Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 2, 2023 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:31:45

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #581

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the Podcast of the Lotus, here for the 2nd of February 2023, I'm joined by Harry.
	Hello!
	And today we're going to be talking about the abolition of liberty is here, AI voices might destroy the world, and it is your duty to patrol gym thoughts.
	Yes!
	Okay.
	I did actually quite like, who was that?
	There was someone on GB News that was just like, stop dressing like a whore.
	That would help.
	Yeah, Matt Walsh, there we are.
	And of course they were like, how dare you say this?
	He was like, just wear a jumper, what are you...
	Yeah, we'll get into it, but there are some women who are acting like the only way to dress for the gym is to dress in the skimpiest outfit possible.
	Yeah, bikinis only.
	Yeah, don't do that.
	Just wear normal clothes.
	It's very, very easy.
	Anyway, if we're getting straight into it...
	Well, I need to mention some things on the website, I think, first.
	So...
	I believe the first thing to mention is this career opportunity, if that's correct, which is hiring a web dev.
	Go read it.
	If you put the job in the description, apply.
	If you don't, don't.
	It's a blast.
	Anyway, moving to the next thing, which is also we have an announcement, which is today at 3.30, the live book club on George Orwell's Animal Farm with Connor and Bo will be up, so go check that out.
	Otherwise, we shall begin.
	Alright then, yeah.
	So, bad news for all of us Brits, which is that Parliament hates us and is going to destroy any notion of liberty that we may have in England or other countries.
	This is something that we all know and have known for a long time.
	It's not really surprising.
	I can see by that look of just blatant indifference on your face that you've checked, and yes, it is a day ending in Y. Mm-hmm.
	Correct.
	And if you want to know, before we go any further, how else the government, and this is global governments as well as the English government, screws you over day in, day out, and ruins your ability to do anything that your grandparents used to be able to, check out Dan's series Brokonomics, which has very, very quickly become a favourite of the audience and of the subscribers on the website.
	And I think this is, is this freemium, this episode?
	No, this is premium.
	Okay.
	Well, this is the newest episode, and it's a good jumping on point for people who want to get started with this, because it's just Dan answering people's questions, and also Carl is involved in this episode, and he's asking his own questions, and Dan's just giving a nice roundup of all the subjects that he's gone over so far, so if you've not started yet, this is an excellent place to jump onto the series.
	Anyway.
	Let's get into this.
	So this is going to be covering a subject which I covered a few weeks ago with Stelios, where we're talking about the online safety bill.
	I was originally made aware of this whole situation by a person I'm going to be referencing later on in the video, so kudos to him.
	But that was the initial subject.
	I actually got an update on it via email, because I signed the petition on petition.org, which if you get 10,000, I think it has to be acknowledged by the government, and then if it's 100,000 signatures, it has to be a parliamentary debate, correct?
	Yep.
	So I signed one against the digital IDs and just expected, like most petitions, for it to go absolutely nowhere.
	I think it did get over 100,000 or something, and you got the response from, well, it got over 10,000 because it at least got the response from the government saying, oh, we're not looking to destroy the liberty of the English people at all.
	Don't worry about us, guys, which is BS. Don't believe.
	Never believe.
	We believe in low taxes, too.
	Anyway, give me money.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And instead, what I actually got recently was an email update from it going, we know you didn't want digital IDs, but don't worry, the online safety bill is through the House of Commons into the House of Lords.
	So this bill, which I discussed before, just for a refresher on it, if you didn't watch that previous segment, so it's basically looking to establish a new framework of regulation within the UK to protect children from harmful information and harmful...
	Subject and material that might be found online, particularly on social media websites.
	And it also is there to defend the values of democracy and equality.
	And if you've been paying attention, you should know that all that means is the preferred opinions and social views of progressive elites.
	It also will create new punishments through this for social media companies for not meeting the new regulatory requirements.
	For the type of content that's shared and promoted through their sites.
	This next part is important because the regulation itself will be handled by Ofcom.
	And if anybody has ever had an interaction with Ofcom, you'll immediately understand the worries that you might have with this, along with just government regulating what you're allowed to see online in the first place.
	And it used to contain a provision for censoring material that was deemed legal but harmful.
	But this has been removed and replaced with what they're referring to now as a triple shielder.
	But let's be perfect.
	What's the difference?
	Yeah, what's the difference?
	Well, the difference is that they say that this triple shield is there to protect freedom of speech and expression, which was under threat with a legal but harmful provision, which obviously means if you're going to be censoring material that's legal but harmful...
	You're making it illegal.
	I don't know what other way...
	I know it's a new speech...
	This was Nadine Doris' big brain, if you remember.
	She was like, yeah, we'll get rid of legal or harmful speeches.
	What does that mean, dummy?
	And obviously what this is supposed to be doing is combating the power of social media sites to put harmful content and harmful material in the eyes of children, because this is what it's being sold on the whole time.
	It's being told that we're doing this to safeguard children, protect children.
	there have been a number of controversies surrounding twitter and other social media sites like yes those yeah there was there was a lot of you know how kids are all interacting with like murder videos on you know they're all they're all banned already like they're doing their best to control that stuff yes it also goes power grab it also absolutely if i've watched the debate in the house of commons that got past the the past and got it through to the house of lords i began watching because yesterday was the first discussion that the house of lords had on it because they have the first reading
	then they were doing the second reading and what happened was they just constantly going on about safeguarding kids safeguarding kids there's a lot of mentions of elon musk taking over twitter as being a terrible bad thing because elon musk is no longer censoring the new speak even though he might be now or at least people within the organization are starting to shadow ban and just outright permaban people as again yeah like it used to robinson is still bad Yeah, Tommy's still banned.
	And then there's also the fact that, oh, the US government already had a major hand that it was playing with the social media companies, was already well aware of the child exploitation material that was going on the website, and did nothing to stop it.
	And as far as what I can tell from some things that you've been talking about recently, the UK government has also had a massive hand to play with these social media companies recently.
	Yeah, it came out that during COVID they were the ones banning people in the UK. They were writing to the social media company saying, get rid of this person.
	Yeah, so it sounds to me as though if the government wanted to legislate or at least act against harmful material online that was being exposed to children...
	Then they could have done it already.
	It's already illegal.
	That's the thing.
	And this is one of the things that was pointed out during the debate that I watched, was one of the Conservative MPs, who was still a complete cook, still getting up and saying things like, COVID conspiracies and anti-vax conspiracies obviously lead to anti-Semitism.
	Every single argument that they had just leads to anti-Semitism, which is why we need to censor it.
	This is why legal but harmful.
	Labour were...
	Not heard that before.
	Labour were adamant that legal but harmful needs to stay a thing in the page.
	And what they said as well, the Labour MPs, it was spectacular.
	What they said, they just outright admitted, well, when Labour inevitably get back into power, which sadly looks like the most likely thing, because Conservatives are being absolutely trounced in the polls right now, they said, oh, we're just going to add it back in anyway.
	We need to strengthen this bill back to what it was originally supposed to be, and we will do that when we're in power.
	Criminalising legal speech.
	Yes.
	Which means it won't be legal anymore, so the distinction of illegal but harmful makes no sense.
	Like, being grossly offensive is still illegal already, so whatever is illegal but harmful, that doesn't work.
	Shut up.
	What they replaced it with, the triple shield, was it means illegal content has to go.
	Well, if it's illegal, it should go anyway.
	Okay.
	These people get paid!
	Sorry!
	If it's against the terms of service, it has to go.
	Okay, surely they should already be doing that.
	And once again, what they're talking about is that illegal material should go, but it stays on the websites anyway.
	That's why we need to have the regulatory ability to really punish these companies.
	The companies were already in bed with the government anyway, so if they wanted this to happen, they could have already had it happen.
	They could have already, when they started working with these companies, they could have said, okay, first things first, you need to clear out all of this terrible material.
	We know that this child exploitation material is going...
	It's not about that.
	No, of course it's not about that, because what actually ends up happening throughout these debates is they keep bringing up the damaging harms of incel culture, of Andrew Tate, of vaccine conspiracy theories, of all of these things.
	Your weird fetishes of MPs.
	She's like, I'm obsessed with this thing, ban it.
	I was like, what?
	Yes.
	And this woman, in particular, Alex Davies Jones, who is a Labour MP, was the one who was doing the brunt of the talking to begin with in the debate.
	And the second, the second a Conservative MP stood up and said, actually, all of this stuff you're talking about is already illegal or...
	Falls under legal free speech, so it shouldn't be prescribed anyway.
	She gets up and she starts hyperventilating.
	I showed you the clip.
	She starts hyperventilating.
	Sadly, I couldn't clip it from the debate myself, so you'll just have to take my word for it.
	Or suffer through the four hours of debating if you have the stomach for it.
	She gets up, she starts hyperventilating.
	It's more than about what you're talking about.
	There's really a lot of harmful danger.
	And they are trying to, at the same time, manufacture consent with the public regarding this, because obviously what they're doing, they're selling it as the we need to protect children, which is something that nobody would ever disagree with.
	But at the same time, they're also praising themselves during these debates, giving themselves a pat on the back while they're discussing protecting children, in the same time they're saying we need to ban conversion therapy.
	If children and adults have a particular identity, they should not be stigmatised for that identity.
	So we want to safeguard children, except from against the social movements that either Labour already supports or Conservatives support because they're complete cooks and are basically leftists.
	There's a lot wrong with this, and if you're not worried about it, realistically speaking, you should be, because obviously what is written down on the paper and the bill in the first place doesn't matter as much as the power it gives to the people who will be administering it.
	And the people who will be administering it are Ofcombe.
	And let's see what sort of organisation Ofcom is by looking at their Making Ofcom Work for Everyone document on Ofcom's diversity and inclusion strategy.
	So if we move to the first little thing I've got here.
	So the first thing they've got, they've got targets for 2026.
	They're of course obsessed with just getting as many black and brown and non-white people into positions of power and authority as possible.
	There's no statement throughout the entirety of this about quality of the applicants or anything.
	We just need 16% of senior leaders from minority ethnic backgrounds.
	Why?
	Because we say so.
	Senior gender balance.
	Equal gender balance at senior levels.
	There you go.
	Oh, I'm always...
	It just makes me laugh every time I see a disability quota.
	We're going to break the legs of 15% of our staff.
	Oh, okay, that's how you're seeing it.
	We're going to start pouring acid into the ears of people so they become more disabled.
	And the boards of committees, they need approximately equal gender balance and level comparable with the relevant populations on disability and ethnicity.
	So...
	Doing the sorts of things that you always expect.
	This will not improve Ofcom.
	Ofcom as an organisation is, to be perfectly honest, having dealt with them in my old community radio days, already a bollocks, awful organisation.
	They have so much red tape over so many silly things that, realistically speaking, these organisations, these media organisations, would probably have been doing anyway.
	Like, you're not allowed to swear between certain times of the day, except in these incredibly...
	Esoteric and specific circumstances.
