The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1277

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 20, 2025 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:30:07

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1277

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters.
	This is episode 127.
	I am joined by Nate and Ed Dutton.
	And today we are going to be talking about Europe's anti-Islam actions.
	How nothing will satisfy the reparations demanders, and how the left and the Democrats in America have really become quite dangerous and extremely unwell.
	As a reminder, uh I'm doing a real politics show right after this at 3.
	It's going to be live, so please join me and ask any questions that you want.
	And uh I want to leave you in the capable hands of Mr. H who is going to be talking to us about well, his new channel, but more importantly, about what the Europeans are doing about uh extremist Islam.
	That was that was a great intro.
	No, uh go check out the State of Politics is a channel which I run with uh Bo.
	So if you like Bo's takes, do go and check it out.
	But we do need to talk about our lovely glorious European friends.
	So our European friends, our European friends.
	Yes, they've uh friends and allies.
	Friends uh friends and allies, yeah.
	Yes.
	So basically, if you haven't noticed, Europe has begun near coincidental timing, uh, two European places anyway, have begun clamping down uh on Islam.
	Uh first and foremost.
	This popped up into uh if you can't if you're if you're just listening, um Italy uh began talking about banning Islamic face coverings and exploring mosque funding.
	Uh not only that, also dropping in to see what mosques were doing, so spot checking mosques.
	So wonder if they'll find any weapons in there.
	Or is this just a British thing now?
	Oh, we are we allowed to interact?
	Yes, yes.
	Yeah, please you doing a lecture.
	No, no, you're very encouraged to interact.
	Oh, oh, okay, I guess I'll be right back.
	Please do interact.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Yeah.
	Right, sure.
	Yeah, have you heard about this?
	Have you seen that?
	No, no, I have I've not been prepped.
	Okay, well, what Giorgio Maloney, the uh Italian beast that she is, the Italian Stallion has popped up.
	Hold on.
	Is she trans?
	No, it didn't mean like that.
	Oh the Italian Stallion uh has popped up and basically launched this with her party um saying, yeah, like this is this is the legislation we want to introduce.
	They haven't actually done it yet, but the plan is, and it's the ruling brothers of Italy Party has said that they want to ban the burqa and Nikab um and body coverings in all public spaces nationwide.
	Uh and it is basically called the bill against Islamic separatism.
	So good.
	You know, that's good.
	Uh I think that's that that's that's a start, right?
	Do we agree?
	Why do you think it's good?
	Why do I think why?
	Why is it good?
	Well, because it devalues Western culture.
	It's uh it's is it is a visual representation uh of an ideal uh an ideol an ideology that is uh reprehensible uh and polar opposite to what western Western culture is.
	Do you not do you not agree with that?
	Do you not like that?
	Well, I I I mean maybe like these women are so beautiful.
	Like they're so beautiful that they know they know they know that if they don't cover their faces, then like Italian men will just be going around being really severely sexually aroused all the time.
	Uh and they won't be able to get any work done.
	Ah and the and the and the husbands are saying, please, darling, could you just integrate into Italian culture by not covering your face?
	They're saying they say they're saying, Muhammad, I would love to.
	I have respect for this nation that's taken me in.
	Uh huh.
	And I don't want these men to be walking around with with stonking Darban Carter erections the whole time.
	And and not and not being able to get any work done.
	So I must, inshallah, I must cover my face.
	I mean, in your bigotry, your inability Oh oh oh it's a symbol, it's a symbol of anti-West.
	No, it's someone trying to make sure that i Italian men are able to just get on with the day.
	You know what I think the economy can function.
	I think that's a very idealistic worldview.
	Well perhaps.
	And and I I think I think realism.
	I think I think I think the I think the realistic outlook is perhaps it's an oppressive ideology, you know.
	You think Islam oppresses women?
	I I well I yeah, maybe.
	I mean you're you're the resident.
	Fresh with women.
	Baris did nothing about it.
	I mean Oh dear dear oh dear.
	So yeah.
	It's a start, it's something.
	Uh and I think actually the main thing which I I I quite like.
	Um well one, their plan to to fine these individuals 300 to 3,000 uh euros, which I mean that's basically just taking back their tax money, because of course half these people don't work, and that's being generous, half, probably uh significantly.
	More than that.
	Uh and loads of people have come out obviously in opposition to this, so uh you have people going, Oh religious freedom is sacred.
	Um I think this is in opposition, actually, but it must be exercised in the open in full respect of our constitution and the principles of the Italian state, which I agree with.
	Um I think that's good.
	There have been some uh sort of opposition to this.
	Of course.
	Five Pillars.
	Oh, yes, yes.
	I like dropping in on these people.
	They're mental.
	They they are one of their editors, I think Fran Saleh was very open in one interview that ended up getting captured by memory where he says that the West is Dar al Kufr, the abode of the unbelievers.
	Meaning that it was therefore the abode of war.
	Oh suggesting that his integration plans are not really what you would hope that they would be.
	It wouldn't be integration, would it?
	No, well, it wouldn't be table for it more than anything.
	That's not integration.
	Yes.
	And uh the the expectation from Five Pillars is that eventually they're going to be running the West and eventually Islam will successfully conquer the West.
	Love it.
	And they're quite um honest about it for the most part.
	It's a marker uh I agree with Nate.
	It's it's a marker of saying I have no respect for this society, I have no desire to integrate into the society, I am not part of this society.
	I don't even care if it offends you, and it does offend you.
	Yes, it is offensive.
	Uh because it is it it it is it is it is uh such a cultural arrogance.
	It's like in Finland, you get some foreigners that go into the public saunas and try to keep their swimming trunks on.
	Right.
	And Finns.
	And Finns are like, no, get them off.
	Heaven forbid.
	No, get 'em off.
	And they come up with these these ridiculous justifications like, oh, there might be chlorine on the swimming trunks and someone might be allergic to chlorine and the steam and whatever.
	No, it's not, it's because Finns are a bit kinky.
	But that but that but but that that is their right, and that is their culture, and they like being naked.
	Right.
	Um I was guilty of it.
	I once went into a smoke sauna, right?
	And the only other person in it, and there's a mixed, you see.
	And the only other person in it was this woman of about seventy, but she had a very good bot, and she knew it.
	Right.
	Um and she and I had my trunks on, and she said in finish get them off.
	And I and I did immediately, and then she went, I'm joking.
	But by then me and this old lady just sat there naked together and I felt I'd integrated into the culture.
	And that's what we want.
	Well, actually, no, we don't want integration, we'd like them all to go home.
	But Italy is addressing this.
	Um a statement from a member of Parliament of the FDI party said this law addresses two needs, the safety of citizens who must be able to know who they're dealing with, and they need to avoid undermining women's dignity.
	Because erasing a woman's face means undermining her dignity, which is I think saying that a woman deserves a quarter of a man is slightly more offensive.
	I mean, in Islam, man is allowed to have four wives, meaning that she gets a quarter of a husband.
	Uh he's also allowed an unlimited number of uh property women.
	Shia, isn't it?
	No, no, no.
	That's that's both of them.
	That's both that's both Sunni and uh and Shia.
	It's only actually the Druze who who insist on monogamy, and I think the Alawites also insist on monogamy.
	But the general view of Islam is sort of quite degrading to women, even beyond the needs of a functioning patriarchy.
	You say it's degrading.
	There's good research on this.
	A lot of women in the studies would rather be the co-wife of a very high status man than the wife, single wife, of a low status man.
	That's where the whole system of polygamy comes from.
	Women are sexually attracted to high status for obvious reasons, because if the chap's got high status, he's got the good genes that attain the status, and he's got resources that can be invested in the kids and in her and so on.
	And so it's much better in that sense.
	choice well I've I've met some of the products of polygamy and I can tell you that the level of social damage that it causes is um outweighs the genetic aspect I'd also I'd also say we shouldn't have to deal with this in the West anyway.
	We have our own culture we have our own customs and it's not something we should be dealing with quite frankly.
	Well the fundamental issue is that the West believes that religion is a matter of opinion I'm sorry yet I do apologize.
	I love just straight down the line How dare you black how dare you it's a black and white name is that discuss this properly like they they I mean the the the the downside obviously is enormous numbers of incels.
	Which then creates which creates a a society which is violent and dangerous.
	Right and something has to be done with those incels.
	Yes that's the downside.
	Usually get them directed to fight against the Christians.
	Well yeah or you give them exactly you give them jihad and you say to them that once you die then you get like the oh you will be in heaven with a permanent erection and 77 virgins and you seventy two let's not exaggerate please two I apologise.
	Don't overpromise it's not there must be there must be young chaps that get to paradise and where's my seventy seven seventy two.
	I was 77 Where's my five extra five virgins get me them now so obviously five pillars I like dropping in on five pillars because they always have some pushback and it's obvious just nonsense subversive nonsense.
	So one of the other criminal offences would be to aim to punish those who propagate ideas based on religious superiority and hatred.
	What?
	I mean that's Islam through and through it's certain kinds of Christianity though, isn't it that we'll be caught up in that now I guess so but all religions claim that their moral code is superior.
	I well we'll get sort of baked into I know we'll we'll we'll yeah we'll kind of get to that I guess.
	Various Italian Muslim leaders have reacted there should be no Italian Muslim leaders.
