Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 2, 2024 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:30:07

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #970

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	intro music On today, Friday the 2nd of August 2024, I'm your host Harry, joined today by Carl.
	Hello.
	And Stelios.
	Hello there.
	Today we're going to be talking about how Britain is a complete tinderbox.
	Um and also of course with disclaimers straight from the start we encourage nobody to engage in anything that could be construed as illegal activity over the coming weekend and including over the coming weeks because yeah I don't see how this gets better uh how people are tired of hypocrisy and then I'm going to be talking about how the BBC was harboring another nonce what a big surprise.
	Institutionally noncy is the BBC isn't it?
	The British Board of Nonce Protection.
	So, anything else we'd like to say before we get started?
	No.
	We've got Rumble Rants, so anybody watching Rumble, please feel free to send in paid Rumble Rants, and we'll get to them at the end of each segment.
	Thank you very much.
	I suppose... Lads Hour as well, yes.
	We've got Lads Hour coming up after this, and sadly...
	We didn't really think that it was the appropriate public mood for a cheery one.
	Yeah.
	So we're going to be talking about the state of things and all of our subscribers are more than welcome to join in with us and we're going to try and make this a bit more of a discussion that we can share with you as well.
	So please feel free to join in and share your own thoughts and we'll address everything.
	So yeah if you're in Britain in particular we want like your messages for the sort of like State of the country, the part that you're in, you know, your sort of feeling of the sense of things on the ground and stuff like that.
	Because it's hard to judge anything at the moment really.
	Yeah, so a nice broad perspective can always help with our own news that we can get out there as well.
	But with all that said, let's get into it.
	Yeah, so there were of course more riots yesterday, and who knows what happens today, and it looks like there are going to be even bigger protests over the weekend.
	Just to be clear, I do not, we collectively do not recommend that you attend any of these.
	Frankly, emotions are too high, even if the cause is just I think Starmer's been crystal clear that in fact you are the enemy and so walking out into a trap I'm not sure is wise and honestly it could get really messy and I just don't think it's a good idea at this point.
	So let's talk about Starmer's speech.
	Starmer came out and gave a Boomer audio speech where he began silently and then explained that, oh yeah, the sound turned on I thought there was a problem with my computer, I wasn't expecting... Of everything else going wrong with the Labour government so far, they boomered the audio too.
	Boomer audio, yeah.
	But he doesn't speak about the murderer in this speech.
	He just says, well, we need to let the family grieve, which is fair, but I think a lot of people are concerned about the fact that we're living in a country now where these things just happen.
	These kinds of things have just happened, so what are we going to do about it?
	And Keir Starmer addresses none of that.
	Instead, he talks about the far right.
	He talks about the protests and the riot in Southport.
	He doesn't talk about the protest or the riot, the machete riot in Southend, that happened on the same day.
	He doesn't talk about any of the previous riots, such as the Muslims in Manchester rioting after... Hare Hills.
	Yeah, in Hare Hills with the Roman community, or any of the previous Black Lives Matter riots, to which he You kneeled for?
	Excuse me, I've got a bit of a cough.
	He bent the knee.
	He doesn't talk about any of these things.
	Instead he just says, right, so the far right of the problem.
	He says, a gang of thugs got on trains and buses and went to a community that was not their own and proceeded to throw bricks at police officers who 24 hours earlier were having to deal with an attack on children.
	Again, that's something firmly in the rearview mirror.
	We're not looking back in anger at the attack.
	That was essentially a natural disaster.
	These things just happen.
	What can you do?
	It's part and parcel of living in multicultural Britain.
	Make no mistake, whether it's in Southport, London or Hartlepool, places where there were riots, these people are showing us exactly who they are.
	Mosques being targeted for being mosques, a flare thrown at a statue of Churchill, a Nazi salute.
	I don't know why a flare would be thrown at a statue of Churchill.
	I didn't see anything about this, but these guys are pro-Churchill, so I don't know why.
	I don't believe in any other circumstance Starmer would care about such an act either.
	Yeah, and the Nazi salute was fake news.
	Someone was waving at someone in the crowd and someone was like, oh look, here's a still picture.
	Oh, they pulled a Bowie on him.
	Yeah, they did.
	It wasn't a Nazi salute, but Keir Starmer spreading fake news.
	But he does not accept that any of this is legitimate protest.
	And, okay, well, that's definitely one interpretation, but that's not doing anything to ameliorate the concerns of normal people who are watching the events of last week, and this week, and saying, well, so we just live in a dangerous society now.
	We just live in a society where, out of nowhere, a random foreigner could turn up with a knife and just start stabbing children.
	And the authorities will just say, well, I mean, that happens, doesn't it?
	But we've got to worry about the far-right reaction to this now.
	Well, one of the interesting things that I took away from this is that towards the end, when they were addressing the journalists, one of the journalists asked, well, are you going to be doing something?
	And this was all, of course, in response to the far-right riots.
	Are you going to be doing something to increase police recruitment so you can better handle these things?
	And he basically said no and then he went on to say honestly we don't really have the police capacity to deal with this in the first place which is one thing there but also okay so I know you're not trying to solve these problems as they arise anyway how is that supposed to make me feel safe as a British citizen?
	He did actually say well we've already committed to hiring six and a half thousand new police officers So that's not going to change because he's already, you know, got that planned.
	But there's not going to be a mad rush to fast track new officers.
	But to be honest with you, that's probably a good thing anyway, because imagine how incompetent they're going to end up being.
	Well, I was going to say, all of these six and a half thousand are probably going to be the lowest of the lowest standards DEI recruitment, so if we're supposed to know that, okay, this is a dangerous country now, at least we can rely on law and order.
	No, we can't.
	The police aren't going to be equipped to keep our children safe.
	But he is going to hire six and a half thousand new ones, because that was part of their pledge, so okay, fair enough.
	But what he does plan to do is establish a national capability across police forces to be able to contain the far-right riots.
	Now, this was specifically to contain the far-right riots.
	No national police force capability to contain the machete riots from the ethnic urban youths in Southend or anywhere else in Manchester, Birmingham, London, wherever these happen.
	No, they're not going to be contained even though they actually do have a kind of similar tone where they're organized on social media.
	They're people from outside the local area and it was absolute chaos.
	People getting arrested, getting Deeply, badly injured.
	Similar sorts of circumstances, just different motivations behind them.
	None of that, doesn't mention this at all, is not interested in dealing with this problem at all.
	It's not going to be used against the Muslim community when they organize to try and... I mean, the attacker in the Manchester airport attack hasn't been charged yet, so...
	He's, you know, it's been two weeks or whatever.
	He was the one where there was the large controversy around the police footage of him being kicked in the head, correct?
	They probably don't want to charge him because they're afraid of the blowback from the media.
	They're afraid of the blowback from the Muslim community.
	That's the issue, I think.
	And the media will gin it up.
	And of course the footage came out and it turned out this guy was literally just slugging police, women, female police officers in the face.
	And the police officer who kicked him had been previously in a bear hug from this kid until he managed to, he got tasered and so he let go of him.
	And he got up, he wasn't sure if his, the police officer said, I wasn't sure if my gun had been taken.
	And so when this kid's laying on the ground, he turns to look at me, he just reacts and kicks him to try and pacify him, right?
	Everyone's acting like this guy should have been a robot.
	He was literally, like, literally a second before wrestling with this kid on the ground.
	And it's like, look, he's not a robot.
	Yeah, okay.
	You may well be like, okay, that was a bit excessive.
	Yeah, sure.
	But in the heat of the moment, I'm not really going to point fingers.
	This guy shouldn't have been throwing any punches or wrestling police officers to the ground.
	I found this address hypocritical because he was talking a lot about public safety and about dangers to public safety being reduced to a position where they will feel the full force of the law.
	Oh yes.
	But he did not do so in previous cases.
	No.
	And in previous riots.
	Yeah.
	So this seems to me to be an instance of basically leftists always refusing to admit responsibility about things.
	One hundred percent.
	I mean, everyone's calling him... I mean, everyone was complaining about two-tier policing.
	Well, people are now on social media calling him two-tier starmer.
	Two-tier kid.
	Yeah, it's nice and catchy.
	It is nice and catchy.
	I can't believe I messed that up.
	No, but I want to say this just to... it's just a sentence.
	It's just, when he's talking about public safety and the danger to public safety, he, for some reason, obfuscates the fact that a lot of the people who are engaged in these protests are concerned with public safety.
	Yeah, that's what the protest is about.
	Yes.
	Like literally the safety of children.
	Yeah.
	But that doesn't at all affect anything that he's doing, because if you take a step back and look at this, you realize what Keir Starmer is doing here is essentially declaring war on the working class.
	This is now not even an informal de facto war.
	This is a now formal de jure war.
	The working class will be put back in their place.
	These stabbings will happen, and if you Take to the streets en masse, if you start causing trouble, if you start targeting anything, you will feel the full force of the law.
	I mean, some of the protests yesterday in London, there was this one, I mean, there were lots of videos, I should have got them up for the segment, but there were lots of videos where, I mean, in one video you saw the police say, just grab one of them, any one of them, you know, just make an example out of them.
	And then some guy gets grabbed and he just starts getting clubbed, even though this guy is not being in any way violent.
	It's like, OK, if he'd been fighting with the police, I'd be like, OK, well, he was fine with the police.
