Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 1, 2023 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:39:09

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #775

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Logositas for a day in the week.
	And I'm joined by Carl, of course, who's now about to say the 1st of November.
	There we go.
	Why are we wearing the poppies if not on this particular date?
	Anyway, Anne-Boe, of course, just to introduce you.
	And sorry for the lateness, audio problems.
	So we're going to try something new and fun, which is we're just going to play it through the friggin' TV in front of us instead of the little things we have.
	And hopefully it works.
	If there's an echo, let us know and we'll try and mute our mics during future playing of videos this session.
	Anyway, today we are going to be talking about Elon Musk explaining the woke mind virus to Joe Rogan, which Sounds like a fun to me.
	A local man has woken up.
	Is that local man not being Joe Rogan?
	Another local man?
	No, he's just out of bed.
	It's just good news.
	And also the least competent fraudsters alive, which I thought I'd try and cheer us up.
	Guess what social movement they belong to?
	I couldn't possibly hazard a guess.
	Professional fraudsters, but not good at it.
	What kind of lives do you think matter?
	It's just every time, man.
	I don't want to get into it.
	Who knows?
	Save for later.
	Save your very, I'm sure, not very certain guesses.
	But before, we shall begin with Elon Musk.
	So Elon Musk went on Joe Rogan's show yesterday, which I think a lot of people had been waiting for because, of course, he gets to actually ask him some reasonable questions.
	And the entire conversation for the, he put two hours of it out on Twitter with another 41 minutes of it behind the paywall on Spotify.
	So what could they, anyway, but the entire thing basically revolves around, Oh, the Woka taking over and destroying everything, which is great.
	Actually, that's the kind of conversation I want projected out into the world because of course there's a massive audience and Elon Musk sounds like 2015 Sargon, right?
	I just want to kind of highlight that.
	I'm not sure I care about the mass audience.
	I care about the elite audience, because I would quite like the elite not to be captured by this anymore.
	Obviously.
	But the point I'm making is it's normalizing and mainstreaming this set of precepts.
	This is the problem with the world.
	This is what's happening and this is what has to be done to solve it.
	And you are right.
	I mean, really it's elite opinion that matters, but it's basically everyone who's going to have watched this podcast.
	I don't just mean that either, I mean that most normal people I think are already on board.
	Oh yeah, quite possibly.
	It's the elite that need to be fixed in line with the rest of us and that's good to see at least the richest man being on board.
	I feel that there's a weird intonation in the term fixed that you use.
	Well, you know, like dogs.
	I think it is great when giant platforms, even though to us they're behind the curve, But it's still great to see it for what it's worth.
	Like, you know, Tucker with a giant platform, Joe Rogan with his giant platform.
	I know, in just my own personal life, quite a lot of normies had their eyes opened by Russell Brand, for example.
	And Russell Brand is not exactly far right, is he?
	I mean he is actually woke in some ways, but in most ways now he's not.
	In the ways that matter, he's not.
	He's going to have opinions on welfare and things like that.
	He does like Bernie Sanders and Noam Chomsky, still, apparently.
	Well, at least it's not for mass censorship.
	Yeah, right.
	Nothing's perfect.
	Yeah, right.
	But anyway, before we begin, go to lowseas.com, sign up and watch part two of our debate on liberalism, because really, this is why we're ahead of the curve is because we've been identifying what the kind of essential problems with the debate is.
	But it's nice to see sort of Joe Rogan and Leon Musk, you know, sort of like five years previously where we were.
	Now, I can't explain why Joe Rogan is dressed like that.
	Like he's got the He-Man wig and he's got some sort of hockey player's shirt on.
	I assume it's a reference to something in sports.
	I don't watch sports.
	This is going to be some American cultural thing we just don't get.
	Absolutely.
	I have absolutely no idea, but it's not addressed.
	It's just Joe's new look.
	More power to him.
	I think it suits him.
	But Elon Musk is also dressed like Andrew Tate and they're both smoking cigars.
	dressed in anyway mama mama the americans are doing halloween so it's just joe's new look and more power to him i think it suits him but elon musk is also dressed like andrew tate and they're both smoking cigars so it's just like right i can't really explain why this has happened but on the plus side i like that we're in a position where the most influential podcast with the most influential public figure are just doing whatever the hell they like and they don't have to I kind of like that.
	It's quite nice.
	But anyway, so yeah, I put out a Twitter thread with what I thought were the most important points.
	What's up?
	What has it been like?
	You've owned X for a year now.
	Oh yeah.
	asking Elon, I mean they do talk about other subjects but this is the thread that winds through the conversation that I've plucked out for us but if, Callum, if you can play this one Elon just explains why he bought Twitter Recipe for trouble I suppose What has it been like you've owned X for a year now Oh yeah Do you ever wake up in the middle of the night and have a dream that you didn't do it and your life is infinitely easier
	Well, it's certainly a recipe for trouble, I suppose, or contention.
	What was it ultimately that led you to make the decision to do it?
	I mean, this is going to sound somewhat melodramatic, but I was worried about that it was having a corrosive effect on civilization.
	That it was just having a bad impact.
	I think part of it is that it's where it was located, which is downtown San Francisco.
	And while I think San Francisco's a beautiful city, and we should really fight hard to kind of right the ship of San Francisco, if you walked around downtown San Francisco, right near the ex-FKA Twitter headquarters, it's a zombie apocalypse.
	I mean, it's rough.
	Have you been in that area?
	Not lately.
	No.
	I've heard.
	It's crazy.
	I've heard it's crazy.
	I've heard you really can't believe it until you actually go there.
	You can't believe it until you go there.
	So that's exactly how I described San Francisco when I went there in 2017.
	Evidently, it's got a lot worse.
	But the point is, if one of the most famous men in the world is basically like, look, this particular way of thinking has created San Francisco, destroyed it.
	That's great because that's what we want the people in charge to be fully aware of.
	Because I think a lot of them live in denial.
	I think they're just like, okay, this bit sucks now, but we're so close to social justice.
	We're so close to Utopia.
	We just need to keep pushing.
	And it's good that the, you know, some of the most influential men in the world are like, everyone can see that's not happening and everyone can see that you're ruining everything.
	And we're going to make sure everyone knows that we know that that's what's going on.
	So I think that's good.
	I mean, there is a definite delay between the people living in places where it's getting worse and the elites.
	I mean, we see this in our own country.
	Yes.
	The people in charge of our country who think that... Oh, like people from Somerset going, there's no problem with diversity.
	What's the problem?
	Yeah.
	I don't care where they come from, no matter how European or Irish they are.
	Okay.
	Right, you're not living in the world.
	He pinned on a point there that I quite like.
	You probably felt it, sure.
	Do you remember how bad Twitter used to be?
	As in, constantly you felt like you had to double-check everything you wrote before you got your life ruined by it?
	I mean, I got suspended in 2017, so... or 2018.
	Sure, but you do remember the hostile environment that everyone lived under.
	Now, it does definitely feel like I could just tweet any old shit, what do I care?
	That's brilliant, yeah!
	So, what philosophy led to that outcome?
	Yeah, yeah.
	Anyway, right, let's go on to the next clip.
	Because in this, Elon understands that this is the power of ideas that have done this to San Francisco.
	So, you have to say, well, what philosophy led to that outcome?
	And that philosophy was being piped to Earth.
	So, you know, a philosophy that would be ordinarily quite niche and geographically constrained.
	So that sort of the fallout area would be limited.
	It was effectively given an information technology weapon to propagate what is essentially a mind virus to the rest of Earth. - Yes.
	And the outcome of that mine virus is very clear if you walk around the streets of downtown San Francisco.
	It is the end of civilization.
	So he's not pulling any punches there.
	It's a weapon that's being used against humanity that is going to cause the end of civilization.
	I don't think he's being hyperbolic.
	I think that's correct.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	I've written articles saying the same thing.
	Globalism or, well, in my mind, for me anyway, all forms of socialism are ultimately at odds with civilization or progress in the true sense of the word progress.
	It degenerates Civilization.
	Which is what's happened in San Francisco?
	And, you know, never, I think, never underestimate lefties' capability to be blind.
	Oh, self-delusion.
	You know, like the crimes of the Soviets or the Maoist era or something, or what's happened to downtown San Francisco.
	Just ignore it.
	It's easy to ignore.
	Pretend you're not aware of it.
	Or pretend to yourself that what you've done to these people is social justice.
	Like, no, we need to give the drug addicts more heroin.
	The capacity for that is, is unbounded.
	It seems.
	Yeah.
	Um, so let's, uh, let's go on to clip three because in this, he basically, again, if you scroll down a little bit, um, I know this is the one, um, he, I think accurately recognizes that the locus of importance in woke ideology is not mankind.
	It is not human being.
	It is something else.
	And of course, when you put the.
	It's not just propagating the mind virus, but suppressing any opposing viewpoints.
	Yes.
	Well, in order for the virus to propagate, it must suppress opposing viewpoints.
	Because it doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
	Correct.
	I mean, you've felt the virus.
	Yeah.
	People have tried to cancel you so many times.
	That's fascinating.
	I don't think you're melodramatic at all.
	I mean, I don't want to be melodramatic, but it's almost like a death cult.
	It's a death cult.
	That is exactly right.
	It's essentially the extinctionists Like, it's in the limit.
	It is that they're propagating the extinction of humanity and civilization.
	It's pretty strong words.
	Like, does it get worse than that?
	Are these a bigger foe?
	Could you think of anything more extreme?
	I love how Joe Rogan, I mean, A, it's just what are you dressed like?
	But Joe Rogan is a complete normie when this, but you think that Joe Rogan would be a bit more Switched on with this stuff, considering he's had quite a long exposure to it.
	I think he knows.
	I think he's just teeing Elon up there.
	I think he knows.
	You know, there's no way he doesn't know.
	Sorry, I'm laughing because I'm just remembering that green text that's just like, Joe Rogan is essentially a great card.
	It's come before him.
	Joe want to know what is wrong with society.
	That is kind of what Joe Rogan's like.
	I respect that.
	At one point in the podcast, they start talking about whether the Cybertrunk can withstand bullets.
	And he's like, yeah, but it probably couldn't withstand my compound bow.
	It's like, that's actually the meme.
	And then they clip in a bit where Joe Rogan's firing the bow at the Cybertrunk.
	It does withstand the bow, actually.
	So the Great Khan has been foiled by Elon's wizardry.
	But anyway, so in this clip he of course discusses that the anti-human death cult is actually in charge of social media and it's influencing everything.
	Let's watch.
	And there's some people who are, like most of the time it's implicit, but sometimes it's explicit.
	Like there was a guy on the front page of the New York Times who literally has the thing called the Extinctionist Movement and he was quoted on the front page of the New York Times as saying Uh, there are 8 billion people on the world, but it would be better if there were none.
