All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 23, 2024 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters
01:30:14
The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1028
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Caesars for Wednesday the 23rd of October 2024.
I'm your host Connor, joined by Harry and Stelios.
Hello everyone.
And today we'll be discussing why Labour are releasing the criminals, the British government conspiring to end Musk's ex, and how the left is dying to have its next BLM martyr, but they certainly won't be getting one in the UK any time soon.
As it is Wednesday, first of all, keep an eye on Twitter for about 10 to 3 this afternoon.
But, at 3 o'clock, it'll be Tomlinson Talks, and I'll be going through Hope Not Hate's recent documentary and their attempt at undercover reporting and exposés, because there is the possibility, I'm not alleging anything here, but there is the possibility that they may have broken the law during the proceeds of procuring this information.
I have received documents that therefore raise questions, and relevant authorities need to answer them.
We'll be going through that and their sources of funding and possible intelligence connections from 3 o'clock on lotusetis.com.
But, without further ado, let's get into today's news stories.
So Labour have decided to release over a thousand more criminals, as of yesterday.
We all remember how well that went last time.
For example, as soon as they let a guy out, he was rearrested within a few minutes for a separate sexual assault charge.
But don't worry, I'm sure everyone released this time is a well-rehabilitated, squeaky-clean, anticipatory member of polite British society.
Not quite, but...
I'm sure every single one who comes out on the way out of the prison, they hand them the social contract and get them to sign it.
Yes, I'm sure there'll be net tax contributors by sundown.
So he was released and he offended yet again?
He was re-imprisoned for an outstanding other offence that he was also being investigated for.
But, you're talking about people re-offending when they're let out of prison.
Don't worry, Stelios.
We'll get to that.
Before we do, obviously the American election is now about two weeks away.
If you've got early voting ballots, vote properly and accordingly.
And if you want suggestions as to what to wear on election night when you're seeing in the results, well, we've got a new merch line over at LotusEaters.com.
Remember, we aren't monetised on YouTube, so the only things which keep the lights on at this place are Donations, subscriptions to our website for as little as £5 a month, and physical products like Islander magazine, released every quarter, and t-shirts and mugs like this.
Trump's art of the grill.
He did just want to grill in the business sense, but turns out his country going down the drain demanded a lot more of him, so go look at that in the description and on our website.
Without further ado...
So this is the details for the prison overcrowding scheme that Labour have conducted.
There's a graph in here that shows exactly how many prisoners are being released.
So this was on the 10th of September, 1,700 prisoners.
On the 22nd of October, which was yesterday, 1,100 prisoners were released.
So the release scheme overall is looking to free 5,500 spaces across England and Wales by releasing some offenders To be monitored on a license in the community after 40% of their sentence has been served, down from the original 50%.
Bear in mind, currently 11,000 foreign nationals in prison.
We are the country with the most crimes committed by foreign offenders in all of Western Europe, second in all of Europe, and yet they're still in there, we're paying for them, and they haven't been deported.
I don't think saying the number gives quite enough of a perspective on the state of UK prisons.
27% of our prison population is ethnic minorities.
But not only that, ethnic minorities, yes, I think it's 18% of Muslims, despite being 6.5% of the population, but the raw number of 11,000 Foreign nationals.
They could be deported tomorrow to free up the prison places.
Now the reason they're freeing up prison places is to imprison not violent offenders, but people that have committed speech-related offences after the civil unrest following the Southport Massacre.
But if you did just want to free up prison places, you could just deport them all home tomorrow.
And it is a choice for them not to do so.
And this choice has been made by Justice Secretary Shubana Mahmood, who has been touted Celebratorily as the first Muslim Lord Chancellor.
She's promised that the Labour government is going to build 14,000 extra prison spaces that were promised but not delivered by the Conservatives.
But she also wants to change the way that sentencing works to prevent the overcrowding crisis repeating.
Now bear in mind there are certain people in this country Have over 11 offences.
And those people are 70% likely to re-offend again.
So it's just a permanent criminal class.
So the idea that just amending the sentencing is going to stop them from re-offending is delusional.
We will explore the reason that they have this delusion later on.
You going to say something?
No, I wanted to say that the left has diachronically bad ideas about prisons.
Yeah, they have a crazily naive idea that we could just have some people reform them a bit, change their way of thinking, and then they'll go back into society and there isn't going to be any problem.
That's crazy thinking.
It's either deeply politically cynical or founded on a fundamentally naive conception of human nature, definitely.
She said, we have an opportunity now to reshape and redesign what punishment outside of a prison looks like.
Punishment outside of a prison.
So what's the purpose of a prison, then?
Mahmood said, we must be smarter about who receives a prison sentence.
They also want to look into giving prisoners smartwatch devices, which has been piloted in the US, which send nudge messages to offenders that are outside.
So basically the giant technological longhouse which keeps reminding you to say your P's and Q's.
Great, love that.
Why don't we just, like, imprison rapists and send home foreign people?
I'm sorry, I was just imagining the smartwatch coming up with, I see you're about to rape somebody.
Have you thought about not doing that?
Have you thought about visiting a community centre?
It's just such a farce.
That's not a very nice thing to do.
Yeah, it's easy to understand what it means to be punished outside of prison, because it seems to me that with this early release, almost everyone is punished.
Yeah.
So the question is, who gets punished?
Quite.
Yes.
The local community have done nothing wrong.
The law-abiding citizen gets punished on behalf of the freedom of the criminal.
So who are they letting out is a good question.
Well, Shabana Mahmood was asked about this on Sky News.
I don't know who does her eyebrows, but blimey, get a different makeup on.
She looks permanently surprised.
So she decided to be asked, this is Beth Rigby, no Kate Burley, isn't it?
Who asked her, well last time there were 37 people you let out that definitely weren't meant to be let out.
How do we know that this isn't going to happen again?
And Shabana Mahmood said, well there's nothing we could have done about that.
Well, there was a very specific problem last time around where there was a very small number, 37 offenders, who were sentenced against an older Act of Parliament.
It's a victim for every one of those.
No, if you let me finish the point.
That was not a problem we could have foreseen because we anticipated everybody would have been charged and sentenced against the later Act of Parliament.
That issue has now been rectified.
That won't happen again.
All 37 of those men were returned back.
To custody and their victims are now being kept up to date.
So that mistake won't be repeated.
One of those mistakenly released was understood to have allegedly re-offended and has been charged with intentionally touching a woman.
He has subsequently been recalled to prison.
Baroness Newlove, before this happened, did foresee that this would happen.
Well, on the specific issue relating to those 37 individuals, I think nobody, you know, I could not have imagined that there would be people in our system charge and sentence against an older Act of Parliament and not the newer law that had come in in 2020.
So I think that that is actually a unique set of circumstances.
The way I have pulled every lever at my disposal in this emergency release scheme to make sure that victims are notified, we deliberately acted quickly in order to give the probation service the time To prepare.
That is a big break with the early release scheme that last Conservative government had bought in.
And I'm determined to make sure that the usual arrangements for victim notification work as they should.
So, right, all of your lawyers and MPs were so incompetent that they didn't realise that different people were tried under different Acts of Parliament at different times.
So you're so stupid as to be unqualified to do this entire operation.
You were sitting there steaming...
The idea that this won't backfire is at best a luxury belief.
Yes.
Realistically, it's really sinister and cynical political machination.
Absolutely.
Couldn't have put it better myself.
But at least, right, gents, I know we're all frustrated.
It's only 37, right?
Oh dear.
It's half of them.
They're already back in prison.
There's space now.
There is space now.
Well, how do they make space?
The spaces that they gave up, they've gone straight back into.
Yeah, what you're saying there about the deeply cynical nature of it, I refuse to believe that there was nobody in this government that didn't put a hand up and say, hold up, isn't this a really, really stupidly bad idea?
And if nobody agreed, then they are all stupid.
And if they all did agree, but then they decided it was a good idea for other reasons, then yes, this is a cynical attempt to terrorise the population of England.
Yes.
So just for further context, this is Martin Jones, His Majesty's Chief of Probation.
And he explained how for every 100 inmates released in the first quarter of 2024, so this was before the original wave of prison releases in September, we can expect to see similar patterns, 56 had been brought back to prison for re-offending or breaching their license.
So, more than half.
I think also part of the point of this is that yes, they will be going back into the spaces that they freed up eventually because, I mean, if more than half of them are already back then we can assume that most of the rest of them at some point will end up back there but that's fine because the ultimate goal of this will be that what happened to, I believe his name was Peter Lynch who supposedly took his own life in prison the other day will mean that all of those spaces that the political prisoners of this country took up will be free again.
Yes, here is Peter Lynch.
I was going to mention him later, but it's pertinent.
Grandfather, 61, pled guilty to violent offences despite none of the violent offences being listed in his charges, and it seems that he was just present at the fiery riot at the Rotherham Hotel.
It was a Holiday Inn, I believe.
