine program, and like a half-decent intelligence service and half-decent special forces capability, small as it might be, half-decent air force.
	There's only small countries that have got like cutting-edge fast jets and stuff.
	Obviously, we haven't got anywhere near the number of China or the United States, but you know, nonetheless.
	Yeah, only a small country, very small number of countries have got any aircraft carriers, but we're one of those.
	Our aircraft carriers are a bit poop, but still, we've got them.
	They count for something.
	The Russia's aircraft carrier.
	Well, that's not hard.
	Better than the French as well.
	They've got one, haven't they?
	I think the French have got one.
	Yeah, I think they have.
	They do, yeah.
	Yeah.
	Of course, the United States have got like 20, and there's like 10 at sea at any given moment.
	And they're huge.
	Yeah, they're biggest.
	Yeah.
	China's got two or three, is it now?
	Anyway.
	All right.
	What's this headline?
	GB News.
	It belongs to us.
	Quote, China pressures Kierstarma to support invasion of Taiwan in major war warning.
	It makes it sound like he wants, you know, China wants us to invade on their behalf.
	The way that's worded.
	They probably would do if they could.
	Yeah.
	They'd use the Royal Marines as cannon fodder if they could.
	Jesus.
	But yeah, this does mark a bit of an escalation as far as I know.
	As I said earlier, it's always been the case since 1948 or whatever that China and Beijing have said, Taiwan's ours and we still claim it.
	And like Chiang Kai-shek's regime there is illegitimate.
	But I can't remember, at least in my lifetime, China ever doing something like this.
	Just coming out and being quite bellicose.
	It's bordering on real sabre rattling.
	It does feel like they're dialing it up.
	They've been slowly dialing it up, haven't they?
	This is we're reaching this point.
	But also, sorry.
	I don't know.
	That's what I was saying.
	I was going to point out that if they were going to invade, they wouldn't dial up the rhetoric and let the world know right before.
	At least in my thinking, it would make more sense to keep your head down, be quiet for a little bit, and then just suddenly do it and take the world by surprise.
	But of course, it doesn't necessarily have to mean that, does it?
	No.
	Well, if they're going to embarrass people, that's true.
	If the aim is to embarrass as well as do that, I mean, it makes sense.
	It's not like it wouldn't come as a surprise to anyone if they actually did invade based on their rhetoric over the you know the years, right?
	I mean, it'd be it, I guess it would be shocking, but it wouldn't surprise you that they don't.
	The surprise would be shocked, but you wouldn't be like, Oh, I didn't, I never saw this coming.
	Like, they've always said it's theirs.
	So, dialing up the rhetoric, I mean, it's multi-purpose, isn't it?
	I think if it were to be a surprise, it'd be like, oh, here and now rather than at some point in the future.
	Yeah, I think.
	Um, well, you're absolutely right, right?
	Machiavelli tells us, Don't declare war, don't let the other side know you're coming.
	Yeah, that's the perfect strategy, but often in real life, it doesn't really work like if you met if you remember the run-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, there was a war of words between George Bush and Saddam for months, for months and months, and like the Pentagon making all sorts of claims, we're coming for you, bro.
	Basically, because all of this doesn't happen in isolation, the world's watching, isn't it?
	Right.
	And you know, if China does capture Taiwan and control it, they do want to be able to trade with the world still.
	If they have all of their trade cut off and they're sanctioned by the world, it would be a disaster for them.
	So, they're very conscious of maintaining good perceptions internationally, I think.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Yeah, well, they want to ultimately be masters of the universe, don't they?
	There's no doubt, there's no not really any doubt about it.
	Here's a headline here: China warns UK of diplomatic retaliation over Taiwan's sovereignty support.
	All right, then, yeah, go poke your diplomatic retaliation.
	Yeah, don't have an embassy in London then.
	That's fine, that's fine with us.
	That would be preferable, yeah.
	That would be nice, yeah, that'd be nice.
	Yeah, let's do that, freeze us up some property to put some migrants in.
	Yeah, sorry, we've got some Eritreans who need to find a bed for, guys, yeah, that would be very insulting to them, though.
	Um, and yeah, okay, and then just something I've sort of almost run out of time, but there's a whole other thing about the uh, I was going to talk about the super embassy they want to build and all the concerns about that.
	Um, it's it's this building here, actually, this building used to be on the mint, the site of the Royal Mint.
	As big as that building is, that's only a fraction of it.
