The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1277

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 20, 2025 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:30:05

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1277

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters.
	This is episode 1277.
	I am joined by Nate and Ed Dutton.
	And today we are going to be talking about Europe's anti-Islam actions, how nothing will satisfy the reparations demanders, and how the left and the Democrats in America have really become quite dangerous and extremely unwell.
	As a reminder, I'm doing a real politics show right after this at 3.
	It's going to be live, so please join me and ask any questions that you want.
	And I want to leave you in the capable hands of Mr. H, who is going to be talking to us about, well, his new channel, but more importantly, about what the Europeans are doing about extremist Islam.
	That was a great intro.
	No, go check out the State Politics.
	It's a channel which I run with Bo.
	So if you like Bo's takes, do go and check it out.
	But we do need to talk about our lovely, glorious European friends.
	So our European friends, our European friends.
	Yes.
	Friends and allies.
	Friends and allies, yeah.
	So basically, if you haven't noticed, Europe has begun near coincidental timing, two European places anyway, have begun clamping down on Islam.
	First and foremost, this popped up into, if you're just listening, Italy began talking about banning Islamic face coverings and exploring mosque funding.
	And not only that, also dropping in to see what mosques were doing.
	So spot-checking mosques.
	I wonder if they'll find any weapons in there.
	Is this just a British thing now?
	Are we allowed to interact?
	Yes, yes.
	You doing a lecture?
	No, no, you're very encouraged to interact.
	Oh, okay.
	No, please go interact.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	All right, sure.
	Yeah, have you heard about this?
	Have you seen this?
	No, no, I haven't.
	You've not.
	I've not been prepped.
	Okay, well, Giorgio Maloney, the Italian beast that she is, the Italian stallion, has popped up.
	Hold on.
	Is she trans?
	No, I didn't mean like that.
	The Italian stallion has popped up and basically launched this with her party saying, yeah, like this is this is the legislation we want to introduce.
	They haven't actually done it yet, but the plan is, and it's the ruling brothers of Italy party, has said that they want to ban the Burka and Nikab and body coverings in all public spaces nationwide.
	And it is basically called the Bill Against Islamic Separatism.
	So good.
	You know, that's good.
	I think that's a start, right?
	Do we agree?
	Why do you think it's good?
	Why?
	Why is it good?
	Well, because it devalues Western culture.
	It's a visual representation of an ideology that is reprehensible and polar opposite to what Western culture is.
	Do you not agree with that?
	Do you not like that?
	Well, I mean, maybe like these women are so beautiful.
	They're so beautiful that they know that if they don't cover their faces, then Italian men will just be going around being really severely sexually aroused all the time.
	And they won't be able to get any work done.
	And their husbands are saying, please, darling, could you just integrate into Italian culture by not covering your face?
	They're saying, Muhammad, I would love to.
	I have respect for this nation that's taken me in.
	And I don't want these men to be walking around with stonking diamond cutter erections the whole time.
	And not being able to get any work done.
	So I must, inshallah, I must cover my face.
	Does that occur to you, Nate?
	I mean, in your bigotry, your inability.
	Oh, oh, oh, oh, it's a symbol.
	It's a symbol of anti-Western.
	No, it's someone trying to make sure that Italian men are able to just get on with the day.
	You know what I think?
	The economy can function.
	I think that's a very idealistic worldview.
	Well, perhaps.
	I think realism.
	I think the realistic outlook is perhaps it's an oppressive ideology.
	You know.
	You think Islam oppresses women?
	Well, yeah, maybe.
	I mean, you're the resident.
	Fresh with women.
	Ferris did nothing but.
	Oh, dear.
	So it's a start.
	It's something.
	And I think actually the main thing which I quite like, well, one, their plan to fine these individuals 300 to 3,000 Euros, which, I mean, that's basically just taking back their tax money because, of course, half these people don't work.
	And that's being generous, half, probably significantly.
	More than that.
	And loads of people have come out, obviously, in opposition to this.
	So you have people going, oh, religious freedom is sacred.
	I think this is in opposition, actually, but it must be exercised in the open in full respect of our constitution and the principles of the Italian state, which I agree with.
	I think that's good.
	There have been some sort of opposition to this.
	Of course.
	Five pillars.
	Oh, yes.
	Yes.
	I like dropping in on these people.
	They're mental.
	One of their editors, I think, Fran Saleh, was very open in one interview that ended up getting captured by memory, where he says that the West is Dar al-Kufr, the abode of the unbelievers, meaning that it was therefore the abode of war.
	Suggesting that his integration plans are not really what you would hope that they would be.
	It wouldn't be integration, would it?
	No, well, we want to take over it more than anything.
	That's integration.
	Yes.
	And the expectation from Five Pillars is that eventually they're going to be running the West and eventually Islam will successfully conquer the West.
	Love it.
	And they're quite honest about it for the most part.
	It's a marker.
	I agree with Nate.
	It's a marker of saying, I have no respect for this society.
	I have no desire to integrate into the society.
	I am not part of this society.
	I don't even care if it offends you.
	And it does offend you.
	It is offensive because it is such a cultural arrogance.
	It's like in Finland, you get some foreigners that go into the public saunas and try to keep their swimming trunks on.
	And I can't do that.
	And Finns are like, no, get them off.
	Heaven forbid.
	No, get them off.
	And they come up with these ridiculous justifications like, oh, there might be chlorine on the swimming trunks, and someone might be allergic to chlorine and the steam and whatever.
	No, it's not.
	It's because Finns are a bit kinky.
	But that is their right, and that is their culture.
	And they like being naked.
	I was guilty of it.
	I once went into a smoke sauna.
	And the only other person in it, there's a mixed, you see, and the only other person in it was this woman of about 70, but she had a very good bot and she knew it.
	And I had my trunks on, and she said in Finnish, get them off.
	And I did immediately.
	And then she was only joking.
	By then, me and this old lady just sat there naked together and I felt I'd integrated into the culture.
	And that's what we want.
	Well, actually, no, we don't want integration.
	We'd like them all to go home.
	But Italy is addressing this.
	And so a statement from a member of parliament, the FDI party, said, this law addresses two needs, the safety of citizens who must be able to know who they're dealing with, and the need to avoid undermining women's dignity because erasing a woman's face means undermining her dignity.
	I think saying that a woman deserves a quarter of a man is slightly more offensive.
	I mean, in Islam, man is allowed to have four wives, meaning that she gets a quarter of a husband.
	He's also allowed an unlimited number of property women.
	Shia, isn't it?
	No, no, no.
	That's both of them.
	That's both Sunni and Shia.
	It's only actually the Druze who insist on monogamy.
	And I think the Alawites also insist on monogamy.
	But the general view of Islam is sort of quite degrading to women, even beyond the needs of a functioning patriarchy.
	It's all for the patriarchy.
	It's degrading.
	There's good research on this.
	A lot of women in the studies would rather be the co-wife of a very high-status man than the wife, the single wife, of a low-status man.
	That's where the whole system of polygamy comes from.
	Women are sexually attracted to high status for obvious reasons, because if the chap's got a high status, he's got the good genes that attain the status and he's got resources that can be invested in the kids and in her and so on.
	And so it's much better in that sense.
	It's their free choice.
	Well, I've met some of the products of polygamy, and I can tell you that the level of social damage that it causes outweighs the genetic aspect.
	I'd also say we shouldn't have to deal with this in the West anyway.
	We have our own culture.
	We have our own customs, and it's not something we should be dealing with, quite frankly.
	The fundamental issue is that the West believes that religion is a matter of opinion.
	I'm sorry, Ed.
	I do apologise.
	Just straight down the line.
	How dare you?
	How dare you?
	So black and white now.
	Discuss this properly.
	I mean, the downside, obviously, is enormous numbers of incels.
	Which then creates a society which is violent and dangerous.
	Quite.
	And something has to be done with those incels.
	Yes.
	That's the downside.
	Usually get them directed to fight against the Christians.
	Well, or you give them, exactly.
	You give them jihad and you say to them that once you die, then you get the alt, you will be in heaven with a permanent erection and 77 virgins.
	72.
	So let's not exaggerate, please.
	72.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Don't overpromise.
	I apologize.
	Don't overpromise.
	Don't overpromise.
	It's not.
	Come on.
	There must be young chaps that get to paradise.
	Where's my 76?
	I said he's 72.
	I was 77.
	Where's my five?
	Extra five virgins.
	Get me them now.
	Anyways, so obviously, five pillars, I like dropping in on five pillars because they always have some pushback and it's obvious, just nonsense, subversive nonsense.
	So one of the other criminal offenses would be to aim to punish those who propagate ideas based on religious superiority and hatred.
	What?
	I mean, that's Islam through and through.
	Yeah, that's certainly Christianity, though, isn't it?
	I think that we'll be caught up in that net.
	I guess so.
	All religions claim that their moral code is superior.
	It's sort of baked into that.
	Yeah, we'll kind of get to that, I guess.
	But various Italian Muslim leaders have reacted.
	There should be no Italian Muslim leaders.