Yeah, but he did not set light to the hotel himself, and he was instead shouting at the police and criticising the government.
He's a political prisoner, he has died in prison, and we knew ahead of time, thanks to a Sky News reporter, that certain members of these riots and protests would be subjected to unwelcome treatment by the Muslim gangs Presently, which are actually probably lots of them being let out of prison early.
Yes, they were in danger.
That was the point of putting them into danger.
Either they are so psychologically tortured by what they're having to go through that, as Peter Lynch supposedly did, they kill themselves, or they end up getting a little accident arranged for them while they are in prison.
It is evil.
I have a question.
Do we have any idea of the profile of those people being released?
Because First of all, this news is something that I definitely believe that most people will think it's so bad it can't be true.
That's going to be the first reaction.
Well, how about we look at some?
And you would say that if some people would say that this is happening, perhaps they did it with some, let's say, minor economic crime.
I get the impression that it's worse.
Well, here's Daniel Dowling Brooks, who was freed earlier than expected from a seven-year sentence for kidnap and grievous bodily harm.
Right.
So, not just stealing a loaf of bread then.
So his 29-year-old freed seven weeks earlier than he had expected from a seven-year sentence for kidnap and grievous bodily harm, which he had been serving at His Majesty's Prison, Swaleside, on the Isle of Sheppey in Kent.
He was among the first of more than 1,200, according to The Telegraph, prisoners serving sentences of five years or more to be released on Tuesday morning.
Not sure who's correct there on the exact number, the BBC or the Telegraph, but 11 to 1200 is about right.
Another prisoner released from HMP Swaleside thanked Keir Starmer, quote, from the bottom of my heart, and said he had been freed a year earlier than expected from a four-year jail sentence.
A third was picked up in a black Rolls Royce by a group of men in matching hoodies.
Turns out being a doctor and a lawyer and a pharmacist pays really well these days, where you can get Bentleys and Rolls Royces and the like.
I wonder how they came for all of that income.
But you can't buy fashion sense.
Surrounded by a group of ten friends outside the jail with a strong smell of cannabis in the air, Dowling Brooks, a father of two, those poor children, said, I love my life, as he posed next to a Mercedes G-Class wagon priced at £100,000.
He said, I'm a dad of two, so now I'm out and very happy.
I'm going to be good.
I kidnapped someone who owed my friend money.
I tied him up and had him at gunpoint.
I beat him up.
It was bad, but not as bad as they made out.
Right, so clearly very remorseful.
I'm so sorry for it, though.
I'm changed.
Big up Keir Starmer.
I suppose that's going to be on Labour leaflets in 2029.
I'm delighted to be released early.
I'm delighted.
I can't wait to go to McDonald's.
That's where we're all going now.
I'm free and can go wherever I want.
It's amazing.
There are some photos of all these early releases here and all these lovely cars.
Very reputable individuals.
Picked up a Lamborghini.
There's that chap, Dowling Brooks.
There's another guy, very happy.
Expensive Mercedes.
Curiously costly cars here for a bunch of desperate, low-income criminals.
I wonder how all their friends came about that.
So yeah, when you say, oh, you know, people might just be concerned it's a mild, non-violent economic crime, no, kidnapping and, I mean, putting a gun to his head should have been attempted murder, shouldn't it?
There you go.
Alright then.
Also, GB News, in the background of one of their broadcasts, caught a guy just escaping from prison.
And we need to remind people that a lot of convicted paedophiles and distributors of paedophilic content are getting suspended sentences.
Yeah, they don't even go to prison.
We need to free up all of those spaces for political prisoners.
Yeah, no prisons.
I'll just play this clip because it's absurd.
And Sophie, we're going to start with you because there's been a strange twist of events here.
We've had a prison escape as you've been reporting outside HMP Kirkham.
We have indeed.
This morning we've seen around 50 men released from HMP Kirkham under orthodox measures as part of this new prison release scheme, but in the last hour or so we've seen one man leave this prison in perhaps more controversial circumstances.
My cameraman and I were stood here waiting to do our reports for GB News when I saw a man in all black, you can see the green fence in the distance there, He appeared on top of the fence, which you may not be able to see is covered with barbed wire.
There was a black vehicle waiting just beneath.
He jumped down, hopped in the car and it sped off out of the prison.
Now, within a few minutes, an alarm had begun sounding here at HMP Kirkham.
And then the police vans and cars have started to arrive.
You can probably see a couple of them there outside the prison.
Now, we've spoken to some of the staff here at HMP Kirkham and they've confirmed to us that now what will have to happen is a roll call.
The prison itself is holding around 600 to 700 But the difference between this prison and perhaps other prisons that our viewers may be familiar with is this is a category D open prison so some prisoners are able to come and go for work purposes but then they must return.
We also asked the police if this is a regular occurrence or not and they were quite reluctant to answer but it seemed like it is quite a rare thing for this to happen so that's what's going on here at HMP Kirkham.
How reassuring!
So basically he said, I'm gonna leave but because I want to not because you ordered me to leave.
How is this a prison even?
I don't know.
This country is...
I mean it would be funny if we weren't all paying for it and now he's probably gonna get on social housing that I have to keep paying for.
And also it'd be really funny if all the people that were legitimately let out hadn't constantly asked Sophie as she was reporting there for GB News to flash them and then made gun signs out of the window and she declined their request.
So yeah, just 37 people that weren't meant to be let out, won't happen again, except all of these criminal delinquents and possible escapees.
There's also another one that's been released early that Luca Watson has brought attention to here.
He was imprisoned in 2019 for 12 and a half years for kidnapping and torturing a child.
He's a drill rapper called Young Diz from Newham.
He's trying to figure out TikTok there, because when he went in it didn't even exist.
And he was actually profiled in a BBC documentary in Season 3 of The Met.
And yeah, he posted him torturing a child on Snapchat.
Not great.
We used to have solutions.
We used to have solutions for these kinds of people in this country.
Solutions I can't talk about.
He also seems really remorseful because while he was in prison, he recorded drill raps issuing threats to other gangs.
Prison freestyle.
Why is he here?
Who had the phone?
Why is he able to post this?
Why is he threatening people and not getting an extension to his...
Here's another criminal, chap, issuing an endorsement for Labour's early release scheme.
Hey, hey listen, public announcement.
I want to thank the Labour Party for releasing all my brothers today, man.
A lot of man are coming out of jail today.
It's a good time, man.
Today's a good day, man.
Hey, kids, make sure you vote.
Labour.
Alhamdulillah.
Ah, there's the reason they've been doing it.
What did he say at the end?
Some foreign gibberish.
Clearly well assimilated.
This is the Labour constituency.
See, when you're in a democratic society, when you want to run a tyrannical regime, I suppose there's two very effective ways to appeal to voters, which is one, appeal to the criminal underclass, By releasing them, and not prosecuting them for their crimes, and appeal to foreigners by promising them gibs.
Labour have specialised in both of these, so far.
Well, this is the perfect case for that, because I just wanted to remind everyone as well, the people that attacked the police officers in Manchester Airport and cried racism before the CCTV came out, which showed that they instigated the incident and attacked armed police officers, they still haven't been charged.
Why?
But Grandad 61 goes to prison for shouting at police officers and has now killed himself.
Because he's more of a threat to our current regime.
Is it also Labour councillor Ricky Jones who hasn't been charged yet?
No, he has been charged.
Peter Lloyd has posted about this today, and it's great journalism on his part.
Ricky Jones has been let out on bail before his trial in January, because he pleaded guilty.
He's been allowed to walk free, despite calling for cutting the throats of Labour's political opponents.
Axel Rudicabana has still not gone to trial until January.
Yes, yes.
Fortunately, he has not been let out on bail, but...
But if he does get sentenced, we can be sure that he'll be released very early.
Well, judging by current trends...
He may not be released, and I don't know if we can say that, but what is possible is he may not even see Prison Time because we know that Valdo Calacane is just instead interned in a hospital on mental health grounds.
Oh, of course!
That could actually happen to Axel Rudicabana, which...
Lots of people wouldn't feel great about.
Yeah, so I just wanted to round up this conversation just by saying, look, we've tried to cover this logic here on Lotuses.com.
We've spoken about it in segments before, I've spoken about it on my show, and I think there are two reasons here that drive this.
The first is that, as you said, Naive optimism about human nature.
In this particular episode, I went through the ideology of the modern state, which is that all people are just blank slates.
Human nature is a product of education and economic circumstances, and if we just give you more youth clubs and more civics lessons and redefine British identity to be inclusive, then everyone will commit no crimes.
And it's actually folks like Peter who say really racist, divisive, populist things that are causing division and stopping us from getting utopia.
So actually the worst crime you commit in society isn't a violent crime, it's being racist.
And so that's their current logic.
But there's also the other argument, and I spoke about Orwell McIntyre with us, which is this blatant anarcho-tyranny, which in and of itself violates the blank slate, because it admits, no, there's a permanent criminal class, and what we do is we make them clients of the state, because by letting them exist, they're going to vote for us, but also we weaponise them against the taxpaying, law-abiding people, so that those people come running to the government for a solution for the problem the government created, and so they constantly expand their power.
