Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 23, 2022 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:30:58

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #464

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	The Lotos Eaters I am joined by Brother Carl and today we're going to be talking about how Andrew Tate has been cancelled.
	He may be a predator but he is trans and also the red pilling of Alec Asparian.
	So, Brother Carl, how you been?
	Hello.
	Oh, very good.
	So you had fun in Afghanistan then?
	Yes, very nice people.
	Lovely atmosphere.
	Wonderful bombings.
	There was a bombing every day, except one day, where there was a shooting.
	And who was the war against there?
	So it's ISIS versus Taliban, and the Taliban won, which is good, because they're now our Middle Eastern partners around the Foreign Office.
	Right, so according to the Foreign Office, we're allies with the Taliban now.
	Against ISIS. Right.
	Because there was no other one else there.
	Well, I mean, I guess better the Taliban than ISIS. Yeah.
	We have to.
	I feel like we're scraping the bottom of the barrel here.
	Yeah, but I mean, it is the Foreign Office, so that is genuinely our situation in the West.
	Yeah, I suppose it would be, wouldn't it?
	I remember George Galloway gave a speech at the Oxford Union speaking about it.
	He was like, one day the Taliban will be the moderates.
	And I was like...
	Well, he was right.
	Yeah, but there we are.
	George Galloway, right about one thing at least.
	Which is that, yeah, so I turned up, did a lot of filming with Lord Miles, and it was good fun.
	Brave Merjadeen fighters in Afghanistan.
	Literally, that is where the foreigners are at now.
	The Rambo 2s.
	Yeah, amazing.
	Met some guys who were out there negotiating with the new government, just being like, it's not directly, but basically everyone in the old embassy is like, hey, can we have it back?
	Because we kind of left a whole bunch of stuff.
	It's in the basement.
	And the Taliban are like, no.
	What's in the basement?
	How'd you get there?
	My understanding is everyone does want to get back, and they're going to work with the Taliban.
	It'll just be a matter of time for the politics to get over.
	Work with the Taliban?
	Yeah, if they hold in power for the next five years, I mean, genuinely, they will be our friends and allies against ISIS. Well, they're not going to get voted out, are they?
	No.
	But anyway, without further ado, I suppose we should get into the show today.
	So we'll start off with Andrew Tate getting cancelled.
	So, the Eye of Sauron has found a new victim, and it's someone called Andrew Tate.
	Now, I have to be honest, I didn't really know who Andrew Tate was before this, and I'd seen, like, the odd clip of him talking in his kind of weird half-British accent, and people had said, oh, you should talk to Andrew Tate, and I remember, like, looking at a few of these clips and being like, I don't really want to.
	I'm not really interested in Andrew Tate's take on anything.
	I don't think he's particularly deep or wise, or, you know, anything else that I could say is a virtue.
	And so it's like, okay, well, you know, and so I just didn't care, and so I just ignored it.
	And then, all of a sudden, Andrew Tate is all anyone in the mainstream Twitter sphere is talking about, and it's like, okay, well, what about him?
	It's like, well, he's an evil misogynist.
	It's like, well, okay...
	But I mean, I guess you would say that, but you say that about literally everything.
	So how is this guy any different?
	And really it's just because he's like the sort of like, you know, manosphere type, you know, life coach for young men to become chants.
	That kind of type.
	I was saying before we started, but like I watched all of his videos.
	Actually irritating though, I kept getting them on YouTube shorts.
	Yeah.
	And I had to start blocking all these channels because there's all these sock channels that just endlessly post clips of him.
	Yeah.
	It's my understanding is apparently he pays for people to do this, but whatever.
	Right.
	But that's not against the term of service.
	No, but it was just the point of the stuff he was making, he would basically talk about bimbo women and say that bimbo women are terrible.
	I'm like, yeah, bimbo women.
	Calum in his Taliban outfit is like, yeah, bimbo women, bad.
	Yeah, well, you know, put them in a nice robe and...
	Cover them modestly.
	You'd have an honourable sister, but Andrew didn't...
	Yeah, but the point is, it's a particular kind of lifestyle that he's offering, and women, certain kinds of bimbo women, as you say, gravitate towards it, and so, okay, well, obviously a feminist isn't going to like it, but somehow we're still trapped in 2012, and somehow the rules from 2012 still apply, and so he got completely cancelled.
	But anyway, before we start, if you want to know exactly how it came to be that feminism became the dominant paradigm of just everything, you can go to loaderseats.com, sign up, and check out my How Elites Are Captured Deep Think to explain just how Tate ended up in trouble.
	And you can see the double-sided narrative that is one of the sections in here that I'm highlighting as to how Tate becomes Mr.
	Evil and the feminists become the innocent angelic victims of their persecution of him.
	Which is just incredible.
	Just look at who's got the whip hand here.
	Who's the one inflicting the damage?
	It's actually the people claiming to be the victims.
	And the double-edged narrative is the method I use to explain why this is the case.
	Very proud of this piece.
	Definitely go check it out.
	Anyway, so Andrew Tate, like I said, I didn't know anything about him apart from a few months ago.
	I was like, oh, he's sex trafficking.
	So I looked into it, and all I found was stuff like this from the Daily Beast.
	They were like, oh, well, he's been...
	Raided!
	And they found two women at his place.
	And it's like, yeah, but they appear to be there voluntarily and no charges were brought against him.
	So it's like, okay, that's actually not sex trafficking.
	And the allegations appear to have originated...
	He lives in Romania.
	And the allegations originated in America.
	So it's just like...
	Yeah, he has boasted previously that being in Romania allows him to subvert the law, so I imagine that's fed a lot of it.
	But I get the feeling that he's a lot of mouth on him as well, actually.
	I get the feeling that a lot of this guy's persona is just him mouthing.
	And it's fine, I don't care, but like...
	The point is, the Romanian policy agency added that no one was charged or arrested yet in the case.
	This was back in April.
	No one's been charged or arrested.
	Okay, well...
	That isn't until proven guilty.
	Yeah, exactly.
	This isn't Romania, so...
	Yeah, charge him with something, and then I'll be like, okay, well, he might have done something.
	You know, take him to court.
	Give him his day in court.
	And so, okay, as far as I can tell, nothing has come of this, but I love the way they frame it.
	King of toxic masculinity.
	This is just his brand.
	You know, it's like, oh, I'm, you know, okay, cool, fine, you know, funny.
	Okay, go on, next one.
	You get, like, articles like this where it's like, oh, these are all these controversial statements.
	It's like, oh, please...
	Oh, do me a lemon.
	Like, ooh, controversial statement.
	I mean, I guess.
	I could not.
	I mean, what these people think is controversial is pathetic.
	But then even if it is, you're just like, yeah, okay, whatever.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Ooh, he flapped his gums.
	Brilliant.
	Yeah, like God died.
	Yeah, exactly.
	And the reason they care is because he had four and a half million followers on Instagram.
	And he didn't have, like, loads for ages.
	And then he just exploded.
	So these viral clips went around of him saying things that apparently, you know, like, Zoomers were like, oh, my God, I've never heard misogyny before.
	And maybe they haven't.
	You know, after everyone else got censored, maybe they haven't.
	They were like, wow, that's so true.
	It's like, wow, that's interesting.
	How all it takes is one guy to say something misogynistic about women for the Zoomer generation to be like, hmm.
	This is interesting and new.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Although I did see, I mean, you know, it may be fake.
	I think it was some Reddit post of some guy saying he took his advice.
	He had his girlfriend and he wanted to find out if the girlfriend really liked him.
	So he took Andrew Tate's good advice of saying he cheated on her.
	Yeah, I saw this.
	And then apparently she got upset and left.
	What should I do, bros?
	And it's like, yeah, it seems like terrible advice.
	All the friends hated him.
	And it's like, that's because it was awful advice.
	Yeah, but I imagine that being one of the things of like, oh my god, he said this.
	Again, it's just dumb stuff on the internet.
	Like, who cares?
	They do say this, right?
	His videos spread hate and threatening ideologies that reach and endanger a significant number of people.
	Andrew Tate is endangering people, is he?
	Yeah.
	I want to know which race he's going after.
	Well, they actually don't say race.
	They don't actually accuse him of being a racist.
	They accuse him of essentially threatening women.
	It's like, okay, I think you're giving him more credit than he deserves, frankly.
	I'm sure he's thrilled with this kind of legendary status.
	And I don't actually care about him.
	I don't have negative things or positive things.
	He's just an internet personality as far as I'm concerned.
	But to make things worse, the majority of his audience are men.
	Of course they are.
	Of course they are.
	So stupid.
	It's like, I don't really like the guy, but it's just, I see, you know, when you see the opposition...
	They make him sound cool.
	Yeah.
	Don't you know he isn't horrible to men?
	I was like, yeah, okay.
	Wow.
	I can't believe young men were interested in hearing what he had to say.
	What did you guys think of Jordan Peterson?
	He wasn't horrible to men either.
	I remember the accusations.
	I remember Kathy Newman saying that he had a male audience.
	Aren't you just raising an incel alt-right army?
	And Jordan Peterson's like, no.
	But even if I was...
	So he was cast in Big Brother in 2016, but was instantly ejected due to these viral videos.
	One of them seemed like hitting a woman with a belt or something, but she's like, yeah, well, it's our sex life, it's consensual, blah, blah, blah.
	So he probably is.
	He probably attracts that kind of woman.
	You know, what do you want?
	He posted homophobic and racial slurs on his Twitter page.
	Okay.
	Have you not been on Twitter before?
	The word Nazi trends every day.
	Yeah, exactly.
	And worse.
	Or Israel.
	Yeah.
	He stated that depression isn't real and that women should bear some responsibility for being raped.
	So, God, okay.
	Yeah.
	He's terrible.
	He's got a website that he makes money out of and they said they hate that too.
	And, yeah.
	So, finally, most of his controversial statements are those that intentionally attack or devalue women.
	These takes include women can't drive.
	The boomerest take of all takes.
	It's like something your dad has said a million times.
	Oh yeah.
	It's like literally all of the humour of my dad's generation focuses around this concept.
	All of it.
	My wife.
	Exactly.
	That's exactly it.
	Men can cheat but women can't.
	Or 18 and 90 year old women are more attractive than 25 year olds because they've been through less dick.
	Okay, so women who aren't massive sluts are more attractive than women are.
	Okay.
	Oh, God.
	When someone stopped this man who's endangering women...
	Yeah, like if you wanted to think statements from him that actually make him sound...
	You'd find an easier job if you knew what you were looking for as well.
	Yeah.
	But when you go for...
	By the way, he thinks women can't drive.
	I mean, anyone over the age of 30 is definitely reading that going, yeah.
	So the main concern, of course, is that Andrew Tate is influencing young men, Callum.
	Young men like you, in fact.
	No.
	Well, no he didn't, because I blocked all his bot accounts.
	Teachers are being urged to listen to what children are talking about in school corridors and be aware of such terms as manosphere to counter sexist social media trends which pupils may have been exposed to over the summer holidays.
	So if we can't brainwash them in the schools, they might think for themselves.
	They might see things on the internet that we don't agree with.
	This is the crux of this entire issue, right?
	Yeah, but it's also very revealing of the school system.
	Just openly telling us our job is actually to indoctrinate your child in thinking a certain way, not to provide a service.
