The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1215

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 24, 2025 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:30:01

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1215

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to Podcast of the Lotus Eaters episode 1215 on this the 24th of July.
	I'm joined by Carl.
	Hello.
	Hello.
	And today in a stunning example to the younger lads in the office, neither of us have managed to write a description.
	Okay, well we're going to be talking about the police conference at Epping.
	Okay, then I'll do one about a dad who's had enough.
	And I just really hate Pedro Pascal.
	Oh, enough.
	And so I thought I'd have a bit of a rant about him later on.
	So good.
	Is this parrot going to land on me?
	Am I safe?
	Yes, you're safe.
	All right, okay, fine.
	I'll ignore it then.
	The parrot's in a very bad mood for me.
	It's very attached to my mum, and I'm looking forward to it while my parents take my kids on holiday for me.
	And so I've got to look after the parrot.
	The parrot's normally fine with me when I'm like, you know, at their house over Christmas or something, right?
	They'll come and sip my shoulder.
	But because she's not there, it's grumpy and missing her.
	And so it sits on its cage with its back to me and occasionally looks over its shoulder to like give me the eye.
	And I'm like, well, you can come over if you want.
	It'll just turn away.
	And it's like, all right, sorry, you're so miserable.
	Yeah.
	So it's currently at home at the moment.
	Anyway, right.
	Yes, by all means.
	So you've probably been following all of the recent hoo-ha around Epping, the migrant hotel, a rapey migrant, and the establishment response.
	Now, what's interesting is how quiet the Labour government has been on this.
	Have you noticed that?
	It is a fair point, actually, because last time they were fire and brimstone when this stuff happened.
	Keir Starmer, I didn't even get the article because Keir Stammer made one statement that was just like, well, obviously violence is unacceptable.
	And that's well, yeah, duh.
	But that's basically the sum total of what his entire story is.
	Exactly.
	Yes.
	You can see that he's learned his lesson on this, right?
	He's, everything's bad, but that's it.
	That's all he said.
	And he's essentially kicked the can then down to the local authority saying, no, this is your problem.
	And so the police chief has had to come out and make a statement.
	Now, this actually was quite a good statement.
	The statement itself was generally focused.
	I'm not going to play it because it's 20 minutes long.
	But he doesn't call people far right in it.
	And what he does, yeah, I know.
	I literally tweeted out, right, we need a bingo card.
	And everyone's like, oh, yeah, it's going to be far-right, fascist, racist.
	doesn't say any of those things and actually does quite a good job of making himself a If it's their concern.
	Okay, I have doubts on that.
	Right?
	Well, hey, I agree with you, right?
	And this is why I've called this segment The Lying About Epping.
	Because the lie isn't actually in the words that he's using.
	The lie is in the framing that he presents and the things he doesn't say.
	But he points out that, you know, he's not there to make political judgments.
	He is, in fact, the police force are meant to be politically neutral.
	And they are the servants of the people of Epping.
	They are there to uphold the law as it's written and not as they'd want it to be written.
	So it kind of nudged, say, yeah, well, you know.
	And this is quite a solid framing, actually.
	And it didn't annoy everyone, because everyone was...
	It seems to me that he has basically two choices, which is to either repudiate the rioters and the protesters and say, yep, nope, you're far right and we're here to protect migrant lives, or capitulate entirely and put the establishment, the regime, in a position where they are essentially morally illegitimate.
	And he did neither of those things.
	What he did was kick the can down the road and say, you know what, I'm a non-entity in this.
	I am politically neutral.
	I don't have any opinions right or left.
	I'm just here to uphold the law.
	And this is nothing to do with me, governor.
	So I didn't watch this because I assumed so heavily it was going to be the first.
	I just knew it would be the latest in a series of betrayals from the police.
	Yeah.
	But if you've detected a shift in their thinking, like, oh, maybe we can't backstab the British people forever.
	It's not that.
	What it is, is I don't want to take responsibility.
	That's what this press conference was.
	And so he committed himself very firmly to the sort of neutrality of the institution as if anyone believes the police are a neutral institution.
	I mean, at least he had the dignity not to wear his pride lapel markers or whatever they call it.
	The old red shoes or whatever.
	Yeah, yeah, exactly.
	Yeah, exactly.
	The vans, they left the pride vans at home, as you can see in the background there, right?
	So, you know, the claim to political neutrality is obviously BS.
	But he understood that this was the safest way out of this and to create the least controversy.
	What was really interesting though is when it got into the Q ⁇ A, so you had obviously Charlie Peters from GB News asking questions, but you also had someone from Sky News asking surprisingly based questions.
	I don't know if I've actually got the Sky News one because I didn't want to focus on that, but it's one of those things where it's like, okay, that was an interesting turn.
	The Sky News person asked him, do you concede or do you admit that your police officers were working with the counter-protesters?
	And we have got them on video.
	Well, he does deny it, which is a reason that I'm saying that he's lying, because he is basically lying.
	But he is politically canny.
	Lee here summarizes the problem with it, though, because this was, as he says, Chief Constable Ben Julian Harrington.
	Who's a double-barreled first name?
	Weird, isn't it?
	Anyway.
	His officers were literally filmed escorting him in and busting out.
	We'll talk about that.
	No explanation, no resignation, no apology.
	Arrogant, vacuous rubbish.
	Kind of.
	I wouldn't necessarily have called him arrogant necessarily, but he definitely didn't concede any ground.
	So it's interesting that he's using 90s rhetoric.
	Yes.
	I mean, 80s or 70s, They would have been on our side.
	By the 90s, they'd moved to nothing to do with Megov before they moved into being 100% pro-the invader.
	But also, even in the 90s, a chief of police would have resigned for what had happened here.
	Yeah, I mean, for anyone who forgot, an immigrant molested a bunch of kids allegedly.
	They've been taken into custody.
	People started rioting at the hotel.
	The police ran someone over.
	Well, I mean, just to add on the rioting front, my understanding is that people were protesting peacefully.
	And then because of the counter-protest that they shipped in the belligerents.
	I should probably have been more clear on that.
	Yes.
	Yeah, the police curated a left-wing protest into their general direction.
	And you may remember, do you remember when Tommy Robinson was running as an MEP in 2019?
	And they did the same thing in Oldham.
	So there was a bunch.
	Tommy was leading quite a large gathering of families, actually.
	And the police just marched probably about 200 Muslim men over to it, and they started a brawl.
	And they started beating people up.
	And it was exactly that kind of thing, except that...
	Yeah, the Epping police, Essex police, didn't have access to 200 angry Muslim men.
	What they had is 200 dysgenic leftists.
	Probably not 200, about 50 dysgenic leftists.
	You're going to need a lot of dysgenic leftists before to worry about.
	You are.
	But the thing that I think was most interesting about this was this particular comment.
	And this is what I mean when I say that.
	I'm going to get to about 55 seconds in just to spare you.
	But this is what I mean about it.
	He decided that he wasn't going to take any responsibility at all.
	Toshio, and that's what we did.
	Was there no thought about keeping the groups further away from each other?
	It's well known that these groups will confront each other and generate that hostility, which then leads to sparks of violence that has played out.
	Is that a regret from your force that you didn't keep them further apart?
	It's not for me to comment and to try and criticise, or indeed to examine that operation.
	We've made 10 arrests.
	we have managed to Okay, so that's really interesting for a number of reasons.
	I mean, first, the obvious point, it's not for me to comment on police operations.
	Chief for police operations.
	But beyond that, there's something deeper going on here.
	I mean, the body language is like, oh, shit, I'm trapped.
	That's what your kid looks at you like after you've caught them red-handed with a cookie.
	And when he goes on to say, you know, it's not for me to comment, I mean, it would suggest that there are orders from a higher source than him, the Home Office, for example, that has said the standard practice is you ship in protesters.
	And he's like, okay, well, I've been caught red-handed here.
	It's all on film.
	People are calling for my resignation.
	But I've got orders from the top that the way you deal with this is like they've been doing it for decades.
	They engineer a fight.
	And that doesn't come from him.
	That comes from much higher up.
	And all he can do is say, well, look, I'm just an empty vessel in this.
	Through me flows the will of the Home Office or whoever.
	At some point, it begs the question, who is actually making decisions?
	Because if you remember, Suella Braithman was saying the same thing when she was Home Secretary, that she basically had no power to do anything or change anything.
	At NATCON, she said explicitly that Rishi Sunak just stopped her and blocked her at every avenue.
	But we also listened to Liz Truss, who said that when she was Prime Minister, that she didn't have any power to change anything.
	Exactly.
	So somebody somewhere has got to be in charge.
	One would think, right?
	One would think.
	But this is the point.
	The Chief Constable of the Essex Police feels that he's not really in charge of the Essex Police, and it's not for him to comment.
	Now, of course, you get headlines like this where they say police deny bussing claims because he does deny that they bus them in.
	You saw the opposite, though.
	Well, you did see the opposite.
	But like, the important thing to note is the very complex and precise language that he's using.
	So this chap isn't the chief of Essex Police for nothing.
	It's because he's very capable of towing a line and giving a very specific set of responses.
	Hang on, can we take it one at a time?
	Just give the chief a chance.
	I think there's one extra point there in that I think there's a myth about police officers' roles with a band specifically, and I think GPU should address that exactly too.
	And I think, you know, that's a good prop, Robin, so thank you.
	I mean, there's been some accusation in the media that we drove people to the protest.
