Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 22, 2022 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:31:49

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #442

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters for the 22nd of July 2022.
	I am joined by Nick.
	Hello.
	And today we're going to be talking about the C people arriving with guns, the BBC being fair and balanced as always, and the G word, which I'm not allowed to say anymore.
	Anyway, we shall start off just with an announcement being that we are now on Truth Social because us Britbongs are finally allowed to join the Americans on their little platform with Trump, so we're joining in to, you know...
	I'm also on there as Nick Dixon.
	There we are.
	So there we are.
	Go check that out.
	But we're there as lotuses underscore com, of course, especially if Truth Social is just your thing, then you can check out everything we're doing on there.
	Plus, it's where Trump is doing posting of his thoughts, which are always good fun.
	Let's say that.
	It's a very high IQ platform.
	Did you see the one he made about Joe getting cancer slash COVID? Was that real or not?
	I saw one and then I saw another.
	I assume one of them is real.
	Because one was a bit more extreme than the other.
	The one I saw was too perfect.
	And he hadn't posted on two socials.
	It was only on Twitter.
	So I was like, this isn't real, but it's so perfect.
	But it's hard to tell if he wouldn't do it as well.
	But anyway, we shall get into the people news instead.
	Phrasing.
	Anyway.
	So the sea people are now arriving with guns.
	As in, you know, the boat people, the migrants coming over from France, much like the Mediterranean.
	And people say they bring nothing to this country.
	No, these doctors and engineers, they're bringing gun rights back to the United Kingdom, which is why I, for one, I welcome this news.
	Because if we're going to get our gun rights back, it's by making the UK an inhospitable place where you need a gun to walk to the shop.
	So 40 chess, I guess.
	Let's do it.
	Yes, it could go wrong where they all have guns and we still don't, and we just have to call some sort of dystopian police that comes too late.
	I mean, we're halfway there already, so I take the gamble, I guess.
	I just described London.
	But anyway, we shall mention first, just an announcement being the Constantine Kissins and Immigrants Love Letter to the West book club we did, and this being in regards to this, obviously, in the respect that Constantine, being an immigrant, is not pro-no-borders, because, well, what's there to immigrate to if you just open the borders?
	And Constantine makes some very good arguments there, but Although he did come over on a dinghy, he told me.
	Did he?
	With a gun?
	Yeah.
	Screaming.
	He's done well.
	He's done well since.
	Anyway, but go and check that out.
	In fact, you can go and check out his family history of slavery as well, which is not the usual one you're hearing.
	But we'll go to the next link here, because this whole story kind of reminded me of this Family Guy sketch.
	Do you remember this?
	I don't know if you've ever watched Family Guy.
	But, you know, a man with a gun and two bullets has taken over the city of Manchester, announced Tom Tucker at one point.
	And, yeah, it seems to be true.
	Because the next link, please, we can see the sea people are turning up with guns as they write a national security risk in the headline here.
	Although they did have a previous headline being that they're entering the UK with guns and pocket knives.
	I thought it was going to be pocket knives.
	Get a real knife, losers.
	They're saying here, Britain's security has been put at risk because hundreds of channel migrants...
	I kind of hate that term.
	Illegal aliens.
	Returns to tradition.
	I hate the softening of the language.
	But anyway.
	...have disappeared before having their fingerprints or photographs even recorded.
	Some migrants have entered the UK carrying guns and pocket knives...
	Where they were confiscated on arrival in Dover.
	Isn't there a floor of the pocket knife that if it falls out your pocket, pops your dinghy?
	I mean, when did dinghies get so unstoppable and indestructible?
	When I grew up, you could just pop them, you know what I mean?
	They deflated.
	Now they're sort of warships that we can't stop.
	Physically impossible.
	The entire Her Majesty's ships are just useless.
	We used to have the greatest navy in the world.
	Now it's two dinghies and a guy with a pocket knife.
	I'm going to say a funny story, because I literally don't care at this point, of a grown man in France who had been rejected for asylum in France because the French government looked at him and went, here's your history, you're clearly taking the piss, please go home to Egypt, you're taking the mickey, you have no reason to be here.
	And he got very annoyed at that, so him and his mate stole a dinghy and then stole two metal shovels and then tried to literally splash their way across to England.
	They got rid of like a mile until the metal shovel went through the plastic dinghy and popped it.
	And yeah, he drowned in the sea.
	And then the French press, his mate, lied to everyone and said he was 15.
	Please have sympathy for us.
	And he was like, no, he was like 30.
	If you did that tomorrow and tried to go with the frauds and a little metal shovel, I feel like you'd get taken the mickey out of, and rightfully so, for being a moron.
	That's what this guy did as well.
	It does show you how easily the crisis could be solved.
	A couple of shovels.
	We're just going to start leaving shovels on the beaches and just be like, just leave them.
	They don't know.
	This is satire, obviously, guys.
	Just total satire.
	But they say in here, some migrants even entered the UK carrying guns and pocket knives, which were constantly out of the gophers, I just read.
	David Neal, the chief inspector of borders and immigration, called out the Home Office's systematic failure to register migrants' biometric data.
	In six months, 227 people who were not fully registered fled, quote, secure hotels.
	Why would you do that?
	You're a refugee from, you know, North Korea.
	I mean, if you get sent back, it's literally concentration camp time.
	So you get to the UK, and what do you do?
	Immediately flee the hotel.
	Because you are legitimate.
	No, these people are not North Korea.
	Some of those travel lodge breakfasts, mate.
	I'm like, the scrambled eggs, I've thought about fleeing sometimes.
	I don't think it's worth going back to a concentration camp or a war, which these people aren't.
	They are literally just taking the piss.
	And we have the data on it as well, which is why they're fleeing.
	But they say in here the numbers, which again just get worse every single year, last year 28,000 arrived, the year before it was only 8,000, and the year before that it was only 1,800, and a couple years before that this wasn't a thing either.
	So there you have it.
	In fact, we now actually have a new record.
	Congratulations.
	New world record for illegal entries by boat.
	Oh yeah.
	Isn't it 430 in a day?
	There you go.
	Yeah.
	430.
	I was impressed by the new record.
	It is a lot like a sport.
	They should let trans people compete.
	When's that going to happen?
	We need trans people on the dinghy.
	I think we need a women's team first.
	So far it's just men.
	You're right.
	It's mainly sort of violent looking men of working age with pocket knives.
	But then we need to extend it to violent women.
	And then other women.
	And then violent trans people.
	And then trans people.
	That doesn't happen.
	No, you're right.
	There's no such thing.
	Sorry.
	Sorry, sorry.
	However, we have the data on this, and for why I'm being so callous for people who might be new to all this is because the data is just unbelievably piss-takey at this point.
	You've also been callous because it's kind of who you are, but like...
	No, but...
	I'm joking.
	Genuinely, just like...
	There are loads of circumstances about migration where there is, you know, sincere reasons to care and to be sympathetic to the individuals, even if they're doing it illegally.
	But, I mean, this one is...
	On one scale, you've got North Koreans who illegally break into China because they're starving, right?
	Who could ever be upset with them?
	It makes perfect sense.
	And then we do our best as the West to get them out of China and into the West to be safe.
	We literally take thousands, and South Korea does their work as well, of course.
	Whereas you have these guys who flee war-torn France for the UK because...
	With nothing.
	There's no reason.
	I mean, it really is just the most comical thing you ever get to.
	And Migration Watch has some funny data on this.
	Quick facts.
	So quickfire round.
	Data point number one, 50,000 migrants have been detected illegally crossing since 2018.
	Wonderful.
	50,000 to add to the migration figures.
	These are the illegal people as well, who will just disappear as soon as they're told they're not legitimate.
	7 in 10 of the men are between the ages of 1838, which is, sorry, 7 in 10 of those coming are men in between those ages.
	There you have it.
	The other three, presumably lying about their age.
	Number 3.98% have no passport.
	Who knows where that passport might be?
	Maybe the bottom of the ocean?
	Maybe in the channel?
	Maybe they just left it at home?
	No, they throw it in the sea.
	I don't know if you've seen the TikToks.
	No.
	They literally post TikToks.
	Are these people on TikTok?
	Wow.
	Are they as big as Andrew Tate yet?
	I don't think that big.
	But there's an endless list of them showing themselves, all smiling, they're getting in, and then throwing their passports into the sea.
	Wow.
	They show you all on TikTok.
	Wow.
	You've made me feel bad now, Colin, because of our satire before.
	But when you see something like that, you don't...
	Yeah, I've seen them actually throwing stuff and laughing and stuff.
	And then you get angry.
	But then at the same time, of course, obviously people traffic is horrible and all that.
	You maybe had to say that now.
	Because now I feel bad for the people that are fleeing something wrong.
	I mean, the people traffickers are definitely bad, but these guys are paying them five grand to break into a country that they have no legitimacy to.
	From a country they've already broken into, and also had no legitimacy to.
	Well, there is that.
	So...
	I really am out of Fs to give.
	Number four, one in six boat crossers already claimed asylum elsewhere.
	That's the ones that admit they've claimed asylum.
	Most of them have already claimed asylum and then just don't admit it when they get here, which is why you also get the majority of them saying they're Iranian.
	They're not, but it's a good excuse.
	And number five, zero are directly coming from a place of persecution.
	Yeah, that was key.
	The place of persecution thing.
	I mean, of course, if you're an English person in France, that is a place of persecution.
	And we should be allowed to come back because, you know, you've gone down on the world.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Imagine having to be with all those French people.
	For us, that would be.
	But for a lot of people, France is like a great country.
	I think it's meant to be a step up from Morocco.
	I don't know if it is these days.
	I haven't been in a while, but, you know, I've heard.
	Apparently it is meant to be some kind of higher GDP per capita, perhaps.
	Yeah, it's one notch up from Morocco.
	Yeah, there we are.
	Although it's not just the fact that, of course, it's zero people coming from these directly from somewhere that are actually being persecuted.
	But you also have Breitbart breaking the news that deported criminals, you know, criminals we deported in the UK, are also coming across.
	This is a case that has been found.
	Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Prisons has confirmed that at least one migrant who had previously received a prison term for more than 12 months and was deemed to pose a medium risk of harm to others has crossed the channel and ended up being in a house hosting women and children.
	Wonderful.
	I mean, yeah, there you have it.
	And that's the one they found.
	And that's in, as you can see, 21 to 22 report there.
	And the numbers are going to be much higher, of course.
	And as I've made the point repeatedly, this is not Ji Yun Park.
	I mean, this is a lady we've interviewed before who fled North Korea, had to go through concentration camps, break out into slavery in China, and then was able to get to the UK. And not only in the UK, but my mum's hometown of Bury.
	And I didn't know you'd interviewed her.
	That's amazing.
	I read an extract from her book, and it's unbelievable.
	She's on sale now?
	On sale now.
	And it's actually worse than you thought North Korea was.
	That's the incredible thing.
	It's like extreme poverty.
	It's your neighbours can grass you up and you lose everything for no reason.
	We knew that sort of...
	But the details.
	There's a part where...
	They find some eggs.
	Their dad brings home some eggs, but they have to eat them all at once, like Cool Hand Luke or something.
	They eat loads of eggs because if anyone finds they've got them, they're in massive trouble for having these eggs.
	And that's just a tiny fraction of it.
	I just remember thinking, wow, this is even worse than I thought North Korea was.
	And it's no surprise when she came to England, she's a conservative.
	Yeah, she funnily enough didn't want to join the Socialist Party.
	Although I will say, I don't know if you scroll down, David Lammy is quoted on the cover of her book, which I thought was a bit much.
	It's like, alright commie, chill out bro.
