Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 1, 2023 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:31:43

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #709

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Good afternoon, folks.
	Welcome to the podcast for the Lotus Seaters for the 1st of August, 2020.
	I'm joined by the Right Honourable Andrew Bridgen.
	I'm only Honourable.
	I'm not a Privy Council.
	Oh, sorry.
	The Honourable.
	I think I did that last time as well.
	I'm sure you'll correct me on that.
	It's only a matter of time.
	But MP for the Reclaim Party and all-round interesting chap because you're getting stuck into things, aren't you?
	So I thought that the first thing we'd do is talk about your ongoing war against the orthodoxy regarding the vaccines.
	Would you like to tell us, just give everyone a kind of background on how you've been approaching this, as in how you came to be maybe a member of the Reclaim Party and then what you've been doing regarding the vaccine harms.
	How long have we got?
	About 20 minutes.
	About 20 minutes.
	Okay, I'll give you a brief resume.
	I've been sceptical of the response to the pandemic response.
	The lockdowns voted against the last two.
	The plan B I voted against everything.
	I was sceptical about the masks and obviously that's now proven that they're no good at all.
	That was pure psychological warfare and control.
	And I think the boiling point for me came When the MHRA in the end of November 22 asked for a recommendation that the experimental vaccines were rolled out to children down to the age of six months.
	I'll declare an interest.
	I do actually have a four-year-old.
	Well I've got kids.
	I don't think anyone's going to begrudge you for having an interest in the welfare of your own children.
	And other people's children.
	So there's no... I knew that there was going to be a huge political backlash when I laid out the fact that the, in my view, and the view of the growing number of scientists who aren't on the payroll of Big Pharma, in fact most of the scientists who aren't on the payroll of Big Pharma, that the vaccines are neither Well, we know they're not effective.
	They don't stop transmission or contracting the virus.
	And they're not safe.
	They are experimental, which is why, you know, Big Pharma needed to have immunity from prosecution.
	And you'd have to think, you know, maybe if they were safe and effective, as they keep being told all the time they are, surely after billions of doses have already gone out around the world, They wouldn't still need immunity from prosecution.
	And it's also interesting that the Indian government have refused Pfizer a license with immunity from prosecution on the basis that they said we want to do an independent study of whether your vaccine is safe and effective.
	And India now is the largest market in the world.
	It's 1.3 billion, bigger population than China as of this summer.
	And Pfizer declined the generous offer of subjecting their product to a full independent evaluation.
	They'll forego the biggest market in the world.
	We learned this from the leaked Albanian contract, didn't we?
	But they were not only immune from prosecution, but I believe it was in there, they didn't even have to deliver the product.
	Like it was such an unbelievably lopsided set of arrangements that no reasonable person would go into it, go into any contract where the scales are so weighted.
	Well, surely Ursula von der Leyen, isn't her husband one of the executives?
	Oh, yes.
	It's all very incestuous, isn't it?
	Yes.
	There's a lot of money being made.
	So I spoke out on the 13th.
	It's just a quick thing there.
	I saw a thing where it's something like, you know, the overwhelming majority of Pfizer's profits now are coming from the vaccine.
	A company that never made a vaccine before Bill Gates, the great philanthropist, put in £55 million in September 19, just before the pandemic.
	Also the company that's had to pay out the most in compensation to people.
	You mean fines?
	Yeah, fines, yeah.
	£33 billion.
	The big pharma itself has paid out £33 billion in fines over the last 10 years for harms and misrepresentation.
	Yeah, and Pfizer themselves are the ones who've paid the largest single payouts because they're a trustworthy company.
	Absolutely.
	So we got to this point and I undernarred and I knew there'd be a huge political cost to pay.
	Um, and I thought, well, uh, I want to look myself in the mirror.
	I know what I know.
	Um, I've got the science behind me.
	I couldn't look at the children again.
	Uh, if, uh, if I didn't speak out when I know, uh, and also my degree from university is in all the right things.
	Mysteriously.
	It was only something I was interested.
	I never used it.
	So what was it again?
	Biological sciences, subsidiary biochemistry of specializing in genetics, virology and behavior.
	Right, so you happen to be exactly perfectly placed to actually have expertise.
	And it's a long time ago, but I've tried to keep my knowledge up.
	But it does mean that when scientists, current scientists and leaders of the science give me the papers, I can read them and understand what they're talking about.
	So I've read a lot of papers, seen the Omicron stuff from South Africa and spoken to them directly.
	So I knew that was the best thing that ever happened because Viruses mutate to be more transmissible, less pathogenic, which is what Omicron was from the South African evidence.
	Plan B was a load of old rubbish.
	So I spoke against that.
	And in the end of that debate, I said that the only words I get, and it'll be in Hansard at the end of that speech, will be that the only pandemic the world's really been suffering in the UK is a pandemic of fear.
	And it's got to stop now.
	So I don't think they liked that too much.
	I think they thought I was probably onto them.
	So I knew that I was going to get backlash for speaking out on the vaccines, safe and effective, going against the narrative, especially for small children.
	No healthy child under 11 has died of Covid anywhere in the world.
	So I thought I could probably explain to the most pro-vaccine person that there was a risk from the vaccine.
	And there was basically no risk for healthy children from COVID itself, especially not when we got to Omicron, which had a transmission rate, an R-rate of about 12 or 14.
	I think the original Wuhan strain was an R-rate of 2 or 3.
	Well, I mean, we couldn't stop that spreading.
	So what chance have we got of stopping whatever measures were taken?
	Even China, with their draconian lockdown, couldn't stop the spread of Omicron.
	Not on 14.
	It's just too transmissible.
	And then it was endemic in the population.
	So I thought I could persuade the most pro-vaccine person that this was a bad idea, vaccinating babies with these experimental vaccines.
	So I did the speech.
	And from that moment on, I was cancelled by the mainstream media.
	Completely blacklisted.
	And I was on the media a lot before that.
	And the newspapers and everything.
	They just don't ring me anymore.
	In fact, they run away from me.
	The lobby run away from me.
	The lobby all know.
	It's absolutely true.
	They are scared to death.
	They do not know what to do.
	They can't speak out.
	And my colleagues, obviously, I think I've been one of the top five items in a Conservative MP's inbox since that date.
	And although the speech was never mentioned in the mainstream media, it probably has had been seen 30 million times on social media, so it's had a lot of coverage.
	People then write to their MPs, the government prepared, and I got hold of the PRU, because I was still in the Conservative Party at the time, I got hold of the PRU letters and the letters were basically saying I was a conspiracy theorist and, you know, and all the rest of it.
	And they were safe and effective.
	Well, I mean, they've made conservative MPs not only put their hands in their blood, they're up to their armpits in it.
	So they're committed.
	We got round to January and I had a meeting with a very senior backbencher who would be well known to all of you.
	And I had an hour with him in his office.
	He'd spoken to the party, and at the end of that hour, the takeaway message was, I was told, there is currently no political appetite, Andrew, for your views on the vaccine.
	There may be in 20 years' time, and you're probably going to be proved right.
	In the meantime, you need to bear in mind that you're taking on the most powerful vested interest in the world, with all the personal risk for you that that entails.
	That was not the answer I was looking for, to be honest.
	It's not really a very good answer, is it?
	It's not acceptable.
	But it's nothing new.
	When you think about it, I mean, all the cover-ups I've exposed while I've been an MP, the post office scandal, I mean, I knew after 18 months they were all innocent.
	So 2012, I knew they were all innocent.
	So 2012, I knew they were all innocent.
	By 2013, 14, I could prove it.
	And I went to every news agency there was on a regular basis, ITV, BBC, all the major newspapers and said, this is the biggest miscarriage of justice ever.
	There's 750.
	There's 736 postmasters criminally convicted.
	This is how, and I've got all the evidence.
	And they wouldn't talk about it.
	They said, we don't talk about that.
	It's exactly the same as the vaccine harms now.
	Yeah.
	Well, I mean, the government covered up that for 10 years.
	Yeah.
	So it's not out of, obviously they would be confident they could cover the vaccine harms up for 20 years.
	I'm determined that's not going to be the case.
	So I've spoken out again On the 17th of March, using the ONS, well, figures that were given to the UK Health Safety Agency, and they'd been given them in November, before the MHRA had asked for permission to roll out both the vaccines to small children.
	And this gave the numbers needed to vaccinate, and when you worked out it was one in 800 average From Pfizer and Moderna's own trial data, one in 800 would have a serious adverse event.
	When you need to vaccinate 934,000 healthy 40 to 49 year olds to keep one person out of hospital, that's not out of intensive care.
	Yeah.
	Well, not only the numbers, I mean, the explanation for the fact that the NHS is overwhelmed, a lot of it has been the vaccine harms.
	Um, and also the cost.
	I mean, you're talking 30 million pounds to keep one person from going to hospital, presenting with COVID-19 symptoms, not going into intensive care is much more than that.
	Millions.
	Um, and, um, at a cost of what, 1100 people would be in hospital or dead.
	Well, I mean, bonkers, absolutely madness.
	I think I described it in my speech as a state sponsored self-harm.
	So can we, and although the government will say that they discredited all my speeches, they never, they never, they weren't able to, uh, they didn't approve the vaccines for babies down to six months in December.
	They did in Australia, America, Canada, all those countries in Europe.
	And they didn't.
	And after my speech about the number need to vaccinate, and also there was, there was 66% vaccine hesitancy amongst NHS staff.
	Yeah.
	Last autumn.
	Yeah.
	I mean, they know.
	So after that, then mysteriously again, they didn't take any notice of anything I said, but within a week or two, the boosters are only for over 75s and the immunocompromised.
	So I did get the government to move their position.
	And where we are now, I've now got evidence which I put into the government to the Attorney General from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
	Yeah.
