Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 17, 2024 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:30:03

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen.
	Welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters for the 17th of October 2024.
	I'm joined by Harry and Josh.
	Hello.
	And today we're going to be talking about how Kamala Harris doesn't do interviews for a reason.
	How Boris Johnson continually lies and lies and lies and yet somehow people still like him.
	It's a day ending in Y so you can be sure he's lied about something.
	Correct.
	And we're going to examine the kind of people who are breaking into Britain.
	We've got an amazing case study for you because you're really going to appreciate the doctors, lawyers, scientists, nuclear engineers, you know, brain surgeons.
	So many of their best and brightest are coming over via small boats across the channel.
	We haven't got any other announcements apart from the fact that Calvin Robinson is live in the studio.
	He's come back from America for a couple of weeks to do his common sense crusade.
	So tune in for that at three o'clock.
	Right, well, let's see what's wrong with Kamala Harris's brain.
	So yesterday, Kamala Harris did a 25-minute interview with Brett Baier of Fox News, and it went just about as well as you could expect, because we all know that she's not the most eloquent of speakers, to say the least.
	You know what, I'm actually not sure I agree with that.
	She actually isn't a terribly inelegant speaker.
	The problem is, she says a lot.
	She transmits a lot of words, but says very little.
	There's actually no content to what she's saying.
	I think sometimes you need to reorder her words to make them form a cogent sentence.
	There's sort of a word salad going on sometimes.
	Is that a talent, Carl, or is that what's colloquially known as BSing?
	Yeah, no, that's a talent.
	Someone who talks for a living, I tell you.
	I have to learn a lot.
	No, no, I have to learn a lot of things.
	As someone who tries actively to say as little as possible when I talk.
	Well, it's not that.
	To be able to say, like, several sentences and have zero actual content in them is a genuine talent.
	It's difficult to do.
	Try it sometimes, honestly.
	Try just speaking without actually...
	I'm sure there's probably enough audience members already saying, but he already does come!
	Yeah, you're just setting them up for an easy win.
	I'm not even joking.
	I think she practices this.
	Practices her word salad.
	Couldn't she practice not speaking in an annoying wine?
	Yeah, she does have very Skylar White-esque manner of speaking, doesn't she?
	That's good.
	We need to, in people's minds, when they see Kamala Harris, we want them to think Skylar White.
	You got in the way of Walter White.
	I mean, evolution has bred me to immediately tune out the tone of Kamala Harris' voice.
	Well, that's going to make this next part very difficult, because we're going to look at some clips and just see where it went wrong.
	Obviously, I'm not going to subject you to the full 25-minute interview.
	I'm a humanitarian, after all.
	But what I am going to do is pick out some of the worst bits, and we're going to have a look at them.
	So here's the first one that people have been talking about here, and what happened here is she didn't expect them to bring in a question whereby they've already pre-prepared the question by asking Trump to play.
	So let's have a look at this, shall we?
	He's the one who talks about an enemy within, an enemy within, talking about the American people, suggesting he would turn the American military on the American people.
	We asked that question to the former president today.
	Harris Faulkner had a town hall, and this is how he responded.
	I heard about that.
	They were saying I was, like, threatening.
	I'm not threatening anybody.
	They're the ones doing their threatening.
	They do phony investigations.
	I've been investigated more than Alphonse Capone.
	He was the greatest...
	No, it's true.
	No, but think of it.
	It's called weaponization of government.
	It's a terrible thing.
	So...
	Brett, I'm sorry, and with all due respect, that clip was not what he has been saying about the enemy within that he has repeated When he's speaking about the American people, that's not what you just showed.
	No, that's not what you just showed, in all fairness and respect to you.
	I'm telling you that was the question that we asked him.
	You didn't show that, and here's the bottom line.
	He has repeated it many times, and you and I both know that.
	And you and I both know that he has talked about turning the American military on the American people.
	He has talked about going after people who are engaged in peaceful protest.
	He has talked about locking people up because they disagree with him.
	This is a democracy.
	And in a democracy, the President of the United States in the United States of America should be willing to be able to handle Criticism without saying he'd lock people up for doing it.
	That last part there.
	Handle criticism without locking people up.
	I mean...
	What are your thoughts, both of you?
	He's just going to apply British standards to America, is what she's threatening.
	That was awful.
	Sightful as ever.
	My life is worse for having been subjected to that.
	But it's going to get worse.
	It's going to get worse because there's more where that came from.
	She's on the pro-censorship side of the argument.
	I know.
	All of the things that she's accusing Donald Trump of doing are probably more true of the Democratic Party.
	And I'm not saying that just to be partisan.
	I think even many Democrats would be able to acknowledge, okay, well, we can't really say that because we've been doing the same thing.
	And I love the idea that she's like, yeah, Trump's just going to march the military down the streets and start gunning down Americans.
	I don't think he's going to do that, actually.
	Also, why would the military agree to that?
	It's a ridiculous premise that, you know, Donald Trump's going to say to the military, let's just, you know, go all-out fire on civilians, and they're just okay with that.
	Also, this is the exact same rhetoric that they have been using against Trump for the past eight years.
	If he had wanted to do that, then he would have done that during his first four years, or have done that at January 6th, if January 6th was what the Democrats had been, if it was what they'd been saying it was.
	Also, the Democrats are literally the enemy within because they are literally opening the borders and trying to flood basically every red state they can with foreigners because they're going to try and give them a vote even though they're not allowed to.
	Well, they're basically fifth colonists, aren't they?
	Yeah.
	So, sorry Kamala.
	Resemble that remark?
	I don't know what to tell you.
	But it gets a lot worse than that.
	And this one was...
	I couldn't actually believe that she said this.
	More than 70% of people tell the country is on the wrong track.
	They say the country is on the wrong track.
	If it's on the wrong track, That track follows three and a half years of you being Vice President and President Biden being President.
	That is what they're saying, 79% of them.
	Why are they saying that?
	If you're turning the page, you've been in office for three and a half years.
	And Donald Trump has been running for office.
	But you've been the person holding the office, Madam Vice President.
	You and I both know what I'm talking about.
	You and I both know what I'm talking about.
	I actually don't.
	What are you talking about?
	What I'm talking about is that over the last decade, But you're the lever of power.
	But listen, over the last decade, it is clear to me and certainly the Republicans who are on stage with me.
	You're the one in literally in the office.
	Joe Biden is literally the president.
	She's basically making it all about, well, I'm not Trump.
	She's sort of doing a very similar thing to what the Labour Party did in Britain, actually, where she's just saying, I'm not the opposition, therefore I'm good.
	Sure, but she can hardly distance herself from her own governance.
	I know, I think that's why she changed it to Trump, is that she wants to take as much focus away from their time in office as possible.
	She was put in charge of the border.
	Mm-hm.
	Like...
	I'm going to vote for change.
	Why?
	Not you, then.
	And isn't this just modern politics in a nutshell?
	She will not take any responsibility for anything that the administration that she has been part of has done.
	And then says, we will fix the problems that exist in this country.
	Who knows who caused them?
	Most politicians at least try and formulate a defense of their own administration.
	I did this for reasons because the X, Y, and Z. They don't disavow their own governance.
	I'm going to play to you a clip from another point in the interview.
	Page said that he never advocated for that prison policy and no gender transition.
	Well, you know what?
	You've got to take responsibility for what happened in your administration.
	Yeah, no surgeries...
	I mean, I agree with her, actually.
	The smug face as well...
	It's so acceptable, isn't it?
	Americans watching this right now, I know that any American watching us is probably not a swing voter who's on the fence about anything, but if you are, just consider, do you want this to be the face of America on the world stage?
	Just...
	Do you want Kamala Harris to be the one, if tensions continue to flare in the Middle East, going to BB Netanyahu and trying to negotiate?
	I actually kind of do want that now.
	It would be kind of funny.
	There would be an element of chaos to it, wouldn't there?
	If you want to go the Joker route, then vote Kamala.
	I'm sick of civilisation.
	The idea that she's like, we've got to take responsibility.
	Okay, okay.
	We're just so far off the reservation at this point.
	We're not having a proper conversation.
	So, she was asked about the open border and illegal immigration.
	She'll take some responsibility.
	I'm sure she will, because she's all about, you know, the things that happened in your administration.
	That's on you, right?
	That's what she just said.
	Original premise.
	Jocelyn Nungary, Rachel Morin, Lakin Riley, they are young women who were brutally assaulted and killed by some of the men who were released at the beginning of the administration, well before a negotiated bipartisan bill.
	Former President Clinton actually referred to Lakin Riley Sunday campaigning for you in Georgia, saying if those men had been properly vetted, Lakin Riley probably would not have been killed.
	So if it wouldn't have happened, This is well before any negotiation.
	This is well before Donald Trump got involved in the politics.
	This is a specific policy decision by your administration to release these men into the country.
	So what I'm saying to you, do you owe those families an apology?
	Let me just say, first of all, those are tragic cases.
	There's no question about that.
	There is no question about that.
	And I can't imagine the pain that the families of those victims have experienced for a loss that should not have occurred.
	So that is true.
	It is also true that if a border security had actually been passed nine months ago, it would be nine months That we would have had more border agents at the border, more support for the folks who are working around the clock trying to hold it all together to ensure that no future harm would occur.
	And this election in 20 days will determine whether we have a president of the United States who actually cares more about fixing a problem even if it is not to their political advantage in an election.
	Because there was a solution, Brett.
	Madam Vice President, it was a policy decision in the early part of your administration.
	I will let one of the mothers talk about it.
	Take a listen.
	That was amazing.
	Fix a problem even if it's not to their political advantage.
	It's interesting that she said that, isn't it out loud?
	Yeah, we know it's your political advantage to flood the country with illegals.
	We know that that's literally your strategy.
	The fact she let that slip in the interview on its own is...
	That's unbelievable!
	I know, yeah.
	So she was the border czar.
	Yes.
	I mean, Biden, literally on the day he got in, started undoing Trump's border stuff by executive fiat.