Steadios, you wanted to And one thing I want to add is that racism is a problem for the state only when it originates from some people and is directed towards some others.
Yes, they're fine with anti-white racism at all times because that's not their constituency.
So I wanted to finish with a quote from Alexander Solzhenitsyn's Gulag Archipelago because this speaks to the idea that they are weaponising criminals against the law-abiding population for political gain.
So there's a section in Gulag Archipelago Solzhenitsyn discusses how the prisoners of the Tsarist regime, predominantly thieves and murderers, were let out by the Stalinist regime and then made the guards to the gulags where their political prisoners were interned, and this is why.
In old Russia, there existed, just as there still exists in the West, an incorrect view of thieves as incorrigible, permanent criminals, a nucleus of criminality.
Because of this, the politicals were segregated from them on prisoner transports and in prisons.
In old Russia, there was just one single formula to be applied to the criminal recidivists.
Make them bow their heads beneath the iron yoke of the law.
of the law, and so it was up until 1914.
And so it was up until 1914.
The thieves did not play the boss either in Russia as a whole or in Russian prisons, but the shackles fell in freedom dawn.
In the desertion of millions in 1917 and then in the Civil War, all human passions were largely unleashed, and those are the thieves most of all, and they no longer wished to bow their heads beneath the yoke.
Moreover, they were informed that they didn't have to.
It was found both useful and amusing that they were enemies of private property, and therefore a revolutionary force which had to be guided into the mainstream of the proletariat.
Yes, and this would constitute no special difficulty.
Reasoning on a social basis wasn't the environment to blame for everything.
So let us re-educate these healthy lumpen proletarians and introduce them into the system of conscious life.
But when this elegant theory came down to earth in the camps, here's what emerged from it.
The most invertebrate and hardened thieves were given unbridled power on the islands of the archipelago, in camp districts and camps.
Power over the population of their own country, over the peasants, the petty bourgeoisie, and the intelligentsia.
Power they never had before in history, never in any state in all the world.
Power which they couldn't even dream of out in freedom.
And now they were given all other people as slaves.
What bandit would ever decline such power?
They are releasing the criminals to have power over you, because they have power over the criminals.
Always remember that.
Well, nice and cheery to start off with, as I pass you your...
Technology, steady off, so I'll just read the Rumble Rants.
That's a random name, has sent three chats for one dollar.
Muslims have entered positions of power in the UK, and totally, by coincidence, Muslim criminals are being let out to make room for blasphemers.
Well, it's not just Muslim criminals, we should be distinct on that, and also to accuse Muslims of entryism in this country, as the founder of Telmama, himself a Muslim, has done, will soon be a crime in England, so we have to be very careful of that.
They've also said, the government are trying to do this to reassert the legitimacy.
All this does is accelerate the fracture of society and people's distrust of the government.
Soon, nobody will trust the system.
Clown world in action.
Quite.
And by the system, I'm referring to the very rule of law and social contract.
Not trying to be an accelerationist, of course.
In fact, I don't want any of this to happen.
Very good.
And Yoshi24R, for $1, says, I can't believe how moronic the Labour government are.
Actually, I can.
Absolute idiots.
Bad person.
Do bad thing.
But bad person is reformed.
Of course.
Right, so we're going to talk about the recent attacks on Elon Musk's ex by several NGOs, and we're going to show how a lot of NGOs are supposed to be politically neutral but end up not being.
Now, to a lot of people who follow news, this isn't news, but I think it's a good idea if we also talk to people who are beginning to follow cultural news, And to show exactly what the problem is with a lot of NGOs who feign political neutrality but actually are political actors.
And we are going to talk about the Center for Countering Digital Hate and some documents that some journalists have found from this NGO that suggest that they are trying to interfere to the US elections by helping Kamala Harris' campaign.
Now, speaking of US elections, you can visit our merch store.
We have some excellent merch for the US elections.
We have mugs, t-shirts, all sorts of nice stuff.
I really like this Trump-I-just-want-to-grill picture.
It's called the Art of the Grill.
This was done before he went and served at McDonald's, by the way, so there's a bit of meme magic here.
Yeah, there is.
We're taking credit for the McDonald's stunt.
We manifested it into being.
I think the designer has some sort of esoteric knowledge.
Right, so check this out.
Right, so we're going to talk about the Center for Cantering Digital Hate, which I think I read a bit when I started here, because they were saying that X is full of hate speech, and the hate speech is rising after Elon Musk bought it.
And I will say some stuff towards the end about the context in this, because this attack isn't something that just happened right now.
There's a rich context As to why the Labour government would try to come into terms with some NGOs and collaborate with NGOs in order to harm Elon Musk's Twitter.
And there is also the question of why are they doing it?
And it's not because they're interested in fighting disinformation or something.
It's because they're not politically neutral.
They are perfectly happy with disinformation coming from mainstream media.
In fact, I don't think they're talking about it.
Well, have you seen the trigonometry interview with the head of the Centre for Cancer and Digital Hate from a couple of months ago?
No, I haven't.
Throughout, he repeated his concerns about there being online transphobia.
So this is someone who is concerned about misinformation Who also believes that sex is interchangeable?
Make up your own mind.
I mean, the very name of it, the Centre for Countering Digital Hate.
Digital hate is a leftist dog whistle for non-leftist opinions.
So the very name of it should give anybody who is informed an immediate knowledge of what these guys are after.
To those who aren't that much informed yet, it's really important if we show that actors that pose as politically neutral ones aren't in fact neutral ones.
So let's see here.
I want to start this, which shows a lot about how they are operating.
Because a lot of people are going to watch a post phrased in such a manner and instantly think that these are the good guys, these are the guys who are actually Fighting power.
And they're saying new Instagram failed to act on 93% of abusive comments targeting high-profile U.S. women candidates.
We reported including death and rape threats.
May I ask?
I'm sure that you'll get into it.
Might I suggest that what they're doing here is a nice sleight of hand where 93% of the abusive comments, most of those will be people saying they don't like...
Kamala Harris or most of them will be very mild but then they throw in the rape and death threats as well to try and smear all of them and make it seem like they're the only comments being directed.
That could be the case but I want to be extra charitable here just for the sake of the argument.
Let's say that there have been such threats, they're unacceptable, and it's good to counter them.
But the issue is that we can't just see people stating the obvious, that incitement to violent is wrong, and just say, therefore, these are the good guys, and think that this is the only agenda that they have, because it isn't the only agenda that they have.
Quick question.
Do they express equal concern about how rhetoric has led to two provable and thwarted attempts on Donald Trump's life, during which two men were injured and Cory Comparator was killed?
Do they express any concern about that whatsoever?
Not that I know of, because presumably he is their political opponent.
But if they were politically neutral, they would speak about it.
Because there have been several attempts against Donald Trump's life.
They would have to speak against it.
And you could say that also the mainstream media have regurgitated this narrative that Donald Trump is, you know...
Hitler in waiting.
Hitler in waiting.
And all Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin wrapped up in one person.
Hitler, Mussolini, well known for having four peaceful years and then giving over power, and then, after another four years later, coming in and then doing bad...
Well, Hitler started no wars, don't you know, Harry?
Well, we have here a really good thread that I incentivize people to find out by Paul D. Thacker and also he's working with Matt Taibbi and they are publishing stuff on the Disinformation Chronicle.
Right, so we are going to show some of the stuff that they are saying here.
Let's click on this.
And they are saying, England nor Russia is the culprit in a real foreign election interference story as the leaked stateside plans of an advisory group with close ties to Prime Minister Kiyostama Sho.
And they have here the goals of this organization.
And they say that throughout 2024, they say that their annual priorities involve killing masks, Twitter, advertising focus, trigger EU and UK regulatory action and progress towards changing USA and support for Star.
Yeah.
What is Star?
Do you know?
I have forgotten but remember...
Well, while you look it up, I noted there as well in the highlighted section that they're saying, US policy engagement set up meetings with Klobuchar's team.
They're referring to Amy Klobuchar, who also ran as a presidential nominee in 2020 and then folded in behind the Biden-Harris ticket.
Presumably, because like Pete Buttigieg, she got a comfy job.
So I don't know what Amy Klobuchar was doing in the Biden-Harris administration yet, but this is a former Democrat senator.
I don't know if she's still sitting.
And she is liaising with the Center for Cancer and Digital Hate to purposefully sabotage a social media platform run by an American citizen.
So this is a declaration of war by the government against a private citizen and their company.
Well, this is an actual conspiracy.
Right, so I can't find right now.
I'll have to check later and see.
So they're constantly talking about killing Elon Musk's Twitter.
And they say that they're an anti-disinformation activist ally of Keir Starmer's Labour Party.