	There should be no leaders that you go to talk to.
	This is nonsense.
	Yeah, I hate that terminology.
	But some Imam said banning the full veil, which isn't banning the veil itself, could be part of a security rationale.
	But legislation to this effect already exists.
	So I wonder what the actual utility of this proposal is.
	It's to make you feel unwelcome because you are unwelcome.
	That's the bottom line.
	Thanks for that clarity.
	Yeah.
	You should go home, quite frankly.
	An opposition member of the Democratic Party, of course, of course.
	I had a taxi driver last night.
	It took me from Heathrow to here, to London.
	And he was Muslim.
	No, no, he just, well, I had the same guy before, but he was cool, Muhammad, so he was definitely.
	And one of the things he was, he asked, it was quite a genuine conversation.
	I was talking about how we were kind of okay about it here till 89.
	And then it was the Tatalik versus Salman Rush.
	Consciousness raising and so on.
	And also the Ray Honeyford swimming thing to taking schoolgirls swimming with Muslim.
	And he said, well, what is it that you people want?
	And I said, well, what we want is, because this is England, right?
	It's for you to completely, if you are going to be here, is to completely and utterly integrate into English society completely, like the Huguenots did.
	Completely.
	That means you drink.
	That means you eat pork.
	That means there is no difference except possibly genetic.
	And he was astonished by this.
	He's like, yeah, but my faith is a big part of my life.
	And it's like, oh, come on.
	You know, you can, via social pressure, you can change your mind.
	Look what happened under COVID.
	Look what happened under people who used to be reasonably conservative suddenly adopting woke and then the reverse as woke becomes unfashionable.
	People can force themselves by effortful control and via just a desire for status and a desire to be seen as moral to change their mind.
	Here's the problem with what you're saying: the rationale behind face veils and these kinds of coverings is that men have no self-control.
	And the rationale behind what you're saying is that you must have enough self-control to integrate.
	These two views are entirely at odds with each other.
	There is some.
	If the premise of the religion is that a man cannot see a woman's face without arousal and without any kind of control over himself to the extent that he might do the needful, shall we say, instantly, then your expectation of a level of discipline and self-control is slightly misplaced.
	As I've explained, if these women that cover themselves up, we haven't seen their faces.
	Right, right, right.
	Well, if they really are unbelievably fit, unlikely.
	But I mean, like, really fit.
	Unlikely.
	Unlikely.
	Genetically unlikely.
	But unlikely.
	But I take it on board.
	I take it on board as a potential, as a potential.
	So the opposition of the Democratic Party said it's hateful in terms of the message it conveys.
	Good.
	That's absolutely fine.
	Good.
	Other aspects of the law seek to deal with matters surrounding Muslim marriages, such as stricter penalties for arranged marriages, inducing marriages through religious coercion as well.
	None of that should be a thing.
	This is the West.
	It's just a further investigation of polygamy as well, because it's happening all the time.
	Yeah, it's happening all the time.
	A really, really serious problem.
	And I don't mean to be insensitive.
	No, of course not.
	No, he's my guess.
	Never.
	Never, never.
	But it's cousin marriage.
	That's the really serious problem.
	Yes.
	And that's not a problem in medicine.
	Why they're probably not that attractive.
	Because they're inbred.
	No.
	Two sides to this, right?
	So on the one hand, you're going to get, obviously, you're going to get the ones that have double doses, okay?
	And they're going to be ugly.
	And the reason why they do it, the evolutionary reason why they do it, is so that you're very, very strongly adapted to a particular niche, i.e.
	a niche with high pathogen load.
	So if you marry someone that's very genetically similar to you, then you ensure that the genetic constructs, as it were, that protect you against a particular disease are not broken up.
	But normally...
	And so normally, yeah, there's double doses, death...
	Well, no, I mean, normally those disease vectors are within a certain locale.
	Yeah, yeah, but that's why they do it.
	That's why they do it.
	And so what you would expect is there's going to be a minority of them that are just unbelievably healthy for their ecology and therefore will be able to maintain a symmetrical phenotype in the face of disease because they'll be resistant to it and therefore will be good looking.
	You actually see that in the Gulf.
	Right.
	Believe it or not.
	You see some exceptional beauties in the Gulf, in part because the past environment was so harsh that anybody who survived had to be of higher genetic quality.
	And in part because marriages were conducted at a relatively young age, meaning that the issue of more mutations as you age was solved sort of intrinsically.
	But then with the advent of modern medicine and the collapse in child mortality rates, you see a change in the other direction.
	Exactly.
	But in theory, what it means is you're going to get a minority of these women, as I said, who need to cover themselves up because they're going to be unbelievably beautiful.
	But then the majority are just going to be muntos.
	Yes.
	So back to this.
	So this is the one which is most interesting, I think.
	So the new law will also target Islamic groups or mosques, which receive funding from abroad.
	Pretty important, obviously, if you have a proliferation of terror activity, they'll be required to fully disclose any foreign funding to the state.
	And such matters surrounding the marriage would actually introduce prison sentences two to seven years, which is good.
	But you also don't want these people to be in prison, isolated amongst themselves either.
	That would offer further radicalization, of course.
	Quick couple of points on the financing issue.
	Any kind of foreign financing is going to come with a dose of radicalization because the people who study Islam properly in Arabic come to the conclusion that it is quite radical and that it is quite has a very deep sense of supremacy,
	a very deep sense of vanity and arrogance that is baked into the story to the extent that Muhammad claimed that it wasn't Isaac, the father of the Jews, who was offered as a sacrifice by Abraham.
	It was in fact Ishmael, the father of the Arabs.
	So there is this baked in sense that Islam is superior.
	And this is peppered throughout the Quran itself.
	It's really full on.
	Christianity encourages you to think of your own sinfulness constantly.
	Islam encourages you to believe that you are the greatest nation ever given to mankind.
	So the difference in worldview isn't going to be addressed by this minor legislative tinkering.
	And if you want to say we want to create a hostile environment, say that the aim is to create a hostile environment.
	Yeah.
	The problem is that everybody is that everybody is operating within a liberal framework where they believe that religious differences are merely a matter of opinion.
	I'm more convinced by Islam, you're more convinced by Christianity, he's more convinced by Judaism.
	And we can sort of debate it nicely.
	As opposed to, no, religion is the bedrock of your moral worldview.
	It's the bedrock of your identity.
	And therefore, religious differences are existential.
	Very substantially just an expression of genetic differences.
	Often these religious differences are religious.
	A diverse community, yes.
	Or are you in the community is not even that diverse.
	So if you look at something like, well, what's going on with the fact that the East of England was very, very into Protestantism when it came along.
	Protestantism and that kind of worldview that goes with it of being puritanical, of being highly monotheistic, as it were, to use Alan de Benoit's division, as opposed to more polytheistic.
	East of England, highly Protestant, they go, they settle the northern states of America.
	West of England, kind of a bit more Catholic-y, Protestant-y mixed.
	And these are genetic cleavages, because the East of England was substantially completely Anglo-Saxon, whereas the West of England is a Saxon-Celtic Klein.
	We then have a civil war, essentially, between the East and the West of England, between Anglo-Saxon and Anglo-Celtic, between Protestant and kind of Protesto-Catholic.
	And then that civil war is exactly repeated in America a couple hundred years later, 300 years later, whatever, soon as later.
	When you have the North Protestant from the East of England versus the South, sort of Protesto-Catholic from the West of England and to some extent Ulster.
	And so these are even that's the difference.
	These are genetic cleavages.
	And that's why it's so much more, what's the word I want?
	Inbaked sort of thing?
	Baked in, yes.
	Sorry, I've been corrupted by an Arabic speaker in my English as well.
	In grained, it's quite embarrassing.
	Yes, ingrained, exactly.
	Much more ingrained than simply this idea that you are, I believe, in this opinion, and you have in that opinion.
	It's not that.
	It's an expression.
	It's an religion is an expression often of genetic difference.
	Interesting.
	It's intractable.
	Very interesting.
	So, in the interest of time, I've got to shuffle on just briefly.
	Italy's not the only country doing it.
	So Portugal has now actually done it.
	So Italy was only talking about it, but Portugal has actually done it, and this is quite hot off the press.
	It was on Friday.
	Burkhaban approved by Portugal's parliament.
	It's seen as targeting Muslim women.
	Yes, that's kind of the point.
	Obviously.
	Non-Muslim women wear burqas.
	Typically, no guardian here with their big-brained massive takes.
	But to me, so even the Arabs will make jokes about how women in a burqa look like a tent and you can't tell if she's coming or going.
	That's so quite funny, really, but yeah.
	There is this sort of intolerance towards this in a lot of Arab societies.
	And the idea that the Europeans should out-tolerate the Arabs is a bit stupid.
	Well, they've even called us out for it numerous times, haven't they?
	But yeah, Portugal is it's to me it's baffling that Portugal even allowed Islam entry, quite frankly.
	If you're not familiar with their flag, their flag is quite literally a representation of them defeating Islam throughout history.