	Mysteriously, actually, the same academic that I retweeted that got me kicked out of the Conservative Party for... You are suing Matt Hancock, aren't you?
	Yes, I am, yes.
	Of course we are.
	Disgusting.
	Of course we are, the Hancock creature.
	And what this evidence shows is that Pfizer have misled the country, or the world, that there were two batches of the original vaccine they made, one which they tested on 44,000 people, which got them approval.
	But I mean, if you actually look at that trial data, which they tried to hide for 75 years, I mean, it's shockingly bad, but it's not as bad as the vaccine Yellow card and VAERS reports would say the one they rolled out.
	The reason is that the vaccine that Pfizer actually rolled out was not the same one that they tested on 44,000 people.
	And we know that for sure.
	I was going to ask you.
	How do we know?
	How do we know?
	Well, the evidence is...
	Not only of the academics at the Hebrew University who are not scientists, they're criminologists.
	They went through the papers, they're fraud investigators, and they found there were two batches.
	So basically the one that was for 44,000 people was a handmade specific batch of vaccine.
	It was like a prototype that everyone was working on just to make 44.
	But the commercial batch was actually manufactured in a completely different way, cultured in Escherichia coli, which the first batch wasn't.
	And you can prove that by, you'll remember, when the vaccines were rolled out in the UK, after the first day there was a change of policy and they said everyone's got to stay at the vaccine centre for 15 minutes to test for anaphylaxis.
	Well they weren't suspecting anaphylaxis because All the test data they've been given, that 44,000 batch that was used, trialled on those individuals, that wasn't cultured in Escherichia coli.
	You only get anaphylaxis with endotoxins in the vaccine, and they come from culturing in bacteria.
	So basically, as far as the vaccines are concerned, the Pfizer vaccine, it's a bit like the public was shown a car in a showroom, which they thought was the one they were buying.
	But the one they actually got was out the back and they never saw it.
	It's never been tested on anyone.
	So there could have been no informed consent because everyone was told it's safe.
	It's safe and effective.
	We've trialed it on 44,000 people.
	I mean, those results were shocking.
	I mean, it should never have had approval of that.
	But they gave it approval, but that wasn't what the UK population of the world got.
	Also, the booster was a different vaccine as well, which was untested.
	And we can tell that by the difference in the harms.
	And the extra harms is not because it's cumulative third dose, because even people who just had the booster got different harms too.
	Right.
	And then that's all.
	And they were telling people to mix and match these as well.
	Mix and matching is a brilliant way of making sure you don't know who to sue.
	Yeah.
	And who to blame.
	Now, the MHRA must have known.
	I mean, if I can work it out with my degree from Nottingham University a long time ago, and they can work it out in the Hebrew University who are criminologists.
	The MHRA, they changed the rules after the first day of vaccination because people were suffering anaphylaxis.
	That means that they knew.
	They knew that it had been cultured in E. coli.
	They knew that it was different to the stuff that had been trialed.
	Now, if they didn't tell the minister, and I've presumed that they didn't tell the minister, that's why the ministers went out and said they're safe and effective when they were untested.
	Then the MHRA have committed a criminal offence, which has never been tested in law, but by not telling ministers information they would have known, that is a criminal offence.
	So that's why I sent the papers to the Attorney General.
	The Attorney General has moved them on to the Department of Health for answer.
	And all I want to know, really, in the short term is, were the ministers told?
	That this is not the same vaccine that was trialled, it's a different vaccine manufactured in a completely different way.
	Effectively, it's untested.
	I don't think they can say that they did, because then they couldn't say it was safe and effective because it was an untested vaccine.
	And therefore, as I come back to my point, no one could have given informed consent because they were all misled.
	And I hope they weren't misled by the ministers.
	Would have been better if we'd just been conned and they'd given us water.
	Not us, though.
	I never got vaccinated.
	So that's the latest bombshell.
	And on top of that, when you've got the Swiss data which came out three or four days ago, the test of 777 medical workers post-Moderna boost at 1 in 35 showing signs of myocarditis.
	1 in 35?
	1 in 35.
	One in 35.
	One in 35.
	Jesus Christ.
	Yeah.
	And if you know about it and you don't take rigorous exercise, there's a better chance of recovery.
	This explains why so many athletes are falling over.
	They're taking rigorous exercise all the time.
	You see the push for it to be normalized.
	And they actually looked for it.
	Because a lot of it was asymptomatic, i.e.
	the people who were suffering from these heart problems had no symptoms and didn't realize it.
	But they've got raised Toponin levels, which is a marker and they actually tested and they ran it against 777 medical workers who didn't get the Moderna booster.
	So this is the Moderna booster.
	We know that Pfizer, we know that the Johnson and Johnson vaccine was withdrawn.
	I tried to have an urgent question on that weeks ago when it was in America, they withdrew it and the CDC said all stocks to be destroyed.
	Was the Moderna one withdrawn from Australia?
	No, AstraZeneca.
	It was the AstraZeneca.
	But very, very late.
	Now, the AstraZeneca and the Johnson & Johnson, they were both, they weren't messenger RNA.
	They were DNA in an adenovirus vector.
	Right.
	It's interesting that both of those have been withdrawn for safety concerns.
	Well, a number of people in the UK will have taken the Johnson & Johnson.
	And I thought we should have an urgent question.
	What advice is the government giving to these people?
	I mean, I took two doses almost, which much to my regret, of AstraZeneca, which was so bad that it was withdrawn around the world fairly quickly.
	Although it's interesting, that is still being pumped out under a different name in India, manufactured in India as Covishield.
	So glad I never took any of the vaccines.
	Just so glad.
	Neither did my immediate family.
	I just said no, because I don't trust it.
	Not because I have any knowledge of it, it's just because I'm really sceptical of the government.
	So, can we talk about the excess deaths?
	We can, but we can't talk about it in Parliament.
	I've been asking for a debate on the excess deaths.
	What are the excess deaths at the moment?
	They're running about 8% average.
	That means some weeks they're 22.
	The few weeks that have been less, basically had over 12 months now of excess deaths.
	Normally after a pandemic where the weak and feeble have been called out by a pathogen, sadly, you would expect a period of fewer excess deaths.
	Because obviously you've had excess deaths during the pandemic.
	Those people probably would have lived for another... The vulnerable have passed away early.
	That's not happened.
	What we've actually seen is continued excesses.
	A persistent pattern of about, what, 10%?
	And it's not just here, is it?
	We're seeing it in America.
	In fact, you're seeing it everywhere where there was a major rollout of a certain medical procedure.
	What's the official explanation?
	They're saying it's a mixture of things and it's people not going to hospital.
	And we had the statins, didn't we?
	It wanted to give statins down to 10 year olds.
	I mean, it's interesting that we've got now defibrillators going in every school.
	Did anyone have a heart attack at school while you were there?
	No.
	Not one.
	Not even a teacher?
	Yeah.
	I mean, we're seeing this normalized in the media.
	It's, oh, well, you know, healthy 20-something athletes just die of heart attacks on the field.
	No, they don't.
	That's never happened.
	And news presenters collapse while they're giving broadcasts, whether it's on radio or TV.
	Hopefully not today, though.
	Hopefully not today, but it's being grossly normalized.
	I thought that was appalling, that British Heart Foundation advert with sort of a 13-year-old girl playing football collapsing with a heart attack.
	I mean, maybe it will be the normal in the future.
	Well, of course, and as well, because we've had the pandemic excess deaths, and then we've had another year of excess deaths.
	I mean, 8% isn't the real figure if we compare pre-pandemic, because on a five-year rolling average, we've already got two years of excess deaths, mitigating the excess deaths we've got now, feeding into the numbers.
	So in another three years, we might not have any excess deaths at all, because it'd be completely normalized on the ONS figures.
	But I've put in every week for the last at least six months for a debate on excess deaths.
	And I've put in for an adjournment debate on it, which there are five a week, four or five a week, four a week.
	I've put in for a Westminster Hall debate, which there are plenty.
	I've even put him for a backbench business debate, which is authorised by the Backbench Business Committee.
	Ian Mearns MP, Labour MP, is the chair of that.
	And I went to him and said, look, we've got all these excess deaths that are affecting my constituency, everybody's constituency, every community.
	Why aren't we talking about it?
	And he said to me, I'll get you the signatures.
	But he never did.
	And I went down to the Labour end of the tearoom, and I know there's something wrong with our democracy.
	When I go down to the Labour end of the tearoom and say, come on, guys and girls, let's have a debate.
	You sign here.
	We can have a debate on excess deaths.
	You can stand up in that chamber and say it's them.
	It's those Tories who have ruined the NHS.
	That's why everyone's dying early.
	Yeah.
	Make a political point if you want to, and I can tell the people the truth.
	And when they turn around to me and say, Andrew, we don't want to talk about it.
	You've come to the wrong pub, they said.
	Those are the words.
	We're not talking about it.
	Something seriously has gone wrong in our democracy.
	So we can't have a debate about it.
	But it's true.
	Just a minute.
	Just a thing on the Labour Party.
	That's awful, because that's clearly them essentially electioneering and avoiding a difficult topic.
	Well, they wanted more lockdowns and more mandates and more vaccines.
	But also, I think they're eyeing the next election, the next general, and they're thinking, we're not going to rock the boat.
	We're just going to stay the course because we're on target for a big win.
	We're on target for a big win.
	We'd all like a red box, a car and a chauffeur, and we are willing to let The excess deaths that our constituents who pass away before their time are collateral damage to the political aims of the Labour Party.
	And our Parliament.
	Yeah, all of them.
	All of them.
	It's appalling.
	I'm appalled.
	I'm appalled.
