Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 23, 2023 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:31:16

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #616

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Good afternoon folks, welcome to the podcast of the Low Seaters for Thursday the 23rd of March 2023.
	I'm joined by Nick, and today we're going to be talking about the gay American empire, why men are becoming weak, I wonder if these are connected, and how the Met Police have decided that actually, yeah, they are institutionally racist and sexist and homophobic and probably just need to be dismantled, which I'm sure will be good for London.
	Anyway, let's begin.
	Nick, did you know that the United States is a giant gay empire?
	It's been going that way for quite a while.
	For quite a while.
	Yep, but with the ascension of President Biden to the top office, it's become pretty much an officially gay empire.
	Which I find fascinating.
	This is the public-facing, the outward-facing look of the American Imperial Project.
	It's to say, hey, we're gay and you're going to become gay too.
	Like Big Gay Al off South Park.
	Yes.
	You saw this was happening when they would fly the gay pride flag in Kabul.
	We'll get to that.
	It's like, why would you put people's noses into... Well, you don't fly an American flag, you fly the pride flag.
	Yeah, because that's the real allegiance that the United States and its imperial dominion has, which is interesting.
	But before we begin, if you want to support us, go to lotusseas.com, sign up, it's only a fiver a month, and watch this latest premium podcast, which is on ancient Roman relationship advice, because of course, there is nothing new under the sun.
	And Connor and I do an excellent job of going through this.
	And honestly, this is one of my favorite podcasts of all time.
	This is such a good watch, because the Romans are right about a lot.
	And speaking of people who are right about a lot, let's go over to the internet's favourite quote-unquote Nazi comic strip writer, who never seems to miss.
	Stone Toss produced this comic a while ago, not even that long ago.
	Of course, you see an American flag flying above some sort of military outpost.
	Who is it, say the Russians?
	Americans.
	How do you know?
	Because it's the gay flag, that's how.
	Because that's what the Americans march under these days.
	So in 2019, the New York Times put out this article just saying, well, how did Americans flip on gay rights so quickly?
	And it is actually remarkable how quickly the Americans sort of flipped on this.
	The traditional Christian morals of America suddenly became supplanted by the morality of human rights, I suppose we'd describe it.
	So in 2004, 60% of Americans opposed same-sex marriage, with 31% in favor.
	And of course in 2019, 61% support same-sex marriage, with 31 opposing it.
	So you can see there's some kind of moral shift in the foundations of what American morality is built on.
	Rather than being the traditional Christian foundations which say, well no, marriage is between a man and a woman because gay sex is sinful according to the Bible.
	Not my opinion, I'm an atheist.
	The complete opposite has now happened.
	So now it's on the secular foundations and so marriage is not a sacred institution.
	Marriage is merely a legal institution.
	And so of course, what difference does it make?
	There's nothing more to it than simply getting the piece of paper and signing it up to it.
	So the question is how married are gays getting I suppose?
	Have you ever met a married gay?
	I've met one or two, yeah.
	Yeah, one or two.
	Because it turns out that literally 10% of gays bother getting gay married.
	So it's not like, you know, the heterosexual community where it's something like 60 or 70%, where it used to be a lot higher.
	It's a very hetero thing to get married, even though gay marriage is legal, because gays just don't seem to want it.
	Get married.
	So this looks more like a wedge issue that was being leveraged for political purposes rather than a genuine organic desire on the part of the gay community when 90% of them are saying no.
	Interestingly, the divorce rates are actually lower for gay men than for heterosexual couples.
	15% for gay marriages and 18% for the heterosexual counterparts.
	Except for when it comes to lesbians.
	The lesbian divorce rate is 30%.
	Right, wow.
	Three times.
	What's that compared to gay men?
	Twice as much.
	Twice as much.
	I wonder why the lesbians are getting divorced so often.
	Well, we've all lived with women, so I think part of that we could understand.
	Anyway, moving on to 2020.
	Global acceptance of homosexuality is on the rise.
	It's on the rise.
	Pew study found that there's been substantial changes in public opinion in, say, the United States, where 72% say homosexuality should be accepted, which is an increase of 46% since 1994 and 51% in 2002.
	And in other foreign places like Japan and Mexico, just over half said they accepted homosexuality, whereas in 2002, nearly 7 in 10 respondents approved.
	And so you can see that this is massively increasing.
	And even in places like India, where even in 2022, I think it was 2021, it was only 37% said they accept homosexuality.
	That's still a massive increase in the number of people who do.
	And that's perfectly fine by my opinion.
	I don't think that we should be discriminating against people on the basis of their sexuality in any significant capacity.
	I mean, what a private organization does is what a private organization does.
	I mean, I don't think churches should be forced to marry people of any stripe, actually.
	But you'll notice that much of the Islamic Global South still rejects the holy doctrine of LGBT rights.
	Here's a quick map for you.
	Let's see where I'm going with this.
	So anyway, what does the American Imperial Empire think of that?
	Well, of course they're not very happy.
	If we go to the notorious Council on Foreign Relations to have a look at their opinion on it, for example, they'll say, well, the global campaign to secure protections for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and other LGBTQ plus people has made significant progress in recent decades, especially in the realm of marriage equality.
	So you can see this isn't just something that they think, well, that's good.
	They're actively on the march.
	We need to have gays everywhere, getting married everywhere.
	It's more than that.
	It's the T and the Q and then mostly it's that plus at the end.
	Exactly.
	So this isn't just about being gay.
	No.
	It's about so much more than that.
	Yes.
	And even if it was just about being gay, why does it need its own separate flag?
	Why does it need to be this big, unique agenda?
	You know?
	I mean, like, you'd think, well, people being executed for any reason, like, it's assuming they're not convicted criminals, but just arbitrarily singled out for a characteristic they held.
	Well, that's bad, no matter who's doing it.
	So you don't need to actually make a special exception for them being gay.
	Could be for any reason.
	It could be Jewish, it could be whatever.
	You know, you say, well, don't single them out and kill them because of this intrinsic characteristic, because that's wrong.
	Punish them if they commit a crime.
	Anyway, so they complained that Trump deprioritized the promotion of LGBTQ plus rights in US foreign policy.
	And what this led to is an erosion of US global standing on human rights issues.
	And so this is what Joe Biden has to really deal with in his position as president.
	He's expected to pursue a robust LGBTQ plus rights advocacy.
	He has vowed to work closely with allies and like-minded governments to ensure that violence and discrimination against LGBTQ plus individuals does not go unchecked.
	The Biden administration could, for instance, confront illiberal crackdowns in Eastern and Central Europe, targeted harassment by law enforcement in the Middle East, North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa with sanctions, while also expanding asylum protections for LGBTQ individuals seeking refuge in the United States.
	I mean, this is actually a campaign of gay imperialism.
	Yeah.
	And then you wonder why so many countries, especially the Middle East, chant, you know, America is evil.
	Yeah.
	America is Satan.
	Legitimately.
	How far away from an invasion of Iraq is Joe Biden to liberate the gays?
	Okay, weapons of mass destruction, not that bothered about that.
	No, we need to go in there to save their gays.
	You can see the rhetoric building.
	Now, Joe Biden did campaign on a promise of gay imperialism as well.
	I mean, as you can see from his campaign website, the Biden plan to advance LGBTQ plus equality in America and around the world.
	This is all over the place.
	As President, Biden will stand with the LGBT plus community to ensure America finally lives up to the promise on which it was founded.
	Equality for all.
	Yeah, okay.
	The promise that America was founded on.
	But does that mean that the promise that America was founded on is every other country around the world has to commit to this?
	And what does that do for diversity?
	You're not very diverse when you're imposing all your views of morality on the rest of the world.
	Especially when your version of morality is to specifically, essentially undermine the Abrahamic religions.
	Because like them or lump them, you know, they have their view on homosexuality and it's pretty consistent across the religions.
	Well, we've destroyed Christianity now, so now they're looking at Islam.
	And they're going to have a bit more of a fight with Islam.
	They probably will.
	I imagine the Muslims will be less amenable to liberal arguments, shall we say.
	But he will provide the moral leadership to champion equal rights for LGBT plus people to ensure our laws and institutions protect and enforce their rights and advance their equality globally.
	And of course, Joe Biden does not just talk on this issue.
	This is one of those things that Joe Biden has actually taken serious action on.
	I mean, for example, his administration, as Japan noted, is basically a gay administration.
	He's got the record number of LGBTQI plus officials.
	Obviously, some of these are quite famous now.
	You've got Rachel Levine, the transgender person who's now some sort of admiral.
	The luggage stealer.
	I was going to say, I can't remember the guy who, I don't even know, don't dare misgender, but the individual who keeps stealing luggage and then wearing the clothes.
	The nuclear... That was funny when that black woman was on TV going, that's my dress!
	It's so inclusive, you see.
	It's so inclusive.
	And in February 2021, it was when Biden actually began the campaign of gay imperialism.
	He signed a foreign policy memo, putting the US at the forefront of global LGBTQ rights.
	This is just an unvarnished good.
	There's just nothing negative that will come from this, you see.
	So it was a memorandum of advancing the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex persons.
	Don't know why he left off two-spirit.
	Do you not think there are two-spirit people in Africa who need that liberation?
	Honestly Joe, so regressive.
	But this directs American agencies operating abroad to ensure the United States diplomacy and foreign assistance promote and protect the human rights of the alphabet people.
	It calls for agencies to combat the criminalization of LGBTQ identity or conduct, protect LGBTQ refugees and asylum seekers, address human rights abuses, blah blah blah, because there are approximately 70 countries around the world that currently have laws criminalizing same-sex relations between consenting adults.