	That is precisely it.
	We're not educating them, we are literally brainwashing them.
	School professionals and child safety charities...
	I am very trusting of these organizations have voiced concerns of videos of misogynistic content creator Andrew Tate have been viewed by millions of social media users over the six-week break.
	In one video, which he was interviewed by another YouTuber, he said he was absolutely a misogynist.
	Adding, I'm a realist, but when you're a realist, you're a sexist.
	There's no way you can't be rooted in reality and not be a sexist.
	You can see how the feminists are like, well hang on a second.
	That's true.
	Men and women are different.
	Yeah.
	In the same video, he called women intrinsically lazy and said there was no such thing as an independent female.
	See, I mean, there you go.
	There's some more character assessments rather than biological aspects.
	UK charity Hope Not Hate recently launched a campaign calling for social media platforms to remove Tate's content, saying it attempts to normalise extreme misogyny and conspiracy theory.
	What conspiracy?
	I have no idea.
	And saying conspiracy theory is not an insult, frankly.
	No.
	But I wonder what the conspiracy is, that men should rise up and oppress women?
	I don't know.
	That's the big male conspiracy?
	But Hope Not Hate have been going really hard on this.
	When you go to their Facebook page, you can just scroll down, you can just see the amount of Andrew Tate content that they've been posting.
	Just keep going.
	Tate, Tate, Tate.
	Non-stop.
	This is all they've been doing for like a week.
	For people who don't know who they are, they like to think of themselves as the British person of the Southern Poverty Law Centre.
	Yeah.
	And they'll be like, oh my god, Nazi, Nazi, Andrew Tate.
	Yeah, exactly.
	It's just like, okay, he's a prat.
	But, like, that's it.
	You know?
	He's not bombing any synagogues or mosques.
	No.
	It's not going to happen.
	He's just an online grifter, basically.
	You know?
	And it's just like, okay, fine.
	You know, who cares?
	But anyway, so the BBC's disinformation reporter, Mariana Spring, provided us with some disinformation.
	She says, Andrew Tate's videos promoting misogyny and targeting women.
	No, the videos target men.
	The videos are specifically for men.
	Imagine that being for women.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Exactly.
	But she is the disinformation correspondent.
	I'm going to gather a female audience on YouTube.
	How are you going to do it?
	By calling them lazy.
	Women aren't independent.
	Literally.
	Prime disinformation from the BBC. I love it.
	Have come to prominence this summer with many teens commenting on just how much he's appearing on their social media feeds.
	His content has raised concerns about the real-world effect of Canada.
	We don't know anything bad to happen, but, oh, I'm concerned.
	This is very much the sort of, you know, concerned, mothering, you know, matronly aspect of the internet coming out.
	I'm like, oh, no, I have concerns.
	So I don't care if you have concerns.
	You know, maybe go and ask your husband.
	No, you don't have one, right?
	Kids, Ralph.
	Why do you not?
	Yeah, exactly.
	You should listen to Andrew Tate.
	I don't know.
	He targets women, doesn't he?
	There was one video from him that I saw Lauren Chen picked up on as well, which was funny.
	Which is, again, it's about bimbo women.
	He's like, if a guy crashes his car, then he'll be like, I'll get a second job, I'll pay for it.
	And then a woman crashes the car and she'll be like, you have money, you pay for it.
	I'm not doing anything.
	And then there's some guy on the street who's interviewing women and asked them.
	And all of them followed the line of being like, no, why would I pay for it?
	He's got money, he should pay for it.
	And all of the women were bimbos, though.
	Well, there we go.
	But anyway, his content's raised concerns about the real-world effect it could have, especially on the younger users exposed to it during their school holidays when they have time on their hands.
	Since then, several sites have made commitments to better protect female users.
	Because female users, they're basically the same as children.
	That's what the BBC thinks.
	Oh, you poor, poor thing.
	Oh, we big daddy social media will come along and keep you safe from the mean Andrew Tate saying things about women.
	Ooh.
	But once again, questions are being raised about the role social media sites play in pushing anti-woman content.
	It's like we're trapped in 2013 forever.
	It does remind me of that.
	Yes.
	Don't you know, women are under attack by what?
	Words that are slightly upsetting.
	On the internet, of all places.
	I can't believe someone said something on the internet you didn't like.
	But anyway, so then the deplatforms began.
	Now, he was banned from Twitter ages ago, because Twitter is Twitter, of course.
	He was banned in 2017.
	I mean, again, most of it's just memes and shitposting.
	That's just most of what he seems to have done.
	But recently, because of all this social media outrage and him appearing in feeds of people who are remarkably sensitive, he got banned from Facebook and Instagram.
	So they were just like, yeah, just no.
	And it's like, okay, but what about it?
	What exactly did he trip?
	And they were like, yeah, we just don't like it.
	It's just icky.
	It's just not our thing.
	They said it was for his...
	something like controversial person policy or something like that.
	I can't remember the exact wording.
	We don't like him.
	Yeah, basically.
	But, you know, Tate was like, well, you know, I've got good people on the case and I trust due process.
	And it's like, oh...
	Oh, mate.
	There's no due process.
	You know, they are going to treat you like you are Satan forever.
	And then, a day or two later, oh, TikTok was next.
	I was like, yep, you're banned from TikTok.
	I don't even think he had an account on TikTok.
	But they do say, oh, we've banned an account belonging to him.
	But the thing is, on TikTok, it was people posting his clips and putting them around themselves.
	So they are just scrubbing Andrew Tate from TikTok.
	You're not allowed to show clips of him talking on TikTok.
	Yeah.
	As if he's that interesting.
	Yeah, but it's, you know, we were saying before, but it's totally true as well.
	It's like, you might not care about the guy, like I don't, but then getting scrubbed like this through means that are just, hope not hate don't like you, therefore you're banned from everything.
	Even existing on there, as you say on TikTok.
	That can be you tomorrow.
	This just isn't a way to run the world.
	Misogyny is a hateful ideology that's not tolerated on TikTok, say TikTok.
	We've been removing violative videos and accounts for weeks, and we welcome the news that other platforms are also taking action against this individual.
	Right, okay, we're going to talk about rapists in the next section who makes their life on TikTok, so...
	Yeah, well...
	They are, of course, using bots to just find clips of his content and just scrubbing it all together.
	And the thing is, okay, well, he still had a YouTube channel, and the YouTube were like, ah, no, I think the public outrage is enough.
	I'm going to need to get rid of that, too.
	So Bloomberg breathlessly reported...
	Oh, brilliant!
	YouTube got rid of him as well.
	It's like, why the hell does Bloomberg care about Andrew Tate?
	Sorry, do you guys not have important things to talk about?
	No, no, no, Andrew Tate.
	Andrew Tate's being misogynistic on the internet, don't you know?
	A YouTube channel associated with it was taken down because YouTube are like, oh, well, it's multiple violations of community guidelines.
	The guy had like 700,000 subscribers and he'd been posting this content for years and it was only today.
	Oh!
	Guideline violations.
	No, it's the Silicon Valley cartel.
	The Eye of Sauron has got together and been like, oh yeah, okay, we've got to destroy this guy because look at the Twitter mob.
	Look at him.
	They're really upset on Twitter.
	Got to get rid of him.
	Got to be done.
	There's no due process, though.
	I mean, if you could say this, you know, policy, this video, there you are, that's a strike.
	Yeah.
	Like, at least everyone can understand, okay, you're at least enforcing some rules.
	Yes.
	But when there is just no rule of law on the internet for who should be allowed to have access to the entire world.
	Yeah.
	And, well, it's decided by, as you say, a handful of people.
	Yeah.
	Every single time.
	A handful of progressive bigots in Silicon Valley who can't take a joke, basically.
	Hope not hate a group based in Britain that organizes against far-right extremism.
	Is Andrew Tick far right?
	Does he even have politics?
	Is being misogynist, is that inherently far right?
	I don't know.
	I don't think it is, actually.
	No, but anyway, they launched a petition in August calling for him to be banned from major social networks, and so everyone was like, yeah, okay, good idea.
	Brilliant.
	Twitch, he did have a Twitch account, as you can see in the headline of this.
	Oh, but that apparently has been closed by the user.
	Sorry, okay.
	Don't know why he'd do that.
	His last method of speaking to the world...
	Oh, he just closed it himself.
	I know nothing more to think about, I guess.
	So he's reduced to having a bit-shoot channel now.
	That's where he is?
	Yep, as far as I can tell.
	That's all I could really find.
	If you can scroll down a bit just so we can see the number of subscribers.
	There's got like 50 subscribers on there or something.
	Is this the official one?
	As far as I can tell.
	I don't know.
	I mean, it might not be.
	But it links to his website, so, you know, I assume so, which he still has for now.
	And so you get, you know, deplatforming works from Hope Not Hate.
	So see, see if we just digitally execute all of these people, then they're gone.
	It's like, well, that is true.
	But that's also the same logic that the Nazis used about, you know, people they didn't like.
	Undesirables.
	Or, you know, the Taliban do on a daily basis.
	Yeah.
	Sure, you think are terrible.
	They posted a thing to their Facebook being like, Yay!
	Isn't this great?
	TikTok has joined Facebook and Instagram and Twitter in permanently banning accounts run by Andrew Tate.
	This is some sort of victory because Tate is a violent misogynist with links to the organized far right.
	The organized far right?
	What are you talking about?
	I'm sorry, but none of that sentence makes sense.
	In the UK, what have you got if you actually wanted to say the far right?
	Maybe national action?
	Which are banned.
	Yeah, they're illegal.
	Yeah, it's a terrorist group.
	Because they made a tweet celebrating killing an MP. If that's how organized the far right gets, which is the banned group that made a tweet.
	Well, you understand, he is creating a dangerous slip road to the far right and poses a genuine threat to the young men and boys he targets.
	Yeah, I forgot.
	Did you go to the march yesterday?
	It was a huge march in London of misogynists unite.
	Yeah, I did.
	I couldn't make it, unfortunately.
	Andrew Tate was leading it.
	Yeah, I was too busy oppressing my wife.
	But the point is, though, of course, we've not heard from anyone on Andrew Tate's side from this, because that's what happens.
	When these mass deplatformings go on, you don't get anyone speaking in your corner.
	And so I found a video, Rory gave me a video, of a woman called Lea Helipern, who is someone who knows Angie Tate personally, and this is what she had to say about him.
	I have had nothing but positive encounters with Andrew Tate.
	He's always been very gentlemanly.
	I think he's very fun.
	He's very charismatic.
	He's very smart.
	I think he's a great businessman.
	He's also, let me say, I haven't mentioned this yet.
	He's also loyal.
	He's loyal to his friends.
	He's loyal to his brothers.
	And that is a huge sign of somebody's character.
	There's a lot of accusations about him online.
	And honestly, I just don't believe them because I've met the guy.
	And because I don't believe them, I will meet Andrew again.
	And we will do another podcast again.
	I mean, I don't believe any of that because I've watched Andrew Tate tell me on YouTube shorts about how he's been disloyal to women or how he's...
	Well, it's his own words.
	It's all mouth.
	But that's the thing.
	It's a front.
	Like, if it's all a front, then he's purposely giving off him being an asshole as well.
	Yes.