	So you have the seven castles there.
	They are quite literally representative of the seven castles of the Moors.
	And then the five shields are the five Moorish kings that were defeated as well.
	Is that right?
	Yeah.
	Are you certain that's right?
	No, 100%.
	No, that's fascinating.
	Well, you can correct me in the comments, but I'm fairly certain that is correct.
	So their flag is literally representative of defeating Moors.
	Yes.
	So actually defeating Islam, and yet they've still allowed them into the country.
	I don't understand what the Europeans.
	I don't understand what Westerners have done to themselves.
	You'd think that after 9-11, the sort of discourse would be get out.
	Precisely.
	I have friends who were in the United States during 9-11, Lebanese Muslim friends.
	And their parents said, get out, they're going to kill us all.
	Yeah.
	Because that's exactly what would have happened if it had been the other way around.
	Yes.
	Yes.
	Yeah.
	Which actually nicely segues on to the overall take of this segment: is: hey, look, it's great that Europe is doing this, but this is fundamentally flawed when you're still leaving the floodgates wide open and allowing them just to pour in.
	This is putting.
	It's window dressing.
	Yeah, this is just red meat.
	So this is populism.
	Yeah.
	What this is is retarded populism.
	What do we do if they take off the burqa thing and just wear a plastic mask?
	Are we going to plastic clown masks?
	Are you going to make that illegal to wear plastic clown masks?
	Who knows?
	Probably, probably not.
	But yeah, this is all irrelevant.
	This is just red meat.
	Good that Europe's doing it, I guess, on face value, but this is shallow.
	This is the pretense of action.
	Yeah, of course it is.
	This is the pretense of action.
	100% it is.
	100%.
	And this is like putting, you know, you have a stab wound through the heart and you put a piece of plaster on it.
	It's not going to do you much good.
	They've banned the use of, they've banned in Turkey in public places like universities, public spaces, the use of headscarves.
	And so what the women do that want to wear headscarves is they just put a wig over the headscarf and thus it doesn't look like they're wearing a headscarf.
	So there's all kinds of ways around this.
	So as I say, it's just window dressing.
	The real problem is since the 2nd of May 1997 and particularly after 2001, the government has deliberately, quite deliberately, A, for ideological reasons, will rub the right's nose in diversity.
	And B, for just decadent reasons to do with undermining the labour, the wages of the working class And keeping things cheap or whatever has imported loads and loads of people who have no intention, who have often no historical relationship with this country and no intention to integrate into it and no ability to do so.
	And it has no love nor respect for it.
	No.
	No, they don't care.
	Fundamentally, they hate you.
	They hate the West.
	They hate everything about it.
	And they shouldn't be here.
	That's a good summary.
	Somebody with a very Polish name says, for I can barely handle one girlfriend.
	See, you're also allowed to use physical force, which sort of helps under the laws of Islam.
	So you just might want to remember that.
	So I was just asking.
	I'm not saying that.
	It sounded like it.
	I'm saying how this conflict is handled.
	A certain kind of female does like to be spanked.
	You're right.
	Is that what you're saying?
	Ed, you need to be on YouTube friendly.
	YouTube friendly.
	You're the one that just said they need to go back to where they come from and all this.
	I never have said.
	I feel like I've fallen into a wormhole or something.
	Me for making a perfectly sensible remark about ladies.
	I'm told to be YouTube friendly.
	God.
	Sigil Stone 17 says, I'm in the US, and remember 9-11, the war against Islamophobia began almost immediately and came entirely from the media.
	Don't look too deeply into who ran all of these media companies.
	Well, the first time I heard that Islam was a religion of peace was when George W. Bush said it.
	I grew up in a Muslim country being told that actually it has precisely the right level of violence.
	Sigil Stone says, maybe the real reason behind making their women wear face coverings is because they don't want to be reminded that they married their cousin.
	And I'm going to stop there, but you should get on the website and check out what this guy's saying.
	Don't look into.
	We're not discussing what he's saying.
	One tall order says, I'd just like to say thank you, Lotus Eaters, for what you do.
	You're extremely welcome.
	Hope everyone is having a better Monday than I broke Fibula and shipped Tibia.
	Oh, Roughwood Motorcycle Rally.
	Yes, it is.
	That's very good.
	Get well soon, mate.
	Get well soon.
	Yeah, rest that.
	That's horrendous.
	Moving on to another segment in which, yes, you're very much encouraged to interact.
	There was a reparations conference by the African, spelled with a K, Reparations All-Party Parliamentary Group.
	So this is a group of parliamentarians in Britain who held a conference to demand reparations for slavery.
	Good luck.
	Yes.
	Of course, you all remember the gentleman who asked for 18 trillion in reparations.
	Who was it again?
	Talk about Lenny Henry.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	He was supposed to be a hero of successful integration, and he wants 18 trillion, which I suspect is four or five times the GDP of Britain, something along these lines.
	Good luck.
	So I don't understand where that figure came from, but I don't think logic is the point, as I'm going to be arguing here.
	I think, just out of the blue, I think he pulled that out of his backside.
	Ah, yes.
	Well, there's a bit of a lot of research done there.
	The conference started at 10 a.m.
	Nice, lazy start with nobody likes to get up very early.
	You had Bell Ribeiro Adi, who was an MP participating in it.
	You had...
	Debbie Flack, Quakers in Britain.
	Yes, the Quakers were very heavily involved in this.
	And it was actually held at the Quakers building in London.
	You had a professor of law, comma, pan-Africanist.
	I don't understand what's going on there.
	You had Jeremy Corbyn participating, of course.
	Diane Abbott, obviously, and a counselor from the Green Party, somebody else from the SNP, as you'd expect.
	And the sort of topics there, from display to dignity, mobilizing the diaspora to lay our ancestors to rest.
	Did they?
	Maybe I'm superseding this somehow, but did they speak about Dahomey in any of this anywhere or not?
	They didn't.
	I bet they didn't.
	They didn't speak about the slave king.
	They didn't speak about the slaving state.
	They didn't speak about the slave king of Dahomey.
	I'll bet they didn't.
	And the ritualistic festival where they slaughtered them.
	They didn't speak about human sacrifice.
	Wow.
	That's an oversight, isn't it?
	We should write to them.
	In a fairly major way.
	Wow.
	They are all descended.
	We are all, as you know, we in England are all descended from King Edward III, by virtue of the fact that there was this pronounced correlation until about 1800 between socio-economic status and completed fertility.
	And this is, of course, the same in sub-Saharan Africa, and these were as well polygamous societies, which makes this even more pronounced.
	And they all held slaves.
	So Diane Abbott is descended from slaveholders.
	So 25% of the current population of Mauritania are slaves, are slaves right now.
	So the idea that this is a sort of big historic, there's something like 50 million people enslaved in the world today.
	Many of them white.
	Many of them white and Eastern European women who are held in slavery as prostitutes.
	They're only focused on their answers.
	Their ancestors, not theirs.
	They're only focused on getting money from the British government.
	That is all.
	We must be guilty for the fact that some of our ancestors, not even all of them, I mean, I don't know, I mean, admittingly, my collateral ancestor was the governor of Barbados in 1700, so he was a bit involved.
	But in general, okay, they're all going to be descended from people that held slaves.
	Moreover, do we ever talk about the fact that until about a thousand years ago, there were no Bantu in southern Africa?
	Yes.
	None.
	Southern Africa was populated by Bushmen, by the Khoikhoi, Khoisan, and by what used to be called the Hottentot, by a peaceable kind of people.
	And then the Bantu went in, slaughtered them, took over their lands and enslaved them.
	But yet they do not have to have hereditary guilt for all this.
	No, because they're not white, you see.
	That's the fact that we have.
	And I think that it manipulates the fact that I don't know if it's guilt seems to be very powerful among Europeans in a way that perhaps is less so in some other cultures.
	It's a direct consequence of the Christian mind.
	Right, direct consequence of the so if you look across the world, it's only European culture that is guilt-based, whereas the rest of the world's culture is honor-based.
	And I would argue that that implies that it's pride-based, in a sense.
	So Europeans and Christians in general concern themselves with the wrongs that they have done rather than the speck in your eye.
	As a Christian, I meant to concern myself with the beam in my eye, not the speck in yours.
	Whereas the sort of more, I would argue, natural perspective is to be concerned with loss of faiths and loss of status because that immediately affects your genetic.
	Guilt is that there is a little thing inside, a little idea of yourself that you have that you haven't lived up to and you feel bad about quite yourself.
	And that's what we are very subject to.
	And all I can say in response to this is that the British were the first people to every society had slavery.
	Yes.
	The British were the first people to abolish slavery.
	So slavery is so terrible, and the British were the first people to abolish it while it was still endemic in Africa.
	But you still owe £18 trillion.
	You don't owe anything because you, according to Diane Abbott, did something which everybody else did.
	And my friend Lipton Matthews, who is Jamaican, look at the benefits that Jamaica has in terms of education, in terms of infrastructure, in terms of whatever, from having been, it still is, a British colony.