And there have been some really suspicious connections between the current Labour government and the CCDH, the Center for Countering Digital Hate, because the current chief of staff, of Downing Street number 10 was essentially the founder And at some point, CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate.
And they're saying here that this is the person called Morgan MacSweeney.
And they say, in the last two months, the Washington Post and Politico, among others, have run a series of features about British advisers from Labour Together, rescuing the distressed political damsel that is the Harris-Walls campaign.
Politico casts Max Sweeney as the election mastermind who first helped Keir Starmer defeat leftist Jeremy Corbyn to become the head of Labour, all the way to Starmer's landslide win over Conservatives to become Prime Minister this past July, implying that Max Sweeney and his team can perform a similar miracle for Harris.
Well, I wouldn't hire him to run a bath considering Keir Starmer got fewer votes than Jeremy Corbyn and is now less popular than Rishi Sunak.
Yeah, I like the idea that it's all down to McSweeney was the success when it was really that the Conservatives decided to run a campaign of shooting themselves in the foot over and over and over again.
That is true.
The main reason why conservatives lost was because of their 14 years running the country.
But it isn't exactly like this, because the kind of activism of Max Sweeney, or you wouldn't say this, it's political action of Max Sweeney, shows how he also helped Kierstamify the Corbynite side within Labour.
So the same strategy is the strategy that he used in labor for in labor fights.
They used against conservatives and they are also, you could say, if you connect the dots together, suggest to the Tim Walz and to the Harris Walz campaign to use against Donald Trump and their political enemies.
And as they say here, they say Mac Sweeney is an ascendant figure, having just promoted to Keir Starmer's Chief of Staff in something of a palace coup after the abrupt resignation of long-time Labour fixture Sue Gray.
Mac Sweeney's liner is not just for a Carville-style rightward tilt within the party, but for mastery of fundraising and dark money, having reportedly pulled a host of new wealthy donors to Labour in the last two years.
That's true.
And they say, after 25 years of the special relationship being essentially one-way traffic with Washington, Politico is advising the Brits, the Democrats now believe they actually have something to learn from Labour, as Politico explained.
And they're saying here that this, I have it from this place, that they used it against a Pro-Palestine faction of Corbynite Labour faction within the Labour Party on accusations against anti-Semitism.
So they use that in order to fight that Corbynite faction within the Labour Party.
So what they're doing is that they are trying to Harass, in a sense, donors to organizations.
And they're trying to do the same with X. They're trying to create, to say that essentially, they try to scare people away from X, advertisers and parties.
So that's their modus operandi.
Yeah, so we have here documents exposed CCDH's plan to kill Musk's tweet ahead of the US election.
And they're saying essentially that in the last two months...
Excuse me, the documents were in reverse.
They said the documents allegedly reveal a coordinated effort to undermine Elon Musk's acts, formerly Twitter, with the explicit goal to kill Musk's Twitter.
According to the leaked documents dating back to early 2024, CCDH's top priority was a campaign titled Kill Musk's Twitter to financially destabilize the platform.
This plan focusing on harassing advertisers reflects the broader general political goals of CCDH's founder Morgan MacSweeney.
And they say that The documents raise serious questions about the intersection of non-profit advocacy and political maneuvering.
While CCDH markets itself as an anti-misinformation organization, the leak reveals a more politically motivated agenda.
And one of its top objectives is to trigger EU and UK regulatory action against platforms like Twitter, further blurring the line between its stated mission and its actions.
So this seems to show a trend within activism of how political action is used by seemingly politically neutral people in organizations like NGO or not.
And their modus operandi has to do with trying to harass the donors of rival political organizations and rival their targets, essentially.
So that's what they're trying to do.
I mean, it's similar to what the ADL attempted to do with Elon Musk's Twitter when he originally took over by throwing accusations of anti-Semitism to try and scare away advertisers.
This has been an attack that's been going on for years at this point.
So if they can't get Elon Musk's Twitter through the advertisers, then we can try and get him through the regulations.
Same thing happened with GB News even before they started up with Hope Not Hate and Stop Funding Hate as a campaign to scare off advertisers from investing in a network that hadn't even gone live yet.
Notice that in our supposedly democratic system, none of these organizations, the ADL, the CCDH, none of them are accountable to you.
None of them have any sort of transparency within their actions.
None of them have any sort of elected power.
They just do it because they have the money behind them.
And because they have a prestige that I don't know why they have, but they do.
They're beneficiaries of a state-funded patronage network.
Right, exactly.
So, Harry, I think you're absolutely correct.
And we need to remember, to remind people of the context of this attack on Keir Starmer by the Labour government, because the very reasons why they attack Elon Musk's ex...
Have to do with why they also want to attack Donald Trump, and essentially it's the same political vision.
So let's just remind people that during the Southport riots and before, Elon Musk warned that when governments are not thinking that they are accountable to their people, that generally leads to a lot of infighting and potentially to civil war.
That was a warning, not a threat.
Instead of focusing on cleaning its own room, the Labour government said, I'm not going to be accountable to people.
I'm trying to attack Elon Musk by saying he is threatening civil war in England, and they are going to do anything else except then set their house in order.
So rather than saying let us focus on making the country safe again, they're saying let us persecute people who are speaking against us and people who are reminding the government that the government is supposed to be accountable to the people.
Elon Musk spoke about the grooming gangs of Pakistani grooming gangs in Britain in a time where a lot of people weren't talking about it.
It was sort of like seen as a topic that people shouldn't mention, a topic that the mainstream media tried to bury, am I wrong in saying, for decades?
Oh yes.
Even after the Alexa J report came out and the 2020 Home Office report came out, they were still trying to deny that these ethnically and racially and religiously motivated grooming gangs were operating in towns and cities across England.
They've now identified with the last government, they arrested 550 perpetrators, they think they've identified up to 1,500, and they've seen at least 4,000 victims in the last year.
So Elon Musk did what the Conservative Party should be doing and what you could say the reform should be doing even stronger with a louder voice.
He brought public awareness, he raised public awareness about catastrophe that is happening in this country for years.
Also what the Labour Party should be doing if they hold tight to their values, their stated values, not practiced, of caring about women and girls' safety.
Here I have this post of your own Connor, and you're talking about the height of civil unrest after the Southport Massacre.
What did the CCDH recommend the government to do?
Oh, so they had a meeting on the 16th of August with the Home Office, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, Ofcom, which is, for those outside the UK, the broadcasting regulator set up under Tony Blair that will soon supervise the internet under the Online Safety Act.
And the Counter-Terrorism Internet Referral Unit at the Metropolitan Police in London.
And they said that Ofcom needs emergency powers to fight misinformation and de-amplify harmful posts to prevent public disorder.
Basically, that the UK government and intelligence services should control the algorithms of websites like X to hide content that they don't like.
That isn't illegal, but they have this standard of legal but harmful.
Okay.
So, question for those who would think that these actors are politically neutral.
How many times have you heard of them speaking of emergency powers to fight misinformation that come from mainstream media?
That's just a very simple question for people to be asking.
To my knowledge, I haven't heard them.
Right, now let's fast forward from the Southport tragedy to the EU, because the EU is also trying to censor Elon Musk's ex.
We had the then bureaucrat Thierry Breton who sent Elon Musk a very aggressive letter warning him about the EU Digital Services Act.
And about his interview with Donald Trump that night.
And essentially that was, again, election interference.
He was saying, if you are going to host an interview with Donald Trump, we're going to actually harm you.
We're going to use our regulatory body in order to create problems for your businesses.
Which is political blackmailing?
It is essentially blackmailing.
And question, because this shows yet again that this person wasn't at all interested in enforcing the law.
If you want to enforce the law, you want to enforce the law irrespective of whether Elon Musk is going to host an interview with Donald Trump or not.
You're not phrasing your threat in such a manner.
If you interview Donald Trump, then I'm going to use My force against you.
They also didn't threaten the Zuckerbergs with this when they used the Zuckerberg Foundation to donate to the Biden campaign in 2020.
This backfired and Thierry Breton resigned.
And also the European Commission denied that the Internal Market Commissioner had approval from Ursula von der Leyen to send the letter.
So essentially they're saying he was acting alone.
Now, I don't know whether I believe this or not, but Judging from what I have seen of him as a character, about him as a character, it's to a degree believable.
But that doesn't mean that the EU doesn't want to censor X. Let me just say very quickly, when I go to Greece, my Twitter feed is completely different.
Most of the accounts that show up on my Twitter feed are not shown.
And a lot of accounts from mainstream media show up.
So stuff that I don't see because I never sort of never interact with, never like them.
But I may have followed, you know, just ages ago, just to have an idea of news.
They constantly come up.
So the algorithm of X within the EU is much more regulator than it is here in China.
And here, Elon Musk responds by saying this violates US criminal statutes against foreign interference in election.
We are going after the Center for Countering Digital Hate and their donors.
And he repeats, and their donors.
Trump-Vant's campaign is also filing an action against this, and they're saying the far-left Labour Party has inspired Kamala's dangerously liberal policies and rhetoric.