	And I'm like, well buddy, you can start with yourself.
	Yeah.
	Um... Does he have friends?
	That's what always fascinates me.
	Well, here he is.
	That guy.
	He looks like he's not long for this earth.
	Voluntary human extinction movement, that's hilarious.
	I'd like to party with that dude.
	I would just like to like...
	That's an explicit version of the death cult.
	Yeah, maybe you live long and die out.
	Extinction is a word he uses.
	Yes.
	No, I mean, it's literally a self-description.
	Did they cover his glowingly?
	That death, though, was in charge of social media.
	Yeah.
	And still largely is at Google and Facebook, by the way.
	Yeah.
	So I'm like, I'm not in favor of human extinction.
	They are, and they can go to hell.
	Yes.
	Great, right?
	Good King Musk.
	Yeah.
	So every one of us.
	Yeah.
	And this, this is fantastic because a, not only is he just lighting up the other social media things.
	So look, this, it's not a coincidence or an accident that someone who's literally By his own words, pro-human extinction arrives on the front page of the New York Times.
	It's not an accident that, and I'm surprised it didn't bring up the sort of anti-natalist movement as well, because that's a very, again, anti-human, pro-extinction kind of philosophy.
	I disagree with killing everyone!
	But these people are in charge of everything apart from Twitter!
	That's a great condemnation of, well really the only thing that could destroy the West is itself.
	Yes.
	And the phrase self-inflicted societal suicide.
	That's definitely what has happened to us, and it's such a brilliant example.
	So he's completely correct.
	I mean, what would I have to do to get a kind of write-up like that in the New York Times?
	You were calling for killing everyone.
	Yeah, I would have to call for the extinction of the human race.
	Put me on the front page of the New York Times.
	If I'm like, maybe that's actually not great, I get demonetized on YouTube.
	So just saying, Elon is right about all of this.
	And so I'm glad that he's making, and this was basically the theme of the entire podcast, which is great.
	Again, he sounds a lot like me seven years ago.
	It is the sort of, kind of, obviously.
	The great issue of our times, of our generation, is that there's some sort of global elite.
	I'm not saying there's one.
	You know, like the Chinese Communist Party are not on the same page as Klaus Schwab.
	Oh yeah.
	Western elites.
	Right, yeah.
	Washington is at odds with Moscow.
	However, there are some sort of elites on a global scale that are At war with average people, the vast majority of the world's population.
	A terrifying thing.
	It's great that Good King Musk is prepared to talk about it on Joe Rogan, one of the biggest platforms out there.
	He's done a lot more than talk about it.
	He's put his money where his mouth is.
	All credit to him.
	He brought us all back.
	Leading the charge.
	I mean, he's doing this in a very low key way where he's just like, well, these are a death call.
	And I think, hell, it's like, but that's that to us because we're just, you know, nobody's on the podcast.
	That's just like, okay, that's funny.
	But do you think that the guy, Tim Cook at Apple is like, wait, the most, most influential man in Silicon Valley to say we're a death cult.
	Yes.
	Are we all going to be just, are we just going to allow him?
	Is that just, are we just going to let that go?
	120 odd million followers or whatever he's got on Twitter.
	And it goes on Joe Rogan's podcast.
	God knows how many numbers that's got.
	And he's just calling us all to death.
	We're just going to let that go.
	The fantastic aspect of that is there's going to be some people at Apple or Facebook who have been living under this and they can't feel like they can break their silence.
	Stuff like this will completely moralize them to do it.
	Exactly.
	Exactly.
	Or just to say that he's so correct, it's so true that they're just like, yeah, well, yeah, yeah, I am.
	Yeah.
	And that's great.
	You know, let's have more New York Times headlines of people who want the extinction of humanity to further prove must correct and to make everyone else get right again.
	Not bad.
	Well, the New York Slimes.
	Look at who they've been owned by in the past.
	Look at their connections with the intelligence services in the past.
	I mean, it's owned by Bezos at the moment, isn't it?
	Bezos doesn't seem to be woke.
	Like, he's spoken out against this.
	He's tweeted about it.
	So, I mean, what that means.
	But what kind of billionaires do we want?
	This is why I see Elon Musk as such a fantastic role model, which is, if there's any life advice for anyone, even in politics, it's get rich, generate wealth for the world, like sincerely make some money, do hard work, make some money, right?
	And then use that for change.
	Of course, he's the most extreme example, making more money than anyone else on earth ever, but it's still not untrue.
	That's good advice though, Callum.
	Get rich.
	Yeah, seriously.
	This is one of the things I quite like about Andrew Tay, where he's just like, yeah, no, get money, get bitches.
	Like, that's his end point.
	But if you get money, you can actually influence stuff.
	Whereas if you don't, you can't.
	So it is just good advice.
	Anyway, so let's go on to the next one, because...
	As you can see the philosophy itself.
	And what I like about this is he has connected pronouns to the extinction of humanity to save the earth.
	He has created a continuum.
	He has recognized this is all the same philosophy, which is why the green party are a bunch of woke socialists and aren't like, you know, ultra Tory environmental conservatives, you know, conservationists and stuff like this.
	They're all parts of the same thing.
	And he has recognized this.
	What it does is render humanity, the problem to humans, you know, as in look, look at the transgender movement saying, well, your body needs to change.
	Your body is the problem.
	It's not your mind.
	That's your body.
	That's the problem.
	You know, it's these people, it's that people it's, it's always humanity.
	That's the problem.
	And when that gets to the environmental stage, well, that means that the earth, as I put here, it becomes a kind of gestalt entity.
	It's like, Oh, humans are destroying the earth.
	It's like for who?
	For whom are we destroying the Earth?
	If it's for the Earth itself, I don't care.
	I don't care about the Earth's existence when humanity no longer exists.
	You freaks!
	Anyway, let's play the clip.
	I'm pro-environment, but in the limit, if you take environmentalism to an extreme, you start to view humanity as a plague on the surface of the Earth.
	mold or something.
	Right.
	And, but it's, this is actually false.
	The earth could, could take probably 10 times the current civilization.
	You know, if you, if you start thinking that humans are bad, then the natural conclusion is humans should die out.
	Exactly where they're at in many ways, I mean, that's literally the extinction guy.
	We hear this all the time.
	And this is what the pro-green movement is mostly about.
	Because if they were, if they were like normal, right, if they were actually, okay, yeah, we are concerned about the environment.
	I mean, I'm concerned with the environment.
	I don't want humanity to be reduced to the stone age.
	So I think building nuclear power plants might be a good idea rather than turning the world into Cybertron.
	That's the conversation, isn't it?
	It's never, how can we make my tap water really clean so I never have to buy bottled water.
	Or we can just try and make sure that no one gets to consume energy.
	That's the conversation.
	It's never, how can we make my tap water really clean so I never have to buy bottled water?
	Yes.
	It's instead, how about we turn the electricity off for one day a week?
	It's just, we're not on the same page.
	Exactly.
	And we want different things.
	You know, I want to make the world better.
	You want to destroy us.
	And so the next one, he talks about the Twitter files, which, and again, the great thing about this is that Musk has connected all of these things up.
	And that's the important thing, because the first thing that the woke left are going to do about this is, Is it there and go, well, what do you mean?
	What's the connection between say the government, Twitter, and the media?
	It's like, well, actually we sort them with files.
	Uh, they're all directly connected literally by people working in the FBI and taking orders of government, but let's, let's watch the clip.
	To me, that was the most bizarre, was the Twitter files.
	When you let Schellenberger and Matt Taibbi and all those guys get in the response where Matt Taibbi gets audited, which is just wild.
	It's just so blatant and so in your face.
	Yeah, it's weird.
	By the way, Jack didn't really know this, but the degree to which Twitter was simply an arm of the government was not well understood by the public.
	It was like Pravda, basically.
	It's a state publication, is the way to think of old Twitter.
	It's a state publication.
	Cracking.
	Absolutely spot on.
	And I think it confirms something I thought.
	I don't think Jack Dorsey was really in control of Twitter.
	Um, he seemed to be totally cut by people like the GI Gad and stuff like that.
	But, um, but again, really fantastic.
	So this is exactly what the Twitter files has revealed.
	It's all being taken as a prior now.
	No, it's been totally shown.
	And it was just the normal narrative that Twitter was completely controlled by the state and these agents, literally FBI agents, dozens of them were literally working in Twitter and pulling strings, making sure that everything the government wanted.
	And we've seen.
	The conversations from Jen Psaki and Twitter requesting people censored and things like that.
	It's all there.
	And it was directly to help the Democratic Party.
	Explicitly.
	And he talks in other parts about how, in fact, I think the next one is where he talks about how this was directly partisan.
	And was the justification from their perspective that they are progressive liberals, they have the right intentions, it's important that they stay in power, the progressive liberals stay in government and power because this is their…
	There was basically oppression of any views that would even, I would say, be considered middle of the road, but certainly anything on the right, I'm not talking about like far right, I'm just talking mildly right.
	The people, like Republicans were suppressed at 10 times the rate of Democrats.
	Now, that's because old Twitter was fundamentally controlled by the far left.
	It was completely controlled by the far left.
	And that's why I say, like, San Francisco-Berkeley is a niche ideology.
	It's hard to say, like, is there a place that's more far left than San Francisco-Berkeley?
	Maybe Portland.
	Maybe Portland.
	Right there.
	Yeah, it's those two places are the most far left places in America.
	Yes.
	Um, so from their standpoint, everything is to the right.
	Including moderates.
	Right, right.
	So, but now, if you internalize a far left position, everything seems wrong to you that is not far left.
	Right.
	And so they naturally oppressed anything that didn't agree with their views.
	Completely correct.
	Normalizing the idea that actually moving to the right is the right thing to do.
	Move away from the far left.
	It's interesting, just one word to pick up on there right there, and you said naturally, they naturally did that.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	It's because leftism or certainly far leftism is authoritarian.
	You know, there's all those scales about whether you're left or right or whether you're libertarian or authoritarian.
	It's that naturally we're going to oppress everything else.
	Naturally, we're going to destroy everything that's in our way.
	I'm not sure authoritarian is the right word because it is actually totalitarianism.
	They don't see.
	No, but they don't see the... Are you going further than what I said?
	Great.
	No, that's fine.
	I can't disagree with you.
	But they don't see the virtue in a division between the public and private because they believe everything is political, right?
	And so once you go, right, everything's political and we have the right politics, then the virtue is in suppressing the wrong politics.
	It's not in the convincing of your opponent.
	No, it's not even the convincing of the opponent.
	It's because the reason we have separations between public and private and limitations on state power is because there is a humbleness that underpins it that says we might be wrong.
	We actually might be in the wrong.
	They actually deserve something of their own because we are not 100% right on every subject all the time.
	And that's what the left has removed.
	And so that just opens the door to totalitarianism.
	We know everything all the time.