	Yes.
	In terms of even something like the invention of artificial fertilizer, which was a European thing, allowed the population of these places to grow.
	People wouldn't be alive today if it wasn't for these issues.
	So it's just being manipulated.
	I'm going to allow Diane Abbott to correct you, if you don't mind.
	I'm going to allow Diane Abbott.
	Oh, well, how?
	Why should we pay all this money?
	This was so long ago.
	This has nothing to do with that.
	But of course, it has to do with the British state in the era now.
	You cannot repeat often enough that the profits from slavery made many British institutions our banks, our universities, our churches.
	So I love the way, exactly, I was going to mention that.
	I love the way in which she transitions from it's the responsibility of the British government to our and that her community demands reparations, but it's ours as well.
	So if it's yours, then you're not owed anything.
	It's also fascinating she mentions the church because it was, of course, Christian ideology which even led us to abolish it.
	Fundamentally, they talk about that.
	Big-brained that isn't the flip that she wants to be both British.
	It's our.
	I'm British, I'm British, but I'm also not British.
	And then reparations.
	And then some of the titles there talk about the African diaspora.
	So you see on the agenda the perception that actually they aren't British, French, whatever.
	And then you see them asserting ours, ours, ours.
	And there is this divide.
	And when you say you must choose, the answer is, well, you're a racist.
	Well, I'm fine with that, but you do have to make a choice, kind of.
	Did they talk about the Barbary slave trade?
	They will never mention the Muslim slave trade and the number of Europeans enslaved by Muslims.
	Not the Slavics?
	If you look at a picture of the Ottomans, of the descendants of the Osman family, the Ottomans, they're all blonde, blue-haired.
	Hmm.
	And that's not the natural look of a Turk, shall I say?
	Sure.
	Yes, yes, I'm quite confident.
	I'm quite confident.
	And the reason for that is because they took so many white women as slaves for so long that they all ended up becoming blonde and very colourful.
	They came all the way from the carnival of Crimea to northern, literally Olu, northern Finland, where I live.
	Right.
	Because they were into the blonde-haired, blue-eyed, and took those women as slaves in the Khan of Crimea.
	And the conditions as well.
	Okay, if we have to pay back reparations to Diane Abbas so she can buy wigs and lose weight, whatever she wants to spend money.
	Then we need serious reparations from the people that lived on the southwest coast, the people that lived even in Iceland.
	They went far north and took slaves and held them in the most appalling conditions.
	In many cases, they would live their lives as galley slaves, excreting where they sat.
	If they worked in the royal court, they would not just castrate them because they would also literally cut off their penises and force them to use some kind of distraught.
	Yes, Catherine.
	Yes.
	The level of cruelty was unbelievable.
	I think there was a guy that was, was he French that was the prime minister of Algiers?
	He was a castrato there, so they could rise quite high.
	But yeah, that's what they would do.
	So we need reparations from the Middle East.
	It only goes one way.
	Because since this is a Christian society that is naturally vulnerable to guilt, it won't in any way work on a Muslim society.
	if you were to tell the Muslims, well, you guys took white people as slaves back in the day, the answer would be yes, proudly so.
	So you have to remember that this sort of...
	All you can say to this is that this is just manipulation by people that are using covert manipulative tactics in order to extract resources from the majority, from the population, and And we must not be manipulated.
	Yes.
	Summary Gibbs.
	And you want to listen to this gentleman here.
	And sorry, the opening of this is quite important.
	Let me just give you a view of it.
	The speaker here is Julius Pan-Africanist Garvey.
	And apparently he's the son of Marcus Garvey, who was important in the Jamaican independence movement.
	And let's listen to him for a second.
	Education is preparation for reparations.
	So let's start there.
	Education is preparation for reparations.
	Right.
	As in, we are sort of brainwashing ourselves into thinking that we deserve more of other people's money.
	That's to translate it.
	This year, we are very pleased to have Dr. Julius Garvey, who is here in the right place.
	Thank you for having me.
	Thank you for my time.
	You have carried out your duty very well.
	This is an excellent conference.
	I'm very pleased to be able to participate.
	My talk is basically building a just and prosperous society.
	Reparations.
	Reparations.
	So to build a just and prosperous society, you must have reparations, otherwise, you can't do it.
	And the question that I had, which was repeated by Cute Queen 8, is if slavery is what made the West great, well, the Africans practice slavery for much longer and continue to do so.
	So Mauritania, with 25, 20, 25% of its population as slaves, should be at the apex of human civilization because apparently that's what makes society great, slavery.
	Yeah.
	Well, and all this hellhole.
	Manifestly, I mean, forgive me if I'm wrong about this, but I'm not aware that, for example, Finland imported slaves.
	Yet Finland is one of the wealthiest countries in the West and one of the highest standards of living.
	They managed it without slaves.
	Yes.
	And Japan, I don't know how much slavery was going on there.
	There was.
	But certainly with Finland and other parts of Europe, there wasn't any.
	So that is complete nonsense to say that slavery may slavery may have contributed in that you have free labor, but in the end, it was quite costly to maintain it.
	And so we got rid of it.
	So this is obviously rubbish.
	No, completely.
	But I wanted to mention this guy, Julius Garvey, because he's the son of Marcus Garvey.
	And I wanted to read a little bit about the profile of Marcus Garvey.
	He wanted to make Africa into a single one-party state.
	He believed in a sort of pan-Africanism.
	Although he never visited the continent of Africa, he was committed to the back to Africa movement, arguing that part of the diaspora should migrate there.
	His ideas became increasingly popular.
	And he was partnered with the KKK because they agreed that there should be complete separation between blacks and whites.
	And so the KKK were of the idea that, yeah, pretty much we need total and complete separation.
	But I just wanted to mention something about why Africa isn't being economically prosperous.
	And use the example of this guy's father, Marcus Garvey.
	He built a company called NEGRO Factories Corporation.
	And it was part of the Universal NEGRO Improvement Association and African Communities League with a million dollars funded by black people.
	But then it went bankrupt.
	And the reason was because, and I quote, Garvey appointed inexperienced people to run organizations because he valued loyalty over competence.
	Now, what you see in every single African country is the exact same story.
	It's pretty much the exact same story.
	And it's the result of this being an extremely low-trust society where you can't have competent people running things because they might overthrow you.
	I would argue that this explains the situation of Africa today much more than what happened in the days of slavery.
	That would be my first argument.
	I would also argue that China, Vietnam, Japan, Korea, very famously, they all had massive slave populations, but they're not in the situation of sub-Saharan Africa.
	And they still ended up partnering with the West and with supposed neo-colonial powers and so on and so forth.
	But they didn't end up with the situation.
	And so when you want to assess a movement or what some kind of grievance group is saying, the first question you should ask yourself is: to what extent do they blame themselves for their own plight?
	Like, this seems to me like a pretty important question.
	And it's a very Christian question.
	This is what Christ tells us to do.
	Look at the beam in your own eye first.
	So when you see these kinds of groups just blaming everybody but themselves for whatever happens to them or whatever happened to them in the past, you've got to ask, well, you know, to what extent is some of it your fault?
	Other societies had slavery and they didn't do this badly.
	This is a video from the previous conference and this is by a guy.
	What are they wearing?
	Yeah, I know, I know, I know.
	Goodness me.
	I know.
	But this is a guy who became the creative director of, I think, either Shakespeare's Theatre or some kind of very major Royal Society Associated art group.
	And he's still saying, we want reparations, we want this, we want that.
	And sitting around in this are a bunch of MPs, Don Butler, Diane Abbott, Clive Lewis, Ribeiro Addy.
	I mean, if you become an MP in a country, you've made it.
	This is the highest echelon of political success.
	Yeah, but I mean, that's just another indictment on why foreigners shouldn't be allowed political office in the UK.
	It's so disgusting.
	Absolutely so disgusting.
	They just push for sectarianism.
	They're an in-group preference.
	All these things in my head that I don't say, and then he just says them.
	I dare say that I'm told, you know, keep it friendly, all this.
	And then I kind of transfer them into his brain via some kind of technipathy.
	It's extraordinary how this keeps happening.
	But no, they they are someone's put a very interesting point on here on one of the questions, which is that who sold them into slavery?
	And the answer is the chieftains.
	Yes.
	They were part of other tribes, Dahomey, as you say.
	Those tribes were defeated.
	They were taken as slaves by those other tribes, and then they were sold to the Americans, to the British, to whoever.
	And if they hadn't been sold to the Americans, the British, they may well have been sold to the Arabs.
	if that happened they would have had a much less pleasant time yes and probably wouldn't have had descendants today yeah there i mean there are tiny communities of blacks in the middle east and the way that they are treated is i find it quite abhorrent still you know um Like, Arabs are not shy about their racism.
	They wear it on their sleeves quite proudly.
	And so you have to ask yourselves, well, you know, in which society did blacks benefit the most?
	And one question to think about is: why is any black person in Western Europe going to be on average much richer than the average black person in sub-Saharan Africa?
	I mean, where do you have a better standard of living?