	What do you expect?
	But he wasn't.
	And so this is a different situation to the Manchester airport.
	But he doesn't seem to me to be assuming any responsibility because he's talking about public safety.
	And the footage we had from Leeds, for instance, are footage that directly show lack of law enforcement.
	And lack of law enforcement communicates the idea that the state cannot ensure public safety.
	There was no price conference there as far as I'm concerned.
	And again, it just seems to be a formal declaration of war on the working class who are objecting to the new global multicultural liberal paradigm that is being properly instantiated under Starmer.
	He's bringing about things that hadn't previously existed.
	For example, this national capability across police forces is going to involve sharing intelligence, wider deployment of facial recognition tech, and preventative action slash criminal behavior orders to restrict movements of people who are suspected of being a part of the working class.
	And they're going to, he also threatens social media companies about misinformation and disorder whipped up online.
	Interestingly, and we'll get to it in a bit, it's Facebook, frankly.
	Facebook and TikTok, where most of these people are organizing.
	And we know because we get all the screenshots floating around Twitter of where the people are organizing.
	It's not Twitter posts because that's where like essentially the elite go to have their public discussion.
	Where the normies are is on Facebook and TikTok putting out their videos being like we're not taking this you know and in sort of like boomer waffin AI lion Facebook groups you know that's where this is actually being organized.
	He takes questions and the BBC goes first.
	Doesn't call on GB News interestingly.
	The BBC go first and ask about Hugh Edwards.
	So is this the time and the place?
	Like, we're not talking about the BBC being institutionally noncy right now, actually.
	But they also say, do you think the violence will spread?
	And he says something quite interesting.
	The message from law enforcement is not that they need more powers and we must wean ourselves off the idea that the only response is to pass more legislation every time you have a challenge, but to use the existing powers that we have.
	That's interesting because they actually have quite extensive existing powers.
	And so it is interesting that he's not like, okay, I'm not going to legislate further.
	I'm just going to use what's available to us.
	Now, in a way, that's good.
	But in a way, that's also bad.
	But he will be fast-tracking recruiting more police because they've pledged to do so.
	What will they do about the far right, was asked.
	And he explicitly doesn't name Nigel Farage, though many on the left have been attempting to say, well, this is all his fault.
	Well, one of the journalists actually asked him about Farage spreading conspiracy theories online.
	and he refused to make a definitive statement about that.
	Now obviously when he's blaming the far right and he's trying to mitigate it by saying it was a small Probably, yeah.
	of people from outside of these communities who bust themselves in who were all far right.
	I think he knows that if he were to outright name Nigel Farage as one of the causes of this, um, then people who support Nigel Farage and don't consider themselves remotely far right would also get pissed off.
	Probably.
	Yeah.
	Um, but it is interesting how he doesn't do that.
	Even while the next statement is him basically declaring war on the far right, saying, right now this, you know, whatever I personally think far right is a synonym for working class.
	So if there's anyone in the North who think Labour still represent them, what is wrong with you?
	Why would you think that?
	But then people ask, well, the journalists ask, well, what are you going to do to protect Muslims?
	It's like, right, okay, and Keir Starmer, on much firmer ground here, oh, well, you know, this is great, I'm going to do everything I can to protect this precious client group of the Labour Party.
	And so the narrative now has become we're going to simply just protect Muslims.
	But the victims were three English girls, eight English girls, stabbed by someone who wasn't a Muslim.
	And because the information was kept for whatever reason, you know, from the public view, and conspiracy theories and misinformation made people think, well, this was a Muslim, and they confirmed this bias because, well, there have been lots of other terror attacks from this group.
	And so this Has made the Muslim community the focus of this, because this isn't really about this one event.
	This is about a pattern of events, a series of attacks on just native British people, mostly English people, who have just been told don't look back in anger.
	And actually they're furious.
	There's only so many times that Don't Look Back in Anger playbook works.
	I think that if they were to have some government plant come out to a sigil and start singing some Taylor Swift song to try and unite everybody, then it wouldn't work this time.
	People are sick of it.
	And also don't look back in anger, which means forget history isn't used for the progressivist, let's say, protected groups.
	Because what they're doing with the woke narrative that the Labour government is recreating is constantly stressing the need for addressing historical inequalities.
	Yeah.
	So they don't intend to forget history.
	I mean, for me, my main takeaway from this speech is that Starmer himself came across shell-shocked, weak, stuttering, uncertain, nervous in himself, and it came across like he probably wasn't expecting such a large crisis less than a month into his government.
	Yeah.
	I think the thing's come a bit loose there, because my thing is not in any way responding.
	No.
	Oh, there we are.
	No, that's Samson doing it.
	Oh, Samson!
	Right, Samson, if you can just go to the, uh, the, not the next one, but the one afterwards, uh, that one, yeah.
	So, like I said, the, on the same day as the riots, um, in, uh, Southport, there were machete riots all over, uh, Southend.
	No one cares.
	Keir Starmer doesn't mention it.
	Nothing No mention of what will be done to prevent more second-generation immigrant atrocities.
	As far as I'm concerned, there's nothing they can do, and this is just part and parcel of living in Britain at this point.
	And, I mean, there are loads, there are so many attacks now, there are so many stabbings, there are so many things that are going on, that they just go completely under the radar.
	Let's go to the next one, right?
	Did you ever hear about this?
	There were two 12-year-olds in Wolverhampton macheted someone to death.
	Recently.
	Did you hear about this?
	Like, I mean, this, this is literally from yesterday, this reporting, or the day before, sorry.
	Did you hear about this?
	Nope.
	No one heard about this.
	Just two 12 year olds macheted someone to death in broad daylight in the middle of the street.
	And the judge said, well, I can't release their names.
	Yeah, no kidding.
	You can't release their names.
	Like, but this is the country we live in now.
	Well presumably this will either be blamed on a failure of integration or just knife crime because one of the other things about Starman is the statements that he'd been given previously prior to this speech was that we needed to tackle knife crime and a lot of people even sadly Farage came out and said we need to tackle Knife crime.
	But how do you tackle knife crime when there's already restrictions on the size of knives that you can carry with you?
	The likelihood is, as some people have been suggesting, that along with the facial recognition technology, this could be used as an in for some kind of digital ID which will track your purchases and therefore can restrict things like the purchases of knives is how they will sell it to the public.
	That could be what they're going for here.
	I mean, look at the next, on the most viewed there.
	We don't want to feel unsafe in the place we live.
	Muslim and asylum seekers fear more far-right protests.
	That's the story.
	Right now, this client group are the victims.
	In fact, if we can just go to the next one.
	This is The Guardian explaining how police in England are going to be protecting mosques as far-right... So, a bunch of English children get stabbed and suddenly the police are gathering around the mosques.
	You think people don't see this?
	You think people, just regular people, are just like, why are they protecting the mosque?
	Why aren't they protecting our kids?
	Why aren't they gathering around the schools?
	Why aren't they doing something to protect us who have been the victim of these kinds of violent crimes for decades now?
	No, you are the problem.
	These people are the protected group.
	So anyway, I wrote a thing yesterday for this to explain why.
	Why are the left like this?
	Why is the liberal elite like this?
	Now my thesis in this, and I do recommend that you don't read it because this is honestly one of my best, is that essentially they hate the far right because these people believe they are They have transcended national identity, right?
	That's what they think.
	They are citizens of the world.
	They are global people.
	They are not from any one place or any one time.
	They love everywhere.
	They're a part of the sort of broad mass of united humanity.
	We are above Mere parochialisms and when they see the English working class they are starkly reminded that they too are English and they hate it.
	It's this kind of metaphysical slime they can't get off themselves and they find it disgusting and that's why they hate the far right so much.
	And so, like I said, go and read this.
	I'm very proud of this piece, it's one of my best.
	I think it really, I've actually really got the bang to rights on this.
	And of course, if you want to support us, this is a free article, but go and sign up for £5 a month to support the work we do here, because of course we're demonetised.
	And so let's go on to Nigel Farage's response, which was stronger than his previous statement.
	Can we play this please, Samson?
	So the Prime Minister tonight reacting to what has happened over the course of the last 48 hours.
	His conclusion, very simple, it's all the far right.
	As if they're causing all of the problems.
	No, the far right are a reaction to fear, to discomfort, to unease that is out there shared by tens of millions of people.
	Let me be clear.
	I don't support street violence.
	I don't support thuggery in any way at all.
	But I'm worried Not just about the events in Southport, but about societal decline that is happening in our country.
	Law and order folks on our streets is breaking down.
	This Prime Minister hasn't got an earthly clue how to deal with it.
	We need to start getting tough.
	We need to use stop and search, regardless of the colour of the skin We need tougher prison sentences for anybody carrying a knife.
	We need folks to get real.
	I tell you what, what you've seen on the streets of Hartlepool, of London, of Southport, is nothing to what could happen over the course of the next few weeks.
	Let's have proper law and order.
	But Mr Starmer, just to blame a few far-right thugs to say that's the root of our problems doesn't work.
	Much better.
	Nice to see he's got British flags behind him now.
	He actually looks like the leader of the opposition now.
	Conservatives haven't come out and said anything like this.
	Conservatives haven't come out and been like, well, hang on a second, why is our opposition demonising the people we tried to win over in 2019?