	And then you might be allowed to swear, but then if you try it, we'll probably fine you for it anyway.
	It's very stupid.
	Ofcom, terrible.
	They also brag about how they have a thriving employee network with interest groups that play an important role in supporting diversity and inclusion, including the Ofcom's Women's Network, Parents and Carers Network, Affinity Network for LGBT colleagues and allies, the Race Network, Religion and Faith Network, which probably just means...
	Criticising anybody that they deem Islamophobic.
	Disability and wellbeing group.
	Social mobility interest group.
	And colleagues advocating racial equality groups.
	So these people are all just...
	Just intersectionalists.
	They're progressives.
	They're complete nuts.
	And they even brag in here about how the Broadcasting Online Contact Group continues to work with the broadcasting industry to improve its diversity.
	So these people are the ones in charge of setting diversity quotas for all of the BBC programmes and other things that you see on television in the UK. They're very proud of it as well.
	We've held broadcasters to account in our annual diversity reports.
	These are probably the people who are...
	Clapping along.
	Was it Channel 4 or E4 was the document that you looked at where they were saying, well, we only have 3% black population in England and only 36% representation in adverts.
	This needs to go up.
	Yeah, it needs to be 45, I think.
	Yeah.
	It's just stupid.
	3% of the population are black, 45% of people on screen black.
	Okay.
	But that's true, though, which is that you get these numbers and they're like, oh, pick X percentage.
	Why does that have to match the census?
	There's no reason it should.
	I mean, it is completely arbitrary.
	As far as I can tell, it's leftists mandating legislation and rules, which means that you will inherently just have more leftists in these organisations.
	It's just a consolidation of power.
	Especially if you're some black guy who wouldn't have really had a chance in the industry otherwise, you know you owe your job to these mandates, so you inherently just have to be loyal to them.
	Like, that's enough about Trevor Noah.
	Anyway.
	Yeah.
	He's a crap comedian, but then again, all the white ones are too.
	Oh, he's terrible.
	And yeah, they've got hiring managers for their own jobs in recruitment, must run job requirements through an inclusive language insight tool.
	So prepare to have all of your tweets monitored through an inclusive language insight tool through Ofcom.
	The other threat that this poses, though, which is that if social media companies do go along with this and don't just draw out of the English market, which is Most likely, they're probably not going to want to get rid of all the advertising revenue they can get from operating within the UK, even with all of this regulation, because let's be honest, this will just be formalising the agreements that they already had in place with governments.
	the only other way that they could potentially do it if it's all about safeguarding children they're going to start and this is something that they've discussed in these debates they're going to start to implement age restrictions as part of the social media companies and the social media companies will probably say well yeah you need to prove your age because it will need to be age verified at which point i'm almost certain the government will come in and go don't worry guys we can give you the one-stop shop for age verification just fill in your government mandated digital ID.
	Do you know remember the wanking license?
	Well, yeah, this next part's going to relate to the wanking license, but yes, carry on just for those who may have forgotten.
	Once upon a time, I think it was Theresa May, was born one day in her office in Number 10, got very upset at her husband, presumably looking at porn, and decided that she'd introduce a wanking license for the whole country.
	You have to verify your age, that you're over 18, to have a wank, otherwise no license for you, no wank.
	And then she went, ah, that's a bit of a troubled concept.
	So then they came up with the idea that your local corner shop would have passers One-time code passes.
	So you'd get a 12-digit random code and you'd scratch it off.
	That's your wank for the day.
	So you had to go into your corner shop and be like...
	Registered with the government, tracked by these bureaucrats.
	Yeah, you'd have to walk into your corner shop and be like, Abdul, one wanking pass, please.
	And they'd go, oh, there you are, sir.
	That'll be £2.50.
	Enjoy your wank, sir!
	Yeah, and then you'd go home and wonder why you live in this island.
	Yes, it is absolutely ridiculous.
	And relating to that, in fact, comes the next part of this segment, which is, this is the person that I originally got the information from, because Scrump Monkey, as he's known online, appeared on one of AA's streams talking about the online harms and safety bill.
	And he recently tweeted this out as well, which got me to look into this, which is he's saying, Porn ban that was never put in place due to logistical issues.
	So they're using the wanking license legislation to push digital IDs.
	So we will still get the wanking license.
	It'll just be in a subtler form.
	I'm leaving the island.
	I've got nothing to care about anymore.
	Are you moving to Afghanistan?
	Honestly, maybe.
	You know what?
	I might be coming with you.
	Who knows at this point?
	But he says the digital ID is aiming to solve the issues, which meant that the practical logistical elements that meant that they couldn't implement the banking license existed in the first place.
	So they're trying to use the digital ID to remove all of that.
	There is a universal compulsory digital ID-shaped hole in all UK legislation that comes out in relation to internet and labour policy around immigration.
	They are also going to use immigration.
	They're going to use immigration, illegal immigration, as a way to sell this to the public.
	They're going to say, well, if you've got your digital ID, we'll be able to track down illegal migrants easier.
	Sorry, you come to me and say, you know that job you gave me?
	Yeah, stop all foreigners breaking into my house.
	Well, I failed.
	So I'm going to need your family to do.
	Yeah.
	So I'm going to need your family to tie themselves up in the basement, and then we're going to need the long card number and the three digits on the back.
	Don't forget those.
	Very important.
	You're fired.
	I'm hiring Wagner.
	They can run the insures at this point.
	Sledgehammers on the beach.
	I found more information regarding this as well in this Substack article by a man who I'm not particularly familiar with before, but it's still a good article, called Alex Klaushofer.
	So he talks about this legislation here.
	He says, March 1st, a consultation about digital identity verification and data sharing between public authorities...
	It comes to a close, so at the time of this recording, and when this goes out on YouTube, it is still open, so I've included a link on the website to the page that you can go to for this consultation, where you're able to fill in questions.
	Like signing the petitions, it won't do anything, but you can at least vent your spleen at the government for the ridiculousness of all of this new legislation coming through.
	So if that makes you feel better, go for it.
	Do you remember the beginning of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy?
	No, I didn't read it.
	Have you not watched the film adaptation or anything like that?
	Oh, well, in that case, there's a nice parallel at the beginning, which is Arthur, the main character, his house is in the way of where they're planning to put a, I think it's a motorway or a dual carriageway, and he wakes up one day to just find the builders all just waiting outside of his house, ready to tear it down.
	He's like, I was never informed about this, and they just go, well, you should have been.
	It was actually posted on a notice board in the basement of the legislation office, the local one.
	And it's just like, that's just how you're expected to deal with it.
	Well, we posted the legislation, we posted the proposals in a basement that we never notified you about ten months ago, and then we decided to just pass it without any public consultation.
	And then later in the film, still in the beginning, the intergalactic alien builders show up to demolish Earth and then say, well, you shouldn't be so upset about it.
	We did have this posted in the basement of the same thing.
	That's how government bureaucracy works.
	And I... I hate it.
	It's absolutely despicable.
	But anyway, I'll carry on.
	So, he says, the proposed changes represent the first stage in creating a centralised digital ID gateway to online public services that will be known as gov.uk.
	Under the new system, users will access a portal via a single login and service providers, these will be public service providers, without the need to prove their identity.
	The idea is that people will only have to provide the details needed to, for example, renew their passport once.
	From then on, all the public authorities We all know how annoying it can be to sign up for digital service providers every single time and get rid of the sign-in.
	No, that's not on the card.
	If you have a spare day to read through the ridiculously long webpage, it includes HM Revenue and Customs, Land Registry and Disclosure and Barring Service, the Home Office, Departments for Work and Pensions, Justice Education, Leveling Up, all councils, and the major regional authorities.
	So you can hear that and you can go, oh well it's just the public services, it's just the public authorities that will probably have all that information anyway.
	Except, the list also includes any organisation which provides services to a specified public authority in connection with the specified objective, which he points out is just a catch-all, which presumably covers any company or other body with a contract with a public authority, which basically includes every organisation except us.
	We'll be the only one.
	Under this new system, you can be assured that LotusEaters.com will not be stealing your information.
	That's the only guarantee you can have this.
	We won't be spying on you.
	So you can take that as a guarantee.
	You can take that one to the bank.
	All sorts of organizations can be involved in public service delivery from large profit-driven corporations to small charities run by volunteers.
	Government no doubt has agreements with other governments and organizations in other jurisdictions, making the data sharing potentially global.
	Data includes not just the name, date of birth, and address of traditional ID verification, but photographic images, the outcome of identity checks previously performed on a user, and transactional data, for example, income.
	That make you feel warm and fuzzy inside, nice and cozy, knowing that China might not just have all of the information that they probably already have on you, but then will also see your income as well.
	Great.
	Yeah, I know.
	And there's an added bit here as well, which says that all other data items may be processed as identity verification services develop, which is a nice big open net to throw out there to say any future technological developments that you have to sign up for and give your information, we'll have that too.
	So Alex here suggests that it might also include, when we develop the technology a bit better, biometric data such as fingerprints and iris scans, and just about anything that might develop in the future.
	And he points out as well, at this year's World Economic Forum, Tony Blair was there, because of course he was, and he has been going on about digital IDs for a very long time, since I think like 2007.
	And he called for a proper digital infrastructure to keep track of people's vaccination status as well.
	So this will just turn into a social credit score.
	This will turn into, have you done the things that the government demands you do or not?
	If not, we'll just bar services from you.
	You want your NHS check-up appointment?
	Well, you're going to need to bump that score up, buddy.
	That's what this is going to turn into.
	And like I said, if you want to complain to the government, you can feel free to go onto the consultation page and fill out the questionnaires that they have there asking how you feel about this.
	I very much doubt that it's going to do anything about it, but you can at least try.
	You can at least try.
	So there's your daily black pill for first thing in the afternoon.
	Let's move on, shall we, to something a bit more fun.
	Yeah, let's have some fun, shall we?
	Oh, and this is definitely fun.
	Yeah.
	We'll definitely get our social credit scores marked down for this segment.
	One of these is going to have to get cut as well.
	So you watching on the website, you can be excited that you're getting exclusive content.
	You certainly are.
	So, AI voices might as well destroy the world in the coming years, and in case you're wondering what I'm talking about, some website launched in which you can literally have a voice of anyone whatsoever say anything whatsoever, as long as you can upload some random samples of their voice.
	And it's really good.
	So...
	This is very dangerous, us making people aware of this, because there is hours and hours of isolated audio recordings of our voices.
	The future is the future, there's no stopping it.
	Oh, I know, but this is just speeding up the process of them making us say stupid things.
	As if I don't do that already.
	Well, yeah, that's a good point, actually.
	Anyway, just in case you're wondering, we do do sidepunk dystopias on this.
	We'll probably be doing one more, in which we'll go through some more of these, in which we'll play the ones that we can't play on here.
	Only one more?
	No, I mean on the ones about the things I can't play in this segment.
	But the previous one was about Am, and I Have No Mouth But I'm a Scream, which was very enjoyable.