	And of course, because we're not having that debate and we're not getting to... I mean, if it wasn't the vaccine harms, if it wasn't the vaccine that was causing it, something's causing it.
	Yeah.
	And while we don't know what it is, we're not treating it.
	I mean, if, if we have sort of like a 10% excess deaths.
	It's mostly heart attacks.
	A lot of people dropping dead at home.
	It's not people, there is an increase in hospitals, but the biggest increase, I mean, 27, 30% increase is people suddenly dying at home.
	So they didn't even know there was something wrong with them.
	I mean, it's incredible how there's a sort of 10% or whatever excess deaths suddenly happening.
	And that's not of any interest to our government.
	Well, there'll be more excess deaths soon than there were during Covid anyways.
	But no one's interested.
	I mean, we were having, you know, counts every night of the excess deaths, weren't we?
	But we're not having it now.
	They're just normal now.
	So, something is going, it's very strange and we need to get to the bottom of it.
	Once again, our Parliament is not working for the people, but then there's many of those issues and I'm sure we're going to come on to some more of them.
	Yeah, that's nothing terribly new.
	But I suppose we'll leave that there.
	Well, I won't.
	I won't leave it.
	Well, no, you won't.
	For now, we'll leave that.
	We'll leave that topic there.
	Honestly, no, it's just... The implications of this are just so vast.
	And it is interesting.
	I'll just share one more thing with your viewers.
	I am a conservative female.
	I was thrown out of the party for my views on the vaccines.
	Yeah.
	And I sit on my own in parliament now.
	I had to cross the floor.
	I sit on my own in the tea room in the dining room.
	Um, and a, a very soft hearted, fairly newly elected conservative female MP came up to me and she said, I'm really worried about you, Andrew, because you're so isolated.
	You know, you, you're isolated in parliament and in the chamber and you're isolated in the rest.
	I'm really worried about you.
	I said, well, don't be worried because A, the public I'm becoming very aware and I've got a lot of support there, but also there are about 4,000 real people who work in Parliament.
	They're the cooks, the cleaners, the security guards, the clerks, the staffers for other MPs.
	75-80% of those have come up to me and said, keep going, you're the only one batting for us.
	They all know, because even the cleaners in Parliament are politically aware, because it's that sort of place.
	Parliament.
	It's Parliament.
	So, you know, they're interested.
	And they can't say anything politically, because they would actually lose their jobs for doing it.
	But they can quietly come up to me all the time.
	They can meet me on the way into Parliament or off the estate.
	And yeah, I mean, they're all.
	So 80, 75, 80% of the people who really work in Parliament, they all know.
	I've even got staffers of MPs who would stand up in that chamber today and said the lockdowns were essential.
	The vaccines are safe and effective.
	And they've spoken to me and said, when is this cover up going to end?
	Because they're sending the letters out and they object to having to send the letters out because they know it's not true.
	I don't think the government will be able to keep a lid on this for 20 years.
	I hope not.
	I'd like it done in the next 20 minutes if it was my way.
	Which is why I'm banned from the mainstream media because we have all the evidence.
	It's overwhelming.
	Speaking of other things that are not true.
	Let's have a conversation about Labour's wrangling with the concept of woman, shall we?
	You said you were interested in this.
	You're actually interested in the TERF question.
	Well, I've been aware of what's going on.
	I'm aware of what's being taught to our children.
	I bought in a 10-minute rule motion a few weeks ago, a month ago probably, much to the government's chagrin.
	I snuck in there to the To the office and was there at nine o'clock and got the slot in 14 days later, which basically this 10 minute rule motion just shared out between the government and opposition parties, whips offices of who's going to have that 10 minute slot to try and present a bill.
	So I had to sneak in there and get a slot.
	The CLOCKS office were very helpful and very supportive.
	So I propose to bring in the Child Protection and Parental Rights Bill.
	A bill which would have outlawed social transitioning in schools.
	Um, and would have also reiterated the rights of parents to know what their children are being taught in RSC and PHSC education, which is not, is, is, is pretty shocking.
	So, you know, I know now that we, what that the five-year-olds are being shown pictures or drawings of male and female genitalia, including an erect penis with a scrotum and have to identify them.
	That's what five-year-olds are being taught in our schools today.
	Right.
	I know that nine-year-olds are being taught about masturbation.
	Yeah.
	And 11 and 12-year-olds are being taught of the joys of anal and oral sex.
	I don't think these are... I've been sent, and the transsexual gender fluidity stuff, I've been sent from a 10-year-old
	At the mother of a 10 year old photocopied or took a photo and sent me, which is on my Twitter, his homework, which was absolutely, it's neither appropriate nor necessary for a 10 year old to know that, you know, what's the sexuality of Jack who had a boyfriend, had a girlfriend, but then also had a boyfriend and all this, but what to gender them all.
	Well, this, this, this sort of thing happens.
	It's actually gender ideology.
	That men can be women and women can be men is an ideology.
	And it's now become, they're indoctrinating children in something that's not scientific.
	That is actually illegal under the 1993 Education Act because political indoctrination is illegal.
	You're not allowed to do that.
	I think schools are breaking the law and I will say that the From the Reclaim Party, we also paired up with, linked very closely to the Bad Law Project.
	We are taking the Department of Education to court for not protecting children, safeguarding them from the gender ideology and also the sex education.
	I mean, one of the best ways of spotting that That young children have been sexually abused is that they have inappropriate knowledge for their age.
	Yes.
	All children are having inappropriate knowledge for their age.
	Yes.
	This is something that happened with my oldest daughter when she was 11.
	She came home from school one day and said, I'm gay.
	I was like, what?
	No, you're not.
	She said, yeah, I'm going to have a girlfriend.
	Okay, I didn't push it because I didn't want her thinking this was something she could be rebellious on, but she's 13 now and now she's got a boyfriend.
	It just drops away as soon as the indoctrination stops, right?
	Yeah.
	Well, we've got a situation now where in some schools, one in 15 children think that they're in the wrong bodies.
	Yeah.
	It's mad.
	Well, it's got a social contagion.
	Yeah.
	But it's not just social contagion.
	It's also being privileged.
	It's being treated as if it's something novel and interesting.
	You get special attention.
	Special attention.
	All your problems will go away.
	And not just that, like you'll be given priority.
	And sex education at the appropriate time with the appropriate materials should be a bridge between parents and the school and now it's a barrier.
	Because lots of schools were especially unwilling to show the parents what they're actually showing the children.
	Well, obviously.
	Parents have a right to that information.
	In fact, in my bill, which was voted down by Parliament, Labour and 10 Conservative MPs voted it down, so I didn't get a chance to bring my bill forward.
	That was absolutely unbelievable.
	If anyone's trying to... It was called despicable.
	I was called despicable by...
	A Labour MP who opposed the bill.
	Well, if you're not being called despicable by a Labour MP, I think you're doing something wrong.
	You know, I know what makes them cheer.
	But it's also interesting now that it raised such the profile that you've got people like the blunt instrument that is Lee Anderson, the Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party, writing in the Express only a couple of days ago, a month after I bought my bill in, which They could have easily got through.
	I've told Rishi he's got to drop all this trans stuff in schools.
	Oh he does?
	Of course he has.
	I pointed out in the question to the Leader of the House a couple of weeks ago that it was interesting that we're pushing all this Ideology in schools, which is indoctrination, it's illegal at the same time as very senior politicians in this house appear unable to define what a woman is.
	Well, let's let's talk about defining what a woman is.
	But before we go on, go over, register on Let's Seize.com, sign up and watch a very difficult conversation about sexuality and gender that I had with Philip Tanzer.
	A men's rights advocate who has spent a long time thinking about this.
	He is an ex-gay porn star who has come out of that lifestyle with a great deal of experience and knowledge that someone who... I'm very normal, so I've never been in any of these sort of spaces, and so he has a lot of... Not yet, you haven't.
	Not yet.
	He has a lot of first-hand knowledge that actually I didn't consider.
	The question of gender roles is actually one between men and women and therefore gay men and lesbian women actually don't engage in gender roles in the same way as straight couples do and so that changes a lot of the perception and underlying dynamic of how they express gender and so it this is his argument why LGBT
	actually is correct rather than lgb and t as a separate thing it's actually there's an anomaly in the understanding of gender that each of these categories have it's a very interesting conversation but they are a minority of about two percent of the population they are we'll we'll how how could how could the view of the of a minority absolutely inflicted upon the majority yeah well we'll go into this so uh annalise dodds uh the that was a shadow health secretary is she
	I wrote an article recently in the Guardian saying that the Labour Party is going to try and thread a very fine needle on this subject, which I think is very interesting because, I mean, she says that she's very proud that the Labour Party created the Gender Recognition Act and the Equality Act that enabled trans people to legally change their gender and protected them from discrimination.
	But she wants to be able to commit to protecting women as well.
	So of course we saw this with Nicola Sturgeon.
	It's the hierarchy of victimhood and when they come into conflict with each other, Labour go into a spin because everyone's a victim and who's a bigger victim.
	But also there's an intransigent conflict here, as Nicola Sturgeon found out.
	It's if a person can identify as a woman, then a rapist can identify as a female and get put into a women's prison.
	Uh, which is something that she had to deal with and was very damaging to her.
	We'll have to build women's prisons, but not for women.
	Well, that's the, that's exactly.
	Only for people who are declaring as women.
	That is exactly the, the, um, petard that Sturgeon got hoisted on, in fact.
	Uh, so they are, they are women sometimes, but not women other times.
	Uh, it's basically what it came down to.
	Yes.
	Yes.
	I mean, can you be raped by a woman?
	Can a woman be raped?
	Legally, no.
	Legally, it requires... Yes, an appendage.
	Yeah, and so legally, a woman can't rape a woman, and therefore, what are all these... What would you be charged with?
