Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 26, 2021 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:30:46

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #183

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters for the 26th of July 2021.
	I'm joined by Carl.
	Hello!
	And today we're going to be talking about the British vaccine passports and the hysteria around that, the fact they are desperate to bring it in even though it makes no goddamn sense.
	Yep.
	Also the international COVID fascism because of course it is not just...
	Sectioned in the UK. It is international.
	There's nonsense.
	And also the diversity mafia.
	And a certain lady who has done a very good job of extorting hundreds of thousands of pounds out of the BBC. And I'm actually quite in awe of that achievement.
	So...
	a little bit of respect for that at least but otherwise nonsense but let's get into it so first thing i want to mention was all the new stuff we have on the website so over the weekend we uploaded loads of stuff so just going to go through some of it now i just wanted to get the front page because the amount of things on there if you can just scroll down on the on the left side there's new stuff there but uh the first one you want to talk about was the the epochs i believe yeah the latest one on the skivians which has been really good fun uh
	The Scythians are nomadic horse people from the sort of Pontic steppe, which had a lot of influence on the geographical and sort of cultural relative position, the sort of, the way that the ancient Greeks viewed themselves in relation to the rest of the world.
	You had the Persians in the east, you had the Carthaginians in the west, and the sort of Romans, the Italians.
	Then towards sort of north you have the Scythians.
	And they hold a particularly large amount of cultural influence because they're so strange and barbarian.
	But also that they're interested in the Greeks themselves.
	They're not like hostile.
	They're just different.
	And it's really, really interesting seeing what people in the ancient world make of them.
	Because they didn't leave any written writings.
	Written writings?
	I suppose they're writings.
	Of their own.
	And so it was just really, really interesting to do.
	Really enjoyed it.
	I think the one was the horse archers as well.
	Yeah.
	The hay horse archers.
	Yeah.
	Anyway, let's go.
	So did the Persians.
	So the next one being the article...
	Contemplations.
	Are we living in socialism?
	I think we're a lot closer to it than not at this point, frankly.
	So Josh and Hugo talk about that.
	But the one I want to talk about, really, is Beau's article of the reboot of socialism, which I find really interesting.
	How, if you go back 100 years ago...
	The socialist thinkers of the time, whether you like them or not, and obviously we don't like them, were brilliant.
	They were brilliant writers.
	They were good thinkers, you know, really high-quality thinkers who can actually analyze the landscape and be like, okay, this is what we need to do.
	Today's modern socialist thinkers are very disappointing if they're following in their traditions.
	But I'll let you read Beau's article to find out why.
	Anyway, yeah, last thing to mention is also the gold Zoom call we're doing on Friday, 4pm, so that's for the gold tier members only.
	Basically, we just do a Zoom call, just hang out, take questions, chat, it's fun.
	Yeah, so 4pm, Friday.
	Come and join us.
	But without further ado, let's get into it.
	Yeah, so Britain is losing its mind over vaccine passports because they're a distinctly un-British phenomenon and we don't really know how to deal with it.
	And so everything is really trapped in this kind of Jekyll and Hyde politics that we're living through at the moment, where the Conservatives on one hand are supposed to be the party of, you know, traditional liberties and freedoms, and yet they're trying to bring in these sorts of international COVID fascism that we'll talk about in part two of this.
	So just to be clear, the number of COVID cases in the UK is down.
	This is not the number of COVID deaths.
	This is the number of COVID cases, which is down by about 10,000 COVID cases per day, which is good.
	A 15.4% decline.
	And we can't accept this as being a herald of good news or anything like that.
	Because according to Paul Hunter, a professor of medicine at the University of East Anglia, he said, well, the data is looking good at least for the summer, but he said these figures do not include any impact of last Monday's end of restrictions.
	So it'll not be about until next Friday, before the data includes the impact of that change.
	Sure, it's not going to be too different, to be honest.
	But then I'm a sceptic.
	Just to look at the government's own coronavirus data, as you can see, the number of cases is not correlating with the number of increased deaths.
	29,000 daily cases, 28 deaths within 28 days of a coronavirus positive test yesterday.
	So what's that, 0.1%?
	Something like this?
	So 99.9% of people who get COVID at the moment are not dying from it.
	It's also an interesting point here, though.
	At the moment, and for this rise, let's say, we haven't been in a lockdown, and all the previous ones we have been, and then the nutjobs are able to say, well, look, this was because of the lockdown.
	This time, it's going back down again now, and if it continues going down, what did the lockdown do?
	Yes.
	I honestly don't see how the lockdowns actually helped.
	I'm obviously against lockdowns generally, so anyway.
	So what's interesting about this, though, is the representation of this by the BBC. As they posted on their website, daily COVID cases down for the fourth day in the UK. And as you can see, they posted on Twitter, COVID infections around the UK continue to rise.
	But that's not true.
	I suppose the total number of infections is still rising?
	No, I'm not sure that that's the case either.
	No, I mean, like, the total number over the entire period of the pandemic is still going up.
	I mean, in aggregate, the overall number of people who have had COVID, sure, I mean, that could only ever rise.
	But no, the implication, of course, is that the country is in the grip of a new COVID pandemic, which...
	I mean, it's got a bunch of cases, but it's not correlating to morbidities or, in fact, the NHS being overwhelmed, because remember, that was the nail on which they hung all of this, that the NHS is going to be overwhelmed.
	But needless to say, nevertheless, plans are being drawn up to reintroduce coronavirus restrictions, according to the Bristol Post, which...
	Can't say I'm surprised.
	Looking forward to the next lockdown, Callum.
	The previous three didn't work.
	COVID cases are going down now that we're not in any kind of lockdown, but still.
	Maybe another lockdown is the way to fix all of this.
	What do you think?
	No one's dying.
	Good point.
	That's the actual justification for this.
	It was never about the cases, and that's something to keep in mind if anyone ever talks about the goddamn cases.
	That's not a threat.
	What is a threat is death.
	And the argument was, this is deadly enough that we need to take serious measures to stop it.
	And if no one's dying now because of the glory of the vaccine, then there is no justification for any terrain.
	Yes.
	The holy vaccines that have been descended upon to us from on high have prevented...
	99.9% of deaths.
	Take the win.
	Anyway, according to a report by The Independent, ministers are reportedly planning to reintroduce COVID restrictions within weeks, the Mirror has reported.
	A report in The Independent said officials in the COVID-19 task force have been drawing up proposals that could see baseline measures such as mask wearing, social distancing and guidance on work from home reintroduced in England by next month to solve a problem that's not happening.
	The task force is exploring the possibility of implementing restrictions on a local, regional, or national basis.
	Why?
	Who's paying for them to do this?
	Why do these people have a job doing this?
	Sources claim the decision would be based on the level of pressure on the NHS. Can we go back to the hospitalisation, the coronavirus dashboard, a second?
	Let's see if we can see those hospitalisations quickly.
	Patients admitted.
	5,000.
	We've got 110,000 beds, 5,000 of them are coronavirus patients.
	That's down.
	Never mind.
	Anyway, a Whitehall source said the independent baseline measures would be a last resort.
	An insider from Downing Street reportedly added there would be no return to a hard lockdown even as a circuit break.
	Well, that's good, but I'm not wearing a bloody mask again.
	Boris said he had previously promised that relaxation rules would be reversible, but SAGE advisers have reportedly warned Boris to be prepared to act in the first week of August to prevent the NHS being overwhelmed within weeks, as The Independent reported.
	So it's the same narrative.
	Exactly the same narrative.
	And it's unbelievable.
	Anyway, moving on.
	Amnesty International have been raising the alarm because it looks like there has been legislation proposed, the new policing bill, that will essentially mean that the government can just refuse all of your protests if they don't like your protests.
	As Amnesty say, you have the right to peacefully protest, but if we don't stand up for this right, it's going to be taken away.
	The UK government's new policing bill is an enormous extension of policing powers that would effectively ban protests should they see fit.
	Worryingly, it's already passed a vote by the MPs.
	So this was the one banning, what was it, serious nuisances or whatever?
	Like, badly worded, didn't support it.
	I hate Amnesty International with their crocodile tears here, because whenever Amnesty International finds someone who they don't like who's being persecuted, they're just like, get stuffed.
	Best example being Count Dankula, where they were written to about this, and they were just like, well, you know, he's done some hate speech, so screw him.
	He made a naughty joke.
	Like, right, okay.
	You'll also notice in this video, because I've seen it, all of the stock footage they have are from left-wing protests, and it's like, yeah, convenient.
	Really interesting, that, isn't it?
	Yeah.
	Anyway, passports, COVID passports are probably going to be introduced to football matches.
	There's actually not really a lot that we can do about private organisations and events demanding these.
	Well...
	Are they demanding them?
	Or are they being pressured by central government?
	Well, that's a really great question.
	I don't have the answer to it.
	But anyway, as ITV reported, football fans attending Premier League games and other large football matches may need to be fully vaccinated.
	The government is in talks.
	Here we go.
	So it is government pressure.
	You had me.
	Whether large events with more than 20,000 attendees would need to use COVID passports calling to the PA news agency.
	The plans could be extended to lower divisions and other sports in England.
	So eventually it'll just be expanded to everything.
