All Episodes
Previous Next
March 2, 2023 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters
01:31:14
The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #601
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus EOS for the 2nd of March 2023.
I'm joined by Carl. Hello.
I think is today the first day of spring, or second?
It feels like the first day of spring, doesn't it?
It was nice coming in today. Hey, welcome to spring.
Welcome to Spring Watch. Today we're going to be talking about the problem with grass, is there's too many white people.
English Londoners have liquid brains, and Hogwarts Legacy is getting a sequel, folks.
Some good news. Yeah, Racism 2.0 is in the works, apparently.
Transphobia 2.0. I think racism too.
I think it ended up getting all of those brushes somehow.
Even though the game has none of... No wonder it sold so well.
Getting with the countryside. So, the problem with grass is that there's just too many white people in the grass.
The problem with grass is there's not enough Guardian journalists touching it.
That's the problem. Yeah, that's the real issue.
In case you're wondering what we're talking about, we'll get it up.
This is the article here that's spurred a lot of interest because what the heck.
The English countryside still feels like a white middle-class club.
We can and will change this, says Dan.
Dan, if you don't feel welcome somewhere, maybe the reason for that is because you're not.
I don't know why he would feel unwelcome at all.
Anyway, we'll get into that in a minute.
I think it's just him, though.
It is just him. It is entirely just him.
There's white people in the grass, like the snow is speaking Finnish, or the trees are speaking Vietnamese, the countryside, the hedgerows are speaking English to me, and he's gotten mad about that.
Is he looking at the crime rates of the Shires and being like, well, this isn't anything like London?
That is one of the complaints. So we'll start off with crime.
We'll just promote something on Lotuses.com, which was crime, which is Frank Dakota's The Tragedy of Liberation.
Ah, good. Dan's going to follow the footsteps of Mao and create the new man.
Yes, because you may remember Mao turned up in China and went, this isn't real China.
You know what real China is?
Everyone's starving to death and murdering each other.
Literally fields of corpses.
Yeah, and Dan has a similar problem where he's gone, God damn it, it's all so peaceful and quaint.
This isn't real England.
I want to have it destroyed.
Let's start off, because there are mock outlets that predicted this.
I mean, this is a fake Guardian outlet that was made to take the piss out of the Guardian.
In 2020, they published this.
Lifestyle. Why aren't more nature countryside walks being created specifically for the needs of black, Asian, and minority ethnic groups?
Oh, Dan, do you feel silly?
He is actually the joke version of himself.
And then if we go to some other memes that were made about this, Cecil Road memes came out of the works.
Oh yeah, I totally agree with this one.
The African countryside still feels like a black hunter-gatherer club.
We can and will change this.
Cecil Rhodes. These poor, belighted savages are yet to be blessed with the civilising effects of the Anglo-Saxon race.
And blah blah blah, as Cecil Rhodes would have written.
Which is basically Dan's position, that these poor, benighted savage Englishmen have yet to be blessed by the civilising effects of Jamaicans.
Yeah, I don't know what we're missing from Jamaica, specifically.
We've got the recipe, so I mean, that argument's out the window.
Yeah, now we've got your food.
I've purchased your cookbook.
So now leave, Mr.
Jamie Oliver. I mean, to be fair, that is true.
I mean, what do you need Jamie Oliver for once you've got the book?
Well, yeah, great question. So we'll go back to the article, because first thing's first.
Dan, over here. Literally who?
Literally in Stroud, eh?
Right. But also, literally who?
Who the hell is Dan? Someone who's about to start terraforming the shires.
Exactly, but keep that in mind. Where I live, he writes, in Stroud, Gloucestershire, I feel privileged to have a gorgeous view of the valleys out of my bedroom window, stretching as far as the eye can see.
Sounds pretty good. Yeah.
It's a postcard perfect...
Dan's like, yeah, this has to change.
It's a postcard perfect sea of green that looks just as beautiful in the summer sunshine as it does on a frosty winter's morning.
And why do you hate it?
Why are you upset? Why do you...
Go enjoy it. So everything's brilliant.
Go for a walk. But...
Comma.
As a person of colour...
Living in a rural area...
Many of the fields I can see feel off-limits to me.
Why? Those fields are off-limits.
Is there a guard by the geeks of these fields?
Just be like, no blacks, no Irish, no dogs.
Checking bags to see if you're hiding any black children in them before you can go and touch the grass.
Excuse me, sir, you have far too much money and then turn around and go back to where you came from.
Back off with you.
You've never seen the British Constabulary?
They usually wear hoods. Not rainbows.
They're not normally out in the countryside, to be honest.
No, I also think there's a new division of countryside keepers, as we call them.
A government review in 2019 found that I'm not alone in thinking this.
That the fields are...
I'm sorry, that just indicates there are loads of idiots.
Yeah. I'm not the only idiot in this country, that's true.
Lots of people who live in the city and don't know what a cow is or seem one, they just know it as beef.
They don't think they're allowed in the grass because the white people will get them.
I don't know. What is wrong with you?
Many black, Asian, and ethnically diverse people, because remember white people are not diverse, reportedly view the countryside as an exclusive mainly white, mainly middle class club.
He then presides his reasoning, which is none, I'm not joking.
There is no reasoning to that. He just says it's the case.
Well, what he's saying is that English people live in the English countryside.
Yeah. And he doesn't really want to associate with English people.
He wants to associate with other migrants.
He wants to live in London, but with fields.
Sorry, you can move to whatever country you came from, or your parents came from.
His grandparents are from Jamaica.
Well, there we go. I think there are fields in Jamaica.
I imagine there are. It might be the surface of Mars.
I don't know. It could be a blasted, desolate wasteland.
In the Caribbean. In an attempt to challenge this perspective of the countryside in an exclusively white area, the Independent Cinema Office and the Lux Arts Agency have commissioned a program called Right of Way to show alongside archival shots exploring the history of the natural trails.
He's talking about archival shots of black people in the countryside, in case you're wondering.
There is some 1950s footage of a black family once having a picnic.
Amazing. And they're like, oh, look what we found!
Proof that England has always been diverse.
Yeah, nah. But it's a really weird obsession, obviously.
However, himself, my film, Black Strangers...
Which I'm sure is going to be a side full of nodgers.
I can't wait to watch it.
Complete sludge. Follows my attempts to search for an 18th century namesake of mine, a mononymous Daniel who was buried in a nearby nymphs field on 35th December 1719 and was described in records held in Gloucestershire archives as being simply a black stranger.
Really? So 300 years ago, there was a black man in Gloucestershire for some reason.
Maybe. And I, someone who has nothing to connect me with him other than the colour of my skin.
Except he's barely even black.
Except he's obviously, yeah, barely even black.
I'm going to go and dig up his bones and say, brother.
You've got no connection to this man.
So he's also made a film whining about how the countryside is white.
The reason he's done that is...
You know what the problem of England is, Callum?
Too many English. He doesn't explain his reasoning either for that one.
That's because that's what that is.
That's just it. Never explain it.
I made the film in the aftermath of my involvement in the council-led consultation in Shroud.
I assume it was a debate in Stroud about to kill all the black people.
To focus your efforts so much on the racial divide of Stroud.
I actually know what they're talking about.
It kind of is, actually.
Not really. It kind of is.
There are too many black people represented in Stroud, and when you start removing some of that representation...
You're quite right. And Dan here was leading that charge.
Maybe we should start listening to Dan.
Maybe he's... He was asking the people of Stroud about the Black Boy Clock.
Stroud's consultation drew media attention from outlets across the political spectrum and ignited a culture war debate.
Now, I think this is interesting because I looked into this.
Because there are a lot of pubs and stuff called the Black Boy.
And everyone's like, but that's got nothing to do with an African.
Because it was King Charles.
Was it the first, I think it was? With black hair.
And so he was called the Black Boy.
Because it turns out that other things than skin can be black.
I mean, in this case, it actually was a replica of a black boy.
But yeah, actually, in this case, it is what we should call black representation.
Yeah, but this is all this individual is, Dan over here.
He's just a local whiner, and if we go to the next link here, we can see how local...
The local man whines in The Guardian.
No, seriously, because he has no other publications in The Guardian.
The Stroud Greens are sharing his thing, I haven't noticed, doing my research, and it's like, yeah, interesting.
I wonder which party he belongs to, and spends his time whining with...
Who knows? He's also a local pronoun user.
Of course he is. He is a pronoun fan.
Pronoun aficionado.
We go to his Instagram, you can see that.
He, him. I couldn't have guessed that.
And as you can see, he then has the black boy there as his only accomplishment in life.
He once saw black representation and went, none of that.
That is his crowning achievement.
I just don't understand why we have to take down every representation of a black person in England.
I don't know if there's a higher picture for people to see, but if you scroll, maybe you'll find it.
There's the black boy there.
In case you're wondering, it's a sculpture that was made in the 1700s of a black person with a spear, who is obviously tribal because it's the 1700s.
They had not quite got to Wakanda in...
West Africa at that point. We talked about this and they still didn't have the wheel, did they?
Well, these days they have spaceships I've seen on Hollywood, so quite a thing has changed.
But you might have noticed that he's got a spear, and I'm harking on that because he keeps claiming, this individual, that it's a representation of slavery.
Slaves don't have spears. Yeah, no, that's a representation of the person who captured the slaves.
Yeah, that's a representation of a slaver.
A hard-working black man with a high-paying job.
He was a crown in his community, provided for his family by stealing other families.
But that's the reality of history.
Anyway, someone put that up in the local town to be like, hey, isn't that neat?
There you are. No, no, I'm kind of on board with taking down the statue of a slaver now.
Yeah, well, I stand with this chap.
So we go to his website, Dan's, just to check out more about this individual.
How do you get some piece of crap published in the article like that?
Where you're just like, you know what the problem is?
White people. Get rid of them.
Give me an article. How do you get that published in The Guardian?
That's practically everything they publish.
But let's check out just this person's background.
Even tangentially. Because I did.
And this is his own website where he just jacked himself off.
Well, obviously it's his own website.
Yeah, but it's like the wankiest thing on earth.
Quote, the new commissions interrupt and challenge the enduring perception of the rural idyllic as an untouched and unchanging space where time stands still.