	So, literally, Joe Biden's like, look, we're going to essentially invade Iraq to liberate the queers.
	And that's why the U.S.
	Embassy in Kabul, if we can get the picture up, wonderful.
	This was in June 2021, before the catastrophic Afghan withdrawal, obviously.
	And this was the last memory that the Afghans have of the Americans.
	Ah yes, a big gay flag.
	It's as if they have no idea what they're doing.
	I mean, at least for the British Empire, we used something called hearts and minds, where we tried to win people over.
	Yes.
	And we accepted some of their, you know, some of their cultural practices that we didn't agree with because we knew it was too much to push on that.
	But They've just gone absolutely nuclear on this and I'm sick and tired of it being referred to, I'm not criticising you per se, this isn't a gay agenda, this is a queer agenda, this is the alphabet people agenda.
	If you're a gay man out there, it's an ideological agenda, if you're a gay man out there you need to start picking sides because when all this collapses and implodes The people who will suffer the most are the gay men will suffer the most.
	All these other lunatics will just fade back into society and you'll never know.
	And if you're a gay person or whatever, if you feel that these people are somehow speaking for you, you just have to ask yourself a simple question.
	Which flag do you pledge allegiance to?
	Is it the rainbow flag or the American flag?
	And if you're on the side of the American flag, you're not on these people's side.
	And if it's this side, if it's this flag, well, then you're a traitor to your own country.
	So you might want to think about that.
	But anyway, how many Afghans do you think this won over?
	I mean, I don't know.
	So if you can scroll down, I don't know how true this image is, obviously.
	It's entirely possible that this literal LGBTQ plus Black Lives Matter bomb is a photoshop.
	It is, but I can also see what's, I can also, it wouldn't surprise me if someone got promoted for doing that.
	Exactly.
	It's a very convincing Photoshop.
	Like if you look at the shadows and the light reflection on the Black Lives Matter sticker, it looks very real.
	So, I mean, it could be a very good Photoshop or what we could call it is an artist's impression of US military and their current policy, because I'm inclined to believe it's real.
	Not that I know or anything like that.
	Well I can guarantee that bomb was for the Middle East or Afghanistan.
	Because it doesn't say Brown Lives Matter.
	Imagine dropping Black Lives Matter bombs on Africa.
	Exactly.
	Talk about bad optics there!
	Anyway, so the reason I bring this up is because recently one of the Biden spokespeople were asked, is this really about your foreign policy?
	And he was like, yeah, of course it is.
	Of course our foreign policy is spreading gay everywhere.
	What are you talking about?
	Let's watch.
	President Biden has been nothing but consistent about his Core parts of the foreign policy?
	in human rights and LGBTQ plus rights are human rights.
	And we again, back to the earlier question, are never going to shy away, be bashful about speaking up for those rights and for individuals to live as they deem fit, as they want to live.
	And that's something that's a core part of our foreign policy and it will remain so.
	Core part of the foreign policy, save the gays.
	Now, the question one might raise is, well, who gave America the authority to begin terraforming the world in its own image?
	I think they jumped on that because they have nothing else to give.
	That's a great point.
	Why else would you need American interference?
	gays.
	We need a reason to make you think like us and to do as you're told.
	It can't be these things anymore because even we don't believe in that.
	We'll use this to beat you if now.
	The Americans can't promote capitalism and freedom anymore considering they...
	Yeah, you are right.
	They don't even believe in these things themselves anymore.
	The American administration.
	So now it's about saving the minorities.
	It's the only thing.
	Ooh, minoritarianism.
	It's the only thing the American imperial project can promote anymore, to sustain its own legitimacy.
	I mean, they could do this in a way that I would support them.
	So if the message was, we're not going to support regimes that Don't think that this is purely confined to the United States, of course.
	are going to support regimes that burn witches or kill Christian children or mutilate Muslim girls.
	There's things we could all agree on because it's the actions they're taking, but this is just the ideology.
	That's right.
	That's exactly the right way to frame it.
	Don't think that this is purely confined to the United States, of course.
	This is the head of MI6, Richard Moore.
	With the tragedy and destruction unfolding so distressingly in Ukraine, we should remember the values and hard-won freedoms that distinguish us from Putin.
	None more than LGBT plus rights!
	Why are we better than Putin?
	Well, we don't persecute the gays.
	Well, we did 70 years ago.
	I guess so.
	I guess it's been a very short period of time that we've been better than Putin.
	But isn't that amazing?
	That's the only reason he can pick.
	But we need to figure out what distinguishes us from Putin.
	We don't persecute gays.
	Oh, brilliant.
	Putin murders journalists, man.
	Like, you know, we celebrate gays.
	We've got a pride flag.
	Putin doesn't have a pride flag.
	Yeah, but we don't murder journalists.
	Isn't that good?
	We're not engaging in imperial wars on our neighbours.
	Isn't that good?
	Well, I mean, I suppose we could possibly not say that.
	But there are surely other things about the United Kingdom, other than LGBT plus rights, that we can distinguish ourselves from Putin with.
	But anyway, I guess not.
	And that's the, if you can just go back and just click on his profile a second.
	What I love about his profile, he's the Chief of UK's Secret Intelligence Service.
	Key him.
	Yeah, brilliant.
	That's how we got the job.
	So the reason I bring all this up is it comes on the heels of Uganda, evil Uganda, anti-imperialist Uganda, which has passed an anti-gay bill in its parliament.
	And so I suppose this is kind of like the gauntlet is down.
	Go to the next one, John.
	What is Joe Biden going to do about this?
	Well Joe Biden now I'm beginning to think could be a racist.
	I'm thinking that actually maybe he's also anti-gay.
	Because remember silence is complicity.
	Anti-African.
	Anti-African, anti-gay.
	Just someone who is watching a gay genocide taking place right now and is complicit with it.
	He's not even going to invade Uganda.
	He's not going to liberate the country for the gay imperial agenda.
	Why not?
	I can't even imagine.
	It's literally the forefront of his foreign policy.
	It's all that America's interaction with the world revolves around.
	And yet, in the face of that, Uganda has passed a bill that has criminalized people identifying as LGBT and puts them in jail for 10 years.
	Now, I mean, I think that's immoral.
	I think something must be done.
	Surely, Joe, if this is literally all you care about, or, now forgive me for being cynical here, it could be that this is literally just the last gasps of the American imperial regime that can't find legitimacy anywhere else.
	Call me cynical.
	Anyway, let's move on to find out why men are becoming weak.
	follows on from that discussion really, because a lot of the problems we've got, we just discussed, really is about how we've got a generation, now for several generations, of weak people in our society, mainly weak men.
	And I want to talk about, is it in the water?
	So are people choosing to be weak?
	Or are we creating, and I've got, mine's filtered water.
	Oh is it?
	Wow!
	Yes, the estrogens in my tea.
	So when we talk about weak men, you know, first of all, we think about people like Sam Smith.
	You know, this big, girly, narcissistic.
	Every moment I'm reminded of Sam Smith.
	But again, we've always had people like Sam Smith.
	So we've had them throughout history.
	But then when we look at some other characters, such as Prince Havy, Lewis Hamilton, who to a certain extent have been successful.
	I mean, Lewis Hamilton, world champion, you know, excellent at something.
	Sam Smith is successful.
	Yep.
	Prince Harry, you know, he's served in, you know, a theatre of war.
	But yet, both of them still don't understand what it is to be a real man.
	And I get criticised for using the term real man.
	Who am I to decide what a real man is?
	I'm a man, I get to decide.
	Exactly.
	If a woman gets to decide what a woman is, it's your own logic.
	We all know what a man is.
	We all know.
	Ultimately a man is someone who takes responsibility.
	That's what a man is.
	Who provides and protects for his family, his community, his country.
	Which you can summarise as just saying takes responsibility.
	This is what you're responsible for.
	We've also got other weak men in society now.
	A good example would be... Prince Harry has been crying again.
	Not that I know, but I don't watch anything.
	I turn off.
	I turn off.
	He just annoys me.
	He's like a big child.
	But someone who I liked for decades was Will Smith.
	I liked the vast majority of his films.
	The series Bad Boys is one of my favourite film series.
	I won't be watching full because I look at him now and I just see a big crybaby.
	I see a man who knows what it is to act like a real man because he made a career out of it.
	But he's been cuckolded by a woman.
	He's now been degraded.
	He's now been embarrassed across the world.
	He's been emasculated because he lives in Californian Hollywood culture.
	Yeah.
	And that's why.
	I don't think he's happy.
	I've been following Will Smith's personal drama for a little while because it's sad to me because Will Smith seems like a nice guy.
	Seems like a likeable chap.
	He's just emotionally weak.
	Yeah.
	And he's allowed this to happen to him where a real man wouldn't have allowed this to happen.
	And you can tell by the people he's surrounded by.
	Essentially, they've abused him, I would say.
	It's a form of abuse that's happening.
	And when I use the term weak man, obviously I don't just mean physically, because Will Smith's something like 6'3".
	Oh yeah, he's a very physically strong man.
	He's a big guy, I mean.
	Yes, it doesn't matter.
	No, because emotionally he's a weak man.
	He's an inferior version of what he should be.
	Yes.
	Who wants to be an inferior version of anything?
	It's just not attractive.
	You know, you need to try to be the best you can be.
	This is actually amazing, an amazing example.
	It's Will Smith that is the butt of Hollywood at this point.