	And just amazing.
	Did you also notice that she did everything but defend her actual policy?
	Well, yeah, because her actual policy got people killed.
	The more stressed she got as well, the more shrill, nasal, high-pitched her voice got.
	Some of it just wasn't related to the actual question as well.
	Oh, this is a tragedy.
	That's undebatable.
	Well, then why are you talking about it?
	Yeah, we all agree it's a tragedy.
	That's why it's been brought up.
	We have all been on the other side of this argument, gentlemen.
	We all know that reason, logic, rational thinking has absolutely nothing to do with it.
	So it goes on to show a clip of one of the mothers of the murdered daughters blaming them explicitly and she just refuses to take responsibility and she just says, I'm sorry for their grief.
	It's because they literally let them out.
	Yeah, but everyone knows that by her just focusing on, oh, it's a tragedy, yeah, everyone knows you're just trying to avoid answering the question.
	It just looks really bad.
	And then I thought that this was quite an interesting moment to end the interview.
	He drops in a comment saying, you've said a lot of things about Donald Trump, not so much about yourself, though.
	Which I thought was amusing.
	I hope you got to say what you wanted to say about Donald Trump.
	There are a lot of things that people want to learn about you and your policies and that's why we invited you here.
	I invite everyone to go to KamalaHarris.com And you will see that I have 80 pages of policies that are quite comprehensive and should be accessible to anyone who would like to read them.
	And it includes what I intend to do about affordable housing.
	You get the idea, right?
	I'm not reading 80 pages of anything.
	No.
	And the media, of course, came out to defend this.
	And the word today was testy.
	Because she really ballsed it up.
	Someone from the Associated Press got their email out and now everyone's using the same word.
	They're not even hiding it particularly well.
	I'm starting to think that all the sort of journalists in the mainstream media are being held ransom and they're sending messages by all using...
	They're totally complicit.
	No, of course they are.
	They're all part of a club.
	And of course this is going on now.
	This would have been, in a previous time, a massive revelation.
	It's not.
	We all know they're coordinating and writing the same article in lots of different ways.
	Basically running a line.
	Why did they think Testy would be a good defensive posture to adopt for Harris?
	I don't know.
	I think it's the softest way to describe how bad she was at the interview.
	Yeah, because there were other articles as well basically saying it didn't look very good, even from the left-wing perspective.
	Like, it didn't come across well.
	Trill and nagging would not be the words that the mainstream media would want to use in their headlines, no matter how accurate it would be.
	If she were clever, she would have read Tony Blair's book on leadership, because everyone knows that Blair was someone who didn't get his messaging wrong, despite being, of course, evil.
	And Dan has done an episode of Brokonomics talking about it, so if you want to know how to be a better leader from the Dark Lord himself, that's Tony Blair, not Dan, then go and watch this video on our website.
	He can be.
	Tony Blair, you are evil, however successful.
	Undeniable as well.
	So, I'm going to torture you with some annoying defences of this.
	Oh, not this guy.
	Wow, Kamala Harris was flawless in that Fox News interview.
	She answered tough questions and discussed the issues.
	Could you imagine Trump sitting down with Jen Psaki or Rachel Maddow?
	It would be a disaster, a true masterclass from VP Harris.
	These kids, I hope they get paid good money.
	They do.
	I know they get paid, but I hope they get paid enough to make selling out their dignity worth it.
	I don't doubt they do.
	I mean, this kid's going to be like, what, 23 or something?
	It says 22 in his bio.
	Oh, there we go.
	Yeah, I didn't even say that.
	Right, so he's 22 years old.
	They give him 100 grand.
	At 22, you're like, wow, okay, I'm going to tweet whatever the hell you want, you know?
	It doesn't matter to me at all.
	If you start paying me 100 grand, I'll support Kamala, yeah, why not?
	I don't think that's what Carl would suddenly turn the company line over to.
	We're all going to be rich, guys, but...
	I'm open to offers, okay?
	Yeah, if the Democrats have some money.
	Yeah, because I'll tell you what, the Republicans certainly don't give us any.
	That's true.
	What's the right-wing money, goddammit?
	Yeah.
	So here's another annoying one as well.
	Oh, it's chilling for free.
	Yeah.
	The beautiful thing about the Brett Bayer interview is that Kamala Harris understood and responded to each question.
	Wow.
	What a high bar.
	That's incredible.
	The things they're doing to try and carry this for her.
	She understood the questions, guys.
	This is the exact same compliment that they gave to Biden.
	Literally, they're putting her on the same level as a senile old man and saying, well, they can both answer questions, they can understand words when you speak to them.
	She used examples of policies, mainly because they were brought up because she had to defend them, and gave real-world context.
	When Brett went hard after her, she didn't call him names, she didn't quit the interview, she met...
	She didn't make things up.
	She didn't storm out of the interview like Peter Hitchens.
	Congratulations.
	She never once complained.
	The questions were tough.
	She never played the victim card.
	She didn't lose her temper.
	She didn't take the bait or diminish or talk down to Trump supporters.
	She stood up to him with force and never backed down.
	Okay, but she didn't take any accountability of things she personally has done.
	Or didn't do that she ought to have done.
	This is from Mark Cuban as well.
	That explains that.
	So not only are the usual talking heads trying to carry water for this interview, it recently came out, thanks to James O'Keefe, that people at Meta, you know, the people that own Facebook and Instagram, anti-Camla posts are being automatically demoted.
	They're being basically shadow banned, and this has been admitted by...
	A senior engineer in one of their stings, which I'm not really surprised about.
	This is already common knowledge, but it's just nice to get it reiterated.
	It is always funny, though, that these people still just go on a date and answer probing questions.
	They think, oh, I can just say, no, no, it's always James O'Keefe in the dress, okay?
	LAUGHTER The most prolific trans journalist in America.
	He's a man of mystery, a chameleon.
	Yeah, you thought you were on a date with a nice woman who's interested in you.
	No one's interested in you.
	You're a software engineer at Meta.
	Obviously you're being taken for a ride.
	So Donald Trump also responded to this.
	I wish I could do a good Trump impression, but I'm just going to read it in my ad voice.
	Wave your hands about like this.
	Great job by Brett Baier in his interview with lying Kamala Harris.
	She has a massive and irredeemable case of Trump derangement syndrome.
	So bad, in fact, that she's barely able to talk about any subject other than the man who had the best economy ever, the strongest border in history, and who just got the unanimous endorsement of the US Border Patrol.
	Me!
	Their endorsement was a tremendous honour.
	They said that Comrade Kamala did a terrible job, the absolute worst in memory, and can't be allowed to do it again.
	She's also the worst vice-president in history, but hopefully will be gone.
	Again, congratulations to Brett Baier on a tough but fair interview, one that clearly showed how totally incompetent Kamala is.
	For the good of our nation, her inferior cognitive ability must be tested at once.
	He's literally calling a low IQ. I tell you what, I'm so glad Donald Trump is.
	So this is him playing into this that came out recently, of course, where he was at a donor dinner and he...
	Do you approve of me reading this word, Carl?
	I mean, I do, but I don't know if YouTube does.
	I think YouTube's actually okay with it.
	Okay.
	So, Donald Trump, in a rather bullying and mean way, YouTube...
	That we don't approve of.
	We don't approve of this.
	Definitely not.
	Called Kamala Harris retarded.
	That's what happened.
	And there's definitely no evidence for that.
	So, on a completely unrelated note, here is something that Kamala Harris put out.
	Black men deserve a president who cares about making their lives better.
	I'm sure you've probably seen this during the rounds, you must have.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	So, she wants to provide 1 million loans that are forgivable of up to 20k for black entrepreneurs and others to start a business.
	Trump already did this during COVID and all they did was buy trainers with them.
	Yeah, that was the Trump box, wasn't it?
	Yeah, trainers and cars.
	Okay, well hang on a second.
	How are they distinguishing?
	They're not going to be like, okay, well you've got to send us a blood sample or something.
	Right?
	That's true.
	Well, to be fair, it does say, and others.
	Sure, but like, if it's like, right, this is for black entrepreneurs, I mean, it's going to be a form you fill out, just tick the box, black, and Kamala's going to give you 20 grand.
	Yeah, I, black man LaQuanda Robinson, would like my $20,000, please.
	Like, I mean, how are they, they're not going to check, they're just going to give you this money.
	This is totally open for fraud, not that I'm suggesting you do.
	Are you in open communication with the Skybird in your hallway?
	Also, protect cryptocurrency investments so black men who make them know their money is safe, which I thought was particularly amusing.
	And also, legalise recreational marijuana.
	There you go.
	That's what the Democrats think of black men.
	This is a fascinating rundown of the Democrat stereotypes of black men.
	Well, they steal money and they don't pay it back and they smoke drugs, right?
	I mean, that's your opinion.
	And when people criticised this, they ran this cover.
	This is the Wall Street Journal here.
	While Harris's rhetoric suggests she'll provide such benefits specifically to black men and women...
	She didn't say women.
	She didn't.
	It turns out the words and others are doing a ton of work.
	The campaign says that the programmes listed under the Black Men Agenda will be open to all Americans on a race-neutral basis.
	Right.
	Right, I totally believe that, which is why you said black men.
	It's just so obviously ridiculous, isn't it?
	It doesn't make them look good.
	This is because she's tanking with black men, by the way.
	Yeah, I know.
	Really unpopular with them.
	They're all going over to Trump.
	They don't want Shrill Harrodin screeching at them.
	So obviously a lot is being made about the polls and how the polls are wrong because national polling is showing Kamala above Trump.
	It could well be due to all of the illegals that have been imported into America.
	But of course popular vote doesn't matter in America.
	It doesn't work that way.
	What actually matters?
	There's a graph here somewhere, trying to remember where it is, where it shows...
	Ah, here we go.
	So, swing states.
	This is the important thing.
	Just weeks ahead from Election Day, neither candidate has a clear lead in any swing state.
	Trump is a few points ahead in four, and Harris in one.