	What are these women rapists doing in prison?
	Exactly.
	It's a bit of a minefield, isn't it?
	It's a complete minefield, but she's determined to thread this, right?
	So, she is insistent that the Scottish Government has gone too far in just having self-ID, but On the other side, they want a medical diagnosis.
	So if a person has been medically diagnosed as having gender dysphoria, which is no longer a psychiatric disorder, apparently.
	And that's where you get the problem of the girl who's identified as a cat.
	Kind of, yeah.
	Because really, she needs to have some help.
	But then if they've referred her for help and she couldn't be a cat, then where does that end for them?
	And why can she not be a cat?
	I mean, I know why I think so, but from that point of view, why do they be rather messy with the toilet facilities?
	Wouldn't it in the cat litter?
	So the, the point is Ali's dogs here is trying to thread this very fine needle where we end up protecting women's only spaces.
	So no males and female spaces, but also we want to.
	Uh, include how do you do that when you don't know what a female, well, exactly.
	She, she doesn't say actually, she doesn't have an answer, but that's what she's trying to do.
	And so the question goes on to what is a woman?
	How do you identify who is appropriate to be in a female-only space?
	And of course, Keir Starmer famously said that 0.1% of women have got a penis.
	Bonkers.
	Yeah, it's mad.
	It's absolutely mad.
	And that would be the one that happens to be with your female children in the changing room.
	Yes.
	Rishi Sunak had a solid answer on this.
	He said that women as an adult and female.
	And then Keir Starmer started hanging out with Tony Blair.
	Right on the heels of that, Keir Starmer was like, actually, a woman is an adult human female.
	Well, Captain High Insight.
	Yes.
	But this is very obviously Tony Blair sat him down and gone, Keir, this is... Promoted to Major U-Turn.
	Yes, you have declared that the women with penis constituency is 0.1% of the population and not the voter base.
	We worked out that was bigger than the capacity, that 0.1% of the female UK population was bigger than the crowd capacity at the football stadium in Leicester.
	And there'd be a few queuing up outside.
	I imagine that it is.
	That's a lot.
	Yeah, that is a lot, but it's obviously not the case.
	Um, but, uh, but anyway, yeah.
	So Keir Starmer is going to be, uh, walking back the, uh, self-identification, um, option, which again, Annalise Dodds has agreed with, uh, that it has to be a medical diagnosis that upholds the legitimacy of applications and confidence in the system.
	Uh, he was on Radio 5 about a week ago and he was just like, well, a woman's an adult human female.
	Let's clear that one up.
	And it's like, oh, thank God.
	With, with, with two X chromosomes.
	With 2X chromosomes, we have arrived at the position of reality where a woman is a female, human, and she's an adult.
	Finally.
	That's a shame because when he hadn't done that, he just couldn't relate to over 51% of the electorate.
	And he's, as he says, with decided that self-identification is not the right way forward, so essentially he's had to choose a side.
	This is because of the increased awareness that we've raised in Parliament and he's been forced to... he's chasing votes.
	It's not what he really believes, is it?
	Well, honestly, I don't know what he really believes.
	That's the thing.
	I mean, I know that on the left, they want to expand the definition of woman to include males who identify as women.
	And so that's the constituency they're trying to serve, activists, radical left activists.
	You do realize all this trans stuff is pretty anti-gay lesbian because there wouldn't be any gay or lesbian people because they'll all have to transition, won't they?
	That is another issue that's happening, yes.
	I mean, tomboys are being called men.
	Yeah, we're always going to have You know, effeminate men, there will be effeminate men out there and there will be masculine women, but that's always we've always had them.
	But then now they'll all be transitioned.
	Well, that is that ultimately there won't be any gay people or lesbians because they'll they'll have transitioned and they'll.
	It does raise the question, what happens to gay men if they become women and still engage in relations with men?
	Then they're not gay anymore.
	So you are right.
	This is an attack on identity, should we say.
	But the point being, he's trying to serve a constituency of very radical left-wing activists.
	And he's also trying to maintain a constituency of people who are relatively normal when it comes to gender relations.
	Of course, this can't be done.
	And so Kirstein has finally fallen on one side, which is the side of normalcy.
	Which is women are out in the females.
	Now you can imagine this was received fairly poorly by the radical left wing brigade flying their little flag to say we're crazy.
	He's ruled out this and this is just something that very I do love.
	I do love the hypocrisy of the left.
	I mean, at least it's one of their only consistencies.
	It didn't have double standards.
	Wouldn't be the left.
	Yeah, it wouldn't have any at all.
	But this this was this is just the general.
	result, the response from average radical left-wing activists, which is, I will never vote for Labour.
	In fact, if we go back to the previous one, if we scroll down, can I scroll down?
	Can we go down to the next tweet under there, John, just so people can see it, right?
	They say, if you're opposed to such policies and don't vote Labour, vote Green.
	If you think that men can become women, vote Green.
	That's very sensible.
	Well, my old Conservative Association tweeted out after I was kicked out of the party that there were 76 genders.
	So, I mean, the Conservatives... Oh, brilliant!
	I mean, I just... Average Conservative opinion!
	I mean, I just... God!
	Absolutely.
	I'll be... I have got a copy of that one, don't worry, for a very good reason.
	And of course, all this is happening in our schools on the Conservatives Watch.
	And I've asked parliamentary questions, I've asked questions to the Prime Minister about all of this.
	I have got a question on the 6th of September when we come back, which might be quite interesting.
	I won't want to give away what it is.
	Okay, I'll keep an eye out.
	And of course, Rishi Sunak can say we're having a review, and we're doing this, and the Leader of the House can say we're having a review.
	Well, I mean, he's the Prime Minister.
	He can stop it in the afternoon if he wants to.
	Just stop it.
	Just stop it.
	Legislate.
	It's all gone.
	There's no need to legislate.
	There was nothing in the bill that I actually brought forward, the motion, that isn't actually the law.
	All I wanted was the law enforced.
	Right, right.
	It is wrong to indoctrinate children in school.
	It is against the Education Act and parents have a right to know what their children are being taught.
	We know it's a political ideology because it has a political flag.
	It literally has a flag.
	We know that this is political.
	It couldn't be any more explicit.
	When you knock away from a child, that sense of Male and female, boys and girls.
	It's one of the basics or tenets of the stability of life.
	I've only met you a few times, but I'm pretty sure that you're male.
	If I find you're identifying as a female, you're knocking away at the Jenga blocks that hold up my view of the world.
	And children's, that's all pretty fragile.
	I think I said in my speech on that bill that You know, the Jenga Tower, you keep pulling away at the foundations of the Jenga Tower, it's going to fall.
	Yes.
	But that's the point.
	The point of all of this is to ensure that they can't get a firm and objective grip on reality.
	That's the reason that they do it, because then you can get them to say and believe anything.
	This is what they're aiming for.
	They want a world where anyone can just say that they are anything and have everyone around them accept that thing.
	We've lost the science on whether it's vaccines, climate change, gender.
	It's about the narrative now and it's not about the science.
	How do people feel?
	Yeah, it literally comes down to that.
	An objective reality stands in the way of these feelings and science.
	There's a measurement of objective reality, so it's got to change.
	But anyway, so this seems to be a relatively sensible maneuver because, as you can see, of the most gay countries in the world, we're the least gay of the most gay.
	The Netherlands at 6%, LGBT, US at 4.5, Germany at 3.9, UK at 2.2%.
	I did see some stats that said the UK population had the biggest pushback against the transition.
	Yes, we're actually winning the argument here, which is nice.
	Well, it's disappointing that we have to have the argument.
	Yes.
	Especially when we've got a conservative government.
	Why are we having the argument?
	It should have just been no on day one.
	And that's the end of that.
	But this is a minor victory in the Battle of Turf Island.
	So the war goes on.
	The war will go on.
	But at least on this front, we've held the line.
	For the children.
	Yes.
	Thank God.
	You wouldn't believe it, though, if you looked at Merseyside Police.
	Well, of course, one of the reclaimed policies is that we would depoliticise all public services.
	Oh, yeah.
	And it needs to happen.
	No pride months.
	The only flag on a public building would be the union flag.
	Which, I mean, maybe a regional flag like an English or Welsh flag or Scottish flag.
	You know, I would accept that.
	This?
	No.
	Just disgusting.
	I hate it.
	Anyway, we'll leave that there.
	Let's go on to talk about climate change and the BBC.
	So, have you been following the trend recently?
	Yes.
	Of people noticing... I've been getting a bit hot under the collar about it, actually.
	Overheated about it.
	People have been noticing that the weather maps that they're being presented with are slightly apocalyptic, actually.
	And the BBC actually got wind of this because enough people were complaining on social media like, hang on, we're actually not all dying in an inferno.
	I've had people texting me from Cornwall saying, I don't know what's going on in London, but it's so cold down here in July, we've had to put the heating on.
	Can we have some heat, please?
	I mean, I hear there's been a heatwave in the Mediterranean, which, good for them, because we haven't been getting that.
	It's just that everyone wants to go on holiday there.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Yeah.
	Summer is exactly crazy.
	This is why people go on holiday to the Mediterranean, because it becomes nice and sunny.
	It's not going to rain, probably.
	Yes.
	And I mean, it would have been it would have been less impactful had the weather in the UK not been so bad.
	I think, you know, been less of a contrast.
	And these wildfires, it's just Well, I'll talk about all of that in a minute, in fact.
	But before we begin, go over and read this latest article by Simon Webb, one of our favorite historians, who's just talking about how climate change has become a religion for young atheists.
	Because it's not the entire religion itself, but there's always an apocalyptic element to the religions.
	There comes an end of days, Where the sin of mankind should be washed away by a wrathful God.
	And that's what climate change actually is.
