All Episodes
Previous Next
July 16, 2025 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters
01:33:40
The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1209
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hi, it's Lotus Eaters.
We're a podcast, episode 1209.
It's Wednesday, my dudes, and we're joined by Bo and Nate, otherwise known as Mr. H Reviews.
How do you do today?
Yeah, good.
Come dressed dapper to show us all up, haven't you?
That's because everyone's like you.
You've got a slothin on your podcast.
What?
Steady up.
That's literally one of the comments.
I was like, all right.
Who's been bullying poor Nate?
I'll come in with my three-piece.
I'm the only one wearing a waistcoat.
Yeah, yeah.
If you do that again, he will show up at your house and beat you up.
That's a promise.
I guarantee that promise.
All right.
So today we're going to be talking about some horrible, no-good, infuriating things that will make you want to Fed post.
I certainly want to Fed post.
And I was trying to tear my hair out during my segment this morning when I was preparing it.
So hopefully you will too.
Does that excite you?
It should.
You ready for your slop?
Yum, yum, yum.
Anyway, it's going to be talking about Sycamore Gap and the atrocity that was that being taken down and the people who did it being sentenced.
How if we stop immigration altogether, it will literally improve everything.
And as such, the UK government does not want to stop immigration at all because they don't want to improve anything at all.
And yeah, is there anything else I should say, Samson?
All right, let's get started then.
All right, well, I think we should talk a tiny bit about the Sycamore Gap sentencing just because it's in the news cycle at the moment.
We did a segment on it originally.
It was quite a while ago now.
It doesn't seem that long ago, but it was back in 2023 when the incident originally happened.
A tree got cut down.
So one of the first angles I want to mention is a lot of people have been saying, and on one level, it's a fair point, and on another level, it really annoys me, of like, why do you care about this?
It's just a tree, bro.
Well, you know, there's more important things going on in the country.
It's like, yeah, I know, yeah.
We talk about that all the time.
The rest of this podcast will be about those things.
Yeah.
So not every single segment we ever do has to be about rape gangs or something.
So anyway, this is in the news.
And seeing as it's finished now and the sentencing has been done, it sort of draws a line under it, doesn't it?
So we can actually, you can report on it and say with fact what the conclusions the court came to and all that sort of thing.
So just thought we'd discuss it because it has touched on a bit of a zeitgeist, you might say.
It was a massive sort of scandal at the time.
Everyone was up in arms about it, and I think quite rightly so.
Because it is more than just a tree.
Obviously, it was just a tree.
Sure.
But some trees are more valuable than others, aren't they?
Yeah.
This one did mean something to some people.
It did have more value than a random tree in the middle of a forest that no one ever saw.
It was beautiful and it was iconic.
Right.
It was beautiful.
Yeah.
So people that say it was just a tree get some perspective.
It's like, well, you could say that about anything.
England is just a bit of rock and soil.
A church is just some stone and mortar.
Churches burn down every day, bro.
Why are you worried about this one?
Well, I would contend that those people saying, oh, it's just a tree, who cares, have no soul and no inner life.
Right, yeah.
Where's their sense of the picturesque?
Where's their sense of beauty?
The ideal, the sublime.
Yeah, the sense of aesthetic, the sense of wonder.
These are things that have occupied the European mind for time immemorial.
To these people, it just means absolutely nothing.
We can throw aside all European tradition of considering beauty, how it transports us anywhere, because I just live in the moment.
I just want to play video games and goon.
That's going to get clipped.
Yeah.
You shouldn't have said that in the first person.
But that's what I think of these people.
Yeah, no, me too.
There's some sort of essential spark of humanity missing if that's your attitude.
Because that was their attitude.
It's just a tree who's going to really count.
And these are a pair of right gooners.
Yeah.
You can almost smell them from here.
I'd also like to add, I think, going back to the argument of, well, it's just a tree.
And obviously, things have an inherent value.
You know, we as a society give things an inherent value.
So yes, a tree can be more valuable than other trees.
And discussing how beautiful the tree was and, you know, anyone that could look at that image and go, oh, it's just a tree.
I think those kind of individuals are not necessarily victim, I guess would be one way of calling it.
Dead inside?
Dead inside, but victims of modern day Britain.
Right?
Like you walk around, I mean, we're in Swindon, you walk around Swindon.
It's hardly the most picturesque location, is it?
Every single building is now like a grey blob.
Everything is square.
Everything is grey.
Everything is drab.
That's what everything is like in this day and age.
The beauty of architecture is lost.
And so I'd say that they're just not people that did it are scum, obviously.
Right.
But anyone that, you know, could look at that and say, well, it's just a tree.
Yeah, well, can you not recognize beauty?
Can you not walk around every day and go, well, I live in this mess.
There is the modern phenomenon of urban bugmen who actually get frightened when they're out of the city.
If they're in like a green area, if they're in the trees or in the woods, then they're frightened.
They're terrified.
And I attribute this to them being like prey animal.
They're out in the wild and they've not got the defense of being in the hive.
And so they just think to themselves, oh, I'm going to get eaten.
Yeah.
Your parents, your children, it's just carbon and water, bro, with a bit of iron and potassium.
People die every day, bro.
Why are you worried about this one?
Yeah.
Like, no, it's a value.
It's a living, breathing, beautiful thing.
And destroyed needlessly as well.
Completely needlessly.
I'll leave that to the end, the motive.
Why they actually did it.
But there's a few pictures.
I think you're getting it a bit wrong there.
We're just a bit of carbon, a bit of water, a bit of potassium.
Yes.
Apart from St. Floyd.
Oh, sorry.
He was above all of us.
You know, some deaths are worth more than others.
We didn't have much CO2 at the end, though, so.
Yeah.
Well, that's really good.
Yeah, Stephen Lawrence was definitely more than just water and carbon.
Emmett Till.
Yeah, sure.
Yeah.
Much more valuable human than most of us.
No, absolutely.
Okay, so it's been in the headlines that these guys, Ratty and Piggy, as I'm going to call them, their real names are Daniel Graham and Adam Carruthers.
Yeah, pig eyes.
He's got the eyes of a feral pig.
Just dead behind the eyes, to be honest.
I mean, that's...
Or is it Daniel Graham?
It's like a rat man, like Skaven or something.
So do we know why it is that they did it?
Did that come out as part of the sentence?
I was going to leave that to the end, but I could just talk about it now if you like.
Oh, well, it's your segment.
Oh, no, let's say it now.
They didn't really have a motive beyond, one, just the general attitude that it's just a tree, bro.
And two, they just thought it would be a bit of a lark, a bit of a laugh.
It seems like in the past they've done other things which weren't revealed in court to mark certain things in their life.
Like one of them had recently had a kid.
It's weird, they haven't really got...
So what?
They just wanted to get it.
They never explained it to them.
They never explained it to them.
Yeah, yeah, they just...
It's almost like Joker motivation.
Awful human beings.
It seems like part of the motivation was for the notoriety, although they were going to try and get away with it.
But there was messages between them in the immediate aftermath of it going, oh, it's on the news.
Have you seen?
It's all over the news.
It's even on like American news.
It's going to be on ITV tonight.
Well done, bros.
Yeah, well done.
Brilliant.
Well done.
Well done.
Congratulations.
Anyone that wants notoriety or fame for doing bad or evil things, scum of the air.
I mean, that's why the guy who killed John Lennon did it, because he just wanted the notoriety.
Although, to be fair, that was like morally polar opposite.
That's why a lot of people do disgusting things is for the notoriety of it.
There's nothing beyond that.
I mean, not in their defence, during their defence in the trial, their lawyers tried to at one point say, oh, it was a drunken thing.
They'd been drinking and it was just a drunken sort of mistake, if you like.
And the prosecution ripped that apart and the judge didn't buy it.
The jury obviously didn't buy it because they're like, well, you drove there.
It's like a 40-minute hour drive.
And you chopped it down in sort of three, five minutes flat, expertly.
They're tree surgeons.
They are tree surgeons.
I think you weren't that pissed.
Well, yeah.
And they basically didn't offer, I mean, the judge in summing up said, it seems, what does she call it?
Like sheer bravado, she said.
So it was for the sake of it.
There doesn't seem to be anything more to it than that.
They never offered a proper explanation.
In fact, during the trial, they denied they did it.
Are they from the area?
Yeah, nearish, Carlisle.
It's up on Hadrian's Wall and they're from Carlisle.
You know what a staggering shame this is?
It perfectly encapsulates and represents the disconnect that local communities have to their actual geography.
The complete and utter disconnect.
No respect, no pride, nothing at all.
It's just a tree.
It's just sad.
It's super sad.
It's kind of infuriating on a wider philosophical level.
Everyone's pure lack of regard for their surroundings.
They're just like, whatever, who cares?
And their own history and heritage.
I mean, it was a landmark, wasn't it?
Yeah.
I mean, this really is cultural vandalism.
Yeah, that tree was a metaphor for, or it was emblematic of something.
And they killed it.
They destroyed it again for no good reason.
I mean, trees always have wonderful metaphorical value because of the rootedness of them.
Literally tied to the soil.
Well, there is the concept of the Green Tree of England.
I don't want to get too history bro about it all.