Nobody thinks that. They're talking about the countryside as a beautiful, wonderful place.
Yeah, but nobody thinks that the English countryside has been locked in some sort of primordial stasis.
Like, the reason it's covered in hedgerows is because it's constantly been used.
Yeah. What happens when black, Asian, and other ethnically diverse people enter the landscapes?
Oh god, why does everyone else have to be ethnic rather than us?
I also love the idea that it's like, it's almost like a white nationalist talking, where they're like, what happens if I put a black here?
Well, the whole thing will fall apart, maybe.
I don't know. Let's find out. What?
Black, Asian, and...
Asian isn't an ethnicity.
No. Like, Asian is a massive continent filled with billions of people.
I mean, black or white, neither of those are ethnicities.
No, well, yeah, black isn't an ethnicity either.
But the only ethnic diverse people...
But at least black isn't a location. See, whites can't be ethnically diverse, even though there's like, what, I think about 200 ethnicities in Europe?
Yeah, there are loads of ethnicities in Europe, and I don't want any of them wandering around the English countryside either.
You really? You don't want the...
No, I don't want the Germans bloody wandering around.
They've got their own countryside. Enjoy.
Go back to Albania.
Well, he asks what will happen if I put one of those blacks in the neighbourhood.
Which is a really weird thing for Dan to ask.
Just average Friday afternoon.
How can our natural spaces be homes to protest, trespassing, activism and raves?
Oh, God, no!
I don't want any of that in the countryside!
But also he's like, you know what will happen if we put brown people?
There'll be protest...
Oh, for fuck! I can't, I can't.
There'll be crimes. Oh, really, Dan?
This is his own writings.
We'll go to... I don't want any of that in the countryside.
I just want to go for a nice walk. How does this person live writing such crap?
Well, he gets money from the box here, which is someplace.
They have an article on him talking about how wonderful he is.
Mr. Dan over here, he got a bursary, supported a new moving image project.
Yeah, so he's essentially state-funded, basically.
But also, he's making a movie, a moving image project, is what they call it.
Yeah, okay. No, but like it's 1910.
He's in the pictures, you see!
I kind of approve of the antiquated language.
He investigates historical and contemporary black presences in Stroud.
Like they're ghosts.
It's an urban legend.
I mean, it probably is in Stroud, but why?
Who wrote this crap?
To what end? Dan used his bursary to purchase some equipment and software that helped him improve his audio production skills.
He developed a generative soundscape for an installation which draws on the unease that comes from being visible as a minority in a predominantly white area of the English countryside.
I mean, there's a lot of words to just say wasted money.
Scroll down! No, no, there's a lot of words to say, yeah, I kind of don't like white people.
You notice funders at the very bottom there.
Plymouth Arts Council being the one.
You've got the National Lottery, which is wrong with the government.
You also have Plymouth Council.
Fantastic. What I love about Dan is literally the only notable thing about him is he's black.
Yes. That's literally all the...
Look, I want to talk about how I've not got the same skin tone as the other people I live around.
Yeah, but why? And also, someone else who isn't me did a thing.
Yeah. And I don't like it. Well, yeah, there is that.
But, like, who cares about that, Dan?
But again, you've done zero with your life.
You sit and whine. If you go to the next one here, we can see more of who funds them.
The Box here, in case you want to know who the hell they were, it's a £46 million cultural destination proudly led by Plymouth Council.
Plymouth Council are funding a black guy in Stroud.
To be black. And that's it.
That's his output. Although it's not a surprise, they list our values, progressive.
They have equality, diversity and inclusion statements and confessions.
Anti-racism party mantras at the bottom as well.
About how they're totally anti-racist.
Anyway, it's all tax money, is my point, fundamentally.
We'll go forward, because we also have the University of Plymouth, who are very proud to have such works as Black Man.
Is literally all this is.
This is Dan's work, I think, at the University of Plymouth.
Do you think he did something else than this one thing for his university projects?
I don't know. What is this one thing?
Uh, whining, again, about the black boy statue.
Okay, well... That's it. Again, literally nothing.
Can't have black representation in Stroud.
I agree, Dan. Get rid of it.
If we go to the installation, just to see what the hell they're whining about.
I mean, this is Dan's work here, is he took some footage that someone else took of the black boy statue, and then got some footage of when he was four years old, and also a black boy.
Okay. And put them next to each other.
Okay. Isn't it stunning, Carl?
I mean, what... Isn't this moving?
Well, I don't really understand what his problem is, to be honest.
I'm actually going to take him seriously for a minute.
Because this doesn't seem, the statue itself doesn't seem degrading.
No, it isn't. It doesn't seem like it's like, you know, an insult.
He hasn't got a collar around his neck.
He's not on his knees. No.
He bangs a bell. The guy that made this in the 1700s wasn't mocking black people.
Yeah. It was actually like, oh, they look different, so let's draw one of them.
Isn't this something interesting and different and foreign?
No, we can't have those things anymore.
Can't have anything nice. We'll have a look at him himself.
Because the thing is, he's a boy.
He's not really achieved anything.
Regardless of how old he is, he remains a boy.
Just whining about statues, and at the same time being given money and attention from pathetic state propaganda machines.
Okay, so here's a quick question.
If you don't really like living around white English people, why don't you go somewhere where you do like the colour of the skin of the people that you're living around?
Don't know. Who knows?
And if we go to the next stuff here, because the thing is, like, this guy, he's given a national newspaper and is, yeah, approved a couple of things, which is mostly these articles are pointless.
Number two, because it's literally just an outlet for him to whine, but that's what The Guardian pays for.
But the second thing is that this happens all the time in left-wing media, and it's kind of annoying that the rightist media doesn't do that.
Because it's literally like left-wing bait you can make, and it has no effect.
The left will whine, it'll have no actual effect on your bottom line.
If you have a telegraph or the Daily Mail, they could do that.
Well, yeah, yeah. But they just don't, because they're pathetic.
But I suppose in the meantime, we'll all get to enjoy more memes, such as social road memes.
But now for some real news, such as local Tunisian man, who I just...
I don't know if we can play this from the start, because it's...
It's, um, some actual racism in the world, which is really weird.
You know who they are?
- Yeah, go soft.
- Yeah.
- I know who they are. - I know who they are. - I know who they are. - I know who they are. - I know who they are. - I know who they are. - Oh. - Least racist Tunisian male.
you - Yeah.
For people listening, it's a Tunisian man being interviewed by Tunisian media.
He's saying, oh, black people don't have the same values as us.
She's like, well, have you met any? Trying to, like, more grandstand on him.
And he's like, my grandfather used to buy and sell them.
What do you mean have I met any? But there we are.
There's something you could actually speak about.
And frankly, I want to hear what that guy's got to say in an article.
I want to hear what Dan's got to say about that guy.
Yeah. Come on, Dan.
You know, we're talking about your fellow non-whites.
The non-white race.
Yeah, the non-white coalition or union that you're part of.
You know, do you want that guy wandering around the Stroud countryside with you?
Is that a no, Dan?
I think he would probably walk up to the statue and be like, my brother.
Like, slavers in slavery pride?
No. What am I saying?
I don't know where I was going. But anyway.
Tunisian guy's like, hey, one's escaped.
No, no, because they're both slavers.
Because the guy with the statue. Yeah, yeah, I know, but Dan isn't.
No, that's a whole other conversation to be had.
But anyway, my point being, when you can do research into people in the media, you do have more fun with, like, realizing what's funny, because it's just stupid as well.
Like, I was sat with my brother the other day, and he's watching some football show, and they've got flags and signs everywhere about, don't be racist, racism bad, black lives matter.
And it's, you know, I'm looking at that thinking, what a waste of time.
Did I get a Tunisian opinion on that?
But then my brother was looking at it and he just went, why am I watching this crap?
I know more about football than these nonsense.
And changed it. Great point.
Yeah, great. And a lot of the people you see on legacy media, such as The Guardian or TV, is just like, yeah, these people are actual morons.
I hate to say, but Dan did look fairly mediocre.
Yes. Right. Well, he's not done anything, so I think it's an accurate assessment.
I mean, none of the thoughts that he was putting down in the article seemed to be original to him.
But he couldn't even explain his reasoning.
It was literally just, it's bad.
Am I right? Isn't it bad to be surrounded by people who aren't the same colour of you?
Not in my opinion, Dan, but that's because that would be illegal.
Some kind of hate crime. I don't know what's the demographics of Jamaica, but presumably also too white.
I actually do know what the demographics of Jamaica are.
And no, it's not too white.
Anyway, moving on to places with strange demographics, let's talk about London.
London, as we learned in the 2021 census, is only 37% English.
And most of those will be rather transient people.
People who move to London in their 20s and leave in their 30s.
Get some experience. And there's a young lady on the internet called Jess Gill.
I'd like to give her a shout out because she goes out and talks to these English people and it turns out that they are basically retarded.
Every single one of them has had their brain turned to mush.
Literally, you can see it dribbling out of their ears as she asks them the most rudimentary of questions.
She's not pushing them hard.
She's not destroying them.
She's allowing them to destroy themselves.
I thought we'd give it a bit of a watch because it's very, very amusing.
The most intelligent Londoners, ladies and gents.
Yes, in fact, that's exactly it, actually.
A lot of them are quite intelligent, and you can see how this has led them to the positions that they've held, which are really, really stupid.
Before we begin, if you want to support us, go to TheLogacies.com, sign up and watch My Contemplations with Josh, The Limitations of Science.
Finally get to put some anti-science action into practice.
Destroy science with Josh, Josh being a scientist.
Destroying science with facts and logic, eh?
Oh, it's brilliant, yeah. Okay. Well, no, you can, actually.
Well, destroy it with feels and reels as well.
Well, because most of science, well, a lot of science, is not factual or logical, actually.
A lot of it's agenda-driven and ideological.
Yeah. So it was quite fun.
Made by humans. Yeah, exactly, because it's done by humans.
And so the standards that science sets for itself are kind of unreachable and doomed to fail.
Anyway, go and enjoy that.
I enjoyed that. So let's begin with Jess's first question to random English Londoners.
What are men good for?
