Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 19, 2024 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:33:20

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #981

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen Welcome to the podcast for the 19th of August, 2024.
	It's a Monday, so I have some bad news.
	It's the beginning of the week, but on the plus side, the end of the week eventually arrives.
	I'm joined by Peter McAvena and Bo, and we're going to be talking about how you're going to become a misogyny terrorist, how you're going to be put into a two-tier police cell, and how you're going to be indoctrinated by Mary Beard, the one feminist academic who knows all about Rome and no one else knows anything about Rome.
	So, let's begin, shall we?
	Got nothing to announce today.
	So.
	I think rumble rants, sorry.
	Oh, yeah, there are rumble rants, and we will be reading them at the end of each segment.
	Right, so.
	It looks like Andrew Tate is going to become Britain's first misogyny terrorist.
	This is going to be a new criminal category, I think, under the Labour feminist government.
	Is he resident in the UK?
	No.
	No, but he is resident on their Twitter timelines.
	I really mean this.
	This is the crux of everything about British politics.
	They only react to what they see.
	Sensory input is the very basis of their understanding of the world, and if all they see is Andrew Tate being a misogynist on their timeline, they're like, oh well, this has to be dealt with.
	This has to be dealt with.
	There have to be consequences to this.
	Because we are now the feminist Karens in charge of the country.
	And I really mean- Look at them extradited.
	I wonder whether you've ever extradited them?
	That'd be a good one!
	I mean, they threatened to extradite Elon Musk.
	They did.
	So if they're going to extradite even someone like that, they may as well extradite Andrew Tate.
	In Romania, really?
	Apparently, yeah.
	They said, like, an SAS team to sweep him off the streets of Romania.
	Maybe.
	Maybe.
	Like, who knows?
	We're in uncharted territory because, at the moment, a cabal of feminist Karens are actually in control of the government.
	Now, I realise that everyone's going to be like, well, hang on a second, that sounds a bit...
	Bit over the top, but it's like, no, actually, it's completely true.
	And we've followed these people's careers for the last 15 or so years.
	So, I mean, we can just name them.
	Yvette Cooper, Harriet Harman, Lord Lady Harriet Harman, Jess Phillips, Stella Creasy, and there's a bunch of others.
	These people form, and I'm saying this as a quote in their own words, a kind of feminist network in Parliament.
	Now, the reason I know about this is because I read Jess Phillips' books.
	Written like... So we don't have to!
	The easiest read in the world is written like it was written by a child.
	It's the sort of language capacity of a child.
	But in one of her books, I can't remember which one it was now, Jess Phillips just explains that there's a feminist cabal that works in Parliament doing all of these things, getting on various committees and, you know, passing legislation, doing all the sort of things.
	Because they're feminists.
	And so they all work together very, very closely.
	And now this cabal is actually in charge of the Home Office.
	Yvette Cooper is currently the Home Secretary.
	She's a core part of this.
	Jess Phillips is a Minister in the Home Office.
	And again, doing what, who knows?
	Stella Creasy here, and all these other, like, Labour feminist MPs are currently in charge of the country.
	So when you thought, oh, well, the sort of 2015 man-hating feminists have disappeared, No, they were biding their time.
	And now they've come back, Keir Starmer has taken over and he's put them in charge of our country.
	And so now we're getting misogyny as a terrorist offence.
	This is genuinely where we are now.
	That's because Keir Starmer isn't really in charge.
	I mean, he's such a weak individual.
	He didn't really run anything.
	He ran and, well, I'm Keir, I'm a bit different.
	So it's no wonder you've got all these women behind him because The thing is, framing it like that implies that Keir Starmer doesn't agree with all of this anyway.
	And he's just being sort of like, oh, I'm just an idiot.
	No, he is an idiot, but he does also agree with all of this.
	He is as radically left-wing as any of these people, which is why he's chosen them to be a part of his cabinet, to be a part of his government, to lead all of the institutions.
	I was listening to an interesting David Starkey video the other day and of course he was saying things that are just de rigueur.
	It should be obvious, absolutely obvious, that the law should apply to everybody equally regardless of sex, age, creed, blah blah blah blah blah.
	But no, women's suffering is more important than men's.
	Yes.
	It's as simple as that.
	There's nothing extra in place for misandry.
	You know what?
	In fact, male suicide is funny actually, isn't it?
	According to Ms Phillips.
	According to some elements of this feminist cabal.
	But I'm going to surprise you a little bit later in the segment.
	Actually, misandry is bad.
	Oh is it?
	With conditions.
	So, the context for all of this is that, as you can see here, violent attacks on women and girls on trains have risen by more than 50% in two years.
	now as lbc tell us uh they've gone from seven and a half thousand to 11 over 11 000 in 2023 and so this is a huge increase and sexual harassment claims reported have doubled over the same period of two years and this has become something that obviously the feminist cabal is very concerned about and rightly so There's an understandable, there's a very concerning thing.
	In London, attacks on women going up by 50% in two years.
	British men have just suddenly become more violent?
	Yes.
	That's precisely it.
	You see, the men are on British soil, which definitionally makes them British men.
	Yep, yep, makes sense.
	And, for some reason, they're far more aggressive and violent towards women.
	Apparently, half of fellow passengers just don't come to the aid of women either.
	So, 50% of the time, just no one helps.
	Which is your social contract society at work, folks.
	And most of these offences take place on, quote, busy trains during the evening rush hour between 5 and 7pm.
	So, I mean, we're not going to talk about the demographics of London.
	We're just going to say British men.
	And so Jess Phillips, again, a minister at the Home Office, says, This is unacceptable.
	In this day and age, no woman should have to plan her journeys by public transport based on when and where she will feel safe.
	Yeah, that is the daily experience for millions of women, whether they're commuting to and from work or arranging an evening out with friends.
	Getting on a night bus or a near-empty train to go home should not feel like taking your life in your hands.
	I agree with all of this, just to be clear.
	It shouldn't.
	Yeah, it shouldn't.
	Whether these figures reflect an increase in reporting or an increase in the volume of crime, one thing is clear, the level of violence, sexual harassment, sexual offences against women and girls cannot be allowed to go unchallenged.
	To which I agree, but I may also add, you literally voted for this.
	The Labour policy is bring in as many people from outside who do not quite share the same values as you, and now you're seeing the fruits of the poison seed.
	So, okay.
	Couple more mate campaigns might sort it out.
	Yeah, maybe Sadiq Khan can solve this.
	I mean, this has been under Sadiq Khan in Sadiq Khan's London.
	No mention of that.
	You know, Labour for the last, what, 15 years?
	Something like that?
	How long has Sadiq Khan been the Mayor?
	Oh forever, forever.
	It feels like since the dawn of time, since the Romans founded it.
	But it's two things, it's an open door, people coming in, you don't know who they are and what values they aspire to, or maybe you do and that's why they're letting them in.
	But the second part is actually lack of punishment.
	If you look, I mean, annually, what, 68,000 rapes are actually reported to the police every year, and yet off those 2% are actually ended up with a charge.
	So if you don't actually have a system in place that punishes people for wrongdoing, then this is what you get.
	People think I can do what I like and get away with it.
	If you don't punish people for not having a ticket on the train, Every time I go and use the tube, every time I see someone going through the barriers, the police just watch it.
	So if you don't punish someone for wrongdoing, then it's just going to happen.
	Is it even wrongdoing if there's no punishment for it?
	Why would these people think they've done something wrong?
	Who decides it's wrong, and obviously the British government don't decide it's wrong, because they don't punish.
	But Detective Chief Inspector Sarah White, again, we've got a Karen-occupied government at this point, right?
	She says, well, there's no place for this, and we have patrols of uniformed and specially-trained plainclothes officers across the railway, day and night, to catch offenders and reassure passengers as they travel.
	Really?
	Apparently!
	Not very many of them, if there are.
	Apparently!
	I mean, like, so we've got a kind of feminist secret police?
	To catch sexual harassers on the trains.
	It's like, okay, but it's not working if the numbers are up 50% in two years.
	But the British Transport Police, and I'm assuming this is run by men generally, have said, well, the rise is actually because more people are just more willing to report these crimes.
	But I don't believe that because that's what the patriarchy would have us believe.
	So they say there are all these individuals in plain clothes reassuring passengers.
	How is someone in plain clothes that you don't know is there to help uphold the law, how is that helping the passenger?
	Take my word for it, I'm part of the cops.
	I'm here to make sure you don't get raped.
	Bobby's on the beat.
	No, no, we'll just have someone playing clues.
	You know, in India, don't they have segregated trains by sex?
	Well, interestingly... Just to keep men away from... Interestingly, that's what we're going to end up with.
	Oh, is it?
	Oh, yeah, yeah, that's what we need, yeah.
	That's what Jess Phillips will need to introduce.
	It's weird.
	There's a strange correlation of... number of... Anyway.
	Yeah, so, no, it... There are lots of feminists who are going on TV and saying, well, could we have gender-segregated carriages as well, please?
	I mean, what other options are there?
	How else can we square this circle?
	We've just got to keep the men and women away from each other.
	Like a mosque.
	And you need a tran carriage as well, a transfer.
	Well, I mean... Which, obviously, if they don't know what a woman is, how do you actually have this conversation?
	That's progress.
	This is segregated train carriages.
	I will not hear this disgusting transphobia from you.
	Transgender women will go in the women's carriage, and transgender men will go in the women's carriage.
	I'm confused already, sir.
	But that'll be voluntary.
	Do you really want to be the only biological female in a carriage of men who have been specifically segregated because they can't be trusted around women?
	No, but you're safe.
	According to the government.
	And so, anyway, there are a lot of people watching this and on the panel who are saying, well, this is clearly the fault of immigration, but I have good news.
	We can't say that with any definitive certainty because the government just doesn't keep statistics on this.
	No.
	Alright.
	This is from the Office of National Statistics, a request for information.
	As you can see from last year, you asked, I would like to know how many illegal immigrants and asylum seekers have been charged with murder and rape and other serious crimes.
	They said, we do not hold the information you requested as our data primarily focuses on the victims of crime.
	Oh, well, there we go.
	Crime is just something that happens, and we don't need to know anything about the perpetrators.
	And if you think, well, that was last year, maybe they've changed their practices.