But that metaphor does go back a thousand years to the Norman Conquest and Henry II's reconnection with the House of Wessex.
And there's this idea of the Green Tree of England.
I mean, you can trace it all across Europe, like in pagan religions, pre-Christian pagan religions, like the idea of the Yggdrasil, the tree of knowledge.
It goes into like Nordic pagan religions, Odin being strung up on Yggdrasil where his eye was pecked out and then gains unimaginable knowledge through that.
Obviously, trees occupy a big part of the European psyche.
Yeah, definitely.
The Saxons had literally sacred trees.
They would have groves, sometimes one particular grove with a sacred tree in it that they thought was the centre of the universe.
You know, some people think the Temple Mount is the centre of the universe or whatever.
They thought it was the centre of the cosmos and stuff.
So yeah, I don't want to get too hippy-dippy tree hugger about it, but you're right.
You're absolutely right.
And regardless of anything, it was just, it was a beautiful thing that didn't need to be destroyed.
anyway um um sigh Ratty McNarl and Piggy McLumpinface cut it down in the middle of the night.
Let's go quickly through what they did.
It seems like they decided upon this plan not long before they did it, possibly even the day or the evening that they did it, but whatever.
There was certainly some planning because they had to drive the, like I say, 40 odd minutes, an hour to get there.
Then you have to walk 10-15 minutes from the car park to the actual spot.
Yeah, they took it.
You needed quite a big chainsaw because it was a chunky old tree.
And if there's a picture of it, there you go.
If you see the guy there for scale, you need a big, big chainsaw to do it and a can of spray paint because they did it professionally because again, they know what they're doing.
They're tree surgeons.
Went up there, the guy had his phone.
In fact, in court, they showed the footage of it.
Let's just watch that real quick.
It's only a few seconds.
Got to pull your phone out and record it, bro.
Yeah.
It's really grainy because apparently, when he actually filmed it, it was pitch black at night.
It's during a storm, in fact.
can you get the sound on it I'm not fine at this.
I can get 4K camera phones, and yet this isn't as bad as it is.
Because apparently, when he actually filmed it, it was nothing but blackness.
And that's been massively enhanced by the police so that you can see anything at all.
Apparently, that's why that's so grainy.
So these masterminds, spur of the moment, decided to not only do this in the hopes that they would get massive notoriety from it, but then also just film it as well.
Yeah, and try and get away with it as well.
Because at the time, they are about as retarded as they look then.
Yep.
Yep.
The thing is, I've only known one tree surgeon.
So this is not a representative sample, but the tree surgeon that I did know was a massive cat head.
I wasn't expecting to say that.
Yeah.
I thought you might say stoner or something.
So is this just like a thing that tree surgeons do?
Like tree surgeons, psychopathic drug addicts who like to destroy nature for the sake of it?
Is that why they sign up for the job?
If there are any tree surgeons in the comments, if you're not on ket right now, please let me know.
Drop us a line.
I'm just saying, it's a weird thing to want to do is to cut down trees whilst high on Ket.
Yeah, that is odd.
I've never done that myself, I must admit.
Neither have I, shockingly enough.
So, well, one thing you can see is that when they have to cut a wedge out of it first, then you cut it down entirely.
And they took the wedge away as a trophy.
Ah, yes.
And the thing that's quite annoying is you very deliberately did it in a way that the tree would fall onto Hadrian's wall.
So they're actually on two charges.
One, the criminal damage for cutting down the tree itself, another charge, second charge for criminal damage to Hadrian's wall.
Although it was minimal, there was some.
But he deliberately, he could have got it to fall the other way.
He was a professional.
But he didn't.
He did that with it.
Okay.
So at the time, if you remember, there was some completely innocent 16-year-old kid and an old man that were arrested.
I don't think they were ever charged.
They weren't ever charged, but they were arrested and under suspicion of it.
Completely wrongly.
The police, it was just a wrong lead.
And they were messaging each other about that, sort of laughing about it.
So these are scumbags.
They're right scumbags.
One of them, the older one, what's his name, Ratty, Daniel Graham?
He, because I watched the entire summing up and sentencing of the judge, it was about half hour long.
And she mentioned that he has got four previous convictions for battery.
Well, two of them were battery, to do with relationships.
And that's all it was said.
But you can only really infer he knocks his missus about.
So, so total scumbag, total scumbag.
The other one, pig eyes, piggy, McGlumpinface, he had no previous convictions, but there you go.
So they were sentenced to four years and three months for the tree and six months for the damage to Hadrian's wall to be served concurrently.
But they take off, for a start, they take off the amount you've already served because they were held in custody, one for about six months and one for about nine months.
So that'll be, that's time already served.
Plus, as long as you're a good boy, when you're actually in the slammer, you'll only serve about 40% of that.
So they'll probably be out in about a year, 18 months.
That doesn't seem too much to me.
Some people are saying, why would you take a man's liberty away just for chopping down a tree?
Again, it's just a tree, bro.
It's like, no, no, I would have given them a bit more.
Other people are obviously saying, string them up, nail them up.
That's a little bit strong for me in all seriousness.
But I would have liked a bit.
I mean, I consider it.
No, I think I would have given them a bit more if it were me.
But there you go.
The next thing to say, which, because I put this on Twitter, and there's a lot of people making the point, and it is a fair point, that, you know, people that do much worse violent crimes get a lot less.
Yeah.
And that I couldn't agree more with those people.
Yeah.
You get someone that actually does a rape or something and they get less time than this.
Sometimes they don't get any in this country.
But I would just say it's a bit of a false equivalency or a non-sequitur or something.
Just because an injustice is happening here, it doesn't mean that we should allow another injustice to go on.
Had they been brown men, would they have got less?
Maybe.
But yeah, it's a horrible situation we're in.
We've got a two-tier justice system.
Yeah, it's really bad.
Yeah, we agree that violent criminals and rapists and such should be getting far worse sentences than what they're getting in this country already.
Absolutely.
That doesn't finish what's happened here.
Right.
Yeah, that was going to be my point.
It's like, well, just because these people are getting disgustingly light sentences for the worst crimes possible doesn't mean we should let these guys off with a slap on the wrist.
It's the inverse.
Right.
They're getting a, I still think a relatively light sentence, but it means that the abhorrent abuse, you know, abusers in society should get significantly more.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Well, I don't think rapists should ever see the light of day again.
Like murderers.
I don't think you should probably ever...
Well, yeah, quite proud.
That's another take on.
Never see the light of day again.
Because in America, they throw out life without parole, depending what state you're in, of course.
But some states in America, they throw out life without parole quite freely.
We hardly ever do it.
We call it full life, what do we call it?
Full life sentence.
Full life order.
Yeah.
Or His Majesty's pleasure, or only the Home Secretary could ever let you free.
We do that very, very, very, very, very rarely.
But I would up to me.
In Bose Britain, you get life without parole for a murder or a rape.
Well, I'd bring back the death sentence.
Yeah, capital punishment.
I mean, America still has capital punishment in quite a few states.
You don't accidentally do those things, so no, you forfeit your life at that point.
It speaks of your character, like these two fellas, right?
Those saying, oh, it's a bit much for cutting down a tree, isn't it?
It's like, no, because it speaks to their character.
It speaks of their character.
That they're dead inside, that they're scumbags.
Anyway, I've made that point.
I've made that point.
Okay, so, yeah, well, just the last thing then, just to round off on this, is just again to touch on the idea that they didn't really have any motive.
It's remarkable to me, that.
It really is remarkable.
Whether they just deliberately decided to not say what their motive was, because again, during the trial, they claimed innocence.
And then after that footage of them actually doing it was shown and a number of other things, where they took the elder guy, Daniel Graham, took a picture of his own boot, which had the next day or the next morning, which had the chainsaw and the wedge they'd cut out in it.
So it was a complete slam dunk in terms of whether they did it or not.
100% bang to rights.
But they still claim they didn't do it.
And anyway, after they were found guilty, but before their sentencing, they both sort of turned on each other, saying he was more responsible.
He egged me on.
They both accused each other of doing that.
Apparently they were close friends and worked together and now they don't at all because they fell out over it.
And apparently they're not really taking any moral responsibility for it still.
And not really accepting that they've done anything wrong particularly.
Like they're a mastermind.
Like their position was, again, it's just a tree.
It's not that much of a big deal.
Imagine that as a defense.
Yeah, how can you get through to somebody like that?
Again, if it was up to me, I'd put them in prison for so long that they were old men by the time they came out and they were different men.
They wouldn't dream of going to do something like that ever again.
Whereas if they're out in like one year or 18 months, they're still going to be the same person, essentially.
But the other guy's got a long history of abuse, right?
So it was just mad to me, I think for a lot of people, he was expecting at some point during the trial to find out why it was.
Some have speculated, one of them, I think it was Daniel Graham as well, lived in a caravan on a bit of land, or one of them lived in a caravan on a bit of land and he was going to be evicted from it.
And there was this idea that it was like revenge in some sense for that.
I mean, the tree belonged to the National Trust.
But that sort of defence or that excuse fell apart under any sort of cross-examination.
Again, the judge and the jury didn't buy any of that.
It's just nonsense.