	That is not true.
	We have not driven anybody to that protest.
	People made their own way there.
	And of course, one of the accusations and one of the things circulated is we put people, we did take people away for their safety, for the safety of everyone there, because it was the best operational thing to do to prevent violence, to diffuse the situation.
	We drove them away from a violent confrontation.
	We didn't drive them there.
	We escorted them there.
	We literally curated their walk.
	I mean, you can see the police here just curating the event.
	No, we're going to march you to where the local protesters are so you can confront them.
	But we didn't bust them there.
	And I guess technically you didn't bust them there.
	Well done.
	You walked them there.
	That's very true.
	And then he says, well, we did bust them back, though, which they did.
	And this is actually a hilarious video from the guy recording this.
	The bus has arrived.
	The bus has arrived.
	The buses have arrived.
	And he's repeating what the police officer just said, the buses have arrived.
	Yeah.
	Does look like a gabbling leftist, doesn't it?
	Idiot.
	coaches have arrived.
	Bye.
	And then you can see them getting on.
	And the guy's just like, don't forget your bus passes, lads.
	But one thing I can't help but notice, not exactly a great sense of urgency there, is there?
	No.
	There's a lot of danger there.
	Is there?
	Doesn't look very dangerous.
	A casual stroll to me.
	It looks like they were just standing around, and then the police turned up with their buses, and we're like, right, okay, here we go.
	Time to get on now, lads.
	Well, ladies and gentlemen, you know, old people, leftists, whoever it is.
	This wasn't done under the impending and looming danger of a far-right mob that was going to tear them limb from limb.
	This all looks very orderly and peaceful, and that you just decided that we're just going to pick them up and bust them out.
	Well, I mean, these are some of the most protected people in the country.
	Yeah, they are.
	And so this really is the lie, because what the police officer, what the police chief constable, what was his name?
	I can't remember.
	His double-barreled name.
	Double-barreled first name.
	Yeah, it's bizarre.
	Yeah.
	Where's his name?
	There we go.
	ben julian harrington right what what he is claiming with this is that there is no level of police engagement uh with the the Stand up to racism, which is the group that organized this, and the Essex Police, which is the group moving them in.
	They're probably getting paid by the same source.
	And taking them out.
	Well, indirectly, yeah, quite possibly, yeah.
	Quite possibly are.
	But the point is what his press conference was designed to do is say, well, no, no, we're just with the local police, we're the Essex Police, which is doing our job, which is completely neutral on this.
	And everyone was just following their own inclinations, and we were just making sure that law and order was followed.
	But it's like, but it's clearly not the case.
	What's clearly the case is that actually there wasn't any dire danger for these people.
	They could have just walked off.
	Like, at no point, there wasn't a huge rabble of guys preventing their exit.
	The police had to come in with their police buses and give them a lift out.
	No, this is all very orderly and prearranged.
	Like, they were all just standing there.
	They knew what to do.
	They knew they weren't going to get busted.
	And the police are like, okay, get on.
	So there is a great deal of hand-in-glove cooperation between the Essex police and stand-up to racism.
	You took them to the protest where it's not appropriate to try and provoke the locals who are very unhappy with rapey migrants touching their kids.
	And then when that didn't work, you bust them out.
	And then you said, oh, yes, because they were in danger.
	They were not in danger.
	There's clearly no level of danger there whatsoever.
	I'm on a note that this guy is a senior officer in current year.
	And that means that he has basically been politically selected.
	I've talked about this in the podcast a whole bunch of people.
	No doubt.
	Don't get into the senior ranks of the police without it basically being a political appointment.
	And the politics that they actively search for is the whole DEI thing.
	But at least he left his rainbow lanyard at home.
	Well, at least he did that, yes.
	So anyway, let's have a quick look at the quality of the protesters.
	These were lovely people.
	Anyone running from wars, we should be welcome here.
	Okay, but these people are not running from wars.
	I mean, it's just literally the case that none of these people are coming from a war zone.
	what these people are, are highly suspect.
	But as you can see, they're...
	Or wars, I guess.
	I mean, they don't know they've run from much.
	But she is being very lovely to someone.
	Drive the Nazis out of Essex.
	I mean, just look at the state of them, to be honest.
	But does this look like an organic protest to you?
	Well, I mean, I've been to some right-wing protesters, especially during the COVID era.
	Nobody was handing out identicate signs.
	Exactly.
	And you'll notice that all of it, we talked about this when we covered it last week on the podcast.
	All of the locals who were protesting had just cardboard signs that they'd written on themselves, their own unique messages, rather than just this, again, who's paying for this?
	The police are working with an organization that have equipped a bunch of rent-a-mob protesters, and the police march them in and then bust them out at their convenience and at their leisure.
	It's like, sorry, you are lying to suggest that you are not working with these people.
	We know that you are, because otherwise they wouldn't have known just to stand around and wait for the police vans or pick them up.
	I mean, where did you take them?
	Where did these signs come from?
	Anyway, just in case you weren't wondering, though, you are a racist, right?
	This is why the demonstrations in Epping are racist.
	are responding with that energy and violence only to these crimes that are committed by people who aren't white, to immigrants.
	However many...
	I don't know, I'm actually not...
	Actually, literally, take, for instance, the aristocrat and her boyfriend who went on the run and their baby daughter died.
	That's a horrific story.
	And you're not writing about the death of that girl?
	No, we're not.
	There's the white man in question.
	I assume this is the story of the aristocrat and her boyfriend, whose daughter died when they went on the run for whatever reason.
	What are you talking about, bro?
	What are you talking about?
	The objection, yes, it is that they are immigrants.
	It's because, I mean, A, white men commit atrocities, do they?
	I don't.
	I'm sure the odd one does, but it's hardly the same thing.
	But the point on this is, like, you can say that's racist, but that still doesn't change the fact that there's no reason that we should be importing a bunch of third world rapists.
	I mean, there's what this segment is actually about, but I'm having to continually turn my mind back from the study of physiognomy with all of these characters.
	Yes, but speaking directly to the point, not why he would be making the point, is that A, obviously we know that the illegal immigrants as well as other immigrants are disproportionately represented in the crime statistics anyway when it comes to this sort of thing.
	White men are actually not a greater threat to women generally.
	But B, we can't actually deport the white men and we jail them.
	No one's in defense of a White man who commits a sex crime against a woman.
	No, I'm in favor of them being punished very harshly.
	Exactly.
	Everyone is.
	And no one's actually on a podcast going, but actually, maybe we shouldn't be punishing the white guy for doing that.
	But when it comes to being an immigrant, someone who is non-white, well, Politics Joe are like, no, we've got to stand in the way of these non-white nonces from being criticized by right-wingers because they're just racists.
	And it's like, well, even if that's true, that's not going to stop me.
	Anyway, yeah, so that was Newsnight talking to the actual Epping residents.
	And I mean, just look at this far-right racist.
	I'm really disappointed that it's been reopened.
	It's not right.
	There's a school right by, and it's just not correct.
	And it's right that the families of this little village actually fight for it.
	They're not right.
	You know, they're not, you know, they're not reform or anything like that.
	They're just there to protect their children.
	Why do you think it's inappropriate if there's a school nearby, for example?
	We don't know where they've come from.
	We don't know...
	I just find it just wrong.
	And why did they close it in the first place?
	So as you can see, mothers and grandmothers who are like, look, this is going to sound so right-wing, but a bunch of rapey foreigners have been putting that.
	It's literally down the road.
	We can see the school from the city.
	This is going to sound so right-wing, I'm worried that my grandchildren are going to be seriously harmed.
	I do apologise for thinking such things.
	And it's only because one of them did touch three of the kids that kicked off.
	She thinks it for good reason.
	Yeah, this might happen because it's already happened.
	Yes.
	I'm worried about it happening more.
	I'm sorry this is going to sound so right-wing.
	It's like, okay, this isn't actually about left or right, actually.
	This isn't a right-wing opinion.
	This is a concerned parent opinion.
	Possibly in the modern day, being concerned for your own children is a right-wing opinion.
	Maybe, but I refuse to define us by their standards.
	So the little Scottish left-winger gimp can call me a racist all he wants, but at the end of the day, I'm completely with the parents who are like, yeah, no, I don't want these people around my children or grandchildren.
	And the thing is, the actual sort of right-wing, they stayed away.
	Because you remember Tommy said, look, people have been asked me to go to Epping.
	He put up this video going, well, actually, if I go there, they make it about me and not the issue itself.
	And so I'm not going to go.
	And, you know, people further to the right than Tommy, such as Paul Golding from Britain First, also said the same thing.
	Actually, we're going to stay away from this because this is an issue that is currently, it doesn't need attention bringing to it.
	Everyone's paying attention to it.
	And if the far right actually do go down to it, well, then the media is like, right, gotcha.
	And so what this is, is the right wing, the far right especially, learning to play the media game, which is actually very wise.
	That's actually quite sensible from Tommy and Paul.
	Yeah, exactly.
	I mean, Paul would declare himself to be a lot further to the right than Tommy, but the point is the right is starting to understand that there is a way of playing the media's game and basically kind of judo flipping them with their own strength.
	And that's what they're doing here, because screeching that this woman is not far right, but she is exactly on the same page as Paul Golding.
	Because this isn't about partisan politics.
	This is about actually what needs to be done, what has to be done to protect children.
	And remember, there are lots of people in the country who want refugees.
