All Episodes
Previous Next
May 9, 2024 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters
01:29:30
The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #911
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
*Music* Oh, hello!
And welcome to the podcast The Lotus Eaters.
I am joined by Harry.
Hello.
And Stelios.
Am I here?
Are we live?
Am I here?
Are we live?
John, where am I?
Do I know what day it is?
Yes.
Well, today we'll be talking about the Menats.
The Menats?
Mentats?
How do we agree on describing them?
Menats.
Yeah, the Menats.
The Menat Menace.
All right, so the Menats.
The Rwanda...
Sorry, Rwanda is political theater and stop noticing crime statistics.
Very, very dangerous things.
Yeah, there's only so many ways I can say Rwanda is a joke, and I think I've already used that segment title, so...
Have you ever tried Rwanda Madness?
Rwandan Madness!
Rwanda gone wrong, gone sexual.
Well, I don't think it wasn't sexual in the 90s.
Moving on!
Alright, I have no announcements, so this is just awkward.
Right.
Would you like to work for us?
You too can be involved in awkward interactions in the office.
Get to find out what goes on behind the scenes.
That's sexual.
Anyway.
Minutes!
We're here to talk about the Minutes.
The Minutes are the newest addition of all the acronyms that we've had to use over the years.
There's BAME, of course, the traditional.
Scholar.
Yes.
Youth.
Yukma Gamur was an attempt that went wrong.
Jogger?
Went sexual?
Anyway, and then we've got minutes that we've got to deal with today.
And before we get into the minutes, I have to announce this.
So this is on the page, which is the CareerOpportunities.com.
It's production manager time.
And if you scroll down on the page, you'll find careers and then find this job.
Go have a look at it.
If you like it, apply.
If you don't, don't.
Rightio, moving on.
Let's get into it.
So this is a policy document that came out.
I know we're all raring to watch more policy documents, my friend.
So MANETS is supposed to be an acronym.
It is indeed.
And this policy document over here, this is the Center for Policy Studies.
I'm excited.
I am actually.
Because it's literally just proving everything we've all been saying for years.
I'm not kidding.
The central government centres of the think tanks are now like, hey, you know that podcast fella?
It turns out that the migrants have taken all the houses.
I mean, I think it's important to note, I was reading through this this morning, Callum was as well, we were talking about it, and it really comes across like they've been watching us.
I think they might have gold-tier subscribers.
They might show up on the gold-tier Zooms and just lurk.
They might mill about in the gold tiers.
So what we're talking about is this here.
here it says mass immigration not delivering promised economic benefits says Jen Rick and O'Brien duh Jen Rick, former Immigrations Minister for the Tory Government.
But not a surprise, not news.
I mean, kind of old news.
It's not even news anymore, it's old.
But in case you're wondering, like you mentioned, this is the fella.
This is Jen Rick over here.
Used to be the Immigration Minister and then realised, oopsie poopsie, it's gone a bit wrongsy and everything's been ruined.
How many years ago was he into the position?
Just a couple.
He came in after Liz Truss.
Okay.
Stuck around and then realized this is bad.
Okay.
I've done a bad job.
So I don't have much sympathy for him personally because it's like, well, you were the guy in charge.
Now, this is like the Tories turning around looking at the effects of migration and going, oops, did I do that?
Did I do that?
Oopsie doopsie.
But here's what the Parthian charge now admits they did, which is detailed in the telegraph quite nicely.
So I thought I'd read some of this.
So they say here that migration has failed to drive economic growth.
Really?
I thought we were all so rich.
It says the data was published showing that British consumers are suffering the longest drop in living standards in the G7 as the economy fails to keep up, whilst immigration is at the highest point it's ever been in all of recorded human history?
I think unrecorded human history, it's also the highest.
Yeah, pre-history.
It's not as high as it is now, a million a year, crossing over from Doggerland.
I don't think there were that many people on Earth.
Probably not.
Back in the Doggerland days.
Miss Doggerland.
They say here although Britain's- You must return!
Although Britain's economy rose by 0.1%- Ah yeah!
Yeah, but who cares about people?
Gains.
Got to get those economic gains.
0.1% growth across the entire year.
The per-person basis, it fell 0.8%.
This obviously being because you can add lots more people, and that will grow economy as a whole.
But obviously, if you've not made more wealth, the wealth is now just being distributed between more people, which means we're soft.
Yeah, but who cares about people?
As long as the GDP goes up?
Yeah, as long as London's financial district is making a comfortable profit, We're all profiting...
No wait, no we're not.
I'm not even sure London's financial district is profiting anymore.
So they say here, the figures were stark in contrast to the other G7 countries, where GDP per capita rose 1.2%, it fell 0.8% in the UK.
To alleviate pressure on housing, the NHS and schools, the CPS said net migration should be capped.
At just tens of thousands a year down from the peak 745,000 in 22.
Which means that, um, I... I think Carl is actually the only person who's been publicly saying for a while now, just put a cap.
Just, okay, once it reaches this figure, every other application for a visa is just, no.
Sorry.
I'd say use the cap.
Personally, tens of thousands, still too many for me.
But it would be a lot better than the complete unrestricted flood that we have at the moment.
Would the GDP suffer though?
Yes.
Yeah.
Thankfully, the GDP per capita would go up.
So they mentioned here, of course, that, well, why did they say tens of thousands?
And you did the reading here, which is that they've also done the thing we did, which is go through back every single manifesto ever.
And they've all said, lower immigration, please.
And we voted for them.
And then they just didn't, they just opted.
And the Tory government being the ones who initially came to power on the basis of capping it at tens of thousands?
This is 2010 policy?
Yeah, well in the report they go back to 1992 and the Tory manifesto for 1992 saying we'll put a cap on that migration, we'll make sure that not many more come in.
for years, 20 of them.
So they say here, to deliver this, the CPS said that the Home Office, which has proven itself to be too unwieldy to function effectively, great endorsement, and undermined high levels of churn should be split into a Department for Border Security and a Department for Immigration Control, and the second charge and undermined high levels of churn should be split into a Department for Border Security and a So, there we are.
That's, um...
I don't necessarily know if that would fix things, that just means more individual departments that over the course of 10 to 20 years can grow and grow and refuse to do their jobs Just fire everyone at the Home Office.
You're gone.
All of you.
We've failed on law, you've failed on order, you've failed on immigration.
I, there was, I always reference it, but it's important, there was the Telegraph column letter that came in, I think it was October, November, from a home office insider, just spilling the beans on everything that goes on in there, saying that most of everybody's time is spent in diversity meetings, talking about how gay they should all be, and then rubber stamping every visa application that comes through, and Suella Braverman would come in and say, please, please, oh please, could we just restrict a little bit of immigration?
Please?
And they would all laugh and say no and she would say, I'm so sorry for asking and leave.
Every single one of those people fired.
One of the weird things would be to see there the amount of money that the people who were talking about the diversity initiatives would get.
Because, generally speaking, DEI offices are... Very well paid.
Very lucrative.
Compensated.
If you are 77, how gay should you be?
I'm actually kind of interested in what the seminar's decided.
They didn't go into detail on that, they just... Is this gay?
A little bit more gay?
What's the point of that meeting?
It means nothing!
That's the point, it's just insane.
But let's get this back on screen.
So this is the article here, but they also have some lovely graphs.
And as you can see, this is post-COVID.
So what's the GDP growth looking like?
And it's just red.
It's just crap.
It's just been awful, if nothing else, over the last couple of years.
And that was supposed to be the return to normalcy.
We'll get the lockdowns ended so that we can return back to normal.
The new normal, it sucks.
That's per capita, though.
There are people who view it in absolute terms and they don't care.
Well, those people are called mad.
Well, in absolute terms, we got that 0.1%.
Oh, yeah.
It's a bit gay.
Anyway, so let's get on to who's coming, because this is the most interesting bit.
As you can see, the minutes there, I will be coming to the minutes in a minute.
The minutes, minutes, minutes, minutes, minutes, minutes, minutes.
What have you done?
- Oh, okay. - You've destroyed the graph. - Whatever, it's back.
Analysis from the Home Office says that the impact of the shift from EU migration, so before we used to have a lot more EU people coming, now we don't, and for some reason, this wasn't asked for, the Home Office decided what we need is huge amounts of non-EU migration.
So the Home Office did this, this is their decision, to massively shut down EU migration because of the Brexit, bro, that's gonna happen, so they decided to massively up non-EU migrants.
Now migrants, they say, from the Middle East, North Africa and Turkey, aged 25 to 64, were almost twice as likely to be economically inactive as someone born in the UK.
And as you can see, they chopped the charts here, and they are called Mennets.
That's the new term.