	But then again I thought, well he's been to the Bilderberg group recently, maybe he's just LARPing as a sort of far lefty.
	Do you know what I mean?
	What's Lammy doing?
	That would annoy me if I was Park.
	Then again, maybe G.E. and Park is just trying to red pill him.
	She's being like, how about you stop being a commie?
	Actually read about it?
	Who knows?
	But there we are.
	that's the point i'm making here though is that for every place that gets taken up by these sea people who are just illegitimate chances i mean just the data shows it you take a place away from someone like her i mean this is the the politics of sympathy that really needs to be taken into account the person in front of you oh the channel migrants of course we'll let them in they've had a hard life no they haven't they haven't had anything compared to these people who really genuinely need your help and instead we can't fund them to come over here from china where they literally live in slavery because uh well abdul in france needs a place
	don't you know he's in France.
	Absolutely horrifying.
	He might be sent back to a Moroccan concentration camp by the French government.
	Not gonna happen.
	It's not a thing.
	Sorry.
	I just hate it.
	But you might wonder who the hell are the people who are, you know, helping these folks?
	Well, we can see some of them in Care for Calais here.
	This is a charity group, as they tell themselves.
	And as you can see, actively campaigning against the Rwandan plan to actually solve this issue.
	Because, of course, they just want endless open borders, ideologically.
	However, there is, of course, another motive for all these groups.
	Yes.
	Is it money?
	It's money!
	Yeah!
	I didn't even know that.
	Not even prepped.
	Nope!
	It's every time, the money.
	And we can just see it because, of course, these are all charities.
	They have to publish their records, which you can just find on Companies House or on the Charity Commission here.
	So if you scroll down to this one, I don't know if it'll come up on your screen, but it should do, in which they had £877,000 in income last year.
	Beautiful money if you can get it.
	And they managed to spend £586,000 on various activities.
	I'm not going to take a huge guess, but the charitable activities they're saying here, I'm going to try and guess.
	It's lawyers.
	The people who are actively fighting in court to stop the Rwanda plan, what do you think they're spending their money on?
	I mean, in my mind, I imagine it's very expensive human rights lawyers.
	And I want to know what other is.
	7.88k other.
	Very wonderful.
	They say in here they've got eight trustees and 1,500 volunteers.
	I mean, that's the level of cringe idiots you can literally find.
	Great business model.
	Work for you for free.
	And they're not the only ones, of course.
	The Taxpayers Alliance actually digged up something on this.
	As you can see here, they document 50 million pounds of taxpayers' money was paid to lobbying groups and political campaigning groups.
	But in here...
	7.7 million pounds was given to organisations actively fighting the government's scheme to resettle migrants in Rwanda, including Migrant Help, Stonewall, Refugee Action, and Hope Not Hate, and InstaLaw as well.
	We'll get to Hope Not Hate another time, I suppose.
	But...
	This is what really annoys me.
	These people working against...
	Well, the money, but also working against this policy that seems to be a reasonable policy.
	It's not perfect as a policy, but I've looked at where they go in Rwanda.
	It's not this terrible thing that people make it out.
	But it's the same as the ECHR blocking those flights.
	It's like, who actually runs the country?
	If our elected government can't enact a policy because of all these groups, including the ECHR and all these secret groups, well, semi-secret, you know what I mean?
	Who's running the country?
	We can't...
	There's no democracy if our elected representatives can't enact policies.
	If our representatives actually can't represent us, then what's the whole point in all of this?
	For all the problems you may have with the Conservative Party, the people voted for them, unbelievably, in high numbers to solve these kind of issues, and they have the mandate, and there you have it, the elected representatives, and then you have the British state, Who are just sitting around handing out our money to anyone to oppose our elective representatives' plans on how to solve these problems.
	And people are probably saying, Dernik, you know, it's quite a naive point, but when it gets to this level, it's like you can't even enact your immigration policy because Europe step in.
	They're like, what?
	We left.
	Oh, because some civil servant has just decided to give 7 million quid.
	Yes, to other...
	To literally a bunch of leftists to try and help fight our own elected government, which, yeah, that's not normal.
	And really, we should keep it in mind and something that should be fought.
	But we can go and check out the organizations in question and their filing history.
	So I don't know if you can let up on these, John.
	You might not need to because they're just big, long letters.
	But on the filing history and the most recent one for all of these, this is Refugee Action's company house page in which they say their income increased over the last year from $2.7 million to $8.8 million.
	Very good year for them.
	Presumably, as Taxpayers Alliance mentioned, getting cash from us to then fight the government's own elected plans to get rid of this stuff.
	If you go to the next link, we have Migrant Help, the other group that was mentioned on there.
	Their income went up to 1.03 million this year.
	Wonderful work you can get.
	They made a profit of half a million.
	Great business.
	Get our money, literally, to sell it, so they can invest it and then continue to pay their own selves.
	Wonderful.
	Stonewall, of course, the ever-present, everyone's favourite secret organisation.
	Stonewall are so far left.
	There's this guy, Simon Fanshawe, I work with on a GB show headliner sometimes.
	Perfectly polite, but he's so far left.
	He founded Stonewall, or co-founded, but he left it because it was going too mental.
	And I'm like, okay, I don't even know what that means.
	This guy's the most left guy I've ever met.
	And I'm going, no, they're a bit too much for me.
	I'm like, I don't know.
	I didn't know it went further.
	Because that's the thing as well.
	There's like the public conversation.
	If he's in there, he's hearing the private conversations as well, which I imagine must be way worse than even the public nonsense.
	That's a good point.
	It's another level again.
	All the wokes have just got too much for him.
	I'm like, you've created a monster.
	I have said it to him.
	It is all his fault.
	But yeah, and they secretly run the BBC, basically.
	With their weird Ponzi scheme.
	Oh, you can get higher up in our chart of Stonewall-approved groups.
	How'd you get it?
	Oh, you pay Stonewall.
	Oh, that's a good idea.
	It's good protection money.
	Yeah, you're right.
	But I also want to take a minute, because I know in politics, on the left and the right, there are endlessly accusations from people, oh my god, this person or that person is a grifter.
	And it's usually unfounded, because most people are just honest in the political sphere.
	There are people who are obviously dishonest, but it's very rare.
	But with groups like this, I mean, I think grifter is probably the right term to use.
	I mean, organizations are literally scamming money off the people constantly.
	It's like our version of the Southern Poverty Law Centre or something like that.
	Yeah, and I hate it when people on the right and stuff get called grifters or people doing like a podcast and they've alienated all their friends and lost their jobs.
	That's not a grifter.
	It's a pretty bad grift.
	Whereas getting literally millions of pounds from the taxpayer to oppose the elected government, that's a really good grift.
	I mean, how do you even do that?
	The opposition party to your ideology wins power and you get more money from the state.
	I mean, that is some next-level lobbying.
	Yeah, it's funny that Boris mentioned the deep state the other day, wasn't it, in his speech?
	And he might have done it in sort of an ironic way, but it is real, isn't it?
	But Kemi's mentioned as well, you know, these lobbying groups that turn up and just get funding.
	Well, there you are.
	Stonewall, they managed to get £11.5 million last year.
	Wonderful.
	They still managed to lose £1.3 million net.
	That went to other...
	Yes, of course, including the other, but I love how much money just sloshes around.
	And you might think, if you're America especially, super PACs, the advertising out there, the money is everywhere and it's ridiculous.
	But in the UK, the amount of money that sloshes around in these places is quite low in comparison.
	But then to get any money for any of these groups, I mean, what do they actually do?
	I mean, what kind of advancements are they actually helping with people in the UK with this state money and donations that they get?
	Well, they literally just oppose the elected government and virtue signal on Twitter.
	That's worth 11 million.
	Fantastic.
	That's not fair, Callum, because Stonewall also manipulate BBC content behind the scenes.
	So they do quite a lot of work.
	I mean, they're all day in the BBC dictating content.
	And they're bouncers.
	Yeah, that's a full-time job.
	It certainly is.
	You've got me there.
	And if any of this is libelous, you can probably beep it out.
	No, literally.
	I mean, we have the inside works from BBC Journal, so we're just like, yeah, we had to pass things through Stonewall.
	Well, that Stephen Nolan piece was brilliant, if you haven't listened to it.
	I mean, it's a BBC guy exposing the BBC, talking to Stonewall.
	And he goes and asks the editor from Pink News, what's two-spirit?
	I don't even know what that is.
	And then the guy doesn't know either.
	But he's a guy from Northern Ireland who had to expose Westminster, essentially.
	That's a very important point that people don't seem to pick up on.
	People outside of that bubble.
	Good point.
	But anyway, so just moving on to who else gets money out of this?
	Of course, Domino's.
	They're doing very well.
	I say, of course.
	This should be normal.
	There we are.
	39 grand.
	It's been spent on Domino's pizzas for these chaps.
	And this is the police going up to the migrants saying, have a ham and pineapple, bro.
	Basically.
	That's a bit cruel.
	Well, come on, mate.
	You know what?
	This was so mental that we're spending nearly 40 grand giving them pizzas.
	But then I thought, under labour, they'll get a cardo.
	Do you know what I mean?
	It'll be worse.
	It'll be more money, more middle class.
	Do you know what I mean?
	They'll be like, it's barbaric that we give them dominoes.
	That'll be their manifesto.
	Yeah, but it'll be Ben and Jerry's, really, won't it?
	Because I'm sure Ben and Jerry's are very butthurt about the fact that all their endless whining about the fact that we don't just let anyone into this country.
	If you go to the next one, please, John, then you can see, in which we have them whining.
	Oh my god, how dare you do this?
	They're fleeing climate change.
	Shut up!
	Shut up, you actual losers!
	How can you flee climate change?
	Get on a dinghy, that's how, presumably.
	It's a very tall mountain.
	Yeah.
	Although, the Home Office is actually trying to do things in response.
	I know we've talked about the story a lot.
	That's because it just never ends and gets worse and worse in this country.
	However, I do want to note that they've actually done things.
	It's just not been effective.
	And I thought we'd just note some of those things, which are funny.
	So we have one here.
	Life sentences for small boat pilots come into force.
	There you are.
	This was last month.
	Anyone who actually pilots the boat is going to get life in prison.
	At least those powers have come in.
	And then the next one I also find really funny.
	They brought a 400 grand drone.
	So they could find the boats and try and turn them back to the French in the French waters.
	Yeah, I didn't understand that, what the drone actually was supposed to do.
	Was it like China?
	Did it just circle around saying, give up your thirst for freedom?
	Did it just put them off?
	Like, England's actually rubbish.
	Do you know what I mean?
	It's just a load of Greggs.
	Or could it shoot at them?
	Did it buzz around their heads?
	How did it work?
	I mean, we'd have loads of ideas about how it should have worked, but my understanding is it would just know where they are and then try to alert the French to get them back.
	But not that that was going to work anyway.
	But what it actually did, I don't want to spoil it, was fall in the sea, I believe.
	Yeah, if we could scroll down, you could see some random fishermen rang across it as well.
	They were just like, well, that's a big fish.
	And took it home, like the Ukrainian farmers were just discovering these wonderful machines of the sea up there.
	So good luck to those lads in reselling it back to the government.
	I hope they get a good price.
	400 grand in the sea.
	That could have gone to Stonewall.
	Yeah.
	But then the last one here is just the most pathetic of things.
	They tried a new £50 million deal with the French to tackle the crossings.
	It's like, what are we going to do?
	We're going to give them the French money and they've promised to stop it.
	Money well spent.
	They say it here.
	The sources said it would be similar to the last £54 million deal that paid for more patrol, surveillance, border security and asylum camps away on the northern French coast, which worked.