	Everyone else is wrong.
	And we're all on a mission.
	So there's no, and as everything is political, there's no justification to separate out the spheres of influence.
	So why wouldn't the government be involved with Twitter?
	Why wouldn't the media just support the government?
	Why wouldn't we, if we're all saying the right thing all the time, because we can't be wrong.
	And so it's a totally self-justifying method of tyranny.
	Elon, he doesn't say it explicitly in those words, but that's what he's getting at, you know, and so he's definitely going in the right direction.
	And so the second to last clip is how these people came to this power in the first place.
	It's a good question.
	Because it's like Silicon Valley attracts the smartest engineers, the smartest sort of technologists and programmers from around the world.
	They created an information weapon that was then harnessed by the far left, who could not themselves create the weapon, but happened to be co-located where the technologists were.
	It happened to be aligned politically with the people that possessed it.
	The technologists generally are moderate, maybe moderate left.
	They're not far left.
	The negative effects of a far left ideology would be geographically limited to a 10 mile radius.
	Any bad effects of that ideology would be geographically constrained under normal circumstances and have been in the past.
	But when you have Basically a technological megaphone, which was Twitter and social media in general, suddenly the far left are handed a megaphone to Earth, an incredibly powerful technology weapon that they themselves could not create, but they happened to be co-located with the technologists who created it.
	So this is the only one where actually there's more to it than this.
	And I'll explain it in a second.
	Um, but so this is the only one where it's, oh, well, this just is happenstance.
	No, it's not just happenstance.
	Actually.
	There are, there are lots of other factors that kind of intersect.
	Dare I use that phrase?
	Um, but if we can go to the, uh, the last one, um, what's the scope of this?
	Well, he says that it's ubiquitous.
	Do you think that this is ubiquitous?
	It's absolutely all the social media companies.
	In fact, right now, X, formerly known as Twitter, is the only one that is not cow-tying to the government.
	It's the only one.
	All the others just do exactly what the government wants.
	That is wild.
	Yes.
	What I was getting at, do you think that that's everywhere?
	Yes.
	Do you think that that's CNN?
	Do you think that that's the New York Times?
	Do you think that that's the Washington Post?
	Because if they were going to infiltrate media, they're going to infiltrate social media.
	I mean, it is weird the degree to which the media is in lockstep.
	Like, why is the media in lockstep?
	And why doesn't the media question the government?
	They used to.
	Why don't they do that anymore?
	Seems weird.
	Something doesn't add up.
	I think it's the deep state on the intelligence services, if you want to call it that.
	But there's a little thing called Rumble.
	Sure, but the question... Elon's totally right.
	He's totally right.
	So yeah, CNN, MSNBC, Washington Post, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, they're all basically singing from the same hymn sheet and they can't help themselves.
	And they are still singing from the same hymn sheet as the government, the intelligence services, the social media companies, the academics.
	Why is everything?
	It's literally just...
	Elon Musk being a bit autistic and being like, yeah, I don't really agree with this.
	I'm just going to go completely against everything.
	Like he's actually ranging himself against a massive power structure here, which I really admire actually, because he doesn't have to.
	He was already fabulously wealthy.
	He didn't have to do any of this.
	And so what else are you going to do with your life and all that money?
	Yeah, especially if you're just kind of autistic and keep noticing things.
	Yeah.
	I'm just like, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	But anyway, so I thought I'd end this by just saying, look, if you're sort of new to what we're doing, um, we can explain all of this.
	So I did a deep think on Rousseau's Savage, which is basically the end state that the left is trying to arrive at with us, which is the total atomization of each individual from one another and their complete dependence on the government so they can act As the liberal philosophy that underpins all of this believes man used to be in the state of nature while living in society.
	So that's the overarching goal and that's why essentially they want the end of human civilization because that's what they're trying to get back to.
	The next thing is, why do they act in the way that they act?
	Well, through repressive tolerance.
	This is how they morally justify it.
	This is a really great podcast that Thomas Dowling and I did, explaining that this is not new.
	This is the way the left has been acting for decades now, and we are just seeing the latest manifestation of it now.
	And the Critical Race Theory podcast that we have done explain exactly how it is that the co-location of the woke ideologues with the Silicon Valley tech bros happened to allow them to break through.
	Because, I mean, if it was some sort of far-right neo-Nazi intellectuals who were co-located with the soft-left Silicon Valley tech bros, you wouldn't have seen Nazism spreading through social media and it wouldn't have been promoted.
	It had to be what it is because of the way that critical race theory came and which is what really woke is.
	This is the correct term for it.
	And already conquered every single university in the United States.
	But the question is why did it conquer?
	And the reason it conquered is because it took weak presuppositions within liberalism that the tech bros all bought into without thinking about it and it essentially exploded them to be able to include that opposite in order to just twist things into the way that we are now it's very complicated i won't go through it now but do go and sign up and check out those podcasts because they do explain everything but otherwise just good news i think you know musk is out there doing the lord's work great stuff can't agree anymore
	well i suppose with that we'll move to some other local news um which is bong a local man has woken up i'm i I'm sorry to bring you such breaking news, but... I like local men waking up.
	You know, local men going, hang on a second, is this how it should be?
	Local man notices too hard.
	Effectively is what has sort of happened, except this local man really should have noticed earlier that things might have been changing.
	One of my favorite memes is the adventures of the man who just started paying attention.
	Yeah.
	That's definitely one of my favorite memes.
	Like, maybe there shouldn't be, you know, Hamas flags flying in central London.
	Well, that's where we are today.
	And we'll begin this with this little clip here from Urban Scoop, a small media outlet who deserves all your support.
	And they decided to put out this video, which is the Met Police turning up in the dead of night to arrest some guy In front of his wife.
	Okay, whatever.
	I mean, it's, you know, horrible circumstances to get me wrong.
	But the interesting thing, of course, in legal cases is what's the crime?
	Sure.
	If he committed some sort of hideous crime.
	Okay.
	It sucks that, you know, you've got to arrest the guy in front of his wife who has stage four cancer.
	His crime was the disapproval of Palestinian flags.
	Hmm.
	Yeah.
	We're not joking either by the video evidence, so I suppose we'll listen to a part of this.
	At six minutes, we'll be listening to all of it.
	I just want to hear what the police officers have to say.
	What are the charges, officer?
	Eating a meal?
	Succulent chains?
	Well, let's watch Democracy Manifest.
	No.
	No.
	And to get the Rumble Pariser, filing the bill to just oppose that you do not attend any events involved with Parasana, okay?
	The reasons why we do this is on the 70th and 10th of 2023, in Bethlehem Road, at 10:04, you were the witnesses saying, obviously, people, while they're over there, et cetera, we let them into our country, et cetera.
	So, the deal.
	Yes, okay.
	Take him!
	Disgusting!
	It quickly devolves into shouting, of course.
	I can't help but notice that, and a little bit, I've watched this already, I can't help but feel that these two police officers dance at Pride events.
	Probably do.
	They really look like the types, right?
	We should really kind of subtitle a bit of that, if for no other reason than most people probably can't understand the accents outside the UK, which is... There's nothing wrong with Scottish accents!
	It's very funny.
	Anyway, so, the officer... I like Scottish accents!
	This officer here, he says that on a certain day, the man he's arresting said, why are those people here?
	We let them into our country.
	Yep.
	The Scottish man says, yes, so what?
	So then he handcuffs him.
	And of course the wife is like, so what?
	Are you serious?
	Yeah.
	And, um, yeah, that's literally what happened.
	Perfectly reasonable question.
	True statement.
	Arrested.
	And I had to cover this because it so beautifully led in to what I did yesterday with the fact that the way policing works in this country, specifically so perfectly crystallized in recent events, is that the police and all of Western society operate on a principle of fear of the most diverse elements.
	That is entirely what animates them at this point in their job.
	And this man, of course, being part of the White British, he's held to a standard which Isn't even the law, which is that you can't criticize flags.
	Well, do you not remember in Scotland when someone wrote Islam is questionable on the wall and they got arrested for it?
	They did.
	And this is the point.
	I mean, at the same time, just to remind ourselves, this is what such people in various parts of the West are doing.
	This is in France, where a bunch of houses where Jews live have now had Jewish.
	Oh, I know that Jews live there.
	Ask me how I know.
	Well, the local Muslims have visited, that's why.
	But the video in question as well has been released.
	I don't know how Visigrad got hold of it, I guess the family released it.
	And this is the video in which they're charging him.
	And I'll play the audio, I suppose.
	Yeah, you see it?
	Then over here at this one, we've got this crap going on as well.
	Then we come along to this pole here.
	And he continues with various Scottish noises as he films.
	This is what we're dealing with.
	This is what we're dealing with.
	And this one here, you see this?
	Yes.
	Same shit here.
	And he continues with various Scottish noises as he films.
	Looks like a lovely area of London, doesn't it?
	Yeah, do you want...
	I do love the O&S.
	Do you guys want the number?
	The number of what?
	23%.
	That's the number.
	Yeah, of course that's the number.
	I don't have to say anymore, do I?
	Yeah, no, well... I quite like this game.
	It's self-evident, actually, to be honest.
	But you look at it, it looks like an absolute hovel.
	Yeah, so of those 23% who remain, they are now held to a standard which is you cannot even criticize Palestinian flags, the flags of a foreign country.
	But no, the police didn't crack down and arrest them when they were dancing on the cenotaph and stuff like that.
	Because the police act as if they're not the lawful authority over the immigrants.
	No!
	They act as if they're only the lawful authority over the white British.
	They're the only ones who deserve the rod.
	Everyone else, literally do as you please because we're scared of you.
	I was just going to say, I've written more than one article really on the theme of the destruction of Western society and what Musk was talking about earlier, civilization, at least Western civilization as we know it, well this is it actually playing out, this is what it looks like, is that there's no law essentially, because if the law isn't applied equally, There's, in a sense, no law.
	They're just making up one set of rules and not enforcing another set.
	So what does the rule of law mean anymore?
	Well, it's specifically repressive tolerance.
	It's sort of meaningless, isn't it?
	What is on the statute books?
	Well, yeah, absolutely.
	But particularly, it is repressive tolerance.
	It is, we will tolerate it from one group, we will not tolerate it from another group.
	And that's how the blade cuts when it comes to this.
	Look at this child in the costume of a policeman.
	I'm sorry, but that is just a commercial.
	Police of Diversity and Inclusion.
	Just to remind ourselves as well, that man shouting there, we let them all in, so this is what happens to us, that's his crime.
	Sorry for saying that.
	Just to remind ourselves real quickly, because at the same time that this was taking place, this news was released, which is Rochdale Grooming Predatory Gang Jailed for Child Abuse.
	Another one.
	This, as you can see, 16 hours ago.
	I mean, I'm just glad they were jailed, I guess.
	Yeah.