	I think it's a selling technique.
	I think he's a big front.
	I think he's basically all mouth.
	And I think that, like...
	It's just nonsense.
	This guy was going to lead some sort of incel uprising or something.
	Yes, obviously.
	It's just stupid.
	And so someone who is essentially kind of a clown in many ways.
	He says funny things that are transgressive against feminism.
	But that's, you know, a natural sort of realignment mechanism when the narrative is all on one side.
	But again, you know, and so if you meet an actual woman and say, well, he's always a gentleman.
	Okay, he's a simp.
	Right, got it.
	Okay.
	Okay, you know, mystique broken.
	I don't know why, but they buy into this.
	And now they've destroyed him.
	It's like, okay, but I just hate seeing the vulgar exercise of power in this way.
	He's got no recourse.
	He can't defend himself now.
	He can't come out and clear his own name.
	He can't speak to the world and say, well, look, they're saying this, but I'm saying that.
	And so, therefore, make your decision.
	It has to be some other just random woman being like, no, he's actually a really nice guy.
	He's always been a gentleman.
	Don't know what you're talking about.
	You know?
	And it's like, okay, well...
	It's just gross.
	Gross to watch.
	Remember, it could be you tomorrow.
	There's no security for anyone online when this sort of stuff happens.
	Even if you don't like the guys, many people don't like Mr.
	Robinson or anyone else.
	It doesn't really matter what it comes down to, how they were treated.
	Yeah, exactly.
	It's your rights as well, and you don't have any, basically.
	Speaking of someone else who probably shouldn't have any rights, but...
	Let's talk about the PE individual who is a predator, but don't worry, he is trans.
	Oh, that's okay then.
	Then we should all give it up.
	And this is something I'm going to put in a sort of narrative here I'm going to make out about the fact that coming back from Afghanistan, it is very clear that the UK is some kind of minoritarian society.
	So you've heard of majoritarian societies.
	Like Hungary and whatnot, who are advocating that we're the majority, we have a right to this place as the majority group, as Hungarians or whatever, and therefore you will culturally be like us, we will pass laws for you to be like us, and you won't transgress against us.
	We, in previous times, would have called this the democratic spirit, actually.
	That the majority should make the rules for how the country is governed.
	And there's the extremes of that, like, well, the majority just votes to kill you, and that's the, you know, political philosophy side of that thing.
	Yes, but we do have human rights.
	Yeah, but not in the UK, because we decided to take the opposite route, and so did the US. So, just going to plug here the Origin of Intersectionality podcast we did together, because it's obviously very relevant, because Kimberley Crenshaw's own ideology is about the superiority or supremacy of the minorities.
	That's explicitly the purpose of it.
	The idea that minorities should, for some reason, have some class consciousness about all being minorities together...
	Form together in a coalition and overthrow the majority.
	Yeah, and then put themselves in that position, which is, again, something that has been carried out in the West and has not been carried out by all minorities having class consciousness or some such thing.
	Leftist activists.
	Actors who want to gain political power by enforcing that ideology upon us.
	And we can just see, like, endless examples of this.
	But we'll start off just mentioning the fact, of course, that it came back from a place that is not a minoritarian society and instead is ruled by people who will just do as they please.
	However, there is certainly put into perspective the madness that we have in the West.
	Because if you go to the next one here...
	Here's a video that I saw Martin put up, and we won't play it because it'll get struck on YouTube.
	But it's a video of a white guy getting beaten the crap out of by three cops.
	They punch the hell out of his head, kicking him, kneeing him, and they don't let up, as you see, for like 30-odd seconds.
	They just keep going.
	And you might be thinking immediately, as an upstanding citizen, well, what did he do before?
	Well, yeah.
	What's the context?
	Why is he being beaten?
	I take it you said the N-word or something.
	I drive a car into a bunch of kids.
	Maybe all kinds of reason.
	Except then you think about yourself.
	I mean, has any BLM community ever asked that question?
	No.
	No.
	Why would they?
	Oh, really?
	Yeah, how do you think that went?
	It started out as a gentleman.
	Gentleman from Redditch.
	So if we go to the next link here, we can read the original story from 2015.
	Man in prison for wicked rape attempt on friend.
	Not the happiest of chaps.
	In May 2013, Mr Crocker contacted the woman by text saying he had just come back to the UK from Spain, which was a lie.
	Asking her if she would help empty some of his stuff from a storage facility.
	Crocker collected a van and drove to the woman's home, and then they travelled back in it.
	He drove into a field.
	Crocker got out and asked her for sex using graphic language, and she made it clear she did not want to.
	So...
	Needs some lessons from Andrew Tate, really, doesn't he?
	That's exactly apparently what he took, which is he tried to force her clothes off, pinned her down, and undid his trousers while continuing to hold her down.
	He told her that if she did not consent, he was going to force himself upon her.
	She did everything she could to try and stop him.
	She punched him in the face three times, but her efforts were in vain.
	He was too strong for her, he touched her sexually, and assaulted her sexually.
	So he's a rapist?
	Yes.
	During the assault, he took hold of her throat and squeezed so hard and long that she lost consciousness.
	Because she had passed out, only one person knows what happened next, but having caused her to lose consciousness, he dumped her body in a field and disappeared in the van.
	He left her stranded and secluded.
	The victim had an injured ankle, but managed to hobble to the road and flag down a motorist, Anne Woolbank, who was passing with her daughter and told them that she thought she had been raped.
	But Mr Crocker denied trying to rape her.
	Claiming it was the woman who had contacted him, asking him to give her a lift to someone, and he said that he had dropped her off and she had been fine.
	Crocker could not explain as to why she left her phone and her keys in his van if she had left voluntarily.
	Yeah.
	So, pretty open and shut case.
	Yeah.
	Very simple.
	Seems that way.
	This dude is an absolute scutback.
	Yeah.
	And the judge went on in here to actually commend the police on, quote, an extremely well-investigated case and an extremely well-prepared case.
	Frankly, I'm surprised there's anyone at that as well.
	Yeah.
	I'm surprised the judge, weren't you, actually did some work.
	Well, you actually sold a rape case for once instead of covering up.
	Good job.
	Surprise!
	But this is in 2015, and the individual on TikTok has admitted that it's them, so the reporters on the previous article have correctly identified this individual, and we'll play the first clip in which he makes an admittance.
	I'm telling you the truth now.
	I got falsely accused of attempting to rape someone.
	I got nine years for it.
	I served four and a half years for it.
	I appealed it every time that I could, but you can't win your appeal if you can't prove that you didn't do anything.
	I'm not gaslighting anything.
	I'm telling you straight up now.
	I don't actually know what gaslighting is myself.
	There you go.
	Where's my mods now?
	Do they?
	I'll probably get my live ended, but I'm trying to put my side across.
	I'm trying to explain to you everything.
	If my live gets ended, people reporting it, then that's it.
	Then I won't be able to tell my side.
	There we are.
	His side is that I didn't do it.
	Okay.
	Wasn't convincing.
	Yeah, not very.
	Especially considering how did the phone and the keys end up in your van afterwards, if she'd left voluntarily.
	Very simple.
	However, this individual goes on to make endless TikToks about their new life.
	I don't know at what point they transitioned.
	Maybe in prison, maybe after prison.
	And they have a wish list here, which did make me laugh.
	This is one item on the wish list for a transgender pride summer dress for women.
	Women's dresses.
	And I love how the image they use as a stock cis woman as well.
	But whatever, we shall move to the TikToks instead, because this is more revealing of the individual.
	As you can see here, here's a bunch of TikToks of them at Pride, celebrating that they are part of the community, and all together.
	So this is a person who is trying to find community because other people don't really want to hang around with a rapist.
	Oh yeah.
	So they became trans and now hang out at Pride events with everyone else.
	And aren't they part of the community now?
	They're part of the alphabet?
	Looks that way.
	Part of the rapist alphabet, maybe.
	There's more clips as well.
	This is the Pride one was previously, but then there's this one here, which is they decide to go and talk to the police, which...
	Pride police hanging out with the rapist.
	Yeah, and this is a really awkward interaction as well, because the individual in question decides to mention, oh, I haven't even been arrested today.
	And the police are like...
	Should we arrest you?
	Why would that be the case?
	I think we have a clip of that one.
	Let's play that.
	And this is the police with their LGBT... And for strange reason, I haven't been arrested today by the police.
	You need to be arrested.
	Well, I was the other day I got arrested, but I haven't today, people.
	But look, this is Norwich Police.
	Norfolk Police?
	Norfolk Police.
	There we go.
	With the LGBT, the father did to the march.
	Having an awesome time.
	There you have it.
	I'm part of the community, lads.
	I'm part of the LGBT team.
	It's like, yeah, I don't think I really want you around here.
	I don't particularly, but what do I know?
	But there you have it.
	And also the fact that they only served four years for this rape, which, okay, there we have it.
	However, we should move on because they also then went on to admit that they were arrested and, quote, because I was bad with a bunch of emojis.
	Oh, wow.
	Okay, don't worry about it, then.
	Yeah, I mean, you were arrested for raping a woman, but, you know, because it was bad.
	Trust me.
	But there we have it.
	I mean, just one of the worst people on Earth, a rapist.
	I mean, I think we can say that.
	I would say so, yeah.
	But don't worry.
	Like, accepted by the Alphabet community, accepted on TikTok as an individual who should be able to, you know, build 10,000 followers and have a life as a trans TikToker, because isn't that quirky?
	I mean, I suppose the argument would be, well, they went to jail, served the time, and therefore...
	100%.
	I could get that argument.
	However, that is not how it is portrayed in the media.
	And as you can see, it got exposed and was like, yeah, hang on, this alphabet hero of yours is not just ha-ha quirky hanging out at the pride parades.
	It actually has a dark past.
	And it very much reminded me of a previous example, obviously in Hollywood, where else?
	Kevin Spacey, where you may remember where he came out and said, whoa, whoa, whoa, I'm being alleged to be a nonce, so I am gay.
	Right, okay.
	Good defence, Kevin.
	It's not really much of a defence, but there you have it, which is, regardless of what you've done, I feel like it's very much a culture in the West that if you can claim you're part of a minority, you should therefore be able to get away with it, as Kevin tried, and as we see with the power dynamics in the West.
	And we can see it play with gays against groomers who have been banned.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, that's a good one.
	This was up when I made this segment, but...
	Oh, they've been suspended again?
	Yes, once again.
	Right, because I covered this the other day, because they were temporarily suspended.
	We got their account back, and now they've been suspended again, right?
	Thankfully I wrote down what they wrote, so we'll just read that.
	So, gays against groomers, of course, so to write out, woke progressives that sexualise, indoctrinate, and medicalise children want us to stop calling them groomers.
	And we will, as soon as they stop grooming children.
	It's a very simple solution.
	I can see why they got banned.
	Yeah, and there you have it.
	So, woke progressives sexualise and indoctrinate children.
	Woke progressives, those are the ones that need to be dealt with, which come in all stripes, all sexualities, races and genders and blah blah blah.
	So how do you think the left took that?
	Oh, it was a personal attack.
	Yeah, against the alphabet community.
	Yeah.
	Unironically, if we go to the next tweet here, we have some verified checkmark.
	Gays against groomers got suspended permanently.