	So that actually indicates that Trump is potentially leading in quite a few swing states.
	If, you know...
	These seven swing states, Trump leads in four.
	Well, that's the majority of the swing states.
	Sure, but it also shows that there's something desperately wrong with about half the American population.
	49% of Wisconsin are like, yeah, I think I'm over Kamala Harris.
	Well, also, you've got to remember the 2016 polls as well that were unanimously in favour of Hillary Clinton, and she didn't win.
	So hopefully, landslide.
	But just unbelievable.
	I mean, how can anyone be like, yeah, I think I am going to vote?
	So even in the partisan polling, though, we're seeing that Trump seems to be leading in the swing states, at least to a reasonable degree.
	I bet the internal Democrat polling is dire.
	I would imagine so, yes.
	And the funny thing is that they must be aware of this desperate situation because they've bussed in 100 Labour Party staff from Britain to help campaign for them because, you know, there's so much enthusiasm for Kamala Harris in America that they need British leftists instead for some reason.
	What I love about this, you know how this is going to come about, look what Keir Starmer just achieved.
	He's got a massive landslide win in Britain.
	So all we need to do is take his campaigning expertise and apply it here.
	And it's like, great.
	So you go over as the Labour Party and it's like, what do we need to do?
	Well, what you need is for Donald Trump to campaign against the Republican Party, to split the Republican vote in half, and then the Democrats can sweep it.
	And I'm like, we can't get that to happen.
	You're going to get these Labour Party activists and just like, well, Kamala Harris is not the Tories.
	It's not foreign interference.
	You might think so, yes.
	You could say that.
	It well might be.
	It's very strange, isn't it?
	Particularly unethical that they're flying in foreign people to campaign for them.
	To be honest with you, I don't mind this much.
	It's just going around going blah, blah, blah, blah, you know, whatever.
	It'd be a bit strange if you have people knocking on your door and they've got, like, an English accent.
	Can you vote for Kamala Harris, please?
	Say no.
	No redcoat.
	I don't think anyone's going to mistake Sophia Patel for a redcoat.
	That's true.
	Well, I mean, we did own India at one point, didn't we?
	Well, yeah, I don't think the Americans are going to make that distinction, though, are they?
	Oh my god, it's a member of the Raj!
	What is happening?
	But anyway, obviously it's not going well for Kamala Harris.
	All leading up to the actual election day, you know, all the interviews, all the polling doesn't actually seem to be pointing in her favour, which I find very interesting.
	Excellent stuff, right.
	Shall we go through some of the rumble rants?
	Yeah, we'll go through a couple.
	Danny says, the interview went about as well as the Hindenburg, fiery but mostly contained.
	Bobobad says, report Kamala's most striking response to Brett was, I have brought peace, freedom and justice and security to my new empire.
	And when Brett questioned your new empire, how has threatened Brett's life?
	I am hearing that that might actually be confused with the movie, so don't sue us.
	Keith says, my Islander magazine has just arrived, thanks lads, we'll be reading after this.
	Well thank you, I'm glad.
	Enjoy.
	I also like this one.
	Babies have evolved to cry at the specific pitch that sounds most irritating to our ears.
	Why is Kamala the same when she speaks?
	How is that possible?
	Josh, you can explain this.
	Great question.
	She's a baby.
	She's a baby in disguise.
	She's the boss baby.
	Cats whine at the same sort of frequency as well.
	Yeah, they evolved to do so, to get our attention.
	You notice they don't whine at each other?
	No.
	They only ever whine at humans.
	Anyway.
	They don't.
	Very, very clever.
	Speaking of whiny things, of course.
	Yes.
	Speaking of cats...
	It turns out that it's a day ending in Y, and therefore Boris Johnson is lying to you.
	He's just this week, or last week, released his new memoir, Boris Johnson Unleashed!
	Hide Your Wives, Hide Your Daughters.
	And it's turned out to be an overwhelming bestseller, selling over 42,000 copies.
	Of course, it's sold less than half of what Tony Blair's memoir sold in its opening week, because of course it did, but it's outpacing a few of the others, and As such, he's doing the media rounds, going around doing interviews, speaking about some of the contents of the book,
	which have some interesting insights into why it was that he decided to betray the country and flood Britain with hundreds of thousands of third-worlders who are completely dependent on the state to be able to feed themselves.
	Boris Johnson explains the knife in your back.
	Pretty much.
	And of course absolves himself of any responsibility for it, because why would he do that?
	He was only the Prime Minister.
	I know.
	Images have emerged on lines of copies of the memoir in shops being positioned next to or covered by titles such as The Idiot, Entitlement, Surrounded by Liars and Surrounded by Idiots, The Psychology of Stupidity, and How They Broke Britain by James O'Brien, otherwise known as James O'Gammon.
	That's one of our favourite books, isn't it?
	It really is.
	A YouGov poll published today found that many Britons do not believe the claims made in Unleashed.
	No kidding.
	So, nobody believes the book that he has written.
	And sadly, it also has managed to infiltrate Swindon.
	Here he is as we were walking past Waterstones earlier today.
	We had Boris.
	There he is.
	You can't quite see it, but if you zoom out again, you see the top of How You Broke Britain down there.
	Yeah, and also Boris Johnson's book The Churchill Factor.
	And also Nadine Doris' book, The Plot, which I have read.
	How did you find it?
	It actually is kind of interesting, because she basically fingers Gove as being part...
	An evil mastermind?
	Yeah, basically.
	It's a series of WhatsApp groups that Gove controls, that brings in the sort of outsiders in the Tory party into a coalition to kind of be an internal insurrection against anything...
	Usurp anything that the internal Tory party don't want happening.
	Well, yeah, yeah.
	It's not even that...
	She basically views him as a kind of long-standing sleeper agent to destroy the Conservative Party to destroy Britain.
	Which maybe he is.
	I mean, I wouldn't pull that out.
	Interestingly enough, there is somebody who doesn't mention Michael Gove.
	We've mentioned him twice already now, and that is James O'Gammon himself in How They Broke Britain, which we've done a book club on, because somebody sent us a copy in, and I decided to go through a trial by fire and descend into the heart of darkness, and actually read it.
	And it's rubbish...
	But if you want to learn more about it, and I think it's well worth it, because it was a very entertaining discussion, you should subscribe to the website and check out the video that we have done on it.
	But it is weird, though, you mention that.
	I don't think he mentions, because each of the chapters is dedicated to a particular figure in British politics.
	It comes up on his Twitter feed.
	But why doesn't he speak about Gove?
	You would think that Gove would be somebody very relevant to talk about.
	It is also worth mentioning as well, a Lotus Eater subscription is cheaper than the book itself.
	Yes.
	And a much better use of your money.
	That's true.
	Yes, much more valuable.
	And if people do want to continue sending us in leftist texts like this, the other books by James O'Brien, like the very humbly titled How to Be Right, or the books by Otto English, who has me blocked on Twitter, please keep it that way.
	Elon's going to remove that.
	No blocking.
	No blocking.
	What happened to Elon putting things up to a Democratic poll before he actually made the changes?
	I feel that he's kind of done a bait and switch on that.
	Philosopher King.
	Yes.
	No.
	Terrible idea.
	If I block somebody, I don't want to see it.
	Are we appealing to a popular delusion here, Harry?
	I am appealing to Elon Musk keeping his word, which is perhaps foolish of me.
	But yeah, we do have a P.O. box, so if you want to torture us with other leftist texts, I will probably end up reading them.
	Feel free to send them in to us, because I'm not spending my own bloody money on them.
	But one of the interesting things from this Boris Johnson round of interviews and the information that he's included in Unleashed is he speaks about his reasons for the quadrupling of immigration into the country during COVID. I was about to say following COVID, but then I remembered, no, no, no, the borders should have been closed, seeing as everybody was locked in their own homes, but instead he decided to open the floodgates.
	And the reason for that is apparently we needed to deal with inflation.
	It was a deliberate policy choice, he understood, and if I read the excerpt here, Johnson put in place a points-based immigration system that pumped up net annual migration to the UK by around 400,000 people, which was one of the main concerns of reform voters.
	This, he claims, was because his government had to deal with inflation after the pandemic, and that meant getting in hands to do the work to prevent wage costs spiralling.
	So the excuse being given is literally, I had to depress your wages.
	We had huge inflation, so employers would have had to pay you more.
	We didn't want that, so we had to depress your wages.
	So what he's effectively saying here is, we locked you down, and therefore now we have to flood you with Infinity Indians.
	Yeah, no, no.
	We forced you to stay at home, we closed all of your businesses, so we had to print a load of money, or else you would have starved to death.
	And now we have to bring in Infinity migrants, or else you're going to get a fair wage.
	Yep, it was to save...
	Thanks Boris!
	It was to save the economy that he did it.
	Let's hear it straight from the horse's mouth when he appeared on television defending this.
	You've got mass migration in this country, which under your watch spirals, basically out of control.
	You can understand why lots of Tories have deserted your party.
	Yeah, but let's deal with that, because...
	It's perfectly true that when I was Prime Minister, migration went up and down.
	It went down dramatically during the pandemic.
	Of course it did.
	It knocked us all up.
	But then so as we came out, what happened was that we had a nightmare where we couldn't stack the shelves and we couldn't fill the petrol stations with petrol.
	Everybody was freaking out.
	I remember every business group, every Department of State was saying, we need more pairs of hands to get things done.
	That wasn't the promise of the referendum.
	It wasn't the promise of Brexit.
	It was controlling our borders and limiting migration.
	But inflation is a huge destroyer of prosperity, of investment.
	You know, you're too young to remember the 1970s.
	I remember it was absolutely appalling.
	And you get into an inflationary spiral and it saps the strength of the economy completely.
	It saps people's prosperity.
	It's a disaster.
	But you can see why people are flocking to Nigel.
	So we had to get inflation down.
	And yes, I would accept that for that year, 2022, the numbers were very high, partly because we also had the Ukrainians.
	We had, quite rightly, a lot of people from Afghanistan, a lot of people from Hong Kong.