	It's a giant complex of buildings.
	It's not on that one, but I'll find it in a moment.
	And the Chinese want to make, oh, here it is, actually.
	All of that will be the Chinese embassy.
	Wow.
	If they get their way, this whole thing.
	Oh, and underneath, physically underneath that site are cables that run from the city of London, i.e., where all the trading goes on.
	That they could, every people in the know say the Chinese could quite easily do a Venona-style, you know, Project Venona, where in East Berlin in the 50s, the CIA tunnelled under the Soviet bit of East Berlin and tapped into their signals intelligence and got secrets direct from them by tunnels, literally tunnels and stuff.
	Nowadays, it would be fiber optics, wouldn't it, rather than sort of telephone lines or anything.
	But anyway, apparently, the plans that the Chinese have put forward of like they're not saying exactly what they're going to do with buildings and rooms underneath.
	There's like a whole wing.
	They've not revealed anything.
	It's really suspicious.
	Yeah.
	And the Chinese are saying stuff like, they're starting to put pressure on us over that as well.
	Like, you know, give us the planning permission to move in here.
	Otherwise, there'll be a diplomatic problem.
	Otherwise, there'll be a trading problem.
	Again, they're taking the piss, they're threatening us.
	Israeli embassy is it.
	Why can't we?
	Yeah, it's really.
	There should be no mega embassies.
	Yeah, in the heart of London.
	No, that's just absurd.
	If you want a really giant, if you need a really giant embassy for some reason, China, build it out in somewhere in like Richmond or something.
	brantford you don't do it on like in a really most yeah You do it in the middle of Blackburn.
	Yeah, that goes down.
	In the middle of Oldham.
	You can have all of Oldham.
	How'd you like that?
	Yeah, yeah.
	And apparently the Foreign Office that we're calling to this headline, the Foreign Office and the Home Office, have dropped demands for security changes to the new Chinese mega embassy in London.
	Weird.
	Wait, are we caving to their pressure?
	Is that what's happening here?
	Sounds like it.
	And the guy that will be basically ultimately responsible for making this decision is this guy, Steve Reid.
	Steve Reid, who is the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government.
	Ultimately, he'll give them the green light or not.
	It keeps getting pushed back.
	Apparently, the latest deadline is like the 10th of December or something, where he'll give a definitive answer.
	There should be a no.
	Yeah, of course it should be.
	Should be get out of town.
	Let's just listen to a few a minute or so of this interaction you gave not too long ago to Sky News.
	Talking planning decisions, should the government rubber stamp a new Chinese mega embassy?
	There's a decision due this time next week.
	Of course the government shouldn't rubber stamp any planning decision and that will be a decision that will come on my desk and of course I can't talk about a specific application because I have to act in a quasi-judicial way in taking the decision.
	Yeah because there's a lot of talk that they've been giving the heads up that it's going to happen.
	This is regardless of things on those plans that don't seem to tell us exactly what they're going to be building.
	Rooms underground that people don't know what are going to be useful.
	You'll be aware I can't talk about a specific application, but there is definitely, in general terms, no predetermination of big decisions like that one.
	The information would be put on my desk for that decision or any other.
	I will then go through it very, very carefully and I will come to a view.
	Is China a threat to national security, in your opinion?
	China poses a threat to national security.
	We know that because we've seen the increase in cyber attacks.
	OK, so it should be actually a predetermined no.
	Right, yeah.
	How is it not a no-brainer no?
	The statement you've just made afterwards indicates that it should be a predetermined no.
	Big firm no.
	No, because we don't actually know what you're going to be doing there.
	So, no.
	You've admitted there are security risks, national security risks.
	We all know that there's planning, unrevealed planning.
	Yeah, the predetermined should be no.
	Should be an absolute slam dunk, not in a month of Sundays, thank you very much.
	Yeah, thanks for playing.
	Yeah, it should be.
	Clown should.
	Although, two things, well, one thing I'll say about that is two different things he said.
	One was that, when he was asked, are they a threat, he actually just said, yeah, they are a threat to national security.
	That's actually, for a Labour minister, it's actually reasonably strong.
	Usually, as I say, they say, they're a strategic concern, a strategic challenge or something.
	They don't usually explicitly say that they are, which he did there.
	So, fair do's.
	But everything else you saw there, it was classic dancing around the issue, dancing around, giving just a straight up answer.
	Just saying, I will come to a view.