	You know that they're going to do this.
	Ministers are also understood to be discussing whether a recent negative COVID-19 test could allow entry into the football matches, although this has been ruled out for nightclubs, of course, which we'll talk about in a second.
	Proving you don't have it is not good enough.
	Yeah, no, it's not good enough.
	Somehow, if you don't have it, you are still at a risk to other people.
	I love the idea that you could be vaccinated and have a positive test, but you could still go in because you're vaccinated.
	So I actually have COVID, but I was vaccinated, Owen Jones or Piers Morgan style, and yet they can go in, but the people who don't have it aren't allowed in.
	Because they haven't been vaccinated against something they don't have.
	It's amazing how much this makes sense.
	A government source said, Yes, that's right.
	People who are not at risk of COVID should be immunised against COVID. Anyway, so the nightclub industry was told that they were going to have to have vaccine passports for people going into nightclubs because, you know, all of those old people, you know, moshing it up on the dance floor.
	That was a real risk of spreading COVID and the nightclub bosses are in revolt.
	Peter Marks, chief executive of Recom UK, which owns 42 nightclubs, including the chains, the ones I've never heard of, said he felt utter disbelief in hearing the plans and there looks like they're going to take legal action.
	During a press conference on Monday's Freedom Day, they reopened for the first time in 16 months, and Boris had sparked fury among them by declaring the plans for the COVID passports.
	And of course, the negative test would not be good enough.
	There was actually a plot point in the South Park vaccination special, where it was all the old people, they were the only ones who could get vaccines, so they all went clubbing afterwards, essentially like no one else can.
	Well, yeah, it looks like that's going to be the case.
	That's actually what's going to happen, by the way.
	Yeah, so, you know, enjoy the nightclubs being filled with pensioners.
	Anyway, so Boris has faced a Tory revolt over this, some kind of revolt, thank God.
	But it's only approximately 40, 42, who have been up in arms about this, which is not nearly enough, frankly.
	I don't know why.
	It's only 40 conservatives.
	They're like, what?
	Are you sure that introducing a sort of Soviet-style papers, please, tiered, segregated society isn't quite conservative?
	And 40 of them are like, I'm not sure.
	I'm not sure.
	I'm not sure I'm on board with this.
	And the rest of them are like, nah, it's fine.
	It's okay.
	We're okay with it.
	That's right.
	We're conservatives.
	And we're so conservative that the conservative conference, the Tory party conference, they're going to require COVID passports?
	No.
	Go to the next one, John.
	It's amazing.
	A bunch of the MPs are prepared to boycott their own conference over this.
	Thank God.
	The members should as well.
	The members should as well, yeah.
	Steve Baker, Peter Bone, Chris Green, and Mark Jenkinsons were among those pledging to stay away from the event.
	Not that they would have made any difference anyway, because they're the Libertarian Caucus and the Conservative Party that does nothing.
	Well, I mean, they're not voting against that.
	They deserve props for that.
	Oh, God, I know.
	But it's, you know, why is it not a substantial amount?
	Why is it?
	Well, it's 40.
	That's not nothing.
	But the fact that they're so small in such of a big...
	40 out of 380 is not nearly enough.
	In the face of a policy like this?
	In the face of a policy?
	Literally, the Stalinization of Britain.
	And only 40 MPs are like, I have questions.
	Bolton MP, Mr.
	Green, Chris Green, suggested they could set up a freedom zone outside of the security fences.
	Doesn't that sound pathetic?
	At the Conservative Party conference, a couple of the MPs are going to go, oh, we're going to go sit in the freedom zone.
	Losers.
	A senior Tory source said, we're the governing party.
	We have to obey the guidance.
	Even if it's not the law, we still need to do what the government is recommending for major events.
	It's like, sure, but maybe the government should be recommending this for major events.
	Again, 99.9% survival rate at this point.
	It's weird, right?
	They can all notice it's total nonsense, but they're like, we're going to have to do it anyway.
	Yeah, because we're recommending it.
	Yeah, because we've told everyone they've got to do it, even though we all accept it's all nonsense.
	It's bizarre.
	But I love this.
	An insider dismissed the concerns from Tory backbenchers, believed to be shared by some of the cabinet, pointing out the public's view is rather different.
	Some MPs might not like it, but all the polling suggests the public are quite strongly in favour of COVID passports.
	That's right.
	71%.
	71%.
	They're all in favour of it, Callum.
	Anyway, moving on.
	Students are being refused.
	Who's the insider?
	We don't know.
	Was it the vaccine minister?
	Well, who knows?
	It may well be.
	Unfortunately, that was kept from us.
	But anyway, students are going to be refused lectures, which is exactly how fair I'd expect this to be.
	The people least at risk from COVID won't be allowed to go to their lectures and stay in lecture halls.
	Halls of Residence, sorry, under plans being pushed by Boris because...
	Why?
	Prime Minister is said to have been raging about the relatively low vaccine uptake among young people and is determined to apply pressure.
	So it's Mr.
	Hyde version of Boris has come out and been like, nope, that's it, I'm raging about this, I'm angry.
	And I'm sure the Dr.
	Jekyll version is like, oh yeah, but this is a bit wrong, isn't it?
	It's like, sure, but why are you doing it then?
	Weird, two-faced villain.
	So this is something that's going to happen to students.
	Sucks for you.
	Remember that Keir Starmer previously had demonstrated the most small amount of resistance to this, saying, well, look, pub vaccine passports isn't very British.
	He's right.
	And so Labour and the Liberal Democrats are considering becoming opposition parties.
	We go to the next one.
	Apparently they're thinking about it along with the Tory rebels.
	How long has it been?
	Two years since the election?
	About that, yeah.
	About two years.
	They're considering opposing vaccine passports and nightclub owners are ready to take the government's call, which is good news.
	And you remember when Matt Hancock was relieved of his post because of His indiscretion with his assistant, Sajid Javid took over and was like, great, we're no longer going to cower in the face of COVID, except now he's had to retract that and apologizes for his cowering in the face of COVID remark.
	Yeah, did you see the tweet itself where he was apologizing?
	No, I didn't.
	It was really pathetic.
	He was just like, oh, I realized it was, what was it?
	Poor choice of word and I sincerely apologize.
	Yeah.
	He's just like, what the fuck?
	I was expressing gratitude that the vaccines help us fight back as a society.
	And the thing is, he doesn't seem to be wrong.
	If the vaccines are responsible for the unbelievably low death rate from COVID now, good.
	Take the win.
	Why can't we just accept that we've conquered this?
	But, you know, Sajid had to apologise for not being a coward.
	I don't get it.
	I'm apologising for successfully stopping people dying.
	Okay.
	I'm sorry I told you you didn't need to be deeply afraid of this all day, every day.
	That was the wrong thing.
	But anyway, this, of course, is to protect the holy NHS, the sacred NHS, without which there would be no Britain.
	Which is...
	No, but you laugh, but that's pretty much their opinion on this at the moment.
	There's a Chinese Communist song that goes like that as well.
	Really?
	Yeah, without the Chinese Communist Party, there would be no China.
	So...
	Well, without the NHS, there would be no Britain.
	And so this is one of those Indy 100 articles that covered it.
	And I love this so much, right?
	So there were protests in London and around the world that we'll cover in a minute.
	And at one of them, this one ex-nurse gave her theory as to what was happening.
	Kate Sheremani stood on the steps of Trafalgar Square on Saturday and addressed the mass gathering of demonstrators protesting against COVID restrictions and vaccines.
	That's not why they were protesting, but never mind.
	As I understand it, they were protesting mandatory vaccine passports and things like this.
	But anyway, she was an ex-health worker who struck off the nursing register for denying the existence of coronavirus and discouraging people from getting jabbed.
	In her furious speech, recordings of which have been widely shared on social media, the mother of four turned against members of her former profession, as if she was not allowed to ever criticise a doctor or a nurse because she was one.
	Comparing the NHS staff to those in Nazi Germany who are hung for their crimes.
	Well, I mean, I just have to say, if this all turns out to go really, really badly, merely following orders wasn't a good enough excuse, as I recall.
	So, just saying.
	But anyway, at the Nuremberg trial, she says, the doctors and nurses stood trial and they hung.
	Then as the people in the crowd whistled and cheered, she added, if you're a doctor or a nurse, now is the time to get off that bus, get off and stand with us, the people.
	Her unconscionable message against Nazism was met with a backlash on Twitter.
	I mean, I get the criticism, though, which is just like, well, if you can't point to it causing mass numbers of death, then it would be irresponsible.
	But the idea she's not allowed to hold this opinion is pretty weird.
	She's not allowed.
	She's a race traitor to the NHS. That's actually exactly how this is being framed, incidentally, and the way Sadiq Khan has framed it.
	Which we'll get to.
	The hashtag, gotyourbackNHS, was one of the platform's top trends of the weekend.
	And it just was the new Marcus Rashford.
	No, no, no, it is.
	Honestly, you look like an ICU doctor, Samantha Batt-Rawden.
	Oh, I think we've spoken about her before.
	Yeah, very working class.
	She's a front-front lobbying group.
	Yep, she is.
	She says, if you're retweeting this, please follow.