So when you're walking around and you notice some minutes, 40% of them are economically inactive, so you'll be able to determine these things as a reflection of reality, because the beta backs up your reflection of reality, if that's what you've seen.
Yes, so economic inactivity has in the past been used as a metric to basically smooth over the unemployment rate, so these people, they're not unemployed, they're economically inactive, and a lot of that will Mean people who are too sick to be working, which means, judging by this graph that we have here, that we are just importing people too ill to work, for some reason, if you were to take their claims of why they can't work right now seriously.
And if you were to do that, you would also see here that an Australian or a New Zealander is about a fourth as likely to be so cripplingly ill that they can't work, whereas a Minot, they're just riddled with disease, presumably.
I mean, probably they are, actually.
Or they're just not working because they can't be bothered.
I mean, it's just a complete cultural difference here.
Yeah, I mean... ...tax forms, or maybe you have a culture in which women are not working, so that'll contribute to it.
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
In other breakdowns, like the one The Economist did for Denmark, they included Pakistanis as a separate category within the Menapt, so it's the Menapt.
So I would assume Middle East is taking in the Pakistanis.
So, given the marriage culture they have over there, perhaps that explains some of the crippling illness so many of them are suffering from, evidently.
One of the things to bear in mind here is the lobby power that some groups have.
And, for instance, they are trying to bargain... They are trying to ask... Lobbies go, we can't work... No, no, they are literally asking for financial support in exchange for political support.
And the more this goes on, the more this is going to happen.
And what will you give me in return?
Well, we won't work.
I mean, it's just a bad deal.
Yeah, they won't work, but they will support politically.
Because we've been over this with Pakistan.
I mean, I'll keep writing on Pakistan because they deserve it more than anyone, which is the state of Pakistan has basically done literally nothing for the British states at all, all the people.
In terms of trade, we get nothing out of that.
In terms of crime rates, everything else, you know, these mass migration differences, not a net benefit, not New Zealanders, not EU, Latin America or anything.
Apparently Australians and New Zealanders are just coming over here to work so that they can pay for benefits for Pakistanis.
It seems so.
Very sad.
But also just on a foreign policy front, like the Pakistanis have stabbed us in the back more times than anyone can count, no matter how many fingers they've got.
And as you can see here, it's just a bad deal.
And it goes for other groups.
You can go through this.
We've been through it many times.
If you wanted to import a group of people because you wanted a load of cheap workers who were going to be really productive, You can do this.
You can look at the data and find out.
As you can see here, the groups that are the best production are South East Asia there, rest of Europe, North America, Latin America, EU, Australia, and New Zealand.
They're the most economically active.
And those who are least are Minot, South Asia, East Asia, rest of Oceania, Caribbean, Central Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa.
Of course, this isn't the end all of all data.
You then go into how much are they earning compared to just economic activity.
But the same trend is the case, because as we mentioned before, I mean, like, what is it?
East Asia over here.
So the Chinese are rated quite high on productivity.
But when you look into the crime rates and then the, well, income, like the Chinese score incredibly high.
So they're probably a lot more economically inactive because they couldn't afford to be.
Like, literally, we just earn more.
get stuffed.
I doubt that's going to be the case for the menets though.
The menets, not so much.
But they say here- And that's for men aged 25 to 64.
Working age men, yeah.
Not retirees.
So they say here, Spanish migrants, for example, typically earn around 40% more than migrants from Pakistan or Bangladesh.
In the same country, same job market- I'm going to say it, same 24 hours in the day.
While migrants from countries such as Canada, Singapore, and Australia paid between four to nine times as much income tax as migrants from Somalia or Pakistan.
So, a migrant from Australia, in tax terms, is worth nine Pakistanis.
And they take up a ninth of the housing, a ninth of the supply of goods, and in return you get nine times the income in terms of taxation there.
And also, and this might be a shock to some people, Aussies and New Zealanders are already basically British, so there's not really much to worry about culture-wise there.
No rise in female genital mutilation.
But I remember this scene from Have I Got News For You.
You ever used to watch that show?
I used to flick past it.
Yeah, well, you know, used to be like some funny moments, but overall, yeah.
Because this is a scene, I think this is nine years ago, this video was uploaded, I can't remember when it was out, but this was during the Brexit debate, and obviously at the time, because they couldn't hide how much they hated us, the mainstream media would run stuff like this, where it's like, look at the UK native, he's fat, has no university degree, low education, versus Eastern European, of course, the height of education and sophistication!
But then it goes on with some others as well.
So as you can see here, this is them making fun of the fact that they're inferior.
Western Europeans, higher level of university degree, higher level of education.
It's like, okay, whatever.
And then, uh, I think next to it, they have non-European, which is represented by a Mongolian for some reason, which is something.
Go on, pick it back up.
Put it down.
God damn it.
Wait, yeah.
Oh no, I didn't get the timestamp right.
Oh there you go, we are.
No!
Oh no!
Whatever, the point being that the TV show would run at the time, this kind of crap, where just constantly non-Europeans, Eastern European, Western European, they're all better than you, native British.
You're basically Grug, whereas they are all big-brained.
You need them to survive.
Is this all based off, I assume this is all based off of information for these ethnic groups within the UK?
Yes.
Which at the time had much harsher selection pressures even with the mass migration that we were experiencing at the time.
But even then, I'm not sure I even trust these numbers back then.
No, of course.
I think this is just typical Westminster propaganda, where it's like, everything is fine, everything is fine, stop questioning anything.
But it's ruining my life.
I can't afford a house.
Ever.
I feel like that's more important.
Well, the pattern of this propaganda is to portray everything that is in the interest of the elite, let's say, as being in the interest of the people.
Exactly.
I mean, one of the things that got me about the Millets, though, is also the Millers.
We were joking about this this morning.
Because Drodka has noted, many times, some world-class milling in this photo, for example.
He writes, in rare sighting of commando prone position milling.
Yeah, I was going to say, normally you don't see them just lying prone on their bellies like that.
It's quite impressive.
He's turtling, almost.
But these are some fellas who are milling.
And I don't understand milling.
Are you a miller?
Um, no, typically I'm doing things with my day.
What about you, Stelios?
Do you mill?
What the hell are they doing?
That's the question!
It's very confusing!
If you go to any train station in and around the Greater London Area, you will be confronted with this level of milling.
I see what's going on here.
You know, they're actually- Being street informers.
A performance or something.
They hear the war in the street and they help the police.
This is Sherlock's Homeless Network.
Are you sure they're not forming some kind of miniature symposium that are actually deep in ponderous thought?
Yeah, they're just waiting for the Warhammer shop to open.
Oh, Carl's there!
Oh, alright.
This is Carl's extended family.
No, I think it's Hasdraka Mozart.
Milling Gear Solid.
There's also a game you can play, uh, Milling Around, a spotter's guide that's been published if you wish to enjoy a spot of milling and figuring out who's milling, what type of millers they are, of course.
Oh, the Sellers, you see plenty of those with their, um...
Oh, no, whoever this gentleman is.
He's not milling.
The sellers with their definitely legitimate Gucci bags and branded t-shirts.
You get a lot of sellers outside of gigs that you go to where it's like, oh and on the inside of the venue you can get this shirt for £45, get this totally legitimate t-shirt for a tenner instead.
So basically milling is...
What you do when you do nothing.
Milling about.
Doing bugger all.
And I always wonder because you do see people milling and I always want to just...
You have a home to go to, you have video games to play, or wives to have sex with.
The street is my home.
Yeah, it's just milling, just constant milling.
And it turns out if you're that economically inactive as a group, such as The Minutes, you can afford to mill.
But we'll get back to the article because there's some more stuff in here that's just amazing.
So they say, the report said, the impact was particularly acute in housing.
Net migration now accounted for 89% of the 1.3 million increase in the housing deficit.
So literally the There's a myriad of reasons why you can't afford a house, but 89% of that reason is immigration.
Almost the entire problem.
I wonder if anybody in this room, perhaps, has been banging that drum for a few years.
I would never bully Tom Harwood for good fun.
That's never happened.
Oh, what's that?
It's nine o'clock in the morning.
Time to bully Harwood.
I do actually get up and bully Tom Harwood as a sport at this point.
For YouTube, I'm joking, of course.
It's just that Tom Harwood believes that we just need to build more houses and that will solve everything.
Whereas now we know 90% of the shortfall is because of immigration.
Housing and wages had tracked each other.
The cost of housing and the growth in earnings tracked each other until the late 1990s, and then something happened.
Why not?
This is from the old days.
Housing and wages had tracked each other.
The cost of housing and the growth in earnings tracked each other until the late 1990s.
And then something happened.
Still yet to know.
And house prices just spiralled out of control.
Back to north there.