	I will make a decision.
	Of course, I can't talk about blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	Typical politician bullshit to not say it's a slam dunk no from us.
	Why can't you just say no?
	Why can't our government just say, no, that's a ridiculous plan, China, to have that massive site in the middle of London as your mega embassy?
	No, why would we?
	How is that in our interest?
	That's what I would like to hear from someone like Steve Reid.
	It's just, of course not.
	But anyway, that's where we are.
	We'll see where it goes.
	We'll see if the Chinese keep trying to mount pressure on us to change our foreign policy and do their bidding all the time.
	All right, I can read some of these if you want.
	Yeah, go ahead.
	Brendan Lucas says, in the event of Taiwan war, a countdown effectively starts.
	The longer China takes to take Taipei, the more likely it is to lose the war because of blockades and a combined US-Japan fleet.
	That is very true as far as I'm aware.
	Conversely, if China took Taipei quickly, the more the world realizes that the task to retake Taiwan is impossible and they'll have to accept things as they are.
	That's not entirely correct as far as I'm aware.
	Chris says, why don't we feed false information through those lines under the embassy?
	That sounds very much like something we would do, to be honest, isn't it?
	Yeah.
	We're very good at that sort of thing.
	And that's the classic counter-espionage thing.
	Oh, they're listening to us.
	Are they now?
	No.
	No.
	we can feed them all sorts Of misdirection, but okay, who knows?
	He knows.
	Luke Stewart says, Did he have a comment before?
	Because it sounds like it's replying to something.
	Is there one?
	Oh, no.
	No, it looks like it is.
	Okay, I see it.
	G'day, I'm not too worried.
	Check out the factory fires happening from the China show.
	Apparently, workers aren't getting paid, so they're burning down factories as well as other issues that they're having.
	Yeah, I think there are a lot of internal issues.
	They've also got a lot of debt that their local councils have accumulated, and they've got to restructure basically how their entire economy works, but from a governmental level, not necessarily instrumentally in individual factories.
	But the way it's funding at the minute, there's an incentive for them to take out loans using assets that they are slowly running out of.
	So they can't continue doing that.
	But they'll find a way to refinance things and fix it.
	I think it's not impossible for them to fix.
	But it's a delay, it's a road bump.
	You've been very good on that a few times, talking about Chinese actual internal problems.
	And in fact, their economy, although giant, is actually not particularly strong.
	Not that the American one is.
	But the thing is, the way it works, it's so funny.
	China and America's import and export relationship, buying each other's sovereign debt and stuff.
	They've both got it's a symbiotic relationship, economically speaking.
	If one or other just decided to cut all economic trading ties with the other, it sort of screws them almost as much as the other guy.
	They're completely entwined, economically speaking.
	It's one of the strategies, isn't it, that we integrate so much with China that them turning against us as in the West would be so punishing to both of us that there's a strong incentive for them not to do it.
	And I can see that argument.
	See, with Britain, if we said, like, yeah, keep your $90 billion a year then, they'd be like, okay.
	Yeah, good luck, have a good life.
	But if America did the same thing, it would be truly damaging to China, as well as America, of course.
	So it's a funny, difficult, interesting situation.
	So he carries them said, but then again, they could start a war to avoid and distract from all the problems at home.
	Again, I recommend the China Show and China Uncensored.
	I'm already familiar with both of those.
	And is it Javier or Xavier?
	I don't know.
	I think it's Javier, isn't it?
	G'day, Josh, has the hairstyle of Superman.
	He's the original.
	Have you seen him in a room at the same time?
	All I need to do is put on the glasses, except to become Superman.
	Superman doesn't wear glasses.
	I know, but nor do I. Clark Kubernetes.
	No, it's got to be the other way around.
	Fair, fair.
	Josh, Clark Kent, firm.
	That's what I didn't tell you.
	Brilliant.
	So we need to talk about Siddiq Khan's cover-up?
	Question mark?
	Probably, highly likely.
	Of Pakistani grooming gangs in London.
	I don't know anything about this, but I say yes.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, it's looking highly likely, to be honest.
	So I'm going to annoy you all.
	Brace yourself.
	And I do actually mean brace yourself because this is probably one of the most infuriating videos, if you haven't seen it, you will ever see.
	I asked you this question last week and you found every which way but not to answer it.
	Just how many grooming gangs have we got in London?
	To avoid any misunderstanding, can she define what she means by that?