	You can also tweet a message of sports in the NHS, blah, blah, blah.
	Let's get this trending.
	And so Sadiq Khan had replied to this, saying, This is utterly appalling.
	I have raised it directly with the Met Police.
	Our NHS staff are the heroes of this pandemic, and Londoners from across this city roundly reject this hate.
	A hate against doctors?
	As if the NHS is a protected class.
	Those people working there are a protected class.
	And he is right.
	I've never seen so many amusing TikTok videos.
	If it wasn't for the NHS, I would have been bored during the pandemic.
	I don't know what to say.
	It would have been tragic.
	But unquestionable heroes of the pandemic, and you're not allowed to hate them.
	I like the idea that if you criticise the TikTok videos, then you're going to get put on the Southern Poverty Law Centre for a known hate group.
	I believe that's going to be the case.
	Oh, jeez.
	I'm not joking, I'm not even joking.
	So anyway, moving on, the government is going to start watching everything around you, because of course now we have an ethical state, and that's what the whole point of this is, to make it so the government's job is to engineer society.
	I would have said that's deeply immoral, but then I'm one of those old liberal dinosaurs that nobody listens to anymore.
	Boris Johnson is apparently going to launch a program where the government is going to track what people eat and how much exercise they do.
	This is what you get for voluntarily downloading an app where the government is allowed to track you.
	They think this is an acceptable thing to do.
	Hang on, well, it depends.
	I mean, is this an app in which it's going to track you and you don't really get a choice in it, or what?
	Because, I mean, there are programs already for health staff in which, for example...
	They subsidize groups that essentially you join are essentially like little cults that teach you that you're bad for eating too much and you should lose weight because, I mean, you probably should.
	Yeah, and I'm more for fat-shaming as well, but I don't think that we should have a government app that tracks what you eat and how much exercise you do.
	Well, he says new program, not new app.
	Yeah, but it's going to have an app.
	It's going to be like the Track and Trace app.
	They've got the framework now.
	They realise that people will accept it and will go along with it, despite the ping-demic that we've had to live through.
	And this is going to continue.
	It's going to become totally normal.
	The government has a new app.
	You're supposed to download it.
	Why aren't you downloading it?
	There's something weird about you.
	We'll have to see it, but even if it was, I don't know why people wouldn't just lie to it.
	I mean, what's the app going to do?
	Why didn't people lie to any of the other ones?
	Well, no, the point in the health cults.
	I'm just going to call them that.
	I know they're doing good service, but they do come off as a bit cultish.
	You go in and you get weighed, and it tells you how much you've lost, and then you get the discounts, or you have to pay, or whatever.
	But an app, you could just lie to it, and then what's it going to do?
	Sure, but this is all stuff that the government really shouldn't have any business with.
	This is what private companies should do.
	If there's an app, sure.
	But if they're subsidizing private companies doing it, I can see that rationale.
	Sure.
	Depends on what it is.
	I agree with Majid Nawaz that this is taking on the aspect of a Chinese social credit system.
	I'm very concerned about this.
	Don't get me wrong, I think you should take care of your health too.
	I just don't want the government deciding that people should get social benefits.
	Even though I'm probably qualifying at this point for whatever those social benefits are.
	But anyway, moving on, this is what I hate about all of this, is that it's permeated absolutely every aspect of life, and so now government ministers are That apparently farting spreads COVID-19.
	If you fart in a confined space, you're probably spreading COVID-19.
	One minister who wasn't named told the Telegraph they had read credible-looking stuff on it from other countries.
	So the Germans and the French were monitoring people's COVID farts.
	This is why I find it funny when people look at people on the anti-vaccine passport marches and be like, yeah, but here's this kook and this other kook in the crowd.
	And it's like, yeah, but then go back to government and look at them.
	Well, I mean, there's been evidence of a genomically linked tracing connection between two individuals from a lavatory cubicle in Australia.
	Well, if that's the case then...
	I mean, they should never have been given this mission.
	And of course, this is all going to cost us unbelievable amounts of money.
	As a report they published recently, a cross-party report, said that the taxpayer would be exposed to significant financial risks for decades to come, with the estimated cost of the government's measures already having hit, are you ready for this?
	£372 billion in May.
	$372 billion.
	This has cost the government so far.
	This makes the UK government debt over $2.2 trillion, about 99.7% of GDP, a rate not seen since the 60s.
	Remember when Labour started screwing everything up?
	Well, back then.
	In June, the debt...
	A little bit about austerity we did.
	Yeah, well, the interest on that debt alone in June cost £8.7 billion.
	Yay for austerity.
	Out of the 32 billion items of PPE, which is personal protective equipment, the government ordered, 11 billion of it has been distributed, while 12 billion of it are stored in the UK as central stock.
	The rest hasn't been delivered.
	So a third of it didn't turn up.
	up, a third of it's been used, and a third of it is just sitting in warehouses.
	The amount of money it costs to store that in warehouses is six and a half million a week.
	Great.
	Yeah.
	I'm actually, I remember that there was a story a lot of leftists have been sharing because I think it's...
	A member of the Conservative Party was given a contract for 120 million to provide PPE, and it was like 0.4% of it worked.
	The rest of it was broken.
	At least you don't have the story, I guess.
	And that's what I think is behind Boris's massive drive to make everything, you know, COVID-obsessed.
	To make sure that every single person on the Earth has got their monthly or daily coronavirus vaccine.
	It's because of all the money.
	It's because of all the money that is going to these people, and as I say, the Conservative Party are connected to where this money is going.
	It's a huge slush.
	Same with every other party that's currently in government around the world.
	Absolutely.
	It's a huge slush, and I hate it.
	So anyway...
	Let's move on to the worldwide coronavirus fascism that appears to have arrived.
	Now, there were massive protests across the world.
	This is the protest in London that you can see.
	There's just tens of thousands of people stretching off into the distance.
	No coverage.
	You wouldn't have known this if you were just watching the BBC or ITV or Sky News or whatever.
	This massive...
	And it was all across the UK. So it was Bristol, Cardiff, all up and down the country.
	We're going to have a video put out of...
	Because we had a bunch of people going there and filming stuff and interviewing people.
	So we're going to get a video about that put out at some point in the next few days.
	But anyway, this upset the Fuhrer of Wales, Mark Drakeford, because apparently some anti-lockdown protesters had protested outside of his home.
	And he was like, that's crossing a line!
	Locking people in their houses, not crossing the line.
	Thinking about having a curfew for men, not crossing the line.
	Protesting an elected leader who's taken on dictatorial powers, that's crossing the line.
	He complained, well, one of his fellow party members complained that this amounted to bullying.
	The public are bullying me.
	The public are bullying me because I keep them locked in their homes?
	Oh, God.
	He's going to tell around to tell the mean comments he gets online justifies censoring them as well.
	I imagine that he's going to get to that.
	This was apparently a...
	This is apparently a favourite tactic of the far right in America.
	LAUGHTER When?
	When has that happened?
	I mean, I suppose they did go to Pelosi's house, didn't they?
	They also went to...
	Tucker Carlson's house, yeah.
	Mayor Ted Wheeler's house as well.
	That's right.
	The Antifa went to Ted Wheeler's house.
	Set fire to it.
	Yeah, they went to Tucker Carlson's house.
	He's not even a politician, but, you know, why not?
	Anyway, moving on.
	Where is his house?
	Is it near, like, central Cardiff or something?
	Yeah, his home is in Cardiff, so...
	Right.
	Like, is it an officialdom kind of place, like number 10 or what?
	I imagine it probably is, but I'm not sure.
	But anyway, moving on.
	Australia has gone into lockdown over five cases.
	This happened a few days ago.
	So next one, if you can, John.
	South Australia, this was, entered lockdown after health authorities confirmed the state's outbreak is the Delta strain.
	The Delta strain, if you remember, has symptoms that can be described basically as being the common cold.
	You might get sniffles, sore throat, and a headache.
	You may die.
	Like if you're in your 80s and whatnot.
	Well, yeah, but that's the same from any disease.
	Sure.
	When you arrive in your 80s, you get a disease.
	There's a risk of death.
	But the lockdown is lasting for a week in South Australia because the fifth case was identified in a diner and that was it.
	Man came from Argentina.
	Entire state lockdown.
	Five cases.
	This is an interesting way that the Australian authorities appear to be looking at this.
	Have a watch of this clip.
	I think early next year we'll be in the phase of chasing up people who haven't come forward to get their vaccination or have missed their bookings and so on.
	So everyone will be able to get a vaccine between now and the end of the year.
	But of course, you know, and I want every New Zealander to come forward, but human behaviour suggests that there will be some people that we have to actually really go out and look for, and some of that may spill into next year.
	Our commitment is everyone will have the opportunity to get the vaccine by the end of the year.
	Everyone will.
	But I can't say that, you know, that we're not going to have some hesitant people or some people who just haven't come forward that we don't have to go out and find next year.
	Sorry, that was New Zealand, not Australia.
	But it seems that...
	What is wrong with Down Under?
	Well, that's a great question, isn't it?
	Like, I mean, New Zealand's been in a phenomenal tyranny for quite some time now.
	But at least people aren't dying of a disease that most people recover from.
	I don't mean Canada's that cucked.
	No.