	Why are they demonising the people who we agree with when they say we want less immigration?
	It's in all of our manifestos.
	Everyone has got that in the manifesto.
	And yet Keir Starmer is like, yeah, but those people are evil and we're going to protect the Muslims out.
	So you have got this completely backwards.
	Nigel Farage is at least on the money here when he says that the far right are a symptom of the problem and the problem is the way that these communities have been mashed together and the damage that has been done and the fact that the English community doesn't have the ability to speak out about it.
	And so, I think he's probably right that in the next couple of weeks, particularly this weekend actually, things could get bad because it looks like the Boomerwaffen are mobilising on Facebook.
	If you can scroll down, you can see that it's exactly the kind of graphics that you see the Boomers on Facebook make, where they're talking about... And that's just a Facebook post right there?
	Yeah, exactly, these are just open Facebook posts, all of these.
	You know, and it's just like, okay, I mean, that's, that looks like a Twitch post, a Twitch thing.
	Sorry, TikTok, not Twitch, sorry.
	But as you can see, these are, am I wrong?
	I shouldn't giggle, but that's a funny image.
	Am I wrong in describing this in this way, right?
	That's Instagram.
	Yeah, so it's very much normie social media in which this is being promoted.
	Yeah, but they hate Elon.
	They do hate Elon, but I don't really think it's... I mean, I'm sure there are people on Twitter doing it, but I don't think this is where the bulk of the people who are going to turn out for these are going to be seeing them.
	I think they're going to be seeing them on traditional social media.
	If you can go to the next one, this is a great point, right?
	So flyers are being circulated online for rallies in Manchester, Liverpool, Nottingham, Leeds, Newcastle, Middlesbrough, Belfast, Bristol and Hull.
	Almost all of those are Labour strongholds.
	Deep red strongholds.
	Can you even imagine?
	Filled with working class men.
	Exactly.
	Filled with working class families who have been betrayed by the Labour Party.
	In Manchester and Liverpool they have been hotspots for grooming gangs as well.
	While I would never recommend that these sorts of things should be congregating outside.
	What's up with Middlesbrough?
	Yeah, outside of mosques and things like that, because, again, it doesn't seem the mosques or the Islamics have anything to do with this.
	I can understand why, when they've got an undirected rage, they would do those sorts of things.
	And again, if you're going to be in any of these areas at the time, again, if there's anything remotely looking like illegal activities, stay away.
	Just don't get involved.
	I would recommend just not going to these, to be honest.
	But if you can go back up, Samson, you can see that, again, these are all Like Newcastle!
	Who can you put the blame on in Newcastle?
	But, as you said, this is about the tension between what the working class have had inflicted on them and the Islamic community, who the working class feel have been wronged by.
	That's what's underpinning this, which is why they... Well, a lot of these areas would have rebuilt the Red Wall again over the past month, and less than a month later, less than a month later, this happens.
	Hope Not Hate had a good take on this.
	Labour Party that apparently these places are supportive of.
	But surprisingly, and this is really weird, Hope Not Hate had a good take on this.
	If we can play this, please.
	This is a guy from Hope Not Hate.
	It's what people who have no power or no understanding of power deal with things.
	These are men who are encouraged to see themselves or they portray themselves as the great protectors of their community.
	And like a lot of people, they feel completely powerless when you see something like this happens.
	And unfortunately, what happens now is people go onto social media to express their horror, their dismay and their anger, which are all perfectly normal and natural emotions to feel.
	And when you get onto social media now, you see it is absolutely full of lies, half-truths, conspiracy theories.
	And that's basically, it's not just Southport.
	This has been brewing for a couple of years.
	We've seen it.
	We saw it in Kirby last year when they attacked the police.
	Okay, you can stop it next.
	He goes on a bit more.
	But he's not wrong.
	He's not wrong, but he's also a part of the governmental apparatus that encourages these people.
	That deprives them of their voice.
	Yeah, to strip them of their power.
	What little power they might have already had.
	Is Collins the one who used to be, like, an actual fascist?
	Ah, I can't remember.
	Because I know that there's one of them.
	Yeah, I can't remember which one it was.
	But, um, but again, it's shocking that, you know, Hope Not Hate would spend their entire life trying to disempower the working class of England.
	And then some guys are, well, they just don't feel like they've got a voice.
	Yeah, no kidding.
	It's your fault.
	Yeah, you're part of the problem.
	You've directly contributed to this.
	And then just finally, we've got very little information about why Axel... I can't pronounce his bloody surname.
	Ruda Cabana.
	Ruda Cabana, yes.
	Traditional name.
	Why he did what he did.
	The Mirror describing him as, quote, an autistic choir boy who hardly left home.
	And, uh, the local residents in his nearby community said, well, I mean, we never saw them.
	We never spoke to them more than say hello in seven years.
	All right.
	But one thing the media is very eager for you to know is that at one point he was a child who went to school.
	Those are the photos that we see is that, look, he was a child once.
	Oh, yeah.
	And just, uh, one last thing, actually, that I forgot to include a bit earlier.
	I think it's the next one.
	Um, obviously the sort of, The Islamic Waffen are organising on Facebook as well, defend our mosques.
	A lot of people are going to be using A-R-E rather than O-U-R in this conflict.
	So we're going to take our country back and then we're going to defend our mosques.
	And I do think there is going to be some sort of conflagration this weekend, which is why I again remind people, just stay at home.
	This is not, this is just walking into a massive trap.
	This isn't going to do what you think it's going to do.
	The point is we're literally a powder keg at this point and I mean the people in charge don't know what to do.
	They've sided against the people who have been victimized and no good is going to come out of any of this.
	Yeah, just a quick, Harry, there's a loose connection on the thing there.
	I've been trying to, they're all plugged in properly as far as I can tell.
	Yeah, I could try and do that.
	Have you tried turning it off and on again?
	Do you want to read through some of the rumbles?
	Yeah, I do.
	That's why we're doing that.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Hero Sanchiban says, this government created this by privileging invaders over natives.
	Yes, not this government, sorry, the government.
	From Blair, to Cameron, to the other Conservatives, to Starmer now, yes.
	I've put everything in and out again, oh wait!
	Aha, it's back on.
	Their response is to double down and make the problem more clear.
	Keir declared native ethnic English the enemy.
	I'm horrified.
	Yeah, no, he literally is declaring war on the working class in England, which is not good.
	Can I have control of the mouse, please?
	Ramshakalot says, you mentioned Wolverhampton.
	I'm in Walsall and got an email from Neighbourhood Watch saying they'd had four men arrested after a disturbance in the high street.
	One suffered gunshot wounds.
	Yes, the level of just background violence and criminality in Britain is obviously rising, and it's just going under the radar.
	And I wonder how much of it is actually even being recorded in the crime statistics?
	I'm sure they'll find some statistical trickery to keep it off the books.
	Exactly.
	Like, with the Manchester airport thing, is that going to be recorded if they're not charging the guy?
	It'll be like Steven Pinker when he did his book about how liberal democracies made everyone safer when he ignored that modern medicine means homicide rates are down even if actual assault rates are up.
	David says, if I'm standing up for our children, if standing up for our children is thuggish and I'm living thug life, again, just to be clear, do not do anything this weekend is my advice.
	There will be times and places for controlled protests that are legitimate, hold vigils for the dead and things like that, right after the event when tensions are so high and everyone is so unbelievably worked up is not it, in my opinion.
	You know, I would say definitely save the energy.
	Matthew says, I live in an area which returned a Lib Dem MP.
	Literally yards outside of London, but is yet untouched by diversity.
	People here live in a bubble.
	My neighbours may wake up when machete gangs appear.
	This is what I've been saying for a long time.
	Those Lib Dem voters are going to flip.
	Xanothium says, Karl just wanted to wish you a happy four year anniversary this coming Saturday.
	Sargon 40k.
	I was like, when I started picking up, it's 40k again.
	On Sunday, I don't know if it means, is it four years since this started?
	Uh, maybe, yeah.
	Yeah, it might be.
	Yeah.
	Um, and O-P-U-H-K, uh, P-H-U-K says, Well, I'm not asking you to apologize for being upset about what's been done, obviously.
	Um, but we have to remain controlled, remain calm, and with that, let's move on.
	Before we start, this is the third segment.
	This is my segment.
	Stelios's is the other one.
	Yes, and also that's working and the mouse is working.
	Wonderful.
	Sorry for the technical issues, folks.
	Right.
	The progressivist narrative that the Labour government is circulating, and a lot of leftist pundits are circulating, is crucially mistaken.
	Because they are making it all about the reaction to a particular crime and its causes, rather than the crime and its causes.
	This is not to deny that agitators exist.
	I come from a country that knows a thing or two about protests, and I know how How protests are being often hijacked by people who just want to do bad things and defame the entire protest.
	Just a quick aside.
	I visited Greece in 2012 and I was on holiday there and there were massive protests in Athens and I had a different girlfriend at the time and we were just like, what the hell is going on?
	You know, that was huge.
	But anyway, yeah, the Greeks definitely know a thing or two about protests.
	Yes.
	So just by Bringing the far-right dog whistle into the mix, the shift of public attention has been towards the reaction to the events, not to the tragic events of this week.
	Keir Starmer had a press conference yesterday.