	Plus, the Migration Advisory Committee said, well, we needed a lot of people to help with social care.
	We needed a lot of stat shelves and all things.
	We need to keep...
	They've never knowingly told...
	Now, of course, Those decisions, in hindsight, we've learned.
	We can say, well, we got it wrong, or the MAC got it wrong, or I got it wrong.
	I didn't actually authorize those.
	They were taken by others.
	But because of Brexit...
	We're able to get it right in future.
	I think that's all you need to hear.
	Thank God.
	The UK government's consistent line since about 1750.
	You know, well, we can get it right in future, yeah.
	Do you like that though?
	The complete abdication of all responsibility.
	Well, he said he got it wrong, but also he only got it wrong because obviously they had the pandemic to deal with, and then after the pandemic it was business leaders saying, oh there's no way that we can use all the people who are already here and unemployed because they lost their jobs in the pandemic to stack shelves.
	No, we need hundreds of thousands more people, and then it was the Migration Advisory Committee.
	So he's saying, Well, it was all of these people.
	I'll take a little bit of responsibility and say, yeah, I got it wrong, or maybe they got it wrong.
	Yes.
	I mean, you were the one in charge making the decisions, but at least we can agree that you were wrong.
	Yes.
	Well, ultimately, he's responsible for the advice that he's given and follows up on.
	Yes.
	So, by externalising it, he's just abdicating his own responsibility.
	Yes, and I will give some credit.
	Sorry, just...
	Oh, go on.
	It's marginally better than Kamala Harris, but not by much.
	We're still way below an acceptable bar of what our politicians should be acting like.
	At least Boris did make, you know, his sentences actually made grammatical sense in the English language.
	At least Boris, also being a journalist, probably wrote his own book, unlike Kamala Harris, as we found out yesterday through Chris Rufo's expose.
	Yeah, I will also give credit to the academic agent who predicted that this was going to be the reason given quite a few months ago, back in July now, branding it as human quantitative easing.
	Yeah, he didn't coin this phrase though.
	No, no, he didn't, but there is a good term for it, for what's being described here, evil as it is.
	And he ended up saying that although each individual British person has been made worse off, the extra people partly, if you examine the figures, offset the inflationary effects of the excess money printing during COVID and he uses various metrics such as the price of apples and such to prove it.
	And you can really tell that, yeah, people have been made worse off because if you look at the graphs...
	I like this graph.
	It is a good graph.
	You've used it before.
	Real net domestic product per capita, so this is GDP per capita, is completely stagnant.
	It dropped during COVID and then has remained completely stagnant ever since.
	And this is during big periods of inflation.
	This is the best measure to assess people's sort of quality of life in economic terms, really.
	And as you can see, it's not really got any better since 2008.
	So, thank you very much, Boris, for saving the economy by keeping people as poor as possible.
	Britain is basically a third world country, at this point, or at least a second world country.
	Yeah, large parts of it are.
	Look at that stagnation.
	It's horrendous.
	On the international stage, we are a laughingstock because of how poor we are compared to how powerful we should be on the world stage.
	Oh, we should be surprised.
	We have such levels of soft power, and yet people are not getting richer.
	People, their lives aren't getting better.
	And Boris Johnson is still using the excuse of, well, it would have been far worse if I didn't do this.
	But the thing is, I don't think his excuse-making, shockingly enough, is the full story.
	Really?
	I know, right?
	Because all you can do, it's very, very simple, is look at the breakdown of the figures of people coming in.
	So if it was all for people working, what are the...
	Why are most of them not working?
	Yeah, why do we actually have almost as many work dependents coming in as work visas being issued, and then about half the amount of that for study dependents, and then two...
	So about a fifth of them are actually working?
	Yeah.
	Jesus Christ.
	About that.
	We've got 230,000 family visas being issued.
	So what we needed to save the economy was roughly about 402,000 dependents coming into the country, not contributing anything.
	Good point.
	And then all of these asylum claims, over 250,000.
	Hong Kong, Ukraine and humanitarian.
	I just can't understand study dependents.
	I'm going to come over and study in a foreign country.
	Yeah, bring your mum with you.
	Well, who's going to make my turkey dinosaurs?
	Who's going to get my nuggies for me while I'm studying?
	The Hasan Piker conundrum.
	And we also know from the work visas, if you look at the work that Conor has done recently, when he was looking at some of the care visas that had been put forward, where it was 77,000 visas issued and only 11,000 positions filled, that means maybe, at most,
	I can estimate if those figures are representative of all of the work visas issued, maybe 15-20% of those people have actually gone into the economy in any meaningful sense if they've not been sucked into the black market illegal economy.
	And of course, the people who are actually working as well may not be working a form of employment and are actually more likely to be working a form of employment that doesn't contribute to the UK economy at all within their lifetime, and they're actually a net detriment, economically speaking.
	It's the golden era of Deliveroo, though.
	Oh, yes.
	There's also another factor to consider here, which is that Boris's entire premise is based off the fact that he introduced these new immigration point systems off of the back of COVID. That's a complete lie.
	This was put forward at the beginning of 2020, prior to COVID, where he introduced the new points-based system, which, if you check this article...
	Opened up, let me see, introduced an immigration point system that opened up half of all jobs in the UK to foreign workers, lowered salary and skilled thresholds for migrants, and lifted the cap on migrants altogether.
	And that included taking it down from a salary threshold of £30,000 to £25,600, and reduced the skills threshold from graduate to A-level.
	If I get arrested with a knife in my back, do I count as carrying the knife?
	I'm just curious.
	It just really matters in this day and age.
	I can't believe we can't stack shelves.
	I don't believe you.
	It's not true.
	It's obvious that we can stack shelves without importing the third world.
	And I'm sorry if businesses felt that having to slightly raise their wages to encourage these people to take these jobs, I think that's a bullet that they can take.
	Well, the frustrating thing is, even if the argument was true that they contributed to the economy, which they don't, Even on the social grounds, it's still not worth it.
	Was it the OBR as well that put out a recent graph showing the net contributions of different types of migrants to the UK economy over an entire lifetime, and low-skilled workers, which clearly Boris Johnson opened this country up to, never contribute?
	They need to walk the street and look at the quality of person that's here.
	The same in Danish as well, when they've done their studies.
	But you are right, Josh.
	Even if they were a net economic benefit, culture and cohesion is something else that you can't really put a price on.
	Exactly, yeah.
	And again, obviously he's lying.
	We've got the facts to prove it.
	And also, this is what he has always wanted.
	I've done a segment on this before, but just to go over a little bit of the information.
	Boris Johnson, for more than 12 years, and this is back from 2015, and you can go back to 2008, so that's 16 years ago, he's always been calling for an amnesty of illegal migrants.
	He said in this interview in 2015 that he is pro-immigration, said it was a shame that illegal migrants can only earn money on the black market because they can't pay taxes, and he told LBC, I'm the great-grandson of Turkish immigrants.
	Where would my family be if London hadn't given sanctuary to my great-grandfather?
	Oh, don't make me dream, Boris.
	I love the reason.
	Oh, well, we need to give them amnesty.
	Why?
	Because they're not paying taxes.
	Really, that's the problem with illegals.
	And could we not deport them, and then they wouldn't be a burden on the system?
	Yeah.
	That would be my preference.
	Yeah, and he said, so I'm totally in favour of people being able to make their lives in this country.
	Similarly, during his Vote Leave campaign, his entire premise for why we needed to leave the EU was so that we wouldn't have to have pro-EU migration coming into the country, and we could open it up.
	To even more people.
	He told a vote-leave rally, I'm not only pro-immigration, I'm pro-immigrants!
	And I am in favour of an amnesty of illegal immigrants who have been here for more than 12 years.
	You know, the ones who've managed to evade the authorities the longest, so the sneakiest ones.
	It's like an enormous game of hide-and-seek, and I guess they would win.
	It's like Grand Theft Auto, isn't it?
	You hide away from the police eventually, they just give up.
	You're okay, you're clear now.
	Boris is like, well, your star level's gone down, Cecil, so here you go.
	They're unable to contribute to the economy.
	I'll tell you why I'm in favour of this, because it's the humane thing to do, and it's the economically rational thing to do.
	Just a quick thing.
	If you can't pay taxes, you can't contribute to the economy.
	It's obviously wrong as well.
	The economy is just the sale of goods and services.
	And so...
	What he's saying there is, if there were no taxes, then there would be no economy.
	It's like, no, no, that's so totally wrong and so totally backwards.
	You know, libertarian economists would be like, what are you talking about?
	What are you talking about?
	If anything, it's the opposite.
	Yeah, these people actually contribute more to the economy.
	Maybe if I was in the dark economy, I'd be doing better as well.
	What the hell's going on with those screens?
	The dark energy of Boris.
	Yeah, I know, yeah.
	You said the forbidden word, taxes.
	Yeah.
	Josh's energy, it spiked.
	Poseidon's angry.
	So, don't believe the thing that Boris Johnson said.
	Never give him another chance.
	Never fall for his lies and tricks.
	He has always wanted to destroy this country and flood you, and sadly, following Brexit, he got the perfect opportunity and immediately did so.
	Just insufferable.
	Rye Lyons says, "Trump for the L there.
	"Per middle school ethics, you never call someone "that has genuine mental challenges the R word." Well, that's the thing.
	Kamala, I don't think she has genuine mental challenges actually.
	I think she's just trapped in a particular position that is irresolvable.
	We're going to restart the video wall.
	I think Kamala has genuine mental challenges.
	No, I don't.
	I think she's just...
	She could have written her own book.
	To be fair, in my segment about the rehabilitation of the word retard, I did say that it is immoral to call genuinely special needs people that name.
	But I don't think she is genuinely special needs.
	No, I just think that she's not very intelligent.
	But within the sort of...
	Yeah, she's going to be like 100 IQ. Very, very normal, average person.
	But the point is, she's way above her station at this point.
	In a real world, in a normal, sensible, properly functioning political system, there's no way Kamala Harris would be running for president.