Are they good for anything? I mean, civilization.
You'd think. Yeah.
I mean, they only make sure the sewers keep working.
I mean, everything. It's around.
Pretty all infrastructure. Yeah.
Is there a single infrastructure project that's mostly run by women?
Mostly farmers producing your food.
No, there's no infrastructure that's run by women.
Men build every building that you see in these clips.
It's just fact. I looked this up a while ago.
It's something like 97% of the construction industry is male, and I bet that 3% are mostly in administrative positions.
Water, power, roads, food, building, shelter, electricity.
Literally anything you think is a common good in your life was built by a man.
It's not, like, secret.
This is well known, but let's watch.
What's a straight white man good for?
Straight white men?
Yeah. Not a lot.
What are straight white men good for?
That's a hard one.
I don't know. Do you think straight white men are important?
No. We're utter fucking trash.
What are straight white men good for?
Being rude and making you feel uncomfortable.
Do you think they're important?
No. So what would you say they're good for?
I don't know.
What do you think they're good for in society?
If they give you their bank card, that's pretty good.
Do you think that the system is against anyone who isn't a straight white male?
I mean, I would say it's like a system based on, like, you know, heteronormative hegemony and, like, binary system.
Okay, so in that clip there were a lot of non-English people.
I didn't realise that first one.
In the other ones there are lots of English people.
I love how intelligent that is.
All of them are so disconnected from any part of humanity.
Yes. Like, this is one of the things I like about going to, like, a place like Lohansk or something where it's all falling apart and it's getting there, is you're reminding yourself of what really matters.
Yes. Like, when you live just in London, where you can just get anything for money.
That someone else has produced and transported to you.
You don't have to think about any of the steps that got to where you are.
Just buy it and move on. You never think about it.
You become deluded. Straight white men are basically scum, aren't they?
Yeah. Basically disgusting.
Yeah. They make me uncomfortable.
Yeah. That's all it is.
Okay. Literally the untouchables.
Okay. So, what about conservatives, Callum?
What do you think their opinions on conservatives are?
What's the difference between a conservative and a straight white man?
The Venn diagram is harmonizing.
What does it mean to be a Conservative?
That you like to make sure that the rich have money and the poor don't and that you don't care about the working class people?
There's a big stigma of disliking poor people, wanting to cut benefits, kind of helping the rich get richer and helping the poor get poorer.
What does it mean to be a Conservative?
Rich and negligent.
Rich and old. Yeah, same.
Do you think the conservatives are good people?
No. Not at all.
They have their own ideals about the world and they're not really in tune with what the people need.
They're not looking at what the people need.
Conservatives? Aren't they just evil?
Help the poor get poorer.
Well, I mean, the poor have, say, got, you know, a very small amount of money.
I'll help you with that. Think Sheriff of Nottingham in Robin Hood, the cartoon, the Disney version.
You know, so you see, oh, they've got a penny left, I better take that.
That's right, I'm a conservative.
Just correct that. That is in Reading.
That's not in London there. Was that Reading?
Yeah, I recognise it. Because I used to live there.
Jess gets about. But it's...
It all looks the same.
I couldn't tell that it wasn't London.
Which is a real sad indictment of Reading.
But isn't that just amazing? Conservatives, yeah.
Aren't they just people who go around being as evil as possible?
As evil as they can be to make as many people suffer.
Yeah, that's what Conservatives are like.
Now, moving on with my life.
Yeah. It's like, dude, you don't think that.
Like, nobody really thinks that.
Have you really thought that?
I don't know. I mean, when you talk about, you know, you go and look at what the average German thought of the Jews in the time of the 1930s and 40s.
They do have a very similar opinion, actually.
That's what I mean. Like, state propaganda.
People think things and don't know why they think it, because they hear someone else say it, and then they think that thing until someone else says a thing that they now think.
They don't actually think about the statement.
It's why you get people who will tell you that they support X, Y, or Z cause, and you ask them why, and they've got nada.
They've just been told to either by the state or the TV or whatever else.
But it's interesting that they describe conservatives in the same way that a 1930s Nazi might describe Jews.
Hmm. Well, they just want the rich to get richer and the poor to get poorer.
It's here to exploit us Germans, aren't they?
So yeah, there's an evil parasite on top of society.
That's what a conservative is. I really like the interviews like this, where it's usually a guy, and they'll be talking to women, and it'll be something like, name three countries.
And they'll be like, London, Asia.
You don't correct them, you just go, yeah, that's right.
Yeah, there's this one guy going, and he literally just agrees with everything they say.
It's amazing. It's comedy gold.
Speaking of comedy gold, what do you think their opinion on being a woman is, Callum?
The W question.
The ultimate, the nuclear question.
The question that ruins careers.
Let's watch! So, how would you define what a woman is?
I think that's a very difficult question.
Yeah, I think gender is a social construct.
It's, I think especially in this day and age, it's something that is, like, possibly, I don't actually know.
I think the idea of womanhood and people who are born in female bodies or with female genitalia, it's like you have this experience growing up, especially with childhood and being a teenager, Of this, like, woman experience.
But that doesn't...
It may make you different to people that have not been born...
That weren't, like, assigned female at birth.
Like, you may have a different experience to those women, and they may have just experiences to you, but I think it's very...
It's not a very good explanation, because defining what a woman is, I think, is very difficult.
Yeah. Because you may, on the outside, to a random person, look like a woman and be a woman, but may not feel like a woman yourself, or be the opposite.
How would you define what a woman is?
I don't know. That is a shitty question.
Someone with a vagina.
Yeah, someone with a vagina.
I don't know. No, no, not in every sense, obviously.
No, that is very true, actually.
Yeah, I'm joking. Like, obviously, just feminine energy.
Yeah. Because obviously that then includes, like, trans women and then, like...
Yeah, everything in between.
So, what does feminine energy entail?
It's just an aura, isn't it?
It's hard to explain it.
I think it's just a being, isn't it?
Like, how you present yourself.
I think it can be different to everyone, really.
I think my feminine energy might be a little bit different to his, different to yours, different to anyone's.
This is actually a great clip to explain thinking as a concept.
Because you can see there's a few there.
I mean, like the girl on the right at the start, right?
She clearly has been told a thing.
She's never thought it. She's never actually reasoned it.
She's been told a thing, which is what her answer was, which was trans nonsense.
And then she started to think for the first time ever about what she's been told and went, eh?
Yeah. Well, I tell you, there were some good answers.
I mean, someone with a vagina, that's a good start.
But then you could see that person realise that's politically incorrect.
That's a bit turfy. I can't say that.
And then the feminine energy.
I mean, I would have said that Dan Guthrie had feminine energy.
Just whining. Yeah.
Total feminine energy.
So he's a woman now. Bad luck, Dan.
Change pronouns. But the other one, which was someone who has had the experience of a woman.
So that's an interesting one, because that's also a very turfy definition.
Because, of course, men haven't had the experience of a woman.
Really? Well, yeah. We're under no threat of female genital mutilation?
Yeah. They've not had the experience of a woman, socially.
And so if they transition, they still can't be women, because they haven't had the experience of a woman.
Still quite a turfy answer.
I quite like it. It's not an essential answer, that's the problem, though.
It's kind of a platonic answer.
It's like, well, someone who has breasts?
You know, it's like, yeah, behold, a woman.
But anyway. And then the next one, I do like that this is something that just keeps cropping up.
Another one, what does it mean to be a woman?
It's a watch. What does it mean to be non-binary?
I think it's where they don't identify as a male or female.
So what does it mean to be trans?
It's where they don't conform to the gender that they were born with and that they don't feel comfortable within their own body.
And what does it mean to be a woman?
What does it mean to be a woman?
To be a leader of the world and to be an inspiration to the future generations of young women and trans ladies.
God! Trans ladies.
Oh God, oh God, I don't know.
But I better not say something bad. Oh, they're just gods.
They're just strident titans who walk among us, leading the way.
Please don't whip me.
How pathetic was that?
I love how it's a perfect setup as well of police-defined woke nonsense, and they can do it perfectly because it's the party dogma.
Everyone knows how to say about Party of Lenin is fantastic.
But then you ask them as to why.
You get to a question of a contradiction.
What's a woman? Crap.
What happened to Katya? I've never had it defined for me.
How would I know? Because, again, these people don't think.
They're told things, and that's what they think they think.
Yeah, but what I love is the straight white man's just like, oh God, oh God, I better not say something insulting.
I better say, oh, they're just leaders.
It's like, okay, that actually...
Right, so anyone who's a leader is a woman now?
Yeah. Anyone who's not a leader is not a woman.
Vladimir Putin, the chief woman of Russia.
Which amuses me greatly.
Prince of Saudi. Saudi prince.
Yeah, woman. Leader of the Taliban.
woman al-bag-daddy woman al-bag-daddy al-bag-sharp woman pinochet woman Hitler a woman - Genghis Khan. The greatest woman who ever lived.
He led the most part of the world.
He's the biggest woman you've ever met.
It's just so funny.
It's so good. Okay, let's watch the next one.
What does gender mean to you?
I'm actually really not sure.
I'm still kind of figuring it out but I think it's like self-expression and like how you identify with yourself really.
So how would you define what gender is?
I just think it's more of like a personal feeling.
I think you can't really define it because Gender is just such a social construct and you just can't really...
It's more of what you just feel.
So what do you guys identify as?
I identify as a girl, but I completely respect anybody who identifies as anything other than that.
And I think anyone should be able to identify as anything they want.
How do you know that you identify as a girl?
What makes you think you're a girl?
I just feel quite comfortable with that label, but I think that it could be...
Anything else if I found out later on.
So what do you guys identify as?
Non-binary, I think.
I'm not really sure. Cis male.
What age do you think you know your gender identity?
It really depends on the person, really.
Yeah, it depends on the person because I've known since forever because I've just been comfortable being cis male.
Yeah, and I'm almost 20 and I still don't really know.
So what age do you think you can determine what gender identity you identify as?
Some people know very young.
I don't think there's a limit to where you are.
Because some people know from so young.
The LGBTQ plus charity Stonewall recently published an article that said someone at the age of four can understand their gender identity.