So just, I suppose the last word to say on it, other than that it's extremely sad and disappointing, is that it sort of doesn't really make sense.
I was really expecting something, even like a weird thing.
Like they had some sort of weird esoteric hatred for sycamores or something.
But no, there wasn't anything.
There wasn't anything.
It was for its own sake.
So what a shame.
Alright, we've got two rumble rants from that.
The engaged few says you know what would be aesthetically pleasing, using that tree as the fuel by which they are burned at the stake.
Is that even a bit too far for Bose Britain?
Say burned at the stake.
What about an impaling?
Oh my.
A Vlad.
A Vlad-style impaling on the sharpened trunk.
And I thought Bose Britain was losing its edge for a moment there.
My goodness.
And that's a random name.
We're just carbon, bro.
People die every day.
I agree.
Now get back on the boat, Ahmed.
Yeah.
Good point.
Excellently made.
All right, let's go on to your social media.
I need stuff.
You want a mouse?
You need to help me do this.
Do you want a box that may or may not work?
Actually, to be fair, you don't really need the box.
You've only got one link.
Give me the box.
Oh, he's having the box anyway.
How am I supposed to work this thing?
Oh, it's down there anyway.
All right, cool.
There you go.
All right, so I thought what we would do is talk about how stopping immigration could save the planet.
Yes.
Yes, genuinely.
Now, I don't mean that from like a comical perspective, at least from our own Brit perspective, our British side of things, the West in general.
So effectively, this whole segment spawned from a conversation I had like two years ago now with the local MP candidates.
So our local members of parliament candidates, as they were sort of polling and trying to canvassing, trying to get people around to vote for them.
I spoke to the Conservatives, didn't speak to the Reform one at that point in time, and I spoke to the Lib Dems.
And we often look out at the nation as a whole, and we look at our policies and things like that, and you go, this in isolation, cool.
I can sort of see that sort of makes sense.
This in isolation, yeah, I can sort of see that there's an argument for that.
But those two things combined are pure retardation.
Right, just demonstrable retardation.
Such as?
Open borders and net zero.
They don't seem to marry up very well, do they?
They don't.
They don't.
And that's because everyone has an inherent carbon value.
And that actually exponentially increases when people move, obviously, from the third world to a developed world.
And when you have to, like, for instance, cut down forests and pave over fields and such for the sake of housing those people.
Well, that's even if we do, which we don't.
Oh, yeah, true.
You've got to remember that.
We actually don't develop a lot of houses.
I think we do develop something like 100 or 150,000 houses each year.
It's just that it's nowhere near enough to make, like, to keep up.
I think that's their aim, but they didn't.
They fell short of like 80,000 or something.
The aim is 300,000, I believe, or at least it was a few years ago.
They might have upped it since then to try and make up for the shortfalls over the previous few years.
But either way, there is a lot of need because of this to pave over the country.
You really do want to make Britain like Coruscant, like one massive city from Land's End to John of Groats, don't they?
I like comparing it to Mega City One.
Yeah, right, yeah.
Madden AD, you know, we've got to bring it back to Britain.
At the very least, in those kinds of dystopias, there's something cool about them, right?
Coruscant's got that like techno-future aesthetic.
Mega City One, there's a chance that you could sign up to become a judge and just be able to shoot degenerate criminals in the streets.
So there's like some cool stuff about that.
Britain would just be the most boring dystopia.
What is the most boring, dull, predictable dystopia out there?
Well, when you look at the most densely populated spots on earth, like I'm thinking maybe Hong Kong or Tokyo, somewhere like that.
Imagine the whole of Britain.
They would have the whole of Britain that dense, wouldn't they?
Yeah, well, I think Tokyo is like three times the size of London.
If it was transplanted onto Britain, it would take up the entirety of the southwest.
And I see people like Tom Harwood say, oh, why aren't we doing that?
Why don't we have Tokyo in the south?
Why don't we have Tokyo in the north?
Why don't we join up Liverpool and Manchester?
Yeah, why don't we just one gigantic megacity?
Because that would be, I don't want that.
Destroy it all.
So I found this.
We'll just take a look at the abstract because I just think it's interesting.
So publicly available data on CO2 emissions with patterns of human movement.
So to analyze the anticipated effects of human migration on the abilities of nations to attain the 2030 CO2 emissions, right?
Because that's what they're trying to push for, this arbitrary figure that they've thrown out, literally arbitrarily, which has been admitted as an arbitrary target.
I mean, we here, I imagine, don't even buy the very concept of CO2.
I don't.
Oh, I don't.
Of CO2 being the driver of climate change.
No, I think weather patterns just generally happen.
Anyway, so this is all in their terms.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So even in their own terms, right?
So this individual says I do so at both global, 175 countries, and national, Canada and the USA.
Now, we'll get on to the UK in a minute.
I've got some statistics for them in terms of some figures.
So this is just Canada and the USA for the most part.
The analysis reveals that mean per capita CO2 emissions are nearly three times higher in countries with net immigration.
Now, that's obviously for a few reasons.
Those countries are where people migrate to, obviously, right?
And this is why we'll break it down for the UK in a minute, because it shows there's an average per person on the figure that they put out.
And so you can actually calculate their totals and go against what they've said we're reducing it by and how it's just one step forward, two steps back, one step forward, two steps back.
Constantly.
So in terms of this one, the difference is Differences project.
I can't believe you read it.
The differences project a cumulative migration-induced annual increase in global emissions of approximately 1.7 billion tons.
All on their own terms.
This is on, you know, this is the NIH.
That's their own terms.
Right, 1.7 billion tons.
For Canada and the United States, the projected total emissions attributable to migration from 2021 to 2030 vary between 0.7 and 0.9 billion tons.
I mean, that's madness.
That's absolutely insane.
On their own terms.
Remember, we've got to answer their own terms.
How that stacks up relatively, if that's a lot or not much.
But yeah, it's all although staggering.
The next sentence begins with although staggering.
So I assume that's bad.
That's a bad number.
Current global emissions total 36 billion tons per annum.
So that is quite a lot.
It is a lot.
It's quite a hell of a lot.
I make this point a fair bit, but the word billion gets thrown out a lot of the times.
You know, Elon paid 40 billion for Twitter or whatever.
This or that billion, or even trillions get thrown out.
A billion of anything, well, not anything, maybe a billion microns isn't all that big, but a billion tons of something, a billion, a thousand million, it's a crazy number.
We just get used to hearing the word billion thrown out all the time.
Yeah, you really can't.
And you become desensitized to it, but that is a huge amount.
A huge, huge amount.
Oh, it's mental.
It's absolutely mental.
So that's just as a quick overview, I think.
It sort of sets the stage a little bit.
But let's bring it home.
Let's bring it home to our absolute, and then we can convert it back out to the West in general.
So the average UK citizen is responsible for roughly 12.7 tonnes of CO2 emissions per year.
A year.
Yeah, per year, per year.
12.7 tonnes of CO2 per year.
So this figure includes both direct emissions, like those from heating homes and driving, and then indirect emissions, right?
So that would apply to production of goods and services consumed in the UK.
So that's just all-encompassing.
Now, these are the figures which I could find.
Those are the figures that are out there.
You can extrapolate from that that it's probably going to be worse anyway, because that's on their own terms.
That's something they believe in.
So could be worse, could be better, depending on where their argument lies and what they're trying to push narrative-wise.
So let's talk about figures of humans that have migrated to the migrated scumbags.
Broken into the UK, yeah, invaded.
So in 2024, this is just the figure I could find.
Net migration to the UK was estimated to be 431,000.
That's the estimation.
That's going to be revised up, like it always is.
Like it always is.
The ONS comes out and goes, sorry, bro.
It was actually higher than that by a significant amount.
Maybe August, September, November at the latest.
But last year, I think it was August, where there were actually...
Yeah, it's More in the ballpark of the 700, 800,000.
No big deal, though, guys.
No big deal.
And we've got thousands of Afghans coming over, even more thousands of Afghans, which I'll cover in my segment.
Well, but this goes perfectly to that as well, right?
So 431,000 is what was quoted.
Now, this will likely be higher as always, but let's play devil's advocate with that as a figure and just take them at face value, right?
So that actually means that the UK in 2024 alone imported a total yearly output of 5.5 million tons of CO2.
Does Ed Miliband know about this?
Has anyone let Ed Murray?
I'm sure he does.
Does he know anything?
He'll be a ghost.
And I know he'll have a solution for this, right?
So, Ed Miliband, wind turbines, his favourite thing.
They've taken away all of the protections of putting wind farms all over the countryside when they just wanted them to be offshore, you know.
So they're back on the land.
They're going to be three times the Statue of Liberty in size, right?
And now they want you to be able to put a wind turbine in your back garden so that you can annoy your neighbors and possibly take out their dog if it jumps for you, right?
I'm sure I've got an even better idea than Ed Milliband to be able to offset individual per capita emissions, right?
Attach turbines to people.
Okay.
I'm imagining something.
Imagining a cap with a tiny turbine on top.
Like those little caps with tiny turbines.
Exactly that.
But yes, you have to wear a solar-powered battery at all times that collects the energy.
That will be mandated by Ed Miliband by the end of next year.
Yes.
That's what's going to happen.