	Yes, if you look at what's gone on in Rotherham, where there are people taking young girls, grooming them for sex, that is what I'm talking about.
	Well, we know in London there are issues about exploitation of young people, but they're not as defined by the membrane her definition of what those types of gangs are.
	So are you saying we haven't got the same sort of gangs that are in Rotherham, Bradford, and lots of other places in the country?
	Just full of misunderstanding.
	What does she mean by that?
	You know full well what I mean by that.
	It's all over the television.
	You know exactly what I mean by that.
	These gangs of people that are grooming young girls for sex.
	Do we actually have those in London?
	I'm unclear, Chair, what is meant by the question.
	If she could spell it out, I can answer.
	I've just spelt it out.
	Are you not listening?
	It's the sort of gangs that groom young girls at a young age for sex.
	Exactly how much clearer do you want me to be?
	She dealt with that quite well, didn't she?
	Yeah.
	Big up Susan Hole.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, yeah.
	The thing is, he wanted her to say Muslim so he can say, ah, racist.
	She was very careful to say groups of men, groups of people that are doing this.
	We all know Pakistani Muslims.
	And he wants her to say that so that he can just say, oh, you're a racist bigot.
	I don't even need to answer that.
	Get out of here, racist bigot.
	Because, of course, Sadiq Khan is Pakistani, isn't he?
	Yeah.
	So he relies on his alliance with the Islamic world in London.
	I mean, what a despicable thing that is.
	There's these lives of these girls on the line.
	And he's just playing semantic games, playing stupid little bullshit games, pretending not to understand.
	That's sickening, isn't it?
	Well, he feels sick.
	It's actually sickening because, again, the whole mindset is that these poor girls don't mean anything to him at all.
	They're lives destroyed and crushed.
	And it's irreparable damage.
	You will never get that back.
	They don't matter one iota to this disgusting pile of detritus in the shape of a man.
	That much is obvious just by how he was conducting himself, wasn't it?
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	I mean, yeah.
	Yeah.
	It's truly fast.
	So sorry about that, to start with that.
	We've got to set the scene.
	And then we've got this as well.
	So we're just going to have a quick look at this.
	Again, just more stuff, basically, right?
	I think many of us wanted to hear the oral update on rape gangs because the mayor has refused to answer questions on the rape gangs on numerous occasions.
	And I'm sure every one of us wanted to hear his update.
	So, Mr. Mayor, are you not able to give us an oral update on the rape gangs in London?
	We've had this conversation.
	I can't make the mayor do something that he doesn't want to do.
	This isn't right.
	You were asked by a member for an oral update on rape gangs.
	You never seem to want to talk about rape gangs.
	If you were asked for an oral update, why can't you just give an oral update and then the clock starts going after that?
	Because many people wonder why we don't ask additional questions.
	And it's because we're on the clock.
	I will ask a question then.
	Do you believe, Mr. Mayor, that there are grooming gangs now in London?
	So, Chair, in London, the vast majority of what we're dealing with is county lines, which involves organised criminal networks.
	Sorry, illegal.
	Sorry, Mr. Mayor, can I stop you?
	This is the answer you keep giving me.
	You know what a grooming gang is now.
	Even you must have picked up on what a rape gang is.
	Perhaps if I put it that way, you'll understand more.
	Does London have rape gangs in it?
	Sort of a we're a step further down sort of timeline of his denials.
	That's just filibustering.
	Yeah.
	He's so infuriated.
	About one of the most disgusting crimes imaginable on a scale that is almost unimaginable.
	Yeah.
	Could you be more evil?
	Could you be more.
	He's just being it's obvious by his failure to admit the existence of these things because he can say yes these things exist and they're terrible.
	We're doing things to combat it.
	But he's not doing that.
	Which suggests one, he knows that these things are going on.
	Two, that he knows it would be damaging for him and he's prioritizing his own self-interest.
	And three that he cares more about his fellow Muslims than he does about the victims of these rape gangs.
	Yeah, there is another clip which I actually couldn't find to include in this where he specifically says that there's no indication.
	He uses kind of like key language where he's like, no, there's no indication.
	There's no indication of this.
	No indication, right?
	But that's something that gives you plausible deniability.
	It's saying no.
	You're not saying no, there isn't, because then he might be on the hook for it.
	Well, there is an indication, actually.
	Because the Metropolitan Police are now reopening cases, not 100, not even 1,000 cases, even though that would be obviously astronomically high.