	Tower Hamlets, for example, says, the East End has a long history of providing a safe haven for those fleeing religious or political persecution.
	Not that there are any of them in Epping, but anyway, as Labour councillors, we're proud of their history and believe Tower Hamlets should continue to play a part.
	Those claiming asylum in the UK have a right to have their case properly considered and they must be accommodated while it's being decided.
	Okay, I think we can find an agreement here.
	Tower Hamlets want the refugees.
	Epping doesn't want the refugees.
	And it should become literally a towered hamlet.
	It should have a wall round it and then they can have as many as they want.
	And Poplar and Limehouse from Aspana Begum MP.
	Refugees are welcome there.
	Those two, yes.
	Okay, great.
	Every other leftist MP and councillor, please raise your hand.
	Please tell us where the refugees are welcome.
	And the Labour government should be like, right, okay, well, I think we can kill two birds with one stone here.
	We need somewhere safe to put these migrants.
	And you guys are totally welcoming of them.
	Enjoy.
	Yes.
	I mean, I just can't see how it could fail.
	Yeah.
	I mean, I'd rather not have it in the first place.
	It's a bit of a problem.
	Sure, but, you know, unfortunately, if you can't persuade Kia Starma to actually deport anyone.
	The habitation says, your favorite Japanese YouTube channel that translates segments of the Little Cedars has translated Bo's most recent segment about Japan.
	You should see the comments.
	They love you guys' work.
	Oh, that's great.
	Or even me saying, I don't like Japan.
	Sigilstone says, Norway saw the lefties that counter-protest and decided to start Viking in Essex again due to how safe it had been for them.
	I quote, come on, they're begging for it.
	Well, I mean, to be honest, the Vikings were just refugees.
	You've got to understand.
	They were climate and economic refugees.
	Oh, were they?
	I didn't know.
	There was a medieval warm period, apparently, that had increased the size of the population in Norway.
	And so they were having a population boom.
	And also, they needed money because they were economic refugees.
	And the English were keeping to themselves, working hard, raising their sheep or whatever, creating lots of money out of the wool trade.
	And they were like, yeah, we're definitely economic refugees.
	So how it worked.
	Okay.
	OPH UK says, I was racist before it became a middle-class hobby.
	I might have to become something else now because all those normies are raging racists too.
	Yeah, they're ruining it.
	Yeah, still to live the normies.
	Ryan says, love the Jurassic Park video, Carl.
	Couldn't agree more with it.
	As a big Crichton fan, I think it's one of your best videos today.
	Yeah, I knew it would be quite niche, but it's been one of those sort of splinters in the back of your mind things where I'm just like, I'm so sick of the...
	I'll let you go watch it in your own time, obviously.
	But anyway, we'll leave that there.
	Right, okay.
	On the theme of people protecting their children, we've got an example here of an incident where a dad responded rather ferociously to an assault on his son.
	Are we going to have to caveat this with a few things?
	I will use ample caveats throughout on this one because it only happened very recently.
	You know, the police are still investigating.
	None of this has gone to court yet, so allegedly, allegedly, and all that.
	But also, I think some caveatting about Fed posting in chats.
	Oh, yes.
	Please don't.
	Obviously, we do not endorse any kind of vigilante violence.
	So do not engage in vigilante-violence is the message of the Lode Seaters.
	Yes, yes.
	Stay within the Lord at all times.
	Obviously.
	Yes, 100%.
	But we've got this video here.
	Now, I'm not going to play the video because it does show the death of a young lad, as we will get into.
	But it is on my Twitter profile.
	So if anyone really wants to go and see the videos and the video of the preceding attack, there's my very weird Twitter handle, KingBingo underscore.
	You can go and watch the videos for yourself if you want to.
	But trigger warning, but beware what you will find.
	We will describe what happened though.
	Yes.
	What happened in this video is, and this is the first one that came out.
	We see a street scene here with an urban youth is on some sort of e-bike or scooter or whatever it is, and he is furiously heading up this road after having allegedly having just taken it from another boy in a rather vicious knife or machete attack, whatever it was allegedly.
	Moments later, the boy's father appears in his car heading towards the alleged individual who stole the bike.
	And there was an impact.
	He ram raids him off the road.
	He does.
	He was most certainly not messing around on that one.
	Now, with regards to the earlier incident, footage then emerged on social media of this situation.
	So it looked like the boy and a friend of his, perhaps, are on their bikes there in the blue circle when these individuals who are allegedly having thieved from them go past on their scooter or their moped or whatever it is.
	As soon as they see these lads, they turn around and the guy reaches for something that's in his belt.
	It looks like a machete to me.
	It does look like a machete.
	I don't know what it is, but it does look like a machete.
	He certainly hits the boy like it's a machete.
	He does indeed.
	Now, for whatever reason, the boys turn around, maybe because he recognises the threat or recognises the boys.
	And I think he's quite close to his home at this point.
	And his first instinct is to get back home.
	So he turns around in this and sort of heads back.
	And the youth, as you can see here, starts and it's very obvious if you watch the video, but the youth starts basically hacking at his head with whatever it was.
	Some people have suggested it's a machete.
	There you go, that's another shot of it.
	He chases him off, doesn't he?
	And he's really going for him.
	He's really going for him.
	And I think at this point, yeah, the boy has ditched the bike.
	Doesn't matter.
	The youth in question is still outraged that he had to fight in order to get the bike and is going to continue attacking the boy with whatever it was, whatever implement that it was.
	So just I watched this video this morning and this looks like an attempted murder.
	I mean, like, you don't hit someone in the head with a machete and continue chasing them down the road, hitting them, unless you're trying to kill them.
	It was, I mean, it was a lot more than just a bike theft, which was what it was originally...
	Looked like it, yes.
	Now, we can only assume due to, you know, the way these videos are connected together, but this is probably right outside the boy's home and the father saw this.
	And this happened in Manchester, didn't it?
	Yes.
	We've got some details here.
	So this is the Manchester Evening News.
	First picture of boy 15 killed in horror e-bike crash.
	So there is the individual that Manchester Evening News think is responsible for this alleged machete attack and bike theft.
	This 15-year-old boy who tragically died in a collision involving an e-bike and a car.
	Devon Simmons lost his life after police recall reports of a collision in Middleton shortly yesterday.
	Despite best efforts of the emergency services, he was sadly pronounced dead at the scene.
	His family are being supported by officers.
	Well, thank goodness the officers are available to support the family at this difficult time.
	It's very easily gone the other way, couldn't it?
	Yes.
	A 59-year-old man had been arrested on suspicion of murder and remains in custody.
	Another 15-year-old boy, so if you remember the still shots of the video, there was two of them on that scooter.
	So presumably that is the other 15 year old boy who's been arrested on suspicion of theft.
	Yes.
	And there is a scene of the of the car having impacted the Zagreb.
	Can we scroll down?
	Another resident said they knew the teenager.
	He was a top lad.
	Top lad.
	Top top lad he was.
	Top top lad he was.
	And why did he have a machete?
	Why was he attacking someone with a bloody machete?
	He was very respectable.
	Very respectable lad.
	Top top, very respectable lad.
	I've got another photo of the lad.
	Oh, yeah.
	This is unverified, but this is what friends of his are putting up, so we can only assume it's real.
	Okay, why is he dressed like a soldier in a combat zone?
	Top top, very respectable.
	He literally looks like a soldier in a war zone.
	Yes, he does, doesn't he?
	But he's actually wearing camo and like protective clothing.
	He's got his face covered.
	Why is this top lad very respectable and dressed like he's a soldier?
	What is that?
	Is that padding or something?
	It looks like protective clothing on his legs, yeah.
	Yep.
	Why is he carrying that?
	Why is he dressed like this?
	So, well, I mean, you might wear protective clothing to protect yourself from machete attacks?
	Machete attacks, yes.
	So, whatever reason, he's very much in the machete subculture.
	I guess the question is, why do these young lads feel like they're living in a war zone?
	Why do they feel the need to dress as if they're living in a war zone?
	Why do they feel the need to carry machetes and attack one another?
	I mean, I say attack one another, but like attack random people on the street because they've got a bike they want or something.
	Why the hell are we allowing this kind of culture to flourish in the UK?
	Well, I suppose the answer might be because we have allowed it to happen and therefore he is responding to his environment in a way that feels correct to him, which is to, you know, I'm in an environment where I can get away with doing this stuff.
	I'm in an environment where I feel the need to carry a machete and armor plate myself against it.
	And I feel no repercussions from going after a young lad with a machete and striking him repeatedly, trying to kill him in order to get his bike.
	Even after he's dropped his bike, I'm going to continue to attack him.
	And so one might wonder why the authorities aren't cracking down on this.
	So the first machete attack should have been a warning to everyone else in that community.
	We're going to make an example of you.
	You are not free to dress like a militant and run around the streets terrorizing people with machetes.
	So everyone else is like, right, okay, great.
	I don't need to dress like a militant.
	I don't need to carry a machete and I don't need to terrorize.
	Because this is not an area that permits gang culture like that.
	Whatever this kind of degenerate tribal culture that they've got going on is, like, this is not permitted.
	So I'm going to go ahead and assume that this is not the first incident that this chap may have been involved in.
	I did hear he was a top-top lad.
	Well, I did hear that, and he's very respectable.
	Yes, I did hear that.
	But even if this was the first time he stepped out of line, I suspect that for this area, this kind of stuff is probably not uncommon.