	But anyway, this is a clip from Australia that was going around in Sydney.
	You've seen massive protests, again, not reported anywhere as far as I've seen.
	I've had to find all of these from social media.
	Although the Australian authorities did reassure everyone that the police are going through the footage, you can go to the next one, and are going to hunt down the people who are part of it.
	Sorry, I must have put that link on afterwards, John.
	But yeah, so the Australian authorities, the police are going through all the footage that they got from the protests in order to find people and charge them.
	They've vowed to identify and charge as many people as possible.
	For protesting.
	For protesting.
	Against being tyrannised by a tyrannical government.
	And they're like, yeah, we're going to get you for that.
	I mean, you couldn't prove their point faster, but also, what the hell is wrong with Australia?
	Don't know.
	Same as New Zealand.
	The authorities are right, right, we're going to hunt you down and vaccinate you, and if you protest, we're going to hunt you down and charge you.
	I'm sick of being hunted down by the government.
	That's how I'd feel if I were in Australia.
	I just want to point out that a few years ago the Australians did give up their guns.
	I hate to give credence to the NRA's narrative on that.
	No, the NRA are right.
	But they do seem to be right about this.
	Where's our guns?
	They're gone.
	Like a handful of people have them in the UK in shooting clubs and whatnot.
	That's about it.
	But yeah, prepare to get hunted down and vaccinated against your will, because your body, your choice.
	Anyway, in France, the New York Times did an excellent article about how the French are taking the lead when it comes to coercion.
	Isn't that nice?
	Don't you want the government to coerce you?
	That's what everyone wants from their governments.
	Coercion.
	So Macron is leading the way down a narrow path, combining limited compulsion to get vaccinated with widespread coercion.
	New York Times' words.
	That wording there, though.
	France is taking the lead in making life unpleasant for the unvaccinated.
	Yes.
	That's not a normal thing to do.
	Yes.
	The government is actively targeting sectors of its own population to make their lives miserable.
	That's what's happening in France.
	His approach of ordering health workers to get vaccinated by September 15th and telling the rest of the French population they will be denied access to most indoor public venues if unvaccinated or without a negative test by August 1st has prompted other countries, including Italy, to follow suit, even though it's stirred deep pockets of resistance.
	Barrelling through 1,200 proposed amendments defying accusations of authoritarianism and chaos from the hard right and then just the left.
	So, hard right, don't want to be tyrannized.
	Evil, evil.
	The left, the cuddly, nice left, it's just the left, just nothing to do with it.
	They all...
	Well, agree that that's bad.
	But the lower house voted 117-86 to back Macron's attempt to strong-arm the French to get vaccinated by making, quote, their lives miserable if they do not.
	Great, my government's going to try and make my life miserable.
	Just what I wanted.
	Brilliant.
	I mean, they say that's not the purpose of the government, but the more I think about it, it kind of is.
	What does the government do that isn't just making people miserable?
	It does that anyway, so what's new, you know?
	It's just another day ending in Y. But there we go, it's like the French government, that's our main objective.
	We're going to say it openly.
	Yes.
	Like, we're here to make my life miserable.
	Yes.
	So the New York Times is presenting the lie that Europe's problem is that similar to that of the United States.
	Vaccination levels around just under 60% are inadequate for herd immunity.
	It's not what herd immunity means.
	Herd immunity can be done in the absence of vaccines.
	Herd immunity just means most of the population have been exposed to the virus and don't fall sick from it because they have antibodies circulating.
	I think there's a specific percentage you want to aim for, statistically, and it's about 80-90% or something like that.
	But you can get it from the vaccines and, of course, people just getting the virus.
	I saw some data recently because they're complaining about the youth in the UK not being vaccinated.
	But the government said that, what was it, 9 out of 10 have the antibodies?
	So that's herd immunity.
	That's a vaccine without the vaccine.
	Well, that's the point.
	Vaccines are not necessary for herd immunity.
	They're not a necessary component of it.
	But the New York Times, of course, is lying to people and acting as if they are.
	In the United States, it has not generally gone beyond hospitals and major health systems requiring COVID-19 vaccines.
	Major European economies, including France and Italy, I love the way they frame them as just European economies.
	They're not countries, they're economies, right?
	That's a good point.
	They're moving closer to making vaccines mandatory for everyone.
	Mario Draghi, the Italian Prime Minister, followed the French example.
	He did not pull his punches in announcing similar measures this week.
	The appeal to not getting vaccinated is an appeal to die.
	Mad.
	Absolutely mad, right?
	The resistance to vaccination could also kill others, he noted.
	Right.
	So if I don't get vaccinated, then I'm a threat to people who are vaccinated, even though the vaccine is meant to protect them from falling ill from COVID. What's your problem?
	Why can't it be each to their own?
	Yeah.
	The people with the vaccine are surely not at risk of COVID? Even if they can get it, which they can, it's meaning they're prevented from becoming hospitalized, which it seems to be, at least if we just go from the hospitalization numbers, and it's certainly preventing them from dying en masse, as we can see from the death numbers.
	So if it's not a threat to them, you could be saying, well, it's a threat to the unvaccinated, but if they've chosen not to, that's their choice.
	They know the risks.
	Yeah, exactly.
	What are you supposed to do?
	But anyway, massive protests against this in France.
	Huge protests in France.
	I mean, just look at the scope of this.
	This is in Paris.
	This is one city in Paris.
	One city in France, sorry.
	Anyway, what do you think the Germans are going to be like on this?
	Nothing.
	No, Merkel's hinting at vaccine passports, obviously.
	Oh, I meant no protesting.
	Oh, well, no.
	Well, actually, yeah, good point.
	I couldn't find any.
	I looked for protests in different countries.
	I couldn't find any German protests.
	I'm not saying there weren't any.
	I'm just saying there weren't any reported.
	Anyway, so the Germans are going to prevent unvaccinated people from going to cinemas, restaurants, and football matches, Merkel's chief of staff said, as protests against COVID passport schemes spread across France and Italy.
	Again, not in Germany, as far as I'm aware.
	But Merkel ruled out French-style mandatory immunisation of health workers, but appears increasingly likely to impose stricter rules against those who decline the jab, because the Germans have learned nothing.
	When the state starts targeting portions of the population, that starts to look bad and historically hasn't aged well in Germany, at least.
	I mean, I don't know.
	Whether I need to use the N-word, do I, my dear German friends?
	Helga Braun.
	God, that's sounding...
	Good name.
	Good name.
	I'm sorry, Germans.
	You should be incredibly libertarian about all of this.
	Just saying, right?
	She said there would be no need for a classic lockdown.
	Ah, yes, we're on to lockdown classics.
	Lockdown classics.
	No, this isn't a traditional lockdown.
	This is a new lockdown.
	But there would have to be a toughening of the measures if the numbers continue to rise.
	The vaccinated certainly will have more liberties than the unvaccinated.
	Braun told Bild.
	That's right.
	The Aryans certainly will have more liberties than the Jew.
	It's just how it works in Germany, isn't it?
	Second class citizenship is not a desirable thing to do.
	I mean, unironically, I should have got some of the German announcements where Jews weren't allowed to go to restaurants and things like this.
	This could mean visits to restaurants, cinemas or stadiums would no longer be possible for Jews.
	I mean, sorry, unvaccinated people, even if they've been tested because the residual risk is too great.
	Because those people who have been vaccinated are apparently at risk.
	But the most shocking form of vaccine fascism that we could see around the world was from Israel, of all places, where the new Prime Minister, whose name I've forgotten offhand, which, I tell you what, man, it makes me miss Netanyahu, because, you know, I just...
	He didn't say this.
	He's going to require all Israelis to carry vaccination papers if they wish to participate in any social activity that involves more than 100 people, such as going to a cinema, a sports game, or a synagogue.
	Preventing certain Jews from going synagogues doesn't sound good to me.
	Sounds pretty bad.
	All Israelis will be required to either provide a vaccination certificate or a negative test result at their own expense whenever the authorities demand papers, please.
	We'll play the clip.
	It's about two minutes long and unfortunately it's in foreign, so if you're listening you won't be able to hear it.
	But I just want your reaction, Callum.
	Subtitle.
	But there are over 600,000 young men who have not yet registered.
	I am ashamed of different ways.
	But there is a moment and a place where this journey needs to be fixed.
	And it's actually the whole life of us.
	The knowledge is clear and clear.
	The risks are working.
	They are strong and safe.
	To the young people, they are strong, but they are not strong.
	Over a million people in the world have already lost.
	They're going to do day drink freedom by not doing what I say.
	Yes.
	Okay, said down.
	Because if everyone has been vaccinated, everyone will be able to complete their life.
	But if a million Israelis will continue to not be vaccinated, it will be delayed to 8 million others in the end to stay in their homes.
	Therefore, the cabinet has a decision that, when the start of August 8, Sarwan will not be able to introduce to the Colnoa, to the theater, to the Beats, to the Luna Park, to the Kedroger or to any activity above 100 people.
	in front or abroad, but if he will bring the corona national security over his responsibility.
	Yes, he did in the middle of the certification.
	There is no reason that the police and the people who have done the criminal care for to protect their lives will be found for those who are willing to protect them.