	It's a secular version of this.
	Oh, and I'm not saying that, uh, you know, it's not manmade or anything like that.
	I don't know.
	I'm not, I'm no expert on climate change, but the narrative as well, man has done this.
	I could believe some of it, but I mean, the IPCC is only allowed to look at the anthropogenic part though.
	And that might be five, 10% of the, of the warming might be down.
	I would, I would be shocked if it was only one thing that was causing.
	Somebody tweeted out to me or text me the other way.
	It's amazing.
	You know, as humans, we can, we can't find a solution to the homeless, but we can raise the temperature of the world.
	And if we can't even, if we can't even figure out what gender belongs in which bathroom, how are we going to save the planet?
	Like anyway, so as we were saying, the weather for the past month or so, uh, has been terrible.
	This is just recent weather in Britain for the past few days.
	But if you go back literally for the last month, it's been nonstop rain.
	It's been awful.
	Uh, as you see, like highs of 15 lows of 14, there was one day with a high of 21.
	21 degrees.
	Sweltering.
	I know, boiling.
	Loads of 13, loads of 12, loads of 11 there.
	It was really cold at some night.
	It's literally November weather we've been getting in the middle of July, which has been really peculiar.
	And so people noticed that this didn't really correlate with the BBC maps.
	Sorry, what?
	Orange?
	Like deeper orange?
	Like, sorry, how is that at 10 or 11 degrees?
	Fiery orange when we've had such terrible weather, right?
	Another person pointed out, look, they've got that yellow is 18 degrees in Ireland.
	Is it yellow?
	That's like nearly white hot, isn't it?
	You know, that's the No wonder people like looking at this going, hang on a second, I don't really, uh, I don't really believe this.
	Right.
	And so I just looked at like the hottest and the lowest months.
	So the, Oh, sorry.
	We're being told that July was the hottest month ever.
	Ever.
	And maybe around the world, maybe on the equator.
	I don't know.
	That's not really very relevant to us living in the Northern Hemisphere, where it's definitely not been the hottest.
	Uh, we're not feeling in England basically.
	And of course, uh, Antonio Gutierrez of the, uh, the United Nations secretary general was hiding.
	Global boiling.
	It's global boiling, you see.
	Climate change is here.
	He flew there in his private jet.
	He did.
	Yeah, of course he did.
	But he says, climate change is here.
	It is terrifying.
	It is just the beginning.
	It is still possible to limit global temperature rise to 1.5 C above pre-industrial levels and avoid the very worst of climate change, but only with dramatic immediate climate action.
	But of course, it's because he works for the UN.
	He doesn't pay tax.
	He's also got diplomatic immunity.
	So even if he told Outright stinking fibs.
	You couldn't prosecute him for anything.
	Say what he wants.
	And it's weird how the... Unaccountable.
	It's weird how the demand is always give us more political power, give us more political power, give us more political power.
	And I'm very reluctant to do that, even if that means we're going to have to install air conditioning, which seems to be the threat that we're living under.
	As far as I can tell, that's what's going to happen.
	But anyway, so the BBC.
	Got a wind of people saying, hang on a second, your maps seem ridiculous.
	And so they gave us this chart.
	That's a weird chart because if you look at that, now the question of color is something that's unique to each individual.
	Where do you perceive one color becomes another, but I can't help but notice that three to four degrees Celsius is green.
	And 7 to 8 is grass green.
	9 to 10 is a very light green.
	And then 10 to 11 is yellow.
	10 to 11 degrees Celsius.
	Really, that's yellow, is it?
	Yeah.
	That's not a comfortable temperature.
	I put my coat on.
	You would think... As the naked apes we are, I mean, even at these temperatures, without clothes and heating in the winter, we couldn't survive at these temperatures.
	No, absolutely not.
	We would have to live at the equator.
	Yes, we would.
	But this thing, why put the sort of grass green, the sort of color that makes you think of comfort, makes you think of decency and security and all these nice things that we always, you know, green is the color of goodness to humans.
	Why put that at seven to eight degrees Celsius?
	Anything above that and we're in the danger zone.
	That's what literally 11 to 12.
	It's yellow.
	That's a warning color.
	Yeah.
	15, 16, 21 to 24.
	We're getting into the red.
	It's in the red.
	We're in the red.
	A nice summer's day.
	Peaking out for about an hour and a half, if you're lucky.
	We always said about the weather in the UK, if you don't like it, Wait 20 minutes.
	Exactly.
	But there's the thing, 30 to 35, so now you've gone on holiday to the Mediterranean, you're on your summer holiday, blood red.
	In fairway red.
	Looking forward to an opportunity to get some sun cream out, get some vitamin D. The unbelievable drama of this colour scale is just absurd.
	This is just ridiculous.
	But they say, oh, well, we haven't like changed this for greater impact.
	It's been this way since 2017.
	Is that right?
	So what you're saying is in 2017, you changed it for greater impact?
	Yes.
	Like that's fine.
	But look at this, like three to four is still in green.
	One to two is the very lightest of blue and nought to two is like finally a blue color.
	It's like, sorry, it's not cold, like which, you know, you would think a solid blue colour would represent a cold.
	0 to minus 2.
	Yeah, 0 to minus 2 is where they first start going, yeah, well that's cold.
	And of course the number of deaths due to cold in our country are something like 20 times the number from heat.
	Oh yeah, and this is something... So if it were warmer, which I think there's some debate whether Fewer people would die of the cold, yes.
	And also, if you look back through our history, I mean, the Romano warm period when they were growing grapes at Hadrian's Wall and making wine was a height of civilization.
	And then you have this sort of mini ice age in which the Thames froze over.
	And this carbon dioxide business, you know, what percentage of the atmosphere is actually carbon dioxide?
	Something like 16% or something like that?
	I don't know.
	No, it's 325 parts per million.
	It's 0.032 of 1%.
	Right.
	And they're saying if it got to 0.04, it's all over.
	Oh, really?
	Well, yeah, but the optimum plant growth is around about 600.
	Oh, is it?
	We could have 30%.
	Well, they let people with commercial greenhouses pump extra CO2 in to increase crop production by 30%.
	And it also reduces pathogens.
	You're far better informed on this.
	So you get 30% extra yield and they let them pump extra calmed oxide into the greenhouses somewhere between 600 parts per million, so 0.06% to See, I have no idea about any of this.
	You said 16%.
	I mean, you just got that wrong by a factor of... But this is... I'm totally uneducated on this.
	What I am good at... It's like 54 times wrong.
	That's fine.
	But that's for the message you've been given, is it?
	Well, we've got loads of this clammed up site.
	No, no, no.
	I literally have no idea.
	You realise that below 150 parts per million, all plants die and the planet's finished.
	I have no idea.
	I'm the first to say I'm the least educated person in the world on this subject.
	But I mean, CO2 is so important.
	I don't know.
	I'm sure it is.
	We're looking at spending somewhere between, low estimate, a trillion pounds to hit net zero.
	It'll be over four trillion.
	Yeah.
	Four thousand billion pounds, which we don't have.
	Yeah.
	So you do something where the UK is less than 1% of the world emissions at the same time as China can double its emissions.
	So all these wind turbines, the solar panels and the electric cars that are coming over here to save the planet are all being manufactured in China using fossil fuels.
	They can't be recycled either, can they?
	No.
	And they blow up.
	Anyway, so the thing I'm good at is just debunking BBC propaganda.
	And I think that this obviously seems like propaganda to me because, I mean, what they're saying is that the average winter temperature is, if you look at it, one to two, which is the average winter temperature in the UK, which I confirmed, um, is, uh, it's the very end of the green spectrum.
	It's kind of a turquoise green.
	And I just find that really weird.
	Why would you put the average winter temperature as The sort of color that is not objectionable, right?
	I mean, that to me, this is baffling because I mean, like the average temperature that you're supposed to have indoors for say, an elderly person is like 20 degrees.
	To make sure that they don't get ill and don't have various problems.
	So why would that not be the baseline you would start for the green color and then go out from the purported comfortable temperature for a human being?
	I think it's fair to say it's all propaganda, isn't it?
	Yes, but that's exactly... And we're terrifying the people who've bought into all this.
	They're being pumped full of it in schools as well, along with the transitioning and the sex education.
	Yep, it's got to stop.
	Yeah, it does.
	I'm actually in contact with some very senior climatologists and interestingly they tell me that they've got sensors all over the world that are feeding back temperature all the time.
	They used to get paid for this data.
	And they won't get paid for that data anymore because unfortunately the data doesn't fit the narrative.
	Oh, right.
	And now can only get paid for models.
	And they've got to be models that fit the narrative.
	Let's, let's go on to that actually.
	Right.
	So, uh, they've been saying, well, we've got record temperatures verified.
	Uh, this was in 20, when was this?
	I do have a rundown.
	Nevermind, we'll skip that.
	Right, so recently they've been complaining, well hang on a second, there are wildfires in the Mediterranean.
	Isn't this proof of global boiling?
	Uh, not really.
	It always happens.
	Yeah, well that's exactly the point, yeah.
	Um, if I can get the Greece one, I mean this happens literally like every year.
	It's also, it's also the part of the regeneration of the deportation.
	It's totally normal.
	It happens all the time.
	Well, my, my parents lived in Menorca in Spain for 30 years.
	I mean, they used to have regularly have, um, wildfires on the island.
	It's not particularly warm.
	And that's when they're not being started by people.
	Who deliberately starved them.
	As the Climate Change Minister for Greece says, 667 fires had erupted and the vast majority, quote, were caused by human hands.
	They were either arsons by criminal negligence or by intention.
	Hmm.
	And in fact, the Wall Street Journal published an article about this saying, actually, this hasn't been the case.