	There should be no leaders that you go to talk to this is nonsense.
	Yeah I I hate that terminology but some imam uh said banning the full veil which isn't banning the veil itself could be part of a security rationale but legislation to this effect already exists so I wonder what the actual utility of this proposal is.
	It's to make you feel unwelcome because you are unwelcome that's the bottom line.
	Thanks for that clarity.
	Yeah.
	You should go home quite frankly.
	An opposition member of the Democratic party of course of course it's got to I had a taxi driver last night took me from Heathrow to here right at London and he was Muslim.
	Did you ask?
	No, you just had the same guy before but he was called Mohammed so he was definitely...
	And one of the things he asked was quite a genuine conversation.
	I was talking about how we were kind of okay about it here till'89 and then it was the Titanic versus Salman Rushdie, and then people were getting consciousness raising and so on, and also the Ray Honeyford swimming thing, taking schoolgirls swimming with Muslim.
	And he said, "Well, what is it that you people want?" I said well what we want is for because this is England right for you to completely if you are going to be here is to completely and utterly integrate into English society completely like the Huguenots did.
	Completely that means you drink that means you eat pork that means there is no difference except possibly genetic.
	And he was astonished by this.
	He's like, yeah but my faith is a big part of my life and it's like oh come on you know you can you can via social pressure you can change your mind.
	Look what happened under COVID.
	Look what happened under people who who used to be reasonably conservative suddenly adopting woke and then the reverse as work becomes unfashionable.
	People can force themselves via effortful control and via just a desire for status and a desire to be seen as moral to change their mind.
	Here's the problem with what you're saying the rationale behind face veils and these kinds of coverings is that men have no self control and the rationale behind what you're saying is that you must have enough self control to integrate.
	These two views are entirely at odds with each other.
	There is some there is some if if if the if the premise of the religion is that a man cannot see a woman's face without arousal and without any kind of control over himself to the extent that he might do the needful, shall we say, instantly.
	Yeah, then your expectation of a level of discipline and self-control is slightly misplaced.
	As I've explained, if these women that cover themselves up, we haven't seen their faces.
	Right, right, right.
	Well, if they really are unbelievably fit.
	Right.
	Yeah, probably unlikely.
	But I mean like really fit.
	Unlikely.
	Unlikely.
	Genetically unlikely.
	But unlikely.
	But I take it on board possibility.
	I take it on board as a potential, as a potential.
	So the opposition uh of the democratic party said it's hateful in terms of the message it conveys.
	Good.
	That's absolutely fine.
	Good.
	Other aspects of the law seek to deal with matters surrounding Muslim marriages, such as uh strict penalties for arranged marriages, inducing marriages through religious coercion as well.
	None of that should be a thing.
	This is the West.
	It should be further investigation of polygamy as well, because it's happening all the time.
	Yeah, I yeah, it's it's it's happening.
	Really, really serious problem, and I don't mean to be um insensitive.
	Um of course not.
	No, he's my guess.
	Never.
	I I I never, never.
	But um is it's cousin marriage, that's the really serious problem.
	Yes.
	And that's not and that's not a problem in many.
	Well, they're probably not that attractive.
	Because they're inbred.
	No.
	Um two two two two two two sides to this, right?
	So on on the one hand, you you're gonna get obviously you're gonna get the ones that have double doses, okay, and they're gonna be ugly.
	Yeah.
	Then the reason why they do it, the reason the evolutionary reason why they do it is to so that you're very, very strongly adapted to a particular niche, i.e.
	with high pathogen load.
	So if you marry someone that's very genetically similar to you, then you ensure that the genetic um uh constructs or as as it were, um, that protect you against particular disease are not broken up.
	But normally and so normally, yeah, this double dose is death.
	Well no, I mean normally those disease vectors are within a certain low locality.
	Yeah, yeah, but that's why they do it.
	That's why they do it.
	And so you're gonna you what you would expect is there's gonna be a minority of them that are just unbelievably healthy um for their ecology, and therefore will be able to maintain a symmetrical phenotype in the face of disease because they'll be resistant to it and therefore will be good looking.
	Actually, see that in the Gulf, right?
	Believe it or not.
	You see some exceptional beauties in the Gulf, in part because the past environment was so harsh that anybody who survived had to be of higher genetic quality, and in part because marriages were conducted at a relatively young age, meaning that the issue of more mutations as you age was solved sort of intrinsically.
	Yes.
	Um then with the advent of modern medicine and the collapse in child mortality rates, you see a change in the other direction with the.
	Exactly.
	But in the in theory, it what it means, you're gonna get a minority of these women, as I said, who need to cover themselves up because they're gonna be unbelievably beautiful.
	Yes, yes.
	But then the majority are just gonna be mundals.
	Yes.
	So back to this.
	So this is the one which is most interesting, I think.
	So the new law will also target Islamic groups or mosques which receive funding from abroad, pretty important, obviously, if you have a prolifer proliferation of uh terror activity, uh they'll be required to fully disclose any foreign funding to the state, and such matters surrounding the marriage would actually introduce prison sentences two to seven years, which is good, but you also don't want these people to be in prison isolated amongst themselves either.
	Further radicalization, of course.
	Um quick couple of points on the financing issue.
	Um with a dose of radicalization because the people who study Islam properly in Arabic come to the conclusion that it is quite radical and that it is quite uh has a very deep sense of supremacy,
	a very deep sense of vanity and arrogance that is baked into the story to the extent that Muhammad claimed that um it wasn't Isaac, the Father of the Jews who was uh offered as a sacrifice by Abraham, it was in fact Ishmael, the father of the Arabs.
	So there is this baked in sense that that Islam is superior, and this is peppered throughout the Quran itself.
	It's it's really full on.
	Christianity encourages you to think of your own sinfulness constantly.
	Islam encourages you to believe that you are the greatest nation ever given to mankind.
	Yeah.
	So the difference in world view isn't going to be addressed by this uh minor legislative tinkering.
	And if you want to say we want to create a hostile environment, say that the aim is to create a hostile environment.
	Yeah.
	Oh, yeah.
	The problem is that everybody explicit about it.
	Yeah, the problem that everybody is operating within a liberal framework where they believe that um religious differences are merely a matter of opinion.
	I'm more convinced by Islam, you're more convinced by Christianity, he's more convinced by Judaism, and we can sort of debate it nicely, as opposed to no religion is the uh bedrock of your moral worldview, it's the bedrock of your identity, and therefore religious differences are existential substantially just an expression of genetic differences.
	Often often these religious differences of religion, yes.
	Or uh are even in the community is not even that diverse.
	Yes.
	So if you look at something like uh well, what's going on with the fact that that the East of England was very, very uh into Protestantism when it came along.
	The Protestantism and that kind of worldview that goes with it of being puritanical, of being highly monotheistic, as it were, to use Alan de Benoist's division, as opposed to more polytheistic.
	East of England, highly Protestant, they go, they settled the northern states of America, West of England, kind of bit more Catholicy Protestanty mixed.
	And these are genetic cleavages because the east of England was substantially completely Anglo Saxon.
	Whereas the West of England is a Saxon Celtic climb.
	But then we then have a civil war essentially between the East and the West of England, between Anglo Saxon and Anglo Celtic, uh between Protestant and kind of Protesto Catholic, and then that civil war is exactly repeated in America a couple hundred years later, right?
	When three hundred years later, whatever uh when when when you have the North Protestant from the East of England versus the South, sort of Protesto Catholic, um from the West of England and to some extent Ulster.
	Um and so these are even that's the difference, these are genetic cleavages, and that's why it's it's so much more uh in what's the word I want in baked or something?
	Baked in, yes.
	Sorry, yes.
	Uh I've been corrected by an Arabic speaker in English is great.
	It's quite embarrassing.
	Yes, ingrained, exactly.
	Much more ingrained um than simply this idea that you're you are I believe in this opinion and you have in that opinion.
	It's not that, it's an expression, it's uh it's uh it's an ex religion is an expression often of uh genetic difference.
	Interesting is intractable.
	Very interesting.
	So in the interest of time, I've got to shuffle on just briefly.
	Uh Italy's not the only country doing it.
	So Portugal has now actually done it.
	So Italy was only talking about it, but Portugal has actually done it, and this is quite hot off the press, it was on Friday.
	Burqa ban approved by Portugal's parliament.
	Uh seen as targeting Muslim women.
	Yes, that's kind of the point.
	Obviously.
	Non-Muslim women wear bur burkas, and I wasn't typically no guardian here with a big brained massive takes.
	But it to me.
	So even the Arabs will make jokes about how women in a burqa look like a tent, and you can't tell if she's coming or going.
	That's so quite funny, really, but yeah.
	There is this sort of intolerance to words this in a lot of Arab societies, and the idea that the Europeans should outtolerate the Arabs is a bit stupid.
	Well, they've even called us out for it numerous times, haven't they?
	But yeah, Portugal is it's to me it's baffling that Portugal even allowed uh Islam entry, quite frankly.
	Um, if you're not familiar with their flag, their flag is quite literally a representation of them defeating uh Islam throughout history.
	So you have the seven castles there, they are quite literally representative of uh the seven castles of the Moors, and then the five shields are the five uh more kid Moorish kings that were defeated as well.
	Is that right?
	Yeah, I'm Pretty certain that's right.
	No, that's fascinating.