	There are so many memes of him being a cuck and crying, being pathetic and weak, and it's like, dude, you're massive, and you're built like a house, and you're a multi-millionaire, you're one of the most famous actors in the world, how are you the butt of all the jokes?
	And it really is because of this moral weakness on his part.
	Sufferable.
	He could just turn down and say no.
	Yeah.
	No more.
	Yeah.
	To his wife.
	You out.
	Yeah.
	Until you change your attitude and your behaviour.
	I'm not having this.
	Yeah.
	He's got the money to do, to employ pianos.
	Literally do whatever he wants!
	One of his children has divorced him.
	Yeah.
	Which means he's now not legally responsible for his child because his child held him responsible for a failed film.
	Jayden is essentially an effeminate trans person.
	So what are you doing?
	It's his whole family.
	You look at it and you think, no wonder he's got mental health issues.
	He thought he was being kind, that's what it is.
	He thought he was being kind.
	And everyone around him told him, oh yeah, no, this is the softy lefty thing to do.
	And he knows that deep down the right wing thing to set the boundaries and force the boundaries and not budge on it.
	Yep.
	And he hasn't got an excuse because he's portrayed those characters in films.
	He has.
	All he had to do was act like that.
	Yeah, that's exactly right.
	What would Uncle Phil think, Will?
	Yeah.
	You know, Uncle Phil wouldn't be having any of this.
	But these men have become too touchy-feely, too girly, they moisturise too much, they cry at films, and they just want to be kind.
	And that's how I define these men.
	They're usually feminists, they're usually vegan or vegetarians, and they're nearly always some sort of form of socialist as well.
	Can't we just share everything and live in utopia?
	It doesn't work like that.
	So the question we need to ask is, are people born that way?
	Does society force them to take those roles?
	Or could there be something they're digesting that's changing strong men slowly into weak men?
	I think it's a combination of all of these things.
	Let's have a look at the first link.
	So we all know we put fluoride in the water.
	No, they just care about teeth.
	In the UK.
	They just care about teeth.
	Aren't you worried about dental hygiene?
	I'm having my first tooth taken out in a fortnight.
	It's the first time at 55 I'm losing my first tooth.
	See, that was the fluoride in the water that kept your teeth in good condition.
	Well, I'm happy.
	But there's nothing wrong with fluoride in the water.
	I've seen no evidence that there's anything... I'm just letting people know that this state, things happen where they will put chemicals that they think benefit you, and putting fluoride in water is one of those things.
	There's a whole rabbit hole that we're going to avoid here.
	I am aware of it.
	Moving on.
	You can tell me off screen then what that rubber hole is.
	I will tell you off screen what the rubber hole is.
	So, what we need to understand is over a quarter of a million women in the UK take the contraceptive pill.
	Yes.
	Over 90% of that drug leaves the body through... What percentage of women, sorry?
	What number of women?
	Quarter of a million.
	Is that it?
	Yeah.
	Take the pill daily.
	I would have thought it would be more than that.
	I mean, there's still a lot of women, but I would have thought it'd be more than that.
	The pill's becoming less and less desirable by women.
	There's more and more evidence coming out now about how it ruins their lives, ruins their mental state, ruins their bodies.
	Well, this is why I've got so many kids, Nick.
	My wife hates the pill.
	There we go, so less and less women are actually taking it.
	It's not the panacea we thought it was 30, 40 years ago.
	But 90% of that drug, it leaves the female body in Her urine goes through the toilet into the water system.
	And what we don't know is our water processing plants have not been designed to take pharmaceuticals out of the water.
	That only takes out bacteria, viruses, things like that.
	And the reason why we know that is because if you go to link number two, In London, you can find cocaine in your drinking water.
	Oh, can you?
	Because there's that many people taking cocaine in London, snorting it, digesting it, sniffing it, it all gets urinated out into the water supply, it gets recycled in the water supply, goes back in your tap, and it contains cocaine.
	I'm thinking some sort of modern Breaking Bad where some savvy drug dealer distills the water.
	Yeah, exactly.
	If I distill the water, I can get cocaine out of the water from the tap.
	I mean, don't do this, obviously.
	This is not financial advice.
	But it would be a good fictional series if that were... I'm just being told, shares in Thames Water have just shut up.
	But no, that doesn't surprise me at all.
	So this just shows that there is pharmaceuticals in the water and we can't get rid of them.
	So the question we need to ask ourselves is what is the residue of the female pill in our drinking water doing to men?
	Well it can't be anything good.
	I mean surely it's turning the frogs gay.
	It's turning fish, female fish, into male fish.
	It's transing the fish.
	It's transing the fish.
	So let's look at link three.
	So we have a study from the Journal of Aquatic Toxiology.
	Now, I only bought that magazine because I thought it was a comic.
	I thought it was the evil archenemy of Aquaman.
	Turns out it's not.
	So, they've done some tests and some controls and they've come up with this.
	So, fish who are exposed to 5 nanograms per litre of, I'm going to say this wrong, ethyleztriadol, Which is found in contraceptive pills.
	So fish that are exposed to only 5 nanograms produce fewer offspring and more females.
	Right.
	We, these scientists, have found levels of that chemical in water supplies up to 12 times higher.
	Right.
	So let me guess.
	What we're saying with this is that Women's liberation is not only socially destroying the country, but it's also chemically destroying the country by effeminating men.
	This is not a conversation that the average woman is prepared to have, I think.
	It's not.
	And I don't even think it's the fault of women because who created the pill?
	I'm sure it was a man.
	Three men created the pill.
	And why did they create the pill?
	Again, because men create lots of things to benefit the lives of women.
	They do.
	Women's liberation was all the rage back in the seventies and eighties.
	Yeah.
	And now that you're liberated and you've turned the men into women, the civilization is collapsing.
	How are we going to have that conversation with women?
	Be like, look, you've got to stop destroying civilization.
	Yep.
	Now, other studies where they've looked at oestrogen in the water have found that male fish start developing ovaries and other female characteristics.
	And if you look at young men today, the preponderance of, like, fat on the chest is something that I've noticed that people have noticed, right?
	This is something that, like, you know, the fitness, the male fitness gurus always talk about the sort of chest fat that young men get these days.
	And when you see, you see video and pictures from the seventies of like, you know, 15 year olds doing the sports and stuff like that, they're all in incredible physical condition.
	And it's like, yeah, something has definitely changed here.
	Yeah.
	We'll put a pin in that because we're going to get to that with rats in a minute.
	Okay.
	So if we bring up the next link.
	So studies worldwide are showing the sperm count in men has dropped by over 50% in the last 60 years.
	If that isn't ringing bells, alarm bells, throughout the world, that we're becoming impotent, that there will be no more offspring, there will be no more arguments over the LBGT people, because there'll be no more people, then I don't know what will.
	What will the American empire do?
	Save the sperm.
	Because we need more gay people in the future.
	It'll make it illegal to masturbate.
	That's a waste of sperm.
	Kellogg wins again.
	So whatever we're doing is having an effect on men.
	I'm not saying this is purely down to the female pill, because it's not, because it's also about what else we eat.
	Lifestyle, diet.
	So let's look at diet.
	So we've all, well before we get to diet, one more thing about chemicals.
	So there's something called Bishphenol A. So not Bishphenol B. Don't get mixed up with a B. I'll try not to.
	And I had one person who said it was C. No, no, no.
	It's Bishphenol A. OK.
	And that is a chemical we use that's in large containers.
	They also coat the inside of tin food with it to stop the tin rusting.
	Oh, right.
	American scientists are saying that has a worse effect on male sperm count than the female pill does.
	Brilliant.
	And we're coating our food containers in it.
	See, this is kind of why I hate science.
	It's like, you know, oh, we've discovered we can do this with this.
	That's brilliant.
	What are the consequences?
	Well, we don't think there are any.
	It's like, yeah, okay, that's great.
	We don't know yet.
	Exactly.
	We don't know yet.
	This thing, like, everything is so connected and there are unexpected effects that pop up.
	Generations later, with consequences that you would never have connected these things to.
	Like, I'm coating my food tin in a non-stick residue.
	Why is that going to drop sperm rates?
	What are you, a lunatic?
	And yet here we are.
	It's like, okay, you just didn't know.
	There's so much about the world you don't know.
	We're so arrogant as well.
	But anyway, sorry.
	And then you remember in the 70s we had that drug Thalidomide that damaged a whole generation of babies.
	It's awful as well, because the purpose of it was to relieve pregnancy cramps or something.
	Morning sickness.
	Yeah, morning sickness.
	And it was just like, yeah, OK, you are also deforming your babies.
	It's just like, oh, God.
	Because they never tested it on pregnant women.
	Yeah, it's so awful.
	And then it was 100 years ago when uranium was discovered.
	They used uranium as a chemical to glow in the dark, so they would paint clock faces with it.
	I mean, it did glow in the dark.
	Yep.
	But the mainly women in the factories, for the laugh and the joke, while they were working, would paint the teeth with it, would paint the noses with it, and then wash it off later after work, sit in the dark, and they all developed cancers and all died.
	What a surprise.
	Because nobody knew how dangerous uranium was at the time.
	So, let's look at what people are actively eating.
	So, we all have heard the phrase soy boy, which is usually, which is always a weak man.
	A weak man who likes his soy milk, cafe latte, and he's eating his vegan sandwich, and eating, no, his vegan soy-based chicken burger.
	And that's quite That's because if we look at soy, soy has a chemical in it.
	So, first of all, we don't know if soy is bad for us or not.
	Now, soy in its natural form can't be bad for us.
	The Chinese have been eating it for centuries and there's billions of them.