	Twitter reversed it.
	Then they went on Tucker Carlson.
	Now they feel emboldened to continue using the groomer label to blatantly slander LGBTQ people.
	It's just like, right, okay.
	I saw a tweet the other day.
	I posted it on my Facebook account because it was just amazing.
	It went along the lines of, if we have a paedophile purge, then this will be damaging to the left as a whole.
	Yeah.
	I was like, really?
	That's fascinating.
	We all self-report.
	Yeah.
	You're like, woke progressive sexualised kids, we need to get rid of them.
	Well, why are you going after the LGBT community?
	I was like, no, nobody mentioned that.
	And in fact, Gaze Against Groomers responded with that, but we can't show you it because it's banned.
	But the next tweet here was them saying that we said woke progressives that sexualise, indoctrinate, and medicalise minors.
	Nobody did we say anything about LGBTQ people.
	It's just such big self-report, isn't it?
	You are what you respond to.
	Yeah, every time.
	The fact that you immediately associate the groomer word with our community says a lot more about you than it does us.
	Talk about hateful conduct.
	And they were banned for that, presumably, because they're now gone.
	For pointing this out.
	But again, it just comes down to, as you can see with that verified checkmark, it was like, yeah, well, you know, we woke progressives might groom kids, but at least we're part of the alphabet.
	I'm like...
	This isn't a defence.
	This is not a way any other country would work, but in the West, this is something that people think they can get away with as an argument.
	But they can get away with it, that's the thing.
	Because...
	The power structures are set up to defend them.
	Yeah, this minoritarian society is what reigns supreme.
	I mean, Kimberley Crenshaw's ideology in sectionalism is exactly what runs our institutions and therefore people think is a valid defence.
	It's saying, well, I am a member of minorities.
	I mean, this is exactly, going back to the Andrew Tate clip, this is exactly why he was banned.
	Protecting the minority that is women.
	It's like they're the majority.
	What are you talking about, anyway?
	Well, technically the minority are feminists.
	You could argue.
	I guess.
	But it's just...
	Holy feminists.
	Awful.
	And then we'll move on, because it just...
	It also, just looking back at the West, I mean, this is what facilitates so much nonsense that we have to deal with on a daily basis, obviously.
	And this is just the latest example of absolute nonsense that is being denied, let's say.
	So here's the science, as it is, the economist here, who are reporting, okay, we have a look at monkeypox.
	The results are not very promising for our narrative.
	99% of confirmed cases are in men and amongst a third of cases for which more detailed information is available.
	97% are in men who have sex with men.
	Gay or bi men.
	Yeah.
	Presumably.
	I don't know why.
	I don't know what the statement is.
	I don't know if it's because of trans things that people don't want to know what a man and a woman is now.
	Possibly, but they're talking about the activity themselves because the identity might change or be fluid or something like that.
	An activity is something you've engaged in, so that's concrete, right?
	So men who have sex with men, okay, well, you know, that's...
	At least narrow that down.
	That is at least specific.
	Yeah.
	You know, men who have sex with men, well, 97% of those cases are, that's where the monkeypox is.
	Yeah, and it's not all gay and bisexual men.
	It is those diagnosed tended to engage in high-risk sexual activity.
	In Britain, about a third of people testing positive reported having 10 or more partners in the three previous months.
	So, degenerate gay and bisexual men.
	People going out on sex orgies.
	As we have witnessed some of the more high-profile cases of journos.
	I love that.
	Ten or more.
	It could just be any number.
	It could be 30.
	About three months.
	90?
	Who knows?
	There we have it.
	So, they say in here, it is increasingly clear that the disease is almost always transmitted through sex.
	Well, I'm shocked.
	Where known, 91% of cases are reported to be contracted through sexual encounters.
	Only on rare occasions has the virus been passed on in other ways from someone to household members, including children.
	So it is possible, but incredibly rare.
	So if it happens a lot to children, I would be very sus.
	And I can hear the hmm going on.
	They continue.
	How did the dog get anal lesions, Callum?
	Sharing bed covers with the dog beds?
	Yeah, I'm not buying that one either.
	They say, Will monkeypox see sustained spread in the general population?
	One recent paper, which has not yet been published in peer-reviewed journals, suggests that this is completely unlikely.
	Too few adults are having the number of sex partners needed.
	Which...
	As if there's a goal.
	Yeah.
	As if, you know...
	Too many people are eating meat.
	It's damaging the environment.
	Nurgle over here is what he loves.
	It's not working.
	There needs to be more orgies going on.
	But not happening.
	So they say it's not going to happen and eventually we'll just die out.
	It's the current rate in which it's being transmitted.
	But they also say in here, they're also assuming that the sexual transmission and outbreaks will quickly hit a dead-on, which is not mentioning any of the vaccines.
	I happen to have met a doctor on the way back from Afghanistan who was Belarusian, and he was out there.
	He got paid 10 grand a month, tax-free, which, you know, is good money.
	But he was telling me, he was like, yeah, no, no one is worried about this.
	Just take smallpox vaccine, it's fine.
	But smallpox caffeine, not make money.
	That's a good point.
	Literally.
	Everyone apparently in the medical profession seems to be blackpilled on vaccines at this point in defense of who's making money.
	And that's the only thing they're blackpilled on.
	Nothing else.
	YouTube.
	But we should go to the next link because there's the science.
	There's how it is.
	However, of course, minoritarianism, so we can't talk about that.
	And instead, we must have the New York Times who come to you with this news.
	How to stop your kids getting monkeypox.
	Don't have sex with them.
	It's probably the main thing.
	I'm just not worried about it, weirdly.
	Yeah, most people don't have that problem.
	Don't share bed clothing with them, because there's a small chance that might give them it as well.
	In your household of men who have orgies every other night.
	Yeah, anyway, but there's the advice someone might give you if they're following the science and would actually deal with the reality.
	However, the New York Times went with, Why the hell would you write that?
	What kind of sub-IQ do you have to have to write something like that if you genuinely believed it?
	Well, I don't know if they genuinely believe it.
	You'd have to be like Equatorian Guinea levels of IQ. It's more that you think that your readership is at that level of IQ. It's not necessarily that you believe it, but you think they will believe it.
	They're sufficiently primed through the years of propaganda that we've had so far to believe just anything you say.
	That's all I can imagine.
	Just wear a mask.
	That'll stop the sexually transmitted disease.
	I mean, technically, one way, but the rest of it, rightio.
	But they have it.
	I mean, just there's the nonsense example I'm giving you there.
	But if we go to the next one, of course, I could have given endless lists of nonsense examples.
	I mean, David here always reminds us of another minoritarian problem in which we talk about child prostitution crises going on in 2001.
	No such thing.
	Again, there's a lot of hmm today, isn't there?
	Because it's just goddamn ridiculous what Westerners are made to put up with.
	I mean, like, honestly printing such things and thinking anyone's going to believe this and not see immediately thrown.
	Why are so many children telling us prostitution, Callum?
	Yeah.
	If you scroll down on this one, Michael, just to the end line there as well.
	In Rotherham, alone, for example.
	I'm just not even going to read it.
	Yeah.
	Goddammit.
	80 girls are said to be working as prostitutes.
	Working.
	Prostitutes.
	Right.
	Not child rape victims.
	But there you have it.
	There's another example, and there are endless numbers of examples of just the nonsense we expected to live in the West because minoritarianism.
	Like, just Kimberly Crenshaw's ideology of the supremacy of minorities as some kind of group that should work together is a reality in which we live.
	And it's also the reason they scream so much about Hungary and Poland, of course, which I thought I'd end this on, which is a very European outlet, caring about the illiberal Hungarians and Polish.
	Majoritarianism!
	Oh no!
	Yeah, it's creeping authoritarianism!
	Right, okay.
	Well, Hungary has many problems, but none of those problems are the problems we have in the West.
	I bet it doesn't have very much problem with monkeypox or grooming gangs.
	No, no Rotherham issues.
	Trans rapists.
	No Brighton issues.
	But it's weird.
	I mean, their problems are definitely different to ours.
	Yeah, and the problems we have, they don't have, which is some kind of miracle.
	Maybe we should learn about how to solve our problems because they don't have them, but instead, no, that mustn't be learned.
	However, I also, you may remember David, I was speaking to him about this, and he said, yeah, you know, Hungary's got some problems with, you know, government overreach and all that.
	But he mentioned he was hanging out with the anti-Orban, so the people who don't like all of this, and they were complaining, and the youth were complaining.
	He says, but do you want to go to New York for a university or California?
	And they went, no.
	I'm like, really?
	I was like, why?
	I was like, you've seen them?
	Like, even the anti-Orban types are like, hey, you know, I'm not mad.
	Yeah, yeah.
	This is bad, but not America bad.
	But they have a situation here which they list liberalism versus majoritarianism.
	As if those two were always in opposites, which isn't true.
	Right.
	They give you an example.
	Referenda could also conceivably be a main feature of raw majoritarianism.
	Indeed, Swiss referenda have resulted in hard clashes between the majority will and human rights guarantees.
	Right, so democracy is the problem.
	Right, okay, I mean, that's interesting that they've finally arrived at that position.
	You might have taken a political science course and be thinking, yeah, well, you know, I read that the majority could just vote to kill the lamb, and therefore this could be bad.
	Don't they realise they're openly arguing for minority aristocracies like this?
	I mean, that's how...
	That is the goal.
	That is how everything is being treated?
	Yes.
	Like, it's like an aristocracy of minorities?
	Yes.
	Yes, 100%.
	That's what I'm trying to get across.
	That is how our society works.
	And they give us, as they say, you know, couldn't it be bad if the majority were in charge, though?
	Because they might have a referenda on minority rights.
	And it's like, yeah, in the West, we're not going to have a vote on bringing back slavery.
	It's not happening.
	So the example they give as to, you know, horrible things the West might do, though, as exhibited by the 2009 vote to ban the construction of new mosque minarets in Switzerland.
	There we have it.
	There's your big bad example of what majoritarianism will bring to the West.
	Oh no, if only there was a country where Muslims could build mosques.
	No, they still can.
	I mean, that's the thing.
	The referendum is, you can have your mosques, just we want the architecture to fit in with a nice, Swiss, lovely village.
	And the Muslims are like, well, fair enough, you know.
	Yeah, it's not the Muslims complaining about that, is it?
	Muslims are like, you know, in our country we can do as you wish, in your country we should do as you wish.
	We can still worship, that's fine.
	And the EU comes in and is like, not on my watch, don't worry.
	I wouldn't have liberal compromises.
	This is illiberalism.
	Isn't there someone you forgot to ask?
	But there you have it.
	And that's just what I wanted to talk about.
	Just a reflection on what the West is coming back from Afghanistan.
	And certainly, it's some kind of minority aristocracy that runs all of these countries from the top down.
	I mean, as you can see, even in that referendum, the Swiss Muslims, of all things, were just like, okay, fine, whatever.
	And then the EU is coming and being like, but don't you know this is evil?
	No, we don't care.
	We don't care.
	We can get along fine without you.
	But it really is the triumph of intersectionalism.
	100%.
	100%.
	It really is.
	It's awful.
	And the thing is, right, okay, so let's go on to the next one, because this all ties together quite nicely with what I'm going to call the red pilling of Anna Kasparian, young Turk's host, who thinks that actually unchecked crime and violence in society might not be a good thing.
