All Episodes
Jan. 20, 2022 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters
01:31:42
The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #311
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Loadseaters for the 20th of January 2022.
I'm joined by Leo.
Hello!
And today we're going to be talking about the British terrorist's final phone call.
Because trust me, it was British gov.
British, mate.
Also, the EU makes yachts exempt from its carbon tax, which...
And private jets.
Oh really?
It's almost as if it's an agenda driven by elitists who are looking after their own.
It'll be Ursula von der Leyen's private jet as well on there then.
Yeah, yeah.
Do you remember, I'll bring it up again later, but she took a private jet journey from Vienna to Bratislava.
Because you can't make that trip by train.
It's ten minutes on train.
And she was like, I'm not doing that.
So it's longer on private jets.
Yes.
Jeez.
Stupid.
Also, the raced physicist.
So, this is Vox's race physicist.
She is going to tell us all about the racism and racialism you can find within physics, as in the study of the universe.
She has found racism in the physical objects themselves.
It's very big brain stuff.
Wow!
We'll get into that.
So, first things to mention, new stuff on the website.
The new thing here, firstly, being the politics of V for Vendetta, with Carl and John going through that, and his anarchism, and how that compares to the movie versus the graphic novel.
So go and check that out.
If we go to the next one, we have the Infinite Opium Den.
This is an article from Carl, or this is one man's journey to the shops to buy a new phone, and the things that annoyed him there, specifically the fact of unlimited social media as a promise or a selling point.
Which, yeah, opium den.
So, go and check that out as well.
And also, if you go to the next one, we have, of course, Getter.
So, if you want to follow us, go to lotuseders underscore com there.
Follow us there, see what's coming out.
And the last thing to mention, of course, being careers, because we are hiring a software engineer slash web developer to redo the website and whatnot.
So, if you can fit the job description and the requirements, then please message us, and we'll look at who's applied.
How much money is it?
I don't know.
It's usually something we discuss in the interview, really.
But also, I'm being shouted at, has to work in the office.
If you email us, you're not working in the office, you're not getting the job.
No remote working.
No.
That was for 2021.
Simple as.
Without further ado, let's get into something else that's simple as.
Yeah.
The British terrorist.
So you may remember the British terrorist, who was a British man, British citizen, as every media reported.
We're now exporting terrorism around the world.
Remember when they used to come from Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan?
Pakistan.
Now they all come from Britain.
That specific part of Britain.
That we can't mention, but instead we should get into the information here because this is a story about the final phone call this guy made before he got shot by the, I believe it was the FBI outside.
And there is a lot of debate whenever a terrorist incident happens, especially in the media, about whether or not they should show you the realities of what's taken place, whether it be footage or images or things like that.
And this sort of comes under it under the same sense of should you show the phone calls.
and I'm firmly in the camp of yes if I'm in control then that's something I would like to do and so I thought we'd go through it also because it now has been publicly released by the Jewish Chronicle so you can see that and the audio is revealing and it also shows why Four Lions is kind of a meme reality but also you might remember people were kind of shocked by Four Lions at the time that it was humanizing the terrorists no because terrorists are human They're not aliens.
So they are human beings, no matter how warped their views.
And I thought we'd go through the backlog first, before we get to the audio, because if you've just joined us, it won't make much sense, I don't think, unless we go through the backlog of information leading up.
So, let's get this first article up from The Telegraph, and as you can see here...
Texas synagogue siege.
Two teens arrested in Manchester as a family of British terrorists revealed they spoke with him during the standoff.
They say in here, US officials said he was demanding the release of Afia Siddiqui, a Pakistani terrorist known as Lady Al-Qaeda, who is serving 86 years in a Texas prison for attempting to kill a US serviceman in Afghanistan.
Yeah, and she also plotted a terrorist attack on New York.
Quite a wide, quite a big scale terrorist attack.
And when she was sent to be arrested, I think the soldiers sent to arrest her, the FBI and the SWAT team or whatever, They didn't take it as seriously because she's a woman and one of them sat down and put his gun down.
She grabbed the machine gun off him and fired off, rattled off some shots and then was shot in the stomach and nearly died.
But now she's recovered and she's incarcerated.
Yeah, but that's also the weird thing of her sentencing.
She was only charged for that incident whilst they were arresting her for terrorism.
She wasn't charged with terrorism.
But that's because they didn't need to.
86 years.
86 years is probably enough to kill someone.
Or she'll be rehabilitated at the end of it.
I'm sure.
she'll come out 130 or whatever but if we go to the next link this is the reporting on the time from the New York Times and as you can see from the headline USC's terror threat Pakistani sea heroine yes tells us a lot about Pakistan suspected of having links to Al Qaeda she was convicted by a New York court in February of trying to kill American military officers whilst in custody in 2008 in Afghanistan and the funny thing here she was named by I believe Khalid Sheikh Mohammed as being a financier for Al Qaeda
So it's not like it was on bad intel either.
It's like, okay, the guy running the 9-11 attacks has told us you're doing this, so let's go say hi.
In Pakistan, she has become a national symbol of honor and victimization, so potent that politicians of all stripes, Islamists, the news media, and increasingly anti-American public have all lined up to champion her claim of innocence.
She didn't do nothing.
I'm sure.
I utterly...
No, no.
I really don't believe any of that.
And we have, of course, the statements from the Pakistani leaders, because Pakistan is a totally normal country and not a rogue state like North Korea.
Prime Minister Yusuf Raza-Ghalini, who has described Ms.
Siddiqui as a daughter of the nation...
This is after she shot the US Marshal.
He's like, well, she's the daughter of the nation.
She works for Al-Qaeda.
She's a terrorist.
Right.
The opposition leader, Nazif Sharif, promised to have her released.
And also, she had links to the Army of Mohammed, apparently.
The Army of Mohammed is something I hadn't really heard about.
And I checked out the Wikipedia this morning.
It's hilarious.
Because if we go to the next link, we can just see the wiki page for Army of Mohammed here.
And if you can scroll down, John, to the sponsors and state sponsors, this is the funniest part.
Go back up.
No, no, no, just where the flag is.
So, up a little more, please.
Just want to show where the flag is and the state sponsors.
So it says in here, state allies, Pakistan.
Directly funded from Pakistan.
Non-state allies, the Taliban and Al-Qaeda.
Designated a terrorist group by the UK, US, blah, blah, blah, and Pakistan.
Every time.
Every time.
Pakistan starts a terrorist group, there's like, oh god, what have we done?
Start a terrorist group.
What did you think you were done?
And state opponents are India.
Yes.
Because there's obviously a lot of friction between India and Pakistan.
Kashmir.
There's regular actual live fire exchange between troops on each side, which is quite exciting considering they're both nuclear-powered states.
Nuclear-armed, I mean, nuclear-armed states.
It's mostly the funny thing here of Pakistan being like, hmm, what if we fund terrorism to fight India?
That'll never backlash on us.
Ten years later, oh, why did we get bombed by our own guys?
Take a guess.
Idiots.
Let's go to the next link here.
So we have more information about MI5's knowledge on the guy, and they said that they, well, they knew the guy.
So, he had been placed on the British Security Services watch list as a subject of interest in 2020 and was investigated in the second half of that year.
But by 2021, Akram, who had a criminal record in the UK, had moved from the active list to the former subject of interest list and was no longer considered a threat.
Brilliant work from MI5 there.
Hmm.
Rabbi Charlie Crichton-White told the BBC partner CBS how he and two other hostages were able to get out without being fired or shot upon after he threw a chair at the hostage takers.
That's since we did the episode that came out, which is great to hear, frankly.
Just grab a chair, hit the guy, run for it.
No one's damaged except the terrorist, which deserves.
According to police sources...
Sorry, according to police sources, he is also to have believed he brought the weapons used in the incident on the street after his arrival.
There were a series of articles, I couldn't find them, probably because they deleted them now, which were trying to claim that this is evidence of why we need gun control in the United States.
And, well then, he brought the guns off the street.
Yeah, but how did they get on the street?
Where did they come from originally?
Were they manufactured by a company, or were they made by gangsters?
That's an argument.
They were manufactured by a company, and they made it onto the street.
But if you're going to make that argument, you have to go all the way to say we shouldn't have guns in the United States.
All I'm saying is, listen, I'm not in favour of...
I love guns.
My dad had a gun so big it's banned in America.
But we've got tighter restrictions in the UK and far fewer shootouts.
Sure.
We also don't have a Second Amendment.
So these things are going to be what they are.
Just amend it again.
It's an amendment.
I mean, people talk about the Second Amendment.
It's an amendment.
Yes.
Literally, it's in the word, amendment.
For what purpose?
It's not a second, like, set in stone for everything.
It's an amendment.
It's for overthrowing the United States government when it becomes tyrannical.
So, kind of set in stone, in my opinion, though.
The United States government will never become tyrannical.
Also, you can't overthrow it.
Remember January the 6th?
When the biggest coup attempt in human history.
Yes.
Even some 86-year-old grannies with flags couldn't overthrow.
So what hope have people with guns got?
You have got me there.
Fair enough.
But if we go to the next link, I also wanted to mention, because I'm mad at MI5, and for no other reason if not this one, because they keep failing.
And here's another example of their failures, which is just them also hiring on the basis of race, not ability still, which I can't believe.
It's just still up.
So if you keep scrolling, John, until you get to the Summer Diversity stuff, because again, Summer Diversity Intelligence Internship.
To be able to apply for the Summer Diversity Intelligence Internship, you must answer yes to the following questions.
Question number one.
I am from one of the black, Asian, and minority ethnic backgrounds.
There we are again.
Okay.
We're hiring our spies, or at least our desk workers, based on their race, not their ability.
Fantastic.
What's wrong with UMI5? Moving on to the next one.
So let's go to the next link because we can also look at the Politics on the Ground, where this guy came from in Blackburn.
And we played this clip before, but I especially wanted to show it to you because it's just incredible and a million people need to see it, frankly.
I'm still ashamed that it only has 7,000 views apparently on YouTube.