	So in itself it can't be.
	But soy today is chemically enhanced, it's turned into goo, it's not the soy that the Chinese eat.
	So there's an industrial process that it goes through to extract a bunch of… this is arriving at the sort of seed oil argument as well, which I have to say I have been fully radicalised by, don't worry.
	Yeah, again, industrial process.
	We could do this, yeah, but did you know what the consequences would be?
	No, of course we didn't know what the bloody consequences would be.
	Yeah, exactly.
	So I'm not saying soil's bad because we don't, even the chemical- It's probably not in its natural state.
	It isn't in its natural state, but we don't know what we're doing to it and we're trying to work it out yet.
	So scientists are looking into this, but there's no firm evidence either way yet.
	So I need to make that clear.
	This is confirming all of my biases.
	No, absolutely.
	So, the point of my section really was, why do I care?
	Why do I care what men are doing to themselves, either intentionally by eating soy or becoming too girly, or why do I care that men are being changed into inferior versions of women?
	Why is it my business?
	I mean, do you have kids?
	No.
	Well I do.
	I have sons specifically.
	I've got a granddaughter.
	I've got a son, I've got two sons and this is what, this bothers me a lot.
	I do not want to essentially betray my sons into being forced into essentially becoming women.
	That's awful.
	You've got a direct link there.
	So I'm like you probably, well like you, definitely like you, I'm a big believer in let adults do what they want to do.
	Unless it's within, As long as it's within the law and not hurting anybody else.
	So if a man wants to do these things, turn himself into a woman slowly over time, let them do that.
	But I've come to the conclusion now that this is all harming society.
	Yes.
	And the examples I can give you would be if we didn't have, if we had stronger men in the homes living with our children, do you think we'd have the grooming gang No, we probably wouldn't have the level of crime we're getting in certain communities either.
	Exactly.
	If we had real men who were police officers, do you think they would have arrested and stopped the Grooming Gang scandal at the beginning, instead of going, oh, we don't want to be called Hirty Names?
	It was incredibly political.
	And in a way, I can understand why they essentially totally dropped the ball.
	It's not a justification for it and it doesn't make it okay.
	But it's... Would strong men... Strong men would certainly have blown the whistle.
	Exactly.
	And that's why certain unnameable Lord Voldemorts are the sort of people I'm never going to just throw under the bus.
	No, it takes a lot of courage and it was the right thing to do.
	And I don't care what you think of that person.
	Exactly, it would have been the right thing to do.
	Do you think we'd have the energy crisis we've got today if we had strong men in politics 20-30 years ago who were putting the future of the country first?
	Do you know what's really interesting?
	Nick Clegg, when he was Deputy Prime Minister, I saw this the other day and I was just...
	Literally, there's a quote of him from like 2010, where it's like, well, it'd take us like a decade to get nuclear power plants ready.
	What would be the point?
	It's like, yeah, it would have been really useful to have had them now.
	It would have been really useful, Nick.
	It's only a decade.
	It's not that long.
	We were expecting to survive.
	But yeah, it's insufferable.
	Because we had the weak politicians.
	Taking the easy choices.
	And the easy choices were, what's going to get me re-elected in three years' time?
	Where what they should be thinking is, what's best for this country 10, 20, 30, 50 years down the line that I'll never get credit for?
	Because I don't want credit for it.
	I want to do the right thing.
	But you would get credit.
	That's the thing.
	If you began the programme, you would get the credit.
	But also, it's more about, for me, it's just, what's the right thing to do?
	Can we just start doing the right thing?
	Is that too much to ask?
	They would argue they did do the right thing because what they did got them elected again.
	Yeah, well, because lying therefore becomes the right thing to get you elected.
	And that's obviously not the question.
	The question is a much higher order moral question.
	What is the right thing in and of itself to do?
	And of course, you know, in this case, probably not pump the water we drink with estrogen so our boys come out effeminate.
	That's probably not the Building the nuclear power plants would have been the right thing to do.
	But weak men don't make the tough decisions.
	That's right.
	They make the easy decisions.
	They don't take responsibility.
	Hence why they're weak men.
	Yep.
	Do you think without the immigration crisis, the illegal immigration crisis, if we had real men in positions of power going, this is like an invasion, we stop this today.
	Or do we have weak men who go, oh, European court might call us hurty words and have told us to stop the flights, we've had to stop it.
	This is driving me mad!
	But this is why I wanted to talk about it because it's not just about me saying to somebody who likes to moisturise, I don't like your lifestyle.
	It's like, no, no, your actions are now beginning to damage the fabric of society because you're negating your personal responsibility of being a protector and being a provider and everything comes from that and now we're falling apart.
	And you know what, it's not even about things like moisturising.
	I actually don't care if, you know, you moisturise your face.
	What I care about is that you're not prepared to stand on the points of principle on which you should stand and take responsibility in the face of the screeching criticism from left-wing soyboys.
	That's the problem.
	Men are designed to be protectors and providers of the tribe, not its social workers.
	Yes.
	And that's what men are beginning, some men, the weak men are beginning to think it's their job to be the social worker of society.
	And they've forgotten how to make the moral argument for the kindness that is drawn from strength rather than drawn from softness.
	Because it's not kind to abolish the barriers that children require in order to know right from wrong.
	That's not kind.
	But it requires strength and you have to uphold it and you have to be in some ways – how to describe it?
	You have to have the fortitude to just say no and to hold that.
	where it seems, you know, and they might cry.
	They might be like, "Oh, but I'm sad." It's like, yeah, and you will be sad, but trust me, this is the kind thing for me to do for you to make sure that in the future you can get past other problems that I won't be there to solve for you.
	That's the kindness.
	A parent and a leader have one thing in common.
	They have to make decisions That may not be popular right now with your child or with the citizenship, but they've got to look at those individuals in the future.
	Just making you happy today isn't a guarantee you're going to be happy for the rest of your life.
	It's a short fix.
	And if anything, it could definitely make things worse.
	I could give my children sweets all day and they'd be like, Oh, brilliant.
	Dad's wonderful.
	then the fat with diabetes and their teeth would fall out and i'd be like well sorry son i know i did that to you but i kind of did it for my own vanity there yeah because i just wanted you to sing my praises all day rather than looking out for what was in your best interest yeah no absolutely and if we have the last image so oh that's another question How are we going to defend the country?
	There's always going to be an evil horde that's looking at your front gate.
	There's always a problem, a military problem coming down the path.
	We don't know what it is yet.
	I'm 100% will have a war with China in my lifetime at some point.
	But we never know how the world changes.
	Several years ago we never would have imagined Putin would have invaded parts of Europe.
	Things change and we need to have strong men who are prepared to guard that gate and weak men are not prepared to do that.
	And we need strong men who understand that their lives are not as valuable as the survival of the tribe.
	Because when those barbarians come through that gate, who do you want stood between you and your, between the savages and your family?
	Do you want a side boy who's saying to them, can't we all just get along and be friends?
	Or do you want a guy with an AK-47 who's willing to put his life on the line to save your children because your children are the future of the civilization.
	And that's a choice we need to make.
	I mean, this speaks to the entire destruction of the metaphysics of masculinity, like the noble heroic self-sacrifice.
	But anyway, I guess we'll leave that one there and move on to more soy boys.
	So, what's the most racist police force in the world?
	I know, sir.
	I know.
	Go on.
	The Met?
	That's correct.
	Excellent.
	And they admit that they're the most racist police force as well, which is mental.
	I mean, one might have said, what about the LA police?
	Maybe they're slightly more racist.
	And well, Harry would have issue with that.
	So if you want to support us, go to locust.com, sign up for a five for a month, and watch Harry's latest podcast about myth-busting around the Rodney King and LA riots event in the early 90s.
	Because there's been a lot of mythologizing of this.
	And Rodney King wasn't some sort of angel, believe it or not.
	He was a criminal.
	Yeah, he was, yeah.
	I mean, I'm not saying that justifies what happened to him.
	You can't justify what happened to him.
	No.
	but you end up with the mythologizing of a martyr, and he wasn't a martyr.
	But Harry takes issue with some of that, so it's a very interesting video.
	And there's a lot in there that I did not know because it gets left out of these official narratives.
	But anyway, moving on to an actually racist police force.
	This has been dogging the Met Police for years.
	As you can see from this 2015 article, at the time, the chief of the Met Police was Mr. Hogan Howe.
	And under his watch, he'd been repeatedly alleged that the Met was racist with Bernard Hogan Howe.
	And he said, well, there is some truth to it, actually.
	We are kind of racist, actually.
	Which is interesting.
	During an interview, he said, if other people think we're institutionally racist, then we are.
	It's no good me saying we're not and you must believe me.
	That would be a nonsense if they believe that.
	Okay?
	Guilty as charged.
	He became the Commissioner of the Met in 2011 and he pledged to repeatedly reform the force and restore public trust in officers.
	Yet Scotland Yard was dragged in several damaging rows over race, such as the shooting of Mark Duggan, that led to the 2011 London riots.
	In an interview for the Met, he conceded that young black men in London were very much more likely to be stopped and searched than young white men.
	I can't explain that fully.
	I can give you reasons, but I can't fully explain it, so there's some justification.
	I can explain it.
	Let's go back to that strong man.
	and weak men discussion we were just having the strong man would say they're committing more of the crimes yeah that's why they are being more policed than other communities you wouldn't budge on that point you'd say no we're not racist we're actually judging you specifically by the content of your character on And here's the evidence for this.
	Because it's not like we don't have the evidence.
	They've got all the statistics.