In recent weeks, they have recruited and sent party members to campaign for Kamala in critical battleground states, attempting to influence our elections.
This is good.
I think that's great that Trump and Vance are doing that.
I think what is bigger is if Elon Musk can actually go against the sorts of donors that regularly give money to organizations like the CCDH. These people are the ones who are financing the destabilization of our society, financing the ruin of our culture.
And so they absolutely need to be punished to the utmost degree and preferably financially ruined.
And they use whatever prestige they have in people's minds to demonize people who are talking about all these policies that make our countries less safe.
I will say as well, I think on Musk's behalf, I don't think he's intentionally trying to financially ruin them because that would be malicious litigation on his part.
I think he's just trying to stop them from trying to ruin him.
So, a lot of the times all these NGOs that appear as being politically neutral, they're actually disguised political actors.
Excellent.
Well, we've got a couple of Rumble rants before we kick off.
On your point at the end there, Connor, my main point is that the preferable result of his action would be if they end up financially ruined.
I'm going to be honest, you shouldn't even say that because that was what, remember, Akilah Hughes got in trouble for when she was suing Carl?
Just, yeah, on Musparv, I don't think that's his motivation, let's just be clear.
Right, Windpill Seeker for $1.
Sometimes it's good to have a list of what they've done to Elon, because when we get the news bit by bit, it happens we can't grasp the extent and the persistence of the pattern.
Thank you, Stelios.
You rock.
So you've got to give a fan there.
That's a random name for two more dollars.
So what are concrete, non-violent ways in which we can fix the West, considering that orcs control every institution and fortify every election?
Again, not being a doom and degenerate curious, we can't answer that in short here, but obviously we're going to try and counteract the Terrible messaging and actual misinformation by mainstream media through...
Well, as long as we can keep the lights on over at Lotus Eaters, and we're trying to speak to, you know, influential figures and potential politicians and the like to try and ensure that they're adequately equipped with the ideas that stop them from being captured like all of our institutions are.
But I think it's worth sort of a political strategy round-up show at some point.
And also, he says, Here in Canada, we've had this for a couple of years now.
Every social media, radio, TV, etc., is only allowed to give news that are approved by the government.
I wonder how many Rotherhams we have and nobody knows.
I don't know the situation in Canada, I can't speculate, but clearly they didn't have much of a problem spreading the hoax about the mass child graves of indigenous peoples that turned out to be rocks.
Interesting thing.
The left is constantly talking about the death of the author for decades, but they haven't spoken about the death of the journalist.
They don't for some reason.
The journalist is a kind of author?
Well, yeah, they're very descriptive about their own lives at this point.
They constantly insert themselves.
Last one from Ryan Hinnigan.
Name is Ursula, is trying to take away voices.
Hmm, not sure what that's a reference to, but...
Maybe I think it's from The Little Mermaid that Ursula...
No, no, no, I don't know who Ursula in that story was, but...
Ursula.
I've seen Poor Unfortunate Souls.
Harry, take it away.
Alright then, so we know that the left primarily grifts off of victimhood narratives, which needs a constant supply of martyrs.
every one of their stated goals for society requires a martyr to justify the extensive action that they want to take.
They are eternal victims, they can never take responsibility or accountability for their own actions, and so they always need the prime victims that they can point to as the reason why society needs to change.
The problem is that the martyrs that they choose specifically from...
Certainly in the 21st century have all been terrible because the ideal martyr is somebody who is virtuous and presents a good example who was punished for no reason.
Of course the left turns vices into virtues so the second that you try to peel back the narratives what you find is that the martyrs that they've chosen are all, putting it lightly, scumbags.
Which does not present a very sympathetic vision for most people when they start to look into this.
And over the past few years since September of 2022 the left in Britain have been trying to present their very own George Floyd as their new civil rights BLM martyr.
Now George Floyd himself, we know, turned out to not be a very good martyr, because it turned out that he had been a career criminal in the past, and when you examine the evidence of what happened to him that was presented in court during the trial of Derek Chauvin, it turned out, if you look at the evidence, he most likely died of an overdose.
Despite this, Derek Chauvin was still found guilty of third degree, I think three different charges of murder, various types of murder, and is in prison at the moment.
We recently have had the trial of a man who was the British Derek Chauvin, who thankfully justice has been properly served in that he has been found not guilty.
I'm going to go over the details of that, But I do think it's an injustice that he was taken to court in the first place, so let's not delude ourselves that this is some great victory for justice, because it should never have happened in the first place.
So, before I go over all of that, we do have merch, it's election season, you can buy all sorts of wonderful things from us, the Art of the Grill Trump t-shirt, this lovely, lovely fight mug as well that we have here, which has the very iconic now Defiant image of Trump holding his fist up.
So you can visit the website and buy our merch, help support the website, and also have something to show for it that will be lasting and worthwhile.
So, the case was that of Chris Cabber, a man who was shot by the police, one shot, one kill, in September of 2022.
The case against the man who shot him was Martin Blake and was recently wrapped up on Monday.
I'll go over the details of the incident as reported by Sky News and then go over the trial and tell you the public response to it.
So...
Martin Blake was the police officer.
He was 40 years old.
He originally had his name kept anonymous, but the judge decided to repeal that and made his name public, which, as we will see, has very negative consequences for poor old Sergeant Blake.
He fired a single bullet through the windscreen of an Audi Q8 for the 24-year-old Chris Cabber.
Let me see if I can get an image of good old Chris Cabber, and you'll see...
There he is.
You might be able to understand why it is that the media and activists wanted you to think that he was a sweet, innocent cherub who didn't do nothing wrong.
Harry, he's smiling in that photo, therefore he could never have committed a crime.
He's black and he's smiling, so he must be innocent of all things at all times.
So he's 24 years old.
He was driving the Audi Q8 as armed officers were surrounding the car in Stratham, South London, and he was trying to escape.
The jury deliberated for about three hours on Monday to clear Mr.
Blake, who appeared to be briefly overcome with emotion as the verdict was returned.
So that's a very good thing for him.
A helicopter and six police cars were involved in stopping Mr.
Cabber on the night of the 5th of September 2022 after the vehicle he was driving had been linked to a shooting outside of a school in Brixton the previous day.
Mr.
Cabber knew he was being followed.
He was telling a friend, Alicia Fizzle, nice British name, Lish, one sec, I think there is police behind me, before he turned into Kirkstall Gardens, where Mr.
Blake was inside a marked BMW. The trial hinged on the following 17 seconds, which saw the Audi reverse a short distance, hitting an unmarked car behind, then accelerate forwards, reaching an estimated 12 miles per hour before colliding with the BMW and a parked Tesla.
So he was trying to escape.
He's trying to ram himself out of the situation.
He was in the dark, the police had surrounded him and they knew that the car that he was in had been marked for firearms offences the day before.
They did not know that he did not have a gun and he was trying to ram them out of the way.
But why was he trying to ram them out of the way if he was innocent?
Well, that's a very good question.
Innocent men typically don't run from the police, as much as Hollywood would try and convince you that they do.
Armed officers were heard shouting, go, go, go, and armed police get out of the effing car as they surrounded the vehicle.
The Audi then reversed, hitting the unmarked Volvo behind, and was stationary as Mr.
Blake pulled the trigger of his carbine less than a second later, followed by shouts of shot fired.
Mr.
Kaba, as they like to point out in this article, in which a lot of people have been trying to harp on as part of this whole victimhood narrative, was not armed and had no weapons in the car, and had both hands on the steering wheel when he was shot in the head and he died in hospital in the early hours of the next day.
Yeah, he had his hands on the steering wheel because he was trying to ram them out of the way, and again, it was dark, the vehicle was connected to firearms charges, How were they supposed to know that he wasn't about to pull a gun and shoot them, given that clearly he wasn't going away quietly?
Harry, I think, irrespective of that, the car can constitute a weapon.
Exactly.
Well, this is also important because after they said, shots fired, another officer said, where from?
Because they had anticipated that the shots could have come from Kaba himself because he was suspected of being involved in the shooting the night before and they didn't know if he had a gun.
So the police officers didn't necessarily know that their officer was the one who'd shot Kaba.
It could have been that Kaba had shot an officer.
That's how quickly things happened and that's how, let's say, this is the threat level that they went into the situation thinking about.
This is all something to think about, and this is something that activists never want to consider, because they don't care about the fact.
And in fact, the prosecutors themselves seem to have a bit of an activist bent to them, because they said that Mr.
Blake may have become angry, frustrated, and annoyed, and Mr.
Kaba had done nothing in the seconds before he was shot to justify his decision to pull the trigger.
So, of course, by describing it that way, they're trying to prejudice the jury against him.
Thankfully, it didn't work, because that is a ridiculous argument to make.
Blake and all of the other officers around him were in danger as a result of Mr.
Carver's actions when Chris really could have, instead of trying to ram his way out of the situation, sat still, stopped the car, and cooperated with the police.