Unless we are building more than 300,000 homes a year, unless we are actually keeping pace with demand, right up until the early or indeed the late 1990s, house price growth tracked wage growth.
And then something happened at the end of the 1990s.
We're still unsure.
Well no, we're not actually, because we have an official government report telling us exactly what the problem is.
Oh yes, you're right.
90% of the problem is that.
And it says that 300,000 houses per year target is based off of the assumption that we only have 170,000 net migrants in the country every year.
And we also never reach the target, ever.
Not even during the post-war period did we build up any houses.
And also, there was another Telegraph article, I don't know if you included it, but it was... let me see if I can find the one that I sent to you, which was talking about how in February, the government had basically bought out, like, 16,000 homes, purely... For millers!
Yeah, for millers.
For menets and millers.
Men who mill.
Houses for people who don't reside in them.
Yes.
To be fair, you should just build tents on street corners for the millers and that would do them fine.
Oh you know what, I love a big homeless tent factory.
Not that I'm suggesting that, I'm just saying if you want to shore up some of the housing costs.
But they say here, it goes further than just buying a house obviously, they say pressure has also been added to the rental markets as well as affecting home ownership.
For example, 67% of privately rented households in London are headed by someone born overseas.
67% of all rented housing in London is from someone who was born overseas.
67% of the market is taken up by immigrants who want access to the British economy.
33% of new social housing, so there's a very small amount being built, but the amount that is even being built, 33%, a third of it, goes to people who are not born here.
Nevermind the already huge amount of stock that's already been taken by people that are not born here.
That's in the new ones as well.
I mean, it's just unbelievable the damage it does to people's wealth.
Because the number one way of building wealth is your income.
This is the only way people have ever built income unless you have some massive inheritance or something like that.
You live below your means, you save up, and then you gain capital over time, and then you use that capital to do things like start a business or whatever else, right?
That avenue has just been closed off since the 1990s.
Just if you want to save money, well I'm sorry but your rent is just going to keep going up at a ridiculous rate that doesn't match your wages.
Never mind the fact of owning a house you don't have to rent and burn that money every month.
That avenue of wealth creation for the natives, just got turned off.
I mean the unrepairable damage that has done just for decades is going to be, well it already is, unbelievable.
But the fella here, Mr Generic, he says that he blames the Tory government for liberalising immigration after Britain voted to take control of its borders leaving the EU.
Do we know who the immigration minister was after Brexit?
Do we have any idea?
No, it's Jenrick.
It's this guy.
You were the immigration minister after Liz Truss.
You could have stopped these things and you just did nothing, so I'm sorry.
He says on here, despite the rhetoric of highly selective systems, the post-2021 system continues to allow a large number of people to come here who are either not working or working in very low-wage jobs.
Out of net migration of two million non-EU nationals over the last five years, 15% principally came here to work.
85% didn't come to work.
That's not people on visas for tourism, that's people who come here for a long stay, proper settlement.
85% are not here to work.
Despite a 6.6% increase in the UK's population between 2011-2021, the number of GP surgeries increased 4% in the same period.
The amount of electricity the UK produces, it rose by... it didn't.
It fell by 14%.
The amount of electricity we can produce as a nation has gone down whilst the population has massively increased.
There is no such thing as a low electricity rich nation.
This is just a truism of economics.
I'm sorry, but that's also just a huge thing to keep in mind.
Remember when we did Mal's Great Famine?
Yep.
And you would read about coal supplies running out and things like this.
Like, that's how I feel reading this.
Well, yeah, because I was actually reading an article about South Africa right before we came on, and it was talking about rolling blackouts and electrical cuts across the country, particularly in larger cities like Johannesburg.
Over the past few years, and I hadn't read the part about the failure to generate electricity, the fact that it fell.
And I see that in the future, if this is where we're heading, if this trend doesn't reverse.
Even if, as I suspect, the elites do hate the native population of Britain to a certain level and want to punish us for some unknown reason simply because they're on the top and they think it's funny to, I don't know, pull legs off of spiders and burn ants to death and magnifying glass in the sun and that's how they see us.
There comes a point where it will affect them.
It will come to them when they look out the window and go, why isn't any of the electric working?
you can't get a GP appointment.
The problem with this is though that they are thinking in a very short-term manner and it's not exactly obvious that they don't understand it already, but maybe they're hoping that this is going to happen when they are not going to suffer the consequences.
I think they will.
Well, as we can see, just they'll bankrupt the country if nothing else.
I have to end this off because we're out of time, basically.
Of course.
Here's Harry's thread on it, where he's got a bunch of graphs.
And the reason I'm picking on the minutes, not only because of the ridiculous level of economic inactivity, which is not naturally occurring, but obviously it's been found in other places.
So as you mentioned here, here's the Denmark graph, in which they looked at net tax paying per year of age, and obviously if you're Danish, you pay taxes between sort of 20-something, you're a net contributor.
Western European immigrants, basically the same.
And then menats, or menapt, as they put it, because they put Pakistanis as a separate group.
Never.
Not once.
Not one year of life.
that the group living in Denmark found to have been contributing to the tax system.
Only a net economic drain.
The kind of economic drain you would usually get from a disabled person or women.
It's the idea that you don't end up paying into it because you're not one of the high percentage earners.
And then as you pushed, Aussies and New Zealanders are the ones keeping the UK from collapse in some respect there.
So thank you.
What's with the bear logo in the background there, Harry?
I didn't notice that.
I didn't know what that was until somebody quoted it and said, did you do this on purpose?
And I said, well, clearly Australians are all gay.
Well, there we are.
Thank you to Australian viewers.
Thank you for paying taxes because the men suddenly aren't.
Let's move on.
Seriously, is that an actual flag behind it?
That's the bear flag.
What is the bear flag?
It's for really hairy gay guys.
Yes, I did do this on purpose.
The only man I know from Australia, Chris Gard, is very hairy and I'm almost certain that he's gay.
his wife just doesn't know yet anal again the There's gonna be some signs.
Chris, can I please shave my armpits?
No!
No, you can't!
Why do I have to have my head shaved?
Jesus Christ.
I don't even know who that guy is.
Sorry.
He's lovely.
He's a great musician.
Anyway, he's pretty gay, though. - Yeah.
So, we've just looked at everything that's going on to do with legal migration.
Now let's take a look at what's going on with the illegal migration, or what the Tories want you to think might be going on with the illegal migration, because they only really want you to think about the illegal migration because it's just a puppet show.
It's a little sock puppet show where they play the hero going, and we will strike down illegal immigration for you, and then they don't.
They don't, they won't.
Rwanda is a joke.
There's only so many ways that I can say that Rwanda is a joke.
It was never meant to work.
It's political theatre.
At least now it does seem that there is some pushback going against the legal migration coming from official sources.
If only because that is where most of the growth is going.
But either way, Rowan, there is something that people want to care about and it's something that we'll be spending a lot of money on.
So let's figure out what's going on with that and what has developed over the past few weeks.
First though, we've got a career opportunity going for a production manager.
We're looking for people with skills in videography, audio and editing available to work in London.
If you are interested in the full job specification, you can find that at lotuseaters.com slash careers or lotuseaters.com slash career production manager with hyphens in between.
And you can fill out your application and send it in to us there.
So thank you very much for everyone who applies.
Good luck to you.
So, Rishi Sunak has said that migrants are going to Ireland instead of the UK, which is showing that Rwanda has finally started to work as a deterrent.
That's right, we didn't send a single person to Rwanda yet under this scheme.
I'll get onto that because some people go, aha, we've sent one!
But that wasn't under the scheme.
So it's just not a solution.
We're going to ruin Ireland.
What did they do?
We're going to flood Ireland again, because we've never had any troubles with Ireland.
Is this not, you know, the plantation all over again?
Like, we're sending new colonists, except they're all minutes.
Worse really.
I feel bad.
Would this not just be evil?
But anyway, so I'll read from the article that's quoted here from Sky.
So if people come to our country illegally but know that they won't be able to stay there, I mean apparently you can, you can just mill about, but this is what Rishi is saying, they are much less likely to come.
Sunak also said the comments illustrate that illegal migration is a global challenge.
That's why you're seeing multiple countries talk about doing third country partnerships, looking at novel ways to solve this problem, and I believe will follow where the UK has led.
Ireland's Deputy Prime Minister said, maybe, the fact that it's all going to Ireland, and when I say all, it's not very much, it's about 6,000, but still, maybe that's the impact it was designed to have.
The Safety of Rwanda Bill ...became an act on the Thursday before this article was posted, with number 10 announcing the same day that the first deportation plane had been booked.
Anticipating the bill's passage, the Prime Minister earlier this week promised the first flights would take off in 10 to 12 weeks, come what may.
So a nice broad timescale there.
