Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 28, 2025 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:33:13

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1174

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters.
	It's number 1174, remarkably.
	It is Wednesday the 28th of May, 2025, and I'm joined by Nate, aka MrHReviews.
	How are you, sir?
	I'm good.
	How are you?
	Yeah, not too bad.
	Not too shabby.
	It's a Wednesday.
	Weather's quite nice out, isn't it?
	Yeah, it's quite nice, actually.
	Here in the west of England, it's not too bad.
	For a British summer.
	Yeah, it's alright.
	And hopefully we might be joined by Stephen Wolfe a bit later.
	He's running a tiny bit late, unfortunately.
	Life gets in the way sometimes, right?
	Okay, so, need to mention The Trivium straight off the bat at the top of the show.
	The Trivium.
	A set of courses that you can get with us on Grammar, Logic and Rhetoric.
	You can buy them individually or as a bundle.
	And there's also a webinar on Thursday, so tomorrow's the next one, the third and final one, with Dr Nima Parvini and Mr Carl Benjamin.
	And that's free.
	You can just go on our website and sign up for that.
	So that's absolutely free.
	And I think there's a question and answer thing at the end where you might be able to actually interact with them.
	So, yeah, check that out.
	And also, we don't say it enough here, but do go onto the website, lotusletus.com, and consider becoming a subscriber for as little as £5 a month because that really is our lifeblood.
	So please do consider that if you haven't already.
	Way to support.
	All right, so the first topic for today.
	I just thought we could talk a little bit about the Tories and reform and Dominic Cummings.
	So recently on Sky News, Dominic Cummings did an interview with them where he talked about various things.
	And he's sort of an insider.
	I wouldn't know exactly the degree to which he's plugged in.
	I would have thought not as much as he used to be when he was at number 10. But you can only imagine still massively in the know.
	Yeah, I'd imagine he's in the orbit, isn't he?
	Oh, yeah.
	That's a great deal that he would know, but certainly not to the rate that he did previously.
	I know some people have had criticisms of him, but I quite like him.
	I think whenever he speaks, nearly always, it's interesting.
	Yeah, no, I like what he has to say.
	I think you're right.
	Pretty much everything he does say is interesting, whether you agree with it or disagree.
	It's always interesting.
	And he's one of those individuals that doesn't really mince his words, which I appreciate.
	You know where you stand with someone like that.
	He's in the political orbit, but he's not remotely given the vibes of a politician with their wishy-washy nonsense.
	Like he's just straight down the line.
	So whether you like or dislike what he's saying, at least you know he's...
	Basically on the inside, if not actually part of the establishment itself.
	Which is nice.
	Yeah, no, I don't agree with every take I've ever heard from him.
	Far from it.
	But it's interesting.
	Yeah.
	Right.
	So, okay, he did an interview with Sky News where he said a bunch of things which I thought was sort of worth going over.
	I suppose one of the main ones was that he predicted Kemi will be gone.
	Either relatively soon or by May next year, he said.
	News at one.
	Kemi Badenoch won't last.
	No.
	Breaking.
	Breaking news.
	Mind blown.
	You heard it here first, guys.
	Kemi Badenoch isn't massively popular.
	Yeah.
	Nigerian immigrant, yeah.
	So one of the things he said, and this is a quote, there's already people who are organising to get rid of her, and I think that that will work.
	If it doesn't work this year, it will definitely happen after next May.
	Maybe that's the local elections next May, is that what it is?
	Yeah, I presume that's what that is.
	He said, she's a goner.
	So there's going to be a big transition there.
	Now, as we said, it's not necessarily like, God, he doesn't know, can't predict the future, but he knows better than nearly everyone, nearly everyone, 99.99% of everyone else.
	Yeah.
	He will know.
	She is a goner sort of thing.
	I mean, look, I would agree.
	She is gone.
	She's an idiot.
	She's a charisma vacuum.
	She speaks, everyone leaves.
	Quite literally, right?
	She did that live stream with, like, less than 300 people watching.
	Did she?
	When was that?
	The Conservatives.
	When was that?
	I can't remember exactly.
	People in the chat, I'm sure, will be furiously typing it down below.
	But they did a live stream.
	There's, like, 300 people watching, which is absurd for the Conservatives.
	So it's not, you know, she is going to go, obviously.
	The Conservatives need to try and save the husk of a political party that they are.
	But that last statement there, there's going to be a big transition.
	It's like, transition to what?
	They're already wet scum, but they're going to get worse.
	I can't see them actually becoming right-wing.
	They're not going to become what they need to be.
	So they're not going to transition into anything.
	The transition, handing over power maybe, to someone else.
	Yeah, Jenrick.
	Cool.
	I mean, he's not that great.
	He says the right stuff, but he didn't do the right stuff.
	They don't have anyone in the party that has the balls or the political acumen to be anything special.
	Yeah.
	It's a big transition to what?
	Yeah, right.
	Well, that was one of the other points he made.
	He said that maybe they're beyond saving, sort of, with the best will in the world.
	Yeah, 100% they're beyond saving.
	I don't think there's anyone that would vote for them.
	Anyone.
	No.
	Done.
	I mean, obviously, there are still diehards.
	Yeah, card-carrying, dyed-in-the-wall owners that would never not vote Tory.
	Yeah, but they'll be dead in 10 years.
	And then that party will be dead.
	The time of the Conservatives is over.
	Everything crossed.
	Zero seats, yeah.
	The time for them is over.
	It's the same with the movie industry, right?
	When a property or a studio wastes its goodwill with the audience, it's exactly the same thing with a political party.
	You have goodwill.
	People have goodwill for a political party.
	But if you waste it, you squander it, you spit in the voters' faces time and time again.
	And the British people, yeah, they move slow.
	But when their mind's changed, their mind has changed.
	And we've seen that now, I think.
	They're done.
	They're gone.
	I don't think they can be saved.
	Yeah.
	I mean, Cummings used the imagery of an event horizon, a black hole, the event horizon, the point of no return.
	That might actually be in there.
	They're already beyond that.
	They're sort of terminally wounded.
	Well, let's listen to a couple of minutes of him talk about it.
	You see a scenario where Farage could be a prime minister?
	Oh, yeah.
	A lot of echo on that.
	Because the old system is just so completely broken.
	It's broken enough that that could easily happen.
	If he does what I'm suggesting and actually sets out a path for how the reform is going to change, how reform is going to bring in people, how it's structurally going to alter, what it's going to build, how it's going to do policy, how it's going to recruit MPs, etc.
	If he does that, then there'll be a huge surge of interest and support into the whole thing.
	Is that what you said to him?
	Yeah, obviously, yeah.
	I mean, it's not anything particularly secret.
	It's what I've said to everyone for years.
	What I try to do in Number 10, right, is bring in these people and try and change how the thing works.
	So if he does that, then it will be super popular and it will be effective and the old parties won't know how to cope with it.
	Yeah, I mean, yeah.
	Reform has been a one-man band.
	It's been Nigel and Nifo.
	Hands.
	They can win 50, 100, 150 seats with a former's knife on an iPhone, but they can't...
	Okay.
	It goes to say...
	He goes on to say, actually, some of the things that we've been saying for ages, for months.
	He says a couple of things that are exactly the same that I've seen Carl make videos about.
	That Nigel needs a group, a team around him.
	I mean, again, Dominic talks about it being a Nigel and an iPhone.
	A one-man team.
	And what you really need is a ten-man team.
	You say, look, this person's going to be my foreign secretary, this person's going to be my home secretary.
	You know, a real, sort of genuine, believable, credible government in waiting.
	Yeah, well, he doesn't have any of that, does he?
	We've been saying that for ages and ages.
	I'm not saying Mr Cummings has directly stolen our tapes or anything, but he is now saying it on the mainstream Sky News.
	It's kind of obvious, isn't it, to everyone looking on now, that wish reform even the tiniest amount of goodwill.
	Isn't this what got Rupert Lowe stabbed in the back?
	Yeah, pretty much.
	It was that, yeah.
	Yeah.
	Well, I...
	Yeah, well, yeah, of course.
	I mean, look, that's obvious, you know.
	It can't be the cult of Farage.
	It has to be something deeper than that, right?
	It has to be.
	There's nothing there without a team, you know.
	Like, look at what Labour's got.
	again, just rank imbeciles in power.
	You've got Rachel from Accounts, the economist that is...
	You need people that, you know, the British public can buy into and go, oh yeah, that person will save the economy.
	That person, you know, ex-army or whatever.
	That person's the defence secretary.
	Great.
	Excellent.
	These are the people that we want, right?
	Not just, oh, there's the leader.
	Yeah.
	No, absolutely.
	I mean, even if you've got an organisation that's like...
	Whoever's at the top needs to be able to delegate a bunch of stuff.
	I mean, if you've got an organisation that's about the size of Lotus Eaters, what, 20, 25 in that ballpark, then yeah, still.
	So if you're running a government, yeah, you not only need to be able to delegate loads of stuff, but you need stars in their own right.
	And it's not great that any of the stars under the leader should necessarily outshine him.
	I get that.
	In fact, it used to be the case in the past.