	Obviously, in the West.
	Why?
	And does that count towards reparations in some way?
	Does it have any economic value or financial value?
	So what they're saying is what would make sense is that they would go back to the poorest part of Africa with kind of a 17th, 18th century standard of living, even in Africa.
	And no plumbing, no electricity, no modern comforts, living in a heart, and then they get some reparations.
	No, that's not what they're saying.
	They've got to stay.
	They're going to stay.
	Oh, they get to stay.
	They get to stay.
	So you're saying they get to stay with all of the enormous material benefits of living in the West, and they just get money.
	It's called have your cake and eat it.
	Pretty much.
	Pretty much.
	And also, it wouldn't work because what I can imagine would happen is that a lot of them would get these reparations and would then fritter them away and very quickly they would.
	But that would be our fault, as well.
	That would then be our fault.
	Then they would say, oh, well, that was because you didn't teach us how to spend the money properly.
	You didn't educate us because education, as you know, needs reparation.
	You should decolonize education.
	You didn't decolonize education enough, so therefore we accidentally spent the money on all kinds of nonsense.
	So that would happen.
	So it's never-ending.
	It would be a never-ending.
	And then they want more reparations and they spend them.
	And it would be never-ending.
	And so, as I say, the only solution is stand up to racism.
	Look at that.
	How manipulative.
	Because I think.
	I also think, like, how if you did a cross-section of the ethnicities that are on benefits in the UK, is there a predominant element that are ethnically descended from individuals such as this?
	Surely that's a form of reparations.
	If your entire life has been funded by the state.
	Yeah, that's still.
	You really want to get into the nitty-gritty of it all.
	I mean, if you want to get into the nitty-gritty, you should also factor in crime.
	Yeah, well, yeah.
	Are we going to get reparations for that?
	Probably not.
	That's one question to ask.
	Also, if this country is so racist, why are you still here?
	Just leave.
	These are elementary logical issues that should not be addressed.
	We're in the modern era.
	The truth of the matter, Innate, is that the inequality we face globally stems directly from the legacies of enslavement and colonization.
	One of the things that stems directly from colonization is running water, plumbing, hospitals, schools, roads, basic state functions.
	Life expectancy, high.
	Life expectancy being much higher.
	Children surviving.
	Children surviving, etc., etc.
	Britain has yet to fully confront or make amends for these injustices.
	Like, how is ending slavery globally not making amends?
	One of the things they argued is they said that Lenny Henry said this.
	Yes.
	Is that if we have these reparations, it will help to end racism globally.
	And I was like, what?
	Why?
	How?
	Racism is inbuilt.
	If racism basically means ethnocentrism, which it does, ethnocentrism is something that is built into us.
	And there's numerous studies that indicate this.
	Yeah, in group preference.
	If you're genetically similar, if you cooperate with someone that's your genetic kin, that's indirectly passing on your genes.
	So there will always be racism.
	And even if we create new races, which we are doing, such as the Happers in America or whatever, then you just get, they marry each other and you just get essentially a new form of what they want to call racism.
	That's absolutely ridiculous.
	And then he says, oh, the reason why black people are underrepresented in the UK today, even putting aside the fact that they've only been here since 1948, in various I thought diversity built Britain.
	What are you saying?
	I'm saying nothing.
	Be careful.
	That's not spicy tape.
	I did go to a part of Colchester a few years ago, which, of course, the oldest town in Britain.
	I did see some black people.
	Whoa.
	So I wonder if they're descended from these black people that were there before the time of the Romans and that they just kind of hid away because of systemic racism for thousands for a thousand years or so and now have re-emerged when the environment was more propitious.
	They were still educated.
	But they were mine.
	But there are reasons why there are socioeconomic differences and slavery is nothing to do with it.
	Terrible conditions are.
	We have people in this country that are recently descended from people that lived in the most terrible conditions, right?
	That worked, worked in factories, that lived in one-room little houses without outside terrible conditions.
	And those people, if by genetic chance, end up having the qualities that cause you to have socioeconomic status, they move up.
	And we know this, and you can trace your family tree back, and you can see that.
	A lot of people in this country that are reasonably successful will have ancestors like that because of these changes.
	So it's absurd.
	It's a complete absurdity, but I want to mention a couple of the organizations that are involved in this.
	So these are some of the organizations that are involved.
	There is obviously the arm of the state known as Stand Up to Racism.
	And they are signing letters against the far right while demanding that the far right pays them reparations.
	Okay, funny.
	They're attacking Tommy Robinson for being pro-Israel, whatever you think about that.
	I honestly don't care.
	Here they are protesting in support of the illegal migrants, essentially, after there were a bunch of incidents of rape, really, and attacking Robert Jenrick for noticing that Hansworth is not really integrated.
	Then there is an organization called Every Journey starts with a single step.
	Apparently, that's an African proverb, whatever.
	And it's taken from Swahili.
	And you look at these guys and you're like, come on.
	Really?
	I think they're culturally appropriate in our clothing there.
	Maybe.
	You get another organization called Repair Campaign, where they're essentially bragging about the Haitian Revolution.
	How did that go?
	Oh, yeah.
	They murdered all the white people.
	Well done.
	And then Haiti became the worst country in the world.
	Yeah, I mean, there you go, right?
	Like, come on.
	And if they don't admit this kind of basic truth, what kind of truth can you expect from them?
	You know, we've got some islands.
	We could probably just give them an island.
	See how they go.
	Yeah.
	We can't.
	You tell this has to be YouTube friendly.
	I mean, we can't even discuss some of the things.
	I know.
	I know.
	He can, but somehow.
	But I can't.
	You can use my guests.
	Extinction Rebellion, International Solidarity.
	What?
	Extinction Rebellion.
	What have they got to do with this?
	Well, because this is all gay race communism.
	Oh, yeah, of course.
	Yeah.
	This is the sort of long and short of it.
	Is the extinction part what they want to do to white people?
	Good question.
	That guy there, he's called Lee Jasper, isn't he?
	The guy that's second from the right.
	Yes.
	Yeah, yeah.
	He used to be quite prominent, anti-British campaigner.
	And they've organized something, Operation Black Vote.
	Try organizing something called Operation White Vote.
	See how far you get.
	Or just Operation Christian Vote.
	See how that goes for you.
	See how that goes for you.
	That's happening now with Gamanzilla.
	Yeah, well, that's true.
	That's why they're so afraid of it.
	And then there are these guys who are pretty much openly communists, more or less calling for the abolition of private property.
	So it's just sort of, you know, rather obviously gay race communism.
	People who are failures, or who, more interestingly, are not failures, but identify as failures.
	Yes.
	They have this neurotic belief that they are persecuted.
	Yes.
	Or that they would be higher up were it not for these bad forces.
	And it is those people that have that kind of neuroticism.
	Neuroticism is associated with Machiavellianism.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	If you see the world as a place where you're disempowered and as a place that's frightening and unpleasant, then you want to take power over it.
	But you fear a fair fight.
	You can't do so overtly because you fear losing that fight.
	So you do so in this manipulative, covert way, pulling on the heartstrings of naive people, using manipulative terms that are elastic, like anti-racist or racist.
	And then people take you seriously because they don't want to feel bad about themselves or feel that they're of low status or whatever.
	And we get to this point where we even entertain this nonsense.
	It's insane.
	And remember, the foreign secretary or the former foreign secretary used to be a backer of this stuff, David Lamy.
	So let's not forget that kind of detail.
	But then there's the law firm that sort of tried to capitalize on this, and I don't have a link for them, I'm afraid.
	They're called Ley Day.
	They sued Britain on behalf of the Mau Mau, got 20 million pounds, press around six or seven million pounds in their own fees.
	They sued Britain on behalf of the Mau Mau.
	Yes.
	Sorry, did I hear you right?
	Yes, you did.
	Have you seen the film Adios Africa?
	No, I haven't.
	Africa Adio.
	Where it looks at the decolonization of Africa and it looks at the things the Mau Mau did.
	Yep.
	I think it was 100 British people, including women and children, who they just massacred and often in the most brutal possible way.
	Yes, yes, yes, yes.
	I fully believe that this is sort of an old thing there.
	One of the most serious allegations is that Ley Day did not pay out compensation in full and failed to disclose its list of victims because some names were fabricated.
	So apparently, Ley Day is accused of.
	It hasn't been proven.
	But the Kenyans claim that after they sued on behalf of the Mau Mau and Leyday represented them, Ley Day made away with some of their money.
	They also sued BP because BP used the militia to protect their own assets in Colombia from other militias.
	They sued the British government for Iraq over torture allegations, got some people £3 million, but then they ended up again being accused of misconduct.
	They got cleared from it, it should be said, but it came close.
	And one of the allegations was that one of the solicitors of Ley Day destroyed a key document at the center of the inquiry into alleged torture, suggesting that the Iraqis that were detained by British forces were members of an armed insurgency rather than innocent civilians.
	So the allegation here is a quite serious one.
	Sued Britain over emissions for cars, sued Britain for unexploded munitions.