On a windy day, you might take off, but that's the sacrifice that Ed Miliband is willing to make.
So, yeah, brilliant.
I don't think that guy.
That's what we'll have to do.
When these Afghans get off the boat, they'll immediately be fitted with little turbines on the top of their head.
Well, they're used to strapping stuff to their chest.
In 2023, right, the UK reduced its carbon emissions.
And again, this is just the only figures I could find.
Is it likely to be worse, better?
Who knows, right?
Just take it on face value.
But in 2023, the UK reduced its carbon emissions by 22.3 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.
So that's a 5.4% decrease from the previous year.
And a reduction excludes emissions from international aviation shipping, which are not included in the UK's 2030 climate target.
So, I mean, if you've taken that figure into account, 22.3 million tons, but you've imported in 2024 alone, basically 5.5 million tons, you can see how this is never going to work.
Like, ever.
It's never going to work.
Because you also have to take into account, as we sort of said from the off, we have not built cities which are required to house these people.
We have imported cities the size of Birmingham worth of population, and yet we've not built them.
So we're running on a mass deficit of output versus what the requirements are, and yet we're still importing an insane amount of CO2 output.
And you're not, so moving one person from one location, that process alone.
I don't care about the emissions.
I want to keep saying that.
I don't care.
I'm just trying to play people at their own game.
Because this is something which you could take to your local MP, right?
Because it is genuinely.
And also, you can have fun like I did, which I'll reveal my story in a minute of why this is so fun.
But you can just dismantle their arguments and play them at their own game.
So you can see that obviously, you know, if you're going to without any cap on migration remotely, and you're going to keep importing millions of people, millions and millions and millions of people with our net zero targets, which were just plucked out of thin air, they cancel one another out.
And so all that you can get from this is, one, your MPs are incredibly stupid.
I call these POPR.
So these are policies of pure retardation.
So they're POPRs.
And the MP, they are, right?
They've got to give them official names, okay?
So you go to your MP and you say, look, you are pursuing POPRs.
And they'll go, what's that?
And you'll go, well, that's a policy of pure retardation.
And let me tell you why.
And you can quote all of this stuff.
At the end of the day, look, it's a scam.
You can't do both.
Obviously, you can't do both.
No, I don't buy into any of this stuff anyway.
I simply don't care.
But some of these people, you need to play at their own game.
And the people that do believe it, they lack the critical thinking skills to dissect this kind of information.
And so that's why I'm weaponizing you with information, ladies and gents.
Take this to your local MPs and take this to any of the radical lunatics that promote any of this stuff.
Because there is clearly an intersection between, you know, zero emissions and migration.
People love it.
They want to promote both because it's a virtue.
And maybe you can get hung up on like I was.
So this all stems from a conversation I had with my now unfortunate local MP where I called her up, Liberal Democrat, and I said, well, tell me about your politics.
Firstly, she was like, how did you get my number?
And I said, it's on your leaflet, you imbecile.
Legit part of the conversation.
It's like, it's quite literally on your flyer, you moron.
Couldn't believe that.
Tell me about your politics.
Told me about our politics.
I was like, we're not really liberal and democrat because, you know, you don't promote democracy.
The liberal democrats, we know they don't promote democracy.
They want to reverse Brexit and things like this.
That's not democratic.
And they want to flood the country with immigrants.
That's not democratic either.
So anyway, then I had a conversation about houses.
Funnily enough, this woman is an architect.
And I had a conversation about, well, do you not see that there's a sort of a contradiction on terms here by wanting to allow infinity migrants into the country whilst trying to reach 2030 targets?
Obviously, usual spin of, well, you know, we, I don't know, we, Britain was built on immigration.
I was like, it's not.
Shut up.
Imbecile.
And then just subsequently continued on from there to saying that, well, we can just build more houses.
And I said, what?
Tower blocks.
She goes, yeah, people absolutely want to live in flats.
I was like, no, they don't.
I said, no, they don't.
You offer someone a cottage versus a flat.
If they have the choice, they will live in a cottage.
They won't live in a flat.
They live in a flat because it's a necessity.
You don't have visions of the glorious great global favela that we're building?
Oh, yes.
I mean, that is one useful thing about these people that they want to bring into the country is that where they're from, they're used to stacking up on top of one another and living in a corner of a room somewhere with no amenities.
They don't expect the kind of luxuries that the West has come to expect.
They're used to their walls just being some breeze blocks and their roof a bit of corrugated iron.
Yeah, I was going to say, if not just like bits of cardboard.
You're completely right.
In their own paradigm, it doesn't make sense many times over that CO2 drives climate change at all.
Doesn't actually make sense.
It doesn't make sense.
And then the idea that you'll care about the carbon footprint, but import people into the West where their carbon footprint is increased.
Brilliant.
That doesn't make any sense.
Like the idea that Britain, its whole history is racist and systemically racist, but it was also built by blacks and immigrants and whatever.
Back from the Roman days.
Okay, you're talking absolute nonsense.
Makes perfect sense to me.
But then again, I am retarded.
Well.
You said it.
Yeah, right.
No, but yeah, in their own terms, it's just complete nonsense.
And surely...
Unfortunately, a lot of people watching this will preach into the choir a bit, aren't we?
I would have thought.
But a lot of people don't.
They genuinely believe it.
A lot of boomers, a lot of young socialist commie pinkos straight out of uni, they buy it all.
How are they not feeling a cognitive dissonance?
I don't know.
How could you not?
There is some dissent, but a lot of it, as ever, is always pushed by social pressure.
I've got quite a few friends who, if they speak to me without anybody listening in, they don't immediately jump to, oh, thank God, I can finally be honest about how I feel.
But sometimes I get the feeling from some of them that they start to really probe about what I think about things and ask me my beliefs.
And it's not in an antagonistic way.
It's almost like in a, can you give me permission?
Give me permission to do wrong think, please, Harry.
Give me a logical argument so that I can do wrong think without feeling bad.
And I'm sure plenty of people have experienced that with people in their own lives as well, in your personal lives.
The way I've always done it, pretty much, is that whenever I even get the smallest pang of cognitive dissonance.
Now, wait a minute, how does that make sense?
Sorry, that doesn't quite make sense.
That's quite a profound thing for me.
Again, even if I get a small pang of it, I have to rethink what I think, rejig my version of reality that rolls around in my head.
Because I can't have it.
I don't like it.
If there's anything really big, really big where I realise, oh, what I thought before must be incorrect if I accept this new thing.
I feel like just lots of people walk around and they don't ever do that.
Well, they don't have...
So it just all comes down to that.
people like to think that they're intelligent you can be knowledgeable but I think intelligence You can be knowledgeable on something, but that doesn't necessarily mean you're intelligent.
I think intelligence, knowledge is just the act of learning information and retaining it.
Intelligence is the dissemination of that information on a critical level.
You could have a Hindu physicist who understands new things about the nature of the universe and yet still believes in Ganesh.
So, yeah, intelligence and knowledge are two different things and can be almost entirely divorced, I think.
You're right, yeah.
But what a strange thing to just endlessly bring in more people, increasing the carbon, but we insist on carbon coming down, even though that doesn't drive climate change.
Mad world, a mad world.
Actually demonstrably increase the carbon as well.
So now you know the figures, right?
We must stop immigration to save the planet.
Yes.
Write a letter to Mr. Miliband.
Which he can ignore.
Yeah.
Yeah.
His people will promptly throw in the bin the second they realise that.
Absolutely.
Yes.
Give you the box as well.
I'll go through some of these rumble rants.
Logan Pine says yesterday I forgot to say, long live death for Spain.
I don't have much context for that.
I didn't watch yesterday's podcast.
I will assume that it makes sense.
That's a random name.
Was at the gym at 3 a.m. this morning, two to three people in, pure quiet bliss, until the one Arab worker doing the night shift starts yelling in Arabic to himself.
Must have been a jinn.
I hate jinns.
Jinn in a gym.
Yeah, that's.
Jinn.
Hey.
I used to do the old 3am workout at university, and it wasn't because I had gotten up really, really early or anything like that.
And there is some kind of peace and bliss to having the entire place to yourself.
For one, the dumbbells are normally free.
I do feel like, though, if you're all about gains, you need your sleep, don't you?
Oh, I was getting a lot of fun.
I was getting my sleep.
It just wasn't in the night.
Yeah, there you go.
As a student.
Yeah, you.
I got it.
I got it.
I said, no, it's a university, yeah, you've been to uni.
Come on, I get it.
I get it.
Yeah, Logan Pine, the free and fair Old England will stay a pleasant garden.
Nelson wants every man to do his duty.
And that's a random name.
The NPC friends Harry talks about is the reason I said last week that a lot of people won't care about the Epstein list.
Shredding itself.
Most are NPCs, which is why universal suffrage is gay.
Yeah, and on the Epstein stuff.
On the Epstein stuff, right?
Why are you talking about the Epstein list?
I forgot.
Wait, still talking about it.
What Epstein List?
He's a creep.
Stop talking.
Who is this Epstein?
Yeah, I mean, Trump was friends with him for 15 years.
Epstein and Maxwell introduced him to Melania.
I'm sure there's nothing there.
Where's the evidence, bro?
Where's the evidence?