This is the Politics on the Ground in 1997.
So let's play this clip.
In Blackburn, the message from one Labour van prompts decisive action from Gita Sidhu.
Hello?
The Labour Party's going around with a microphone at the moment, saying she's against Islam.
She's not Muslim, she's not one of us.
Don't vote for her, because she's against Islam.
And this is making it racist, it's making it personal.
Particularly considering the fact that my husband actually is Muslim.
So, we're just going to pull the gloves off.
I'm going to get a car and walk around, drive through town, telling everybody jackstalls a Jew.
And the Muslim is going to vote for someone who's Jewish.
That's it.
That's what happened and that's what we're gonna do about it Yeah.
So that's 1997.
I don't think it's got much better.
And for people listening, she was shouting in Urdu, of course, to her constituents, don't vote for Jack Straw because he's a Jew.
Jews are the enemies of Muslims.
Vote for me in the election.
I mean, I know politicians do stuff like that, but you're supposed to do it in a subtle way, not overtly do it.
There's a reason we've invented the phrase dog whistle.
Yeah.
What's really weird is she got 25% of the vote.
Just 25%?
Only 25%.
I'm surprised after that, after that call to arms.
Yeah, and she didn't have any repercussions put on her until she tried to run for Mayor of London under the Lib Dem banner, and then the clip was released and people were like, oh wait.
Well, she probably made it if she'd ran for Labour.
Maybe she would have got more votes, I don't know.
But that's the level of local politics there, as it being an Islamist place in the country.
You can openly campaign on don't vote for Jews because they're the enemies of Muslims, and the opposition is campaigning on don't vote for her Islam enough yeah yeah this is the kind of politics you want really is that what we have to having discussions on national level in ten years I don't I've got to be honest the the rule like the changes that new labor made like the the faith schools it just breeds division in society right from their youngest age so
So if you go to an Islamic faith school or a Catholic faith school or whatever, they're basically madrasas teaching you that you're the chosen people and everybody else is dirty and unclean.
And that's why you get things like the grooming gangs in Rotherham and Rochdale and Oxford and all the rest of it.
Because people are told...
You're the chosen people.
These people are the unclean, the infidels.
You can do what you want to them.
The religious supremacism.
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, if it was white people doing it, somebody would do something about it because it's racist and it's completely, you know, it's the worst of human...
Well, it's inciting racial hatred, right?
Yeah, yeah.
Religious hatred.
And acting on it as well.
Yes.
And I thought we'd also mention, because that's the local politics, it wasn't for no reason that I mentioned that, this article here from Vote Watch also released apparently that he worked for the Labour Party, like the terrorist worked for the Labour Party.
Vote Watch can exclusively reveal that the British Islamist shot dead after taking hostages in a synagogue in Texas was an active member of the Labour Party in Blackburn, and a close relative of Blackburn Labour councillor Mohamed Ifran.
Pakistani media released an interview saying, As soon as the news emerged of Faisal's involvement in the hostage-taking, the local Blackburn Council issued a request to all local councillors not to speak to the media.
Oh, fantastic.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Should we coordinate with people to try and find out what's going on?
No.
Let's not say anything.
A former local Labour activist from Blackburn told VoteWatch, And as we can see there, that candidate screaming about Jews, she was the Conservative candidate?
I mean, this is how in rife this area is with anti-Semitism.
Both candidates or at least both branches there seem to be infested with anti-Semitism.
That's the situation on the ground.
So, if we go to the Jewish Chronicle, because they have the audio, and I think this will finally now make sense...
They have the story here.
So, a couple of things first to note from this article before we play it.
He's talking, so the terrorist is talking to his brother who is in a police station.
So, his brother's trying to talk him down because he's working with the police.
And one of his younger brothers died three months ago reportedly from COVID. So, he'll be referencing that.
So, if we go to the next link, you can find the full audio at this YouTube link.
But let's play the first clip.
Hello.
Hello.
What's up?
Assalamu alaikum.
What's going on man?
I'm in America.
I thought I'll just kiss my last goodbye to you.
What's happened?
I took some hostages on.
I've been surrounded by one.
I'm in a synagogue.
But why are you doing that man?
Why are you doing that for?
What's wrong with you?
Don't worry about it.
Just you don't worry about what I'm doing.
You just do what you gotta do.
I've come to die.
But I need to do that.
I have come to die.
I'm going to take him toe to toe anyway.
Listen.
But why are you here?
Your father said, listen, I promise.
No, no, it's not guna.
You want to read what is guna and what ain't guna.
Okay?
I promised my brother when I watched him on that deathbed, I'm going to go down as a martyr.
I'm going to let no more suppress me.
I'm surrounded by old mummy, right?
Right?
I'm in a synagogue.
I've got four beautiful guys, Jewish guys with me, right?
They're trying to play a ball with me.
I've told them, bring her here.
She's got 84 years.
They're talking to her because I'm near the prison of FMC gospel.
I'm bombed up.
I've fucked every ammunition.
I've only been here two weeks, right?
I've got them all at gunpoint.
I'm gonna die.
I've told them I'll release these four guys.
I'll come on the yard and I'll have a toe-to-toe with you.
Shoot me dead.
Shoot her dead.
Because I'm dead and she's dead.
She's 84 years, right?
They f***ing named her.
So you know what?
I've just rang you to say, Yara, if I said anything wrong to you, I'm sorry.
I've told my kids to man up.
Don't f***ing cry at my funeral.
Don't cry at my funeral.
Because guess what?
I've come to die, G. But Yara, come on.
Okay?
Yara, come on.
I've prayed for Allah for two years for this.
Firstly, we can see what kind of British accent, which is the Rupadingi Rapids British accent from Four Lions.
In it, mate, I've come here today for Allah.
Okay.
The meme film is becoming reality.
Yeah, I suppose that is reality.
Also, the point's there that, of course, some outlets try to go with the...
This has nothing to do with Islam.
It has nothing to do with Judaism as well, which, no, he's clearly religiously motivated, so we can put that to bed.
I never understand why people always say, oh, these people don't represent Islam, when they're literally, they say themselves, they're calling themselves the Islamic State or, you know...
The Army of Mohammed.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
It's like, I think they know what they identify as, so we shouldn't be projecting their beliefs onto them.
The Lord's Resistance Army has nothing to do with Christianity.
Okay.
But also the point that being made, which is a British man, and this is why it is a comedic joke to call him a British man, even though he's got the accent, let's say, of a particular area of Britain, is because, do you remember how her case that he's referencing was such a big issue in British politics?
No.
It's not.
It's an issue of Pakistani politics.
The Pakistanis believe, or at least the government does, that she's done nothing wrong because it's the Pakistani government.
And the Americans don't.
They think she's a terrorist.
And this isn't the first time people on the Islamist side of the fence have tried to bust her out.
So when Jack Foley, he's an American journalist, he was seized by either Al-Qaeda or ISIS. And they offered to exchange Jack Foley for Lady Al-Qaeda.
And Americans refused and then they beheaded Jack Foley.
Anyway, let's play the next clip.
So this is the last part of it.
I'm telling you.
Either you come for it or they send it.
I'm coming back home with a body bag.
I know what I'm doing.
I'd rather live one day as a lion than a hundred years of a jekyll.
Listen to me.
Listen to me.
I've asked Allah for this death.
And guess what?
Allah is with me, man.
I'm not worried.
I'm not worried the slightest.
I don't even flinch, man.
You don't need to do this.
Whatever you're doing, man.
Just pack it in.
You'll get a bit of time and you'll come out.
Money's come back to black.
Do you know what I mean?
He's come back last week.
Do you know what I mean?
He's done his time.
Whatever.
Whatever you're doing, man.
Think about your kids, man.
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
These guys you've got there, they're innocent people, man.
They will never take another woman from a Muslim and I'm opening the doors for every youngster to enter America and f**k with them.
Why does Afghanistan always have to have a defensive vote?
Why can't these thick d***** Taliban So you know what?
I'm setting the precedent today.
I'm setting the precedent that...
You know what?
You ain't gonna get away with it anymore.
Even if they don't release Dr.
Afia, who gives a they let James Foley die?
They didn't, they didn't let James Foley, they let him die and they didn't release him, but guess what?
Maybe they'll have compassion for Jews, but guess what?
I'm opening the doors for every youngster in England to know, let your life go, you caverns, but come into America and with them if they want to.
They give them war.
I like how he's worried about his minutes yeah you know it's international cool bro can't do it more it's very strange But you can see his ranting there and his arguments.
And we don't have too much time, so I will skip over this one because it's just a hadith which everyone should go and read.
But apart from that, he mentioned in there that part of his reasoning was that they come to our countries and we don't go to their countries and cause war.
And therefore we should do it.
As if that solves anything, but whatever.
And the point he made in there that they come to our countries and rape and kill kids.
And I don't know what the hell he's referencing.
I'm going to take a stab in the dark.
Because there are two incidents I can think of.
So there are occasional incidents like this one here.
So this is an incident in Iraq in which some American servicemen...
Went out and I believe they killed the parents and then raped a couple of their kids.
And what happened?
Well, we put them on trial and sentenced them all to prison in life.
So, there's justice.
Yeah, I mean, it's obviously a terrible thing.
I mean, you could kill them if you want.
I mean, I'm not opposed to that either.
Yeah, yeah.
It's a terrible thing, but I mean, it was recognised.
It wasn't celebrated.
it was uh it was dealt with with our criminal justice system it's not culturally accepted whereas if we go to the next one this could be what he's referencing this is a story u.s soldiers told to ignore sexual abuse of boys by afghan allies so the u.s turned them in afghanistan in which noncery was the norm and we overthrew the taliban and instead put another bunch of guys in charge who were not heterosexual nonces but homosexual nonces yeah but they don't see it as is nonsense.
This is interesting.
So one of my mates, so comedians used to go out and do shows for the troops in Afghanistan, Iraq, and all these places.
Unfortunately, you know, we've ended a lot of the wars, so we really need some new wars so I can get out there and go in a helicopter and make some money.