	And I say that on the basis that it's not uncommon anywhere in Britain anymore.
	Even nice villages.
	It seems to have ceased to become a thing.
	More details from the Manchester Evening News.
	Here we go, another photo of that.
	Repeat some of the same details.
	Of course, that's here.
	Yeah, officers were called to the scene around midday.
	A 15-year-old boy was pronounced dead.
	So in the middle of the day, he decides to bring out a machete and start attacking another kid.
	Well, I mean, that's the other thing.
	It's just standard middle of the day behaviour now.
	Fearless.
	And he obviously felt that this was something that he would just get away with.
	Yeah.
	Or he didn't think through the consequences, but for whatever reason, this was considered.
	Obviously, he didn't think that he was going to suffer any consequences from the authorities, right?
	I mean, I would never go out with a machete because I expect to get in trouble for carrying the machete.
	Yes, I think I've got a relevant point to that.
	This is not my quote, but, you know, Lieutenant Colonel Jeff Cooper once made the assertion that if violent crime is to be curbed, it is only the intended victim who can do it.
	The felon does not fear the police, and he fears neither the judge nor the jury.
	Therefore, he must be taught to fear his victim.
	Make your own minds up on whether Lieutenant Colonel Jeff Cooper was on the money there or not.
	So this is terrible incident has seen the death of a teenage boy and we are working hard to establish the full facts of this case is what is the early stages of investigation.
	I don't know if they will be looking at the full facts because of course what they probably won't be looking at is the complete and total social decay of this country to the point where this sort of thing is standard.
	A man has been arrested on suspicion of murder.
	Yes.
	Questioned in due course.
	The officers are ready to play support of the boy who has died.
	Well again, it's great news that they can throw police at that.
	Well I mean have we got a statement from the boy's father?
	The driver or the other one.
	The other one.
	Well I honestly don't know if he could be located.
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	Yeah there you go.
	And they're urging people to get in touch with the police if you have any information.
	So there you go, authorities.
	That's why I'm making this segment because I'm just circulating your claims for pills for people to come forward with any information.
	do have to ask the question, what would you do if you were on the jury for something like this?
	I don't know if we can say, but Yes.
	But those of you in the audience, you might want to think about, you know, perhaps as a hypothetical, if you were on that jury, how might you respond?
	So I think that the normal response would be, well, I'd phone the police and I'd expect them to pick that lad up and charge him with attempted murder.
	And then obviously not just release him onto the streets.
	Well, yes, you might well indeed.
	I mean, you might say to your son after watching him be brutally attacked with a machete, you might say to him, well, don't look back in anger.
	The police are going to do their job, sure.
	Yeah, the police will do their job.
	We will ring the police and maybe after a day or two we might get a crime reference number and then we're submitted an insurance claim.
	And then maybe after a month or two we get you a new bike and that's fine.
	And just don't look back in anger about the machete attack.
	I mean that I understand is the correct response in these circumstances.
	And if we were in a functional system, the correct response from the police would be to arrest the 15-year-old machete wielder and make sure he's not just out on the streets.
	Yes.
	That would be what one would expect.
	Yes, but it would appear that we don't actually live in that world anymore.
	I remember when I was a young lad, and I'm not proud of this, but when I was probably 13, 14, something like that, I was out with a mate and We'd been eating something, and I casually threw the stuff onto the ground, the litter.
	And immediately, some guy walking past was very aggressive and he was like, No, you pick that up and you put that away.
	And he was, I'm not proud of my actions.
	I was a young kid, but all the same, not take responsibility for it.
	He was absolutely bloody right.
	He absolutely was.
	He absolutely was.
	And we used to live in a society where low-level stuff like that would be stamped on immediately.
	Yeah, the adults felt that they were morally empowered to correct children, regardless of whose children they were.
	You do not throw rubbish on the streets.
	Now, I've not seen something like that for many, many years.
	I mean, apart from about a year ago when I did it myself to some lad who casually tossed rubbish on the ground.
	And that's the way it should work.
	Oh, absolutely.
	Older men should set an example and younger men should know if you step out of line.
	Any man around you has the authority to do this.
	Yes.
	But that is not the culture we live in anymore.
	speaking about the dad who will no doubt be facing some sort of charges, I mean perhaps he will perhaps he won't, maybe it was a He misjudged the distance.
	We don't know.
	We don't know what the jury is going to say.
	What I will say is that if funding for the dad pops up, I will share it.
	It's probably as far as we should go down that road.
	Probably right, but we don't know what his details are.
	We don't know the full details yet.
	No, we don't.
	don't.
	There are historic examples that my mind went to of He just watched his son be attacked.
	And yes, we know that he's supposed to not look back in anger and get an insurance number and all the rest of it.
	But we're both fathers.
	If our sons were...
	I think one of the main problems is that I imagine that there's a deep-seated feeling, particularly in that community, but this is likely not the first time this sort of thing has happened, that nothing else will be done.
	The phrase had enough comes to mind.
	Yeah.
	Had enough.
	And the thing is, this is something we've been warning about for quite a while.
	If you have a two-tier system which doesn't protect law-abiding citizens and actually seems to do privilege and literally not spend its time incarcerating criminals, violent, dangerous people, well, you have to expect some kind of reaction.
	Yes, I mean, I think in this particular case, it's probably so immediate, so visceral.
	I don't know how much of any other thinking, even if we lived in a society that actually punished criminals and dealt with machetes and urban misbehavior, I don't know if that would have made any difference because it's difficult to imagine this until you have children of your own, but it is so raw and visceral, the desire to protect them and to respond against any threats against them.
	I don't know.
	But I can't help but feel that this is the first time this has happened.
	On the first time something happens, it probably is your natural instinct to first ring the police.
	Possibly.
	I mean, I would imagine from the speed of the reaction that the dad might have seen it out of his window or something.
	I don't know.
	He may have known where he was.
	He may have actually physically seen it.
	Like, who knows?
	But, like, I just don't feel this is the first time that young man with machete in the street has attacked someone.
	Very likely.
	This is a historic example from a slightly different age.
	I don't know if you're familiar with this one.
	I am indeed.
	So this is, what was it, in 1984?
	So the man in the red abducted the man on the left's 11-year-old son, took him to a motel and raped him over the series of 10 days.
	And the boy was able to get to a phone and rang for help.
	And the man was arrested and he was being brought back to Louisiana to face up to his crimes.
	But the father was waiting at the airport and he took out a concealed pistol and shot him at point-blank range in the head.
	Now, you know, this is a historic case, so we're not under the same restrictions as we are on this previous case.
	On YouTube, we probably are.
	Okay, fine.
	The father, I can't remember his name offhand.
	Didn't the jury vote not charge him?
	Well, he plead no contest.
	And the judge gave him an appropriate, and we can say this because it was the judge who gave this down, gave him a perfectly appropriate sentence after pleading no contest.
	300 hours community service.
	Harsh but fair.
	Yes, harsh but fair for this.
	But that was in a different age.
	That was in a time when we viewed predation on children differently to where we view.
	It wasn't just a fact of life.
	It wasn't just a fact of life of living in a big city that you have to accept being preyed upon and attacked with a machete.
	Gary Plauci is the name.
	Thank you, Sigilstone.
	I can't believe I forgot.
	Yes, yes.
	And the thing is, we do live in a world where we just no longer have any faith that the simple rules are being upheld.
	So let's look at this.
	I could give a myriad of examples.
	Yeah, there are so many videos like this.
	Oh, yeah.
	So basically, all I did is I thought, okay, what I'm going to do is I'm going to find an example of just how decayed it has got in this country.
	So I just went on Twitter and scrolled down a little bit to find a fresh one from today.
	Yeah, let's play this.
	So here we see Q and whatever it is.
	Yeah, a couple of urban youths are basically just holding open a shopping bag, emptying the shelves and walking out.
	In a Gregg's?
	Yeah, okay, in a Greggs, yeah.
	So we can't even have Gregg's now.
	Yes.
	I mean, I wasn't a fan of Greggs to begin with, but all the same, I don't think that this should be happening.
	But there are so many...
	Indeed.
	Now, I did notice some of the commenters to this video saying, look, why are the men on the right, why are they not doing anything about the men on the left?
	Because they'll be the ones arrested.
	Well, yes.
	It's probably got something to do with the fact that the men on the right know that they are the absolute and complete enemy of the British police.
	Yes.
	And the men on the left have the complete and unconditional support of the British police.
	Correct.
	That could have played into their decision-making factor.
	In this scenario, there's only the possibility of one of these kinds of people being arrested.
	Yes.
	That's the issue.
	Yes, and it's the men on the right.
	The other thing that pops into my head is that there used to be quite a lot of large predators living in the British Isles.
	Yeah, sure.
	I mean, just for anyone unaware, I mean, it was wolves, brown bears, Rasian lynx.
	This surprised me, spotted hyena.
	Really?
	Yeah, they used to live in the British Isles.
	Cave lions, and possibly leopards, although that one's unclear.
	They're still here.
	They got reintroduced in the 19th century.
	In the 20th century, actually.
	The beast of...
	There are big cats in Britain.
	Yes.
	And we know why they were released, because in the 19th century, people in the empire would bring them home as exotic pets.
	And then in the 60s, the Labour government was like, right, you're not allowed these empties.
	They made no provision.
	But the point is they had died out for a very long time.
	And the reason that they had died out for such a long time is because if you want to go extinct, a good way to do it is to threaten people's children.
