Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 24, 2022 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:30:25

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #508

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters for the 24th of October 2022.
	I'm joined by Connor.
	Hello there.
	And today we're going to be talking about the fact that Matt Walsh has been having an awful lot of fun inside the LGB Alliance Conference and Vox in defense of racial discrimination, which is a treatise I did not think I'd be reading from left-wingers.
	You know, you should read me, don't you?
	You should have seen it coming, but anyway.
	suppose we'll get into the news so matt walsh has been having an awful lot of fun and i thought we'd enjoy some of the fun that he's been having and we'll start off just by mentioning something on the website of course this being the politics of american psycho which my understanding is also free for a week so do go and check it out on notisies.com otherwise it's going to be premium the rest of the time so do go check that out and the relevance obviously being that quite a lot of psychopaths trying to shut down matt walsh to say the least but they aren't as well groomed as patrick bateman unfortunately No.
	Some of them very poorly.
	Well, we'll go first for the start off of this, which you have him here responding to, what is it, Madison University in Wisconsin.
	And he says here, so Madison University approved my event, but is now calling me harmful and lamenting the impact that my presence is having on campus.
	Abject cowardice.
	You might wonder what the hell they wrote here, which is a very coherent statement.
	Quote, We're aware that a speaker is coming to campus on Monday whose viewpoints we believe are harmful towards our trans community.
	Opinions are going to get you.
	They're going to come out of his head and get you.
	Well, I like the idea that they don't know what the content of his speech is when he's doing a speech tour about what is a woman.
	So they could have watched the film and watched any of the other speeches which are identical each way he goes.
	The only thing that differs is the Q&A, so clearly they're afraid of their own students asking him pertinent questions.
	It's the fundamental point, though, of the speech is going to be harmful.
	How?
	I'm not letting that slip.
	Just every time, there's this rephrasing of the debate.
	If you say something that disagrees with me, you're hurting me.
	Not only me, the community.
	Not even just the community.
	Our trans community.
	We own them.
	They belong to us, dammit!
	We let them out of the basement every so often.
	We affirm, include, and celebrate people across the spectrum.
	Well, if there was...
	Who said this at the LGB Alliance conference?
	They said, if something about being trans is so beautiful to be celebrated, we wouldn't have to have a Trans Day of Remembrance.
	But there's just the point of the times like these.
	Living through literal Holocaust 2 boogaloo.
	Why?
	Because man is coming.
	Man is going to say he does not agree with me.
	Oh no.
	For the police.
	Sad.
	To the trans members of Madison, we see you and value you.
	What does that even mean?
	We know what it means.
	We stand with our comrades in ideology.
	We stand and value it.
	No, you don't.
	But who was this by?
	In case you're wondering.
	Last slide here.
	Christiana Ostland, she, her, hers.
	And Gabe Javier, he, him, his.
	Oh, okay.
	Yeah, there we are.
	Student Affairs Identity and Inclusion Department.
	Yeah.
	Very sad.
	Those two people, quite an embarrassment to all of humanity.
	Well, at least they've given their name so we know where the mould is behind the fridge.
	Yeah, I do like how the pronouns thing has become normal for the less to do.
	Ubiquitous, yeah.
	But it's good for any normal person because we can see them and go, oh, oh dear, it's retarded.
	It's a tribal identifier, yeah.
	If we go to the next link here, you can see just the meme version of that, IRL, which is, oh dear, it really is retarded indeed.
	It's a shame.
	Anyway, there are many leftists coming to his events, which is his events, sorry, to screech.
	So you can screech the loudest, I suppose.
	We have the first one here, where we have Drew Hernandez down here.
	He's just documenting it.
	This is a rally he put on.
	The rally to end child mutilation.
	Yep.
	Pretty good name.
	Yep.
	Hard to disagree.
	It's great framing.
	So, the left has turned up, and as you can see here, they're chanting, F you fascist, as a detransitioner survivor speaks about her life.
	Yeah.
	We have a lady who was convinced she was a boy, went through the medical surgeries, realized this was a scam, left, but the damage is done, because it's not actually reversible.
	No.
	And while she tells them about the hell she's gone through, they all just scream, F you fascist, for daring to point it out.
	It's the optics of radical Islamists also yelling at female FGM victims.
	But they don't seem to understand that.
	Yeah, exactly.
	It's indistinguishable.
	It's uncanny.
	And also we have UC Berkeley being rather scared, because apparently Matt is also doing a university tour, as mentioned, and he's planning to have a stopover in Berkeley in November, which...
	I'm looking forward to, for sure.
	Berkeley 2.
	Anyway, this is a Berkeley professor who decided to respond to this by saying, just saw that Matt Wash is coming, blah, blah, blah.
	He is screening what is a woman on a college campus tour film, obviously to intentionally aggravate and agitate people on the sensitive topic.
	Sensitive topic?
	What is a woman?
	Difficult.
	Difficult for some.
	Unfathomable question to answer.
	And seriously, I hope he has the worst time here beyond his own imagination.
	Right, so that's just a threat.
	Is he getting his bike lock at the ready?
	Yeah.
	Many a Berkeley professor putting on their mascara and face masks.
	He also says, I recognise that college campuses are supposed to be a place to challenge ideas.
	He has to caveat that.
	I know we're meant to challenge that.
	We got to for some reason.
	But...
	But, I also wonder when these actions are presented on bad faith or bigotry.
	No, Matt Walsh genuinely believes what he says.
	Sincere, I believe that women exist.
	Yep.
	You got me.
	And when it is the duty of the university to protect students from irreparable damage.
	Oh, really?
	Irreparable damage.
	Right, not trans-surgery at all.
	Right, okay.
	The man's opinions are going to get you.
	Not the surgery, but the opinions are going to be the irreparable damage.
	Yeah, not the hole drilled into your pelvis.
	Matt Walsh has a poignant response to this, which is that you are a ridiculous coward, and your threats mean absolutely nothing to me, but thanks for chiming in.
	See you later.
	You get the next one here, just that.
	But it's just, the kind of people we're dealing with, I do want to remind ourselves, the kind of folks you will get at these universities, remember the bad faith comment, that Matt Walsh turning up saying women exist.
	That's bad faith.
	It's not sincere.
	But it's also bad faith, according to these people, to say that men are taller than women.
	I don't know if you've seen this clip.
	Right.
	We're going to enjoy this.
	Okay.
	Libertarian Pie posting this.
	It's the Nick Dixon position.
	Yeah, let's play this.
	Let's look at differences between men and women that are explicitly anatomical and physiological.
	Are men taller than women on average?
	Does anyone take offense at that fact?
	So I would say, you could be irritated by it.
	You could be irritated by the fact that women have to be the ones to gestate and lactate.
	You could be irritated by a lot of truths.
	But taking offense is a response that is rejection of reality.
	So, men and women are different on height, they're different on muscle mass, they're different on where fat is deposited on our bodies, right?
	Our brains are also different.
	Security!
	This is what happens.
	Oh, did they shut off the volume?
	Can you hear?
	- Can everybody hear? - Really? - You can eat the piece of .
	That's not okay.
	Even the women in there have been brainwashed.
	What?
	You should not listen to fascism.
	It should not be tolerated in civil society.
	Nazis are not welcome in civil society.
	Yeah, there you have it.
	Saying that men are taller than women is bad faith, fascism, and brainwashing of women.
	Oh, thank you to the poison frog hairs there for defying biology by thought.
	That's Portland University.
	Yeah, no shock.
	You know, when he goes to Berkeley, that's the kind of people he's going to be interacting with, and yeah, the universities are making the students more stupid.
	There's also just going back to his rally against genital mutilation.
	We have the other folks turning up and being perfectly normal, as always.
	We have Antifa here.
	The Joker.
	Looking great.
	We do, in fact, live in a society.
	Also mentally, doing fantastic.
	Let's play and enjoy his mental state.
	He hates children.
	He hates trans people.
	He hates queer people.
	He's a far-right lunatic propagandist.
	If you support anything he f***ing says, you are indoctrinating everyone you know into being a Nazi.
	Matt Walsh is a sarcastic terrorist!
	They can be gay.
	It's not right!
	They can be gay enough time.
	And why you don't push things on people while they're a child.
	You very rarely get this with right-wing protests.
	Yeah.
	You know, there is right-wing cringe out there, but not to this level.
	And it doesn't stop, either, with he's a sarcastic terrorist.
	Yeah, I'm glad they updated the Oblivion NPC script for the mod.
	If we go to the next link here, we can see more of that, which is this one.
	We're not going to play, it's just that it goes on and on.
	We have, you know, Sean here from Drew's Village, some lady screaming, F you, F you, whitecracker, F you, you ugly piece of S, at protesters.
	Yeah, for audio listeners, she's got translucent skin, so...
	She's also a damn good cracker.
	We go to the next one here.
	We also have Count Protesters with severe cottonmouth, as he says here, as they just screech at Drew to F off Nazis.
	The weird diminutive goblin physiognomy of these people just speaks for itself.
	There is some memes that do come true.
	I mean, the lady in the back there.
	Yep.
	We're being polite.
	Yeah, the F-fascist, F-off.
	This totally sane person.
	It just goes on.
	I mean, there's endless numbers of these people who turn up to these things.
	So in the next one, we have a bearded trans woman.
	Okay.
	I love you, Andy.
	I'm not going to read the rest of that.
	It's not your fault, obviously.
	It's just, I'm not going to respect a bearded trans woman.
	I don't get what you have to say if you're there with a beard and telling me you're a woman.
	I'm not even going to try and engage.
	It puts the lotion in the basket.
	I just...
	I'm actually showing this to anyone in the East.
	This is what the West looks like now.
	We have these women.
	It's just a waste of time.
	So much like Walsh went to the Maasai tribe in Kenya and said, what about non-binary?
	And they went, what?
	What's this American leftist nonsense?
	Did you mention this when you were over...
	It didn't translate very well to the Taliban.
	Right, okay, here we go.
	Women?
	What do you mean my property is up?
	We go to the next link here, we can see Matt Walsh's response to this.
	There was another poster advertising that they were going to stand up to Matt Walsh and he's just like, ah, finally guys, yeah, I'm going to have a change of heart because one more stupid, just screeching session is really going to convince anyone, for Christ's sake.
	And there was something magical about the event he held, which is that it was a broad church, to say the least.
	You have the fact that now biological, well, evolutionary biologists need a platform and a safe space because they're not safe in academia, which...
	Good.
	Cool.
	It reminds me of the Question Time episode that you covered, where the very seasoned biologist said there are two sexes, and Fiona Bruce cuts in and goes, well, some people disagree with that opinion, and you just see the colour drain from his face.
	Why am I even in the sciences anymore?
	What does science even mean, if it literally is just, my opinion disagrees?
	Well, I have a friend who works on the Hadron Collider, and they sent me a poster, a press release, from Particles for Progress, and they were like, I didn't Believe you when you said that wokeness would come for physics, but you were right.
	So, even to that level, there is ideological indoctrination.
	I'm not going to try.
	What?
	Insanity.