	I'm thinking of the governments leading up to World War I, where sort of the Foreign Secretary would be a brighter star than the Prime Minister himself.
	So it used to happen.
	Yeah, yeah.
	But you want sort of a constellation of stars around you as well.
	I don't see the issue, unless you're a massive egotistical douche, I don't see the issue with people.
	That are more talented than you in different roles below the leader.
	A leader's role is not to be the best of the best.
	That's not what a leader is.
	A leader's role, when you're leading a group of people, is the ability to lead people.
	You have to be the best at leading people, nurturing talent, fostering growth within those people's scopes that they're good at.
	That's what a leader is.
	You have to be the best at leading people, not the best at everything.
	That's not what a leader is.
	Right.
	So I don't see the issue with that.
	I think it's...
	That's the thinking of a popularity contest, which is not what politics should be, although, unfortunately, it is.
	No, I absolutely agree.
	I absolutely agree.
	It always struck me as odd when I was old enough to sort of realise this, I don't know, in my late teens or something.
	But quite often government ministers, heads of departments, secretaries of state, aren't often in...
	There often aren't experts in that field.
	Like, you've got a health secretary who doesn't know anything about health or administration.
	They used to share a flat with the Prime Minister when they were in their 20s, and so now they rode on their coattails to become an MP, and now they're a Secretary of State for something.
	It's like, really?
	That guy?
	Really?
	Yeah, no, I mean, it's absurd.
	And I think it's even more absurd when you view our sort of societal paradigm at the moment, which is...
	Trust the experts.
	Trust the science.
	And you have people that are the most unqualified in positions to lead those departments.
	You're like, well, that, what?
	It's bizarre.
	Like, it's truly bizarre.
	You know, it shouldn't be the case anyway, but it's even weirder when you look at how, you know, trust the science, trust the experts.
	It doesn't make any sense.
	This is a contradiction right here.
	And it's so obvious when they shuffle them around.
	This guy was, like, education secretary and now he's the foreign secretary, like, the next day.
	It's like, really?
	Yeah.
	So they weren't doing anything.
	I think that's actually what it reveals, is that they don't do anything.
	Yeah.
	Right?
	That's what it signals to me, is that these ministers are being paid to do nothing.
	Literally, to do nothing.
	Which makes sense, because that's why you've got, you know, such issues with any political party, because of Whitehall.
	The civil servants.
	They do everything.
	I also find it very telling when an entirely new government comes in, not just a minister, but an entirely new government will come in and they don't change anything about the civil service.
	It's structure, all the individuals, the permanent secretaries.
	They make no effort whatsoever to do that.
	I'd fire them all.
	I'd fire them all.
	I'd come in and go, you're all fired.
	Literally, you're all fired.
	The wise men together.
	There should be no permanent secretaries.
	There should be none.
	Like, why?
	What are we being paid to do?
	Like, no, this is disgraceful.
	No, I'd demolish the Whitehall buildings.
	I would, as a sign that I am, you know, Grand Pharaoh of the UK, of England.
	I'd just demolish it, just bulldoze it.
	And I would lead it.
	I'd be on that JCB as the first one.
	They are some of our most historic buildings.
	Well, all right.
	I'm not mucking about it.
	I'm mucking about it.
	Yeah, no.
	No, but if I came in, certainly the Cabinet Secretary.
	I want my guy in there.
	Yeah.
	No, I want my guy.
	I want a partisan of me and my government and my policies.
	Not just the last guy.
	You don't want the status quo, really?
	He might or might not.
	I mean, it's like potluck whether he might or might not have the same politics as you.
	Yeah.
	And that nonsense that civil servants are completely neutral.
	Obviously, they're not.
	Obviously, they are not.
	Obviously.
	Shall we see if we can play a bit more of this, whether it's going to work?
	Win an overall general election and have a plan for government and have a serious team able to take over Now Downing Street and govern and control Whitehall with one man and an iPhone.
	Can Farage stand up in 2028 on a platform and say, look at the 10 people on this stage with me.
	This is going to be my Shadow Chancellor.
	This is going to be my Pope Secretary.
	Man for man, woman for woman, these ten people are obviously better, both than the current farce in the Cabinet and the current farce in the Tory party.
	Look at me.
	Look at these people.
	If you imagine that they go through a transition and they could do that, then British politics is going to be in a completely different state.
	Yeah.
	And what about a pact with the Tories, maybe?
	Would that work, do you think?
	All depends on the cards fall.
	I mean...
	When he says where the car's for, he means at the next general election, how many seats you actually win.
	I think it's funny, just quickly, to say a couple of words about this constant talk of a pact.
	Kemi's ruled it out, I mean, quite logically, saying, no, they talk openly about destroying us.
	Yeah, yeah.
	That's their raison d 'etre.
	That's their reason for being in some ways.
	And whenever Nigel or whoever is asked about it, obviously Nigel has flip-flopped in the past over various things like the Brexit party and stuff.
	But they're pretty strong.
	They're pretty hard lying on, no.
	If the Tory people, whether they're actual MPs or just activists or members, you can join us.
	But we're not just going to join you.
	Be in coalition and be the junior partner.
	In a government with you.
	We're not doing that.
	So I know I get why the mainstream media and even commentators like us would like to talk about it.
	It's a little bit of content, speculate on it.
	But both sides are pretty clearly, it seems to me, genuinely, might be proved wrong, ruling that out.
	And yet, what Dominic Cummings just said there, it depends how the cards fall.
	I mean, imagine at the next general election, the Tories get...
	So they both get 120 odd each, something like that.
	And in order to keep Labour out they could form a coalition.
	That would be the only way to keep Labour out.
	Then suddenly sort of the realpolitik thing, pragmatism kicks in and despite what you said and what you really even think and feel, it's like, well no, we're presented with this situation now.
	Where it's either we form a coalition A pact Or we just let Starmer go for another five years I mean...
	I understand he flip-flops on stuff, but this is a man with a planet-sized ego, so I don't know whether he'd be able to stomach that.
	As long as he was the face.
	Maybe, I guess.
	I agree with you the leader the Prime Minister Yeah, I agree with you that that would be the smart thing to do.
	It's like, yeah, if you're presented with that scenario, it'd be malleable to her, but...
	No, no.
	The thing is, in Britain, we're not used to coalition governments very much.
	I mean, there was the Cameron Clegg one.
	Yeah.
	That's the only one in my living memory.
	Yeah.
	Bizarre.
	After that general election, there was a few days where there was behind the scenes tinkering.
	And people asked me, because even back then I already had my master's in politics, various people asked me, what's going to happen?
	And I said, whatever happens, it won't be a conservative Lib Dem coalition, because that just makes no sense whatsoever.
	And I'll have an egg all over my face.
	So I said that to a few people.
	Yeah, and when it happened, I was like, whoa, okay, wow, all right.
	Big proclamation from you there.
	Yeah, completely wrong, completely wrong.
	But in reality, when it played out, Obviously the Lib Dems were not just the junior partner, but the absolutely junior partner.
	I mean, they were shat on.
	Bottom of the run.
	The whole time.
	So there's different power dynamics within coalitions, because other countries in the world, United States don't really do it, but lots of other countries in the world, particularly European countries, it's more like the norm.
	Yeah, it's pretty common.
	It's really common.
	I think that's a byproduct of...
	Proportional representation.
	It enables that as almost a necessity, really.
	Otherwise, you won't get anything done at all.
	And that's the downfall of things like that, is that partnerships have to be made and harder political policies have to be put to rest.
	And that's why, I guess, Europe's not really done anything.
	He's still got Stabby McStab faces running around.
	Yeah.
	He goes on here now to talk about Kimmy.
	But also, it's quite possible that the Tories have just kind of crossed the event horizon and actually aren't salvageable.
	Like, everyone sort of assumes that because they've always been around, then somehow there must be at least one last chance for them to turn things around.
	but it's possible that that chance is actually in their past and doesn't exist.
	I mean That's a good point.
	I think I hope that's true.
	I think that they're done.
	I think that they're done.
	Again, it's that goodwill.
	You've squandered the goodwill and apathy is fully set in.
	People don't care what they've even got to say.
	People aren't interested in whatever they've got anymore.
	You can't do the exact opposite of what you've promised the electorate.
	For over a decade and expect people not to go, yeah, we've had enough of you now, actually.
	So, yeah.
	How many times can you return to an abusive partner before you say enough is enough?
	Yeah, yeah, exactly.
	And you can't be, if you're in that situation, you can't be told you've got to wake up yourself.
	But when people wake up, they're done.
	And the British public have woken up.
	That's what I think.
	I think so.
	I hope so.
	Hashtag zero seats.
	Yeah.
	I would love to see the Tory party completely annihilated full-time and not be a thing.
	Yeah, yeah.
	There is this idea that they have been around for centuries.
	Doesn't matter.
	Yeah, don't care.
	Don't care about that.
	Literally doesn't matter.
	Yeah, yeah.
	That's an imbecile's way of thinking, is that just because something is an institution, it must therefore always be.
	No.
	No.
	No, that kind of ego.
	Is what dooms you to fail, 100%.
	Well, it is, isn't it?