	And basically the people living on the British Isles didn't like the fact that their children were being snatched up by wolves and bears and hyenas.
	And so they dealt with the problem.
	The last wolf in England died over 600 years ago as well.
	It was in 1390.
	They were looking for wolf pelts and they couldn't find a single wolf in England.
	Right.
	That's over 600 years ago.
	And the other animals I mentioned, they died out quite a bit sooner.
	Yeah.
	Because at least wolves are mostly skittish around people, whereas the other ones that I mentioned will just go straight for your children.
	And the men of the British Isles dealt with it.
	And so for a very long time, we didn't have any large predators on the island.
	Just as a quick aside as well, this is what fox hunting is actually about, because wolves would control the fox population.
	And so the fox population gets out of hand.
	So now it's not just your children, it's your livestock.
	Your chickens, your lambs, and things like that.
	They get attacked by foxes.
	Well, now you have to make sure the foxes don't get out of control.
	So I'm not saying I'm a big fan of fox hunting or anything, but like there's a reason that they do it to show that they're the top predator on the island.
	Yes, quite.
	Yeah, but for whatever reason, the British state has decided that it wants to import new predators.
	Now, that term predator, that's not my own term.
	In fact, I'm going to give you a quick speech here from somebody who is basically accurately describing this situation, who I think we can safely say could not be accused of being a member of the right.
	The C-SPAN networks bring you long-form public affairs programming from the nation's capital and or a public service of your television provider, C-SPAN, created by cable.
	The fourth challenge is to take back our streets from crime, gangs, and drugs.
	And we have actually been making progress on this count as a nation because of what local law enforcement officials are doing, because of what citizens and neighborhood patrols are doing.
	We're making some progress.
	Much of it is related to the initiative called Community Policing because we have finally gotten more police officers on the street.
	That was one of the goals that the President had when he pushed the crime bill that was passed in 1994.
	He promised 100,000 police.
	We're moving in that direction, but we can see it already makes a difference.
	Because if we have more police interacting with people, having them on the streets, we can prevent crimes.
	We can prevent petty crimes from turning into something worse.
	But we also have to have an organized effort against gangs, just as in a previous generation we had an organized effort against the mob.
	We need to take these people on.
	They are often connected to big drug cartels.
	They are not just gangs of kids anymore.
	They are often the kinds of kids that are called super predators.
	No conscience, no empathy.
	We can talk about why they ended up that way, but first we have to bring them to heal.
	And the President has asked the FBI to launch a very concerted effort against gangs everywhere.
	In addition to that, he has appointed a new drug czar.
	You probably saw him Tuesday night.
	He's one of the most distinguished active military generals that we have in our country.
	He's already proven that he knows how to interdict drugs because of his command of the South American activity on behalf of the United States.
	But General McCaffrey...
	No compassion, no empathy.
	Yes.
	We can talk about how they ended up that way.
	Yes.
	But I think that proves Exactly.
	That accurately describes machete-wielding combat-clad urban youths.
	Yes.
	Miss Clinton was right.
	She was.
	In fact, a lot of the 90s Democrats were actually remarkably sensible by today's standards.
	So, no, she was right.
	And you have to ask the question, as Rupert Lowe has been lately, is, why are we in this situation?
	Why are they here?
	Why are they here?
	Yeah.
	Why are we entertaining this?
	Why are we continuing to import more predators into this country?
	So this one isn't the crime stance, but, you know, he's...
	Funnily enough, they do.
	They do.
	The other point that I wanted to make is excellent point by Wolf here.
	The police can't turn up if you've been robbed or assaulted.
	And even if you do, they most certainly won't solve the crime.
	But there are always hundreds of them available to Facilitate the great replacement of the English.
	And that's interesting, isn't it?
	You know, if you want to take a bunch of immigrants who, at least one of their number, has been involved in the raping of a child.
	I mean, just look at this.
	The volume of police that they can put together.
	Yeah, they can line the streets with police when it's protecting the thing that they're concerned about.
	Yes.
	And I saw that they put up fencing around the hotel as well.
	Oh, did they?
	No.
	Oh, the way that hotel has behaved as well.
	Yeah, and around Parliament, too.
	So borders are something they can make.
	They do work.
	But people only put borders around the things that they want to protect.
	Well, if you don't put a fence around your country, you need to put a fence around everything in your country.
	And you only put a fence around the things that you value.
	And so what do they value?
	Well, they value the government and they value the government.
	Exactly right.
	Just look at the huge number of police that they may have been able to deploy that.
	Is it possible that maybe instead of deploying all of the police numbers on something like that, it might be worth at some point thinking about using the police to deal with something like this?
	I mean, I'd rather the police be on regular streets just walking around, stopping super predators from attacking people with machetes than literally anything else, actually.
	And I pretty much guarantee that this was not this lad's first brush with the law.
	And if you had police who actually did their job rather than just basically turning into an army to support the great replacement, then we might not have been into this situation.
	So we will watch this case with interest as to how it unrolls for here.
	B-Chain says, that blonde woman in the video sounds based.
	If she ever decided to run for president, she may have my vote.
	If only that continued, eh?
	It must be her time soon.
	Yeah, this is all a misunderstanding.
	He was a bright young man ready to start his career at the nearest Turkish barbershop.
	He just wanted to give his friend a new fade, rest in power, king.
	You know, I love the movie Judge Dredd.
	I love the part of the movie where the criminals had a slow-motion part.
	Yes.
	The Sheriff of Nottingham and his thugs have gone national, and to quote Robin Hood, then by God, we take it back.
	Well, that's the issue, isn't it?
	I mean, I've just can't really say what I think.
	I don't really know.
	There was a lot unsaid in that last segment, but I think the audience might be able to figure it out for themselves.
	So let's move on to something a bit more jolly shall we.
	Oh yes.
	Yeah, I wanted to, We can do something that isn't serious and isn't important.
	Right.
	Of all the things that we cover, we cover some horrific stuff that honestly is quite depressing.
	Because of the nature of the sort of the gravity of those things, this is a subject that is completely trivial.
	Completely, completely trivial.
	And you don't need to think about or worry about in any way, shape, or form because it will never really affect you.
	But it keeps coming up my timeline and it is pissing me off.
	Every goddamn day, I see Pedro Pascal smiling mug and I'm sick of it.
	That actually might be important because it's starting to irritate me as well, right?
	As Steph here is posting.
	You guys come to AMC Theaters, what movie do you want to see?
	You want to see a Pedro Pascal movie?
	You want to see a Pedro Pascal movie?
	Or do you want to see a Pedro Pascal movie?
	Which Pedro Pascal movie do you want to see?
	He's even Superman.
	Oh, wait a minute.
	That's not him.
	But there he is.
	Yikes.
	I am so sick of seeing this guy that I just don't understand.
	Yes, yes.
	So, I mean, I first...
	Right.
	And that was the first time I'd ever seen him.
	And it was a sort of a historical thing.
	And he actually looked like the DA agent that he was playing.
	So I thought, okay, that makes sense.
	A new actor has popped up.
	He actually looks like the character.
	He did a fine job.
	Yep, thought nothing more of it.
	And then after that series ended, he was then in absolutely everything ever made since.
	So the first time I saw him in something was Game of Thrones, where he was the prince from the Southland.
	I can't remember the name of it.
	But he was fine.
	I enjoyed the role.
	And he got his head popped open, which was brutal.
	Yes.
	In retrospect, I thought I would have enjoyed that scene more.
	Right, exactly.
	Yeah.
	I mean, you know, I enjoyed it.
	It was shocking.
	It was great storytelling.
	And, you know, I thought that was great.
	And then, as you say, he then began popping up in everything.
	Yes.
	And one has to wonder why.
	Because, I mean, he was fine, but he's not like one of the world's great actors.
	He's just fine.
	Why is he in everything all the time, everywhere?
	I'll give you a really weird example.
	But Disney came out with a Mandalorian.
	Yeah, and the whole gimmick of this was that you never got to see the guy's face.
	Yeah, they don't take it off.
	He had a helmet on the entire time until later on when they did take the helmet off.
	And it turned out that they couldn't even resist casting Pedro Pascal for that.
	Yeah, and he wasn't even great for that either.
	He didn't have a sort of body presence that the Mandalorian had.
	I remember there was a scene of him walking down some steps and he's just kind of slouching down these steps.
	Yeah, with his anxiety.
	Yeah, yeah.
	We'll get into his bloody anxiety in a minute.
	Anyway, so as you can see, it's because the woke Hollywood loveies love him.
	He is a feminist and he's inspired.
	He's only inspired by powerful women.
	He's inspired by powerful women.
	Yeah, I'm feeling the ghost of Gad, sorry, he's not dead, but I'm feeling Gad Sad has a term for men like this.
	Yes.
	And sneaky effers.
	And that's why I'm starting to really hate him, I think.
	So Julius Caesar, the Duke of Wellington, Alexander the Great does nothing for him but show him powerful women and that's inspirational, yeah, yeah.
	Anyway, so yeah, as you say, you know, he's look at men's health.
	Oh, the simple way Pedro Pascal manages anxiety.
	Now, weirdly, this article, I was reading through it trying to look for the thing that he does to manage his anxiety, but it's basically nothing to this.
	Like, he just he says he's very anxious during the summer of 2020 because of COVID, but he doesn't explain how he manages his anxiety, which is really weird.
