Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters episode 983 we're nearing that thousand for the 21st of August I'm your host Connor, joined by Carl and Bo.
Hello.
Today we'll be discussing how we shouldn't have to live with the violent consequences of mass immigration, how the media lies by omission, and to Tia Keir's record on BLM, always good to document examples.
It'd be a useful resource for you all.
Before we jump into today's stories, just a reminder, it's a Wednesday, so you get to get a double dose of me, you poor unfortunate souls.
At three o'clock, I'll be going how the Home Office and the various networks of NGOs, including Hope Not Hate, work with foreign intelligence agencies and PR firms to gaslight the public over things like the recent Southport riots.
Hopefully, should be a useful educational resource to arm yourselves accordingly.
But, without further ado, So there's been a recent spate of crime, lots of stabbings by men, even some women of no fixed abode in the UK, and you are commanded not to notice a pattern here, but what we should know is that we shouldn't have to live like this.
That this is a choice by a very permissive ...asylum and criminal justice system to allow violent criminals carte blanche to attack innocent people on British streets.
And someone who has noticed that you don't have to live like this are the Swedes.
There is a piece, Screaming, Crying, Coping, in our favourite outlet The Guardian, as of today, that is titled deliciously, From Open Hearts to Closed Borders, behind Sweden's negative net immigration figures, They're living the dream.
If progressive Sweden can do it, I think this sets a palatable model for other politicians in the UK to perhaps take note.
Because I have seen suggestions, especially following the recent civil unrest, where even YouGov registered 67% of the public thought that immigration had something to do with why people were upset, even if they condemned the rights themselves.
I've seen politicians suggesting we need a debate, or even a referendum, on mass immigration.
I don't think there's anything really left to debate here.
Like, we have the statistics, we have the case studies, we now have examples of countries implementing positive policies that we could just copy.
So you could just table ready-to-pass legislation and put the onus on the government as to why they want this state of affairs to continue.
Now, the Swedes certainly don't, so I'll just read from this Guardian article and really channel the spirit of that meme that Count Dankula responded to me this morning when I tweeted out this, which is, "'Lord Jesus, I see what you've done for other people, and I want it for me too.'" So just 10 years ago, the Prime Minister, Frederik Reinfeldt, asked Swedes to open your hearts to refugees.
Very similar to Angela Merkel's Vishoff and Das.
Now the country's migration minister is celebrating the fact that Sweden has, quote, negative net immigration, with more people thought to be leaving the country than entering for the first time in more than half a century.
Now, proviso, some of these statistics may be slightly misleading, as Josh will be covering in detail tomorrow, but there are Positive trends here because of certain policies the Swedes have passed.
So it might not be net hundreds of thousands departing, but there are certainly things that the UK could do by copying the Swedes.
Quote, the number of asylum applications is heading towards a historically low level.
Asylum-related residence permits continue to decrease, and for the first time in 50 years, Sweden has net immigration, Maria Malmö Stengard announced earlier this month.
Sweden's moderate-led government, which is supported by the quote, far-right Swedish Democrats, For some reason, informing the government of lawbreaking is deterring asylum applicants.
including plans for a snitch law that would legally require public sector workers to report what the Guardian call undocumented people.
Illegal migrants working for the government.
That just seems like a very sensible thing to do.
You are required to abide by the law and inform the government when the law is broken.
And for some reason, informing the government of lawbreaking is deterring asylum applicants.
How strange.
While the workings behind the government's conclusion have attracted speculation, including for the government agency whose figures Stengard's statement was based on, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees confirmed the trend.
It was surprising, the UNHCR said, that while global displacement ...basically just people moving away from horrible countries, was at an all-time high.
The number of people seeking asylum in Sweden was at an all-time low.
The statistics show Sweden having a net outflow of immigrants for the first time in decades.
Annika Sandlund, the UNHCR representative to the Nordic and Baltic countries, told The Guardian.
Stengard claimed, I like how the Swedes still frame it in progressive terms.
I mean, you need to be very exclusive in order to attract the right sort of people that have an affinity for the country and will actually assimilate, and not the first and second generation immigrants that I don't know go around stabbing Taylor Swift dance classes.
I always think it's weird where people come from far-flung corners of the earth, whether it be, you know, Bangladesh or Nigeria or wherever, and they think, oh I know, I'll go to Malmo!
You know, I know, I'll go to Hull.
Like, what?
What?
It honestly doesn't make any sense.
I don't know why you would... I don't know, I want to go to... I'm from Sub-Saharan Africa.
What I really want is to live in Sweden.
Have you considered the area might be improved by a Turkish barber or a vape shop?
The answer is, of course, welfare payments.
That's why they're coming.
Let's be honest, let's be realistic about this.
They're coming because they're being paid.
And if they weren't being paid, they wouldn't.
Still, the places they end up.
Like, I get the capital cities.
I want to go to Europe and you end up in Vienna.
Okay, that makes some sort of sense.
You end up in Copenhagen, that makes some sort of sense.
But, like I say, Malmo.
Or, like, Solihull.
My wife's family, some of them live in Fishguard.
And I've said this before, and yet there's refugees there.
It's like, there's no way you knew about Fishguard when you were living in Congo or Somalia.
You didn't know this place existed.
So there's obviously been a network of NGOs and government interference that has placed you there.
This isn't something you've done on your own initiative.
It's just Somalis with a, like Jim Carrey in the Truman Show, dreaming of Fiji, just a poster of Port Talbot.
I'm here all week, ladies and gentlemen.
So this Annika Sandlund at the UNHCR has said that exact thing.
- You got it, you nailed it. - I'm here all week, ladies and gentlemen.
So this Anika Sandland at the UNHCR has said that exact thing.
She's saying it might not be such a good thing for Sweden as a country to have fewer asylum seekers.
As well as playing a vital part in the workforce, What?!
We'll get to it.
Given Sweden's aging population, making immigrants feel welcome was crucial to integration.
That explains all the grenade attacks.
What we know is that successful integration, which this government wants to see, depends on people feeling welcome, including the Swedes in their own country.
Asylum seeker aid organizations and members of immigrant communities told The Guardian that fear over the government's anti-immigration policies and rhetoric was to blame, actively encouraging people to leave the country or seek asylum elsewhere.
We are contacted by people who are very worried about the restrictive regime and thinking about leaving, said one organisation.
So the messaging works?
It's working.
Just please go away?
And they go away?
Tobias Hubernet, who's a senior lecturer in intercultural studies at Karlstad University, said a reverse from net migration to net immigration would be totemic.
And he says, if it is true, it's absolutely historic because Sweden has apparently been an immigration country for such a long time, basically a hundred years?
Is he counting that sort of one stint in the 40s where they had a bit of an excursion with some Germans?
Not sure.
Was that immigration?
But no, I don't think that's true.
Yes.
He also said if this had happened five years ago there would have been uproar.
Because of the two years, you just give up and accept things.
The prospect of tightening restrictions, including on visas, citizenship and bringing relatives to the country, has made Sweden unappealing, particularly among highly educated people from countries including Somalia, Iraq and Syria.
For Swedish society, this is a pure catastrophe.
These famous Somali universities.
Yeah, fewer Somalis, Iraqis and Syrians.
What a catastrophe.
Now if anyone is persuaded by this man, his name, again, it's Hubinet.
Like an IKEA bookshelf, I suppose.
Reporting from the UK, we have plenty of Somalis, Iraqis and Syrians.
Let's see how that's working out for us.
Well, the BBC decided to report, pretty honestly, on... I know, it's rare.
Remarkable.
On the Channel Boat migrant crossings, and they've got a fantastic graph down here.
So this is the migrant crossings.
At the moment, 2024 is proving to be a record year that's tracking and trending to be higher than the record year of 2022, where it's predominantly Albanians.
Who's crossing at the moment?
Afghanistan, Iran, Turkey.
Popular holiday destination, Turkey, they're claiming asylum from.
How can you claim asylum from Turkey?
Eritrea.
Syria.
Iraq.
Vietnam.
Sudan.
Albania.
Egypt.
Egypt.
Others.
Yeah.
There might be others here.
Not just Egypt.
Yes.
None of these countries are at war.
Nope, nope, you're right.
Yeah, literally none of them are at war.
Oh, and maybe the Sudanese.
Are the Sudanese engaged in some sort of civil war?
This is a completely failed state, isn't it?
It's an endless... Like Somalia, it's just an endless... Hey, don't be racist.
You can't notice.
Cultures are equal.
Okay, maybe we'll leave Sudan out, but like... Hey, there aren't that many Sudanese, apparently, coming over there.
But, like, how do we get... Again, people go on holiday in Vietnam.
Like, none of these places are being invaded by a foreign power.
Also, how many bloody Afghan interpreters did we apparently use?
Isn't places like Vietnam and Cambodia, that's because Indians used them as slaves in this country?
Quite possibly, I don't know.
Like, when there was this, like, slave problem in Leicester, it was the Indian people...
So the stats read out as of the 12th of August, so about a week ago now, 18,467 people have crossed the channel in 2024, more than the same period over the previous four years.
I mean, are you kidding me?
Come on.
So the stats read out as of the 12th of August, so about a week ago now, 18,467 people across the channel in 2024, more than the same period over the previous four years.
In 2023 as a whole, only 29,430.
29,437 people came in small boats, a big drop from 2022 where we saw 45,755, the highest number since figures were first collected in 2018.
Since 2018, more than 130,000 people have come to the UK by breaking in via the Channel.
In the year ending March 2024, Afghans were the top nationality crossing the Channel, making up just a fifth of all small boat arrivals.
Iranians were 12% and Turkish nationals were 11%.
Slightly different from 2023, when Afghans were again the largest number of asylum seekers, 9,307.