	Nope.
	Same thing from this year, January.
	You said, I'd like statistics on migrants charged with murder, attempted murder or rape.
	We don't hold that.
	Not our problem.
	Why are you asking?
	We don't have that information.
	So it could just be any man.
	Asking the question gets you in trouble.
	Not quite yet, yes.
	You might get in trouble.
	You'd be put on some sort of list, I would imagine.
	Possibly.
	But you just get a, uh, sorry we don't carry that information for some reason, we're only the Office of National Statistics.
	Why would we have rapes broken down by, say, immigrant status?
	What, a dereliction of duty?
	And obviously a deliberate one.
	Yes.
	And it's exactly the same thing on the grooming gangs, that actually they don't record the data.
	And when you ask for a breakdown, oops, we don't actually record that.
	But actually we may record it in the future and some police forces are maybe advised to do it.
	But obviously you don't get a overall picture of the situation if you don't record the information, which is perfect for the government.
	Well, that's a good point.
	So let's go back to the government.
	So this is the world that they're living in.
	They don't know.
	It's just men, just the undifferentiated mass of men, who are, for some reason, in the last couple of years, really starting to ramp up the sexual assaults on women on the train carriages.
	And so how do you figure this out?
	Well, you think about what these people are taking in, and they're taking their Twitter feed, and they're seeing Andrew Tate.
	So it must be that Andrew Tate is actually radicalizing young men to become misogynistic.
	He's just making young men hate women.
	Now, I'm not sure that's true, but senior police officer Maggie Blythe, again, Karen Occupy Government, said that young men and boys could be radicalised in the same way as terrorists.
	Oh, can they?
	We know that some of this is also some of this.
	What percentage?
	You don't know because you don't keep the data!
	We should assume that some of this is linked to radicalisation of young people online.
	We know that influencers, Andrew Tate, he's the only name that they bring up by the way, because he's the only misogynistic influencer they know of.
	There are lots of others, there are loads of others, but they only know Andrew Tate because he's just a continual thing in their Twitter feed.
	He's the only thing they see.
	He's the only one Channel 4 News and Radio 4 brought up to them.
	Yeah, he's the only one who went on Piers Morgan.
	But Andrew Tate, the element of influence in particularly boys, is quite terrifying and something that both the leads for counter-terrorism in the country and ourselves from violence against women and girls perspective are discussing.
	Counter-terrorism?
	Yeah.
	And Andrew Tate is being framed already as the misogyny terrorist, right?
	And they also tell us that there's been a 37% increase in the number of violent crimes against women and girls between 2018 and 2023.
	I'm glad that having, what is it, 28,000 or 40,000 so-called terrorists on a watch list.
	I'm glad that they're sorting all those out with 24-hour observation and they can now look at Andrew Tate.
	That's so good.
	Andrew Tate from another country terrorising women in Britain.
	Is there any connection with Mr Tate converting to Islam?
	Does that influence the young boys?
	They haven't brought that up because that would be Islamophobic.
	I was going to say misogynistic.
	And there's absolutely no crossover on the Venn diagram between those two things?
	Between Islam and misogyny?
	The data is not in.
	They do not keep that information.
	But they do say, you know, look, between 2018 and 2023 something happened And a graph went up, and there's been a 37% increase in the number of violent crimes against women and girls.
	Clearly, this is Andrew Tait.
	Now, the question would be, okay, Andrew Tait got let back on his Twitter, what, a year ago?
	Two years ago?
	He was banned from all of social media.
	How was he managing to radicalise all of these teenage boys without having access to social media?
	I would have thought that would have been a good question.
	But it doesn't matter, because they've decided that it is Andrew Tate who is the sole cause of the increase in sex offences, and of course the government says it welcomes this new project to, and what their aim is, is to halve violence against women and girls over the next decade.
	And so what they've done is decided, well you know what, it's just going to be terrorism.
	It's just going to be terrorism.
	Yvette Cooper, the very sensible feminist Karen, who has been banging this drum for decades now.
	Yvette Balls.
	Yeah, well, yeah.
	That's a bit of a patriarchal... Mrs. Ed Balls?
	You can see why she didn't take her husband's name, right?
	Yeah, right, yeah.
	But no, extreme misogyny, quote-unquote, will be treated as terrorism.
	This means teachers will be legally required to refer pupils if they suspect them of extreme misogyny, so they'll be referred to Prevent, the same place that, you know, Islamic jihadis get referred to.
	If they suspect them of it?
	Yeah.
	So if they think, they've been watching Andrew Tait videos online.
	That's it, to the counter-terrorism police you go.
	They suspect you know who Andrew Tate is.
	You talk to anyone in a class and everyone, I guess just actually these people are jealous of the power of influencers on social media.
	I bet if a Cooper wishes that she had the views and reach because that's what it's about.
	And obviously filling in this massive gap because men, obviously it's a women, girls, women, girls, men and boys don't get to mention any of this.
	So if you're a good someone championing it.
	Don't worry, they will.
	In a prison cell.
	No, no, no, in a positive light, trust me.
	Jealous and scared?
	Don't worry, don't jump ahead.
	So, um, yes, so several extremism categories are going to be ranked by the Home Office.
	Islamism, right-wing extremism, animal rights extremism, environmental extremism, and Northern Ireland-related extremism.
	What?
	I missed that!
	What's that?
	I don't know!
	Uh-oh!
	They're talking about the Cathos or the Prodys.
	Which one?
	I need to know which one.
	Well, that's the thing.
	There seems to have been a bit of a consensus on the two warring factions.
	Hang on a second.
	Don't we have bigger problems at the moment?
	So, yes, nothing about, you know, left-wing extremism, but I guess that's in the government, so I'm not surprised they're not bringing that up.
	It's no such thing.
	They're on the right side of history at all times, right?
	That's what we've been told.
	But there's also a category for incel.
	Incel extremism, they think, is a massive problem.
	They think it's behind the violence against women and girls, the rise in violence, which, I mean, just Okay, you excessively online losers.
	Like, what are you talking about?
	As if Andrew Tate's like a model for incels.
	Incels love Andrew Tate?
	Aren't incels like introverted people that don't really go out?
	Aren't they the least like... The government's declared war on virgins.
	Isn't every bloke who hasn't got laid yet by definition an incel?
	Teenage virgins.
	That's the government's...
	I mean, you know a man by the quality of his enemies, right?
	And if the quality of this government's enemies are literally virgin teenagers, there's something wrong with them.
	But they are concerned that this category does not capture other forms of extreme misogyny.
	So, like, I don't even know what they're talking about.
	What else have we got?
	Hitherto undiscovered forms of misogyny!
	Seems to cover most of the bases, yeah.
	I mean, what else is there?
	I'm looking forward to seeing what these new forms are.
	Imagine, like, a David Bellamy, or we've just found a new undiscovered...
	Hiding under this rock for centuries!
	And again, you think this is... it gets more ridiculous.
	Sir Mark Rowley, of course, the Met Police Commissioner, suggested that violence against women and girls should be treated as a national security threat, on par with being invaded with Russia, I presume.
	We need to build pillboxes up and down the country.
	To keep the incels out?
	With overlapping fields of fire, yeah, to be able to...
	Because of incel terrorism against women on the train.
	In London.
	Yes, London.
	Just a hotbed of incels.
	Anyway, so what Yvette Cooper is going to do is institute a rapid review, which will be completed in autumn, which will form the basis of a new counter-extremism strategy, which they intend to launch early next year.
	So they'll begin persecuting the incels and Andrew Tate in January next year, basically.
	But they won't address any of the passages in the Hadith or the Quran that talk about... Of course, we'll get to that in a minute as well.
	We'll get to that in a minute.
	And so they're conducting this rapid thing and they're going to use this study on incels and Andrew Tate to underpin the criminalization of...
	Extreme misogyny, whatever that's supposed to mean.
	And so Jess Phillips went on LBC and I think we'll just watch actually because it's really... I completely get there's a big educational sort of element to this Jess and the need to do more of that.
	But I guess what I'm getting at is where do we draw that line between someone's opinions and someone's attitude which we might not like, we might find abhorrent, but ultimately we live in a country where people are free to express opinions.
	On the one hand, and sort of police action and counter-terrorism intervention on the other, is the line where we fear an attitude or an opinion is going to stray into a crime or an act of violence?
	Is that the line we have to draw?
	You'd just use the exact same test you would with far-right extremism and Islamism, wouldn't you?
	The same test would have to apply.
	People can hold their views about women all they like, and believe me, they let me know them all the time.
	I've had some choice emails just today.
	It's not okay anymore to ignore the massive growing threat caused by online hatred towards women and for us to ignore it because we're worried about the line rather than making sure the line is in the right place as we would do with any other form of extremist ideology.
	I think, you know, it fails women and has failed women.
	Right, that's incredible.
	What an incredible series of revelations.
	So Ben Kentish, like, so you are criminalising opinions here, right?
	There's a distinction between saying something and taking an act.
	And of course, English common law always criminalises acts and not opinions.
	There's no such thing as a thought crime.
	Used to be.
	Historically.
	No precedent for a thought crime.
	And so Ben's like, look, where's the line going to be between, you know, someone puts out an opinion and it becomes criminal?
	And she's like, I don't care.
	Yeah, don't worry about it.
	I don't care.
	People are sending me messages online.
	That's literally the core of her argument is, well, people are sending me messages online and I want that criminalized.
	Oh, great.
	Great.
	So we've got a woke thought police that's going to be operating in this country.
	We are literally going to be criminalized for tweeting at Jess Phillips.
	What the hell's going on?
	Justice.
	Progress.
	But Libra MPs have threatened us with leaving X. Leaving Twitter.
	I mean, just go.
	Go, woman, go!
	If only.
	But this is the point.
	She just comes out and just basically says, yeah, no, this is going to be a woke thought police.
	It's not going to be about your actions.
	It's going to be about whether I personally feel offended.
	And we don't care where the line is.
	We're spending far too much time worrying about the line.
	This is dangerous to women and girls.
	But you don't know that.
	You've proven no connection.
	You don't know that anyone radicalised by Andrew Tate is sexually assaulting someone on the London Underground.
	You don't know that for anything.
	There are lots of other reasons that I would suggest are maybe a lot more prosaic, but anyway, it doesn't matter.