	In the field of tanks, the miscellaneous people will be able to fly to the states and to return, and after the receiving of the coronavirus coronavirus It's a Tacfession paper.
	It's a Tacfession paper I mean, this just seems like Nazism to me.
	I just thought the nutsness of him being like, yeah, if you get the vaccine...
	Because, again, the problem overwhelmingly is not that the elderly have done it.
	The elderly have done it because it's worthwhile for them.
	The young people is the universal complaint here.
	The 18 to 24-year-old group, let's say.
	It's how we usually do that.
	And it's the point of just like, well, there's a reason they're not taking it up because it's not worth the risk to them, they don't think.
	Because the chance of death is extremely minute.
	And then the discussions in the UK about it being under-16s getting vaccinated, it's even smaller.
	Yeah.
	I wonder what the statistical analysis is of actually the risk of getting it versus not getting it in regards to death threats.
	Well, I don't think we'll ever see that data.
	But anyway, for the people listening very quickly, dear citizens, those who refuse vaccines are endangering their health, those around them, and the freedom of every Israeli citizen.
	They're endangering our freedom to work, the freedom of our children's study, the freedom to hold celebration with our family.
	So those who refuse vaccines hurt us all because if all of us were vaccinated, we would all be able to maintain daily life.
	And so because if one million Israelis continue not to get vaccinated, this obliges eight million others to shut themselves in their homes.
	And it just goes on and on about the fact that you get it or you're harming everyone else.
	Yes, get it or you're going to get persecuted by the state.
	Again, it just seems that's just incredibly Nazi-ish to me.
	I can't stand these governments thinking, yeah, it's okay for us to persecute a percentage of our own population.
	No, that's a wrong.
	That's a bad thing.
	Anyway, so if you're wondering what you can do, write your elected representatives.
	I know it's boring and it doesn't sound very exciting, but seriously, look up whoever your local representative is, wherever you are, write them an email.
	They actually do respond to these emails, and the more emails that you send them, the more they will think the public view this as a pressing problem, because, of course, all of these things are about perception.
	Tweeting about it, posting YouTube videos about it, no good, unless they're actually getting the inbox full of people saying, don't you dare do this, don't you dare do this, I'll vote for anyone else other than you.
	I think I have seen a few emails of people doing that already.
	And yeah, there have been some good receptions from MPs being like, actually, yeah, I'm not sure about mandating papers, please.
	Yes.
	And the more emails that they get, the more it looks like there is a massive public objection to this.
	Because, of course, them receiving emails isn't that common.
	They don't get stacks of emails on one subject, usually.
	And when they do, that implies...
	There's a much wider public perception of unrest.
	And so make them think that they are on the wrong side of this issue because they are by getting in contact with them.
	Obviously, join protests and do your best not to cooperate either.
	Don't do anything crazy or anything, but just, you know, if they're saying download this app so we can track you, don't download the app.
	Delete the app, obviously.
	Anything that you can do that's voluntary, don't do it.
	Don't cooperate with this.
	That's what I'm personally doing.
	And I haven't taken a test or a vaccine or anything.
	I haven't had to do anything.
	So it's just like, okay, let's carry on with my life.
	I mean, that's not going to be an option for most people, but do your best.
	Anyway, let's go to the Diversity Mafia.
	So this lady is going to be the subject of today's clip, in which I want to talk about, because I think...
	Well, she's really done something amazing here.
	She's managed to scam about a quarter of a million pounds out of the BBC to work three days a week, in which she says racism bad.
	Good job.
	Good job, lady.
	So this is the story.
	You can see David posting here.
	June Sarpong, the BBC's diversity guru, works three days a week in return for a salary of £267,000 a year.
	So that's over $300,000 for any Americans watching it.
	She's also the author of a book, The Power of Privilege, How White People Can Challenge Racism.
	And you can probably guess what that's all about.
	So if you can click on this one, because I need to get the quotes out of here.
	So they say, at £1,700 a day, former Channel 4 presenter Sarpong is paid more pro rata than the BBC's director general, who earns £429,000 a year.
	God, what a grift!
	£1,700 a day to just walk in and be like, racism bad!
	See you tomorrow!
	And then just leaves.
	You've got to appreciate the grift.
	There's something about it.
	It's just like, right, yeah, okay.
	I don't know how you've got away with this, but fair enough to you for getting that money out of there.
	It's the BBC Director General and the government's fault for paying you.
	Three days a week.
	Was it three days a week?
	Three days a week.
	Three days a week?
	Yeah.
	Quarter of a million pounds a year.
	It gets worse.
	License fee payers money, so they have to pay it.
	Because she's the general director of diversity, which is its own industry, isn't it?
	Yes.
	So within the Beeb, Sarpon currently presides over £100 million in the budget to boost ethnic diversity.
	Okay.
	Right.
	Unbelievable.
	She also got 100 mil sat there to just spend on whatever nonsense she wants.
	Jesus.
	So there have been some responses.
	Former Tory leader and Brexiteer Ian Duncan Smith said, How can anyone be worth paying £267,000 for the three day a week?
	Once again, the BBC has scored a known goal.
	There must be thousands of perfectly qualified people who could do this job for less.
	No, you goddamn moron.
	For God's sake, it is not.
	No, she's being paid a bit much to be in charge of diversity.
	The whole department is a cancer on the institution that sucks away money from the taxpayers to be spent on leftist causes that has nothing to do with ending racism or tolerance.
	Dear Ian Duncan Smith, remember you're a conservative?
	You don't want this?
	I mean, if this was, you know, a hundred million a year to boost Aryan purity, you should also be like, yeah...
	Couldn't you get someone for cheaper?
	Yeah, exactly.
	Couldn't we do that for a bit less?
	No, that's the wrong response, Ian.
	Yeah, apparently she also makes 100k more than the PM, so that's normal.
	Well, yeah.
	There was one response from a conservative, from the chairman of the Tory's Common Sense Group.
	You remember we issued the manifesto, which was gold?
	So he says, Well, that is true.
	Why don't you just defund it?
	Yeah, that should be the stance.
	And I don't know why the government hasn't done that yet.
	When I spoke to a conservative MP after the victory, he said to me that they were going to decriminalize not paying it, which was essentially them de facto saying to the public, you don't have to pay anymore.
	Which is...
	I'd rather you just outright just went, oh, come on.
	This is just nonsense.
	We don't need this anymore.
	It's not 1950.
	Which is not...
	So Sarpong came to prominence as a presenter on teen entertainment show T4, although she was never far from politics, having dated a quality and EU campaigner Labour MP David Lammy around this time.
	I used to watch her when she was on TV. I remember being quite young.
	She's been around a long time.
	She's been radicalized by David Lammy by the looks of it, because the stuff she's coming out with now is nuts.
	So they mention here the book she wrote, and I went to just type in the book, and then went on Google, and you can get the preview of it.
	And with all these kind of things, you're going to need to read a few pages to understand what on earth it's going to be about.
	And what's this one about?
	Well, it's the usual.
	Critical race theory, white people bad, brown people inferior.
	So, in here she quotes critical race theorist Peggy McIntosh when she's whining about white privilege.
	The author of the Unpacking the White Privilege Knapsack.
	Yeah.
	So there's some quotes in here I wanted to go through because I thought they were really funny.
	So she says that a system of white privilege, though being white dominated, results in white people almost always occupying societal positions of power.
	A person of color inhabiting this position is consequently seen to be an exception.
	White dominance, Johnson explains, can be seen in Barack Obama being described as a black president and not just the president.
	Right, number one, the reason it's different is obviously because whites are the majority in the US and there hasn't been one because of American history.
	But even then, if you want to say that race doesn't matter, as the liberal position should be, well, who's the one implying that there should be racial consciousness in society and we should see him as a black man?
	As if the black community in America wasn't framing Obama as the black president.
	Right.
	There's also the point of just, well, he's also not black.
	He was the, what was he?
	The Americans, I don't know what term they used that's correct, but I'm going to say they called him the mixed candidate, and then when he became the president, he was the black president.
	There's that aspect as well.
	Anyway, so she continues, this white-dominated society further leads to white identification, throughout which white people are identified as the norm.
	Probably because of the majority.
	Everyone who calls outside of this category, often people of colour, are defined by what they are not.
	Non-white, rather than what they are.
	Who's doing that?
	Who's the one doing that?
	I'm sure if you lived in Africa, June, that wouldn't be the case.
	And so society constructs the most logical explanation.
	The whites are the majority?
	No, no, no, no, no, no.
	The white people are the norm because they are seen to be superior.
	Jun Sarpong, famous white supremacist.
	I love it.
	It's just like they think we are gods.
	There's something about white people that is just something they can never achieve.
	It's just a skin tone, lad.
	It's nothing special.
	And it's not surprising that in, say, England, most of the people are white-skinned because they're Northern European.
	Nah, it's because they're superior.
	June Sarpon.
	Leader of diversity at the BBC. Quarter of a million pound a year to go, yeah, white people are better.
	Just defund all of this.
	All of this needs defunding.
	She continues in her book.
	These two principles combined with white...
	No, no, these are the principles we're operating on.
	That's it.