Like, I'm sorry, I just can't.
After how this first six months of his admin has gone, I wasn't intending to get onto this, but brought it up.
Can you guys wait for when Trump does his farm work program, mass amnesty, mass amnesty of farm workers, agricultural, 40% of that industry in America is estimated to be illegal workers.
When he amnesties all of them, and then like MAGA cultists, the real loyalists, turn around and say, yeah, well, if he didn't do that, American farming would have collapsed.
So it's America first, bro.
Do you not want American farmers to succeed?
They need the cheap labor, bro.
That's the same thing.
Can you wait for that?
That's the same thing they're doing with the Ukraine stuff now.
And would it have collapsed anyway?
Can't you just buy a few more combine harvesters?
I'm sorry, whoever sells copium right now is in rolling it.
Because the amount of copium that I see on a daily basis these days is infuriating.
You can just like, you can jump off the bandwagon.
You can get off the train at any time.
Like Bo said, cognitive dissonance is not a good thing.
Vote for this.
Yeah.
I don't think you did vote for it.
And as far as I'm aware, deportation numbers are not up to Obama standards yet.
So if you're not even making up for Obama deportation levels, it's not worth it.
I know everybody keeps saying like, oh, well, we're getting deportations though.
No, you're getting a lot of rhetoric about deportations.
You're getting a lot of newspapers showing, oh, look at Trump's evilly taking these families away and sending them back to Mexico.
Yeah, but if the numbers don't add up, they don't add up though, do they?
It's just an intelligence services compromat machine, bro.
Stop talking about it, bro.
They implode themselves all the time, bro.
Yeah.
Isn't it funny how Epstein killed himself during Trump's first admin as well?
When Bill Barr was the Attorney General and it was Bill Barr's dad that gave Epstein his first job as a maths teacher, which he had no qualifications for.
And Bill Barr's name does appear on the Lolita Express thing.
Funny all that.
Funny all that.
We should get on to the actual subject of the segment, but yeah, that's just something.
For lots of, like, where's the hard evidence, bro?
Okay, explain all of these coinky dinks then.
What about the eyewitness testimony of the dozens or hundreds of women that said what went down on that island?
Unbelievable.
Liars.
Is that not evidence?
Liars.
And Virginia Guthrie killed herself.
Yeah.
Completely out of nowhere, you know, just like.
It just happens.
Just happens.
Anyway, another one.
That's a random name.
For the record, I did not give myself a heart attack to the back of my head.
Yeah, well, you're going to get the Clinton treatment, are you?
He tragically, mysteriously blew the back of his own head out.
Funny how that happens.
Anyway, so to end on a positive note, we're getting more Afghans.
Yay.
Yay, because the government is retarded and I hate everything.
Statistically speaking, per capita, Afghans are some of the worst sex criminals in the world.
Oh, I've got that, don't worry.
Okay, okay.
I've got all of that.
Don't worry.
Per capita, in the UK specifically, we have those figures.
So this is one of the biggest F-ups I've ever seen, is that we're having to take up to potentially, potentially, estimated an extra 100,000 people because the 24,000 who are being offered asylum in this country after a data breach also, you know, have families and dependents that they need to bring along with them because they're not safe either, despite the fact that, as we'll find out, they are actually pretty safe staying where they already are.
The UK government has just got to cargo cult more foreigners into the country.
More foreigners equals more good, no matter what the actual real consequences on the ground are.
So if we just pray to the cargo cult of more foreigners, good things will eventually happen is the logic behind all of this.
Except Dan has pointed out that, you know, there's normally like an economic reason which we're given for these kinds of things.
There's always some kind of explanation given as to why it will improve our lives in some way, or at least improve the lives of the people that we're bringing in.
But due to court injunctions on all of this, this has only just been revealed now, despite the fact this process has been in play since at least 2023.
And the information, the data breach was in 2022.
So they've been trying to keep it secret from us.
The Telegraph and other publications haven't been able to report on this because they know it would piss you all off.
There's also, they would make the excuse of, oh, well, if the Taliban government knew that we were doing this, then they might leap into action and get all of these guys before we can save their lives.
The Taliban has had this information for three years.
Yeah, they literally come out and said, yeah, we knew about that, guys.
Yeah.
We knew about the data.
We had the data.
We knew it.
And of course, it's going to cost potentially £7 billion.
Wait, can I just clarify a few things?
Yes, yes, I was going to clarify what's happened as well.
So at the heart of it then Is that where The coalition of the willing Invaded what Oh, yeah, yeah.
Against the Axis of evil.
It invaded Afghanistan in what, 01, was it?
I think straight after 9-11.
Iraq was 03, yeah.
Yeah, and it was mainly the UK and Britain.
And so where loads of people worked with us or for us during the next twenty odd years as either what troops, policemen, interpreters, whatever.
Yeah, these people.
It's those people.
And the argument is that if the Taliban ever found out who they were, they would certainly torture them or murder them or at least arrest them, put them in prison for being collaborators with us.
Is that what this is?
That's the logic.
The people involved in this data breach specifically were involved in two large units, I believe, that had each of them had triple digits at the end of the name of the unit, which was like 444 or 333, something like that.
As such, they were known colloquially by the forces as the triples.
So it's the members of these triples units who have had their data breached, because what happened was in early 2022, February 2022, some random Royal Marine sent an email to a group of Afghans and accidentally included in that email a spreadsheet containing the identities of 25,000 Afghans who were applying for asylum in the UK.
Yes, it was, and he did it twice.
That's a big spreadsheet as well.
Yeah.
And these were soldiers.
Not only was it the soldiers' names who'd worked with their families, but in here as well, it also included details of their contact details, the personal information, and the names of their families.
Just like everything.
Take care.
To be fair, from the perspective of one of those guys.
From the perspective of one of those guys who's worried trying to get his family out or make sure that they're still safe, I would be pissed off, to be fair, that some random Royal Marine accidentally fat fingers when he's adding a link or an attachment to his email and accidentally sends the wrong spreadsheet.
So you say that.
I don't care.
And I don't care, because there are countless documentaries from British and US Special Forces that are sat there going, one of the worst things I had to do in Afghanistan was turn a blind eye to these pedoes.
Yeah, Dan mentioned it.
So, no, I don't care.
Stay there.
I don't care.
I could not care less.
Woe is you.
I'm not interested.
Yeah, I remember at the time Hallum was showing a lot of the documentary footage of the soldiers confronting these Afghan collaborators.
And they're higher ups going.
And they're just like, well, you know, I was sodomized as a child, so it's my turn now.
Just like the fagging system in public schools in Britain.
Yeah.
It happened to me, now it's my turn.
Yeah, and as a result, so far, according to Patrick Christie's, we've got 18,500 secretly flown to the UK after this data breach revealed their identity to the Taliban.
Some had previously been denied entry due to sexual or violent crimes.
So this is something else that happens.
This is something I think there was a Channel 4 documentary that I referenced a while back where it's like, sometimes they will just commit sexual and violent crimes when they're over here.
And the HMRC, sorry, not HMRC, the ECHR will refuse to allow us to deport them because they'll get executed in their home countries for being a sex criminal.
Yeah, but to hell with your personal safety.
To hell with your human rights and your safety and the fact that you need to be protected.
To hell with that.
It doesn't matter, does it?
And it costs £7 billion.
So one of the big things.
I'm not buying this Marine accidentally did that.
Certainly if you did it twice.
You kind of don't accidentally attach a spreadsheet to an email.
Certainly not twice.
Certainly not a massive spreadsheet where it actually has to think about it for a moment before it's finished uploading to the email as an attachment.
Yeah, that would take quite a long time.
Probably, yeah.
I don't really buy that you.
It doesn't really add up to me.
I mean, it's possible.
Okay, it's possible.
But I don't...
They were behind that.
They were like, well, if you accidentally send this, then we can make the argument that we have to import them.
That makes more sense to me.
Then he accidentally went, oh, I'll just attach this giant spreadsheet to this email.
Watch it upload.
Yeah.
And it's finished.
Sent.
What's that?
I'll do it again.
Oh, SOS.
Whoops.
I can't possibly count it.
I'll just CC the Taliban into this one.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It is fishy.
I could believe that given the general incompetence of everybody these days, perhaps.
It is possible.
But also, because we don't have any evidence that it was anything other than an accident, I think best case, most moral scenario is that the Royal Marine was tired of having to turn a blind eye to all of these people being pederasts and decided, I'll get them killed.
I'll get them killed.
That's possibly the most moral solution.
Yeah, unfortunately.
Either way, no matter, remember, no matter what the catastrophe is, no matter where it happens in the world, our involvement or responsibility, obviously we were deployed in Afghanistan, we were part of the occupation, etc., etc.
But even in situations where that isn't the case, where we're not involved at all, we're nowhere near, none of our national interests are involved, the solution is always more immigrants into Britain or Europe as a whole.
That's always the consequence of anything that goes wrong in particularly the third world.
Sins of the father.
Happens to be a reasonably just occupation in my opinion, anyway.
I don't buy the Lord Miles Callum angle that the Taliban were hard done by in any way, Or they're actually alright in any way.
They're complete scumbags, backward scumbags.
I don't care about any of them over there.