	From a progressive, she said this.
	From a progressive.
	Well, it has obviously garnered a great deal of backlash because progressives are like, we thought you were a progressive, Anna.
	And she was like...
	Stab, stab, stab!
	And she's like, well, hang on a second.
	I am, but I also think that maybe random men punching women in the face in the middle of the street isn't progressive.
	And they're like, you're out.
	You're out of the club.
	Get out.
	You're a disgusting right-wing bigot.
	You're a fascist, basically.
	I'm not even joking.
	There have been people, progressives, literally calling her fascist.
	And it's like, right, okay.
	That's mad.
	That's absolutely mad.
	Like, you guys have lost the plot.
	Oh...
	But I think that there's actually...
	Believe it or not, Friedrich Nietzsche actually nailed all of this in his Genealogy of Morals, which I covered recently on the website, because there is a distinction between the traditional and progressive views of justice and the purpose of this justice.
	The traditional view of justice is a kind of...
	A kind of paying back of the suffering inflicted on the community on the perpetrator, which is why he's punished.
	He's punished to make him suffer in the same way that he's made other people suffer.
	Whereas progressive justice is to render him harmless.
	And ideally, the most ideal point of progressive justice is that there's no punishment at all.
	That's the end goal.
	And Nietzsche does a really great job of explaining why this is, and I go through it on this podcast.
	And the problem Anna has is she's falling back on a traditional view of justice, as in the person who commits a crime should be punished for it because of the damage they have done to someone else and, by extension, society itself.
	Whenever you get into thinking about progressive worldviews, it's scratched slightly below the surface.
	It's insane.
	It's completely insane.
	But the point that they're going for is that the society is so powerful it doesn't need to punish its criminals.
	That's what they're aiming for.
	The worst they want to do is render them harmless.
	It's like, right, but that hasn't worked.
	It hasn't worked anywhere.
	And what this is, is Anna Kasparian learning that progressive justice is no justice at all.
	So let's begin with the problems that Asian people have been facing in places like San Francisco and Los Angeles and various other progressive Californian cities.
	You get this, you know, some guy who's of a certain ethnic persuasion, and this is a very common, and I'm not the one who frames it this way, but this is...
	Well, the FBI do.
	The FBI frame it this way.
	Black people targeting Asians in the streets.
	This is a guy trying to get into his home.
	A black guy comes up with a gun, robs him.
	Could have gone worse, to be honest.
	Worse are the random street attacks that you get, which, if you go to the next one, you go, like, this guy just randomly walked up to a 30-year-old Asian man, beat him up, fractured his nose, chipped his tooth, made anti-Asian remarks, then punched him multiple times in the head.
	Hashtag stop Asian hate.
	I kind of want to know the remarks were...
	I mean, it's bad enough that he obviously beat him for no goddamn reason, but to then turn around and go, ching-chong, ching-chong, and leave.
	That is actually the sort of thing they say, yeah.
	That's what I'm imagining.
	Yeah.
	No, no, that's literally what happens.
	The next one is a chap who's attacked with a box cutter, just randomly accused of an Asian, 59-year-old Asian seamstress.
	It's an old Chinese lady, an old Asian lady.
	Guy's like, right, I'm just going to hurt you in the street.
	I'm just going to do what I can to hurt you.
	Isn't he doing this to bring down the white supremacists in the United States?
	I have no idea.
	Honestly, it seems that there's a deep strain of real xenophobia in this particular minoritarian community.
	The next one is just attacking elderly Asian women again.
	Just a racist man attacks two Asian women in the street, just in San Francisco.
	Racist man.
	Well, he was a racist.
	What clothes was he wearing?
	He was black, but he's obviously a racist.
	You can imagine the news articles just being like, racist man.
	Oh, I'll get to that in a minute.
	Oh God, sorry.
	But yes, and so it's not at all surprising.
	Like, this person is an Asian crime report Twitter account.
	But you can see, just walking down the street, and then he sees them, and he just attacks them.
	It's just, oh...
	Well, I just walked past you.
	Hey, you know, screw you.
	I hate you.
	You're Asian.
	In fact, why don't I just come up and start attacking you in the street?
	Just what the hell is this?
	Right, and so this person's like, Asians live in fear daily walking down the street and can never relax.
	It's like, yeah, I'm not surprised if that's the sort of thing that actually happens to you in San Francisco, right?
	The next one, again, the stuff...
	I mean, if this was happening to black people by white people in San Francisco...
	We're going to be the end of the world.
	The Stop Asian Hate hashtag doesn't seem to be working.
	A seven-year-old might have just...
	But look at this.
	Four black kids just kicking an old Asian woman around on the ground.
	What the hell is this?
	Look at that.
	Sorry, it's just where you said the hashtag.
	Do you remember the old bands they were giving out in Sweden?
	Yeah, yeah.
	That said, please don't rape me in Swedish to girls so the Somali men wouldn't rape them anymore?
	It wasn't written in Somali, honestly.
	Yeah, they can't read that.
	Yeah, exactly.
	And then you get these just amazing takes.
	Like, oh, why is this not a hate crime?
	Forget the next one.
	There's a bunch of Asian kids beating up a black kid.
	It's like, oh, this is a hate crime.
	They were yelling the N-word.
	It's like, okay.
	I mean, it probably is a hate crime, to be honest.
	Yeah, as you described, you could do that.
	But then, surely the other way around, they were all hate crimes too.
	Okay, good.
	Now we can compare the numbers.
	Yes, exactly.
	And the thing is, they seem to just generally be quite racist against Asians.
	Like, genuine racism.
	If you go to the next one, this is...
	No, actually, yeah, we'll go for this one.
	This is a woman who, like, is just telling this Asian guy to go back to China and being incredibly rude to him.
	Just randomly on the street.
	So, a Chinese person.
	Piss off back to China.
	Go back to Africa.
	No.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Exactly.
	And then she hits him, obviously.
	It's like, what the hell are you doing?
	This is the normal ethic towards Asian people in San Francisco, in Los Angeles, in, you know, wherever else.
	If you go to the next one, right?
	So, you've got this, um, the former San Francisco commissioner is Mr.
	Chu.
	If you scroll down a bit, you can see that, of course, he has an Asian heritage.
	And he was attacked on, in August, around 7.30pm, uh, just in the streets of the market neighbourhood, according to authorities.
	Stuffed a cut to the face, swelling, bruising, uh, to the face, fractured left clavicle.
	The assailant did not speak during the attack.
	The motivation was unclear.
	The assailant.
	The assailant.
	Turns out it was a guy called Derek Yearby.
	Didn't speak to him before the attack, just saw a Chinese guy and was like, ooh, I'm going to get him.
	Kicked the crap out of him, fractured his collarbone.
	If you can go to the next one, you can see a picture of Derek Yearby.
	Something else I'm also noticing.
	I don't think all these guys are wearing MAGA hats, as we've always been told.
	Yeah, it's weird.
	Not much in the way of Trump supporters.
	Do you remember how it was always said that it's because Trump said China virus?
	That's why all this is happening.
	Yeah, I'm sure these guys were like, right, I've got off Truth Social.
	And now I'm going to go show those Asians who's boss here.
	Yeah, it's quite awful, right?
	And so you've got, like, articles like this from The Guardian being like, why are all these Asians buying all these guns?
	Mysteries.
	You know, the next one.
	Like, you can see, like, they're buying guns in record numbers.
	What's caused this surge?
	So there's a 43% spike in Asians buying guns in America.
	Did they get the answer in The Guardian, or...?
	Well, The Guardian says...
	Crime's gone up.
	It's racism.
	Obviously.
	Come on, you knew it was going to be racism, right?
	And so a peer-reviewed study from the University of Michigan found that it's racism.
	More so than the surge in attacks against Asians.
	One chap they interviewed said that his decision to buy a gun was shaped by the Black Lives Matter protests during the pandemic, which have shattered his trust in law enforcement.
	In the past few years have brought to light how the police are with people.
	You've seen people get shot and killed by the police.
	Do you really trust they'll serve and protect us?
	It's like, really?
	Really?
	Really, it's the police not doing their job that makes you think, I need to carry a gun.
	The whole thing is framed as if it's racist white people doing this, obviously.
	But isn't it framed as racist Asian people who are like, I need a gun because...
	No, no, no, because the Asians are the victims of what's happening.
	Okay.
	There's no getting around.
	There's too much video footage.
	Has Whitey done this?
	Well, that's the thing.
	I'm sort of riddled as to how on earth, like, black man hits Asian man.
	Asian man buys gun for future.
	The white man did this.
	I can't believe Whitey done this again.
	That's basically what it is, right?
	Because these are just evil viral stories, taken out of context.
	Don't know what the context could possibly be, where four black youths are stamping on the face of an elderly Asian woman.
	Don't know what that context is, but I don't write for the San Francisco Chronicle, right, where they say, well, this study says they're just manipulative social media accounts.
	They're using viral crime stories to stoke division between black and Asian communities.
	Right, that's stoking division.
	Stamping on their face, randomly attacking the street, that's not stoking division.
	This is the thing that stokes division, right?
	And so one very progressive Asian-American and Pacific Islander group is sounding the alarm.
	It's like, really?
	That's what you're sounding the alarm about, is it?
	Whitey.
	Whitey on social media.
	Sounding the alarm about him.
	It's not the stampings, not the box cutter attacks.
	No.
	Right, okay, fine.
	I mean, this feeds into the minoritarianism again.
	Yes, it does.
	In Rotherham as well.
	It wasn't the crime that was the problem.
	It was the groups complaining about the crime.
	Yes.
	Those people were making, well, racism because they were pointing out that a certain group were engaged in it.
	Yep.
	And so Jonathan Ong says, don't fall for it.
	There's nothing bad happening.
	This is just propaganda.
	He's from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, who worked on the study.
	As he's giving a speech, just...
	What?
	Like, they literally say, right?
	So anonymously run social media accounts, vloggers, and alternative news sites, disseminating powerful shock imagery in the form of CCTV footage, graphic photographs of bloodied Asian bodies, and recontextualized news stories to fearmonger the Asian American community and drive a wedge between it and other communities of color, and recontextualized news stories to fearmonger the Asian American community and drive a wedge Any others?
	Are the Asians also fearful of, you know, Mexicans?
	No, no, no.
	They never mention Mexicans, weirdly.
	Mexicans don't seem to be saying nasty things to Chinese people.
	Not Europeans?
	Slavs?
	Afghans?
	But of course, it's really the whites that are the problem.
	And this is exactly what they say in this.
	San Francisco data from the FBI shows that white people are largely behind local hate crimes.
	Okay.
	That's what all the videos show as well.
	That's all I need to know.
	What percentage of the local people are white, just out of interest?
	We don't have that detail.
	Because I know what it's going to be.
	It's going to be like, well, 51% of the hate crimes are from white people.
	They make up 80% of the population there or something.
	So, nothing to worry about.
	Yep, and so basically Asian people be aware that white people are evil in San Francisco.
	Anyway, so this is the context in which Anna Kasparian did this particular segment talking about how, for some reason in California, the criminals are just being let off from all the crimes they commit.
	Now, you may remember that it's legal to steal up to like $950 worth of goods from a store.