	Anyway, if we go to the next link here, we can see the evolutionary biologist who needed his own space to come out and tell people that, yeah, men exist.
	And there's women, and when a mummy and a daddy love each other very much.
	The state of American dialogue.
	We also had Tulsi Gabbard come out.
	Which was nice.
	I don't know what her future holds, but seeing her stand with Matt Walsh...
	She wants to jump to the other side of the aisle, but she has some opinions that need correcting first.
	Well, my understanding is I don't know her deeply, but she has the opinion that if you just take away the guns, everything will be fine.
	Yeah, she's also pro-abortion.
	She also drafted, so after Ilhan Omar made a comment, it's all about the Benjamins, and they talked about drafting some anti-Semitism hate crime bill, she's the one that broadened it out to practically everything, because she crowbarred the first thing and says, oh yeah, anti-Hindu as well.
	So she's still a leftist.
	I don't know, I kind of like that move.
	I keep expanding it, why not?
	I suppose, yeah, she did accelerate its collapse because it then didn't pass.
	Because we also had the problem in the UK, which is that, well, a lot of Indians are very nationalist.
	And as a result, they keep getting kicked out of university positions.
	So, the response has been that this is Hinduphobia.
	Oh, I saw that, yeah.
	And the universities have been apologising whenever this happens now.
	It's like, huh, that's quite smart.
	The very rapid-talking Indian news broadcast that you covered.
	Yeah, I remember that.
	But they're able to get away with it.
	It's like, yeah, well, you know, she may have liked a post about how Mein Kampf was the greatest book ever, but she is brown.
	Therefore, firing her is Hinduphobia.
	That actually happened at...
	That what?
	That actually happened at Kent.
	There was someone who was running to be president, and he was an Iranian national with the Iranian imperial flag behind him in his promo video, and then they found on his Instagram account he'd like posts of Oswald Mosley.
	And did he get removed?
	He dropped out of the race, but he did try claiming it was a moment of madness.
	Yeah, but it's not the same, which is what the meme becomes in Oxford, where I believe she actually did say that some genocide was good or something.
	I can't remember what.
	If any white person had said it, we should be out of society.
	We disavow!
	But my point is not that the things they're endorsing are based on.
	The return was, well, I may be a fascist, but I am brown.
	Yeah, exactly.
	And the university crippled and just allowed them in, which is hilarious.
	Tulsi Gabbard expanding it to also anti-Hindu is just funny.
	Anyway, getting back to it, which is that we have some more news on this front as well.
	We have this clip, which we knew was coming.
	This is Joe Biden, sitting down with Man Without Beard, and, well, there's a TikTok correctly saying in here that, just so we're clear, the official Democratic Party position is now that puberty blockers and sex reassignment surgery for kids is good.
	It's funny in the background that it's by NowThis, when it could just be current thing.
	NowThis is owned by Vox, so...
	Ah, that makes so much sense.
	I suppose we'll play and enjoy that.
	Do you think states should have a right to ban gender-affirming health care?
	I don't think any state or anybody should have the right to do that.
	As a moral question and as a legal question.
	I just think it's wrong.
	He also stands with lobotomites everywhere.
	Yeah.
	Stop.
	Just stop.
	The love of Christ.
	Anyway, we have David Rearboy's response to this.
	I'm not even going to dwell on that goddamn clip because it's just so embarrassing and David does it justice, which is, this is a far lower moment for the United States morally and spiritually than the botched withdrawal of Afghanistan.
	It's hard, probably impossible to make sense of this without religion.
	Yeah, it's a child sacrifice cult.
	It's also just, why would you do any of this?
	Um...
	Even on just an optics basis, the West is retreating from any of the areas we've been in, struggling to win over allies outside of the West.
	Quick, what should we do?
	Well, we should advertise to the Easterners that they should join the West.
	How should we do this?
	Take a look at the Dear Leader with Man Without Beard.
	Yeah.
	Talking about how they're going to turn your kids into not kids.
	Eunuchs.
	Okay, fantastic.
	But we'll end this on the high note, just to end all that off, which is there was another clip that gave me a laugh.
	That Matt responded to recently, which is we have Stacey Abrams here trying to tell everyone that the cure for inflation is to kill children.
	It's a brave move.
	Obviously not quite.
	She's saying that if you are worried about inflation, the only reason you're worried about that is because you're going to have kids and the kids will cost you money.
	So we need to have more abortions so that you'll be less worried about inflation.
	It's not the best of thinking, but it's the Democrats' thinking.
	Let's play that one and enjoy this wisdom.
	You're running for governor of Georgia.
	I would assume, maybe incorrectly, but while abortion is an issue, it nowhere reaches the level of interest of voters in terms of the cost of gas, food, bread, milk, things like that.
	What can a governor, what could you do as governor to alleviate the concerns of Georgia voters about those livability, daily, hourly issues that they're confronted with?
	But let's be clear.
	Having children is why you're worried about your price for gas.
	It's why you're concerned about how much food costs.
	For women, this is not a reductive issue.
	You can't divorce being forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy from the economic realities of having a child.
	And so these are...
	It's important for us to have both and conversations.
	We don't have the luxury of reducing it or separating them out.
	I'm not sure what's larger, the gap in her teeth or the hole in her heart...
	The only reason you care about inflation is because of all those damn kids you're going to be having if we get rid of abortion.
	Yeah, single people who don't have kids, they don't feel inflation.
	Yeah, I'm really feeling inflation.
	I'd quite like to have children in the future, but you guys are making it increasingly difficult.
	But don't worry, we've legalized abortions, so then you don't have to worry about the inflation.
	You don't have kids, but, you know, less inflation.
	I do see people in the chat comparing this to, have we tried killing all the poor?
	Yeah, it's Jonathan Swift's modest proposal about, oh, the Irish are starving, why don't they just eat their children?
	Just stop complaining about it.
	What's the problem?
	Which, yeah, there you have it.
	Which is Matt Walsh having incredible fun at the expense of his enemies, but his enemies are laughable, to say the least.
	So...
	Good job, Matt.
	I look forward to Berkeley, which you're going to have to go and try and give Milo a run for his money about who can get the most interesting response, but I think you might win by saying that women are women in the current year.
	Go to the LGB Alliance.
	Yeah, I was going to say Milo will be happy that women and women are in the current year, because considering he's acquired his new personal taste.
	He's no longer a queer.
	He's a super straight.
	There we go.
	Speaking of straight, I suppose.
	So Rory and I, on Friday, were invited to the LGB Alliance conference.
	It was following the Conservative Party conference, where the founder, Kate Harrison, spoke to us.
	She gave me a little pin, and then we had our run-in with the police wearing that, where I said, The Q and the plus was being used as a Trojan horse by, quote, insidious actors, so we thought it was only fair to go along to our favourite child protection charity and show some support.
	We did feel a little bit like fish out of water, though, because even Andy Noh remarked that we had, quote, big straight energy.
	So, we were interlopers.
	Hopefully we didn't ruin the good music taste and the dress code.
	Today I'm providing some dispatches from the panels, our experience with the positively tens of protesters that showed outside in the pouring rain, and unfortunately why the movement is so close to achieving something, but is in danger of fractionating into infighting interest groups, and hopefully we can advise them against it, because...
	Some of the people who were attending did express concern that this is going to break down into another sort of left-wing cannibalism thing.
	Okay, so speaking of conference, if you'd like to go over to LotusEaters.com, you can watch Rory and I at the Conservative Party conference.
	We went so you didn't have to.
	Next year, if you still have your membership, despite the party being utterly reprehensible, I'm dragging you because you have to go to at least one.
	I can see the enthusiasm on your face already, mate.
	I was too busy being at Labour Party conference in my clown uniform.
	Oh yeah!
	I've already got my plans, I'm sorry.
	In my defence, I did get Steve Bray to admit that Germany was wrong.
	So, if you'd like to watch...
	About what?
	There's a long list.
	It's just about everything.
	I'll leave that on a cliffhanger for everyone to go find out.
	Anyway, so, next.
	What could the LGB Alliance possibly be objecting to?
	Are they just transphobic?
	Or did they perhaps pre-empt this awful thing?
	We're not going to really scroll down on this article, John, because I don't want to subject people to it even if it is censored.
	Her penis.
	Yes, thank you Daily Mail for acquiescing to the delusions of autogynophiles with a public indecent exposure fetish.
	Jordan Gray, who is a signed male at birth and has been open about undergoing her transition, appeared on Friday Night Live on Channel 4 yesterday.
	In the sketch, they sang an expletive-filled song about their experience as a trans woman.
	It was part of a one-off return of the popular 80s stand-up show, originally called Saturday Live, which Channel 4 aired as part of its 40th birthday celebrations.
	Before the performance, Grey, who was the first transgender singer on the talent show The Voice in 2016, told their Twitter followers tonight, we make history.
	They opened with the lyric, I look out in the faces in this room and wish I could crawl back in the womb and start again against God's plans with different glands and smaller hands.
	So thank you for just admitting that gender transitioning is Satanism and that you would like to supersede nature.
	Satanism?
	I would like to contravene God's plans.
	Oh, right, okay.
	Yeah, their own framing is kind of disconcerting.
	It's exactly what Mark said in his poetry when he was younger.
	He said he would like to dispense with God and revolve around himself as his own true son.
	So I do think this is an egotistical, spiritual trip for some people.
	Very weird wording, that.
	Okay.
	Are these people terribly spiritual?
	They are a bit kooky.
	And also, transgenderism is kind of a Gnostic religion where you believe your soul is trapped in the wrong body.
	So...
	I'm sure you can make that argument.
	Well, it's like you said in the prior segment.
	It's difficult to justify child sacrifice for economic reasons without some sort of religious spiritual element.
	I do love that from Stacey Abrams.
	You try killing all the kids.
	Yeah, we disavow.
	As the song drew to a close, they told the audience, you know the best thing about live TV? I can do stupid stuff like this.
	They then stripped off entirely, showing their bare breasts and penis, and played the keyboard with their penis.
	Right.
	Yeah.
	One note at a time?
	A few notes, yeah.
	How?
	They held it and played the note.
	Alright, yeah.
	We're not scrolling down for a good reason.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	There was actually a Labour councillor who was arguing with some people that objected to this on Twitter, and they said, how dare you object to the Daily Mail using these she-her pronouns in the article?
	That's really transphobic.
	Which is quite funny, because you're basically saying that this person exhibiting themselves on stage is a representative of the, quote, queer community.
	I wouldn't think so, but straight from the mouths of leftists, awfully transphobic of you, isn't it?
	Now, the disturbing thing is, this man taught kids.
	Go to the next one.
	This is Archived from Educate and Celebrate.
	If you scroll down, it's Jordan Gray, their profile on the website, talking about how they're a Pokemon master, comedian, singer, and trans.
	It said in another article they found out they were trans when they were cutting wood in Sweden, which I'm not sure isn't a euphemism.
	So if we go to the team page for Educate and Celebrate, also Archived, if we go down, so we just keep scrolling, and if we look at someone on here, Peter Tatchell.
	Are you familiar with this gentleman?