I don't think it was wise to try and force them to respect women's rights, but that's also because I don't really care that much about the women's rights in the desert, somewhere over there.
Okay?
They treat each other horribly over there.
It's not my business.
Either way, so it came to light after this whole data breach, it came to light a year later, 2023, when an anonymous Facebook user, just some random Facebook user, posts extracts of the data.
Just posted them on Facebook.
The posts were deleted within three days after MOD officials contacted Meta, but the government decided it had no choice as a result to offer asylum to the Afghans affected because they're at risk of reprisal attacks from the Taliban.
I don't care.
I don't care.
I just don't care.
I don't care.
Stay where you are.
We don't want you.
We don't need you.
So they give context here that a number of former Afghan special forces personnel had been murdered by the Taliban since it regained power in 2021.
Some of those who will come to Britain now, as they mentioned in their tweet, had previous asylum applications rejected, and now they've had to reverse all of that.
However, also the number expected to be brought to Britain as a result of the breach was initially stated in court documents to be nearly 43,000 people.
However, John Healy, the Defence Secretary, told Parliament that it was just about 6,900 Afghans will be brought to Britain as a direct result of the breach.
But also, according to the MOD, 4,500 are already in the country or are in transit, and 2,400 more are yet to travel.
We have the information from Patrick Christie's that we've already had 18,500 in here.
And later in the article, they say in total, it's believed that between 800,000 and 100,000 people were affected by the data breach.
So we've got conflicting figures over exactly how many.
The headline has given 24,000.
It's going to be way worse than that.
It's going to be way worse than that.
Mark my words, the amount that's revealed, it's going to be so much worse.
And again, the government fought a two-year legal battle to keep it a secret.
The superinjunction was lifted on midday on Tuesday by the High Court.
So I would imagine they would say, oh, there was national state secrets needed to be covered up, and we needed to make sure that we could get them over before the Taliban knows.
There'll be some kind of national security reason why they wanted to keep this a secret.
But also, it helps that they managed to delay the blowback on this for two years.
Well, now the headlines are like the government's incredibly worried that there's going to be riots due to this.
So why did you do it then?
That's one of the reasons why they did the super injunction as well, to stop everyone talking about it.
And now you're like, well, people are going to be really annoyed about this.
Right.
So maybe, just maybe, that should be the indication at which you go, shouldn't be doing this, actually, should we?
Because those people that we serve, you know, that we're in this position to do, to serve, they're going to be really annoyed about this.
You probably, probably shouldn't be doing that.
A fair point.
Whether it's a superinjunction or a denotice or whatever you want to call it, that should be a massive, massive scandal.
We live in a world where we're used to being screwed over by our government so badly, so egregiously.
Something like this is like, I'll just throw it on top of the pile of all the other treason and betrayal we've experienced.
But it should be an absolute scandal.
A couple of quick questions, though.
Of course.
When it originally happened, or when the original, at least when the original super injunction was put in place, who was sort of the minister in charge of immigration at that time?
I imagine I don't know.
It would have been either 2022 when this originally happened or 2023 when the information was posted on Facebook and the Ministry of Defence decided to start handing out asylum to the people affected.
I believe it was one...
Apparently, someone else looked into this and said that the timelines don't massively line up that he would have basically left around the same time.
It sounds like he probably was like, ooh, I'm done with this.
Don't try to stop here, Angry.
I don't know.
I can't.
I'm just.
Yeah.
The other thing is, what's the conversion rate or the ratio of 100,000 or 43,000 Afghans?
What's that convert into number of British women raped?
It's going to be a minimum of a few hundred, isn't it?
I think.
No way it won't be.
Yeah, I think Firas figured this out, about 250.
And we're spending about £7 billion on it.
I replied to this and said, no, it's way worse.
Because they will have kids.
Yeah.
Of course.
At my expense.
So the cost is estimated about £7 billion.
And also, this comes alongside, speaking of things to pile on top of each other.
So Rachel Rees, Rachel from Accounts, has tried to make us a £9.9, almost £10 billion headroom in the budget, in the government budget and economy and such to balance the books.
Yeah, this takes out most of that.
And also we found out that the cost of housing asylum seekers, you remember when it was about, I think a few years ago, it was £2.2 million per day?
And how Labour were campaigning on things like they'd reduce the cost of such things, would get stronger border.
Well, now it's £4 million per day.
So it's gone up from £4.5 billion per year to roughly about £15.3.
Great.
Wasn't pretty.
point of removing them from hotel or at least that's the estimate for 2029 for cheaping the bill well I remember If you remember, what they tried to do was they tried to shove them on a load of boats on the coastline.
They tried to get them in big cargo ships.
There was that one.
Yeah.
It was that one prison hulk they made.
Which was a complete failure.
Yeah, which was a failure.
Or didn't they burn it down anyway, quite quickly?
I think they definitely vandalised the whole place.
They were causing a nuisance.
That was on Portland.
So that's actually where I grew up in Portland.
And they were causing a nuisance down there.
Sorry.
Oh, no, no.
So, something to point out here is that people who are in the know, like Laws Miles, Lord Miles, for instance, said that he knew that the head of the foreign intelligence of the Taliban had the list for years and they don't care.
They did a blanket amnesty for anybody who was like a low-level collaborator.
They already had a blanket amnesty on those people, and they're not in any danger.
And Firas also commented on this, saying that the American withdrawal happened in August 2021.
The data of 19,000 applicants who had applied to relocate were inadvertently leaked.
Tory government, blah, blah, blah, blah.
So they already knew.
There's no evidence that these people were going to be killed by the Taliban because the Taliban already had this information.
If it could get leaked on Facebook, then the Taliban already had access to it.
I think that's a pretty clear thing, especially seeing as the spreadsheets were leaked in emails to Afghans.
So again, this is just an excuse to bring in more foreigners.
That's what this is.
The people who are affected by that, they're thinking to themselves, well, I'm not getting killed, but I am a disgrace to my country because I collaborated with an occupational foreign government and there's not much opportunity here.
This is still Afghanistan.
Still not a nice place to be.
I'm in the desert.
People kill each other every single day.
Or I could move to England with its wonderful welfare system and ample opportunity for illegal work for people who shouldn't be working.
Yeah, I could go and live in Telford or Oldham or satellite town of Birmingham and sign on and be an Uber Eats guy.
Yeah, or just do nothing at all.
As Rupert Lowe shared out, foreign nationals claiming universal credit is just a straight line up.
Line go up.
Line go up.
Job done, guys.
The line's gone up.
The line has gone up.
Salvation be praised.
The line of unemployment has gone up.
The line of adult illiteracy has gone up.
Line gone up.
Oh, jobs are good, lads.
And Rupert Lowe also shared out this, which was information from the Centre for Migration Control from 2021 to 2023.
The nationality of people who commit sexual assault in numbers.
So right at the bottom here, you can see United Kingdom, people of UK nationality, probably be boosted by people who just have the passports.
Per 10,000 is 2.66.
Afghans almost 60.
They're literally top of the table.
Top of the leaderboard.
They're literally the most dangerous sex criminals in the world.
When they're in England, yes.
Statistically, whilst they're in England per capita.
So we're getting more of these guys.
Great.
We've got some of them.
And again, not only those guys, but we're getting the collaborators who we already knew were sodomizing children.
Great.
Fantastic.
Brilliant.
When will the trials start happening?
When can we put our...
As a result, when it comes to Europe, we're rape capital of Europe.
It's going to be higher than that now as well.
Probably.
Great job.
Because that was 2022.
Great job, guys.
This is the extent.
This is what the benefits of being the second most powerful soft power in the world gets you.
Quite a long way as well.
Yeah.
Oh, Sweden's pretty high.
Sorry about that, Sweden.
If you think, like, actually, how close we are to the United States and how big their population is by comparison to us, I mean, that's mental.
We've got slightly more than half the number of rape cases in 2022.
That's insane.
Except we have some...
Is it 60 or 70 million?
And they've got a population of 330 plus million.
Great.
Fantastic.
Everyone involved in this.
Not just this, I mean the general.
String them up.
Yeah.
What a crime.
What a terrible crime to have done.
That was under Boris Johnson as well.
Wasn't it?
Or no.
Well, I'm talking about everyone from Blair onwards.
Oh, right, yeah.
Now, who would have been the Prime Minister first?
Rishi?
I think Johnson would have still been the Prime Minister.
Johnson was still the Prime Minister at the time of the Afghan collapse.
It was 2022, late 2022, if I remember correctly, that Liz Truss became PM for a day.
And then Rishi was installed straight after.
So the majority of these mess-ups would have been done under Boris, who is kind of like, who's kind of like a shadowy figure at this point in British politics, where there's always the threat that he's going to re-emerge and retards with no object permanence and who can't remember past five days ago will go, I remember Boris.
He was from when times were better.
He got us Brexit.
He got Brexit done.
He kept us safe during lockdowns.
We'll get him back on charge and we'll see what happens then.
And they'll forget.
There are still Tory boy Boris Simpson on Twitter.
Yeah, definitely.
Definitely.
Bad, right?
And also our inflation's dead high.