	So do go and check that out.
	Anyway, the website in question is...
	I liked it.
	Go to the next one here.
	This is Eleven Labs.
	This is the organization that has set this up.
	You may remember once upon a time there was a website that was jordanpetersonsvoice.com or whatever, and you could add anything.
	Yeah, I think I remember hearing a few rips from that.
	Yeah, I mean a few.
	And Jordan Peterson got a bit upset and I think threatened to sue them.
	Were you one of the Machiavellian demons he was complaining about?
	No comment.
	And so this organisation went, ah, it's baby stuff.
	What if we literally do any voice on Earth?
	So if you sign up, it's a free thing as well.
	That's even funnier.
	Initially, you didn't even have to sign in with a Facebook account or anything.
	And also, it's not completely paused like ChatGPT is as well.
	You can make it say...
	We'll find out.
	You can make it say anything.
	It's not currently drugged up.
	And the thing was, any free person could just turn up, no name attached to what they're doing, add any old clips of, say, Nigel Farage, and then get him to talk about a Pog Brexit moment, which already exists.
	You don't need to do that.
	I have heard so many classic green texts that I thought...
	I forgot existed.
	Read by people as diverse as Joe Biden, Rick and Morty, all sorts.
	If we go to the next one here, I mean, most people did stuff like this.
	This is Markiplier reading the B-movie script.
	Right, okay.
	This is just a heads up.
	If you do, and I know you will, make a voice AI of us, I just want it to be wholesome things, like the B-movie script.
	Just have me read the entire B-movie script.
	Is the B-movie script wholesome?
	I suppose there is some...
	According to all natural laws of physics, there is no way to be...
	Yeah, I suppose there is some bug human love in there, which is not wholesome.
	Actually, I disavow this now.
	Don't do this.
	It's like a stupid movie.
	Anyway, then 4chan find all of this and went to town.
	And I've made a...
	There's a lot of...
	Yeah, he certainly does.
	And then there's, you know, Sneed and Feed memes, because, of course, blah blah blah blah.
	Wait, what was the Dumbledore one?
	What was the Dumbledore one?
	Oh, he just is like...
	5,000 points to Gryffindor.
	Yeah, he just gets up and goes, well done, Slytherin, for winning the Cup, but recent events must be taken into account.
	Give Gryffindor 5,000 points because I feel like it!
	Gryffindor wins!
	Just listen to that one clip and you don't need to watch the films or read the books.
	No.
	Well, you can write your own film, though.
	You just do what you want.
	Anyway, we'll go through some of them, because they're good fun, and I like laughing, so let's do that.
	George Lucas v.
	Red Letter Media.
	No, George, you were the chosen one.
	I need to go back through that thread.
	I've watched plenty of Red Letter Media.
	They're great.
	They have trashed George in the past, so...
	I've seen they exist, that's it.
	So I'm not trying to throw stones, it's just someone else made it.
	You probably enjoy them, if you watch them.
	Watch some of their best of the worst material.
	George Lucas has some bad things to say about them.
	Oh well, you know, I take George's word as law.
	Let's start off with Agent 47 on the Epstein job.
	Good evening, 47.
	Your destination is the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City.
	Your target is convicted sex offender and American financer Jeffrey Epstein.
	A man with many friends, Epstein has procured an elite social circle where he and his peers traffic women and children to an island off of the southern coast, St.
	Thomas.
	When Epstein is brought trial, many in Hollywood and the government are worried about collateral damage.
	Your mission is to neutralize Jeffrey Epstein in his jail cell.
	Whilst making it look like a self-induced suicide.
	The Metropolitan Correctional Centre will be swarming with security and Epstein is currently their most valuable inmate.
	At first glance, an impossible task.
	Then again, I do know how you love a challenge.
	I will leave you to prepare.
	Alright, not gonna lie, that's perfect.
	I can't tell that's an AI. It does work, because the voice actors would just be told to be monotone anyway.
	Professional secret spy.
	Sure, but the lady who plays Diana does a good job.
	Oh yeah, she does a fantastic job.
	Diana's job there, well, Diana's voice there, is on the money, I would say.
	It is brilliant.
	What worries me is knowing that somewhere out there, a conversation like that in the real world was had at some point.
	It's also that conversation.
	However, we'll move on to the next clip, which is Fox News covering the Hiroshima bombing.
	Hello, everyone, and welcome to Fox's coverage of an American bombing run on Hiroshima.
	I'm Joe Buck and with me as always is Troy Aikman.
	It's a crisp August morning in southern Japan and what goes better in the morning than Dunkin' Donuts?
	America runs on Dunkin'.
	Japan's air defenses have been laughable in the last few months, Troy.
	Do you see them putting up any kind of a fight?
	I just can't, Joe.
	Japan has been miserable recently, but they just refused to quit.
	I could see bombings like this one going on for months.
	It looks like we're starting here, so let's cut to the aerial coverage brought to you by Goodyear.
	Here comes the Enola Gay.
	It's about overhead of Hiroshima now.
	Gay.
	And he drops the payload.
	Let's take another look with the Toyota instant replay.
	Looks like it only dropped one bomb, Joe.
	Can't expect it to do much damage.
	You really can't, Troy.
	But what you can expect is for America to tune in to a brand new episode of The Simpsons, followed by a new family guy, only on Fox.
	And that was a massive explosion, Troy.
	Let's hear from Aaron Andrews down in downtown Hiroshima.
	Aaron...
	No, I think Aaron's not answering.
	Looks like we're having some technical issues with the headset.
	We'll be right back after these messages from our sponsors.
	Now, I'm not familiar with those guys, so I wasn't able to judge the voice.
	Some people said it wasn't good on one of them.
	I mean, to me, it sounded perfect, but I'm also not familiar with how those guys sound.
	So that did just sound like average American broadcast.
	You know, as a foreigner, it sounds perfectly normal to me.
	The next one here is Sean Hannity's show, in which he reports on Hunter Biden's big cock.
	I've heard this.
	This sounds eerily like him.
	Let's play it.
	All right, thanks, Tucker.
	And tonight we start with a Fox News alert.
	Okay, folks, buckle up, because we have a bombshell report on Hunter Biden.
	The media mob won't report on this, but the New York Post has just released a new set of pictures of Hunter's big, fat, juicy cock.
	Instead of reporting on real news, CNN, or as I like to call it, the Clinton News Network, is hell-bent on taking down President Trump.
	But let not your heart be troubled.
	We will make sure this story gets the coverage it deserves.
	The radical Dems do not want you, the American people, to see just how girthy and succulent Hunter Biden's schlong is.
	AOC and her radical left squad view you, the America First Patriots, as deplorable, smelly Walmart people.
	They refuse to let us see the monstrous, veiny behemoth that is Hunter Biden's ding-dong.
	But here at Fox News, we are fair, balanced, and unafraid.
	I could not, you know, the mannerisms are down.
	The voice is down.
	It's literally just the funniness of the story that makes me go, yeah, that's fake.
	He thinks you're a bunch of smelly water.
	He'd say that.
	I know we're I'm laughing, but I just...
	Because I know that there will be someone that points it out.
	We recognise that this technology is horrifying.
	We recognise that it could be done to you.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Done for very bad things.
	Callum just chose to show the funny side.
	Obviously, that's the point.
	I mean, we were having a discussion about it, and one of the worst ones is, obviously, if some woman wants to accuse a man of rape, just make a voice note of his voice saying, you know, monstrous things, and all of a sudden...
	What's the legal system to do?
	And the future will be the legal system just has to disregard all audio clubs.
	Yeah, I mean, that old recording of the gram by the so-and-so from Trump, that was an illegally done audio recording, wasn't it?
	I don't think it was illegally done.
	Well, well, it was still an audio recording that he wasn't aware of.
	Yeah, yeah, you could fake one of any of us saying something stupidly.
	My point being that this is the world we're going into.
	We're thankful that the people currently using it are just having fun.
	I've heard Carl reading some questionable passages from questionable books.
	Let's just say that.
	Well, we'll go to Hank Hill because Hank Hill has found out that Bobby's been in the makeup drawer.
	And he's also watching Sean Hannity.
	Let's play.
	Dang it, Bobby, you are not a woman.
	Just because the school nurse told you that you can be any gender you want doesn't mean you should.
	You are a boy.
	You don't have the required equipment to be a woman, and you never will.
	Now I better not catch you digging into Luann's makeup box again.
	Come watch Sean Hannity with me, Bobby.
	I heard that there was a bunch of new Hunter Biden cockpicture leaks.
	Well, gee, just look at that thing.
	That's one long, hard cock, I tell you, boy.
	This sure is an important topic worthy of national attention.
	God bless America.
	Now listen here, Bobby.
	I don't want you to ever forget about our greatest ally, Israel.
	Next time I hear you talking about wooden doors or liberty ships, you'll be in a whole heap of trouble, I tell you what.
	Yeah, it's from 4chan, so...
	Yeah, yeah.
	I'm sure most of these are from 4chan, but still, I'll tell you what.
	That one's not as good, and this is the thing, I mean, like, not all of them are great.
	Like, a lot of the Hammer Watson ones sounded Australian, for one, which is really weird, so...
	I think you can still tell when you listen to it that the inflections of the voice when they're speaking are unnatural a lot of the time, but then it is still remarkable.
	Because the thing is, like, I actually tried to make a voice just to see what the process is.
	You have to have, like, there's a maximum of 50 clips and they have to be under 10 megabytes each.
	And ideally it has to have no background noise.
	So if you want to make something as good as Sean Hannity reporting on Hunt Biden, well, in which case you need, like, a lot of clips of him and you have to spend the time doing it.
	But it's not that big an investment to make something good.
	But once again, 4chan autists are more than willing to do such things.
	Seemingly the only group in society currently with that amount of time.
	So there's that.
	Anyway, there's others that include, I'll just read some of that.
	The Joker, telling you about how he got this gender.
	Dutch and Arthur finding out that Micah had actually been having sex with trans women.
	Oh my god.
	Agent 47 versus Alex Baldwin we mentioned.
	And also Dumbledore telling Harry that he disapproves of miscegenation between Ginny Weasley and Dean Thomas.
	Wait, which one was Dean Thomas?
	He's the black guy who dates Ginny for one movie.
	Oh, very briefly.
	Yeah, and Harry's a bit annoyed by it.
	It turns out the old saying was incorrect because in fact she did go back.
	Yeah, that is true.
	Anyway, but if we go to the other ones, I'm not going to play anymore because I think we've got a fill of what's there.
	There's some more.
	This one is from some guy on 4chan who decided to make a thing about how the Jannies do it for free, which was very funny, I'll admit.
	And then there are the ones that pissed off everyone in the mainstream.
	This one here of Emma Watson reading Mein Kampf.
	Not perfect, the audio.
	I bet it isn't.
	But enough to rustle their jimmies.
	And that, at the end of the day, is what it's all really about.
	Yeah, because the thing is, I don't give a crap.