	Yeah, I am.
	Yeah, he's an LGBT campaigner who frequents GB News as the token leftist.
	Picture that's not loading for people.
	Yeah, it was loading earlier.
	I don't know why that isn't.
	Can we have a reminder what Peter Tatchell thinks as well, please?
	Oh, there we go.
	Lovely.
	Yeah, if we go over to the Daily Mail article.
	Not all sex involving children is abuse.
	It's Peter Thatchell.
	This is probably Peter Thatchell's stupidest argument I've ever heard.
	Yeah, he's got a lot of them, but this is actually disgusting.
	And he's trying to reframe it.
	Just don't bother, mate.
	You should retreat from public life entirely.
	His opinion emerged yesterday, so when this was written in November 2018.
	So again, he still provided a platform four years later.
	From a letter he wrote to The Guardian in 1997 when he defended a book which challenged assumptions of paedophile sex.
	That's not me saying that.
	That's the Daily Mail's article.
	The 66-year-old has since apologised for his comments and said the book he was referring to was, quote, not a paedophile handbook.
	If you have to declare that, it's kind of weird.
	Mr.
	Tatchell told The Sun, the printed version did not include my point that I oppose adults having sex with children, empathise with victims of child sex abuse, and agree with the vast majority of children sex with adults is neither wanted nor joyful.
	Sorry, for the vast majority.
	He's still leaving a little bit of wiggle room there that says that Yeah, Peter has a long history of being weird on this topic.
	Yeah.
	So, GBNews, please stop inviting him on.
	That'd be wonderful.
	So, that's obviously what the LGB Alliance are rallying against.
	There were people rallying against the LGB Alliance, though.
	The amazing amount of protesters that we encountered.
	We took some footage, and John has done the great service of editing this together into two little clips.
	So I'm just going to narrate this.
	There's the Queen Elizabeth II Centre.
	Beautiful little building.
	Here's the conference.
	The actual hall as it's filling up.
	Rainbow lit, funnily enough.
	And if you pan over to the left, there is a spattering of protesters, which we spoke to.
	They commented on my jacket lining and said I looked like Joey Essex, which I thought was a bit weird.
	But nice of them to catterly compliment me, I suppose.
	And then we asked these gentlemen if we could photograph their signs.
	The fella in the coat didn't want to be on screen.
	But I support women plus cis women.
	One of the more creative ones.
	It's cis women.
	We have men who think they're women and then cis women being women.
	So I support men without beards and women.
	Yeah, but notice the intersectional hierarchy there.
	I support women.
	Yeah, the women are on top of the actual women.
	Yeah, so the presupposition of trans women are the original women.
	Again, we're saying it's going down to the religious angle, isn't it?
	It's the old-school accusation that women are subordinate to men because they're taken from Adam's rib.
	So, the men who think they're women are the first ones, and then the quote-unquote cis women, the actual women, are subordinate.
	A weird religious argument that the trans women are the real women because they've got the rib.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Horseshoe theory of anti-biological insanity.
	Wonderful.
	If we can play the next one, we decided to just film some of what the protesters were saying and shouting.
	Why'd you take cash from bigots and fash?
	Why'd you take cash from bigots and fash?
	We said a fucking lie.
	Why'd you take cash from bigots and fash?
	Let the pay!
	That's crunch.
	Exciting and creative.
	They're also blasting out Cardi B's WAP when there were small children across the road.
	Yeah.
	Lovely.
	Really tasteful.
	The idea of the WAP is the anthem to your movement.
	Yeah.
	What a pick.
	Yeah.
	I don't want to know how you achieve the moistness of it in your song with your neo-vagina.
	Keep that to yourself, thank you very much.
	There were also Black Blot that showed up, so there were three of them.
	They weren't very energetic.
	They kept circling around the barricades and looking for a way in and we were talking to security and police and things like that and tipped them off because they uncovered a metal water bottle of God knows what.
	They also had eggs with them.
	We spoke to Andy about this and he vetted this with two sources before he tweeted it.
	He tweeted, three black bloc militants jumped over the fence around the venue for the LGB Alliance conference and began hurling projectiles at a parked vehicle.
	They fled on foot and police pursued.
	What he doesn't include in there is one of them got stuck getting back over the barricades.
	So they're immediately detained.
	Not the fittest?
	No, no, the physiognomy proves again.
	Unknown if they were arrested, far left want gay events shut down for being critical of trans ideology, and that pretty much perfectly sums up.
	They were trying to weave themselves into the crowd and infiltrate, so...
	Yeah, that was the incredible protest size.
	Really energetic there.
	So I thought we'd go through some of the panels and whatnot, because it helps to know what exactly was going on in there if you couldn't make it.
	And they did say they were uploading some of the footage later on, so you'll be able to see.
	I do have a booklet here.
	I thought I'd bring along something authentic.
	Hello.
	Wonderful.
	So, panel number one...
	I didn't believe you'd been there until now.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I got it signed by all the gays.
	Wonderful.
	So the first one was the new intolerance finding a way for LGB voices to be heard.
	And right before that panel, we had some addresses from Kate Barker.
	Obviously, you've covered the mermaid lawsuit before.
	They couldn't talk about it at the conference, for obvious reasons.
	But it was alluded to with a few funny lines.
	And she said, there's an elephant in the room.
	We all know the elephant is more of a sea creature.
	When that unmentionable event is over, watch out, because with support like this, the LGB Alliance will be a force to be reckoned with.
	So they're pretty confident in their legal demolition of mermaids who have tried to strip them of their charity status.
	I'm not surprised they're pretty confident, given the head of mermaids who was photographed in the schoolgirl outfit.
	Not to mention the director who was giving speeches at noncevents.
	I mean, it's a really weird thing for mermaids to try and go after them.
	It's like, you're definitely going to lose.
	Yep, yep.
	You just wanted all your dirty laundry aired out, clearly.
	So the first panel had Helen Joyce, Judy Bindle, Kathleen Stock and Shirin Benjamin.
	Shirin Bindle called gender ideology, quote, patriarchal psychology and old-school deep-rooted misogyny.
	And she said, we are called TERFs, spelled C-U-N. Don't have to finish that, of course.
	But then the problem she got onto was, and this is why I'm saying I'm concerned about the fractionating...
	She then turned around and said, you do realise though the religious right are not our friends.
	They want to control women's reproduction.
	They don't like lesbians and gays.
	Of course they know what a woman is.
	They're biological determinists.
	Of course they know a woman can't have a penis.
	They want men to be men and women to be women if they want to take our rights away.
	And I was like, right, okay.
	So you've immediately started on the front foot of segregating yourself off from your literal allies, which is frustrating.
	Especially because I was sitting there and I was like, okay, as a Catholic I feel attacked.
	Cheers for inviting me and then poo-pooing on it.
	That's what you get for being Catholic.
	Yeah, well, there we go.
	So the main issues of those are they were framing it again as the old feminist paradigm.
	And this is the problem of using the label TERF because radical feminist is still in there.
	And this is why one of the foreseeable problems was when the Gay Men's Network gentleman, we were sitting around and having a chat with him, and he said the reason he sees this movement breaking apart slightly is because the leadership are a lot of lesbian women and feminists.
	And we noticed at the event that the gay men were talking to gay men and lesbians were talking to lesbians.
	as you kind of expected. - Yeah, that does make sense.
	Yeah.
	What are the boys doing?
	Being disliked by both, as per usual.
	But, probably being called greedy someplace.
	It's a joke, don't worry, we're not rude to you.
	But he did say they're basically going to cannibalize each other because he sees it down the pike that the gay men, when the trans activists, mermaids types, are dispensed with, he does fear that they're going to be accused as patriarchal infiltrators.
	And so with language like bindles, it's slightly worrying.
	Yeah, this is why I felt quite dispirited.
	The idea of it, yeah, I mean, even the first thing of, oh, but God, the religious right will come for us once we've done it in this country.
	Yeah.
	I mean, it's a joke in the United States.
	But here, I mean, you are actually insane if you think the religious right is coming for you.
	Yeah, it's literally just me. - Look, Kathleen Stockton said some interesting stuff.
	She said that the doubling of student bodies, incentivised by foreign student numbers and fees increasing since 2011, has been a perverse incentive for the promises of diversity, inclusion, and equality, because as the student bodies expanded and got more disparate in their cultures and fragmented into little groups, then the promise of an overarching...
	Unifying doctrine has become why they've put it out.
	Of course it's ideological, but the selling point is also to the university boomer administrators that will bind all the student body together with a form of multicultural glue.
	And so she said the university needs some restructuring materially to overthrow this weird sort of pervasive thing that's seeped in or at least germinated in the halls of academia.
	So that adds some interesting insights, at least.
	Panel number two, if we can just go here.
	Just go past this one, John, please.
	There we go.
	Yeah, it was with Richie Heron, and we spoke to him after the panel.
	I may have been a little bit distressed when I spoke to him, so I'm sorry if I... Just because his story was so harrowing, it actually got to me a bit.
	Like, I'm a stone-hearted guy, but...
	Some of the stuff he said, I mean, we've covered his story before when he spoke to the Times about it, but the main word he used was not trans regret, but trans grief, because you mourn the loss of the person you were never allowed to live to be.
	And it was really harrowing.
	He said, you know, he'd had repeated surgeries, he was left to bleed out for multiple days until he had a blood transfusion, he was incontinent, he's had multiple infections, and it was just like, it's horrifying what they've done.
	And I did speak to him, and hopefully I'm not leaking this, but he did say, oh yeah, I'll come on and talk to you guys sometime, because he knew the show, which is quite nice.
	And Andy Noah did an interview with him there, so you'll be able to find that and listen to that in your own time, in the comments.
	The reason I raise this is because it was the most difficult panel to watch, and the most interesting.
	And then immediately after, they had panel three, and that was the politicians' panel.
	And the politicians panel featured Dermot Kayahi, Rosie Duffield, our mutual least favourite, Baroness Sarah Lundford, Shara Ali of the Green Party, former deputy leader, Joanna Cherry, and Sir Peter Bottomley, MP, who's a Tory.
	We've got the article up here that was the main takeaway from the panel and she said that she will refuse to call Eddie Izzard a woman even if she is imprisoned under the criminalising misgendering thing that Keir Starmer proposed at the Pink News Awards.
	But my main takeaway from it was really frustrating because Joanna Cherry said, I'm really proud of the LGBT plus protections we have in Scotland.
	I believe people across the UK support equality and support trans rights.
	I am happy with the Equality Act, which includes gender reassignment, not gender identity.
	And it's like, right, so you've just listened to Richie say about how, not just children, no adult should be allowed to access this surgery because he was so vulnerable that it was misassigned, you know, part of his OCD, his childhood trauma and that, was misassigned gender surgery, and so he consented to something he shouldn't have been allowed to consent to, and yet you still get up there and say, oh yeah, but it's alright, we should still protect gender reassignment.
	It's like...
	Again, it was frustrating to have people just not listen.
	Sorry, I know I'm just venting, but this is part of...