	We have some names, so you can not find a pattern.
	So, I suppose I'll read those.
	Ali Raza Hussain Qasami, Insa Hussain, John Saeed Ghani, Martin Rhodes.
	Yeah, that's an interesting name.
	And Mohammed Ghani.
	Yeah.
	There we are.
	I thought I'd just remind ourselves, because I don't like that this has now become part of parcel of living in.
	Just a quick thing, that Martin Rhodes looks like a real winner, doesn't he?
	Piece of sh... Anyway.
	Someone, I think Rorega Nationalist in fact, decided to tweet out that he would make today National Grooming Gang Day of Remembrance.
	I thought was interesting and he details the case here of Charlene Downs, the young girl that went missing.
	Two kebab shop owners were joking about the idea that they turned her into kebab meat.
	That was on video.
	The police had that.
	They weren't able to charge the men with anything, so they're still offering a hundred grand for anyone who can find who killed her.
	And that's probably one of the most horrific circumstances, but that's a bit of hearsay, I suppose, because no one was officially convicted for that one.
	So I thought we'd just go back to Rochdale real quick.
	Where a bunch of people were convicted.
	Yeah, I forget how bad it is, frankly, in this country, because That was 16 hours ago.
	Another five men go away, in which we can see no pattern.
	I just want to read you the details of the people who have been convicted and sent to prison, so we're not even dealing with suspects here.
	They're probably already out.
	Aren't these the guys who were bumping into their victims in Asda?
	Maybe.
	I forget which one, because there's so many.
	But just to remind you, Rochdale is a 70% white British area, so you'd probably expect 70% of the people arrested for this to be white British.
	But we'll start the story in 2012, in which 12 were charged, 9 convicted, 8 of them Pakistani, 1 an Afghan asylum seeker.
	One of the people who weren't convicted, the reason was because he fled to Pakistan to avoid justice.
	Really, the Pakistanis didn't extradite him back to face justice?
	No, they weren't concerned with child rape.
	2013, five men were also imprisoned for this.
	They were from the Congo, Kurdistan and Pakistani.
	2015, we stopped recording the ethnicities apparently.
	Gotta do it for the sake of diversity.
	I don't mean to laugh, because it's just like, what are you going to do?
	If you don't laugh, you're going to cry, right?
	But this is the police force.
	I mean, this example we've just gone through, it's such a crystallization of a long-standing pattern of oppression against the white British.
	And we can see it, because I'm going to mention the names now, because I can't mention their ethnicities, because we don't have it, we just have the names.
	So I'll let you make your own judgments as to where people are from.
	We have Afris Aham, Chowdhury Ikhal Hussain, Rehan Ali, Kutab Iham, Mohamed Dahoud, Mehid Khan and Mohamed Zaid, and Mustafa Rahman, and David Law.
	Right.
	There we are.
	There's an interesting pattern of like, there being like one white British person who's obviously some sort of absolute reject.
	Yeah.
	Who gets dragged into these gangs.
	Or was, you know, somehow part of a nucleus of it.
	I don't know.
	But like, it's some weird outsider who ends up joining this gang.
	Chaudhry Hussein, that I mentioned, he also fled justice.
	Can you have a guess what country he might have fled to?
	Pakistan?
	Yes.
	There we are.
	2015, it continues.
	Bihil Ahmed, Dhillon Rasool and Hassan Ali.
	2016, there was another... Just to tell you, this is the Wikipedia list I'm reading from, of just the various operations in a single town.
	So, 2016... Rochdale isn't exactly a big town either.
	No.
	Shihlab Shahaba, Ikhran Wani, Gul Zaman and Mohamed Ishqiq.
	The next year, 2017, people again convicted, not even suspects, Joshim Miha, Iqtad Yousif, Mohamed Sada, Mohamed Mir, and Ashkif Yousif.
	And then, just before that news broke, 16 hours ago, of people being sent down, in August 2023, Mohamed Ghani, Israd Hussain, Jan Shaheed Ghani, Martin Rhodes, Ali Hasan and Hussain Qasami.
	So of the 43 people convicted, two of them were white British.
	So despite making up 70% of the population, they're only 4% of the pedos in the specific town in this investigation from the police.
	I mean, I'm sorry, but it is sort of ridiculous when there are so many long-standing community issues, and yet the man who turns up and says he's a bit niffed at the flags, he's the one that goes to prison.
	He's the one getting arrested.
	Why?
	Because, as you say, repressive tolerance.
	And there's no more perfect example of that, I think, than what the Labour Party had to say today.
	They had some news.
	It's Islamophobia Awareness Month, it turns out.
	I'm doing everything I can, Keir.
	Just look at what a Mr. Potato Head is.
	His eyes are like, he's apologetic.
	Like, oh please don't accuse us of being bigots.
	Yeah, yeah, exactly.
	And not just that, please Muslim community come back and vote for the Labour Party again.
	Because we covered the other day that like 95% of them when surveyed were like, yeah, I'm not voting for Labour anymore because they support Israel.
	It's like, oh really?
	That's interesting.
	The thing is, not only is this messaging and Keir Starmer and the Labour Party just so far off the mark.
	Yeah.
	What you've highlighted there, and that we all know, and that most of our audience knows, is that that cannot go on forever.
	But it still is.
	There must be a reckoning at some point, or a realignment It cannot go on forever.
	But that issue, let's say, you know, the mass rape of young girls, that's not the important thing that Kia's getting at, of course.
	Kia's entire reason for putting this out.
	It's literally the Norm Macdonald meme.
	It's like, imagine the Muslim communities, the bigotry they'll face.
	It's like people were to, you know, be told it's happening.
	Anyway, so, um, I mean, look, look, Kia Starmer is literally signaling.
	To a foreign outgroom.
	Yeah, I know.
	Look, I know, you know, Islamophobia is the really real problem here.
	He's not, he doesn't do like a grooming gang awareness month where he sits there in his tie and his stupid spectacles and goes, well, I'm really concerned about the grooming gangs that have been predating on vulnerable English girls up and down the country.
	He doesn't do that.
	He, in fact, I probably can't say any more on that, but you know what I mean?
	Whose side is he on in that question?
	And he's like, yeah, Islamophobia is bad.
	The whole reason I bring up that stuff is obviously he's not directly responding to that news because that's not of interest to his party instead.
	Well, they're the ones who covered it up, so.
	Yeah, but even as a side point, as I mentioned, the reason he's even done this post here is because foreign conflict in a foreign place now affects London.
	And that's where the real concern of everyone is.
	And this is a local friend of ours who happens to be in London.
	And he says here, it's beginning, sorry, becoming ever clearer that the Met do not plan on enforcing the law, which suggests people to take precautions, protecting their family and friends accordingly, especially if Jewish.
	Make no mistake, it's coming everyone's way.
	This being the fact that police don't enforce the law.
	And he's naturally responding to another event, which was this.
	This is Liverpool Street Station, one of the, I don't know, there's about four major railways in London, if you're going east, south, north or west, and Liverpool being one of them.
	And as you can see, there's just thousands of people decided to occupy one of the major train stations and scream, free Palestine and to the river, sorry, from the river to the sea all evening.
	Great.
	And if you complain about that, as that chap did earlier, you're the problem.
	That hits particularly close to home for me because I lived up in Essex and worked in London for the best part of 20 years and we'd go through Liverpool Street Station twice a day every weekday for let's just say years and years on end.
	So I know that particular station every inch of it.
	I can't help but notice.
	For my sins and that is just, it's so bizarre and sickening, sickening in a bizarre way of course.
	Not to be occupied.
	Yeah.
	But I can't help but notice that a lot of these people appear to be white British or at least European in some way.
	right largely europeans by the looks of it yeah just the demographics of london um obviously being i mean there are some shed scarves around and whatnot but like But you'll know, I imagine, because a lot of Jews point out, that there is a monument, the Kindertransport or whatever, I forget how the word in German is used, but it's a monument to those Jews who were evacuated just outside of the station.
	Yeah, well, it's just out of shot to the right there, yeah, as you go down into the underground.
	Yeah, there's a thing about, remember... But then there's one more, which is the one I think you're referring to, because there's one outside which is about the Jews and there's one inside which is about the British.
	Those kids who had to be transported.
	Remember when there was history in London that didn't have to do with some foreign ethnic group?
	Yeah, there's a little monument to the children of London who were English who had to be exported whilst the Blitz took place.
	And I just... How irrelevant is that event and those people to what now occupies this land?
	I would love to... I wish we had a Vox Pop there.
	Have you ever heard of the Blitz?
	I bet they'd be like, what?
	Yeah.
	It's unbelievable.
	It's not our civilization, though.
	That's what we're witnessing.
	And what we can see, as the friend earlier was mentioning, is the police don't enforce the law.
	You can see the police there.
	They attended this.
	They protected it.
	It looks like a lot of students there, doesn't it?
	To keep in mind as well, maybe for an American audience or something, but being one of the major train stations, this is a period in which pretty much everyone in that area or around is having to travel through to go home.
	The tube is all connected to it as well.
	So any Jewish person passing through has to witness this, not to mention literally every other human being who has to be like, Why is the major train station this now?
	What has this got to do with anything?
	If you head west out of London, you kind of have to go through Paddington.
	And if you're heading anywhere east, essentially, you go through Liverpool Street Station.
	So it's a real sort of hub.
	Honestly, these look like a lot of students to me.
	Students sitting.
	I'm going to play some of it so you can hear.
	Imagine trying to go home and that's what you've got to listen to.
	How quickly would you lose heart or think I've got to get out of here?
	If only the Germans would stop bombing us again.
	They would do less damage.
	There is a streak, again like Elon was talking about in the last segment we did, there's a streak in some people, it's deep in humanity in some ways, of self-loathing and self-destruction, self-abnegation, all that sort of thing, all those sorts of things.
	As you see it there, they're not sort of... The cult of destruction has to continually destroy.
	Not many of those people are from Palestine.
	It looks like a lot of them are Western students.
	Exactly.
	I mean, it's us now, but then when we're gone and someone else is like, okay, well, we're going to try and order the world in the way we think it should be ordered.
	These same people are like, no, you have to be destroyed too.
	And whoever it is, it's just continual destruction.
	I just love how the state stands with this.
	This is the purpose of it now, as you can see in the form of the police there.
	Wow, wow.
	I just, I didn't think it could come that fast visually, but it did.
	And this is where... I was going to say, hopefully the Home Office and Swimmer Breverman might... And do nothing?
	Get them back in line.
	Oh no!
	No, right, this is what they want, essentially.
	It must be.
	This is why I labelled this segment what it is, which is, a local man has woken up, one singular MP is the only friggin' one I could find, saw this footage, And decided to tweet out, just dreadful, thought this sort of thing would never happen in the UK.
	But if you look at the quote tweets on this, you'll see me going, you invited it, because there we go.