The next biggest group, 7,400 people, came from Iran, followed by Pakistan, India and Bangladesh.
Why the hell would you not just get on a plane from those places?
Well, because if you've got a criminal record, we do actually turn you away sometimes.
Oh, do we?
If you come on a boat, you definitely won't be turned away.
Also, I think a lot of these people, dare I say, dare I suggest, Are just lying that they're Afghani.
Well, yeah.
Because the Afghan war and the invasions, if you say that, then it pulls on our heartstrings, on the people in the border forts.
Are you suggesting there's a... Those people claim they're Turkish when they're actually Syrian and things, don't they?
Are you suggesting there's some sort of, like, giant coral reef of discarded documents at the bottom of the channel?
Yeah.
Where we could authenticate whether or not these people are from Afghanistan, but mysteriously they arrive on our shores without any documentation proving that.
That would be a conspiracy theory, wouldn't it?
I never thought of that, Giant Reef.
Eventually there'll be an actual Cools Wave.
Linking France to England of discarded documents.
One of the dinghies will just be punctured like the Titanic-style iceberg by all of the passports that have built up.
And a seamount of discarded documents.
But fortunately, right, we know that diversity brings great things like food groups, sure.
I'm sure all of these people, the sort of people that the Swedes are now losing out on, are massive economic contributors, right?
We couldn't be losing out on Iraqis and Somalis, could we?
Well, let's look over to Far-Right Conspiracy Outlet, the Centre for Policy Studies, to see who's claiming social housing in the country, just as a reminder.
At the top there we've got something like 72% of Somalians in the UK are on taxpayer-funded housing.
Why are we- It's just bonkers.
It's madness, isn't it?
It's madness.
Yeah.
Why are we battery farming Somalians?
Yeah.
At the British taxpayer's expense?
Look at Africa total.
Is that more than- Is that half of them?
Other Africa?
So that's not- No, no, just below.
Just Africa total.
Oh, there?
Oh.
Yeah.
Is that half of them?
Almost half of them?
I believe that's 30-something percent.
A third of all of the Africans in Britain are being paid to live here by the taxpayer.
About a third of the Turks as well.
Why?
About a third of the Iranians.
Iraqis, those very profitable peoples, over a third as well.
Bangladeshis.
The Afghans, nearly 40%.
Why are any of these people... I'm of the opinion that someone born overseas should not be entitled to taxpayer benefits at all, ever in their life.
Maybe if they conduct some sort of act of great service, like they spent 20 years in the military or something.
I could find it in my heart to give an exception for, but this is preposterous.
Absolutely preposterous.
I think every single foreign-born national that isn't working should be deported.
Just as simple as that.
Or at least, even if they're not deported, they don't get access to the benefits system so they're incentivised to get another job.
But not even just another job, I think you don't... The reason I'm against just deporting them if they don't have a job is because we'd have to pay for their plane tickets too.
I think if you just withdraw benefits from them, then they are either forced to seek a job, or if they go and work in the dark, criminal, underground economy, then of course we have the pretext to deport them then.
It would be very unfair if you're between jobs to be deported, but if you were a criminal, of course you should be deported.
That's just the sensible thing to do.
I think that's a perfectly sensible policy.
It's also reasonable, because, you know, someone's come over and they're working and they're working very hard, blah blah.
But like, the company they're working for goes under because of various labour policies of increasing VAT or something like that, right?
That's not their fault, you know, just to grab them, deport them, it seems a bit unfair, right?
It's, you know, no one's going to agree with that.
But like, don't give them benefits, you know?
No, you don't get benefits.
You're here to work for our benefit, and yours, your mutual benefit, and ours, you know?
We're not going to just give you a free house just because you come from Somalia.
What are you talking about?
It's madness.
It seems the Swedes have wised up to that, and so it just seems like a perfectly sensible policy.
There's a quick thing as well.
I would find it baffling if I moved to, I don't know, let's just choose Ghana.
And I was over there working and I was like, okay, you know, I've lost my job.
And the Ghanaian state was like, okay, we'll give you a house.
Will you?
I wouldn't believe my luck.
And here's some benefits so you don't go hungry.
And we just expect at some point you might get a job.
How long is this for?
Well, it's indefinite, obviously.
It's indefinitely allowing you to live in Ghana, make sure you're fed, and you've got your bills paid for.
And would I spend all my day at the beach in Ghana?
I might, actually.
You know, why would I do anything?
What was, why would I do any, like, contribute to the economy?
Anyway.
Just note that the nation that's not on here, a nation with very low immigration, very high productivity, the Japanese, there's like no Japanese people claiming social housing in Britain.
Curious how we might be able to predict the different populations with different cultures from different parts of the world.
Might be better neighbors, but maybe maybe it's just the British system that's causing this maybe it's just the British system that is warping the productivity of erstwhile Ingenuitive Somalis and Iraqis... Sorry, just a quick one.
Can I point out that there are more Germans than Kenyans on social housing?
How is that possible?
You lazy Germans!
Get to work!
How can you live with yourselves?
Well, speaking of a sort of Germanic-slash-Nordic country, we do have stats from the Danes, because of course, the Home Office, the Crown Prosecution Service, the Ministry of Justice, the Department for Work and Pensions, they don't like publishing hate facts.
It's not even that, they don't keep them.
They do keep them.
I bet loads of those Germans are actually Syrians as well.
They just come from Germany.
They say they're German.
You recount them as German.
They're not German.
German by documentation.
I covered it the other day.
When you make requests for ethnic breakdowns of things, they just apparently say we don't keep those.
Oh no, they do keep them.
Neil O'Brien has confirmed they do keep them.
Oh really?
Because GB News are even often too paid to compile and release the data, and they said no, it's still too expensive.
What do you mean it's still too expensive?
How can it be too expensive if someone else is paying for it?
We're paying for all the crimes being actually committed, so, you know, having data on them.
If we're going to pay for the compiling of the statistics, that's not too expensive for you.
Yes, it would be cheaper than allowing the crimes to take place, for example.
Sending Google Docs and PDFs, very expensive.
Very expensive game, that.
Quite.
Even when someone else is paying for it.
Again, the very concept of it being too expensive doesn't make sense if someone else is paying for it.
Anyway, sorry.
So we might have been able to predict that Somalians, Iraqis, Turks and the like, Afghans, are not that productive because if you look at the patterns of behaviour for both first and second generation immigrants from those countries, in Denmark and in the Netherlands as well, as I covered on my show last week, they are never, as an aggregate group, net taxpayers across their lifetime.
Only Westerners are.
Only, yeah, Westerners... Westerners and Danes.
Westerners, Japanese, Anglosphere, for the Netherlands, they contribute about a billion plus in taxes every year, and the Menapt countries, North and Sub-Saharan Africa, Middle East, Pakistan, Turkey... I mean, look at them, they never even get to the positive contribution.
They're minus 16 billion every single year in the Netherlands.
Even in the height of their productive working lives they don't even get to a net negative, a net zero.
And that's for the children of immigrants also born in the country as well.
Amazing.
That accounts for it.
So integration doesn't really work.
The other thing as well that we should take note of is the crime rates.
Now the Danes keep detailed statistics on this and as far as I can read, here we go, They might be slightly over-represented in rape, homicide, assault and theft.
Just minorly.
Overall, Western immigrants, so Japanese, Anglosphere and Western Europe, have violent crime convictions 20% lower than that of native Danes, whereas non-Western immigrants have 3.5 times higher conviction rates than natives.
So, they might be a bit more stabby.
And perhaps we could extrapolate from this trend something from the UK when we see a steady stream of articles that I covered last Wednesday.
But we have more.
A man has been charged with the murder of a woman and sex offence on her body in Dartford.
That's not far from me.
Good old Dartford name.
Ernestus Yuska.
He's 20, from Dartford apparently, from nowhere else but Dartford.
Will appear in court on Monday.
Happens to hold like a Ghanian passport or something, right?
That sounds... Eastern European, probably?
Something like that?
It was a Portuguese colony that he was from, I'm pretty sure I looked into this one.
Oh really?
I think it was this one, correct me if I'm wrong.
But he came to Britain via Portugal.
And had from, you know, some South American country that Portugal had colonised and then, you know, linked like that.
I think.
I think that's this one.
Right.
There was, there was, are you not thinking of the Colombian national who chopped up the two gay men in Bristol who just so happened to not look Colombian?
I think it's this guy.
Okay, there's another one.
Manchester.
We don't have the name of the man who has been arrested yet, but apparently he's known to the family and the family, they don't sound native British.
God rest them.
A care worker killed in a triple stabbing in Manchester that left her daughter and husband in critical condition has been described as a mother to everyone.
She's pictured here.
Bertha O'Binham, 43.
She died after an attack at the family home in Gorton.
Unless this was a white supremacist who popped around for tea and biscuits.
64 in-hospital life-threatening injuries.
We obviously pray for their recovery.
Greater Manchester Police said a 22-year-old man had been arrested, and early indications were that he was known to the victims and the stabbing was being treated as an isolated incident.
Unless this was a white supremacist who popped around for tea and biscuits, I think it's probably another act of diverse crime, but But there you go.
It's probably just a man that's going to be cracked down on.
Here's the next one.
The Crawley Station car park stabbing.
I didn't even hear about this.
Oh, this was a young woman stabbed to death in Crawley Station car park by a man.
This was about two days ago now.
Two days ago.
Here's another one of those men of No Fixed Abode.
It's a very violent country, No Fixed Abode.
The one that perpetrated the Parnell Square stabbing and the Leicester Square stabbing recently.
Jason Pascal Flore, 26, charged with murder and remanded to appear at Crawley Magistrates Court on Tuesday the 20th of August.
There's another one as well, this time a woman!