	Well, you can correct me in the comments, but I'm fairly certain that is correct.
	Um their flag is literally representative of defeating Moors.
	Yes.
	So actually defeating Islam, and yet they've still allowed them into the country.
	Um understand what the Europeans I don't understand what Westerners have done to themselves.
	You'd think that after 9 11, the sort of discourse would be get out.
	Precisely.
	I have friends who were in the United States during 9 11.
	Uh Lebanese Muslim friends, and their parents said, get out, they're gonna kill us all.
	Yeah.
	Uh because that's exactly what would have happened if it had been the other way around.
	Yes.
	Yes.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Which which actually nicely segues on to the overall take of this segment is hey, look, it's great that Europe is doing this, but this is fundamentally flawed when you're still leaving the floodgates wide open and allowing them just to pour in.
	This is putting it's window dressing.
	Yeah, this is just red meat.
	So this is retarded populism.
	Yeah.
	What this is is retarded populism.
	What do we do?
	What do we do if they take off the burqa thing and just wear a plastic mask?
	Are we gonna are we are we gonna clastic clown mask or something?
	You're gonna make that illegal to wear plastic clown masks?
	Who knows?
	Probably probably not, but yeah, this is uh this is all irrelevant.
	This is just red meat.
	Good that Europe's doing it, I guess, on face value, but it is shallow.
	This is this is the pretense of action.
	Yeah, of course it is.
	This is the pretense of action.
	It is 100%.
	And this is like putting, you know, you have a stab wound through the heart and you put a piece of plaster on it.
	Yes, it's not gonna do you much good.
	They've banned the use of they banned in Turkey in public places like universities, public spaces, uh, the the use of headscarves.
	And so what the women do that want to wear headscarves is they just put a wig over the headscarf and and thus it doesn't look like they're wearing a headscarf.
	So there's all kinds of ways round this.
	So as I say, it's it's just it's just window dressing.
	The real problem is since the second of May 1997, and particularly after 2001, the government has deliberately, quite deliberately, a for ideological reasons, we'll rub the right's nose in diversity, and B for just decadent reasons to do with making to do with undermining the labor the wages of the working class and uh and uh and and uh keeping things cheap or whatever um has imported uh loads and loads of people who have no intention uh who have often no historical relationship with this country and no and
	no intention uh to integrate into it and no ability to do so, and it is and no love nor respect for it.
	No.
	No, they don't care.
	They they fundamentally they hate you.
	They hate the West, they hate everything about it, and they shouldn't be here.
	That's a good summary.
	Um somebody with a very Polish name says for I can barely handle one girlfriend.
	Um you're also allowed to use physical force, which sort of helps under the rule laws of Islam, so you just might want to remember that.
	Um I'm saying how this conflict is handled.
	A certain kind of female does like to be spanked, you're right.
	Is that what you're saying?
	Ed, you need to be on the street more often, man.
	YouTube friends.
	You're the one that just said they need to get back to where they come from and all this.
	I'd never have said I feel like I've fallen into a wormhole or something.
	And me for making a perfect a perfectly sensible remark about about little go about about ladies.
	I'm told to be YouTube friendly.
	God.
	Central Stone 17 says, I'm in the US and remember in 911, the war against Islamophobia began almost immediately and came entirely from the media.
	Don't look too deeply into who ran all of these media companies.
	Well, I the first time I heard that Islam was a religion of peace was when George W. Bush said it.
	I grew up in a Muslim country being told that actually it has precisely the right level of violence.
	Um Sigil Stone says uh maybe the real reason behind making their women wear uh face coverings is because they don't want to be reminded that they married their cousin.
	And I'm gonna stop there, but uh you should get on the website and check out what this guy's saying.
	Saying he's saying don't look into We're not discussing what he's saying.
	One tall order says, I just like to say thank you, Lotus Eaters, for what you do.
	You're extremely welcome.
	Hope everyone is having a better Monday than I broke Fibula and shipped Tibia.
	Oh.
	And a rough road motorcycle rally, yes, it is.
	That's very very good.
	Well soon, mate.
	Get well soon.
	Yeah, rest that.
	That's horrendous.
	Um moving on to another segment in which yes, you're very much encouraged to interact.
	Uh there was a reparations conference by the Africans spelled with a K reparations all party parliamentary group.
	So this is a group of parliamentarians who um in Britain who held a conference to demand reparations for slavery.
	Good luck.
	Yes.
	Um of course you all remember the gentleman who asked for 18 trillion in reparations.
	Who was it again?
	Talk about um Lenny Henry.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	He was supposed to be a hero of successful integration, and he wants 18 trillion, which I suspect is four or five times the GDP of Britain, something along these lines.
	So uh I don't understand where that figure came from, but uh I don't think logic is the point, as I'm going to be arguing here.
	I think just out of out of the blue, I think he pulled that out of his backside.
	Ah.
	Yes.
	Well, there's a bit of played a magician.
	Uh the conference started at uh 10 a.m.
	Nice lazy start with nobody likes to get up very early.
	Uh you had Bell Riberio Addy, who was an MP participating in it.
	You had Yeah, go on.
	Jeby Flack, Quakers in Britain.
	Yes.
	The Quakers were very heavily involved in this, and it was actually held at the Quakers um building in London.
	You had um a professor of law, sl comma pan-Africanist.
	I don't understand what's going on there.
	You had Jeremy Corbin participating, of course, Diane Abbott, obviously.
	Uh and a counselor from the Green Party, somebody else from the SNP, as you would explain you'd expect.
	Um and the sort of topics there, from display to dignity, mobilizing the diaspora to lay our ancestors to rest.
	Did they?
	Maybe I'm superseding this somehow.
	But did they speak about Dahomey in any of this anywhere or not?
	Uh I'll bet they didn't.
	They didn't speak about the slaves.
	Speak about the slaving state.
	They didn't speak about the slave king of Dahomey.
	I'll bet they didn't.
	And the ritualistic festival they slaughtered them.
	They they didn't speak about human sacrifice.
	Wow.
	They know this, isn't it?
	Maybe we should uh write to them in a fairly major way.
	Wow.
	They are all descended.
	We are all, as you know, we in England are all descended from King Edward the Third, right, by virtue of the fact that there was this pronounced correlation until about 1800 between Socio Republic status and completed fertility.
	And this is of course the same uh in uh sub-Saharan Africa, and these were as well polygamous societies, which makes it even more pronounced.
	Right.
	And they all held slaves.
	Yes.
	So Diane Abbott is descended from slaveholders.
	So 25% of the current population of Mauritania are slaved, are slaves right now.
	So the idea that this is a sort of big historic pro there's there's something like 50 million people enslaved in the world today.
	Many of them white, many of them might many of them white and eastern European women who are held in slavery as uh as prostitutes.
	They're only focused on their own their ancestors, not there.
	They're only focused on getting money from the British government.
	That is all.
	We we we must be guilty for the fact that some of our ancestors, not even all of I mean all of them.
	I mean, I don't know, like some of I mean admitting the uh my collapse ancestor was the governor of Barbados in 1700, so he was a bit involved.
	Um but but in in in in general thank you.
	Um but in in in in in in general, okay, they're all gonna be descended from people that held slaves.
	Moreover, do we ever talk about the fact that until about a thousand years ago, there were no Bantu in Southern Africa?
	Yes.
	None.
	And not allowed.
	Southern Africa was populated by Bushmen, uh, by the Koikoi, uh, Koisan, and by the what used to be called the Hotentals.
	About peaceable uh kind of people.
	And then the Bantu went in, slaughtered them, pretty much took over their lands, and enslaved them.
	Yes.
	Um but yeah, they do not have to have hereditary guilt for this.
	No, because they're not white, you see.
	But we have and I think that it is it manipulates the fact that I don't know if it's guilt seems to be very powerful among Europeans in a way that it perhaps is less so in some other culture.
	It's a direct consequence of the Christian mind.
	Right.
	Direct consequence.
	So if you look across the world, it's only European culture that is guilt-based, whereas the rest of the world's culture is honour-based.
	And I would argue that that implies that it's pride-based, in a sense.
	So Europeans and and Christians in general concern themselves with the wrongs that they have done rather than the speck in your eye.
	I as a Christian I meant to concern myself with the beam in my eye, not the speck in yours.
	Whereas the sort of more I would argue, natural perspective is to be concerned with loss of face and loss of status, because that immediately affects your genetic.
	Guilt is that there is a little thing inside a little idea of yourself that you have that you haven't lived up to and you feel bad about it for yourself.
	And that's what we are very subject to.
	And all I can say in response to this is that the British were the first people to every society had slavery.
	Yes.
	So the British were the first people to abolish slavery.
	Yes.
	So slavery is so terrible, and the British were the first people to abolish it, while it was still endemic in Africa.
	But you still owe 18 trillion pounds.
	You don't owe anything because you've got to be a very good idea.
	But according to Diane Abbott.
	And you could my friend Lipton Matthews, who's Jamaican, look at the benefits that Jamaica has from uh in terms of education, in terms of infrastructure, in terms of whatever, from having been uh uh uh it still is uh a a British uh colony, yes um uh in terms of uh even something like the invention of uh of uh artificial fertilizer which was uh European thing, uh uh allowed the population of these places to grow, people wouldn't be alive today if it wasn't for these issues.
	So it's uh it's just being manipulated.