	You are a self-fulfilling prophecy if you think that you're constantly going to be around.
	No, no, not at all.
	Because then you rest on your laurels and you don't question, you're not introspective.
	And that's what they've done as a party.
	They've just done the status quo at all times, just thinking that they can coast.
	Nah, you're gone.
	And history's littered with examples.
	I was thinking of maybe the ancient Assyrian culture or ancient Roman paganism.
	Yeah?
	Yeah, it's been around for centuries.
	Yeah, it's steeped in sort of unbelievable tradition.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, and it died in the end.
	And it's gone now.
	Because that's the way of things.
	Yeah.
	That's the way it had to be.
	Yeah, nothing, institutions anyway like that, are not, the world reality doesn't owe them anything.
	Exactly.
	An endless life.
	There's one other little clip I thought we'd quickly play here where he's talking about Boris.
	He just started completely lying about everything.
	And rewriting history.
	And then a lot of the media just kind of went along with it.
	That was bad.
	But then also, like, on area after area, the way in which he just started doing the exact opposite of what we said we were going to do was bad.
	Very bad.
	And so, yeah, me and a few other people said, okay, like, as you asked before about questions of responsibility, like, we got this, put this guy in there.
	With the 2019 election, we told people we were going to do a whole bunch of things.
	He's now doing the opposite.
	OK, we should get rid of him.
	Has he got rid of him?
	Yeah, got rid of him.
	And I think that was all to the good.
	When an elephant goes rogue, then there's not much else you can do.
	You have to remove them.
	An elephant goes rogue.
	Yeah.
	I mean, it's pretty matter-of-fact about it.
	Yeah.
	I mean, because then there was the, obviously, if everyone remembers, the debacle of Liz Truss, and then we end up with Rishi.
	Brilliant.
	Amazing.
	Good times.
	Brilliant.
	But, yeah, I suppose it is what it is.
	It's all happened now.
	But I personally, because there's been some rumblings of Boris coming back.
	The Economist says, bring back Boris.
	Because, I suppose, No one likes her.
	Other than the virtue signallers in the party.
	Yeah, the people that voted her in.
	Yeah.
	No one, or people who thought that their career would be advanced if she became leader.
	Other than those people, no one likes her amongst the general public.
	No one's loving Badenoch.
	Like praying for the day when finally she can enter number 10 and lead us into a new politics and a new nation and all that stuff.
	No, no, no.
	She's not inspirational in any possible way.
	But I think Boris himself has come out and said he's not going to come back or he's not seriously thinking about it.
	Or maybe it was mooted by his team and the reception wasn't all that positive so it's been put on the back.
	Politico, will Boris come back?
	He's a winner.
	He's a winning formula, like Blair.
	He's the winning machine.
	Yeah, okay.
	Because people can't see the millions of ethnics that are just randomly here now, thanks to him.
	Yeah, no.
	Yeah, definitely.
	Yeah, people are going to just vote for that again.
	No.
	now people are done.
	Well, I consider him...
	Hate his guts.
	Absolutely hate his guts.
	Yeah, the Boris wave.
	The Ukraine thing.
	Lockdowns.
	Lockdowns.
	That annoyed me so much.
	It annoyed me so much.
	You're going to remove everyone's human rights whilst important people and telling us you can't deport them because of human rights?
	Go away, you scumbag.
	Even your own internal logic is broken on that.
	You are disgusting.
	I'm under house arrest now, am I, Boris?
	Yeah, thanks.
	Oh, really?
	Oh, and it's Home Office Directives telling me I'm effectively under house arrest now on the strength of a liar.
	Yeah, thanks.
	Really, dude?
	Good times, mate.
	Screw you.
	But, yeah, here are the Telegraphs saying that a lot of the Tory MPs actually don't want him back.
	Good.
	Or, yeah, if he's an elephant gone rogue.
	Oh, yeah, so, what if it's generic?
	I mean, here, scroll down, it's a very long tweet here, but at some point he says, oh, look, look, I believe that demographics is destiny.
	Yeah, he says the right stuff.
	Spicy tamale.
	He says the right stuff, but he didn't do the right stuff.
	Yeah, right.
	This is the issue that I've got.
	I like all of his rhetoric, right?
	you can't look at this and disagree with it I mean I don't I don't even know what he's saying but the vast majority child benefits But you've not done anything.
	And this is the issue with all of the Conservatives.
	Anyone that's in there who has said anything has always just done the complete bloody opposite.
	Yeah.
	It is in the Conservative Party's DNA.
	Nobody trusts them anymore.
	Yeah, Jenrick does make some of the right noises for me, but I don't trust him to actually do anything.
	That's why I've said it before, I think last week, I said, I don't buy this stuff that you hear from people like Preeti Patel or Suella Brevman or James Cleverley or whoever, or Liz Truss or Rishi or Boris or Jenrick or anyone, that they would do this or that.
	Talk is cheap.
	Actions speak louder and you did nothing.
	You did the opposite.
	They had their chance to be a real government and they blew it.
	They blew it!
	They blew it!
	So, no, I don't trust them.
	I don't want them.
	I want them to die and go away.
	Zero seats.
	Yeah, hashtag zero seat.
	So, OK, that was just about the time limit for that one.
	A couple of super chats.
	Do you like my De Niro?
	Yeah, it was good.
	Was that what it was?
	De Niro and Copland.
	Okay, for two dollars, the Engaged Few says, I'm persuaded that Farage's greatest flaw is that he never listens.
	He waits to speak.
	In the broadest sense, he's a follower.
	A huge follower, yeah.
	He was like, oh, I've been talking about this Turkish barbers.
	Mate, we've been talking about Turkish barbers as a front for years.
	You didn't blow the lid on this, mate.
	Like, rewriting of history?
	What on earth?
	I feel like he waits for the conversation to change, the Overton window to move, and then he moves with it to match it.
	Or indeed not.
	Or not.
	At the moment.
	And I want a dude that is comfortable in his own skin.
	Constantly being outside the Overton window.
	Absolutely.
	And being unapologetic about it.
	That's not really what you get from Nige, is it?
	No.
	You need someone with strength of conviction.
	Right.
	Anyone that's going to fix what's happened has to have balls.
	You have to stand behind what is right.
	Whether it's the wrong thing to say, it's the right thing to say.
	Deemed wrong by the general, you know, woke society.
	You have to stand behind it because it's the right thing to do and it's the right thing to say.
	And if you're a follower, you're never going to do that.
	And therefore, you're never going to fix what needs to be fixed.
	Right.
	No, absolutely.
	Ryan Rumbles 1993 says, Hi Bo, could you ask Nate next time he's on Open Bar?
	I've sometimes been on Open Bar.
	Could you ask him to ask the drinker when he's coming on L.E.?
	Thanks.
	I actually haven't replied to him.
	I think I'm going on there tonight.
	Oh, yeah?
	I don't know.
	I didn't reply.
	He invited me.
	I need a reply.
	But yes, I will ask him.
	Yeah, I'll ask him.
	Okay, cool.
	I mean, I tweeted at him the other day.
	He didn't respond.
	And even Kyle, I think, retweeted it and added him, and he didn't reply.
	I think it's because, although he's...
	I don't think he wants to dive into politics.
	Which is fair enough.
	If he doesn't want to do that, it's fine.
	No judgement here.
	He's also changed his approach to reviewing to be a little bit more not Hollywood friendly but a little bit more acceptable.
	Now he's getting the gigs on What's it like?
	Piers Morgan and Sense or Talk TV or whatever.
	I don't even know what it is.
	I love the guy.
	I don't want to torpedo his career in any way.
	He comes on here and I'm screeching about, remigrate them all!
	Yeah, I don't want to do that to him if he's not comfortable with it.
	I'll ask him.
	Okay.
	We're going to go on 30 second break.
	And we'll be right back.
	Okay.
	30 second break.
	Bye.
	Alright, so I thought we would talk about the Met Police legalising car theft, right?
	yeah sort of comical I think sort of comical but they Yeah, yeah.
	So this is a bit of a moan from a personal gripe, to be honest.
	So this is a therapy session for me, alright?
	My car was actually stolen.
	In central London, yeah.
	But it also enabled me to look at the figures, which goes on from one of your segments the other day, just the utter state of the police, because they are a joke, right?
	So I want to start off with a question, what is the point of London?
	What is the actual point of London now, genuinely?
	That's actually interesting, because I was on a train going up to London, I had to go up and do some interviews, and we ended up talking to us.
	With London declining, the City of London is on the way out.
	I mean, I was talking to some of my big investment bankers and hedge funds and private...
	Capital is going.
	The FTSE is going.
	So, OK, that's going.
	So, what is the point of London?
	And they're trying to say, oh, it's all about entertainment.
	It's a cultural centre.
	And I said, well, what culture have we got out there?
	I mean, I'm not seeing Maurice dancing, am I?
	But what about our lovely buildings?
	And I said, well, they'd be there anyway.
	There were no Londoners.
	No people.
	The buildings still remain.
	So what is the point of that?
	Does it fall to me to No, no, no.
	Let's absolutely destroy London.
	Why not?
	I know you don't know.
	You've got a West Country boy and a Northerner.
	I lived in London for a bit.