Prime Minister created the bill to revive the scheme and send people arriving in small boats to the East African nation after the Supreme Court ruled the scheme unlawful in a landmark ruling last year.
So they just overstepped the Supreme Court, said actually it's safe, we've made this law that says that it's safe, so you have to treat it as safe so we can send people there.
Now, this is, again, another business masterclass from Paul Kagame, because, if you notice, again, still, we have not sent a single person there under this scheme, and yet he has collected £250 million, well, sorry, £240 million from it.
Kunle Drukpa puts it quite nicely here.
We heard you have a migrant problem.
The threat of deportation to Rwanda is causing migrants to leave the UK into islands.
We're being overwhelmed.
It actually worked?
What do you mean by that?
Oh, I mean, how terrible.
Perhaps we can help.
I have a proposal for you, for just 250 million euros.
You can send the Irish migrants to Rwanda.
I mean, it's brilliant.
Then he's gonna what, scam Iceland out of their money?
And then Greenland will have to pay up, and then Canada?
Well, the thing is, the thing is, we've not heard any official talks going on.
Migrant diggies are gonna be like Vikings discovering Vinland.
We've not heard of any official talks going on quite yet between Paul Kagame in Rwanda and Ireland, but Happily, happily, we do know that Downing Street is offering to act as the middleman.
They're saying, huh, perhaps I can put you in touch with a guy.
I will also mention, like I said, we have sent an He'd already been rejected for his claim.
mercenary to Rwanda.
Are you serious?
An asylum seeker.
An asylum seeker, yes.
And it wasn't under the scheme.
It was voluntary, and we paid him three grand to do it.
We paid a guy to go on holiday.
Now, bear in mind, he'd already been rejected for his claim.
He'd already been rejected.
And instead of just deporting him, like we should, because he was rejected and had no right to live in the UK, we said, pretty please.
And he went, nope.
With a cherry on top?
Nope.
£1,000.
Two?
Three.
Deal.
Then he left.
Do you want to know how much a one-way flight to Rwanda is?
£50? £366.
They do got an extra three grand on top of that.
To what?
Mill about?
I don't... In Rwanda, potentially.
I mean, that's a lot of milling about money.
Yeah?
What do you say?
I mean, I'm sorry.
Yeah, what do you say?
A British government document published on Monday showed that the first asylum seekers to be deported from Britain to Rwanda would come from a group of 5,700 people that Kigali has agreed, in principle, to take.
In principle?
Did we need to return?
I'm gonna pay you three grand to fuck off.
Yes.
Literally.
Even though, again, and I have to emphasize this, he'd already failed his asylum claim.
So he had no right to be here.
So people are paid to fail their application.
How is that going to function like a counter-incentive?
I don't know, that's a really great question.
You know, a few, I don't know, a few, maybe a millennia and a half ago, we had a poem about the Dengel.
And I don't think they learned, our particular political leaders, I don't know why, don't seem to have learned that lesson.
Do you?
I'm still in awe.
I need three grand.
I could do this.
Not my passport.
The government document that also suggested that the government would only be able to detain easily just over 2,000 of these people.
So we've got 5,700 lined up, but we've not actually arrested all of them yet, and we can only detain about 2,000-ish.
To do what with?
What do you mean detain?
To send them to Rwanda under the actual, you know, deportation scheme.
2,000.
About 2,000 dollars.
So 2,000 times 3,000 is gonna be 6 million.
No, no, no, we're not, we're not, these aren't the ones that we're paying, although to be fair... Just that one guy got a free holiday.
To be fair, we might be like, right, you're leaving the country, and then we march them to the gate at the airport, and they all just stand there and go, nuh-uh, nuh-uh, and we go, please, Please go, we've already brought you all this way.
Nuh-uh.
I'm gonna go three grand.
Okay.
That might be what it ends up being.
But again, like I mentioned, we're suggesting this genius business plan to Ireland as well.
Asylum seekers interviewed in Dublin by the Telegraph this week cited the prospects of removal to Rwanda as their reason for fleeing the UK.
So, however, new figures revealed a record 711 migrants crossed the channel on Wednesday, the highest number on a single day this year.
Takes the year's total to 8,278, up 34% on the same point last year.
Remember, we're not in summer yet, so those figures will spike like they always do.
More than 6,000 people have applied for asylum in Ireland by April 12th this year alone.
If that rate continues, Ireland will have a record number of more than 20,000 asylum claims by the end of 2024.
Previous record was 13,000 in 2004.
So if this is as a result of Rwanda, like you mentioned, we're just fobbing the problem off and ruining Ireland.
I mean there is a great tradition of doing that in this country but it feels like a before problem, not something that we should continue doing.
You know how in Ireland the left are portraying us as like controlling the far right in Ireland with the British hand?
We're playing both sides.
We're not playing the far right.
So we always come out on top.
The British hand brings the migrants and then the British hand organises the far right response.
No, we're just bringing the migrants.
And we somehow profit by all sending money to Rwanda.
Is Paul Kagame behind all of this?
I can only- Paul Kagame's hand on top of our hand.
Number 10 sources confirm Mr. Sunak was working on a statement of intent with like-minded countries, such as Italy and Denmark, to explore alternative and untested schemes that would act as deterrent to migrants.
This includes details where migrants' claims are processed in third countries, like Rwanda, again.
So Ghani is just swimming in money.
And he's not had to take a single per- well, he has had to take a single person, and not even under the scheme he got paid all of this money for.
The man's playing a blinder, really, isn't he?
You know what?
Well done, Paul.
I mean, you earned it.
You really earned it.
Mr. Harris has ordered his Justice Ministry to bring forward new legislation to declare the UK a safe third country for asylum seekers, overturning an Irish High Court judgment that the UK was unsafe because of the risk of migrants being sent to Rwanda.
So we put in legislation For- that Rwanda was safe, so we could send them there, and as a result, Ireland, who declared that we were unsafe because they might get sent to Rwanda, have put through legislation saying that we're safe, even though we might send them to Rwanda.
What is this clown world we live in?
The numbers say everything.
They don't want to do anything and they just want to appear to do something so they could have, let's say, articles and videos of them doing it.
So they could just appear to be doing something for people who want something to be done about it.
I'm sorry when you said the numbers so I'm just in my mind I had TNA Scott Steiner the Samoa Joe you see Joe the numbers don't lie and they spell disaster for you Yeah, they do.
The whole thing, this is... They do.
This is a bad wrestling storyline.
That's what this is.
Oh, God.
The new law, which they point out mirrors SUNAC's Safety of Rwanda Act, is designed to remove the legal block that would prevent asylum seekers being sent back to the UK.
At least 100 migrants earmarked for deportation to Rwanda have been detained since Monday.
Yes, boys, we're doing it, finally.
I mean, we've had over 8,000 so far this year, but 100 might be going, maybe, if we offer them, I don't know, 300 grand to leave, I suppose.
They're being put in contact...
Take your three grand on a third chance times my two hundred grand chance.
My four billion migrant chance.
You get fifty trillion dollars Joe.
You see Paul, the numbers don't lie!
They're being put in contact with lawyers to seek bail and challenge their removal according to charities specializing in immigration detention.
Why does the government allow this?
Why does the government allow this?
The charity Care for Calais say it's been contacted by 90 asylum seekers earmarked for deportation to Rwanda who have been detained this week nationwide.
No, we can get you five grand.
and operations by immigration enforcement officers.
Another charity bid said it had been contacted by eight prospective deportees.
Now, I can only assume that these charities are getting involved, again, to act as a middleman to negotiate better money for these people going over.
No, we can get you five grand.
No, no, we'll get you six grand going over.
What a joke.
And again, this whole thing just comes across as a pyramid scheme.
Ah, Paul saying, I've got a new investment opportunity for you.
Wow, really?
For just 250 million pound buy-in, you too can join the Rwanda recruitment scheme, which means for each new friend you recruit to the plan, you'll receive 15% commission.
Wow, it's fast cash and passive income.
And here we see the follow-up where he's texting on the WhatsApp group.
Yeah, tell your friends in Germany and Ireland and Sweden too.
Tell them about this amazing offer.
The best part?
They'll get 10% commission if they refer a friend as well.
The man's playing a business masterclass.
I mean, could be sitting on a migrant empire.
Without having to take any migrants at all apparently.
It'll just be swimming in money if they really do start to siphon all of these claims through Rwanda.
Except all of the governments are far too useless.
It's gonna be like with the drug trade.
Where they say that they should legalize drug trade.
legalize drug trade.
Now they should legalize illegal migration.
These are the steps.
It basically is, because as well, you ask, well we've already spent all of this, how much is it going to cost to send these people away anyway?
Well in this article they say, Britain's National Audit Office, a public spending watchdog, estimated that it will cost the UK government £540 million to deport the first 300 migrants.
to deport the first 300 migrants.