	They're going to be criminalising your opinions, so, you know.
	And your thoughts, that's the whole, because hate is an emotion, so now we criminalise, so a whole list of emotions and I'm assuming you'll not be allowed out of your house until you've got a happy emotion or a caring emotion and you must stay locked in until you can swipe your new card that you'll get.
	And then in extremism, what is extreme what?
	Well, what isn't, you know, the line, worrying about where the line is, is, you know, doing a disservice to women and girls.
	So, I mean, like, stabbing three girl children, three girls in Southport, that wasn't terrorism.
	That wasn't misogyny, right?
	However, Andrew Tate, being a dick on Twitter, that is misogyny.
	That is terrorism.
	You've got to understand, right, and obviously there are going to be lots of people doing well.
	I mean, there are certain communities in this country that, uh, as, uh, I mean that definitely doesn't look like a hostage situation there, did it?
	You know, there are certain communities in this country that may have views that could be described as, uh, to the right of Andrew Tate on women.
	Are they misogynist terrorists?
	Is a single grooming gang member going to be declared a terrorist over this?
	Or is that not misogyny?
	Is it misogyny having those meetings and not allowing women to come unless you're Angela Rayner?
	Well, yeah.
	I mean, the 500 migrants broke into the country yesterday.
	Are they misogynists?
	Have we asked them their opinions on women?
	Do you remember the thing about the Garrick Club a few months back?
	Where it was like a male-only club?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	And then after two or three... They were forced to... Yeah, they were forced to open it up.
	And when Titus was asked, he said, yeah, no, they should.
	There shouldn't be male-only spaces.
	Two or three days into that news cycle, as I mentioned, What about mosques?
	Suddenly the whole debate has just dropped.
	We won't talk about male-only spaces anymore.
	Well, I'm talking about male-only spaces.
	Channeldeenies are male-only spaces, actually.
	And so, does anyone ask these people their opinions on women?
	No, actually.
	And you were saying, well, look, we're not going to criminalise misandry.
	Yes, we are, but only against the migrants.
	Only here's the Channel Refugees, because quote, they are victims too.
	You've got to understand, we've demonised and dehumanised all of these people.
	It's not on.
	It's not on.
	So the feminists have become men's rights activists, but just for foreign males who arrive here illegally.
	Because if white males shoot themselves in the head, according to Clive Lewis, that's funny.
	Yeah.
	Do you remember him on the front bench?
	He was like going... What a scumbag.
	We've got genuinely a feminist-occupied Karen-based government that is actively evil and against the native men of this country.
	They just say it.
	They're all for the foreign men.
	They're against the native men and they assume you are the ones harassing women on the tube.
	Even though if you go on the tube you look around, where are they then?
	That's what the Home Office adverts show, don't they?
	They show a white dude harassing a woman of colour somewhere in a park or whatever, that's what the adverts say.
	And I thought I'd just end this by noting that concurrent to all of this, and I assume totally unrelated to it all, women have coincidentally started discovering modesty, Weirdly, I covered up for a week to see if men would stop harassing me.
	The results shocked me.
	Oh, oh, did you?
	Why did you feel the need, London-based journalist Sama Ansaripour?
	Why did you feel the need to do that?
	Because the Englishmen were just like, well, you know.
	Anyway, well, I think, actually, with this one, we'll save this for a lads hour, because this is just, honestly, the article is such gold.
	It's interesting, actually, in like the 1950s or early 60s, when sort of the bikini became a thing, people were a lot more straight-laced before the war.
	Oh yeah.
	When the bikini became a thing, or miniskirts became a thing, there wasn't, in the West, in Britain, there wasn't a massive spike in sex crime.
	Was there not?
	No.
	Oh wow, really?
	No.
	Who could have imagined?
	But anyways... But now you need to cover up.
	Yeah, coincidentally, women are realising, actually, maybe a burqa isn't a bad thing.
	Burka would be a perfect way of protecting them from these bad men.
	That's how it works in the Middle East, so why shouldn't it work here?
	Exactly.
	Or better yet, don't let them out on their own.
	Yes.
	Always got to have them with a male member of their family.
	Make sure they're not in any spaces where men are as well.
	Anyway, we'll leave that there.
	Well, on to two-tier prisons, or legal system.
	Oh, sorry, yeah.
	Let's do some Rumble Rants, actually.
	Sorry.
	Blood for the Blood God for $100.
	Thanks, dude.
	Says, uh, sorry I had to light your S on fire.
	Uh, sacrifice to God.
	Uh, what?
	Hundred bucks, though!
	Yeah, I appreciate it.
	And, uh, Russian says, Islam is right about women.
	Go on, discuss that, Jess.
	Go on.
	Yeah, well, that's the thing, isn't it?
	Like, um, Angela Rayner sat in that mosque.
	Is she gonna be like, look, I think you guys just have backwards views on women?
	No, she's not going to say a damn thing.
	She's saying please give me your vote.
	I think the Hadiths and the Iraqi government have got it right on the age of consent.
	We should really fall in line with that.
	Well, it'll end up there, doesn't it?
	It's a horrible joke.
	At the end of the day, you guys voted for this.
	You voted for open borders.
	You come out and actively defend the illegal men who arrive in the country from these Islamic countries that want you to cover up.
	You're making this happen.
	You're actively making this all happen.
	Everyone sees it.
	Yeah.
	Everyone other than the most hardline sort of guardianists.
	If we don't keep the data on who is harassing and sexually assaulting women, then we can just assume it's just men as a general category.
	Axis says, why should I apologise for being a misogynist?
	Has any woman apologised for turning me into one?
	Inshallah.
	Yeah, I know, I know.
	There's so much that reform should be doing at the moment, which they're not.
	But we'll leave that one there and we'll carry on.
	Okay.
	Two tier prisons.
	My opening thoughts were, what we've seen over the last couple of weeks and the failings of our legal system, the failings of our police and the government using tactics that none of us really have probably witnessed, certainly not for decades, is that those in power are terrified of people who speak the truth.
	That's what we've learned.
	Those in power are terrified of the reach and lack of control on social media because all of what we've seen is an attack on alternative media.
	Elon Musk is the main opposition to the British government.
	We don't actually have anything, but Elon Musk is fulfilling that role of Her Majesty's opposition.
	Good King Elon, he saved every one of us.
	Oh, it's wonderful.
	I won't hear a bad word against me.
	Sorry.
	But I've also seen those arrested and charged have received very little or extremely poor legal advice.
	No juries, just magistrates elected.
	And my last thought before we jump in to this is the government is attempting to terrify and silence everyone it doesn't agree with by, and the media lockstep in that system, pushing the ridiculous sentencing that we've seen that we're
	going to get into but we've had ridiculous sentencing but don't worry because there is a scheme where actually we can fix this problem and it is to release many people not everyone so not all 90,000 people in our prison cells get released only the selected few so this is this is today it's just being announced move to ease prison overcrowding as more rioters are jailed the problem is the rioters yes
	So this is amazing, isn't it?
	Because criminals who have actually broken the law in normal life, who have broken the law sufficiently so, and have been sent to jail, are now being freed in order to put what I guess you could summarise as political prisoners into jail, in their place.
	I don't know what to say.
	Like, okay, this is an actively politicised judiciary we have now?
	Well, we'll go through this because this was Operation Early Dawn.
	It sounds like, I don't know, military action in Iraq.
	No, that was Operation New Dawn.
	This is Early Dawn.
	I think it's a classic tactic of leftist or communist governments when they're getting to open the prisons.
	Yeah.
	In Spain in the 30s.
	I mean there's lots and lots of examples, but also a thing that sprung to mind when you mentioned there is Alexandra Solzhenitsyn being what they called a zex, a political criminal.
	Yeah.
	So there'll be under the Stalinism anyway, or the early Soviet period, there's a whole A whole class of political prisoner and usually for very very very little.
	Well the new political prisoners are patriots.
	Those actually who are concerned at the change in their communities.
	But this is across the the north of England.
	I guess the north of England is more prisoners or more overcrowding.
	But this is yeah just this morning announced and one Here we have more than a thousand people have been arrested in connection with violent disorder and Facebook posts, but they don't mention that, following riots in England and Northern Ireland.
	It's good that Northern Ireland get a mention in that but sometimes we feel left out.
	All we have to do is challenge the government and they'll crack down on you just as hard as they crack down on us.
	So, I mean, the riots obviously erupted following the spread of misinformation online after three girls were killed in Stockport.
	It's amazing how you look at individuals that say, now, oops, I didn't mean to say that.
	Politicians, because everyone may say something that isn't correct or repost something and you get it wrong.
	But that's fine but if you're regarded as a patriot or regarded as that type far-right then of course you will be arrested and there's no apologies are accepted.
	But the CPS, Crown Prosecution Service, says more than 470 people have been charged with offences so far and it goes in to describe some of those with up to a thousand people actually being arrested and held.
	The problem is I just want to be clear as well.
	Some of these are totally legitimate as well, right?
	So, like, I can see there that the Longest is a guy for attempted arson.
	I guess he was one of the guys who was trying to set fire to a migrant hotel.
	Yeah, okay, it's totally legitimate.
	But is every single Facebook post of people being angry because foreign men are stabbing children and nothing's being done about it, is every single one of those just as guilty as that guy?
	According to the Labour government, yes.
	You know, they're politically exposed people now.
	And there doesn't seem... I mean, you have someone knocking at your door, and it's the police, and you haven't been at any of these demonstrations.
	I know, Carl, you've warned people not to go, and I think that was certainly at the beginning, it was okay.
	Actually, people should come and stand up for Three girls getting murdered and what the hell is your community and then you see the violence you say okay this now is not something you should get involved in.
	The police come and knock on your door arrest you and you're just carted off by the police to a police cell and you think what on earth has happened never been involved with the law never been in trouble before Do you have a lawyer on speed dial?
	No, most of us don't.
	We wouldn't know what to do.
	And the police are using that confusion and element of surprise to actually throw people away.
	And these people, before they know, within 48 hours they're actually charged and sentenced and sent away.
	Up to three years in jail so far.
	So as of Friday last week, there were only 340 spaces left in prisons.
	So they've arrested 470 people.