Why do you think he might not have done that?
Why would an innocent man...
I've been stopped by the police before, I've been pulled over before when they've just had tail light or something out.
I've never once thought to myself, God, I need to get out of this situation, and decided to ram my way out of it.
Instead, what I've done, I've pulled over, I've stopped, I've said, Hello, officer, how can I help you?
Is there anything wrong?
And the situation has been resolved like that.
When the police officer threatened me with arrest outside Conservative Party conference on camera, I didn't punch him one.
I didn't decide to sprint off and engage in pursuit across Birmingham High Street.
I was- Ran them over.
Yeah, I decided to just argue my case without necessarily getting myself arrested.
Funny that.
Clearly your socio-economic factors were not the same as Chris's.
If only he had been born into a wealthier background, perhaps it would have ended differently.
They also said that the Metropolitan Police Officer gave a false and exaggerated account when he said that Mr.
Carber had used his car as a weapon in a bid to escape at any cost.
Well, he didn't, because as you'll see, we've got footage of it.
Mr.
Blake was previously known as NX121 before a judge lifted an anonymity order, and he told jurors he was full of dread as he heard wheels spinning and the car's engine revving.
He said he didn't intend to kill Mr.
Kaba, adding, I felt I had a duty to protect them at the time.
One other armed officer said that he would have opened fire if Blake hadn't, while another said he was fractions of a second away from doing so.
So this was not just one split-second decision that Blake made, this was the same split-second decision that at least two of the other officers at the scene were about to make at the same time because they were in danger.
And they didn't know that he didn't have a gun and was about to pull and shoot any of them, and he was trying to ram them out of the way in the first place.
Of course, he has been found not guilty of this.
This does not mean that he has not received consequences, and does not mean that he will not face further persecution, because, of course, the IOPC is still going to be reviewing the case internally.
Well, they have vowed to be an anti-racist organisation, which means that they've In their minds, ahead of time, found him guilty because Chris Carver is black.
But something else to add here is that one of the reasons why he may have done this is the constant narrative that the police is constantly against black people.
Perhaps.
Because it's also like the way that all of these narratives are working.
If some people grow up and they're constantly being told that the system is against you, Then they're not going to have respect for law enforcement officers.
That might be one explanation, but I think...
I'm saying it's part of the reasons why this may have happened.
I think with Chris Haber, it's much more reasonable and likely to say he was a criminal, which he was, as we'll find out.
And that's why he was trying to escape from...
I'm not disagreeing, but that's the verdict, in a sense.
We're talking about the explanation, but that's...
Of course, what is the real desired effect of all of this?
Because we know the desired effect is not to keep London Street safe for anybody but criminals.
Well, some Met Firearms officers turned in their weapons after Mr Blake was charged in September of last year, while the Forces Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley called for greater legal protections after a review was ordered by then-Home Secretary Suella Braveman.
Rowley is trying to actually get greater protections for his firearms officers so that this doesn't happen to them.
That's not happened, but the desired effect really was to make sure that London is less safe.
Met firearms officers turn their guns in and the people who will be replacing them are going to be subject to DEI requirements, I'm absolutely sure.
So, the verdict itself was called a devastating moment for the family, our community and the nation by the Justice for Chris Carver campaign.
The family of Chris Carver have said that they have been left with a deep pain of injustice.
No family should endure the unimaginable grief that we have faced.
Chris was stolen from us, and this decision shows his life and many others like him does not matter to the system.
Our son deserved better.
Perhaps you could have raised him better.
The acquittal of Martin Blake isn't just a failure for our family, but for all those affected by police violence, and they vowed that they won't be silenced and will continue fighting for justice and for real change, which basically just means that we will continue fighting to make sure that black criminals do not ever face the consequences for their actions.
And the interesting thing as well is, this is being very publicised right now, if you went back to the reports that were coming out at the time, most of this information, barring a few key details, was already available.
This is the IOPC report statement read out at the opening of the inquest back in October of 2022, so slightly less than a month after this originally happened.
And you can see that other than certain key details, like his name, And like the exact circumstance of ramming into the car multiple times, all of the information to be able to tell that, hey, this guy was a criminal trying to escape the law, was already available to you.
And even better, we have the footage.
This was...
Tweeted out by Steve Laws saying that really the reason they released his name was because Chris Carver was black and they wanted to publicize it.
They wanted to have a Derek Chauvin for their George Floyd.
But, again, let's look at the footage.
There's Chris Carver.
He's pausing every so often so you can get a good look, and you can see on the left here, there's the positions of everybody involved.
You can see the wheels spinning, you can see the smoke, and you can hear some of the wheels screeching as well.
He reverses.
You can see the wheels smoke.
And then bam.
Happens in a split second.
You can see all of the officers around them.
And you can see if he had rammed further and been able to push him back, he might have had space to start to get around, maybe mount the curb, maybe start to run people over.
This was a very, very dangerous and completely unnecessary situation.
Let me just make the small screen again.
And, yeah, it's his own fault.
Also, this entire situation was completely avoidable.
Looking at that diagram on the left there, the officer in question who's just been acquitted couldn't really be fired from anywhere else except in front of the car where his life was in danger because all of his colleagues were surrounding the car trying to get Carber out.
Because if he would have fired from the side window, it might have hit his colleague if it went through Carber.
So it was perfectly reasonable for him to be there and also being there in danger in his life, therefore it's reasonable for him to have shots.
So thank goodness that unlike with Derek Chauvin, where the jury was politicised, literally infiltrated by a BLM activist, and there were social media posts going about where other activists were threatening that they were likely to burn cities down if he wasn't found guilty, the jury was given the appropriate information and appropriate space to come to the correct conclusion.
And regarding this, even Sadiq Khan has said that, you know, okay...
I would normally like to parade this out as an example of injustice, but I can't really do it this time.
However, I'm going to end my little statement by saying there's still clearly a wider lack of trust in the police, particularly within the black community, that needs to be addressed.
Or maybe if they didn't try and turn every criminal who had a bad run-in with the police into a martyr and try and look at them and go, hey, that could have been, I'm a criminal too, that could have been me.
Then maybe there wouldn't be this lack of trust.
If they weren't committing more crimes on average per capita, if they weren't having more run-ins with the police, if when they did run in with the police they weren't escalating it to the point where they can get themselves shot, perhaps they would have more trust in the police.
And as Stelios presented, perhaps if they weren't sharing this narrative that the system is inherently out to get them, Then perhaps there could be more trust, but that's not going to happen.
Sadiq Khan himself by sharing these kinds of statements is certainly not helping as well because he is saying that they have a reason to have this lack of trust.
That's what I meant before.
Of course not.
Because I know of his past.
I think we all know, and if you don't, you'll find out in a moment, because, as I say, they want to look at this and go, oh my god, that could have been me, the same way that they looked at George Floyd and said he was just an innocent boy who didn't do nothing, who the police decided to choke out and murder because he handed in a fake $20 bill.
And these were the scenes from the Justice for Chris Carver types when they first announced that this had happened, when they were doing all of their publicity stunts, I think it's fair to say.
Why did you break my heart?
Oh, look at them all.
I weep no tears.
Yeah.
Oh, he was a king.
King of criminals.
They're all making their statements.
That's enough.
I find that quite queasy, to be perfectly honest.
Let's take a look at some of the other statements that some have said.
The officer who shot Chris Campbell was standing in front of the vehicle that clearly wasn't going anywhere.
Well, it had more than enough space to go forward and ram him.
So that's a lie.
And instead of the firearm officers shooting the tyres...
Okay, how was that supposed to prevent the threat of him still getting the car forward, or perhaps even if he had a gun, how were they supposed to know that that would neutralize?
Martin Blake shoots the suspect in the head.
The suspect didn't have a gun, meaning an unlawful killing and murder.
You are an idiot!
You're an idiot unfit to produce opinions that should be shared in society.
I'm sorry to say I would have your Twitter account taken down for such a STUPID and reti- ugh, it's so stupid.
You are a Marvel brain right there.
Why didn't he use Dragon Ball instant transmission to go in the back of the car and talk him down?
Why didn't he jump on top of the car Punch through the roof, yank him out, and give him a nice talking to so that he would calm down.
Why couldn't he do any of these number of ridiculous John Wick situations instead of doing the only thing that was actually available to him, which was shoot the man who put him in danger?
These kinds of ridiculous assertions really annoy me.
And then you get the other people just saying that, uh, he was not armed.
He had surrendered to the police.
That's a lie.
That's a complete lie.
And the thing with these kinds of statements as well, you see, You know, almost a million people have viewed this, over 3,000 people have liked it, over 200,000 people, 2,000 people liked it, which is actually a pretty normal ratio for Twitter, saying that he'd surrendered to the police, so a lot of people who don't actually look into this will look at this and go, oh my god, it was an unlawful and unjustified police shooting by giving false information.
the CCDH countering digital hate and misinformation do they look at this and say this is the kind of misinformation that we need to sort out on the internet no, because they don't care because this furthers leftist narratives This is the leftist narrative, that a black criminal can never be guilty of anything.