Nearly £2.23 million per person.
Oh, sorry.
Dollars, they say there.
Does it matter?
Yeah, it doesn't really matter.
The UK already paid £240 million pounds to Rwanda.
Is the CEO of Ryanair personally debating the price of the flights with them?
Or is he just taking the piss?
And the UK government's just every step of the way agreeing.
They've never used Google Flights or Skyscanner or Kiwi.
They don't know anything about budget flights.
I find it funny in here this foreign policy article points out what we all know, which is, analysts consider the UK-Rwanda deal a smokescreen in an election year since the majority of Britain's migrants are there legally.
Yeah.
Yeah, mass immigration is mental.
Pretty much.
Asylum seekers and refugees make up less than 20% of all migrants.
And to, uh, they go back to kayfabe here, Support an aging population?
Britain's health and social infrastructure relies heavily on migrants.
Migrants who can't speak English.
Australians and New Zealanders, yes.
Yeah, yeah.
Mennets, no.
Yeah.
Particularly young African and Asian workers.
We've looked at the NHS data.
Brits are over-represented compared to their ethnic breakdown within the NHS system.
We know this in terms of their staff.
And it doesn't matter anyway.
Because these people shouldn't be here and they don't benefit us in any way.
We have the data now.
Up to last June, the top three countries for which health and social care work visas were issued were India, Nigeria, and Zimbabwe.
That country that kicked us out.
Now want to be here, looking after our elderly.
Fantastic.
According to the European Council on Foreign Relations, an alternative policy of fast-trafficking refugees and asylum seekers to employment could have netted the UK £211 million annually for an economy in recession.
That's just a lie.
That's just a lie.
No it wouldn't.
And also, here's something else that's fun.
Rwanda won't guarantee how many migrants it'll take from the UK.
Do you wanna hear what they say in this video?
Shall I play a bit of this little video?
Is it just her laughing?
While rubbing money?
It's like she starts crying, she gets thousand pound bills, she starts like dabbing her eyes with it.
No, no, it's not exactly that.
But listen to what she says here.
If it plays.
How many people do you think you could accommodate initially?
The initial accommodations that we have secured since the beginning of the partnership, this is Hope Hostel, that particular facility is able to take up to 200 people.
However, we've already started initial discussions with other facilities around Kigali and further afield, and these will be firmed up and signed once we know how many migrants are coming and when they're coming.
Can't you give a guarantee that you'd be able to process the tens of thousands of people that the government would like to send to Rwanda?
We will be able to welcome the migrants that the UK sends over the lifetime of this partnership.
What I cannot tell you is how many thousands we're taking in the first year or in the second year.
This will depend on very many factors that are being worked out right now.
Did you see that smile?
Did you see that smile as she's like, oh yeah, yeah, we can do it, we can do it.
I mean, we've only got enough room for 200 right now.
Yeah, we'll take 20,000.
Yeah.
Apparently, we've rounded up 100 and are planning to round up another, what, almost 2,000 on top of it.
They only have room for 200, apparently.
But don't worry, they're in talks.
They're in talks with consumers themselves.
Where is the criticism from human rights organization here?
Well, it's all going to the UK government.
Oh, well, no, to be fair, there are some criticisms from human rights organizations towards Rwanda.
There's some talk about them potentially being in a proxy war with the Congo.
Supposedly, Rwanda defence forces have fired some rockets at the Congo recently, which makes the country unsafe for migrants, so they've all got to stay here and in Ireland.
I think they need to defend Rwanda with their lives, just like Ukraine, so we should send them weapons and migrants to fight the war against the Congolese menace.
Yes, clearly.
We can send wave after wave of migrants.
Until the migrant kill count is reached.
The kill bust.
Do you wanna know something else that's fun?
There's also lots of- there's a slew, when I was looking into this this morning, of articles from The Guardian and The Independent, all talking to really frightened Albanian migrants, going, oh no, don't send me to Rwanda, oh no, this is so scary, and The Guardian going like, oh, can you believe the UK government would be so scared as to send Rapey McStabface here to Rwanda?
This is such a terrible thing for us to do.
What is it?
You run a barber shop?
And a vape shop?
Interesting.
But yeah, with the people who are going to be sent, once again we've...
We've detained... Sorry.
No, we've detained about 100 people.
And what are those 100 people getting?
What's their treatment right now?
Are they being treated well?
Well, they're being treated excellently.
Because they're getting this booklet that says, I'm being relocated to Rwanda.
What does this mean for me?
And it points out Rwanda is a country here.
It's probably right next door to where you came from originally.
You probably passed through there to get here.
Is Rwanda safe?
gives advice you can get a free 30 minute appointment with a qualified immigration and asylum case worker by requesting a detained duty advice scheme appointment from the welfare team so who knows how much that's going to be costing us is Rwanda safe?
yeah it's fine but also if you feel it's not safe for you just tell us Just tell us!
We'll probably not send you there anyway.
And what else is in here?
Well, they give a breakdown in this Daily Mail article.
I'll read through some of this.
Upon arrival, the 100 men were given an 8-page booklet which would include a map of Africa, pictures of Kigali, statistics about the country, a list of medical and legal rights they're entitled to, and pictures of the accommodation they'll be living in.
Despite the claims in the pamphlet, more than 20 asylum seekers have already instructed their lawyers to mount legal challenges against their removal.
Asylum Aid, a refugee charity, has slammed the government and says it's preparing legal action against the Home Office, including taking ministers to court.
Asylum seekers sent to Rwanda will stay in a hotel in the country's capital, Kigali.
The £19-a-night accommodation includes a football pitch and bedrooms with prayer rugs.
That's nice.
Oh, also, if they commit crimes while they're in Rwanda, they get sent back here.
So, Rapey McStabface comes back if he stabs or rapes?
Yes.
They don't have prisons in Rwanda?
Well, not for migrants.
Okay.
Only British prisons are for migrants.
Lawyers on behalf of Asylum Aid have sent a pre-action letter to the Home Office over the safety of Rwanda policy published late last month saying it's inconsistent with the Safety of Rwanda Asylum and Immigration Act which became law last week and I will go over that because I actually think that the Um, action that they're putting makes perfect sense from a legalistic perspective in such a way that I can only assume was on purpose from the people writing all of this up.
Asylum Aid says it's concerned the policy could lead to the Home Office unlawfully denying people seeking asylum from entering the UK.
They shouldn't have the right, if you ask me, I don't care about any of these people, don't let them in.
The charity's executive director Alison Pickup said there's a lack of information on when the flights to Rwanda will take off and who will be on them but the government has made clear it's determined to act quickly and we have already seen the Home Office carrying out forcible detentions.
The panic this causes is made worse by the limited capacity to provide high quality legal representation in the legal aid and charity sector We have brought forward this legal action to ensure the Home Office properly considers any individual cases against removal to Rwanda, including on the grounds that they would have returned from Rwanda to the place they fled.
The FDA Trade Union is also bringing legal action.
The Trade Union, which represents senior civil servants, you know, the people who should be administering this, enforcing this, they've just decided, no, we don't want to.
And so they've put a case forward.
They previously said it would be bringing legal action over the relationship of the Civil Service Code with the government's Safety of Rwanda Act.
The judge has also said the legal action was being brought against the Cabinet Office, with the Home Office listed as an interested party.
So yet again, we see the Home Office doesn't want to do their jobs, and will go as far as putting legal action towards the government to ensure that they don't do their jobs.
And don't have to, and never have to.
They can sit around in meetings all day every day, talking about how gay they all are.
And then if Braverman, or whoever the current Home Sec- Is James Cleverly the Home Secretary right now?
I thought he was the Party Chairman, or- Which would- It doesn't matter.
Yeah, whoever the bloody Home Secretary is right now can just come- Ricky McStabface, I hear.
Yeah, he can come in and say, and say, please, please do your jobs, and they say no.
And he says, pretty please, and they go, if you ask again, we will sue you.
And then he leaves.
Fire them!
Fire every single one of these people.
Britain is not fixed until London is flooded with homeless ex-Whitehall staff.
I will repeat that.
England is not fixed until London is flooded with fired Whitehall staff.
However, it appears from the claim that some civil servants believe or have been advised that it would be contrary to their terms and conditions to comply with a ministerial decision to proceed with Rwanda removals in the face of a Rule 39 measure, which was the same one that I think the Supreme Court struck this all down in the first place.
So that's fine.
What do asylum aid, what are their reasons for going ahead with this?
What's their justification?
They say the Home Office's policy, which was issued on 29th April, requires its caseworkers to assume that Rwanda is generally safe, as set out in Section 2 of the Rwanda Act.