Shockingly enough, when you're spending billions of pounds cargo cult importing these people into the country and then they immediately jump on benefits and start committing crimes and then you're whilst using the NHS and you have no budget with which to cover any of this stuff and also your socialists.
And also you lied about your qualifications for being Chancellor in the first place.
It turns out this is not a recipe for economic success.
That's another POPR policy of pure retardation.
Open borders and socialist policies with respect to healthcare and things like that, yeah.
The welfare state and no borders.
The welfare state and no borders completely pure POPR.
POPR.
So yeah, I hope you didn't have any sharp objects near you during that segment.
let's go on to the Rumble Rants.
Woo!
There you go.
Thank you for sending us money in.
It will dull the pain.
Is that a Ric Flair woo?
I'm not going to do a Ric Flair Woo.
I want to, but I won't.
Logan, it would be one thing if the people they bring in were just slaves.
I can understand that.
They make it worse, though.
Well, there's the thing.
They kind of are.
They kind of are without saying they are.
They want them in as slave labor, basically, but they just can't be upfront about it.
Just eat, do?
Oh, well, yeah, true.
Yeah, that's a random name.
That soldier tried real hard to pull their numbers before they got to the UK.
Absolute patriot.
Yeah, maybe that's what.
Again, in my mind, that's like best case scenario.
What he was trying to do is like, I'm going to get the nonces to kill the other nonces.
Because I believe the big difference between the people we were collaborating with and the Taliban was the guys we were collaborating with were gay nonces, whereas the Taliban were straight nonces.
So that's why it's like, it doesn't matter to me what brand of nonce is in charge of Afghanistan.
And we shouldn't be trying to teach them Western values or how to respect women or anything like that.
We should hem them in to stop them from hurting us and just let them get on with it.
Nonce on nonce violence is always a net win, is it not?
Yeah.
Or, as I've said before, the big problems with the Middle East is a lack of sensible European colonialism.
If we just went in with no pretenses and said, we are in charge now, we're not going to put up some big fake occupational government that are actually collaborating with us or anything like that.
No, we just went, no, no, we run you now.
You stick to our laws and we extract profits from you.
That would be better.
And I'm sure a lot of people in the Middle East would actually be grateful as well.
That's a random name.
Also, speaking of Afghanis, there's one in my parents' building who keeps stealing people's lockers and parking spots that they paid for.
They're in the process of legally forcing him out and he follows up.
In retaliation, he keeps pissing in front of someone's door, taking big wet turds on the carpet and smearing it on the door handle.
Disgusting.
What a creature.
Gross.
Scott Saigai, as a database analyst, programmer, what I'm most triggered about is the government keeping and sharing the data on spreadsheets.
Excel is the bane of my existence.
Fair.
I used to work with Excel for many a year.
And yeah, I hate it.
I grew to absolutely hate it.
The fact that I very rarely, if ever, have to use Excel in this job is brilliant.
Brilliant.
Love it.
True.
I hate Google Sheets.
I hate Excel.
Yeah.
Last time I used it was regularly was like secondary school and I'm not eager to go back.
I hate it.
I hate Excel.
Tom Rat.
Two things, Harry.
One, this is the cover of the cover-up, i.e.
why do Iraqis have massive numbers of British passports?
Always a good question.
Why are any of the people of these nationalities in this country?
This excludes Kemi from being PM.
She knew and could have resigned.
There are a number of things that should exclude her from being PM.
They don't, sadly.
The Habsification.
Every day this stuff makes me want to Fed post.
I know how you feel.
And again, come on, guys.
These Afghan men had to touch those women.
You Brits just don't allow them to express their true love.
Little bo.
That's gross.
That's gross.
Anyway, video comments.
I'm a professional AAA game developer, and these people are lying about the liabilities.
There are numeral software licenses that absolve the company releasing a product of any and all liabilities.
A lawyer wrote this, and a lawyer will know that.
Likewise, they're actually misrepresenting what Stop Killing Games is actually asking for, claiming that it means maintaining a game indefinitely.
It doesn't.
The only stipulation is the game remains playable in some form at end of life.
For instance, in the crew, all you need to do is disable the always online check, and it's fully playable offline.
And finally, Stop Killing Games itself is the project of Ross Scott, or Accursed Farms on YouTube, who's a good boy.
He's been doing Freeman's Mind since 2007.
He's my absolute favorite YouTube channel.
I insist everyone checks him out.
And that is a threat.
All right.
Interesting.
Thank you very much.
What was it?
Accused?
What?
What?
Accursed.
Accursed.
Accursed Farm, I think is what it was.
Well, check it out.
Okay, we're gay, but we're in Barnes and Nobles, and there's a kids' book section, a gay kids' book section, and this shit is crazy.
Look at this.
Okay, there's the gay BCs, right?
Bye-bye, binary.
Bye-bye, binary with a mohawk on a baby.
Gay BCs, you're not ready.
Hold us.
Okay.
What?
A is for arrow and ace.
B is for buy.
This is crazy.
We're gay, but this is crazy.
What?
For a baby?
Yeah, that's disgusting.
Who's buying this stuff?
Who's published it?
Who wrote it?
This should be like a honeypot for parents buying this for their kids.
You should take it to the counter and then security guards come and arrest you straight away.
It's like, oh, you want these books for your children?
No, you're coming with us.
Like, there's always stuff like that.
Not WH Smiths, in Waterstones, you go in and around the kids' sections.
There'll be books like, what was it, that?
Heartstopper, which is some gay graphic novel, which I was looking online, and all of a sudden they're making like a Netflix show of it.
Despite the fact that I've never seen anybody buy them, I've never seen anybody read them.
It's pushed on the stands in these bookshops because they're just pushing it for the sake of an agenda.
And then they just get given a TV program because of immense demand, which has popped up out of nowhere.
It's all completely artificial.
I imagine the places that most buy those kinds of stuff are school libraries.
Any sexualization of small children.
In the benefit.
And even really small kids, like that's aimed at toddlers or whatever, first beginning to read.
Let alone homosexual sexualization of small children.
I mean, it's absolutely demonic.
Do you remember that channel, Queer Kids Stuff, I think it was called?
Do you remember that?
No.
Oh, good.
Good.
What were you watching?
No, it was a thing in the news.
I think we did bits on it.
Yeah, yeah.
In the early days and stuff like that.
It was just some channel, some weird freak woman.
Oh, shit, I tried play too.
I remember watching a segment of kids.
Yeah, Callum.
Yeah, yeah.
That's nice.
And just talk about how it's okay to be gay.
Like, she's meant to be addressing little kids and stuff.
There's enough evidence.
It's the most of these people getting a hold of kids and what they do.
The most depraved thing you could do.
Short of violence, right?
Is something like that.
Yeah.
Depraved.
Yeah.
We've got another rumble rant in from that's a random name.
One of you must move to India.
One of you must move to Afghanistan.
And one of you must move to sub-Saharan Africa.
Who goes where and why?
Right, I'm picking dibs on Africa.
Because frankly, in terms of the general environment, that place is like a paradise.
You think so?
Like, I mean, all the jungles, the nature, all of that sort of stuff.
And we did build wonderful civilizations there temporarily.
I'm just missing one factor.
Trying to ignore that one factor.
Because I'll take India, please.
Oh no, I was going to take India.
Because I don't want to go to India, but out of those three...
*laughter*
If I'm left with Afghanistan, I'll just end it if I have to go to Afghanistan.
No, no, I'll go to Malaysia.
You're all stuck with Afghanistan.
I'll rule it.
I'll build a new Raj.
New Rajasthan.
I'm the king of Afghanistan.
Well, yeah, you know, like, I mean, in Africa itself, you know, people...
It'd be a tropical paradise.
You might be able to find a nice little enclave of whites somewhere in Kenya.
I'll move to Irania.
In South Africa.
I'll move to Irania and we'll build a great civilization which people will be very jealous of and try and break into.
Maybe somewhere.
I'll have a Gatling gun.
Maybe somewhere in West Africa, again, there's a tiny enclave of like German expats and it's like everything's nice and squared away and clean.
Maybe if you could find a village like that, okay.
Did Botswana get taken over by socialists recently?
Oh, don't think so.
I don't know.
Recented, yeah.
Botswana is supposed to be like the sub-Saharan African country that still works.
Is that right?
Yeah, that was, you know, like Top Gear went there.
It looked pretty nice.
It had a decent economy.
I think a lot of it was run by European expats.
And the Botswanans themselves were perfectly happy with the whole situation.
But then I think earlier this year, a bunch of socialists took over.
Lovely.
Brilliant.
Yeah, great.
Amazing.
Still, though.
Still, though.
I'll move to Irania.
There you go.
There you go.
Let's do some of the written comments from the website, Beau.
Oh, okay.
Do you want the mouse or have you got yours on from there?
I've got one here.
Okay, so Mr. H reviews Stolen Car, the name of the poster there.
It's calling back to you.
Stabbed right in the heart.
The sycamore tree was just a tree in the same way that Stonehenge is just some rocks.
Right, yeah.
The meaning comes from what it represents to us and how it makes us feel as opposed to the physical classification of what it is.
Never mind the historical age of both.
Yeah, because that tree, it was mentioned in the summing up, the judge is summing up, the tree itself was worth about five grand, they said.
The actual lumber or whatever.