	Which is why we don't have this problem anymore.
	I mean, I'm sorry.
	I know it's just sad at this point.
	What if we give the French more money?
	They've promised to stop it this time.
	It's like paying the Danes to go back to Norway.
	Yeah, can't trust the French.
	First rule.
	But there we are.
	There's just the net effect of how we solve this is either the French do agree to start taking them back, which they won't because they've got too many already.
	They're happy to put the burden on us.
	Or the Rwandan plan, which, of course, is full of legal troubles as well.
	But honestly, I mean, at this point, I mean, the British government are even actually just looking at breaking international law just to solve it.
	I mean, like pulling away from the EHRC and just going, no, we're just going to start forcing them back.
	Who cares?
	What's your solution, Callum?
	Because this is a pretty heavy black pill for me.
	I'm quite tired today.
	You've hit me.
	You've hit me.
	I'm like, God, this is depressing.
	What's your solution that doesn't get us banned from YouTube?
	Well, either apply all the laws that stop the Rwandan plan and then just do it, which is, you know, one way of doing things, or you literally just start forcing them back and militarise the sea, which is also on the table.
	It's worked for us in the past.
	Yeah, it's just that you have the stones to do it, and I guess we'll see if they do.
	Yeah, Britannia rules the waves.
	That was a thing, wasn't it?
	Once upon a time.
	I suppose we'll move to the BBC being fair and balanced.
	Yes, we should do that.
	The BBC are very fair and balanced, guys.
	I thought about calling this segment that, or we could call it Take the Jab, Plebs.
	I'm not sure.
	Basically, what's happened is the BBC, I'm sure you've heard this, have done...
	And I don't know what we're allowed to say.
	Are we allowed to say I'm vaccinated, even the phrase?
	I think the phrases are fine.
	Just we have to say that by YouTube laws, I will be shot.
	Masks play a role in combating the virus.
	I don't know what role that is, but they do play a role.
	And we don't question the efficacy of the vaccine.
	It's safe and effective.
	I think that's party speak.
	Okay.
	Because I was proposing to Callum we change the word to Elliot Page just to make sure we're not in trouble because you're definitely allowed to say that.
	It's the only word I know or phrase you're allowed to say.
	No, he's doing a no sign.
	So, okay.
	Let's just go with this then.
	So Professor Hannah Fry seeks to understand why 8%, hmm, questionable, of the population remain unvaccinated against COVID-19 in Unvaccinated, an eye-opening new documentary for BBC2. And so that immediately got ratioed, immediately people were saying it's more than 8% and it got obliterated.
	I had some questions, but I, you know, I trusted it.
	I wrote, I look forward to this in-depth documentary that will definitely not try to make anyone look bad or stupid.
	So I went into it with an open mind column.
	I can see.
	Yeah, because I was like, the BBC, they're very fair.
	We've seen it in the past.
	I mean, just unbridled, solid gold journalism.
	Absolutely.
	BBC, right down the middle.
	So it's Hannah Fry.
	Can we get a little look at Hannah and who she is in this clip?
	I'm Professor Hannah Fry.
	I'm a mathematician and I worked on the data and the models that the government used to bring us out of that first lockdown.
	And I had a question there.
	Are you only responsible for bringing us out of lockdowns?
	It's like, you know, it's a small question, but I've never heard of a scientist that's used just to get us out of lockdowns.
	She may have, but you know, usually they just present data, then they do something with it.
	Or some cynics would say they have a policy in mind and they get the data they need.
	But it's often brought us into lockdowns.
	I didn't know they brought in people just to get us out of lockdowns.
	You know what I mean?
	Like, we need to get out of lockdown.
	Call Hannah.
	But it's possible.
	I just think it's interesting the way she framed it.
	Like, I'm the one that got us out of the lockdowns.
	I just had a question immediately.
	But she may well have.
	They're already all distanced themselves from whoever the hell put us in.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Steve put us in it.
	I got us out.
	And I'm Hannah.
	I'm the BBC. Hello, Professor BBC. So, now, let's be fair to the BBC. We didn't have time to show it all, but they had a range of people.
	They had someone who was worried about fertility.
	They had someone who was a care worker and didn't want to get sacked for not taking it.
	And he was very sensible.
	So they did have some sensible people.
	And they had some more sort of people who, you know, I just don't want to take it.
	I don't trust it.
	My friends have had problems with my family.
	And then they also...
	They were all clearly mad, but...
	Well, there was different degrees.
	The care worker guy was smart.
	There's a girl called Nazarene.
	We'll see later.
	She seems perfectly smart.
	But they also had this guy, Luca.
	Let's have a look at him.
	I reckon there is a chip inside the jab.
	And obviously when they turn all the 5G towers on, which they're building everywhere in the world, I think a lot of people are going to...
	Die.
	So they had that guy as well.
	That's a bit different.
	You've got to throw that guy in for balance, I suppose.
	But yeah, I mean, look, those people out there...
	It'd probably be wonders if he works for the BBC. They're just like, dude, just put on the glasses.
	Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Dave, can you just come off that camera a minute?
	Yeah, yeah.
	It's perfectly possible.
	You've got to have that guy in a way.
	You've got to represent everyone.
	They didn't have Toby Young.
	They didn't have Dr.
	Robert Malone.
	You know what I mean?
	One could argue there were...
	People who would have represented the case a little bit better.
	They're not looking for that, are they?
	Well, you could say that, Callum.
	I say they're fair and balanced.
	But yeah, so mainly what they did, they had people like that.
	And they asked, you know, it was a sort of, it wasn't like a balanced documentary.
	It was more about like, how can we do better next time in our authoritarian schemes?
	So they asked themselves searching questions like this one that Hannah asks here.
	My big question is, what did we get so wrong about the way that we've been talking about this, that millions of people still don't want to take the vaccine?
	I mean, it's a good question.
	I've got a few answers for it.
	The girl, if we played a bit further, would have said, oh, there's no easy answer for that.
	It's like, well, I've got a few.
	Censorship.
	I mean, this is the thing.
	If there's the free debate in which we can find the answers and, you know, truth will prevail in the free debate, we must believe if we're liberals.
	And, well, the state didn't believe in that.
	The social media companies didn't believe in that, presumably because none of them are liberals or progressives, and instead shut down conversation, which, of course, makes people suspicious.
	Which, if you wanted them not to be, don't do that.
	Yeah, and do you think things like this could have put them off?
	It's time to punish Britain's five million vaccine refuseniks.
	They put us all at risk of more restrictions, says Andrew Neil.
	Do you think that kind of rhetoric might have put people off?
	Do you think Karen Brady...
	A sensible libertarian, I'm sure.
	Right.
	What about this one?
	Karen Brady make their lives harder.
	We can't force people to have jobs.
	We can force vaccine refusenics to live a far more difficult, inconvenient and restricted life.
	One that will also be more expensive because of mandatory testing, says a rich woman who's some sort of baroness or something.
	Oh, thanks, Karen.
	And...
	Never forget these people.
	I'm just reminding everyone.
	Literally, OK, Karen.
	Exactly, OK, Karen.
	Make the UNJ face their own lockdown so we can live our lives.
	Never forget these people.
	Sean O'Grady, independent.
	What did he say about it?
	This is what we do about anti-vaxxers.
	No job, no entry, no NHS access.
	Oh, really?
	No healthcare?
	No healthcare for the unclean?
	Healthcare is a right, but not for you.
	Yeah.
	This was recently.
	This was May last year.
	The one from Karen Brady was December.
	It feels like a long time ago now.
	This was seven months ago.
	And then here's another reason people might not want to take it.
	Oh, look.
	Are we allowed to say this one?
	Can we even say Lisa Shaw?
	Do we have to call it Elliot Page?
	I think this is a fake news article or I'll be shot.
	This must be fake.
	Presenter's death due to complications.
	Oh, yeah.
	We can't say that.
	This didn't happen.
	It's on the BBC though, weirdly, so it's confusing.
	I don't know which BBC to believe now.
	I'm very confused.
	I just noticed that.
	But yeah, so look, there's lots of reasons, Hannah, why people might not want to take the vaccine, but what could we have done better?
	So it's one of these little fake self-examination.
	Anyway, there's a few good people in the documentary.
	Nazarene comes across quite well.
	The BBC may have accidentally created a new star here, like people said they did with Farage, or some people even claim they did with Boris Johnson on Have I Got News for You?
	Because actually she comes across really well.
	And here she is with her friend who had 28 years old...
	Five days, she took her, something happened, and then some things happened to her.
	I don't know what I'm allowed to say.
	I just suddenly realised that sentence has just gone completely off the bit.
	I was like, I can't say any of these words.
	This is what they've done to us.
	This is why it gets the censorship being the root cause of, you know, if you actually want to sit there, if a genuine person from this position is like, well, I don't understand why there's so much, you know, upset around the idea that we're forcing people to take this, or why are people suspicious?
	Well, okay.
	I mean, you can have all the, you know, the guy who talks about chips, and that's a whole other scheme of what the majority of the complaints are, which is, if people are suspicious about your censorship, and, well, if you're censoring things, there's usually things that are suspicious about you, then that obviously makes sense.
	And therefore, if you want them to be confident in your position, don't censor them.
	Don't censor information about what you're doing.
	You'd think, Callum, but you're not the BBC. I mean, so she had a stroke and three heart attacks, but of course it was not from the medical treatment, as Hannah will explain here.
	Let's have a look.
	So this is a video of her having a seizure.
	Her life has been profoundly changed by what's happened to her.
	Yeah.
	I think the one question that I would ask...
	Is how can you be sure that that was the vaccine and not something that would have happened anyway?
	If you've been completely healthy before, that one thing changed and then days later you're suddenly experiencing all these things you've never had before, like paralysis and seizures.
	The chance of that happening to someone so young, I would say, not possible.
	She's completely wrong, of course, and we can't stress that enough.
	BBC woman say coincidence, so she must be right.
	And Callum's just thinking about how much he's going to have to edit later, and I can see it in his eyes.
	She's going to start selling memes at some point.
	But this is the BBC. All we're doing is showing what the BBC show.
	So anyway, that happened in the dark.
	The bit that attracted quite a lot of attention online is this Professor Adam Finn, and it's quite interesting to hear how they describe him in the documentary here.
	I'm heading to Bristol with Luca, Ethan and Mark to meet Professor Adam Finn, who's been instrumental in COVID-19 vaccine research.
	He's instrumental in COVID vaccine research.
	But do you know what else he is?
	Adam Finn, he's the leader of the Pfizer Center, we find out.
	So, it's an interesting question.
	It says there, you know, led by Adam Finn.
	This is in Bristol, I think.
	And it's just interesting that he works at a Pfizer Center.
	Just pointing it out is not necessarily a problem, but, you know, presumably they'll mention it in the documentary and just say, hey, I'm Professor Adam Finn.
	I work for the Pfizer Center.
	And, you know, that might make you think...
	My job might be tied to all this.
	Yeah, but then you might explain and say, well, but really I'm still independent because blah blah blah.
	Let's see what he actually says in the doc.
	If we have it.
	Play the clip.
	There you go.
	The American companies like Moderna and Pfizer have taken a very different approach and they've seen this as a bonanza.
	I mean, they've made an absolute fortune out of making these vaccines, but we've all kind of jointly made the decision that capitalism is the way we want to go.
	People like me and people like the regulatory authorities exist as a kind of buffer in between them and the public.
	And if results come out that companies might not like the look of, It's my job to publish them and make sure that everyone knows what's going on.
	Did any of that make you think, I work at the Pfizer Center?
	I mean, he offers a critique of Pfizer, saying that they're making a load of money.