	I don't remember this.
	You don't remember that?
	What?
	In California, they decriminalized petty theft.
	So thefts of up to something...
	I think it was about $950, something like that.
	Police won't prosecute for.
	Per trip.
	You can take $900 worth of stuff.
	I actually don't know whether it's per trip or...
	Because I'm thinking, that's not very pay.
	I mean, I assume it's per trip.
	Why bother going to work?
	But you've seen all of the sort of gang lootings, the raids and stuff like that.
	Well, that's California's response to it, right?
	It's like, well, we'll just decriminalise it.
	Because they're poor people, they're victims of society, they need those goods more than the stores.
	And a bunch of major stores, like, you know, like Walmarts and stuff, have just closed in certain areas.
	Because they're just like, okay, well, we're not going to operate here.
	Because it's not safe.
	And so Anna's like, okay, well, this actually isn't very sensible.
	It seems worthwhile prosecuting crime.
	Now, she's not talking about the property crime.
	She's talking about actual physical violent crime.
	And so she's, you know, as you can see, why violent criminals not serving jail time in California?
	Well, that's because jail time is oppressive.
	Jail time is an expression of the white supremacy, Anna, and it's actually this society that has failed these people, now penalising these people for its own failure, which is the progressive view, and so it's right that the violent criminal is just let out onto the streets.
	And so Anna's like, look, okay, I'm a progressive, I'm all for progressive reforms, but shouldn't we punish people who murder people?
	Well, if you did that, you'd be supporting the white supremacist crime-to-jail pipeline.
	Yeah.
	So we need to shut that down.
	Yeah, no, that's exactly right.
	And, you know, that's a very right-wing perspective, to want to punish criminals.
	And there was a progressive response to this, which was amazing.
	Now, I first saw this tweet, like, floating around, not realising that this guy was, like, a left-winger.
	Because, I mean, it sounds like the sort of thing a right-winger would say, right?
	Right.
	I've never seen the Young Turks show, but several people have sent me videos of this person recently.
	I've only seen a more confused and dishonest presentation of public safety issues.
	It's a mix of false police union copaganda and profound ignorance.
	I'd be happy to curate a panel to educate the Young Turks on debate Anna Kasparian or anyone else.
	It seems important to correct such dangerous right-wing propaganda about the role of criminal punishment bureaucracy in our society.
	Protecting people from murderers is right-wing propaganda.
	Yes.
	Believing in the crime-to-jail pipeline.
	Yes.
	And so Anna responds to this, saying, well look, she's actually been very reasonable on this for once.
	I don't think there's much to debate.
	A violent criminal who was charged with kidnapping and beating his partner was released from prison one day after he got a 180-day prison sentence, then proceeded to murder a cop in a botched robbery.
	She's such a right-winger.
	That's not bad, is it, Anna?
	You Nazi!
	The levels of...
	You have to do so little to be based anymore in that community in San Francisco.
	You have to say, maybe physical crime is bad.
	Property crime's okay, but maybe actually murdering people.
	I mean, you would think that there would be a limit, but there isn't, right?
	And so someone replies to this saying, well, except the anecdotal nonsense is entirely being pushed by Anna and not Alex.
	She picked a single case to make everyone S their pants.
	Literally no different from what Fox News does.
	Basically Fox News at this point, right?
	And so she replies to this and being like, well, look, homicides in LA haven't been this high in 15 years.
	I'm not using anecdotal evidence, but whatever.
	You guys are crazy, which they are, right?
	And she's not wrong, obviously.
	I looked this up, you know, in the last year there were 400 nearly reported homicides.
	Well, this is the kind of fun Fox News would do.
	Yeah.
	Which is, you know, getting the data together, presenting it.
	Getting the FBI data.
	400 people died in the last year in Los Angeles from murder.
	It's just terrible.
	Okay.
	So more progress is piled on.
	Someone called Tanner Ganeva was like, you're complaining about this homeless guy who got off easy with $5,000 bail.
	How much do you think they earn?
	So actually begging can be quite lucrative, believe it or not.
	But she wrote this Substack article, which I found fascinating, right?
	Because this is based on the...
	There's a video that we'll probably end up seeing as we go through this, of just a little old Asian lady wandering in the street, and a black guy clocks her, and then roundhouses her in the face, and she's just smacked to the floor, and she's just laying on the floor.
	And Anna's just like, is that acceptable?
	Is that what feminists support?
	All the panel are going, yes, yes.
	She's going, hang on.
	Exactly, right?
	And in response to her being like, is it very progressive for a black guy to punch an old woman in the face?
	Well, he's black.
	She's Asian.
	She's rich.
	She must be.
	Oh, she's not bloody rich.
	Her race is rich.
	That's probably how they look at it.
	So this person's like, you know, oh, early this month, a subway cleaner was assaulted by a homeless man with a long record of arrests.
	The young Turks Anna Kasparian is really outraged by it.
	Why shouldn't she be?
	Just this random homeless guy belts this woman in the face.
	And I was like, well, I'm going to turn a blind eye for that.
	And so how about providing homeless people suffering from clear psychiatric problems with drugs and therapy?
	They need to get their lives under control as well as stable permanent housing.
	There's actually an answer to this, right?
	I was talking to Arch about this a while ago.
	And in Norway, they were like, yeah, well, that's what we're going to do.
	It turns out they just don't stay there.
	They'll just leave.
	They actually do well for that in the United States.
	They're probably doing California, yeah.
	Yeah, in LA for veterans, there's this building where you have to go, and you have to be clean.
	You can't get drunk, you can't use drugs while you're there, and they'll take care of you.
	And there's just lines of homeless tents of veterans who are like, no, we're not going to do that.
	And this is portrayed as some kind of patriotic act, because they're not having those restrictions on their lives.
	But I look at them and just think, yeah, but you're all homeless and high on drugs.
	Like, I appreciate your service, but what the hell?
	How is this a good position for you to end up in?
	But she ends this with this, right?
	I'm not sure why progressive and liberal women pundits and reporters have started carrying out.
	Just this guy wallops this woman in the face.
	It's like, what were you carrying out for?
	It's like, sorry, is that...
	Oh, God.
	And so, you know, if you go to the next one, you see this.
	As someone who claims to be progressive, this is in response to this Substack article, Anna Kasparian's attitude towards the issue of cash bail is regressive in the extreme, and she doesn't at all seem to be interested in learning the facts about the issue.
	You posted that in response to a woman getting belted in the face, and the guy only getting a five grand bail.
	And he's been arrested 41 times?
	Why does he have any bail?
	Yeah.
	I mean, that should be the natural response.
	Yeah.
	And Anna just responds to this being like, well, look...
	And this is the video.
	Just...
	Why?
	Why not?
	Right?
	This man was arrested 41 times.
	After this incident, he was released and went on to send a subway worker to the hospital with a broken collarbone.
	But according to this, crime reported the man committing the assault is breaking the bones of the real victim.
	Yeah, welcome to progressives, Anna.
	She passed out there as well.
	Yeah.
	Welcome to being a progressive.
	The guy doing the hitting is the victim in the progressive mindset.
	That's correct.
	Because the woman who's not doing the hitting represents a society at large that has failed the man doing the assault.
	It is an inversion of values that you are looking at as a progressive.
	And you are relying on traditional notions of justice, as in the man committing the act is the instigator and the villain here.
	That's why they're calling you a fascist.
	And she points out, look, if this were Carl Rittenhouse, you'd be baying for blood.
	It's like, yeah, because Carl Rittenhouse is white.
	Yes, I know.
	It's almost like the left has no goddamn standards.
	Goddammit, man.
	I mean, I love it.
	I kind of love she's taking these little baby steps.
	It's like, hang on, maybe my network and my life's work is based on BS? Yeah.
	But...
	How can these people all be in favour of the guy punching the woman?
	We're progressives!
	If only there was some kind of network that had been working hard over the last God knows how many years to convince people of this kind of worldview.
	Who would have thought of that?
	And the thing is, you can see in her tweets, she's just like...
	What am I doing?
	What are they doing?
	Your disregard for victims of violent crimes disgusts me.
	If Carl Rittenhouse randomly sucker punched an older woman on the streets, I'm pretty sure you'd be singing a different tune.
	Yet somehow, the victim and her trauma doesn't matter, right?
	It's sickening.
	Yeah, it is sickening.
	I just want to respond with teats of her talking about state lines, just going like, yes, did the black man cross state lines?
	Pain.
	So yeah, that's Anna Kasparov learning about what progressive views on justice really are.
	They're really pathetic, regressive, and they're going to get a lot of people hurt.
	God, that's hilarious.
	Taliban wouldn't stand for that, would they?
	No, they certainly wouldn't.
	Which, just for people to know, we would leave stuff in the car.
	Everyone around is, you know, hungry.
	It's a poor country.
	We'd go in a restaurant, come back two hours later, stuff would be in the car.
	No one would break my window.
	Yep.
	Because of your hand.
	Not in San Francisco.
	With Seth Rogen.
	Well, I wasn't attached to that car anyway.
	Lucky for you, eh, Seth?
	Yeah, I haven't read that many of them.
	Let's go to the video comments.
	So, in Florida, DeSantis is passing a law that allows veterans to become teachers without traditional qualifications, and it's interesting that the leftists are complaining online how this is what the fascist government and Starship Troopers does with their veterans, and followed up by them talking about how fascist and evil the Starship Troopers government is, and how much they hate Heinlein for being a fascist.
	They also keep making these shallow arguments that the Federation engaging in basic conventional war is somehow fascism, which, you know, all ideologies engage in war as far as I understand.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, it's really dumb.
	To be honest, I mean, we all kind of fall for it at one point.
	Like, I fell for the whole idea that Star Trek Troopers might be a bit, you know, but then when you explained it in your video, I was just like, oh yeah.
	This is what the average military is actually quite like.
	Yeah.
	But what I love about this as well, right, is with the Anna Kasperi thing, they were like, what are we supposed to do, Anna?
	What are you supposed to do about this guy who keeps punching and beating people in the street?
	It's like, well, gallows, actually.
	Like, that's exactly what you do.
	After the 39th time...
	They're American, so they might shoot them, but...
	Sure, but after the 39th time, surely there's got to be a limit.
	But not in progressive California.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Hey everybody, Preston Poulter here with Pocket Jacks Comics coming to you live from Lubbock Comic Con.
	It's my wall of ambient degeneracy behind me.
	Tough break for Vic Monogna and the whole Vic Strikes Back Nick Riccata spearhead because Texas Court of Appeals handed down that no, that lawsuit is over and Vic Monogna has to hand out even more cash to the defendants.
	I think it's up to like three quarters of a million dollars.
	What can I say?
	Adventures in cloud chasing do not always go well.
	Take care.
	I actually haven't been following this case, so I don't really know what's happened there.
	But this is one of the reasons why I try not to be litigious.
	Because you don't know what's going to happen, frankly.
	Like Hilo didn't know what was going to happen.
	I thought I did.
	Well, yeah, maybe.
	But you don't know what's going to happen.
	It might not be worth your time.
	I kind of, because there was a story I watched from Andrew Tate where he was mentioning about the corruption in Romania.
	There was some American who wanted to sue him for copyright infringement, and he was in the right for this, so he just didn't care.