	He addressed the British public and also some journalists who found it a good idea to ask him about stuff other than the events.
	We mentioned before someone who asked him about the BBC and Hugh Edwards, and Keir Starmer made some really interesting points in this address.
	He mentioned the issue of public safety.
	He also drew a distinction between the community and the riots because he's a politician and he didn't have as hard a left line as a lot of leftist pundits had.
	And he also said that public safety is of paramount importance and those who are a threat to public safety are going to feel the full force of the law.
	Now I think that One of the things that happens with a lot of the pronouncements of Keir Starmer is that they are very much traditionally wooden, politician-like statements.
	They're so abstract that, you know, you can always say, yeah, I agree in a very abstract sense, but the point is that we cannot just stay into the abstract.
	We have to bear in mind that when we're talking about laws, there are people who apply these laws in particular cases and people who interpret them.
	And sometimes they apply it with double standards.
	And what is particularly interesting to note here is that there is an element of hypocrisy that is coming out because, as I said before, There are dangers to public safety, and the people who engaged in these protests, their main concern is that they feel unsafe.
	Now, some weeks ago, there were a lot of events, some of them in Leeds, that showed a lack in law enforcement.
	And there were videos circulating, I will show you some of them to just to refresh your memory of events.
	They communicate to the public that we cannot enforce the law, Yeah.
	And because when people see this, they feel that, you know, the law is not there to protect them.
	They feel unsafe in public.
	So one of the major things that the majority of the British public has in their minds right now is that they feel unsafe.
	And Keir Starmer had an opportunity to actually appeal to a significant portion of the British population and actually did not.
	And he in fact sided with the minority.
	Exactly.
	The sort of three to four percent of Muslim population.
	Because if you look at like who's actually being listened to here, Yes.
	The Muslim community says, well, we're worried because these guys attack the mosque.
	And Keir Starmer says, yes, well, I will defend your mosque.
	The British public said, we're worried because we're worried that multiculturalism might involve dead children.
	Keir Starmer says, shut up, you bigot.
	And you're not going to be allowed to protest.
	So this was a golden opportunity that Keir Starmer had to actually address working class people of the UK and engage in dialogue with them and actually recognize concerns about public safety.
	Because it's not much to ask from a state to ensure public safety, well apparently it is, but it should be the number one thing that a state provides And Starmer admitted this as well.
	I mean this is even worse to a certain degree because Starmer has not only shown that he is unwilling or unable to provide some kind of safety to the population of this country, it could have been a very easy win or at least something to try and contain and calm down the rising tensions right now if he had come out and even just made it clear that he understood the concerns.
	Some people say that this is what somebody like Tony Blair would have done.
	Perhaps he would have, but the complete lack of any ability to competently handle the situation, from a PR perspective, shows that there's a complete failure of statesmanship.
	This was the perfect opportunity to calm things down.
	Instead, he pointed the finger, he threw out accusations, he slandered and labelled people who were upset.
	Exactly, so rather than doing what he should have done, he actually doubled down on an ultra-ideological narrative that presents the British population basically as having a civilizational guilt for which they have to atone themselves by cultural self-implosion.
	And I will show you how all this comes down to one particular point and how what he said about public safety is something that a lot of people cannot actually interpret as meaning safety for all.
	The question arises, safety for whom?
	Because precisely we see nothing but double standards when it comes to this ultra-ideological cancer called wokeness that the Labour government is recreating.
	And I want to say, I have a paragraph from A tweet I had.
	We are told to not look back in anger and be unburdened by what has been, but the very people who say this bombard us with an ecophobic message that asks us to part with our cultural heritage and identity in the name of addressing historical inequalities.
	So this is not something that is designed to appeal to all people.
	This is a narrative that the Labour government is doubling down on, which is precisely a narrative that divides the population into groups, Into oppressor and oppressed and is actively recognizing more rights to the oppressed groups and it gives them preferential treatment
	So, I want to show you how there has been a consistent double standard applied in several cases when it comes to a number of events across the last few years to show you precisely how there is talk about isolated incidents and noticing patterns.
	Because, you know, these are some phrases that are somehow hot topics or are considered a bit spicy.
	I will say this, that whenever something happens, Whenever someone engages in a crime, there's political discussion about how this crime can be understood and also utilized for political means.
	This is, I think, uncontroversial.
	So, the mantra of the left is, for my friends, isolated incidents, for my enemies, patents.
	So, whenever there are crimes, what happens is that there is a whole machinery from the left, coming from the left, that is basically Projecting all kinds of patterns to incidents that don't have to be read this way.
	So, I will say this because, you know, in one sense every incident is an isolated incident, but in another sense we can only understand isolated incidents in terms of understanding patterns.
	I don't know, I'm getting to the point where I'm thinking there aren't really isolated incidents, that everything is a part of a series of events that led up to it.
	Yes, so I have a number of slides to show you.
	Here is the BLM riots, where we had the death, the killing of George Floyd by Derek Chauvin, and there was a whole machinery of projecting A lot of patents, not just Derek Chauvin, but eventually to the entire U.S.
	nation.
	This wasn't an isolated incident in their mind.
	Exactly.
	In their mind, this wasn't an isolated incident.
	Derek Chauvin, the murderer of George Floyd, wasn't just seen as the murderer of George Floyd.
	He was portrayed as the representative of the essence of the U.S.
	police force.
	the US system and the white population and its institutions and of arguably according for some voices for the entire population and the slogan I can breathe was the slogan of the 2020 summer.
	Have you seen anything like this when it came to the murders of Monday?
	No.
	There is no slogan from the left like we don't want our daughters to be machete'd Or we don't feel safe.
	It was no such thing.
	It was all portrayed as an isolated incident.
	A mental health incident.
	Something that just couldn't be prevented.
	Yes.
	Keir Starmer here with Angela.
	Rainer kneeled in opposition to anti-black racism.
	So they actually double-downed upon their narrative.
	And they didn't condemn the The riots from these protests, they didn't draw the distinction between the riots and the protests.
	During COVID they were allowed to riot.
	Yes.
	They were allowed.
	Everyone else was locked in their homes apart from the black community which were allowed to get out and do damage.
	So by doing this... Racism was a far greater pandemic than the pandemic if you recall.
	I heard that, yes.
	So what they did was not basically to say that there are illegitimate Riots, because there is a lot of use of force and a lot of burning things and a lot of looting.
	They didn't say it's a crime.
	They actually bent the knee.
	Yeah, they recognized the legitimacy of it.
	Yes.
	So here we have the other unfortunate event, the murder of Sarah Everard.
	This was presented not just as an isolated incident.
	There were several patterns projected, not just upon the murderer, but there was a whole narrative of femicide.
	And by talking about femicide, there was a very abstract presentation of The murder, and it sort of gave nebulous accusations for all men.
	But also, the police force themselves were declared institutionally misogynist, etc, etc.
	This is why we need more tiny, weak, incompetent women in the police.
	The point being it wasn't isolated.
	Keir Starmer didn't see it as an isolated incident.
	He projected the patent onto it and he said the conservative has just voted for legislation that does nothing to address violence against women and girls.
	I never realized how beady his eyes were.
	Now, we have the other unfortunate event, the brutal murder of Breonna Gay.
	Again, this was portrayed as anti-trans violence.
	And the people who said this talked about this as being an endemic feature of society, of Western society.
	They didn't just say it's an isolated incident.
	They projected a whole pattern upon all The population, virtually the entire population of the West and they were particularly happy and trigger happy to equate every person who has ever expressed gender critical views with someone who would want something like that, which is a blatant lie.
	Now, when it comes to the pro-Palestine protests, now that's an interesting thing, because London was vandalized.
	There were monuments desecrated for months.
	Am I wrong to say that this lasted for months?
	And Kiasame himself was confronted by a lot of angry pro-Palestine people.
	Do you remember him making any pronouncement about it?
	No, not least not in condemnation of it anyway.
	Yeah and there were also rumors that a lot of people were outside his house, outside his home and chanting bad things to him and curses because they disagreed with the stance on it.
	I haven't heard any press conference of his that is as condemning of these protests that were violent as the protests and riots of last week.
	Here again we have several people from the pro-Palestine camp doing salutes that Kyistama was saying that a lot of the far-right thugs in these protests were doing.
	But apparently, again, I haven't heard any other condemnation.
	Right, now we come to something different.
	Now we come to other events when the victims belong to groups that are not groups that are protected by the left.
	They're not designated.
	One of that is, well it's not a group, it's an individual, it's Trump.
	But you could say that supporters of Trump are being targeted precisely, to a ridiculous extent, by a whole machinery of Propaganda that says all people who support Trump basically are for destroying all freedoms in America.
	And they even portrayed him as a dictator.
	Yeah, they even constantly portrayed him as Adolf Hitler.
	Now, there was an assassination attempt against him, and the mainstream media, rather than just rushing to portray and project patents upon the incident, upon the murderer, actually had a different response.
	A lot of them, for a long time, for the first hours, had really weird Yeah.
	And you saw a lot of downplaying of it initially when it just came out.
	But when it became evident there's too much footage of him actually being shot that it couldn't be downplayed.
	of it initially, where it just came out.
	But when it became evident, there's too much footage of him actually being shot, that it couldn't be downplayed.
	- Have you seen the new footage that came out? - Where you could see the sniper on the road?