	But no, he was like, well, you know, if you say we're racist, then we're racist.
	You know, I can't explain it.
	I can give you reasons which you might think would have been the explanation, but I can't explain it.
	So here's some justification.
	We're sorry whether we're racist.
	The Met was of course sued in 2017 by a police officer who was like, yeah, they're racist.
	The allegation here was that she was held back while white colleagues were allowed to work more complex investigations.
	Not the biggest allegation of racism.
	No.
	I mean, it could have been something to do with you personally, but the thing is, I was looking for the conclusion of this and I couldn't find what happened with this.
	So, we'll move over.
	But anyway, so in 2017, that was the year that Christina Dick took over.
	She became the first female head of the Metropolitan Police, completing a remarkable career comeback, considering she's terrible.
	She oversaw one of the biggest disasters in policing in 2005, when Jean-Charles de Menezes was mistaken by police officers for being a terrorist, because he was from Brazil, not from Arabia, and he was shot.
	This was under her watch.
	She was in command of that.
	There was an individual for that?
	Yeah, it's awful.
	He's sat on a tube, they walk up to him, shoot him dead.
	it's awful and she was the one in charge of the operation uh he wasn't muslim or from the middle east he was from electrician going he was going to work yeah and he was a brisilian immigrant yeah like he's like anyway so christina dick for some reason i mean not for some reason but like you know this was uh considered a comeback and for some reason she was given it and it was sadiq khanu Sources close to Khan said that of the four candidates for the job it was Dick who outlined the best vision for reforming the Met while keeping the capital safe.
	Dick accepts there needs to be changes and it's like so what are we taking from this?
	Very woke progressive Sadiq Khan was given a woke progressive spiel from a terrible police commissioner And he was like, yeah, I'm gonna go for the woke one.
	We know.
	I don't think there's anything to do with that.
	We know why she was given the job.
	Go on, go on.
	She takes two boxes, female and gay.
	How's that not woke?
	But you were saying it was the spiel she gave at the interview.
	I'm just saying she got it purely tick box characteristics.
	Yes, undoubtedly.
	But the thing is, it's not just tick box characteristics that is a requirement.
	It is also the ability to speak the shibboleths.
	So, okay, yeah, if it was a gay woman who came out and said, yeah, what we need is, you know, if it was like Sweller Braverman or Priti Patel, he would have been like, no, never, you know, because she wouldn't have been on board with the agenda.
	They never would have progressed up the ranks in the first place.
	Exactly.
	But the, but the point is the, the, she, you are right.
	She ticks the correct boxes.
	She's gay and she's a woman and she knows the lingo.
	And so that gets her the job.
	Um, this not really good timing for Chrissy Dix.
	Merely three years later, 10,000 miles away, in another continent, under someone else's jurisdiction, a police officer did something that people didn't like.
	And therefore, riots in London.
	Because, of course, George Floyd died under the knee of a police officer.
	Now, I personally don't believe he was murdered, but then that's a different question.
	But this meant that Chrissy Tedick had to deal with riots in London.
	So she put out this statement.
	I recognize trust in the Met is still too low in some black communities, as is their trust in many other institutions.
	I feel very sorry about that.
	This is something I've worked to change and I commit to stepping up that work further.
	Blah, blah, blah.
	The challenge is to keep Londoners safe, be it a reluctance to share information, to report crime or to support our work to tackle violence.
	Sadly, this leads to more black victims of crime.
	What's she saying?
	She's saying that black people in London don't cooperate with the police.
	And we know this from the example of Sasha Johnson, a Black Panther activist who got shot by some black people at a house party at like 3am on a Sunday.
	And not one of them came forward.
	No one cares.
	And so they're like, okay, what are we supposed to do?
	It's like, yeah, well, you're racist, aren't you?
	So she says, my two top priorities are reducing violence and increasing public confidence in the Met, particularly the confidence of the black, Asian and minority ethnic communities.
	Actions are more important than words and as I've said before we can do more and will do more.
	George Floyd's death was utterly awful and we recognize the strength of feeling all over the summer here in London and elsewhere.
	Okay, fine.
	So in 2022 there was a series of leaked WhatsApp messages that revealed that the Met Police are run by Ku Klux Klan incels.
	Details of messages from WhatsApp and Facebook groups, including multiple references to rape and violence against women, racist and homophobic abuse, were unveiled by the Independent Office for Police Conduct, apparently a congenitally progressive organisation.
	The officers in their defence said it was banter, but we all know there's no such thing as a joke.
	That's how men bond.
	Men insult each other all the time, and the closer friends you are, the worse the insults get.
	Yes, but you have to understand this is a police force that's being run by a woman.
	So she would see this and be like, ooh, a progressive woman no less.
	So she's like, well, that's racist homophobic abuse.
	These police officers are terrible.
	She did say, however, she had no intention of leaving, even though she is presiding over an institutionally racist and sexist police force.
	She says, I have absolutely no intention of going and believe that I am and have been actually, for the last five years, leading a real transformation in the Met.
	And she's right.
	I guess she is.
	She's led it right down hill.
	We'll get to how bad it's gotten very soon.
	She says we have a service now, which I'm absolutely certain, more professional, fairer, more transparent, more accountable and closer to its communities and more effective in, for example, reducing violent crime.
	As if.
	And has been bucking the national trends.
	Which is ironic, considering it was, was it 2020 that it became more dangerous than New York?
	Anyway.
	This scandal forced Christina Dick to resign.
	Because it's literally the only thing that we can say about the Met that's bad.
	Have we heard anything about the crime statistics, or the arrest rate, or the investigation?
	No, nothing, right?
	This is all about simply progressive talking points.
	Chrissie Dick resigned this last year, February, after the Mayor of London accused her of failing to root out a culture of racism and misogyny.
	Dick suggested that she was forced out by Sadiq Khan, saying, it was with huge sadness that following contact with the Mayor of London, it was clear that the Mayor no longer has sufficient confidence in my leadership to continue, so left me no choice but to leave.
	Khan had also put her on notice, following the publication of the Police Watchdog report previously, and he said that Crusader had presided over a return to the bad days of the Met of his childhood in the 70s and 80s.
	Those 70s where hardly anybody was being stabbed to death on the streets of London, those 70s.
	Those 70s where London was like 90% English.
	Those 70s.
	That's interesting.
	So, how's it gone?
	Well, Christina, under her tenure, actually did fire some people for being racist and sexist.
	If you go to the next one, there's a link here so I'm just going to give you the stats.
	Rather than opening it up.
	Oh, you've got it.
	Okay, fine.
	So, when it comes to race and sexism misconduct, Crusader really went hard and ended up disciplining, over the course of two years, no, sorry, four years, 26 people.
	Out of 10,000, I think it is.
	Yep.
	Right.
	Can't be that institutionally racist, if that's all they could find.
	And out of them, How many of them were dismissed?
	Only five of them were dismissed.
	The rest is written warnings, final written warnings.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	I mean, only four were dismissed.
	Yeah.
	Only four.
	So I mean, I mean, well, I mean seven in total actually of those four years.
	So, um, but the 26 cases that she investigated in total, very compelling.
	Um, so the thing is let's go to her diversity and inclusion strategy.
	Because she understands that it's the composition of the force that is the problem.
	Too many English people is basically the issue.
	She says, London is the fastest growing and changing city in the UK.
	When faced with heavy criticism in the early 2000s following the inquiry of the murder of Stephen Lawrence, at that time 3% of our officers were from a black and minority ethnic background.
	15% were female and our policies and processes were challenged as being unfair, outdated and discriminatory.
	We have moved on.
	Over the past 17 years, diversity and inclusion within the police service in general, and the Met in particular, has transformed.
	Okay, let's see how that's working.
	And their performance, when they have more diversity, could there be a link here?
	Well, performance is racist, right?
	So this is from the data that the government has given us that I post out on Twitter.
	You can see on the very far right there, the overall aspiration for Asian, black, and multiple ethnic heritage people is 40% of the force.
	Now, London is 37% English, The Met, however, is approximately 88% English.
	Isn't that strange?
	The current percentage of non-white people in the Met is 12.69% at sergeant level and 10.11% at inspector level.
	Why are the immigrants and ethnic minorities in London not joining the police force?
	Because their parents want them to be doctors, solicitors, barristers, dentists.
	Entirely possible.
	Yes, entirely possible.
	I have no idea.
	But you can see the bind that they find themselves in.
	They're like, look, we want to interface with these communities, but these communities don't seem to actually want to join the police.
	And therefore, you end up with a kind of Like a kind of two-tier ethnic policing system where you have English police over a majority-minority capital with a political framework that actively resents the English police.
	So no wonder that this isn't going very well.
	I'll state another problem.
	To attract more ethnic minorities and women you then lower the bar to attract more so they'll pass the test and pass the fitness and the written test so to employ them which then you think that's good we've got more but these people are not good enough to be police officers so they end up failing leaving or being disciplined Which then enhances the reputation of being racist, misogynistic and sexist.
	Absolutely.
	So it's this cycle you're in because weak people are making the wrong choices in leadership which then creates all the problems below it.
	That is exactly right.
	If you've got incompetent police officers who have been recruited from a community where you had to lower the standards, then not only are they going to reflect badly on that community, but they're also going to make the Met seem incompetent in that community as well.
	So, like, nobody wins outside of these diversity hires.
	The next one is the female recruitment.
	They want 50% female.
	They've got 23%, which, I mean, it's something, I suppose, but up on that 15%.
	But on the plus side though, nearly half of people think the Met's racist because of non-stop left-wing propaganda.