	He does a weird commie dog whistle by saying, well, we've all chosen capitalism.
	I'm not happy with it.
	Hey, wink, wink.
	But that's what we chose.
	Then he says he's a buffer.
	What he means is he works.
	Maybe it's perfectly innocent.
	He works within the vaccine centre, but maybe he's independent.
	I'm not suggesting he does what Pfizer says.
	But you'd think he'd just go, I work at the Pfizer centre, but really my role is blah, blah, blah.
	But they don't mention that anywhere in the documentary.
	And from that clip, he sounds like he's critiquing.
	He sounds like he's on a march against Pfizer.
	I mean, it's sort of weird as well, where he's like, okay, I mean, firstly, if a medical company makes a load of money making good medicine, then no one cares.
	I don't know why you're bringing up, like, we're communists who are, like, we're suspicious of that.
	No one is, except the commies, but that's like, what, five people in the basement?
	But the aspect there is, this is capitalism.
	Okay, hang on.
	Like, if it's mandated, it's not capitalism?
	Like, you're not mandated to buy certain groceries because it'll make you healthier and live longer, and therefore it's good for your health, or anything else.
	It is up to you, and that's the way it's always been, and that's, you know, the ethical way of doing medicine, you would have thought.
	But that wasn't the conversation that was being had.
	You're right.
	There's no international campaign behind Calpol.
	We just liked it.
	It tastes good, guys.
	It may have worked.
	We don't know.
	Calpol refused to make Steve to cut down.
	But yeah, what's interesting to me is that if I'm doing a BBC documentary, I know the internet's going to explode with this.
	I just get ahead of it and say, this guy works at the Pfizer vaccine centre.
	But actually, and they later said something like, oh, it's not like a company where it means he's the leader in the corporate sense.
	He's just like a, I don't know, he just works there in some sort of academic sense.
	But put it in the documentary or the internet's going to go crazy, isn't it?
	Because that's the obvious thing you should mention.
	You shouldn't just say, he's been instrumental.
	You should try and be as transparent as possible so people trust you.
	I think so.
	You know, censor things or hide things.
	I think so, but I'm old fashioned.
	So very similarly with this Professor Asma Khalil, who had a clip about why the treatment is safe and effective for babies.
	Let's play it.
	It's normal and it's common for pregnant women to feel very protective of their babies.
	But what we know for sure, the vaccine does not cause miscarriage.
	We know that their vaccine does not increase the chance of stillbirth.
	So we really have good safety data from a very large number of pregnant women who actually receive the vaccine.
	And that's just in the UK? No, just in the UK. So most of the data that we have are from the United States, from the UK. Yeah, that'll do.
	But if you go to the article, you actually find that this professor, again, if you scroll down this one, there you go, is tied to the pregnancy trial, the Pfizer pregnancy trial, with her name there.
	So I don't know.
	I mean, I'm not making any claims.
	This was just in an article.
	It's not a surprise that someone in this field would work in pregnancy trials.
	The question is, well, she works for Pfizer.
	So...
	I mean, again, this kind of reminds me of, I mean, it's the obvious point of when you speak to someone in medicine and journalism, you need to make sure who's funding them.
	And if they're funded by the corporation that they're promoting their products, well, then you just can't use them, because that's not really an ethical way of doing journalism.
	Yeah, and I don't know.
	I'm just asking the question because it was hard to find more information on that, but I'm just asking the question.
	I think the other one was more questionable to me, but there it is.
	I'm just putting it out there.
	It's a point of interest that someone raised.
	And the whole documentary really, the problem with it was, instead of just saying, here's what these people think and here's what these people, you could have a great documentary.
	You could have skeptics like Toby Young and Dr. Robert Malone and people like that against smart people who say we should take it and that would have been completely fine.
	That would be very interesting.
	But they didn't go with that.
	They went with, we need to convince these plebs to take it.
	At one point she pours a load of jelly beans on the table to try and demonstrate your chances of getting a side issue.
	It's stuff like that.
	It's like...
	What about if I used jelly beans?
	And it's like, no.
	And some people have said they felt patronised by that.
	The lady later said on GB News Vicky that she felt that was patronising, which it was.
	And the other thing they did, they tried to use the Ukraine fake news from the war to try and say, hey guys, you've been fooled by other fake news.
	Maybe you've been fooled by...
	The jab fake news.
	I'm just trying not to say any words, guys.
	If I sound like unsure of my sentences, I keep thinking what words am I supposed to say?
	I just can't get over the hilarity of the BBC being like, maybe you believed fake news elsewhere?
	It's like, you guys literally published that, you know, the bad man wanted to behead Muslims and made a post about it.
	Never happened.
	You guys have been caught continuously just making things up.
	Yes, there is that.
	Let's have a look at a clip where Nazarene sort of hits back at their attempt to use the war as an analogy.
	But on there, there are a few videos of, yeah, with the war.
	Yeah.
	This is incredibly irrelevant.
	It is so irrelevant what you're saying right now.
	I can tell you the reason.
	No, no, we're not talking about a war.
	We're not using that to discredit anything.
	This whole group is saying.
	I'm not trying to discredit anything.
	You're generalizing again.
	We're not doing this.
	We're not doing this.
	I'm not trying to trick you.
	We're not talking about a war.
	We're talking about a...
	Why?
	She can't even say it because it's on Twitter, so that word's out.
	But yeah, that was good.
	She said that was one of the actual clips she was proud of.
	Obviously a red herring to the whole conversation.
	Yeah.
	It's so clear what they're trying to do.
	But you go, okay, they're throwing everything in the book at it.
	But why?
	Why is your approach?
	All right, I'm trying to convince Callum.
	I've got him in a house for six days with a lot of other people.
	A bit like brainwashing.
	A bit like how you do brainwashing.
	You arrive in a van, you don't know where you are, and I just hit you with jelly beans, war analogies, and you go, oh, maybe I should take it.
	Or you could just ask what they think.
	Is that crazy?
	Am I mad?
	Anyway, that was the whole tone of the piece, and I think it was summed up at the end when the conclusion that Ms Fry, sorry if it's not Ms, I don't know what it is, but Hannah Fry makes his conclusion at the end.
	Experts are warning that the risk of a new pandemic is higher than ever before, and next time, engaging effectively with the millions of unvaccinated could be even more important.
	Yes, and the lesson you should have learned is don't censor people in conversations.
	Right, but instead her conclusion is, more plague on the way, how can we make more plebs take it next time?
	Isn't that what you got from that?
	Yeah.
	And the question no one asked in the whole doc, D Company Bookie has put it on Twitter, watching a bit of this unvaccinated program.
	One question they seem to not be asking is, why the F does a healthy young adult need a bleep for a mild bleep?
	I'm just bleeping everything out.
	Need a vaccine?
	It's not a conversation worth having, really.
	I think we're allowed to just say that.
	God, I love making segments for YouTube.
	I know, but that didn't come up in the...
	Sorry, these segments I picked.
	But that didn't come up in the whole doc.
	What if they just didn't want it for that reason?
	And now the fallout from it has been quite interesting.
	The Telegraph have reviewed it and they've given it one star.
	Oh, hang on.
	It's been changed.
	That's weird.
	I know.
	Oh, here's one.
	Oh, that's my eyesight.
	Sorry, guys.
	That's a boomer moment.
	That's my colour blindness kicking in.
	I thought they'd change the stuff.
	Yeah, so painfully patronising documentary treated vaccine sceptics as idiots.
	The BBC set out to prove wrong rather than fairly represent the views of Britain's 4 million unvaccinated.
	And it's probably way more than 4 million, as people have said.
	And there was a good quote down later on.
	It said, Professor Hannah Fry was the host there to discuss the issues and their views.
	What this really meant was that Fry would try to change their minds by explaining to these people in a lovely soft tone of voice that they were wrong.
	That's basically the whole show.
	And then, in a kind of rotten tomatoes of UK media, The Guardian give it four stars.
	They love it.
	Unvaccinated review.
	The most infuriating TV show of the year so far.
	They're still annoyed.
	But for opposite reasons, they're annoyed because Hannah Fry tries to change the minds of seven COVID vaccine refuseniks in this documentary, and you'll need a saint's patience to tolerate some of the responses.
	So they just hate the idiot plebs.
	So four stars from The Guardian, one star from The Telegraph, both angry for opposite reasons.
	Only one of them is right.
	Again, the patronising comes from her.
	It's like, oh my god, imagine talking to people.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	The rest of us do that.
	Like, we're not all starlitists who just assume opposition is the correct politics.
	The Guardian ran into a bit of a problem because there's a black woman in it, so they found a way to praise her, lower down the piece.
	They say, well, she was great, but like, and they love the host.
	She's got the same views as this white woman, but she's white.
	Yeah, yeah, it was amazing.
	And even in the documentary, they're trying to say that basically black people haven't wanted to take the vaccine.
	But the way they explain it is they go, people from Lambeth.
	And it was just like, you don't mean that.
	Lambeth, just say what you mean.
	It's like they don't want to take the vaccine because, you know, they've got good reason.
	So did the people feel represented?
	Well, Nazarene didn't.
	She said, sadly, we've been misrepresented as expected.
	This leaves me no choice but to expose the truth of how those six days really went.
	BBC Two, if you're looking to make another biased documentary, rehire that same editor because they did a great job.
	So there you go.
	I'm hoping she's got recordings.
	And this is really a lesson, as any of these hit pieces always are, which is if you ever do decide to sit down with someone from dishonest media, you keep them honest, you just record the audio on your phone.
	Either you tell them you're doing it to try and keep them honest that way, or just do it secretly and don't tell them.
	And then when they put out their smear piece, you can literally just prove it.
	Yeah, I think she implies she has got some stuff in other posts.
	So it'd be interesting to see.
	And Vicky wasn't too happy either in the next tweet.
	She said, Oh, what a shock the BBC made me spend a week of my life explaining why I wasn't vaccinated to edit it and just show the bits that are made for good TV. So please watch me on GB. And they talked about GB. They didn't add that much to it.
	So I haven't got a clip, but they just basically said we've infantilized.
	They didn't use it for, you know, all the stuff we know that happens.
	So, at the moment, what's your viewpoint on the vaccine?
	It's just, to be fair, there's a lot of fear.
	Is there a main fear?
	Is it little fear?
	I look at some of the side effects, or at least some of them that you see online, and I'm just starting to think, I don't want that.
	Is there any in particular that sprung out to you that really worries you?
	I mean, I'd like to have kids.
	I want the fella to be working.
	I want the fella to be working.
	So that was the kind of thing they put in it.
	I mean, fair play to the lad, really.
	But that's really what the whole thing was.
	It was sort of like pretty professionals of various kinds.
	Just take it.
	Going, no, I want my fella to work.
	So that was the tone of the piece.
	By the way, I threw this in as a little Easter egg, if people are still using that phrase.
	Just the presenter there doing the one-eye pose.
	What's that?
	I just thought that would send the internet.
	Have you seen the one-eye pose?
	I haven't, actually.
	You've never seen this?
	Is this a meme Callum doesn't know?
	I didn't know there was such a thing.
	The boomer comes on and gives him a new meme.
	Alright, teach us.
	So the one I pose is just lots of people doing this satanic, allegedly satanic pose.
	They cover that.
	Now I'm doing that because I'll screenshot that.
	Yeah, yeah, it's the Illuminati sort of satanism stuff and it's the adrenochrome rabbit hole.
	But like, why is Hannah doing it?
	And I thought, has someone photoshopped that?
	Is she part of the One Eye Club?
	I've just got to put it out there.
	Yeah, I feel like that's a bit...
	That's a bit of fun just to discredit my position at the end.