	I did my 20 years prison sentence in London.
	Of course, there's the city of London and the city of Westminster and it's much more than just the suburbs that have been colonised by foreigners.
	There is much more to it.
	I mean, let's not demolish Westminster Abbey unnecessarily, right?
	No, I don't find getting the builders in and saying, let's steal.
	Not like me and Whitehall.
	Like they did with one of the largest cathedrals in Winchester.
	They just knocked it down and people stole the bricks and put them in their own houses of build around the walls as they did around the 14th century, 12th century.
	Yeah, I don't mind going up to Westminster with a lorry load of lads going, come on, I fancy that in my back garden.
	I'm going to build a shed with it.
	We'll pull down the roof of Westminster Hall and make a shed out of it.
	You're the people who want to pull the statues down.
	Come on.
	This is true.
	Well, I mean, I will be the arbiter of pain with respect to London.
	It's an ethnic, multicultural hellhole currently, and it's only getting worse and worse and worse and worse.
	I posit it serves absolutely no purpose aside from economic leeching by...
	That's why we have remittance signs everywhere on the tube, in every single train station.
	It's remittances, remittances, remittances.
	Failing that, you've got the welfare drain from individuals that are just sat there on my dime and theft in broad daylight.
	So we're obviously going to look at Grand Theft Auto.
	But we've known for a while there's phone thefts going on constantly, there's watch thefts going on, knife crime, everything.
	Everything under the sun.
	And the violence right in front of you.
	As I said, I put out an ex recently where I was just going into the M&S.
	In Paddington Station.
	Paddington Station is one of the wealthiest stations where people go off to Oxford and Bristol.
	And in there, there were several scrotes, clearly looking ready to nick everything.
	But unfortunately, a guard had spotted them as he was trying to carry drinks out, which were non-alcoholic.
	So he pulled them up.
	Next thing you know, bosh.
	There's a bit of violence going on outside of that.
	And that wasn't the first time I'd seen it recently.
	It just happens all the time now in London.
	People walking away, they're going, oh, let's step back.
	Let's get phones out and video it.
	I will say there's a number of things going on.
	Everything you said is absolutely true.
	Oh, I'm going completely hard on this.
	Compared to when I was a child, it's horrible.
	It's horrible.
	But, you know, there's the British Museum, the Natural History Museum, the Tate Gallery, the National Portrait Gallery, National Gallery.
	There are also endlessly amazing and good things, though.
	I will concede.
	It's the people.
	It's the imported criminal class.
	Exactly.
	If that could be swept away, cleared out, then maybe we could go back to something that is...
	And I like the phrase, the administrative leeching class.
	You know, the ones who sit there and the civil servants who make a lot of money, pensions that they don't have to contribute to, which I find a complete anathema.
	I've been saying this for over 15 years.
	Why is it?
	Because I'm a civil servant.
	I do not have to contribute into a pension.
	And it's all taken out of tax when I retire.
	So I retire as a permanent secretary on a six-figure pension.
	And the taxpayers of today have to pay for it because there's no contribution by you into it at all.
	I mean, that's one of the first things I would remove.
	But there we go.
	Bulldoze, Whitehall, please.
	it's going.
	But I also think it Valid points.
	I mean, everything I've stated here is all demographics, right?
	It's all demographics.
	It's a beautiful place.
	Could be a beautiful place, for sure.
	There are fantastic things I concede there.
	Absolutely.
	But as the nation's capital, it should be Every single facet should be the shining example for every other part of the UK to follow.
	And perhaps where it's one of the worst is crime.
	It's just abhorrent.
	So this is something I found out recently.
	Met Police failed to solve 90% of London car thefts.
	90%?
	I mean, they may as well not be there for that.
	There are just about a million CCTV cameras in London.
	A million CCTV cameras.
	And you can't solve, what, any more than 10% of Car thefts?
	It doesn't add up, does it?
	It doesn't make sense.
	It doesn't make sense.
	Yeah, actually, to be fair, that's quite illogical.
	When you've got so many cameras, they know where are your cars.
	You've got APNR to be able to check you if they're going to fine you.
	We fine you because you're a diesel gas dust.
	Yeah, you can fine you for all of that.
	And yet they can't, with the same fine in cameras, find where your car has gone.
	Yeah, they can do you for congestion charge.
	Yeah.
	But if someone steals it, oh, don't know.
	Yeah, computer says no.
	So this is the thing.
	This is a will situation, right?
	It's not that there's no way to do it.
	There's no will to do it.
	It feels that way.
	It must be that, right?
	Well, it absolutely is.
	So I'll take you on to my story now.
	Some of you may know if you're familiar with my channel and things like that.
	I'm doing a master's degree.
	MrHReviews, check it out, like and subscribe.
	There you go, do it.
	So I'm doing a master's degree.
	So I've got to go to London, unfortunately, every other weekend for a period of like six years to do this bloody degree.
	And it's a relatively nice area.
	It's not, you know, it's alright, it's not, you know, Sort of arse, end of nowhere.
	It's like SE1.
	Okay.
	Central, relatively nice.
	It's not bad by any stretch of the imagination.
	Anyway, I go in, I park up at 8.30 in the morning.
	I go into my university and I come out about half four in the afternoon.
	This is on a Sunday.
	And I come out and I walk down the street where my car was.
	And I've parked right outside of a gym as well, just because it so happened to be one of the spaces.
	It's just a residential street, just like a broad daylight street.
	And my car is literally not there.
	No glass, nothing.
	The sheer confusion.
	It's been like, huh.
	Was I tired this morning?
	Did I park?
	Because I've got to wake up at 5am to drive into London.
	Did I park it further down the road?
	Like, what's going on?
	Anyway, obviously, I deduce that my car's literally just been stolen.
	Very expensive car.
	You've seen it.
	It's a sweet set of wheels.
	Yeah.
	For those that know anything about cars, it was a Lexus LC500.
	It's a 100-plus grand car brand new.
	Wow.
	And so that's actually important.
	It's not to be a bragging right, but that is important because it's not a £500 banger.
	No, no, no.
	And so I call the police, call the line, And they go, right, yep, got all the details.
	You can leave.
	I'm like, sorry, what do you mean?
	Yeah, you can just go.
	I'm like, right.
	Is anyone going to, no one wants to come down and speak to me?
	They don't want to come and have a look at the location?
	No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
	We'll be in touch.
	I'm like, okay, that's frustrating, but fine.
	That's the process.
	I've got to trust that process.
	And so I then contact the insurer, do all of that side of things.
	And then I get an email, and it's probably the most condescending email ever.
	So it just says, well, we understand the effects of crime can be devastating, it can be difficult, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	We're still not going to do anything about it, of course.
	So after they said, after you got off the phone to them, you would have hoped there'd be people then tripping through some CCTV and doing something?
	You'd think.
	Well, actually worse than that.
	So I can't exactly find out where it is in this email, but basically they pinpoint...
	Does the email come up on...
	I think it's bad res, to be honest...
	They effectively say, we've handed your case over to the telephone investigation unit.
	Are they going to try and call the car up?
	That is legitimately a thing that the Met Police have.
	A telephone investigation unit.
	Right, okay.
	Excuse me, is that the car?
	Have you been stolen?
	Yeah.
	Hello, are you stolen?
	Hi, did you steal this car?
	So, that was in the afternoon.
	I get that.
	I get this email saying, it's obviously just a stock email with your crime reference number and this is what we're doing.
	Anyway, the very next day, the very next day, at 9am, I get a phone call.
	And the phone call is, hi, we just need to confirm some details.
	Well, I'm the investigator.
	I'm like, oh, thank you.
	God, you know, brilliant.
	I might get some sort of recompenses.
	Something might happen.
	So I go through all the standard privacy, you know, use your name, postcode, all that standard drivel.
	And then the guy goes, was there any glass at the scene?
	I'm like, no.
	Did you go down there, though?
	Oh, no.
	No, no, no, no.
	We've not been down there.
	So how do you know?
	Right.
	So you're asking me whether there was any glass there.
	Right.
	Okay.
	Anyway, immediately he then goes, that's all we need from you, Mr. H. That's all we need from you.
	I'm like, okay.
	Anyway, two minutes later, get off the phone and I get an email saying, we're sorry to hear that you've been a victim of crime.
	An investigator from the Metropolitan Police has looked carefully at your case.
	The span of 12 hours.
	And we're sorry to say that with the evidence and the leads available, it's unlikely that we will be able to identify those responsible.
	Leads.
	The leads.
	You assigned it to a telephone investigation unit that their investigation was phoning me up to ask if there was any glass at the scene and then you immediately closed the case.
	So when you have, you know, articles like this saying, well, we don't solve 90% of London car tests, it's because you don't want to.
	The institution is in a way, it's aligned in a way to not do those things.
	Right?
	There's no investigation into that at all.
	There was nothing remotely.
	You said the leads, so you could say, do you need me to go to the gym?
	And ask them whether there was any CCTV cameras pointing at the car at the time.
	What about the APNR camera that was above where I was parked?
	Did you see any of that?
	What about it?
	So none of that's investigated at all.
	It's just, sorry, tough luck.