	He was like, yeah, take the court.
	So the American contacted a Romanian lawyer who contacted Tate's Romanian lawyer and said...
	Look, this guy doesn't have a clue.
	So what I'm going to do, I'm going to charge him a load of money and I'll split the money with you if you keep this going.
	So they kept it going for like two years just because it was obviously ridiculous.
	And I'm imagining Akilah's lawyer after, you know, the fifth tweet from her that was breaking her own case.
	Maybe he did that with my lawyer, I don't know.
	Yeah, I mean, he didn't, but you just imagine him sat there like, well, at least I'm going to get paid.
	Yeah, well, that's got to be what they're thinking.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Also, Akilah, please stop tweeting.
	Good evening, gentlemen.
	I've had this thought at 3 a.m., so you'll have to forgive me if it's a little bit incoherent.
	But I've been thinking a lot about the suggestion that Carl had about inventing an ad hominem attack we can level against the progressives in the same way that they level the bigot accusation against us.
	And I think I've settled on essentially annexing them into the white race by saying that you're a part of the European paradigm since they can't think outside of the Enlightenment framework.
	and everything that they are is dependent upon European philosophy framing progressivism as white supremacy is an interesting take Yeah, let's just ignore that, is my opinion.
	They probably will, but...
	I really like the nonce one, because they can't refute it, because then that would be casting nonces out of the umbrella.
	So they're stuck with it.
	Damaging for the left as a whole, Callum.
	Yeah, whereas the whole of normal society in the right wing, just look at them and go, yeah, okay, they're not throwing the nonces out, so maybe we should build a wall.
	We'll keep thinking about it.
	There will be four parts to this review, so please look out for the videos in the comments section below if you have any interest in finding out what I thought of the origins of totalitarianism, and maybe set me straight on any of the points I make.
	Arendt is most famous for pointing out the banality of evil.
	My observation is that perhaps she was granted more kudos than she deserved due to her being Jewish and a Holocaust survivor.
	To me, she comes across as that type of educated and aloof scholar who does not feel any belonging, and seems to look at the ordinary mass citizenry with sneering contempt, a point she raises regarding Jews in the book but sadly that is lost on her.
	Interesting.
	I imagine there is quite a bit of that with horrific circumstances because everyone thinks that you get an individual from that they must have something interesting to say and it happens a lot with North Korean defectors where some of them are really really interesting and then some of them are kind of missing the point.
	What was the chap that the banality of evil was based on?
	Was it Eichmann or something?
	Sorry.
	Sorry, an autoplay there.
	Was it like Eichmann or something?
	Eric Eichmann or something like that.
	Where it was like, he was just like, well, I was at a desk signing papers doing my job.
	And so, you know, I'm sure it's this.
	She extrapolates from that well.
	It's the banality of evil.
	It's not...
	He's just a guy doing his job, right?
	And that's boring, banal, but he does also do evil.
	But the thing is then, like the Eichmann papers or something came out, where all these other recordings of him going like, yeah, I hate the Jews and I've got all of these Nazi ideals and all this.
	And Michael Knowles actually pointed out, well, hang on, this actually BTFOs Hannah Arendt's banality of evil.
	As in, if he's like a radical Nazi ideologue...
	Then it wasn't banal.
	He was doing it on purpose to be as evil as possible.
	He wasn't just following orders and doing what he was told.
	And so there's actually contention there, but I don't know.
	It sounds right from Michael.
	Well, yeah, I saw him posting about it.
	I was like, oh, God.
	I'm not getting into that.
	Can we go to the next one?
	I think that was it, wasn't it?
	That was it.
	Well, we'll go to the written comments on the side then.
	Callum says, Welcome back, Callum.
	Love your new outfit.
	The big goes well with it.
	Missed you here.
	Please tell us your stories of Afghanistan and Birmingham.
	Well, Birmingham's very dangerous.
	Afghanistan, lovely this time of year.
	No, I don't recommend visiting, to say the least.
	Fuzzy Toaster says, remember what the internet was like in the early 2000s?
	Better times.
	On a side note, Carl, will you ever run in politics again?
	No.
	I remember when you ran down here for UKIP, the choices are honestly so naff.
	I appreciate that, but no, I'm not going to.
	Baystate says, Andrew Tate shouldn't be banned, he should be ignored.
	Which is exactly the line I took on him.
	Who cares?
	The guy reminds me of the hyper-cringe of the MGTOW movement mixed with the kind of guy who'd brag about hiring a hooker.
	I wish YouTube would stop showing me clips of him trying to be bass.
	You're not bass, mate.
	You're a washed-up fighter who sells self-helped spotty teens.
	Yeah.
	One of the things I know is that, like, in all of the interviews, the people he's surrounded by are very, like, low quality.
	And it's like...
	I didn't get to see much of that because I saw the short...
	Well, I only had...
	I was watching some clips in preparation for the segment.
	I was just like...
	Yeah.
	I mean, like, it just...
	I told you just before we started, but there was one clip that very much rubbed me the wrong way, where he's talking about the fact that when he started his company, this is his words, he was dating four women at the same time, brought them all to their same house, then told them he'd been cheating on them with each other.
	And then if they stayed with him, they'd get a job and earn loads of money.
	And if they left, that's up to them.
	And, like, two women left, two women stayed, and I'm just like, yeah, that makes the two women that left look better than everyone else in the room.
	It explains the Reddit post of the guy who lied to his girlfriend about cheating on her.
	Yeah.
	Idiot.
	SH Silver says controversial person policy is the most nebulous and easily abused excuse to ban a person from social media.
	By this logic, anyone the media manufactures as controversial can be targeted.
	Yes, that's exactly it.
	That's exactly why Andrew Tate has been targeted.
	Because they're just like, we just don't like him.
	They say, okay, well now, essentially you have to be like, yeah, I have to be likable to progressive lunatics in the media, or else this could happen to you.
	Eddie says that people fell for the Tate bait so hard they had to ban him to get the internet to talk about something else.
	LAUGHTER Kind of.
	Lee says, no one I knew on the right knew who the hell Andrew Tate was until the establishment started screeching about him.
	Now he's bigger than ever.
	Funny how that works.
	Yeah, but now he's, you know, been completely removed from social media.
	Because he's not allowed to be on social media.
	But that could be anyone.
	Free Will says, everyone who is not one of them is far right, even if they are more left.
	Yeah, welcome Anna Kasparian.
	Most of the people described as far right are actually centrists or conservatives.
	But because they value freedom of expression and won't buy the party line, so to speak, they're demonized as far right.
	The real totalitarians are the ones currently trying to compel everyone to follow their ideology.
	Ewan says, Do you know about that?
	No, I didn't.
	Probably true.
	Colin says, innocent until proven guilty.
	That's so 2010.
	This day it's guilty.
	Sorry, what do you mean proof?
	Edward says, unfortunately, the natural argument against cancelling someone and ostracising someone won't work these days.
	The reason why this is as it is, is that the left believe that it can never come around to bite them.
	And when it does, they actually believe they were most likely in the wrong, like Lindsay Ellis, or they get booted out like J.K. Rowling, so it doesn't matter.
	They can't conceive the world where they won't be able to agree with the general narrative because they believe that these precautions mean such a world will never exist.
	It really is just anything that triggers the narrative at this point.
	It's terrible.
	Scotty says, keep banning people who make the slightest infractions.
	It only adds to our circus.
	We've got a small car, but a lot of clowns fit in it.
	The honking will only get louder.
	Well, that's the thing, isn't it?
	Eventually, the interesting people from social media will be on the alternative platforms, because every single one of them has had the guillotine come down on them.
	Yeah, well, a lot of them already are, aren't they?
	Yeah.
	I mean, you can see Robinson, Tron, Milo.
	Alex Jones.
	Alex Jones, yeah.
	I mean, literally anyone of any amusement.
	In fact, the list is long now as well.
	Amy says, Andrew Tate is attacking women incorrectly.
	He needs to go into their changing rooms instead.
	Just put on a dress, Andrew.
	If he came back as Andrea Tate, I mean, would that be allowed?
	What could they say?
	Because he's not the same person, because otherwise you're dead naming him.
	He might be a rapist, but she might be a rapist.
	Charlie says, I would love to hear Calum's version of being a pick-up artist from his time with the Taliban.
	I imagine it's if you see a woman and she's single that you pick her up and bring her home.
	No, no, no, no, no.
	There's rules.
	There are rules, aren't there?
	asked about how does women work here uh one of them was a shopkeeper it was the funniest one where he said um well you know my uh aunt's daughter i i i liked her so i asked my mom to speak to her and the mom did six months later which i don't know why she waited that long right and then they were married and then he complained because he had been to europe as a migrant right which uh whole other story but he tells me you know in the west you have this system where you get to know the woman first and then you get married so you can find if there are problems whereas in afghanistan you oh you don't know
	and then you get problems and there's nothing you can do and it's just like Okay, it's going well then, is it mate?
	What's that?
	I mean, it's also just not really true.
	I mean, you could be fine and then get married and then 20 years later there's problems.
	So, it's not a foolproof version either.
	Whereas in Afghanistan, you can just get three more.
	Yeah, but then you've got three more problems.
	Yeah, roll the dice.
	Kevin says, YouTube, Twitter and Facebook have to use bots to search for mentions because if my recent ban or refusal or rebuttal to the ban on Facebook is to be believed due to COVID, they don't have enough staff to investigate further.
	Probably.
	Maureen says, Again, Again, Anna Kasparian just stumbling says, Again, Anna Kasparian Again, Anna Kasparian just stumbling says, Again, Minorities, mate.
	I mean, this is another reason I went over it.
	I mean, it is a fair criticism to say, well, the person has served their time.
	They only serve half of it, but they initially denied it and said that there was nothing to do with this.
	I'm just a brave trans woman.
	And then it got exposed as, no, this is you.
	And then they had to admit it.
	And I was like, right, okay.
	So you're trying to make this new life for some kind of cover.
	I don't really believe you, if I'm frank, about this whole, oh, I'm just a trans woman.
	See, it seems quite evident that you're using this as a way to hide behind what you've done, away from what you've done Reintegrate yourself into what is society in the UK now.
	Maureen again says...
	Erica attacked his victim after trapping her in a van when she was helping him move some belongings out of a storage facility.
	That's giving us some strong silence of the lambs.
	I'll make a skin suit out of you vibes.
	Callum again says, There is no minority smaller than the individual, yet we have groups of screeching, degenerate, hypocritical, racist, bigots rule and oppress all of us.
	Bring the dukes, barons and nobles back, please.
	Also, does the G in LGBT now mean groomer?
	It meant gay, but I guess.
	I mean, Q is the queer at the end, isn't it?
	Well, the alphabet never ends, so you just shove another G on.
	Don't we have two Qs now?
	I think it was Santander who put a leaflet out saying LGBTQQLI or some crap like that.
	Queer and questioning.
	There we are.
	Questioning?
	I don't know what questioning.
	Is that bi-curious, but...
	You're not quite that, okay.
	How is that sexuality?
	Because you're not having sex.
	It's not even a preference, though.
	I don't know.
	This is all just total BS, and it surely has to collapse at some point.