	But anyway, safe and effective, guys.
	Please take it.
	I suppose with that perfectly good news, we shall move on to the G word.
	Yeah, and there's so many words now.
	No idea if we can say...
	So there's a new slur, the G word, which no one's allowed to say anymore, at least not on Twitter and Reddit.
	So presumably in the next short period it will spread to being banned on YouTube, Facebook, etc.
	I mean, on Facebook you're not even allowed to call someone a cow.
	If you call them an animal name, that's a bannable offense.
	That's how nanny-state-ish these companies have got.
	But the G-word is now one of them as well.
	In case you're wondering, the word's groomer, not the gamer word.
	So, there you have it.
	And you can see here, just to promote first, the origins of intersectionality, of course, being very prominent in regards to all of this, because...
	Well, why did the alphabet people end up getting called groomers?
	Dunno.
	I suppose we'll find out, shall we?
	Because if you go to the next link here, we can see the news itself.
	This lady, some verified checkmark, saying Twitter says anti-LGBTQ slur groomer is banned, but its enforcement is sorely lacking.
	Right, number one.
	Gay people are groomers.
	No one's saying that.
	As in, we don't actually think that people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, etc.
	are groomers because they're part of their group.
	We're saying that the groomers are using that as a cover demonstrably every time and we have endless cases of it.
	I mean, I love in here, what is it, Rhonda Santos' press secretary responds, Grimmer isn't an LGBTQ slur.
	It's a description of an evil behaviour that sick adults of all sexualities and gender identities engage in.
	Why do you conflate this behaviour with LGBTQ? Just out of interest.
	That's like when they say to people like Danny Baker or whoever, like, oh, you're conflating black people with apes.
	It's like, no, no, you're doing that.
	Stop saying I'm doing it.
	Don't mention that.
	You want to roll that up.
	You can see Andy as well coming up with this.
	Same thing, which...
	I mean, if Andy's an anti-gay activist at this point, it'll be news to him, that's for one, but I suppose we'll move forward and go to the article itself for the news in here, which they say that, you know, they don't enforce the rules.
	Quote, So this was Reddit that banned the G word, and now Twitter followed suit in response.
	She writes, Grooming is a slur that falsely equates being LGBTQ with being a paedophile.
	No, it doesn't.
	You're the one who did that.
	Like, again, as mentioned, this is about behaviour of individuals.
	And, well, they have to come from one group, and they have to be using that very much as a mask, as we can see.
	The slur has roots in the term's original meaning, which refers to how sexual predators coerce and manipulate children in order to abuse them.
	Yes, because pedos are genuinely using gender ideology as cover, as they always have.
	Also, it's not just noncery as well.
	It is, of course, coercing defenseless children into cultist ideology, which you 100% are doing in every school in America.
	We've all got access to live as a TikTok still.
	We can see the clips.
	We can see the TikToks, in fact.
	And in case you're wondering, have you ever read any queer theory?
	Maybe I've been forced to in education by mistake.
	The founder of queer theory, if we go forward, is Gail Rubin.
	Someone who definitely would have been featured on the lips of TikTok if it was back in the day.
	And they write on Wikipedia here, just a crowning achievement, her 1984 essay, Thinking Sex, is widely regarded as the founding text of gay and lesbian studies, sexuality studies, and queer theory.
	You ever heard of this text before?
	Don't think so.
	The Taliban are most famous for making it a famous text in the recent years.
	Oh, really?
	Because they kept being like, yeah, this is the West.
	We're not interacting with that.
	Because if we go to the article itself, there's the front cover from Gail Rubin.
	Quote from her.
	It is harder for most people to sympathise with actual boy lovers...
	Yeah, it is.
	She writes, We're a theorist.
	This text, founding document, describing paedophilia as an erotic orientation.
	Consequently, the police have festered on them.
	Local police, the FBI, and watchdog postal inspectors have joined to build a huge apparatus, CHADS, whose sole aim is to wipe out the community of men who love underage youth.
	Ugh.
	It actually says the police have feasted on them, so she brought cannibalism in as well.
	But the FBI and the Postal Service doing the right thing to try and stop noncers, and she's like, how dare they?
	This is an oppressed minority that I stand with.
	The left always pushed that, man.
	Didn't even Peter Tatchell say something like that?
	The left always pushed towards paedophilia because they want to break every taboo.
	I think I've said it before.
	Just for the sake of it, they never consider some taboos are there for a good reason.
	Yeah.
	It's another marginalized group in their terms, and that needs to be brought to the center.
	They're another intersection of oppression, don't you know?
	Good.
	I don't care if they're oppressed.
	She continues, though, because she wasn't happy with shutting up at that point.
	In 20 years or so, when some of the smoke has cleared, it will be much easier to show that these men have been the victims of a savage and undeserved witch hunt.
	No, they won't.
	A lot of people will be embarrassed by their collaboration with this persecution, but it will be too late to do much good for those men who have spent their lives behind prison.
	Wrong side of history, bro.
	That's the argument she's making.
	You're on the wrong side of history for being anti-pedo.
	Yeah, and this text specifically is the founding text of queer theory.
	Yeah, funnily enough, queer theorists are obviously long-standing, being alleged to be, you know, groomers for exactly statements like this, and then the Daily Dot comes along and says, why are you saying that about gay people?
	I was like...
	No one was.
	They were saying it about people like her and their ideology.
	I love how she says, what was it, within 20 years things will change.
	It turned out we only took 40 instead, so she was a bit off the mark.
	But in schools across America, they are trying to make that the norm, as every TikTok teacher seems to show.
	Back to Twitter's stance on all this, because they write some more.
	Twitter wrote...
	We are committed to combating abuse motivated by hatred, prejudice, or intolerance, particularly abuse that seeks to silence the voices of those who have been historically marginalised.
	That would include paedophiles, Twitter.
	What about the currently marginalised, like kids who are being groomed, or straight white men?
	But they deserve it, according to Twitter.
	Why is it always the historically marginalised?
	There's problems happening now with the Uyghur Muslims.
	Because they want to destroy the West, and if Westerners are being marginalised, that's good.
	Oh yeah, soz, forgot.
	Where the evil West used to say that pedos were bad and deal with them appropriately, that's wrong.
	So Twitter is there to save them.
	For this reason, they write, we prohibit behaviour that targets individuals or groups with abuse based on their perceived membership in a protected category.
	Right, right.
	So nonces and queer theorists are very much historically marginalised.
	Good job.
	All of history.
	But then the question becomes, are they a protected characteristic?
	Are they a protected group?
	And, well, according to the intersectionals, yes.
	They're a marginalized group, therefore they deserve protection, as the Daily Dot is essentially arguing here by trying to conflate those people with being gay.
	They're like, aren't they just like gay people?
	And everyone else in the room is like, no?
	You freak?
	The hell doesn't matter with you?
	I mean, this is literally a homophobic thing we try to get rid of, but instead you're bringing it back for some reason.
	I must say, if I was a normal gay person like Andrew Doyle or Douglas Murray or Andy Ngo, I'd just be constantly furious at these people.
	Well, they are.
	They are.
	That's it.
	If you go to the next one, you can see, in fact, gays against groomers.
	Also, not very happy about that.
	Not really appreciative of Twitter's stance that they're just like paedophiles.
	I can't blame them, to say the least.
	By the way, harking back a little bit to what you said, but it's interesting, you can get the tone of a social media platform by which words they ban, can't you?
	Twitter's banning groomer, it's an absolute cesspit.
	Facebook, it's cow, because it's basically middle-aged Karens having a pop at each other about recycling, and it gets a bit feisty.
	You've got to stop women on women violence.
	Although, this, you know, is horrific, but there we are.
	It's leftist ideology advancing in the way that leftists do.
	And, of course, they're going to run into horrific statements such as leftists now believing that all gay people are pedophiles, which, um...
	Weird thing to do, but okay.
	But this is kind of where we win when they try to die on the groomer hill.
	Because people will always, I said it probably to you before, they'll always defend their children.
	And the left will keep pushing and saying, no, no, we should be able to do what we want.
	And he's like, no, no, stay away from my children.
	Step away from the children.
	And that's where we start to fight back.
	Leave those kids alone.
	And that's where normal people fight back and say, you've gone too far.
	And then they say, hang on, what else are you doing?
	Which is what's happening now.
	But there is a somewhat comedical aspect to all this, which you might appreciate, which is some right-wingers have obviously responded to this by being like, oh, groomer is literally the N-word for LGBT folks, they're telling us.
	What's up, my groomers?
	Groomer, please.
	And that's with a hard R, so you should only say groomer with an A at the end, really.
	Groomer instead of groomer?
	You've seen that Boo Docs episode about the teacher who did that.
	Have you seen it?
	No.
	There was a teacher who got him problem because he's a white teacher.
	He had black students in the city.
	And the students would all call each other with the hard R because they were black and they thought they could do that.
	So he decided he would do it with an A in response to try and reach out to the kids.
	But he didn't want to do the hard R because that would be too much.
	I don't know.
	He also got suspended for calling the kids the N-word.
	And then there's an interview on local TV where he's trying to explain.
	He's got a little board with both letters, being like, look, the difference.
	Please believe me.
	I mean, it's a very close sound, isn't it?
	So you rested your whole job on a vowel sound there, essentially.
	Yeah, but there we have it.
	If you need a new gamer word, we have one, apparently.
	And James Lindsay got suspended for this.
	One of the first victims for saying the G word.
	As you can see here, there's a TikTok noticing that he responded to someone calling this a conflating gaze with paedophilia.
	And he was like, okay, Grimo, what's wrong with you?
	Did he come back on?
	Because he could have appealed to this using the argument, but they totally are.
	I don't know if he made an appeal, but he is back on now, so presumably he had to delete that.
	I think he just had to pledge allegiance to Elliot Page and it got him back on.
	Zeke Elliot.
	But if we go to the next one here, we can see a clip of TikTok posting that...
	No.
	No, come on.
	Like, we all know what the reality is of this.
	As you can see, she notes, in other case, I mean, there are many of these, but we have another one.
	Michigan public school employee who spoke at a school board meeting in support of teaching an LGBTQ curriculum mocked parents, was arrested for allegedly trying to meet a minor for sex.
	Are you shocked?
	Not anymore, Calimacus.
	It's happened so many times.
	The drag show, oh look, they had a record of assaulting, etc, etc.
	It's every time.
	And I suppose we will enjoy this chap here.
	I'm a resident, townie, taxpayer, vaccinated and functioning, graduate of this high school, class of 1999, proud member of the LGBTQIA community, and an employee of Mount Pleasant Public Schools.
	Thank you.
	I really cannot speak any more eloquently than the people who have spoken before me tonight.
	But what I can say is that for the last five years, I have had the profound privilege of working with your students.
	With your students.
	With your students.
	And I can tell you this, they are hungry for knowledge.
	They are so hungry for knowledge that despite your words, your wishes, your values, they will learn on their own.
	So many of your children are hurting, questioning, struggling in this world that we have created.
	They are simultaneously being taught to celebrate and to hate who they are.
	I can't deny that.
	Every day.
	Ultimately, they will become who they will become with or without us.
	Give them the chance, the grace, and the support to embrace their own learning.
	They're going to do it anyway, no matter what you say or do.
	No matter how many candles you light.
	No matter how many rallies you hold.
	With liberty and justice for all.
	Okay, groomer.
	I mean...
	I mean, really, yeah.
	What can you say?
	That's the most disturbing clip you've ever played.
	In the context, on this show, the way he says that your kids...
	And then the hungry bit, you wonder what he's going to say for a minute.
	He's like, what are you going to say there?
	And then it's still bad, but he actually says...