	I'm I'm gonna allow Diane Abbott to correct you if you don't mind.
	I'm gonna allow Diane Abbott Oh, well how why should we pay all this money?
	This was so long ago.
	This has nothing to do with that.
	But of course it has to do with the British state in the here and now.
	You cannot repeat often enough that the profit from slavery made many British institutions, our bath, our universities, our churches, um, what I so I love the way exactly I was going to mention that.
	I love the way in which she transitions from it's the responsibility of the British government to our and that her community demands reparations, but it's ours as well.
	So if it's yours, then you're not owed anything.
	It's also fascinating.
	She mentions the church because it was of course um Christian ideology which even led us to abolish it.
	But Wilbur Force and all of that.
	They talk about that.
	Big-brained.
	That is the flip that that she wants to be both British.
	It's our I'm British, I'm British, but I'm also not British.
	And then reparations.
	And then and then some of the titles there talk about the African diaspora.
	So you see on the agenda the perception that actually they aren't British, French, whatever, and then you see them asserting hours, hours, hours.
	And there is this divide, and when you say you must choose, the answer is, well, you're a racist.
	Well, I'm fine with that, but you do have to make a choice, kind of.
	Did they talk about the um Barbary slave trade by anything?
	They will never mention the Muslim slave trade and the number of Europeans enslaved by Muslims.
	If you look at a picture of the if you look at a picture of the Ottomans of the ruling f the descendants of the Osman family, the Ottomans, they're all blonde blue-haired.
	And that's not the natural look of a Turk, shall I say.
	Sure.
	Yes, yes, I'm quite confident.
	I'm quite confident.
	And the reason for that is because they took so many white women as slaves for so long that they all ended up becoming blonde and they came all the way from the carnet of Crimea to northern literally Olu, Northern Finland, where I live.
	Right.
	Because they were into the blonde, blue eyed, blonde-haired, blue-eyed, and took those women as slaves in the cant of Crimea.
	And the conditions as well.
	Okay, if we have to pay back uh reparations to Diane Abbott so she can buy wigs or and lose weight, whatever she wants to spend the money on.
	Um then um we we we we need serious reparations from the people that lived on the southwest coast, the people that lived even in Iceland, they weren't that far north, um and and and took uh and took slaves and held them in the most appalling conditions in many cases, they would live their lives as galley slaves, uh excreting where they sat.
	Um if they worked in the royal court, they would not just castrate them, because uh they would also literally cut off their penises and force them to use some kind of distraught UN Catherine.
	You can uh Yes.
	Um the the level of cruelty was unbelievable.
	Well, there was I think there was a guy that was was he French that was the Prime Minister of Algiers.
	Um he was a he was a castrato though, so they could rise quite high.
	Uh but but uh yeah, that's what they would do.
	So we need reparations from the Middle East.
	It only goes one way.
	Because this is because since this is a Christian society that is naturally vulnerable to guilt, um it won't in any way work on a Muslim society.
	If you were if you were to tell the Muslims, well, you guys took white people as slaves back back in the day, the answer would be yes, proudly so.
	So you you you have to remember that this sort of all you can say to this is that this is just manipulation by people that are uh using you know covert manipulative tactics in order to extract resources from the majority from the population, right?
	And we must not be manipulated.
	Yes, summary Gibbs.
	And you you want to listen to this gentleman here, and and uh sorry, the opening of this is is is quite important.
	Let me just give you a view of it.
	Uh the speaker here is uh Julius Pan Africanist Garvey, and apparently he's the son of Marcus Garvey, who was important in the Jamaican independence movement, and let's listen to him for a second.
	Education is preparation for reparations.
	So let's start there.
	What?
	Education is preparation for reparations.
	Right.
	As in we are sort of brainwashing ourselves into thinking that we deserve more of other people's money.
	That's to translate it.
	This year we're very pleased to have uh Dr. Julius Garvey, who is like, uh thank you for having me to uh you have carried out your your duty very well, my friend, you're not gonna be able to do that.
	I'm very pleased to be able to participate.
	Um building a just and prosperous society, reparations.
	Reparation So Just and Prosperity.
	To build a just and prosperous society, you must have reparations, otherwise you can't do it.
	And the question that I had was which was repeated by Cute Queen 8, um is if slavery is what made the West great, well the Africans practice slavery for much longer and continue to do so.
	So Mauritania with twenty-five, twenty-twenty five percent of its population as slaves, should be at the apex of human civilization because apparently that's what makes a society great, slavery.
	Yeah.
	Well, and all this hellhole manifestly, it I mean, I don't I'm forgive if I'm wrong about this, but I'm I'm not aware that, for example, Finland imported slaves.
	Uh yet Finland is one of the wealthiest countries in the West, and one of the higher standards of living.
	But they managed it without slaves.
	Yes.
	And Japan, I don't know how much slavery was going on there.
	There was.
	But uh but certainly with Finland and other parts of Europe, there wasn't any.
	So that is complete nonsense to say that slavery may slavery um uh uh may have contributed in the in that you have uh free labour, but in the end it was quite costly to maintain it, and so we got rid of it.
	Um so this is obviously rubbish.
	No, completely.
	But I wanted to mention this guy, uh Julius Garvey, because he's the son of Marcus Garvey, and um I I wanted to read a little bit about the profile of Marcus Garvey.
	Um he wanted to make Africa into a single one party state.
	He believed in a sort of pan Africanism.
	Although he never visited the continent of Africa, he was committed to the back to Africa movement, arguing that part of the diaspora should migrate there.
	His ideas became increasingly popular, and he was partnered with the KKK because they agreed that there should be complete separation between blacks and whites.
	And so the KKK were of the idea that, yeah, pretty much we need we need total and complete separation.
	But I just wanted to mention something about why Africa isn't being economically prosperous, and use the example of this guy's father, Marcus Garvey.
	He built a company called NEGRO Factories Corporation.
	And it was part of the Universal NEGRO Improvement Association and African Communities League, with a million dollars funded by black people.
	But then it went bankrupt.
	And the reason was because, and I quote, Garvey appointed inexperienced people to run organizations because he valued loyalty over competence.
	Now what you see in every single African company country is the exact same story.
	It's pretty much the exact same story.
	And it's the result of this being an extremely low-trust society where you can't have competent people running things because they might overthrow you.
	I would argue that this explains the situation of Africa today much more than what happened in the days of slavery.
	That would be my first argument.
	I would also argue that China, Vietnam, Japan, Korea very famously, they all had massive slave populations, but they're not in the situation of sub-Saharan Africa.
	And they still ended up partnering with the West and with supposed neocolonial powers and so on and so forth, but they didn't end up with the situation.
	And so when you want to assess a movement or or or what some kind of grievance group is saying, the first question you should ask yourself is to what extent do they blame themselves for their own plight?
	Like this is this seems to me like a pretty important question.
	And it's a very Christian question.
	This is what Christ tells us to do.
	Look at look at the beam in your own eye first.
	Um so when you see these kinds of groups just blaming everybody but themselves for whatever happens to them or whatever happened to them in the past, you've got to ask, well, you know, to what extent is some of it your fault?
	Other societies had slavery and they didn't do this badly.
	Uh this is a video from the previous conference, and this is by a guy wearing.
	Yeah, I know, I know, I know.
	I know.
	But this is a guy who became the uh the creative director of I think um either Shakespeare's theatre or some kind of very major uh Royal Society associated um art group, and he's still saying we want reparations, we want this, we want that.
	And sitting around in this are a bunch of MPs, Don Butler, Diane Abbott, Clive Lewis, uh Ribiero Addy.
	I mean, if you become an MP in a country, you've made it.
	This is the highest echelon of political success.
	Yeah, but I mean that's that's just another indictment on why foreigners shouldn't be allowed political office in the UK.
	It's so disgusting.
	Absolutely so disgusting.
	They just push for 100% sectarianism, they're an in-group preference.
	All these things in my head that I don't say, and then he just says them.
	I can't say that I'm totally no keep it friendly, all this, and then I kind of transfer them into his brain via some kind of telepathy.
	It's extraordinary how this keeps happening.
	Uh, but no, they they uh they are the someone's put a very interesting point on uh on on here on one of the questions, um, which is that who sold them into slavery?
	And the answer is the chieftains that that they were part of other tribes, uh Dahomey as you say, uh those tribes were defeated, they were taken as slaves by those other tribes, and then they were sold to the Americans, to the British, to whoever.
	And if they and if they hadn't been sold to the Americans, the British, they may well have been sold to the Arabs.
	Yes.
	And if that happened, they would have had a much less pleasant time.
	Yes.
	And probably wouldn't have had descendants today.
	Well, the there I mean there are tiny communities of blacks in the Middle East, and the way that they are treated is I find it quite abhorrent still, you know.
	Um like Arabs are not shy about their racism.
	They they they wear it on their sleeves quite proudly.
	And so you have to ask yourselves well, you know, in which society did blacks benefit the most?
	And one question to think about is why is any black person in Western Europe going to be on average much richer than the average black person in sub Saharan Africa?
	I mean where do you have a better standard of living?
	Obviously in the West.
	Why?
	And does that count towards reparations in some way?
	Does it have any economic value or or or or financial value?