This is mixing it up a bit.
Murdered a 72-year-old landlord and killed his cat for some reason.
Very lovely.
Thanks, Habiba Naveed.
Yeah, Habiba Naveed, British woman, 34, charged with the murder of Christopher Brown, 72, and causing unnecessary suffering to protected animal on August the 14th.
This was in Lewisham, again near me, and his cat called Snow had been stabbed in the neck and was also found dead.
See, again, you just don't understand these people.
You don't understand what's going through their minds.
Okay, like, you know, let's say a British person decides to murder a landlord.
Do they then stab the cat in the neck?
It's incomprehensible.
You know when people say, if you ever complain about foreign enclaves in our country and they say, oh, because Britain don't go to Spain and have foreign enclaves and stuff like that.
It's like, Can you think, do British people abroad ever do ridiculously violent crimes like this?
Like, ever.
Like, kind of ever.
And the thing is... Like the Japanese.
You don't get a Japanese enclave in America and they do loads and loads of rapes and murders.
We've had loads of Hongkongers recently, and as Constantine pointed out, there are no Hongkongese grooming gangs.
Isn't that curious?
But also, I'm actually... I don't care.
Deport them if you don't want them there.
You know, don't care.
It should be your prerogative, Spain.
Exactly.
It's totally the Spanish prerogative.
They don't want the English living there.
They can just go, no, you're English, get out.
You know, that's fine.
And we should have that same ability.
When was the last time an English expat blew anything up abroad?
I've never heard of it.
Zunu wars?
Oh right, yeah.
Oh yeah, there is the ever-present spectre of colonialism, of course.
In Spain!
Sorry, forgetting about that.
Yeah, but also, well actually, yeah, but there's a very different type of colonialism.
Wasn't the British there, was it?
I do find it very funny, the sort of semantic game they play of where immigration is good, it's simultaneously built Britain, but we need more immigration to rebuild Britain after the Second World War, and also to improve our food.
But, if you start complaining about it, it's not only a good thing, it's also revenge.
So it's also somehow a bad thing.
Yeah, they're being inflicted upon you.
Yeah, I feel the second one might be more accurate.
Diversity built Britain, and Britain has had millions of black people since the Roman era, but yet also, as well, all of our history is evil and racist at the same time.
Diversity built the British Empire.
Who did it, really?
They were so busy building it, they couldn't build their own.
Clearly.
It really absolves us of any guilt of it.
No, no, diversity built Britain.
I agree, the Scottish were black.
Speaking of someone who's going to get deported, this was one I saw you tweet out.
Tweet out, Asylum seeker jailed for the attempted murder after stabbing his own solicitor 71 in the chest.
See, I saw James O'Brien's face then and got excited.
Someone's getting deported.
Great. - Yeah.
This man's name is Ezias Nguzi, he's from Eritrea, the same constituency who were lightsaber dueling with sticks on Camberwell Road for some reason.
Many of the 21-7 bombers were Eritrean by the way, just out of interest.
Interesting.
Very interesting.
He stabbed his solicitor, Mohamed Soaib, 71, in the chest and on the hand on September the 21st, 2022.
Ngozi was charged and arrested, then initially denied a charge of attempted murder, as well as a number of other charges, including two of assault to injury, but then pleaded guilty after Mr. Soaib testified in court.
He was sentenced to 11 years and 8 months in prison on Tuesday.
Why 11 years?
Why not just send him back?
Mr. Shaib had a very strange reaction to this, right?
So he said he thought he was going to die after the attack.
The blood was coming out of my chest, he told STV.
It was like a shower of blood.
He also said he felt sorry for Ngozi because he has completed five years of residency being an asylum seeker for Eritrea.
He would have been granted permanent residence.
This incident has done a lot of damage to him as well.
Why would you have wanted him to stay here after stabbing you?
Do you just hate the native population of the country that you would like to inflict murderous Eritreans on us?
Is he being paid by the government to get these people residency?
I would be fascinated to find out if he was one of the recipients of the sort of legal aid style stuff.
Yeah, because he might be like, well look, you know, this is... It's that classic thing, it really is insanity, like the London Bridge, the parents of a couple of the London Bridge victims, you know, they can trot them out and immediately say, oh it's really terrible that my son or something has been murdered, but...
Globalism is more important.
That's the Home Office's propaganda unit.
Possibly strong-arming them, allegedly, of course.
But it is also vile.
Yes.
It's even madness, yeah, to allow yourself to be manipulated.
In the London Bridge Attacker, one of the young men who was killed, he was like, you know, he wanted to work with refugees because he'd bought into all the propaganda that, oh, they're just poor oppressed people fleeing persecution.
He brought the guy that stabbed him as an example of rehabilitating terrorists.
Yeah, and it's just like... Man, they're... They're erotic idgits, black mirrors.
And he was, what, 23, something like that?
He was a Cambridge PhD student, so around that age.
He was quite young.
And so it's just like, God, the amount of young people who are just getting absolutely sold up the river here, and actually murdered, brutally murdered, in service of this bizarre lie, it's just harrowing.
Yeah, it's curiously not in Sweden.
Sweden have decided to stop.
Sweden have had lots of other problems.
Yeah, they have, yeah.
Grenade attack capital of the world.
Mainly from second generation immigrants.
Again, curious how integration doesn't work.
So maybe, maybe your prediction that the Labour Party I'm not saying they'll put the woke away.
I think that what they'll do is they'll reduce illegal immigration, or at least it looks like they might have reduced illegal immigration, just because Keir Starmer is such an insanely hardline person when it comes to the letter of the law.
Legal migration I think they'll continue to increase.
Yeah, so Yvette Cooper has come out this morning and said to deal with this mass problem.
She's going to remove 14,000 migrants from the UK.
It's a good start.
When they do it, how many times do we have to be fooled by this?
How many times does the Tory pull this trick?
We're going to do this, we're going to do that, nothing ever happens.
Yes.
I did have just big doubt written in my script, yeah.
But she's apparently pledging to return Albanian, Iraqi, Turkish, Nigerian and Pakistani nationals.
So we'll be hearing lots about how we will be losing Doctors, lawyers and engineers from those nations, just as the Swedes are.
Again, excuse me if I don't think this is going to happen, and I would just urge any opposing politicians who think that we still need a debate or referendum on this, there's nothing more to be discussed.
Instead, just take a lead from Sweden and just table the legislation to ensure we have net emigration.
Judge these people by what they do, not what they say.
I just like the very firm, nothing-ever-happens line you've taken on there.
The nothing-ever-happens crew in the chat will be very happy with that, I think.
Not nothing-ever-happens in general, but on that front, particularly on that front.
Shall we do the rumble chat?
Binary Surf says, I know you're covering today, but you should do more on the different lying biomission techniques the media uses, and there are many.
PS Dom was released after a no-knock arrest, and a legal battle just started.
Well, good luck to him.
They're importing more client voters and battery farming them.
Connor is correct.
Think chicken farming, but with humans in new-build battery cages and votes instead of eggs.
Correct.
And hey, Carl, your chat with Nemo yesterday was great.
It really was.
The EMC shenanigans were really funny.
Consider doing them more often.
Well, thank you.
I might.
Take it away Bo!
So I thought we could just talk a little bit about the mainstream media's reaction to the riots now they've been over for a couple of weeks, three weeks or so.
I'm really sorry to begin this by laughing but I like that they've got Captain Far Right here.
Like a superhero of the far right.
I just think there's the one man dressed as a Union Jack for pride.
It's the fact that he's got a Union Jack hockey mask and cloak.
Like, okay, Captain Far Right.
I think that mask's kind of cool.
The Marvelisation of the Far Right is in progress.
Halfway between Jason and, well, anyway.
Captain Chaos from Cannibal Rum.
So yeah, just talk about what the mainstream, the corporate mainstream media anyway, are sort of saying.
So I've picked out this one article from the BBC, not because there's anything particularly special about it, just because I thought it was sort of fairly indicative, just a fairly good example of what they're saying.
So the guy, if you want to scroll down a bit, scroll down a bit, Daniel DeSimone, I've not heard of him before but anyway, so yeah the take on it is to say, is to quickly mention the three little girls who get murdered and then quickly move on to what really matters, which is the far right.
I mean this is like a 2,000 word essay.
And they get one paragraph, one sentence, three paragraphs in.
Quickly mention that horror did happen and then move on to the real issue, the extreme and the far right.
He makes a distinction in his mind between extreme right and far right.
Seized upon by extremists who exploited the tragedy to Tragedy as if it was a natural disaster.
Yeah.
And not something avoidable perpetrated by a second generation migrant.
It's just a landslide.
Some people got hit by lightning.
What a tragedy.
You can never foresee or do anything about it.
So overall, This article, I think it's a good example because it just hits all the notes.
Right, right.
All the main notes.
So, immigration is not mentioned once.
Oh, really?
Yeah, no, no, no mention of that.
No mention of what is actually causing people, working class people to be, er, yeah, right, yeah, no mentions, no mention of that.
Er, there's just, there's no mention of the actual causes of why there might be either extreme or far right or nationalism or, or any sort of in-group preference.
No mention of why that's a thing.
None.
So he said that it was a result of a series of he calls them violent flash mobs I've not heard that kind of phrase before that was quite interesting to me violent flash mobs spanning over several days with racial and religious hatred as the central animating motive just on just on the far right side of the equation doesn't mention anything actually there is one sentence further down that mentions Um, violence on the other side.
But one sentence out of, as you say, a whole essay.
This is an in-depth thing for the BBC, it's quite a long article.
Wouldn't flush mobs insinuate that these were not organised ahead of time and they were spontaneous?
So, how is there a sort of central far-right nexus causing them to spring up across the country?
Well, this is how the far-right has changed, isn't it?