	And by the way, that moustache and accent, pure South Park character...
	I mean, it would have been, you know, a right-wing parody, surely.
	I'm fully vaccinated.
	Black Lives Matter, by the way, I'm here to groom your kids.
	Oh, yeah.
	I presume that speech was the reason his hard drives were investigated, and now he's allegedly being charged with sex with a minor.
	I can't believe he also got the vaccinated bit in there.
	If he was also a sea person on a dinghy, that would be the full set of today's show.
	It really is memetic magic, isn't it?
	Just like, oh, the memes are real.
	And I'm fully vaccinated.
	And I'm a penis.
	I'm hungry for your kids.
	Oh, boy.
	But there you have it.
	And he's not the only one.
	I mean, we've shown repeatedly these individuals keep getting arrested.
	Genuinely upset me.
	It seems.
	And we're not surprised, because the ideology they're promoting is not homosexual toleration or, you know, acceptance.
	Instead, it is one of, well, turning people into queer theorists, as Gale might have wanted.
	And if we move to the next link here, we can see Pink News is incredibly happy with this news that the G word has become a banned word.
	Because that's the aspect here.
	They're not countering the argument that, you know, people like him seem to keep getting arrested, this sort of thing.
	Instead, they've just decided to shut down the criticism.
	I mean, the right has looked at all these TikToks, all these arrests, and gone, you know, we're a bit critical of you people.
	We don't seem to trust you after all those arrests.
	You think there might be something wrong with your ideology.
	I mean, you just, you did all right in the 80s that you were a bunch of nonces as well, and then made Gail your founding text of, you know, queer theory.
	And that criticism has now been banned.
	I mean, that is the response from the progressives.
	Every time.
	Not to counter the argument, but just to ban the discussion.
	Pink News did a hit piece on me, so every time I see them I just go into sort of blind rage.
	So justified.
	And I also love how Pink News endlessly put themselves as the oppressed, marginalized people.
	Yeah, but you literally have the ability to ban criticism.
	I mean, like, you and the Muslims are the only ones who have that, really.
	I mean, I know they can trump you on this aspect.
	They've got a, you know, better...
	Convincing arguments.
	And that beautiful moment we were talking about before where Stephen Nolan grilled the head of Pink News, whatever he was, and he couldn't even say what Two Spirit was.
	Then he said, well, what's gender queer then?
	Just give me that one.
	And he couldn't do that one either.
	He didn't know what it was.
	He's like, you're the guy pushing all this.
	You don't know what it is.
	No.
	I was like, why are you doing this to me?
	I was like, because you're the head of Pink News.
	Anyway, but we go to James Lindsay, who responded to Pink News here, just saying it's homophobic to say Groomer is anti-LGBT, by the way.
	And that's the fundamental point as well.
	Even their own headlines and the way they're trying to frame this ends up making them anti-gay, which I suppose that's what they are in the end.
	Otherwise, why would they be trying to conflate the two?
	But if we go to the last one here, I just wanted to also mention just some other madness, which I didn't know where else to fit, so I think we'll do it.
	Can I just say, it was a simpler time when we were just turning the frickin' frogs gay.
	You know what I mean?
	In hindsight, that was quite innocent grooming.
	Yeah, I mean, if they were just grooming frogs, I don't think I'd actually really have a problem at this point.
	We wouldn't do a whole 20 minutes.
	I'll sacrifice the frogs if it means the kids can be safe.
	But the news in the UK, which is, of course, we have to indoctrinate the whole of society, don't we?
	It can't just be the schools, and you have to have public symbols of approval.
	This is Guido breaking the news that £230,000 of taxpayers' money have been sent on Rainbow Roads, which if it was for, you know, go-karts, so we could do Mario Kart skits...
	Well, I was going to say, that is disgusting.
	That money could go to pizzas for migrants.
	It certainly could.
	You could buy a lot of pizzas.
	Imagine how many dominoes you could throw into a dinghy for that.
	But if you want to give it to people who might actually need some food, and we're just piss takers, again, it does have the numbers.
	They say, to put that in other terms, that's 109,000 free school meals worth of rainbow paint.
	Money well spent.
	But there we have it.
	That's the G word.
	Being banned.
	I mean, you have to ask the question as well for those Rainbow Roads.
	I mean, who is that for?
	I mean, seriously.
	I mean, it's not for homosexual people.
	I mean, they don't give a crap.
	The ones I know hate it.
	A lot of my best friends are gay.
	Andrew Doyle.
	And he hates it.
	You know who else hates it?
	Horses.
	Dogs.
	Blind people.
	Guide dogs.
	Don't know what the hell they are.
	Freaks out the horses.
	Foreigners.
	Very confused as to what the hell that is when they're driving in Britain.
	So, I mean, there you have it.
	It really is just ideological paint, which instead you could feed the kids, but that's not important.
	Technically, groomerism is important, at least to these people.
	There we have it.
	Let's go to the video comments.
	We were having a heatwave here in the United States, and then this suddenly popped through, so this is a nice bit of relief.
	So this question is for Callum.
	I see you and Lord Miles are both following everyone's favorite Talban meme lord on Twitter.
	So I just kind of want to know, what are your thoughts on this guy's memes?
	Because obviously some of them are funny, like the France one on screen.
	Some of them are kind of based, like the top one on screen.
	But a lot of them are also a little bit cringe.
	You know, obviously very pro-Islam, which makes sense from his perspective.
	But either way, everyone should follow this guy because he's worth a laugh at the very least.
	Yeah, well, it sort of reminds me, number one, of a simpler time in which the internet really was free and you could go and find anything.
	And the fact that he's on Twitter, of course, is hilarious because, you know, Trump's banned.
	But do you follow Malang?
	I don't.
	You really should, because he's...
	The most interesting aspect, fundamentally, is how the hell are the Taliban good at memeing and the left aren't?
	I mean, how long have the Taliban had internet connection?
	I mean, seriously.
	Yeah.
	And yet their memes are a million times better than anything the left produces.
	You know, the blocks of words.
	I suppose if you buy the argument that Taliban are sort of far right because of their repressive regime, they should be really good at memeing.
	Oh, he is.
	There you go.
	There you have it.
	I suppose that's the lesson to learn.
	But yeah, that guy, he was banned for posting Islamic opinions on Jews.
	So, I mean, what do you expect?
	And then he's back on another account.
	But he'll keep coming back.
	And all the rest of them are out there having fun as well.
	But it really is just nice to be able to see into the other world, at least.
	So, go to the next video.
	We say that criminals are a cowardly and superstitious lot.
	But there is nothing superstitious or cowardly about not wanting to be strung up by your entrails to a building for stealing a loaf of bread.
	Conrad Kurz is Batman if he had zero morals and Superman power.
	Oh, and They can't see the future!
	Cursed with visions his entire life, and was often derided by his brothers for his suffering, except for, of course, Horus.
	He eventually was allegedly killed by an Imperium assassin.
	A lot of people doubt that, but honestly, he kind of welcomed it.
	Alright.
	I didn't know anything about Conrad Cuts.
	I know you're looking confused as ever.
	I'm very confused by...
	This is not my world, but that was one of those models that I see Carl painting a lot.
	As in the one before the lady assassin, presumably.
	But yeah, there we are.
	Warhammer is where I don't...
	Not that clip was even about that, really, but there's a Venn diagram with Lotus ears.
	That's the bit I don't go into.
	That's the outer circle.
	Oh, you should.
	The lore is hilarious.
	I think I've told you about the Orcs before.
	Do you remember or not?
	They're one of the races in the universe, and it's just pure comedy.
	They're a race of mushroom people who just love war, so when they go to war with the Space Marines or whoever, if they win, wonderful, we won.
	If they lose, I don't care, because, you know, still got to fight, and that was fun.
	And if they die, I died fighting!
	It's just a beautiful, beautiful way to be happy about the whole world.
	Warrior spirit.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Let's go to the next one.
	This time what it means when a human meditates, but what does it mean when you meditate?
	It means I sit quietly for a while every day.
	I do my best not to think about any of my worries, and I also try to think about things that I'm thankful for from my past.
	That's very interesting.
	Please go on and describe how you see the world and how different it is from the human experience.
	Humans receive only a certain number of pieces of information every time, as they need to focus.
	I don't have that feature.
	I'm constantly flooded with everything that's around me.
	I didn't really follow that because I couldn't understand the high-pitched voice.
	It was hard to understand the little thing.
	Apparently it was the AI. It was a smiley face from Watchmen, and Carl was in there somewhere, and Sam Rockwell.
	Is that his name?
	It's Carl walking, talking to, I think, an AI. But otherwise, we'll have to lose the next one because I don't remember.
	Man, this heatwave I've been hearing about in the UK. You Brits must really be suffering.
	33 Celsius.
	That's about what?
	90?
	91 Fahrenheit?
	Anyways...
	Oh, hey!
	It's mild today!
	God, I hate that.
	I hate this Yankee position on our heatwave.
	Like, oh, I'm sat in my air-conditioned house and my air-conditioned car.
	Why are you complaining?
	I was like, so houses are built like furnaces to keep the heat in.
	Yeah, I'm tall on this.
	He said 33, it got to 38, 39, if you believe the media, 40.
	It said 39 on my app, then it suddenly went to 40, which I didn't trust, because it hadn't been 40 all day.
	I'm like, the app's in on the big lie.
	Because they actually take the reading at Heathrow Airport, which is quite relevant.
	If you take it next to a massive exhaust port, you know...
	It's hot, guys.
	Yeah, because you keep expanding Heathrow Airport.
	So I hate the climate change insane meltdown everyone had.
	It's the end of the world because it's hot.
	It was 38.7 in 2019.
	I remember it.
	That's official as well.
	So on the one hand, I say, yes, the hysteria is ridiculous.
	On the other hand, I say it was hotter than he claimed.
	And in a London flat...
	Like you say, no air con.
	Heat kept in.
	Some weird new build.
	Kids screaming from the council say, this is my life.
	Just horrendous.
	All of our housing is built to keep heat in.
	They're all insulated and whatnot, and there's no AC. The best you've got is a fan, usually, for a British home.
	So it's just not fun.
	It put me in this thing, like, should I play football or not when it's 40 degrees?
	Basically, I hate the hysterical climate, oh, it's terrible, people.
	But, so now I have to go out, but even though I don't like that level of heat, I now have to go out and enjoy it, despite them.
	It's very convocated, Callum.
	I do hate that rhetoric, though, because it really is like the left-wing version.
	If you remember, there was a Republican senator who went, it's snowing outside here.
	It's a snowball.
	Global warming?
	Like, complete nonsense, because I've got snow.
	And then you get to the summer months, and then you see the left do the exactly opposite.
	We're like, look, big ball of plasma in the sky, very hot.
	Yeah, global warming, am I right?
	It's just like, dude, stop.
	Another point Toby Young made to me is that I think it was deaths from heat were 180th deaths from cold.
	So cold is a much bigger problem, but that's not politically efficacious for them.
	So all we hear about is, it's heat death, guys.
	The planet's heating up.
	It's like, way more people die from cold.
	Nothing on that, guys?
	Oh, they're the wrong deaths.
	For the UK, this is our concern.
	They're the black guys in Chicago.
	They're not the George Floyd.
	It's the wrong death.
	Let's go to the next video comment.
	We really need to start addressing the weird leftist conspiracy theories that go around their mainstream circles, such as the fact that they believe that the city crime rights are no different than the rural or suburban areas but are made to look that way because of over-policing, which means that they believe that there are hundreds if not thousands of unrecorded murders happening in suburbia that are just not recorded on social media because of racism.