	Yeah, from a different angle, from behind Trump at an angle, and you could see him running along the roof.
	And even the FBI director came out and essentially spread a conspiracy theory.
	Well, I mean, we don't know he was shot.
	It's like, yes we do.
	Just look at the double standard.
	Whenever there was a victim from a group that is protected by the left, there was a whole machinery of propaganda that tried to project negative qualities among the entire population of their political opponents.
	And this was something that they did, but didn't assume responsibility for.
	That was an isolated incident.
	That was a lone wolf.
	So, we have here people who rushed to portray the murderer, Axel Rudakabana, in a very interesting way, as someone who did what he did because of Western internalized whiteness, let's say.
	So we have Dr. Shola saying Axel Rudakubana is a 17-year-old Old Southport murderer.
	Black, British, Christian, born and bred in the UK.
	Not Muslim, nothing to do with Islam, and not immigrant on a small boat.
	Everything he knows he learned from Britain.
	Really?
	He didn't learn anything from his Rwandan parents?
	So all bigoted racists have to weaponize now is that he is black.
	So, I think that this is very mistaken, and this is even worse than people who would just say, oh, it's an isolated incident.
	This is not an isolated incident, this is to project patterns on it, but it's to say that basically this is internalised whiteness.
	But also, yeah, like, it's to project the pattern that Britain is evil, and Leo is completely right.
	Well, I mean, if we're turning people into murderers, we probably shouldn't let them in.
	Yes, exactly.
	Right, so we have Juanjuran Joya who makes a good claim here.
	She asks, why is Lawrence Fox under fire for wanting to remove Islam from Britain while Dr. Sholeh is not under fire for wanting to abolish whiteness and eradicate whiteness from the face of the planet?
	That's just another...
	Right, so what we have here is a narrative, an ecophobic narrative, that is applying double standards and is legitimizing double standards.
	And we see these double standards here in Yvette Cooper's response to the Hare Hills incident and the Southport incident.
	In the interest of time, I'll have to speed up a little bit.
	Yeah, we will have to speed up.
	I'm approaching the end of my segment.
	Sorry.
	People have, we have spoken before about it, but she was notably more aggravated when she was dealing with... She was furious.
	She was furious.
	Right, so we have all sorts of footage here from the Leeds incident, you can see.
	What they communicate is basically lack of law enforcement and lack of the ability of the state to ensure public safety.
	No press conference was staged there and actually this is one of the reasons why a lot of people are led to think that basically they are not represented by the Labour government and why they have to protest.
	We have here several leftist pandits that I want to end with.
	And we will show again how hypocritical they are.
	So we have Ian Dunn here saying, we need to be really clear here.
	These people are racist.
	Oh, wow.
	That's really original, Ian.
	Really original.
	You haven't called anyone a racist up until this point.
	I'm glad you're really just making it very clear.
	You think people are racist.
	Oh, thank God.
	Yeah.
	He says these people are racist thugs and he ends with a chilling, each and every one of them should basically do what he writes there, hang their head in shame.
	I do agree that yes, the Rwandan who murdered white children seemingly for no reason probably was a racist thug.
	Well, not even questionable, really.
	Now, if we can search what Ian Dunn said about the Leeds riots, we will see something really interesting, that we can't find something.
	We cannot find any, let's say, strong condemnation of the riots there, any strong criticism of the ability of the police to enforce the law.
	We find nothing.
	Let's go to Paul Mason here, another Paul Mason calling people racists.
	Yes, there were racist mob incidents last night in Hartlepool, Manchester, Aldershot, and Whitehall, in each case stoked by online disinformation.
	History tells us this could escalate, so we need swift arrests and sentencing of those inciting and committing violence.
	He has a thread there.
	Interestingly enough, what did he write about Leeds and about the events that happened there?
	Can we please search Paul Mason Hartlepool Leeds?
	What we will see is yet another incident where he basically wrote nothing.
	We can't find something.
	If he has, I'll admit I am mistaken in saying what I'm saying, but we couldn't find anything.
	So, Josh has a good chaddish response here to Paul Mason.
	He says, remember when the ruling class tried to make conspiracy theories a right-wing thing?
	Here is a left-winger saying that people are writing because of Russian disinformation rather than being angry at murdered and wounded children.
	It's incredible they brought the Blue Anon conspiracies over to the UK as well.
	Oh, it's all Russian.
	It's all Russian disinformation.
	And I'll end the segment with something that shows the tendencies of the Labour government when it comes to dialogue, because what happened here is that Kirstein and the Labour government missed a golden opportunity to engage in dialogue with the people who they claim to represent, who they're supposed to represent, and whose interests they're supposed to promote, and they didn't.
	And what they are going to do, they are battling freedom of speech.
	Cracking down on freedom of speech and they're basically trying to make academia even more problematic when it comes to expressing people's opinions and criticizing the government.
	And all this is a move that leads into turning academia and turning the young generations into activists or people who just passively support progressivism.
	Not to people who are going to embody civic ideals of being critical of the government, because the government is not the country, they're not identical, and care for the interests of the country has got to imply that people are subjecting the government into criticism, and people are focusing on obligations bilaterally, not just obligations of the people to obey to power, but also obligations of those in power to obey
	The will of the people who they're supposed to represent.
	Okay, Caleb Knight says, I agree with Carl.
	Hot-headed behaviour is just easy ammo for propaganda for our enemies.
	Calm, actually peaceful public action is the way to go.
	Yeah, and when it's not in the eye of the storm as well.
	Do it on our own terms, not on theirs.
	But for the sake of time, I'm afraid we're going to have to skip the other ones.
	But thank you for sending them in.
	We will go to them after this segment is done.
	So, we talk a lot, even in the previous segment, about noticing patterns.
	We also talk a lot about the corruption of the government and the arms of the media that tow the government line and we often wonder why that is and I have my own personal theory about this that also recognizes patterns.
	That pattern being that a hefty number of media pundits in the elite talking class seem to be paedophiles or at least associated heavily with paedophiles.
	The BBC!
	Is this a pattern we're allowed to notice?
	Uh, I'm saying yes.
	I've determined that yes, you're allowed to notice that the BBC seems to harbour a shocking number of paedophiles, even following the Jimmy Savile scandal, which would at least make you think that they would be on high alert, making sure to weed out any paedophiles in their midst.
	Although, of course, we know as well that Jimmy Savile was well known for his own activities, his illegal activities within the organisation, was actively protected.
	They facilitated it.
	So, I mean, my ultimate theory of politics is, as it exists in the modern, contemporary world that we live in, that probably about at least 60% of all political and media action can be explained in, you know, if you look at David Cameron having sex with a pig's head and such things like this, can be explained by sexual blackmail that goes on behind the scenes to motivate action.
	That's how I read it, and this is the latest story that seems to confirm it, which is that Hugh Edwards, a BBC presenter who... The lead presenter.
	The lead presenter of BBC News at Ten, I believe it was, who retired, resigned in April of this year after having been suspended last July, it turns out is another Another in a long list of BBC nonces.
	But we'll go on to speak about this.
	So first of all, last year there was a large controversy that came out around him.
	Around the exact same time of year, it was July of 2023, when The Sun released a story that they said was in the public interest, where it turned out that Hugh Edwards had been speaking Sending inappropriate messages and exchanging money with a 17 year old.
	Now this didn't come to everything, this didn't come to a head at the time mainly because there was a lot of different allegations and media pundits were throwing accusations at The Sun saying that they'd got a lot of this information illegitimately and were promoting the story outside of the public interest purely for the sake of pushing tabloids.
	But here's what they originally said.
	It was that a high-profile BBC presenter, which was later revealed to be Edwards, had given a young person more than £35,000 since they were 17 in return for sordid images.
	Just a quick thing.
	Hugh Edwards was on about £450,000 a year.
	Of taxpayer money.
	Taxpayer money.
	License payer money.
	You have to pay that license if you want to watch TV.
	You have to facilitate Hugh Edwards paying underage kids for sordid images.
	And who knows how many other BBC presenters.
	So his wife came out and said that he would respond to the allegations but had been going through some troubles because it all triggered a serious mental health episode.
	He was in... Oh, yeah.
	Oh, poor Boo Boo.
	Yeah, he didn't play the victim.
	Yeah, he tried to play the sympathy game.
	Huge amounts of money.
	when it reported the son then reported on a letter external from the young person's lawyer to the BBC denying the substance of the son's story in their parents response because the parents also did an interview with the son saying that yeah this happened we're horrified that this happened our son is literally a crack addict and this guy was sending money to him to help him to continue his crack addiction huge amounts of money 35 grand is a yearly salary well crack don't come cheap cut well that's true Well, that's true.
	I don't know how much it costs, but I assume it's not cheap.
	Yeah, so after that all came out, his ultimate suspension came not from this son's story.
	It came from the fact that at the exact same time, a lot of other people in the BBC decided to come out.
	And say, actually, actually he's been messaging me inappropriately as well.
	The Sun said the presenter broke COVID lockdown rules to meet a 23-year-old who had contacted him on a dating site.
	Paper also published messages it's claimed were from the star to a 17-year-old on Instagram, including love heart emojis.
	Shortly after Edwards was named by his wife, BBC News reported that three current and former employees of the BBC claimed Edwards had sent messages that made them uncomfortable, so a sex pest.