But yeah, so he was out in Afghanistan doing shows for the troops, and so they're working with the Northern Alliance, and then, you know, one night they're having the, you know, the British guys have a, you know, have a party or whatever, and the Northern Alliance guys were having a party as well and he said, like, 14-year-old kid with, like, eye makeup, you know, mascara, or what the call, or whatever it's called, and he's, like, got bells on his feet and all the rest of it, and he dances for them, and then they all shag him.
That's the locals for you.
That's just what they do.
But they don't see it as, you know, they're still like very, they've got a very homophobic culture.
It's just, you know, they've got this thing, it's not seen as gay.
And they've got this thing in other parts of the Middle East where women are for babies, men are for fun.
That's the saying.
But it's not seen, it's not seen as, it's gay if you like, you know, marry a man or something like that, but this isn't seen as gay.
Sure, but it's also the non-serie aspect in it, which he was referencing, certainly.
Yeah, this kid that turns up with the bells on his feet was like 14.
The accusations don't make any sense because you're just looking at it and it's like, okay, yeah, the locals are doing that, not the US Army.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
And, well, could we talk about what As he puts it, the forces from over there come over here and do to our kids.
Not so much.
That's not allowed now, is it?
But that's the story.
Have there been any instance of Pakistani Muslim men being child abusers?
No idea.
We're not allowed to talk about it.
If anybody does talk about it, they're far-right extremists.
I assume there are just hordes of Gaz and Daves living in Pakistan, just grooming kids, maybe by the dozens, specifically targeting Pakistani Muslim youth.
Probably in a racist way, because they see those people as subhuman because they're racist?
The reverse does not take place, I am sure.
And everyone can see through that.
But there's the story.
So there's the call, the information around it, and what a messed up situation.
Let's move on to something more fun.
So...
Fun time!
Okay, well, you know, as we know, green policy, carbon taxes, all the rest of it, climate change is the big issue of our time now that we've dealt with, you know, Brexit and all the rest of it.
So, yeah, we've dealt with coronavirus, we're coming out of that.
So you think, you know, we're introducing all these new tariffs and taxes on energy and transport and all the rest of it to try and reduce our carbon footprints.
You might think of Carbon dioxide is such a problem, the first things to get cut back would be things like private jets and yachts because they burn insane amounts of energy for each passenger mile.
So yachts, for example, as you can see here, they're used by obviously rich guys like Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos who are right behind all this climate change green policy.
They're flying everywhere they can to help go conferences and deal with Yeah, yeah, like COP26. COP26, there was some, like, I can't remember how many private jets, some, like, 200 private jets flew in.
It was insane!
And, like, you know, people were flying in.
Extinction Rebellion as well, the Emma Thompson.
What, they flew in?
They didn't fly in.
They didn't fly in.
They came in on donkeys, probably.
but Extinction Rebellion, when they took over Oxford Circus in London and had a DJ and all the rest of it, so Emma Thompson saw that this was happening and decided she must do something to act on climate change.
So she flew first class from LA to read a poem, a climate change demo, about how we all need to stop flying first class from LA.
I mean, I don't know.
To me, it just proved how necessary jet travel is.
But she didn't seem as...
You should always judge people on what they do rather than what they say.
And Emma Thompson, absolutely, you know, just disgusting hypocrite of the highest order.
These rules are always for the little person, not for us, as this story shows.
So yachts just hugely polluting.
The yachts that Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates have, and yachts that are typical of, you know, the super rich, emit over 7,000 tonnes of carbon per year, which just blows my mind.
Private jets as well, if we move on to the next one.
Also hugely, hugely polluting.
So if you scroll down, there's a little graph there.
I don't know why these people can't just get on a plane like everyone else.
And yeah, that's the one.
So private jet CO2 emissions have risen 31% in Europe between 2005 and 2019.
And also they recovered faster from COVID because obviously in a private jet you don't need to worry about all the COVID regulations and all these things because it's a private jet.
You know what I mean?
You're not mixing with anybody.
You've got much more control over the security and all the rest of it.
And the next tab shows how much carbon these things actually put out.
So, I mean, this is a carbon footprint calculator for private jets.
So, you know, just to take an example, a VIP Boeing 777 will emit 46 tonnes of carbon on a six-hour flight.
So the yearly emissions are going to be thousands of tonnes, you know, private jets.
I mean, it's...
You know what I mean to tell you?
It's obviously going to burn so much carbon.
So a four-hour private jet flight emits as much as the average person does in a year.
The next tab shows the greenhouse gas emissions from a typical family car.
Just 4.6 tonnes per year.
That's when it's being used for commuting and leisure and all the rest of it.
Just 4.6 tonnes per year.
Compare that to the yachts, 7,000 tonnes per year.
So, you know, one yacht or one private jet emits the same amount of carbon dioxide as hundreds of families.
It's insane.
So yeah, and also, whenever rich people, whenever elites get criticised for having yachts or taking a private jet to a climate change conference, they say, oh, but I paid to offset the carbon footprint.
So the next tab got Elton John.
So he flew to some Prince Harry thing about supporting the environment and he flew on a private jet.
And he said, to support Prince Harry's commitment to the environment, we ensured the flight was carbon neutral by making the appropriate contribution to Carbon Footprint TM. Sorry, what?
It doesn't work like this.
So is the word Carbon Footprint trademark, or is that a company he's just given money to?
It's a company.
It's a company.
They're like, we bless you for your sins and then pocket the cash?
Exactly.
Just like Stonewall do with opinions, this company will do for your carbon footprint.
So, you know, they say they offset their carbon footprint, but it just doesn't work like this.
Like, long term, you can't just trade credits between countries or, you know, pay a company to plant some trees or, you know, just fill in numbers on a form so it looks like they planted some trees.
Like, you just can't...
If you want to reduce emissions, you've got to do that by reducing emissions.
It sounds stupid.
It sounds like an obvious thing, but Elton John doesn't get it.
You can't reduce your carbon footprint by burning carbon.
And, you know, trying to do it by offsetting, by paying somebody to plant trees.
That's like Jimmy Savile offsetting his child abuse by donating money to an orphanage.
Like, you can't offset a bad that's been done.
Like, it just doesn't work like that.
Because any company that says that they're reducing carbon footprints, they plant trees or whatever, but it's generally a bit of a scam.
You know what I mean?
There's dodgy accounting and trees that would be planted anyway, or trees that actually don't have a net carbon benefit.
So anyway, there's all this.
We've shown that private jets and private yachts, shock, horror, they release a lot of carbon.
I mean, I was shocked to find that out as well.
So you think the EU, when they're bringing through their new regulations for transport and emissions and stuff...
They do it for private jets and yachts first.
Also, yacht travel and private jet travel is increasing far faster than other forms of travel.
But actually, the EU are exempting private jets from the jet fuel tax.
So this is insane.
So the private jets will enjoy an exemption through classification of business aviation as the use of aircraft by firms.
Sorry, every other plane is used for what exactly?
And also, like, private jets even says a further exemption is given for pleasure flights whereby an aircraft is used for personal or recreational purposes, not associated with a business or professional use.
So this is just full exemption.
Yeah, just full exemption!
Full exemption!
So, you know, all these playboys, all these billionaires can take your...
Also, the average wealth of somebody who has a private jet is £1.3 billion.
So it's absolutely insane.
Am I getting this right, though?
They're going to put a tax on all jet aircraft for everyone who wants to fly anywhere to do anything, except if you've got your own private one, in which case, no tax for you, bruv.
Exactly.
So they're putting a tariff on, you know, like the sugar tax and like the duties they have on petrol already, but they're going to increase it on jet fuel.
So basically, you know, you get your cheap Ryanair flights.
They want to get rid of that.
So if you're a family and you fly to Tenerife once a year, they want to make that too expensive for you to go.
Because obviously, if millions of little people can't go on their holidays, that's going to reduce a lot of the carbon footprint.
But they want to make it so the rich people, the elites who give them money and do all the lobbying to the politicians can still fly around the world whenever they want.
So it's really disgusting.
It really shows the two tiers of green policy.
So there's the tier...
They're doing the same with the car as well.
Yeah.
And this is the thing.
They've subsidised electric vehicles and they're sort of forcing through electric vehicles.
But electric vehicles, they're okay for certain situations.
They're good in a city.
They're not so good for somebody like me.
So I'm a comedian.
So on the road, I need to be able to drive to Wales or drive to Hull and drive back.
But you can't do that in a Tesla because you have to drive to Wales, then wait six hours while your car charges because it's only got a range of whatever, know 500 miles or whatever so um so electric vehicles aren't great and And also, electric vehicles, it's going to be an end to the cheap banger market.
So when you're 19 years old, you get your first car or whatever.
And it's like a bashed-up Nissan Micra for 300 quid.
But it goes and it works fine.
And there'll be an end to that because the battery pack has got to be functioning.
And a functioning battery pack is worth a lot of money.
So you're not going to have that cheap resale market for electric vehicles, because if it works, it's going to be worth money.
And if it doesn't work, it's not any use.
And it's going to be really bad for people living in the countryside as well.
It's going to push up costs for people living in the countryside.
We're seeing...
These tariffs come through on energy as well.
So because wind farms and solar farms and renewables are subsidised so heavily, other people's fuel, other people's energy is taxed to pay for that.
So it works at about 27% the extra money you're paying on top of your energy bills to pay for wind farms, which don't even work!
Which don't even work!
So wind farms, they don't...
There's some debate as to whether they're even carbon efficient because you've got to expend all the carbon manufacturing on them.
But then, you know, the last four months have been very calm, so there hasn't been enough wind.
You ever seen how you de-snow them?
No.
Because they're up there covered in snow.
You need to get the snow off.
So what do you do?
You get in a helicopter with a flamethrower?
Fly the helicopter up, go next to the wind farm and burn the snow off.
And that's not a sidebar.
That's real life.
That's insane.
Helicopters burn a lot of carbon.
And flamethrowers, also not particularly carbon efficient.