	Yeah, literally.
	Pass it on to the insurance claim.
	So everyone wonders why your insurance is going up and up and up and up.
	It's because the police can't bother to do their job.
	the police do not want to do it.
	And this is most egregious when you have, and look, look, No, it isn't.
	No, it isn't.
	It's a directional manpower issue.
	Because you direct the police to arrest, on average, 33 people per day for what they post online.
	That's a stat.
	This is absurd.
	So, crimes with a real victim.
	That was my dream car.
	I'm getting a little bit heated now.
	But it was my dream car.
	It was very special to me.
	I cannot ever replace that ever again.
	The insurance payout.
	Was the market value now, not when I bought it.
	So it's substantially less.
	And then it was even £10,000 less than the market value right now.
	And I've got no comeback on that.
	But the police just go, well, whatever, who cares?
	We don't care.
	This is the degradation of society all around you.
	And they've even put it to, this is the London Mayoral Assembly, isn't it?
	And the answer that they give, basically, is how can you improve this?
	What work is taking place to improve the outcome for those who have their car stolen in London?
	This was in May and June 22, but I'm sure it's bloody the same, if not worse.
	The Met Police Service takes vehicle crime seriously and ensures every allegation of car theft is investigated.
	Well, obviously not.
	Oh, no, no, no.
	That's an investigation calling you up.
	Yes, sorry.
	Hello?
	Hi.
	What's your name?
	Thanks.
	I've investigated you.
	Absolutely, literally, legally, the bare minimum.
	Yeah.
	And you mentioned about CCTV, like there might have been CCTV out beside this particular gym.
	Now, if you drive a car from SE1, in any direction, it will be on dozens, maybe hundreds of cameras.
	If you wanted to find the car, any car, so it's not just me, this will happen to anyone, right?
	So obviously this is my personal therapy session, but...
	If you wanted to find the car, you could find the car.
	It's the fact that they do not want to find the car.
	And then I ask you, what's the point of the million CCTV cameras?
	What is the point of them?
	Oh, the point of them is very easy.
	That's just to monitor us and make sure that we do as we're told.
	Is to be able to make sure that if anyone escapes a tweet, we'd be able to track them down to their house.
	Those hurty words.
	Yeah, that's it.
	Those dangerous things.
	That's what it is.
	This is all about control that Blair put in for us.
	If you'd have turned around and said, listen, I have six guns in the back of that car.
	I don't know where they are now.
	I don't know where they are now.
	It was in the back of their car.
	I'd legally own them.
	Or there was a sticker that says, I don't like Islam.
	Yeah.
	On the car.
	You best find it.
	Remove that sticker.
	Maybe on it.
	I had a copy of David Irving's book on Dresden.
	Oh!
	Suddenly, suddenly, there's a team of cops working around the cops.
	You better find that car, because the nuclear bomb that I planned to explode outside Parliament is still ticking in there.
	Oh, and by the way, MI5, listen, that's called a joke, something that you do not yet understand, apart from your lives, which are a general joke.
	So there you go, yeah.
	The Met Police legalised car theft in London.
	It's a shame that really was, I'm not just blowing smoke up your ass, that was a sweet motor.
	Yeah.
	It really was.
	I know what it's like to have, my little story is I lived in Clapham, Clapham Common, and I bought a kind of Italian motor, scooter.
	Vespa?
	Lamboretta?
	What are we talking about?
	Oh, no, the Aprilia.
	Oh, really?
	Aprilia Habana.
	Okay.
	And it had, you know, the wide arms out there.
	It was a big base, two seats that really comfortably got the girl on the back of that, which helped me a lot.
	I was able to just drive up, you know.
	It's one of those things you did in the early days of being a young, healthy man, to be honest, in London.
	But what is the point in London I could have gone on that point?
	That's not so bad.
	Anyway, I come in and I literally had been to like...
	So I'd have pulled over in those days, you'd get done for it.
	I literally pulled in, onto my pavement, into the little square area that I was lucky I had in front of my flat.
	Got off the bike with the two bags, the key was out, wasn't even in, went down, opened the door of mine, went straight through into the house, put the bags out, turned around, the bag had gone.
	Scrotes, who have been living, and I've subsequently found out, living in the block of flats opposite, had literally watched me run down and come out.
	When I got the police trying to chase it, no, they couldn't find it.
	Eventually, I did get it back, though.
	Someone had managed to hand it back, and it was brought back to me in pieces.
	Yeah, that's disgusting.
	Literally, they'd have tried to take it apart.
	Absolutely disgusting.
	And I contacted the Aprilia people and they rebuilt it and put it back together for me.
	So I did have it, you know, so eventually.
	But the cost, like you said, insurers wouldn't pay out properly for it.
	I had to repay for it to be rebuilt myself because they wanted to scrap it and they wouldn't have given me the full value of what the bike was worth.
	And again, the police are not interested in about it.
	So deal with the insurers.
	Crimes with real victims.
	Because, I mean, we could go on about this all day, every day.
	Burglaries, for instance.
	They've legalised that now.
	It's just absurd.
	Shoplifting, legalised.
	It's absurd.
	Violence on the streets, legalised unless you're a march opposing Antifa.
	If you're allowed to wear masks, you're not.
	Yeah, it's disgusting.
	Just out of interest, one of my dream bikes would be an Aprilia race bike replica, an Aprilia RS250.
	Oh, yes.
	I think they're beautiful.
	Check those out.
	Which colour, though?
	I could go black or silver.
	Red and black stripes?
	Yeah, maybe, yeah.
	As long as it's not embarrassing, like bright yellow or bright green, I don't mind too much.
	I've seen one in chrome or sort of silver, brushed chrome.
	Let's go to your LGBT side and go for pink, you know.
	Rainbow, rainbow, rainbow.
	If you had it rainbow, they'd find it if it ever got nicked.
	Imagine that, a race bike replica, but you get it in rainbow.
	That would be weird.
	That would be weird.
	The little dolphin.
	We're going off in a wild string there now.
	You have to sit there and watch these shows.
	And it sits there.
	Can't get rid of the images.
	We need to read a few of the super chats.
	So Sligglestone17 says the new version of London is going to produce a new Indian version of Sweeney Todd, the demon son.
	Of Fleet Street.
	The engaged few says, does anyone believe that the king, as the head of the church, would actually defend the church, or the nation for that matter, from a Muslim invasion?
	No.
	No, absolutely not, no.
	I think he's actively...
	And did you see the Manchester Cathedral turned into a mosque?
	I saw they had the chapel in Windsor Castle.
	They had Eid or something or other there.
	That's right.
	Because he considers himself the defender of faiths.
	Yeah.
	Traitor.
	Tracer.
	No, I see...
	And someone kindly sent me an email not too long ago saying, would you do a thing all about Queen Elizabeth and how brilliant she was?
	And I just didn't reply because...
	Elizabeth the Silent, Elizabeth the Absent.
	No, a terrible thing happened under her watch.
	She did nothing and stood by her.
	Imagine Britain back in 1952 or 1954, whenever her coronation was, to the year she died, the difference in Britain.
	The decline of that.
	You know, she didn't do a good job.
	I'm not a big fan of the old Queen.
	And King Charles III is much worse, if anything.
	Oh, it's much worse.
	A speech going into Canada saying they're living in a lovely democracy.
	Seriously, a democracy in which farmers and truck drivers are arrested, you know, bank accounts closed, you know.
	So, yeah, I see that.
	That's one reason why I think so many of us will not fight for this country if they try to take us on a war against Russia or China, to be honest.
	Yeah, 100%.
	Egan17pine, I might not pronounce that right.
	It's Logan, isn't it?
	Sorry?
	That's Logan.
	Oh, Logan, sorry.
	Yeah.
	Logan7.
	They didn't use a capital L, but okay.
	Logan17pine says, I look into the sky and see a new star growing ever bigger as the old ways die.
	Something big is coming as the right grows stronger.
	I only hope that it will be a comet.
	Yeah, hopefully.
	Maybe that's an Elon Musk rocket coming down.
	Sorry.
	Apple Tea Party says police were liar rats up a drainpipe when I was caught doing 26 miles per hour in London though.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Marks Lives, odd thing to say, odd name to pick.
	Five Bucks says, Miss H Reviews, aka the Hellraiser guy from Hellraiser on YouTube, was cool.
	Do you still keep the faith?
	Have you sought the puzzle box?
	I have read the books of blood.
	I don't need the puzzle box because we're living in a hell right now.
	Stickerstone 17 says, Officer Mohamed and Inspector Mohamed investigated carefully and found their brother cousin did not steal your car, but it was always his, and he merely took possession of it, and they greatly enjoy it.
	Yeah, I mean, yeah.
	Which will happen.
	Oh, it's Britain.
	Reckless police will be sentenced to five days in the stocks, or the pillory, in any other way, where the people, for a nominal fee, will be allowed them to rotten food and poke them with sharp sticks.
	I'm not sure we would do that, because all the food that we've got is rotten, and that's all they'll allow us to eat.
	Yeah, being like a bent cop, it is like one of the worst things.
	It is terrible, isn't it?
	When you can't...
	If you don't have that, to a very high standard, you don't really have anything, do you?