	One is one too many.
	They're reviewing and reopening 9,000 grooming gang cases.
	9,000.
	Very quickly to interject just for anyone who might not know, Met Police just means London police.
	Yeah.
	That's just London.
	That's just London.
	Also, super important point is under the Mayor's purview, the Metropolitan Police.
	He is the chief of the Metropolitan Police.
	Basically, right?
	That's his purview.
	He runs them.
	I mean, yeah.
	It's one of the many hats that the mayor, you know, sits above.
	He's like the commissioner for all police or something, isn't it?
	Something like that.
	Yeah, police and crimes commissioner.
	It's interesting that this comes up now because I remember being on the podcast with Carl one time and we were talking about the grooming gangs and he said how it's interesting how London has all of this diversity and yet there doesn't seem to be any cases of grooming gangs.
	And of course the obvious answer is, well, it's all going on.
	It's just been not reported on.
	And, you know, one of the explanations that we came up with at the time, like, you know, to try and potentially make sense of it was, well, because everyone is, you know, from all around the world in London, maybe they haven't got as concrete a community as in, you know, in areas like Bradford, where it's majority Pakistani.
	But of course, that isn't necessarily the case.
	If you look at London, there are areas where it's majority certain ethnicities or nationalities.
	And so the conditions are right for this sort of thing to go on.
	Yeah.
	And so the only reason that they've done this, the Metropolitan Police, that I can see, is that there's been mounting pressure nationally, obviously with the inquiry itself, but that's not that much pressure.
	But there was an I think it was the Express did an investigation, basically, and sort of spoke to a whole bunch of people.
	There was a whistleblower as well.
	There's a whistleblower, which has gained quite a lot of traction now, former investigator.
	And they're like, yeah, no, there is patterns.
	This is indicative of grooming gangs.
	And it's just been ignored.
	So much so that these cases were even put to Sadiq Khan directly.
	And he was just like, yeah, no, don't worry about it.
	It's a crack-on type deal, basically.
	And it's just disgusting.
	We'll have a brief look.
	I don't want to read from this too much verbatim, but just a brief look from the BBC's article.
	It just says 9,000 cases of CSE are being reviewed by the Met police.
	The force was confirmed.
	In a statement, the Met said it was reinvestigating the cases which involve intra-familial peer-on-peer and in institutional settings, along with those which did not fit the common understanding of a grooming gang, right?
	So they're sort of broad scoping it, which has now also been sort of refuted by Susan Hall as well.
	So the case is being re-examined following a national review into group-based CSE.
	So, okay, well, fine.
	It shouldn't.
	The fact that you've got to re-examine it.
	Well, yeah, that speaks volumes, just that.
	Yeah.
	Why wasn't it dealt with the first time round?
	What possible reason would there have been?
	There's obviously pressure from the top, isn't there?
	That's why that would happen.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Again, not caring a fig for the victim.
	Yeah.
	And future potential victims as well, of course.
	Yeah.
	Oh, it's the whole, I mean, the whole thing is disgusting.
	I don't really like coming on era talking about this, but you know, needs to be spoken about, doesn't it?
	You've got to confront these horrors to actually move past it and create a better culture and civilization.
	So, Susan Hall, this is the individual, Councillor Susan Hall, who has been doing all those questions that I sort of started with.
	And this is just her statement as well.
	This is very, very recent, October 25th at the time of recording.
	So we'll just watch this.
	Firstly, I'd like to thank so many of you who've been kind enough to watch the videos of me questioning the mayor and the deputy mayor about rape gangs in London.
	You all saw that the mayor says, I don't know what she's talking about.
	What does she mean?
	Well, all of you knew what I meant, and I suspect he did.
	But trying to get information out of him and the Metropolitan Police and definitely the Deputy Mayor has been so difficult.
	But we now see that the Met are investigating 9,000 cases of grooming gangs or rape gangs, as I call them.
	9,000.
	So from going in January, when I first started all these questions, when he said he didn't know what I mean, we're now seeing that they're admitting to at least 9,000 cases.
	I'm not surprised because so many very brave victims or survivors have actually contacted me telling me their terrible stories.
	So at least it's out there and now they admit to it.
	But why did it take so long?
	Sadiq Khan is the police and crime commissioner.
	He's the mayor of London.
	What a damn disgrace he is.
	He is not worthy of that position.
	Disband London Mayor.