Anything.
And then you get these people.
This could have been me.
Could have been any black man I know.
And living in constant fear of being criminalised on sight by the police.
In 2020, I was told repeatedly that George Floyd's murder was only possible in the US. I beg to differ.
Thoughts are with his family.
Yeah, if you were a violent criminal...
Yeah, this could have happened to you.
If you were a violent criminal, resisting arrest by the police, yes.
This could happen.
Sorry, Stelius.
Yeah, if you drive your cars to ram police cars, yeah, it can happen.
Why is this the first instinct of many...
Oh, and look at...
Look, broadcaster for the BBC. And we'll get to the BBC again in just a moment, but first, Runnymede Trust, the most, for racial justice, the most trustworthy organisation in the UK, saying that the legal system doesn't deliver real justice for families, and they lack accountability that perpetuates cycles of violence.
Martin Blake should never have gone to trial in the first place.
He's still being investigated by the IOPC who have their own distinct political incentives for finding him guilty of something and punishing him for something because he had the gall to defend himself and other officers against a violent black criminal.
I'm just annoyed.
Everyone keeps making excuses about criminals and, you know, what about law-biding citizens?
Well, they go to prison as political prisoners.
Second-class citizens.
They are second-class citizens.
So this is an institution, the Runnymede Trust, who have influence in UK politics, spreading lies and letting you know that they treasure, they value the life of the criminal more than they do the safety of the police, the safety of the law-abiding citizens.
And, um...
Here's where the BBC comes back into it.
You know what happened to George Floyd, how I described what happened was that he OD'd on fentanyl, or, if you're a fan of the orthodox narrative, he was choked out for 9 minutes and 14 seconds by Derek Chauvin until he died?
What did the BBC have to say about this?
It's very quiet.
Britain's George Floyd.
George Floyd, you may remember, was shot dead, unarmed man, shot dead by police in Minneapolis in America in 2020, which led to the Black Lives Matter protests which were in America.
They were huge and they were here as well, of course.
I look forward to Mariana Spring correcting her own network for misinformation there.
Literally just saying he was shot.
That's not what happened.
I don't know how you make that mistake.
How do you do that?
It was the most publicised event, barring the pandemic, of all of 2020.
If anything, it overshadowed the pandemic because gatherings that otherwise would have been prohibited were allowed.
Because of the Black Lives Matter protests.
He's had a whole team that's given him that brief, that short news hit, because they're only on there for a few minutes to talk about a special subject.
So that means everyone who's meant to prep him in the BBC... Steady, that's very distracting, please don't do that.
Everyone who's meant to prep him in the BBC has failed at their job.
An overwhelming failure by the BBC there.
And I'm shocked that that didn't get...
Nobody managed to clear that out before it went live on television.
What were you trying to highlight there, Stelios?
No, I'm trying...
Let's move on.
That's alright.
But in the comparisons to George Floyd, who was also a former criminal and, at the time, seemingly a fentanyl addict, perhaps it seems that there are more parallels that you can draw The activists didn't really want to highlight, which is, this was, again, kind of well known at the time.
I've reported on this twice at least by now, and reported on this both times, but now it seems that the news is being spread and publicised more, which was, of course, he was a career criminal.
Obviously this man was a career criminal.
Who else in that situation is going to be trying to escape from the police?
He was a member of a gang, the 6-7 gang.
As I've pointed out before, there are drill gangs in London which have postcode wars, which is that if they operate from a particular postcode, often in parts of London like Brixton, like 6-7 did, They will have gangland wars with gangs that operate in other postcodes.
This is so well known and so well documented that on the UK Drill website they have an interactive map that show all of the gang territories for each of these gangs.
So if the London Metropolitan Police really wanted to clean up a lot of the gang activity that happens in London as a result of these people, they literally have a map telling you where they operate.
They know the crimes that these people commit.
It could be cleaned up like that.
But it's not.
But it's not.
Anyway, for the specifics on Chris Cabber, he was a core member of 6-7.
He went under the name Itch or Mad Itch as part of his rapping career.
Like an STD? I can only assume.
I can only assume.
And he would have been on trial for a shooting in a Hackney nightclub carried out a month before he died.
It can now be revealed that Cabba was on indictment for a trial that led to three men being found guilty of a range of offences for shooting a rival gang member in the legs in August 2022.
Excuse me, just days before Cabo was shot dead.
Shamia Bell, 32, Marcus Pottinger, 31, and Conal Bangboy, all wonderful British names right there, 29, were found guilty of possession of a firearm with intent to cause fear of violence.
But it can now also be revealed that it was Cabo who was said to have carried out the shooting on Brandon Malucci...
Again, all of these British names suggesting that had none of these people been here in the first place, none of these problems would have existed.
He was struck by bullets to both layers.
So here's the media preferred image of Chris Cabber.
Where are some more of him?
I know that there's some more in here somewhere.
Maybe it was in one of the other articles.
Good job on Charlie Peterson reporting on this, though.
Yes, yes, very good job.
Oh wait, no, it's in the Daily Mail article, so we'll get to see some of the better photos of Chris Carber that they have on here.
The shooting at the Oval Space nightclub in East London took place in late August 2022, around the same time as the Notting Hill Carnival, because of course it was!
Of course it was!
He was an open member of the 6-7 gang, a drill rap group linked to several murders and violent incidents.
Shooting a Malushi revolved around a rivalry between 6-7 and another gang called 1-7 from the Wandsworth Road area of Lambeth.
It can also be revealed that Kaba had been convicted of possessing a firearm with intent to cause fear of violence and spent time in prison for it.
Now at the time when this was first all reported again...
I actually found people speaking about it from the kind of insular drill subreddits, and there were a few of them saying, live by the sword, die by the sword, and some others saying, can't believe this happened so soon after he got out of prison the last time.
So people already knew about this, but it wasn't being widely reported by anybody except a few.
Which means the family obviously knew about it.
Well, yes, Kaba was also find guilty in this offence and was in January 2019 being sent to a Young Defenders Institute for four years, but he was released in 2021 because of course he was.
If they'd kept him, maybe he'd be alive today.
Kaba's family, this isn't included in this article, I think it's included in the Daily Mail article, but I thought it was relevant here, made a last-minute application seeking to prevent any disclosure of his ganglang activities until an inquest.
So the family's saying, I can't believe that society, persecuting society that just hates innocent young black men so much it goes out of its way to kill people, knew about his criminal past, probably knew that he was being chased by the police, they were well aware of the circumstances, why it was that he would have been being chased by the police at the time, probably aware of the kind of man that he was and the kind of action that he would take in response to this.
Don't care.
They do not care.
The victimhood narrative, I didn't do nothing.
I will never take responsibility or accountability for our own actions.
It's not our fault because we didn't stop him from being a criminal.
It's society's fault for persecuting criminals.
There you go.
We've actually got video.
Video of the nightclub shooting.
Can you believe this?
So the little blue arrow, that's Chris Carver.
And this is being reported by The Telegraph and other news outlets, so this is confirmed.
Blue arrow is Kirshkaba right here.
You can see he's got his face masked.
Red arrow here is this Malushi person that he shot.
Let's check it out.
You can see him approaching.
Pink arrow is...
Oh.
There you go.
We can assume here.
Bang, bang.
Nice screenshot and then you can see all of the people start to realise that something very bad has just happened and they all start to disperse.
So we've actually got footage of it happening and as far as I'm concerned regarding the Telegraph and other people reporting on it, it seems true that this was Chris Cabot.
If you worry that, oh my god, well we don't know it's his face, how do we know that he killed people?
Well...
Steve Laws, who's done quite a bit of looking into this and posting about it, found one of Mad Itch's old rap songs from his drill years, and you can find that it's about rapping.
He's rapping about drug dealing, violence, gang warfare, and murder.
I apologise for what I'm about to put you through, but let's just check out a quick moment of this.
Six, seven.
Drillers and trappers.
There's no four doors.
Fuck around and get smoke.
One, two, five, anything, anywhere.
Anytime.
Scurring on the hops.
Anytime.
Free puller, free giant.
Fuck around and get smoke.
Gang, gang, gang, more, more, more.
Yeah, I think that's about enough.
So, I don't speak fluent urban scholar, but I think that is a challenge to a duel.
Mm-hmm.
Slightly less respectable than we used to have back in the old years.
But yes, thankfully, you may not, but a member of the office who does speak urban scholar translated some of the most vital lyrics to this.
Drillers and trappers apparently mean shooters and drug dealers.
Ends no four doors.
Four door car.
F around and get smoked means exactly what you think it is.
One two five anything anywhere anytime means one eighth of a kilo anywhere anytime.
There's drugs.
Scurring on the ops means pulling up on one's opponents.
I like how he's translated it into much more demure and proper language.
And three puller, three giant means three knives and three guns.
Kind of speaks for itself.