What do you think about that? Do you think Paul's too young?
I think I might be the parents pushing it a little bit because when a kid's younger they can make wools blue and give them blue balloons or make them yellow or have a boy with pink wools.
At what age do you think you know your gender identity?
I think it differs between each person.
It's preferable for whatever.
So, the LGBTQ plus charity Stonewall recently tweeted that a four-year-old can determine their gender identity.
What do you guys think of that? I agree with that, yeah.
I think somebody can feel, like, a certain way about themselves from a very early age.
What I love about all of these clips is that it just shows that these...
It's mostly the young women as well.
Like, the men are just like, yo, god, I don't want to get in trouble.
But the women, like, that 20-year-old woman, obviously a woman.
I don't know what my gender...
Of course you do.
I love that, because she's there with clearly her boyfriend.
Yes. And she's like, well, you might be gay, mate.
We'll find out. Exactly. He's like, I'm a man.
It's like, well, what if you're a man?
You're gay. You don't know.
But you're both gay. It's so stupid.
But these young women are kind of walking around in this intellectual haze.
They're like, I don't know about anything around me.
I'm just so unsure.
Who knows? I can't even imagine.
That's what you're raised with in the West.
Yeah, I can't even imagine living in this kind of intellectual fog where you're just constantly moving through things you don't understand.
But the most understood concepts, as has been pointed out, is woke terminology.
So the fact that the guy could use cis, the fact that the guy earlier could define what non-binary was and non-conforming, but any other things that actually matter instead of party doctrine.
Real things! It's like going to Yugoslavia and been talking to the youth, and they can all perfectly recite Lenin and Marx's works and how that relates to the proletariat being oppressed in the West.
And you ask them about, so, how does something become profitable?
Are they just all staring at you?
What do you mean? How do you start a business?
Why is capitalism succeeding?
In fact, speaking of the West, and I'm glad you brought it up, why don't we ask them what's good about Britain?
Do we have to? Yes!
Because it's... What is British culture?
Racism and tea. I love London because it's so diverse.
Multicultural society, which hopefully is increasing.
I'm very proud of this country because it is so diverse and accepting.
Possibly the fact that it's multicultural is helping, certainly in places like London.
Again, none of those people actually think that.
They've been told to think it, and now they think they think it.
What's good about Britain? Oh, the foreigners.
But you can tell, that's obviously state propaganda.
That is what our state puts out to everyone constantly.
And those individuals there, they're not thinking...
It's not just the state. Think about EastEnders.
Think about the adverts.
Everything is anti-Britain.
I see that as organs of the state as well, frankly.
But you see these people here.
None of them are thinking people.
They've been told these things, and now they think they think it.
That is it. That is all we're witnessing.
What's Britain? Racism and tea?
I watch the BBC, and they keep saying about how Britain is racist, so what do you think of as Britain?
Racism and tea. Well, that's the point, isn't it?
What's great about Britain? Well, the BBC keeps telling me that multiculturalism is good, and it's increasing, and that's a good thing.
Let's hope it's increasing. Let's hope the rest of Britain becomes like London, and the rest of the English become like us.
Because aren't we such a fine example?
Unthinking individuals.
Yeah, literally in a fog of nonsense, because the sort of foundations that they would build a rational worldview on have been kicked out from under them.
I can't say what a woman is.
I can't say what my country is.
And so I can't form an opinion that I can hold to.
You know, you used to watch interviews with people like what should be taught in schools.
I used to see people always, the occasional person will mention, critical thinking is more important than any of the subjects that you might propose.
And I never quite understood that concept until...
Now you do. Yeah. Now you do.
So that's way more important to actually running the society.
Jess also did a couple of interviews with people about the recent kerfuffle with the crazed Islamists and a slightly scuffed Quran by an autistic child.
Self-preservation kicks in?
Yeah, well, yes, kind of.
Very much party apparatchiks here.
But this was such a preposterous scenario.
Even an insane person like Ash Sarkar was like, well, look, we shouldn't really be persecuting a 14-year-old.
Even she was like, yeah, no.
I'm a Muslim who celebrates the Londonification of Britain.
Well, that's where you're going to get, Ash.
That's why you're complaining. Yeah, exactly.
I mean, she was like, who could think that?
I was like, Ash, you claim to be a Muslim.
You must know. But in Pakistan and Bangladesh, they literally lynch people over this.
Well, it's funny, actually, because, of course, the Quran isn't firstly a book.
It was oral tradition.
It's a divine revelation. Sure, but one of the funny things is, as David pointed out earlier on Twitter, if you go to the Hajj and look in the sewers after the Hajj has ended, the Saudi authorities actually do have to go out and dig Korans, piles of them, out of the sewers, because there's too many.
Don't tell the Pakistani community in Wakefield.
They'll be very angry at the Muslims in Mecca.
Yeah. Anyway, so the question is, do we need to respect religion?
Is it compatible with tolerance and freedom of expression, as if those things matter?
Depends if the religion has any balls.
That's exactly right.
Let's watch. Freedom of expression or religious tolerance?
Freedom of expression?
Why? So, firstly, there's no God.
Like, so anything religious, it's basically based on something thousands upon thousands of years ago.
We've grown as a society so much since then.
Recently, a student damaged a Quran and they got suspended by their school.
Do you think that was the right action to take by the school?
Yeah, no, that was the right.
You still need to respect Do you not think that might go against freedom of expression though?
No! I mean like, I'm religious, but I'm also queer.
And my freedom of expression is more important to me than, like, orthodox values.
So, like, I've kept with my religion, but I've kept with the freedom of expression for myself and for others, that people should live the lives that they basically want to live.
But if a student wants to damage a Quran, do you not think they should have the right to do it?
No, because it's unnecessarily disrespectful.
They should have the right to live the life they live, but not be able to do...
She began being as disrespectful as she could do to religious people generally.
There's no God. Ha ha!
Okay, but now we're not allowed to damage Korans.
And I'm religious, actually, myself.
I'm queer, but I respect this language.
Rooftop. But you can see just the political dogma, right?
You know what she believes.
She obviously believes. She doesn't care about anything.
But of course, oh, oh, right, Islam, right?
That's got a special place in the progressive hierarchy because you can't do anything about that.
Yeah, this has a special mix, doesn't it?
Because not only are they just thinking they think a thing and, again, saying what they've been told to say, but also there's an element of fear.
And contradiction.
Yes, of course you should have religious freedom of expression, but not against Islam.
But that contradiction is baked into the state propaganda.
We're endlessly told in the West that, oh, we're bred up because we have freedom of expression and blah, blah, blah, and freedom of speech.
But then we're told, don't blaspheme.
Yes. But only against these guys.
Yes. And so when she has to explain it, it sounds ridiculous and contradictory and embarrassing.
It's kind of fun, actually, because we're not interacting with human beings.
We're acting with NPCs of the state.
So what does the state believe today?
It's seeing how the code crashes right in front of your eyes.
Jess has done a great job here actually by not being like confrontational and challenging just asking them so can you explain your position and of course they can't this is probably my favourite because this chap's probably some student somewhere he's an intelligent chap and yet he's also an NPC let's watch what do you think is more important religious tolerance or freedom of expression I'd personally say freedom of expression.
I think it's very important to be tolerant, but I think ultimately, I don't know, the mark of a free society is what you're able to say, and I feel like the right to kind of offend someone is kind of important because it's a sign that we live in a free society, ultimately, even if it can make us uncomfortable at times.
So do you think I should have the right to burn a Bible, for example, if I wanted to?
I think so. I personally think that, like, I mean, I wouldn't personally, I'm not a religious, but I wouldn't personally think that's a great thing to do, but I think that still it's, you know, a right you have in terms of expressing your political views, your kind of, I guess, anti-religious views in that case, in a free society. So yeah, I guess so.
So, I don't know if you've heard of this case, but a Year 10 student recently got suspended from school after damaging a Quran.
Do you think that was the right move from the school's part?
I do, because I don't think it's particularly...
I don't think that's damaging that person's free speech.
I think there's a confusion between...
Free speech being viewed as, you know, someone literally being suppressed from what they're being able to speak out, and someone being, you know, punished for that action.
You know, it's not like they're taking legal action against them in schools and institutions, and it's quite a very culturally insensitive thing to do.
So I think that that's not damaging that person's free speech, but I think it's correct to show that person that's very culturally insensitive and racist, to be honest.
But if a governmental institution is basically punishing a student for exercising their way to express themselves, do you not think that might be damaging their freedom of speech?
It's an interesting question. I think it's not one where necessarily there's a completely black and white answer.
I think nuance is important, and I think that is a fairly inflammatory thing to do.
But yeah, I guess to me that's the thing.
There's a difference between suppression and accountability.
I think it's okay to hold people accountable to a degree for things that are culturally insensitive.
Accountability. That's accountability, mate!
It's just death threats against a 14-year-old.
That's accountability. That's part of free speech.
Why do the Muslims hate the West?
It's because they don't respect you.
Yeah. How could they possibly respect the West?
Look at it. But look at it.
It's so good, the duality of his thoughts here.
It's so good. It's like, but a Bible?
Yeah, of course. You've got free speech.
That might hurt some feelings, but that's fine.
But what about Quran? Well, I mean, it went too far.
We need to be sensitive to religious feelings.
We've got to respect them. But you're right, there was not even a moment where I could see him go, crap, self-preservation kicked in, and he was like, I'm going to say this because I want to self-preserve myself.
It was instead, that was his legitimate, what is in his head, which again, he didn't think.
And now he's got to try and rationalise it.
So he's just like, blah, blah, blah. And it's just like, yeah, okay.
So you know you're caught in a contradiction, and you know...
I mean, that's an interesting question.
I think accountability is that really, really accountability.
Threatening 14-year-olds. Just accountability, bro.
Accountability. So anyway, well done to Jess for doing such a fantastic job with these absolute NPCs.
Pulling out your phone and just showing an ISIS crucifixion.
What do you think of this? Accountability.
I've posted this on Twitter because it seems like every couple of months there's a lynching in Pakistan because someone is accused of desecrating the Quran.
And this guy's like, well, I mean, it's accountability.
You don't want to offend religious sensibilities, do you?