It goes on to instruct caseworkers that when considering any protection claim made by a person being sent to Rwanda, they must conclude that Rwanda is safe, even if presented with compelling evidence that it is not safe for that person based on their individual circumstances.
It also tells caseworkers that they must not consider claims on the basis that Rwanda will or may remove or send the person in question to an unsafe state.
This, however, is at odds with the Rwanda Act, Section 4, which allows a person seeking asylum to challenge their removal to Rwanda on the basis of compelling evidence relating specifically to the person's particular individual circumstances that Rwanda is not safe for them.
So, in the space of a month, when they put forward the Act and then the Policy Act, saying how they should administer the Act, they contradicted themselves.
And the two things say two different things about how you should treat these people, and what rights they have.
This is a fuck up so clear and obvious that I can only assume it is on purpose to allow for charities like Asylum Aid to be able to put this kind of legal action forward so in the end they don't actually have to do anything.
Internal sabotage you're saying.
That's what it comes across to me.
And they say, as a charity that provides free and high-quality representation to people seeking asylum in the UK.
So these people, they get free and high-quality legal representation.
Free?
How can this random charity that nobody's heard of afford that?
And here's another claim, and I have to give Steve Laws credit for this one as well, because he posted on Twitter directing people towards this.
Well, you can go to their charity commission page.
There's the charity number.
If you go down here, here's the total income from the year ending December 31st, 2022.
Total income, £883,372.
Sorry, £883,372.
Total expenditure, £640.
Where are they getting some of that from?
Oh, what's this here?
£883,372, total expenditure, 640.
Where are they getting some of that from?
Oh, what's this here?
Total income includes £190,000 from two government contracts.
They fund their own opposition.
They write legislation that contradicts itself to allow for legal challenges, and they actively fund the people who put these legal challenges forward.
So in the end, money is circulating around these NGOs and charities, everybody is paying each other, the Home Office never actually has to do anything, and England continues to fall.
Brilliant!
The whole thing is a joke.
The whole thing is political theatre.
You are not supposed to think it's going to work.
You are only supposed to let it demoralize you.
So, there you go.
Alright.
Right.
Let's move on.
Right.
Lately, a lot of governments don't want their people to notice crime statistics, and they claim that doing so constitutes hate speech.
Now, we've talked many times about hate speech, but today we're gonna Show a different angle.
So think of it this way.
There are many reasons why governments put forward the hate speech.
One thing is, for instance, that, you know, if you have an agenda that is unpopular, you don't want people to be talking about it.
That's one thing.
Another thing is to placate members of minority groups or pressure groups that give you political support.
But there's an extra thing I want to talk about today, which is the effect it has on people with respect to demoralization, because you could say that hate speech laws aim to make native people of Western cultures hate themselves, because on the one hand, we are supposed to listen constantly to crimes made by native people, but no one is on the other side
comfortable or allowed to talk about crimes committed by people who are non-native in their countries.
And there are lots of, there's lots of punishment, marginalization, there are economic fees, also economic, let's say, punishment and stuff.
So that's the thing we're going to explore here.
Now, we are going to go to Germany, but before we're going to go to Germany, you can visit the website.
We have a career opportunity.
For you, the production manager, go to www.LotusEaters.com, check it out.
The winner's gonna win a job and also a compilation of high-quality twerking videos.
Now, let's go to Germany.
I see that you didn't appreciate the... What are you talking about?
What?
Yes, the person... It's just whoever gets the job, you're gonna... Whoever gets the job will receive a lot of funny videos with twerking.
This is the Stelios special.
That's not a promise, as we say.
On the thing that you were saying there about people not supposed to know it...
Uh, about foreign-born crimes, shall we say, being committed.
Uh, you've covered this before, Callum, the X could be here, Y could be here, that RawEggNationalist constantly does, which is that if it is a foreigner that's committed the crime, if it's a non-white person committed the crime, they'll use any euphemism to try and hide that in the headlines.
So I just, I did the thing that you did, and just typed in, RawEggNationalist could be here, and you get, Daycare could be here, he thought.
I hate date care.
Gifted and talented students could be here, he thought.
They'll use anything.
This is where the scholars come from, this is where joggers come from.
Two men could be here.
My new favourite one, massive goons could be here, he thought.
I hate massive goons!
Right, so we are going to talk about a very sad thing.
We're going to talk about gang rape statistics and we're going to go to Germany.
This is an article from the freespeechunion.org by Frederick Attenborough, published I think yesterday, about a young IFD politician convicted after publishing gang rape statistics in connection with Afghan migration.
So, it says here, a member of Germany's right-wing Alternative for Deutschland party has had her conviction for incitement to hatred upheld on appeal after using government statistics to warn that Afghan immigrants are disproportionately liable to commit sexual violence against women and girls.
The judge at Verdun Regional Court in Lower Saxony ruled that the text of the articles had been Taken out of context, and any reasonable person would therefore perceive her post to be inciting hatred.
Posting the statistics is inciting hatred.
Yes, because apparently statistics are there just to show that the statistical agency or whatever agency is neutral.
But on the other hand, anyone who is trying to interpret the data is clearly trying to say that this is an incitement to hatred.
What's the point of having data if you don't interpret it?
to maintain the idea that you have a neutral statistical agency that allegedly gives data to people and allegedly doesn't have a problem with circulating data.
But on the other hand, anyone who is trying to interpret those data with respect to particular ways are being branded as being inciting hatred.
I think this is one of the reasons that places like the UK, if you go on the ONS website, they won't give you crime breakdowns by ethnicity.
You can find arrest rates, and you can find prison population rates by ethnicity, but you can't find crime rates because people are more likely to search primarily for crime rates rather than those other two metrics that you can look by so they try and hide the data because they know from looking over other countries like Germany and like America with the FBI statistics that people will look at these and form conclusions and notice patterns.
Exactly.
And in many, many reports, they have summary number one, and they say three, four times that all these should not be interpreted in a way that suggests that particular groups could be, let's say, more prone to violence.
Because all of this is just basically a cover-up of Of multiculturalism and a cover-up of what is going on and a forced interpretation of the issue as boiling down just to economics.
So, they're going to say, we give you the data, we give you the statistics, you're not going to interpret it in any other way other than saying that all these problems are caused by, let's say, dire economic conditions.
So the cure for this is to not talk about it and give more money to members of these groups who commit more violence, because more violence is committed just because of poverty.
So that's the forced interpretation, the only interpretation people are allowed to make of this.
And it's funny because, you know, you have a lot of people on the left constantly talking about people on the right saying that they are very economically reductive, And that they frequently neglect the importance of culture, but here is the exact opposite.
Everything now is going to boil down to economics, because they find that this rhetoric helpful to promote their agenda at the minute.
And again, to boil it down to a simpler stuff, all of this is in the pursuit of making you less safe.
All of it is in the pursuit of making you less safe, because if you don't have the right information to be able to inform the decisions that you make, you will make bad decisions, and those bad decisions could put you in danger.
Okay, so the original offense took place in August 2021, a few weeks before the country took to the ballot box for federal elections and state elections in Berlin and Mecklenburg-Württemberg, when Kaiser wrote on social media, Afghanistan refugees, Hamburg SPD, mayor for unbureaucratic admission, welcome culture for gang rape.
No, question mark, question mark, close quote.
The 27-year-old politician went on to warn about the threat posed to women by culturally alien masses.
Now, she based that on the statistics of the government agency.
And let me just give you some of the data here.
data here.
It says in 2023 there were 419,000 Afghans residing in Germany.
And at the end of 2023 So in 10 years, there have been around 348,000, 352,000 people from Afghanistan to Germany.
And there are also some other statistics.
been around 348,000, 352,000 people from Afghanistan to Germany.
And there are also some other statistics.
She said that she justified her concern about what she says is uncontrolled immigration by referring to a series of newspaper articles that cited official government statistics showing Afghans are disproportionately involved in the perpetration of sexual crimes in Germany.
And she cites evidence here that are saying that Figures released by the Federal Criminal Police Office of Germany, BKA, in 2022 revealed that a total of 677 gang rapes were recorded in 2021, up from 300 in 2018.
Although non-German citizens comprise just 13.7% of the country's total population, they were suspects in exactly half of those cases.
And again, here, there is a separate report.
Now, we should say that being a suspect of something like that isn't the same as being guilty, but it is important to have this in mind.
So, it says there that a separate report earlier that same year also indicated that from 2009 to 2020, the proportion of non-German suspects in group sexual assault cases grew from close to 30% to close to 41%.
While recorded cases of sexual assault jumped from 35% to 50%.
So, these are all data that she shared.
Now... Those are both enormous leaps in only 11 years.
Those are enormous leaps and... A tiny population.
Yeah, and the fact that she would face such a...