So you know how Nae Bekele locks up every single member of that gang that murder and rape people?
They might have tattooed it on their faces that they were rapists and murderers, but we can't be sure.
They sing about it.
We could just do that, couldn't we?
We could just lock them all up forever.
We could.
But that would be racist.
But it would be racist.
We can't have a function in society because Chris Carver smiled in a photo once.
Yeah, but the fact that this has become much more well-known means that, of course, leftists most affected.
Here's a very funny clip of our favourite lolcow, the most famous Britlib of them all.
James O'Gammon.
Holding back tears as it's explained to him that, yeah, you can't celebrate this guy's life.
He was literally a criminal who went to prison when he was 13.
We can now report that Chris Cabba was a member of a notorious gang in South London called the 6-7 gang and in the days before he was shot dead by the armed policeman Martin Blake he was actually accused of being involved in two separate shooting incidents one in Brixton just the night before he was killed And one a few days earlier at a nightclub in Hackney.
He has been in jail a number of times.
And those convictions going all the way back to when he was 13 years old, including offences for stabbing with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, possession of an imitation firearm, and also involvement in the gang as well.
There was an interim gang order in place To put restrictions on some of those members of the 6-7 gang, of which there are dozens of known members as it stands.
He makes big-eyed Irishmen look bad.
He wants to weep.
He's dying from the inside.
He is dying from the inside because he desperately wanted this to be, finally we've got our own George Floyd, let's get a hold of this, we can get even more Stephen Lawrence laws in there, we can persecute the English working class who I hate so much, even more than we already do, I can really rub this in the face of my cause.
Oh no.
Oh, no.
So, you know, that's what you get for deifying criminals, I suppose.
And, of course, this isn't all good news, because, as I mentioned, Mr.
Blake is going to face more consequences than just those that I've already pointed out, because, well, the gang, 6-7, don't like their members being shot by police officers, that's something they try and avoid, and have now put a £10,000 bounty on his head.
So there should be a dawn raid of all of those spots on that self-professed drill rap gang map.
Yeah.
But there won't be.
Instead we're letting out members of drill rap gangs from prison to lock up people for Facebook posts.
Yeah.
What are they going to do about it?
No, because this is incitement of violence.
The most I think they're going to try and do is to protect him.
I don't know if they're going to do anything more than that.
There's not much more reported about it other than the information and the fact that they said this is terrible.
We're going to try and protect him in this article.
So I can hope that they're going to do as much as possible and maybe keep the...
Unlike they did with his name, keep it under wraps so that it won't put him in more danger.
But, you know, I don't trust the system.
And I think I have much more reason to not trust the system than Chris Carver did or any of his family members.
Excellent.
Do we have any video comments, Samson?
None today?
Okay, we're going to play them tomorrow.
Sorry, sorry, my segment went on for a bit.
There's just a lot to go over.
Yeah, that's okay.
We've got a bunch of rumble rants, and then we'll do some website comments.
So, Marm line for $5.
With all the current problems in governance in the UK, what are the odds that Britain returns to a true monarchy, given under the reins of a strong Anglican monarch, the empire was global?
Very unlikely, because every single monarch is...
and the one waiting in the wings...
Signed up to all of the woke shibboleths that animate our current ruling political- Charles and William are Globo homo monarchs.
Sadly so.
That's what they are.
That's a random name.
I think non-violent solution to these problems is forcing leftoids and their client groups to live together and prevent them from moving out.
Also Samson says, you can cook, prove me wrong lads.
Um...
Okay.
Winpillseeker.
Don't look back in anger at police doing their job.
Don't look back in anger at those support police doing their job.
Harry, you know you rock.
Yes.
Oh, thank you.
Support police doing their job in proper instances like this, not when they're policing mean tweets or enforcing lockdown rules, of course.
Hiro Sani Chyban.
The irony is, if Chris Carber had let himself be arrested, he would be freed to make room for an English person mocking Keir Starmer.
Sadly true.
Yeah.
Dragon Lady Chris.
Perhaps you could have raised him better.
Mic drop.
Yes.
I don't think I can read out those other two because they're going to be a tad bit insensitive.
He said, have you guys thought about making a Lotus Eaters cooking show showcasing British cuisine and possibly other cuisine with guests?
Far right filet mignon.
Stelios wants to do a cooking with Stelios segment at some point.
I'd be interested in it.
I also think there were people that were asking to film Carl's Warhammer 40,000 matches, which might be...
Oh, come on, let me read out the Bobo bad.
I know it's insensitive, but...
I'm gonna read it.
I don't think it's wise, but okay.
During the shooting, Blake was heard yelling to Kaba, What if you didn't ram my car?
To which Kaba yelled back, But I am ramming your car!
To the tune of the chirping of Kaba's Dora Jar alert.
It's kind of funny.
And with that, I'm going to read out the written comments on the website.
Someone online, they're releasing criminals because they hate you.
There you go.
Yes, we all agree you should bring the death penalty.
I'll leave it at that.
Sophie Liv, all I want to know is what Mahmoud is doing outside her house without her husband or her father keeping an eye on her.
Blimey.
Keep the fed posting to a minimum, ladies and gentlemen.
Moose Thompson.
Recalling criminals to prison that should have never been released.
Doing a great job so far, Keir Starlin.
Yes.
Stelios, do you want to read out some of yours, my friend?
Yes.
Derek Power.
The Harups are pissed at X because they thought they had a reliable means of stroking their own ego.
But then Elon proved that he would not play along with them.
Therefore, the elites now want it dead.
It must be really embar- I know that we talk about them sometimes like they're really Machiavellian, but also idiots at the same time, which I do think is actually quite true.
It must really hurt the fragile egos that they have, that every single post that they put up gets relentlessly ratioed and insulted.
I have heard about, like, inner departments of civil servants that are mostly staffed by women.
Some of them end up crying because of all of the mean responses that all the tweets get.
They care about that.
There it is.
Bleached Demon.
The drumbeat against Mosque and Twitter shows how weak the facade of government propaganda is.
Yep.
Jose Angel.
Are there NGOs that are giving real help to refugees?
Who exactly is giving them housing?
Transport, mobiles or jobs?
Normies need something simple to relate to.
I'm from the US and I can't find much in it here either.
I did find some charities a little while ago when I was covering how the Biden administration were flying people across the country.
It's actually like Jesuit Catholic charities in Arizona that are just distributing them all across the country.
The problem with looking into the NGOs is an enormous labyrinth and cobweb of them.
For every one that you find you will unearth and it is connected to three dozen more, each of which have interlocking mechanisms for funding and supporting one another, it is endless.
And very frequently the donors, the names of the donor companies are in the names of the people who are involved behind them.
And Afraybenters for every Haitian, labor in the Dems colluding with each other is nothing new.
There were plenty of prominent names behind Clinton's campaign who ended up working across the pond for Blair.
This is correct, but what I think is something that we should keep on doing is reminding people that a lot of the NGOs that pose as politically neutral are in fact political agents.
Absolutely.
And for more information on what you just highlighted there, I think in Adam Curtis's Century of Self documentaries, he talks about the literal teams, he interviews the literal teams who worked for Clinton and then went over to work for Blair during the 1997 campaign.
Biggie Bigfoot, if only they had shown us photos of Carver as a child, maybe he was a sweet choir boy.
The search for UK's Floyd continues.
Choir boy.
Perhaps he was an associate of Diddy.
That would explain a lot.
You didn't get my reference.
I wasn't making fun of cryboys.
Have I let you down?
It's an Arnie quote, but let's move on.
I'm sorry, I don't have the same encyclopedic Arnie brain that you do, alright?
General High Ping, I'm expecting your honour.
My client was merely black and smiling to become a new legal precedent soon.
Yeah, Hector Rex.
He'd still be alive if he'd been in a truck of peace instead of a car of crime.
I don't know why that's tickled me.
Omar Awad.
Considering the types of cars many criminals drive, I'm not sure a lack of wealth is the problem.
Well, that's a good point.
North FC Zuma.
Excuse me, this Kaba case is nothing like the others.
They've all been doctors and engineers in the past, but Kaba was an aspiring architect.
Aha!
Actually...
Probably like all of them, when you start to look into it, they all say...
Stephen Lawrence was an aspiring architect, somehow.
And Stephen Lawrence is one of the only ones that I'm unable to find much corroborating evidence to suggest he wasn't just a guy who got murdered on the street.
Although I'm aware that there is different reports on that depending on who you ask, but there's very little official information out there.
But he was an aspiring architect.
All of them were.
It's absurd.
Blandine Broomfield, the last one I'll read, he was armed with a car, his foot was on the trigger.
Quite.
Well, thank you very much for watching.
We'll be back tomorrow at 1 o'clock with a regularly scheduled podcast.
I'll be back in less than half an hour for Tomlinson Talks.
Stay tuned for that, about Hope Not Hate.
Speaking of the labyrinth of NGOs, have a good day.
▲
Export Selection