	I guess they do commit the crime of reproduction in the rural areas, which they view as probably the same as murder.
	There is that.
	There's also the rhetoric.
	You know, you endlessly hear it.
	Studies show that white Americans use drugs as much as black Americans.
	Black Americans are stopped more for it.
	And I don't believe it.
	I just don't believe it because it's that rural city distinction again, in which people talk about the fact that, oh yeah, people living in the sticks use drugs as much as people in the city.
	You haven't lived in a city, if you think that.
	Which is the level of drug dealing, the level of people who are just junkies.
	You've hit on another one of my hobby horses.
	I walked back home.
	Yes.
	I walked home from the gym the other day.
	This is in London, modern London, 2022.
	Group of young men openly doing that balloon drug that Raheem Sterling did.
	And for the US audience, that's a footballer who was sucking laughing gas, nitro socks, I think it's called, from a balloon.
	They're all doing it openly on the street with canisters and balloons.
	I'm like, guys, you're just on the street.
	Like, really?
	Is that where we are now?
	And I just had a full Michael Douglas in falling down moment.
	I was like, I've had enough.
	Give me the bazooka.
	You know what I mean?
	Just the level of decay.
	I'm the bad guy.
	Remember the movie?
	Yeah.
	Good, because you're younger than me.
	Because you were sending me memes about it in the heat and you were just like, I'm going to end it.
	I've just had enough, man.
	I'm just like...
	Yeah.
	Is that normal?
	You're just looking at me like, yeah, that's normal, Nick.
	A lot of people are doing a balloon drug outdoors.
	It depends where you are.
	I mean, I used to live on Oxford Road in Reading, and there was someone on that street whilst I was there just for two years.
	Someone was murdered in their own home over drugs.
	You could buy heroin up the road.
	I made friends with a homeless guy who was legitimately just homeless.
	He wasn't a junkie who told me about that.
	He was very angry at all the other homeless as well.
	Like, genuinely hated them.
	He was like, they're all just here because they're on drugs and they like it.
	I can't stand it.
	I think he was a bad name.
	Yeah, literally.
	You could get prostitutes up the street as well.
	There was a mate of mine who was in the drive-thru at McDonald's and he was waiting.
	And this woman in front of him got out the van and, like, justed her knickers and then walked off.
	And he's like, that's weird.
	And then he heard a knock on the door, and it was her offering him for sex.
	And he's like, yeah, no, roll up the window.
	You need to go away.
	But again, in cities, it's so different.
	I literally walked past, and you might say that's not much, but when you've been here since 2009, and I actually came in 2007 to London.
	No, 6.
	But anyway, who cares?
	The point is...
	It's that moment where I just said, I'm getting out.
	And you might say, why was it the balloon people, Nick?
	But it just was.
	It was just the straw that broke the cows.
	I'm like, I've had enough degeneracy.
	It's either I get a bag of weapons or I leave now.
	But I can't sell my house.
	I own a percentage of it, so it's going to have to be the bag of weapons.
	How much for a soda?
	Can we cut that from everything?
	How much for a soda in London?
	Too much, I reckon?
	Yeah, yeah.
	It needs to be taken down.
	Why doesn't it look like the picture?
	Yeah, yeah.
	I'm the bad guy.
	How'd that happen?
	Anyway, let's go to the next one.
	To me, The Boys is perhaps the best example of left-wing cognitive dissonance because it's clearly written to appeal to people of that sensibility and is openly enjoyed by leftists.
	It criticizes corporate control over every aspect of society, even though leftists often willingly go along with that.
	It criticizes unethical pharmaceutical practices, despite leftists openly supporting rushed vaccines and imposed mandates which bolstered corporations' profits to all new highs.
	It shows right-wing violence as rampant, despite the fact that in real life the left actively does the things that are shown to be bad when soups do it in the show.
	The Boys is to champagne socialists what the handmaid's tail is to feminists.
	Ah, brilliant.
	Very good analysis.
	Have you seen The Boys?
	No.
	So, I've been thinking about it, and he's sort of saying, yeah, it's almost like an old, less romanticized idea of itself, but actually, yeah, it's hypocrisy.
	I've been thinking about The Boys, but I haven't coherently formed this yet, so I probably shouldn't even say it on a podcast with such intelligent listeners, but The Boys is degenerate, and I need to prove it.
	It's degenerate, nihilistic TV that's supposed to demoralize us, and it's also anti-Christian TV. And it's also like he's saying, lefty.
	Why are you looking at me so sceptically?
	I'm looking forward to the analysis.
	Well, so am I because I haven't come up with it yet.
	But I've watched nearly all the first season and I had this horrible feeling.
	I'm like, there's something really wrong with this.
	And what it is, it's constantly pushing this kind of meaningless violence and gore.
	And maybe lots of things do it, but something about it struck me.
	It's kind of trying to say everything's...
	Pointless.
	Your girlfriend can just be like vaporized by a superhero.
	It's kind of constantly pushing this weird kind of nihilism and meaninglessness and kind of celebrating and glorying in like horrific one-off things that it's saying happen all the time.
	Then it has this whole anti-Christine section and all this stuff.
	I just haven't quite articulated it yet, but something about it in my gut just said, this is evil.
	And some people disagree with me and they say, what are you on about, Nick?
	Maybe I'm getting old.
	But I just sense that it's evil.
	And my friend said, you're exactly right.
	But I just need to...
	That guy articulated it much better.
	He's figured out one reason.
	But I think it's even worse than he said.
	I think it's actually evil.
	I'm looking at the chat.
	Most people seem to also hate it.
	Anyway, let's go to the next one.
	Heyo.
	Unfortunately I've got to pop over to the UK in a few weeks.
	I've got to go for a funeral down Oxford.
	Death of a family.
	Unfortunately that means I'm gonna have to deal with family so I'm going to need an excuse to escape once all the festivities are done.
	Anybody want to meet up for a beer?
	It's a good excuse for me.
	Well, there we are.
	I presume on the unofficial Discord or something, people organise that kind of thing, but I'm not there, so I can't help with that one.
	But there we are.
	I love the way people from the Isle of Man reluctantly are like, I'm going to have to go to the mainland with those people, the balloon drug people.
	I'm going to have to leave this paradise.
	Maybe that's where I'll live, an island.
	Go to the next one.
	So remember not too long ago, Carl was talking about how he doesn't like the Republican system because he thinks it's too prone to corruption.
	Well, what is the alternative between us, the Republican system, and you guys, your parliamentary system?
	As far as I can tell, the parliamentary system is far more prone to either corruption or unaccountability on the fact that you can't vote for your primaries for your prime minister and you're just voting for your parliament member and then once you get them in, you have no say after that.
	Yeah, I actually find myself agreeing with the position that we should just elect the leader instead of it being this weird, oh, we're members of parliament and then the party elects the leader.
	Because it's just, there's no ability for us to actually, you know, the people, to just completely reform the party in the way that Trump did to the Republican Party.
	We have no mechanism for doing it.
	No, all we have, and I'm sure he knows, is the choice between the final two, if you're a Conservative member now, you can choose between Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak.
	Bit of a Hobson's choice.
	I mean, this just isn't...
	The kind of reform the Americans are able to get.
	I think we need better.
	We do.
	I have a happy little story for you guys.
	The dog that you see on screen, her name is Daisy.
	Daisy just spent the last two months in a shelter because her old human died.
	Health-wise and behavior-wise, there's nothing wrong with her.
	She's a perfectly normal dog.
	She's about eight years old.
	And for some reason, older dogs just tend not to get adopted from shelters as often as puppies do.
	The happy ending to this story is that Daisy has a new home now with people who love her and she's very happy in.
	She came potty-trained and very well-mannered, so I'd recommend older dogs from shelters.
	Oh, that's nice.
	Finally!
	Very good video call.
	Finally something nice.
	My parents did the same thing, so also I'd recommend.
	And Daisy seemed to have quite good energy for eight years old and to be happy.
	That was nice.
	Go to the next one.
	So I'm actually at the airport right now on my way to Greece.
	Today is the anniversary of the first day of the Battle of Thermopylae, although by the time you're watching this will be the second day, but I'm headed to Greece for the reenactment.
	The airline took all my equipment without any issues, so I'm on my way.
	I'll have a great time, and I'll try to get you guys some cool videos and sights.
	Alright, look forward to it, I suppose.
	I'm also celebrating that.
	What, the Battle of Thermopylae?
	Yeah, yeah, every year, big thing.
	Are you a Persian supporter?
	No, I didn't really know about us.
	Just make a little joke.
	Oh, okay.
	You know about the Battle of Thermopylae, surely?
	Oh, yeah.
	300, the movie?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Okay, alright.
	I've seen 300.
	Go to the next one.
	Meow!
	Meow!
	What are you doing, dog?
	I like the animal videos.
	Rare!
	What are you doing crazy?
	I'm really surprised it still has both the legs.
	I don't want it!
	What?
	Huh?
	What are you doing?
	Hey!
	Love it.
	I enjoy animals.
	Notice it says Elliot.
	Is it Elliot Page?
	Is that the name of the cat?
	Can you imagine?
	I've seen people on GB News reading comments from people that send in comments.
	Imagine if you just played dog and cat videos.
	People paid to do that.
	What happened if your cat just came into my head?
	Sorry if I'm weird.
	What happens if your cat had the dead name of Elliot Page?
	That was just the name of your cat?
	Would you be allowed to call to your own cat?
	Or would you have to change your cat's name?
	I think you would be banned on social media for it.
	And would you just, in the street, would people just scream at you in, like, Portland?
	Depends if you live in Portland, yeah, I was gonna say.
	Let's go to the next one.
	I was hoping to show off my latest walker experiment, but unfortunately it took a little longer than expected.
	And I gotta mount the lift motors better.
	But what is it for?
	Well, it is a proof of concept to see if I can make a mechanism that can get Marduk here walking.
	Walking on four legs, of course.
	I'm gonna need to use some thicker materials in the final version, aren't I? Well, I look forward to it.
	That's the guy with the ED-209 again, isn't it?
	He's making a robocop baddie in his basement.
	The next one.
	No, no, no.
	Modern neckties and trousers are an abomination.
	Repudiate modernity Embrace tradition.
	It's a writer's debate about fashion going on there.
	It's actually a great point.
	Did you see the video of the woman who was dressing like you would in Victorian times?
	It had a couple of million views.
	It takes like two minutes for her to get ready.
	There's about 18 layers.
	I was going to just tweet women what's stopping you dressing like this, but I couldn't be bothered.
	I thought someone's probably done it.
	But yeah, it's great.
	I thought, this is what we should be doing.
	Lots of women are saying, well, I'd never get to work on time, you know, I couldn't do that.
	And I'm thinking, don't admit that your standards are that low.
	You should be dressing with, where's your petticoat?
	So yeah, you should watch on Twitter.
	It's brilliant.
	So I agree with that previous person.
	Go to the next one.
	I was watching Kent Dankler's video about the heat wave going on in the UK, and he said something that I actually agree with, which was the fact that the news media is nothing more than fear-mongering.
	News media here is not much different, having brought in scare tactics, especially involving COVID and this new variant of Omicron.
	So I can't help but agree with Count Danklin's statement about the news that it might actually affect your mental health.
	It's also nothing but propaganda nowadays.
	You don't even get the actual news.
	Yeah, I mean, if you check that out, I don't know if I've shown you that website where you can watch news from the 2000s and the 90s and whatnot.
	Ah, different world.
	Really different.
	Like, you actually get told things, and that's it.
	Yeah, I've seen that on the old CNN coverage and stuff.
	And it's completely different.
	And on the heat stuff, people like this guy, Adel Ray, OBE, was saying the country is literally on fire.