	I want to expose this because we really enjoyed the insights when we went, but I am worried, again, that building too broad a temp with the LGB alliance because they want cross-party support will have the polls collapse because some people are still abiding by the same narrative that got us to this place in the first place in its amoral tolerance.
	It's really annoying.
	Then the final panel...
	You're going to have a laugh at this.
	How did we get here?
	Social media.
	And if you can see on the video, for all of your listeners, I'll describe it to you.
	One of the slides I had to take a photo of was 4chan is behind being trans, apparently.
	So they're still whining about Gamergate.
	The rest of the presentation had some interesting stuff in it, particularly about Tumblr, which I'll go into in a minute.
	But they've got Pedobear there.
	The description is hilarious.
	4chan is an image-based site that originally was created to discuss anime, but has been taken over by the alt-right.
	To express forms of misogyny.
	So it's got Pepe.
	Literally 4chan would be a nothing burger if no one was scared of it, but they're all scared of it for some reason.
	Yeah, it's like when you do the ghostly apparitions, like, far right, ooh, 4chan, ooh.
	Yeah, it was kind of frustrating.
	No one else has.
	This is just a funny message board, but whatever.
	But some of the stuff they did raise, which was actually interesting, and the woman on the left there was a Marxist, so I'm not shocked that she was giving these material critiques and complaining about the right wing.
	But if we go on to the next one, they did draw my attention to this paper.
	So the rest of it was about Tumblr and how Tumblr's mental illness glorification, self-harm, anorexia, had created a pipeline for vulnerable young girls to increasingly identify with these damaging markers.
	Mental illnesses and personalities.
	Yeah, unfortunately so.
	And then you see the trends of anorexia diagnoses among young girls have been completely displaced by about a 5,000% increase in Tavistock referrals.
	And then you see neopronouns coming up, new sexualities coming up.
	TikTok has a perverse incentive for this.
	They showed this paper because in this paper it says that banning pornography on Tumblr harmed black and brown youths of colour.
	What?
	Yeah.
	They said basically children not having access to porn has caused trans suicides.
	Yeah.
	I don't follow.
	So, neither do I. That wasn't the people on the stage saying that.
	This is this article that they pointed to, and that said, basically, because the article title is called Tumblr was a Trans Technology.
	So, the academics who are praising it as an instrument for increasing awareness of trans identity are saying there should be porn on the platform for children to access.
	So we should be slightly, slightly worried about that, I think.
	Then also said some other funny things.
	They also said that gender critical and things like that on Reddit had been banned.
	And our actual lesbian had also been banned at one point.
	Now you're wondering why it says our actual lesbian.
	Can you guess?
	Yeah, I can.
	Yeah, they said because r slash lesbian was just porn.
	That's quite funny.
	They then showed Google Trends across COVID lockdowns and they were just skyrocketing for mastectomies, trans, queer, top surgery, things like that.
	And then another one they called out was a surgery centre in Scotland called Cosmedicare.
	Who run a free surgery for TikTok influencers scheme.
	So if you're a trans TikTok influencer, you get your mastectomies and your hormones given to you for free as long as you film the entire process.
	So they're making a lot of money out of this, as Matt Walsh has already exposed as well.
	So yeah, this is why it's really important that we don't just devolve into infighting along identity, sexuality, political lines, and why the LGB Alliance should be gatekeeping a little bit more as to which politicians and what they stand by.
	You know, things like scrapping the Equality Act and not allowing trans surgery, not only for kids, but for vulnerable adults, as Richie suggests.
	And it seems like they're at least making a little bit of headway.
	So I thought I'd finish on a slight white pill, though we will still critique this.
	If we go to the next one, it's just a Telegraph article that came out yesterday.
	The NHS are going to discourage social transitioning of gender questioning children.
	So most children who believe they're transgender are going through a phase, that's a quote the NHS has said, as it warns that doctors should not encourage them to change their names and pronouns.
	NHS England has announced plans for tightening controls on the treatment of under-18s questioning their gender, including a ban on prescribing puberty blockers outside of strict clinical trials.
	No, no, no, no, no, no.
	Again, strict clinical trials.
	There is no clinical trial where you should be giving a child Lupron, which is...
	The chemical castration drug used on convicted sex offenders.
	The services which will replace the controversial Tavistock Clinic will be led by medical doctors rather than therapists.
	Possible good start.
	And will consider the impact of other conditions such as autism and mental health issues.
	Good.
	NHS England says the interim cast report advised even social transition, such as changing a young person's name or pronouns or the way they're dressed, is not a neutral act that could have significant effects in terms of psychological functioning.
	This is a point I raised the other day on a quiz on another network.
	Someone said, oh, what's the harm in just changing their names and it being respectful?
	And I said, well, if a child said they're a superhero, you wouldn't say, run up to the roof, jump off and try to fly, would you?
	So, yeah, not good.
	Well, at least you hated them.
	One would assume.
	Anyway.
	Yeah.
	If you had an ideology which has you violate childhood innocence, you'd be pushing this kind of thing along.
	The proposals say that a new clinical approach for younger children will, quote, reflect evidence that in most cases gender incongruence does not persist into adolescence, and that doctors might be mindful that this is, quote, a transient phase.
	Instead of encouraging transition, medics should take a, quote, watchful approach to see how a young person's conditions develop, the plan state.
	When a pre-pubescent child has already socially transitioned, quote, The clinical approach has been to be mindful of the risks of an inappropriate gender transition and the difficulties that the child may experience in returning to the original gender role upon entering puberty if the gender incongruence does not persist.
	Basically, you have to still leave the door open that they aren't genuinely gender dysphoric, because as the LGB Alliance says, many of these kids are questioning their same-sex attraction, which is budding throughout adolescence, and so they think they must be trapped in the wrong body because heterosexuality is the evolutionary norm, otherwise the species wouldn't propagate, of course.
	For adolescents, social transition will only be considered when it is necessary for preventing clinically significant distress, and when a young person is, quote, able to fully comprehend the implications of affirming social transition.
	There's the problem, right?
	You're still leaving the door open for saying, oh yeah, but if the young person can consent, that's the crux of this.
	So we're making a little bit of headway, but this is why it's important the LGB alliance doesn't fall apart, because they need to keep hammering on this, because the door is still open for saying, but some kids are genuinely trans, some kids are cognizant of knowing who they are, and it's like, no, no, no, no, no, no.
	Even if people genuinely are gender dysphoric, As of Richie's testimony, I cannot think of anyone who would benefit from having their body mutilated in this way.
	Like, I walked away from it quite distressed, and I said to Rory, the doctors who are doing this, even if you were really, really angry, and you endorsed retributive punishment, I would not wish something like that on them, because it's a method of mutilation so brutal and barbaric and medieval.
	That it would debase my soul by inflicting that on someone.
	So we should not be leaving the door open.
	So that's why it's really important that the LGB Alliance don't break into infighting social groups, that they keep up the pressure like this.
	And if we're invited back to next year's conference, I look forward to reporting on it and hoping that some victories against mermaids are announced.
	That's a great point.
	Imagine if the Serbs and the Bosnians did that to each other during the wars as a form of punishment.
	It would be in history as the sickest thing possible.
	Well, Countess Elizabeth Bathory, for example, she's got this apocryphal myth around her and she was bricked up for pretending they said she was a vampire because she drank the blood of girls and sexually tortured them.
	That wouldn't be out of character for her to do.
	So it's just genuinely distressing that that's done for profit by medical professionals and posted all over TikTok.
	So yeah, it was really blackpilling, man.
	It was quite difficult to get through, but it was worth going.
	Hey, real life is real life.
	Speaking of which, Fox have decided to endorse racial discrimination, which is something I did not expect.
	On brand for the Democrats?
	Yeah, ironically.
	We'll start off just mentioning something on the website first, being, of course, the Critical Race Theory Explained video that Carl did with me, just going through the essays in his big-ass textbook that I'm sure everyone has seen.
	Have you seen the new Uber Eats advert of The Gentleman Dancing, by the way?
	Look it up after this.
	He looks exactly like that.
	It's a bit weird.
	Okay, anyway.
	I believe this is Derek Bell who started the Critical Race Theory movement.
	Yeah, people in the comments will know what I mean.
	Alright, well, Derek Bell, actually, his first essays were about the fact that you need to reject desegregation and endorse segregation, because it's what keeps us safe.
	Keep that in mind, because we will come back to it as Vox tries to argue that racial discrimination, actually a good thing, unironically.
	This is an article I saw, and I just have to go through it.
	What the Constitution actually says about race, explained...
	There's a giant flaw in the Supreme Court's lawsuits attacking affirmative action.
	Sorry, boys.
	Turns out racism is legal.
	Spack of a go-home, I guess.
	I'm sure Ketanji Brown-Jackson will enjoy explaining this to us, because have you seen the bar graphs that chart how many words each Supreme Court justice used in the decisions?
	She used a lot.
	Yeah, she used about 3,000 on average, where Clarence Thomas used about 36.
	Shut up for five minutes.
	King Clarence.
	No, Diversity Hire won't.
	They're right here.
	I'm not going to use her name either, as is tradition, because I don't care.
	I'm just going to keep calling her the Diversity Hire because it's the only reason she's there.
	Justice Diversity Hire was hearing only the third case of her career as a Supreme Court Justice when she went after one of her conservative colleagues' most sacred cows.
	The idea that the Constitution requires all US laws to be colourblind.
	That's an amazing sentence.
	The Conservatives are arguing for colourblind law And she thrust herself in there and decided she would deal with that.
	We are greenback racism, boys.
	That's why I'm here.
	Literally.
	It's also the reason she's actually there.
	The country's right flank, Fox right, now in the majority in the Supreme Court, has long argued that US laws cannot draw distinctions on the basis of race.
	Good.
	This is not a very good smear.
	No?
	As Chief Justice John Roberts argued in Parents Involved v.
	Seattle School Districts 2007, a case about whether public school districts may take voluntary steps to racially integrate its schools.
	Good.
	The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discrimination on the basis of race.
	So Pindy X Andrews took that personally.
	Yeah, if you want to stop discrimination, stop doing it.
	Yeah, that's the Morgan Freeman position on CNN where he's talking to Don Lemon.
	Don Lemon, how do we stop racism?
	He went, stop talking about it.
	Oh, Don Lemon, I am sick of you.
	Roberts and his ideological allies derive the colour blindness principle from the 14th Amendment's guarantee that all individuals will receive equal protection under the law.
	Right.
	Now, a few paragraphs in.
	I'm yet to hear a bad word about the right, which is new.
	I'm sure noted biologist judge will tell us exactly why we're wrong.
	But diversity hire explains that the framers of this amendment did not strive for colour blindness.
	Okay, we're not them.
	Trust me, they hated the...
	She comes out and says, it's like, no, don't say it!
	But she did.
	Mr.
	Lammy, get down.
	Instead, they were trying to erase, sorry, ensure that people who had been discriminated against, that is, formerly enslaved black people, were actually brought equal to everyone else in the society.
	That's right.
	Racism is the legal standard we should be standing things on because it brings everyone together.
	It brings everyone up to the same place.