	If you don't have decent police force, clean, decent police force, and a justice system that you can rely upon, then you don't really have a society.
	No, I mean, the Met Police, I remember growing up, the Met Police were the best of the best.
	They'd be the biggest blokes, right?
	They'd be the ones actually doing stuff.
	They're just a joke.
	They're an actual joke.
	How the mighty fool.
	Once All Order says, it was mentioned on Monday's podcast, but I think it would be an interesting segment to do an Andrew Real Industries.
	That rings a bell, but I can't remember what that is.
	Bo and Dan, I think, would do it best.
	Maybe with Carl as well.
	Cheers, fellas.
	What was Andrew Real?
	I can't quite remember exactly what that was.
	His next one elaborates a little bit.
	Andrew's founder, Palmer Lucky.
	He's a protege of Peter Thiel, all right, and notable for being a Silicon Valley type, who is also pro-Trump.
	Okay.
	Okay, all right.
	Well, I think we're getting it to mind, so again, apologies once more for missing the first segment, but there we go.
	Are you going to link through on this?
	Because it might be easier if you do.
	All right, well, I'll crack on where we start.
	Or just ask Samson to do it.
	It's either way.
	Yep.
	Yeah, I might do.
	We've got this as well, actually.
	I was trying to work it out the other day and I was not doing too badly.
	I wanted to go back and...
	But I want to say that one of the things about the right that I think is completely misunderstood is actually that when we look at asylum, when we look at refugees, when we look at those illegally coming into countries, we're not turning around to them and saying we don't like them, we hate them, we want to see them drown, We want to see them separated from their families.
	Our view is that...
	It's an enabler of child exploitation.
	It's an enabler of sexualisation of women.
	And it's also a destructive element of the countries that they come from because we allow them to remain in poverty economically.
	Now, I'm not going to deal with the economic arguments of that today, but what I want to show is how the European and global elites are actually enabling...
	And I begin by just looking at some of the big numbers.
	Here from the European Parliament and Think Tank, obviously something I looked at before, I've put this up because it's quite important to try and understand that the United Nations and its Children's Fund, again...
	Some of their stats are a little bit devious.
	But when it comes to try and calculate the numbers, generally they're not too bad.
	And the reason they do that is because they wanted to try and get reasonably accurate figures to get as much money as they can.
	But what is interesting about this element of the think tank that uses UN's children's funds data is to show that around the globe at the moment there are about 36 million, what they call, migrant children.
	And what that means is that these are children that were living in camps in Africa and Pakistan and Iran.
	These are the children that are in the camps in South America trying to make their way up into America.
	These are the ones that are coming across on the western, eastern or central Mediterranean routes, coming down through the Balkan routes, all across the globe, including those in Asia as well.
	There's about 36 million children out there.
	An astronomical number.
	It's an astronomical number.
	It was half of one million, I would be appalled.
	Yes.
	And this is why, in many, many ways, that I come back to the very basics.
	In order to deal with trying to make people live in comfortable and better lives, it's important for us to try and ensure that their countries are not like South Africa, where you have governments who are willing just to kill white people for the sake of white people and their history that they want to grab their land, thus putting people into poverty, thus ensuring that they want to leave that country and become part of the exodus of individuals that become part of the 36 million.
	Solve South Africa, you solve some of those leaving it.
	Solve what's happening in Venezuela.
	You solve the criminals dealing with that.
	That's the overall principle of what we on the right say.
	Solve those issues by removing that, and you help go downstream.
	Equally, economically, stop stealing from them.
	All the time.
	Let them actually do their lands, providing they're doing it ethically and not with corruption.
	And that doesn't help with China and Russia and ourselves in some ways.
	You might have seen it on TV.
	I can't remember if it's for water aid or whether it's for Oxfam or something like that, where it shows sub-Saharan children drinking dirty water, walking from really long ways to fill up with really dirty water.
	And it keeps saying, they have no choice.
	You have to give money to them because they have no choice.
	Really?
	Haven't you had decades or even hundreds of years to form an actual country?
	Yeah, absolutely.
	And if there we are, we want to get as much lithium as we can do to salve our green consciences and net zero.
	so we'll allow lithium where we're using thousands of children are dying from the poisonous waters and areas around them.
	But, hey, we can salvage our conscience as we get in a Tesla and drive off down the road or a BYO, whatever we want, because we now can say...
	Look back at down the line.
	There's no responsibility for the governments in those countries.
	Not a word about that.
	Nope.
	They haven't failed in any way.
	No, they're all perfectly fine.
	They're all lovely individuals, and when they come over to Paris and they get their wives to buy lovely dresses at the next Parisian event, then we're happy to see them in the million-pound houses that they have.
	So I wanted to just run through some quick numbers, just to go in.
	So separated and unaccompanied children in Europe.
	Can I just ask?
	Because I think it's important for...
	What's the age range?
	The child is up to 18. So it is up to 18. And it's important when I come down to the UK numbers why that is an important age for us because they differ from country to country.
	It's really important to try and understand this.
	So what I found interesting in this particular stat, again, I look back from my days in Europe and find organisations like this.
	This is into the EU.
	And if you look in the second paragraph, it says, between January and October 2015, the number of unaccompanied child asylum seekers in Sweden alone was just over 23,000.
	In that period of 2015.
	Now that was an element obviously to do with what was happening in Syria and the mass movement of a million plus odd that went into Germany, what I call Merkel's monumental madness.
	But because we've got a pre-war scenario where we needed to remove Syria from the arms of Russia and China, we didn't care how many people would die, how many people would move.
	We've just got to make sure that we've got to get our boys in charge into Syria to enable ourselves to have a front against Iran.
	This is one of the consequences of that.
	You get 23,000 children, and they say unaccompanied children are those who don't have parents or family, and they're under the age of 18. I just want to look at that number there.
	It's 30,000,000, 23,000 in one year in Sweden.
	Now, Sweden-like numbers I know have declined dramatically, but that was at that time.
	In the UK, we have...
	I mean, I remember going through this particular bill, the Home Office wanted me on a video which they put talking about the people smugglers and how much they were getting.
	So when Sunak launched this, I was in that, but only because I said I'd agree to talk about inhumanity and the evil that is the people smugglers.
	I fully understand why they didn't want that part in a promo video.
	So this is your point.
	The majority of unaccompanied children in the UK are aged 16 or 17. And where there is a dispute, about half of those are found to be adults.
	This we know is a fact, that the vast majority of people coming over are 16, 17 and 18, or adults pretending to be children in the UK.
	And I think we have something like 8,000 since the year 2000 that have come up.
	We don't have as many of these children come here.
	Most of them are male.
	Most of them are adults, but we do have 16 and 17-year-olds.
	And what we have to understand is that they send their 16 and 17-year-olds across Africa, coming down from the Middle East, because they're strong enough to be able to get here.
	And when they get here, they can claim their family reunion rights.
	That's what I was going to move on to, actually.
	Absolutely.
	to be asking that because as much as it's good to have empathy and compassion and humanity That's where my sort of humanity starts to wane ever so slightly.
	And I think you're right.
	When you look at the stats of people now looking at numbers and people coming over, genuinely, human beings, Yeah, 100%.
	Where we're clear now is we now know through our own figures and organisations like ourselves who are coming out and saying, look, here's the evidence to you, and I will be publishing at the end of the next month.
	All the figures from the year 2000, since 2000 to now, of all the asylum numbers, 1.2 million, what countries they come from, what the ages are, what the sexes are, so that people can see true figures when they can talk about this.
	But I find it appalling to know that we've got so many children across the globe, but we have a system that allows the 16 and 17-year-olds to come here knowing that they are the front for the migrant gangs.
	Yeah.
	Who are being paid money to get them here.
	If they disappear, which we have evidence of that, they go back into gangsters working for them in the marijuana houses up and down the north of England, into the car stealing section that happens in London, to the sexual abuse sections of the criminal world.
	When they're used as a tool or a gambit by evil people.
	Yeah, it's despicable, isn't it?
	It's disgusting.
	I always think that, I mean, how to say it, it's just like gangsters and monsters have always used children.
	It's like actual gangsters on the street where they'll use a small child to be a lookout or something.
	Because, one, they know they're easily manipulated, and two, they know if they do ever face justice, it's minimal.
	Right.
	Yeah, well, we saw that in Fagin.
	Pick a pocket sword.
	What was his name?
	The big gangster in that movie who was using the kids.
	Fagin?
	No, Fagin was the kind of guy at the top, but he used a muscle knife.
	I can't remember his name.
	That's it.
	You know, he was the muscle man, wasn't he?
	Yeah, when you know that, you know, if we send a 20-year-old dude to do this...
	But if we send a 16-year-old to do it, it's actually going to work out.
	And we've done segments before about in Sweden how they actually needed to change their laws because there were so many children, children, we're talking 16, 17-year-old young men, involved in...
	Yeah, it's monstrous.
	It is.
	It's monstrous things that the people pulling the strings do it.
	And it's not only that, it's the knock-on effect that it has and our cultures that we're used to having.
	Really settled common law principles of saying that we will look at children differently to those of adults.