These are the flames.
Don't worry, it's electronic flamethrower, I swear.
So, and also, if we move on to...
So, basically, yachts as well are going to be exempt.
I forgot to put the link in, but yachts are also going to be exempt from these...
Sorry, have you ever seen super yachts?
Like the fact that a bunch of them lined up in Nice or something.
You ever notice how they all look the bloody same?
Yeah.
I've always found that weird, because I watched a video from a guy called LaserPig recently, who pointed this out, and, you know, you have the bigger yacht, because you want a bunch of hot babes on your yacht, right?
Yeah.
And I was always thinking, like, if you wanted to get at the, you know, stand out and look interesting, surely you'd buy, like, I don't know, an old-timey huge ship, or, you know, scale a replica of the Titanic, or something like that.
Not just the same yacht, but bigger.
Yeah.
I don't really get, why are they all these white, weird models, and that's it?
Yeah, yeah.
Like, the most daring thing is they might paint it black, or blue, or, and then, oh, look at that.
Yeah.
No, no, I knew the last who worked crewing private yachts as well, and the waste on them as well.
So, I mean, super rich people, they have, like, a bunch of properties all around the world.
Like, she worked for Russian oligarchs, and so they've got properties all around the world, and the properties have to be kept in tip-top condition.
It's the same with the yachts.
So yachts are all, because they might just decide, oh, I'm going to the yacht, like, now.
So the yacht has to be kept tip-tom, so it's always running, the engines are always running, the generators and everything are running, it's being manned and cleaned and everything, and they're constantly buying in food.
So there was just constantly food on board that perishes and then just gets thrown away.
Because these people are so rich!
The money is literally no object.
They're generating more money from, if you're a Russian oligarch, all the businesses you stole from the state.
So there's just huge waste and profligacy.
And you'd think if you wanted to reduce the carbon footprint of humanity, then you'd Start with those kinds of people.
But obviously those people have the political influence and the control and the money to influence politics.
Because trust me, there's a lot of corruption in politics.
There's a lot of money changes hands behind the scenes.
Or even in front of the scenes, as we've seen with the dodgy government COVID contracts.
And also people being given really nice roles at corporations after they've left office.
So that's like an open backhander.
But yeah, basically the EU isn't.
So yachts and private jets are going to be exempt.
And meanwhile, they're bringing in lots of policies that are going to affect us.
So if you aspire to having a conservatory, sorry, but new regulations are going to state that window size must be limited.
And if you want to build a conservatory, you're going to have to prove that your house doesn't overheat.
With this conservatory, because that would mean you'd have to have air conditioning on, I should imagine.
Although my mum's place in Scotland had a conservatory, trust me, it never got too hot.
If anything, it was nice having a room that you could go in and feel like you're in the sunshine sometimes, you know what I mean?
So yeah, if you want a conservatory, you're going to have to jump through hoops and spend lots of money proving that it's not going to be too hot.
If we move on to the next one, we've also got, so the way energy performance certificates, you know when you look at flats, they've got that thing and it's got the green to red banding and it shows you where your flat is and they do it for fridges and all the rest of it.
It shows you how energy efficient your house is.
So the way they're calculated actually disincentivises the installation of heat pumps, and heat pumps are great.
I think how they work is they pump water down into the earth, and it gets heated up by basically magma.
It shakes hands with the devil, comes back up, and then you can have a shower in it.
The devil water.
Yeah.
Yeah, you've got this devil water!
They're a very energy-efficient way to do it.
The only thing is they're run by electricity.
So at the moment, the way it is calculated assumes that electricity is bad because at the moment we get a lot of our electricity from burning gas and burning fossil fuels.
Whereas in the future, electricity is going to be mostly decarbonised.
So the way the energy certificates are calculated disincentivises the installation of these energy efficient heat pumps.
I don't know if that makes any sense whatsoever.
It's like doing maths in your head.
But basically, people are being disincentivised from...
This is government policy, green policy, but it's disincentivising a green thing.
Move on to the next one.
Recycling is also backfiring.
So, you know, when you go to the supermarket, you're supposed to pay for carrier bags now.
Yeah, in this country.
Have you ever paid for one?
I just take my rucksack now, to be honest.
It's not changed anything, because I never used them for bin bags anyway.
So now I just buy bin bags.
Well, yeah, and these plastic bags, I use them for bin bags as well.
I refuse to pay.
You know what I mean?
It's like license fee.
I'm not paying for a plastic bag.
What sort of madness is that?
And yeah, so now I've just got drawers stuffed.
I used to have drawers stuffed with these very flimsy light bags.
Now, they're stuffed with these ones that you could use them as a sleeping bag.
They're so tough.
So there's obviously far more plastic in the ones that you pay for.
But anyway, yeah, so I did some calculations, or somebody else did some calculations, and I saw them on the internet and wrote them down.
The replacement.
Yeah, here we go.
Here we go.
So we used to have single-use plastic bags, and this shows you how many uses you need to use a bag to make it more environmentally friendly than a single-use plastic bag.
So even paper bags, you'd think they're environmentally friendly.
Wrong!
You've got to cut down trees that have probably been planted by Elton John when he's offsetting a private jet ride.
You've got to cut down trees.
There's toxic chemicals that are used in the manufacturing industry.
And then you've got to ship them around and whatever.
So there's four times as much carbon in the creation of paper bags than in single-use plastic bags.
And it gets worse!
So if you go up to Bag for Life, you've got to use it like eight times, a non-woven PP bag, whatever that is, I've no idea.
You've got to use that like 12 times in cotton bags, because cotton uses so much water as well in its manufacture.
You've got to use it like 130 times.
I think it's the one the Cobb gives you.
Because they care so much.
Yeah, so these replacements for single-use plastic bags, ain't that great.
Also, there's going to be a tax on businesses if they don't use at least 30% recycled material in their packaging.
But some businesses reuse packaging.
You know, for example, like bars, bottle drinks in Scotland.
So you get the, you know, they come around with the iron brew and you get the money back and all the rest of it.
But so they reuse the bottle and it just gets rinsed out.
What?
A lot of...
If I go to a bar in Scotland, get some iron brew.
No, bars.
It's got two R's.
It's the brand of the fizzy pop.
So yeah, but they come round and you hand the bottle back.
You can collect all the iron brew bottles up over a month and then that'll pay for a night out because each one's like 25 pence or something.
I can't remember.
I used to do that when I was at uni.
There were so many bottles.
But...
But yeah, basically the plastic packaging tax is going to come in and penalise companies that don't use at least 30% recycled plastic in their packaging.
But some companies actually reuse the packaging instead of recycling it.
And recycling it is actually quite an energy intensive process.
It's much better to reuse it.
So this is giving an incentive To companies to stop reusing, reusing stuff in environmental terms, the absolute best you can do.
It uses very little energy and obviously reuses the packaging.
They'll be incentivized to recycle instead, which burns a lot of energy.
Communication as well.
Businesses are being told, there's no actual legislation around this, but businesses are being told to use email instead of paper.
But email has a carbon footprint because you're burning that electricity.
So yearly, for an average office worker, it's 0.6 tonnes.
That's how much carbon is released just with all that email.
I don't know how much is released from Pornhub, but for perspective, the entire annual carbon footprint of someone in India is 1.5 tonnes.
Commuting as well.
Businesses are installing green light bulbs and insulation and energy-efficient generators and all the rest of it, but there's a big carbon footprint from commuting.
98% of an employee's carbon footprint is from commuting.
So it's all commuting.
It doesn't matter what happens in the office.
The average American commutes to work by car just under an hour each day, and that works out to roughly 32 miles and equates to 30%.
3.2 tonnes of CO2 per person every year just commuting to work.
So, you know, there's a lot of green policy out there that's actually counter-effective.
It's not going to improve our lives.
Or openly corrupt.
Or openly corrupt, like the exemption for yachts and private jets.
So green policy, it looks to me, because green policy is based on quite opaque science and consensus across all this.
It's becoming a mantra, a religion.
You're not allowed to question it.
Anybody who questions it is a denier, even when you could just be raising issues such as...
I'd rather have nuclear than wind.
Science denier.
Yeah, and a lot of scientists say nuclear is much better than wind.
It can run as much.
And we get so much energy, so much electricity from France, which gets 75% of its electricity from nuclear power.
So France didn't get rid of its nuclear power station, so they send us electricity under the sea, under cables.
And yeah, nuclear is great because it can run whenever you need it.
It's just a constant.
It's constantly on, whereas wind turbines are just on when the wind blows.
And unless you've got somewhere to store that energy, then it's gone, you know, or unless you can sell it to another country.
So, yeah, a lot of the science doesn't add up.
Even the concept of carbon being in the atmosphere being bad.
So the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has risen 12% over the last few decades, the time that they're worried about.
But historically, it's still incredibly low.
So pre-Cambrian times, it was like 8,000 parts per million in the atmosphere.
So it was really high.
There's obviously a lot of green vegetation.
It wouldn't be so good for humans back then.
You wouldn't actually be able to breathe or stay awake.
But it came down to, I think, 350, 360 parts per million.
And it's risen to about 440 parts per million.
So it's still, you know, it's pretty low compared to prehistoric times.
But this increase in carbon dioxide, since the Industrial Revolution, this increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has actually...
It's basically plant fertiliser.
So now we're seeing the greening of parts of the desert because plants don't lose as much moisture because they don't need to open their stomata.
I mean, you say...
Stomato, I say stomata.
But they don't need to open their stomata, which is their breathing hole, as much to get as much air in because there's more carbon dioxide in the air.
So we're seeing the greening of previously arid areas.
So if you want to green the planet, drive more of your car.
Exactly, exactly.
And, you know, people talk about rising sea levels.
I mean, they don't seem to be rising that much.
The Maldives is expanding and building airports.
You know, if they were worried, Barack Obama bought like a $16 million house at sea level.
Martha's Vineyard.
Like, why would he buy it?
If he really believed this stuff, that he appears on TV and says, oh, we've got to worry about this stuff, buy one up a hill.