Worth about five grand.
The little bit of work that the National Trust had to do to move it and get rid of it and fix the wall and that run into actually quite a lot of money.
I think 20 or 30 grand, something like that ballpark, incredibly.
I don't know quite how it came to that much.
But anyway, that's what they said.
the value of the thing, the value of the thing, beyond its monetary value, is just, It meant a lot to some people.
Okay, that Texas girl says, some will never understand the loss of natural beauty.
I mentioned that here in the hill country and the tragic destruction of the ancient bald cypress trees from the floods.
It's nearly akin to the loss of life.
And I got berated for it.
Yeah, some people were sort of dead inside robot morons.
Yeah.
Why would you be berated for that?
Horrible.
Yeah.
Unable to understand.
That's not good if the people that you're with are berating you for mourning the destruction of ancient beauty.
Roman Observer says, I hope they plant a new tree there.
Apparently, there are shoots growing up from the same spot.
And apparently, I might be wrong about this, but I did read somewhere, that sycamores are particularly good for that sort of thing.
They probably will, a tree will regrow there.
It'll take a long time.
It'll take decades and decades before it's...
Right.
Okay.
Yeah.
Right.
But still, we'll all be old, if not gone, before there's like a nice big tree there again.
Well, hopefully our ancestors can enjoy it then.
Yeah.
They don't need to just cry for what they lost.
Sorry, Nate.
So ha, lol.
No, there'll be a flat there.
Alright, yeah.
Yeah.
Just let me have something, Nate.
Please.
There'll be Hadrian's wall estate will have been built on it.
Robo Observer continues to say, we don't need to just cry for what we lost.
We can build and grow again while remembering.
And maybe one day the new story will be richer because of the loss.
Yeah, that's a nice bit of optimism, actually.
Yeah.
Yeah, I do like a bit of optimism.
Me.
Okay, let's read one more.
Zombie Philip the Undead Duke of Edinburgh says, from my experience, most tree surgeons are of the traveller community.
Right, yeah.
And judging by their faces, I'm more inclined to think they are.
Yeah, I mean, one of them was living in a caravan.
Yeah.
I don't know if they were full-blown.
I don't think they were full-blown, you know, like Roman-y, gypsy types, but yeah, they were of the traveller type.
Yeah, yeah, they were.
I mean, Lord Inquisitor Hector Rex did also point out that he's a tree surgeon, but he is also on Ket right now.
So he'll hold fire from commenting.
Daniel Butchers, most tree surgeons I know, I've known and met through going to timber yards are not like that.
This is important as it shows the decay of interest and respect for our culture.
I can only hope that most of the people who are being trusted to cut down trees with heavy machinery and chainsaws aren't on ketamine.
One or two people I've known that have been tree surgeons or had roles that are tree surgeon-like, let's say.
Yeah, they've been the furthest thing from druggies or heartless scumbags.
They've been much more like hippie tree hugger types.
Does that make sense?
Of the couple I've ever met, they've been really nice, really nice, kind, warm-hearted people.
So I don't mean to cast dispersion on the tree surgeon community.
I'm sure most of them are extremely good people, I'm sure.
We're all for the inclusivity of tree surgeons.
Yeah.
Nate, do you want to go through your comments?
Scroll down.
Oh, I've got some comments.
Excellent.
There you go.
Omar Award, Awad, SOS, says, mathematical difference between 1 million and 1 billion is only 3 zeros.
So 3 0 is bro.
So 3 0 is bro.
But a really good way to visualize it is by representing each unit as one second.
To count to 1 million is slightly over 11 and a half days.
To count to 1 billion would be under 32 years, just under 32 years.
Either way, I wouldn't trust these politicians and experts to count past their fingers, and they'd probably lie about it even if they did.
Oh yeah, we're run by like actual low IQ reprobates, like unequivocally, you know, stupid and evil.
At first I thought he was making a bad point, but he completely redeemed himself.
Yeah, okay, good.
Justin B said, a billion an output can be nothing.
How much CO2 does the planet process in a year?
If there are enough plants to process a billion tons of CO2, then outputting the same is not a problem.
I don't subscribe to the CO2 issue.
That wasn't the point of the segment.
The segment was dismantle their arguments using their own rhetoric.
That was the point.
And I think it's fair and justified because you can make your MPs look like total idiots and they will just have like a big spurg out.
It's so funny.
Like I got hung up on by doing just that.
So that was the point.
You know, allow someone to highlight their stupidity was the whole point of the segment.
Yeah.
The sun and volcanoes and glaciers drive climate change much more than man-made CO2.
Yeah.
And then we've got White Rider says, I don't believe even that narrative emissions are three times higher in countries with net immigration.
Bullshit.
India and China disprove that alone.
China, I think, is number one.
Yeah.
Maybe.
Yeah, yeah.
At least places like India and China have got like dozens, maybe it's hundreds of coal-fired.
Constantly churning out.
Again, don't buy the CO2 thing.
But if you did, if you did, why is that not your first target?
Yeah.
Yeah, exactly.
Exactly.
And then lastly, Jethro says, wind is arguably the worst renewable in the UK.
It only works one-third of the time, wrecks the grid with volatility, needs full gas backup, kills wildlife, eats up copper and rare earths.
Still gets paid not to generate during curtailment.
The only reason it's scaled is due to subsidies and greenwashed accounting.
Not only that, it's that we actually have enough windmills to...
Something along those lines.
Don't quote me.
But effectively, the whole point of wind as a renewable is completely worthless because we can't store any of the energy.
We don't store wind power.
It's only functional whilst it's actually...
But we can't store that power.
There's no storage facilities for any of the renewables that we've got going on.
It's pathetic.
It's a complete waste of everyone's time.
Genius.
Yeah.
Plus, I feel like Ed Miliband is bought and paid for by some other interests.
Not just Ed Miliband, but that whole lobby that we must have more and more wind turbines.
Yeah, why?
Why?
Who's paying you to say that?
A dysgenic Dale Vince or Vance, whatever his name is, probably.
Yeah, someone like that.
Perhaps.
Yeah, Incorrigible Frog for my segment says accidentally leaking twice.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah, it's a pretty bad one.
Justin B, Bo, I work in tech.
Never underestimate the idiocy of end users, especially since everybody works in the cloud now.
Azure even has a government instance specifically for this.
So sharing a document can be as quick as adding a link to the email.
It probably was a false flag, but believe me, if you want to see the depths of human idiocy, work on first-line tech support for a year.
Is that an offer you're going to take up, Bo?
No.
I'm happy being employed by Mr. Cole Ping.
Thank you very much.
No, I can imagine, I can well imagine.
I can feel like the almost feel from that comment the frustration.
Because yeah, I have in the past worked where you have to speak to the public in any sort of way.
And it's annoying.
When I was not fresh out of uni, but not long after I was at uni, I worked for JP Morgan, where I was essentially in a phone centre, call centre, effectively.
It was an asset management thing, so he's only speaking to people that had invested a fair amount Of money with JP Morgan.
Nonetheless, it was talking to the public to all intents and purposes.
And they were, yeah, the depths of their rudeness and idiocy, idiocy and rudeness dialed up to 10 or 11 80% of the time.
It's horrible.
It's horrible.
Yeah, it's really horrible.
I'll never do that again.
I'd hate to work in sales or any sort of public-facing role ever again.
Try customer service phones having to transfer the call over to offshore Indian call centers.
You worked in a call centre, didn't you?
Yeah, didn't you?
Yes, I did.
I was working phone claims.
And if it wasn't a phone claim issue, then you needed to transfer the call over to our offshore Indian call centre where the people were presumably being paid like slave wages, probably less than that, to be perfectly honest, all bundled into a factory with no aircon.
And they were some of the rudest people I've ever spoken to in my life.
Anyway, Lord Hector.
Nate, you look exceptional.
Don't let those bullies get to you.
Lord Hector, again, Bo, can we have a Bo's Britain segment where you lay out all of your policies as Lord Protector General of the Realm?
Yes.
They're allowed now just on both brains.
Look forward to that.
Naomi Roberts, Harry's given up on chasing Josh's most viewed video, instead trying to be the most featured on Lotus Eaters out of context.
I don't try.
It just naturally comes to me.
And two more Rumble rants and then we'll call it quits.
The engaged few.
Bo can't go anywhere because he must ascend to the throne.
You all really want those, Britain, don't you?
And that's a random name.
One of you must be reborn as Afghani.
One of you must be reborn as Indian.
And one of you must be reborn as sub-Saharan African.
Who gets reborn as Watt and White?
We're not answering that question, frankly.
Frankly, you can take that question and shove it.
All right.
And with that, thank you very much for joining us on this Oh So Joyous podcast.
We'll be back again tomorrow with, I'm sure, more good news.
Thank you for joining us today, Nate.
Thank you.
And for raising the standards of dress on this podcast.
Oh, and check out Mr. H Reviews and The State of Politics.
The State of Politics.
There's a new channel, The State of Politics.
I forgot I'm sat between a separate nestled podcast right now.
If you want more of me and Bo, we have our own channel called The State of Politics.
Check it out.
Check it out.
Anyway, we'll see you again tomorrow.
Take care.
▲
Export Selection