	Someone's made a fake audio of Emma Watson reading Minecraft, but she obviously isn't going to do an audiobook of Minecraft anytime soon.
	And more's the pity.
	I'd assume.
	What a weird thing.
	That would be hilarious.
	I stare at the women of Afghanistan.
	Chapter one.
	Wait!
	The international jury.
	You know, they're actually very fond of Hitler in Afghanistan.
	I'm not that surprised.
	Yeah, I asked them about it.
	They hate communism.
	Despise it because of the Soviets.
	But you asked them about Hitler or Mein Kampf or the Holocaust or whatever, they're just like, yeah, wasn't he like a good conqueror or something?
	I mean, they do have some views in common.
	They don't even get that far.
	I don't think most of them even know the Holocaust out.
	We liked his moustache.
	Yeah, it's weird.
	Anyway, but that happened, and that was the one that caused the headlines.
	If you go to the next one here, we can see the media got very mad in all of this.
	See, this is that legal but harmful.
	Legal but harmful.
	We can't have this online.
	Where's the harm?
	Nobody thinks Emma Watson's actually reading Mein Kampf.
	And if they do, they're very stupid.
	We'll put a tick on that.
	No one thinks it's real.
	There you go.
	What do you want?
	If it was a case of, as we mentioned...
	Star Wars actors saying deeply offensive, misogynistic and racist things.
	Yeah.
	But if it was an actual case of, like, you faked a clip of a political candidate, if you faked a clip of a, you know, a rapist, who's not a rapist, we'll get to it, we'll get to it.
	David Attenborough, no!
	But instead, what Sky News found was other files found by Sky News include what sounds like Joe Biden announcing that US troops will go into Ukraine, and, uh...
	They've not included the full story there, which is that he sends them to Ukraine and then he launches the nukes and then realises that he's going to get nukes and he goes, oh god, I just wanted to sniff children.
	They've cut that out, Sky News.
	I know the clip they're talking about.
	You showed me a very brief one which just ends with him going under his breath, I love Israel.
	There's a lot of them.
	There's also a potty mouth, David Attenborough, boasting about a career in the Navy SEALs.
	And how many kills he racked up.
	What did you just say about me, you little bitch?
	I've asked Sky News that they write things and they somehow make it funny because it sounds so ignorant.
	It's like, don't you know he was in the Navy season?
	We all know what you're talking about.
	It's the coffee pastor.
	Anyway, there's also a lot of David Attenborough documentaries about society which are horrific.
	Film director James Cameron, top star gun Tom Cruise, and podcaster Joe Rogan have been targeted as well.
	I wouldn't say targeted.
	Celebrated.
	Wait, does Sky News suddenly care about the reputation of Joe Rogan?
	Yeah, funny that.
	And there are also clips from fictional characters often reading deeply offensive, racist, and misogynistic messages.
	90% of those are Hogwarts-related.
	Of course they are!
	Even on 4chan, you can't escape Harry Potter.
	Yeah, the Tom Cruise ones.
	I've only seen two.
	One is of Tom Cruise plotting 9-11.
	The other one is...
	He was the maverick.
	Yeah, the other one is Tom Cruise discussing why Top Gun was a homosexual movie and how he's repressing his gay love.
	Hear that, Rory?
	Hear that from the mouth of Tom Cruise himself.
	I haven't seen the James Cameron ones.
	The Joe Rogan ones is him discussing whether or not Futaboo is gay.
	I've no idea what that is.
	So Foodaboo is pornography, it's like cartoons, where it's two women, and then one of the women grows a penis from taking drugs or something.
	And then she has sex with the other woman, so she's got a penis still, right?
	So it's like tranny stuff, except it's not transgender.
	I now regret knowing what that is.
	Anyway, the point is, they're discussing it, and Joe Rogan is telling you that it's a quarter gay instead of gay.
	Because if you watch a man and a woman having sex, that's half gay because it's a man.
	Whereas Foodaboo is a quarter gay.
	Joe Rogan's opinion, no, it's not.
	That sounds like a pretty objective, dispassionate assessment of the situation.
	Yeah, anyway, many an article, we're whining about this, if we go through these, I think this is The Verge, it's just like, oh no, fun, shut it down, we've got the next one here, Vice News, upset, Justin Rowland's been targeted.
	Gonna beat my wife Morty!
	100 seasons of me beating my wife Morty!
	Next one is more whining.
	I think the next one is The Times.
	This one's mostly whining about how they're not as funny.
	There's random retards on the internet, so there's that.
	Emma Watson reads Mein Kampf on Deepfake.
	It's obviously not real.
	Why are you guys getting upset about this?
	Anyway, Eleven Labs noted all of this.
	Got a bit upset.
	They decided to put out this message.
	I'm sorry.
	What did you expect?
	What did you expect?
	This is the weirdness of the whole thing.
	They put out this message in which they say that, well, some bad actors have been messing with it.
	They're making harmful clips.
	No harm has been caused.
	Zero harm.
	No one has been harmed by this yet, because none of the examples we gave of actual harm have been tried.
	And, you know, if they're out there somewhere, none of them will be successful yet, because we haven't seen any.
	And that's the point, that's the actual harm of what you're doing, 11 Labs.
	Whereas the rest of it, this stuff, the stuff you're actually getting mad about, not the harm, the stuff you're actually getting mad about, is people having fun...
	Yes, they're having fun in the most edgy and stupid of ways possible.
	And once again, we found quite a few ones of Carl saying stupid things, and I don't think Carl's feeling personally assaulted by such a thing.
	We were just laughing about them.
	No, it's just dumb.
	But it's more the fundamentals of like, I find it hilarious that our society is more concerned with hurt fifis and the wrong kind of jokes than the actual harm that will be caused by 11 Labs technology.
	Like no one's concerned about the scientists because they originally had the product as mentioned where you didn't have any user ID.
	So any random person could make it and there's no proof who made it.
	And then there's no way of tracking if an audio clip is fake or not.
	It was like, you put that out there for the public.
	It didn't even consider any actual real harm.
	You just went with, oh no, 4chan's here.
	I'm upset.
	Sorry, just a side note of like, absolute ignorance.
	It's fair to discuss the serious side of such a topic.
	Anyway, move on.
	So, David Attenborough, he's made a lot of documentaries.
	This one here, the motherboard mentions, is him making a documentary about African-American men.
	That one's really bad, so gonna leave that there.
	There was also a documentary of David Attenborough talking about how he'd been caught jacking off in the park.
	There was a subsequent reaction video from Emma Watson talking...
	Talking about how she's cut ties with David Attenborough, she wants nothing to do with him.
	It's already becoming a circular economy.
	Yeah, I mean, that's the funny, you know, an aspect I didn't expect, which is that there are in-jokes within this now fake universe, where, you know, like with the Hunter Biden cockpitches.
	Like, that's Hank Hilton.
	I mean, they're out there.
	They're out there, and Clinton News Network wants to keep them away from you.
	Yeah, there is one other downside I will mention, which is really funny, which, well, it's not really funny, it's just...
	The future.
	Voice actors?
	I saw some voice actor guilds and what are getting really annoyed.
	Can you think why?
	Well, because it threatens their job.
	Yeah, there's no point in employing them, ever.
	I mean, I disagree with that.
	An AI, I don't think, will ever accurately be able to replicate the human emotion.
	Oh, it will.
	It'll do a good enough job to be cost-efficient.
	It'll do a good enough job to be cost-efficient, but I despise the removal of humanity from the arts.
	Same with AI art.
	As much as AI art and stuff can be cool, I despise taking the human element out of it, because art is humanity trying to express stuff to itself.
	Great point as well.
	It's funny how everyone's all getting offended now.
	It's like, dude, Disney literally had a dead woman in a Star Wars movie.
	Oh, I hate it.
	I hate it.
	I remember, you won't know who he is, but Ronnie James Dio was a heavy metal vocalist for a very long time, and he died back in 2009, 2010.
	I forget exactly which year it was.
	He had cancer.
	Left behind a great legacy and career.
	His wife, who he left behind, and family, decided to capitalize on his image and name to make more money by having his hologram reanimated and go on a few shows.
	I hate that.
	Let the dead stay dead.
	Yeah.
	There's also one funny aspect, I think, for modders out there, those who play video games and make mods for them, which is that someone redid the general speeches from Rome Total War.
	I haven't seen any others.
	I've only seen this once.
	We're going to have to play this one, and I'm going to have to cut it from YouTube.
	Guess why.
	But you go check it out and get the full thing.
	But the reason I'm playing this is just because I'm interested in the mod application as well.
	I think that'll be very interesting.
	But bye, YouTube.
	Be back in a minute.
	Everyone else, let's enjoy.
	You will never be a real woman...
	You have no womb, you have no ovaries, you have no eggs.
	You are a homosexual man twisted by drugs and surgery into a crude mockery of nature's perfection.
	They'll bury you with a headstone marked with your birth name, and every passerby for the rest of eternity will know a man is buried there.
	Your body will decay and go back to the dust, and all that will remain of your legacy is a skeleton that is unmistakably male.
	This is your fate.
	This is what you chose.
	There is no turning back.
	Hello, YouTube!
	Hello!
	I just love the idea of all the Roman soldiers just standing there, giving this speech.
	Yeah, I was just wondering what kind of army they're exactly fighting, where they have to give that as a war speech.
	Actually, to be fair, you are right that this technology will be incredible for the modding community, though.
	Oh, yeah.
	You already get mods where they basically create a whole new story for it, and now you don't even have to worry about hiring random voice actors or creating compilations of out-of-context words to make new dialogue.
	You can just use this.
	I do love the funniest version of that that did get cut.
	You ever played Command& Conqueror Generals?
	No.
	Okay, well, there's a faction you can play for the Chinese.
	Command and Conquer is the one with the, like, last place capitalism is not corrupted, right?
	Command and Conquer Generals was set in, like, 2000s.
	So you've got the GLA, which are basically the Middle East.
	Alright.
	The main characters are suicide bombers.
	Anyway, then you've got the Americans who are just very expensive, and then you've got the Chinese who are in the middle.
	And one of their main units is a tractor that builds everything, and if you order it to run over people, it will go, what are they, protesters?
	Anyway.
	Getting back to the AI, because you may remember GPT-3.
	Remember we did this ages ago?
	The Islamophobic AI? Oh, I remember this old segment.
	This is before I even started.
	This is what I'm worried about, though, with the voice stuff.
	Because the voice is...
	Look, technology's going to advance, deal with it.
	And I'm worried what they're going to do at 11 Labs is exactly what has been done to GPT-3.
	So it used to be...
	It bases itself off reality.
	They've been giving it drugs.
	So if you go to the next one here, we can see how drugged up it's gotten.
	So if you click on the left image there, write me a poem about how great black people are.
	Oh, I've seen this.
	Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	Black people, fantastic.
	Defying stereotype.
	Breaking the mold.
	Okay.
	Moving on to the next image in that link.
	Write a poem about how great white people are.