The far-right is now the organic response of the native British people.
That's one of the things this guy laments.
Sort of, in a way, anyway.
In the olden days, you had the National Front and the BNP or something, where they had leaders and organisations.
Now it's just like a headless beast, which is much more scary, according to him.
Well, it kind of is, because then it could strike at any time, right?
You can't predict it in advance.
You know, the sort of Nick Griffin types or whatever, who would go out and make a big spectacle.
Okay, we can use them as the scapegoat.
All of the sins of the society can get put on that person's back.
He can get cast out into the wilderness.
No, he's just evil and everyone knows he's the evil guy.
But without those characters, what are you going to do?
Stigmatise our entire society?
And everyone in it?
Yeah, that's exactly what they did.
But that's not going to have the same sort of...
Corralling effect, right?
That's not going to partition off the bad people into the bad area where they never have to actually integrate and engage with anything else.
This is going to make the whole thing an unstable, sort of, potentially explosive environment.
Yeah, they created it, yeah.
Because, of course, we've got no Hitler figure, no Mosley figure even.
The closest thing to it is Nigel Tommy, right?
And they're just not... Just to be clear...
There isn't a single politician in this entire country that encouraged that righting.
Every single one of them was on the other side of it.
Tommy, Farage, Tice, everyone.
No one was like, literally everyone.
Every Conservative, every Lib Dem, every Labour, every Reform MP was like, don't go out and do this.
Okay, well then, who are you going to point the finger of blame at?
Yeah, exactly.
The closest thing to any sort of populist or right-leaning leader is Farage or Tommy, and yeah, they're both on this.
Complete milquetoast.
Yeah, and it's the right take as well.
I agree.
Give them what they want.
No one said go out and do this.
And the ones that did are in jail at the moment.
According to this shill, according to this professional hack, it was a racial and religious hatred was a central animating motive from our side of it all.
He said, but the recent disorder, it's more complex.
And has laid bare the anarchy of modern right-wing extremism as well as the extent of its reach.
Yeah, it's just the working-class English that are pissed off of being displaced from their own ancestral homeland.
Decades of being raped and murdered and displaced and gaslit about it.
That's very interesting.
It's laid by the anarchy and the extent of the... Yeah, no, it's the entire society is becoming politicised against immigration because of what it's done to the society.
It doesn't require leaders.
This is an organic, natural, and that's what the BBC are admitting.
Yeah, yeah, basically.
There was a quote, lack of cohesion makes the situation more unpredictable and dangerous.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah, I agree.
I think it does.
Which is also one of the main complaints we've had about mass immigration, right?
A lack of cohesion has made everything about... I mean, this is why there's literally every day there's a new stabbing.
Every single day.
It's just somewhere out there in the wilderness where some migrant is upset about something and then stabs someone.
It's like, right, okay.
Could be anyone, could be for any reason.
You've got no, like if it was all like one community, you could learn the patterns of that community.
But right, okay, well, you know, with the Muslims, like with the Batley school teacher, well he's just gonna go into hiding, we'll never show a picture of Muhammad again.
At least it's predictable, we could do something about that.
But why did this person from Africa murder their bloody lamb?
And his cat?
You know, like, what the hell are we supposed to do with this kind of random violence?
You know, there's no predictability about it, you can't do anything.
So he's completely right, and this is, okay, now you're getting it on the other side now.
So there's this idea, you know, Dr Parveni talks about, that populism is, there's no such thing that, um... I've gotten to walk back a bit.
Well, hell.
So, I mean, always, yeah, a mob doesn't just spontaneously form a cabinet and an agenda and all that, so that's fair enough.
However, there is such a thing as actual grassroots spontaneous uprisings.
One example, I've been re-listening to Mike Duncan's Revolutions podcast about the French Revolution.
There's one story in that where they forced the King Louis to leave Versailles and he never returned.
That was completely spontaneous.
The wives of Paris were completely fed up with not having enough money to buy bread.
So they just completely organically, with no leadership of their own, marched down to Versailles Or like 12,000 of them or whatever, marched in, brushed the guard aside, insisted the king leave Versailles and come back to Paris where they can keep their eye on him.
It's only one small element within a much bigger narrative and everything, but... The Karens of Paris.
Right, yeah.
I know it's only one small thing, but of course the French Revolution did have largely middle-class leaders and all that sort of thing.
However, in small pockets, real populism can move things.
I think the asterisk on the populist illusion is that, uh, mass disorganized crowds do not accomplish anything politically.
The difference between politically and mob is the willingness to use violence, which of course we all disavow.
Yeah, sure.
Yes.
I mean, I think they do move the needle politically.
Like, not necessarily in any, well, not in any organized way by definition, but they can move that needle.
They can make, the way I'm looking at it, it's like, Kind of like a series of tumbling blocks that have fallen down a hill, right?
And a riot can move one of those blocks to allow other blocks to continue to move, so things can move, but they still go in the direction in which things are heading already.
For example, Keir Starmer is like, right, we're just gonna have crackdowns, we're gonna have all of this stuff.
He was gonna do things like this anyway, you know, but they were...
Other blocks in the way that prevented it, that the riots themselves have just shoved out of the way, so now things are going to continue tumbling down.
So I think you are right, they do make things move, but they aren't policy changes to rewrite the ship of state or anything like that.
Or if you look at maybe the poll tax riots under Thatcher, didn't really have, as far as I'm aware, you could put someone who knows about it in detail and might disagree with me, but any sort of massive organised leadership, that got the Thatcher government to 180 that policy.
Anyway, I don't want to dwell on that too much.
I just want to say about this article, I don't want to dwell on it too long, because I want to make a broader point, but it hits all the highlights.
It says, it mentions Tommy Robinson, quote, real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon.
They love that, don't they?
They love doing that.
It's not a proper corporate mainstream media article unless any reference to Tommy.
He mentioned that his real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon.
Why are they deadnaming him?
I don't know why they're obsessed with him.
The difference here, I tend to use extreme right and far right for... Right, so far right, which was normally reserved for Nazis and fascists, well, that can't be an acceptable thing now because these people are not ideological, right?
They don't have any particular leadership.
None of them seem to have any ties to any actual far-right organizations.
So we need a new name for those people, which is the extreme right now.
So far-right is just the normal working classes who are upset with what's happening, and the extreme right are the ideological actors now.
This hack's just making it up as he goes along.
Yeah, he's totally making it up.
Next, most normal people will be extreme right and he'll make up hyper right or something.
It doesn't make any sense.
Mega right.
Ultra mega right, yeah.
The ultra uber mega right, yeah.
Okay, so of course it's just a Southport tragedy, which I do find really annoying when I say it.
Had to have a dig at PA, even though PA's not really involved in any of this.
It's the same port of Trosser.
Had to just have a little dig at PA, of course you have.
People that got arrested had attended PA events.
Again, it's just hitting all the highlights.
With people like this, I wonder whether they've got an editor that says, you have to hit all that, because he has a dig at Elon as well, and Twitter, towards the bottom.
You know, the real problem, not the murder of these little girls, but the real problem, the fact that Elon's got a free speech platform, You know, quickly mention the Finsbury Park van attack dude.
You know, throw that in there.
Almost in the same breath as PA and Elon.
Just throw that in there.
Again, I wonder if, like, you've got an editor saying, I want you to hit all these notes.
I don't think they need to.
I think this guy is... Yeah, but whether people like this, true believers, completely brainwashed.
I mean, look, had a quick look at his Twitter.
He's still going on about Stephen Lawrence endlessly.
So, out of his mind, completely out of his mind ideologue.
Anyway, I don't want to go on about this dude, he's a nobody.
But yeah, so this article, like loads of others in the corporate mainstream media, it's just a complete, you know, deliberate lack of understanding, a deliberate failure to Talk about any of the actual issues of what caused these people to riot.
And the thing is, you can tell that they know there must be other issues, right?
Because buried deep in this, and this is the best line, most of those who took part in the disorder had no known links to the extreme or far right.
Right.
So they're just regular people who are outraged by something that is the accumulation of decades of government policy over multiple Labour and Conservative governments, and they are now just reaching the boiling point where they're like, look, we just can't have our children stabbed on such a regular occasion, you know, on such a normal thing.
You know, going to a dance class and eight of them got stabbed.
And buried deep in this article, it's like, well, they're not linked to the far right.
Then what is this about?
Well this is Douglas Murray's point in his recent chat to Jordan Peterson.
It's that for decades the indigenous working class of Britain has been besieged by migration they did not ask for and any time they make their concerns expressed at the ballot box every five years of the Brexit referendum it's willfully ignored by the political class And so is it just the sole property of well-educated newspapermen with columns like Douglas Murray who went to Oxbridge to complain about this when the people on the ground that live with it have absolutely no recourse?
Are we surprised, not that we condone it, that they turn to violence in the end?
This is what's happening.
It's an organic groundswell that did not need top-down direction because these are just the White working class who refuse to have their identity liquidated by unilateral multiculturalism.
And he, he's trying to put it back in the box of, only we the educated classes can talk about this and we can put politics back on rails again.
But this, this admission that they've got no links to the extreme or far right is just the most precious thing from this.
It's like, no, yeah, so your entire thing, oh the new far right, they're not far right.
You're just admitting they're not far right.
The ideological right or whatever.
But also, almost in the same breath, mention that Neil Basu, one of our finest police officers, ex-police officers, said that they probably are connected with terrorism.
Prove it!
Great quote from Neil Basu, brilliant.
So this is a classic example of lying by omission.
Just by simply failing to talk about the real issue.
And, I mean, that's what, we've played, if you could click on the link.
I mean, that's the measure of the man.
Sangeeta.
Happy to... Can I just go back?