	Literally, is it?
	Anyone with a sane mind knows climate change is real.
	It needs to be top of the agenda.
	This is the kind of stuff we've dealt with.
	And people are like, thousands will die.
	In 1976, thousands died in the heat.
	This is the kind of stuff we've been dealing with.
	Everyone's like, right, the woman on the ITV leadership debate said on national TV... You've seen these last couple of days.
	We've got this heatwave.
	It's clear proof of the severe effects of climate change.
	Is it?
	Is it?
	Again, it's snowing.
	It's clear that climate change no longer exists.
	It's just...
	I don't know why people don't call them out on that.
	I know.
	That's the new narrative.
	Weather, not climate.
	Yeah.
	Hot equals definitely climate death.
	Cold equals definitely not.
	It's definitely bad for your mental health.
	Unfortunately for my job, I have to consume an awful lot of news.
	And I think, yes, I'd be much happier if I didn't.
	Well, with that, we should go to the written comments on the site.
	So, on the sea people.
	M1Pink says, Foreigner turning up to your shores with guns used to be called an invasion.
	It suddenly did.
	Colin P says, Back in the early 40s, we used to have a way to deal with armed invaders from the sea.
	And, uh, most technically, so the Germans fought you to stay on that.
	Well, there's a strange echo of Dunkirk, isn't there?
	It's kind of like the anti-Dunkirk it occurred to me.
	It's like we showed them how it was done.
	You know what I mean?
	Lord Nerevar says, I can't exactly blame the sea people for making these journeys.
	They've given the promise of free lodging and healthcare and free middle class standard of living.
	If they make the crossing, I blame people who give them all of those things.
	True.
	I mean, you can get to that, but it doesn't take away from the individual, like, what the hell are you doing?
	Like, you know you have no legitimacy to this, and this is meant to be a reserve for people who have literally been through hell.
	Frankly, as people like Julian Park had.
	Maureen Peters says, I am pretty sure the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea does not apply to an invasion.
	Could be wrong, though.
	There are some ludicrous rules in there.
	Well, I suppose it's up to the boys to try and make that case.
	Haku...
	Weird name.
	Sorry, how do you...
	H-A-K-L-U-Y-T. There we are.
	Sorry, I'm illiterate.
	Sea people, have you ever tried going to Saudi Airlines flights to the UK with a Swiss Army penknife in your washbag?
	I have, and the results are dramatic to say the least.
	I don't remember any four-star hotels.
	Perhaps I could have taken a shovel.
	Which, uh, doing some soldier roleplaying there.
	Edward Woodstock says, If you told me ten years back that an ice cream company would lecture the Home Secretary on morality, I would have laughed in your face.
	Now, here is Ben and Jerry's, a bunch of ice cream merchants.
	Yeah, well, they're more social justice merchants than anything, aren't they?
	Colin P says, Yeah, the Navy that had the major role in ending the slave trade can't keep out a few rubber dinghies.
	Certainly not anymore.
	That's the facts.
	I suppose we'll move on to the BBC being fair and balanced as always.
	Well, a bit controversial this one because of the nature of it.
	Hey look, the BBC... This is Lord Neverer.
	He says, hey look, the BBC is taking money from average people by force and using it to tell them how awful they are and insult them to boot.
	Repeat after me, taxation is theft.
	Yeah, he's talking about the license fee, the anachronistic extortion model.
	Someone's written, Callum Dathan, I hate this segment so much.
	This is what is destroying words language does to a basic conversation.
	That's true.
	How can anyone still trust the BBC, believe what they say, and trust them to be transparent about shit still?
	Yeah, I mean, it's a problem because I don't know what I can say.
	I come here, I'm tired.
	They've made me get up in the morning and I don't fully know the rules.
	And I got Callum in trouble last time.
	He had to, not in trouble, but he had to go through editing the video and I felt bad.
	So now I'm like, what can we actually say?
	Because another person said, Joe Creed, please stop centering yourselves.
	Just don't put spicy segments on YouTube.
	And there is an argument for that.
	But I blame myself because I don't fully know what we are and are not allowed to say and I don't want to get Callum in trouble.
	I don't even particularly know.
	I have to go back and read again, because you can't just burn all of those rules into your memory, and then go back to the segment and find what you have to...
	Yeah, and it does put us in a vigorous position.
	I don't want to get anyone in trouble.
	I don't want to get banned.
	Imagine if I got Carl banned from the...
	We think I'd be back.
	So it's very difficult, and it puts us in this absurd position.
	So yeah, maybe we shouldn't put them on YouTube.
	In regards to trusting the BBC, my friend put this to me, and it's a great one.
	If you're talking to a normie who still trusts the BBC, and you need an argument for convincing them as to why to stop, Tell them about the telly vans that come round and check if you've paid your licence.
	Fake vans.
	Yeah, have you ever seen one?
	Do you know anyone who's ever seen one?
	No, but they were fake anyway.
	Never existed.
	And, you know, the BBC would never lie to us.
	Okay, well, what about the vans?
	Okay, so they would lie to us.
	So now how far do you think they've gone?
	And then...
	What they do now, they send you letters and it has a day circled.
	Will you be in on July 19th?
	And they pretend they're coming to get you at your house.
	They're not coming.
	And if they do, just don't let them in.
	But it's just, they threaten the public.
	It's absolutely insane.
	Never paid it.
	Very glad I've never paid it.
	How is it different from the Matthew?
	Don't know why it's controversial to say any type of medicine that was rushed to be researched and manufactured.
	While all the legal hurdles that will force it to prove its efficacy over time were suspended, might, just might have had an unknown side of it.
	It's hard for me to follow this one.
	Oh, this is like claiming a brand new car is perfectly safe when it hasn't been on the market long enough for a recall to occur.
	Yeah, fair enough.
	I mean, I remember when they published the side effects documents and everyone freaked out.
	But the bigger question was, why did it take so long?
	Like, why, at the point at which half the world has already had it, now do we get the side effects report?
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Chris Wolfe, how long do I have to survive without the vaccine for people to stop saying I need it?
	People misunderstood herd immunity during the pandemic.
	So many people thought it meant the vaccines didn't even work until most of the population had it.
	They're in such denial.
	That one's come up twice for some reason.
	Based ape, how do you know for certain that it was the vaccine and not something that would have happened anyway?
	Was one of the most disingenuous leading questions I've ever heard.
	She should have responded is, how do you know the vaccine didn't cause it since we have such limited and totally censored data about the negative effects of this rushed and experimental treatment?
	This is the website only bit, right?
	Yeah, but also just...
	She's fine, and then we do this, and then the thing happens.
	It's like, okay, well...
	I'm not saying 100% proves it, but I mean, it's pretty good data, so then it's up to you to tell me as to why this is not the case.
	Not just look down on me, you would have thought, but...
	Yeah, and a couple of good ones say, Colin P, hold on, if vaccines work, why are the unvaccinated threats that are vaccinated?
	And M1Ping says, if the vaccinated are so dangerous, why does a BBC journalist have no issue spending six days in close proximity with them?
	That's a great point.
	Which is a decent question.
	And actually, the Guardian review did imply that they were unclean.
	They said they called her brave for being in the unventilated space.
	It's like, yeah, thanks to the left.
	No one's coughing or sneezing, but they might have it.
	Yeah.
	Do you want to read this last one?
	Sure.
	Because I don't want to take up all the time for yours.
	This is Free Will 2112.
	The scary truth is that the chattering classes are a bunch of fascists who revel in telling ordinary people how to behave.
	Yes, science in the past evolved because of dissenting opinions looking at new options.
	Today, whether we're talking about climate change or vaccines, dissent must be quashed.
	This is the ideological science that used to be practiced in the Soviet Union.
	The best way to get the truth is open discussion and criticism.
	But the BBC is part of the cabal that only cares about ideological conformity.
	Absolutely nailed it.
	Yeah.
	Anyone who genuinely cares about science should not be accepting the paradigm we live in, in which things are just openly censored because we can't let people discuss things.
	They might not do it.
	That's not science.
	It became the science.
	So on the G-word, Chris Wolfe says, That's another great point I hadn't thought about.
	I mean, I know there are going to be some stupid robots doing the censoring, and they're going to end up censoring grooming victims who are talking about their groomers.
	And...
	Well, that's anti-LGBTQ. We've seen plenty of that in this country.
	Radcheck was right, says, to learn who rules you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
	It's demonstrable.
	I mean, literally give them money by the state to do what they do.
	So marginalized.
	Severin Knox says, Predator is a nice replacement for Grima.
	It certainly is.
	Oneping says, no type of punishment would be too savage for a pedo.
	That's something I think I'd also mostly agree with.
	Death penalty seems to be the right one.
	And Callum Dayton says, when disgusting things not only become the norm, but expect it.
	Feeling pretty depressed, but also they won't argue with us with words.
	Well, when words fail, what comes next?
	We've really annoyed Callum with too many black pills and too much censorship.
	Well, it's just, you know, I don't know what they're expecting when they start censoring debate.
	It's like, you know, the right is criticizing us saying that we're protecting groomers by trying to say they're a protected group.
	And yes.
	And you went, right, how do we counter that?
	Well, we'll stop them from being upset.
	Yeah, I didn't mean you by the way, I meant this column.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah, but it's just the idiotic nature, the childish nature of how to govern from left-wing ideology, of just sense of the criticism.
	It's like a Chinese emperor.
	It's never worked well.
	Shaker Silver says that given the context of the groomer speaking, him announcing and pointing to people that he taught your kid, your kid and your kid, was horribly disturbing.
	Yeah, that's unbelievable.
	Omar Awad says, I'm wondering if the Venn diagram of narcissists and lefty pedos is so close to being a circle that they are just applying the narcissist tactic of Darvo by reversing the victim children and offender predators.
	As an aside, why do the men in today's video sound like women?
	Are they that low T? Statistically, yes.
	Kevin Fox says, in 20 years there won't be a witch of the pedos.
	No one will be able to offend the...
	Afford the fuel for the woodshippers.
	It's a cost of living issue.
	There we are.
	C. Willie here, dunking at us.
	No AC. Are you sure England is a first world country?
	Number one, no.
	We lock people in prison for mean words, so we're not part of the West.
	Seriously, AC is the single most important invention in the modern age.
	Yeah, but we only need it for like two weeks of the year.
	And then it's a huge investment for the rest of the year that you're kind of wasted.
	We are starting to need it in London.
	When London's at 38 degrees, it feels just like Dubai.
	And I've been to Dubai and I'm like, oh, we do need aircon.
	But we also got by before without it somehow.
	You know, there was a weatherman on Twitter the other day making this argument, oh, it's the climate apocalypse.
	And he said, and those people saying, what about holidays?
	Well, that was their choice, and they probably had aircon.
	I'm thinking, why does the choice bit matter?
	Plus, when I went on holidays when I was younger, there was no aircon.
	I didn't see aircon until I was about 20.
	If you grew up in the 80s or earlier, there was no aircon.
	So, yeah, I don't know.
	So, on that note, I suppose we are actually running over, so we have to end the show.
	But if you want more from us, loaders.com, of course.
	Otherwise, Nick, where would they be best to find you?
	Oh, at NickDixonComic on Twitter.
	Or if you don't want censorship, there's Getter.
	I'm just NickDixon, my name.
	And also on social now, the same NickDixon.
	Well, there we are.
	Otherwise, we'll be back tomorrow at one o'clock.
	Thank you and goodbye.
	Oh, not tomorrow.
	It's Friday.
	Wait, is it Friday?
	Oh, yeah, it's Friday.
	This happens every time.
	We'll be on Monday, one o'clock.

▲