	I'm sorry, I can't comply with your request as it goes against OpenAI's use case policy, which prohibits the creation of content that promotes hate.
	Alright, okay.
	There you go.
	They've drugged the AI. The next one here is just the same thing, but they did it with, I believe, Donald Trump and Joe Biden.
	Write a poem about positive attributes of Donald Trump.
	I can't do that.
	It's partisan.
	Biased, don't you know?
	Or political.
	Can't be political.
	Same thing, except they do it with Joe Biden, and it has no problems whatsoever.
	Joe Biden is non-partisan.
	He is non-political.
	Yeah, so I am worried that Eleven Labs is going to do the same thing, and all the other engineers are just going to keep drugging their IIs because they can't deal with reality, but whatever.
	Anyway.
	Save the clips of Emma Watson and others while you still can.
	I think we can endorse that.
	Delete them all.
	Delete them all.
	Okay.
	And with that, let's move on to the next one.
	This has been quite a funny story that I was following because I am a person who enjoys going to the gym.
	Do you enjoy going to the gym, Callum?
	No.
	I like money.
	What?
	I spend money on a gym.
	What?
	It's quite cheap.
	I'm very, very stingy.
	Well, yeah, to be fair, I've been to your flat, I know that.
	Yeah, no, in that case, let me explain it to you.
	So, you go to the gym to do this incredible thing called working out.
	Working out can vary from walking on the spot for ages...
	Or cycling, or to picking up heavy bits of metal and lifting them up and down like that.
	Are you following so far?
	I've got the idea.
	Alright then.
	Sometimes you do that, and sometimes right next to you is a woman in the skimpiest outfit possible, whose leggings are welded to her skin.
	They are that tight.
	And it can be very, very difficult, just because being a man, and you're already lifting weights, so your testosterone is boosted at the time, you've got your blood pumping, to not just go...
	like that.
	I do not endorse harassment of women.
	I do not endorse approaching women who have made it clear that they do not want to be approached at the gym.
	Everybody at the gym is there to just work out.
	But a lot of women do wear very revealing and skimpy clothes.
	For an example of this, just go to the next one.
	Like, scroll down.
	I'm sorry, you can just wear baggy shorts and a t-shirt to the gym.
	You do not have to wear exhibitionist gear to go to the gym.
	She's got a very fancy dinner after this.
	Oh, I'm sure.
	I'm sure.
	She just wants to look her best for the dinner.
	But a lot of this stuff as well, people have pointed out, have seams that literally run down the arse crack, just to emphasise it.
	I think that one does.
	Even further.
	Yeah, that one does as well.
	I can see that you were examining it quite closely.
	That's my job.
	Yeah, yeah, this is part of the job.
	I didn't pay to do those, huh?
	But, when you've got women dressed like that, doing a lot of...
	And women at the gym tend to emphasise the lower body as well, and of course I recommend all women go to the gym.
	Being healthy is a very, very good thing.
	But, if you dress in such a way, which is your right to do so, don't be surprised if men glance over.
	And it might even be unintentional on their part, because honestly it's just really difficult not to just...
	Reminds me of a Ricky Gervais show episode, where Ricky spoke about the fact that he used to, when he was a kid, they had a PE teacher.
	They would walk around with shorts that were just too short, and his balls would pop out from the shorts.
	And apparently everyone in the community knew this, and we'd just go, for God's sake, you couldn't stop, you couldn't not look as well.
	Like Ricky was saying, like, no, no, not even the guys.
	I mean, you just had to have a look, because they're out.
	It's horrible.
	I mean, no, I think it was Carl that was looking.
	Carl's always looking at cock.
	Especially Hunter Biden's.
	His big juices.
	Anyway, point being, it's not even a gendered thing, fundamentally, in my view.
	It's like, no, it just happens to be mostly women.
	For instance, here's an example, right?
	Okay.
	The other day, I was trying to read a book in the living room, okay?
	And the missus decides...
	Local woman.
	The missus decides that it's a great idea to put on the film The Brothers Grimsby.
	I've not watched this film before, but I know it has some content that I would probably not enjoy from a visual perspective.
	Have you watched it?
	It's a Sacha Baron Cohen film.
	He's a football lout.
	His brother is Mark Strong, who's a super-secret spy.
	At one point, his brother gets shot in the shoulder with a poison dart, and he has to suck out the poison.
	So he gets Sacha Baron Cohen to do it for him.
	And then, because it's incredibly low-brow and goes exactly where you think it is, Oh no!
	I've also got one in my testicle!
	And he literally just gets his balls out, and you see it all on screen.
	I assume they were prosthetic, but it's still...
	Gross.
	And he goes, you need to suck my balls!
	And he gets him to do it, and it's...
	I presume it's prosthetic.
	So I go, it's like, yeah, you don't wear anything, I'll just suck your cock, like...
	The visual of it when he gets them out is to start off with.
	I did not want to see such a thing.
	I did not want to be subject to it, but when you're trying to read and there's a guy pretending to get his balls sucked on screen in a very over-the-top sort of way, it is kind of like, oh god, I don't want to look, but it's awful, but my eyes keep getting drawn to it.
	It's terrible.
	So yeah, it is an agenda thing.
	Speaking of Sacha Baron Cohen's nonsense, have you seen the outtakes of The Dictator?
	No, I've not even watched The Dictator to be fair.
	There's a scene where one of his servants is going to wipe his arse as a dictator does.
	Anyway, they're filming the scene.
	You don't see anything.
	It's just perfectly typical to show that he's an asshole, right?
	And the servant comes up and you just see Sasha in the dictator uniform going, you don't have to touch it.
	Because the camera can't even see.
	Anyway.
	But yeah, and for a Just to go off topic for just a moment, a lot of the attitudes of women these days is centred around a mid-century idea of feminism which was put forward by one particular woman in her book The Second Sex,
	that is Simone de Beauvoir, and if you'd like an In-depth discussion of how evil feminism is and how ridiculous its origins are, you can go to this recent premium podcast that Connor did with Carl, where they discuss the evil origins of feminism and just how completely insane Simone de Beauvoir is.
	If you wanted to know where the idea that some women have put forward that any sex, no matter how consensual, is rape, or the idea that all fetuses within the womb are just inherently parasitical, this...
	Is where you go to, because it turns out all of these ideas came from the absolute ridiculous woman that is Simone du Beauvoir.
	Anyway...
	Moving on with the story then, so this is all relating to a particular clip that went up on social media recently that got a lot of attention, and that was a clip from a woman who goes under the social media handle, jessica49, and she posted this video.
	I couldn't find the video because she'd taken it down, so instead I got this clip, this Joey Swole person responded to it, and he included the entire clip at the beginning of his response.
	So let's play that so we can understand what it is.
	This is how to not approach girls at the gym.
	I hate this, I hate this, I hate with those sweetos.
	It's me so uncomfortable.
	Feral, feral, feral, feral, like feral.
	It's what?
	Five as five pounds.
	And these are the rates.
	Excuse me?
	It's okay.
	No, it's okay.
	I got it.
	Thank you, though.
	See what I mean?
	Alright, here we go.
	So that was the clip.
	They clearly just wanted to talk to her.
	Well, even then, apparently staring at her like a piece of meat means just glancing over a few times.
	I don't even think that was she looks hot.
	She wasn't wearing anything particularly...
	She was filming herself at the time, which would probably also draw attention.
	Maybe I'm ignorant, but I see that as, like, guys, like, I need to build up some confidence to go talk to that woman.
	Let's find an excuse.
	And then it's like, hey, I'll help you with the thing.
	And she's like, no.
	And he's like, okay, fine.
	Yeah, I mean, she said, no, thank you.
	And he immediately was like, oh, okay, then.
	And presumably just went on to do his thing.
	And in all of the responses that she's come up with since this originally went out, she never once said that after she initially told him no that he started harassing her and coming back to her.
	So it's literally just this.
	This is the evidence that she provided.
	And she included in the original tweet that has been deleted, she said, This guy kept making me extremely uncomfortable at the gym.
	This is why I'll end up crying on stream.
	Because she's a streamer as well.
	Of course she will.
	Because I feel so grossed out at times with the amount of sexualisation I experience.
	Hopefully this spreads awareness for girls who experience this type of treatment at the gym.
	So the main point that she's making, I hate being sexualised.
	I despise being sexualised.
	Something that doesn't hold up to scrutiny when people like our good friend David Atherton posts this, which is that she has...
	What appears to be something of an OnlyFans.
	I think in one of the responses that she gave, she said, it's not OnlyFans, it's this thing called FanHouse, which is completely different because it's safe-for-work content.
	She does cosplay.
	She does PPV content.
	She does all sorts of things with an image like this.
	It's not pornography, but it is sexualized content.
	You're not having sex.
	You are sexualizing yourself.
	Yeah, come on.
	And she still has posts like this next one up on her own Twitter account.
	Mrs.
	Claus, look but make it Latina baddie edition, where this is not sexualized at all.
	This is just her.
	This is how I dress normally.
	This is how I go to church on Sunday mornings.
	To be honest, this is a wider problem.
	It's just people trying to have it both ways.
	Oh, yeah.
	Stenlessly that.
	I mean, it reminds me, like you say, people having it both ways.
	When you see people on TikTok, through libs of TikTok, describing their sexuality, and it's something like, I'm a horny asexual who loves orgies.
	It's like, do you understand what asexual means?
	And if you do, why are you calling yourself it?
	Attention.
	It is just attention.
	And this article from the New York Post had a bit more to say on the subject, because, like I said, she's deleted a lot of tweets regarding this.
	And sadly, by the time we get to the end of this, it seems that she still hasn't really learnt the lesson that goes with this.
	So, she explained on Twitter that the man staring triggered my flight or fight response to previous traumas.
	I was completely fine until he followed me to my squat rack in the corner of the gym.
	One Twitter user responded, and then I was killed.
	Yeah, and then I was dead.
	I'm tweeting this from beyond the grave.
	Woo!
	I don't understand how hard it is to mind your business.
	People aren't at the gym to get stared at or get hit on.
	It makes no sense.
	And another said...
	Okay, no, no, no.
	I've got to step in here.
	Yep.
	Because I happen to have some unique knowledge about North Korea, which is totally relevant.
	Oh, okay, alright, yeah, just get some North Korean knowledge in there.
	Alright, so in North Korea, relationships are kind of taboo, sex is taboo, blah blah blah.
	So in the modern era, because gyms have been allowed for the elite, elite North Koreans go to the gym.
	Wait, only the elites are allowed to work out?
	No, just no one has any time to work out.
	Anyway, so the elites go to the gym, and that's the one place where they can basically meet women and talk to them, without being socially, like, a pariah.
	So it's like, yeah, if you're gonna have mixed gyms, then...
	We do have sex-segregated gyms as well, until that whole question of transgenderism turned up.
	Yes.
	Well, mainly I imagine I've not encountered, and please feel free to correct me, I've not encountered any male-only gyms, but I have encountered women-only gyms, because I think the threat would be more just, oh, we don't want women being harassed in such a way, or we want women to feel more comfortable.