And that's all he could say to that.
And he knows it, actually, and I think he's kind of embarrassed by his answer.
But I mean, that's what you get when you be a bloody NPC, isn't it?
But anyway, good job, Jess. Really good stuff.
Go for the sequel. Hogwarts Legacy is getting a sequel.
And yes, I knew it was going to be the last one, but...
Alright, last one. Hey, man, I'm not against this covering the fun that is Hogwarts Legacy.
Yeah, because, again, do not care about the video game.
Didn't buy the video game. Told everyone I wasn't buying the video game.
Point for me was that, funny.
You guys hate this game, and so it's really good fun.
Watching Reithard's fight is always good fun.
So we'll start off just by mentioning debate might as well be dead, because discussion is for nerds, apparently.
At least this is the reasoning of the trans rights section of this boxing fight we're about to watch, which was that, no, not going to talk.
Except they ended up playing the game as well and buying it.
So good, wasn't it?
Amazing. But the news has come!
Don't hate me, but my entire childhood was Harry Potter, and I have to play it to feel validated!
And yet, J.K. Rowling is currently funding the transgenocide that's going on with some nonsense.
All these people who have very recently become transgender remember a time in which they were happy, which is when they were a child watching Harry Potter.
They remember a time when they were happy, which is when they were pretending to be part of an extremely right-wing and reactionary organisation.
So, the news has come that Racism 2 Boogaloo is going to be published by Warner Brothers sometime next year.
I saw JK Rowling tweeting about this and apparently this sold like 12 million copies in the first few weeks.
Yeah. That was a good boycott.
I think there's like two games that are doing better than it in history.
Yeah, it's probably like GTA 5 or something.
Yeah, because in the time span that it's been out in the sales figures.
So Hogwarts Legacy...
Pretty good. Unsurprisingly, capitalism demands a sequel.
And you can tell, because I looked up, there's some big firm that's invested in Warner Brothers, made $120 million off this recent bump.
You can look at the stock of Warner Brothers, and you have the date Hogwarts Legacy was released.
It's just gone up. I wish I'd bought some.
And some company made $120 million off it.
And you can tell, it's investors and the CEOs and whatnot.
We're all boomers, don't really understand any of this.
They've just gone, money.
I'm a boomer and I don't understand any of this, because Harry Potter came out in the 2000s, right?
Yeah, and I was in my 20s, so I didn't watch or read or anything, right?
And so I watched a few videos talking about this, like people who played the game and wanted to talk about it in a way that wasn't like, I hate JK Rowling, right?
And apparently, it's very good for people who like Harry Potter.
It's a faithful adaptation of the thing.
It makes them feel like they're in the world.
Yeah, exactly. So I'm thinking, okay, good.
That's nice. They've got a nice thing.
Someone has produced something that's actually internally consistent with the universe.
Frankly, I'm just used to having everything I like perverted.
It's not just a skin suit, apparently, of Harry Potter.
Well, it is and it isn't.
I mean, there are some aspects to this.
There are going to be aspects. Yeah, there's a trans character.
No, no, no. They made like half the cast British Empire, which a lot of people have noticed.
In all of the movies and the books, almost everyone's white.
So what did Dumbledore do when he took over?
J.K. Rowling, latent reactionary.
Apparently the history of the school is in the 1800s it was incredibly diverse and then something happened in the 1890s when that went downhill and Dumbledore changed the school forever.
Because... But the news is, the boycott failed.
Really failed. And if we go to the next one, apparently they're making a TV show out of this as well.
Hogwarts Legacy TV show could be coming to HBO? Yep.
What? That sounds terrible.
It doesn't even sound terrible.
I love Harry Potter. I'm telling you, that sounds terrible from a fan perspective.
Oh, is it? I don't know anything about Harry Potter.
The movies were gold. The new prequel series they tried to make was a complete waste of time.
I never saw it. Cursed Child I didn't even interact with, because who cares?
Right. It started with the story of Harry, ended with the story of Harry, completely perfect.
Like those first three Star Wars movies, the story of Luke.
It doesn't need any more.
It didn't need any more. And then they're like, no, the plan all along was to make a never-ending story.
It's just a bad idea in my view.
But whatever. It's obviously because of money.
And it's partly because of all those damn transphobes who bought the game.
And who made such a big deal about this game as well.
If they hadn't been whining about it, I wouldn't have known about it.
But some of the people who enjoyed the whining, such as the transphobes, I follow a group on Facebook that are openly transphobic.
Because they decided to go out and buy a load of copies of the game and just give it away to kids.
Brilliant! Thanks, mister!
Yeah, they ran out of copies.
Anyone know good games?
I'll donate the copies to some kids holding on one for PS5 and Xbox copies.
Children ward at my local hospital.
Oh, no. This is a really sweet forum on Facebook, by the way.
Good guys. But they're partly the reason why this is happening.
And it turns out all that bullying didn't pay off.
It wasn't worth it. No kidding.
No. And we can go see the trans-bullying, the attempts that they made.
Because this Twitch streamer, for example, who is what they are, but that's...
Is a man. Back to normal.
With a woman's avatar, yeah. I don't know who this is, actually.
But they... All VTubers are men.
They were brought to tears by the harassment and then eventually just gave a speech there where they were like, I don't care, I'm going to play the game.
Go to hell, losers. And it's like, oh, that's good.
Isn't it strange? Another individual who's been moved.
Setting yourself against the Harry Potter franchise was actually not a tactically sound manoeuvre.
No. You're not going to win that one.
I might have to read Harry Potter at some point.
I watched the movies. I told you. Yeah, you did say that.
But the retards who are engaging in harassment haven't learned their lesson and are now pretending to be offended whenever you call them harassers.
Oh. Which is quite funny.
Maybe you should stop harassing people.
So if you click on the first one there, it's about the Twitch streamer who was, you know, brought to tears.
And then the response is, absolutely justified and well-deserved from local transgender person.
We'll go through some more images on here.
We're the party of compassion.
She should have not played it at all, stupid B-word.
Lovely person. A bunch of males who have transitioned and now insulting women on the internet.
Yeah, some other person here.
Death threats to JK Rowling because we've got nothing else going on.
Clearly sane. Look at those eyes.
Need some drama in their life, I presume.
No mental health issues here.
Keep going, please, John, so we can see more.
Twitch streamers are all horrible people and one could get cancer and I would literally giggle from lovely trans chap.
Really representing their community well.
Go ahead of that image, scroll down, because then there's some subsequent tweets in that thread where he just puts more images.
And it just never ends of these people.
Ah, it's not showing up, but whatever.
They just continuously go on.
Let's go to the next link, because maybe it's in there.
But it's, I don't know, this one is Reddit, who decided to jump on with the trans lobby to try and bully everyone.
Think Reddit won? No.
No, the might of Reddit was defeated, and they tried to defend that J.K. Rowling was actually Hitler.
It's like Ukraine 2.0.
Because how are we going to prove that Hogwarts Legacy and Hitler are in the same room?
Well, they decided to cite the New York Times piece defending J.K. Rowling and then cited that the New York Times in 1922 was slightly positive about that Hitler chap who was up and coming.
They were, yeah. And in which case...
Lots of people were, actually. Hogwarts Legacy.
So what they're saying is that in about 15 years time, J.K. Rowling is going to be rounding up transgender people and putting them into death camps.
Presumably. I don't know what else is going to be.
To be fair, you know, politics in the last five years has been quite surprising.
Who knows what might happen?
Probably not that.
Since about 2016, 2017 onwards, it's been kind of crazy, right?
So who knows?
Well, we'll go to the next one here because we can see the people who are actually engaging in minor petty vandalism here are the leftists who turn up violating adverts for the sign for the game, sorry.
Oh, yeah. This is a Hogwarts Legacy sign that just has don't support TERFs, the graffiti on it.
Yeah, that worked. And the media are still moulding about the whole situation.
Good. Vox still moulding.
Can Harry Potter ever be okay?
More Harry Potter. Yeah.
Haven't we had enough Harry Potter?
No. Well, I mean, that's my opinion.
I think we've had enough. Average Harry Potter fan.
Yeah, strangely, once more.
Pinks for girl daddies.
We'll go to the Nexus mods, because this is something I really want to talk about.
The mod was hard at work, whilst everyone was molding.
Someone made a World War II German wand.
As in a Luger or something?
Yes. Right. Don't know what you'd use that for, but that's been allowed on the modding scene.
Yeah. Which is interesting, because we've got the CJ mods.
Someone ported in CJ, and you can play us him with a Glock.
You can kill people there by shouting Avada Kedabra.
In case you don't know Harry Potter, Avada Kedabra is the death spell.
It's one of the unforgivable curses that will kill someone instantly.
Oh, right. And every school child can do this.
You can learn it. It's the dark arts.
You're not meant to. It's meant to be kept from kids for school shooting purposes.
We'll go to the banned mods because that's more interesting.
We mentioned previously, there were some others, but the Siona Ryan bug fix of the voice was banned.
This one was banned. The trans character is not allowed to have a more feminine voice.
No. The Professor Garlick painting mod was deleted for being not safe at work.
What was the painting mod?
Go to the next one. It was essentially this, but with more sex.
Oh. Because, um...
Well, I mean, I can understand why they're bad.
Yeah? Yeah, okay. That might be reasonable.
Harry Potter is meant to be wholesome, isn't it?
Oh, well, the people who are playing are all, like, 20-plus at this point.
Because, as you said, it came out in 2000.
Sure, but it might be kids as well.
So I can see where they're, like, you know...
Hogwarts Hub. That got banned.
I think this might be fake, actually, but the Professor Garlic thing was definitely real.
There's also the Centaur Not Safe for Work mod, which added genitalia to all the centaurs.
That got banned. Good.
Yeah, these ones make sense.
I can see the reasoning here.
If we go to the ones that didn't make so much sense, I mean, of course, there was the Voice Fix mod that got banned for being transphobic for saying that trans women should sound like women.
But literally when they transition and take the hormones it changes their voice.
There was also the paler skin mod was banned because it was really hard to make a character who was actually white because the sliders aren't going far enough for some reason.
Don't know who did that, the dev team.