	No, I very much agree.
	I mean, it's obviously the case.
	I thought that about a lot of American political candidates, actually, where it's very unusual that they're the people that get picked.
	Like, the Clintons repeatedly cropping up all the time.
	It's like, well, what are the chances?
	The Clintons are not, like, tremendously incompetent.
	You are right, it's got the sort of dynasty aspect.
	But, like, Kamala Harris is definitely not that person.
	And so the fact that she's at the top of the pyramid is just bizarre.
	Listen, there are incredibly simple reading and mathematics comp- um, uh, comprehensions tests that quite a few people fail in America.
	Three out of ten black applicants for police jobs in Maryland are unable to pass a particular standardized test.
	I want to see recorded footage of her trying that test.
	I would love to see it.
	So, Kamala, how would you feel if you didn't have breakfast this morning?
	I also want to see the Labour front bench doing the same thing.
	So, for instance, the first question.
	Officer Jones worked the 3 to 11pm shift.
	At 10.55, he was called to the scene of an accident where he remained until 1.30am.
	How long past his regular shift did Officer Jones work?
	Multiple choice question.
	I just want to see how she answers.
	And with that, let's move on.
	So...
	We are constantly, constantly deluged, every single day in this country, with illegal immigrants who somehow get hold of boats that are actually seaworthy enough to get across the English Channel, and when they arrive, and they don't even have to get here, they get about halfway, and our border force turns up, picks them up, and just brings them in, drops them off, and then they're our problem forever.
	These people are just here until the sun burns out.
	It's just the way things go.
	It's just normal.
	It's like the ancient Egyptians just said, oh, sea people, come on in.
	Join our cities.
	Bring about the collapse.
	Why not?
	Egypt, incidentally, was one of the few places that avoided the Bronze Age collapse.
	So we bring them into our green and pleasant land, our nice ancient, settled society in which everything is well negotiated.
	People are very familiar with their surroundings.
	It's this kind of environment that I want you to have in mind.
	In fact, it's the kind of England that Tolkien lived in that I want you to have in mind for the rest of this segment when we get to the kind of people that we're just bringing in.
	And ask, "Do these people fit in?" So anyway, the round table on Tolkien was superb.
	I want you to just remember the kind of shire that he is projecting.
	He's like, look, it's just, it's calm, it's safe, it's familial, it's a good, nice place to live, and we've lived here since time immemorial.
	So, should we have...
	I haven't got a good picture of it.
	Right, okay, we'll get to it.
	I was going to say, we'll get to it in a second.
	So just before we start, these are the small boats data, so that's about 1,000.
	900, sorry, 897 in the last week have just broken in.
	They've just broken in.
	We just take them.
	They're just here now, forever.
	They get to go and join the Shire.
	And one of the people in the mainstream pointing this out is the MP for Clacton, Nigel Farage.
	And those are, of course, the boats we know about.
	Yeah, they're just the ones we know about.
	Although that's probably the majority of it, to be fair.
	It's not like we've got the Mexican border or something.
	And so Nigel Farage did a video on this.
	And one of them, he identified one of them on TikTok.
	I'm sure he personally wasn't browsing TikTok, but...
	What is going on here?
	Yeah, yeah, let's watch.
	Nigel Farage's live TikTok reaction.
	Explains all of those unusual clips from a few years ago.
	Of him saying Big Chungus.
	There's another great one of...
	I showed you Dream Theatre's vocalists singing Big Chungus.
	It's fantastic.
	It amazes me that cameo is ever a thing and people agree.
	It's kind of annoying that Nigel Farage does it.
	I know.
	I don't know why he does it.
	I don't think he should.
	Very demeaning.
	Yeah, anyway.
	Here's why he does it.
	Yes.
	Alright, for some reason Twitter's not going to play the video if I skim to it.
	But anyway, about a minute and a half into this video, he's watching a TikTok video of a guy called Madha Passa, and Nigel Farage identifies this guy by name.
	It turns out he's an Afghan immigrant.
	Who went from Afghanistan, before the Joe Biden collabs, to Sweden.
	Of course.
	He's hanging out in Sweden.
	Naturally.
	Low crime areas of Sweden.
	Is he joining the community of hand grenade enthusiasts over there?
	You don't know, but he does have an AK-47 tattooed on his face.
	So he's interested in small arms.
	Yeah, you could say.
	He's a Second Amendment enthusiast.
	Yeah, he's just a very big Second Amendment enthusiast.
	A big reader of Locke.
	Yeah, so it's one of those things where it's like, right, I don't know why he was kicked out of Sweden, or why he's left Sweden, but he has left Sweden for some reason.
	And so he's like, right, I'm just going to go to England then, because great, what do we need?
	We need people like him.
	And Nigel Farage is raising the alarm, saying that, hang on a second.
	Do we really want what appears to be some sort of gang criminal coming here?
	And this guy started replying to Nigel Farage, weirdly enough, because he has a TikTok account, which I believe is this one.
	75,000 followers as well.
	He only had 20,000 followers at the beginning of this week.
	He's going to be an influencer soon enough.
	He's going to be bigger than Farage.
	Yeah, but you'll notice that basically all of his videos have been deleted.
	Oh, wait.
	He does have some.
	There he is.
	Trustworthy fellow.
	Yeah, with the tattoo there.
	He's a lovely chap.
	Go on, play it.
	Do it.
	I would, but he doesn't speak English.
	That doesn't stop him.
	Just as British as you or I, Carl.
	It doesn't stop him, you're right.
	But for some reason, TikTok are totally fine with this guy.
	I mean, again, he's wearing body armor and wearing a face mask, but okay.
	Seems trustworthy.
	And so anyway, he saw Nigel Farage had made a video about him.
	And he was like, oh, do that again, boy.
	Let's start some beef.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Englishman, Nigal Passa, don't talk shit about me.
	You don't know me.
	I come to England because I want marriage with your sister.
	Don't talk about me more.
	The later video is not good, my friend.
	You don't know me.
	I'm gonna come to England.
	I gonna pop pop pop mother What's the money you know, there's motherpasta Every country know me so Embarrassing Embarrassing.
	That he adopts American black culture slang.
	That was so low IQ, I couldn't believe it.
	Yes, that is incredibly low IQ. You can tell just looking into his eyes that there is nothing going on behind there.
	I don't think there's a soul.
	I don't know if he can rotate an apple, if that's what you're suggesting.
	Can you rotate an AK-47?
	I don't think he can picture an apple.
	No, I don't.
	But the point being, this is a threat.
	Actually.
	It's a crime that we're being subjected to these sorts of men coming into our country.
	Did you catch that?
	I think he said, I'm going to marry your sister.
	He did say that.
	I don't know if Nigel Farage has a sister, but she can't be a young lady.
	She might be a bit old for him.
	Yeah.
	He's into his older ladies, apparently.
	But this is just embarrassing.
	Why are we...
	I mean, of course that's a threat, and of course he's going to be the kind of person who's going to follow through on it, right?
	Let's be real.
	I'm not going to give him any charity, let's just take him at his word.
	Yeah, I think this is the kind of lunatic who might actually shoot Nigel Farage.
	You mean someone who gets an assault rifle tattooed on their face doesn't have a bishop?
	Again, the fact that men like this are allowed on our streets while we do not have access to weapons for self-defense and our women are not even allowed to carry pepper spray with them.
	If you're watching from America, yes, it's illegal for people in the UK to carry pepper spray.
	It's actually treated like a firearm in the law.
	That is a direct attack on our safety and on our sovereignty.
	It is a crime.
	Yeah.
	And so anyway, he's threatening Nigel Farage.
	Don't talk about me, blood.
	As if...
	Again, it's unbelievable that this is our country in 2024.
	And because he doesn't speak English, he put out this video that has a translator on it, but it's an AI translator.
	It's really funny.
	Hey everybody, I want to say something to Eagle Passa.
	Eagle Passa, listen my friend, I can't speak English, but I have translated.
	Listen, listen my friend.
	Hi IGEL. You don't know who I am.
	I know that someone has given you the wrong information about me, that I am dangerous and that I am on my way to England.
	But that is not true.
	I am a TikTok talker who usually broadcasts live and vlogs my everyday life and shows where I am and who I am around.
	I left Sweden to put my past behind me and start a new good life in England.
	On my way to England I ended up in a place on the border between France and England where people were armed who were moving people across the border.
	They asked me to film a video where they also wanted to appear in the video with their weapons.
	I couldn't say no as I was in a danger zone.
	I have nothing to do with people's guns.
	Don't spread wrong info about me.
	I am in England and would be happy to meet you if you want so you can see me in real life and explain to you who I am.
	The person who has given you the wrong information about me is my enemy and wants to smear my name as he has previously done in Sweden.
	He himself is abroad and spreading false rumours about people.
	Hope you understand what I am trying to explain to you.
	I love the way that Nigel Farage has got embroiled in some Swedish Afghanistan migrant gang brawl.
	Why is this guy just looking into the camera going...
	See?
	I love that.
	This is a perfect parody in some ways.
	It is genuine.
	And also the really sort of effeminate camp voice that he's chosen to represent himself as well.
	People will actually watch this stuff and deny that IQ varies across the world.
	It doesn't matter.
	It's more that this is just cringe.
	This is just weird.
	Why do we care that some low IQ fucking...
	Like, Afghan gangster from Sweden is currently like, no, no, Nigel, I'm actually a good bloke.
	Trust me, bro.
	Let's meet up when I get to England.
	Let's have a pint.
	The government would be like, no, you're not coming in.
	Obviously, you will never come in.
	Look at you.
	Look at the absolute state of you.
	It's anti-Swedish discrimination, this is.
	Obviously Swedish, just look at him, he looks like every Swede I've ever seen.
	Yeah, but the thing is, he's obviously some gangster, so in this, I'm going to try not to play parts of it actually, because he's smoking from a makeshift bong, but he also has a gun.
	Okay.
	Yeah, no, you just got the wrong impression of me, bro.