	You welcomed them, Brandon.
	Our plans to secure our borders while welcoming skilled migrants.
	Oh, thanks, Brandon.
	What skilled migrants?
	We have the graphs, if nothing else.
	But I love the entire comments are full of it.
	There's people just being like, are you serious?
	People like me.
	There's also my graph there.
	More people need to see the damage they've done.
	I mean, what is this?
	Since 2010.
	That's all them.
	That's entirely him.
	In fact, he has been in his seat for 13 years.
	He's been a minister for much of that.
	So he's one of Cameron's MPs.
	He's one of Cameron's Blairites.
	He is probably one of the people you could accurately define as had the most time to try and stop this and has done nothing.
	Yeah.
	And as you can see, some people just being like, bring in the army.
	It's time for that.
	What army?
	Apparently.
	We have an army.
	Former MEPs there.
	And it just keeps going with people being like, yeah, you did this.
	You're the ones responsible.
	And that is some good news.
	I am glad and proud to see every single one of you and everyone who has woken up to the fact that the Tories did this and every friggin' speech or utterance out of their mouth in regards to, I think things are going a bit wrong, has to be returned with 13 years.
	You've had 13 years and you've done nothing.
	And just the absolute embarrassment of this guy sitting here and being like, oh, I've just woken up.
	Something might be going wrong.
	Sorry, son, you had your time and failed utterly.
	Yeah, I mean, you had such a huge majority, you could have done anything.
	You did nothing.
	In fact, worse than nothing, you allowed more people in.
	Well, that's what I was going to say, yeah.
	It's worse than nothing.
	You've actively done this.
	It's not just that one chap who wants the army brought in.
	Quite a lot of people are talking about having us live in effectively France, which means having the army patrolling the streets everywhere.
	I don't want that, though.
	That's, like, aesthetically, that's the wrong way for our civilization to be run.
	Well, that's how you would run a British colony, isn't it?
	You'd have a squadron of boys patrolling the area.
	And that's what people are now saying is necessary for London.
	I don't know if our colonies did have squadrons of boys patrolling.
	I think in my opinion, it's a bit beyond what you would like aesthetically.
	I agree with you, I suppose.
	So we have the rule of law, though.
	Sure.
	But the essence of English civilization is definitely opposed to having marching boots on the street.
	Yeah, like I say, we're far beyond that.
	I don't have time for some of the other stuff about it, so I'll end it on this last thing, which we'll have to get back to at some point.
	Dominic Cummings was called in for some inquiry about COVID.
	A whole lot of conversation.
	But one of the things he mentioned here is that not only do we not have any ability to control our borders, is what he discovered when the debate was had about trying to stop the virus coming in, there's not even a desire to have it.
	Oh, because the Conservatives were the ones saying closing the borders is racist.
	Yes, and not just them, but every part of officialdom.
	Oh, good, good.
	There you are.
	That's right.
	We don't allow literally every foreigner under the sun to come here.
	We are morally deficient.
	Right.
	You're insane.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Really, really sane and rational people, sensible people are running this country.
	On that note, I suppose we'll move to the last thing.
	Well, we'll be running a little bit later after this.
	Yeah, we'll run over, of course.
	We started late.
	Apologies for being late.
	Some more fun.
	So.
	I do like them.
	We have found the least competent fraudsters of all time.
	Which is, of course, Black Lives Matter Bristol.
	I love the Bristol on that.
	I don't know what it is.
	It just sounds stupid, doesn't it, frankly?
	Black Lives Matter Bath.
	It's just like... Black Lives Matter Aberystwyth.
	There's just something really silly about it.
	Yeah, so this is just a feel-good story, I suppose.
	Oh good.
	Let's enjoy it.
	So this is, we'll get this on screen, this is the Mail Online reporting that a Black Lives Matter fraudster who organized the demonstration that toppled the Colston statue, this being a local man who didn't do nothing, and they destroyed that, she raised £30,000 and then just spent it all on herself.
	So she has been given a sentence of two and a half years.
	So one, you only raised £30,000.
	Well, it is British politics.
	Yeah, I noticed.
	We can't grift like the American BLM.
	Yeah, the American BLM raised a billion.
	You only got 30k, you absolute losers.
	But she is going to jail!
	Oh, wow.
	Shocked.
	I'm just, I'm in awe, frankly, that anyone goes to jail for doing the regime-approved thing.
	Two and a half years, though.
	Yeah, it's not the most.
	It is about in line with what I read the sentencing guidelines to be for fraud.
	Right, okay.
	You have to get, to get about four years, you have to steal a hundred grand.
	Right, okay.
	You can get up to ten years if you go over half a million.
	Okay, fair enough.
	Right.
	But the details, yeah.
	Might be fun.
	So they say in here, the BLM organiser received £32,344, or good boy points, in donations raised from 558 individual contributions.
	She went on to spend the money earmarked for local charities to fund her own lifestyle.
	She couldn't even scam 600 people.
	No.
	This was national news for weeks.
	One thing I can't quite get over though is, if I gave you 32 grand, I know it's not half a billion, but I find it quite hard to pocket that in just lifestyle spendings.
	Like, I'm not really sure how expensive some of the stuff she was doing is, because they only tell us some of the things she spent the money on.
	Hasn't she got to pay for, like, nails and wigs?
	How did you tell?
	Wigs.
	Is that really?
	You haven't read it and you do know.
	Sincerely, Bo has not read the notes.
	I assume it'd be like cars and housing.
	No.
	Firstly, rent.
	Right, there we go.
	Hair and beauty appointments.
	You were right on the money.
	Takeaways.
	How do you spend 30 grand?
	Okay.
	I mean, at least, at least, what's her name?
	Colors.
	Patrice Colors bought bloody mansions.
	Our one's getting Chinese.
	How much are you spending on Chinese?
	My nails!
	But even to get £30,000 on Chinese... Pathetic!
	I demand a better quality of fraudster!
	She also brought a new iPhone, so that's £600.
	Oh wow, there we go.
	An iMac, so that's a couple grand or something.
	Amazon purchases.
	How expensive is that?
	But it turns out she spent £6,000 of the pounds on Uber.
	We need a better quality of corrupt.
	It's a bit like Brewster's Millions.
	You've got to try really hard.
	You're trying every single day to spend as much money as you can.
	And it's just kind of crap.
	George's 30k.
	I thought I could do a sequel.
	I'm sorry, I'm not a big fan of taking taxis in general.
	Why wouldn't you buy yourself a nice car rather than take taxis if you had 30k just dropped on your lap?
	Yeah, just take that 6 grand, buy a car.
	It doesn't have to be an amazing car.
	Take 15 grand, buy a quite nice one.
	Dare to dream!
	Exactly, go wild!
	Get a Jaguar, spend the whole 30k, you know?
	But also, at the risk of stating the obvious, what an amoral scumbag.
	Yeah.
	Because how could you live with yourself?
	The shame that not... Okay, being a fraudster, okay, one thing.
	Stealing money from somewhere, somehow, okay.
	But you did it in the most morally reprehensible way possible.
	People's guilt about the Atlantic slave trade.
	Yeah.
	I mean I obviously can't sympathize with her because I wouldn't steal 30k grifting on guilt over the transatlantic slave trade.
	We'll get the image on screen just so people can have a look.
	So I come to the conclusion that these people just don't basically feel guilt.
	I don't think she feels guilt.
	No sense of ethics or morality.
	Obligation to others.
	There is some speculation in the chat, maybe she's very fat if she'd spent six grand on taxis.
	She's not that fat.
	Uber's not even that expensive.
	She's pretty fat.
	She's not that fat.
	Well, the most expensive taxi I've ever taken is I went from, I think it was Stansted to Swindon, just because I buggered up my timings.
	The flight was late and it was either spend basically that much on hotel and then train or £300 to go from Stansted to Swindon, which isn't fun.
	But that's a long journey.
	Yeah.
	That's only 300 quid.
	How do you spend six grand on Ubers?
	Bristol.
	Sorry, it's just something that stuck with me.
	I just, I don't understand.
	It must be habitual.
	It must be everywhere she goes at all times.
	Yeah.
	Maybe she, her brother is an Uber driver.
	Well, remember, I think, I think one of the things you've got to remember is the, I think people like herself view this money as reparations, right?
	And so actually, I bet they do.
	I bet she is.
	I bet she's had these conversations with people around her and be like, are you just going to take my money?
	This money's for black joy?
	Yeah, exactly.
	Exactly.
	That's, they've got a, they've got an excuse for everything.
	I'm just imagining because I've seen some footage every year this happens of course in the United States where someone puts out a big bowl of candy and it has a sign that says please take one because you live in the suburbs and then some scumbags turn up with their kids and take the whole lot.
	Well, I actually had to have this with my kids last night because I took them trick-or-treating and people leave a bowl of sweets and I'm you have to emphasize to a two-year-old take one one because he just sees handful right Now, that's fine, because he's two, nearly three, obviously you've got to have that conversation with him.
	You know, my eight-year-old doesn't need to be told, he takes one, leaves them for everyone else, because you go to each house, you take one from each house, everyone wins.
	It's actually, I mean, you wouldn't need to explain it to a normal person, but then you have Black Lives Matter activists.
	Well you've got a sense of fair play.
	Yeah.
	And being reasonable.
	Yeah and just doing the right thing and not stealing all the sweets so no one else gets any.
	Which is why the police will arrest you and none of these people.
	It's like toxic whiteness.
	This isn't the only money she is being charged with stealing though.
	That's one court case in which she demanded money.
	There's another fundraiser here.
	This is to raise money for those who destroyed the statue.
	This is to pay their legal fees because of course they didn't do nothing even though they were on camera doing it.
	Yep.
	This is 28 grand, as you can see.
	Again, British money, so it's never half a billion.
	But I just wanted to remind ourselves of how that went, because she's still pending something for that charge, as my understanding.
	I just want to remind everyone just how corrupt our country is, frankly, on a human level.
	As you can see here, the police at the time of the destruction of one of these statues said they didn't intervene because they were too much of a bunch of pussies.
	Because we don't govern the brown people.
	That's whatever they said.
	We don't govern the brown people.
	Could have sparked a riot, is the direct quote.
	It's an absolute dereliction of duty.
	They didn't get involved because they were physically scared.
	That is the real reason.
	No one's scared of these people.
	I think it's morally scared.
	I think they themselves don't have the courage of their own convictions as policemen and feel that actually, well, that something greater is going on with the non-whites and so that's not our business.
	I really think that's what they believe.
	I mean, there are going to be ones that are scared, obviously.
	Look at these people.
	I remember the day.
	It was not a scary incident.
	If you're a police officer and you wanted to get in there like a nice Russian police officer and battle some protesters, oh, you'd have fun.
	These guys have got such soft hands, they've got to put gloves on to roll the statue into the bloody water.
	They fished it out, right?