	So basically horrific, greedy lawyers partnering with communists, traitors and others, demanding more and more money.
	And as I've sort of mentioned in the segment, slavery was always normal.
	It happened throughout the war.
	There was only the British who ever ended it.
	And the lack of development in Africa isn't because of colonialism and isn't because of slavery.
	It's because of factors within Africans' own control.
	Or it's because of the behaviors of Africans.
	Everybody's responsible for their own country.
	And if you insist on reparations, what do you call welfare and foreign aid?
	And if it goes one way in terms of reparations for slavery, what about reparations for crime?
	Like, if you're going to have this conversation, you're going to force people to have other conversations with you.
	You can't allow to do that.
	Yeah, and I mean, what they're assuming is that there is still some goodwill here.
	But really, there isn't.
	There is zero goodwill here anymore.
	They are destroying the goodwill that was there by pushing by pushing, which was there.
	By pushing people so far.
	Because that's the problem.
	They can't help themselves.
	People like Diane Abbott are such bitter, nasty people that deep down hate themselves and thus become narcissistic, like she is.
	That they can't help that.
	They will always be so bitter that they can't know.
	They don't have the impulse control almost to be able to draw the line and say, hang on, we might be pushing people a bit far here.
	It's like almost like an abusive relationship.
	Some girl that has borderline personality or something.
	She doesn't understand that eventually she'll push the chap so far that he'll just say, I'm ending this.
	Yes.
	And I can't.
	Yeah, there's some positive sides to this, maybe.
	I don't know.
	But this is too much.
	And that's what they're doing.
	And that's what Lenny Henry is doing.
	It's weird, actually.
	I've been with the side.
	I remember when I was about seven, our teacher, Mrs. Rusby, asked us to draw our favourite character from Telly.
	And then she set up this thing that looked like a telly and scrolled it around so that it looked like things were moving.
	And everyone, there was a big cue for the pink pencils.
	Right, because everyone was, but I didn't need a brown pencil.
	I didn't have to wait.
	Because the person that I drew was Lenny Henry.
	Absolutely right.
	And I thought he was great.
	And he was really funny.
	And there was Lenny Henry's show.
	And there were various other things he did.
	There was genuine goodwill.
	And that goodwill is gone.
	Imagine how.
	In the interest of time, let me get through a couple of the comments because we have another segment that I really want your views on.
	Ooh.
	Chris Hage says, Lotus Eaters Schill.
	If you are not a member, join just for the Friday Lads Hour.
	Dan made Monopoly into the perfect reflection of modern UK.
	Yes.
	Firaz got radical and Bo went from cocky to a broken man.
	Very funny.
	It was absolutely hilarious.
	I'm trying to get Samson to put me on for a.
	If you haven't watched it, you should absolutely watch it.
	It was just too much.
	Dan did an incredible job capturing the evil randomness of the UK economy.
	JM Denton says, Don't worry about reparations.
	The Middle East will help us pay.
	There is no reason they'd only ask us to pay for African slavery, right?
	Yeah, good luck with that.
	Sigil Stone says, Well, apart from medicine, irrigation, health, roads, cheese, and education, baths, and soccer, what have the British ever done for us?
	And a litany of other things.
	Yep.
	Yep, yep.
	Steam engine.
	Anyone want to go with that?
	Industrial Revolution.
	Tiffany says, Japan had an official slave system from the Yamato period.
	Yep.
	Somebody's calling you called Avon.
	Hello.
	The Hapsification.
	The Industrial Revolution is what made the West great and built the West.
	I would argue that it was ahead even before that, but yes.
	Is it just Western?
	And this helped Britain in its fight to end the slave trade.
	Absolutely.
	Finland had slaves.
	Vikings took slaves.
	Idiot.
	Vikings took slaves.
	I didn't quite what you're saying.
	Are you saying that Finland had slaves because the Vikings took slaves?
	The Vikings are from Norway.
	Yeah.
	So let's not call each other names.
	Sigril Stone says, so how about this?
	We'll pay them reparations, but they have to go back to where we stole them from.
	Secretly, our NGOs in Africa will still be there to steal our money back.
	Well, that is very much what the NGOs steal.
	Habsification, again, they will never ask the Oyo Empire, Kingdom of Daume, Empire of Mali, Kingdom of Congo, Kingdom of Benin, Kingdom of Zanjiba, just Britain.
	Yep.
	Benin is modern-day Dahomey.
	They're one and the same.
	But okay.
	Just a small.
	Pup-pu-pup.
	Yeah.
	And then the last comment.
	What has always bugged me the most is when I read about Hangout Daesh independence.
	They asked Britain for reparations for what Pakistan did to them.
	Not sure I got that, but okay.
	Anyway, moving on to the next segment here.
	The left in the United States have really lost their minds, and Trump needs to do something about it.
	Over the weekend, we had the No Kings protests in the USA.
	Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
	Are you saying we wasn't kings?
	I yeah.
	Yeah, I'm not going down.
	I'm not going there.
	Thanks for that.
	Thanks for that.
	But the left is clearly expressing a bit of murderous range.
	So this guy wants Trump shot, essentially, and demands better snipers.
	This gentleman here says that ICE agents need to get shot and wiped out.
	A madness, isn't it?
	It's absolutely madness how absolutely.
	Are they allowed to incite murder like that in America?
	No.
	Like outright incitement to murder.
	I think that crosses a line.
	So it's really up to the feds to decide.
	It's not free speech.
	They're just so repugnant, aren't they?
	They're just so nasty.
	I'm sure you're going to like them more and more.
	Watch this dance.
	Oh.
	Yeah, there is name.
	There is no one.
	I'd like to concentrate on the one with the yellow shirt and the black thing under it, who is a woman who has shaved her hair like that.
	Now, let's think about this.
	What are you doing when you do that?
	Basically, it's kind of like aposemitism.
	It's making yourself ugly and startling in order to say to people, I am dangerous, stay away.
	Right.
	Sit like a wasp, but it's not a wasp, it's a hoverfly.
	Yes.
	It's not dangerous.
	She just wants people to think she is because she's neurotic and she fears people.
	Secondly, why would you do that?
	Why would you make yourself ugly like that?
	It's like expressing externally how you feel about yourself on the university.
	And thirdly, it's kind of like what I was saying earlier: borderline personality.
	They self-harm to draw attention to themselves and to feel in control of themselves.
	It crosses over with Narcissism quite strongly.
	But if you feel that you're ghastly, then one of the ways that you deal with it is by controlling the ghastliness, by saying, I'm ghastly because I want to be ghastly.
	Yes.
	Not because I am ghastly.
	And that's what she's done.
	She's shaved her hair off.
	It's self-harming.
	It's drawing attention to herself.
	And it's a way of controlling her negative emotions about herself.
	And so that's exactly what I'd expect.
	You're fine though, don't you?
	The physiognomy of someone.
	Well, not just physiognomy, but you can tell a lot about someone with how they look.
	You know exactly what that woman thinks.
	My brilliant terms.
	I can tell you.
	There you go.
	Plug it.
	My book, How to Judge People by What They Look Like, goes into some detail on this aka physiognomy change.
	And you have another book that just came out.
	Oh, no, that's just come out.
	Yes, that's called Genius Under House Arrest, The Cancellation of James Thompson, which looks James Thompson's colleague of mine.
	Again, oh, we're live!
	Genius Under House Arrest, The Cancellation of James Watson.
	And that looks, although James Thompson is very clever as well.
	He's not under house arrest.
	And that looks at how we've become anti-genius because of the way in which feminine values of equality and harmful and taken over with society and Trump, even a belief in truth.
	It's a really good book.
	I just read it.
	It's really excellent.
	I recommend you read it.
	But the No Kings riot really didn't go very peacefully.
	The media claimed that it was mostly peaceful.
	As usual, and as usual, Seattle and Oregon were the centers of violence.
	They got pepper sprayed as they were attacking ICE.
	They're doing their best to basically make ICE unable to operate, thereby forcing the state to accept the open borders of Biden and their consequences.
	And there is a lesson here for the West because when the time for deportations comes, these dysgenic leftists will pretty much do the same exact thing all over Europe.
	Yeah.
	And I would argue that Britain, Spain, France are especially vulnerable because of the power of the lunatic left in those countries.
	So we're going to see more of these scenes here.
	And this was what makes it so important for Trump to resolve the issue and to actually force these guys to back down.
	Here, this guy is walking around saying, Would you like to kill Nazis with me?
	Where are the Nazis?
	I don't know.
	No, that's interesting because they term their enemies Nazis, which their enemies are not.
	Yes.
	And then argue that you should kill Nazis.
	Yes.
	So it's in a very covert and manipulative way.
	They're basically via that process, and there's plausible deniability, saying, kill these people.
	Oh, yeah.
	Yes, yes, absolutely.
	People.
	Absolutely.
	Absolutely.
	It's inciting them.
	I mean, this guy sort of puts out a video about how it actually operates from a communist directive in 1943.