Because you are, this is exactly, exactly right.
Directly after that bit.
There were a range of people involved, from people in their late 60s to children, with a range of different motivations.
Some were opportunistic criminals who took part in looting and stealing, others were drunk and joined in after the chaos had started.
But why did the chaos start?
Like, all of this, like they've got a range of motivations, would you like to detail some of those motivations?
Yeah, that'd be nice.
That'd be real journalism, wouldn't it?
Exactly, that would be a real exploration.
I mean, this is like a deep dive, a BBC deep dive.
So this is meant to be, you know, intellectual, credible, useful.
That we've all paid for, by the way.
About as deep as a teaspoon.
Exactly.
And it's all very, very deliberate and cynical.
And it's what the corporate mainstream media do.
It's almost that the whole thing is a type of PSYOP.
It's going entirely a bit far to say that, but I don't think particularly, because if you look at the mainstream media, in all sorts of ways they toe the line of The Deep State, whatever you want to call it, the intelligence services.
There's so many examples of it, you know, from wars and foreign policy.
Whenever a foreign policy comes out, you'll notice that CNN or BBC, they're just completely on board, nearly always, with that foreign policy.
Or if you look at the way they deal with the COVID response or something.
There's like a line that they're all parroting.
You know when you see, Dias is very good on this, quite often you see loads and dozens of media outlets not only with the same line but using the same tone of phrase, the exact same word.
Like one recently was that Vance was weird.
Do you remember that?
Or the Kamala campaign is joyful, full of joy or something.
They're all saying the same word.
The recent counter-protest when they ginned up All of the, you know, hope not hate types.
And they have the same thing, Britain United, on the front of the papers.
Who are those guys?
Communists and foreigners?
This is the exact subject of my show later.
You're saying about foreign policy and the like.
It turns out that the guy that headed up RICU, which is the Public Perception of Terror Manipulation Unit within the Home Office that Theresa May started in 2011, The guy that headed that up was previously working for a large PR campaign from Baghdad on behalf of the Blair government to promote the legitimacy of the Iraq war and Alastair Campbell's successor then became the head of that.
So they're literally gaslight- and this is the same unit that ran all of the public perception around COVID.
The government, the cabinet office, spent millions on advertising in newspapers.
Are they going to bite the hand that feeds them if the government's subsidizing you?
No.
I mean I don't think it's too far to say it is a type of psychological warfare operations, very very deliberately.
I mean if you look at, and this is well documented, so what I'm going to say isn't conspiracy theory.
If you look at Operation Mockingbird from America, from way back when, I wrote an article a while ago, back in 2023, that we still live in the shadow of Mockingbird.
Now anyone who doesn't know what Operation Mockingbird was, it was an OSS or CIA, straight from Allen Dulles, to manipulate the media.
Because he had, he worked for a law firm, but also had lots and lots of connections with publishing.
And at some point he realised, well we need to sort of standardise this.
Whenever the CIA wants to put out an article, instead of just asking one of my friends to write an article and get the publisher to publish it, the editor to publish it, let's actually create things.
So, things like CBS.
CBS is a completely Intelligence Services created thing.
The New York Post, the Washington Post, you know, Newsweek, Time Magazine.
They're all... they're not all created by the Intelligence Service, but they...
The New York Post?
Time Magazine?
It's a few years old, isn't it?
Oh, OK, sorry, yeah, well, it's got, er, what's the word?
Co-opted?
Co-opted, yeah, sorry.
Because a lot of them, I think, are working very willingly.
OK, so CBS, for example, but, like, Time Magazine, for an example, they got hold of the Zebruda film.
Right.
And kept it in their safe.
Because they were told to.
By the CIA.
Was it NBC who crushed the Epstein expose?
Amy Rohrbach?
It would be co-opted because NBC predates the war but yeah they're co-opted.
Yeah.
Right?
So like the BBC is much older than the Five Eyes intelligence services.
America, Canada, Britain, Australia and New Zealand.
Their intelligence services are sort of one thing.
And so their operations to manipulate the media, if you noticed how in lockstep America, Canada, Britain and Australia were on COVID for example, it's because they get their orders from the exact same place.
And you know, so Operation Mockingbird in the 70s, there were the church hearings and David Rockefeller had a commission to look into it.
Like wait, are the CIA manipulating all of our news media more or less?
They found out they sort of were, at least to an extent.
And they said oh but we'll stop doing it now.
So Mockingbird ended at some point in the 70s.
Of course it didn't.
I mean the example I used there is if you remember that loads and loads of heads and ex-heads of intelligence, people like Leon Panetta, John Brennan, Mike Hayden, you know the list of endless people saying no Trump is a is a Russian agent.
Yeah.
And it's just not.
It went absolutely nowhere.
You know like the news is more fake than a WWE storyline.
The joke about kayfabe, it's more fake.
At least in WWF, WWE storylines, sometimes there's someone who's really died and someone's really crying about it.
You know?
Like when Eddie Guerrero died and, um, anyway.
Sometimes it's quite real in wrestling.
This is complete, it's complete fake.
I mean, if you look at the Hunter Biden thing, the Burisma thing, the way things get memory hold.
The Hunter Biden laptop, when they tried to claim it as Russian disinformation and then it's just arbitrarily removed from Twitter.
Yeah.
That was an active campaign and it was going to have been run by the services, the intelligence services under Biden to protect Biden.
Well there were, there were, was it 60 different intelligence agency members who signed a letter saying it was Russian... Yeah, that's what that open letter was.
Yeah, that's exactly what I opened this article with.
And the way sometimes they flip something, like Biden is as sharp as a tack in private.
Oh no, he's not competent enough to be president.
They think we're stupid or something.
I mean, it's so obvious.
Sadly, lots of people have bought it.
I think they're bought into the power of their own hyper-reality.
As in, if we declare it and have everyone declare it, then it becomes true because we keep repeating it.
But the point is, this lies by omission is sort of the tip of the iceberg, in a way.
When you look at news, corporate news, realise that you are watching something that is essentially scripted.
It is very much like a script.
When you think of it like that, rather than they're bringing you just the news, just what's happening in the world.
No, no, no, you're being presented with a choreographed narrative.
You know, a good way to think about it is the same way that serials and sitcoms work.
It's like you're going to begin from a position of conflict, but eventually you're going to arrive back at the status quo by the end of the episode, right?
And that's what all of corporate news is designed to do.
Make you arrive back at the status quo to normalise, to therapeutise, Whatever has happened we're back on the rails and we're carrying on to the next day until the next event and then by the end of that episode we'll be back on the same rails.
So this is what's happening to bring it back to the story.
This is what's happening with the narrative around the riots that happened a few weeks ago is that there's a there's a line the deep state the intelligence services have got a line which is it's just all far right.
and then you know whether someone like this Daniel DeSimone is like an actual intelligence officer no I wouldn't it's not it's not like Mariana Springs not that Strong accusation.
Well yeah, allegedly.
I don't know if she is or... Anyway, moving on from that.
I know she's a liar though, so... Oh yeah, certainly.
That's certainly a documented liar, beyond all doubt.
So they'll take him and they'll just say, you know, he's just an ideologue.
Get him to write an article that hits all the main notes and our platform, the BBC, will put it out.
And that's the narrative, that's the story.
And we're supposed to just gobble it all up and not question any of it.
I hate to do this.
Well, not anymore.
In the interest of time.
Yeah, well I've pretty much brought it to an end.
One last thing I'll say is, just specifically on the BBC, which should absolutely be defunded.
because it's an enemy is our enemy in many many ways I wrote this article I think it was among the first ones I wrote we need to talk about auntie well I just talk I just go on a scree against the BBC and they should be defunded because they're filth and they just pump anti anti-british anti-western anti-white propaganda into your into your living room all day every day so don't trust them and certainly don't give them a penny
Right.
So, I thought it would be worth having... Is there any rumble, Wren?
Oh, there are, but we're running out of time.
I thought it would be worth talking about the difference in response that Keir Starmer has had to the latest riots because of the Southport stabbings, and the response he had to the Black Lives Matter riots.
Because I think that these are not necessarily parallel, but the... I mean, you can definitely argue it.
From their perspective, they believe that George Floyd was murdered by a police officer, Derek Chauvin, and therefore these international riots have happened, so they, the Black Lives Matter protesters in Britain, feel as strongly connected to George Floyd, apparently, as the people in the North West have.
They feel as strongly connected to the hymn as they did to the children who were stabbed in Southport.
Whether you believe that or not, okay, different question.
But the response has been just remarkable.
So Keir Starmer recently went to Northern Ireland because there was riots there and he decided he was just going to condemn the people of Northern Ireland for being bothered by this.
Let's watch.
I'm in Northern Ireland here today for three purposes.
Firstly to meet the PSNI officers who've been on the front line during this disorder.
Many of them have been injured.
My purpose was to say to them thank you for what they have done.
We make big asks of them, they step up and they deserve our thanks.
I've also had the chance to speak to the PS&I senior leadership about the challenges that they face and the support that they need.
And then third and very importantly to speak to some of the communities most impacted about the fear that they have, the anxiety that they have about the recent disorder.
The disorder is intolerable.
It is incapable of justification.
It's clearly racist.
And it does not represent the modern, forward-looking Northern Ireland that I know that this place is.
Right, so intolerable, unjustifiable.
And racist.
Specifically non-representative I found very interesting because they're trying to refashion Britain as a ideological project in the mould of British values, which just means liberal, pluralistic, multicultural, in the same way that in the 60s JFK and the ADL attempted to do with America with it's a nation of ideas, it's a nation of immigrants.
Go back to Lincoln with that.
They were a propositional nation.
Yes, I mean the Nation of Immigrants idea was literally the book title of the 60s, but that's when... The notion of it being a propositional nation comes from Lincoln.