	Yeah.
	A disgusting sex pest.
	Yet another one.
	Yet another one being harboured and protected by the BBC, because if you're going to tell me that these people had made these claims to the BBC only after all of this came out, no, that's obviously untrue.
	From what I can tell, the BBC were probably made aware of all of this long before they decided to report on it.
	Like with Jimmy Sadler, it'll have been an open secret in the staff rooms of the BBC.
	Oh, here comes Hugh Edwards, you know, watch out.
	Yeah, the police decided to take no further action at the time, but of course when all of that came out, there were many people very eager to come out and defend Hugh Edwards and talk about how the son was a rag.
	John Soppel, former BBC employee and a friend of Edwards, who said that Oh, I can't believe how disgusting the tabloid press are.
	They all need to take a hard look in the mirror.
	Of course your taxpayer money should be going towards sex pests.
	This is what the British government is all about.
	After all, he didn't actually say that, but he was saying about how terrible this was.
	Owen Jones decided to go on a big rant about The Sun as well, saying they were trying to destroy someone's life with false claims of illegality involving a minor.
	You mean he got metooed?
	Yeah, he's basically trying to say we got metooed despite the fact that his wife, when she came out and said, oh he'll address it, didn't deny it.
	Yeah.
	Didn't deny it.
	But the thing is, all of these people were on the other side of the issue when metoo was happening.
	They're like, oh well, we've got to believe all women, every allegation is legitimate, that person should be cancelled, presumption of innocence has gone down the tubes until it's one of their guys.
	And of course all of this came to a head now over the beginning of the week.
	The news story broke just as the events in Southport were going down.
	So some people think that the media might have been keeping this in their back pocket just for such an event.
	It turned out that Hugh Edwards had been arrested back in November.
	You know what's interesting?
	I went to Bristol because it was Eldersdorf's birthday yesterday.
	And, uh, we went past the newsstand and it was just Hugh Edwards' face.
	All over the newsstand.
	Hugh Edwards, nonce.
	That's the... basically this picture.
	That was the story.
	Like, none of the riots, none of the unrest.
	I mean, it's absolutely important to understand that the people that the BBC are hiring and promoting as their lead newsreaders are Disgusting sexual degenerate pedophiles, but also it's very convenient, but it shows again how desperate they are when they're willing to throw their own under the bus to distract.
	Question, how long was he on BBC?
	Because... He is.
	Yeah, how long is he... Decades probably.
	Decades.
	So how can you be decades in a...
	Collaborating for decades with someone without having any inclination.
	You can't.
	You can't.
	I mean Jimmy Saffel had been employed by them since the early 70s.
	Or you can but you stay silent because you mentioned some people who started talking about it.
	Yeah, they would have just kept them out.
	Yeah, so he was accused of having dozens of photographs on WhatsApp including seven of the most serious type as you can see from the headline.
	He is pled guilty to three counts of making indecent images of children.
	Made them.
	Well, that's what they're saying in the headlines, but when you read this story I'll go through it now.
	So, he was arrested in November last year and charged last month, but the details of those developments and his court appearance were kept under wraps by authorities until Monday.
	The offences were committed between December 2020 and August 2021.
	The court heard that Edwards had been involved in an online chat with an adult man on WhatsApp between December 2020 and August 2021, who sent him 377 sexual images, of which 41 were indecent images of children.
	Of the Category A images, which is the worst kind that you can have according to British law, the estimated age of most of the children was between 13 and 15.
	However, one was aged between 7 and 9, the court was told.
	That's just disgusting.
	Why did they sit on this for six months?
	The BBC supposedly sat on it for six months because of the fact that the police had told them to keep it under wraps.
	Right, so they kept paying him?
	Yes.
	So he got... Until he resigned in April.
	So what, he got about £200,000?
	Yes, actually yes, about £200,000 in that time.
	Amazing.
	So those offences are contrary to a number of sections and laws.
	He could now receive a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment.
	That's it, but that's the maximum.
	and he's he should be so lucky yeah he was previously the BBC's highest paid newsreader with a pay bracket between the year 2023 to 24 of 475,000 to 479,000 for the year which was a 40,000 pound increase on the year prior so you know Good behaviour, good work.
	We give you a pay bump for that, Hugh.
	You know that meme where it's just the picture of the universe and there's a little arrow pointing to the Milky Way?
	It's like, you're here paying taxes to paedophiles.
	I don't see... Where's the lie?
	Yeah, exactly.
	How is it wrong?
	Where's the lie?
	They've been reporting on the sex offender who was sending in these images, Alex Williams, and I've got to say, looking at this, physiognomy never lies.
	It's always the person you most suspect.
	Yeah, every time... Listen, if you look at somebody and your gut tells you don't trust that person, you're probably right.
	You have been honed by thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions of years of evolution and intelligent design.
	To spot a wrong-un.
	To spot a wrong-un, yes.
	So there's, uh, Williams was convicted of seven counts of distributing and possessing indecent images, including one charge of possessing prohibited images of children, of course, and at least one of them that he sent to Hugh Edwards was between seven and nine years old.
	Can you guess how much he was sent away for?
	You know, I reckon he got a suspended sentence.
	Well, in March this year, Williams was given a 12-month sentence suspended for two years.
	I knew it!
	God damn it!
	They constantly do this.
	I hate this country.
	Honestly, like, so this is something that constantly comes up in the Swindon Advertiser, right?
	For some reason, whenever a nonce is, like, and there was one guy who had like 30,000 images.
	And he got a suspended sentence and the judges just constantly suspended sentence suspended sentence suspended sentence and it's just like why?
	Why are these people not being sent to jail?
	Well let me think our political class seem to be a bunch of disgusting sexual perverts and pedophiles and the media class seems to be.
	Could the judicial class be as well?
	Question mark?
	This is a question mark.
	A-E, Samson.
	A-E.
	Yes, yes.
	A-E.
	No, no, no.
	They're not going to just put Pedo in the headline.
	No, no, no.
	A-E, Samson.
	Right.
	Go back.
	There we go.
	Yes, there we go.
	No, not P-file.
	Oh, this is like pulling teeth!
	Sorry, I can't spell.
	P-A-E-D-O.
	File.
	There we go.
	Yep, carry on.
	There we are.
	There's still nothing.
	They've scrubbed it.
	They've scrubbed it as they've been watching this stream, I assume.
	Oh wait!
	Here we go.
	Oh look, there's one that's actually gone to jail.
	Oh my god.
	Jailed for 10 years?
	Teaching his- This is not like a- I don't know what's happening here.
	Jailed for 16 years.
	But this, honestly, normally it's just let off now.
	Well, we've got more information that we'll get onto in just a moment, so I'm going to move on now, Samson.
	Thank god these guys are going to jail, aren't you?
	Of course, the question that a lot of people are asking is, why was I paying for this?
	Why was I paying for this?
	I mean the big question is... Why do I live here paying taxes to pedophiles?
	Yeah, the big question is why does this keep happening over and over again in the media and political class?
	Why are they all disgusting perverts?
	But the BBC, it says in here...
	for the five months after he was arrested, so this was November through April, paid him £200,000, as you guessed.
	In an interview with BBC News on Thursday, Mr. Davey said that the corporation had taken difficult decisions in a fair and judicious manner.
	He said it was legally challenging to recover any of that pay, but he would look at all options.
	He also said it would be nigh on impossible for the BBC to claw back his pension.
	So he's still getting his pension.
	Jesus Christ.
	So it pays to be a BBC pedophile.
	No.
	Not that we recommend you do that.
	He's pled guilty.
	I mean I can say that.
	He can sue you.
	He can sue me and then I can say here's the headline and here's the article.
	Here's the admission.
	Here's the admission when you said it.
	Jesus Christ.
	And again, why does this keep happening and why do people get such lenient terms for it?
	Because this is a report from December of last year, about 8 in 10 convicted in the UK over child abuse images avoid prison, according to the National Crime Agency.
	So if the court of children being sexually abused, eight out of ten of them, avoid going to jail.
	Graham Biggar, the director of this organization, said that some had been caught with thousands of images, but avoided imprisonment, and others had been given rehabilitation orders and suspended sentences, and then re-offended.
	My goodness, who could have seen that one coming?
	No kidding.
	So this country, for some reason, who can only guess, is shockingly lenient on pedophiles.
	Of all classes.
	And I can only assume, personally, that it is because a considerable number of our own ruling class and media class all turn out to be pedophiles and other variants of deviant.
	Conclude that we're truly ruled by truly disgusting people, but, but I console myself at the knowledge that if the events of the past week show anything, is that as well as being completely disgusting degenerates, they have coombrain rot, And are also lunatic retards who are not actually really in control of much and are flailing around, failing to establish any sort of thing that could be considered law and order.
	Which is terrible for us right now, but means that their grip on power is probably not half as tight as their grip on their nether regions.
	Yeah, I take solace in the fact that one day the sun will burn out.
	Balder Heal says, if anything, the imminent collapse of the UK is going to have the EU start fraying even more as the members start shifting away to save their own culture.
	Maybe.
	And is there any reason, sorry, there's a reason they kept it under wraps and continue to pay the scumbag Carl.
	Anything that could tip the suspect off and have them delete evidence is to be avoided.
	Sentencing was stupid.