	The percentage of the globe that has been set on fire each year has actually been declining since 2001.
	Not according to the BBC.
	Well, yes.
	Where's the BBC Verify unit when you really need it?
	They're lying about me.
	I know.
	It's weird.
	Too busy making things up.
	Yeah, I've never been to Totnes twice.
	I've been once.
	I don't know why the BBC said I went twice.
	Have they apologised?
	Not yet, no.
	I had to apologize to Farage.
	I know.
	Where was the BBC Verify unit over all that as well?
	Great question.
	It's almost like it's a political propaganda.
	But just a quick thing here.
	They point out that the data is unequivocal.
	Since the early 2000s, when 3% of the world's land caught fire, the area burned annually has trended downwards.
	In 2022, it's trended down to a new low of 2.2% of burned And that goes along with all the figures for extreme weather.
	Tornadoes, hurricanes, massive storms, big winds.
	All that happens is that there's less happening than there were 30, 40, 50 years ago, but they're more reported on the television.
	It's all in the messaging and the marketing.
	That's exactly what they're saying.
	Instead, the media acts as if the world is ablaze.
	Completely true.
	I mean, there have always been wildfires.
	There are fewer wildfires now.
	The biggest power the BBC and the mainstream media have actually is deciding what's the news.
	And they decided that this is the news, so therefore it's exceptional.
	And the biggest power is the power of omission.
	And whatever I send them as the news, like the fact that we've made some discoveries about some medical treatments, they don't want to know about it.
	But yeah, so I thought we'd, uh, we'd do a quick summary of this.
	Basically.
	Uh, everyone at least is aware.
	Did you, but didn't believe any of that stuff, but they put on the, people are canceling their summer holidays because it's too hot.
	Oh yeah.
	I mean, that did make me chuckle.
	Come on.
	That's why people go higher point.
	I want to say they had more bookings.
	Those last few seats went with it.
	Oh, it's really hot out there.
	Oh, that's it.
	I've got to go.
	But you can feel the kind of desperation on this propaganda, right?
	It's like, oh no, the weather's nice in the Mediterranean.
	Are you sure you want to go?
	Yeah.
	It's definitely not going to rain all week.
	You're going to get clear skies!
	Picnic on the beach every day, not worry about it.
	But just going back to the thing, where's the mapping?
	These maps, I like people are totally, totally on point by pointing out that this is just awful because I mean, like you can see like Switzerland there in the Alps where it's where it's the sort of greenish color.
	OK, well, that's it's 10 degrees in the still snow.
	Yeah, exactly.
	That's it's going to be relatively chilly for summer.
	This is such an obvious attempt to make people afraid of the outdoors.
	I hate it.
	I really hate this sort of stuff.
	It's just so dishonest and everyone can see it.
	Everyone can see it.
	Well, good.
	I hope everyone can see it.
	Well, they can.
	To be honest, I don't watch the BBC from one month to another.
	No, I don't.
	But I follow their BBC weather on Twitter.
	It's been coming up in my feed and I'm just looking at all of the responses underneath it.
	I have tweeted a bit of this and we did a comparison of 2017.
	It was a German map from 2017 and now.
	The temperatures are hotter, but it's just the matter of the terrain was green.
	Yeah.
	It's all green.
	Yeah.
	Um, but yeah, no, that's, I'm glad, honestly, I'm really glad that there are so many people in the public who are just not taking this, you know, cause this and the BBC, they put this article out say, well, um, this is how we do it.
	And that's just normal.
	And wherever, since 2017, when we decided to adopt this new system, Yeah.
	These, these, cause I mean, you can see like they, they, they know, they know that people are like, hang on a second.
	This is not representative.
	I mean, look at that one in 2023 where it's, you know, 2021 and it's yellow and orange.
	They are unappealing colors.
	It looks like you couldn't live there.
	Yeah, exactly.
	It looks like on your habitable.
	Whereas in fact, everyone was having a nice sunny afternoon.
	Yeah.
	And they're doing it on purpose.
	Barbecues.
	Yeah, exactly.
	This continual push to make you afraid.
	I mean, Gutierrez literally said, you know, we should be afraid.
	But they want people to give up all hope.
	And unfortunately, and I've tested this out with psychologists.
	Younger people have got less resistance to this level of propaganda.
	They're more prone to it because they don't have the life experience to realize.
	They don't have a point of reference.
	And also that everything in the newspapers and on the television, all the government says, isn't necessarily the truth.
	And in fact, they've got a vested interest in that.
	We've got to a situation now where one in three of our under 25s thinks that it's not worth getting married and having children because the whole world's going to burn up in 10 years.
	Well, I don't think it is.
	Well, it might be a nuclear war if we don't stop Mr. Biden and Mr. Sunak, but I can guarantee it won't be because of global warming.
	Yes, I am very skeptical that a 1.5 degrees C increase in temperature worldwide is going to destroy anything.
	And also, as we point out, a bit more carbon dioxide would increase food production, which is always helpful.
	Well, you would think so.
	But if you were, say, the Dutch government, Well you've actually got a re-greening of the planet, you'll understand.
	So this very small amount of carbon dioxide, 325 parts per million in the atmosphere, 0.032 of a percent of the atmosphere.
	To make plants grow you need water, You have transpiration through the roots and the stomata underneath the leaves open to let the carbon dioxide in.
	They need that in there with the water to make the sugars and obviously the more carbon dioxide about the less open the stomata need to be.
	Therefore you lose less water because the top of the leaves are generally waxed aren't they?
	I have no idea.
	I'll take your word for it.
	You lose most of the water out of the stomata and they're open to let the carbon dioxide in.
	Well, if you don't have to open the stomata underneath the leaves as much to get the carbon dioxide, because there's more carbon dioxide, you lose less water.
	That then means that parts of the ground around the Sahara Desert, which don't get enough rainfall normally for plants, suddenly plants don't need as much rainfall because they don't have to open the stomata so much.
	So what you're actually seeing is the re-greening.
	There's more greening around the planet.
	Hmm.
	Because of the extra CO2, because suddenly areas with lower water now can sustain plant life.
	Hmm.
	I had no idea about any of that.
	That's all science.
	That's 100% correct.
	So if with higher, with higher, uh, CO2 levels, we'll have more areas of the planet that currently haven't got plant life.
	We'll have plant life and be able to support it on lower rainfall.
	There's a NASA study that John's got up, which reinforces exactly what you're saying.
	Carbon dioxide fertilization greening the Earth, says one study.
	Can we just get that map up, John?
	Yeah, so there we go.
	We're greener than we've ever been.
	Yeah.
	I'm all for that.
	Oh, I am too.
	And I'm all for going on holiday to nice sunny places because I live in England.
	Um, right.
	Okay.
	Well, um, we'll leave that there then and go to some comments.
	Uh, George says the best politician in Britain is back on the show.
	Oh, you've got some fans.
	Well, I'm the only politician on the show today anyway.
	Well, that's true.
	Uh, but you are also the best politician in Britain because you are the only one bringing this stuff up.
	Yeah, I'm going against the narrative, yes, with all the personal risks for you that entails, as they say.
	But I stand with the truth and I think the people are waking up very quickly now.
	Oh yeah, and I think that really There is a larger constituency of people who are switching on to this than I think the mainstream is happy to admit.
	And other things, the low-traffic neighborhoods, 15-minute cities being pushed through, no one's voted for it, those people are coming on board as well.
	Yeah.
	I mean, the more intrusive it becomes in people's daily lives, the more reason they've got to actually look into this and say, hang on a second, what's happening here?
	Why am I being told I can't drive my car to town and how that's going to save the planet?
	It's not going to save the planet.
	And all the studies show that it creates more pollution because people have to travel further to get out of wherever they're living.
	So it makes their journeys longer.
	So it's nothing to do with, with, with, with pollution and the environment.
	No, it's about control.
	It's about control.
	Well, I mean, it really was about having all the facilities you need to live your life.
	The shops.
	The 15 minute city.
	15 minute cities.
	Surely what they do first is put the amenities in.
	Yes.
	Not the cameras and the bollards.
	Yes.
	That's exactly right.
	Now we've got them.
	You see, now we've got them.
	That's exactly the point.
	Well, okay.
	If they've just been put in, they just had an announcement.
	A friend of mine lives in Exeter.
	Yeah.
	Just announced they're doing it there.
	Uh, and they're going in at the end of, they just told them that they're going in at the end of August.
	And I just tweeted this morning, the queue of people that went to the council to complain about, cause they have no consultation.
	They've been told they'll bring it in.
	Now they're being told, but it's only a pilot for 18 months or what?
	And they're going to take the cameras out after they've spent all this money.
	Cause they're not going to.
	They're lying to you.
	They're lying to you.
	But, and this is the thing is that I can tell, I can always tell because if, if it really was.
	We just want everyone to have all the amenities they need within 15 minutes.
	Then you would just install the amenities.
	You would.
	And also, I tweeted out this morning.
	I got sent something last night.
	It was fascinating.
	I see the Uxbridge and South Rye slip by-election.
	People, voter conservatives, thought that they were going to stop you, Les.
	Yeah.
	No.
	Well, if you have a look at my Twitter.
	I saw your tweet about it, Shaps.
	Shaps in 2020 told Told Kant to do it.
	Extend the U-Less.
	So it's a total theatre, isn't it?
	It's a pantomime.
	The Union Party.
	They agree on all the big things.
	The Labour and the Conservatives.
	The SNP and the Liberal Democrats.
	Net zero.
	The vaccines.
	The lockdowns.
	They agree on pretty much all of it.
	And again, if it was just... I know we have a saying in Parliament, which I heard like 14 years ago when I arrived, and it's never been proven wrong.
	Whenever all the major parties agree on anything, it's always bad for the people.