	Combined with the principle of white-centeredness, putting white people in the center of attention from newspapers, books, to films and TV result in white people being afforded unprecedented amounts of opportunity and advantages simply because they are white.
	Tony Sewell disagrees with you, June.
	Totally disagrees.
	He says actually white people are failing because for some reason the education system is loaded in favour of non-white people.
	Yeah, if you want to look at the outcomes.
	Don't know why that is, June, but you seem to be talking out of your rear.
	Also, the idea that white people are represented in books and films.
	Not anymore.
	Not according to Netflix.
	But also, what's wrong with that?
	Like, what's the problem with that?
	You're going to say that they're the majority?
	Well, they're the majority of the country, so what's the problem with that either?
	Like, there's nothing.
	It's just, I hate white people.
	I'm sorry.
	That's all this ever ends up coming down to.
	But she continues, White women from affluent backgrounds undoubtedly are those with the most agency in society and are likely to have the closest proximity to their male equivalents who are in the most privileged group.
	So white women, in case you're wondering, you have diverse characteristics.
	This is like the birthing person thing, where it's like you're not a woman, you're a birthing person.
	You're a birthing diversity unit, but you're also getting tack-feared out of the diversity race.
	You're not part of us anymore, because you've got too much proximity.
	This is very much the Bill Burr point.
	It's like, for all of human history, the white women are like, yeah, we get to take advantage of all the oppression, and now that it's over, they're just trying to step over the fence into the oppressed groups.
	Like, no, no, no, no, no.
	You're with us.
	If we're all getting blamed, you're getting it too.
	Yeah.
	He said back in that article as well, the chap earlier, who said, in a recent interview, June said, there is unfairness baked into our system.
	Yeah, there is.
	There is.
	There's no way I could get quarter of a million a year for working three days at the BBC. And that's never going to happen because I'm white and I'm male.
	You are black and you're female and that's what you're on.
	This is an unfairness baked into the system.
	I completely agree with you.
	I don't for a single second say that all white people are privileged.
	You did in your book.
	Of course not.
	But there are benefits even if you come from a low income and you're white.
	You're never judged on your race.
	Oh wow, and that's the thing that was holding back the white working class.
	Right.
	June, BS. Shut up, you utter liar.
	Your own organisation discriminates against white people on the basis of their race.
	I'm sorry.
	If you're a white working class, you can't get certain jobs at the BBC because you're white.
	Stupid crocodile tears from the goddamn people who run this country.
	So her sitting there, you're never judged on your race being white.
	First tweet here, we talked about it before.
	This is one job in which the BBC, if you can get that second image, in which they, what was the wording here, they used for their own jobs.
	This opportunity is only open to black, Asian, and ethnically diverse candidates.
	Goff June.
	You liar.
	You never judged on your race.
	Let's go to the next one.
	This is just another example of it happening because it happened before, years ago, in which they also had a trainee-she internship for, I think it was the radio station, only open to ethnic minority backgrounds.
	I can't believe that people would talk like this when your own organization, this is undoubtedly your department, you do this.
	There is no one else calling for this stuff.
	June Sao Pong has a four-day weekend, and literally it's only available to her because of her skin class.
	I'm so oppressed.
	Oh, God, I hate it.
	You white working class don't know how good you've got it.
	No, you can't have that job because you're white, but, you know.
	There's also her influence over the new director general.
	I think the, what was it, the Tories appointed this guy, and he was the big fool about it, but he doesn't seem to be able to do much.
	It also looks like the meme of the conservative.
	Anyway, but let's get to this, the next image here, in which you have David pointing out that there are new standards for the BBC in which they want 95% of their staff to complete unconscious bias training.
	Well, why not 100%?
	Seriously, why not 100%?
	They'll get there.
	Why are they accepting 5% of their staff to be obvious racist?
	Because unconscious bias training is pseudoscience and doesn't work anyway.
	But they also say they want 50% of all gay employees to be out...
	Are you going to do that?
	I recall this, yeah.
	Are you going to walk into the newsroom with a baseball bat and be like, right, who's gay?
	If you don't tell us you're fired, go break your legs.
	Anyway, what's interesting though is the previous Director General for the BBC actually admitted that this lady, June, is a diversity hire.
	So she's only where she is earning the money she is.
	Not only because she's a black woman, but because someone at the BBC was like, we need a black woman.
	Yeah, this clip is a bit long, but it also just demonstrates how woke this guy was.
	But he literally says in here that I had a target of two black people on the executive team, and she was black, so hired.
	I'm like, right, okay.
	Enjoy this clip.
	Simple as.
	The Secretary of State of the Dowden has stated that the BBC lacks, and I quote, genuine diversity, thought, and experience.
	Do you agree, Mr.
	Dowden, yes or no?
	Yes or no.
	I... I don't know whether that's woke or not, to be honest with you.
	The answer is yes.
	Why is Victoria Derbyshire the only BBC News programme being cut?
	Victoria Derbyshire programme has been a very good programme.
	It's actually not reaching the numbers that we hoped it would reach.
	We felt that a programme that costs around about £3 million for an audience of around about £300,000.
	more male, actually, and older than you might think, was a programme that we should kind of rethink.
	In Sarpong, we brought in as our creative diversity lead.
	She sits on the executive team, which means we now have an executive team with two VMA people on, so I've achieved my target in that sense.
	We're actually hopeful that we can have a creative diversity festival led by her, led by the BBC. - The whole reason she's that.
	A creative diversity festival?
	What?
	We're going to make our blacks...
	Dance through the streets?
	Look, we have our blacks.
	Look at them go.
	They're on a creative diversity festival.
	They're on the halls of the BBC. This is definitely not racism.
	Oh, man.
	There was a clip later on as well in which they're boasting about how loads of people still watch the BBC and they trust the BBC. And I can't remember the name of the MP of the Conservancy just turns around and goes, well, all the youngsters are all watching YouTube, so what do you make of that?
	And they all look at each other frantically enough.
	Which one do you want to answer?
	Any of you?
	They look like morons.
	Anyway.
	So, remember her whining about white people being on TV, and this was a problem, so of course, her work, her very, very important work, is that she set up an organization, a partnership here, so they can get more non-white people into...
	More diversity hives.
	Brilliant.
	They say in here, are you a debut author from an underrepresented background that is currently insufficiently or inadequately represented in UK publishing?
	If so, we want to hear from you.
	And then a message from her being like, yeah, more brown people in media because we're underrepresented.
	No, no you're not.
	In case you're wondering.
	We have the data, so we've got a pink news of all people to prove you wrong as well.
	That's the best bit.
	So, journalist.
	Absurdly claims gays and ethnic minorities are overrepresented on TV and the backlash is fierce.
	So not an organisation that would want to push such a narrative, but they do in their own writing.
	Of course they had to put some cope.
	Discrimination is over.
	We won.
	Even if hate crime in England and Wales is going up, it's more than doubled in the last four years.
	Had nothing to do with the point at hand, which is the representation on TV, but nice cope there.
	That's their opening line.
	They say in here, So nearly overrepresented by a factor of 2 to 1.
	Yes.
	Massively overrepresented.
	Okay, well then we need to get cutting those LGB characters for the sake of representation and diversity.
	That's the logical consistency of this narrative, but of course they had to write in here, although statistics mean that 88.1% of roles go to hex sexual people who are not in the slightest bit overrepresented.
	No, they're underrepresented morons.
	That's how that works.
	Yeah, that's right.
	You are right.
	They're not in the slightest bit overrepresented.
	They are underrepresented.
	So we get the first image up.
	This is the source they're using.
	I went to it.
	And you can see in here that the females, BAME, LGB, are overrepresented.
	So we need less women.
	So women are overrepresented.
	Yep.
	We need less women.
	We need less BAMs and also less LGBs.
	This is according to leftist dogma.
	I don't care about the outcomes.
	You're the goddamn people who care about the outcomes.
	I care about the procedure.
	Anyway, but also that means we need more men, disabled, whites, heteros, and fifties.
	The BAMs are overrepresented two to one as well.
	Yeah.
	June.
	Your organisation, what do they need to be doing?
	According to the numbers, you need to be hiring more men, disabled, whites, heteros, and over 50s.
	Weirdly, transgender people are accurately represented.
	Yeah, transgender is the only ones doing perfectly aligned.
	Yeah.
	So Ho's mad that people have been pointing out that this charlatan has been able to take a quarter of a million pounds out of the BBC to push obvious nonsense.
	And so some people have been defending her on this basis.
	This one's really funny.
	So, verified checkmark, of course.
	People hate black women being paid for things.
	Oh yeah, that's what it was.
	You got us.
	It's not that we're forced to pay for this grifter to work three days a week.
	Work, I say, in inverted commas.
	It's that I hate black women being paid for stuff.
	Like, when she was a presenter on T4, no one was like, oh, that's being paid.
	I liked her, actually.
	It's being paid for nonsense, the 100 million diversity budget she's in charge of.
	100 million you swindle out of the taxpayers.
	The absolute grift of it?
	No, no, no, that's not what I'm bothered about.
	Should June Sarpon been doing this work for free?
	Yes, because it's pointless.
	Or no, she shouldn't be doing this work at all, but you're right.
	Oh, if she wants to do it, she'll be doing it for free.
	Well, yeah, sure.