	I'm actually a totally normal guy, which is why I got the AK tattoo.
	Somebody in the replies on this, well, in the comments is saying, prison in England is no joke.
	Well, it would be for him.
	Because he'd go in and be part of a gang that runs the place.
	Yeah, prison in England is a bit of a joke.
	I saw a video recently of some Albanians that had an Albanian flag, a TV, they were smoking in the prison cell.
	Yeah.
	But the point is, TikTok's like, yep, no, if you're an illegal migrant, you can travel from Afghanistan, do whatever terrible things you've done in Sweden.
	Like you said, I want to get away from my past in Sweden and film yourself.
	Who knows?
	Who knows?
	I'm sure no more details are forthcoming.
	Film yourself going to England with a gun, with drugs, and threatening British politicians.
	And TikTok's like, yeah, you can have 75,000 followers.
	Why not?
	Why wouldn't we do that?
	What's the problem here?
	This is crazy!
	This is actually bonkers that these absolute morons are allowed to do this.
	Anyway, so GBNews has given us a write-up on this.
	They haven't got any more details, apart from the fact that he actually has arrived in the UK. Great.
	Brilliant.
	So good luck to everyone.
	I feel so enriched.
	Bump into him.
	I'm sure that you're going to have a really lovely conversation with him and hear about how he's not actually an insane gangster who has to flee for whatever his crimes is.
	Well, it won't be difficult to pick him out.
	I was about to say that same thing.
	At least you're going to recognise him.
	I was trying to find more information, more detailed, concrete information on this because why wouldn't you want that?
	But of course, he's an illegal immigrant and obviously some sort of gang member.
	It's actually kind of difficult to find anything concrete on him, so I had to go for, like, Twitter rumours.
	Apparently this guy is infamous in Sweden for making outrageous livestreams and basically conducting himself in the most uncivil manner.
	He was deported from Sweden, and now I guess France has to deal with him.
	Well, no, we have to deal with him.
	Let's just watch this.
	He's gonna break his phone doing that.
	He also looks really short.
	It's like he knocked his phone into pausing there.
	Which he may well have done.
	He looks like he's wearing a wetsuit.
	I know he's wearing those silly roadman masks that you see Londoners wear.
	Why is he a black American gangster?
	Why does he adopt that?
	I don't know.
	It's just incredibly cringe and basically demented.
	What do you think America was exporting to Afghanistan when they were over there?
	I was about to say, yeah.
	Well, I guess so.
	And they had George Floyd murals.
	That's what those 20 years in Afghanistan was for.
	People like him.
	He's integrated.
	Yeah, I mean, there's some more footage of him being very normal.
	He looks tiny.
	You're mental fucking...
	You sure showed the ground.
	Totally sane as well.
	What are they putting in Red Bull these days?
	Well, he doesn't notice.
	He's sticking his pinky out, maybe he's old.
	So I want the sweepstakes in the chat.
	Right.
	I want press A for astronaut, press B for surgeon, press C for nuclear engineer.
	Which do we think he's going to go into?
	Like, come on.
	This is, this is...
	Yeah, let's bring the chat up.
	Unbelievable.
	Obviously, this...
	Keir Starmer should just come out and go, no, we're not having illegals threaten politicians.
	He's gone.
	He's never coming in.
	If he arrives here, we'd deport instantly.
	C is winning.
	You got here by C, to be fair.
	But, uh, okay.
	Well, I look forward to him powering our homes.
	Um.
	But it's just, this sort of person obviously shouldn't be allowed in the country, and I don't know why this is going on, and yet now he's here.
	To be fair, someone in the chat said he might be a gynaecologist.
	Horrifying.
	He's not lucky.
	But anyway, Patrick Christie's noticed this, covered it on GB News, and so of course he made a video in response to Patrick Christie's.
	All people work here, he want to kill mother pusser because All people work here, he think Mother Passa come here, he stand alive, he take a video.
	Now everybody talk about this place or this gun or this people.
	So everybody want to kill Mother Passa.
	Don't talk about Mother Passa more.
	Don't talk about Mother Passa.
	Then this place is danger for me.
	Please, don't talk about me.
	Motherfucking!
	Don't talk about...
	Why is he going to tick-tock if it's so dangerous to talk about you?
	There is nothing going on in his head.
	He refers to himself in the third person.
	So anyway, Patrick Christie is going to have a conversation with him, apparently.
	I don't see why he would.
	I don't think he should.
	I think this person should be instantly deported.
	But the fact that we're controlled by Labour, not that Conservatives would have done it anyway...
	But again, some literal gangster can break in, send threats to an MP, and then he just arrives and he's given a hotel.
	He's just here.
	This is just the kind of person that we are allowing to break into this country.
	Someone's going to have to have encounters with this guy.
	And again, he is armed.
	He brought a gun.
	So, whatever.
	I'm just phenomenally disappointed in my own country.
	Yet again.
	I hope he doesn't kill someone, that's all I can say.
	I hope he doesn't kill Nigel Farage.
	He seems to think that he might.
	Anyway, let's go to the video comments.
	Possibly.
	Samson?
	We do have some super chats in the meantime.
	Yes, we do.
	Someone says he's high on meth.
	Probably.
	Yeah, yeah, probably.
	Um...
	Maybe out of place, but if Reform have backstabbed us with paying hope-not-hate and refuse to call for national deportations, we have another party that could achieve this.
	Head of Homeland?
	Yeah.
	I don't see anything going anywhere at this point, to be honest.
	Steelfang says, you are not allowed to carry for self-defense.
	When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty.
	Okay, but for the Keir Starmer government, that was from America and we don't endorse that.
	Just to be clear, we probably do have to say that.
	Amandine says, some US states require a firearm license in order to buy pepper spray, and in Massachusetts we can't even legally end slingshots.
	Can we legally own slingshots?
	I think so.
	It's fine.
	You can even own a crossbow without a license here.
	You've got to have a license to have a bow and arrow.
	Didn't Kirsten say something about this the other day?
	I don't know.
	I thought the Starmer's government said something about this.
	To be fair, if they did ban crossbows and they're just like, actually no, only bow and arrows are allowed, I would agree.
	You are legally able to own a slingshot in the UK, but it's illegal to carry a catapult in public without reasonable excuse or lawful authority.
	That means slingshot.
	What about a trebuchet?
	Excuse?
	Pardon?
	What about a trebuchet?
	I'll check.
	By reasonable excuse, I might run into an Afghan asylum seeker.
	And he's high on meth?
	Maybe.
	I mean, Eddie Hall owns a tank.
	Tanks are allowed on the road.
	And he drives it to the gym.
	Yeah, you're allowed to drive a tank.
	So I feel like me in a tank versus a horde of angry, meth-high Afghans.
	I like my chances.
	Yeah, but that's why you've got a tank.
	I would pay to see that MrBeast video.
	One Harry versus a hundred meffed up Afghans.
	It is not illegal to buy or carry a catapult.
	Okay, that's a good start.
	I'm listening.
	Okay, there we go.
	That's a random name says, honest question, am I the only one who actually understands him a little more than Kamala Harris?
	Maybe it's the caveman speech.
	Maybe?
	I could understand him perfectly fine when he was using the AI translator.
	And Threadnought says, yeah, being a gynecologist probably got kicked out of Sweden after examining one too many children.
	Yeah, probably.
	Like I said, I can't confirm any of the information about this guy because, of course, nobody knows anything.
	But it's just beyond the pale that we're just allowing these lunatics into this country.
	And he's saying now.
	You're going to be paying for him, by the way, to live somewhere.
	You're probably paying for his drugs.
	He's going to get into a...
	He's going to get in some criminal endeavor.
	And the cycle will continue.
	Do we have video comments, Harry?
	Samson, sorry.
	Yeah, Harry, where are we?
	And now for our final David Lamentation.
	David Lammy is like Indian food.
	Looks good on the menu.
	Might even look good on the plate.
	But an hour later, he gives you the hot liquid runs.
	So we've established that David Lammy gives you the runs, makes us sick, creates searing burning pain during urination, and is a serious case of painful rectal itch.
	So David Lammy is like dysentery.
	David Lammy esentery.
	Why did Scots invent the kilts?
	Because sheep can hear a zipper a mile away.
	What was that insult for?
	That's half my heritage there.
	That's why we bred deaf sheep.
	You know I love you.
	I forgot when things get tough, you leave.
	What's that supposed to mean?
	Forget it.
	You know about giving away all your dad's things to rich white folk.
	They ask you how you are and you just have to say that you're fine when you're not really fine, but you just can't get into it because they would never...
	And hopefully we do something both new and also something that we all remember loving You know, so I'm I'm old enough to remember when Tomb Raider came out, right?
	Mm-hmm And I was really unimpressed, because I was like, look, it's just triangles, bro.
	Literally just triangles.
	And everyone was like, she's a massive booze, does she though?
	Yeah, they're just geometric shapes.
	Yeah.
	And that's genuinely how I felt about it when I was like 15 or something.
	Because these days, physics have come a long way.
	Yeah.
	This is what happens when you put leftist women in the show.
	Japan's still carrying the torch.
	You know, apparently her massive breasts were a mistake.
	Oh yeah, I heard about that.
	They programmed it wrong and then somebody in the studio was like, nah, keep it.
	Good call.
	That's because it wasn't leftist women.
	It made her more of an iconic character than she would have been otherwise, let's be honest.
	Totally true.
	So there was a lot of complaining about Vance being a bad candidate because, you know, he scares the hoes away, but he is more ideologically reliable, though, which I think is more important because people were saying that Rubio might have been a better choice, but...
	I can't forget the fact that during all the Floyd riots, he was spending all of his time on Twitter complaining that, yeah, the riots are bad, but has it occurred to you that there's white people on Twitter saying mean things about Bantu rioters?
	That's a way more important thing that we need to talk about.
	I don't think we can trust him as a VP. Yeah, I was the one who was sort of sceptical about Vance, because I was like, yeah, no, I appreciate misogynist neckbeard representation, but is it wise?