	If we're more racist, it's okay if we're bringing everyone to the same level.
	How we define what the same level is on a collective basis...
	The clan position.
	It means nothing.
	It never has.
	This collective is thinking in which you're like, yeah, well, this collective and that collective aren't the same, so we'll make them the same.
	In arbitrary characteristic X, Y, and Z, all the other ones we'll worry about later, because once we fix these ones, we'll have to fix those ones.
	Except we never really will have them the same, because that's not how humanity works.
	No.
	So we just get to legalise racism forever, because say so.
	Yeah.
	There isn't even equality among black siblings of the same household.
	No, but Diversity Hire over here doesn't care.
	I really do think this is just an argument to legalise racism.
	Yeah, when does this ever stop the race, Marxists?
	It's the reality of what happens.
	And Diversity Hire brought the receipts, they write.
	As if any good point has been made.
	Among other things, she cited the Civil Rights Act of 1866...
	That's right, racism is legal, because in 1860...
	Okay.
	A law enacted by the very same Congress that wrote the 14th Amendment, which provides that all Americans shall have the same contracting and property rights as white citizens, and that any non-white person convicted of a crime shall be punished the same way as a white person.
	Yeah, because they were correcting historical injustice because white was the standard under that mindset.
	So what is the argument here?
	There's no diversity hiring going on there.
	No.
	The guys are saying, you know how we used to treat the blacks as slaves?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, let's not do that anymore.
	Yeah, we shouldn't treat them differently.
	We'll treat them the same.
	They'll have the same rights, and they'll have the same property rights, contracting rights, and in case of a crime, they'll have the same rights on that.
	And diversity hired brings this up to prove that racism should be legal in favour of black people.
	I don't think giving black people the same constitutional rights is positive discrimination.
	No.
	I've read plenty of critical race theory to understand my enemies and even now my brain still feels like it's leaking out of its ears with misunderstanding.
	Didn't make any sense.
	No.
	Vox don't let you bother about that.
	They continue.
	The Congress wrote the 14th Amendment.
	In other words, rejected colourblind theory.
	They literally didn't.
	You just told us.
	They were like, yeah, how about everyone has the same rights?
	Yeah.
	You're like, yeah, see?
	Racist.
	What?
	Are you just making stuff up now?
	This is how you write your articles.
	You're not even going to bother.
	And instead wrote a landmark civil rights statue that explicitly requires the government to consider race when deciding whether non-white individuals' rights were being fully respected.
	No.
	You just told us.
	The whole thing was explicitly colourblind, you have the same contracting rights, you have the same rights in case of a crime committed, and you have the same property rights.
	And Vox is like, yeah, see?
	Racism, huh?
	Okay.
	Sorry, just a side note.
	This is terribly written, to say the least.
	Which is not even going to bother.
	But they're right.
	Now, the Supreme Court is about to decide whether Roberts or Diversity Hire is correct about the contribution of colourblindness to the Constitution.
	Obviously Roberts.
	There's no racism there.
	So, there's a bad argument to try and legalise racism.
	But that's what a racist would say!
	Given that Republicans appointed two-thirds of the justices, it would be shocking if a majority of the justices do not side with Roberts, even if diversity hire is correct, about the Constitution was not originally understood.
	You were right in your prediction when she was being put up for an appointment that eventually she would have to rule on affirmative action.
	We're seeing it The diversity-hire judge would have to rule that her being in her position is unconstitutional?
	Yeah.
	That's beautiful.
	Yeah.
	You couldn't ask for anything better, frankly.
	They continue.
	Students for Fair Admissions v.
	University of North Carolina asked the court to overrule nearly a half-century worth of Supreme Court decisions holding that universities may, under limited circumstances, have affirmative action programs that consider race in student admissions.
	Now, here's the crux of the whole thing.
	People who haven't been paying attention.
	so in this suit the people suing are saying well all the whites and asian kids are being discriminated against in favor of black and latino kids on the scores because you say we're allowed to do it in limited circumstances what the hell is a limited circumstance well in the uk it's argued that if the two applicants are exactly the same in every possible way then you can discriminate based on race and latino kids on the scores because you say we're allowed to do it in limited circumstances what the hell is a limited circumstance well in the uk it's argued that if the two applicants are exactly the same in every possible way then you can discriminate based on race of course that's actually impossible though you don't have two of the same people ever yeah not a thing
	so we just we just ignore that and legalize racism cool i guess that's what we do and in the united states they have a similar situation where they're like yeah if they're similar then you can be racist and um of course yeah no one's that similar you can't do it You can invent new categories like likeability or personality scores that you can apply to Asian students who have massive grade point average advantages over their black and Latino peers on individual cases.
	I'm letting in all these students.
	Why?
	They've got really high likeability scores.
	Why?
	I just like black girls.
	Yeah.
	What are you going to do about it?
	And we can see this, ironically, with the black girls, in the lore videos which we've covered previously.
	There was a whole host of ladies in here who had started their own YouTube channels telling you how to get in, which is to be a black woman.
	Yeah, this is a really good segment, by the way.
	But also just...
	I'm a black woman.
	Yeah.
	The Rachel Dolezal position.
	What are you, idiots?
	Trump's like, come on.
	Someone can photoshop that where Trump is a black woman in that scene.
	That would work.
	Anyway.
	And Vox themselves have also previously pointed out how unequal this is.
	In Minecraft, apparently.
	Yeah.
	I love this.
	They have this graph and they're like, yeah, look at this.
	It's just terrible.
	It's great.
	I wouldn't dream of doing like that.
	Just unreal.
	People listening.
	So you have the white applicant score as the baseline for some reason.
	They could have actually chosen black and then showed how much Yeah.
	Everyone else is being screwed.
	They were complaining about that a minute ago when they said, oh, everyone's now equal to white people.
	But then they're framing this around white being the standard.
	So it's just when it suits to make a ham-fisted political argument, isn't it?
	But this is also actually a disgusting practice in terms of just statistical representation.
	You'll always notice with anything like this, like the income, for example, in America.
	Someone make an argument, oh, yeah, well, whites in America are this much, and blacks are this much less, so it's racism.
	Yeah.
	Why always centre around whites?
	Yeah.
	The argument will be made that they're the majority ethnic group.
	It's like, yeah, but that's not relevant to actually the data you're presenting, which is that if we center this around black students, for example, then white applicants have to score 310 more points to be equal to a black student, whereas the Asians have to score, what's that, 450 more points in their SATs.
	And Hispanics...
	440.
	It's just great.
	Fantastic.
	The level of discrimination is huge.
	And even then, you're going to get plenty of unqualified students of black and Hispanic colour, which has nothing to do with their melanin and more to do with their attitude.
	And even then, to steal a quote, one of the more reasonable ones that Jordan Peterson said recently, unfortunately, when the bridges start collapsing, it will be blamed on a lack of authentic black voices.
	I'm pretty sure it would be the black women.
	Anyway, let's not even have it a go.
	It's just the reality of who is getting the biggest, well, open door.
	Meritocracy, please.
	Is that too much thought?
	Anyway, getting back to Fox.
	They decided to write in here, specifically, Students for Fair Admissions, which is run by Ed Blum, a white man!
	Right.
	I'm not going to go any further with that paragraph, because it's just, that's the crux of it.
	That's what they want you to get away from that, which is that it's bad because he's white.
	He's asking for equal rights, but he is white.
	So this would privilege him to have the same rights as everyone else.
	So it isn't that bad, folks.
	I know maybe people are used to this.
	Why do I keep stumbling on it?
	But the fact that that's normal...
	Yeah, we shouldn't be desensitized.
	We just say, yeah, of course we hate him.
	He's white.
	Yeah, of course.
	Hello.
	We've got the next image here.
	Just I imagine Vox writing in, what is this, 1963 here?
	Mr.
	King, a black man, seeks to banish segregated spaces.
	Right, okay, fact check.
	That's an incorrect article because you haven't capitalised the B in black.
	No, no, this is 63 before all this happened.
	I did think about that.
	You'd still find a way.
	Anyway, I do love when they called it, how Mao Zedong secured his 10th term in power.
	Anyway, but we'll move forward to Fox, because I continue.
	Many of the court's most conservative members claim to believe that the only legitimate way to interpret the Constitution is to read the words as they were understood when they were written and ratified.
	As Justice Clarence Thomas said at the 2019 conference at Yale Law School, reading the Constitution any other way usurps power from the people because it gives too much power to the judges.
	So yeah, not making it up as you go along.
	Yeah.
	And the examples you gave us in this very article is that white and black should be treated the same according to the people who wrote the law.
	Yeah, but Judge Humpty Dumpty here says words can mean whatever I think they mean.
	I think that means racism is legal, so...
	Also, I just love the idea that if you went back to 1866, and were like, oh, howdy, folks!
	How are you doing today?
	I don't know how they speak.
	And just had a chat, and they were like, yeah, we're writing this law.
	We think that blacks and whites should be having the same laws.
	Are they the same?
	Of course not.
	This is 1866.
	But they're going to argue that they should have the same rights.
	And you go, no, no, no.
	But doesn't that mean, like, weird commie stuff where we should, in 108 years, let's say, have black students get into schools that whites shouldn't be allowed in, even if they're as good?
	Click-clack.
	Click-clack.
	What are you saying?
	Would you throw it out of the hall for being retarded?
	Sent into an institution, probably.
	And yet, neither Thomas, who may be the court's most outspoken opponent of affirmative action, good, he's not a diversity hire, deserves his name, he's actually the most competent, or any other justice who identifies as an originalist, has ever offered a substantial originalist defence of the colour-buying thesis that racial preferences are always impermissible.
	Well, I can offer a defence.
	The fact that...
	Yeah, the one that you provided in that whiteness was the original discriminatory standard, and by elevating everyone up to saying you should have the same right, non-white persons should have the same rights as white persons, that's abolishing the racial distinction in the law.
	So that's literally...
	If we all white now, boys...
	Even the Irish.
	Ah, that's why Larry Elder is the blackface of white supremacy.
	Is he Irish?
	No, as in, like, we're all white now.
	Larry Elder's Irish.
	Well, if he was Irish, he'd be black, so...
	But these same Conservatives have barely even attempted to show that the Constitution, as originally understood, forbids affirmative action.
	There's just a...
	You know what?
	Fine.
	Yeah, you want to go for the original constitution?
	You really want to go for that one?
	Right, okay.
	If you wish.
	That's how we'll solve this, to claim that racism is legal.
	Why?
	Because, you know, slavery and stuff.
	Previous justices had made some other statements on this, which were retarded.
	This is by a Democrat guy.
	The Congress that passed the 14th Amendment, Marshall wrote, is the same Congress that passed the 1866 Freeman Bureau Act, an act that provided many of its benefits only to Negroes.
	The Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Land Acts is what he's referencing there.
	Which, funnily enough, after the Civil War, most of the refugees, in fact almost all of them, were black Americans.
	And therefore were recipients of an act spent literally for refugees, freedmen, and abandoned lands.
	Therefore racism is legal.
	Again, not sending their best.
	I don't really understand what this argument is.