	Maybe, maybe.
	Entirely possible.
	But then Bald Eagle says, I take back everything I said about the BBC, given the benefit of the doubt, when dealing with this police investigation, it just gave them cover to give us money to keep the guy from squealing.
	That was just over three minutes.
	The quickest retraction I've ever seen Bald Eagle.
	I really appreciate that series of tweets.
	Again, in the abstract, that does sound, that's a totally reasonable, no good point.
	You don't want deleting evidence and stuff like that.
	No, absolutely.
	In the abstract, it makes perfect sense, but no, the BBC is just essentially institutionally non-see, and they're covering up for one of their most highly paid nonces.
	No, they're acting- they're most highly paid nonce.
	Yeah, sorry.
	Well, no, there are people at the BBC- Oh, I suppose there might be executives.
	Exactly, who get more money and we don't know whether they may or may not be nonces.
	Probably are.
	So, anyway.
	No, I like this one as well.
	Not just a string for one dollar.
	Harry needs to be more careful in a two-tier system before accusing people of crimes they're convicted of doing.
	That's a good point.
	Thank you.
	True, true, yeah.
	Thank you for the warning.
	Allegedly.
	Well, yeah, he admitted it.
	So he's pled guilty.
	So I don't know how we're supposed to frame that that doesn't make him sound like a nonce.
	I mean, he's admitted it.
	Yeah, that'll be my defence in court.
	Well, he admitted to it, so... The comment earlier about the four-year anniversary was about the old picture of Akila Obi.
	Ah, right, of course.
	Yes, I didn't even think about it, because I don't really think about it very often.
	But no, that's a good point.
	Akila, I don't think of you at all.
	Well, I don't.
	Why would I?
	Fair.
	Anyway, should we move on to the video comments as time is passing on?
	So I don't know if you guys can agree, I agree, but one of the things I find almost the most distasteful, and one of the worst arguments that people present when there's been a terrible crime, is when they say something that alludes to another crime.
	Something like, oh, you know, what about Dunblane?
	Which was an English guy that went and attacked English children.
	Yeah, I do hate it.
	Well, my favourite thing about that deflection was the fact that the person who used it said that it was a knife crime, when famously Dunblane was the shooting, which is why they took away all our handguns.
	Yes.
	So these people who are using these deflections don't even know what they're talking about, shocker.
	I thought I'd share some evergreen Lotus Eater articles that I like.
	Against lived experience.
	How we became pro-life.
	Deconstructing the four pillars of leftism.
	McCarthy did nothing wrong.
	The right should embrace environmentalism, which helps me feel less isolated as a nature lover.
	Look back in anger, remembering the victims of the Manchester Arena attack.
	And you can't define woke, oh but you can, and this is my favorite article because it's a good short guide to help you in the culture war.
	Thank you very much for the appreciation post there.
	I confess that I don't enjoy poetry, But Blake is fascinating.
	To see a world in a grain of sand, And a heaven in a wild flower, Hold infinity in the palm of your hand, And eternity in an hour.
	To be in a passion you good may do, But no good if a passion is in you.
	The whore and gambler, by the state, Licensed build that nation's fate, The harlot's cry from street to street, Shall weave old England's winding sheet.
	The winner shouts the loser's curse, dance before dead England's hearse.
	That was beautiful.
	Thank you very much for that.
	I'm not a poetry guy either, but that was good.
	Welcome back, Harry.
	Your takedown of Ubisoft over their misappropriation of Japanese history is spot on.
	The Japanese take their history and culture very seriously and have long opposed its contamination.
	Keep in mind that the leader of the Satsuma Rebellion, made famous by the movie The Last Samurai, Takamori Seiego, is still considered a hero for fighting against modernity, even though that put him in conflict with the Meiji Emperor, the same emperor that Takamori had helped put on the throne.
	Takamori is so revered that there's a statue to him in Ueno Park in Tokyo.
	And now for something completely different.
	There was a man born without eyelids.
	And in order to build him a set of eyelids, they took the foreskin from his circumcision and made him new eyelids.
	This is all well and good, but it ended up making him cockeyed.
	Terrible joke.
	I respect it.
	dad jokes on point you know what you do is just pay your bills and you know pack heat if you need to and don't worry that's all yes worry is praying to the devil that's great worry is betting against yourself you know we po yang
	it looks tranquil Wholesome.
	It doesn't look tranquil.
	Yeah, it isn't.
	The two-tier policing is just... Two-tier society, man.
	This is exactly what he wants.
	Yeah, it isn't.
	The two-tier policing is just...
	Two-tier society, man.
	This is exactly what it was.
	Anarchy in the UK!
	Chaos.
	Brack and gas.
	There's so much chaos, someone will do something stupid.
	And when they do, things will turn nasty.
	The rioters were arrested in Brixton.
	And then Sutler will be forced to do the only thing he knows how to do.
	To be fair, that is ominous.
	I don't think that Starmer would be competent enough to draw out the military like this onto the streets.
	I'm not saying he'd be competent enough, but he'd definitely do it.
	He's definitely sort of tyrannical enough, I think.
	I don't think that our dystopia would look like any of the dystopias that we've seen like V for Vendetta.
	Ours would be a far more pathetic dystopia, as it is right now.
	That is true.
	Lord Nerevar says, With the most charitable lens I can muster, it is possible to forgive the ruling class for not understanding us until now.
	They're so disconnected from the average person, they simply cannot fathom our concerns.
	Now, however, we're becoming a nuisance, and instead of addressing the roots of the problem, they've decided to stamp the boot down.
	There are more of us than there are of them.
	Yes, I think that that's too charitable, though.
	I think they've hated us for a long time.
	And I think the article I wrote, actually, the Liberal Powder Keg, explains why.
	Andrew says, to be honest, the hypocrisy and much more the blatant lying by the left over this year, last year, has been nothing short of infuriating.
	It's simply brazen at this point.
	He is hoping the left's hubris will lead to a tremendous fall.
	Yes.
	Bjorgvin Andresen.
	Says, Gents, not to be too black-pilled, but how do we correct course, not just ourselves, but our societies, out of this age of toxic empathy?
	Non-violently.
	We don't actually want violence.
	Yeah, well, this is why I don't think anyone should go to any of these protests.
	I think they are going to be violent.
	Honestly, it just has to come with a mindset shift away from parties that are obviously globalist.
	We just have to choose a non-globalist party and be like, yeah, them, right or wrong, we don't care anymore.
	Chase says MSM on the far right.
	Tommy Robinson seen literally drinking water.
	How drinking water is a subtle dog whistle to the ancestral roots of Nazi Germany.
	MSM on the machete wielding Welshman.
	He literally drinks water.
	He's just like you and me.
	He's a good boy.
	Didn't do nothing.
	How will the far right spin this one?
	Yeah, I know it's... You know he's a good boy because at one point he was a child.
	That's literally the argument that gets made.
	We've got a photo of him as a child.
	Don't you feel bad for him?
	They always do this.
	They're like, yeah, okay.
	I mean, he may well have butchered a bunch of children, but until that point he hadn't butchered any children.
	He had a mother.
	Yeah, he had a mother.
	Yeah, but like, they equate as if, look at this time of him not butchering children.
	So that's not so bad, right?
	It's like, no, that just is all the steps leading up to it.
	And again, there are so many, there's so much misinformation or rumours about this kid.
	Like, if There are a lot of people online saying someone said that he said that what will sort this country out is a genocide like Rwanda.
	It's like, how can that be real, man?
	And this was supposedly when he was in school.
	There are also statements going around that he was kicked out of school at some point.
	And like in America, the reason they don't show you the pictures of them past very early childhood is because they won't be able to find a picture of him not looking like a dead-eyed psychopath.
	Kevin Fox wonders if we can call the pro-Palestine stuff far-left issues.
	Yeah, we can.
	But our government is far-left.
	So they look at those client groups and think, well, we need to protect them.
	Hence Yvette Cooper's very calm face when dealing with the Gypsy riots, compared to her fury when dealing with those awful gammons.
	Oh, but don't worry, though.
	Once Labour's in, Blair's going to get everything locked down and in control.
	Yeah, I think Blair better hurry up and descend from the rafters, Deus Ex Machina style, to save the day if he's coming, because it looks like things are going to kick off.
	Michael Brooks says, I don't think the left hates us individually.
	They hate that we have a sense of belonging, and they don't, and they will destroy us, out of jealousy for this.
	For we have tradition, homeland, and a place of metaphysical history that we occupy, and all they have is hate and destruction.
	No.
	Read my article.
	Read the article I wrote.
	It's not that they are jealous of us having this metaphysical history.
	They want to leave the metaphysical history, and your existence reminds them that they're still a part of it.
	That they're still just English plebs, basically, stuck on this damp island.
	I've said for a long time now that the woke left, however you want to call it, is really a coalition of groups that all, for their own particular reasons, hate classical western civilization and the people who built it, in one way or another.
	Whether it's from those people who are inside the system itself, who think that they have been historically marginalised by it, or those who are outside of the system, such as the foreigners that we've been bringing in, who see themselves as our historical enemies.
	The whole idea is how we will dominate you.
	Yeah, but the whole thing is really fixed around and pivots on the white liberal who hates the fact that the English working class remind them that they come from a place and a time and have traditions and have culture and are honestly a disappointment to them.