	However, Kamala's campaign is tanking, and Vance had some really great events.
	I mean, the debate with that weird guy, Tim Walz.
	Tim Walz, yeah.
	Well, what Trump seems to be doing is just appointing his successor.
	Yeah.
	And the fact that he's quite ideologically aligned to Trump and is able to sort of hold his own in a similar way is good and promising.
	Yeah, and he's really good in the media interviews as well.
	He's a lot more slick than Trump comes across.
	And obviously Trump's great, he has his own style.
	Trump's got his own energy.
	But Vance is very clear, very well spoken, and he gets to the point very quickly.
	I really like how he answers questions, because you can tell that he knows his stuff.
	Yeah, he's very much on the ball.
	Right, Lord Nerevar says, Kamala seems to be the exact same type of person as Keir Starmer.
	Literally just no thoughts, head empty.
	And she's also a prosecutor, right?
	Also a lawyer.
	So it's very interesting how the global managerial regime's like, right, raise these people to the top.
	It's like, yeah, but they're terrible.
	Also evil.
	But I think that's the main qualifier that they're looking for.
	We need to get your evil scale on 1 to 10.
	If you're a 6 and above, we'll consider you.
	You'd think that people prosecuting criminals would actually be better than the people defending them, wouldn't you?
	You would, but it's very interesting how both Kamala Harris and Keir Starmer look like they can't rotate an apple in their mind's eye.
	I mean, we know that Keir Starmer doesn't have dreams.
	Or tastes, or music, or ambitions.
	It's not in his programming, yeah.
	Nothing creative.
	Does he like a film?
	No, he said he doesn't have a favourite film.
	So he doesn't enjoy art, he can't dream.
	I don't know what he does in his free time.
	I think when he sleeps, just a series of ones and zeros whizz through his head.
	No, no, no.
	Even that's too creative?
	It's just darkness until, in the morning, Kirstam arises.
	Like a vampire.
	So he gets up out of his coffin.
	But the point is, Kamala Harris is much the same, just a complete empty head.
	There's nothing in it.
	And it's the same with Trudeau and Jacinda Ardern, right?
	You can tell these are generally quite empty-headed people.
	I think when it comes to...
	Sorry.
	Well, not people with deep internal monologues.
	I think when it comes to the law, it actually doesn't help to have your own thoughts.
	It's all very procedural.
	You just sort of have to write, learn stuff.
	And if you're following precedent, just remember it and recall it.
	The human element...
	Yeah, Josh makes a good point that morals are actually a negative if you're training to be a lawyer.
	It's true.
	It's genuinely true.
	But it is interesting how we've got a kind of convergence there on both sides of the pond.
	Jimmy says, the Dems are getting labor bods in for campaign damage control.
	Might be the most retarded thing I've ever heard.
	They really don't have a clue, do they?
	No, they don't.
	And, like, again, just, Kit Starmer's less popular than Rishi Sunak at this point.
	He's had the worst first 100 days of any British Prime Minister in history.
	And I was like, we need that guy.
	And why are they asking Labour Party campaigners, who basically did nothing anyway, who can remember the Labour Party campaign, really, from the election?
	It was only a few months ago.
	Consider as well the worst hundred days.
	Winston Churchill took that office when we were literally in the middle of a war where we had just evacuated Dunkirk.
	So we were a pretty low point right then.
	Keir Starmer somehow, somehow has done one.
	Keir Starmer's having a worse hundred days than Napoleon did.
	LAUGHTER If Keir Starmer just did nothing and started dropping bombs randomly in a British city, he would at least be on par with Churchill.
	He would raise him up.
	If Keir Starmer decided to randomly invade Russia in winter, he might be hitting Napoleon.
	To be fair, if he did that to Birmingham, it would win in popularity.
	Charlie says, Weird how Kamala has been described as testy, as a good thing, but it's offensive if it's used against Michelle Obama.
	They're very bad.
	Different context.
	They're getting worse and worse with the propaganda each year.
	You know what?
	I'm actually not sure if that's true.
	The problem is that the candidate they've got to defend is getting worse and worse, right?
	Why not both?
	Well, it could be both.
	But I'm not sure they're getting worse.
	I think they're just...
	They're not Eddie Bernays anymore.
	I'm not saying they are, but they might have a basic level of competence.
	You can imagine in the writers' room, okay, what's she done now?
	Oh, God.
	She's been incompetent.
	Testy?
	Are we going to say she was testy?
	Is that too bad?
	I don't know.
	I can't work with this.
	She's too testy.
	So, anyway.
	Michelle Obama certainly is.
	Yeah, that's true.
	Jimbo says, I'm surprised they even allowed Kamala to do a Fox interview.
	I know it's the distinct lack of joy when she was asked basic questions.
	Well, they did that with Waltz as well, and both of them were completely unprepared for even the slightest pushback that they were going to get from an opposite partisan news outlet.
	Yeah, and it's only Fox.
	It's not like it's some, you know, really hardline right-winger or something.
	I was quite surprised, actually, at just how bad it was.
	I expected it to be bad, but I didn't expect it to be as bad as that.
	I think that surely, yeah, that would be amazing.
	You've got two hours, Kamala.
	To be fair, if Jo does his normal thing and she's, you know, a bit stoned, it might actually help her performance.
	And again, this is contrasted against all of the interviews that Trump and Vance do, which you'd say at least 70% of them are against people who are partisan against them, and they always come out looking great.
	Yeah.
	Vance especially.
	Arby says, Kamala reminds me of a 90s, early 2000s school bully.
	So smug, condescending and fake.
	If you've ever seen the movie Mean Girls, you'd fit it right in with those snotty high schoolers.
	What an infuriating person.
	There is a difference, though, which is that the high school bullies depicted in Mean Girls are supposed to be also the pretty girls.
	Kamala Harris wasn't terrible looking.
	Yeah, she was.
	She was.
	She was.
	She was alright.
	No, she wasn't.
	I'm not saying she was a stunner or anything, but...
	I've not seen a young camelot.
	She was not one of the pretty girls.
	Okay.
	Let's have a look.
	I'll be the tiebreaker here.
	Is that her?
	Starting off great.
	She looks like an 80s male pop star.
	She looks like Prince.
	She does, actually.
	Okay, fair enough.
	Yeah.
	She doesn't look too bad there.
	Carl's grasping at straws, folks.
	Look, we're just going to have to go back to Hillary Clinton in her 20s, I'm afraid.
	You know, I'll agree with you.
	Nah, I told you.
	You see?
	Does that mean you won?
	I win this somehow.
	LAUGHTER Andrew says, a relative of mine has explicitly praised Harris for her ability not to say anything.
	She likes that Harris dodges questions.
	Also, what?
	This is the typical Dem voter?
	Is that what's going on?
	This is clever, yeah.
	You thought you were out of it.
	No, she's slippery like an eel.
	I can't pin her down on anything.
	Maybe it is a skill.
	Maybe you're right.
	It's a skill.
	It's so comical.
	I remember when I was young, politics was quite serious, and it was really boring.
	You'd have John Major on TV or something like that.
	But he wasn't a clown.
	Even Tony Blair wasn't a clown.
	Gordon Brown wasn't a clown.
	And even David Cameron came across quite slick.
	But now, everything is just...
	Oh, man.
	I don't even know where to begin.
	On the plus side, one day I'll be dead and you guys will have to deal with this.
	Oh, cheers.
	That would be my problem.
	That's how linear time works, I'm afraid.
	Carl's embracing the boomer mindset there.
	Peter Hitchens is among us.
	The thing is that, like...
	It's just, everything is just so bad compared to how it used to be.
	Everything's so amateur compared to how it used to be.
	Everything used to be quite professional and serious and decent.
	Like, again, the guy interviewing Kamala, you can tell he's from a previous time, right?
	The sort of pre, sort of, you know, he would have been early 2000s where momentous events were happening.
	You know, okay, George Bush wasn't brilliant, but, like, he wasn't...
	He wasn't terrible.
	I don't know, George Bush Jr.
	was pretty memeable.
	Yeah, he was pretty memeable.
	Now watch this drive.
	Yeah, that was a good line.
	Also, I don't necessarily know if it's that they are less clownish overall, just that we have more access now.
	Yeah, I think it might be that as well.
	To be fair, to give George Bush credit, the glee on his face when that, I think it was an Iraqi, started throwing shoes at him.
	He actually enjoyed that.
	You've got to give him credit as well.
	It was quick.
	Anyway.
	I yearn for the days of John Cena announcing the death of Osama Bin Laden to an enthralled, proud eye of on television.
	I can't believe that happened.
	It's wonderful, yeah.
	It's amazing.
	What's the phrase he used?
	Compromise to a permanent end.
	What does that even mean?
	What does that mean, John?
	It means he ain't coming back, okay?
	That makes it sound like he was sexually assaulted to death.
	I mean, we don't know what happened after they got him.
	St.
	Benny says, people say we have an incel epidemic, but being an incel is job security, with James O'Keefe undercover reports behind all the active dating profiles on the apps.
	That's a good point.
	I mean, I've heard that 90% of dating app profiles are James O'Keefe, so...
	I tried to get him, it just didn't work.
	Yeah, to be honest with you, James McKeith does do great work.
	He does accomplish what he's doing.
	So, good on him.
	Thomas says, we can't stack shelves because it's largely a zombie economy filled with companies that would completely collapse if their salary costs went up.
	The economy is largely a product of government spending and fiat increases.
	True.
	Yeah, this is true.
	At which point I say, well, if the only way to prop up these large companies and the economy is to destroy the country through third world migration, maybe we should...
	Let them die.
	Yeah, let them die and face the consequences.
	Yes.
	Because eventually, it's all going to lead to a collapse one way or another, right?
	So why not...
	If that's what it's going to be, then have it happen sooner rather than later.
	And then you have to deal with it as well, Boomer.
	Sure, but eventually it's just going to be back to small businesses.