	Yeah.
	Completely.
	We've got on fine without it.
	Get rid of it.
	We don't need it.
	Clearly, actually, very clearly, we don't need it.
	Especially when it creates incentives for client classes.
	No, get rid of it now.
	It's only a recent addition, wasn't it?
	It's not been about for that long.
	Under Blair, yeah.
	I'd get rid of the entire London Assembly, the whole bureaucracy of it.
	Sweep it aside.
	London worked better before we had it.
	And then clear out the Met of all the apologists for all the people that allowed this sort of thing to happen.
	Clear them out.
	Let's get some real people who are going to truly hunt for justice, come what may.
	That's when these happen, obviously.
	Things I've heard from inside the Met, I know quite a few people that are working within it, and the culture in there of this sort of thing covering up these sorts of things.
	The Met police are only out for the Met police.
	And even then, they're not sticking up for each other.
	So it's pretty much an environment where people have to only be out for themselves.
	And it's self-selecting for people like that.
	There are some good people in there, but they're in a minority in a culture that prioritises people being careerist and selfish and not denying, you know, not acknowledging politically inconvenient facts that would be for the good of the country if they go against the institution.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Well, so, yeah.
	So why has this happened?
	This was obviously going to be the case that London had them.
	I've got some statistics here.
	So in 2021, this is in 2021, right?
	So the Muslim population in Greater London was 1,318,755.
	Now that is only in 2021.
	So the floodgates have opened since then.
	It's 15% of the city's population.
	I guarantee you that that is much higher now.
	Guarantee.
	Of course, the 2021 census data.
	So that's just people there legally.
	Yeah.
	And there's good reason to believe that that figure will be much, much higher when we then subsequently open the floodgates as well.
	So there you go.
	Islam is the second largest religion in London after Christianity.
	So there's that.
	And that, again, that is just in 2021.
	So let's have a look at London's voting record as well, just to sort of indicate potentially why they're keeping this stum, shall we?
	Ha.
	For those that are just listening, that's a map of the London general election results.
	And any observations there, guys?
	A bit red.
	It's a massive Labour stronghold.
	In fact, it's the only real place left, it looks like, where Labour can rely on any sort of safe seats.
	Well, there are the odd other places here or there, but yeah, this is where they'll get the majority of their MPs from next time, probably, I would have thought.
	Classic West London there, Lib Dems, really rich area.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, we'll just wait.
	Yeah.
	Just wait, because that operation scatter, that'll get you as well.
	So this is important, the voting makeup for when we watch this.
	I know you, you know, got some issues with Trevor Phillips here and there, but he says this, and it's worthwhile listening to.
	What's coming together here is a really horrid combination that nobody really ever wants to talk about, which is the intersection of race and sexual predation.
	And, you know, let's be honest that actually a lot of this is bringing those two things together in an unpleasant way.
	The issue about the grooming gangs inquiry is very straightforward.
	The government clearly never wanted this, these two things to be put together.
	And I suspect that their big reason for not wanting those two things to be put together is that much of this took place in areas which are run by local Labour councils.
	And that the authorities who ought to be watching over this, stopping it, monitoring it, and all of the rest of it were controlled by those councils and they did nothing.
	As I make the point I make in my people, I'll just stop it there.
	We don't really need to listen to the rest of it.
	I just thought the map plus what he says, which is patently obvious and true.
	It's particularly significant coming from a former Blair minister as well.
	Of course, he himself represented the Labour Party and him saying, Listen, this happened under the Labour Party.
	Wasn't he on various commissions and bodies that talked about systemic racism all through Britain?
	You know, white on brown systemic racism.
	So, wasn't Peter Manson your best man, Trevor?
	Well, thanks, Trevor.
	Yeah, you're about 15 years too late, actually, Trev.
	Yeah, really brave of you now.
	Yeah, cheers.
	Trevor Phillips.
	Of course, Peter Mandelson was on Epstein's flight logs.
	Best mate, actually.
	Yeah.
	One of his best mates, apparently.
	So there you go.
	9,000 cases reopened.
	And probably even more.
	Those are the cases that were only reported, remember?
	It's going to be significantly more than that.
	And so, ultimately, the buckstocks were Sadiq Khan.
	He's in an untenable position.
	And, yeah, I don't think there's any sort of breadth of strong, coarse language that would suffice to describe the utter contempt I have for that man.
	Hear, hear.