	Oh yes.
	Oh yes!
	It's always bad!
	But there's no reason to use the stick.
	HS2.
	That was one of the older ones.
	Yeah, but they could get any result they wanted by just using the carrot, you know, their nudge theory.
	It's just like, look, if you just incentivize people to have this thing, then you will get that thing eventually, just over a process of time.
	Okay, the shops are 15 minutes away.
	It's a lot more convenient.
	It'll just happen.
	You don't have to be a tyrant.
	You know, you can get the result you're looking for by just offering people a good thing.
	But of course, if we end up with central bank digital currencies, they're programmable.
	What happens when you can't work 15 minutes?
	Exactly.
	This is what people have been... Yeah, and Rishi Senna is on top of this as well, isn't he?
	The central bank digital currency.
	He's sitting on top of the digital ID, because it'll be his father-in-law that makes all the money.
	Yeah.
	Infosys.
	Yeah.
	That's just never be allowed.
	And they will literally have money that doesn't function in different regions because they will be able to do that.
	And it won't be able to buy certain things if they decide you can't buy petrol.
	You can't have a car.
	And do we think that they won't tie this to the NHS, say?
	Oh, you're eating that fatty food.
	You're not up to date with all your mRNA vaccines.
	with all your mRNA vaccines.
	Therefore, you only get 75% of your allotment.
	Yeah.
	Well, you can't buy chocolate because you haven't done enough running today I don't know.
	Who knows where this goes?
	It's a terrible, terrible future we're looking at.
	Well, I think most of the politicians will be running for the hills when this all comes out, to be honest.
	I hope so.
	They'll be excused from any of this nonsense, won't they?
	Anyway, let's let's go on some more comments.
	The Real Bigfoot, I am skeptical of that name, says, as a father and a nurse, I'd like to thank Andrew for his doggedness and determination against the government overreach in the last few years.
	Patients deserve choice.
	The attitudes towards the NHS nurses regarding the vaccine has left me greatly jaded towards the NHS.
	I guess he's one of the 66 percent of NHS... I have had a lot, a lot of, over the last nine, ten months, I've had a lot of emails from NHS staff which Joshua asks, can you talk more about the Johnson & Johnson vaccine?
	It was a thing that disappeared and I've heard nothing about it.
	That's because we weren't allowed to talk about it.
	I got my data from America when someone sent me an American report and from a certain date about two months ago, two and a half months ago, they decided it wasn't It didn't say it wasn't safe, but clearly it was safety concerns.
	So, it was to stop being rolled out immediately and all stocks to be destroyed.
	I mean, if it was there to just run the stocks out, if it had been, if it wasn't a safety issue, surely.
	Why would you be so worried?
	It's interesting, as I say, that the Johnson & Johnson, the way that so-called experimental vaccine was exactly the same format as the AstraZeneca, which is There's DNA, not mRNA, inside an adenovirus vector to get it into the cell.
	So, I'm no biologist, as I think has been demonstrated in this podcast.
	What's the difference between the DNA and the mRNA?
	Well, the DNA is the genome, so that's the deoxyribonucleic acid.
	I know what that is.
	That's what makes up, that's in the nucleus of every one of your cells.
	When that splits, you make a copy, so you're making a mirror version.
	That's becomes, that's messenger RNA.
	Right.
	And then the ribosomes zoom along that and three base pairs of RNA, they code for a protein.
	So he builds a protein up and normally after one whip through with the ribosome, that RNA is gone.
	But we do know with the vaccines, they're not necessarily messenger RNA.
	They were modified RNA, which means they were hanging around for a lot, lot longer.
	Is this connected to that?
	Have you seen the Died Suddenly film?
	I'm afraid I have.
	Yes.
	Yeah.
	And these fibrous strings that the coroners are pulling out of bodies.
	Is that in any way connected to that?
	Well, I've seen another report from Germany that they pulled that out of.
	They took a blood sample from a lady who was suffering from basically her legs had gone numb below the knees.
	They took blood samples from her lower legs and it looked pretty normal.
	But when it cooled, there was a big blob of spike protein there, and it was about 15% of my volume.
	15%?
	Yes, but obviously.
	Her blood is spike protein.
	Yes.
	And then what happens is, obviously, when you pass away, your body cools and that's when it congeals.
	And it is actually in those of us who've been vaccinated's blood.
	Every time I talk to you, Andrew, I just thank my lucky stars.
	I'm such a skeptic.
	You have to rub it in, don't you?
	No, I'm not rubbing it in.
	I'm not.
	But I'm just I'm just sat there thinking, thank God.
	I just am a paranoid conspiracy theorist.
	Really?
	That's that's all I'm coming out with.
	Thank God.
	I'm just I totally distrust all of these people.
	I knew I was right.
	And, you know, I keep quoting in the chamber Sir Richard Dearlove.
	Yeah.
	And whether it was about the Passing of sovereignty to the European Union through the European Defence Union.
	And I'm accused of being a conspiracy theorist, but I'm actually quoting Sir Richard Deerlove, who was the chief in charge of all of us.
	And he's actually tweeted today, which I'll be retweeting later, that we'll never sort out the issue of the Ukraine war until we sort out the corruption.
	Well, then it's good luck with that.
	Again, billionaire comedians leading countries.
	Interesting.
	Interesting.
	You know, you know, when my wife was pregnant with my youngest daughter.
	That has nothing to do with me, I promise you.
	No, I know.
	The hospital was pushing her to get the vaccine when she was pregnant.
	I wouldn't recommend pregnant ladies have an aspirin.
	No.
	Well, that was the thing.
	They tell them not to have coffee and don't have alcohol.
	Exactly.
	Yeah.
	She's not supposed to have an experimental vaccine that was never tested on pregnant women.
	They were trying to stop drinking Diet Coke.
	And I was like, OK, well, you know, fair enough.
	And then they're like, OK, but take this.
	There are several things that the government has stopped reporting on a regular basis.
	They stopped in 2020, mysteriously.
	One was deaths by blood clots and the other is the reporting of stillbirths.
	Yeah, I saw a bunch of things where initially... From BOSIS UK, a charity, put a paper out a couple of months ago saying we've got this epidemic of people dying from blood clots and we haven't had the data for three years.
	The government aren't producing the data anymore.
	But also, so many women reporting... Could make you into a conspiracy theorist, couldn't it?
	Already did.
	So many women reporting that their fertility cycle, their menstrual cycle, has been totally messed up by the vaccine.
	Yes.
	And I've heard, like, spiking miscarriages.
	We were originally told about the vaccine, that not only is it going to certainly be contracting, transmitting the virus, it's going to stay in the injection point.
	Well, I mean, that wasn't true either.
	Why would that be true?
	Like, why would it be true?
	Doesn't your blood flow circulate around?
	Well, you're not supposed to, it's not supposed to go into a blood vessel.
	That's why it's been put into your, into your, your deltoid or whatever is muscle.
	I'll take their word for that.
	But the injections weren't aspirated where you push the needle in, draw back, see if you get any blood, then you'd know you're in a blood vessel and you wouldn't inject.
	They didn't do that.
	Not in this country.
	Right.
	God, I'm so glad I'm a conspiracy theorist.
	Sorry, I keep bringing it up.
	It's better to be a conspiracy theorist than have myocarditis.
	It's better to be safe than sorry, right?
	That's the thing.
	For a pandemic, a disease that had at least a 99.8% survival rate.
	Yeah.
	And it was something like 87% if you were over 82.
	It's like, right, if almost every old person is going to survive.
	That's longer than normal longevity.
	Yeah.
	And the government wanted us to jab down to six months.
	I mean, we saw Boris' WhatsApp where it's like, so what?
	If you get COVID, you live longer.
	Yeah.
	So yeah, that's kind of... But he sort of changed his tune.
	He did.
	And it was really insufferable.
	If we want to talk about Boris Johnson, I mean, now he's... We can very briefly.
	Very briefly.
	Go ahead.
	But now he's out of Parliament.
	I mean, he's earning...
	Megabucks.
	He's basically a lobbyist for the military-industrial complex to keep the war going.
	And I think when you find out that in March last year he went over and kiboshed the peace deal between Ukraine and Russia that had been brokered by the Israelis, he's got a lot of blood on his hands.
	But he's making a lot of money and all these No one really wants to pay him a quarter of a million pounds for a 20 minute speech in New York.
	No, no.
	But it's all sponsored by the right people.
	But that's always been the case, isn't it?
	Because, I mean, he's going to come back to politics.
	That's the thing.
	Not if I have my way.
	Really?
	No, no.
	Well, yes, remember, I've got history.
	So, I mean, I was one of the people that persuaded him to back leave.
	He was completely ambivalent.
	He's no leaver.
	He was looking for his own political advantage.
	And also, if you go and get the video clips, I, he was with me in my constituency because I led the leave campaign for the East Midlands the day before the referendum.
	When I told him you're definitely going to win tomorrow.
	And you'd see the look on his face.
	That wasn't what he wanted.
	That wasn't the plan.
	Really?
	No, not at all.
	Not at all.
	Boris Johnson is not what you think he is.
	He's nearly as good an actor as Zelinsky.
	I don't think very much about Boris Johnson.
	I think he's a very good front man.
	He's got a lot of front.
	Anyway, Rue the Geneva Convention says, It's hilarious how we're expected to eat up all of these contradictions without question, and it's disgusting how often it works.
	The dissonance is becoming physically painful.
	Yeah, I feel you.
	Honestly, I really do.
	Jonathan says, I personally recognize exactly what Andrew Bridgen is talking about by the extremely early inappropriate understanding of sexuality.
	Having lost my virginity at the age of 11, I've seen how my life has been absolutely affected and damaged By the experiences I went through in my childhood, it saddens me greatly that this is just getting worse.