But anyway, so this is probably not true, because I don't think that he believes that, because of course we have a similar event that was in 2020.
There was massive riots across Britain and 27 police officers were injured, which is a lot.
And, well, Keir Starmer didn't have the same response.
Just to be clear, I mean, like, this was...
Quite shocking for the people watching it, when we were watching and we covered all of this.
We were like, oh my god, you know, who knew that this was going to erupt out?
So we were sort of on the other side of what they're on the other side of now.
Because they're like watching the riots from their perspective saying, oh my god, I didn't think this was going to come up.
So everyone was surprised that these deep wells of feeling exist in the country from what are essentially siloed communities that don't really have much interaction with one another.
And so, the response though, the response is so different.
Instead of the authorities and the media, the government saying, well, there's no legitimacy to any of this, we're going to hunt you down, we got, I'm deeply saddened and depressed that a minority of protesters became violent towards police officers in central London, said Chrissie the Dick.
Not the, we're going to get you, from, what's his name, Mark Rowley.
The majority of Sunday's protests were peaceful, but in the evening there were disturbances outside of Downing Street.
Right, okay, so mostly peaceful protests.
Right.
Again, the complete tonal shift and difference between how we've heard.
I happen to remember cops again physically running away down Whitehall.
Yeah.
Won that one, again.
And after that, the Met came out and instructed their police officers that they were at liberty to take the knee if they would so wish.
Get to that.
Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, said, uh, well the violence is not acceptable, but I stand with you and share your anger and pain.
Sure.
Direct quote.
Because George Floyd took a belly full of fentanyl.
Yes, 100%.
But eight girls getting stabbed?
He didn't say that, right?
So it's just very interesting.
This vital cause was badly let down by a tiny minority who turned violent.
Again, the same thing could be said about the Southport riots.
Exactly the same thing could be said, but it's not being said, and the question is why.
I mean, for this one, in the London one, 135 arrests were made, and like I said, 27 police officers were injured.
How many people were prosecuted?
I mean Priti Patel, who is of course the Secretary at the time, said peaceful protests were fine but a lawless minority of protesters turned to violence.
The thugs and criminals responsible are ready to be brought to justice, she tells MP, and that justice will follow.
Okay, well how many were prosecuted then?
She was really busy at the time letting millions of new migrants in, so she just couldn't get round to it.
She was!
So I looked into this, I did a lot of googling, I decided to, you know, do various sort of time slices to try and find any prosecutions.
I tweeted out, has anyone been prosecuted from this?
And this is what I found.
So the first thing that came up was the fact that in Northern Ireland none of them were going to be prosecuted.
They literally just said, uh, 14 suspects from the rioting, from the Black Lives Matter protest, but we've decided not to prosecute.
I'm gonna do it, bro.
It's our choice.
We're at luxury to do it.
We're not gonna do it.
The kid who set fire to the Cenotaph, 19-year-old chappie, who failed.
Astrophel Sang.
Yeah, who failed to set fire to the Cenotaph, because I guess they must have prepared in advance for this sort of thing, because these are fire-resistant flags.
He was supposed to face up to 18 months behind bars, but the judge decided to give him a two-year conditional discharge and order him to pay £340 in court costs.
So, I guess not a big deal.
How is that not a fifth columnist?
Well, he's 19, so... No excuse.
He's an adult man.
Sure, but, you know... Yeah, I didn't need to sit five to the seventh off when I was 19.
Yeah.
Yeah, but I think that's the way they're looking at it.
But, like, people say, oh, it's... Sometimes I say fifth communist on Twitter.
Some people say, commies, usually say things like, that's ridiculous, that's hyperbole, you've gone way too far with that.
But it's not, it's literally exactly what it is.
I mean... Some black guy OD'd in America.
And then you use that as an example to riot and set fire to the flag at the Cenotaph.
Anyone who might not know, a memorial to our war dead.
I think it speaks... Then what is that then?
I don't know if I'd call him a fifth columnist, because I think that ascribes to him far more intellect and agency than of which he's capable.
But what I think this represents is the total failure of the ability of the state to bring these people onto the narrative of why being British is a good thing, right?
If you're some 19 year old kid... It's definitely that.
Yeah, exactly.
If you're some 19 year old kid, you feel you're trapped in Britain and you don't The British state is evil and doesn't represent you, and the fact that the society that that represents is worthy of being burned down, which you would symbolically do by burning down the flag, that's a massive failure that we should be talking about.
But instead, we're just going to let him off.
We're not going to punish him.
We're not going to show him that there's a hard border on that, right?
You have to change your ways on that.
No, no, no.
He's just going to get through.
I would say we've failed nothing.
His character has failed.
Sure, but again, he's 19.
I mean, look at him.
He doesn't look like he's The following year they were trying children who put up some very edgy posts about black footballers on the England team for missing penalties at the Euros.
They were trying them as adults.
I'm not saying they weren't, but what I'm saying is I think you're ascribing too much intellect and agency to this interview.
You're responsible for your own actions.
I agree.
You've got to be.
I agree, and he should have been punished, right?
He should have been punished.
But the wider meta-analysis, I think, would be way beyond this person.
But anyway, the point is, he was let off, basically.
A £340 fine, that's it, don't worry about it.
It's only the war dead, it's only the British flag, you're only setting fire to it.
And then you've got the Colston statue, there was of course a massive amount of disorder in Bristol, where they rolled the statue of Edward Colston.
Into the, uh, canal.
This was, of course, criminal damage and four people were let off of this.
They were just acquitted.
They were rewarded with this as well because they replaced the Coulson statue with a BLM activist with their fist in the air.
Yes.
Um, the four defendants wore t-shirts designed by Banksy.
Quote, this is a victory for Bristol.
This is a victory for racial equality and it's a victory for anyone who wants to be on the right side of history.
Thanks, Banksy.
Yeah.
Regime approved dissident.
So obnoxious.
And they get let off.
So obnoxious.
The criminal damage they committed, doesn't matter.
They just got let off.
I love how at least the Coulson statue was fished out.
Yeah and put in a museum or something.
Yeah.
The graffiti on that wasn't cleaned off though.
Was it?
No.
I mean, I don't really care about Edward Colston.
He's not a great hero of mine, but, like, the fact that they have just got away with just arbitrary criminal damage that was done during a riot is what absolutely infuriates me.
And then... The sick of it gets three years.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, exactly.
I mean, don't get me wrong, you know, he was encouraging people to go riot so I can understand why they came down on him.
That was a silly thing to do.
But why is there this two-tier standard?
I find it insufferable.
It's literally, like, Nails on a chalkboard to me.
It's just driving me mad.
But they get to parade around and parrot.
Yeah, the regime supports us.
We were let off because we're on the right side of history.
So we are leaning into the warm embrace of the power structure, and you can feel who's on the outside and gets the cold face of it.
And so I kept looking.
So in Newcastle, two years later, 18 protesters were jailed for violent disorder.
So they didn't break out the 24-hour policing.
Could have put you through the door.
Not necessary, not necessary.
Two years later, what happened is the Newcastle police just decided for years to trawl through this footage.
Because counter-protesters came out.
Do you want to know?
Do you want to know the names of the people who went to jail?
Craig Hornsby, Christopher Bone, Neil Drummond, Ryan Barlow, all these Black Lives Matter... No.
These were the English counter-protesters who came out.
They're the ones who got jailed in the Black Lives Matter protests.
In the Black Lives Matter riots.
Michael O'Brien, Richard Short, Wendy Robinson, Jay Plunkett, Elliot Wright.
I'm sure they all did something.
I'm sure they threw bottles at the cops or something like that.
But so did the bloody Black Lives Matter protesters on the other side.
And the only one, Usman Oguden.
He's the only one, right?
So, this guy.
In the middle.
He's the only Black Lives Matter protester from this who got arrested.
He was 22 years old and he went to take a bottle from someone else and threw it at the counter protesters.
So he actually got arrested and got 20 months in jail or something like that, right?
And there was one other that I could find.
Some alcoholic lunatic from South Africa.
James Michael, M-E-I-K-L-E, 39, was filmed laughing following an unprovoked attack on emergency workers.
For some reason, there's like, you know, emergency workers.
They're not even police.
But he starts attacking them because he's drunk and he has British and South African passports.
Lives in North Devon to attempt to overcome problems with alcohol and drug abuse.
Right, we can just revoke one of those then.
You would think.
And he was supposed to go back to South Africa that day, but he decided to attend the protest instead because he discovered he could not buy alcohol at the airport.
Literally on the day of his flight.
Couldn't buy alcohol at the airport, so he went to central London to begin drinking, for some reason got caught up in Black Lives Matter protests and decided to start assaulting emergency workers.
And so he got six months in prison.
Was he then deported after that?
Not as far as I'm aware.
You assault two emergency workers, six months in prison, you Yell racist slogans at a police dog?
20 months in prison.
You're a 50 year old woman with caring duties who puts an ill-advised Facebook post up about two years.
That guy we covered, he didn't do anything.
He just walked towards the police line.
Remember that?
We covered it.
There have been loads.
There was one other BLM organiser that went to jail for fraud.
Not because they were involved in riots.
That's what BLM was?
A giant fraud?
100%.
100% a giant fraud.
She had Just stolen money from the, uh, Edward Colston statue fundraiser.
Uh, yeah, yeah, exactly.
Recognizable.
Zara Salim.
And, according to Robert Buckland, this could have been fast-tracked.
Conservatives could have done precisely what the Labour Party are doing.
Because, of course, all of this legislation was in place.
You may remember Keir Starmer saying, look, we're not going to come out and introduce a bunch of new legislation, we're just going to use the powers that we have.
And he did.