Buy one just, you know, at least 100 feet up a hill.
Then you're safe.
But he's bought one at sea level.
So I don't buy all this climate change, you know, catastrophizing.
I don't think it's going to be that.
I think there's going to be changes, there's going to be bad things, but there's going to be a lot of benefits.
Like, a lot of tundra is going to be opened up as viable There's farmland.
And also the temperature around the equator.
Everybody has this idea that the Sahara is going to boil and all the rest of it.
The changes are mostly in the upper and lower hemispheres rather than at the equator.
So I think...
Governments are using climate change as a scaremongering to increase taxes, increase their own power.
Except on themselves.
Except on themselves and their friends who have the private jets and the yachts.
And this is a classic, classic example.
So, yeah, this is something that we're going to be digging into more over the next few years as green policy overtakes from COVID and Brexit as the leading drivers of policy.
I'm glad to see they're being so openly corrupt, though, because I know they are trying to basically destroy the car at this point.
I can see their arguments, but I just don't trust it for a minute because they're like, yes, but not my car.
Yeah.
Okay.
Yeah.
And I just, man, you know what I don't like about Teslas?
My mate's got a Tesla.
And I went in it with him and it was amazing.
Went really fast, really good acceleration, but it's got this thing that tells you.
It's like a mobile phone battery.
You know where it says like 87% battery left?
It shows you how many miles you've got left.
And if you super accelerate, then that thing just goes...
You know, you can see it going down.
And it just gave me that...
Anxiety.
It'll give me low battery anxiety.
Just seeing it going down.
Whereas with my car, I've got an Audi.
It's red.
It's really fast.
It's really cool.
Pull over.
Put some petrol in it.
No anxiety whatsoever.
Anyway, let's move on to the race physicist.
So, this is the Vox raced physicist.
So, this is an article from Vox.com that caught my eye because it is insane.
And also, a very good example of what I'm going to call ideological pollution.
So, it's where you take a topic, say physics, and just start ramming in your ideological biases until you can't find any more to put it in.
And let's go through it.
So, a physicist's lesson about race, power, and the universe is In her book, The Disordered Cosmos, black queer scientist Kandra Pescod-Weinstein argues that physics can be more universal.
I don't know what the hell that means.
Presumably she's like, we can allow more people to do physics.
The physics department and the sciences in general are probably the least bigoted places on the planet, primarily because they're not infected with SJWism, frankly.
Because, you know, they've gone through the reforms of, let's say, the 20th century, and then they haven't fallen into the pitfalls of being like, so this is the LGBT physics department, and this is the black physics department and the white physics department.
Well, I'd be amazed if they were immune to all the, you know, critical race theory and SJW nonsense because they're in universities!
And universities are where all this stuff started!
In my experience, those specifically hard sciences have just been like, get the hell out.
Like, we don't want you here.
So, Prescott Weinstein says she realised Hawking was being paid to use math all day to solve problems Einstein hadn't worked out.
For a black, queer, feminist kid from a working-class neighbourhood who liked doing math, it seemed like a pretty good deal.
Quote,"'That was really where I got my first taste of the idea that math is a kind of language of the universe,' Prescott Weinstein told me.
She's now an assistant professor of physics and astronomy at the University of New Hampshire, where she studies dark matter and particle physics.' She is also, on the core faculty of the university's women's studies department, a seemingly unusual combination that hints at the multifaceted approach she brings to her work.
And I'm sure she's a joy to be lectured at on either of those topics.
I bet that she keeps them very distinct.
I bet when she's teaching you about, I don't know, let's see, Fermi diagrams or whatever, she totally isn't just talking about how this is also sexist because there are straight lines or some crap like that.
Actually, I find the term dark matter quite problematic.
Oh, she does too.
Oh, it really is!
I was joking, but how did you find it?
She actually comes down to that.
Oh my god.
She thinks dark matter is black people.
It's not.
Dark matters matter.
It's matter that we don't know about, and therefore it's dark.
Because once we know about it, it's not dark matter.
Right.
Oh my god.
In 2021, Prescott Weinstein published The Disordered Cosmos, A Journey Into Dark Matter, Space Time and Dreams Deferred, a wide-ranging book that is both scientific explainer and an argument that unjust power structures shape the world of physics.
Yeah, shove that in, why don't you?
We're looking at Dark Matter and you're like, yeah, by the way, racism.
She tells stories of subatomic particles, like baryons, which are the building blocks of atoms.
She critiques a trend she's seen in which writers compare the mystery and invisibility of dark matter to the lived experiences of black people.
What?
What the hell are you talking about, lady?
For starters, writers that she's seen, I don't name them.
In a chapter called Rape is Part of This Scientific Story...
What?
A chapter that grew unexpectedly out of her writing on the Dark Universe, and that she debated including in the book, she writes about her own experience of sexual assault that shaped her understanding of injustices in her field.
That is a really weird stretch.
So, she was sexually assaulted whilst studying physics, I presume that's what that sentence is meant to mean, and therefore rape is part of the field.
I mean, can this be extended to all crimes?
Yeah, like, murder is part of the scientific process.
If somebody breaks into your car, it becomes part of injustices in the world of physics.
Part of chemistry, vehicle theft.
Makes no sense, but okay.
What was I expecting from a race physicist, I suppose?
I recently asked Prescott Weinstein about being one of the few black women in her field, how concepts from physics apply to our lives.
You know where she's going to go with that.
And why dark matter is a complicated metaphor.
Oh, God.
Early in your book, you write that particle physics continues to teach you that, quote, the universe is always more bizarre and more wonderfully queer than we think.
How do you see queerness in the universe?
It's like the universe has got a sexuality now.
She's a professor.
Also, this queerness thing, because loads of comedians are describing themselves as queer now, but they haven't had any same-sex experience.
They're just doing it to try and be a bit more interesting.
I think that's the funniest thing about people who describe themselves as queer.
It's like, what does that mean?
Yeah.
Does it mean you're gay?
Because we could just say gay.
No, it's something...
So what is it?
It means you want a hint of that stuff around you, but you don't actually want to suck a dick.
That is basically what it means.
That's one interpretation.
I've got no time for that.
If you have a lecture on queer theory, at least suck a dick or have some same-sex action, then I'll take you seriously.
When you become a dad.
I want to see Polaroids.
I'm not taking your word for it.
I want to see Polaroids in videos.
Well, there you have it.
Where do they find you?
What's your email?
Sorry, we're going to...
Actually, somebody tried to scam me on Bumble, you know, dating up.
Like, I've got pictures of your cock or something.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So they asked for pictures of my dick, and I was like, here you go.
And then...
Is that a scam?
And then, because she had my phone number, because, you know, we'd moved to WhatsApp...
And she sent me screenshots of all my contacts on Facebook.
And she's like, I'm going to, because she'd get my Facebook account from my phone number or whatever.
She's like, I'm going to send these pictures to everyone in your contacts list.
And I was like, yeah, do it.
Not if I send it to them first.
I can't if I do it.
If I do it as a crime, if you send it, I'm a victim.
And I'm not joking, that is the best picture of my dick that's ever, you know, I'm not sending out a picture of my dick where it looks bad.
You know, that, like, my dick, like, just, I got it.
So you were really proud?
You really wanted to send it to all your friends on Facebook?
Oh, one of those days you just got peak boner, you know, and it's just an extra, you know, inch longer and, you know, just so shiny and, like, the light's just glinting off it just right.
It looked amazing.
Just checking if you've added me on Facebook yet.
Oh, crap, you have.
Okay.
Well, I disavow whoever has those pictures, please don't.
No, they refused to.
In the end, I ended up pleading with them to send it out because I wanted everybody to see that picture of my dick.
Right.
They refused.
Anyway, back to racist physics.
Back to the queerness of the universe, which includes somewhere in there, your dick pics.
So, she asked, where do you see queerness in the universe?
And at this point, I'm just wondering for, like, our poor students who had to go through modules with her, trying to teach them stuff.
But you know all these students will be like, mmm, yeah.
It is the United States.
God, I hope those are worse soon.
She says, "Yeah, I think the universe is weird, man." Sorry, I want a professor to talk.
"There are so many things about it that are counterintuitive.
What we do in science is exist at the boundary of what humanity understands about the universe, and you try to push that boundary forward.
And that means living in a place where things are not known." And that means being confused and asking a lot of questions.
So science is really a practice of asking questions.
What the hell does this have to do with queerness?
Yeah, well, she says queerness is just like that.
Queerness is living at the boundary of what is known and unknown.
But I think it's all known.
But hang on, what does that even mean?
If it's not known, I can show you, like, categories on Pornhub that will explain everything.
Like, Netflix even makes shows for children about it.
I don't think any of this stuff is unknown.
But also, like, in her definition, she's defining it as unknown and saying that's basically science because in the first paragraph she says that we don't know things in science and also we don't know things about queerness.
Therefore, universe kind of queer.
Yeah.
This is a professor.
This is a professor of physics, is it?
Right.
Continuing with her statement.
So anything that's slightly unknown or exists at the boundaries of something is queer.
Atomic physics.
A bit of a reach.
Just every study, queer.
There is a certain understandings of queerness that in 2021 seem antiquated.
And similarly, there were scientific ideas back in the 2000s that we now know better.
Therefore, queer.
We know that the mass of a Higgs boson, what is now, we did not know that in 2000.
So I think there is a real way in which queerness and science can track each other.
Therefore, what I don't know is queer.
So, the Higgs boson was queer.
But now it's not.
Now it's not queer.
Now it's straight.
Now it's queerphobic.
Now it's cisgender.
This is an actual professor.
You write a lot about invisibility, literally, in the case of dark matter, and metaphorically when it comes to the contributions of women, non-binary folks, and people of colour in the field of physics.
At one point you write about physicists who draw a comparison between dark matter and the lived experiences of black people.
Can you tell me a bit about that?
I would want to know about that too, she says.
I literally have this chapter called Black People Are Luminous Matter.
What are you doing with your life?