	No, that's like saying, we set up Liberia, they started slavery, therefore, racism is legal in America.
	Seven years later, in 1985, civil rights lawyer and future law professor Eric Schnippenier published a seminal paper arguing that the 14th Amendment was originally understood to permit affirmative action.
	How does he argue it?
	Quote, From the closing days of the Civil War until the end of civilian reconstruction some five years later, according to Schnippenier, Congress adopted a series of social welfare programs whose benefits were expressly limited to blacks.
	No, they were limited to the people who suffered slavery, so it's not black people as a monolith.
	It just so happens that they're all blacks.
	Yeah.
	I've one of them shook.
	He said, they write, these are race-conscious programs.
	Slavery is a race-conscious program.
	Anti-racist means, and in which case anti-racist means to deal with that are also race-conscious.
	We're supposed to be the same legislators who favoured the constitutional guarantee of equal protection.
	Yeah, material support to the victims of direct racial discrimination by the state, not giving them their rights...
	So the state steps in and gives them, what, reparations?
	Yeah.
	In this form?
	You're welcome.
	And in which case, question's over.
	We're not arguing that because the Japs got given money after being in the concentration camps, well, that means that, I don't know, we're allowed to be racist now because we gave money to the Japs?
	Wouldn't that be the predicate to not discriminate against Asian applicants in universities?
	We don't have that conversation, do we?
	No, no.
	That would be common sense and that would be white supremacy.
	But if you follow this line of logic, the right thing to do now is to destroy the racial discrimination that's happening in universities and instead offer white and Asian students who have gone through the last several 50 years of discrimination against them money for what has happened to them over the next five years, which...
	Not gonna happen, obviously, but it's just weird arguments.
	The Reconstruction-era federal government was especially active in providing educational benefits specifically to black people, though, he says.
	The Freedmen's Bureau educated approximately 100,000 students, nearly all of them black.
	So, yeah.
	Again, imagine going back to these people and saying, yeah, you're doing all this so in 180 years we can keep discriminating against white people, right?
	No.
	Again, it's helpful for people who are directly discriminated against by the government.
	But trust me, bro, this is totally what they wanted.
	However, then we finally get to it, which is they admit, they want to bring back segregation.
	Trust me, it'll be good this time, because the whiteys don't have the power, and in which case, we'll be able to do what we want.
	This is the same thing as that Muslim police officer woman saying, Kafars drank from my cup.
	They're like, white people drank from my drinking fountain, so I want a new one.
	Yeah.
	Wow, okay.
	But this is the thing of the critical race theorists.
	I think the reason they're so proud of bringing back segregation as their goal is because they know they have the power to ensure that they'll be on top.
	In 1862, four years before the 14th Amendment was drafted, Congress enacted a law instituting a system of education of colored children in the District of Columbia, according to a legal historian, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	Most of the states also did this.
	And all of this is powerful evidence that the 14th Amendment, as originally understood, permitted the very kind of school segregation declared unconstitutional by Brown.
	There's Vox writing there about why racism should be legal.
	Because desegregation should be legal.
	Because 14th Amendment and stuff.
	That's incoherent.
	This is a weird goal.
	It's amazing that they're just openly saying, yeah, the originalist approach to the Constitution is now anti-racist, which means segregation today, segregation tomorrow, and segregation forever.
	Yeah, see, I'm getting a headache trying to wrap my head around the logic of this stuff, and then I just realise they don't care about logic, they just want to segregate you into racial groups, raise resentment, and incite a revolutionary war, because they want to come out on top.
	But the segregation will be positive this time.
	Yeah, no.
	Positive segregation.
	Like positive discrimination.
	Positive slavery.
	Yeah.
	Positive holocaust.
	God almighty.
	But this is the reasoning though.
	The framing.
	They're just like, I'll shove the word positive at the front of it.
	It's okay, right?
	Yeah.
	What?
	Are you mad?
	Anyway, the people who are supporting this kind of anti-white discrimination, I thought we'd just check in with the kind of folks who vote for this sort of thing, and a media outlet called Cut decided to give us this.
	Oh my god, what is that creature?
	Let's enjoy various people being asked what white people are superior at.
	What are white people superior at?
	What exactly are white people superior at?
	They're real good at violence.
	Violence.
	Genocide.
	It's like stealing people's lives just because they feel like it.
	If you are white, and you know this is happening, and you say nothing, then you're a killer too.
	What exactly are white people superior at?
	Insecurity.
	Pretending.
	Fear.
	Being fearful of nothing.
	Being ignorant.
	Blame.
	Letting their egos control their every move.
	Superior at being dicks.
	What exactly are white people superior at?
	Oppression.
	Gaslighting.
	Lack of empathy.
	Intellectualizing oppression.
	Did I say oppression?
	What exactly are white people superior at?
	Taking what's not there.
	Taking shit.
	Taking our ideas.
	Copycat.
	Gentrification.
	Appropriating things that do not belong to them.
	Taking over other people's cultures.
	And making you believe that they invented it.
	Maybe they're thinking of it as repurposing.
	It's like recycle and repurpose.
	As my grandma was saying, the white folk, they'll take it if you don't copyright it.
	They are very good at destruction of land, destruction of people, destruction of humanness.
	Republican, whether you're Democrat, whether you're conservative, like, white people are really good at upholding white supremacy.
	How about claiming that, you know, they are actually a whole separate race when actually white DNA comes from the black female?
	So what exactly are white people superior at?
	Honey, lying, stealing, and cheating.
	Manipulation.
	Withholding information.
	Lying.
	Telling lies.
	So, you remember earlier in the LGB Alliance segment, I said to you the biblical argument for actual women being inferior because they came from the male rib.
	Is that not the exact evolutionary cradle argument that woman just gave, where she said all white people came from the black female body?
	I think a lot of those arguments are bunk.
	Yeah.
	But my point being that, check out all these people who totally want to work with us and make a society and not oppress us for being white.
	Oh yeah, if you want to voluntarily self-segregate just so I don't have to listen to you and I can live next to Thomas Sowell and Larry Elder, go for it!
	Eh, but we don't have the power, they do.
	That's unfortunate.
	Thanks to the black pill, bro.
	Running the place.
	Every day is a black pill.
	But also, I thought I'd just go through some of those arguments, because the friggin' irony of trying to say that white people are known for such things as violence.
	The white people, they're the violent ones.
	Oh, yeah.
	1360, bro.
	I don't know if you've noticed.
	No, no, no.
	We're sticking in the United States.
	Let's not leave the land in which these people spend their entire lives.
	But 13% of the population, now 60% of known murders every year, according to the FBI. It's not even 13.
	It's half of that, and then half of that again.
	3%, 60% of the murders.
	Yeah, so it's black males 18 to 35.
	The whiteys did this.
	It's just unbelievable.
	It's white supremacy beating up Asian people in San Francisco.
	Oppression.
	White people are very good at oppression, which is why we're literally being oppressed in the universities, along with the Asians.
	So, there we have that.
	We also have taking over other people's cultures.
	We literally live in a minoritarian society in the West.
	We praise minorities every single day of the week, and how they make us stronger, but no one else does.
	I went to the cinema on Saturday night, and I spotted one straight white man in 40 minutes worth of adverts.
	I'm not joking.
	I kept just nudging my dad and going, oh look, another one, another gay couple, another mixed race couple, things like that.
	They should be morally neutral, but they're not, because we are being foisted on each other, and the world does not look like that outside my doorstep.
	If we're going to define everyone as the white people and the brown people, whose culture's being taken over by who there, there's also taking our things, which, okay, then we'll turn off the lights, because you didn't invent those, so we can take the camera back if you want.
	Actually, the modern medicine that means you're not dead at birth, we'll also take that back.
	Did you see the Bill Burr bit in Paper Tiger where he got in trouble with this with his wife?
	Because she said, oh, well, Elvis stole blues from black people.
	And he said, oh, so we're not allowed to culturally indulge then.
	All right, so you can't skateboard, you can't fly across countries.
	And he was like, yeah, and I slept on the sofa that night.
	The architecture of the house, honey.
	I think you need to sleep in the garden under the sun, if that's how you're going to argue.
	Yeah, wheelbarrows.
	Look, I don't want to do this as well.
	I don't want to racially segregate inventions, but...
	If you're going to bring this game, you're going to lose, is the point.
	So don't try.
	There's also the destruction of land, the argument.
	White people are very good at destroying land.
	It's like, how are you alive then?
	How is there so much food in America?
	Why are Americans the way they are?
	Anyway.
	But also, Whitey is the one who's lying about everything.
	Sure.
	And to reinforce my point that we do indeed live in a minoritarian society, we'll go to George Osborne, who's got something to say.
	Rishi Sunak will be Prime Minister by the end of the day.
	Some think, like me, he's the solution to our problems.
	Blah, blah, blah.
	Who cares?
	But he ended off with, but whatever your politics, let's all celebrate the first British-Asian becoming Prime Minister and be proud of our country when this can happen.
	Nope, he's a lying, technocratic, crypto-communist.
	I don't care that he's brown.
	But ignore him.
	He's not even...
	His achievements and failures aren't even being taken into account by George here.
	His entire anything is that, ooh, brown!
	Ooh, they have those now!
	We have a brown person, and the propaganda in this tweet is, we must celebrate him because he is brown.
	And this is constant.
	You would never get someone tweeting something like, celebrate three-note because someone is white English in a position that has not been white English for so many a year, or something like that.
	It would not be a thing.
	Not something we're allowed to do.
	Instead, we must endlessly celebrate minorities.
	Minoritarian society.
	We go to the next one here.
	We also have the fact that we have The Guardian, who's taking note of the same thing.
	Trickle-down economics has had its day.
	Trickle-down diversity doesn't work either.
	Right.
	He writes in here, the author, I have since sat on numerous panels with large media organizations, many of them liberal, all genuinely confused as to why increasing diversity at senior positions has not substantially changed their workplace culture.
	Funny that.
	When you have ideological homogeneity, it turns out you result in groupthink.
	But also just the cherry-picking for the top positions is not enough.
	All positions must be minorities.
	How does that even work?
	There are just simply not enough qualified people, which is why they're starting to pick unqualified people.
	There are not enough minorities.
	Now am I qualified or unqualified?
	How do you make the minorities 100% of society?
	Yep.
	Well, there's one way, I suppose.
	Anyway, his conclusion in here is, so what in Black History Month can we take away from all this?
	First, there is no doubt that British companies and institutions need to increase the number of women and people of colour in senior positions.
	It makes no material difference, but we need to do it.
	I don't even smoke and I feel like I need a cigarette.
	Anyway, we'll end this off just to take a look at our geopolitical enemies.
	How are they doing these days?
	Meanwhile, in China, I think we've got people from very diverse backgrounds here.
	I think some of them are from the north and some from the south.
	Anyway, that's all from us, so if you'd like to...
	Sorry, but it is funny.
	We have John here just writing that diversity is not on top of the mind in China communications.
	People listening, we've got Tibetans, people from Xinjiang.
	No, we don't.
	No, we do not.
	Anyway, there's that, which is that racial discrimination is totally legal according to Vox, because trust me, bro.