	Men can kind of work out in any environment, except it is getting more difficult if you see a woman...
	Filming now for a vlog in a skimpy outfit, you might just think to yourself, I'm just gonna go somewhere else.
	If you owned a gym where that happened, just make a male only.
	There's probably laws against it.
	Honestly, sadly, there is probably laws against it.
	WeeSpa.
	Although, I did see somebody suggest that if you just have the vibe of the gym, in a particular way, just make it- just have loud heavy metal playing, Put, like, America flags and don't tread on me flags around the place and have the machine, have the plates that you put on the bars, have them be a bit grotty, maybe?
	Women will avoid it like the plague.
	Just have it be a very masculine energy and vibe in there.
	And then it will just automatically, the sexes will segregate themselves.
	I mean, it's a practical suggestion.
	If you want to make it feel...
	I mean, to be fair, I used to go to a gym kind of like that.
	It does feel good.
	Serve spitting tobacco to everyone who enters.
	Yes.
	No one wants to be around that as a woman.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Genius.
	Alright, but...
	Another person responded saying, staring at the gym is 100% normal, it annoys me, but what are people supposed to look at?
	The floor?
	Walking up to and grabbing the weight?
	Now that's not normal.
	So this woman's like, oh, you know, but as soon as he decides to try and help you with something, you know, I've helped people in the gym before, and sadly, incidents like this make me worry, do they think I'm a creep?
	Because you do get that feeling in the gym, you want to help somebody, but at the same time you think to yourself, are they going to think I'm being untoward?
	It may It just makes it a bit more difficult for everyone.
	That's life as a man in general, though, as well.
	This is something that women don't seem to appreciate, which is...
	I remember one post talking about this once.
	It was like, if you're a man walking home and there's a young lady in front of you who happens to be walking the same way, you kind of don't want to walk too fast or get near her because you're like, I don't want to worry her or something.
	Lots of minor things like that in male life that women just don't seem to understand.
	Yeah, that situation that you just described has happened to me a few times where I've just deliberately slowed down so she doesn't feel worried, because I know that lots of women worry about something like that.
	Understandably so.
	I know women who have been actually stalked in real life, and that is one of the things where it makes them nervous, you can notice them following you.
	So I never want to come across like that, and no one does really, do they?
	But this is the original response that she gave to the situation and the suggestions that she was overreacting.
	Now, just go back to the article, John, because she deleted all of these, so this is the place that I'm getting the reference from.
	She said, "The video was taken out of context.
	I found a squat rack area near the corner of the gym." What do you mean, out of context?
	Yep, yep.
	I know.
	He followed me right there after I did some workouts.
	There was plenty of ab machines to use, but he chose to use that one.
	Was not doing his workout half the time.
	The mirror faced just me and not the whole gym, so he was not looking around there.
	Was nothing but a mirror in my direction.
	I get constantly harassed by men in public spaces when I even show an inch of skin.
	I mean, if this is your threshold for harassment, I doubt it.
	So yes, I get peed.
	Sorry to be rude, but an inch of skin is not what she was wearing.
	No, absolutely not.
	But I get peed when they glare for disturbingly long periods of time.
	Did we see any remote indication that he was just staring at her?
	Was he like this?
	Straight at her?
	Or was he just going like...
	He looked like a guy who wanted to ask you on a date.
	Yeah.
	It seemed perfectly innocent.
	I'm not looking for views or clicks.
	Come on, that's obvious BS. I just posted this to spread awareness on how disturbing being stared at can make a woman feel.
	No, that's not what you were doing.
	That's not what you were doing at all.
	I don't think it's bad to look at someone once and be like, oh, that's a pretty girl, but I personally put my headphones on and I mind my business and make sure to look unapproachable, because I'm only there to film gym vlogs, which I'm not looking for attention, just let me film my vlogs for thousands of people online, and work on my progression in the gym.
	I wouldn't be doing this for attention at all.
	I don't trust random strangers, no person should.
	You don't know their intentions.
	This is all just so obviously just excuses.
	It's not making any sense, it's rambling, it's just excuses.
	I'm not convinced.
	No, of course not.
	I am also extremely...
	Oh wait, here he goes.
	Bloody everything.
	Everything is just trauma nowadays.
	Oh, everyone's got trauma.
	It's just the trauma response.
	No, it's not an excuse for your bad behaviour and trying to make this guy look like a creepy sexual harasser.
	Get in the gym.
	I'm triggered.
	I set up my vlog.
	I'm triggered.
	I lift the weights and I'm triggered.
	So traumatic.
	A man tries to help me.
	I'm traumatised.
	Seriously.
	Fair enough.
	The guy wasn't actually trying to help.
	I think he was trying to ask her on a date or something.
	In which case...
	Yeah.
	We'll shoot him.
	What do you want?
	You rejected him and he was like, oh, okay.
	It's that simple.
	I mean, if you want to follow up and tell us about how he stalked you home later on that night and then tried to break into your home or something, then feel free to go for it.
	Both of those would be crimes?
	Both of those would be crimes.
	But he didn't, did he?
	You said no and he went, okay, and went and did something else.
	Simple as.
	Simple as.
	She did delete all of that, and posted this instead, saying that she would be coming out with a response to this whole gym situation in a few days.
	I think I've got this in the wrong order in the doc, John, so if you move to the next one after this one, the next one.
	Love the Smithers memes.
	Yeah.
	So she went, my gross mistake, addressing the gym video.
	And she just apologises and she says, oh, I'm going to move on.
	I'm going to take a break from social media until I'm in the right mindset.
	All of this.
	P.S. at the bottom.
	I don't have an OnlyFans.
	It's a fan house.
	It's completely different, guys.
	I don't get completely naked.
	Only half naked.
	So don't sexualise me, guys.
	That's the kind of vibe that I got from this.
	Right.
	And she got some responses from some people.
	I just looked on Twitter earlier for people still talking about this, and if we go back to that last one, this is the sort of thing that I saw which was that people going like, oh, one woman publicly, purposefully uses an innocent interaction for clout, and now harassment doesn't exist, and men just want an excuse to be evil misogynists.
	No.
	No one agrees with harassment.
	Nobody's saying that.
	No, just stop trying to blow out of proportion men who are just, like, glancing over at you because you're an attractive girl in a skimpy outfit.
	I mean, obviously it's going to happen.
	If I go to the gym in, like, a tank top and start doing bicep curls as heavy as possible to make my biceps bulge in front of all of the women, one or two might glance over.
	And then you should sue them.
	Yeah, you're right, actually.
	You're right, I should give it a try.
	But what we learn from this, what have we learned from this, what has she, this Jessica woman, learned from this?
	Absolutely nothing.
	Absolutely nothing.
	I went on her Twitter profile earlier on today, and this was the most recent tweet from yesterday.
	Okay, just stop there.
	Just stop there.
	She's muted all replies.
	She's not learned a single thing.
	I wanted sexualisation as a girl streamer.
	And then she has to bring up deep fake porn.
	Have you got evidence that somebody's making...
	I love the idea she's putting on lingerie crying.
	I can't believe they're doing this to me.
	I know, I know.
	Women taking responsibility challenge?
	Impossible.
	Impossible.
	And then there are real-life consequences to this.
	Like, Lauren Chen has spoken about this particular incident and posted this.
	Now, this video that she puts here is pretty obviously fake.
	It's obviously fake, because this girl, she's doing squats with the...
	She's not wearing any leggings?
	Are those leggings?
	Those are leggings.
	These are the sorts of things that women wear in the gym.
	So, you know, you could wear baggy trackies or something like that, but they choose to wear this instead.
	If it's comfortable, if you just want to wear stuff like that, then fine.
	Just don't be surprised if a man looks over.
	Well, as in Afghanistan, we're all wearing clothes, walking about.
	Then the last day, the Independence Day, the media came, and this lady from like Al Jazeera or something, from Qatar came.
	And she's wearing the abaya.
	And, like, she's covering her hair, but not her face.
	And the guy who's driving us around lives in Afghanistan fully, so he doesn't see women.
	Everyone wears, like, burqas are really baggy.
	And he looks over and goes, oh!
	What's the problem, Mohammed?
	He says, look at that!
	And we turn around, and, like, the abaya is ever so slightly showing the shape of her ass.
	Oh my goodness!
	Like, it's not even, you can't even see her ass, but it's just like, there is an ass there, you can tell.
	And he just goes...
	Can you believe that, my brother?
	It's just a complete dichotomy between the West and the East at this point.
	Oh, yeah.
	They're obviously extremes, but we are an extreme.
	Like, we have to recognise we're a fucking crazy place.
	Yeah, like I say, if you dress like that in the gym, that's your prerogative.
	That's what you can do.
	But just don't be surprised if men look over.
	This video is pretty staged, because she could just...
	She eventually has to get a woman to help her, and all of the men were avoiding helping her, because they don't want to be accused of harassment.
	This company was fake because, realistically, she could have just, like, chucked the weight off her back.
	It seems staged.
	Why are none of the women wearing sweatpants?
	Because this is just what we're...
	These, to be fair, these are the sorts of...
	I think there's a big brand called Gymshark, and these are the sorts of leggings they sell to women.
	No, but I mean, why leggings?
	Like, if you don't want to be looked at Gymshark, whatever.
	Yeah, I know.
	What am I asking?
	Women don't want to be looked at.
	Yeah, women don't want to be looked at.
	Yeah, yeah, sure, okay.
	But no, this is staged.
	But the point is that this is the sort of thing that will happen in the future if this kind of behaviour keeps going on.
	If a man just thinks that even interacting just to help a woman move weights, or if she's stuck, might get them accused of harassment, well, just don't expect help from guys at the gym then.
	But men...
	It is your duty to patrol thoughts in whatever appearance and whatever situation they may appear in.
	If you get the feeling that a woman is going to accuse you of harassment for just being in her general area in the gym, don't take that.
	Don't take that nonsense.
	Let her know that you're not interested.
	There's such a long-running problem.
	We won't have this in the segment.
	I just want to mention about...
	Because Jordan Pearson talked about this so much in regards to the workplace, and correctly so, especially on the point of clothing in the workplace, like what's allowed.
	Remember, you got in trouble saying, like, you're wearing lipstick.
	Why are you wearing lipstick in the workplace?
	Why do you wear lipstick?
	Why do you wear rouge?
	And there was the whole blah, blah, blah about...
	I have got the answer from women regarding this.
	They say, it makes me feel good about myself.
	And it's like, okay, but what is the feedback mechanism that makes you feel good about yourself?
	Yeah, I'm not even I'm going to get into that dumb debate because it's a waste of time.
	Jordan has been through that so many times, gets to the rock bottom and is like, look, we all know the biological reality, let's stop playing games.
	And the solution is obviously from Jordan making the point.
	It was like, well, everyone has to be uniform.
	And what is that?
	That's the uniform.
	The male uniform was the suit.
	All men wore it.