	Um what they what what they're saying is um what what what would make sense is that they would they would go back to um that the poorest part of Africa with a kind of a seventeenth eighteenth century standard of living even in Africa and they that no plumbing no electricity no modern comforts living in a heart and then they get some reparations.
	No that's not what they're saying.
	They got to stay they get to stay oh they get to stay so you're saying they get to stay with all of the all of the enormous material benefits of living in the West and they just get money.
	It's called have your cake and eat it pretty much and also it wouldn't work because what I can imagine would happen is that a lot of them would get these reparations and would then fritter them away and very quickly they would that would be our fault isn't it that would then be our fault.
	That then they would say oh well that was because you didn't teach us how to spend the money properly and educate us because education as you know needs reparation.
	Yes um decolonize education you didn't decolon education enough so therefore we accidentally spent the money on all kinds of nonsense.
	So that would happen.
	So it will never it's it's it's never ending.
	It will be a never end and then they want more reparations and then they spend them and it would be never ending and so as I say the only solution is stand up to racism.
	Look at that how manipulative I also think like how if you did a cross section of the ethnicities that are on benefits in the UK is there a predominant element that are ethnically descended from individuals such as this a form of reparations if your entire life has been funded by the state.
	Yeah that's still you really want to get into the nitty gritty of it over I mean if you want to get into the nitty gritty um you should also factor in crime.
	Yeah well yeah are we going to get reparations for that?
	Probably not that's one question to ask.
	If this country is so racist why are you still here?
	Just leave these are like elementary logical issues that should not be addressed we're in the modern era the truth of the matter innate is that the inequality we face globally stems directly from the legacies of enslavement and colonization one of the things that stems directly from colonization is running water,
	plumbing, hospitals, schools, roads basic state functions life expectancy high life expectancy being much higher children surviving children surviving, etc etc.
	Britain has yet to fully confront or make amends for these injustices.
	Right.
	Like how is ending slavery globally not making amends one of the one of the things they argue there's they said that um Lenny Henry said this.
	Yes.
	Is that if we have these reparations it will help to end racism globally.
	And I what why?
	How?
	Racism is inbuilt in if racism basically means ethnocentrism which it does um ethnocentrism is something that is built into us and there's numerous studies that indicate this that we're in group preference similar if you cooperate with someone that's your genetic kin um that's indirectly passing on your genes.
	Yes.
	So there will always be racism and even if we create new races which we are doing such as the happers in America or whatever um then you just get they marry each other and and you and you you you just get uh essentially a new forms of what they want to call racism.
	That's absolutely ridiculous.
	And then he says oh the reason why black people are underrepresented in the UK today in even putting aside the fact they've only been there since 1948 in in in various they were always here I thought diversity built Britain.
	What I'm saying is I'm saying I'm saying adds uh not careful not that's uh that's uh that's not uh not spicy tape not not well I I I did go to a part of Colchester a few years ago which is of course the oldest town in Britain I did see some black people.
	Whoa and so I wonder if they're descended from these black people that were there before the the time of the Romans and that they just kind of hid away because of systemic racism for thousands of for a thousand years or so and now have re-emerged when the when the environment was more propitious.
	They were still educated as they're mad.
	But uh the the the other the there are reasons why there are socioeconomic differences and slavery is nothing to do with it.
	Uh terrible conditions are are uh we we have people in this country that are recently descended from people that lived in the most terrible conditions, right?
	That worked that work worked with factories, uh that that's that uh uh lived in one room little houses without outside terrible conditions.
	And those people, if by genetic chance and and end up having the qualities that cause you to have socioeconomic status, they move up.
	And we know this, and you can trace your family tree back, and you can see that a lot of people in this country that are reasonably successful will have ancestors like that because of these changes.
	So it's absurd.
	And it's a complete absurdity, but I want to mention a couple of the organizations that are involved in this.
	Because um these are some of the organizations that are involved.
	Uh there is obviously the uh arm of the state known as stand up to racism, and they are uh signing letters against the far right while demanding that the far right pays them reparations.
	Okay, funny.
	Uh they're attacking Tommy Robinson for being pro-Israel, whatever you think about that, I honestly don't care.
	Uh here they are protesting in support of the illegal migrants, essentially.
	Uh after there were a bunch of incidents where of of rape, really, um and attacking Robert Jenrick for noticing that Hansworth is not really integrated.
	Um there is an organization called every journey starts with a single step.
	Apparently that's an African proverb.
	Whatever.
	Uh and it's taken from Swahili, and you look at these guys and you're like, come on.
	Really?
	Um I think they're um culturally appropriate in our clothing there.
	Maybe.
	Uh you get another organization called repair campaign, where they're essentially bragging about the Haitian Revolution.
	How did that go?
	Oh, yeah, but they murdered all the white people.
	Well done.
	And then Haiti became the worst country in the world.
	Yeah, I mean, there you go, right?
	Like, come on.
	And if they don't admit this kind of basic truth, what kind of truth can you expect from them?
	You know, we've got some islands.
	We could probably just give them an island.
	See how they go.
	Yeah.
	We can't.
	You you you say this has to be YouTube friendly.
	I mean, we can't even discuss some of the things.
	I know.
	I know.
	He can, but uh somehow I think I guess uh extinction rebellion international solidarity.
	What?
	Extinction rebellion.
	What have they got to do with this?
	Well, because this is all gay race communism.
	Oh, yeah, of course, yeah.
	There's the the this is the sort of long and short of it.
	Is the extinction part what they want to do to white people?
	Good question.
	That guy there is called Lee Jasper, isn't he?
	The guy that's second from the from the right.
	Yes.
	Uh yeah, yeah.
	He he used to be quite prominent of uh anti-British campaigner.
	And and they've organized something operation black vote.
	Try organizing something called Operation White Vote.
	See how far you get, or just Operation Christian vote.
	See how that goes for you.
	See how that goes for you.
	That's happening now with Gammanzilla, but uh yeah, well, that's true.
	That's why they're so afraid of it.
	And then there are these guys who are pretty much openly communists, more or less calling for the abolition of private property.
	So it's just sort of, you know, rather obviously uh gay race communism.
	People who are failures or who more interestingly are not failures but identify as failures.
	Yes.
	Well, interesting.
	That wouldn't that that they have this neurotic belief that they uh that they are persecuted.
	Yes.
	Uh or or that that uh they would be higher up were it not for these bad forces.
	Yep.
	And it is those people that have that kind of neuroticism.
	Neuroticism is associated with Machiavellianism.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	See the world as as a as a a place where you're disempowered and as a a place that's frightening and unpleasant, then you want to take power over it.
	Yep.
	Uh and but you cut you fear a fair fight.
	You can't do so overtly because you fear losing that fight.
	So you do so in this manipulative, covert way, pulling on the heartstrings of naive people, using manipulative terms that are elastic, like anti racist or racist.
	Yep.
	And then people take you seriously because they don't want to feel bad about themselves or feel that they're of low status or whatever, and we get to this point where we even entertain this this nonsense.
	It's it's it's insane.
	And remember, the foreign secretary or the former foreign secretary used to be a backer of this stuff, David Lamy.
	So uh let's not forget that kind of detail.
	But then there is the law firm that sort of tried to capitalize on this, and I don't have a link for them, I'm I'm afraid.
	They're called Le Day.
	Uh they sued Britain on behalf of the Mao Mau, got 20 million pounds press around six or seven million pounds in their own fees.
	They sued Britain on behalf of the Mao Mao.
	Yes.
	Sorry, did I hear you right?
	Yes, you did.
	Have you seen the film Addios Africa?
	Uh no, I haven't.
	Africa Addior.
	Uh where it looks at the decolonization of Africa and it looks at the things the Mao Mao did.
	Yep.
	I think it was a hundred British people, including including women and children, who they just massacred, and often in the most brutal possible way.
	Yes, yes, yes, yes.
	I I I fully believe that this is sort of an old thing uh there.
	Uh one of the most serious allegations is that Ley Day did not pay out compensation in full and failed to disclose its list of victims because some names were fabricated.
	So apparently Ley Day is accused of, it hasn't been proven.
	Um but the Kenyans claimed that after they sued on behalf of the ma uh the Mao Mao and Leday represented them, uh Ley Day made away with some of their money.
	They also sued BP because BP used a militia to protect their own assets in Colombia from other militias.
	They sued the British government uh for Iraq over torture allegations, got some people three million pounds, but then they ended up again being accused of misconduct.
	They they got cleared from it, uh it should be said, but it but it came close.
	Um and one of the allegations was that one of the solicitors of Ley Day destroyed a key document at the center of the inquiry into alleged torture, suggesting that the Iraqis that were detained by British forces were members of an armed insurgency rather than innocent civilians.
	So the allegation here is is is a qu quite serious one.
	Um sued Britain over emissions from c for cars, sued Kenya s sued Britain for unexploded munitions.
	So basically horrific greedy lawyers partnering with communists, traitors and others, demanding more and more money.
	And as I've as we've sort of mentioned in the segment, slavery was always normal.
	It happened throughout the war.
	There was only the British who ever ended it.
	And the lack of development in Africa isn't because of colonialism and isn't because of slavery, it's because of factors within Africans' own control.
	Or it's because of the behaviors of of Africans.
	Everybody's responsible for their own country.
	Um and if you insist on reparations, what do you call welfare and foreign aid?
	And if it goes one way in terms of reparations for slavery, what about reparations for crime?