	Yeah, they did.
	They did, didn't they?
	They put it in a museum or something.
	But what happened to the criminals?
	Well, they were cleared of all charges because they didn't do it.
	Even though they're on camera doing it.
	Moral fear.
	No, it's worse than that, in fact.
	Do you remember the defense?
	The defense was that the removal of the statue helped to prevent another crime.
	Therefore, we're not guilty.
	What other crime?
	Of criminal damage.
	Now, the crime that they were stopping was the display of the statue itself.
	Which, according to the defense, that was a criminal act by being indecent or abusive in its material, saying that the Colston's continued veneration in a vibrant multicultural city was an act of abuse.
	A lawyer stood up in a British court, said those words.
	And the judge was like, good point.
	Well, no, the jury did.
	It was a jury trial.
	Bristol jury.
	You want to guess how tight that was?
	It was 11 to 1.
	There were 12 people on a jury.
	Imagine being the one person who's just got to sit there and go, you know, you're all mad, right?
	It's the 12 angry men scenario, but with just the guys giving up.
	Just like, yeah, but no, you're all mental.
	No.
	So that has descended into a precedent, a state of literal law, of madness.
	Yeah.
	So the jury did not provide any rationale.
	In case you were wondering, they did not, for that decision.
	And of course this blew up, because the Home Secretary was like, no, sorry, that is madness.
	She did come out and say that has to be destroyed, that ruling, because we can't have that.
	Of course the Guardian then accused her of political meddling, for daring to say that the law Should apply to brown people?
	Yeah, yeah.
	I mean, it's not even brown people, it's a bunch of bloody students!
	Yeah.
	Like, most of them are white!
	They represent something, which is our deep guilt about being white.
	Yeah.
	To the police.
	So, um, this went to- Which is why we need an Indian Home Secretary who's like, look, I don't have that, actually.
	You're mad.
	So it did go to an appeal court, and the appeal court did rule that it was unlawful, that that can't become case law, that is legal nonsense, and the jurors are all crayon munchers for believing it.
	But then the appeal court decided that they were just going to continue to allow those human beings to be innocent and not convicted of the crime.
	I'm not really sure how that works.
	Which is that, clearly, this was a mistrial.
	Everyone involved was, I don't know, snuffing... Comprised?
	Compromised, should we say?
	Yeah.
	But then the adults in the room, the appeal court, went, we're just not even going to bother and go back and charge those people.
	Which means that the only person who is facing justice for any of that is, of course, our dear friend.
	Right, so the four white students got off scot-free.
	They did indeed.
	The black woman went to jail.
	This is anti-racism.
	Got it.
	Understood.
	I wonder if they have the other picture because of course she has now decided she's a Muslim.
	So you can see that.
	What?
	That is actually an amazing procession of justice for the anti-racist.
	She decided, I'm guessing, because she decided to start putting on hijabs and whatever this is.
	And so, as she was being charged with crime, she was like, but I'm Muslim.
	What's the full-blown thing?
	Is it a niqab?
	Is that the full face?
	Yeah, that's the full one.
	That one there.
	So she's got a full-blown... The penguin outfit is the niqab, as my Arab girlfriend used to call it, so I'm allowed to say that.
	So there we are.
	Does that give you a pass, does it?
	Yeah, I think so.
	I dated an Arab once.
	Yeah.
	No, no, in the Arab world, they literally, so the girls who don't wear niqab, they'll see the other ones doing it and they, of course, because women are quite bitchy, they'll sit around and be like, there are the penguins, the penguins are coming.
	They refer to them as Boris Johnson did for decades.
	She really should have had a bit of lace across her eyes, really.
	Otherwise, yeah.
	I think there's a difference between niqab, burqa and hijab and stuff like that.
	I think that's the difference between niqabs and burqas.
	Well, she's also showing her hands.
	I mean, what's wrong with her?
	I mean, sincerely, I've got a… She's a practiced Muslim.
	She's just learning how it works.
	Right, yeah.
	I suppose when you're in charge of the crime… It's like speedy and see, isn't it, really?
	I've now got a criminal record, well, time to learn.
	Yeah, I guess I'm going to figure out this Muslim… Do you ever understand outside a court or something, when people try and hide their face, whose image is already in the public domain?
	Like, we've got pictures of you already now.
	What could she possibly look like?
	I love how she's wearing, like, lace here as well.
	I'm sorry.
	You can't turn around and be like, I'm an orthodox Muslim after that.
	Whole other conversation.
	But her defense, her defense lawyer, Tom Edwards.
	Oh, yeah.
	He stood up in court and said, she's extremely sorry.
	I'm sorry.
	Sorry.
	But what's the defense?
	That was it.
	OK.
	Well, no, no, no, no, no, no.
	I've got a better defense, he says.
	She was only 20.
	Okay, but what's the defence?
	Old enough to know better, you mean?
	Is that what that means?
	The legal age of criminality I think is 10 in this country, so she's double that.
	She was 20, she's sorry, but she was also trusted with this money when she was living away from home for the first time.
	Again, no defence detected.
	So, sweating, presumably, because we don't allow cameras in the courtroom, so I've got to guess.
	He got up and then said that she's a druggie, an alcoholic, so she... I'm not joking, is there?
	Excuse me, your honour, you'll have to understand, my client's on drugs.
	That's why they should go free.
	The direct quote was, she's been drinking heavily and taking drugs at the time.
	She's also had mental health issues, so she's a mental, druggy alcoholic.
	And I could just hear Peter Hitchens, I told you!
	Yeah, I think court cases in Bristol might be the funniest on planet Earth.
	But I love the idea that the judge is like, you know drugs are illegal as well?
	You must be like in the room where all the lawyers prepare, the little drinking fountain there, that must be just using lead piping or something.
	Because how else do you get multiple defence lawyers standing up and being like, well here's my defence and it's just gobbledygook.
	She must have been buying extremely rare Johnny Walker or something.
	Booze isn't that expensive.
	She hasn't been spending money on that particular wig, has she?
	No, no, she only gets the best meth.
	Scumbag.
	The other aspects of this trial don't even make any more sense.
	So just to remind you of why she asked for that £30,000 in the first place.
	She wanted to set up the protest.
	That cost 30 grand, was it?
	Well, apparently.
	She said in the crowdfunding page that it was to raise money for face masks.
	Oh, this was during COVID, was it?
	Yeah.
	Oh.
	30 grand for a face mask.
	Millions of face masks.
	And then it was promised that, of course, because people figure out maybe it doesn't cost 30 grand to buy.
	She turns up in the cab.
	She's like, what?
	Yeah, she put some panties in your mouth instead.
	Apparently that's how it would work.
	So there we are.
	Instead, she said that, I'm not just spending money on face masks, I'm going to then spend the money on a charity.
	I thought you were going to say a chariot.
	No.
	Which I would have been more forgiving of.
	Well, she picked Changing Your Mindset Limited.
	What's that?
	Well, one of her friends runs that, right?
	No, no, no, no, she's not that corrupt.
	They're a very legitimate charity that helps poor youths of all kinds and provides them with essential water and food as they go on a trip to Africa.
	I'm not joking, literally all they do is take kids on trips to Africa.
	Holidays to Africa, right?
	Yes, holidays to Africa was the charity she chose.
	I'm sorry, no one involved in any of this story is a reasonable human being.
	Not the charity.
	That's a terrible idea for a charity.
	Not the people stealing the money.
	Not the people giving the money.
	And the lawyers with lead poisoning, I just feel bad for.
	So... No, they get paid.
	I don't feel bad for them at all.
	I suppose so.
	They've been recusing themselves.
	Sorry, Your Honour.
	I'm not insane.
	I can't take this case.
	You would have thought.
	But I'll just end this off with probably the best fraudster of all time for this week, because I don't want it to go by the wayside, the Labour Party, who decided to come out Welsh Labour and demand that we must celebrate black history, because it is indeed Welsh history.
	Man, there is a coal mining joke in here.
	I love the bottom line, though.
	I just can't seem to dig it out.
	There is no history of Wales without the history of black experience in Wales.
	But unironically, picture of coal miners and blackface.
	That's, in a way, they're right.
	Sure, but coal mining jokes aside, what does that mean?
	There is no history of Wales without the black experience of Wales.
	Now, just picture Vox Pops somewhere in Africa.
	Have you ever heard of a country called Wales?
	No.
	In the sea?
	What are you talking about?
	No one in Africa knows what Wales is.
	Who do they think they're kidding?
	George W. Bush didn't know what Wales was.
	There's no way some guy in Senegal has any idea what Wales is.
	Are they actually trying to make the argument that the valleys of South Wales or the Snowdonia region or Anglesey has got any connection to sub-Saharan Africa?
	Is that what they're actually trying to say?
	It's not even there's a connection.
	It's indivisible.
	Hang on lads, this is more insane than you're even thinking because you're responding to the typical claim which is that black history is British history or something like that right?
	They said here there is no history of Wales without the black experiences of Wales.
	So without this history of black experiences and that's actually quite interesting because The history of black experiences could also include the sort of negative of it, right?
	So there is no black experience here.
	So technically, if you were charting the history of black experiences, you would have to explain where there isn't one and where there is one, right?
	If you were going to do a well-rounded historical analysis.
	So in a technical way, they're not wrong.
	You haven't hit on the worst part of that.
	That wasn't what I was thinking.
	Literally, if a black person doesn't hear it, there is no Wales.
	Read it again.
	That is actually what they've said.
	If there's no black person to hear the Welsh, there is no Welsh language.
	There is no history of Wales without the black experiences in Wales.
	That's a great point!
	If only white people sing choral music in the valleys of Wales and there's no black ears to hear it.
	Didn't happen.
	Did it happen?
	Nope.
	Roman invasion of Britain didn't happen.
	Anglo-Saxon invasion of Britain didn't happen.
	Norman invasion of England didn't happen.
	But around 1540 or whenever, Henry VIII got that one Moorish guy over to play the trumpet.
	That's when Britain began.
	Suddenly Wales exists!
	We discovered apparently there's this place called Wales that started now.
	Oh my Jesus Christ!
	It's the insane position, isn't it, of not only do we want to make your country black or more black, it has always been as well.
	And before we came it literally didn't exist.
	The representatives of left-wing Wales.
	Welsh Labour.
	But you have to just forget the literary evidence and archaeological evidence.
	You have to just pretend that doesn't exist.
	Well, it didn't until a black person saw it.
	Yeah.
	So just bring a friend.
	I just want to be clear that this is the lived experience of epistemology being taken to its logical conclusion, right?
	This is absolutely how they want to put the locus of the world's experiences through the eyes of people of color.
	And therefore, actually Wales does exist in about 1540 or whenever that Thomas guy arrives from space.
	But that's literally what they think.
	You know, this is their entire philosophical framework.
	Not that Owen Glendower was actually from the Ivory Coast.