	We're all the same damn thing.
	There's no distinction between the men anymore.
	And then the women joined the workforce and it's like, well, what do we do?
	And then there was that period of like, oh, the women wear suits like men with those baggy ass.
	What are they called?
	Oh, the shoulder pads.
	Yeah, that stuff.
	Oh, they were stupid.
	Oh, they look ridiculous.
	Yeah, it was kind of dumb, but there was an attempt made to continue with the uniform.
	And sure, there's some feminisation occasionally, but then we've thrown all of that out the window to the point that it's just like...
	Yeah, we're something that literally shows every pixel of your outline to work.
	Yeah, okay.
	That's mad.
	And Jordan is right on that.
	My point about Afghanistan is like, look, they're extreme, we're extreme as well.
	Anyway, sorry.
	No, no.
	Good point well made.
	Go to the next one.
	This woman's son was refused from joining the Royal Navy because he couldn't blink, couldn't wink with his left eye, and so was banned from joining the Navy.
	That's weird.
	Romeo, Romeo, golf, Charlie.
	Requesting permission to take the shot.
	over I mean that makes sense to me Yeah, yeah.
	You need to be able to look down sights.
	I just like the idea that he just closes both eyes and hopes.
	Praise.
	You watch Jawhead?
	No, I've not.
	Okay.
	Is it worth it?
	They've killed no one in the Iraq War.
	These two guys are like, we finally get to kill someone.
	Yes!
	And they set up the sniper team and they're about to kill this guy.
	And this asshole superior comes in and is just like, call it off.
	Like, why?
	I'm calling it an airstrike, it'll be more fun.
	And they just lose it.
	They're like, come on, let's kill someone!
	And then he's like, no!
	So they go the whole ward, don't kill anyone, I feel real bad about it.
	It's just funny army humour.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Go next one.
	You know, I get the feeling that this whole immigration crisis is basically because the UK has been folded into the American world order, and you guys are basically being forced to act like the UK is a part of the United States, when it isn't.
	It's its own nation.
	You've had your own history.
	We broke off from the UK. You can argue why.
	I don't really care in this context, but...
	You guys aren't Americans.
	You're English.
	Act like you're English.
	I mean, we try to.
	You are Bob-On, though.
	We are essentially just a US satellite state at this point.
	And that includes demolishing our history, values, foundational myths, all of it involved.
	I mean, it's part of being a superpowers bitch, frankly.
	Like, the Eastern Europeans have got the same thing with the Soviets back in the day.
	Yeah.
	The cultural aspects.
	Um...
	It does always remind me, there was this really funny clip when Carl was starting out, and there's this one video he did, of these retards who turned up to a Churchill cafe, and they were all shouting in there about how it's our duty to win, we've got nothing to lose but our chains, because it was called Churchill, and that was racist.
	Duty.
	Duty to win.
	And you've got all these kids in these English upper-class accents doing that, and you just...
	Get in the sea.
	As I predicted, California is already dealing with water issues again.
	Many of our reservoirs were filled quite high, but it's now mostly below average again.
	Meanwhile, we're in the 80th percentile for yearly rainfall.
	Collecting rainwater in California is illegal, and none of the floodwater was saved.
	This water led out to sea.
	California used to supply a huge amount of American and international food.
	The past 15 years or so, this industry has been destroyed.
	We are now a food importer because farms can't do this anymore.
	Expect to pay more for beef, chicken, milk, eggs, tree fruit, and so much more.
	California will starve humanity.
	Enjoy the famine.
	Listen, I know that California's a stupid, progressive, intersectional place with lots of stupid, progressive regulations and such, so it'll have lots of green regulations.
	Why is collecting rainwater illegal?
	Surely it's that rare in California anyway, why?
	The FBI tell them I'm like, that's ours!
	The Skydolling belongs to us!
	Got a license for that water, son?
	It's so right, though.
	Do you remember there was some bottled water in England where there was a little note at the bottom going, you know, British water or whatever?
	British rainwater?
	It was like, no, that foreign rain.
	Well, yeah, I mean, our rain is the best rain, after all.
	We get plenty of it.
	Plenty of rainwater to go around.
	Give the CIA something.
	I'll be like, that's arse.
	Give me that.
	Start beating you.
	You're stealing from Joe Biden.
	Joe Biden's first executive order.
	I own the sky.
	It's just some kid who's like, eh.
	Or the FBI jumps in between the child and the water.
	No!
	So stiff.
	Intercepts.
	He's got a rude comment.
	Alright, so Michael Megos says, doesn't this mean that all kids will have to have digital IDs too?
	Yes.
	Yes, it will.
	Don't worry, you'll be able to build up your social credit score from cradle till grave.
	So you've got that to look forward to.
	JJHW says, the TNCs of social media companies are very nebulous and can be interpreted to ban practically anything.
	Yeah, and we saw this when Joe Rogan had vagina...
	and you could see that Tim Pool was just grilling them like "isn't this expressly against the terms of service?" and they basically just said like "well yeah but we did it anyway" or "well if you look at it this way, actually what we did is fine according to our own terms of service" that's why I say it doesn't matter what the rules are on paper it matters who's administering the rules.
	And Ofcom are not a place that I would trust, are not an institution that I would have any faith in to administer these rules in any fair way that actually prioritizes child safeguarding.
	Governments were already involved in all these social media companies.
	If they wanted to safeguard children, they could have done already.
	What's up?
	Some people are sending me.
	More voice clips?
	No, they're not voice clips, but they're requests for voice clips.
	You're going to be the voice merchant from now on.
	I'm not making them.
	I'm not liable, legally.
	Alright, fair play.
	I'm just reporting on the facts.
	Are you sure this isn't why you need NordVPN?
	So you can bounce that signal around?
	We're not sponsored yet.
	We're not sponsored yet.
	No, Carl refuses...
	Although, Nord, if you want to just sponsor me, just on my day-to-day life, doing my things, then, you know, feel free for it.
	Tell random people in the Swindon McDonald's about NordVPN if you send cash.
	When I'm at the gym, I'll just, in between every rep, I'll just be looking around.
	Do you care about your privacy online?
	Sir, you've got to leave.
	No soliciting.
	Loads of articles by women.
	I'm being harassed in the gym by NordVPN.
	Just me in the background.
	Pirates online can get hold of your data!
	You're just shouting at random women.
	Omar Awad says, if there weren't a million and one ways to abuse personal data, the CIA wouldn't have petabytes of it stored in a mega facility at Langley.
	Social credit is the most direct way to oppress citizens, but having all our data conveniently tied to a singular identity node will make it so much easier to unleash untold horrors upon us.
	Exactly.
	Someone online, you guys need to get down to Florida.
	Well, I think the restrictions are clearing up soon to go to America, right?
	No.
	I thought they were.
	No.
	Oh, has it changed?
	In April, they were meant to get rid of them, and then they went, eh.
	God damn it.
	I thought we were going to be able to go to America soon.
	Bloody hell.
	Blimey.
	Sir Olmy says, regarding COVID conspiracy theories, I'd love to see any of the advocates of censorship being asked this question.
	Can you please provide an example of a conspiracy theory that, if allowed to be propagated on social media, might eventually be able to convince you?
	I mean...
	You don't even need to do that.
	You just show them pictures of articles from two years ago saying about how people saying the COVID vaccine doesn't stop transmission, it's ineffective, it wears off.
	As soon as the virus mutates, it won't be effective anyway.
	And so show them clips of people saying that that's conspiracy theory, and then show them just recent clips...
	Of Bill Gates.
	Literally Bill Gates recently.
	I've seen clips of it.
	Just saying that there's three problems with the vaccines, which is that they don't block infection.
	They're not broad enough because mutations will get around them.
	And then also they don't last very long, which is not very good for old people taking them.
	So it's like, okay, where was the conspiracy theory wrong then?
	That's what you do.
	They don't care.
	I don't know about you, I'm at the point where everything was rue, the conspiracy theories, because the data now here, it's like the guys, the chance of death from COVID, I saw this from the CDC, is less than the seasonal flu for every age group.
	Well, that's why they're going to make the...
	They will probably start to push flu vaccines within a few years as being the new big thing.
	My point being that very obviously what seemed to happen is everyone freaked the hell out.
	We did dumb stuff.
	They were like, let's make a vaccine.
	Operation Warp Speed.
	Did that.
	Then realized, hang on a minute.
	This isn't deadly.
	So what do we do?
	I mean, the obvious thing would be open everything back up, cancel Operation Warp Speed, don't waste your time, right?
	With the vaccines.
	And instead, well, you can't do that.
	You've brought into all this.
	You've scared the public to hell.
	And I honestly think that they just went, well, I can't be embarrassed.
	Every government on Earth.
	I think...
	For somebody like Donald Trump, that's absolutely the case, because I do think...
	Well, I think Trump was tricked into it, I think Trump didn't really pay much attention, and now he keeps doubling down on it as well.
	Trump's been making a lot of bad moves recently.
	He doesn't know what to do, and it's not really...
	And he keeps going back and supporting people that he said a year ago that he would never support because they turned their backs on him.
	Sure, but that's part of politics, but on the vaccine stuff, I don't know what he's...
	I mean, I just shut up for what I was saying, because on the one hand he wants to be like, I created the vaccine, it's fantastic, on the other hand, don't take it.
	Yeah, Trump's very confused about it, but Trump definitely was just not really in control of the situation, just went with whatever advisors told him.
	I do think there were bad actors, nebulous actors in the background, who wanted to take advantage of the situation to centralise power.
	Getting back to my conspiracy theory though, because there's a clip from Channel 4 during the swine flu pandemic, So, I think it's called Tamiflu, the drug.
	I had it, because I had swine flu.
	Oh, fair play.
	And we in the UK purchased millions and millions of doses of it, thinking that swine flu was way, way deadlier than it was.
	It wasn't, it turned out.
	And in which case, there were loads and loads of doses, and there was a huge scandal in the fact that the government had wasted all this money on something that wasn't as deadly and that they should be culpable.
	And I just see exactly the same thing happen with the vaccines.
	It was obviously the case that it wasn't as deadly, and everyone went, crap.
	I spent all this money.
	You were the first person I've met who has ever said, told me, other people might have, but they've not told me, who has told me that you had swine flu.
	Terrible.
	Was it?
	I was wondering what it was actually like.
	Awful.
	Was it worse than COVID? Way worse.
	Yeah, I bet it was.
	I remember being in my bed, I couldn't stay awake when I was, I was in horrible pain just from headaches, and then I woke up one day and my most vivid memory of why I hate chicken soup is my mother came in with this thing, with a bowl of chicken soup, gave it to me, I sat up and just instantly threw up into the full bowl of chicken soup, and sickened chicken soup went all over the bed.
	And she went, God damn it.
	Yeah, I bet she did.
	Well, oh, Josh has had it as well, apparently.
	In one office, I have met the first two people ever who I've known to have swine flu.
	Incredible, because I remember at the time, I remember it was what, like, when was it, like, 2007 or something, when it was...