	But now we've allowed the gangsters and the criminals to be able to usurp that.
	Sensible common law that's been built over 100 years.
	Because they didn't have that in their countries and they're going to use it for any way that they want.
	And in addition, to be able to go out to a position where the police don't even do anything for a crime that no doubt the big gangs are involved in.
	Because they didn't steal your £100,000 car because they thought, OK, I'm just going to drive it myself.
	Oh no, 100%.
	That's gone.
	That would be stolen to order.
	Again, I think my main issue with stuff like this is, and I'm sure you'll mention something along those lines anyways, is with respect to the government themselves.
	If you have a statistical...
	you are using your child as a middle person to stake economic claim elsewhere, which is wrong.
	It should be decentralized.
	There should be no There should be no realm where a child should be able to cross however many countries, come to a country, and then go, I'm here now, can I bring my family?
	No, you shouldn't, actually, because your parents allowed you to travel through however many countries and try to get to...
	I just think that's abhorrent.
	It's interesting you do that because over the weekend the Germans have actually now started to look at changing the law on family reunions.
	Yeah, I think that should be the case.
	They're being pilloried at the moment by saying you're just trying to respond to the AFD, the usual thing.
	Yeah, but I think that's common sense, isn't it?
	Why would you want parents, why would you want adults in your country that would allow their child to traverse the globe?
	No.
	Those people are scum.
	They're awful people, right?
	They're treating their child like a taxi service for an asylum claim.
	No, you should not be allowed here.
	So, yeah, I mean, I agree with the humanity aspect, absolutely.
	But, yeah, if there's statistics to show it, there should be changing policies here.
	Yeah, there are.
	more sorry I didn't want to go back down but I'm going to quickly win through the next step This is the interesting point here.
	Not only have we got the millions coming in, and then we know the thousands in each individual countries, but we also know tens of thousands of these unaccompanied miners went missing in the European Union.
	And when I look at this, I mean, I know this is called the...
	It's funny they won't fund the Centre for Migration and Economic Prosperity, but they will fund organisations like this to say, look, unaccompanied minors are at risk preventing child trafficking.
	Well, we could say there's no S at Sherlock, that of course we're going to find unaccompanied minors go missing.
	Some of them, we know they go missing because they're 16, 17 and 18 and they're involved with the people smugglers.
	But others do go missing for much more nefarious and evil and disgusting reasons for it.
	And again, I point out that we on the right are trying to prevent this.
	We on the right are bringing to bed the argument that it's the elites who are allowing this to happen.
	By not having determined borders with disincentives to being here, you enable gangsters and people smugglers and evil people to continue their business.
	Where is the moral outrage from the globalist types when they hear a figure like that?
	It's just silence.
	It's just crickets.
	Their moral outrage is, why do you not allow them all to come in?
	Why do you not have safe ports of call?
	Why do you not allow them to transient?
	Because if you did...
	And the problem wouldn't go away.
	You're just filling the country with more and more people.
	Which exponentially gets worse.
	More people go missing.
	Yeah.
	Percentage increases.
	Absolutely.
	And I find this quite staggering that here we've got 30,000 migrant and refugee children estimated to go missing on their arrival in Europe.
	That's mental.
	30,000 just go missing.
	It's a giant number, isn't it?
	A giant number.
	In three years.
	That's three years.
	10,000 a year going missing in terms of that.
	And behind closed doors, this is another organisation, lots of them out there.
	It talks about legal and empirical analysis of human trafficking risks in home office hotels.
	Well, we know that they're not.
	They're not policed in any way properly.
	They're not controlled in any way properly.
	People can come and go as they please.
	So what do you expect to happen?
	Mainstream media journalists completely ignore them and homegrown activist type investigations.
	You're just told you can't enter, aren't you?
	So you can't be here.
	This is private property.
	You can't come in with your phone and see what's going on.
	So you can't check.
	You're a bigot for even thinking you could.
	And again, I often ask myself, okay, if you're really that deeply concerned, in Winchester there's this lovely image of a guy who's got a reform flag on the flat below and above it is migrants welcome.
	And I just wonder whether if you knocked on the door of the migrants welcome, would you say, okay, we're here from an organisation that wants to place a migrant in your house.
	Would you have one in your house?
	Of course they will.
	And when I knock on all these big houses that have got similar sorts of supports, would you do so?
	No, you won't.
	They're welcome as long as they go to the poor working class areas of our country.
	That's a stance as old as time itself.
	People on the street asking these individuals that are always at these rallies, anti-fascist, open the borders, blah, blah, blah.
	You're like, oh, you're perfect.
	Are you going to take one?
	No.
	No space, no time, no money.
	You want a 17-year-old Iraqi lad to live in your home with you?
	Yeah, well, I do.
	We'll pass, but for somebody else, sure.
	Somebody else, yeah.
	Bring them in, but not my problem.
	Organised crime.
	A thousand women a year in the London sex trade in the UK.
	It's going to be way worse than that.
	That's right.
	Way worse.
	And that's staggering.
	Staggering numbers.
	A year, a thousand, a year of what they actually know.
	Every single year, a thousand.
	That's unbelievable.
	Modern slavery still exists in the UK.
	Yet foreign people enslaving other foreign people, which just happens to be in Leicester or something.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Well, there was that.
	I can't even remember.
	Was it Leicester?
	I think so, yeah.
	I've certainly seen headlines about it in Leicester.
	It was bad.
	But again, it was an open secret.
	Everyone knew about it.
	A factory that was being used to make clothes using slaved labour from different countries.
	Being rented in houses by people who weren't born in this country to house them and then ship them in taxes that were done by people who weren't in this country.
	That's perfectly fine for GDP purposes.
	Well, you're not a racist if you're that slavery, I guess.
	What a disgusting stain on the nation that...
	And my point about it is, I don't really particularly care what country or culture you are.
	If you do something like that, you should be imprisoned.
	You should not even, and deported if you're not from this country.
	This isn't about race or colour or creed.
	We're just recognising that the numbers and figures across whole sections of our criminality is linked to the mass migration of people who are coming here illegally.
	And again, I'm just going to whip through this one because I found this one particularly concerning about the trafficking of women from all over into Europe.
	And that's an interesting map.
	There's a lot coming from South America, but you can see them through Central Asia.
	It's where they begin.
	Look at the arrows where they're beginning.
	From Afghanistan, Central Asia, coming through the Middle East.
	Coming through countries such as the United Arab Emirates, coming through places like Saudi Arabia, why are they not stopping?
	Turkey.
	And of course then you've got similar ones coming through Africa into ourselves and equally into China.
	I don't touch China and Japan too much, I don't have a huge number, but I do know that there's a mass amount of people smuggling, of Asian people, into China, into the sex slave trade, a lot of Thailand, a lot of the Philippines, and into China itself.
	So it isn't just homegrown to us, gangsters are all working together.
	You could stop the supply and demand here, right?
	Like, that's the thing.
	Yeah, it's going to happen everywhere.
	Of course it is, absolutely.
	But you don't, as a nation, you don't have to facilitate that criminality.
	You could just stop it.
	And I just find this a fascinating little graph that they've done on this, because I used to be in financial services and markets, and you'd look at the value of the share price, and they're looking at what the share price is, and here they've got here.
	Annual of the new victims, £70,000 a year.
	Volume of market stock, £140,000.
	Value of market stock.
	That's an odd way to put it, isn't it?
	Yeah, £3.6 billion a year.
	We're talking £3.6 billion.
	I think that number's actually probably underestimated, of £3.6 billion.
	Always going to be higher.
	What's the market share globally, though?
	That's important.
	We need to up our figures.
	Those are rookie numbers, if anything.
	That's right.
	So it's interesting how they look at it.
	You shouldn't joke about it.
	It's terrible.
	You shouldn't joke about it.
	It's terrible.
	But it's just the way that it's casually, just, it's the market.
	Estimated trend.
	Stable.
	That's right.
	Estimated trend.
	Stable.
	So here we are, ladies and gentlemen.
	I'm giving you the market trend now on how we've got on people smuggling.
	We've got a good market for Europe.
	It's sexual exploitation.
	The trend is stable, but we've got 3.6 billion in the market stock.
	Are we buyers of this market?
	Are we sellers?
	You know, that's the kind of weirdness that these organisations who are funded by governments write about this issue, and they think that we're the ones who are anti-humanity?
	Well, they're disassociating from it massively, aren't they?
	They're dehumanising these individuals by putting it down as...
	This is the value of it.
	And it says that potential effects.
	Potential.
	Human rights violations.
	What do you mean potentially?
	Absolutely.
	What are you talking about?
	Yes, obviously.
	It's human rights violations.
	And human rights violations means misery.
	It means misery.
	Yeah.
	The likelihood of effects being realised very high.
	It's absolutely human rights violations.
	Thanks very much, UN-funded organisations, for pointing out that humans are shattles, to be honest, and they've just got a stock value there to bend on there.
	I got this one from the IOM.
	The deadest year on record.
	I'm whipping through this part because I know where we are in 10 minutes.
	Because this is about the numbers of people who die.
	Nearly 9,000 died on the migrant routes.
	And what they mean by that is the ones who are dying in the waters.