	They want to be the sophisticated nowhere people.
	There is still that contingent of white liberal that I see even posting over the past week or so who think that by enjoying foreign food... That makes them cool.
	No, it makes you morally better than you, and sophisticated, and interesting.
	But they're a global citizen at that point, so they've transcended the particularities of nation and race and culture.
	No, we're just floating above humanity at this point, that's how they think of themselves.
	At this point we just have to accept that that mindset and those people is willing to allow the death of children as long as it means that they get to go to their local kebab shop and buy slop from an authentic Turk.
	No, the death of your children.
	Oh yeah, sorry.
	Let's be clear.
	That makes far more sense, yeah.
	The death of the native British children, that's completely understandable as long as they get the foreign slop, exactly as you said.
	Richard says, hope not hated bad actors and they're behind all of this.
	I think that's giving them too much credit, but they are part of the institutional structure that is designed to keep the native working class on their knees.
	They're definitely bad actors though, I agree with that.
	No doubt about that.
	That's why I played the clip, because I was like, OK, so it's not that they don't know, right?
	It's not that they don't know.
	It's that they're evil.
	Might as well have been rubbing his hands together and going, all according to plan.
	Yeah, exactly.
	It's not that they don't know exactly how these people are feeling.
	They're just evil.
	OK, understood.
	That's good to know.
	You know, I like it when you just come out and say, hi guys, we're the villains.
	It's like, yeah, good.
	I'm glad I can identify you.
	Just, you know, I agree that you're the villains.
	So there we go.
	You know, at least everything's on the table.
	Do you have something to add, Stelios?
	No, but I think they get a kick from it.
	A perverse pleasure?
	Yeah, I agree.
	They don't want to go and confront you head on.
	But you know that pathetic worm that you knew in school, who couldn't actually do anything, was really untalented, had no friends, but the only thing that he had was that he could annoy you sometimes.
	He could be a hall monitor.
	Yeah, and he thinks that being annoying to you is him getting one up on you.
	It's attention, isn't it?
	Yeah, that's who we're ruled by.
	I mean, can you imagine what Keir Starmer was like in school?
	Right.
	I bet his pencil case was immaculately organized.
	I bet his bedroom never had toys on the floor or anything like that.
	I bet he was chafed raw from the wedgies.
	Undoubtedly.
	He was undoubtedly bullied by like jocks.
	Obviously didn't get the girls.
	And like, you know, and he was sat there, well, I'm going to make my time, make sure that my times tables are all correct.
	It's like you, how is this guy in charge?
	And yet still only gets middling marks.
	Yeah, yeah, absolutely.
	Yeah.
	Still only gets a C.
	Because these people still aren't as smart as they think that they are.
	100%.
	Kistam is dumb.
	He's genuinely block-headed, where it's like, oh no, I've got the thing and I can't move from this frame.
	And so he'll just double down on the frame again, even if you've destroyed it, and it's just like, okay, Kier, that's dumb.
	You don't understand why that's dumb.
	Anyway, SupremeDuck says, if everyone notices a wolf about and suddenly some farm animal turns up dead, we would logically assume it's the wolf, not a rogue panther.
	Either way, I understand why people look at Muslims after what's been happening the past few years.
	Well, the fact that people are turning on Muslims is not because this is about Muslims.
	I mean, there's a general...
	Sense of danger in the country, and there have been grievances that the English community have accrued against the Islamic community.
	And these haven't been talked about, they can't be admitted, and so now this is how they're expressing it.
	For right or wrong.
	There's a reason why we know the playbook generally is that if the suspect's race isn't immediately said to be white, Then it's more than likely someone who isn't white.
	The only reason that this was slightly different is because it turned out he was 17 years old.
	Yeah, and I'm gonna do a proper, like, piece on this at some point.
	But even then we were right, he's not English!
	No, he's not, no.
	Um, he wasn't Welsh either.
	Uh, Lord Nerevar says, Nonsense and their collaborators, um, are lizard folk.
	Quite possibly, I'm not gonna read the rest of that though.
	The new car for you from Kia, the Starmer, the car with the fastest U-turns, says, Rolf Harris, Jimmy Saddle, Max Clifford, Dave Lee Travis, Chris Denning, Jeffrey Wheeler, Philip Schofield and Hugh Edwards.
	All of these men have had, in some way, re-questionable or downright criminal interactions with minors.
	Their combined victim count is doubtless in the thousands.
	They all worked for the BBC.
	The only way such an organisation could possibly get away with all of this is through public funding and lies.
	That's the thing as well, a lot of them are playing the victim as well.
	Do you remember Phillip Schofield playing the victim?
	Oh they all do, especially now that they've got the therapeutic, like, oh my mental health has been so badly affected by all this.
	I don't care you or not.
	Yeah.
	Oh, my heart bleeds for you, Peter Philes.
	What did Dave Lee Travis do?
	I didn't even hear about that.
	I've not heard about this either, but I'm sure that that's a limited list.
	But, uh, Small L Libertarian has got you there.
	Getting caught was devastating to my mental health.
	There you go.
	Literally exactly that position.
	And it's like, okay, well, I'm so sorry for you.
	You know, how could you?
	How could you?
	Oh, here we go.
	On the Wikipedia page, in October 2012, two former BBC employees alleged that Travis had sexually assaulted several women during his time in the BBC.
	One of the women, who was 17 at the time, claimed in the media after making a formal statement to police that Travis put his hand up her skirt in 1977.
	Okay, well, I wouldn't be terribly surprised.
	This is very indecent.
	Yeah.
	Threadnaught says, uh, the rank-and-file leftists call the existence of a particular group evil, and every argument suggests a final solution, but they just want to bully, uh, and call a proposal of it a conspiracy theory.
	Um... Oh, Travis was also sentenced to three months in prison, so there must have been something to them.
	Well, yeah, he was obviously found guilty for something.
	Yeah.
	I don't think it's that they just want to bully.
	I think a lot, for a large segment of the left, they actually want to see their political opponents destroyed.
	Lives ruined, dead if possible, but reduced to old blind Belisarius if not.
	I think there's also an aspect of, yeah, these people really are insane utopians, and there's a particular part of them that goes, okay, we just keep going, keep going blindly, keep forging ahead, eventually I'll be right, and then I can really rub it in their faces.
	Once even more English children are dead, but eventually the utopia comes... I think only useful idiots think this way.
	Possibly, but I think Stammer's part of it.
	Like, he's doubling down on everything stupid that's ruining this country.
	And he's like, yeah, well, I need to protect the client groups.
	I need to make sure that the French Revolution continues.
	We're going to have more dispersal of power.
	We're going to have more power taken away from politicians.
	We're going to have more lawfare, the rule of lawyers.
	You know, we can have all of this because we want certainty.
	So democracy essentially withers away.
	And he's still on that train, despite the fact all of this is going wrong.
	He was doing interviews.
	He was doing interviews with Sadiq Khan leading up to the election, where he said one of his main focuses was going to be against combating Islamophobia.
	Some people took this as, oh he's just throwing out red meat to the Muslim vote for Labour.
	I don't think he believes it.
	He was being true.
	He was being honest.
	Threadknot again says, just ask a leftist.
	If the existence of your hated group is the source of all evil, why not Final Solution?
	And they will immediately accuse you of being a frightened conspiracy theorist.
	Yeah, but the thing is, they can't really admit that that's actually what they would do, given the power, because obviously it makes them look insanely evil.
	But the, honestly, the problem of the left is that literally the real world exists.
	That's what it basically boils down to.
	And people who are happy and exist in the real world don't want what they want, and so you are essentially just intrinsically bigoted or whatever, you know, racist, transphobic, whatever it is.
	These things are just inevitable.
	But Bleach Demon says, I know there has to be a level of milquetoast tepidness in the coverage, but there needs to be suggestions on productive and within the law ways to address the blood on the hands of the establishment.
	Yes, but just at the moment, I mean like personally, I would like...
	In like, you know, a few weeks time or something when all of this has died down.
	See some sort of massive vigil outside of Downing Street.
	Well, his own suggestion from Bleach Demon says perhaps a national strike.
	Yep, something like that.
	Large-scale, organised, mass action has worked in the past.
	Yeah, just outside the Home Office.
	Prevent the people working in the Home Office from getting in.
	No more immigrants.
	You know, just sort of, you know, stand at the door, like, just stop oil.
	It's like, come and arrest us, I guess.
	You know, like, just stop oil.
	I don't know.
	But, um... But, like, last one.
	Furious Dan says, did a diverse mob not rout the police in Meads?
	Why did Sir Starman never contend this?
	Yeah, weird, isn't it?
	And I think it really comes down to the fact they just don't feel threatened by the diversity.
	They see the diversity as part of their in-group and they're like, well, you know, that's fine because we will genuflect towards them at the end of it.
	But when the working class are rioting, they feel the ground trembling under their feet.
	And they're like, oh God, no, the entire edifice is put in danger.
	And so, no, we're going to have to come down on that as hard as possible.
	But I think we're out of time there, aren't we?
	Yes, and with that, thank you very much for watching.
	We'll be back again next week, and for all our subscribers, please make sure to tune in for Lads Hour.
	We're really interested to hear what you have to add to the conversation that we'll be having.
	Until then, see you next week.

▲