	I mean, he might have been.
	Or something.
	They'll probably find a way... Tariq Nasheed's entered the chat.
	Shai Suleiman, he was a black man.
	They will absolutely try and find a way of, like, post-hoc rationalising in order to make the narrative as firm as possible.
	But if it doesn't exist, then they'll just ignore it.
	They don't care.
	Llewellyn at Griffith was actually Nigerian.
	Or Uther Pendragon was ethnically Bantu.
	Maybe.
	Can't prove it's not.
	Actually, genetic studies have shown that Tutankhamun was most closely related to the Irish, apparently.
	There we have it.
	It's very interesting.
	I've heard that one before.
	It's interesting.
	But anyway, there you are.
	There are the literally worst fraudsters on planet Earth.
	And good luck to the mental cases.
	Enjoy the lead poisoning.
	Do we have any video comments, I wonder?
	I don't think we do, so instead we will go to... I think there were some.
	Are there?
	Well, I will investigate.
	If there aren't, then I'll read some normal comments.
	AK says, for Bow, how long before the great unraveling of our civilization really begins to speed up?
	Oh well, we're experiencing the quickening right now, aren't we?
	I think so.
	I think it's one of those things, probably it seems, from revolutions in history that there'll be some sort of real tipping point and then it gets exponentially faster and sometimes there'll be like some kind of flashpoint in all sorts of revolutions.
	But who knows?
	Who knows?
	It definitely feels like we've gone over the slippery slope and now we're just sliding down to the bottom.
	Often the powers that be like to keep it on a simmer if possible.
	Yeah, but I feel that the tipping point has been reached, a Rubicon's been crossed, we've gone over the edge and now we're just sliding and we are getting... I do feel that way.
	Stuff's just getting worse every day, but I think we have found some video comments.
	Yeah, I mean, just to end off that conversation, though, because I think it's a good one.
	Which is, I think you're correct, but there's two possible outcomes, isn't there?
	There's either we become Kuwait, which is when the money runs out, just becomes another hole-diving village that's multicultural, or this country does go through something truly cataclysmic.
	Not fun for any of us, but it would save the country from absolute... I don't know.
	Disappearance.
	I think we're on the former trail.
	I think we're just going to literally end up as an impoverished, strange place until no one would know why you would want to go there in the first place.
	I think that's what it'll be.
	Well, let's move to Joshua.
	I've just watched the contemplations on liberalism.
	And I wanted to point out the problem with liberalism is that it requires the toleration of the intolerable.
	The idea that as long as you're not doing anything to hurt someone directly fails to recognize that you are hurting the society at large.
	If you are 25 and too fat to fight in a war, you are a liability.
	Funny how liability and liberal are so close.
	Yeah, this is, of course, Popper's paradox of tolerance.
	But I think Joshua is correct to expand it out.
	And this is something that Nietzsche would put in the frame of how many parasites can a civilization tolerate before it collapses?
	And the West, in his day, was like, well, we can just... And he was using it in terms of criminals, right?
	Criminals are kind of parasites on society but for some reason the West has decided it's okay to be riddled with parasites and at some point you're going to be so drained by the parasites that the thing will collapse and that's inevitable and he seems to have been proven right.
	Someone was saying to me recently that an ex-teacher in a class of 30 or 35, a class can sort of absorb one troublemaker who's sort of refusing to learn and being a constant disruption.
	Two maybe, three probably not, more than three or four and the whole class is screwed.
	Yeah.
	But Joshua's main point is not just about being an active troublemaker either, it's also being a liability.
	Kind of makes you a dead weight.
	And when you look at, and that's, that's just like the flat plane of the now, right?
	But if you look at it in the long plane of the future and the past, then actually you get, you have to kind of add other people to that category.
	Like people who don't have children actually are a liability in the future and things like that.
	People who don't bother working really and just claim taxes.
	They're a massive liability.
	And so you can't go on forever.
	So it won't.
	Here I am in Wisconsin and it is actually snowing.
	Australian man learns about snow.
	It is snow on my car.
	Not snowing.
	Since CityCon wasn't the best fit for me, the lovely people here at Kennedy Mall in Dubuque, Iowa have let me set up a stall right here.
	Come and check me out if you're in the area.
	Well that's very kind of them.
	Um, the funny incongruity of, uh, an Aussie in Iowa or something.
	Yeah.
	Being like, Hey, look, this is snow in Minnesota, but this is snow.
	That's not snow.
	It's adorable that you think that's snow though.
	That's very cute.
	Yeah.
	The next one.
	Well, what better way to celebrate Halloween than volunteering at a haunted mansion with over 40 other actors?
	Aside from my scene being outside in the middle of the night so it was cold as heck, it was a lot of fun.
	And here I am just freezing my butt absolutely off in the middle of the night in my woodshop.
	Oh, the glamorous life of an actress, I tell you what.
	Yee-hee-hee! Yee-hee-hee! Yee-hee-hee!
	I'm just glad some people can still have fun, frankly.
	me.
	Anyway, the real Bigfoot and Callum still doubts, honestly.
	It says, It's just true. It's just true.
	It's interesting to see that Musk has started to fully grasp the gravity of the situation in which we find ourselves.
	It's a relief that the richest man in the world isn't captured by the cult, and it seems to be in touch with enough to recognize those who are.
	The question remains, what will he do about it?
	Well, Musk still has pro-immigrant, pro-immigration sympathies, which is like, oh, I just want illegal immigration stopped.
	So he goes down to the Texas border, which is great, but then he doesn't go to like Little Mogadishu And be like, hang on, where are the Americans?
	Oh, but it's so legal!
	Yeah, where are the Americans, though?
	You know, that's not crossed his mind yet, but... There have been a couple of tweets, I believe.
	So, there's room for learning.
	Okay.
	Well, I agree that Musk probably isn't... Hey, South African!
	He can't be... of demographics.
	Yeah, how ignorant can it be?
	But like, you know, I wonder how much of that is kind of inputting up a kind of false front just to get people off his back or something, you know, because that, you know, could be something.
	He has said a couple of contradictory things, it seems to me, about that.
	Sure, but you know.
	Mike Hunt says, I think it's interesting that the Extinctionists want to end humanity, but don't start with themselves.
	To me, that leaves but two options.
	They are either lying for virtue points, or they're raging narcissists who would end humanity and save themselves for last.
	Yeah, well, it's because they don't really have the courage of their convictions.
	And you're right, it is narcissism, I think.
	Saying, I know I'm the one good person because I realize it's all mankind that is the problem.
	So yeah, I suppose in a way you can say that every single person is in some way fallen and riddled with sin and therefore humanity is the issue because the earth has never done anything wrong.
	It's not a moral agent.
	And so yes, we are the problem.
	Bravo.
	Um, Robert says the fact that all media orgs are based on the coasts where the leftists reside, there's some way to explain the bias too.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	I'd say one thing just very quickly.
	I want to say earlier about this.
	There's publications like the New York times or the Washington post or time magazine, all sorts of things, which way you look, where they came from.
	When did they come?
	When they were founded.
	The intelligence services.
	Who controls the media, Elof?
	Mouthpieces.
	I mean, they might not be anymore because like I said, they can... Something like the, for example, the New York Times.
	It's not as simple as that because it'll pass through the ownerships of various families, various individuals.
	So it's not just one thing.
	It's not as easy just to say, you know, the Washington Post is a CIA front thing 100% and always has been since its inception.
	That's not necessarily the case.
	But the point is, they were always A tool of the elite on some level to sort of suddenly realize, oh, the New York Times hasn't got the best interests of the most of the normal people of the masses at heart.
	Oh, I thought it always did.
	I mean, we never did.
	We did the Active Measures Book Club, and this was the case for all Western countries, which is the localized intelligence services, but usually the Americans, because we're talking about the West, would, yeah, just use them.
	They had it as a playbook.
	When we need to use them, we'll use them.
	And they do.
	So.
	Richard says, don't vote for Labour, the party that allows grooming gangs, councils and police force cover-ups, and then says something I'm not going to repeat.
	Stand for Labour!
	The Labour Party is engaged in active cover-ups of the grooming gangs.
	And has done everything they can to make this subject untouchable because you're a racist?
	I could have gone into the counsellors in Rochdale, yes.
	And to try and ostracise and destroy and silence those that did try to speak out about it.
	Make it so it's unviable to talk about it because it will ruin your life.
	There was a Labour MP, female Labour MP, I can't remember.
	Nashar?
	No, no, at the time.
	Is her surname Green, maybe?
	I can't remember.
	Who's tried to speak up.
	Sarah Champion.
	Sarah Champion, sorry, that's who I'm thinking of.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	She tried to do something.
	Yeah, they made her life a living hell.
	She was Rotherham.
	Yeah, that's right, that's right, yeah.
	Champion in Rotherham.
	She was Women's Minister, so she thought women being raped was quite bad.
	And the Labour Party didn't agree.
	Paul says, look at a list of the most popular nonfiction books from the 60s and 70s to find out where the anti-human sentiment comes from.
	Doom and Gloom books about overpopulation, resource wars and pandemics killing everyone.
	Yeah, this has been a long thread in left-wing thought, because left-wing thought seems to think that ideas can exist outside of the heads of human beings.
	And so there's this kind of transcendent ether in which the idea is really there and your brain touches it.
	for a bit.
	And oh, I'm a leftist.
	Yes, I'm so much better than everyone else.
	Oh, it's mankind that's the problem.
	It's like that doesn't exist.
	The thought is in your head.
	You're a moron.
	Omar says, You need to buy that person a safety cap.
	Yeah.
	This is why the tinfoil hats are important, Callum.
	You don't want your brain touching that piece of thing.
	You need protection.
	This idea that you're on the right side of history and anyone that disagrees with you is on the wrong side of history.
	The power that that has over some people's minds.
	Totally.
	It justifies anything now.
	Absolutely.
	It's the apotheosis of Whig historical history.
	The ends being on the right side of history justifies the means, anything.
	Because what does it matter?
	When they write the book, you'll be on the right side.
	But also history is just straight up and it's up forever and everything just gets better when you do what we want.
	It's like, yeah, well, that's a nice myth to tell yourself, but it's obviously not true.
	Omar says something to remember about NIMBYism is that not only do they not want it in their backyard, it's never been in their backyard.
	The people facilitating the ruin of your communities don't live in the aftermath.
	That's a great point.
	Every Lib Dem voter ever.
	Kevin says, why stop at Twitter, Elon?
	How about a hostile takeover of TikTok, Facebook, and OnlyFans?
	Honestly, because you can't afford them.
	That's why.
	God only knows how much Facebook would cost.
	Take money.
	Elon, richest man to have ever lived.
	No, it's not enough.
	You've got to make more.
	Boys, together we have to make more.