Such a punishment for this is just mind-blowing.
And again, it's making you, the native to Germany, less safe.
Because if you look at the statistics, again broken down, for instance in America, you see that interracial crime generally goes one way, which is that white people get victimized.
So the important thing here to note is that The data is circulated in order to force the economic interpretation, that all sorts of over-representation of particular groups in crime are to be traced only in dire economic straits and not to any other thing, such as cultural differences or other cultures.
For instance, in sociology, in academic departments, we constantly hear the myth being circulated that men in the West somehow adopt a kind of of rape culture, which is obviously false.
Okay, obviously false.
But people are not allowed to talk about other cultures that may be a bit more prone towards that.
And things like that are well documented.
Right.
John Peterson is talking about the event.
He says, remember when the Venezuelan government made it illegal for physicians to report death by starvation?
I do.
He's illustrating how just silly all this is.
Right.
Let's go now to Paris.
We're going to go to Paris because Paris is going to stage the Olympic Games this summer.
And a lot of people right here What I'm going to tell you in light of the Olympic Games, but it's not just tourists who live in Paris.
It's not just the tourists who are going to be there for the Olympic Games.
Paris had a lot of people living there.
So we have here by Robert Simonson in the European Conservative a Article that according to some people could be crime report, basic, you know, crime report or basic hate speech.
I don't think it's hate speech.
Says foreigners commit 77% of solved rape cases in Paris in 2023.
This is important because it's solved cases.
It isn't just suspected cases.
It's solved cases, which is a huge number. 77%.
It says here with the figures recorded by Paris Police Headquarters.
It's not just some random right-wing commentator.
It's the Paris Police Headquarters revealed that 77% of rape cases in the capital solved in 2023 had been committed by perpetrators who do not hold French passports.
And they say down that the Paris Police Headquarters report revealed 97 rapes were recorded across the capital in 2023, a figure up by 2% compared to those from 2022.
But they say before this past year, the number has stayed relatively stable since 2018.
Of the total recorded cases, 30 were solved with 36 perpetrators being arrested.
You can check a bit more if you want, and there are links to the reports.
Now, we have another here, just another illustration.
It says here in Remix, France, foreigners commit 69% of robberies, violent crimes and sexual assaults on public transport.
And it's pointing out here, it's saying foreigners, so it's not specifying the place of origin of these foreigners, it's just meaning people who don't come from France, nor do they have French passports.
Yes, and this is important because it works also in the reverse case, because when native crime is being counted, you don't know exactly whether they count it in terms of ethnicity or in any other way.
Actually, in this article.
3% of the population are African, but they make up 52% of the crime there.
Well, violent robberies and other violent crimes.
The worst kind of crime you want to be representing So, let's go to Canada, because, you know, Trudeau is one of the most woke politicians.
We have here from Post Millennial, Elon Musk and Jordan Peterson blast Trudeau for proposed Orwellian law targeting free speech of Canadians.
Now, they're talking here about Bill C-63, which is, again, one of the worst pieces of legislation, along with the Scottish Hate Crime Act and the Irish Hate Speech Bill.
Is that the same one that Peterson got into trouble for protesting years ago?
Is it the same legislation or is that an older piece of legislation?
I think that was Bill C-16.
16, yeah, I think you're right.
He has been in trouble with many of these bills, I think multiple times, because obviously these bills are against his speech.
They're terrible.
Yes.
And we're going to talk about Bill C-17.
63 a bit because there are clauses within it that seem to open up the gateway to retroactive punishment of free speech.
And we're gonna look here at the Bill C-63.
We can go on part three.
Everyone who is interested in legal stuff like I am, they can go check on the website.
And O'Callum, you don't think many people are interested here?
So in Section 13, you can see here sub clauses 1, 2, 3, 8, and 9.
They're talking about communication of hate speech and they say it is a discriminatory practice to communicate or cause to be communicated hate speech by means of the internet or any other means of telecommunication in a context in which the hate speech is likely to foment detestation or vilification of an individual or group of individuals on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination.
Now, This is absolutely subjective and it is, in a sense, the gateway to punish a lot of claims retroactively.
Jordan Peterson could be charged under something like this when he's been talking about the trans issues.
He would definitely, but it's even more than that, because it isn't just the trans lobby that is here.
It's also more prevalent in any kind of group politics, except for the natives.
So that's why I'm saying that it is deliberately designed to be a double standard in terms of which all non-native groups in each Western country are going to have preferential treatment.
All natives are going to constantly be subjected to a rhetoric that tells them how bad they are, how much white guilt they have, how much their dominant culture is evil and the worst thing ever.
There has no evil has ever been perpetrated in the world before Western culture.
And that's what people native Westerners are going to be subjected to.
And here you can also see it's when it says it's likely to cause the same thing.
According to this rationale.
Yeah.
Yeah.
According to this rationale, the official statistics that the IFD member cited were likely to cause hatred.
But now illegal.
Yeah, so now, according to this, just publishing statistics that claim that some groups are overrepresented in crime is likely to induce incitement to hatred.
It just amazes me how much Trudeau wants to ruin Canada on the way out.
Like, the dude's political career is over and he's still doing crap like this.
I suppose it's rigging the deck, maybe?
Is this the last César?
Just arrest your political opponents for retrospective speech?
I mean maybe, maybe that's why he's doing it.
I honestly don't know why the hell you'd do this unless you're a mental case.
It's just crazy how you see lots of politicians, they really push forward some deeply unpopular agendas.
And here we have, you know, for instance, pick Nicola Sturgeon.
She lost the premiership.
First Minister.
She lost the position of the First Minister just for the trans issue with For the trans lobby.
So here we're gonna talk, excuse me, sorry, I wanted to show you something else here.
Also, to see how the definition of hate speech, clause eight here, it says, in this section, hate speech means the content of a communication that expresses detestation or vilification of an individual or group of individuals on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination.
Well, the question is, who decides what is prohibited?
And what this is doing, again I will repeat it, is it forces a particular interpretation of the over-representation of some groups in crime.
And I will say, obviously economics play a part, but they don't exhaust They don't exhaust all the reasons.
Economics do not determine culture 100%.
There is a kind of autonomy of culture from the economic sphere and that is precisely why we shouldn't just view the issue of multiculturalism and immigration in terms of GDP or economic indexes.
And again, Canada is experiencing some of the benefits of multiculturalism that we've been experiencing over here for a long time because they've had a massive influx of foreigners, I think, in the past 20 years like most Western countries have.
I've seen some videos pop up on my Twitter feed of people speaking to obviously non-Canadian Canadians in the cities who pushed out the OG Canadians who originally lived there Complaining that now there are foreigners moving into their neighborhoods, ruining their neighborhoods.
Oh, you're changing the culture.
All of a sudden all of my shops are changing and they're owned by all of these foreigners.
I can't believe it.
I can't stand it.
So, uh, as always, you import the world, you get the world's inter-ethnic conflicts.
This is the most obvious thing that anybody could ever have said about anything, but our leaders don't care!
I moved to Canada and turned it into a Jamaican neighbourhood, and now it's been replaced with the Curry Mile.
Nooo!
Yep.
And I will end with this link by Spiked Online from, I think, Tom Slater.
Yes, so he's talking about the fall of woke tyrants and he's talking about Leo Varadkar, Hamza Yusuf.
He's talking about Jacinda Ardern and Trudeau.
But I want to say that I'm not as optimistic as he is, because the issue is good if woke politicians leave stage, but the problem is wokeism hasn't gone, and I don't think it will go away.
And not particularly because of some other interpretations I've heard, like we've reached peak liberalism and stuff like that.
I don't think that's true in any way.
I think it's just a purely Machiavellian thing.
It's the best way to divide the population and just divide the population and play divide and conquer and disintegrate the domestic population into a battle of pressure groups and try to control them.
The natives just become another interest group among interest groups who aren't able to achieve anything that they want because otherwise you might have some kind of competition.
Yeah, and just to bear in mind that there are infinite ways to categorize people, and...
Infinite ways to discriminate in line of such categorization.
So even if all these letters that are now present in the WOKE calendar or the WOKE acronyms just stopped being promoted, there could be other letters.
It's just the structure of the thing.
So it's not so much an issue of persons.
It's more an issue of the principles and that they are on which they act.
All right.
Well, let's go to the video comments.
Thank you.
This first one doesn't have any audio, apparently, so... Okay.
We're looking at some anime stuff, and some... People talking?
I can't read that fast.
Mobocracy, therefore... Oh god, yeah, this is going by really quickly.
Yeah... I don't think this one's gonna work, to be honest.
But there is a point there that politics is a mobocracy and that we do see something like this here when we see, instead of people just being concerned with the good of the country, in some circles, obviously not all, they're concerned just with promoting the interests of particular special interest groups.