	And so, people have is this a recent condition?
	No, he's been talking about this for a while now.
	Because I'm just wondering, like, let's say you are a young man and you're suffering anxiety, and you talk to somebody about this, and is their advice going to be, well, why don't you put yourself in front of as many people as you possibly can?
	Is that how you deal with anxiety?
	To be honest with you, I mean, a lot of dealing with anxiety, I think, is just confronting a fear, right?
	Yes.
	You just got to go out and do it, right?
	So maybe it is.
	But he's overachieving when it comes to that.
	Well, exactly.
	He's doing great.
	So he's become super famous, but he's still deeply anxious, like a little scared toddler, is how he describes himself.
	Right.
	Which is weird.
	Man needs some testosterone then.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	And then you get clips like this.
	How many?
	60 million views on this one.
	Don't bring me a tea.
	But as he's standing on stage and he...
	Oh, I need Yeah.
	That's not his wife, is it?
	That's someone else's wife.
	Yeah.
	So basically, the...
	He needs soothing when he's in public by touching people, which is really weird.
	And so there are many, many clips of him basically being very handsy with women around him, which.
	About a year ago, I got a puppy.
	And I was willing to provide soothing for the first week or two.
	And then after that, it's no, you're on your own.
	Yeah.
	But this is a very brave thing to do in the era of Me Too.
	Well...
	I mean, I...
	But the point is, everyone can tell this is kind of BS.
	And do you know how I know it's kind of BS?
	Yeah?
	Yeah.
	Why doesn't he have anxiety around his male co-workers?
	It's only around the women.
	And what's even more interesting?
	It's only around the attractive women.
	Didn't get anxiety around Bella Ramsay.
	Is that touching her?
	No, he didn't.
	And the thing is, he explains what he does when he's around Bella Ramsay.
	Huke?
	No, no.
	I'm not trying to say anything negative about Bella Ramsay.
	But there we go.
	He says, in an appearance of the promotion of The Last of Us with Bella Ramsay, Pascal was seen revealing to his co-star on why we'd put his left hand on his stomach to combat feelings of anxiety when he's in public.
	So he puts his left hand on his stomach when he's around Bella Ramsey.
	But when he's around beautiful blonde English girl who's in my...
	I've got to be all touchy with her.
	I mean, if I were Bella Ramsey, I'd be like, what on my chopped liver?
	Like, come on.
	Well, no, no, no.
	Bella Ramsey seems, I'm sure she's a lovely person, right?
	And, you know, like, you know, as an uggo, I'm sympathetic.
	But the point is, why doesn't he need soothing from his male co-workers?
	Why doesn't he need soothing from his male?
	Well, it's, I need, I need a beautiful blonde woman to soothe me.
	Thank you very much.
	And this is just creepy.
	Just unbelievably creepy.
	That she is not dating him.
	And she is pregnant with a boyfriend's, presumably a boyfriend's child.
	Well, we find out if the kid comes out and immediately gets put in every single film, like who the father is.
	Yes, we will.
	But I mean, I'm just saying, if your pregnant wife was doing this like if your pregnant wife was doing this with just any other man anytime, let alone in public, I wouldn't stand for it, is what I'm saying.
	I wouldn't stand for it in quite explosive ways.
	Probably not as explosively as the father in the previous segment, but I would be raging, absolutely raging.
	And there's a lot of weirdness going on here.
	And I'd be raging at her too.
	I wouldn't be as angry with her.
	The question of why, if you suffer anxiety, you chose this career.
	Why Hollywood feels the need to put him in absolutely everything, including roles where you can't even see his face, just to be on the safe side.
	And why he feels it's appropriate to touch the men's wives like that, and why these women feel the need to mother him.
	I mean, it's mothering, isn't it?
	I mean, kind of, but it seems that there is a...
	Like, I don't...
	It seems that under the auspices of it being, oh, no, he's just anxious.
	I'm just trying to soothe him.
	Very flirty, right?
	Very, very flirty.
	Like, again, if you go back to, like, this isn't motherly, you know, this, this is way more than that.
	You know, I mean, look at her.
	Like, sorry.
	Absolutely not.
	Absolutely not.
	This is a girlfriend.
	Allegedly.
	Yeah.
	Well, no, allegedly not a girlfriend.
	But absolutely not.
	But what this is, is creepy and scummy, right?
	This is weird and unacceptable.
	And again, there are just loads.
	Like, and you get people saying, you know, I don't understand what this man needs has her to hold his hand all the time.
	Not even dating it makes him look like Grade A Wimpy pervert.
	Yeah, he does seem like a really creepy Grade A Wimpy pervert.
	In fact, Gad Sad has a great term for these people.
	And so why is her boyfriend standing for it?
	I mean, this is her boyfriend.
	Like, okay.
	Sorry, Paul, I think you should deal with that guy, right?
	And I really mean it as a guy with a chin like that.
	I think he's got the capacity to deal with it.
	He was a lacrosse player and now owns a professional lacrosse player.
	You can move a lot of soil with that chin.
	Yeah, right.
	Like, sorry, the sneaky effer thesis is really coming about, right?
	Look at a little wimpy Pedro Pascal there, who's your girlfriend is all over this guy, your pregnant girlfriend is all over this guy.
	Are you gonna stand for that, mate?
	I wouldn't bloody stand for that.
	I'll tell you who's a great example from the other side is Kiana Reeves.
	Yes.
	Because loads of people come up to him and want photos.
	Yeah, and he hover hands.
	Yes.
	He makes sure his hands are well out of it because he knows what's appropriate and what isn't.
	Yeah, he's not going to get me-tooed.
	Yeah.
	But all I'm saying, Paul, is I don't know why you're standing for that, mate.
	I bloody wouldn't stand for that.
	Yeah.
	Because Sitch here, I think, makes a great point.
	Like, people wonder why young men are getting angry and turning against society.
	The Pedro Pascal Vanessa Kirby coverage is the perfect example.
	All of these weird articles and comments gushing over these two seem to have an open affair where no one cares about Vanessa Kirby cheating on her husband, well, boyfriend, but, or at best, making him publicly look like a cuck.
	If Pascal was married and he was cheating on a woman, the vibe about this would be completely different.
	Most people would be outraged, and Kirby's husband better get a paternity test.
	There's about a 99% chance he's cheating on him.
	I totally agree.
	So is he not married then?
	They're not married, but they've been dating for like four years or something.
	No, no, no.
	Pedro Pascal, is he married to anyone?
	I don't believe he is.
	Does he date?
	Does he prefer the company of men?
	I don't know.
	That's funny.
	I've not seen anyone accusing him of being...
	If he prefers the company of men, that might perhaps explain why.
	Right, I mean, Google results are it's unclear, so the answer is no, right?
	Well, I don't know if...
	Nah.
	Because, like, I mean, you know, there's the clip of him, like, dancing, but that doesn't mean anything, really.
	But the thing is, well, like, a lot of...
	Sure, but he seems to, I mean, look at the picture.
	He seems to prefer the company of women, right?
	Particularly other people's women, right?
	Yes.
	And not on, right?
	Again, Paul, why are you standing for this, mate?
	You should be doing something about this.
	I think less of you as a man for permitting this.
	again i just can't even imagine like what my reaction would be if i was in public and i saw my wife doing that there are literally pages and i I might dissent on this one.
	All I see is pages and pages of speculations and articles about his sexuality.
	Let's assume it's all speculation.
	Even if he's gay, I'd be like, no, absolutely not.
	Because at the end of the day, he's only gay until he's not, right?
	He's only gay until he's having sex with your wife or something.
	He'd be like, well, hang on a second.
	Yes.
	It's conversion therapy.
	Well, I mean, I think it's Gad's sneaky effort thesis in play.
	And I think that the question about his sexuality is deliberately vague.
	But I just, again, this is more video of him we don't need to watch because we've seen enough.
	I just cannot stand it.
	And I can't stand it in that kind of...
	It doesn't matter to me whatsoever.
	But it's constantly shoved in my feed.
	And I'm more annoyed for this guy not like this culture, this very feminine culture in Hollywood, very permissive feminine culture, you should be enforcing your boundaries.
	And that's what really bothers me about this, is that what it's setting is an example to other men, but like, yeah, you know what?
	Actually, your wife, your girlfriend, your pregnant girlfriend, can just go and do this weird thing.
	Oh, he needs soothing.
	He needs something.
	Right.
	Okay, first things first, he needs a slap, right?
	If you're 40, how old's Pedro Pascal?
	Like 40-something, right?
	Man, and you're like, oh, I'm getting really anxious in public.
	No, grow up, right?
	You sound like a toddler.
	You sound like a child.
	You're not a child.
	You're an adult man.
	Grow up.
	Also, you should know that there are boundaries with other people's women, right?
	Yes.
	And if you are not respecting the boundaries that other people should be setting with their woman, then that's on you as well.
	You'd expect a smack in the face.
	Even if I don't know who the man is, I just know.
	And you'd expect a smack in the face if you did.
	But that's the point.
	Everyone involved in this is, frankly, failing in their duty to patrol the boundaries of their own relationships.
	And I think this is a terrible, terrible example to others.
	And it's really annoying me that I'm constantly getting shoved in my face in my bloody timeline.
	But it's not just, as Sitch pointed out, there are loads of articles going about, oh, isn't Pedro Pascal sweet?
	He's like, no, he's insufferable.
	I hate him.
	And I'm sick of seeing him.