	And basically, the communists were, since the 40s, saying that the way to label anybody who disagrees with you is to call them a Nazi or a fascist.
	And as you keep on repeating this allegation, it becomes entrenched in the mindset of the populace so that violence becomes more palatable against these kinds of groups.
	So this isn't an original tactic.
	It's amazing, though, isn't it?
	Because, I mean, that's gone now.
	No one cares about being called a Nazi.
	No one cares about being called a fascist.
	It's the same as no one cares about being called racist.
	It's done.
	It's played up.
	You've had your fill.
	Yes.
	Those vouchers are all used up now.
	Pretty much.
	All the guilt's gone.
	It's fascinating that it managed to take a hold for as long as that.
	Yes.
	Absolutely amazing.
	Absolutely amazing.
	Incredible stuff.
	And the problem with.
	Sorry, just to counter it.
	Again, counter myself, not counter myself, but to add a little bit more.
	We're so hung up on this mid, you know, the mid-20th century.
	Yeah, mid-20th century nonsense and the constant banging on about it.
	It's just, I just, yeah, sorry, I can't.
	I mean, it is very much the foundational religion of these great things.
	Crazy today.
	It's portrayed as, and it kind of was a turning point in history.
	Yes.
	And there's an extent to which there's before, for very, it's been politicized, obviously, but there's before and after World War II.
	As you say, it's foundational.
	World War II and various things about it are the foundational mythology of the post-World War religion.
	And you can't have a rational debate even over something like Churchill.
	Yes.
	Try doing it.
	What AA calls the boomer truth regime is very, very strong.
	People that are otherwise sensible find it difficult to cope with the idea that Churchill was obviously a psychopath who played his part in bringing about World War II.
	And this is true.
	And he was funded by people that wanted a war.
	Yes.
	But we can't talk about that.
	I think that what we must talk about is a couple of things.
	One of them is that it was the communists who won World War II and won also in the West.
	And that we have been in the West living under some kind of idealization of communism for quite some time.
	And now it's becoming more and more open.
	And the communists are increasingly allying themselves with the Islamists who will A, destroy the West in its entirety, and B, turn on the leftists and murder every last one of them when they get power.
	Are you proposing or stating that Islamists don't play nice communists?
	Do they maybe betray them?
	Is there any murder all of them?
	Yes.
	Well, I don't think that's a good question.
	Someone should tell Zach Plansky that.
	Well, there's a lot of things to be.
	Someone should tell a gay Jewish man what Islamists do.
	I think we're bleeping that out, yes.
	He's a gay Jewish man.
	Yes.
	These are temporary coalitions.
	And when the coalitions are, for example, we have weird coalitions among conservatives at the moment.
	Yeah, coalitions of traditionalist conservatives and feminists who are trans-exclusionary.
	Yes.
	And that coalition is unstable.
	Yes.
	And eventually that coalition will come apart.
	And it's the same on the left.
	You have a coalition at the moment between the communists, the white, the self-hating whites, as it were.
	Yes.
	And woke, including homosexuality, transsexuality, and Islam, which strongly condemns those people.
	And in one of the sort of manuals of the Muslim Brotherhood.
	Not loud.
	In one of the manuals of the Muslim Brotherhood, they explained clearly that they want to ally with forces that would help them destroy the West from within.
	And they were speaking about that since 1991, I believe.
	And they'd had that idea for even longer.
	So this is not new at all.
	But I wanted to get back to this issue of Trump and dealing with these groups.
	What's happening is that these guys get arrested, but then they get released.
	And what do they do the minute they get released?
	They go back to conducting new attacks.
	So it's not just that they are getting more violent.
	It's that the state really isn't doing anywhere near enough.
	I don't know if it's a kink.
	I don't know if it's...
	I don't know what's going on there, but I thought that was fascinating.
	They're furries.
	Yeah.
	If that's what they are.
	Well, fairies carrying rocks to use them to attack ice.
	Amazing.
	And the political leadership, they ask Jerry Nadler, do you condemn attacks on ICE agents?
	And he says, what attacks?
	Amazing.
	This comes a couple of weeks after they had snipers shooting into an ICE facility and accidentally killing the migrants, but that's a different story.
	But they deny that this is happening.
	Amazing.
	Pelosi is encouraging this.
	What's his name?
	Chuck Schumer is encouraging this.
	And you see this fatty here.
	I know they're opinion.
	You ever heard of Osanic, you fat ass?
	And she's sort of bragging about the Charlie Kirk murder.
	And it turns out it's a school teacher.
	Ha!
	Well, that's hard as surprising as academia is.
	I mean, academia and NGOs are really full of freaking psychopaths.
	and the democrats aren't doing anything to condemn this they are just sort of this it's funny isn't it Because they're next on the chopping block, right?
	they don't realise that.
	Because that was part of, I think it was Oregon, I think it was Portland, Oregon, because it was the mayor, wasn't it, who came out and was like, how do you do, fellow kids?
	And then they were like, no, we're going to burn your house down actually.
	Pretty much.
	Yes.
	It's like, you're next on this block.
	Like, you need to get a handle on this.
	They don't want to stop.
	They don't want to.
	They absolutely don't want to.
	They want to keep on denying it and keep on testing Trump and provoking Trump.
	And I looked at some of the stuff that Mike Shelby has been saying.
	I'm hoping to invite him for a realpolitic to have a chat with him.
	What they're trying to organize, it seems, through these protests, is some kind of color revolution.
	It seems that over the No Kings protests, they managed to get around 3 million people mobilized, which is quite substantial.
	That's quite a lot.
	Which is sort of 1% of the American population or thereabouts, which is a very substantial number.
	And they are trying to register them for elections, but when they register them, they get their email addresses.
	And then they use them to both mobilize for elections, mobilize for getting other people to come out and vote, but mobilize them for further protests and maintain a very high level of pressure against Trump.
	And This is getting to a point where they're cooperating with Mexican cartels to get weapons.
	Wow, okay.
	Yeah.
	And so, with Trump working on a couple of things, he's working on doing a lot of redistricting in the middle of an election cycle.
	Part of it by getting the Civil Rights Act out of redistricting so that race isn't a factor in drawing electoral districts for the House of Representatives.
	When that happens, the Democrats could lose 10, 12, 20 seats.
	And they're doing some redistricting within Republican states.
	And that's going to cost the Democrats a few seats, meaning that they can never control the House again as easily.
	Plus, the next census is going to exclude illegal aliens, meaning that the representation of northeastern states and western states is going to decline with the representation of illegal aliens on the census and then draw up the electoral system.
	That's incredible.
	Yes.
	So when they're counted, it boosts the number of house seats they get and it boosts the number of electors in the electoral college that they get.
	So for the Democrats, keeping the illegal aliens and counting the illegal aliens in the census is important.
	And so Trump is doing these three things.
	And these guys are preparing a color revolution and are getting weapons from the Mexican cartels.
	Meaning that when the midterms happen in 2026, in November 2026, the Democrats are going to come ready with an army that they know is mobilized, with the Antifa and Trantifa and other leftist goons, and with a narrative that says that the loss of the House in 2026 was not legitimate.
	And therefore, they need to escalate into violence, which is why the political leadership of the Democrats is not in any way condemning the violence to get to a position where they run into the 2028 elections and they can really pull off some serious escalation.
	So Trump needs to get on top of this, both in terms of targeting the cartels, but also in terms of not just listing Antifa as a terrorist organization, which he's already done, but going after the financiers.
	And if you dig deep enough into the financiers, you're going to find not just Soros, you're going to find, I will bet, Mexican cartel money involved as well.
	Highly likely.
	And if you look at the way in which, for example, Act Blue was able to funnel donations from people's accounts without them knowing it, without them being actually their accounts.
	So they did this thing where, Ed, you're a 90-year-old, whatever, living in your home, and then suddenly there are donations going to the Democratic Party in your name, and you don't know anything about them.
	So they're not taking money from your account, but the donations are being registered to you.
	Right, right.
	So they did that with a lot of elderly citizens behind their backs.
	And to me, this looks very clearly that this is money being laundered from the cartels.
	And now they're arming Antifa.
	It's accelerationism.
	I mean, there's a level on which I, you know, this book woke eugenics on this.
	It's like, I think wokeness is an evolutionary adaptation, as you know, whereby you induce people who are genetically sickly to basically resign from the gene pool.
	Right.
	And you collapse society, collapse complex societies such as the people that are sickly can't survive.
	And that's what the woke are doing.
	The woke are there to kill off the woke and the semi-woke.
	And also to cause people that are right-wing and conservative to bond with each other and to create separate communities that weather the storm.
	Even something like this, alternative media that's conservative.
	20 years ago, there was nothing like this.
	There was just a few people meeting above pubs.
	And now we're able to create this whole community.
	And that will, because we feel rightly, we feel persecuted and under attack, we are all kind of Christian fundamentalists now.
	Yes.
	In the sense that we are in the world, the woke world, but not of the woke world.
	And that kind of behavior is only going to further that sense of in-group bonding, further polarization, further the process of breaking away.