	Also, the Prime Minister's official salary is one thing, which is less than hers.
	The money he and his minions have made out of the pandemic is quite another.
	Again, you can...
	Yeah, I agree.
	Let's cut their wages too.
	What's this whataboutery as well?
	Yeah.
	No, no, no.
	Let's level the lot.
	Didn't you know the government wasted money trying to combat COVID? At least they didn't waste it on diversity.
	I mean, that's one thing.
	Combating COVID, you could say, is a thing that could be done.
	You could waste it on building roads and not build the road properly.
	But at least they tried to build the road.
	They didn't just sit around and talk about how oppressed they are and muff-eels.
	I love the way she's like, oh yeah, you're happy for the Prime Minister and the Conservatives to get all this money.
	Not really.
	I've already complained about it.
	She finishes that tweet with, suck out.
	And then she goes on later to complain and says, leave black women alone, which is very reminiscent of me.
	Yeah, leave my wallet alone.
	How about that?
	So there's the next one here, another verified checkmark.
	What did he have to say?
	June Sarpong should get a raise.
	You could donate.
	If you want.
	Like, she can open a Patreon, can't she?
	You can see the midwits in the comments there being like, successful black woman works for the BBC. Tories.
	Pitch books.
	Yeah, yeah, that's it.
	No one is bothered that she's being paid to do what is essentially religious work.
	Ridiculous amounts at the BBC. No one's bothered by that.
	If you want to know what this poor oppressed woman does for a living as well, those three days a week when she's ever so busy, I have some examples.
	So if we go to the next one, this was from her account, which is celebrating the female...
	I don't even say that word.
	How can purpose-driven leaders drive the Great Reset?
	Oh, bloody hell.
	Tune in live to the Equality Lounge at the World Economic Forum's Davos Agenda.
	Oh, God.
	It's the worst of worst advertising possible.
	Yeah, there's another one from her account in which she's just whining about the patriarchy online.
	I'm not joking.
	If you scroll down, you can see it's like a VR version of a robot in which she's just like, yeah, the patriarchy is bad with her book rotating in the background.
	What was it?
	260-some grand?
	You paid for that.
	There's also her getting awards left, right, and center, because what else is she going to do with all this money?
	So we go to the next one.
	This is her getting an award at the National Diversity Awards, which you would have thought is a meme.
	National Diversity Awards?
	It sounds like a 4chan prank.
	June Sarpong, congratulations for being black.
	And she's like, oh, thank you.
	I'm going to accept this award with all the money, because I'm black.
	And at no point is she like, are they patronizing me?
	Are they patronising me?
	The Director General said to Parliament you're a diversity hire.
	Sorry, I can't think of anything more embarrassing.
	Here's the award for being black.
	She's been nominated for a Lifetime Achiever Award at the National Diversity Awards 2021.
	She's been black her whole life.
	Yeah.
	No kidding.
	Yeah.
	She also has, I think they mentioned that she's got an MBE. Yeah, Member of the Order of the British Empire or whatever.
	Yeah, a member of the British Empire.
	But don't worry, that's getting upgraded to the Order of the British Empire.
	Oh, there we go.
	Because diversity is key.
	So she's been knighted.
	She's been given all these weird orders.
	She's got, like, these diversity achievements, and she's being paid literally just to be black.
	And to tell the BBC they're not black enough.
	She does a lot of networking.
	Oh, yeah, I bet she does.
	Networking.
	If I were June Saplung, I'd feel like such a fraud.
	Chill.
	you thought i'm joking but like this is a conversation she had between barack obama and marcus rashford and you can see up there's just a book this is an advertisement for his book chill good work Totally worth the money.
	But in case you're wondering, you mentioned about her feeling like an imposter.
	She does.
	What good?
	She should.
	So let's go to the next one.
	She absolutely should.
	Interview she gave, June Sarpong, every time I interview I do, I still feel like an imposter.
	That's because you don't have anything behind you, other than the fact that you're black.
	Let's play the clip of her admitting said impostorship.
	You know what?
	I'm insecure.
	I live in a world where, actually, I've been conditioned to think that I should be at the bottom of the hierarchy ladder, and therefore it's a miracle that I'm even where I am.
	Let's give myself credit for that.
	Yeah.
	You want credit for miracles?
	Like, don't you credit God for miracles?
	I mean, I'm not a religious man, so I'm not too au fait with it, but, like...
	June, you should not be at the bottom of the hierarchy because of your skin tone, or your gender, sex, whatever you want to call it.
	You should be at the bottom of the hierarchy because you're a fraud.
	And you have no observable skills.
	You have no skills.
	You spend your time peddling critical race theory in your writings, and then with your work, you rattle on about how discrimination on race bad, and then instruct your organization to carry it out against white applicants.
	But she wasn't always like this, right?
	I used to watch her on T4 and things like that.
	She was always actually quite a good TV presenter.
	She was charismatic, fun.
	You know, she didn't talk about race all the time, but that was 20 years ago, so it was before the diversity religion took over all of these institutions.
	She used to be a perfectly fine presenter.
	Not quarter of a million fine.
	Not like, you know, member of the British Empire or order of the British Empire winning, diversity initiative winning fine.
	But I mean, like, you know...
	She doesn't need to feel like a fraud, but it's because of the honours that have been heaped upon her.
	She was not a fraud as a presenter.
	Yes, she was perfectly legit.
	Becoming a propagandist for critical race nonsense, you are a fraud for that.
	And the Great Reset.
	And you should feel some shame.
	Yes.
	Let's go to the video comments.
	Hi Carl, hi Callum.
	Just wondering about your thoughts on your system being around in my head this year.
	Yeah, the people who build a society, people who tend to pick the rules followers and their own type, society slaves in favour of the great business people who game a system, the corruptors.
	And that's because what ends up disappearing from the system of the barbarians, the people who used to be the natural predators, the narcissists and sociopaths, the people who don't care about the rules when you upset them and abuse I don't understand any of that.
	Thanks for that, Carl.
	I really appreciate that answer, and I thought I'd Today I just wanted to ask, have any of you heard of a woman named Pauline Hanson?
	She's an Australian politician I've recently been looking into.
	She's pretty based.
	And she basically got the same treatment as Trump got, except way back in the 90s.
	She might be a good person to interview.
	Yeah, Pauline Hanson is, as I understand it, quite far right, should we say?
	Is she?
	Is what I've heard and seen of her, like, speeches and stuff.
	The only thing I've seen from her...
	Working class, I think, is how I'd describe her.
	That I thought was incredibly funny, where she went to the Senate and says, well, let's have a vote on whether or not it's okay to be white.
	And she gave examples of anti-white racism and said, look, this is bad, and we should be able to say this is bad.
	And it went to a vote, and she lost.
	The Parliament voted that it was not okay to be white.
	And what was interesting is the Green Party senator gave up and gave a speech and said it wasn't okay to be African or a woman in Australia.
	LAUGHTER I love it, I love it.
	So the Australian Parliament is having a vote, is it okay to be white?
	No.
	And furthermore, it's neither okay to be an African or a woman.
	Love it, love it.
	That is mad.
	So I've got sympathy for Pauline and that's just like, you must be living in goddamn cuckoo land, you know what these people?
	God.
	I do believe at this point I'm officially radicalised.
	I have to ask, what is wrong with the left, really?
	What is wrong with them?
	It's okay to fiddle kids, to prove I'm not a Nazi.
	Well, you know what?
	You're making Nazis sound very, very good people.
	Let's be clear, that's not the dichotomy.
	Nazis are not good people.
	They are not the position against child molesting.
	That's every position, other than the left-wing position is the non-child molester position.
	And again, it's a German thing, right?
	It's literally a German thing.
	That's how the leftist German see it.
	It's just like, Nazism or...
	If you can't diddle kids, then you're an outie.
	Germans.
	2021.
	But yeah, don't think that that's the only option, obviously.
	I do think Franz Kauffman's solution to the German question was actually the best solution.
	Just break her up into different states.
	Oh, right, okay.
	Well, it's better than the other Kauffman solution, wasn't it?
	No.
	No, the Carthaginian solution.
	Not that one.
	No, no, no, not that one.
	But yes, no.
	Like, there are terrible people on all sides, and you don't have to be a Nazi, you don't have to diddle kids.
	That is a coherent political position.
	Don't know why I have to defend this, carve this out from the left and the right.
	I have a question for you, Callum.
	Given your statement yesterday about the J.K. Rowland death threats, Is it fair to now say that criticizing people for issuing death threats is Islamophobic?
	Um, yeah, because that follows with Erdogan's proposition that being homosexual is Islamophobic.
	So, yes.
	I mean, literally just anything that makes Islam look bad is Islamophobic.
	Yes.
	Even if, to Islam, apparently, that makes it look good.
	And that's the same as, you know, being racist or transphobic or sexist or whatever it is.
	Anything that impacts negatively on the narrative of the people that are trying to be defended is phobic against them.
	That's how it works.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Good afternoon, gentlemen.
	I wish to correct your error on Friday, where you talk about inflation as the increase in the prices across the economy as a result of printing money.
	Alright, give it to me.
	This is false.
	It's kind of like the same thing that's happened to the definition of a woman.