But a load of people from Iceland, Sweden and Norway.
Like we're not being represented here.
Literally I can't look like myself.
No Celts are allowed. Which is kind of based actually.
Someone made a white skin mod and then they banned the white skin mod.
For some reason. Just no whites.
This wasn't the only one.
They also banned a mob that, well, represented Dumbledore's vision of Hogwarts.
It's called the No More's Mod.
So, it changed the skin tone of the class to represent 1800s England.
Oh, that's definitely an exchange.
Instead of Fantasyland England, which is what people were doing instead.
Instead of modern London. And you might think, who cares, because of course it's all fantasy world, but as you pointed out before, when Mrs Rowling decided to make the movies, what should she insist upon?
She was on No Foreigners. Yeah.
She insisted it be very, very British and adhere to actually what a traditional setting would be.
The more I learn about Harry Potter, the more I realise this is like a high-level right-wing fantasy.
Yeah. I mean, the Gun Club stuff we'll get to in a minute.
Anyway, it could be worse. I mean, it could have been this mod.
Spider-Man Human Holocaust.
Yeah, this was for a Spider-Man game.
So, you know, the Hogwarts scene isn't infested with that, it's instead infested with people who are like, I love tradition.
And sent our dongs, apparently.
Weird Venn diagram crossover, but there we are.
Zoomers for you. We'll go to the last one here, because of course Nexus Mod is no strangers to real life issues as well.
Current thingism. Yeah, this is for Fallout 4.
Fallout 3 doesn't have any of this, just Fallout 4.
Right. They also have Confederate flags in case, I don't know, you feel like presenting Nova Rossi or something.
But I wanted to really go to The Tale of Mary Sue.
The Outlet, which...
I haven't looked at the Mary Sue in a long time.
I know, right? I remember it from your videos.
Yeah, exactly. The joy it has provided to all of us.
It's been a long time.
And, of course, they fell to the inclusivity brigade.
They became intersectional feminists.
Of course they did. And their moulding about all of this, I think, is going to be something to enjoy.
A delicacy, perhaps.
LAUGHTER February 15th, J.K. Rowling appears to sick lawyers on Queer Critic for, open brackets, arguably accurate, close brackets, saying her views are lying with Nazis.
Arguably accurately, eh?
Yeah, you may wonder what this is about.
I actually saw this, because this was one of the best humiliations of a transgender activist I've ever seen.
Who was like, J.K. Rowling's a Nazi, and J.K. Rowling went, okay, I'll sue you for defamation.
And won. Didn't even win.
It got instantly cucked.
Yeah, and that's why the Marys who had to put arguably accurate in quotes, because it's my honest opinion, don't sue me.
Yeah, when they say arguably, that's our opinion, that's our opinion.
And then we go to the 19th of February, Hogwarts Legacy Purchase Simulator skewers the but the developers argument.
Are we not going to read through that apology?
Because it was a good apology.
We've done it before, so I don't want to go over it again.
But the Hogwarts Legacy Purchase Simulator, you heard about this?
No. It simulates you purchasing the game, so if you want to buy the game but don't want to support the, well, fascists, you can pretend to buy the game.
And what, do you download a pirate copy or something?
No. It's a funny plug-in.
Do you find yourself an immoral conjury, torn between giving your money to transphobes and anti-Semites?
Or supporting the developers?
No. I don't.
I don't either. But I'm just not interested in buying Hogwarts Legacy.
The simulator's game begins with the Warner Brothers CEO, David Zaslav, addressing the player, asking them to buy the game because the developers worked really hard and deserve their reward.
People have take...
This excuse for buying the game at face value.
Rowling's bigotry has been able to run away with it, despite the fact that the game developers are paid an agreed upon amount prior to the game's release.
That amount isn't impacted by sales.
Zaslav is then countered by a woman named Ashley, reminding you that the game is directly associated with Rowling.
Remember, she receives royalties from it.
And that Rowling uses her Harry Potter royalties to campaign directly against trans rights.
Yeah. From here, you get to start making decisions about whether you're going to buy a copy of the game or not.
Even if you do, it turns out that one copy isn't enough.
This is so cope.
This is so bad.
I love how a transphobic Facebook group I'm on agreed, and we're like, no, it isn't enough.
I'm going to buy ten for the kids.
But imagine making a game about this game and the moral quandary involved in it.
I think halfway through coding this game about the game, what am I doing?
Exactly, but just the amount of space this takes up in your thought process.
Finally, Rowling herself appears at the end of the game to congratulate you!
Satan the big boss!
For defending sex-based rights.
Like the cyberdemon in Doom.
If you brought enough copies, she'll congratulate you for defending sex-based rights.
And that's how you know if you're really on the side of women, is how many copies of Hogwarts Legacy brought.
We brought neither, so I mean, we're not on the side of women, obviously.
Or she will berate you for silencing women if you don't buy it.
So we're on the silencing women trade.
Yeah. There we have it.
I'm on the silencing women and trans women trade.
The reason I mention it's a tale of the Mary Sue is because there are two articles, not a lot.
John, just scroll.
Just keep scrolling down and down and down.
Wow, they're really bothered by this, aren't they?
And down and down.
And keep going.
And keep going.
Would you like some tea, Carl?
Yeah, I would, actually, because I... Wow, they're really bothered by this.
Yeah, the way their site works is that every article about Hogwarts Legacy is put on the same page.
And these are all about Hogwarts Legacy.
These are all the whining.
Should we leave?
I mean, I'm certainly not going to read all of that.
How many words do you write on a subject?
I mean, I get a bit bored doing a few segments about the same thing.
I mean, I've only reason I've kept doing these Hogwarts Legacy pieces.
These have been gold, man. It's because there's been so much.
It's been funny. I've been enjoying the Hogwarts Legacy segment.
How much salt do you have? How many words are you writing?
Oh, now we've finally left Hogwarts Legacy.
Have we? There we are.
I think it ends about there. So, there we have it.
After about a billion words, the Mary Sue are like, well, I'm done.
Hmm? We're not obsessed, you're obsessed.
Yeah, I'm just going to go through some of my favorites.
So, first one here.
Transphobes have come up with Harry Potter dog whistles for their hate speech.
Excellent. I get a lot of anti-trans people commentating Avada Kedavra on my videos now.
You know that curse from earlier?
Yeah, yeah. YouTube need to recognize this as harassment and a death threat.
So they need to ban the word Avada Kedavra.
Because that means we're going to kill trans people.
So Harry Potter has to be banned because it's...
Okay. Harry Potter has sadly become a tool for hate, writes local trans person whining.
Okay. Avada Kedavra, an Aramaic phrase that translates to I destroy as I speak, is one of the three unforgivable curses in the Harry Potter series.
But that's not the funniest one.
The funniest thing from the Mary Sue is Jews.
Yeah, I didn't see this, but the Mary Sue looked at the goblins in the game and reverted to being Karl Marx.
And seeing things that weren't there.
We'll start off with this article.
The anti-Semitism of Harry Potter returns in Hogwarts Legacy.
They're not just talking about the, like, John Stewart criticism.
Who are the goblins in the Harry Potter universe?
Ponders Mary Sue herself to a rube of feminist women after a speech about Palestine.
They are small.
I love that they're looking at this picture and being like, yeah, that average Jewish person, isn't it?
Ragnarok's Goblin Rebellion, truth or gobbledygook?
They're small in stature and possess dark, slanted eyes.
Hook-shaped noses.
They're often described as greedy and control a large portion of the wizarding economy through the magical banking system.
Starting to see the problem, says Mary Sue.
I certainly am. No, I'm not, Mary Sue.
You're really starting to wake me up on this.
Tell me more, Miss Sue.
Great point, Mary Sue.
According to the Harry Potter mythos, goblins revolted against the wizards in an insurgency movement known as the Goblin Rebellions, per the Harry Potter Compendium.
This happened for a number of reasons, including the lack of goblin representation in Magical Parliament...
Attempts to enslave goblins as hells elves, stripping of wand privileges, wizard attempts to control Gringotts, the bank, our brutal goblin slayings of innocent non-goblins.
I can understand the goblins wanting to revolt.
I don't...
It's not really anything to do with...
What's that got to do with Jews? Yeah.
I mean, there have been plenty of...
I guess they're drawing a parallel between Jewish revolts against Rome, but that's not really what that was about.
I don't really think the Jews in Palestine were revolting against the Romans, being like, I want representation in the Senate.
No. Obviously not.
I mean, you're the history buffs. Yeah, no, they absolutely weren't.
Yeah. Sounds a lot like wizarding stuff.
You know, one privileges. Sounds like stuff that was made up for Harry Potter.
But no, no. Mary Sue is writing that and they're looking at you going, hmm?
According to the designers of the game, players will be able to make...
They didn't destroy the second temple of the goblins or something, did they?
They're able to make the decision in the game whether to oppose the Goblin Rebellions.
Yes, you read that correctly.
You can support or oppose the movement.
And considering that Ragnarok is said to have ties to Dark Wizard, the game seems to be of the opinion that the moral choice is to crush the Rebellions.
Thereby, returning goblins to subjugation.
Side with Hadrian.
After all, that's how it happened in the Harry Potter canon.
The goblins lost.
Just like the Jewish rebellions of 1950...
Well, no, the Jewish rebellion in, like, 87 AD and then 130 AD. Stuff like that.
Yeah, but it has no relevance to what they're describing.
No, not at all. So, again, I'm not...
Like, there wasn't the Jewish rebellion against the British Crown or something.
I mean, I'm familiar with the criticism of goblins and money and therefore medieval fairy tales.
But the Mary Sue is trying to stretch this as much as possible to be like, yeah, see, aren't they Jews?
And it's just like, please leave my house.
Logs into Hogwarts Legacy.
White human male named Titus.
We're going to the next one here because there's more of that.
This one they may have more of a point.
Hogwarts Legacy players are already finding more troubling anti-Semitic references.
On the Mary Sue website.
No, no, in the game as well.
Holy Moly, the fictional 1612 Goblin Rebellion in the game coincides with a real historical murderous riot against Jews in 1612 known as the Pogrom of the Holy Roman Empire.
Yeah? Yeah. Okay, which one?