	Would you like me to read the comments?
	Yeah, go on.
	Crack up.
	That's a random name.
	Says, I would genuinely be shocked if Khan isn't directly involved in those gangs after all the per capita of Pakistani nonces is insanely high and they all know each other and are all related.
	Yeah, well, I think that it's something that is considered normal in a lot of Pakistani communities that they do this sort of thing, right?
	And so one would imagine that him being Pakistani means that he's got some degree of personal connection to these things.
	Of course, we can't know this until it's investigated.
	However.
	I mean, logic dictates it, right?
	Like these people were groomed to someone.
	Their groomers weren't the only ones abusing them.
	The logic dictates that community is like universally aware of what's been going on.
	I mean, we know that anyway, because of Alderman and Bradford.
	We know that they all knew.
	Because, you know, they're welcomed into the community after they come out of prison, which is wouldn't happen with white people, that's for sure.
	Just throwing that out there.
	We react very differently.
	Rob W says, when they have taken over the cities, well, you know, where they'll be herding to next.
	That is very true.
	Squo Blutt says Rupert Lowe needs to take this and run with it.
	I'm sure he's paying very close attention to it.
	9,000.
	It is time for a crusade.
	Protect our girls.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	And should we go to the video comments, Samson?
	Can we also have a little bit more time to read some written comments as well?
	I don't want to miss anyone out.
	The benevolent Samson has granted us more time.
	Thank you.
	Hello, gentlemen.
	I'm the composer for C.S. Cooper and Meninx Games' new title, Going Viral.
	CS suggested I write some music for your intro and outro.
	Here it is.
	It's devilishly close to your previous tune, but it's just different enough to avoid copyright.
	If you like it, CS can connect you.
	CSCooper.com.au.
	Keep up the good work, lads.
	That was great.
	Good old coop.
	Still working on my novel, by the way, bro.
	Ready for the next one?
	Come on, Samson.
	It's playing, I think.
	Oh, right, okay.
	I didn't realise it started.
	What?
	Okay.
	What?
	What?
	William Wilberforce.
	In Bose Britain, I pledge.
	All that's getting cleared out of there.
	Nothing to do with that.
	William Wilberforce MP.
	Obviously, anyone who doesn't know is the champion of abolitionism in Parliament.
	What any of that's got to do with him, really, and his birth.
	Pure subversion.
	Pure subversion, isn't it?
	That's disgusting.
	He's claiming he was a black man.
	William Wilberforce was brown, didn't you know?
	Amazing.
	Regarding the West Midlands situation, I find it interesting that the people banning the Tel Aviv fans for what is technically the actions of a few.
	Although, yes, I know it's more complicated than that.
	They can't be a kind of a bunch of jerks sometimes.
	Besides the point though, the is that the same people doing this are the same ones that are complaining about the protests out of migrants outside of migrant centers, say that you can't just lump all of them together just for the actions of a few of their number, who they all happen to be rallying around to defend in the face of the righteous outrage of the native population.
	The left definitely hold hypocritical beliefs.
	And it's not really even that novel to point this out anymore because they have one rule for their political enemies and one rule for themselves.
	That's how it works.
	And if you don't do that yourself, you will be beaten by that.
	It's Eric Andre That story I very nearly covered that But I thought I needed to leave it to go on A little bit longer before Apparently he's being deported today They found him, have they?
	Right.
	Is that right?
	What?
	Kabatu?
	Yeah.
	Is that the guy?
	Yeah, he was arrested on Sunday, I think.
	Okay, I missed that then.
	Yeah, what?
	He's just been wandering about, hasn't he, in his what further developments did you want?
	I think, yeah, so he was at large for like a couple of days.
	They re-arrested him.
	And I heard he was taken to a deportation centre, not back to prison, normal prison.
	But I hadn't heard that he's going to be deported today.
	That's apparently.
	That would be good, wouldn't it?
	Apparently he's going to be deported today.
	But that raises an interesting point in discussion anyway, in and on to itself.
	Where's the human rights lawyers?
	Have they all been called off randomly?
	I thought, what?
	Well, how can they?
	The prison service and the home office and the government themselves just want him gone now.
	It's now in their direct interest that he's no longer in the country.
	So it happens.
	I think all of that footage of him wandering about like a sort of Mr. Bean-S character, as many people pointed out, was very embarrassing for the state, wasn't it?
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	And to be British more generally.
	I was just like, this looks so bad internationally.