	I mean, don't get me wrong, maybe it is.
	You know, they could only find literally seven people to fire for being racist.
	But no, if 46% of the people think the Met is institutionally racist and only 25% think it's not racist, well, the Court of Public Opinion?
	Boom.
	Guilty.
	Why wouldn't you think It wasn't racist, because all the top police officers are saying we are racist, so I'm surprised it's only as low as 46%.
	Yes, I know, and you know, in no way am I inclined to defend the mat, because it's run by a bunch of wokists over a capital that's mostly foreigners.
	Not my problem.
	It's your problem.
	You made this.
	And so the latest report on the Met Police has found it institutionally naughty in all the progressive ways.
	How dare they?
	So, the Metropolitan Police is broken and rotten, suffering from collapsing public trust and is guilty of institutional racism, misogyny and homophobia, an official report said.
	Well then, what would you expect?
	It's been run by weak people for the last 20 years, who have all admitted that it's all of the things it's being accused of, and have just lowered the standards in order to try and exculpate themselves from a sin that can never be cleaned away.
	You realise that from the progressive perspective, This will eventually boil down to, but the Met was created by white people.
	The far left want rid of the police.
	Yes they do.
	The hashtag defund the police really means dissolve the police, that's what it really means.
	Of course that's what it means, of course that's what it means.
	But the reason they hate the police as an institution, as a concept, is because the police are a product of Robert Peel, who was a white man, and so any amount of policing, ultimately a bottom, when you drive through all of these sort of, you know, this surface layers.
	They'll get to, well, the reason this institution is racist is because it was made by white people.
	And so there is no satisfying progressive demands.
	Now, not my complaint.
	I don't live in London.
	If you guys want to live in literally a crime ridden hellhole, Not my taxes.
	But anyway, so the report by Louise Carey commissioned after the Met after one of his officers abducted Sarah Everard before raping and murdering her, obviously.
	Don't know why Chrissie DeDicke didn't find that guy's WhatsApp messages.
	Yeah, and you can't judge a whole organisation by such an outlier, such an evil one-off person.
	I can and will.
	No, you are right, obviously.
	But no, um... But that's the thing, like, okay, all of these guys who are doing, you know, banter in their WhatsApp group, none of them are convicted, but the actual rapist and murderer, for some reason, wasn't saying that in the WhatsApp group.
	Isn't that weird?
	And had nine warnings previously.
	He'd come to the attentions of his bosses nine times in his 20-year career.
	Yep.
	And yet still?
	Still.
	Crusader?
	Well, still was a firearm officer.
	It's mad, isn't it?
	It's mad.
	Anyway, so this 363-page report detailed disturbing stories of sexual assaults, usually covered up or downplayed, with 12% of women in the Met saying they had been harassed or attacked at work.
	And one third experienced success in 12%?
	Seems remarkable.
	You would think that something would have been done by the progressive leaders of the Met, but for some reason, despite all the people at the top saying the same thing, nothing filters down.
	That's such an ambiguous statement.
	It doesn't imply that she was attacked by fellow officers.
	She was attacked at work.
	I think that is, I think they are trying to say it's by fellow officers, but maybe it's not.
	Maybe it's just on the streets.
	Maybe, yeah.
	Maybe they've written it in an unclear way deliberately.
	But anyway, The woman who wrote this, Louise Casey, pinned the primary blame on its past leadership and said the public respect has fallen to a low point.
	Londoners who do not have confidence in the Met outnumber those who do, and these measures have been lower among black Londoners for years.
	A lot to unpack there.
	But primarily this comes from weak leadership, obviously, as we were talking about, but also the lack of fortitude to say where the disparate levels of crime are coming from.
	And also cultural.
	If you speak to people in Africa, do you have confidence in your police force?
	The answer is no.
	They're all corrupt.
	So then they emigrate over here.
	We have a police force.
	Of course they bring some of those cultural ideas here.
	Please don't mess with the...
	So some of it is that.
	And then you've got the Met bosses going, oh, we are racist anyway.
	And then you also have the...
	The propaganda.
	The Caribbean community that has this very insular view of justice.
	They don't...
	You know, like with the Sasha Johnson case, just the most open and shut case...
	Someone in the black community shot into this house, hit her.
	It's in every person in the black community's interest to find that person and report them to the police.
	Not if it's not culturally acceptable.
	But that's the point, isn't it?
	That's exactly my point.
	The insular nature of this culture is like, look, we kind of want segregation from the wider community of London.
	It's like, okay, but then what can they do?
	Oh, you're a bunch of racists.
	Well, You can say that, but it doesn't matter.
	If you won't cooperate with them, it doesn't matter how racist they are, they can't help you.
	They can't do anything about this.
	But anyway, as Louise carries on, the Met has yet to free itself of institutional racism.
	And that's the real problem.
	Public consent is broken.
	The Met has become unanchored from the Peelian principle of policing by consent set out when it was established.
	Okay, but it wasn't set out with the people who live in London.
	I know this is a canard I'm just going to keep hammering, but when Robert Peel set up the police in like 1890 or 1880 or whatever it was, London was like 95% English.
	The consent was about a kind of understanding between the people in charge and the cultural continuation of that community.
	This has changed.
	Like now the remnants of the Met are floating on a sea of a mixture of different cultures.
	The minority of that being the original culture that that was connected to.
	So the values embedded in the culture that are transmitted down generation upon generation that see the police through the lens of sort of peer-liked policing.
	Well, there's a vast ocean of people who don't have any connection to that.
	And so they don't understand why you should cooperate with the police.
	They don't understand what the benefit of that is.
	And it's like, okay, well, what can you do?
	And if you're one of those cultures, if you ask them seriously, would they all want policing differently?
	To fit in with our culture.
	So that neighbourhood you need to police this way, this neighbourhood that way.
	I've seen some of this first hand in Greater Manchester when I worked with the police there.
	And I'm sorry, that's just not on.
	That's just not an acceptable way of...
	atomizing and breaking up the country.
	We shouldn't do this.
	Anyway, Sir Mark Rowley, the police force commissioner since September, said he would not use the labels of institutionally racist, institutionally misogynistic and institutionally homophobic that Casey insisted that they deserved.
	Okay, so the guy in charge is now like, yeah, I'm not going to call us that.
	It's like, okay, but everyone has been doing that forever.
	And all these reports are saying, because they're being done by leftists, I mean, Sadiq Khan is like, the evidence is damning.
	Baroness Casey has found institutional racism, misogyny and homophobia, which I accept.
	Okay, well then, get rid of it.
	Defund it.
	Just abolish it.
	See what happens in London.
	See what happens.
	I'm sure it's going to be brilliant, right?
	Because, I mean, it's not like the police in London have been doing a particularly great job anyway, right?
	Since 2017, they've basically started abandoning investigating low-level crimes.
	Meh.
	Meh.
	Not our job.
	I mean, you would have thought it was their job.
	But the police are like, yeah, not my business.
	What are you talking about, right?
	This is because of a spending cut, obviously.
	But they said that they would no longer look into many reports of crimes, including burglaries, thefts and assaults, where there was judged to be little prospect of identifying the suspect.
	Detective work?
	Do I look like a cop?
	Of course I don't do that.
	Those decisions have always been made in the police.
	You know, nine cases come in, six of them have got no name suspect, well they go on a back burner, let's go for the three, we've got a name straight away.
	Those decisions have always been made.
	But the Deputy Assistant Commissioner Marksman said, with the pressure on our resources, it's not practical for officers to spend a considerable amount of time Looking something where, for example, the value of the damage or item stolen is under £50.
	Or the victim is not willing to support a prosecution.
	Yeah, it's just a waste of our time.
	Because the community isn't really worth it, and they're not going to cooperate with us anyway.
	Good.
	Turns out they ignored lots of crimes.
	If we can go to the... Not the next one, but the one after, sorry.
	Yeah, this one.
	Scotland Yard dropped 54,000 burglary cases after 24 hours.
	This was reported in 2022 as well.
	This isn't, like, historical.
	Apart from rape, burglary I would say is the most important crime for the police to investigate if you ask members of the public.
	Well I would say murder is probably top.
	Most people are not worried about being murdered.
	That's fair.
	People are worried about being raped and people are worried about being burgled.
	Between 2019 and 2021, just over 360,000 crime calls were screened out by the force in the 24 hours after they were made, meaning that after basic inquiries, detectives decided not to launch a full investigation.
	These included 38,000 violent offences, 11,000 reports of robbery, 118,000 theft allegations, 93,000 vehicle offences, and 364 sexual offences, including 10 reports of rape.
	Don't bother.
	You know, someone stole something.
	Yeah.
	Not a problem.
	The new commissioner in 2022 was like, um, I think we might actually attend burglary reports.
	So really, what a radical thing for the police to do.
	You phone them up and they turn up at your house and investigate.
	Apparently the Metropolitan Police will get back to attending all reports of burglary in London, the new commissioner has said.
	He said it was unacceptable that the proportion of reported burglaries attended by an officer from the force had fallen to 50%.
	Literally flip a coin and see if the cops come out and deal with the fact that you were broken into.
	Unbelievable.
	But hardly anything was happening anyway, because only 4% of those investigated resulted in a charge of summons anyway.
	You had a 96% of just getting away with it.
	It's remarkable.
	I mean, you know, and then everyone's just like, yeah, but they're racist.
	Racist?
	The police, they don't do any policing.
	What are you talking about?
	It's just unbelievable, the complete collapse in standards.
	And as you rightly said, it is all due to moral weakness.
	Moral weakness, poor leadership, people being promoted because they tick a box or because they walk.