	And so they need to let out 100 actual criminals to make sure the people who posted things on Facebook can also... One in, one out, like a full-up nightclub.
	Yeah but it's like there was that guy we covered it on the podcast a few days ago a 61 year old ex-train driver dude who cares for his wife now literally all he did was walk towards the police walked a bit closer to the police line and they just sucked him into the police line he's suddenly sentenced to 18 months you know so gesticulating towards the police blur the line between him and an actual arsonist what a gross thing to do what a weird thing to do
	Well, the biggest one was the gesticulating, but we'll get into that.
	But you look at some of these mother of six who threw brick at police, jailed as more in court over riots.
	But then you begin to delve into them and you find out some of them, this is the BBC Live reporting, obviously the excitement.
	But some of them have called for things to happen, have called for something to be burned down.
	And if you're actually calling for people to do that, that is incitement to violence.
	Yeah, that is wrong and you should be punished for that.
	But others have not called for those to participate.
	We've been told, obviously, reposting, retweeting, putting out a video.
	And of course, as Elon Musk saw that, he doubled down and started tripling the posts.
	But that's the danger and no one knows where the line is.
	But you've got...
	And this early dawn is now in place for the North East, Cumbria, Manchester, Merseyside, Cheshire...
	Labour heartlands.
	And the East and West Midlands, well yes.
	Labour heartlands are being tyrannised by the Labour Party.
	It's, it's, it's an attack on, on... Conservative areas.
	I know.
	All the Southern Conservatives are just like, what's happening?
	So I want to go into some of them because one of them had, we'll get to that in a moment, but some of them were in Manchester, this is today, there are two cases being looked at today.
	In Manchester, Thomas Ward, 35, will be sentenced after he exposed his genitals at the police officer.
	Unwise thing to do, this is not a Braveheart, lift up the kilt and shoot at the English.
	But he will be sentenced today for that crime.
	Graham Brooks will be sentenced after admitting to throwing a pint of cider towards police.
	I mean it was hot, maybe they were thirsty.
	It didn't hit, I know.
	So throwing it towards.
	So those are some of the actual people who are participating in violence.
	We'll get into some of the posts.
	Just a quick thing, I'm not a lawyer or anything.
	But these seem really petty.
	Like, you threw something at the police.
	Did it hit?
	No, it didn't hit anyone.
	Right, okay.
	I mean, isn't a fine or something appropriate for this level of criminality?
	Yeah.
	I mean, I would have thought.
	Well, not even that.
	It's not even worth the cops' time.
	Sure, but like, you know, if you feel like that, I want to make an example out of these guys.
	Okay, fine them 500 quid or something.
	You know, okay, that'll probably teach them not to do it again.
	That would make sense, especially because prisons are full.
	Yes, especially.
	And if someone is not a repeat offender the first time, then you would think that's fine.
	Yeah.
	But of course today, sir, just what we're going to take here, Stormer, is in Northern Ireland.
	So he's speaking to the police today, telling them that Labour are with them, and I'm sure that will make everyone in Northern Ireland feel happy who don't actually support Labour in any shape or form.
	Nobody votes for Labour in Northern Ireland, do they?
	No, no, no.
	Irrelevant.
	And then they get Keir Starmer hoisted upon it in Northern Ireland.
	But this was, this hasn't just happened.
	This was, from the BBC, thousands of prisoners to be released in September.
	Yeah, this was like the Labour government's first thing when they came in.
	They were like, yeah, we're going to open the prisons, by the way, because we're a communist government.
	But this is a week after they get into power and they're announcing, no, we're going to release the prisoners.
	This is a key part of our judicial system.
	And this is the Justice Secretary, Sabana Mahmood.
	Her parents, her family are from Pakistan.
	So maybe a Pakistani justice, you know, that could work off of the head and things like that.
	I don't want to give Libra too many ideas.
	So she is there visiting a prison looking very confused at what she's seen and we just released them all.
	Look at the framing.
	She says, sorry go down a bit.
	So she's accused Rishi Senak and the previous Conservative government of a disgraceful dereliction of duty for not dealing with the crisis of prison overcrowding.
	So basically she's coming like, look we're going to let them out.
	Why didn't you let them out?
	You should have let them out.
	The prisons are overcrowded.
	What are you talking about?
	You're not saying we're going to build more prisons.
	No, no, no.
	There are people in jail who shouldn't be in jail, say the Labour Party.
	It's like, well, look at this machete guy.
	The guy got like 14 months or something and was let out for good behaviour.
	It's like, oh my God.
	A Justice Secretary who seemingly knows nothing of justice.
	Well, it's just not concerned.
	The opposite of justice.
	Well, the thing is, you've got to understand that justice is people living as their true and authentic natural selves.
	And jails stop people from being their true and authentic natural selves.
	In fact, form punishment for being their true and authentic natural selves.
	So they're going to build thousands and thousands and thousands of homes, but not a single new prison?
	That's not possible.
	They're going to build lots of youth clubs.
	So she had a great plan.
	So under her plan, some prisoners, we don't know exactly which ones, not the bad ones we're told.
	If they're bad, they won't be released.
	If they're not too bad, they will be released.
	I'm paraphrasing.
	Some prisoners will be released after they've served 40% of their sentence in England and Wales.
	Not on Northern Ireland, we get away, our prisoners stay until they serve their sentence.
	Rather than the current 50%.
	If you get a fine, You're going to get a fine for, what, £500 for doing something wrong.
	And they say, tell you what, we'll just knock 50%.
	Tell you what, we'll knock 60% off it.
	Hey, just pay whatever you want to pay.
	That's what we'll get.
	It's like, how long would you like to serve?
	What, just one night?
	No problem.
	You're helping our prison overcrowding.
	That's what we'll become.
	Well, do we think that Stammer's political prisoners are going to get this kind of treatment?
	Or are they going to be on some sort of special register where it's like, no, they get to serve the full term?
	Well, I think they, because the whole purpose of jailing those who were involved in the backlash, some involved in riots, that's not right, many others involved in Facebook twos, the whole point of this clampdown is to terrify and fear and shut down that town.
	And to that extent the British government actually did well and they achieved their aim.
	Well they definitely terrorised the people of the North.
	Yes.
	The traditional Labour voters of the North.
	I think they are living in fear at the moment of Keir Starmer.
	So we wonder, this is what's out there, 4,000, it'll be 4,000 over the next 18 months.
	4,000 extra male prisoners and fewer than 1,000 female.
	I don't know why it's just fewer than 1,000.
	Around 1,000.
	Very few women actually in prison.
	Well, nearly 1,000 of them are going to be released.
	I think this is only up in the North and Midlands, so I think if you're in the South, you escape it, or if you're Northern Ireland, you don't get these prisoners out after 40% of their time.
	But yeah, I assume the government have decided these people have been punished enough, and they're now reformed characters, and they'll not carry out the acts they originally carried out to put them in jail.
	So 40% sentencing.
	Speaking of that, that's all I think they've done.
	Well at the moment it's 50% which is keeping another 10,000 people in jail but if we reduce that to 40% then we get those numbers down.
	That's what I think they're thinking.
	So moving on we obviously had this um a number of statements in this we had the head of public prosecution said 10 years and now we have a judge John Thackery Casey says prosecution needs to look at those plain front and central rules as he sentenced Hull Rider who kicked a police officer.
	So suggesting... WPC?
	What's a WPC?
	Woman Police Constable.
	Is that what it actually means?
	Yeah.
	WPC is a female cop.
	How is it that the Manchester Airport guy hasn't yet been charged.
	You know, he slugged a couple of women in the face, women police officers, still hasn't been charged.
	Well this, so the the court sat however long they had to sit for 40, well to arrest these people, charge them, sentence them, put them in jail within 48 hours, a lot of this, but of course the the individual who stabbed and murdered the three girls in Stockport at just five months until, now he's held in custody yes, but justice has to be done and if they can do it Quickly for someone throwing a pint of cider at someone.
	Sure they could do it for someone who murdered three girls, but possibly not.
	So, 10-year prison sentences and we've had this.
	Now, what are some of these?
	This is a great headline.
	This is unbelievable.
	Did he get four years?
	For stealing bath bombs.
	So, soup.
	He did do it, he was quite angry and he did go into an O2 store and he did steal a phone or two.
	So obviously you shouldn't be doing that.
	But he did also scare three Romanian men from their BMW.
	So I guess it's worse if you're Romanian.
	It wouldn't be as bad if you're English.
	I don't understand.
	This guy's obviously a massive prat.
	Yes.
	What the hell are you doing?
	Looting Lush?
	For bath bombs?
	What are you doing?
	So I'm not in any way sympathetic to this guy.
	Bro just wants a nice relaxing bath.
	He deserves four years in prison.
	Maybe he gets it in prison, I don't know.
	He can use the bath bombs in prison, maybe they can confiscate it.
	But it was just, it was just that headline, Rather Little Lush, lush for bath bombs, wearing England flag, just four years.
	Was that why?
	The Independer's pointing out that he was jailed for four years because he stole bath bombs and he had an English flag.
	That's why they have said he was arrested.
	Now he was part of a mob shouting and bad things at these Romanians and their BMW had to flee.
	Amazing that three Romanian men just happened to have a BMW, isn't it?
	Yes.
	They're not in some crappy second-hand car.
	They're in their nice, shiny, brand new BMW.
	Amazing.
	They're such hard-working people.
	No, we, of course, we saw this.
	This was one of the cases I reported a lot back from 7th of August.
	So just the discrepancy, and I know you'll have covered this here, but Agne for mother of teen killed in machete attack after learning one of his killers will be released after six months due to prison overcrowding under new Labour scheme.
	You know, we used to have a solution to people who murdered people that didn't require us to have overcrowded prisons.
	A necktie party?
	Yeah, it was a short walk and a long drop.
	You know, a short drop.
	It really did solve the prison overcrowding problem.
	But instead, we're just gonna let them out?
	So you murder someone, and murder a kid, because this was a 14-year-old who got killed, and after six months you're just like, yeah, you're free to go.
	Does that deter anyone else?
	No.
	Terrence, this is not justice!
	I think it's about a story like this, is that It's so monstrous.
	Yeah, it's not just like, things like this.
	It's on a whole nother level.
	It's not just like one more annoying, frustrating thing, is it?