There's also a lot of Jewish haunts.
Oh, yeah. Which, um...
Can we have a look at the Jewish horn in the game?
There we are. So, you've got the Rosh Hashanah horn over there, and then if you go to the right, we can see the horn in game, labelled as the Goblin Artifact, which...
Used by the goblins during the 1612 Rebellion Tour...
I mean...
That, again, doesn't make sense because the Jews of 1612 in the Home Room Empire weren't rebelling.
They were being killed. Yeah.
So... But I can actually...
I'm starting to see where they're coming from, though.
There are some funny aspects. That is a bit of a weird dog whistle.
It's obviously because I don't think they actually picked 1612 because they were like, haha, 1488, can I hide it in there somewhere?
I mean, I can see that the Mary Sue could draw that connection, though.
It's kind of... Interesting.
But we'll get to the BBC because this is where looking back at the past I think has us the greatest fun.
Because you remember this? Harry Potter became a rallying guy.
Against Orange Man.
Yes. To destroy Orange Man.
To stand up for Obama, our hero.
What did he do in the Middle East? No one knows.
What I love about this is it takes on a very British sort of anti-American spirit.
But if you scroll, because it's all American leftists who were doing this back at the time, just the images is all you need to show people here.
We'll read them, I suppose. So we'll go with that first one.
If you scroll back up so we can read it. And it's someone with a sign that says, When I said I wanted real world to be more like Harry Potter, I just meant the magic stuff, not the entire plot of the book, with government refuses to do anything about deadly threats.
So all the what's...
She's saying that...
So the teenagers love to rise up and fly back.
A lot of these signs are all about mass shootings in American schools.
Right. And they're like, you know what the government should do?
Is put someone in charge who will get rid of all the wands.
That's just like the book.
Just like in Harry Potter, where none of them have wands.
Yeah, no. I mean, all of this aged quite poorly.
I mean, if you go to the next one, the image, then we can see the image on there, please.
Then we can see more of that. People talking about fear in our schools, protect our kids, not guns.
If Hogwarts students can defeat Death Eaters, our students can defeat the NRA. How did they defeat the Death Eaters?
With a leaflet campaign. And when that failed...
When the government banned the Death Eaters, right?
They cracked out the T-shirts.
Now, like I said, I don't know what a Death Eater is, but I'm assuming it's some sort of villain, given the name.
They work for the terrorists.
So they're essentially the school shooters.
The terrorists? Yeah, well Voldemort's the terrorists.
Oh, right, right. They're essentially school shooters.
And the way they were defeated in the school was not a leaflet campaign.
So they're arguing to arm the students.
But they don't know this. Because this is the thing.
The meme at the time was read another book.
Yeah. I don't think any of them read the books.
I don't think any of them understand anything.
I mean, keep scrolling. There's more images of that.
I mean, that's literally an argument to arm students.
Yeah, if you actually know what you're talking about.
Dumbledore's army, still recruiting.
Don't you need a gun?
You're gonna be an army?
Doesn't make any sense, but there's some quotes in here.
Dumbledore did not die for this to keep happening.
Oh, Jesus Christ.
Yes, Dumbledore died in the books for gun...
They say at the BBC, while some critics have accused Rowling of creating a conservative traditional picture...
I keep making the point!
This is written years before any of this.
Look at them all there with their weapons.
Hmm. Kind of based.
She has argued that this was never her intention.
Put them in a hierarchical school.
I mean, keep the camera on that image, because the thing is, I'm just looking at that.
You remember all those memes that are like, oh, you know, Republicans, they're arming their kids.
How disgusting. Great point.
When was this written? Like 2016 or something, right?
Something like that, yeah. So the great point, though, like, you know, I can see why the leftists have been like, well, hang on a second.
Isn't this just a right-wing power fantasy?
Because it kind of is. I mean, in The Order of Phoenix, they literally just set up a gun club to rebel against the government who's not dealing with the terrorists.
I can't believe I've never watched Harry Potter.
The government wants them to all be completely unable to defend themselves, like the British government.
Exactly like the British government, in fact.
While she was writing that book, that's exactly what was happening.
J.K. Rowling's making some great points.
Expelliarmus, this disarmament spell, is a go-to spell for Hogwarts kids, tweeted another person.
Quote, You need a gun to do it.
Yeah, you have to use a wand to get rid of someone else's wand.
Only a good guy with a wand can stop a bad guy with a wand.
You actual morons!
This is great, honestly.
Hufflepuffs for gun control.
Harry Potter red-pilled the millennials.
Hermione used knowledge, not guns.
No! No, she was the leader of the gun club!
She was the one teaching people to do the most messed up spells possible.
Okay, yeah, maybe they didn't read the book.
But anyway, I mean, this is the same...
I wasn't going to be that guy who got into Harry Potter for culture war reasons, but I'm starting to think about it now.
I feel like we need to start cross-playing.
I want to see the next right-wing march.
There'll be people in Harry Potter uniforms.
That's the new right-wing swag.
That's what this is. Like the BBC are right.
This is definitely very conservative.
And it's kind of hilarious that this ever became a left-wing meme for a while.
I don't know how they squared it with themselves.
No, I don't think anyone paid enough attention, seemingly.
But it's obviously the opposite.
But the parents of these kids who have become...
Kids who are having fun. Yeah, let's let them have fun.
Yeah, but the parents who have come...
Well, they're all adult enough to be parents now.
They're losers. Why have they all got Zeds on their foreheads?
Because Harry has a scar from where Voldemort tried to kill him.
Oh, right. And his parents sacrifice themselves to save their son.
Oh, right, okay. Again, family values.
What really matters is the family.
Take care of the family. Yep.
Personal sacrifice. Carry on the family's legacy.
Yep. But we'll go to the last thing here, which I just wanted to show, which is the...
I mean, the people who are... You know, the leftist here.
They do this kind of stuff to kids.
This is what they want their kids' future to be instead.
I would rather kids be brainwashed into Harry Potter than this.
Yeah. And go to Harry Potter World.
It's just south of London.
If you're ever visiting the UK or in the UK, it's good fun.
You can get the butterbeer around the back of the triple-decker bus.
Yeah, I had to go there a while ago, before the lockdown.
It is quite good, actually. Yeah.
Well, I'm not even mocking you. I genuinely recommend it.
But otherwise, I guess we're looking forward to racism to the game.
Maybe the modding scene will be less weird.
Let's go to the video comments. I do wonder if the censorship of Roald Dahl is somewhat motivated by his spicy opinions about the American Zionists after World War II. Granted, those groups were engaged in a guerrilla war against the British in Israel, so his opinions aren't necessarily unfounded.
Although I do have a distinct soft spot for really bastardized simplifications of stories.
My favorite examples are the Lego ones, where they try and sanitize what is already a children's movie for even younger children.
I haven't seen the Lego versions of those.
What the hell is going on there?
I assume it's Anakin Skywalker about to murder all the children.
Why are the kids in cages? They don't get away.
I have done a little dive into these contemporary AI, and thought I'd share a little TLDR. Their responses are based on massive libraries of data, calculating the average response to your query, referring to these massive libraries, with some randomness thrown in.
They will never do anything outside of their data.
In essence, they are little more than glorified parrots.
Which, to be fair, many leftoids are, which explains why they're so quick to give AI humanity.
Great point, actually.
We're going to come onto the site. Yeah, Rick says, this segment, the first one, can be summed up as racist who hates white people tries to exclude white people from the native lands of white people by claiming oppressive white people should not travel where the racist fears to tread.
What was quite funny about him as well is he writes about how his grandparents have lived there, his parents lived there, and now he doesn't feel welcome.
He's the only one in this family who doesn't feel welcome in his child.
Everyone else did. Yeah, they've literally been their generations.
The only reason that differentiates him from his parents, because they're both black, is that he's the one locally whining about the culture and saying it's awful.
He's the one who's been programmed to kind of dislike the white people.
His parents are just like, yeah, they're right.
I love the idea his grandparents got off the boat from Jamaica.
Like, hang on a minute. White people?
In England? Someone online says, each blade of grass in the English countryside has a little white hood.
You know the Japanese saying about America?
Yeah, there'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass, yeah.
Omar says, yeah, there's a white hood behind every blade of grass.
Omar says, I'm surprised leftists have yet to arrive at the conclusion that black people invented grass and white people stole it from Africa.
Wakanda was a lush grassland until the white man enslaved the African gardeners.
Good point, actually. Populated with trees.
Even populated with trees is scrubbed.
What? No. Africa.
Loads of Africa are covered in trees.
Well, the jungle bits. But then the other bits are just like thin, reedy grass.
Sure. And then you've got the desert in the north.
Yeah, exactly. Good place.
That's where we took all of our grass from.
Look at the condition we left it in.
The desert part was all grass.
Yeah, it was all grass, and then we, the white man, came along and stole all the grass.
Caesar's Legion says, Coming from a rural, small town myself, I'm completely in favour of gatekeeping aggressive leftists out of the countryside.
The last thing we need is having communities where you know and care about your neighbours ripped apart by race and gender politics.
Yeah, totally agree.
MR says again, you know what the countryside needs?
A metro. 15-minute countryside.
It's not as if non-whites can enjoy nature, mud huts in a desert or concrete jungle.
No exceptions. Yeah, for some reason they just can't enjoy the countryside.
I actually agree to the metro.
Come on, how great would that be?
Like, if you had a metro going from every small town across the country...
Then Londoners would get there.
Yeah, yeah. I'm assuming, obviously, we're in charge and we're going to fix a few other things.
But if we're going to make, like, the perfect England, like, the ability to be able to go from...
Okay, okay, maybe. Ah, that's my dream.
But if we're going to build the perfect England, I wouldn't mind a metro that took me to, like, you know, the Pennines or something.
Like, two stops to Bath, and you wouldn't get on the train, and it's just underground.
So it doesn't spoil any of the beauty as well.
What could have been? S.H. Silver says, This writer is so blatantly anti-English that he's either been so brainwashed by globalist programming and doesn't realize it, or he's intentionally being divisive for his agenda.
I think he's just doing it for attention, to be honest.
Tish Potato says, I've lived in the Australian area my entire life, and people like Dana Weiss are getting notably worse.