	Fuzzy Toaster says Is Tran Is the sex best Colour me absolutely Unequivocally Undoubtedly Unsurprised Scotty again says Get your children To wear a mask To protect them Against monkeypox I mean Silence in children Whenever they try to alert Other sexual abuse Is part of the course Of the authorities So preemptively Covering their mouths Isn't surprising advice To be honest And And Andrew says, And a Kasparian finally beginning to realise the left is a hierarchical, hypocritical cult.
	If only more people would too.
	Shame it takes a minority attacking another minority with impunity to make it happen.
	Northance Knight says, Remember, we're constantly told you can't be racist if you're black.
	Such is the clown world logic and the circus music plays on.
	Yeah, and Kevin Spacey generally went with, I can't be a nonce if I'm gay.
	That would be homophobic to try and suggest.
	Who's ever heard of such a thing?
	Because it's an old gay slur, you know.
	But I reckon that that was his thinking.
	Oh, probably, yeah.
	If I come out as gay, then they can't call me a nonce.
	Yeah, because then you're calling all gays nonces, and not just the ones who are nonce children.
	Thankfully that didn't work.
	Yeah.
	George says, should we really call a slight inflight on the left a red pilling?
	Well, you know, it's just a YouTube headline.
	You know, calm down.
	People like Anna and Destiny...
	You can take smaller and bigger pills.
	Yeah, exactly.
	You know, it's the first step on the right direction.
	But people like Anna and Destiny are not our friends and never will be.
	Well, obviously.
	But we can laugh at the more radical people in their side go against them.
	Yeah, but, you know, who knows?
	It's just a fun title.
	Casey says, 70% of...
	Did you see Destiny hanging out with Nick Fuentes?
	Yeah, what the hell is going on?
	Oh, this is wonderful.
	I haven't seen the stream.
	Like, they're just shitposting.
	It's just hanging out.
	But...
	I mean, I saw lots of people going, well look, Destiny is actually hanging out with a literal Nazi at this point.
	Yeah, but they're just kind of friends, so it's weird, because it's not a political alliance or anything, it's just like, I think you're funny, I think you're funny too.
	And they obviously hugely politically disagree, and I kind of don't like that criticism of like, well they can't hang out because they're politically obviously very different.
	I agree, but like, when someone calls Nick Frontez a literal Nazi, I don't feel it's the most inaccurate label he can be given.
	No, but watching Louis Theroux hang out with neo-Nazis is also kind of funny.
	Sure, but Louis Theroux isn't friends with them.
	And I'm not saying that Destiny can't be friends with...
	The KKK? Yeah, and I'm not saying it's not a thing he shouldn't do or anything like that.
	It's just remarkable given the milieu he exists in, right?
	Oh, yeah.
	Like, you know, he comes out of left-wing Twitter, so it's like...
	I mean, hanging out with Nick Fuentes is quite a remarkable thing to do.
	I think he's done a pretty good job of actually purging that side of his own following at this point.
	Oh, okay.
	Well, I haven't been following that closely.
	Okay.
	But I think it's hilarious.
	His girlfriend, wife, woman, came in with sandwiches.
	Yeah.
	And she had peanut butter jelly and just...
	Destiny's living the patriarchal life.
	Yeah, he was like, where's my Nothella?
	Good point.
	Casey says, 70% of all assaults in the San Francisco Bay Area involve an Asian victim and a black assailant.
	As an Asian woman, I detest the dishonesty of the Stop Asian Hate movement.
	They refuse to address the reality of the issue and the movement is completely co-opted by leftists.
	Yeah.
	But we've got a hashtag.
	Oh, I've got a joke, but I don't know if I can do it.
	Probably best not.
	If you're not sure, don't.
	You know the armbands in Sweden.
	Same thing, but, you know.
	Don't worry.
	Ignacio says, it's always black men slash teens and the media always avoids mentioning it.
	And if they can, they will avoid using a picture of the perpetrator.
	Yes.
	I propose mandatory military service come back.
	A couple of years of discipline will straighten out or break a fair few of them.
	Yeah, but where's America illegally occupying now?
	Not Afghanistan.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Or Iraq.
	Where are you going to send them?
	Ukraine, I guess.
	Boots on the ground.
	Be a good guessing game, actually.
	Try and figure out where America will go next.
	Israeli crusader says minority attacks minority.
	Demon KKK rats say...
	I love that.
	Demon KKK is so good.
	How is the white man responsible for this?
	I remember when they tried to blame the white man because the white man makes the guns at one point for all the mass shootings.
	Oh, in some states they can sue gun manufacturers for guns that are used.
	Did you not hear about this?
	What's the suit for?
	Because the gun manufacturer is somehow responsible for the minority shooting someone with the gun.
	The white blame the Soviet Union?
	Yes.
	Well, you're not minority enough.
	Well, that's the thing.
	ISIS truck a piece.
	Can they sue Ford?
	Oh, yeah.
	I mean, that would actually legitimise...
	I mean, every terrorist group ever has not committed a crime.
	I mean, technically, it was Boeing who were responsible for 9-11.
	I mean, that's a great point.
	What logic?
	Ignacio again says, what leftists don't realise is that being permissive with crime, this permissive with crime, they will inevitably get a reaction with harsh punishment for even petty theft, even violent physical punishment.
	And I say that because I'm slowly inching to that position myself.
	Well, again, you didn't have anyone break into your car, did you?
	No one's like, oh, I don't need this hand.
	I need what's in your car more than I need this hand.
	That's the calculus.
	It's good calculus.
	I know.
	It worked.
	Noidenis Maxima says, does Anna realize the delicious irony in being told by progressives that they are better than her?
	Yes.
	Robert says, is Calum enjoying his cultural appropriation?
	That's cultural appreciation, isn't it?
	One thing I liked being over there is there's none of this.
	Yeah.
	None of it exists.
	So, I mean, you put in the clothes and everyone's very happy.
	I mean, that's how the real world actually works.
	Oh, yeah.
	Integration.
	People love mimicry.
	Yeah.
	People love it when, you know, like, if all the foreigners came over and started wearing tweed suits and flat caps, I'd be like, okay, well, that's a good start, actually.
	You know?
	I'm like, okay, it's not so bad.
	Yeah.
	I remember we watched some video from the 1950s of Arabs coming to Britain, and there was some article at the time being like, oh my god, it shows that Arabs have always been here.
	But all of them in the film, in London, were wearing suits and ties.
	Every single one of them looked incredibly smart.
	They weren't showing off people dressed like this in Birmingham, which is what Birmingham looks like.
	And when we went there, if we walked around in jeans and t-shirts all the time, I would have felt like a bit of a prick.
	You didn't look very out of place.
	Yeah.
	Keith says, progressives equal real crime minus no prison time.
	Thought crime, off to the Gulag.
	Andrew says, all hail the Callum fate.
	When do we get to hear his first edict?
	I will be honest, I did have a problem with women when I came back.
	Really?
	Yeah.
	Go on!
	So we were in...
	So you've got to fly...
	You can't fly direct because the airline is rated so poorly it's not safe to fly pretty much anywhere on Earth.
	But it could fly to the UAE or Pakistan.
	So we got in via Pakistan, back out from the UAE, and I'm in this queue waiting to get on the flight to Turkey, and...
	There's a woman in front of me, and she's wearing, like, a housewife dress.
	You know, like, a typical, you know, like, goes down, covers up there, you know, goes down below her knees, but, you know, pins out of the bottom.
	But you can see her lower leg and, like, her cleavage and her hair and everything.
	You were like, whore!
	Honestly!
	Like, because I've been there so long and not spoken to women, and you're not meant to.
	And everyone's covered up.
	I honestly looked at her and went, What the hell is she wearing that for?
	In my head?
	And I was like, is she trying to make me have...
	What?
	And I went, no, no, no, I'm retarded, right?
	Okay, I forgot.
	Trying to provoke unclean thoughts, that's what she's doing.
	Yeah, genuinely.
	So I can understand, like, when an Afghan comes to the UK and they see women for the first time...
	Callum went really native.
	I'm not saying that it justifies anything they do or the way they look at women and always should change how we live our lives, but you should not be surprised in the goddamn least that they are confused to hell on what women are doing.
	And when you think about it, it reminded me, I spoke to Michael about this, and it reminded me of Jordan Peterson.
	Remember when he did that little thing where he spoke about lipstick and rouge to this female?
	High heels.
	Yeah.
	And so, but why are you doing that?
	And she was like, oh, because it makes me feel good.
	And I was like, yeah, but why does it make you feel good?
	Why is it acceptable?
	It gets me attention from men.
	And that's acceptable in the West.
	If a woman wants to get attention from men, that's perfectly fine.
	Why wouldn't she?
	Because men are inculcated with a great deal of self-control.
	Yeah.
	But in Afghanistan, why would a woman want attention from men?
	She's a prostitute.
	She's trying to make money.
	And you can see the mindset.
	And then the same thing I was thinking, because you think about women who wear...
	Well, they're not tights, leggings.
	You can see their ass, right?
	And that's normal here and fine.
	But if you're an Afghan, what the fuck is she wearing that for?
	Yeah, yeah.
	I remember when I first saw them coming on as the fashion, I remember thinking at the time as a kid, hang on, what the hell?
	Well, yeah, I mean, it's too far.
	Yeah, and the solution to that is either if we're going to have these people here, we have to understand how they think and care to it, or we don't have them here.
	And the easiest solution is we're different countries and we're different worlds.
	I don't know, man.
	I think imposing more conservative dress on women, that's an option we should throw out to the floor.
	Is your daughter getting to that age where you're looking at her going, no, not that.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	No, I'm not even joking.
	Brow a burka back if you want it.
	I do want it.
	It's actually horrible to wear.
	I can imagine, and that's good.
	Because, like, the top bit, you know the face bit, right?
	Yeah.
	It doesn't actually go on your face.
	It sits on top.
	Right.
	It doesn't fit your head on purpose.
	So you've got to, like, edge it down so you can see through the mesh, but it's not fitting you, because then it would show off your head, and therefore it would be haram.
	So...
	Utterly uncomfortable.
	Right, okay.
	And were all the women wearing burqas or what?
	No, the Taliban passed the law just before we got there, saying everyone had to wear burqas or niqab in the letterbox, and the women just didn't bother, and the local Taliban just haven't enforced it.
	Right, okay.
	And I don't know if it's because the new Taliban are all Zoomers, don't care, but the law just not being enforced.
	Zoomer Taliban.
	Yeah, well, they had smartphones, they were taking pictures and stuff, so...
	Anyway.
	Yeah, women.
	Have to readjust.
	Yeah, but are you really willing to concede that much territory to communism?
	Because I'm not.
	You know, Michael knows when he talks about human rights and he wants to destroy democracy because his rights aren't up for debate.
	And Michael Malice, you think?
	Yeah, Michael Malice.
	I think he said this to you and it was really funny because he's just like, oh, okay, yeah, based.
	But then when you think about it, yeah.
	I mean, in the same way, justice isn't up for debate.
	We're not debating these things with progressives.
	It's just a huge waste of time.
	But anyway.
	Criminals should lose their hand.
	It works.
	That's all I'm saying.
	Anyway, we're out of time, so if you'd like more from us, you can go to lazies.com, of course.
	Otherwise, we'll be back tomorrow at 1 o'clock.

▲