	It's like when you see that thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of girls have been raped and things.
	Things like this where you see, like my whole view of the world...
	Changes my whole view of the government and the establishment and you people that see that that have seen that will never forget it Almost certainly never forget it.
	They'll hold that as a little ball of resentment deep down in their soul Well, they should I mean, this is the 14 year old kid who got machete to death in the street Yeah, just like this is unbelievable his is killing and this is six months in jail It's just unreal And this is the thing that the Osama government and all the Tory governments as well, all the governments we've had in the last 20, 30 years or whatever, they expect you just to forget about it.
	Just don't be so fragile.
	Okay, just forget about it.
	It's not your problem.
	But also they're working in hand-in-glove with the media because the media will put out the message they want to put out and they don't cover this day in day out but they cover something else to move on.
	But then if we move on to some of them, so this is the BBC getting really excited because Night of August was the beginning of social media posters starting to see jail.
	And they go in, I mean this guy, Taylor Kaye, 38 months.
	Stirring up racial hatred.
	I guess that meant it was an aggravated crime.
	It's not just enough to call for people to do it.
	Actually, if you have a racial element and that's the whole hit crime.
	Hang on a second.
	So the asylum seekers are racial, are they?
	So, like, it's just assumed that the asylum seekers are all non-white, right?
	They might have been Albanian, you say?
	Well that's the thing, they could have been Romanian or Albanian or whatever, but they're all just, they're the Browns now, right?
	So, asylum seekers equals Browns, according to our government, our legal system.
	And it goes on and on on a whole list of them having, but I don't know if 38 months over three years is a penalty when you could have a fine, you could have many others.
	And whether these people get out after 40% of serving their time, I wonder.
	I reckon these people will actually be in for much longer than 50%.
	I can imagine the government bringing legislation to say actually these people are so bad we can't let them out after 50% of the time.
	We have to hold them in.
	And then it go their keyboard warrior Jill for a part in UK disorder.
	And this was one of a number that have actually really concerned people because didn't take a part in any of this and yet got... He's sick of it isn't he?
	That's the guy.
	He's sick of it.
	Three years.
	Three years he's been in jail.
	So he praised the burning of a car but he pushed misinformation.
	This is it.
	It's the government or the guardians of information and you must check with the government what is right and what is wrong as Jacinda Ardern told us.
	So actually they are the gatekeepers of information and they will tell us.
	And that's why it's a fear of alternative media.
	It's a fear of social media because that bypasses those gatekeepers of our government.
	But then you go and change your sentence after punching and kicking a police van.
	So he's got two years and four months for beating up a police van.
	I didn't know police.
	I mean, that's criminal damage.
	Is there some way?
	But no, 18 year old, an 18 year old.
	Nearly two and a half years and he serves out in a young offenders institution.
	I get no conversation or debate on media whether this is right or wrong, how you treat people who've been maybe sucked into something.
	If someone has gone out, had a few drinks as a kid and they see that and start shouting and then it's actually, is that a criminal offence?
	But if gesticulating and shouting is a criminal offence, I mean gesticulating is the worst of all crimes I think.
	Do you remember in the Leeds unrest?
	They flipped a cop car, didn't they?
	Yeah, and they set a bus on fire.
	She flipped a cop car.
	Was there anyone?
	No.
	Nobody?
	Okay.
	Panic was on, and yeah, that's the 26 months for gesticulating and shouting.
	The police don't like you waving their arms at them or raising your voice.
	26 months for being constantly in the face of officers gesticulating and shouting.
	I think this is the one he got bit by a police dog.
	Right, I wasn't aware this was a crime.
	You weren't allowed to gesticulate and shout at the police.
	But again, the terror legislation and the public order legislation makes it so wide that the police are judge and jury.
	They decide what is wrong and once they nick you, The system will lock you away.
	You don't have any response or any pushback.
	It seems like, yeah, the process... It's been so quick.
	They make you plead guilty.
	Well, not make you.
	They sort of put pressure on you.
	They're very, very good.
	It's their job.
	They're professionals at making you feel like you have to plead guilty.
	And that's it, so the CPS barely need to get involved, take it straight before a judge, who's a political activist, who just goes, here's 28 months, here's 36 months, it's all over very very quickly.
	So that interview, that's like a star chamber then, effectively.
	You're then in the clutches of the tyranny, and they'll do everything to make you just say, okay I accept I'm guilty, I'll sign the thing saying I'm guilty, and that's it, you're done.
	So it really is terrifying to people who've got no sort of legal nous whatsoever.
	Yeah, because you'd think these people would be entitled to jury trials.
	Well, it's the pleading guilty thing.
	Katherine Blake looks very good on that.
	It's just, don't tell them anything.
	Yeah.
	Like, they'll say, oh, anything you don't say may later rely on in court.
	Maybe you should say, OK, I'll take that deal then.
	I'll wait until I'm before a magistrate and a jury then.
	I'm not going to sign whatever nonsense you're putting in front of me.
	No, no, I reject this star chamber.
	I'm telling you nothing until I get a solicitor.
	And they go, well, why don't you?
	You go, solicitor, solicitor, not talking to you until I get a solicitor.
	You've got to do it like that.
	Don't make it convenient for them.
	You've got to make sure that they have to do the proper process.
	They're not there to help you in any way, shape, or form.
	They're there to convict you, the police.
	The police say, come on down the station and just, we want a little word with you.
	You don't have to.
	Well, I don't want to.
	You go, am I under arrest?
	They go, well, but, no, am I under arrest?
	Well, we said, no, am I under arrest?
	And eventually they'll say, no, if you're not, that is.
	Yes.
	You go, okay, bye-bye then.
	Bye-bye.
	Bye-bye now.
	But this was, the headline of this is, woman jailed for involvement in terrifying mob.
	Katie Price has really let herself go.
	That's true separately to this.
	She's actually more attractive than Katie Price.
	But look, so the third paragraph, a 38 year old woman was in a prominent position during the ordeal, during which she threw a can and shouted verbal abuse.
	How dare you throw a tin of beer and shout some abuse?
	Two years in jail?
	Yes, two years in jail.
	For verbal abuse.
	State will deprive you of your liberty for a... He's got five kids?
	A percentage of your life for that.
	But no care from the government of the damage this may do.
	I mean, have a conversation.
	Is this the right thing?
	If someone has got a criminal record long list, that's one thing, but... You know, I remember the Muslim guy who was like, well, he's been given a suspended sentence because his wife doesn't speak English.
	Yes.
	Oh, well, that's okay then.
	Maybe the Home Secretary can make a personal intervention and, you know, on behalf of these unjust... She's too busy making Andrew Tate a terrorist!
	Oh yeah, no, sorry, she's got more important things to do, that's right.
	But the last, just, I just want to show the discrepancy.
	So, grooming, Rotherham grooming victim frustrated over parole wait, and I mention this because this is the legal case that we have been involved in, and we're now waiting for ownership of the property.
	So he can actually sell it and get her money.
	But she talks about that her perpetrator, rapist, was jailed for nine years, got out after four and a half, served the last, I think, year in an open prison, and then they found out that actually he had gone into Rotherham, into the area, was arrested, put away in jail.
	But she's been told it might be 18 months till he gets a parole hearing.
	Now he's held in jail, yes, but he's still 18 months?
	But yet, if you throw a can of beer, we'll do you in 48 hours.
	Why is it not 48 hours for this?
	Why is it longer for the throwing of the can of beer than for being part of a grooming gang?
	Yep.
	And if he was born as a foreign national, or was born in a foreign country of origin, why isn't he being deported after his sentence?
	The eternal question.
	So, and again, just to show the discrepancy, these are older stories this year, but if the police are not cracking down on crime, then actually it gives the green light for individuals to carry out crime.
	So hundreds of thugs caught carrying a knife at least twice are spared jail despite two strike crackdowns.
	Figures show 38% of repeat knife offenders avoided jail in 2022-2023.
	Talk tough, but actually act weak.
	That seems to be the mantra.
	And there was just one last, I just wanted just to show, because this infographic caught my looking, just how old are prisons?
	And you drive around some of the prisons in the UK and they're very old.
	Prisons are listed buildings.
	A lot of them are Victorian or older.
	Yes, so they're not fit for purpose.
	I think the last one was built, I think, three years ago.
	But if you have to keep filling them up, have to keep building more, maybe you need to look at the system in place that puts people in.
	Maybe there's something wrong.
	But yeah, we just build more prisons and lock more people away and eventually can lock everyone away, I guess.
	Because look at the prison building programme.
	But yeah, 370 places on Friday.
	Let's see how many are released to free up those places for any people throwing cans of lager at the police.
	It's going to be at least 100.
	It's going to be at least 100.
	That's what lockdowns were or curfews are, isn't it?
	You're put under house arrest.
	Your own home will become your cell.
	Yeah.
	And your neighbours and yourself, members of your own family, will become your wardens.
	And guards.
	Who's the guy in Central America?
	Is it El Salvador?
	Is it El Salvador?
	Where he turned it from one of the homicide capitals of the world to one of the safest places in the world.
	He built, I think it was one, maybe more than one, but at least one massive, massive prison, didn't he?
	With massive, massive open plan things.
	If we really needed to, we could build... If they're going to build tens of thousands of houses, they could commit to building one massive jail somewhere out on the moors.
	And then get every Labour voter in the North in there!
	So yeah, I'll not touch on this.
	I'll just leave the viewers and listeners.
	Reform the Single Justice Procedure.
	I heard a programme on this on Friday and it shows the conveyor belt of our judicial system.
	Over 40,000 people actually charged and they are not even present.
	When you get a letter being told something's going to happen, 75% of people don't respond, they get charged, don't even know they've got a criminal record.
	And they talked about judges having like a minute or something on each case, or two minutes on each case.
	It is impossible.
	So everyone gets charged.
	And when you delve into the system, you realize it is utterly broken.
	And yet they want to just add more people onto the system.
	So I'll leave that to the viewers and listeners.
	Single justice procedure, it is horrendous.
	I didn't know about that conveyor belt of the judicial system until I heard it on Friday.
	Someone with a name I can't pronounce says, what happens if these political prisoners meet Islamic gangs who are serving their time in jail?
	Well, Being a racist is way worse than being a jihadi, according to our government and our institutions.