	Yep.
	I mean, my son's nearly nine years old.
	He has got no interest in... If you were, if you were I, were to get some photos, some pictures of male and female genitalia and go down and show them to five year olds, surely that would be a criminal offence, wouldn't it?
	Appropriately so, yeah.
	Quite rightly so.
	Yeah.
	But when it's being done for the left wing's agenda... It's alright.
	It's fine, yeah.
	It's all for their own good.
	Well, I'm not sure it is.
	We need to stop it immediately.
	Rishi needs to grow some.
	I can send you some photographs so he knows what he needs to grow.
	Tell me about Rishi Sunak.
	Rishi Sunak?
	Yeah, he just seems like... I mean, he's got the demeanor of a CBeebies presenter.
	Yeah, but I'm looking down on him from the back row of the chamber on the opposition benches.
	I mean, I'm reminded of what Winston Churchill said of Clem Attlee.
	He's a modest little man with a lot to be modest about, really.
	He looks very small.
	He can barely peer over the dispatch.
	But why is he?
	He's a man whose wife has got all the money, so he's not a man who rules his own life.
	So why does he do any of the things that he does?
	I can't seem to divine any actual kind of personality in the man.
	I'm afraid I think the whole thing's completely corrupt, top to bottom, and it has been for a very long time.
	So what do you mean there?
	Is he someone else's puppet?
	For years in Parliament, we kept looking at legislation that was going through under a Conservative government.
	And I think I've said to you before, I came into politics to try and do good things for my constituents and the country.
	And I spent most of my time in politics stopping bad things happening, being inflicted by my own government.
	And people will say, well, if you're stopping bad things happening, That's the same as doing good, isn't it?
	Well, kind of.
	But it's not as satisfying, is it?
	Yeah.
	Why?
	It's your own government.
	Why?
	And I always question, why are we doing this?
	Why are we doing this?
	And I think it looks like a bit of a conspiracy.
	But also, but I looked at the characters, you know, Cameron Osbourne.
	Yeah.
	And then Theresa May.
	Boris Johnson.
	They're not bright enough to run a conspiracy.
	It's got to be cockup, hasn't it?
	Because they're just not bright enough.
	But then you realize it's not their conspiracy.
	They're only puppets.
	They're just being paid off by someone else.
	Yeah.
	Well, also, you've got to bear in mind all the all the weird stuff that's inexplicable.
	It's happening in this country.
	It's happening.
	It's everywhere else around the world at the same time.
	You know, and all the the covid response, the pandemic response, the lockdowns, the mandates.
	I mean, we can't we can't blame it all on Matt Hancock.
	He wasn't the health secretary in America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand.
	But the same weird stuff was going on.
	So who are we looking at behind the front then?
	Well, you've only got to read the books and Mr. Schwab and the World Economic Forum.
	OK, so this is interesting because a lot of people say, well, look, Klaus Schwab is not as influential as you think.
	He's not in control of these things.
	No.
	But he did say that they've infiltrated all the cabinets around the world.
	He did say that, yeah.
	You know, Trudeau's quite happily taken Canada, which was always my bolthole.
	Things went really tits up in the UK.
	Canada.
	You can't go there.
	I mean that was the best standard of living anywhere in the world for 30 years and one rogue prime minister has ruined it.
	I mean he's ruined Canada.
	He's finished that place off.
	There's nowhere to run.
	We've got to stand and fight because there is nowhere to run.
	It's the same weird stuff.
	I mean I've spoken to wide awake senators in Australia and you know and they've got the same problem with transsexuals going in and teaching the children Who, who, like, who would you actually, what organizations?
	Are we talking like Tony Blair Institute, the Bill Gates Institute?
	Well, Tony Blair's looking to take over the WEF from.
	Yeah.
	So, so we would say Tony Blair, the WEF.
	I think with Tony Blair was when it all started going seriously wrong.
	Oh, I agree.
	And things like, you know, they will never admit to you.
	Tony Blair signed us up to the European Defense Initiative.
	Yeah.
	They never told the people and it's been carried on by every Conservative Prime Minister since without telling the people.
	Why?
	Because they know it's politically unacceptable what they've decided they're going to do it.
	I think they were all promised big cuts.
	Imagine amalgamating all the defence procurement of Europe Same ammunition suppliers, everything.
	There's a huge amount of money.
	Huge amount of money for contracts.
	I mean, it doesn't make military or political sense to me, because if you centralize all of that, you make yourself vulnerable one strike.
	But also, there is no sovereignty, whatever we do.
	And also during Brexit, we're pretty much The message was we can't talk about defence, because that was already sorted.
	And there can be no sovereignty without sovereignty of defence.
	There's no sovereignty of defence if you don't have control of manufacturing your own ammunition.
	So we say, well, a small island, one of our overseas territories, is being threatened.
	We want to go and defend it.
	We're not sending you the ammunition.
	Well, that's our policy gone, isn't it?
	How are we an independent nation?
	I'll make a little prediction that within the next two to three years, our independent nuclear deterrent will not be ours.
	It'll be under the auspices of France, Germany and the EU.
	They want their own nuclear deterrent and we'll be desperate for money.
	So there'll be a vote and effectively we could say, no, we don't want to fire them.
	And France and Germany say, yes, we do.
	And then they'll go.
	Really?
	Yes!
	I've no idea.
	A hundred percent.
	Really?
	A hundred percent, yes.
	That's where I think we'll be.
	We will sell away our independent nuclear share for Germany and France, effectively.
	It'll be a European deal.
	We're going to be into that, no doubt whatsoever.
	And I say, once Belgium make all the armoured personnel carriers, and Germany make the tanks, because they're good at that sort of thing, and we might be doing some of the aeroplanes, but the ammunition's coming from France, I mean, that's it.
	I mean, if they don't send them, we can decide whatever policy we want in our parliament, but we haven't got any materials.
	Can't do it.
	So where would you put the locus of decision making for this international?
	Well, I think Keir Starmer summed it up when Davos, when he came back from Davos, he was interviewed by Laura Koonsberg.
	And I put that out.
	I got millions of this.
	And from his own lips, Koonsberg asked him, you know, where do you prefer Davos or Westminster?
	And he said, I prefer Davos.
	You know, I can do business with these people.
	They suit his temperament as well.
	Well, I mean, he knows where the power and the money is.
	And he took his whole cabinet out there.
	Why is Bill Gates fated?
	Every time he comes to this country, he goes to sea.
	He can walk in with any Prime Minister and he can do all that.
	He was with the Shaps talking about managing climate change.
	He was with Barclay talking about pandemic responses.
	What are his qualifications in any of this?
	All he does is he puts money in and makes money out of it.
	And I really object to the BBC.
	No advertising.
	Gates had put all the money through his foundation into the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines and then he was allowed on the BBC to say everyone's got to take these vaccines.
	Well surely that was advertising his own products wasn't it?
	Yeah.
	That was against the BBC charter but not for Bill Gates because his foundation also gives the BBC a lot so he's bought everybody and I'll tell you something which I only remembered She's wishful shocked you're gone.
	He's thinking, yeah, I'm thinking I'll go.
	So you'll remember we got it.
	I got, I got first elected when in 2010, we didn't get enough for a majority.
	So I had to do a deal with the Dems took about a week or so of course trading.
	Then we got the message, go to committee room 14.
	The prime minister is going to address you.
	The deal's done.
	He's been to see the queen.
	It's now David Cameron, his prime minister.
	All the Conservative MPs went to Committee Room 14, which is where the 1922 Committee meets, every Wednesday at five o'clock.
	Guess who walked in behind David Cameron on that day the deal was done?
	We're not going to say Bill Gates, are we?
	Yes.
	Bill Gates walked in behind him, David Cameron introduced him, and he said, I think you'll recognise this gentleman, you can smell the power, he was already there, and Bill Gates gave us a lecture about some wonderful vaccines he was developing that you're going to like.
	You are kidding.
	I'm not.
	It's just a coincidence anyway.
	Yeah, what was Bill Gates doing?
	He's just done Cameron's first... Just happened to be there on the day... Day one of Cameron's Prime Ministership, yeah.
	Yeah, the deal was done, and he got a chance to address all the Conservative MPs.
	I asked him a question.
	I asked Bill Gates a question.
	Go on.
	I asked him, because he was talking about his vaccines and eradicating polio, and I said, are there any countries you won't deal with because you don't agree with the political system that they're implementing, or the dictators?
	He said no.
	Why would he care?
	Why would he care?
	I wasn't quite as awake then as I am now.
	If I were to meet him now, I might ask him some different questions.
	I might ask him, you know, what was the attraction of Epstein's Island?
	A man who can have whatever he wants, whenever he wants.
	He did say that he couldn't get into that lifestyle himself.
	Which means that he knew all about what was happening with Epstein.
	Possibly dabbled in it.
	Who knows?
	I think a man of his wealth can have whatever he wants, when he wants, where he wants.
	I don't see what the attraction of the island would be in a character like Jeffrey Epstein.
	I hate to say this but we're out of time.
	You'll have to invite me again.
	I will definitely have you.
	I did not know.
	The Bill Gates was bloody now, and Cameron.
	Um, yes, I'm afraid he was.
	Fascinating.
	You can smell the power.
	Where can people go if they want to follow you?
	If they want to follow me, um, Twitter is a good one.
	Matt A. Bridgen.
	Yep.
	Yep.
	And, uh, yeah, so follow him on Twitter.
	And, uh, thanks for doing what you're doing.
	Bye.
	Yes, I will do what I'm doing for as long as they allow me to do it and the next election I'll be down to the people of Northwest Leicestershire.
	Godspeed.
	Thank you.
	Thanks for joining us folks.
	We'll see you tomorrow.

▲