They want London, but in the countryside, and it's awful.
Yes. John says, Those fields might be someone else's property.
That's because they are. That's not Dan's concern.
Dan doesn't recognize your claim to property.
White. Taffy says, Well, it will happen.
Don't think it won't happen. It's going to happen.
George says, Yeah, I mean, I don't really like the game for a number of reasons.
I don't really like J.K. Rowling.
In terms of politics, the game seems like a fun mechanical.
Yeah, but I'm not. But some of it is really weird.
It is correct to identify.
Why is there one professor from India, one professor from Indonesia, one professor from Egypt?
And then in the 2000s, everyone was white English.
What did Dumbledore do exactly?
We're a manifesto. You know what's funny about those AI deepfics?
There is actually one where Dumbledore tells you about why he loves the white race.
Someone made. The line is, I may be gay, but that doesn't mean I don't care about the white race.
And he stomps off. It's just funny.
Dumbledore, calm down. No, but maybe those four channels were predicting more Harry Potter lore.
Because that seems to have been what's happened.
I mean, at least, I tell you, the one good thing about the AI and the deepfakes is that they are genuinely hilarious.
Like the Obama, Biden, and Trump gaming videos.
It's classic. You know, every one is just instant classic.
Sophie says, we had a similar thing here in Denmark where they tried to get more refugees into the countryside, even offered them pretty big and way nicer houses than getting the cities, and they just did not want to go there.
No dice. They don't want to go to the countryside at all.
So maybe, just maybe, these poor refugees are offered nice houses and they don't want to be out in the country.
It's because they aren't actually refugees.
Well, obviously. Obviously.
the day of the wand will come how funny is it going to be when Harry Potter becomes a right wing aesthetic I don't know why the right-wing isn't busy making it a right-wing.
They should be actively co-opting it.
Trad Wife Almighty or something.
Yeah, or like, just, you know, based libertarian slash conservative Harry Potter.
Hmm. I mean, from what I've seen of Harry Potter, it seems to map on quite closely.
Anyway, RanchoCosRite says, Why do these people, the Londoners, sound afraid?
Feels like these people are realising the secret police are asking them what their opinion on the dear leader is.
Yeah. Exactly it.
Rude the Day says, I can't wait for all men to check out for a month.
Just a month. But all of you.
I would love to hear the sweet banshee screeches of these retards when they realise there is nothing without men.
Yeah, there is a part of me that wishes that we would all just go on strike.
Nah, we're all downing tools, as it were.
We're just going to stay at home. Just going to stay at home.
Male strike. Yeah, but for men.
Funny. Because I remember some feminists used to talk about, what if all women went on strike?
They're like... Services would improve.
Waiting times would go down.
Have you ever been? Am I wrong?
I used to work in a store and I did the counter, right?
And there was a very marketable distance between being served by a male or female cashier and also how many women are in front of you for the thing.
If it's all men, you go to that queue every time.
They all just, fine. Yep.
It is real. I know.
Like the women's bathroom thing.
I know. SH Silver says, oh sorry, Small L Libertarian says, asking those girls what is a woman who is literally instigating a struggle session amongst the group and then watching the gears grind.
Yeah, I know. It's the most ultimately destructive question, isn't it?
Literally, careers have been ruined over this question.
I love it. It's nonsense to me.
SH Silver says, I can't totally blame these drones.
They've had their brains turned to goo and are just spewing globalist propaganda unthinkingly because they're explicitly raised not to think about things.
That's true. And that's why I was just, one of the reasons I wanted to do that segment, just to highlight, these people must be going through life in a fog.
Just the total, I don't know what things are.
And I'm trained not to think, to try and figure out what things are.
I just can't imagine. They all vote still.
Yeah, I know. They all vote. I mean, this is probably the best possible propaganda for AA. Yeah.
Which is his whole point of just change the law and you take over the country.
Yeah. Because if you scrapped Tony Blair's requirements that everything promote diversity and equality and instead replaced it with, I don't know what he would produce it with.
But overnight, all of those people would believe what AA believes.
Yes, they would. They would literally be told one thing, never think about it, and then never have it questioned.
XYZ says, short answer, don't let your kids go to university or any state education system.
What does a woman according sticks?
A human without a Y chromosome.
That's still a negative definition though.
Adult human female is a positive definition, and it's the one we've always used because it's true.
So... Makes sense.
Grant says, Conservatives just have their own thing and don't really care about the needs of what voters are.
No, love, that's the Conservative Party.
They're actually lefties, do keep up.
Yeah, I just love that... What are the Conservatives?
Well, they're basically like Sauron, aren't they?
They basically want to flood Middle-earth with evil orcs and burn down all of our villages.
No, that's the Labour Party.
I knew that was coming. I knew that was coming.
But just the actively, well, my opponent is just evil and seeks to have you all, you know, pitchforked or something.
I think everyone knows that.
Even in America, they always talk about, well, the right sees the left as misguided or stupid.
The left sees the right as just evil.
It's a global universal thing.
But it is so dumb on the part of the right.
If your opponent is constantly portraying you as evil, you have to be like, right, that's the evil person.
You have to. Because who thinks like that?
Because no one thinks like that. Like, yeah, my neighbor, he votes conservative.
Wow, he wants to just literally kill poor people.
I'm going to cut all the pouring out. Yeah, but that's not why he's conservative.
Nicholas says, Londoners are retarded.
I've been saying once I moved back to London that the people in Greater London Ring Road have a collective IQ of minus 20.
This segment has just confirmed to me that's correct.
LaFrenchFry says, asking what is a woman to a leftist is like trying to run a program on a computer with a faulty CPU. You end up with random results and all crashes.
Geordie Swordsman says, and what is feminine energy?
Well, it starts with the moon goddess.
Yeah. Um...
Why do you think that is, Callum?
Why does Stephen King get a free pass?
Well, okay, but you know about Stephen King's politics, don't you?
I know he's a retard, that's by it.
Yeah, well, that's exactly why. Stephen King's, like, general retardation, politically.
I don't think he wrote anything interesting.
Oh, Stephen King...
Oh, no, no, I've read loads of Stephen King books, and he has written some really, really great books.
There's just no getting around it.
What is embarrassing about Stephen King is that he's one of the greatest living authors.
I hate to say it. I really do hate to say it, because his politics is just absolute trash.
But some of his books...
The Dark Tower series is incredible.
Actually incredible. I've not even seen the movies about these books.
I don't know. I managed to completely miss his existence.
The thing about Stephen King's movies, the movies that are adapted from his books, is that they're generally terrible because his writing style is quite hard to adapt, but it's an incredibly engrossing writing style.
He's actually really good. I hate to say it.
Shawshank Redemption, I've seen that.
Yeah, that was a good film as well.
Kevin says, at this point, lads, I think you're obligated to do a seven-part book club series on the Harry Potter books.
Yeah, I know. I'm not doing that.
Rue the Day says, Yes, Carl, please do a book club on Harry Potter for a British aesthetic.
A British aesthetic. Start up book three if you're not going to read to your kids, though.
The first two are a bit small. Kevin says, The Goblins equals Jews thing.
Just reminds me of the same silly buggers who equate orcs with blacks.
Yeah. It's exactly the same.
I think it's interesting which, you know, Jon Stewart would be like the Banks, right?
But it's a bit weird when the Mary Sue is just like, yeah, and everything else, right?
And all those Jewish rebellions.
I mean, goblin rebellions.
Yeah, it's like, Mary, calm down.
Nerfblood says, I'm getting flashbacks to the Gamergate.
Take the big fat L you lost progressives and cope.
There is a huge amount of coping about this, though.
I mean, I just genuinely love the amount of...
You can feel the frustration.
They were like, no, no, no. The entire online progressive lobby is like, no, we are literally in ranks about this.
No Harry Potter.
No Hogwarts Legacy. We've all agreed.
And then literally the public are like, brilliant, Harry Potter game.
A million sold.
A million sold. They must have felt impotent.
You know, if nothing else, it's like, God damn it, we worked so hard.
We harassed so many people online.
You know, we sent so many death threats to J.K. Rowling and nothing.
Love it. Alexander, I enjoy the ongoing Chinese versus Rowling drama.
It's entirely bad guy versus bad guy.
Yeah, it's like watching if you put a tarantula and a scorpion in a cage and have them fight it out.
That's how I feel about it. Have you seen the YouTube channel that does that with as many animals as possible?
No, it sounds awful. Yeah, but it's Vietnamese, so, like, what are you going to do?
Yeah, well, yeah. They probably see them afterwards.
We started watching in the office.
I found one channel. Yeah.
They throw, like, three or four and watch them interact.
This one guy, he just keeps throwing things in.
He's got, like, ten animals.
He's still throwing another snake in, a centipede, and just see them interact.
Okay. Basically, the frog always wins, weirdly.
Just eats the scorpion.
Yeah. Eats the centipede.
Good for frogs. Yeah. Yeah.
Why are you? Well, I'm technically just a kind of moving belly.
And I'm just going to consume everything.
Yeah, I mean, nature versus nature.
The thing that can eat the more.
Yeah. Literally, a frog is like 90% mouth, isn't it?
Yeah. Anyway, Alexander says, I don't have to be invested in either side.
Whichever one gets damaged, we win.
Yeah, I know. It's brilliant, to be honest.
Soviets and the Nazis have gone to war.
Good news. Soviets and the Nazis have gone to war.
Twisted Frenzy. Do it, Carl.
Watch the Harry Potter movies and do the Politics of Harry Potter video.
I may have to do it at some point.
Harry Potter is intrinsically right-wing.
Like the 40k thing. Some things are just very right-wing.
And from what I've seen, Harry Potter looks like one of them.
Literally, there's an exclusive group of people who aren't muggles who get to go to this...
By blood. Yeah, by blood, this old English boarding school that is obviously the most traditional thing that's ever been represented in film.
And on that note, it's time to end the show.
So if you'd like some more right-wing fantasies, go and watch Harry Potter.
Otherwise, you can...
Enjoy your copy of Hogwarts Legacy.
Otherwise, we'll be back tomorrow at 1 o'clock.
▲
Export Selection