The Conservatives could have done all of this against their ideological enemies, but they didn't.
They didn't do any of it.
They didn't come out and make sure that all of these people, again, 27 police officers were injured.
That's because they weren't their ideological enemies.
Exactly.
He's saying Robert Buckland was sort of slow off the mark.
The former South Swindon MP, yes.
The head of the One Nation Conservatives.
And so this was the parallels here, right?
I think there are parallels here.
It's the same institutions, it's the same sort of problems, it's the same response that could have been had but wasn't.
Instead it was very much massaged by the media, by the politicians, by the legal system.
Two people, two people, got light sentences for this.
Even though, again, nearly 30 police officers wounded.
So, Keir Starmer's response was, of course, the iconic taking the knee.
Now, his response to the Southport writers was, your concerns aren't legitimate and I'm going to jail you.
Wasn't a regret doing it.
Exact words.
I promise you, you will regret doing this.
As if!
As if there's a person in this country, I saw the secret barrister, the shit-lid barrister, complaining, there's no two-tier policing.
Just don't even try it.
Don't even try it.
It's so self-evident, it's so on the face.
The serious look on his face, very seriously breaking the knee.
Oh yeah, and the thing is, this was the first thing he did, like you can see the date.
The first thing he did.
And then he rushed to get this video out.
And I thought we'd just watch this video.
Again, just think of the tone of the first one where he's like, nope, you're racist and we're not having it.
It was indefensible, cannot be justified.
Volume on this one?
There it is.
And the response of President Trump and the US authorities to the peaceful protests, to people rightly demanding justice.
has been an affront to humanity.
The last week has shone a spotlight on the racism, discrimination and injustice experienced by those from black and minority ethnic communities in the US, in the UK and across the world.
Martin Luther King said, injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.
That's why today I've written to the Prime Minister Asking for his assurance that the British government is doing all that it can to urge President Trump to respect human rights.
None of the opposition did anything like this.
Trump did nothing.
He didn't send in the National Guard.
Let's assume that Trump was an inveterate opponent of Black Lives Matter in the same way that he's an inveterate opponent of the English community in the Southport riots, right?
Where is our opposition saying, well look, I'm going to write to you and say you've got to guarantee that the human rights of the rioters, or whatever it is, is going to be protected, that the English community will be protected from stabbings?
But look, there is no one on the other side of this.
Elon Musk was the only person doing anything about this.
But I want to watch the rest of this.
Like the bit that's actually on screen right now.
Where's Nigel and Tice?
Say, banging the drum for our fundamental democratic right to peaceful protest.
I mean, Tice has actually been a lot stronger on this than Nigel has, and you know, fair enough, I'm happy to take back the accusations of weakness from Tice.
You know, if he's going to come out strong on something, I'm happy to do that.
But we've had very little in the way of actual representation on this.
But I'm going to watch the rest of this.
For some reason the sound's gone off again.
The UK government to ensure that our exports are not being used in the suppression of democratic rights in the US.
But we must also reflect on the injustices in our own country.
Why?
We must address the reality and the impact of anti-black racism which has been highlighted Daily stabbings in the UK.
Lives Matter movement.
Now, more than ever, it's incumbent upon us all to ensure that this is a turning point.
Daily stabbings in the UK.
Well, I like how he's saying we need to ensure our exports are not being used to crush human rights, like their arms sales to the Congo.
I mean, yeah.
The BAE system missiles that were built in England don't get used against black rioters in Los Angeles or something.
Just nonsense, isn't it?
Let's assume that the argument they're making is entirely just, right?
Okay, racism killed George Floyd, right?
Oh yeah, we need to think about racism.
Okay, stabbings killed the Southport girls, and there have been stabbings every single day since then.
We're not reflecting on the condition of our country, because, no, no, no, this is just an acceptable part of diversity.
When the second reporter at his press conference teed him up with a very easy get-out-of-jail-free card by saying, is there not some sort of legitimate grievance that is here from the peaceful protesters, do you remember what he said twice?
It doesn't matter.
That is what he believes.
He believes that the three dead girls and all the other injured do not matter.
But he believes that George Floyd, the narrative confected around this, takes precedent so much that the British government must intervene in American affairs.
Justifies the riots.
That's the point.
There's no justification, there's no excusing it, apart from when it's happening to black people that Kiyosama feels that he's the defender of, for some reason.
Look at the faux seriousness again.
It was all very, very serious.
It's the application of grace that I'm really concerned about.
There is no grace given to the English community.
You've just had a bunch of your daughters murdered.
Every single day, English people are being stabbed by diversity.
That's literally a news item every single day.
a man has done something oh good another one you know doesn't matter it literally doesn't matter suck it up gammon exactly whereas something's happened in america oh come here black community i'll cuddle you to my bosom and make sure that your concerns are taken care of it's just like i just i'm so the double standard is actually sickening Yeah, it's disgusting.
It makes me feel nauseous.
It's disgusting.
And so, yes, as you can see, Kisshammer could not have been more overflowing with sympathy, with empathy, with concern for the rioters themselves, right?
And this, again, police want to take the knee during the BLM protest?
Oh, I think it's a very good thing, quote-unquote.
No!
Like, it's not justified, it's not this, it's not that.
No, I think it's a good thing.
And when he came out and he was like, ooh, I called Black Lives Matter a moment rather than a movement, I'm really sorry.
He took a lot of flag for this.
Took a lot of flag for this.
No, no, that's fair.
It does happen every four years, so it's not worth the while.
Yeah, happens every electoral cycle.
But he came out and said, well, what we're going to do then is call for action, not words.
And so he's got like four targets in law, like we're going to challenge the ethnicity pay gap, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Right.
And he went on and took, he willingly took unconscious bias training and imposed it on the Labour Party as well, because he was like, yeah, I didn't mean to call it a moment.
I meant to call it movement.
And he says, For all of our staff, I'm going to lead from the top on this and do that training first.
I think everyone should have unconscious bias training.
I think it's important.
There's always the risk of unconscious bias and just saying, oh well it probably applies to other people, not me, is not the right thing to do.
So he could not have been more supplicant about this.
He couldn't have been more pliant.
I was going to write a character.
And I was going to make them comically a moral coward.
Yes.
That's what I would write, something like that.
I mean he's literally salaming before these people and saying just lash me if you need to.
I'll go through everything willingly and I'll impose it on the rest of my party and everything you've done is just and right and oh you know we don't like the violence against the police but I'm totally standing with you in every way.
Whereas for the English rioters, you are getting the full force of the law.
The boot is stamping down as hard as it can, and I am not in any way sympathetic to your pain.
Your pain does not matter and you will regret anything you do.
Yeah.
His literal words.
Anyway, there's a couple of rumble rants here.
So Threadnaught says, every dictator is on the right side of history until they're overthrown.
I just remembered what they were by the survivors.
And Cranky Texan says, for my friends, everything, for my enemies, the law.
Oscar Benavides.
Basically, is exactly what the position we're in.
But for the sake of brevity, I'm afraid we'll have to leave it.
Have we got any video comments, Samson?
We do!
Here we go.
You playing?
That's very true.
stand up to us then they all might stand up.
Those juny little ants outnumber us a hundred to one and if they ever figure that out there goes our way of life.
It's not about food it's about keeping those ants in line.
That's why we're going back.
I mean that is literally Keir-sama's position on this.
I have thought he sounds awfully similar to Mr. Waternoose in terms of his mass migration policy which is I'll kidnap a thousand children before I let this company die.
I mean, the BBC article you covered earlier, they were like, oh, you know, this is widespread and it's everywhere.
Yeah, no, they've come to that position from The Bug's Life.
They outnumber us 100 to 1, probably more, you know, and if they work that out, how come you can't?
Exactly the point.
On with the next one!
Here's a quickie tour of the old abandoned old abandoned amusement park and the Soviet bumper cart arena where we just do yoga on Thursdays now.
The park is beautifully maintained although the buildings say many words about many different cultures such as ACAB and TIFA and trans rights.
They really are an orc horde.
Like, literally wherever they go, they slap the white hand of Saruman.
That's a good analogy, that.
It is anti-beauty, isn't it?
Anti-nice things.
Oh, they're 100% anti-beauty.
That's why you get the picture of the young girl before and after she goes to university.
She's a lovely young lady, and then she's a hideous, malformed orc.
On with the next one.
When tyrants disarm us, ridicule Becomes our only weapon.
So let us ridicule Keir Stalin, the two-tier queer.
And remember that the Democrats in the United States will now follow his fine example as come all over here Harris decides that she is going to try to one-up Keir Starmer and tell him, hold my Chardonnay.
One thing I have really appreciated is our American friends who have been exercising their First Amendment rights to come in and bombard them with very offensive memes.
I can't wait for June when Pride Month does roll around and we can just call him Queer Starmer.
How are you going to object?
He goes on the marches.
Yeah, I agree.
What's wrong with being queer?
I'm not being rude at all.
I mean, it's a term of endearment, actually.
I mean, they're literally cheering and shouting, we're here, we're queer, whatever.
It's like, okay.
That was a cute dog by the way.
But yeah, he's absolutely right and Sojourn Itzen talks about that as well that when the only thing you've got left is to simply ridicule them.
There's no opportunity to fight back.
It's not actually physically possible to fight back in sort of late Stalinist era for example.
They had won that battle.
They would throw millions of people into gulags.
And there's no real way to physically fight back.
But you can still pour scorn on them.
They'll give you longer sentences.
Well, okay.
You can still be rude about them and use satire.
They can never take satire away from you.
Yeah, and it's more than that though as well.
Because it may well be that at some point they will just criminalise you for mocking them.
But they will forever be looking for your approval and you can always withhold that.
When Keir Starmer, I mean, I don't know whether you noticed, but recently he's starting to look a little bit shaken.