Did you not think when you were writing that title you might have been wasting it?
You might have been finding other ways to waste your life in more confusing ways than most people have.
I have a very clear agenda, I'm sure you do, that I wanted to hit home.
We're not magical negroes, she says.
I mean...
She continues.
We feel pain.
But this isn't scientific advancement.
Like, I think people already knew that black people weren't magic.
What did you do last year?
And they feel pain.
Because they're just people, but just...
With a different skin colour.
Two physicists walk into a bar.
What did you do?
Last year I found the weight of a Higgs boson.
What did you do?
I found out that magical negroes don't exist.
Right, this is what you do.
She says, we feel pain.
We feel pain just as much as white people do, despite a widespread belief from medical students and doctors.
What?
I've never seen this in any NHS guidance.
They've never been like, oh, by the way, here's the different amount of paracetamol you use based on skin colour.
Actually, redhead people do feel pain slightly differently.
What, because you keep punching them?
No.
But that's why a lot of redhead women are into S&M. So he says, is there a better metaphor to be found in physics?
I don't know why you're looking for a better one.
That was already absolute garbage, and I don't think it's going to get much better.
Also, why are you looking for racism in the study of physical reality?
That's just a get-go in all this.
Vox journo.
I mean, we know why.
You've got an agenda.
As she said, she has an agenda as well.
She responds, yeah, if you really want a cosmic analogy for race and racism, weak gravitational lensing is much more useful.
Instead of dark matter.
No, that was a bit trash, according to her.
We're going to look at gravitational lensing instead.
So weak gravitational lensing.
We're going to find out real racism from the telescope.
Essentially, one of the big lessons of general relativity is that space-time tells matter how to move, and matter tells space-time how to curve.
So when you have matter in space-time, say the sun, the space-time is being distorted by the presence of that matter.
Your space-time is actually bending.
If you get a lot of dark matter together, it can bend light as though it has gone through a funhouse mirror.
The light looks like it is coming from one place when it's actually coming from another.
And there's a whole bunch of other garbage, you know, to say jargon there that I'm not going to waste people's time with because we're running out of time anyway.
And she goes on to argue that you can see this is when you're a black Jew like her.
Quote, I've been a black Jew around white Jews.
It's very easy to be like, are you sure that you're that white Jewish professor you're asking if you're really Jewish?
It is because you're black.
So she's asking if a white professor says to you, are you really Jewish because you're black?
And she's like, yes, but I don't know what that has to do with gravitational lensing.
But get a bunch of black Jews together and talk to them about their experiences and you're like, ah, we've all seemed to experience the same distortion and how people think it's okay to talk to us.
That's systemic.
It becomes a lot harder to deny when there's systemic pictures there.
This is the thing, when you call something systemic, it makes it impossible to deny or really sort of do...
Systemic is...
If you see somebody being racist, actually racist, like shouting abuse or doing something horrible, then you can say that person is being racist.
These are the objective reasons that person is racist.
If something's systemic, then it's sort of unmeasurable because you're sort of saying it's in the essence of the institutions and the...
Did you follow any of that example she's giving?
Is this the simpler example of what she was giving before?
I switched off some time ago.
Because it was crap.
I was just amazed they're going through, oh, it's Vox.
I thought this was like Scientific American or something.
I was like, why are they taking it so seriously?
She is a real professor, though.
She actually does teach physics and women's studies.
Vox is absolute garbage.
There's a reason I read all that crap that she blurted out, because it makes the point that this is clearly ideological pollution, but we'll try and put it in simpler language.
If you go to the next one, so this is an example of gravitational lensing.
So I don't know, if you can scroll down, John, there should be two images, and I want you to get up one of those images.
So there should be one more here, if you keep scrolling, please.
Yeah, that one on the right there, please.
So this is an example of gravitational lensing.
So you can see the sun and then the gravitational lensing around it of a galaxy behind it.
So the light gets bended around the sun.
Yeah.
And therefore, this shows how black people find systemic racism in their lives.
What?
I don't know what the hell she's talking about.
I mean, maybe because physics is quite complicated now.
So maybe that's why we don't understand.
Or she's a goddamn lunatic trying to insert ideology into a field that doesn't need it.
There is no racism or analogy for racism in gravitational lensing.
You're just a weirdo.
And this, I think, can be called ideological pollution.
It just isn't necessary.
Especially in a discussion like this about physical reality.
And so I thought I'd look her up just really quickly.
Let's have a look at what else she does with her life.
And so I went to Twitter.
So if we go to the next one, she blocked me.
What?
I'd never interacted with her.
Oh my god!
I didn't even know she existed.
Wait, what's she called?
Justice for Julius?
Oh god, how am I going to find her?
No idea.
I'm blocked, so okay.
Let's see if I'm blocked.
So I also just looked up what else she does with her time on the internet.
We go to the next one.
You can see this is what she does.
She invites you to a seminar in which her, her mother, and her grandmother will be talking about feminism.
This is what she's doing with her university's time.
Literally, hanging around with her own family, bitching about men.
Very good.
You're literally a family of activists.
Could you be more useless?
Let's move on.
Let's go to her blog.
It's part of the University of Toronto.
This is her blog.
Particles for Justice.
Strike for Black Lives.
This is also just full of insane crap, as you can imagine.
She says, it was time for the particle physics community to be dragged into the 21st century.
While we may be on the leading edge of asking and answering questions about foundational physics, the important thing about particle physics is the foundations of physics, right?
We may be on the edge of doing that.
However, the particle physics community remains intensively white and male.
That's the problem.
We may be answering the questions, but we are quite white and whale.
Not just demographically, but also culturally.
I mean that unstated expectations of how we will behave and ways we are expected to speak conform to whiteness.
You mean do your bloody job.
That's what she's whining about.
Just be normal.
Stop going off about black queer theory about the black holes and instead tell me about the black holes.
Moron.
And if we have a next question from her here.
So, this is the last thing.
If we go to the last thing, yeah, please.
Which is, uh, this is what she got an award for.
This is part of her, like, I'm so good.
The LGBT plus physics award.
What does LGBT Plus have to do with physical reality?
Well, so the rainbow is made from the diffraction of light, or is it refraction?
No, it's diffraction.
I don't know.
I don't think the rainbow's gay, though.
No, the rainbow is gay.
It's on the flag.
That's why it's on the flag.
Right.
Although they had to add black and brown stripes to it because it didn't represent the skin colours of black gay people.
You know how the yellow did before.
Yeah, exactly.
They've got those.
And they had some blue.
Obviously, it was a skin colour that was represented.
So gay Smurfs were represented.
But black people weren't.
And it was very bad.
Yeah, it was very bad.
They give their reasoning for giving her this award for LGBT physics.
We are literally turning into the position of we're going to segregate all the different groups, aren't we?
They say she was given this award for educating and holding to account many physicists on issues of race.
They don't talk about race.
Race is not part of their study, but okay.
Including multiple of us within the LGBT plus physicists, co-chairing the annual meeting of the National Society of Black Physicists and the National Society of Hispanic Physicists, And is a founding member of AAS Committee on Sexual Orientation and Gender Minorities in Astronomy.
Could you get a more...
a large example of someone missing the entire point of the gold standard of science, which is that we don't care about where you come from, can you do the damn job?
Yeah.
Can you find the truth?
The objective, measurable, repeatable truth.
That's what it's about.
That's what they're looking for.
This is why STEM has gotten that glowing halo of actually worthwhile around all of its subjects, because they just find the truth.
They're not there like the humanities are, especially in the United States, to sit around and talk about black queer feminism.
No, they're too busy doing stuff.
And no, apparently in the United States, this culture has now sent into STEM, specifically in physics here, in which we're now going to start segregating off the different groups and inserting this crap into it.
There you are.
There's the race physicist, the future of physics.
Makes me think that the wrong side won in the war with ISIS. Okay, what is...
L'A'Hwagma!
MI5, I'm only joking.
You're going to be put on another list.
I'm not on a few already, I'm just pointing.
Let's go to the video comments.
So I said it once to Cooper.
I'll say it again here, now.
If you want to make fun of me, you just go on YouTube, type in Sultans of Chadelet, press the enter button, after that you'll find one of the many episodes, go to description, go to link, find discord, contact me, I will give you video files to make it easier.
So yeah, if you want to make fun of me, I just don't care.
I'll help you do it.
Also, that's my up there.
That's the dog that I had when I was a kid.
Alright, a message to another commentator that's not really involved with us there.
Let's go to the next one.
So this comment is for Tony D, the Legend of the Pines guy.
So I'm over here in southeastern Pennsylvania, and when we think of haunted places, usually the most haunted area around here is the Battlefield of Gettysburg.
So I'm just wondering, have you ever been to the Battlefield of Gettysburg, and do you know any ghost stories or tales from it?
Because there are so many because of all the missing bodies that still have not been found over the years.
You seem like you're into ghost stuff, so it might be your kind of thing.
Looking forward to your reply.
I like how people in the video comments are now talking to each other instead of us.
There's two now.
I pretty much finished Red Dead Redemption 2 and there's some Civil War battlefields in the game that you can go and see.
I do want to because I've just never been to the United States whether those battlefields are kept in a pristine condition at all or is it just grass now?
Is it good, that game?
Red Dead Redemption 2?
I highly recommend.
If you want to play Pony Simulator 2020, that's the game.
Right, yeah.
But it's not just like some games, oh my god, you're just wandering for ages.
I'm like, I'm just bored.
I'm bored.
It's not like that.
There is, to be honest, there's actually an irritatingly large amount of content, which is a weird complaint.
Because they have a load of random events, let's say, different stories, and you can run into them instead of the ones on the map.
And you'll just keep running across them.
I've got to the point where I just ignore them because I'm trying to finish the bloody story.
Right, yeah, yeah.
But they're actually, they're not just like, oh, go and find ten things.
It's not that.
There's actually stuff going on.
What is the best video game?
Best video game?
Apart from Call of Duty, because I've played that.
It's going to start a common war, isn't it?