	I'm sick of you putting him in everything.
	Well, more broadly, I don't understand why Hollywood does this.
	I mean, is there really a shortage of people that can act?
	I don't think so.
	I think there's a shortage of male feminists who haven't been Me Too'd who can act.
	I think that's the real issue.
	Yeah, that could be right.
	Because, I mean, there are...
	If you're right-wing, you're not allowed to have a job in Hollywood.
	Like Henry Cavill.
	So you've got to...
	Well, yeah, but only because he stays very quiet.
	Well, yeah, but he still doesn't really have a job in Hollywood.
	He should be in, like, big blockbusters, but instead, he gets marginalised.
	Well, we can infer that he's right-wing because he knows the Warhammer source material.
	But also because he never does anything left-wing.
	Yes, yes.
	It's the same with Chris Pratt is another one.
	He's obviously right-wing.
	He's lucky to be in the Jurassic.
	I think that is probably more it is for a movie, you want a masculine guy.
	Yeah.
	Good luck trying to find a left-wing masculine guy.
	In fact, there was a study that I saw not so long ago, and it was about basically what they did is they got a bunch of left-wing men and gave them testosterone, and they all turned into Republicans.
	Oh, really?
	Yeah.
	So left-wing is basically faggotry.
	I mean, maybe there's a lot of people who are.
	I'm going to have to bleed that on.
	Okay, fine.
	It is.
	Well, you know what I'm trying to say.
	So, yeah, if trying to populate a roster of movies with a masculine left-wing men, I mean, there can't be more than about four of them in the country.
	But the thing is, though, there's another aspect of this, which is her doing this, right?
	What she is doing is reveling in breaching the boundary with her own boyfriend.
	She's reveling in having this little toy because the thing is about Pedro Pascal is non-threatening.
	He's not going to do anything.
	If she draws a boundary, he's going to have to live with it.
	He's not going to be able to physically do anything.
	But she's reveling in the transgressiveness of this.
	You can see it on her face.
	This isn't your boyfriend, love.
	You shouldn't be doing this.
	You know, you shouldn't be doing this.
	She should know that as well.
	Exactly.
	And she's reveling in the transgression of it, which again, I'm just absolutely sick of this at this point.
	Terrible example.
	And just any young men watching, don't ever let a woman do this to you.
	Don't ever let another man do this to your woman.
	And you know what I'm talking about.
	Sorry, I'll read loads of these cards.
	I didn't realize how triggering Pedro Pascal would be.
	Good lord.
	Yeah.
	You don't need to do another episode.
	People generally turn to vigilantism when they feel like they have nothing to lose.
	You learn nothing else from the previous segment.
	Pedro Pascal stands up at the movie with Nick Cage to steal all of Nick Cage's be in every movie ever made.
	Energy like in Monsters and Space Jam.
	He will not stop until he's remade all the movies with himself.
	Pedro Pascal comes across the type of guy that will try to convince you that him having sex with your wife is good for society.
	I don't even think he does that.
	I think it's the sneaky fucker thing where he's just, oh, I'm such a vulnerable, pathetic wretch that I need your wife or girlfriend to come over and give me a hug.
	I'm still in team prefers the company of other men.
	I don't think it is.
	Because, again, why wouldn't there...
	Being gay would be good for his career.
	And could his career get any company?
	Can we ever vote in the chat?
	Sneaky effers or gay?
	There's absolutely no reason that he would keep being gay hidden.
	Absolutely none.
	In fact, he would gain social cachet for coming out as gay.
	Yeah, that is a good argument.
	And he's always touching women.
	He's never touching the men.
	If he was gay, he'd be doing to his male co-stars.
	He's only ever touching women and only ever the attractive ones.
	As Sigilstone points out, Pedro never crawls over his unattractive co-stars.
	Again, like...
	Like...
	It's so totally this.
	Like, I love this guy becoming a meme of people being sus.
	But it's like, I'm fucking watching you, Pedro.
	I'm just watching you, mate.
	Like, I don't, like, sorry, I don't believe you, you liar.
	Chat seems evenly divided between sneaky Ephra and gay.
	If he was gay, he'd be touching men.
	He never self-soothes through.
	Yeah, but men might respond.
	There are gay men.
	There are loads of, like, men who respond to that.
	But again, like, we're not talking about guys down the pub here.
	We're talking about weird perves in Hollywood.
	Anyway, Baystape says, no, Your Honor, I'm simply using a breast to stress balls.
	I have anxiety.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Bullshit.
	Pull the other one, mate.
	Obi-Man to Invisible Woman.
	Pedro is the father, isn't he?
	I'm so sorry.
	I've got a term you use for Pedro and male feminists in general.
	Ambush Predator.
	No, no, no.
	That's the thing.
	He's not a predator, right?
	He's got this kind of pathetic weakness that is allowing the women to essentially lie about what's happening to create a kind of fictional event, a fictional thing that now is a lie that everyone's got to play into.
	And the media's like, oh yeah, look, he's just got anxiety.
	No, he's a fucking perv and he wants to touch other guys' wives.
	Don't have it.
	Paul, get out there and bloody lamp him.
	No doubt they'll use the same Raylo group trying to ship these two together.
	Yeah, well, probably.
	And I don't, I don't, you know, at the end of the day, if Paul doesn't enforce his own boundaries, he gets what he wants.
	To be fair, I wouldn't allow my wife to be an actress.
	No.
	No, I would stop her at the first hurdle.
	Yeah, of course.
	Chris says, Carl clearly hasn't seen the Pedro and Nail compilations on X. Listen, man, being a metrosexual does not mean you're gay.
	Like, Russell Brand is one of the most famous metrosexuals ever, and he slept with more women than I've had hot dinners.
	So.
	Plot twist, Vanessa Kirby has a penis.
	I doubt it.
	She's pregnant.
	Hasn't been outed as a predator so far, you mean?
	Yeah, I mean, it is weird.
	I saw a tweet the other day.
	So can someone please just me too this guy?
	Because I'm sick of seeing him.
	You know, just get on with it.
	That's a random name says, I had a gay co-worker who acted like this with all the women at work, and they were allowed to touch him all over weird stuff.
	Yeah, but that's the thing, right?
	I think for a lot of them, being gay is a kind of cover.
	I am 100% team gay at this point.
	I'm not.
	Touch the men.
	That's going to get Lotus Eaters out of context.
	Touch the men, Pedro.
	That's all I'm saying.
	Anyway, video comments?
	From 4th August 2025, a new system called Enhanced Customs Monitoring will track UK residents who leave the country more than three times within a 12-month period.
	On your fourth trip, an automatic alert will be sent to the government's Mobility Oversight Unit, a new branch under HMRC and the Home Office, to check whether your declared income, employment status, and tax residency match your lifestyle.
	According to a leaked briefing reported by The Guardian, this policy is designed to tackle benefit fraud, tax evasion, and cross-border abuse of the welfare system.
	Oh, it's totally true, isn't it?
	What, is that real?
	I've not heard of this.
	So this is the first I've heard of this, but I've seen lots of people, particularly Morgoth on the right, being like, look, they're going to use the manipulation of the benefit system in order to bring about a very hardcore surveillance state.
	And everyone will agree with it because it'll be like, yeah, well, we've got to do something about the immigrants on benefits.
	It's like, you could do that anyway.
	Yeah, exactly.
	You just stop them from getting benefits.
	Solve that problem.
	Anyway, Zester King says, I think the responses from both government and Essex Police show that the people in power are unwilling to recognize.
	Oh, sorry.
	The people in power recognize the potential for mass unrest.
	Looking at the previous response last August, an unwillingness or inability to deal with the situation.
	To quote Edmund Burke, the dangers by being despised grow great.
	Yeah, I really think that that's one of the reasons that Keir Starmer basically has not said shit about this.
	He's just been like, yeah, no, that's bad.
	Yeah, amazingly, he learned.
	Yeah, exactly.
	I mean, like, he must have had focus groups or whatever, you know, advisors being like, listen, man, just let the local.
	I mean, it is extraordinary that it takes a focus group for him to understand the concept that people don't like their kids being attacked.
	And he's like, well, let the local police constable step on that rake, mate.
	Yeah.
	You don't need to do that.
	While the local police constipers dodging left, right and centre.
	Yeah, I mean, who...
	I think the question was right, though.
	And who is supposed to be taking responsibility?
	Or anywhere.
	Yeah, or anywhere.
	Who's in charge of the Prime Minister and Trump and all the rest of it?
	Yeah, no, it absolutely is.
	Henry says, it's incredibly hard for the police to claim they're politically neutral these days when regions elect a police and crime commissioner who are politically affiliated.
	Yeah, I mean, absolutely.
	And then all of the other political baggage that they carry.
	And the idea that the police are like, oh, we're just a neutral institution, bro.
	It's like, bollocks.
	Just don't even stop lying, man.
	Not Carl's Parrot says, his answer to every question was about the right to free speech.
	Yeah, as if they believe that.
	As if they believe that for a second.
	Purely performative and showing up for a press conference and they hope it'll go away.
	He was probably given command from on high, like the Home Office or the government themselves.
	Like, look, you have to go out and do a press conference about this.
	And he's like, Jesus Christ, what am I going to do?
	Well, they weren't doing it, so somebody else.
	Well, exactly.
	Someone's going to do it.
	And, you know, I guess dodge the bullets and just claim you're a neutral free speech institution, bro, as if anyone believes that.