	And then, I'm going to defend the police, will be this bit.
	Constantly being told by politicians what they need to do and what their priorities are.
	So, you know, they're going to start looking at burglaries.
	Well, this time next year, forget burglaries, it's this.
	And all that work that it takes to start looking at burglaries is all then dismissed.
	We need to get the best leaders in the positions of power in the police and then say to them, Do your job.
	Because you're a professional police officer, you know how to tackle crime.
	Do your job.
	Take the politics out of it.
	And that's what's ruining these police forces.
	Politics.
	But then the London mayor is literally a woke ideologue.
	Who got rid of another woke ideologue because she wasn't woke enough.
	Yep.
	I mean, what are you going to do?
	He's in charge of the police.
	No one holds him accountable for the police.
	He's the chief constable's line manager.
	And you would think, but the people of London, when given the opportunity, voted him back in.
	Okay, well then...
	abolish the police you know it's only a venerable institution with literally a century and a half of proven track record of service that was and honestly like when i was young we used to look at the police institutionally in a very positive light because of the principles it was founded on it was very well respected now look what they've done to it look what they've done to it anyway let's go to the comments apparently someone's made a game of us
	I'll be checking out the link tonight.
	See if it's any good.
	Do we have one more?
	I had no idea that there was a game with us.
	I have no idea what I've just watched.
	No, I don't!
	I don't know what I've seen!
	Any more video comments, John?
	You know, I quite honestly could be just racist here, but I think the reason why white people don't wash chicken is mostly because we understand that the heat of the cooking of the chicken usually kills all the germs anyways, so washing it is just an extra step that doesn't need to happen.
	Have you... I just can't right now.
	Have you seen this phenomenon?
	I've seen... I've not seen anything.
	I've read a little bit about it.
	Well, it just turns out that apparently American black people physically wash chicken with soap.
	And I looked into it and it turns out that a lot of Europeans do the same.
	Apparently Italians also do this.
	Which is weird.
	I think it's probably down to if you trust the manufacturers of where you get your meat from.
	And you're trying to wash off, you know, the bacteria.
	But in our country now, since the war, we've become so reliant that we know that chicken is grade A, pure quality.
	We have health standards.
	Yeah.
	But also, like, I mean, yeah, it's washing it with actual like soap, like suds, which is gross.
	But also that doesn't kill the germs, that just spreads them around to the surfaces on which you wash them.
	So it's the cooking of it that kills the germs.
	It's the heat.
	Yeah, it's the heat.
	And it's just remarkable how this was a widespread phenomenon in the black community that no one knew about until right now.
	Until what they started doing is making TikTok videos of them preparing food and I was like, why are you doing this?
	But if you've learned to cook off your mum and your mum did that, then you do it.
	George says, can you remind non-UK viewers that it'll be UTC plus one on the 26th?
	I didn't know that, by the way.
	I didn't know the clocks were changing on the 26th.
	So for anyone who doesn't know, it'll be an hour later, I guess?
	UTC plus one?
	Spring forward, yeah.
	I don't know.
	I think it's an American thing.
	John's like, hang on, we don't change for the Jews.
	Yeah, I know.
	But this is crazy foreigners, John.
	They're changing their clocks on the 26th, apparently.
	So be warned, crazy foreigners.
	Sophie says, this is exactly why Uganda passed the law the other day, making it illegal to identify as LGBTQ in Uganda.
	Seriously, look it up.
	It happened like yesterday.
	Yeah, gay imperialism.
	They don't understand what they're doing.
	By pushing this so hard.
	She also says, this is going to backfire horribly.
	And don't forget all the anti-LGBTQ countries starting to ally.
	China, Russia, the Middle East, and they're giving them motivation for it.
	While nobody in the West will sign up to fight for the rainbow flag.
	This is one of the things they keep saying about Putin.
	Putin's an evil monster who's invading Ukraine.
	It's like, yeah.
	And when you listen to his speeches, he's the only person telling the truth about the state of the West.
	It's just crazy.
	He's like, look, look what they're doing to their kids.
	Look at what they're doing to their own countries.
	Look at them.
	It's like, well, I mean, I don't like Putin.
	He's a murderous tyrant.
	But he's not wrong about his critique on us.
	It's because he's picking a message that is very hard not to support.
	If the West's message was we need to treat all our citizens with respect and we should be more tolerant to different lifestyles and we should be tolerant to different religions, well their message is that everyone can get behind.
	It'd be a lot more difficult to call us degenerates.
	Yes.
	Because they're not messages that would theoretically lead us into degeneracy.
	But apparently the Russians are surprised.
	Callum was talking to me about this the other day.
	He spoke to some Russians around there and was like, so this LGBTQ stuff, it's all just Russian propaganda about the West.
	It's like, no, that's real.
	They're like, oh.
	Did you see Putin's Christmas message when he was dressed up as Santa?
	A little advert?
	I can't remember actually.
	I watched it online.
	So he's dressed up as Santa.
	He comes down the chimney in someone's house and all the pictures of two mummies and a kid and two mummies and the little boy's got presents under the tree and a little fairy and a little doll.
	And he goes round and the dolls turn into footballs and something.
	The picture turns into a mum and dad and two kids.
	I have not seen this.
	All you see is the back of him.
	Until at every end, then he turns around and he goes... That's genius!
	Yes!
	Absolutely, that's genius!
	That's... shockingly based.
	Lord Nehervar says, It's amazing to me how the US military is constantly complaining that recruitment is through the floor and they physically cannot find enough people to enlist, but they don't seem to notice that US foreign policy is obviously imperialistic in nature at this point.
	That's another great point.
	They are making justifications in order to literally take over other countries, to gay them up, and yet no one at home is... The revealed preferences of the people at home are like, well, I'm not signing up to die for that.
	I'm not dying to queer Uganda.
	Sorry, why?
	To be honest with you, I don't agree.
	dress it up.
	People don't support imperialism, whether it wears a union jack or a pride flag.
	The US is founded on a principle of anti-imperialism, or so the youth is told, so why would they ever want to uphold the gay empire?
	To be honest with you, I don't agree.
	I think people do, would support imperialism if it was for a cause they believe.
	But I don't think this is a cause that people authentically believe.
	I don't think it's the cause.
	Where is the self-respect and social status now of joining a woke army?
	You've got boys who are not academically gifted who would be quite prepared to join a military for that training, that respect, that comradeship.
	This is why my dad joined the army.
	Exactly.
	Where you don't get that in your woke army anymore now.
	Why would you do it?
	I mean, working class lads all across the country joined the army.
	When I was young, they joined the army to get out of a poverty trap.
	Yeah.
	And to come out with skills and to do something they believed in.
	And something that was a male role.
	Yeah.
	It was honourable.
	To prove yourself that you were a man.
	Yeah.
	But it was honourable.
	It was respected.
	And it's not now.
	It's disgusting.
	It's like, no surprise whatsoever that these things are failing.
	Russian Garbage Human, see you on the weekend man, says, I'm sure it's been recommended before, but I'd like to call out the recommended reading on the weak man topic.
	Estrogeneration, how estrogenics are making you fat, sick, and infertile, which is a book by Anthony J. He's a biochemical PhD with a lot of other qualifications that goes into intricate detail about the topic.
	Good recommendation.
	Brandon says, heterosexual and lesbian couples both have higher divorce rates than gay couples.
	Well, the heterosexual and Gay male divorce rate is roughly the same.
	It's the lesbian one that's really high.
	What do heterosexual and lesbian couples have in common that could cause them to divorce at high rates?
	No, it's the other way.
	It's what's unique about the lesbian couples that makes them divorce at high rates.
	Kevin says, LGBT rights are human rights.
	Okay, so the world has the right to castrate boys and pump girls full of puberty blockers so they can't have kids.
	That's what the WEF are saying about population reduction.
	If we push LGBT in every country, particularly third world countries, where people still breed, is there is a long term way of reducing the global population?
	Well, I mean, if you listen to people like Bill Gates, they do go on about reducing the global population a lot.
	And that's happening in the West.
	The only reason we don't see it is because of immigration.
	So if you raise more people out of poverty, then they'll hit a certain level where they want the better things in life.
	And having six kids isn't the better things in life.
	I'll have two or one and I can go on foreign holidays.
	So raising people out of poverty will reduce the Earth's population anyway.
	And that's why they're all for feminism and women's rights and whatnot.
	They want the same process that's happened here to happen there, in order to reduce the amount of people in the world.
	It's like, OK, well, I'm sure that there's going to be nothing terrible that happens from this agenda being enacted.
	Miles says, with net zero and the Great Reset, we'll no longer go to war for oil, but for LGBTQ rights.
	Yep.
	This is wokeness.
	It will be a woke empire.
	But I don't think they're going to find many soldiers signing up.
	Matthew says, do you find it interesting that the same Western countries that complain of low birth rates are the ones pushing the acceptance of the gay agenda?
	I think these are not directly tied, but they're a kind of consequence of the other, right?
	It's the over-feminisation of society.
	Yeah.
	Women are more tolerant, more compassionate, more be kind, let's share everything.
	And these are the female traits that we're inheriting that then allows the alphabet people to expand.
	So, this is a good question for you here, Nick, from Bleach Demon.
	The question I have to Nick, then, is what is the incentive for strong men to sacrifice themselves for a tribe that openly despises that sacrifice?
	There has to be some inherent value for the sacrifice to be worthwhile.
	In the current paradigm, it seems that modern society is taking one on the chin may be more of value than keeping society limping along.
	So why should men do it?