I don't know.
I've really enjoyed Resident Evil 4.
Right.
I've spent so much money on getting new versions of that, even though it's years old now.
Right.
What about you?
Call of Duty.
Just in general, the whole franchise?
Yeah, all the Call of Duty ones.
World of War, Modern Warfare.
Yep, all of them.
Just all of them.
All of them, yeah.
And I was playing that zombie one.
It's not called Walking Dead, but it might as well be.
Last of Us.
Oh, Last of Us, yeah.
Last of Us, yeah.
So when I was recovering from COVID, I had my nephew's PlayStation 3 or 4 or something.
And so I was playing that and it was great.
Have you finished it or not?
No, no.
Spoiler.
Yeah.
It's saved on his PlayStation.
So now I'm going to have to start from the start again.
Is there a way around that?
I don't know.
I assume you can get the file and have him send it to you somehow.
I mean, put it in the comments.
Let us know.
How does Leo get a save file back?
And also, how do I get a PlayStation 4?
Let's go to the next one.
It's always really amusing me with these female presenters...
They're just saying, well, this show isn't for straight white men, so if you don't like it, don't watch it.
And a second after, they go, no one is watching our show.
This is all straight white men's balls.
And all I can think about is women aren't watching your show either.
Nobody is watching your show.
Not the Asians, not the gays, not the white women, not any women, not the non-binary.
Nobody.
Yeah, it's very true.
I wish we could take all the credit.
Just Chad, yes, we've destroyed your show, but no, nobody's watching.
And it's good to see she's recovered from COVID as well.
Yeah, doing well.
Let's go to the next one.
Who is the Laris?
Stellaris is a sci-fi 4X strategy game with a huge emphasis on customization, and I've had a lot of fun making meme species and empires.
I've come up with an idea for a theme based around contemporary British style affairs, and so far I have the Republic of Cheese and Wine, in which live the frogs, and North SC, led by Top Light Vance.
Other ideas in the early stages are one for the Celts, one for Brighton, and one for the BBC. Let me know what you think, and feel free to give me ideas or criticisms or suggestions.
Carl and Callum especially.
Anyone else is welcome to, of course.
Oh, that's wonderful.
I imagine you can make that a save file and upload it as well, make it freely available for people to download to put in the game.
Because that looks like fun.
I really like North FC as well.
It's traditional.
Yes.
Yes, indeed.
Let's go to the next one.
Here is my prototype COVID protection suit.
The design is very human.
It has powered arms so you don't have to touch things yourself.
And it's secured in place so you don't even have to leave your house.
Nah, I'm just messing with you.
That footage is like, a year old.
Hopefully this weekend though, I'm going to be walking around in the power armor, so...
Wish me luck.
Hopefully I don't get stuck in it.
Do we actually have a mad scientist building power armour?
Yeah, this guy was on last time I was on, and I googled his stuff, he's got a YouTube channel, well there it is, and it's amazing stuff, it's these full on mech robot suits.
So like in Aliens, the one that fights Sigourney Weaver, the loader.
That's awesome.
I'd love to have a go.
Yeah, I want to go as well.
I won't need to get the train into Swindon.
I can just run in my mech suit.
Well, I don't know what to say.
It's just really cool.
Send us the footage if you don't get trapped in it.
He takes them to schools and community events and stuff.
That would blow my mind if I was a kid.
I mean, it blows my mind now, and I'm slightly older than a kid.
So, yeah, if I was a kid, that would blow my mind.
That's awesome.
Let's go to the next one.
Joan, how you doing, babe?
Oh, you're very happy.
You're very happy because you're not making a video and you don't have to sit in a chair.
That's why you're so happy.
Say bark to the camera, Joan.
Go ahead.
Say something nice.
All right.
Good enough.
Oh, that's adorable.
I really like Jonah Barker.
Really cute.
I don't know why.
There's something about him that's just incredibly adorable.
I thought it was going to be like a hostage video in a moment, though.
You're like, say something, say something, or you'll get the bullet.
But, nah.
That was wholesome, I think.
Let's go to the next one.
This guy said Germany was such a positive example for migration for the rest of us, right?
So let me give you my lived experience.
I grew up in a neighborhood here in Germany that was 80% Russian and Turkish migrants.
And let me tell you, it was a freaking nightmare.
All I had throughout my childhood were gang wars, graffiti, Violence, insults.
Best of all, as a German, I was part of neither team.
I was neither Russian nor Turkish.
So nobody liked me, nobody wanted anything to do with me, and nobody integrated with me.
So this guy calling Germany a positive example for migration is a freaking joke to me.
It certainly is.
You know what's really funny about the gas diboter program, so the guest workers?
So, you know, the West Germans brought in loads of Turks, and then they settled and had families?
The East Germans did the same thing.
They did it with Vietnam, but both of them being communist countries, as soon as the term was up, they just deported all of them.
They're like, bye-bye, get out.
So they don't have the heritage there, because they just enforced government policy.
It's a weird sort of, let's say, compliment to the East Germans there, but they said, you come here for an X period of time, and then you go back, and, well, they did it.
I don't know for the idea if there's Russian gangsters and Turkish gangsters all fighting each other, and then he's just sat in the background and be like, hey guys!
And he'll turn to him and be like, what are you doing here?
Get out!
This isn't your country!
Or at least it isn't your neighbourhood.
Let's go to the next one.
Hi guys, you alright?
I wondered if you'd seen the story about Voldemort today and about creditors coming out after him, which was on the BBC. And also the story about him going after the kid, I think his name was Jamal, and he lost the case.
Do you have any information on that?
Because I didn't want a leftist take.
I want to see if you guys had any thoughts.
Cheers guys.
So this is Tommy Robinson.
Oh, we're not allowed to see him.
Sorry, sorry.
What are you doing?
But yeah, so this kid, Jamal, there's a video circulated of him being bullied at school and he had his arm in a cast, I think, I seem to remember.
And somebody who, what do you call him, Voldemort?
Right, right, right.
So he said that the kid that was being bullied was actually abusing girls at the school or something?
He poured some water on the Syrian refugee.
That's how he's said in the papers, let's say.
And that video went viral.
It was like, look at the bullying.
This is unacceptable.
The whole nation goes, bullying bad, and then you think you move on.
Mr.
Romlinson got contacted by the, I think it was the kid who poured the water, or someone in the neighborhood or something.
And said, no, the story is bigger than that.
The Syrian kid actually is a bully himself and is also engaged in much worse things.
So there's that going on.
So he's not some innocent nobody.
There's conflict between different students because, you know, like students, they're interacting, let's say.
And so he goes up and says, no, actually, Jamal's in the wrong.
I've got witness statements, video evidence, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
He's just got the hearsay of this one kid who's obviously got an agenda.
Yeah.
Well, you've got that, but then he went up and did undercover recording with people there.
I'm sure John will be able to have the better information.
Undercover recording of school kids?
No, no.
You knock on the door of the principal and have a hidden camera, talk to them, and then he's got the recordings.
And then he went down to the court case, and I've only seen the footage where he essentially just gets pissed off with it because he doesn't think the judge is being reasonable.
And if I remember rightly, that's the one where he just walked out and went, stuff it, and they can sue me if they want.
I don't give a crap at this point because he didn't think they were being fair.
I can see John writing, they literally shut down the school to get rid of the records.
None disclosures agreements with all the staff, otherwise they'll never get hired.
I have seen, as a personal thing, some of that undercover recording where he's speaking to one of the teachers.
And they just say, because he's wearing a hidden camera there with a mic, and they just say, look, I can't go to court and say this because I'll be in trouble.
So I'm sorry, but I'm not going to do it for you.
I was like, well okay, so there obviously is far more to that case, but I guess we won't know until all the footage is released.
But anyway, so Left has sort of got behind this kid and helped him to sue Voldemort.
And Voldemort was found guilty and owes, I think, like $1.5 million in legal fees plus damages as well.
So then Voldemort put everything in his wife's name, got divorced and declared bankruptcy.
And now Hope Not Hate have paid.
I was reading about this this morning.
That's bizarrely.
But Hope Not Hate are paying forensic accountants and investigators to dig through Voldemort's finances and business affairs to try and find some sort of link and find him liable and find a way that he can actually pay the money to, But they've got it until the 3rd of March and if they haven't found it by then I think he has his bankruptcy revoked?
I'm not sure.
I don't know.
Something happens on the 3rd of March.
Do you know about Hope Not Hate or not?
Like the people who run it?
Well, the thing is, I saw they say we're a non-partisan organisation.
It's like, well, you seem pretty partisan.
You seem to just be on one side.
You're not investigating racism in any other community.
Their head of research is an openly admitted, like he said on his own Facebook page, that he is a current member of the Communist Party of Great Britain.
That's your head of research.
So this is why Helen...
Research!
Yeah, Helen Dale, I don't know if you know her, the commentator.
Yeah, yeah.
Whenever she gets asked about it, she's like, communists, go to hell.
Yeah, yeah.
Because that's what they are.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
And it kills me that the British government, in a lot of committees about, let's say, terrorism or extremism, they quote Hold No Hate directly, invite them on for comment.
It's just like, dude, they're a literal communist.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Wow.
Which probably makes them more right-wing than half of the establishment.
But that's my understanding of what's gone on with that case and the attacks on him.
He is releasing his documentary.
What's the date again, John?
Sorry?
29th.
He'll be releasing his documentary about Talford.
So we'll see what happens there.
Let's go to the next...
Oh, somebody was telling me about that.
Somebody was trying to explain.
Yeah, Tommy Robinson's got...
I mean, Voldemort's got...
I'm so sorry.
Voldemort's got this film coming out and, you know, you should watch...
I was like, oh, what is it?
A subtle, nuanced and reasonable look at the issues?
And it's called, like, The Rape of Britain.
And it's like, well, you're not doing yourself any favours here, Voldemort.
You know what I mean?
Like, just make it less incendiary.
Just, you know...
Not that I want to start doing PR for Voldemort, but like, you know, like the rape of, come on.