	Ewan says, the point is we don't want more criminals on top of homegrown.
	The crimes they commit are totally avoidable to their victims.
	Well, that's exactly the point.
	Like, I saw a tweet going around the other day that was something along the lines of, oh, yeah, no, we want locally sourced rapists.
	It's like, well, we can't do anything about the locally sourced rapist.
	It's like, well, you're suggesting we need to import rapists because the numbers aren't sufficient.
	Like, importing rapists, like rape as a measure of GDP or something.
	Like, for fuck's sake.
	It's one of the things I've been looking to do at some point is work out how much GDP the government is willing to trade for one rape or murder.
	And the only reason I couldn't do it is because by the time we had good enough numbers, it was evident that the GDP contribution of these people was actually negative.
	Well, yeah, I was going to say, they're not contributing GDP.
	The growth.
	I mean, what was the growth, Britain's growth last year?
	It's only like 0.1%.
	Oh, it was absurd.
	Really low.
	And it's like, okay, well, that's probably fictional too.
	Anyway.
	Yes.
	Omar says, the far right does nothing, wins.
	It appears reality is finally catching up with the establishment orthodoxy.
	Well, that's the point.
	Even the woman is like, look, this is going to sound really far right, but they are a bunch of rapists that you've put in this hotel for some reason, and I don't know why.
	Should I do something for my section?
	Well, I've got one more from Alan.
	Oh, okay.
	It's a shame the Lode Seaters are atheistic because there's a clip parallel with Chief Constable Ben Julian Harrington and Pontius Pilate.
	That is an interesting parallel, actually.
	I didn't even think about that.
	Which clip?
	So that police officer will be like, look, nothing to do with me.
	Pontius Pilate is a bit more likely to be able to do my hands of it.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Wash my hands of it.
	I always found the thing about Pontius Pilate quite funny, actually, because the Roman governor is just watching these two groups of Jews just angrily arguing about some esoteric, you know, theological.
	And he's just like, oh, no.
	Just pay the taxes.
	Yeah, I don't know about that.
	I don't give a shit.
	But I do apologise for our atheism.
	I mean, we do what we can.
	I mean, Frez is quite sensible on the religious front, but we're correcting that where we can.
	I just want to answer a question by Hector very quickly.
	He says, is it confirmed that the Chief Constable is ordered by Keir Starmer to bus in counterpresses?
	Now, I haven't.
	There's no evidence that he's been ordered by Keir Starmer.
	As far as we can tell, they do it because they choose to.
	On this, Dad, had enough.
	Mason Roy says, note all the typical media earmarks.
	A nice vague headline.
	Only the final crime is reported.
	With the most innocent, flattering photo of the alleged perpetrator-victim.
	Yes, the one of him dressed up in combat gear, that came from Facebook from his own supporters.
	Yeah, weirdly, they didn't use that one in the bloody fight.
	Yes, no, they went for the, you know, choir boy.
	What was it?
	He was a Welsh.
	He was a top-top lad.
	Very respectable.
	Respectable.
	Yes, respectable, yes.
	Respectable, didn't he?
	Yes, I'm sure if you took back to 1950s Britain, he would stand out as a beacon in the community, as a very good person.
	I'm sure he already was a person.
	Ewan Baker points out there was a dad a few years back whose son got his bike stolen and had a track on it.
	So basically, the dad went to try and get the bike back, and he had a knife on him just in case.
	Now, before he drew that, the thief stabbed him in the eye, and so he then retrieved his knife and stabbed him back.
	He went to jail.
	Why didn't the thief go to bloody jail?
	Well, maybe he did as well, but the dad went to jail for counter-stabbing.
	We need to get these stabbed low.
	We need to make this.
	I mean, that's the thing.
	It's the official line in this country is...
	Yes, you have to allow violence to be done to you.
	Because only the state has the complete monopoly on violence.
	And if someone steals from you, you have to deal with it.
	If they machate attack you, you just have to deal with it.
	Like, Cameron was saying there was an example in Swindon where some urban youth got arrested with a machete and he was out the same day.
	Holy shit, I meant to put that in the segment.
	Yeah.
	and it's just like ugh So if they're just around on the streets, what are we supposed to do?
	I don't think that if I got caught with a machete on the street, I'd be let off within a day.
	Yeah, I can't have a feel I won't be out the same day.
	Yeah.
	I doubt it.
	Yeah.
	But for whatever reason, the protected classes are, and then they wonder why people feel the need to take the law into their own hands.
	Basetape says, the reason why banning ninja sawms seems so ridiculous, we're introducing a ban on this form of knife, but we're also keeping the ban on enforcement to do anything about it.
	May the odds ever be in your favour, citizens.
	Yes.
	Paul Nebuchadnezzar says he's dressed in military cosplay because he's part of the occupation force in Britain.
	Yes.
	Good comment from Zesty King there.
	I hope the bike was okay.
	I'm afraid I've got some bad news about that bike, mate.
	Well, your bad news and this and the garden wall.
	And the car, probably.
	And the most shocking thing was why did that house need five bins?
	Yeah, that's a good point.
	But no, I believe the bike didn't make it.
	Someone online says the dad did nothing wrong.
	Well, that's your opinion, sir.
	You know, that's not the view of the Lotus Eaters.
	The view of the Lotus Eaters is he should have rung for an insurance number and not looked back in anger.
	Yep.
	Mason says, Pedro Pascal is an inoffensive, diverse, but not too diverse actor of some ability.
	Ticks a lot of Hollywood boxes.
	Yeah, also he's a proud feminist and ally of LGBT.
	Okay, that pushes me back into the sneaky effer view, if he says.
	Oh, yeah, absolutely.
	He's a proud feminist and proud ally.
	Oh, that is classic sneaky effer behaviour.
	100%.
	I should have mentioned it, Rare.
	I brought up the feminism is for everyone page just as a sort of earmark of it, but I should have made it more explicit.
	Can you be both?
	Can you be a sneaky effer and gay at the same time?
	Maybe you can.
	I mean, probably, but that's an issue for the gay community that I don't know about.
	Anyway, Michael says Pedro is the perfect example of the new man that Hollywood wants to push.
	Weak, spineless, whiny.
	Meanwhile, his twin brother is trans, so too...
	Something's in a pod.
	Yeah, that's, again, like...
	No.
	I've seen more of that suspicious guy.
	Like, yeah, Pedro's brother's trans, eh?
	Eh?
	Okay.
	Interesting.
	Yeah, I wonder if that's natural nurture.
	Yeah, exactly.
	I've always wondered with that.
	Supreme General David says, I suspect all of these intimate relations that, interactions that Pascal has in public with these women are carefully curated by their respective agents in order to create publicity and increase their profiles.
	Maybe, but I'm bloody sick of seeing them, man.
	I'm absolutely sick of it.
	Peaceful Welsh Choir Boy says, I recently tried the Pedro Pascal anxiety gimmick with a co-worker and got reported to HR.
	I'd just taken it to see Coldplay 2, the ungrateful cow.
	Man, what did you make of that cold play thing, just very quickly?
	Well, if they had just not reacted, no one would have noticed.
	Yeah.
	But they did the worst possible thing.
	They drew attention to the fact that they went to a coldplay concert.
	Probably unlikely that their spouses were watching.
	No one would have noticed.
	I did like, oh, what's his name?
	The shouty guy, Andrew Tate.
	His response was, imagine losing half your money for banging an old lady.
	The woman was older and less attractive than his wife.
	Yes.
	So what are you doing?
	Yes.
	God, I mean he knows.
	Mathurian says, I didn't think I particularly dislike Pedro until I took a look at the Nick Cage movie where he plays himself.
	I haven't seen it.
	George says, yeah, Pedro is the new man feminism wants.
	Safe, progressive, and submissive.
	Yeah, that's the submissive part is the part that's really rankling me.
	He has no personality, just accepting whatever the woman in authority tells him to do.
	I refuse to watch anything he's involved in.
	Yeah.
	Why does he keep touching women in public?
	Well, that is the question.
	The question.
	And Chance asks, do you guys think it'd be possible to signal boost the Dominion Society out of Canada?
	It's basically Rupert Lowe's Restore Britain in Canada.
	The Commonwealth needs you.
	Well, I've never heard of the Dominion Society.
	Nor have I. But if it is, as you say.
	We've got some Canadian friends, so maybe we'll ask and see what view they take.
	Yeah.
	But yeah, this Pedro Pascal thing, I just don't believe that he's gay.
	A gay man, I think, would have a different attitude.
	I just don't see it.
	He looks like he's looking for female attention.
	The reason I'm so confused is I'm getting both sets of vibes from him.
	I think the submissive thing is the issue with the Josh Ranner.
	He's playing a game where if he's sufficiently submissive and pathetic, then he can sneaky fucker his way into getting other men's wives to give him intimate attention.
	He's in absolutely every movie.
	He should be able to get laid as much and as often as he wants.
	You would think.
	I don't really see how you could possibly fail at this point.
	I don't know.
	And it really annoys me, and I really don't like him.
	And so I'm just kind of, like I said, I'm sick of seeing him everywhere.
	I'm sick of him.
	Right.
	With that, mystery to solve.
	I think we have to bow out now because it is time.
	So thank you very much for turning up and watching and chatting and all the rest of it.
	And see you in the next one.
	Here we go.
	Oh, yes.
	And there is a Common Sense Crusade to watch.

▲