	Coming across from Libya to Italy.
	Those coming across on the channel.
	But about 9,000 are dying a year.
	So is it any sense for us to say we should allow it to continue?
	No.
	This is why we want them to stop the borders.
	It's not the reason, but it's one of the important reasons is we stop allowing people to die in waters by stopping the boats.
	Well, again, their argument would be, we'll just let them in.
	Absolutely.
	Yeah, we need safe routes for them then.
	Yeah, that's what the argument...
	Now, again, we can have a different argument, but do not ever call us on the right of being evil and nasty and anti-human when we want to stop the boats because we know that one of the ways of stopping people drowning is by having deterrence.
	Isn't it always?
	Because that's just the price they pay.
	It is.
	I've often said when I come to this, I mean, that's a quick stat for people to look at how many people are dying.
	But remember when we're doing the arguments, and I want to give people the arguments when they're out there debating, is that we're trying to stop this.
	Deterrence is stopping the deaths in the water.
	deterrence and ending legal migration is stopping the sexual abuse of children and here how many boats Again, I've not really put my numbers up on this for quite a while on the site.
	Probably something I need to do.
	That's a rough people figure coming over 24. I'll put my figures out later.
	But when we come down to the numbers here, I think it's roughly around 200 and odd.
	There we are, dying up there.
	78 died in 24, but it's about 225 that have died crossing the channel.
	We're not cruel to want this to stop.
	And now we're beginning to see in America, and I hope that, Samson, you managed to get this from 158, was it, or something like that?
	I'll take it in.
	Maybe I can do it.
	I don't want it to go all the way through.
	How do you get to 158 on this?
	I'll just slide it along.
	It's roughly around here.
	So this is the Biden administration that has been attacked on this.
	We're turning a blind eye to human trafficking.
	So we just listened to what she says to this guy on the right who I've known for a while is following the people smugglers and the human trafficking.
	Well, this shows the crisis that the Biden-Harris administration created.
	So since the inauguration, Homeland Security Investigations has conducted an investigation, a well-being check on 100,000 of the 324,000 children that were reported as unaccounted for.
	Out of that, they could only locate 5,000, which means 95,000 children are completely unaccounted for and there's nowhere else to look.
	The information the Biden-Harris regime 70%?
	That's correct.
	So, since Trump's come into power, they've done an audit of the unaccompanied children and migrants, something the Biden government, we now know, has been found out to be fraudulent on, and found out of 100,000 children they can only find 5,000.
	95,000 children.
	And again, here we are talking about Trump as being somebody who's the right, is anti-immigration, anti-asylum.
	Their whole organisation in the White House is about opposing migration.
	And yet these are the people who are trying to stop human trafficking.
	And we can see that under the Democrats...
	But the figures speak for themselves.
	Use facts to show it.
	Globalism is eating children.
	It's just making them disappear.
	It's ignoring them.
	It takes the money to fund the organisations.
	It takes the money to give them to their friends in the charities.
	And when the right try to create policies...
	And it's the usual things.
	You know, this is a French organisation and it talks about the fact that overcrowded Britain.
	Well, we are.
	We've got more density now than ever before.
	I mean, fundamentally, to stop these kind of things from happening, you have to...
	As a nation, you're never going to fix...
	Thank you.
	No.
	You just can't.
	You can facilitate and help people when they come here, sure.
	That will change that person's life.
	That's all you can do.
	It won't ever fix the place that they came from.
	You need to, except in asylum and immigrants, you know, just ad infinitum.
	It's never going to work.
	How many is too many at the end of the day is always the question I always ask people that are like, yeah, no, I'm pro-immigrant.
	So I'm like, well, how many is too many?
	It's a figure which no one can ever say.
	They can't because they know that when you put a cap on it, the whole virtue signalling project that they've got going on just falls apart.
	But you have to work on trying to facilitate the individual, you know, the locales that these people are coming from, trying to help that, or get them to help their own bloody place.
	You can't import just infinity people and not expect the degradation of your own society.
	like, oh, we're going to just help these poor whatevers, then your country, your nation will just become like...
	And I say that is something that everybody's beginning to see, and we are going out saying we can help solve this, not completely, but with different views.
	When we talk about criminality and terrorism, all you do is say it's there, there's the numbers, but we'll fund organisations to support the numbers.
	We will then fund organisations that criticise people like ourselves who want different results.
	We will fund organisations like this report about journalists, a study by journalists for journalists and policy makers, about how the media on both sides of the Mediterranean report on migration.
	Read it by, it's a very quick report, but right at the bottom, I just find it interesting when it comes down to how we solve it, is conclusions in there, is media coverage is vital to shaping people's opinions.
	We must use migration and two narratives to show the emotional and highly charged reporting on the plight of migrants.
	They want journalists all across Europe to say how sad and awful it is to go to our heartstrings.
	Coerce the public.
	Coerce the public.
	Into accepting infinity.
	And then it talks around making sure that they go against those of the right by challenging them as being nasty.
	So rather than solve the problem, keep the doors open.
	Allow people, smugglers, to win financially.
	Allow sexual exploitation, disappearance of children.
	But the right who wants to solve this with different solutions, let's turn around in their arguments and say they're racist and xenophobes.
	Let's use the media to do so.
	And I do this fine.
	And every now and again we'll have an image of a dead baby washed up on an Italian beach.
	And anyone that says anything about it is...
	racist and then the very other The very other extreme about it, I just played this very briefly because right at the beginning of this, I just want to come up with the first literal three or four sentences of what Tommy says on this.
	First of all, how are you?
	How are you feeling, boss?
	I feel good.
	Unfortunately, in a country that doesn't believe in free speech, being a citizen journalist, this place is an occupational hazard.
	It's ridiculous.
	16 years ago, when I first started speaking out against Islamic rape gangs that were plaguing this country, from that point on I faced relentless attacks from the British state, wielding lawfare as a weapon in order to silence me.
	That's the final thing that they're now implementing all across Europe, whether we're going to remove the AFD, we're going to get Marie Le Pen out, we're going to stop the elections in Romania, we'll arrest people like Tommy Robinson, we'll put people who tweet aggressively against large-scale migration, we'll put them in prison for public order offences, rather than deal with our issues and our solutions that we're suggesting.
	They will do all the lawfare, use all they can to stop us.
	And my argument to you is when we go away, remind ourselves that we're the ones who are trying to save the children.
	We're the ones trying to stop the deaths in the Channel.
	We're the ones who've got policies.
	We actually are not the evil individuals that they are.
	We want free speech and we're the ones who have the ideas to stop this.
	And that's why I want to try and pull all of this together so that people have the information and evidence to go back in debates and show us that we care.
	But we have the solutions.
	They don't.
	they've allowed it to happen in a very evil way.
	I'll grab the mouse then.
	Just read the final few of the super chats that we're obliged to read out then.
	So Sleekystone17 said, Andrew Real Industries is the new real-life name for Cyberdyne Industries.
	Right, yeah, they were the ones making the...
	Like the dog drone things.
	Like those dog android things.
	Anyway, I remember now.
	1617 again says, another one.
	I think they're another one.
	Does the unaccompanied children metric include the quote-unquote children with full beard saying quote, I am 12 quote, with Barry White level deep voice?
	I'd like to know if so.
	And to what degree before caring?
	It is.
	Those numbers do include those.
	They include them all, and they only take them out when they're allegedly proven to actually have metric tests that show who they are.
	Logan17pine said, here in SoCal, I guess that's Southern California, we call them coyotes, and they die literal babies in Mexico?
	DUY?
	I don't know.
	I don't know what that means, actually.
	Maybe that's a typo of some type.
	Or buy.
	Buy.
	And they buy literal babies in Mexico.
	This has been going on for some years now.
	Thankfully, Trump is doing something.
	And that audit is important in that.
	That's a random name, says.
	Japan got nuked twice and is now one of the most civilised nations in the world.
	The countries reflect their people.
	Harsh but fair, I think.
	Yeah, it always annoys me when Yeah.
	That's sort of on you in the end, ultimately.
	Well, again, there's always going to be plight in the world.
	You can only minimise it ever so slightly, I guess.
	There are some places that for geographical reasons will always struggle, sure.
	Yeah.
	I'm not saying it's not that, but like, there's no real reason why No, we've not...
	There's no good reason why, other than a state of their own...
	Well, it's because we do not enforce, effectively, for the companies going in there that have the assets in these countries, and we do not enforce anti-money laundering regulations, corruption regulations on these leaders, because we have this pre-war scenario that's going on, first of all, with communism, and now going on with China, Russia, and Iran.
	So as long as they're on our side, we'll let them get away with the abuses, rather than turn around and saying, no, we shouldn't deal with these individuals.
	And the last one, Amandaian512 says, the government can identify the parents of unaccommoded minors with accuracy, but they cannot find car thieves at all.
	Yep.
	That's a joke of it all, isn't it?
	Okay, so we've come to the end of our time, so I won't read any comments today.
	So, have we got any video comments?
	No.
	Okay, alright.
	Well, I hope you've enjoyed the podcast today.
	We'll be back tomorrow at the usual time.
	So until then, take care.

▲