	Like if you're gonna have this conversation, you're gonna force people to have other conversations with you.
	You can't allow to do that, you know.
	Yeah, and I mean what they're assuming is that there is still some goodwill here, but really there isn't.
	There is zero goodwill here anymore.
	They are destroying what the goodwill that was there by putting by pushing, which was there.
	There was by pushing people so far.
	Because that's the problem.
	That they can't they can't help themselves.
	People like Diane Abba are such bitter, yes, nasty people that deep down hate themselves.
	Yes, and thus become narcissistic like she is.
	Um that they can't help that they will always be so bitter that they can't know, they can't allow they can't, they don't have the impulse control almost to be able to draw the line and say, hang on, we might be pushing people a bit far here.
	It's like it almost like an abusive relationship with some girl that has borderline personality or something.
	She doesn't understand that eventually she'll push the chap so far that he'll just say I'm ending this.
	Yes.
	And uh I can't say uh yeah, there's some positive sides to this, maybe, I don't know, but this is too much.
	Um and and that's what they're doing.
	And that's what Lenny Henry's doing.
	It's weird, actually.
	I mean, with the side I remember when I was about seven.
	Our teacher, Mrs. Rosby, um asked us to draw our favourite character from Telly.
	And then she and then she like set up this thing that looked like a telly and scrolled it round so it looked like things were moving.
	And everyone, there was a big cue for the pink pencils.
	Right.
	Because everyone was, but I I need a brown pencil.
	I didn't have to wait.
	Because the person that I drew was Lenny Henry.
	Absolutely.
	And I thought he was great, and he was really funny, and there was Letty Henry show, and and there was various other things he did.
	There was genuine goodwill.
	I was good.
	And that goodwill is gone.
	Imagine how in the in in the interest of time, let me get through to a couple of the comments.
	Um because we have another segment that I really want your views on.
	Ooh.
	Um Chris H says, uh Lotus Eaters Shill.
	If you're not a member, join just for the Friday lad's hour.
	Uh Dan made Monopoly into the perfect reflection of modern UK.
	Yes.
	Uh Firas got radical and Bo went from cocky to a broken man.
	Very funny.
	It was absolutely hilarious.
	I'm trying to get Samson to put me on for a if you if you haven't watched it, you should absolutely watch it.
	It was just too much.
	Dan did an incredible job capturing the evil randomness of the UK economy.
	Uh J. M. Denton says, Don't worry about reparations.
	The Middle East will help us pay.
	There is no reason they'd only ask us to pay for African slavery, right?
	Yeah.
	Good luck with that.
	Uh Sigil Stone says, Well, apart from medicine, irrigation, health, roads, cheese, and education, baths and soccer, what have the British ever done for us?
	And a litany of other things.
	Yep.
	Yep, yep.
	Steam engine.
	Anyone want to go with that?
	West.
	Industrial Revolution.
	Uh Tiffinel says Japan had an official slave system from the Yamato period.
	Yep.
	Uh somebody's calling you called Avon.
	Hello.
	Uh the Hapsification.
	The industrial revolution is what made the West great and built the West.
	I would argue that it was ahead even before that, but yes.
	Is it just Western?
	And this helped Britain in its fight to end the slave trade.
	Absolutely.
	Finland had slaves.
	Vikings took slaves.
	Vikings took slaves.
	I didn't quite what you're saying.
	Are you saying that Finland had slaves because the Vikings took slaves?
	The Vikings are from Norway.
	Yeah.
	So let's not call each other names.
	Sigil Stone says, so how about this?
	We'll pay them reparations, but they have to go back to where we stole them from.
	Secretly, our NGOs in Africa will still be there to steal our money back.
	Haha.
	Well, that is very much what the NGOs steal.
	Hapsification again.
	They will never ask the Oyo Empire, Kingdom of Daume, Empire of Mali, Kingdom of Congo, Kingdom of Benin, Kingdom of Zanjiba, just Britain.
	Yep.
	Benin is modern day Daomi.
	They're one and the same, but okay.
	Yeah.
	Just too small.
	Papa Pup.
	Yeah.
	And then the last comment what has always bugged me the most is when I read about Hangout Dash Independence.
	They asked bitted for reparations for what Pakistan did to them.
	Not sure I got that, but okay.
	Anyway, moving on to the next segment here.
	The left in the United States have really lost their minds and Trump needs to do something about it.
	Over the weekend, we had the No Kings protests in the USA.
	Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
	Are you saying we we we wasn't gangs?
	I uh yeah.
	Yeah, I'm not going down.
	I'm not going there.
	Uh thanks for that.
	Thanks for that.
	Uh but the left is clearly expressing a bit of um murderous range.
	Uh so this guy wants Trump shot essentially and demands better snipers.
	Um this gentleman here says that ice agents need to get shot and wiped out.
	A madness, isn't it?
	It's absolutely madness, how absolutely are they allowed to incite murder like that in America?
	No.
	Like outright incitement to murder.
	I I I think that crosses a line.
	So it's really up to the feds to decide.
	It's not free speech.
	They're just so repugnant, aren't they?
	They're just so nasty.
	sure you're going to like them more when you watch this dance.
	Yeah, there is no.
	I'd like to concentrate on the one with the yellow shirt and the black thing under it, who is a woman who has shaved her hair like that.
	Now let's just think about this.
	What are you doing when you do that?
	Basically, it's kind of like apo-semitism, it's making yourself ugly and startling in order to say to people, I am dangerous, stay away.
	Right.
	Sit like a wasp, but it's not a wasp, it's a hover fly.
	Yes, not dangerous.
	Um she just wants people to think she is because she's because she's neurotic and she fears people.
	Secondly, why would you do that?
	Why would you make yourself ugly like that?
	It's like expressing externally how you feel about yourself on the unit side.
	Yes.
	And thirdly, it's kind of like what I was saying earlier, borderline personality, they self-harm um to draw attention to themselves and to feel in control of themselves.
	So if you if you feel yeah, well, it crosses over with Nazism quite strongly.
	But if if you are if you are if you feel that you're ghastly, then one of the ways that you deal with it is by controlling the ghastlyness by saying I'm ghastly because I want to be ghastly, yes, uh, not because I am ghastly.
	And that's what she's done.
	She's shaved her hair off, it's self-harming, it's drawing attention to herself, and it's it's a way of controlling her negative emotions about herself.
	And so that's exactly what I would expect.
	You're fine though, don't you?
	The the physiognomy of someone uh the well, not just physiognomy, but you can tell a lot about someone with how they look.
	You know exactly what that woman thinks.
	That's what my brilliant how they tell you.
	There you go.
	Plug it.
	My book, How to Judge People by What They Look Like goes into some detail on this uh aka physiognomy check.
	And you have another book that uh just came out.
	Oh my god, it's just come out.
	Yes, that's uh that's called uh the genius under house arrest, the cancellation of James Thompson, which uh looks into Watson.
	Sorry.
	That's James Thompson's colleague of mine.
	Uh again.
	Oh no, we're live.
	Um Genius under House Arrest the cancellation of James Watson.
	Uh and uh that looks although James Thompson is very clever as well.
	Um, not under house rush.
	And that looks uh that that that looks at how we've become anti-genious because of the way in which feminine values have basically take of equality and harmful winds have taken over the society and trumped even a belief in truth.
	It's it's a really good book.
	I just read it, it's really excellent.
	I recommend you read it.
	Um but the No King's Riot really didn't go very peacefully.
	The media claimed that it was mostly peaceful.
	Yep.
	Um as usual.
	Or not organ.
	And as usual, Seattle and Oregon were the centers of violence.
	Uh they got pepper sprayed as they were attacking ice.
	Uh they're doing their best to basically make ICE unable to operate, thereby forcing the state to accept the open borders of Biden and their consequences.
	And there is a lesson here for the West when the time for deportations comes, these disgenic leftists will pretty much do the same exact thing all over Europe.
	Yeah.
	And I would argue that Britain, Spain, France are especially vulnerable because of the power of the lunatic left uh in those countries.
	So we're going to see more of these scenes here, and this was what makes it so important for uh Trump to resolve the issue and to actually force these guys to back down.
	Uh here this guy is walking around saying, Would you like to kill Nazis with me?
	Where are the Nazis?
	I don't know.
	No, that's that's interesting because they they term their enemies Nazis.
	Yes, okay.
	Which their enemies are not.
	Yes.
	And then argue that you should kill Nazis.
	Yes.
	So it's it's in a very covert and manipulative way, they're basically via that via that uh process, and there's plausible deniability, yes, saying, kill these people.
	Oh yeah, yes, yes, absolutely people.
	Absolutely, absolutely.
	It's inciting murder.
	I mean, this guy sort of puts out a video about how it actually operates.
	Uh from a communist directive as 1943.
	And basically, the communists were since the 40s, saying that the way to label anybody who disagrees with you is to call them a Nazi or a fascist.
	And as you keep on repeating this allegation, it becomes entrenched in the mindset of The populace so that violence becomes more palatable against these kinds of groups.
	So this isn't a um this isn't an original tactic.
	It's amazing though, isn't it?
	How it's because I mean is that's gone now.
	Yes.
	No one cares about being called a Nazi.
	No one cares about being called a fascist.
	Like it's got the same as no one cares about being called racist.
	Yes.