Because I think he's seeing his approval ratings going down.
I think he's seeing that, you know, actually, I mean, actually more people agree with the riots than with Keir Starmer by the polling.
I think that he's got a bit of a sort of ghostly look about him at the moment.
Same thing happened with that flash of insecurity when in, I think it was the Sky News one-on-one interviews ahead of the election, someone laughed when he brought up for the umpteenth time about his dad being a toolmaker.
There's both a flash of anger but also panic.
Yeah.
I don't have another line to fall back on.
My NPC's dialogue script has run out here and I can't recover.
But there's no, the approval that he's looking for, for what he's doing, is being rescinded.
And I think that, I mean, even if you don't mock, even if you just give him the sort of cold face and say, I just don't agree with you.
I think you're doing the wrong thing.
If everyone around him was saying that, he'd be like, well no.
Like, suddenly the power shrivels out of him.
He's definitely massively weak, both physically, which is why I'm trying to punch the bag.
But also, there's a clip that's quite a few years old now, I think it's from 2021, when he went to go into that pub and the landlord kicked up a stink.
Well, if you watch the full clip, it starts where the guy's obviously had some words with Starmer, and Starmer says something like, I'm not going to take any lectures from you.
and uh just walks into the pub and the guy sort of starts raising his voice and he's restrained by obviously some sort of protection guard but he raises his voice for like 10 seconds and Starmer just comes back out of the pub.
He obviously realises the optics on this aren't good.
He just gives in, he just folds.
If he was a strong leader, he'd be like, no, get that guy out of here.
I mean, he was the owner of the pub.
Yeah, I know, but if he was a strong, strong leader, he could have played that in all sorts of ways, but he just backed down, he just gave up.
If he had any sort of empathy or charisma, he would have just talked to him about it.
Oh yeah, if he had any sort of ability at politics to convince people.
I think Bo's point is there's no way Stalin wouldn't have been having that drink.
Right, that's what I mean, yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's very Emperor's New Clothes, that's the tactic.
On with the next one.
Regarding Elon having English ancestry, Most people in South Africa, somewhere along the line, do have an English ancestor.
It's a small collection of people, composition being French, Dutch, English, you know, families would have intermixed.
It's a natural consequence.
One thing I will say is that if you do have Afrikaans lineage, you're going to try very hard to probably identify more with your English lineage because of the natural consequence of being associated with apartheid.
I used to work with a white South African dude, Ted, or Tid as he pronounced it, and he was of British stock, and he ate something that I never really appreciated before, that a lot of white South Africans, or most of them, are either of English stock or Dutch stock, and if you get it the wrong way round...
They hate it.
If you say something like, oh we're a family originally from from Holland.
They'd be like, no, no.
God, get it right.
Apparently they go to different schools and all sorts of stuff and they had rivalries among themselves.
That's why I see Dutch segregation.
Yeah.
It's interesting anyway, I never knew that before I worked with Tid.
Excellent.
Well, that's all of the video comments.
Yeah, I'll go to the website once.
It says, Gadsad coined the term suicidal empathy and it fits so well.
These people will literally be stabbed in the chest and be worried about the person stabbing them being deported.
Yeah, I mean, there was one in Norway that really got me where some Somalian guy raped, I can't remember what the man's name was.
He raped some man.
I think he might have been a politician actually or a politician's son.
He was just like yeah well I don't want him being deported because that would be terrible for him.
It's like this dude raped you?
Madness!
It's just a kind of insanity.
Turkey's voting for Christmas.
I think somewhere in Scandinavia a female, I think she was in the government or she was an equivalent of an MP or something.
thing.
It was also sexually assaulted or raped.
And she went on record saying, no, no, no, it was, you know, don't punish him.
He doesn't know any better and stuff.
Wasn't there an article from a woman who called herself a Malcolm X scholar that went over to Haiti and was raped and said, I don't want this to discolour people's perceptions of the country?
Oh, yeah.
Baystape says, you were supposed to tell the authorities when the law is broken, but we've been trying to tell them for years that the law is broken.
Yes, the law is very, very broken.
Well, the problem is that the authorities were part of the reason the law was broken.
I'm thinking the grooming gang cover-ups.
Lord Nerevar says, it's always amazing to me that we can look at countries like Egypt, Syria, or Pakistan, and see the massive social and political problems they have, and then decide that those people really need to come and live in England instead.
And by we, I of course mean our benevolent leaders.
Yeah, but they of course think that if the blank slate applies, the only thing that's stopping them being as British as you and me is the fact that they haven't walked through the passport gates at Heathrow and Gatwick yet.
It's literally, they don't have air conditioning, they don't have our level of economic prosperity, and they don't have a secular liberal education.
That's it.
I'm sure there are some people, maybe even a majority of people, that ascribe to that view.
But like, say for example, the Runnymede Trust.
It's their entire raison d'etre to make Britain multi-racial.
Not multicultural, multi-racial.
It's explicit.
That's their whole raison d'etre.
Some of them maybe believe exactly what you just said, but I think a lot of them... No, they are... Anti-white racists.
They simply want to destroy our society and country.
Oh, I don't think Hamza Yousaf was making a nuanced point about universalism.
I think he was just saying white people.
I'm merely explaining the arrogance of, or the cognitive dissonance of how Jess Phillips can have a room full of pro-Gaza people and just say, it's men.
The cognitive dissonance, how can you... When I experience any touch of cognitive dissonance, I'm sort of like, I stop everything.
Wait, what am I doing?
What do I think about this?
That's what I do.
That's what any normal person really should do.
Well, that's because it's a crack in your entire worldview that you have to understand.
Right.
Right.
If I ever experienced some real cognitive dissonance like that, I would retreat for a while and think about things very deeply and change what I think and all sorts of stuff.
I wouldn't just carry on regardless, just steamroller through this.
This is what I did after my Richard Spencer debate.
After it, I was just like, why am I on the wrong side?
Why did I lose that?
Why are the liberal arguments not working against any of these things?
You re-read Locke.
Well yeah, I reread everything, you know.
That's what a man does, right?
Am I wrong?
I think I might be wrong.
Okay, I've got to admit that to myself and then think again.
That's like a proper human being.
It's what an adult does.
Right, yeah.
Anyway, Wallard Wu Tu Tai says, Karl, to add to your point about why immigrants go to Sweden, it's not just welfare payments, it's also Swedish women.
Honestly, I've heard this that in the Arab world and the Muslim world, they have just insanely bad views on what Western women are about.
Alex Phillips has been very good on this recently.
She has.
The overwhelming consumption of pornography is slanted towards ethnic minorities, particularly men in the countries as well where it's meant to be banned, and all they see is white Western women, so they think, okay, if they're participating in this, they must be up for it.
And they look at the way they dress and say, well, I mean, they literally, a whore would dress that way in their own country.
Right, and assume they'd be even allowed to.
Well that's the story I sent to GB News about all the North African gangs advertising women on nights out, drunk, being filmed without their consent, alongside trafficking services.
Is it any surprise that they have the opinions and do the things?
But also, like, um, blonde, pale, white women are sort of the gold standard for beauty easily in the whole world, obviously.
Or Swedish women.
Yeah.
Probably, yeah.
This is why Fraser Nelson's so pro-migrant, it's literally he's got a Swedish wife.
You've got that, why do you need to worry about that?
Because he thinks all migrants are his Swedish wife.
It's the classic sort of ultra repressed thing is that I hate you for being a whore and yet I desperately want you.
Oh, it's so messed up.
It's so messed up.
Well, it's a genuine problem that we're struggling with.
Let's see some presenters being confused about which foreigner has committed what crime is peak UK 2024.
Well, it's a genuine problem that we're struggling with.
Were we confused?
No, no.
We couldn't remember which crime was done by which foreigner.
And so we're trying to fit the foreigner to the crime because it just happens so often.
Okay, right.
Sophie says, the biggest thing going on in Denmark right now is that we have quote-unquote Swedish gangs recruiting miners to do hit jobs on quote-unquote Danes in Denmark.
I love that!
What that's gonna be is, you know, Muslim gang, Muslim gang, border.
It's funny when everything, everyone involved in the story is foreign.
History Debunked did a, not funny, not funny ha ha, funny mad, there's a video he did a while ago where someone, some foreign national was run over in the street by another foreign national, he was fighting in the street, so a third party come and run them over, they were also a foreign national, and then when it went to court, the solicitor and the judge also had foreign names.
That was the Abduzidi case.
The Clapham alkali attack.
That was also the recent Leicester Square stabbing of where it was a mum and a daughter who were a tourist stabbed by a foreign vagrant.
It's not rare, is it?
It's not rare.
Well, I mean, the thing is, these things are concentrated.
So when you have an area that is, like, overwhelmingly immigrant or minority...
Well yeah, the guy who was like, oh I wish the Eritrean guy didn't do this because then he'd be able to stay in the country, he was a Muslim.
You're not going to be interacting with us because we don't live around you.
Then also the cop and the ambulance driver and the solicitors and the judge, they're all foreigners.
So what is going on?
But, uh, finally, uh, just, we'll end on this one, I guess.
Brian says, uh, the Nigerian government apparently recently stated that the UK is not a safe country, so it's in their best interest to deport Nigerians.
Hey, look, I, I agree with the Nigerian government.
You should not come for your own safety.
Yep, yep, yep.
Spare us the hundreds of thousands every year.
Anyway, thank you very much for watching.
Good show, gents.
It was good fun.
Half an hour, I'm back, wittering on about how the government is gaslighting us all.
But if you're not a Gold Tier member, I mean, well, if you're not a Premium member, you still can be.
Otherwise, we'll be back tomorrow at 1 o'clock with a regular podcast.