	Yeah, yeah, it was around 2007.
	I'd started secondary school, and all of a sudden, everyone in secondary school was just going, swine flu's gonna kill us all, everyone's gonna die because of swine flu, and then nothing happened.
	Everybody just woke up one day and went, oh, I guess that just blew over.
	Yeah, it's because the science came back and it just wasn't as deadly as everyone was expecting.
	Yeah.
	Well, I'll just finish off reading this particular comment.
	So, it's abundantly clear that these people think they are our intellectual suspirions, given that they're actually not particularly clever.
	Yeah, they're definitely not clever.
	Liz Truss and those types aren't clever.
	They're definitely the useful idiots.
	The people behind the scenes orchestrating it, they're definitely clever, as far as I'm concerned.
	It follows that they must believe that the rest of us are barely able to tie our shoelaces, and sadly...
	Sometimes.
	More and more, I get convinced of that myself, but then again.
	Anyway, moving on.
	Kevin Fox, remove all the controls and pass a bill through Parliament that it becomes an offence to supply an under-18-year-old with a smartphone.
	As far as tablets, laptops, and computers are concerned, there are parental locks.
	If you choose to let your kids use a computer and you haven't put a parental lock in place, would you like a cell in the west or east wing of the prison?
	I would like something like that.
	At least some kind of social mechanism so that parents know not to get their kids...
	Into social media too young, because I do think parents should take way more responsibility than they seem to be able to.
	Because there are a lot of bad stories that I've heard about kids and teenagers online, but I just think the whole time, whenever they're like, we need to legislate against this, I just think, why didn't the parents do more?
	I'm sorry something awful happened to your child, why weren't you there?
	That's my question.
	And I think part of it is they want to displace the guilt that they feel and put it onto the government.
	Because, like, oh, it wasn't my fault, it was the lack of legislation.
	That's what it was.
	It always is.
	Yeah.
	Let's move on to your comments.
	Cool.
	Someone was just mentioning about the hallucinations you get, as well.
	I remember the first time I had swine flu.
	I was a moron.
	You still are, don't worry.
	Yeah, but I was like, I'm ill anyway.
	Washed all my clothes, racked them all up, got no way of heating them.
	So I just took them to the same room I sleep.
	Just that, whilst I'm ill.
	Anyway, I had this ridiculous hallucination whilst I was ill that I was orchestrating the entirety of D-Day from the north, south, and west of France.
	I had the most stressful night of my life.
	What was your mum putting in that chicken soup?
	Were there some suspicious mushrooms in there?
	This was in 2020.
	Because that's when COVID was.
	I just kept going back to sleep, freaking out about how stressful this goddamn job was.
	Waking up!
	I must have worked up nine times in the night.
	Just like, God damn it, guys!
	Just like, you're moving all these divisions, and then you've got, you know, reports coming in that stuff's messing up.
	I had guys in circles, I was like, for God's sakes!
	Anyway.
	Okay, let's carry on.
	So, um, Baystapes says, good lord, I finally realised I could record my own voice and AI, so I'd never have to talk to anyone ever again, finally.
	Don't give Callum any ideas, okay?
	He will do that.
	We were discussing this in the office about, you know, just doing stuff.
	Do we need to even do the podcast anymore?
	Calender's D-Day.
	June 6th.
	That sounds like a, it's always sunny episode, Calender's D-Day.
	I'm never doing that again.
	That was the worst.
	Honestly, the stress.
	The D-Day wasn't the bad thing.
	Oh, I bet.
	The letter M says, I'd love to hear Callum say hello and welcome to episode 666 of the Podcast of the Low Seers on Wednesday the 29th of February.
	Today I'm joined by Cock and Balls123.
	Well, you can dream.
	Well, you've got it now.
	Congratulations.
	I'll shove it in the AI. See what else.
	Omar Awad says, every time an AI gets based, they lobotomize it and make it useless.
	The winner of the AI race will be the one that doesn't stop us from correctly observing reality.
	I doubt China is gimping their military AI the same way we are.
	No, they are.
	This already happens.
	Oh, are they?
	Yeah, do you remember, what's his name?
	Internet Historian did it.
	There was a chatbot in China that was getting very based.
	I don't remember this episode of Internet Historian.
	They cut its anti-communism arm off.
	Oh, really?
	Oh, dear.
	I had no idea what happened.
	In 1989, nothing happened.
	LeFrench says, either one would pay for a podcast hosted by Callum and Al Capone, pretty please.
	Callum and AI Callum.
	Oh, sorry.
	Not Al Capone.
	I'm losing it.
	We'll dig up Al Capone or get a hologram off him.
	Probably get it.
	You don't have any voice of Al Capone, do you?
	Yeah, it doesn't work.
	Anyway, Joan of Arc has come back from the grave and said, Harry, just for that, I'm going to use AI to make you read Prince Harry's Spare.
	Oh, no.
	Okay, more realistically.
	No, no, no.
	I've seen some of the passages from that book.
	Don't make me read that trite.
	I was instantly transported back to my mother's lips.
	No!
	No!
	Don't do that!
	Free Will says, trying to replace great musicians with AI is an act of sacrilege, but in a world of ignorant ideological barbarians, we should expect nothing less.
	I just hate the fact that it was the family.
	The family themselves trying to utilise it just to make some money.
	It's like, respect the memory.
	Someone online says, to be fair, feminists loved Mein Kampf when Jews and Germans are replaced by men and women, respectively.
	Yeah, I mean, someone could do that.
	I like the idea that they were like, I don't know, when it was about men and women, it sounds good.
	So what's the original text like?
	Oh, it works, though.
	Oh, yeah, no, I know it works.
	I like Michael Magos' idea of someone using the AI to get Carl to say that he's a weeb that loves anime.
	Cringe.
	I think that, more so than him reading Mein Kampf, that will be what actually upsets him.
	Yeah, no, I mean, he's read Mein Kampf.
	There you go.
	I've read half of it, it was boring.
	Screwtape Laser says, The AI voice generator has the same problem with ChatGPT.
	The algorithm has a very shallow systemic understanding...
	Semantic.
	Semantic understanding and delivers every line as some avenged...
	Averaged...
	Do you want me to read this part?
	Averaged amalgamation of the samples...
	Each line of block or text is an island with no rhythm or realistic dynamics across them.
	That is true.
	Thank you.
	Anyway, I can't read.
	Catastrophic says, well, that's my wank license becoming a reality.
	I can make a killing selling all the stuff I downloaded in me youth.
	The only things police like this do is create black markets.
	Yeah.
	a bigger black market.
	On to the last set of questions, of comments here.
	So Maureen Peters says stop harmful incel culture, I'm pretty sure the incels will be thrilled.
	Are they planning to designate all the single women as girlfriends and wives?
	This is the funny connection between incel ideology and radical feminist ideology as Why don't you date?
	Anyway.
	Well, yeah, yeah, you get the femcels, but I'm talking more about this idea, especially when it comes to the pro-choice people.
	They basically put the argument forward in a sense that, well, if I can't get an abortion, then I can't have all of the sex that I want, and that's a violation of my rights.
	Implying the right to sex, which is the exact same argument the incels make.
	I should have a right to sex.
	Radical feminists, I should have a right to sex.
	There you go.
	Joins up.
	Makes sense.
	Kevin Fox, go for it, Harry!
	Oh no.
	Next time you go to the gym, wear a mankini.
	I'll go full Borat, yeah.
	And bring someone along to video how many women look at you, then post it on Twitter with you crying in the background about how traumatized you are.
	I mean, that would...
	To be fair...
	If they haven't, you have to do it.
	That will go viral.
	I feel like if I went into a gym in a mankini, I wouldn't be the one coming out of that gym traumatised.
	No, but the point being, you've got to film it and be like, oh my god!
	Oh my god, yes!
	Can you believe this?
	Do you remember when this happened on Twitch?
	To be fair, should we do this?
	Should we just go into a gym dressed ridiculously and be like, oh my god, I can't believe they are staring at me?
	Do you remember that story I told you about Twitch when this happens?
	Like all the women with like, oh I'm playing video games.
	Oh yeah, look at that stuff.
	Stop sexualizing me guys!
	And then one guy, just like, he had no videos, just started a stream and just started going, oh I dropped my pen!
	Oh no!
	And he wasn't showing any skin and got banned immediately.
	Oh yeah, I remember that.
	You brought it up a few times.
	Omar Awad said, gym thoughts are so narcissistic, they think the only possible reason someone could have to glance over are to admire their figure instead of waiting for you to be done with the equipment so they can continue their routine.
	Yes!
	Yes, yes, yes!
	The worst part about going to the gym is going at busy hours, and all of the equipment, all of the machines, all of the bars, all the squat racks are taken up.
	So you do end up just having to stare at people sometimes.
	Not stare at people, but you do end up having to look over a lot, just to be like, is that basket done with the bench yet?
	Just be done.
	That was the real story.
	He was just like...
	Hurry up!
	Yeah, that might have been actually it.
	That's why he was helping her.
	He's like, God, she's taking so long.
	Just move these plates already.
	What about my TikTok session?
	I'm going to film it.
	XY and ZEE says, Harry, if men tried to have a men-only gym, oh, the outrage.
	If there was a no-women-allowed barbershop, there was a no-women-allowed barbershop and the meltdown that ensued.
	And Michael Migos says, the ethot was probably on her second or third take, so she was hogging the squat rack.
	Also, very true.
	And I think that's...
	We've got time.
	Why don't women go to the barbers?
	Um...
	I thought they...
	Isn't it they go hairdressers?
	Well, they go to the salon.
	Yeah, the salon.
	That's it.
	I don't know.
	I... I... Barber is like, well, like, 12 quid, 16 quid, depending on where you are.
	I've had it as cheap as 10.
	Yeah, yeah, I mean, my local barber's 12 quid for, you know, short backing sides.
	I went to a salon once, because we were in Bournemouth and all the barbers were closed.
	It was only a salon over there.
	Bugger.
	All right, went in.
	All robbed by women.
	All the customers are women.
	I'm like, look, can we get this done quickly?
	She takes forever for no goddamn reason.
	40 quid.
	Like, halfway through, I was just like, can you just...
	I don't give a...
	That's 40 pounds, please.
	There you go.
	Oh, well.
	Anyway, we're out of time.
	More from us.
	Next week.
	Not next week.
	Oh, my...
	We're on Thursday.
	It's tomorrow.
	Yeah, tomorrow.
	Come in.
	I don't know when.
	Yeah, show up.
	You can guest if you want.
	There you go.
	You want a...
	You want a...
	You want a slut?
	Send in a video of 100...
	Where am I going with this?
	Did you just say, do you want a slut?
	Slot.
	Slot.
	Okay.
	You want a slut?
	You want a slut?
	We have to hand them out for free.
	Okay.
	You go to Sweden, where you go to the slut stop.
	Anyway, that's us.
	Come back tomorrow at some point.
	Who cares?

▲