	And thankfully, I feel like that argument's not going to work, and the Supreme Court will actually make being a diversity hire the unconstitutional and legal, whilst the diversity hire sits there and screeches.
	You really know how to smuggle misery into a white pill, don't you, Callum?
	Let's move to the video comments.
	the issues surrounding the sowing of the wild oats culture we often see on the right and pickup culture where it's kind of seen that you have to be a tomcat to be a truly masculine man and unfortunately that does feel like a system where the women kind of lose out thoughts are dismissed as feminist whinging quite often even though it's more a matter that we simply want to have a stability culture and not a domination culture like the feminists want
	Yeah, don't create more resentful feminists that walk out into other guys' lives like emotional suicide bombers.
	Don't sell a woman love just to get her into bed because that's how you make women hate men.
	Someone put a comment on the Patrice O'Neill video that I think I'll feature in a segment later this week where he said it's the equivalent of leave the picnic area tidier than you found it.
	If you have a relationship with someone and you commit to them, don't screw them up and also don't make a false promise of a relationship just to sleep around and poison the well.
	Maybe it's just...
	I never actually understood the whole point of sleeping around, even as a man.
	It's a sort of...
	I think it's the low impulse control, the gratification of the conquest, and it's just lizard brain of it feels good.
	That's it.
	There's also just...
	There is a...
	That's a phrase of this.
	A certain level of testosterone, it becomes all you can think about, but you should still have a moral prohibition to not do it.
	Does that make sense?
	Not to me.
	I've always felt like it just seems like a waste of time just to go from woman to woman to woman.
	You are hypological, so most people are not.
	That's a very polite way of putting it.
	The autism in his office is palpable, Callum.
	I'm sharing it.
	It's fine.
	Go to the next video, Callum, before I reveal anything more.
	Tony D and Little Joan with a special announcement.
	Book 10 of the Pineys is now available at Amazon.com.
	$2.99 ebook, $7.99 for trade.
	Kindle Unlimited is free.
	This contains stories based on some of the comments I've previously made on the Lotus Eaters.
	There's stuff about Red Lion, New Jersey.
	antonian leblanc the famous french murderer the blob of egg harbor and others uh news stories include the sandy hook serpent and thomas edison's spirit phone it was a it was a real thing uh so thanks for uh supporting me and thanks for checking in out see you in the pines thanks for supporting us man Also, is that meant to look like Nancy Pelosi?
	Why's she eating Biden's ice cream?
	And why's Jerry Nadler on her desk?
	Next video comment.
	Hang on, Matt.
	So I watched this episode recently, and remember how I said in one of the gold-tier calls, my girlfriend's from America, and you need the vaccine to get over there legally because of Biden being an idiot?
	You know how I love martial arts?
	My stamina and heart have never been the same since.
	I just can't seem to level grind hard enough to get past the one minute of stamina mark.
	I used to be able to go for ages.
	It's just horrible.
	I hate it so much.
	I'm sure your girlfriend's disappointed if you can't go past one minute.
	Sorry, I had to.
	Yeah, it's horrible to hear.
	Yeah, it's screwed up, man.
	Come on.
	I've not been following much of the vaccine stuff.
	I know that someone I know has had someone in their life die because of it.
	Yeah.
	I know of a couple of people.
	We've started to see more and more of these discussions in open public.
	The reality in the EU Parliament and I can't remember somewhere else where someone asked the question, what proof did you have that these things stopped transition of the virus?
	None, but we claimed it anyway.
	Did you know they only tested it?
	I ate mice.
	That came out on ABC News the other day.
	Noted far right outlet ABC News.
	I think we're getting to...
	Carl predicted when we were in the midst of it that in five years there'll be a Frank DeConnor book about this leading out everything that happens.
	I think we're getting there.
	Yeah.
	The thing is I'm slightly dispirited on who will be held to account in our own country, you know?
	I suppose the lesson we should learn from this is to do what the Chinese did after the Great Famine, which is the correct response, and I'm glad most of us did it, which is to resist.
	And the way you resist is by...
	The phrase was, corruption is a liberating force.
	I do know quite a few people who can travel to the United States because they've been totally vaccinated, bro, trust me.
	My...
	My digital ID says so.
	100% legit.
	No virus.
	And so forth.
	If you don't cooperate with the state, they actually can't do anything.
	That's what Chris said to me.
	He said, oh, come back to Austin, man.
	You've got to go sometime.
	And I was like, well, I'm very envious of you living over there because I can't get it.
	And he went, oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Trust me, bro.
	I've definitely got a vaccine passport.
	Yeah.
	How much were they again, John?
	John happens to know someone who's brought it, I swear.
	Anyway, so XYZ says, On the Nazis not welcome, I think it was D'Souza who pointed out that it was the brown shirts would stand at the back of the auditoriums and create disruptions when confronted with counterpositions.
	Free Will says, In about ten years, these drones will have left academia and be in politics, education, and the civil service.
	Law enforcement, quangos, etc.
	Think about how bad, and imagine what it'll be like then.
	I mean, we're sort of there now, but we do keep getting the leaks.
	Oh, look, this head of the civil service is a communist.
	Yep.
	For the last 30 years.
	Susan Michi, head of SAGE. Yeah, it's not just her, it's quite a few of them, though.
	Yeah.
	Hmm.
	Purge.
	Actually do things.
	Yep.
	Sophie Lev Peterson says, I honestly just love that Matt Walsh exists.
	He is the perfect foil for all of this, exactly because of his deadpan way of interacting with anything.
	It's honestly comedy gold.
	Also, that he just doesn't care about these people.
	It's almost like he sucked up all the testosterone from all of those red states and kept it all from himself.
	Someone's got a bit of a white on.
	Yeah, Sophie, calm down.
	Though I will say, I understand the total level of respect, because I've been talking to a few people, young conservative people behind the scenes, where they said, how do we make change both in and outside the party?
	We've been writing, we've been doing media stuff, we don't really feel like going up to random students on the street and saying, what is a woman who's doing anything?
	And I've suggested a few things, like go to Westminster events, get within the think tanks, have a chat with people, try and convince them slowly.
	But we do feel like we're waiting for an extinction-level event to seize upon.
	However, Walsh over in the States and James Lindsay as well, who are both making legislative pushes, they are doing something practical.
	So, I mean, maybe we're a few years too young to feel like we'd be legitimising these institutions, but we do need to tip over from just raising awareness to actually doing something about it.
	And credit to the guy for really doing stuff on the ground.
	Really difficult as well.
	Yeah.
	Although I think Sophie is correct about the fact that the deadpan nationals, the fact he does not care about these protesters.
	It's a very...
	It's very disagreeable.
	It's not so much that.
	It's a basic learning step in politics, which too few MPs apparently get, which is that when you're faced with someone who is 100% oppositional, ideologically possessed...
	They are there for you to ridicule.
	Yeah, just treat them as the existential threat that they are, yeah.
	But it's not even that.
	What use can you actually get out of such people?
	Well, there is no use in terms of friendship, cordiality.
	I've tried speaking to be a waste of your time.
	Yeah, I can't reason.
	All you can do is either turn them into content, or just make them so ridiculous by talking to them and showing how ridiculous they are.
	So that's the two options.
	Or you could be Steve Baker, who says he's a man of the left now.
	Not an option.
	That's a shoot-you-in-the-head moment.
	Yeah.
	As in, you're shooting yourself in the head as a politician.
	Paul Neubauer says, well, the World Economic Forum solution is to eliminate the poor.
	Yep, you are the carbon.
	They want to reduce.
	They want to round up all the dwarfs.
	Radshake was right, says, hey, lefties, you discredit your position immediately if you're asking Joe Biden what he thinks about it.
	If you can give a coherent response, it's because his handlers have beaten his into his dementia-ridden skull, which just means that, yes, the deep state...
	Improves of your opinion.
	That means your argument and probably your personal beliefs are automatically invalid.
	Usefully it.
	Yeah, but Mr.
	Radchick, I think you are correct.
	I don't really know what the point in going to these events is, even for those folks.
	Sure, there's the TikTok of, oh, I met the president, but...
	There's no interaction.
	There is scripted question, you ask scripted question, scripted response.
	Yeah, but it's the external social media validation you're going to get afterwards.
	It's like the protesters at the...
	They do.
	They're narcissists.
	Yeah, yeah, I know.
	Again, you're trying to apply reason to one reason, man.
	Like, you're too good for these people.
	You're not being funny.
	Same thing as the trans protesters, the LGB Alliance.
	There's like ten of them.
	They're standing out in the pissing rain, performing and being catty.
	It's just because they're trying to pick each other up afterwards.
	That's it.
	It's just an ego trip.
	That's it.
	But it's an ego trip that's destroying the West.
	Shaker Silver says, Ah yes, I bought the paw.
	What a brave thing for a black woman to say about the black community.
	Remember, these people are eugenicists.
	Accurate.
	Adam Hack Davies says, Matt Walsh, we really need to start a movement of MBGA. Make biology great again.
	And instead of pronouns in the bio, make biology in the pronouns.
	No, because we're just acquiescing to the idea of we should control how you refer to me when I'm not around.
	I think he's taking the piss.
	Yeah, I know he is, yeah.
	Ewan Baker says that megaphone sounds like it belongs in Nuremberg.
	That could have been for my segment as well, to be fair.
	Alfred of the Beta says Matt Walsh is discovering speech is harmful when you have a closed dogma built on absurdities.
	Subverting the dogma is heresy, therefore speech is harmful because speech leads to thought and thought leads to action.
	Potential heresy, heretical thoughts and heretical actions.
	It's determinism.
	Some hate leads to suffering.
	Suffering.
	Bold Eagle 1787 says when the actual Nazi terrorists are projecting themselves on others.
	Free Will 2112 says if words hurt and it is now unacceptable to say hurtful things, the logical final step is to ban people speaking.
	For this was part of the function of Newspeak to end critical thoughts and by extension criticism and to create a class of auto-automatic apparatchiks who would carry out the functions of the state instinctively.
	Yeah, nihilism is the prerequisite to ideological capture.
	So it's to disarm you morally, you can't argue against it, and then you're ripe for thought colonization.
	We'll move on to the...
	Yep.
	Omar says, the enemy of my enemy is still a TERF. This all began with feminist removes exclusivity to male spaces and now they're losing theirs.
	They haven't changed their minds, they're just feeding the other edge of the sword.
	Unfortunately, that's true.
	That's entirely true.
	That's why you just got to abandon the TERF label.
	Sorry, I mean, you're still conceptualising it as a patriarchy.
	Well, that conceptualisation is going to create an Ouroboros of biting you in the arse.
	Well, it's the funniest thing when you have...
	I think Posy Parker has stopped doing this now.
	I've seen her stop doing it, at least.
	But you had, at the beginning of all this, she would phrase it as, like, it was men's rights activists who were doing this.
	That's what they did at that conference.
	Or the patriarchy.
	It's not just her.
	There are other TERFs who did this.
	She stopped calling herself a TERF, actually.
	I think because of this sort of thing.