Well, it depends on what's in the film, isn't it?
Because if he's found, you know, legitimate undercover evidence that this person has been engaging in grooming and he's been covered up by the police, then I think it would be fair to call it something that extravagant.
We'll see when it comes up.
I don't know if you've seen Three Girls BBC production.
Yeah.
And that was, I mean, that was almost unwatchable.
But I'd call that the rape of Britain, you know?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
But I think you win more people over when you're reasonable.
Whereas if your bias is very obviously on show, people will filter for it.
You know the really messed up thing?
What?
So the guy who did the Finsbury Park mosque attack drove a mosque into a bunch of...
Drove a van onto the pavement.
Some Muslim guys who were going from mosques.
Yeah.
In the court documents, he admitted that his radicalization was from watching Three Girls.
Right.
Because initially there was a lot of media spin trying to say that Voldemort had radicalized him.
And it was like, no, it was the BBC. Right.
Now what?
Yeah.
But actually, yeah, Three Girls was criticized by leftists for...
This is the way the left tries...
The left created Voldemort.
The establishment covered everything up.
The Labour Party covered everything up.
I know people in the north of England who work in the public sector.
Social workers or anybody who raised it as an issue, people in health or whatever, raised it as an issue.
They were demoted.
They were sent on diversity training.
People did everything they could to just brush it under the carpet until it reached such a proportion that it just couldn't be brushed under the carpet.
And even the report into it, the investigation into it, found that political correctness and fear of appearing racist was a big contributing factor in it being hushed up and it not being investigated properly.
But still, the fear of being...
Misconstrued as racist.
The fear of ensuring everything's politically correct still governs everything.
And the Guardian are still putting out articles smearing and spreading misinformation saying anybody who mentions it, who discusses it, is racist.
It's a far-right extremist.
And I think it's so poisonous and so sickening.
Stuff like this has to be dealt with properly.
Really, I think it is the story of the century for the UK. Yeah.
The cover-up, specifically.
Yeah.
We could talk about this for ages, but we'll try and move on.
The last thing I'll say on this is that if you'd like to find out the, let's say, entire storyline of it, from his perspective, Voldemort's perspective at least, he gave a speech in St.
Petersburg, invited by the Libertarian Party of Russia to do this, because he couldn't find a venue in the UK that would let him.
And it's just the history.
His starts in the 80s, his the evidence, blah blah blah.
And the Libertarian Party uploaded it to their YouTube and it got instantly deleted.
Right.
The Libertarian Party can't even have someone saying this stuff.
Yeah.
But go and give it a watch if you want to find out all the different details in there.
And I'll send it to you after as well.
Because you can think of him, you know, you can take into account his biases or whatever, but the evidence there I think is well sourced.
Yeah.
But even Three Girls, man.
It's horrifying.
I almost couldn't watch it.
It was so horrible.
I know somebody who's in it, funnily enough.
There's a comedian in it.
Jessica Fostecue.
She's a great comedian and she's in that as well.
Let's go to the next video comment.
Howdy load his ears.
This one's addressed to Callum since he had asked about the books.
I've read all three of these.
I do enjoy reading them.
Yes, the art war does have some redundant advice.
So do all three, really, when you think about it.
But you do have to take into account.
They are essentially a collection of wisdom to help other people learn from it.
Because not everybody is going to figure out the most basic of things.
Remember, common sense isn't really common sense when you think about it.
Yeah, I think you're probably right and I think we agreed when we were talking about it, mostly.
But thank you.
Let's go to the next one.
As a massive Lovecraft fan myself, I must say, don't actually read Lovecraft.
His writing style can be absolutely nightmarish to get through sometimes.
If you want to hear his stories, I would advise the YouTube channel Horror Babble, which has done audio productions of almost all of Lovecraft's works at this point.
My personal pick for a starting point would be the Dune Witch horror.
And if it's something you end up enjoying, I would check out the video game Darkest Dungeon, which arguably does Lovecraftian horror better than Lovecraft himself did sometimes.
Oh, crap.
Sorry, I was looking up horror babble.
The audio started playing.
But yeah, thank you.
I'll put that in a chat I can go check out later.
That's all of them.
We've got comments from the things.
So, on the terrorist phone call, Chris Wolfe says Republicans should play that synagogue call over and over from now until 2024.
This is what happens when you act tough and then invite your enemies to tea.
What was the bit that was crossed out?
I don't know.
Probably something where he's swearing.
So, for people who wonder what we're talking about, Pete takes the comments and then puts them for us to read on the document.
And if there's swearing or something, usually he crosses out and be like, don't say that.
Not meant to swear.
We'll skip over some of these because we don't have much time.
Callum Dayton says, of course the Muslim terrorist from Britain was in the Labour Party.
Aye, for one, I'm shocked too.
He's probably been promoted.
Even though he's dead.
And yeah, EU yachts.
So we've got Adrian of the Fountain saying the fact that the CO2 tax is exempt from the ultra-rich is less than surprising.
Really, the fact that the lockdown did it first is not good enough to prove the contempt they have over us is astonishing.
I think I mangled that.
But yeah, basically lockdown and these taxes, these new green policies.
Ready for the global climate lockdowns?
Lockdown for the planet.
You know it's coming.
You know, like, I mean, The Economist did this thing about how the state is just growing in power and influence in every country.
And, you know, when the state gets too much power, it naturally gravitates towards authoritarianism.
As we're seeing, the amount of legislation that's coming through, even guidance that isn't even legislation, HR guidance and stuff, the state's just got far too much control and has taken far too much of a portion of GDP compared to history.
So, yeah, this sort of communism light is coming across Europe and America.
So the Free Will 2021-12 says, the Green Great Reset is a project of the elites.
It is only the plebs who will have to give up their luxuries, not the Davos billionaires and their allies in the CCP, Chinese Communist Party.
That's great.
Sam Fletcher makes a good case for nuclear power.
I've said it before, I'll say it again.
Nuclear power, the vast majority of CO2 is from energy production, burning fossil fuels to turn water to steam to turn a generator.
Unless they start advocating for the power of the atom, they're stupid, deceitful, or both.
Sounds like a professor from the 1950s.
That's fantastic.
But yeah, nuclear power is so clean.
The amount of energy people say, oh, nuclear power is dangerous.
The amount of radiation you absorb from nuclear power on average, each person around the world, on average each year is equivalent to eating one banana.
So it's not a huge amount of radiation.
Obviously, if you live in a fishing village just downwind of Fukushima, you're taking it a bit more than that.
I always hate those examples as well.
It's like tsunami and an earthquake.
Yeah.
And if you look at coal-fired power stations, the amount of people who die from coal-fuelled power stations, you've got the people dying in the mines to get this coal out of the ground, and you've got all the...
I mean, the only people who die in a nuclear power station is people who fall off ladders, basically.
But you've also got then the air pollution.
So coal puts pollutants and particles into the air.
People breathe them in and elderly, infirm asthmatics can die from the smog.
So that's a real thing.
Even in London, which we don't even think about it, but I can't remember.
We're talking five-figure deaths each year from air pollution.
Yeah, but it's not sexy.
Yeah.
It won't make a good like, oh look at all the damage.
Oh yeah, there's no like, you know, and it's not this sinister radiation that's invisible and can go, you know, wherever.
It's like a, it's just a pretty mundane, you're breathing in smog, you're dying.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Do you want to do one more?
And then I'm moving on to the race physicist.
Yeah, I like this.
JJHW says, they can't fly commercial because noncerate is not allowed.
Making a very good point.
Yeah, like...
I mean, look at Epstein's island.
You know, he had a private jet who's flying all of the people.
All the people we're talking about.
You know, Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, all these people.
Prince Andrew were flying out there.
And there's, you know, all sorts of dodgy goings-on that are coming to light.
To be honest, if you wanted to take this whole thing seriously as well, I can kind of make the...
You know, it's obvious to make the argument, really, that the president needs his own plane or stuff like that.
Okay, security detail.
But for, like...
Does Warren Buffett really need his own plane?
Yeah.
Probably not.
If you want to take those commitments as seriously as they say they do.
But Warren Buffett lives a very humble life.
Oh yeah, he goes to McDonald's.
Yeah, he just lives in a small house and quite a cool guy.
Those Extinction Rebellion people, do you need to go first class?
Yeah, like Emma Thompson, she was actually asked, she was quizzed, do you need to fly first class to this climate change rally?
Could you not have just made a video and they could have played it?
Yeah, exactly!
We've got Zoom now, Emma!
Or could you not have just gone to the beach or something?
Because nobody cares.
You're not going to change the trajectory of modern economies by going and reading out a poem next to some smelly hippies.
It's just not going to happen like that.
If anything, the smelly hippies make me want to use more.
I just want to drive my Audi past them.
I just want to get a lighter and just light it in front of them.
Yeah.
Yeah, yeah.
Doing donuts in my V8. So on the Race Physicist, we'll have one from this and then we'll have to end.
So Tom Way says, From experience, STEM has fallen too, though it had a good run and lasted perhaps longer than we expected.
Education sections equals future teacher training are the primary vectors of attack through which the rest is infected.
Well, that's sad to hear.
We didn't see it when I was there, but it may very well have got there.
I'm just quickly looking for any advice about your PlayStation 3 predicament.
I can't see any, but okay.
We'll have to Google that afterwards.
I can also confirm what Leo says about redheads.
If you want more from us, go over to Lizzy.com.
Oh yeah, if you want more from me, go to my YouTube channel.
It's gone up loads in the last month.
I'm on like 26.
Very specific.
Yeah.
So yeah, Leo Kearse on YouTube.
I put a video up every week.
Yeah, guys, it's going up loads.
I thought you were going to end it there.
So Leo Kearse on YouTube if you want to go and find more on Leo.
I made money from the adverts.
If you want to see more from us, of course, go over to lotuses.com.
Please subscribe because that gives us money to run everything and also you get access to all the premium content.
And we'll be back tomorrow at 1 o'clock.
Thank you and goodbye.
Export Selection