	Just unleash this guy and he's wandering around in his prison outfit.
	I read an interesting tweet was that you should make all prison outfits bright pink.
	So then if anyone gets released, everyone will be like, oh, there you go.
	There he is.
	I've seen them do that exactly that for real in America in a few places.
	Apparently, actually, you get less violence in that prison as well.
	Statistically speaking, there's less shankings in prisons where they're loving pink.
	Because the men are just slightly derascinated by it as well.
	More prison bitches.
	I don't know.
	They deserve it anyway.
	Is that all of the video comments, Samson?
	Okay.
	So Binary Surface says, Bo, Owen Jones, when he stormed off that interview, was showing clear, fear-based, non-verbals, body language.
	He knows the devil's pact, the gay community slash progressives made with the Islamists and what will eventually happen to people like him if they gain power.
	But he will never admit it publicly.
	Understand it's dishonestly not stupidity or ideological blindness.
	Yeah.
	That's what I'm saying.
	He's not stupid.
	Owen Jones is a number of things crit him.
	But he's not stupid, actually.
	You've got to give him that.
	He's actually quick-witted.
	And he's not stupid.
	But then it is ideology that prevents him from calling out what he knows will be his ultimate destruction.
	That is ideology.
	It's not just dishonest.
	That is ideology.
	To the point where the only option you've got is to raid quit and walk out.
	That's the only thing you can do.
	Then, if that's how you're going to play your hand.
	Omar Award says, lives are on the line has the same ring to it as when abortion activists imply they'll be forced to abort even more enthusiastically if their right to kill kids is taken away.
	The stop hitting yourself of politics.
	That is very aptly put.
	And finally, for my section, Jimbo G says we should have an English no-go zone.
	We could call it England.
	Yeah.
	Here, here.
	Beast.
	China, okay.
	Justin B says, now that the CCP has tried to bully us, we should recognise Taiwan's claim over China and support their reclaiming West Taiwan from the insurgents.
	If I were in government, that was what I would do.
	I have a number of times said that Taiwan, that they're the Chinese.
	They're Chinese.
	What we normal people call what most people normally call China.
	They're just the communists.
	There's China, Taiwan, the real China.
	And then there's the communist insurgency on the mainland.
	Yeah, yeah, there.
	Fair.
	I can go along with that.
	Shall I read one more?
	Sure.
	Michael Dre Belbis.
	I should know how to pronounce that by now because he's a great supporter of ours.
	Thanks, Michael.
	Spoke to him on Goldier a couple of times.
	Sorry, I still can't pronounce your surname properly.
	He says, What does he say?
	Thanks, Bo.
	Good to hear someone say that the US actually does win wars.
	Problem is, we effed up the peace.
	Yeah.
	I mean, when it comes to just the battlefield, they're absolutely, absolutely dominant.
	No one can touch them.
	No one can come close.
	China won't be able to come close.
	But that's just the first stage of any sort of conflict, isn't it?
	That's just like the first straw only, isn't it?
	It's harder to govern after the fact than win the war, even in many cases.
	As for dominating the battlefield, yeah, the United States are just miles ahead of anyone else.
	Miles.
	Okay, anyway.
	For my segment, Sophie Liv said, remember this was just the 9,000 reported and recorded.
	the rule number is likely higher yeah it's kind of that's the sad reality And it is sad.
	It's truly despicable behaviour.
	Arizona desert rat says, what a knucklehead.
	Doesn't matter the men's race or ethnicity.
	It's evil and vile.
	Well, I mean, it does matter.
	The men's race and ethnicity, actually.
	I think it matters from abroad.
	If there's a pattern and they don't have to be here, and subsequently, our women folk don't have to be subjected to it because we could just deport them all, then, yeah, it matters, actually.
	It's a choice.
	It's a policy choice.
	Those lives have been destroyed by policy.
	If the goal is to have as little child sexual exploitation as possible, then yeah, we need to look at patterns then, don't we?
	We need to be able to notice patterns, then, don't we?
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Is that all the comments?
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	Well, sorry, it's been quite a depressing one today.
	However, it's all very important stuff.
	But thank you very much for watching.
	And of course, tune in same time tomorrow.
	And also, Samson has pulled up his Brokenomics with Dan talking about Warhammer.
	So if you want to watch something else, that might be the thing for you.
	Thank you very much for watching.
	Thank you to my two co-hosts.

▲