	And it's just comical.
	That's not the case.
	They actually said that the 2015 alt-right have now become all the trans girls.
	And they said, there's a running joke in the trans community.
	Don't ask the trans girl what she was doing before 2016.
	And it's like...
	No.
	No.
	There isn't.
	No, there isn't.
	It's not.
	They're all online leftists.
	And then they unironically put up images of ContraPoints at Philosophy Tube, and it's like, yes, noted alt-right personality, Philosophy Tube.
	Did you have a chat with the person who did that?
	No.
	I'd love to hear them trying to explain that.
	She was a Marxist, though.
	Yeah, but it's like, you don't know anything, do you?
	No.
	ContraPoints.
	4Channer.
	Yeah.
	Huh.
	They're just versed in the wrong direction entirely.
	Like, you've sat around seeing these TikToks firsthand all the time, and then you go, yes, my conclusion is you're probably a Nazi.
	Okay.
	Colin, regarding the NHS, is it possible that some degree of sanity is returning?
	Maybe the NHS's anti-sanity vaccine is wearing off?
	Sure, but incrementally.
	And as it's done incrementally, there's still going to be children suffering because they're too permissive.
	Sophie, yeah, therapists shouldn't be letting anyone near gender-questioning...
	Shouldn't let...
	Sorry.
	Yeah, therapists shouldn't be let anywhere near gender-questioning youths.
	A therapist is not a psychologist.
	All this affirming care, self-care, and so on is therapy-speak, not psychology-speak.
	A therapist is someone with much less education that want you to feel good in the moment.
	A psychologist has a long education and is not afraid of being hated in the moment if it means getting the correct diagnosis and they find a better solution long-term.
	Kind of.
	I mean, technically, John Money and Alfred Kinsey were qualified psychologists.
	So the psychological establishment is not above reproach.
	I think you just need to shut down the idea that any kids can consent to being the opposite sex.
	You can't leave that door open.
	It's just too much.
	Like, I'm with Richie.
	Just ban any transgender therapy.
	And stop lying to people.
	You can't become the opposite sex by thought.
	It's just cruel.
	It's the same way as you can't get the demons...
	My uncle couldn't get the demons out of his blood when he's schizophrenic by slitting his wrists.
	You can't do it.
	I will become a radio if I think hard enough.
	Yeah, his uncle said they gave lithium and it really improved it.
	It's like, yeah, it's a perfect example.
	Stop mainstreaming delusion, please.
	Lord Nerovar.
	Hello, mate.
	I saw the story about how to put this stunningly degenerate and bravely predatory individual who got their penis out on live TV. Oh, you've heard of Jimmy Savile.
	How is it permissible for there to be full frontal nudity on TV at any point in time at all?
	I think it was behind the watershed, but yeah, I agree.
	It's just degenerate.
	But no, it's fine because it's trans representation.
	How many children have to be exposed to inappropriate material like that before we say enough is enough?
	Reminder, Channel 4 does naked attraction, so they're like the most deftly subversive network on the airways.
	Base Ape.
	Connor, it would be awesome to hear your thoughts more in depth about the religious aspect of the T movement and the woke movement in wider sense.
	It's long been my opinion that religion is actually something fundamentally human, and the rejection of religion by the woke system has ironically resulted in the foundation of their own religion via the collective subconscious.
	We'd love to watch a deep dive if you seem so fit.
	I do want to do something like that.
	At the moment, I'm currently working on a hangout in future with Carl that I'll drag him into because he promised to do it in the Genealogy of Morals book club that goes through biblical verses and explains why Jesus is not a socialist.
	So I think that might actually be a useful one to follow up with.
	The metaphysics has been displaced by leftism.
	Ross, Connor, you gave me an image nobody needed with, how do you get the moistness with your neo-vagina?
	You're welcome.
	SH Silva, making cis women subservient to women is horribly subversive.
	It's an attempt to normalize the less than 1% of the population as a standard.
	Alpha of the betas, if children are genuinely gender dysphoric, they are genuinely mentally unwell.
	You don't affirm anything by amputating hands or legs of children with limb dysphoria, so why does gender dysphoria get treated differently?
	Believe me, that will happen.
	I mean, you've had people euthanised in the Netherlands and Canada for mental illness, so we're going to get differently abled people will be affirmed.
	Sophie, I am just going to assume this is the exact same group of people that keep showing up to Posey Parker's Let Women Speak rallies and scream and shout that women aren't allowed to speak.
	Men's...
	Man, women's rights has gotten this far, huh?
	Have a speak with your sisters.
	Free Will 2112.
	At some point, you'll be able to ring a bell and they will start chanting their slogans.
	I mean, they're utterly predictable.
	It's the point of Pavlovianism anyway, so...
	Go on, then.
	Tell us why Vox are awful again.
	Alexander Drake says, I can't imagine a better way to recruit for white supremacy than this video of retards.
	I assume it's in relation to the retards who were telling us that, oh, you know what?
	White people are good at being evil.
	Yeah.
	Um...
	Yeah.
	Ironically, I think if there is something in the modern day that does actually create white nationalists, it's white youths being told they're evil, being discriminated against in the education system, and then being told that the white nationalists, the bad guys, don't join them.
	They're not looking out for your interests.
	Yeah, I can see why a 16-year-old kid will become a white nationalist after that treatment.
	Yeah, but that's obviously the plan.
	It's to fractionate us into groups that don't really make much sense, try and homogenize us, raise resentment to the point of where it incites a race war, and as you said, they think they're going to come out on top.
	It's the exact same thing as a dictatorship of the proletariat.
	Redcheck was right, says that these people instinct...
	Yeah, instinct to say that white people are better at negative traits is childish and screams of insecurity.
	Yes, the white people are better at violence and stealing.
	That's why minority crime eclipses...
	No.
	I... It is something funny.
	I was thinking about it while watching that video when running the segment, which is that very often the things you're accused of, when it comes to left-wing politics, they will say, you are this, you are that.
	They will always actually be the worst for whatever they're accusing you of.
	Such as the Soviet Union, honestly, accusing the United States of being a totalitarian society, which no one has any rights, no freedom of speech.
	It's just like, the Soviet Union?
	What the hell am I listening to?
	Yeah, white people, they're the most violent.
	Shaker Silver says, worrying the amount of people in chat saying base to discrimination.
	It really is the racists on both sides are just arguing who should benefit from discrimination, majoritarian or minoritarian society.
	Yeah, the base is the supremacy of the majority or the supremacy of the minority is...
	Just hell.
	I just want to be left alone, man.
	Like, I don't...
	I didn't hate my black Ghanaian neighbours that went to church.
	I hate the people that are running through the streets and machete-ing each other.
	They have the same skin colour and completely different ethos.
	So I don't want to discriminate against one.
	I do want to discriminate against the other.
	On the boundaries of behaviour, not their melanin.
	There's also an obvious point.
	I imagine some people are thinking the idea that...
	So there are differences.
	There is some debate about the majoritarian, minoritarian philosophies.
	So one of the funny ones being Hungary, of course.
	But the idea is not that if you're ethnically Hungarian, you're superior or some such thing.
	It's just we actually want to defend Hungarian ethnicity and not have it wiped off the face of the earth because we've been threatened with that quite a few times.
	I can't blame them for that.
	And that's not discrimination against people with the wrong skin tone or something.
	It's just, can you actually speak Hungarian?
	Do you actually know Hungarian culture?
	Can you make the cakes?
	Lonerva says, I hate how I'm not even surprised about all this race posturing.
	Even the Conservatives have stooped to the low of celebrating an individual for the colour of their skin or their cultural heritage.
	I'm just so sick and tired of it all.
	It's as if the people at the top are speaking an entirely different language to everyone else.
	If this carries on the way it's going, soon they literally will be.
	That's a damning final line, but that's actually quite true.
	I think at some point I will get, speaking of the Conservatives fractionating to identity groups, I will get Albie in here who runs Conservatives Against Racism for Equality for a bit of a debate.
	Because we've never been able to set our political issues even though he's a very nice guy, interpersonally.
	And it'll be interesting for the website.
	I don't think any of these people are riotous.
	I would purge every single...
	No, he's not.
	He's left-wing.
	He won't agree with it.
	He says, oh, I am Conservative.
	No, I'm talking about George Osborne.
	Oh, right, yeah.
	No, no, George Osborne is...
	Golden age of Sino-English relations.
	Yeah, he's Chinese captured.
	Yeah.
	They're just like, oh yeah, well, it's Rishi guy.
	Yeah, brown.
	See, we have those now.
	Get lost.
	I'm so glad a brown person is taking away my bank account.
	Sophie Love Peterson says, first Asian Prime Minister.
	Yes, because the first two, no white male here.
	Cabinet went so well.
	Diversities are strength.
	Yeah, that headline of List Trust's cabinet has no white men has been doing the rounds again.
	Yeah, that lasted long.
	Kenneth Perron says, surely the equalizing of punishment meant that black people couldn't be lynched for minor crimes, but had to be treated the same as white.
	That is the idea.
	They're also the same as us.
	Yeah, we don't want to lynch black people.
	Radical position, I guess.
	But then you have diversity, like, snapping and you're like, no, no, no.
	If you read between the lines, they actually, they wanted to kill black people.
	Why didn't they write that then?
	It's just so expensive.
	It's 1860.
	Yeah.
	If you want to write something racist, go for it.
	It's 1860.
	Nothing was stopping them.
	There is no moss to take off.
	Might get in trouble.
	It is 1866, after all.
	It's the current year.
	Nick S says racism framed as positive discrimination has alas been part of the Australian jurisprudence since the early 90s.
	Oz had a series of ex-discrimination acts introduced in the 80s and 90s, which ran afoul of various affirmative measures, programs that were imported from the United States.
	Yeah, just all criminal.
	The High Court was tangled into knots as to uphold all of these measures.
	I've just realised his name.
	Nick S. Nickers?
	Nickers?
	Yeah.
	Smooth, dude.
	Anyway, but the whole point of we made a bunch of racial discrimination illegal, sorry, legal, and also illegal at the same time where we can't figure out what to do with it.
	It is kind of funny.
	There are a couple of guys in HR in this country who keep sending me stuff in regards to the crap they have to deal with.
	And the funniest one is a fellow who keeps talking about the civil service where he's like, we can't actively discriminate in favor of black applicants, but we can Make all of the advertising for the job available to black applicants.
	Which is totally different.
	Whenever something does get criminalised, finally they'll just go, what about a workaround?
	That's what I was doing during lockdown when I was looking like I was going to leave university after my undergraduate.
	I was looking at jobs and all of the job enrolment programmes emailed to me by Ken were, oh, BAME and disability only.
	I was like, great, thanks.
	I guess I'll shoot myself money caps.
	And on that note, time to end the show.
	So, if you want more from us, losiers.com, of course.
	Go and check out the things.
	Also, go and check out the free things, as I said, because they are only free for a small time.
	It's been a while since we've been on.
	Cheers for the good show, man.
	Appreciate it.
	Otherwise, we'll be back tomorrow at 1 o'clock.

▲