	So you can assume for yourself.
	But anyway, we're running out of time, so let's move on.
	Okay, um, can someone scroll up or down on this document for me so I can see my notes, what I'm actually going to be talking about?
	So, um, we thought we'd do a little bit of light relief, perhaps.
	Yes.
	Talk about, uh, the fight between Mary Beard and tech billionaires.
	Can we properly- Is there anyone who doesn't know who Mary Beard is?
	Well, I was going to say, can we properly frame and contextualise this?
	Because as I understand it from Mary Beard's social media posting, she is the sole scholar on the Roman Empire.
	She's the only person.
	Anyone who might not know, Mary Beard is a famous classicist.
	And feminist.
	And ancient historian.
	So a historian that talks about the ancient world.
	Particularly the Roman world, and she's the darling of TV producers, the corporate TV, so you'll see her on BBC and things all the time.
	She's a radical leftist?
	Yeah, and she's a complete femtard, yeah.
	What I would describe her as is not a historian, she's an activist.
	She's a leftist activist promoted, put front and centre to subvert and often pervert the narrative of history in all sorts of ways.
	That's just your patriarchal view because I follow Mary Beard on Twitter and all I get from her is that zero other people understand Rome like she does.
	So she's the one authority on all of this and everyone is wrong about everything they've ever said.
	She's extremely smug and conceited on top of everything else.
	Shocking!
	Extremely so.
	So I mean because I did I did ancient history at undergrad and been in and around it a bit you know and like a lot of things when people think they're an expert on something they get they often get it's hard not to almost become a little bit conceited about it you have to be very careful not to for example someone like Stelios who's got a PhD in philosophy is very very down-to-earth.
	He doesn't say that other people don't understand philosophy.
	Yeah, right.
	But a lot of academics do get like that and I've noticed that, particularly in the humanities, often it's the case.
	Now I've got, well my background is in history, I've got a lot of respect for people that have done maths,
	or physics or even chemistry things like that because they can really they can actually well I think so anyway they can legitimately say to people look you haven't you haven't even got an A level in maths you haven't even got an undergrad in physics I am gonna have to say I know better than you on this one I'm gonna have to pull that card when it comes to history though when it comes to history though anyone can read Plutarch's account of Sulla's life it doesn't even take that long it will take you about three hours it won't take you one hour You should read it.
	It's really good.
	It's really interesting.
	Sorry, go on.
	So for one example, she's having a pop at Elon and also Zuckerberg.
	She's also trying to cut the Zuck.
	But particularly Elon, that he dare have an opinion on Rome, which isn't exactly in line with hers.
	She says something like he's got odd views about Sulla.
	And it's like, yeah, he's probably read Plutarch, though.
	So his view is completely legit.
	It's as good as yours.
	Here's the other thing, a little secret to give away about ancient history.
	There's not that much to it.
	It's way, way easier to get an undergrad degree in ancient history or classical studies than it is in modern history.
	You can read all the source material, or nearly all the source material, in a few weeks if you really tried.
	A few months tops.
	You can read it for fun, it's interesting.
	Like, for example, Scylla.
	You've got the life of Scylla by Plutarch.
	You've got some bits in Appian.
	You've got a bit here and there, like some letters of Cicero might mention it.
	Or something in Caesar might mention Scylla.
	The odd bit there, like Pliny might mention Scylla once or twice here or there.
	You can read everything there is to read in Scylla from the primary sources in a day.
	Easily.
	But she knows everything about it and all her views are correct and Elon's aren't.
	Or anyone else's for that matter.
	For some reason Elon's not allowed his opinion on this.
	No.
	Because look how smug she is.
	Zuckerberg, if you want to move on to that link, had commissioned a statue to look like his wife.
	I mean, I think it's a disgusting statue, but nonetheless he said that it was bringing back the Roman tradition of making statues of your wife.
	And she tried to sort of have a pop at him saying, oh that's not in the Roman style.
	Obviously it's not.
	Her critique was even more tepid than that.
	It was like, well there are actually very few statues of women in ancient Rome.
	Yeah, but the ones we have are of the wives of the senators.
	Like, that's... There's loads of statues of women.
	So, this is the other thing.
	This is the other thing she does.
	And I wrote an article... Awesomely maybe, then, you know, but... I wrote an article about beard ages ago now.
	What, two years ago?
	Three years ago?
	Yeah, I called it Mary Beard's Absurd Cherry Picking.
	And in that article... When is it from?
	2021?
	Yeah, so a while ago.
	In fact, you asked me, you said she's come out with this book.
	A little pamphlet.
	It's more of a pamphlet, really.
	And it was about women in history.
	Of course it was.
	Because that's all she cares about, really.
	And she did some of the most absurd cherry-picking I've ever heard of.
	For example, in the Odyssey, Homer's Odyssey, there's a bit where Telemachus, Odysseus' son, says to Penelope, his mum, And Odysseus's wife.
	At one point she says something or other and he basically says, pipe down, pipe down, the men are talking, right?
	That basically is what happens.
	And she goes off on one going, this is how men treat women, this is how women have always been treated through histories, women's voices have always been subject to oppression, blah blah blah blah blah.
	And it's just, she cherry-picked one thing.
	And I just listed loads and loads of women from history.
	If you scroll down a bit, at some point, I can't remember the list of women I made.
	Can you scroll down a bit?
	There's somewhere where I mention just a whole bunch of women's names from... from uh... Well, I can't be bothered.
	There's so many examples of important women from history.
	So many.
	It's from Rome alone?
	Right.
	Right.
	But she's looking at this proportionally.
	She's saying, well, most of them were men.
	Is that the case?
	So?
	What do you want us to do about that?
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	There's been lots of, lots of empresses.
	Rome wasn't feminist?
	And not just in the Roman world.
	Thinking of Theodora.
	There's been many, many females, many Queens of England.
	But she tries to argue that they've never been listened to.
	Women have never had political voices.
	So anyway, that's just one example of how she's not really a historian in any real sense, in any objective sense.
	She's a political activist, a feminist.
	Can you scroll down a bit more?
	I've made some notes.
	If I quote from myself, real quick.
	Again, that's a classic historian thing to do.
	Put your own book on the reading list.
	Get the undergrads to read your stuff.
	Can you scroll up slightly?
	There you go.
	So I called her Corporate TV's Most Beloved Historian and National Embarrassment Mary Beard.
	I call her National Embarrassment over and over and over again.
	That's what she is to me.
	She's not actually a historian in any meaningful sense.
	She's an activist partisan.
	She's a quasi deranged crypto-communist boomer shill, hand-picked and sent to pervert and subvert decent society.
	She is, in a number of ways, the very antithesis of a historian.
	I go on to say that's not hyperbole there, because what she's doing, it's not just for a laugh, it's not just funny, it's not just because she's got a chip on her shoulder about being a woman, which is what it largely is.
	It's much, much more than that, isn't it?
	It's to say that your Western culture, your whole civilization, your history and your heritage, is bad and wrong.
	Or what a despicable, disgusting thing to be involved in and do, and yet call yourself a historian.
	Well it doesn't live up to the liberal ideals.
	I was like, no, why would the Roman Empire live up to liberal ideals?
	Why on earth would it?
	It's ridiculous.
	But like, what specific sort of claims is she making about Elon Musk exactly?
	Because I'm curious about, like, because she just says over and over, well, they don't understand Roman history.
	It's like, okay, why?
	To explain, you know, she's like, I'm a professor of Roman, of classics.
	I don't think you must understand Roman history.
	It's like, okay, but that's not enough.
	You need to explain why.
	But she doesn't.
	Oh well done, you've read Suetonius and Tacitus like anyone else can in a day.
	Yeah, well done Mary.
	But even then, like, she's not making any actual claims or specific claims about what Elon Musk has said that's wrong.
	Yeah, she'll just say it's just a wrong-headed view or it's just an odd take on Sulla or something.
	Yeah.
	I make the point here that she...
	The culture war extends to not just sort of TV and film and the news cycle, but history itself.
	What we're allowed to think history was.
	You know, revisionism.
	Actually, there was loads more transgenderism and gayness and crypto-communism in the ancient world.
	Actually, that was what was going on the whole time, didn't you know?
	Well, one thing I dislike about Beard, and this thread that she retweeted, this one, She retweeted this, obviously, she endorses it, and what I hear about this is the debunking view of the world, which I really, really get frustrated by, because it doesn't actually answer any questions, right?
	First issue, tradition.
	Yeah, the Roman wives had statues made of them.
	Okay, well, there we go, right?
	You've conceded the entire argument.
	Like, Mark Zuckerberg was like, oh, Romans made statues of their wives.
	Yeah, Romans made statues of their wives.
	Okay, Miss Beard, or Dr. Professor Beard, like, why did you retweet this?
	Like, but she says, there's a noted exception, Hadrian's statues of Antoninus.
	Okay, Hadrian was gay.
	So what?
	What's the point?
	Did Romans make statues of their wives or not?
	You've already admitted they did.
	So what?
	Was it an act of devotion?
	Eh.
	What do you mean?
	Because Hadrian made the statue of Antoninus, then Romans weren't devoted to their wives because they made statues of them.
	It's nonsense.
	Again, trying to insert cracks in the argument where cracks just don't exist Cherry-picking.
	It's worse than cherry-picking.
	What they're trying to do here is cast doubt on the fact that Roman men made statues of their wives.
	Why would you make a statue of your wife?
	Because you love her, obviously.
	And, well, I mean, Hadrian made a statue of Antoninus.
	Well, Hadrian loved Antoninus.
	What do you want from me?
	How does that change anything about what the other Roman men are doing with their wives?
	Nothing.
	But in general, statues of wives would show off dynasty, show off wealth through public magnificence, or for funerary purposes.
	Or showcasing Roman virtues.
	Yeah, okay.
	That's not a debunk.
	That doesn't debunk anything!
	Zuckerberg didn't say reviving that tradition, of which there were very few.
	He didn't say that.
	To oppress women or something.
	Anyway.
	I hate the framing because what they're doing is confirming everything that Zuckerberg has just said.
	All Romans used to make statues of their wives.
	And framing it as if he is completely wrong.
	Which is just not true.
	You've admitted that he's right.