	What about just an aggressive takeover of Alphabet where you don't have to buy the whole thing outright and own all 100% of the shares.
	Just enough to change the board.
	No, no, no.
	Yeah, no, that was it.
	Just enough to sort of change the board and change like the CEO or whatever.
	Make yourself the CEO.
	If you bought 25% of Alphabet shares, Something changes the alphabet, right?
	Like suddenly it's like, okay, what now?
	You know?
	Um, anyway, Thomas says, uh, it's not a police force, Callum.
	It's a police service.
	At this point, it's very clear who they are serving.
	Good point.
	Yep.
	Very good.
	X, Y, and Z says, the police knock sounds exactly like the same tactics Stalin's security forces used.
	They'd come late at night to catch you at your most disoriented and keep you off balance.
	Totally true.
	AGB Stars E-101.
	California Refugee says, you'd think if we'd send Parliament to hold sessions in Tower Hamlets, they might start changing their minds.
	Just a thought, a silly thought.
	I don't know, man.
	I think that, like, who's the MP for Tower Hamlets?
	Does it matter?
	No.
	You don't need to know her name.
	I mean, it's not Diane Abbott, she's Hackney.
	But it's going to be someone like the Han Abbot.
	And so it's just like, you know, the Labour Party would be like, yes.
	We're about to become the biggest party.
	Sophie says, you know what we need to do?
	Inform everyone that Russia is in support of Hamas and Palestine.
	I just want to see their brains melt down trying to figure out what to say, because it's true.
	They are.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Good point.
	Suddenly Russia are a force for social justice.
	But that only works on NPCs.
	Yeah.
	But did you see, um... Was that a sarcastic comment?
	Yeah.
	Okay, great.
	Because that is actually what's happening.
	I was going to say, no they're not.
	But okay, if it's sarcastic then... I thought the Russians were supporting the Palestinians?
	They are helping the Palestinians in various ways, legitimately.
	But the...
	The thing I think she's speaking to is those who are just like, I love Ukraine, I love Palestine, like just complete NPCs.
	I mean, ever since the Gorbachev years, the Russians have pretty much cut ties with Fatah and stuff.
	You can't say Putin is pro Hamas.
	I don't know.
	He's had meetings with them.
	Some of his journalists are working with them right now as to what extent it goes to the FSB or whatnot.
	We won't know for 10 years, but he's certainly not opposed because he's helping them in the long run.
	I think for Putin, this is clearly just They're standing up against the Americans.
	Good way of getting at the Americans.
	I assume what you're getting at is correct as well, which is that Putin can't just be like that, though.
	Well, no, no, I'm not saying he's going to come out and say it in a press conference.
	No, no, because the problem is the South.
	So they've been fighting ISIS as recently as, I think, 2017.
	They finally defeated what was left of them in Russia.
	Killing civilians, so actual jihadists is not really something they like to touch.
	So I think it's a very strange circumstance.
	Russia's got their own problems, or had their own problems with Chechnya and all sorts of things.
	Well like I say, five years ago they were still fighting ISIS.
	A proper war was going on in southern Russia.
	Yeah, it was the Russian Air Force that largely defeated them in the end, wasn't it?
	Yeah.
	Going back to the 60s and 70s and even parts of the 80s when the real Cold War was going on, you could say the Soviets were sort of explicitly pro-Palestine in a way because of the Cold War.
	But like I say, ever since the Gorbachev years, Gorbachev slapped, in the end, pretty much slapped down Yasser Arafat and said, no, we're not interested in you anymore.
	The way the Jordanians and the Egyptians are not really pro-Palestine in all sorts of ways.
	They're not pro-Palestine.
	Zero, the number of refugees the Arab countries will take.
	I don't think the Kremlin is pro-Hamas.
	No, it's just an alliance momentarily of convenience.
	Give you that.
	Well, they exterminated ISIS in Syria for a good reason, which is that they don't deal with Islamists because they're not as stupid as Pakistan, who will, and then get blown up by the people they fund.
	George says, hard to blame the Palestinians for waving their flags around.
	It's what you usually do in a conquered nation.
	The police not doing anything about them means they're useless, so we might as well defund them and rely on self-defense.
	Well, I mean, to be honest with you, you are, right?
	Whether you realize it or not, you kind of are relying on self-defense at this point, because frankly... What else have you got?
	Yeah, exactly.
	The police are not going to prosecute, like 95% of burglaries go unattended, not investigated.
	In many parts of the country, there just is not such a thing as law and order.
	Ethelstan says, all of these videos of officers arresting individuals generally appear like intellectually stunted people trying to remember a script given to them.
	They never understand or know the law, can never justify why the individual is being arrested as it pertains to the law and never justify it.
	It is exactly like the dimwit handing out warnings to the pro-life Christian praying in a head.
	Yes, this is another thing that is important to remember is that the police are not necessarily best and brightest.
	And so they have been given Woke training about transgenderism and things like that, but they have no knowledge of what it is they're dealing with.
	I've had to speak to police before, and it became very evident that I was talking way over their heads when they brought this subject up.
	And they ended up letting me go, so I was like, okay, they don't know what they're talking about.
	And the thing is, it's not really their job to know what they're talking about.
	It's their job to make sure that people don't get murdered.
	I guess that, you know, there's the idea of, um, are we the baddies?
	Yeah.
	Do any of these individual cops, I assume not, at any point pause and think, wait, am I doing the right thing here?
	Yeah, I am arresting an old chap in front of his dying wife.
	Am I on the side of evil right now?
	Yeah.
	You do see it occasionally.
	It does happen on occasion.
	I think the Michael Malice position is correct.
	There's nothing the police won't do up and including the killing of children when they're told to do it.
	I think that's probably true.
	I don't think they've got very good moral compasses and I don't think they're restrained because I think they just do what they're told.
	Well, that's what the system is meant to do.
	You just hope that the system that manages that doesn't get taken over by some insane ideologues, and in this case it has.
	I mean, the police of old, who you expected to have their own moral compass, are gone.
	They've been selected out.
	You know, the old Bobby on the beat wearing his blue... No, that guy doesn't exist anymore.
	Now it's the high-vis Like Global Police, you know, the Met Police, who are just literally going to do exactly what they're told and without any thought... There's some white guy who's been beaten down or some woman who's gonna scream and pounce on you.
	Yeah.
	You know, oh, you called her a lesbian nana, did you?
	I don't care how autistic you are.
	You're in trouble.
	You know, they don't they don't have morals as you think of it normally.
	I don't know.
	It's not dunk on all the police.
	I don't agree.
	The high-vis jacket.
	Constantly like, you know, Stasi-like enforcers.
	I'm not sure I agree.
	Isn't Michael Mannis like an all cops are bastards type?
	Anarchist.
	In a way, he's right.
	It depends on the police force, because if... Impulsively at the Mets, definitely.
	In a small village in Somerset or bloody the Orkneys or something, probably not.
	But this is the thing, like Malice would be thinking of all police forces in that way, whereas you've got some large, like the old British police.
	They're not going to kill kids, they couldn't.
	They don't have any guns, so it wouldn't be possible back in the, I don't know, 30s or whatever.
	I bet there's loads of British police officers that are darsed by seeing videos.
	Well, then they should bloody well do something, shouldn't they?
	That's the thing, right?
	I'm actually kind of sick of this.
	Oh, no, no, no.
	These are your compatriots.
	Do something about it.
	Stage a protest.
	Have a walkout.
	Do whatever you have to do.
	Plus, do you want to be part of this?
	Yeah, exactly.
	Resign, if that's what it takes, you know.
	But if you're just going to sit there and go, well, I don't agree with it, but I'm not going to literally do a damn thing, then it's going to continue indefinitely.
	You know, and so I'm losing sympathy.
	But what can they do?
	What can we do?
	It's the Home Office that control it.
	And go and protest it.
	Well, the police shouldn't protest.
	Well, there we go.
	That's how bad things have got.
	I'm sincerely, and I've spoken to this before about the intelligence services, the police and the army and the Air Force now.
	I think the Navy too.
	Have all actively discriminated against whites and men, in which case none of us should join them ever.
	If you have a friend who's thinking about joining, no.
	I'm sorry, but this is a bad idea.
	Tell them just don't do it, frankly.
	Because why would you work for an organization that actively hates you just for what you are?
	I think that's the one thing you can do and probably should.
	Can't you infiltrate and take back the organisation?
	Isn't that what you and Conor talk about for the Conservative Party?
	Like give up on the Home Office and the police and the army though?
	It's not like that.
	The police forces are all separate and spreading across the entire country.
	So that's a really big job.
	Getting control of the Conservatives I think would be easier.
	I'm largely with you on both of them though, we're just both organisations.
	The whole other debate.
	Last question.
	Sam says, I have a question for Bo.
	I'm always looking to expand my historical knowledge and reading.
	I've come across two books on Amazon that do look as if they are fascinating reading.
	Bede's Ecclesiastical History of the English People and the Anglo-Saxon Chronicles.
	Are these two books you would recommend to anyone with an interest in history?
	Yeah, absolutely.
	The venerable bead, the bead of Jarrow.
	You can get it all in just a Penguin paperback for like £7.99.
	Absolutely brilliant.
	You need to do a little outside reading.
	I definitely advise reading the introduction to it because otherwise a lot of it wouldn't make much sense.
	The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle is something a bit different, a bit more difficult to get to grips with and there's more than one version and all sorts of things.
	The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle is a little bit more problematic to actually understand properly.
	But nonetheless, give it a go.
	And the venerable bead is brilliant reading.
	When you're reading the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, you'll come across lines like there were great fire dragons in the sky.
	And then the Northmen arrived and sacked Lindisfarne.
	Right.
	So, I mean, the sacking, yes.
	Fire dragons in the sky, maybe less so.
	But what you'll want, rather than going straight to these sort of original sources, find a good historian talking about the time period.
	I mean, Tom Holland did a book on Aethelstan, which is probably great.
	I haven't actually read it yet.
	A whole bunch of our epochs are on pre-Conquest Britain, so you could do worse than starting there.
	So start with more popular history before starting with the original sources, basically, is what my advice would be.
	If you're new, but you know, once you've gone through them and you actually want to read the, because that's what I did, then you want to actually read the original sources and then you really find yourself cherishing some of the original sources.
	They're really pleasurable to read.
	Just books like that, for example, um, Bede in Penguin Paperback, it will have a long introduction, like a 20, 30, 40 page introduction written by a professor.
	Yeah.
	Read that.
	You really need to read that before you just start reading the original text.
	But this is why you should just read a book written by a professor rather than the originals, if you need.
	But anyway.
	Just one I wanted to end off because I think it's a good quote.
	Omar mentioning the Manchester Arena bombing, which is they'll let the little girls get blown up and then once you say something on social media, they'll arrest you for noticing.
	Anyway, but we're out of time, so if you want more, come back tomorrow!

▲