	It's a great point.
	And I would say you do it because it's the right thing to do.
	Because if you don't do it, then who's going to step forward and do it?
	By one strong man standing forward and making a stance will encourage others to stand forward.
	And if all we're doing is strongmen don't admit defeat, I think that's really the point.
	Strongmen don't admit defeat.
	But to argue in Bleach Demon's court here, It is essentially what he's saying is there would have to be a total revolution in the way that we look at men and women to make it noble again to be a man and therefore for men to be prepared to make sacrifices.
	Because I'm actually very much with him on this.
	In the current state of affairs, in the way that men are constantly derided, I mean I wouldn't recommend joining the military.
	don't go and die for the gay empire guys.
	You know, it's just not, you don't, you don't deserve that, you know?
	And so until these things change, why should they do it?
	I don't have compelling reason that they should.
	These things won't change until men start being real men.
	I mean, things are definitely changing.
	Women now, a lot of women now are beginning to realize this career trap.
	Yeah.
	Isn't beneficial to them.
	They're beginning to realise taking the pill is messing with their bodies.
	They're reducing taking the pill.
	Some of the things... They've only had 50 years to work this out.
	Yeah, but in a grand scheme of things, it's tiny.
	The backlash on abortion now is growing and growing all the time.
	When I was growing up, that just seemed as normal.
	Things are changing.
	We don't see them changing because we're living in the moment.
	We're living through it.
	It seems terrible.
	But if you take a step back, we're in a better position now to win this culture war than we were Ten years ago?
	Yeah.
	Ten years ago we had nothing.
	Exactly.
	We at least have voices speaking about this now.
	So who knows where that goes.
	But don't do anything stupid.
	Don't sacrifice yourself.
	Just be patient.
	We don't need martyrs, so don't lose your job and your life over something silly.
	What you can be, though, is a ninja.
	Be a ninja, not a whinger.
	So don't moan about things.
	Do the little sneaky things you can do that will have an impact, but don't lose your job, your career, your life over it.
	Yeah, yeah.
	So, you know, support those people that you think are worthy of support.
	Yes.
	Alex says, being a man requires that you suffer.
	Men train, make hard decisions, carry burdens, and lose friends along the way.
	This has to start from childhood.
	We idolize youth, we never want them to suffer, so we don't make men.
	A hundred years ago, every kid would have seen death by the age of ten.
	The story of Old Yellow was a reality for every farm boy.
	By banishing suffering, people have chosen a soulless existence.
	I totally agree.
	I totally agree with that, yeah.
	What was I talking to you the other day?
	I can't remember who it was, but I was basically like, no, I'm actually kind of pro-suffering at this point, actually.
	Like, I'm actually kind of pro it, you know.
	Obviously, not terrible, deliberating suffering that you'll never recover from.
	But you need to suffer.
	Without pain, there's no joy.
	Without sunshine, without rain, there's no sunshine.
	You need yin and yang.
	You need both of them.
	You can't appreciate what's good until you've seen and felt what was bad.
	Also, you don't understand the benefit that suffering has to your personal character.
	You don't understand that you need to be tested in order to have a measure of yourself and to grow as a person.
	To keep you in a position, exactly as you're saying, to keep you in a position that prevents suffering is to keep you in an internal child-like place where you can't become an adult.
	No, you need to go through the fire.
	It's not wrong to suffer.
	Baystape says the water supplies in London are full of cocaine.
	That actually explains a lot.
	It does explain a lot to me, doesn't it?
	Taffy Duck says, the pill ruins women.
	I mean, how much worse can it get?
	Look at the list of side effects.
	Yeah, this is what I was saying.
	My wife hates the pill because it does weird things to your body.
	It makes you depressed, or it makes you want to, you know, all these horrible side effects.
	It's like, yeah.
	It's awful.
	I'm so glad I don't have to go through it.
	Nape says, men should moisturize with the blood of their enemies.
	There, solved the problem.
	Still moisturizing, which is kind of gay.
	Le French Revolution says, while water might contribute, the biggest reason for the weakening of men is the lack of physical activity.
	Sitting around all childhood at school or playing video games and adulthood working in the office will not make you a real man.
	You have to get up there and build things with your hands doing hard work.
	And that's, again, another actually real issue.
	I recall seeing a thing about jaw strength.
	Apparently our food has become softer.
	So if you look back at men in the 1920s, they've got much stronger jaws.
	Whereas we're all soy boys now.
	Our grip has been reduced by 30%.
	Yeah, it's mad.
	Yeah, it's genuinely mad.
	So yeah, no, you are absolutely right.
	We should be doing it.
	And we also miss role models as well.
	It's like, who can you look up to?
	Who you're aspiring to be?
	Yeah.
	Will Smith?
	Yeah.
	I don't think so.
	I bet 20 years ago Will Smith was a genuinely inspirational role model for young black men as well.
	I bet there were so many young black men who were like, yeah, I'm going to be successful at Will Smith.
	He was tall, good looking, charismatic, funny, a good actor, rich, did action movies.
	He was like perfect.
	Yeah, he had everything.
	What was he missing?
	He could sing, he was a rapper, he's like everything!
	Yeah, that's a good point.
	I'm thinking back when I was a teenager, Will Smith was just the biggest thing in the world.
	Don't worry, I've watched a bunch of films with Will Smith in.
	I've absolutely loved!
	Me too!
	But now, it's a genuine tragedy.
	A genuine tragedy.
	And all it took was a bit of spying for him to just go, no, I'm not doing that.
	I'm not going to do that.
	That's all it would have taken.
	You're my son.
	Sit down and shut up.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Sit up straight.
	Yeah.
	That's genuinely upsetting, actually.
	It's like, what a sad thing to watch play out in real time.
	Did you see the interview with him with his wife?
	His wife interviewed him about her affair.
	Live.
	When they were around a kitchen table.
	And you could see the tears in his eyes.
	How are you doing this Dave?
	This 5 foot tiny woman is just destroying this 6 foot 3 beast of a man and he's just taking it.
	Whatever was in him, she's chipped away over decades.
	And she's so selfish as well.
	It's just like, look what you're doing to this guy.
	Why do you want to reduce him to this?
	Why don't you want to have some sort of ennobling characteristic in the man you're married to?
	I just, I can't stand it.
	But it's his own fault.
	He did it to himself.
	She's damaged culture.
	I think on that podcast, she explains about how her gran taught her how to masturbate at 11.
	And it's like, you're damaged.
	You're damaged.
	But the point is, he should be taking responsibility for all of this and be like, yeah, no, you're right, I messed up.
	He's a man.
	You're out.
	You're gone.
	Kids, you know, you're going to school, you're going to discipline them however he needs to.
	Anyone, you know, I will fix all of this and these will be the rules.
	And I'm not going to, you know, he could sort all of this.
	He's rich enough, he's famous enough, he's popular enough.
	He could have fixed all of this.
	Everybody would have been on his side.
	Yeah, totally!
	Totally, I'd have been banging the drum being like, yes, come on!
	You know, lay down the law, you know?
	Anyway, Severin Knox says, Convince women to pick up strong guys and guys will get stronger for their families.
	All of your strength will be used to make your life easier for parasites and you will perish like a horse from Animal Farm.
	Well, yeah, unfortunately, that's the way things are at the moment.
	Brandon says, I don't know if the left really wants to get rid of the police.
	If they did that, who would arrest people for praying outside of abortion clinics or posting hate speech online?
	Are left anarchists or totalitarians?
	Well, that's the point of contradiction that they've been on for the last 200 years.
	They don't know.
	And the answer is always totalitarians.
	Angel Brain says, I think the Met is a really good example of tradition and institution banging heads with political convenience and gain.
	Are they racist?
	Not by design, but if you take an institution that is old and ask it to develop a new and radically different culture every 15 years or so, in the sense that they don't now police London, but instead Bangladesh, Romania, Nigeria, the People's Republic of Transistan, they can't adapt that quickly to becoming every type of police officer at every place in the world at any point in history, and you're forcing a return to fiefdoms and city-states.
	Exactly right.
	And what we should be doing is saying, no, this is the English method of policing.
	And if you're going to come and live in England, you have to live with that.
	If you don't like it, well, the door's free.
	Your door's open, you're free to leave.
	But this is how you'll be policed.
	They should have just come down.
	Like Will Smith, just all of this, this entire podcast, the one message, just stick to your guns.
	Weak men.
	Exactly.
	Weak men, man.
	Anyway, Radnar says, The police's permissiveness of particularly sick forms of crime has turned Britain into a powder keg.
	If this is not fixed in the near future, I truly believe we'll have one grooming gang story too many for common people and the keg will blow with pretty dire results on all sides.
	Yeah, I really at some point would like to go to these communities that have been victimised by the grooming gangs and ask just the regular English folk around there, how do you feel?
	But the thing is, I'm worried that they wouldn't even say, because I'm like, well, I can't say.
	What am I supposed to say?
	I met, not me, my charity worked with one of the girls from Watchdale.
	She ended up homeless, living in a squat in the city centre.
	And we met her in a homeless shelter in the city centre.
	And we'd known her several years before, but she said to us, I need a shower.
	Would you come upstairs in this centre and sit outside the bathroom door?
	No need, there's big locks on them.
	I know, but I can't have a shower unless I've got someone sat outside because I've been in lots of bathrooms where I've been washed and bathed and raped.
	And it's like, wow.
	On that note, I'm afraid we're out of time.
	So if you want more from us, go to lowseas.com, sign up, support us, help us keep the lights on, and we'll be back tomorrow.

▲