	The job of a serious historian is just an attempt to get to objective historical facts.
	Now, that's not possible.
	The past is profoundly lost to us.
	It's very, very difficult to agree on any sort of objective truth in the present.
	So in the past it's always difficult and historians will always end up with a story or a narrative rather than a definitive truth.
	However, that is the job of the scholar, of the serious historian, is to try and be as objective as possible and just get to the truth.
	So, by that criteria, Beard absolutely fails.
	You know, because all she's doing, really, is trying to present a particular partisan narrative.
	Well, that's the point.
	She's trying to debunk, like, anything that the right-wing men have set up as... They've extracted a certain selection of facts to present a narrative that they feel is the spirit of the thing, and they're like, well, no, I mean, all the facts are correct, but we disagree with the interpretation.
	It's like, who cares what you agree or disagree with?
	Your interpretation is, I mean, look at the kind of person who's doing the interpreting, you know?
	It's like, sorry, like, no.
	And plus, her takes on Rome aren't particularly brilliant anyway.
	I remember watching a program of hers about Caligula, where she insisted that Caligula's memory had been, is completely unfair, that he probably was nowhere near as bad.
	Now that's, that's, many historians, many scholars have said that sort of thing, and there's probably an element of it which is correct, that probably for political purposes after his death is, but no, no, no, no, but she went so far with it Where she's sort of contradicting what, not Tastus so much because the Caligula bit of Tastus is largely missing, but what Suetonius and other people say about him.
	It's just not right and it's like, oh you know better than Suetonius do you?
	Wasn't Suetonius living through the period?
	A bit after.
	Which one was it who literally couldn't write what they wanted to write about Caligula?
	They were living under his tyranny.
	Well, Tacitus was living under the tyranny of Domitian, and so he couldn't really write what he wanted to about Domitian during Domitian's reign, but then afterwards could.
	And Domitian is like a slightly lesser insane version of Caligula.
	Actually quite a lot less insane.
	We did an Epochs on Domitian, and Caligula actually!
	Check out Epochs, sign up to notasetas.com, click on the history tab, Epochs, you'll find me and Karl, a few hundred hours of me and Karl talking about history.
	Anyway, Yeah, so I say that... Sorry?
	For the sake of time.
	Yeah, okay.
	So I said of her that she's parachuted onto TV because she's an arch-feminist and a committed leftist devotee.
	They could have picked any historian to make sort of the darling of TV history, but they picked this one because she's a shill for globalism.
	Because she'll write love posts like this.
	Yeah.
	And that she's the very embodiment, this is me speaking again, of a particular stripe of super cringe feminism, the type of Germaine Greer-esque come-woman's-hour semi-hysterical man-hating nonsense.
	And that's exactly what it is.
	I stand by that.
	I stand by that.
	It's not real history.
	It's not real history.
	You're having a slanted, weirdo take on history presented to you.
	Be very, very suspicious of her.
	I say it's not the behaviour of a serious historian committed to the pursuit of truth.
	She's an agent of partiality.
	"creature spawned of deceit and liars" type of modern witch.
	If you look at this blog post, there's not... like, it's what, six paragraphs long?
	Yeah, scroll up a bit more.
	She says there, he's got a strange admiration for Sulla.
	Says who?
	Says who?
	Well, I think it's a very sensible admiration for Sulla, because Sulla was a very admirable leader.
	Other than the extrajudicial killings.
	But, um, yeah, he got the job done, at least, didn't he?
	He brought order back to Rome, at least.
	No friend served me or enemy wronged me, I think.
	That's all I'm saying.
	He did win.
	Yeah, exactly.
	He never lost a battle.
	He completely won the Roman Civil War.
	He was obviously a very competent leader.
	He was just exceptionally ruthless.
	But again... He wasn't a mass murderer, I bet.
	Yeah, well, the name of Roman general that wasn't a mass murderer?
	Pompey?
	Actually, he was.
	Yeah, he was a mass murderer!
	Fabius?
	You think he was meant to be a good one, Fabius?
	Well, I said it because he never left bloody Italy, you know?
	But like, if he'd left Italy, he would have done the same.
	They all just sacked cities and killed thousands of people.
	Like, they're all mental.
	But like, if you look at the Pompeys, like, no.
	Yeah, no, he killed all sorts of people.
	Look at the content of this blog post.
	This is just me versus the tech billionaires.
	Okay, but what are you actually saying here?
	Like, nothing.
	It's the classic thing of, I am a tenured professor at Cambridge, don't you know?
	And even though we've read exactly the same thing, you need to be quiet.
	But like, there's just no content to this.
	It's like that thing I said about maths and physics.
	One person's actually studied it and done the reading and understands equations properly.
	And someone that doesn't...
	Yeah the person can pull that card saying look you don't act sorry you don't actually know what you're talking about.
	I would never debate maths with James Lindsay.
	Right yeah I wouldn't say to Professor Penrose actually I think those equations you did back in the 70s that you won a prize for actually I think you were wrong that would be insane right but when you there's a There's a small amount of reading that anyone can do, and then you've got as much knowledge as anyone else, really.
	But that's the point, isn't it?
	For her, it's about the interpretation.
	She's not challenging the facts of the thing.
	And even in the debunking thread that she retweets, they're not challenging the facts of the thing.
	They just don't like the way you view these facts.
	Can you scroll down a tiny bit more on this, and I'll finish up?
	So the last thing I said about her is that you know she's nakedly a structuralist or a post-structuralist or some one of those weird types of some manner of grotesque leftist claptrap revisionist nonsense.
	That's what she is and ultimately these people They're at war with history.
	They're at war with the truth and with your heritage, Western culture and civilization.
	They're there to undermine it and replace it with some crazy feminist dystopia.
	Yeah, 100%.
	Her entire philosophy on history is to show how it wasn't liberal and how we shouldn't want to emulate it, how you can't take any good examples from the Roman Empire.
	How you can't draw any virtues from any of its leaders.
	It's like, okay, but I don't agree with you because I'm not an insane feminist, so shut up.
	All your ancestors were evil people.
	Yeah, that's literally their position, yeah.
	I say, I would urge all unassuming television viewers to be suspicious of Mary Beard.
	Though she seems like a harmless storyteller, a mildly obnoxious Karen at best, she is in fact a pernicious snake.
	She is an example par excellence of a useful idiot.
	A purveyor of leftist filth.
	A vehicle for subversion.
	An endless folly.
	She's certainly not in any meaningful sense a historian.
	She's an anti-historian.
	Interested less in truth and more in grinding her moronic axe.
	History takes a back seat to partisan leftist activism.
	And her cherry picking of history is a crime of the most revolting type.
	I stand by that.
	And Mary Beard on Twitter if you want to come at me bro.
	Matt says, uh, why has Britain not bought an island or an area of land in the Middle East where they can exile Muslims who commit crimes?
	Um... Not related to this segment, I guess, but, um... No, why haven't we done that?
	Well, Calvin's busy buying his island in Scotland.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	I think it's quite cool.
	We've got loads of little islands out in the Pacific still, haven't we?
	Like the Pitcairns, haven't we?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Get rid of all the pedos that live on Pitcairn.
	What?
	Didn't you know?
	Yeah.
	What?
	That's well documented, yeah.
	I've no idea what you're talking about.
	There's a few families, like less than a dozen families on the Pitcairns, and I think in the 1990s, I hope it's the Pitcairns, anyway certainly one of our small islands, it is the Pitcairns, okay, and I think in the 90s someone, a girl, I think escaped from the island and was like, there's loads and loads of, all the men on this island are systematically Diddle in all the kids and the police went there and found out that it was.
	Jesus.
	Yeah, get rid of them put them in jails.
	Yeah, we can use it as a as a Nothing substantially changes.
	Let's go to the video comments.
	I have no idea about that.
	Yeah, it's horrible.
	Really horrible.
	A Gentleman's Observations of Sundan, Chapter 22.
	Princess Margaret Hospital closed at 7am on the 3rd of December 2002, with the new Great Western Hospital officially opening one minute later.
	In 2004, the Princess Margaret Hospital was demolished and the Ocus area redeveloped into a residential estate.
	For Wichelstowe, the roads and bridges began construction in 2007 and opened in 2011, while the first residents of East Wichel moved in in 2009, and Middle Wichel began construction in 2013.
	Hmm.
	Well, what do you know about that?
	Yeah, I mean, I didn't know any of that, so that's good.
	Oh, I enjoy this guy's video.
	Yeah, I love it.
	The Princess and the Princess Royal, to give her her full name.
	Next one.
	Captain Ufarsin here.
	was expanded to account for the greater flow of traffic.
	What do you know about that?
	Yeah, I mean, I didn't know any of that, so that's good.
	Oh, I enjoy this guy's video.
	Yeah, I love it.
	It's the Princess and the Princess Royal, to give her her full name.
	Next one.
	Captain Eupharsen here.
	I'm starting a series on what can be revealed about different peoples, given the armament that they issue to their troops.
	Today I have a classic Mosin-Nagant.
	World-renowned for being large, heavy, extra long, crude, and just unrefined.
	Even with the later models, such as this carbine, Thank you.
	that came in shorter, it's still just way heavier than anything else that was available during World War I or World War II.
	You can really see that crudeness with this bolt here, which is just something that you might expect a blacksmith to be able to forge.
	Yeah, it does look heavy.
	I don't know anything about the subject, but I find it fascinating.
	You should turn this into a gun channel.
	Yeah, there's one of the couple of things I do is watch gun channels.
	There's a really good British guy who's got access to, I think, the Royal Armoury.
	Oh really?
	So he's got everything there.
	Nice.
	And I can't remember the name of the channel, but it's great.
	You ever been to an NRA event?
	No, no, no.
	I've been to three.
	Oh, really?
	It's just, it's a war.
	It's like, wow, there's something about this, which is curious.
	Slightly on the crazy side, but I kind of like this and understand that, but yeah.
	I really like Demolition Ranch as well.
	Check out Demolition Ranch.
	That's a great channel.
	Massive channel.
	Yeah, we're the best.
	Oh, I got lame so quickly.
	You're going to be a very spellbinding candidate.
	Frustrated.
	What is going on?
	Is that from Rue the Day?
	Yeah, I don't know what that's about.
	She loves us.