	It's done, it's played up.
	You know, you've you you you've you've had your fill.
	Yes.
	Right.
	Those vouchers are all used up now.
	Right.
	All the guilt's gone.
	Um it's fascinating that it managed to take a hold for as long as that.
	Yes.
	Absolutely amazing.
	Absolutely amazing.
	Incredible stuff.
	Um and the problem with But sorry, just to counter it, again, counter myself, not counting myself, but to add a little bit more.
	It it it we're so hung up on this mid um you know, the the the mid-night uh um Twentieth century.
	Yeah, mid-20th century nonsense and and a constant banging on about it.
	It's just it's insane.
	I just yeah, sorry, I can't.
	I mean, it it it it is very much the foundational religion of these groups.
	It's it was the it was it's portrayed as and it kind of was a turning point in history.
	Yes, and there's an extent to which there's before uh for very I it's been politicized obviously, but but that it's there's before and after World War II.
	Yes.
	You say it's foundational.
	Yes.
	World War II is a is the is the fell and various things about it are the foundational mythology of the post-world war religion.
	Yes.
	Uh and you can't have a rational debate even over something like Churchill.
	Yes.
	Uh try doing it.
	What AA calls the the boomer truth regime um is very, very strong.
	People that are otherwise sensible find it difficult to cope with the idea that Churchill was obviously a psychopath who played his part in bringing about World War II.
	And this is true.
	And uh he was funded by people that wanted a war.
	Yes.
	But we can't talk about that.
	I I I I think that um what we must talk about is is a couple of things.
	One of them is that it was the communists who won World War II and won also in the West.
	Uh and that we have been in the West living under some kind of idealization of communism for quite some time, and now it's becoming more and more open, and the communists are increasingly allying themselves with the Islamists who will a destroy the West in its entirety, and B turn on the leftists and murder every last one of them when they get power.
	Are you uh you proposing or or or or stating that Islamists don't play nice for communists?
	Are you they say that do they do they maybe betray them?
	I don't know I I'm saying murder all of them, yes.
	Well, I I don't think someone should tell Zach Polansky that well.
	Someone should tell a gay Jewish man what Islamists do.
	I think we're bleeping that out, yes.
	Uh is a gay Jewish man.
	Yes, these are these are temporary coalitions, and when the coalitions are for example, we have weird coalitions among conservatives at the moment.
	Yeah, coalition of of traditionalist conservatives and feminists who are trans-exclusionary.
	Yes.
	And that now that coalition is unstable.
	Yes.
	Uh, and eventually that coalition will come apart.
	And it's the same on the left.
	You have a coalition at the moment between the communists, the the the the white, the self-hating uh whites, as it were, yes, uh, and uh and woke, including homosexuality, transsexuality, and Islam, which strongly condemns those people.
	And in You can't point it out in in one of the sort of manuals of the Muslim Brotherhood.
	Not allowed.
	Uh in one of the manuals of the Muslim Brotherhood, they explain clearly that they want to ally with forces that would help them destroy the West from within.
	And they were speaking about that since 1991, I believe.
	And they'd had that idea for even longer.
	So this is not new at all.
	But I wanted to get back to this issue of of of um of of Trump and dealing with these groups.
	Um what's happening is that these guys get arrested, but then they get released.
	And what do they do the minute they get released?
	They go back to conducting new attacks.
	Catch them release.
	So it's not just that they are getting more violent, it's that the state really isn't doing anywhere near enough.
	And they're getting more organized and they're becoming sillier, getting dressed up in in animal costumes to pretend that they're I don't know if it's a kink.
	I don't know if it's I I don't know what's going on there, but I thought that was fascinating.
	So again, furries.
	Yeah.
	If that's what Well, fairies carrying rocks to use them to attack ice.
	Amazing.
	And the political leadership, they ask uh Jerry Nadler, do you condemn uh attacks on ice agents?
	And he says, What attacks?
	Amazing.
	This comes a couple of weeks after they had snipers shooting into an ice facility.
	Yeah.
	And accidentally killing the migrants, but that's a different story.
	But they deny that this is happening.
	Amazing.
	Uh Pelosi is encouraging this.
	Uh, what's his name?
	Chuck Schumer is encouraging this.
	And you see this fatty here.
	I know they're never heard of fatty.
	And uh she's sort of bragging about the Charlie Kirk murder, and it turns out it's a school teacher.
	Ha.
	Well, that's hardly surprising as academia is.
	I mean, academia and NGOs are really full of freaking psychopaths.
	Uh, and the Democrats aren't doing anything to condemn this.
	They are just sort of different It's funny, isn't it?
	Because they're their next on the chopping block, right?
	Like they don't realize that because that that was part of um I think it was Oregon, I think it was Portland Oregon because it was the mayor, wasn't it, who came out and was like, uh hello, how do you do, fellow kids?
	Yeah, I'm with you.
	And then they were like, No, we're gonna burn your house down, actually.
	Pretty much.
	Yes.
	It's like your next on this block.
	Like you need to get handle on this.
	They don't want to stop.
	They don't want to.
	They they absolutely don't want to.
	They want to keep on denying it and keep on testing Trump and provoking Trump.
	And I looked at some of the stuff that Mike Shelby's been uh saying.
	I'm hoping to invite him for for real politics to have a chat with him.
	What they're trying to organize, it seems, through these protests is some kind of color revolution.
	It seems that over the No Kings protests, they managed to get around uh three million people mobilized, which is quite substantial.
	That's quite sort of one percent of the American population or or or thereabouts, which is a very substantial number.
	And they are trying to register them for elections, but when they register them, they get their email addresses, and then they use them to both mobilize for uh elections, mobilize for uh getting other people to come out and vote, but mobilize them for further protests and maintain a very high level of pressure against Trump.
	And um this this is getting to a point where they're cooperating with Mexican cartels to get weapons.
	Wow, okay, yeah.
	And so with Trump working on a couple of things, he's working on um doing a lot of redistricting in the middle of an election cycle.
	Uh part of it be by getting the Civil Rights Act out of redistricting so that race isn't a factor in drawing electoral districts for the House of Representatives.
	When that happens, the Democrats could lose 10, 12, 20 seats, and they're doing some redistricting without within Republican states, and that's going to cost the Democrats a few seats, meaning that they can never control the house again as easily.
	Plus the next census is going to exclude illegal aliens, meaning that the representation of Northeastern states and west western states is going to decline with the representation of um that's just corrupt.
	Illegal aliens on the census and then draw up the electoral system.
	That's incredible.
	Yes.
	So when when they're counted, it boosts the number of house seats they get and it boosts the number of uh electors and the electoral college that they get.
	So for the Democrats, keeping the illegal aliens and counting the illegal aliens in the census is important.
	And so Trump is doing these three things, and these guys are preparing a color revolution and are getting weapons from the Mexican cartels.
	Ah, yeah, I mean anyway.
	Meanwhile, that when the midterms happen in 2026, in November 2026, the Democrats are going to come ready with an army that they know is mobilized with the Antifa and Trantifa and other leftist goons, and with a narrative that says that the loss of the House in 2026 was not legitimate.
	And therefore they need to escalate into violence, which is why the political leadership of the Democrats is not in any way condemning The violence to get to a position where they run into the 2028 elections and they can really pull off some serious escalation.
	So Trump needs to get on top of this, both in terms of targeting the cartels, but also in terms of not just listing Antifa as a terrorist organization, which he's already done, but going after the financiers.
	And if you dig deep enough into the financiers, you're going to find not just Soros, you're going to find I will bet Mexican cartel money involved as well.
	Highly likely.
	And if you look at the way in which, for example, Act Blue was able to funnel donations from people's accounts without them knowing it, without them being actually their accounts.
	So they did this thing where Ed, you're a 90-year-old whatever, living in in in your home, and then suddenly there are donations going to the Democratic Party in your name.
	And you don't know anything about them.
	So they're not taking money from your account, but the donations are being registered to you.
	Right, right.
	So they did that with a lot of elderly citizens behind their backs.
	And to me, this looks very clearly that this is money being laundered from the cartels.
	And now they're arming Antifa.
	It's accelerationism.
	I mean, there's a level on there's a level on which I uh this book woke eugenics on this.
	Um it's like I think wokeness is an evolutionary adaptation, as you know, right uh where whereby you induce people uh who are genetically sickly to uh basically uh resign from the gene pool thus and you and you collapse society, collapse complex society such that people that are sickly can't survive, and that's what the woke are doing.
	The what the work are there to kill off the woke and the semi-woke.
	Yes, a part of how you uh and also to cause people that are right wing and conservative to bond with each other to create separate communities that weather the storm.
	Even something like this, uh alternative media that's conservative, uh, 20 years ago, there was nothing like this.
	Yes, you know, there was just a few people meeting above pubs.
	Yes, um, and and now we're able to create this whole community, and that will and because we feel rightly, we feel persecuted and under attack.
	We are all kind of Christian fundamentalists now.
	Yes.
	Uh, in the sense that we that we are in the world, the woke world, but not of the woke world.
	Right.
	Uh um, and that kind of behavior is only going to further that sense of in-group bonding, further polarization, further the process of breaking away.
	So, what you're saying is we may eventually be rid of these people.
	Oh, yeah, eventually, yeah, but I think but I but I think it will be in a in a context of of socioeconomic decline.