	So what you're saying is we may eventually be rid of these people.
	Oh, yeah, eventually.
	Yeah, but I think, but I think it will be in the context of socioeconomic decline.
	Yeah.
	And people will break away into sort of little, a bit like in South Africa.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I don't see it getting better before it gets considerably worse.
	And this stuff is really dangerous.
	It's obvious that they're preparing for a big escalation.
	And it's very obvious that the same exact playbook will be used anywhere in Europe that tries to fix the problems of legal and illegal immigration.
	It's also obvious that if these problems with legal and illegal immigration don't get fixed, then the scenarios are extremely negative for the survival of the West.
	So there's an existential fight with these guys, and they see it as existential because their power is peaked.
	Their ability to influence people through words has peaked because everything that they say is completely discredited.
	Reparations, this Islam is tolerant, blah, blah, blah.
	Look, guys, none of this is true.
	We all know that none of this is true.
	I think they also see it as existential because if you look at the psychology of these kinds of people, right?
	So narcissism, custody B disorders, or whatever.
	This phrase that they use, I feel literally unsafe.
	Yes.
	That is true.
	If you're crazy like that, your heart starts to beat.
	You really feel that you might die.
	Yes.
	Or that you might do something to yourself that you can't control and kill yourself.
	That's how they feel.
	So I think that's genuine.
	But they often play that out.
	So you're right.
	That is genuine, main thing.
	So yeah.
	You know, one of the commentators says, Dreadnought Log.
	It bugs me when people say that Trump doesn't do anything when he's constantly being harassed by lawsuits, internal sabotage, and 50 fires around him.
	Look, I agree completely.
	I agree completely.
	But these are militant organizations that are mobilizing for a big escalation.
	Yeah, I mean, and so the priority must be domestic rather than Israel, Venezuela, Mexico, etc.
	Mexico just sort of seal it off as much as you can.
	Obviously, that's very important.
	But the domestic pressure is huge, and that must be factored into your thinking.
	Paviom P says, have you seen this?
	Have you heard about this?
	There's an up-and-coming YouTube channel called State of Politics.
	Very based.
	I've never heard of it.
	What is this?
	Check it out, guys.
	Basically, me and Bo we started a little project just together to record our conversations on things.
	And that's it.
	It's just a bit of fun for me and Bo, but you guys seem to like it.
	Do go and check it out, please.
	I think you will enjoy it.
	Please do.
	Citral Stone 17, they can't dig into the finance series of Antifa because the Epstein list doesn't exist, and they're our greatest ally.
	Yes.
	Tiffany says Finland did play a considerable role in the history of slavery as a source of slaves.
	Okay, that's what I said.
	That's exactly what was said.
	Let's see some of the comments from the website.
	Do you want to read some of yours?
	Yes.
	Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.
	So, what have we got?
	Sophie Liv says, I found it a little fascinating that in Islamic societies, the burden of SA always falls on the woman, while in Western feminist countries, the burden is always on the man.
	Both just seem incapable of looking at things from a case-by-case basis.
	Yeah, well, group thinking.
	Very dangerously based, yes.
	Oh, what on earth is going on?
	Can you stop?
	Good night.
	Sims in.
	I need to look at the things.
	There we go.
	All right.
	Thank you very much.
	Dutton is right.
	Women would much rather share a single high-value male.
	Tinder is the prime example of harems forming around the top 2% of men.
	Not healthy for society.
	Yes, buddy.
	We know.
	If we don't nip Islam in the bud, the only solution that I see is something like Reconquista.
	And that has its own horde of horrors.
	Yeah, absolutely, mate.
	Absolutely.
	Nothing will ever satisfy them.
	From Ed Dutton eating red mutton shopping in Sultan for some chocolate buttons.
	More slaves were traded in the Arab slave trade than in the Atlantic slave trade.
	True, and it lasted for much longer.
	Also true.
	Yet no Middle Eastern country has apologized for this because it's an honor-based, not shame-based, not guilt-based culture.
	And they're mostly proud of their conquests.
	It is only through our weakness that these vultures think that they can get resources from us.
	Look, it's not because of your weakness.
	It's because you still have a Christian-formed mind without thinking about Christian natural law and Christian theology properly.
	That's what makes you weak.
	I mean, Paul Newbar says, reparations is giving all of them a one-way ticket.
	Yes.
	Based.
	Binary surfer, pay the reparations, hear me out, negotiate it down, and then pay it on condition of deport all diversity.
	I'm diverse, and I agree with that message.
	Russian Garbage Human says, after accounting for a billion stolen bikes and mobile phones, I'm not going there.
	Sophie, live again.
	It is completely worth noticing that these are all old boomers who haven't realized that the hippie age is long over and they are old.
	Yeah, that dance was disgusting.
	You're absolutely right, Sophie.
	Joe Schmoe, while reprehensible, calling for illegal acts against federal agents is definitely free speech in America.
	Oh, wow.
	Calling for violence against...
	I didn't think you were allowed to do the book.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Ed Mutton eating red Dutton eating red mutton again.
	The closest thing to kings in America are the judges who are unelected, hold the positions of power for decades, and decide willy-nilly that upholding the law is actually illegal.
	Absolutely.
	They invent new rights, they invent new ideas.
	Judges in America are elected.
	Some of them are, but the federal judges are appointed.
	And it's a very complicated system when it comes to the judiciary.
	But a huge number of them are not, in fact, elected.
	Not that elected judges is an absolutely great idea.
	That comes with its own problems.
	But yeah.
	You want to show us, Samson, some of the video comments, please?
	The Robert Heinlein book, Farnham's Freehold, is about a family who got thrown forward in time into a society where blacks enslaved whites.
	I think such a society is one many Democrats dream of.
	No responsibilities and everything taken care of by your masters.
	Amazing.
	It's a great robot, and that's a great point.
	That's exactly what the Democrats dream of.
	Your feet of engineering.
	Very cool robot.
	Very cool robot.
	So here I am for my union convention here in the village of Lake Placid, New York.
	this is actually mirror lake Yeah, that part of upstate New York is absolutely gorgeous.
	Because he's just done this.
	Say again?
	He's just sent this now.
	Well, a couple of days ago, or at some point, yes, in the show.
	Yes, we get people sending us video comments from America.
	So it's like 8 o'clock in the morning where they are.
	I don't think he's sent it just at this moment.
	He could be watching us live.
	He could not be watching us live.
	He always sends us very nice video comments.
	It's not necessarily that it's on the day that he sent this over breakfast.
	No, that's not necessarily our case.
	Yes.
	Compelling as your critiques of the UK government's immigration policies are, I can't help but notice that the same sort of arguments about the English claim over their ancestral homeland are the exact same arguments used to attack the legitimacy of colonial English nations like Australia.
	Therefore, we often are forced to put forward an affirmative claim for Western culture, not just relying on an appeal to traditions.
	I'm curious as to what your response is to these people using your own arguments against us.
	I'm not sure I fully got the gist of it.
	I didn't get the gist of that.
	I didn't also get the gist of it.
	So all three of us are stumped somewhat.
	What was that?
	Our response to them using our own arguments against us.
	What argument of tradition?
	What argument does he mean?
	No, the argument of having a claim to the mutation.
	Yeah, so the point is that he's making, sorry, is that in Australia, the arguments from the left is this isn't your ancestral homeland.
	Right?
	And so what is our response to them using that as the argument?
	And that's our argument for our claim to this land, basically.
	Oh, okay.
	Well, I mean, your argument would be...
	I guess the response would be, what is it now?
	And, I mean, you could...
	Not just that.
	If the Aborigines had built anything, you might have a point.
	But talking about a Stone Age society that built absolutely nothing.
	Also, how far do you go back?
	New Zealanders.
	The argument is just, why do we even have to have these moral issues?
	We want it.
	We took it.
	Take the L. We control it.
	Take the L. Take the loss.
	And let's fight and may the best man win.
	Yeah.
	Which is exactly where it's going in Europe, which is exactly where things are going in Europe, which is exactly the Muslim attitude in Europe, which I think is a little more honest.
	But I think the objective reality that nothing was built there also matters.
	How far back do you want to go?
	I guess is the argument, isn't it?
	I mean, New Zealanders.
	I mean, they weren't ever for a great deal of time either.
	The English have been in England longer than the Maori have been in New Zealand.
	Yes.
	Exactly.
	So take the L. So I'm perfectly happy to accept it.
	Fine.
	I'm fine.
	Fine.
	The Maori are indigenous to New Zealand.
	Ergo, the English are indigenous to England because they've been there longer than the Maori.
	And we put the Australians there, so you win because we win.
	I mean, and indeed, the Greenlandic have been in Greenland for less time.
	I mean, the Norse got there first, right?
	And then died out.
	It was an empty island.
	So I'm perfect.
	And they are an indigenous people.
	So I'm perfectly happy.
	There you go.
	Any more comments, Samson?
	Nope.
	All right.
	Well, that is all the time that we have.
	Thank you very much for joining us.
	I will see you in another half hour for a live episode of Real Politic.

▲