	And I accept the love.
	Okay, let's go to the next one.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	You know, I collect radical literature, and here's some observations.
	Firstly, the arguments and writing style haven't changed one bit since the 1950s.
	But, they used to admit that there are differences between individuals, even men and women, if you can believe that.
	Meaning that the radical Rousseauianism is far more extreme than even the Frankfurt School would prescribe.
	Secondly, the climate narrative is a very old one, and is also completely inverted.
	Between 1950 and 1970, the average global temperature dropped by 3.5 degrees, leading to the claim of a new ice age before the year 2000.
	The key takeaway being that these people simply do not think.
	Merely parrot verbatim what was handed to them in a great chain going all the way back to the Frankfurt Institute and the Dadaists.
	The climate thing is particularly interesting, I think.
	Because what they do is they take a very temporary and very short trend, and the geological and weather history of the Earth is obviously a very slow-moving system.
	And they go, oh well, it's gone down three degrees over the last five years, therefore ice age is coming.
	And it's like, you don't know.
	It's such a complex system.
	There are so many factors you don't know anything about.
	And suddenly it's like, oh no, we're actually all going to boil to death and Bryson will be underwater.
	God, please.
	Let it be true.
	There's a few things that we cannot understand properly, and weather patterns is one of them.
	Turbulence, like on a mathematical scale, people like Einstein were like, we can't really understand turbulence properly.
	You take the world's best supercomputers, and they can't map weather far into the future at all.
	It's not possible, it's too complicated.
	Yeah, and so like, this whole like, oh well, the current climate alarmism is definitely the true climate alarmism.
	Like, you were wrong every other time.
	Have you seen Randall Carlson?
	No.
	On Joe Rogan, he's been on Rogan a couple of times.
	A guy called Randall Carlson.
	He's a geologist, so his understanding goes back into deep time.
	Randall Carlson.
	Watch Randall Carlson.
	Randall Carlson.
	I'm not saying I know the answer either, I'm just saying... No, he says exactly what you're saying.
	Every other time you were wrong, so... I'm mildly sceptical.
	If you look back over tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, or millions of years, you realise that all this climate alarmism is nonsense.
	Yeah, for millions and millions of years the Earth didn't have ice caps.
	Yeah, and it's been a snowball Earth as well.
	Yeah, we've also had completely covered in snow, so yeah.
	Anyway, let's go to the next one.
	This isn't copyright.
	It's an original score.
	It is copyright.
	Well, I mean, that was very relaxing.
	I'll take it.
	Yeah.
	Was that the final one?
	Right.
	Josh says the misandry will never be attacked.
	Men and boys will never be protected.
	They don't care.
	No, that's not true.
	If they come over on a dinghy, they will be given protections.
	It is a matter for comedy though, again, that Clive Lewis.
	Yeah.
	It's preposterous.
	It's funny.
	Ewan says, if young men and boys can be turned into a terrorist so easily by Andrew Tate, just think what they do in these mosques.
	You're not allowed to think that.
	That actually might be a thought crime.
	You may well get a knock on the door.
	You are the dead.
	Theodore says, I don't give a damn what happens to Tate.
	He's a scumbag, a pornographer and a pimp who brags about seducing women, then manipulating them into becoming cam girls for profit, then he sells his vile lifestyle to men as true masculinity to hell with him.
	Yeah, but like I was saying to you before we go on, it's not that I like or dislike Andrew Tate.
	Obviously I don't agree with his business, but the people who are against Andrew Tate really have nothing to say about his business, which is why you never hear them criticising it.
	Oh well, he turns women into prostitutes and pimps them out online.
	And they're all like, yeah okay, that's empowering.
	You know, we want women to get naked and get paid for it, so that none of them ever criticise what he's actually doing professionally.
	They just go, well, we don't like what he tweets.
	So I actually quite like what he tweets, actually.
	If Andrew Tate was just what he tweeted, and not how his business model operates.
	I'd like him a lot more.
	No, I mean, I despise Andrew Tate.
	Absolutely despise him.
	You like his tweets.
	You like the one where he was bragging about how the Trocadero be turned into a secret mosque and that Britain is funny.
	Calm down.
	I'm not saying I listen to every single tweet.
	I know you're not.
	I know you're not.
	But no, he gloats about the Islamisation of Britain.
	I don't know.
	I've seen him do it a number of times.
	Yeah, but I think that he's... Screw him.
	I think that it's strategic to make people like you pissed off.
	Oh, so I hate him even more then?
	I hate him even more then.
	Well, no.
	Sure.
	I think what he is, I genuinely think what he's trying to do there is to make you come out and be a, be an activist against it.
	Really?
	Yeah, I think so.
	That's some 4D chess.
	Yeah.
	I don't think he's capable of such things.
	Accultured Thug says, I'm offended on your behalf.
	If anyone, Karl, if anyone deserves the honour of being top massagist in the UK, it's you.
	To be honest with you, I'm barely even in the league tables these days.
	I'm actually quite far down the rankings.
	I've been letting the ball drop, to be honest.
	Arizona Desert Rat says in order to decrease violence against women they're going to have to actually arrest and jail the criminals committing these acts of violence.
	No.
	Well, I mean, to actually fix the problem, yes.
	But to make themselves feel like they're doing something about the problem, they can just criminalise and entertain.
	Pete says, did I hear a thousand women are being released from prison to free up space?
	There are only 365,000 women in prison across the whole of the UK.
	And a third of them being let out.
	What's your problem?
	Good behaviour on a third of them.
	Well done to the women.
	It's just genuinely mad.
	The thing is, the prisons are disproportionately filled with ethnic minorities.
	So it seems very likely that disproportionately, ethnic minorities are going to be let out of jail so a bunch of white English Labour voters can be shoved in jail instead by the Labour Party.
	I know we've got another five years of this, but I don't see how Labour can expect to get re-elected.
	The prison's what, £45,000 a year?
	Something like that?
	Prudent, mate.
	So if you've got, I think Albania top, like 1,500 Albanians, you could save a couple of million, sending them back to Albania, is where you'd start.
	Northblood says, surely the appeals court is now going to get clogged up with this?
	Not saying they shouldn't appeal it, but I imagine some lawyers that have morals would take a lot of these pro bono.
	Well, that's the point, isn't it?
	Like, again, do any of these people know what an appeals court is?
	Do they know that they have any options?
	They even have lawyers on hand.
	Toby Young and The Free Speech.
	This isn't a dig at The Free Speech.
	They should be doing something about it.
	Do you think they could get involved with these on the appeals side?
	They have one or two that are big on Twitter.
	But everyone else.
	So it's actually, if you've got a profile, the cavalry come in and back you.
	But for anyone else, you're left on the sidelines.
	Yeah, I mean, providing free legal advice to these guys should be the least that the free speech union can do.
	And even if it's just basic stuff, like don't just admit you've done everything wrong so they can lock you in jail for two years.
	You know, make them work for it at the very least, because I mean, these people may well be guilty, but like, come on, you know, don't just allow them to just throw the book at you.
	But the FSU could be actually the opposition to the government at the moment because the Tories are nowhere.
	So why not actually have that well-funded entity to say we're going to go up against the system and we're going to fight for justice?
	Yeah, I mean where is reform in all of this?
	Yeah, and these are probably all reform voters.
	I know.
	Reform of the second party in the North at this point, why aren't you out there pounding the pavement?
	Going, no, we're going to support that guy, we're going to support that guy.
	Nigel Farage on his £97,000 a month could be like, I'm going to take on three lawyers at £5,000 a month or however much you have to pay a lawyer.
	And I'm going to have them give whatever support they can to each one of these people, and they're going to be constantly working on these cases.
	Nigel Farage could do massive stuff here, and yet he's not.
	Reform silence on this is deafening.
	It is absolutely deafening.
	And sickening, actually.
	Just a complete lack of leadership.
	Well, that's the point, isn't it?
	As you said earlier, Elon Musk is the opposition to Her Majesty's Government at this point.
	He's the only person.
	Like, it's mad.
	Omar says, I think eventually prison will be so filled with white natives that it will accidentally become the safest and most productive place on earth.
	We'll have to fight to keep them out of our gated communities.
	That's a fair point.
	We might actually get fed some meat and cheese because we won't be able to afford that in the outside world.
	And last one, Kevin says, putting these people in prison for tweeting and posting is bad enough, but why are they being put in genpop in prisons, the general population in prisons when the majority of the inmates are isthmus, or only one has been shivved?
	Yeah, I heard about this, but I didn't want to say anything about it because I don't know, I can't confirm it, but apparently one of the rioters has already been stabbed or murdered in prison by an isthmist.
	Like I said, I can't confirm it, so I've heard the rumour is going around.
	But the point is, the government has put a target on them, saying, oh, these guys are racist.
	They're racist, they're racist.
	And therefore, everything's on the table for them, which is terrible.
	But anyway, Peter, where can people find more of you?
	Heart2Vote.org.
	I think to now, we're Alex Newman looking at the US.
	And on Thursday, we have Dr. Mark Truese, a Canadian doctor.
	And they've got Callum with us the week after.
	So Heart2Vote.org or on Twitter at Heart2VoteUK.
	When you're hosting War Room?
	That was weird.
	On Tuesday I hosted War Room, Battleground.
	I've been on War Room 25 times.
	It's weird when you get to know someone.
	I remember six years ago thinking, when Banna was coming through London, seeing Nigel, I'm thinking, wow.
	I'd love to meet him.
	He was actually a pro.
	Actually, God, I'd love to meet him.
	And then end up getting to know him, getting to be on the show, all our programs stream on War Room.
	And yeah, so that was a stressful day.
	Because you realise, actually, you're not just representing yourself, you're actually representing someone of that ilk.
	I mean, when you come into any programme like this, you've got a responsibility to the show you're actually part of.
	But actually just doing that, and it was great because I was able to introduce new guests to War Room.
	So they hadn't had Calvin and Luz on before.
	I've never been on it.
	So, well, I know.
	Your day will come, Carl.
	Your day will come.
	But Billboard Chris as well.
	So that's the fun of actually bringing new people on onto the show and letting the Warren Posse see what's happening here in the UK.
	Great.
	Anyway, good fun.
	Go check that out and we will see you tomorrow.

▲