	Well, you either allow businesses to collapse or you get such a critical mass that the entire economic system collapses at the same time because you've propped up these failing, inefficient businesses for so long.
	So I think the former is more desirable than an entire economic collapse.
	Maybe we can do without Deliveroo.
	People can go back to the arduous labour of ringing the place and then driving to pick it up themselves.
	Or even better, cook your own food, you lazy losers.
	Maybe you can go to the local greengrocers for your food rather than a giant mega shop.
	It's often better quality as well.
	Yeah, exactly.
	The way it used to be, this used to be a nice contract.
	It's not that hard to cook.
	You can actually enjoy it.
	Put on some music, get a fine glass of red.
	I'm just describing my weekend.
	This is the bougiest thing in the world.
	It's not that bougie.
	This is the glass of red.
	Pretty bougie.
	Oh, well.
	Can't blame me for classing the place up.
	CharlieTheBeagle says, Politicians and taking responsibility.
	Name me two more foreign concepts.
	Maria says, Kamala and Boris, both using the big boy did it and ran away.
	God smite them all.
	Yeah, if only possible.
	Freybentos for every Haitian.
	Look, I'm not giving Haitians Freybentos.
	Freybentos is good.
	Like, okay, he is a significant step up to me.
	It says a large portion of our economy is actually being subsidised by a taxpayer although not directly.
	Many large car dealerships for example would go bust following the pandemic if it wasn't for the Motability scheme propping them up.
	It's worth a whole segment of its own.
	A number of people on benefit is getting massive discounts on brand new cars.
	Ridiculous.
	Yeah, it's true.
	Also looking into the council subsidies for new businesses being started by foreigners as well.
	That's a big thing as well as far as I know.
	I didn't get a goddamn council subsidy.
	It's annoying.
	You obviously didn't play up the African heritage.
	I didn't actually.
	You should've.
	Damn.
	Why do these parasites get special treatment?
	In my dystopia they'll get a, you know, a stainful sort of...
	My dystopia's a lot like V for Vendetta.
	And also, again, what he's saying there...
	No homeless people, though.
	Exactly!
	People just hanging around in their homes, watching their TVs, having a good life.
	But this is another government-created problem, because the car dealerships wouldn't have to worry about that had we not all been locked down in the first place.
	Yeah, it wasn't like an act of God or something.
	Lars says, Taxes aren't theft, it's the price you pay for living in a kleptocracy.
	Oh, sorry, we forgot.
	Yeah.
	It's unironically true.
	Boo.
	Dane Scott, he says, he's stupid, he barely speaks English, this chap, but when we're here, and it could have been anyone, really, couldn't it?
	Just to specify, I'm pretty sure he's talking about Passer here.
	Might have been Boris.
	Yeah, it could have been anyone.
	He's stupid, he barely speaks English, and he certainly doesn't consider himself English, despite feeling entitled to live in England.
	He's going to be a Labour MP within a few months.
	Oh, don't stop there.
	He's going to be in the House of Lords by the end of next year.
	He's going to be the most intelligent person on the Labour frontbench.
	Yes.
	I mean, to be honest with you, I'd probably choose him over the Labour Front Bench.
	I feel I can get things done.
	None of the Labour Front Bench are going to be able to smuggle themselves into the country.
	We asked him, mate, could you slip us some gun rights, right to self-defence?
	He'd be like, yeah, blood, I got you.
	Pop, pop, pop.
	Sorry for doing that, by the way.
	Henry said, this might be a bit out there, but are the orcas near Portugal and Gibraltar who are sinking the yachts off the coast?
	They're smart creatures.
	Could some sort of cross-species deal be struck?
	Yeah, I mean, it's literally...
	The defence of Britain is now entirely reliant on the ocean.
	We're reliant on...
	We need to start praying to Poseidon.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Poseidon to either bring up the waves or send up the creatures of the deep to sink the boats.
	That's literally the only thing that we have at this point.
	But, I mean, how much is 100 tons of fish a year, he's asking?
	It's a good question.
	So we could, like, bribe the orcas and start to say, look, you patrol the English Channel and we'll give you fish.
	It would disrupt the shipping a little bit, though, wouldn't it?
	Well, maybe.
	I mean, I don't think we're going to sink a tanker, but, you know, I think orcas are smart enough to get the message.
	It's like, give them, like, you know, like, bloodhounds and, like, hunting dogs, give them, like, a sniff of some Afghan food.
	It's like, go!
	Go!
	Sophie says, I would like to politely but firmly decline this gentleman.
	Very nice of him to ask, but face tattoos rarely make for good marriage material.
	Yeah, he looks like the kind of guy who takes no for an answer, doesn't he?
	Apparently the global price of fish, according to Fred, per metric tonne US dollars is about $9.
	Which sounds way too cheap.
	I might be misreading it, but...
	Yeah, because I was going to say, you could just get one fish.
	Oh, observation.
	It might be wholesale.
	Observation, like 8.95745.
	I might be misreading it.
	Do you see anything US dollars per metric ton?
	That would be a really cheap deal.
	But I've seen cuts of salmon that are like £10.
	This might just be like the most low-quality scum fish.
	Sure, but I'm sure the orcas aren't going to be that picky.
	Exactly.
	They're intelligent animals.
	They've got a palate.
	They're not going to be like salmon or nothing.
	In the 80s, orcas had a fashion trend where they'd wear squid on their head as a hat.
	We can't fall.
	What?
	You didn't know that?
	No.
	Yeah, so...
	In the 90s, they're like, God, that looks...
	Wait, wait.
	What about this?
	Global price of fish meal.
	It's like a perm.
	Yeah, go on.
	Let's see if this...
	Okay, this seems more appropriate.
	Per metric ton, about 1,407.
	Still cheaper than what we're paying there.
	Times that, buy a hundred.
	Oh, it's dead salmon, sorry, not squid.
	Times that, buy a hundred, that's what?
	One million four hundred thousand?
	Way cheaper than the three billion we spend a month.
	There you go.
	Look, this could be...
	Get little redcoats for them.
	Get little jackets.
	If they're good enough for SeaWorld, they're good enough for the British Navy.
	Conqueror says, is it only me that noticed during Matapasa's Patrick Christie video?
	You can hear clippers in the background, clearly working in your barbers already.
	I wonder, I was watching these videos earlier, being like, what the hell is that?
	What is that in the background?
	It didn't even occur to me that he's actually working in a bloody art of Turkish barbers.
	Of course he is.
	Of course he is.
	Do you still remember when Callum told us that he went to a barber and then realised that the guy was probably in ISIS? Getting that guy?
	Just a bit off the sides, mate.
	I mean, a very close shave you get.
	I just can't believe how pathetic our country is these days.
	Well, also, the notion that we need to defer cutting hair to foreigners as well.
	Like, we don't have the ability, we've just forgotten how hair is to be cut.
	Well, we didn't defer it, it's just that they don't pay taxes, and they get their money from drugs.
	I mean, it's just...
	Roman Observer says, quote, I tried to take over an Afghan crime gang in Sweden, but I failed.
	So now I have an open feud with a mob boss who tries to smear my totally good reputation.
	Yeah, I, honestly, the idea that this guy with the AK tattoo is just like, oh, I'm just going to leave my life behind in Sweden, set up a good life in your country.
	It's like, I would just have this guy shot.
	Oh, can we say that now that we're off YouTube?
	Maybe.
	Yeah, I'd just have him shot on the channel.
	I'd trebuchet him into a pod of orcas.
	He's obviously a criminal.
	Anyway.
	Would it be inhumane to let dolphins have their way with him?
	I mean, it's poetic justice, if anything.
	Could happen.
	That's true.
	This is for the Indus River Dolphins.
	No, no, I just want to be clear.
	That was an unconfirmed rumour.
	But I also choose to believe it.
	That is fair.
	Given historic precedent.
	If I was going to put a bet on it...
	No, I've read that one.
	Yeah, thanks God, he says, he talks about himself in the third person, you said.
	No wonder Keir likes him so much.
	Oh yeah, that's another thing that Keir Starmer does.
	He's referred to himself in the third person.
	Has he really?
	Apparently so.
	It's people around him who he's talking about.
	He does it in cabinet meetings.
	Keir Starmer doesn't like that.
	No, I'm imagining more like a small child or a baby.
	He's sat at his desk and he's hungry.
	Presses the buzzer.
	Kier hungry!
	Kier wants sandwich!
	I'm thinking more Dalek-like.
	Like, Kier Starmer does not approve.
	Maybe.
	that sort of thing XY and Z says while I'm enjoying seeing diversity hire Karen from HR implode how this bodes for Trump's odds in returning to the White House I still have my concerns we're dealing with people and organizations that are used to getting what they want and they will not let anything get in their way it will be through fortification or some other underhanded means Trump and his cabinet only have four years the bureaucrats have been there always and will still be there when he leaves see how many of these people cycle up and down as the situation changes
	I tweeted this out earlier.
	It's like, look, Trump's going to have four years and he better make bloody good use of it.
	Like, there is a lot that needs to be done.
	Four years to save America, basically.
	Yeah, basically.
	But yeah, the fortification is that they've got so many migrants in, and the fact that they've strategically positioned them around the country, and they've bused them into small towns and swing states to try and...
	Basically get these electoral college seats they wouldn't have otherwise.
	I love that Kamala Harris admitted that as well.
	It's against our electoral prospects but...
	She admitted it in an interview.
	We can see it happening and we know that they're deliberately being distributed in red states on purpose to try and swing them.
	And they're being asked to vote.
	They're writing the pamphlets in their own native languages.
	And they're also suing any state that tries to take them off the ballot.
	It's actually kind of bizarre just how far this has gone.
	But okay, so it's just beyond dispute.
	They're obviously doing this.
	They know they're going to lose otherwise.
	On that note, unfortunately we are out of time, so thank you for joining us.
	Calvin will be here in half an hour with his Common Sense Crusade, and we will be back tomorrow.
	So have a great day, and just avoid anyone who's got an AK-47 tattoo on their cheek.

▲