	Yeah, and then people will break away into sort of little little little bit like in South Africa.
	Yeah, yeah.
	It's it's it's it's I I don't see it getting better before it gets considerably worse.
	And um this this this stuff is really dangerous.
	It's obvious that they're preparing for a big escalation, and it's very obvious that the same exact playbook will be used anywhere in Europe that tries to fix the problems of legal and illegal immigration.
	It's also obvious that if these problems with legal and illegal immigration don't get fixed, then the scenarios are extremely negative for the survival of the West.
	So that there's an existential fight with these guys, and they see it as existential because their power is peaked, their ability to influence people through words has peaked because everything that they say is completely discredited.
	Uh reparations, this Islam is tolerant, blah blah blah.
	Look, guys, none of this is true.
	We all know that none of this is true.
	I think they also say it as existential because if you look at the psychology of these kinds of people, right?
	So narcissism, custom be disorders or whatever, this phrase that they use, I feel literally unsafe.
	Yes, that is true.
	If you're crazy like that, your heart starts to beat, you you really feel that you might die.
	Yes.
	Or that you might do something to yourself that you can't control and kill yourself.
	Yes.
	That's how they feel.
	Yes, and I think that's genuine.
	But they often play that out, so you're yeah, you're you're right.
	So it's genuine, maybe.
	So um you know, uh, one of the commentators says uh dread dreadnought log, uh it bugs me when people say that Trump doesn't do anything when he's constantly being harassed by lawsuits, internal sabotage, and 50 fires around him.
	Look, I agree completely, I agree completely.
	Um but these are militant organizations that are mobilizing for a big escalation.
	Yeah, I mean, priority, right?
	Like the priority must be domestic rather than Israel, Venezuela, Mexico, etc.
	Mexico just sort of seal it off as much as you can.
	Obviously, that's that that's very important.
	But the domestic pressure is huge, and that must be factored into your thinking.
	Uh Pavion P says, have you seen this?
	Have you heard about this?
	There's an up and coming YouTube channel called State of Politics.
	Very based.
	I've never heard of it.
	What is this?
	Check it out, guys.
	Basically, me and Bo, we start a little project just together to record our conversations on things.
	Uh and that's it.
	It's just a bit of fun for me and Bo, but you guys seem to like it.
	Do go and check it out, please.
	Uh, I think you will enjoy it.
	Please do.
	Uh Sigil Stone 17.
	They can't dig into the finance series of Antifa because the Epstein list doesn't exist, and they're our greatest ally.
	Yes.
	Um Tiffanel says Finland did play a considerable role in the history of slavery as a source of slaves.
	Okay.
	That's why I said that that's exactly what was said.
	Um let's see some of the comments from the website.
	Do you want to read some of yours?
	Yes.
	Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.
	So uh what we got uh safety live.
	Says I found it a little fascinating that in Islamic Islamic societies, the burden of essay always falls on the woman.
	Well, in Western uh feminist countries, the burden is always on a man.
	Both just seem incapable of looking at things from a case by case basis.
	Yeah, well, great thinking.
	Very dangerously based, yes.
	Uh Robert Hide.
	Oh.
	What earth is going on?
	Good night.
	And he said, look at the things.
	There we go.
	Right.
	Uh thank you very much.
	Dutton is right.
	Women would much rather share a single high value male.
	Tinder is the prime example of harems forming around the top two percent of men.
	Not healthy for society.
	Yes, buddy.
	We know if we don't nip Islam in the bud, the only solution that I see is something like Reconquista.
	And that has its own horde of horrors.
	Yeah, absolutely, mate.
	Absolutely.
	Uh nothing will ever satisfy them.
	From Ed Dutton eating red mutton.
	Shopping in Saturn for some chocolate buttons.
	More slaves were traded in the Arab slave trade than in the Atlantic slave trade.
	True, and it lasted for much longer.
	Also true.
	Yet no Middle Eastern country has apologized for this because it's an honor-based, not shame-based, not guilt-based culture.
	And they're mostly proud of their conquests.
	It is only through our weakness that these vultures think that they can get resources from us.
	Look, it's not because of your weakness, it's because you has still have a Christian formed mind without thinking about Christian natural law and Christian theology properly.
	Um that's what makes you weak, I mean.
	Paul Newbar says reparations giving all of them a one-way ticket.
	Yes.
	Based.
	Binary surfer, pay the reprobations, hear me out, negotiate it down and then pay it on condition of deport all diversity.
	I'm diverse and I agree with that message.
	Uh Russian garbage human says, after accounting for a billion stolen bikes and mobile phones.
	I'm not going there.
	Uh Sophie Live Again.
	It is completely worth noticing that these are all old boomers who haven't realized that the hippie age is long over and they are old.
	Yeah.
	That dance was disgusting.
	You're absolutely right, Sophie.
	Uh Joe Schmoe, while reprehensible, calling for illegal acts against federal agents is definitely free speech in America.
	Oh wow.
	Okay.
	Calling for violence against the I didn't think you were allowed to do that, but okay.
	Okay.
	Uh Ed Mutton eating red Dutton eating red mutton again.
	Uh, the closest thing to kings in America are the judges who are unelected, hold the positions of power for decades and decide willy-nilly that upholding the law is actually illegal.
	Absolutely.
	They invent new rights, they invent new ideals.
	Some of them are, but the federal judges are appointed.
	And uh I it it it's a very complicated system when it comes to the judiciary.
	But a huge number of them are not, in fact, elected.
	Uh, not that elected judges is is an absolutely great idea.
	That comes with its own problems, but yeah.
	You wanna show us Samson some of the video comments, please.
	The Robert Hide book, Fordham's free hold, is about a family who got thrown forward in time into a society where blacks enslaved whites.
	I think such a society is one many democrats dream of.
	No responsibilities and everything taken care of by your masters.
	Amazing.
	It's a great robot, and that's a great point.
	That's exactly what the Democrats dream of.
	Your feet of engineering.
	Very cool robot.
	So here I am from my Union Convention here in the village of Lake Placid, New York.
	This is actually nearer Lake.
	Right?
	It's a very nice place to see.
	Beautiful.
	Yeah.
	That part of like upstate New York is absolutely gorgeous.
	He's just done this.
	Say again?
	He's just sent this now.
	Well, a couple of days ago, or at some point, yes.
	In the show.
	Yes, we get people sending us video comments from America.
	So it's like eight o'clock in the morning where they are.
	I don't think he sent it just at this moment.
	He could be watching us live.
	He could not be watching us live.
	He he always sends us very nice video comments.
	Alright, but it's not it's not like that he wants to be.
	It's not necessarily that it's on the day that he sent this over breakfast.
	No, that's that's not necessarily our case.
	Yes.
	Compelling as your critiques of the UK government's immigration policies are.
	I can't help but notice that the same style of arguments about the English claim over the ancestral homeland are the exact same arguments used to attack the legitimacy of colonial English nations like Australia.
	Therefore, we often are forced to put forward an affair decline for Western culture, not just relying on an appeal to traditions.
	I'm curious as to what your response is to these people using your own arguments against us.
	I'm not sure I fully got the gist of it.
	I didn't get it, just that you I also get the gist of it.
	So all three of us are stumped somewhat.
	Our response to them using our own arguments against us.
	What what argument of tradition?
	What argument does he mean?
	No, the argument is the point having a claim to the Yeah, so the point is that he's making sorry.
	Is that in Australia they the arguments from the left is this isn't your ancestral homeland.
	Right?
	And so get out.
	What is our response to them using that as the argument that and that's our argument for our claim to this land, basically?
	Yes, yes.
	Well, I mean your argument would be I guess the response would be what is it now?
	And and I mean you could you can't.
	Not just that.
	If the aborigines had built anything, you might have a point.
	But you're talking about a what is it now Stone Age society that built absolutely nothing?
	Also, how far do you go back?
	The argument is just it's what why do we even have to have these moral issues?
	Yeah.
	We want it.
	We took it.
	Take the L. We control it.
	Take the L. Take the loss.
	And and and let's let's fight uh and may the best man win.
	Yeah.
	Which which is exactly where it's going in in Europe, which is exactly where things are going in Europe, which is exactly the Muslim attitude in Europe.
	Which I think is a little more honest.
	But um I I think the objective reality that nothing was built there also matters.
	How far back do you want to go?
	I guess is the argument, isn't it?
	I mean, New Zealand is I mean, then how they weren't there for a great deal of time either.
	So, we've been in the English who've been in England longer than the Maori have been in New Zealand.
	Yes.
	Exactly.
	So take the L. So I'm perfectly happy to accept it.
	Fine.
	I'm fine, fine.
	The Maori are indigenous to New Zealand.
	Uh go, the English are indigenous to England.
	Because they've been there longer than the Maori.
	So And we put the Australians there, so you win because we win.
	I mean, if I and and indeed the Greenlandic have been in Greenland for less time.
	I mean the Norse got there first, right?
	Yeah, and then died out.
	It was an empty island.
	So I'm I'm perfect and they are an indigenous people.
	So I'm perfectly there.
	Yeah.
	Any more comments, Samson?
	Nope.
	Alright.
	Well, that is all the time that we have.
	Thank you very much for joining us.
	I will see you in another half hour for a live episode of Realpolitik.
	And thank you very much, Ed and Nate, for joining us.

▲