Well, the fact is that when you have universal suffrage and a large multicultural population, democracy just turns into a game of handing out free stuff to groups to get them to vote for you.
Let's go to the next one.
And there's a specific reason why a lot of people... I know it was written as a joke, but I can't stop thinking about it.
I heard this.
Sorry, carry on, Celio.
What were you saying?
No, I'm saying that there's a reason why a lot of philosophical Democrats from ancient Greece and stuff were saying that in order for a democracy to work, you need a homogeneous culture.
I just think we need to know what they went through in order to understand why Putin happened.
He's not just some evil force that came out of another galaxy.
Adam Curtis is typical of left-wing researchers.
He knows something is up and can point to the effects of something being wrong, but he always ascribes incorrect reasons and reaches incorrect conclusions.
This is why it's so important for those on the centre-right to pay attention to what people like Curtis are saying and suffer their outrageous claims about the world until we can formulate a more balanced approach to what is going on.
One that won't drag us further into a pit of despair leftists inhabit.
I have been watching a series covering Adam Curtis's documentaries going back to the 80s and onwards and I will say I've never listened to Adam Curtis speak off the cuff in an interview or just filming himself like that but the documentaries that he's produced over the years certainly the only ones I've seen so far are going up to the Century of the Self
are very, very interesting and are very worth watching, even if you're not of a center-left or leftist perspective, as I'm sure Adam Curtis is, because he seems to be interested primarily in giving you the information that he's focusing on.
And a lot of them contain a lot of really useful information for understanding the past century or so.
Next one.
As the progressives progress, the consequences of their actions become more and more apparent.
And eventually, it will get to a point where even they don't like it. - As the old duck-billed platitude goes, you can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.
F around and find out.
So that's very impressive that you've managed to get the, uh, screen face, whatever it is, to react to whether it's, uh, tilted to one side or level.
That's quite impressive.
I don't know how you do these things, so, you know, it's all basically magic to me.
Let's go to the last one.
Regarding yesterday's discussion about cultural futurism, it kind of struck me that we might actually be stunted by media.
Which is to say, most people get their understanding of the world through their screens now, and we've had a century of development of film language.
You know, cut to the London skyline, three bars of Royal Britannian.
Hey, that's England.
Whereas in days gone by, your impression of a foreign place would be much more abstract, even if something as subtle as meeting someone from a foreign place, and much was revealed about their mannerism, let alone the language they use and the opinions they hold.
I'd say still meeting people from foreign countries is much more illuminating than watching films that try and represent them.
Because when you watch a film, you're just getting a bit cardboard cut out of the culture.
But yeah, I've stopped watching most films and television these days.
As I talked about last Friday on Lads Hour.
Well with that we'll go to the written comments I suppose.
So um, on the minutes.
JJHW says the conservative anthem should be oops I did it again.
Pretty much.
But did I do that?
Did I let in three quarters of a million migrants on that?
Imagine if now they made TikTok videos dancing like Britney.
Oh no!
Actually, Dan would be thrilled with Preeti Patel doing something like that.
So Harry's chlamydia-ridden mug says, My friend works in the home office and programs the software used by migrants who don't understand English.
His team is completely overworked and constantly recruiting more people to deal with the sheer demand.
Fantastic.
So you know the system's working.
Mm-hmm.
Can't even get the fuck out of it.
Alex Ogle says, being largely ignored.
The latest terminology.
I didn't know what menet was.
I've just discovered.
I think we should refer to what it is.
Caliphate.
Caliphate would probably get more done than what the menet does.
Caliphate isn't entirely based around milling about.
I'm very skeptical of the Islamic Golden Age.
I think the Europeans were just milling about even more.
I'm thinking during the Islamic Golden Age, China's doing stuff, Europe's basically not doing much, and the Arabs' achievements is like, oh, I found these Greek books and translated them into Arabic, and everyone sits there clapping, like they came up with the ideas, it's like, what?
And then they went back to milling about.
Also, some of them were preserved by the Romans.
Yeah, so you didn't do this.
At least it's good that they didn't destroy it like other stuff.
Well, congratulations!
You are not literally, I don't know, a raccoon.
It always annoyed me how that's propped up as some glorious achievement.
It's like, this is the bare minimum I would expect.
Okay.
Screwtapelazer says, so what you're saying is England is so racist that minutes, 40% of them, can't work.
Yeah, but they just get refused.
They go to a local chippy, run by a Bangladeshi.
And the Bangladeshi says, no.
Yeah.
No more minutes.
Let's move on to Rwanda, I suppose.
Yes.
The Shadow Band, very kindly on Rumble, has sent us in $20.
Thank you very much, Shadow Band.
And says the whole Rwanda segment was hilarious.
Harry presents the most depressing blackpilling content in such a happy-go-lucky tone.
Well, you can either laugh or cry.
That's my look at it.
And also, this might be the last podcast ever that I get to do with Callum, and so I didn't want to spend it despondent and weeping and crying, as I am on the inside, of course.
So I thought I'd have some fun with it.
Harry's chlamydia riddled mug again.
That thing's got quite a gob on it, I tell you.
The Rwanda plan was always smoke and mirrors for an actual immigration policy.
I'm glad more and more people are seeing the uselessness of this policy and how it's all intentional.
Yeah, something I forgot to mention during the segment but was always on my mind is that part of the plan was that we also accept people from Rwanda in return for them taking our asylum seekers.
So the whole thing was a net negative anyway, because at best we can hope that it would level out the amount of migrants.
So we send them five and we get five back.
So it's not solving anything.
What are we getting five of?
I don't know.
Rwandan millers?
What?
I don't know.
They'd be fleeing Rwanda.
Maybe they've got their own, they've probably got their own refugees over there.
And so they say, oh, there's a war.
You take these Congolese.
Brilliant.
Walund Wututai says Rwanda is about to enter a golden age of milling.
Milling World Cup in Kigali 2026.
I'd- No, I wouldn't pay for what- to watch that.
Alex Bradbury, the voluntary asylum seeker is a genius.
Go to Rwanda.
Spend £1,500 on holiday there.
Fly back for £350.
End up back where you started with about an extra grand.
And then you get sent back again on a voluntary scheme and profit.
300 quid to fly there, 300 quid to fly back, so 600 quid gone.
You've still got 2.4k.
Yep.
I have just... Okay.
There you go.
Henry Ashman, people are going to Ireland rather than the UK, not because of Rwanda, but because Rishi has let the country go to hell in a handbasket.
I'm sure there's another way to not have infinity migrants that doesn't require burning the country to the ground.
Well, Rishi's all out of ideas, so I guess we're gonna have to break out the matchbook, blokes.
Kevin Fox, odd fact, Bangladesh has exactly the same Global Peace Index score as Rwanda.
Thailand's score is lower.
More dangerous, apparently.
That's probably because of China.
Rue the void how many times of breaking into the country and then being paid thousands to leave before it stops working.
I do have a trade diploma in milling about.
Perhaps you could broker the Rwanda deal for Ireland.
North End's night.
The Rwanda plan proved itself to be the nonsense I suspected it was when I first learned about the clause that makes it a migrant exchange program.
Yeah.
Imagine you have to sit for, you know, accreditation for being a miller.
What different poses can you strike when you're milling?
Right, Sophie Liv.
Honestly, I just support that any rapist should be given free gender-affirming care.
And anyone who says I'm wrong is a transphobe.
Very based.
Very based.
Sophie usually writes based stuff.
Kevin Fox.
So just like Narendra Kaur.
Is it pronounced the other way?
I think it's Narendra Kerr.
I think you're close enough.
The German government have no idea of what per capita means, or they do bet they don't want indigenous Germans to see.
Derek Power, you know that per capita is nothing but a racist dog whistle.
Well, foundational black Americans on Twitter would have me believe that.
Chase Ball from Canada again.
There are rumors that Trudeau is also trying to implement a $20,000 fee if you emigrate to another country.
The utopia is so great you have to erect walls to keep people from fleeing.
Again from Canada, Trudeau's approval rating is around 20%.
The polls indicate he is going to lose bigly next election, quickly descending to zero seats.
The leader of the opposition, Pierre Polyever, is leading the Conservatives to a historic supermajority next October.
Just hope will last until then.
Canada has had enough.
Is it October 2025?
Is that when they're having the elections?
If it is too much.
Next October would suggest next year.
Rather than this October.
Let's see.
Next Canadian.
So, I hope if Trudeau's party does get zero seats and you get a Conservative supermajority, I hope it's not the abject disappointment that our Conservative majority was over here.
Yeah, sadly it says here it is October 2025.
Oh, so Trudeau's still got plenty of time to continue to ruin things.
▲
Export Selection