	Inflation is the printing of money, with the rising prices a consequence of it.
	And the US has certainly printed a lot of money.
	I actually thought that was what you said as well.
	Yeah.
	Sorry if I wasn't clear enough.
	I thought you were going to make the argument of the supply of goods and the deficit of goods in the market affects inflation, but that's nonsense.
	Leave it to the Germans to put the nonce in nonsense.
	Well, I mean, pretty much.
	What can you do?
	Hello, gentlemen.
	I am...
	I just got done watching the segment that you did on Kentler and his non-serie, and I've been thinking, I've been formulating a quote, and I want to get your opinions on it.
	A man is blessed when his enemies are so evil that their killing makes him a saint.
	Well, obviously we advocate against killing generally here.
	No, I do believe the death penalty should be for pedophiles.
	That's a perfectly acceptable position to have.
	I don't know what the German position is on it.
	Presumably fund it instead, which is what they did.
	There should be one correction.
	I believe it was West Germany, not East Germany.
	Yeah, yeah, no, no, my apologies.
	I don't know why I thought it was East Germany.
	I knew it was West Germany.
	Because he was a communist, presumably?
	Yeah, I assume that was the reason.
	But no, thank you for the correction.
	Imagine making East Germany look good.
	LAUGHTER It might be a communist tyranny, but at least they're not diddling kids.
	There's also a funny thing with East Germany.
	You know the Gastiberta program, the guest worker program?
	Yeah.
	So in West Germany, they brought over loads of Turks because of the European situation, and then they were going to go home totally, and they didn't.
	So now you have a huge amount of Turks living in West Germany.
	In East Germany, they did the same thing, but they imported loads of Vietnamese, and then they just deported them afterwards because of the East German government.
	Right, yeah.
	So again, it's like, you could have just done that, but...
	Making communists look based.
	Not good.
	Number two is a vague concept.
	Would you like one LEGO set?
	Or two LEGO sets?
	This is why math has axioms and definitions.
	However, you can have rounding errors too.
	Two plus two equals five for greater numbers of two.
	As well as 3 for lesser values of 2.
	Or 100 in human-machine interfaces.
	Sorry, that Gustav guns made out of Lego.
	I want to get a zoom in on the Gustav Gun, if you can, actually, for the next video comment.
	Please show him more.
	Please show Gustav Gun.
	No, I hate this.
	It's like Bob and Fajin.
	I don't agree that the number two is a vague concept.
	I think it's actually a very well-defined concept.
	But I'm no mathematician, so anyway.
	Tyler says...
	Oh, is that right?
	Okay, sorry.
	Hey there, Lotus Eaters.
	It's Anti-Propaganda here.
	So I just made a video on my channel discussing how earlier in this year, in May, Israel lied to the entire global media, and the entire global media picked up the narrative and ran with it, just so that they could get a specific reaction from Hamas, so that they could send in 160 fighter jets to bunker buster Hamas to death.
	Pretty sure that's a war crime.
	I don't know about you.
	Nah, not if Hamas are engaging in warfare.
	Like, if you're bombing enemy insurgents, then that's not a war crime.
	But I actually quite appreciated the tactical genius of the whole thing.
	Like, I'm not a supporter of Israel or Palestine, I don't care about the damn thing.
	But the funniness of being able to say to all the journalists, and knowing they're as predictable as the sun, and just saying, yeah, we're totally going to invade, and then making Hamas do that, and then just bombing Hamas and being like, idiots.
	I find it very ironic that, with regards to taking vaccination, people are getting so upset about people not doing it that they want them to be forced into being a second-class citizen, yet they don't seem to have the same argument when it comes to rape and consent.
	You know, my body, my rules, I don't want foreign objects inserted in me.
	Weird, that.
	Yeah, it's weird that they want to treat people who have had vaccine or haven't had vaccines as un-demented, but paedophiles are just fine.
	No one cares.
	Paedophiles don't even get taken off social media.
	They don't get deplatformed from anything.
	Say one thing about the vaccine narrative that they don't like, though.
	Moving on.
	So I'm a weeb.
	And so I'm going to give my suggestion on what anime you should watch, if any.
	And I believe a good one would be Shin Sekaiori.
	I still think about it from time to time is just very like food for thought.
	And so it goes over morality and What it means to be human and to subversive control over emotional and even genetic levels of humanity.
	And it also goes over collective safety of society compared to individual freedoms.
	It's very food for thought.
	It is super good and if you're going to watch something I would suggest trying that out.
	I will never watch an anime.
	I did actually watch, we got a recommendation the other day to watch, what was it?
	No Men Beyond This Point.
	I sat down and watched it the other day.
	I think I sent you some messages about it.
	Good God, never recommend anything like that again, you bastard.
	So the movie was, it's like a documentary in which they're just like interviewing people constantly.
	And the thing is like, women started getting pregnant by themselves and they would only produce women and there was no longer any need for men.
	And these births started going up more and more and normal births started collapsing.
	So men basically started going extinct.
	And it's an interesting premise, but then the entire movie was just that, just them saying again and again, did you know that men have gone extinct?
	And it was like, right, okay.
	It just became feminist propaganda, like, now that there are just women, there are no wars.
	We have a will of government, and all peace has been achieved.
	Also, there's no crime, ever.
	Also, we can't open jars.
	Nothing new is being invented.
	Like, men are basically going extinct.
	And you think, well, they'd make them really valuable.
	Like, just as a curiosity, if nothing else.
	Like, you'd be like, I've got a man, don't you know?
	But no, instead, they're like serfs.
	Like, they couldn't gather in groups of more than two.
	Why?
	I don't know.
	And sex with them was forbidden.
	Why?
	No wonder the demographics collapsed.
	Yeah.
	Okay, that's weird.
	But yeah, if you want some cringe, go and watch that.
	Right.
	Hey, Lotus Eaters.
	Two things.
	One, thank you to Callum for recommending the Adeptus Ridiculous podcast.
	I wanted to get into the Warhammer lore, and I didn't know much about it, and that is a great podcast.
	I've learned that the Emperor of Mankind is a terrible dad, and that Magnus did nothing wrong.
	Also, if you really, really like Fallout, and, you know, everyone who likes Fallout knows that Fallout New Vegas was the best Fallout, Obsidian actually made a game called Outer Worlds, which is basically just like Fallout, except Mass Effect.
	It's amazing, and you will love it if you play it.
	Googling.
	Next one.
	Was that the last one, was it?
	Tyler says, linking to the petition for Parliament, 325,000 signatures and still going, which is outlawed discrimination against those who don't get a COVID-19 vaccination.
	325,000 is good, but it should be better.
	It should be well over the millions.
	So keep spreading that around, folks.
	Definitely needs to be done.
	Arsenal by Ideas Nuts says, remember six months ago when all the talking heads said the idea of a COVID passport being implemented was nonsense?
	No, of course not.
	We've always been at war with East Asia.
	Yeah, that's the thing, isn't it?
	Yeah, funny that happened.
	Like, a year ago, it's like, oh, that's conspiracy theory nonsense.
	Now, if you're not in favour of it, you're a conspiracy theorist.
	Okay.
	Ross says, you don't need a COVID passport to enter Britain, just to leave it.
	That's a good point.
	A rubber dinghy and a shovel is all you need to enter Britain at the moment?
	It's true.
	The projection is something like 22,000 coming across this year, they're expecting.
	Yeah.
	22,000.
	Illegals.
	Illegals.
	Right, okay.
	Yeah.
	They haven't solved that problem at all, have they?
	No.
	Someone messaged me about this the other day.
	He's a good lie.
	He just sends me constantly updates on that.
	And I am interested to see what happens with illegal immigration, at least.
	I wonder if Priti Patel's point system does work and it goes down to tens of thousands from 300,000 or whatever it is.
	That'd be a good start, yeah.
	I don't know.
	She's going to get props for it, but could she be forgiven for the illegal stuff?
	Well, I mean, she doesn't seem to be pro-the-illegal immigration.
	No, but the inability to solve it.
	Sure.
	Unless he actually does do the Rwandan solution.
	Radnar says, The incremental movement to tyranny we are seeing really feels like the frog in the boiling pan story.
	Two weeks to flatten the curve became only a few months of lockdown, and now we're looking at the fourth lockdown coming up.
	Only banning harmful speech has become the banning of offensive speech.
	If people don't start pushing back now, we are going to be too far down the pit to change things later.
	Yes.
	Frankly, is all I have to say to that.
	I agree.
	Yes.
	North Antonia Knight says injection passports are as unnecessary and ultimately damaging as highly unreliable testing scheme.
	Stephen says they're not cases, they are positive tests, which is not the same.
	That's correct.
	What is the failure of that?
	Because I know the government keeps changing their statements.
	I have no idea.
	All of the information just keeps changing so often.
	I honestly wonder if it's a way of gaslighting the public.
	Keep them in a state of not knowing what the things are.
	It's the Russian political playbook.
	Like, you spread so much information, it's conflicting, and then no one knows, and then everyone just gives up.
	Yeah.
	David says, the actual number of deaths is as low as 27 now.
	Can we not request the details surrounding each of the actual deaths being recorded?
	As in other issues, it could be the actual cause of death.
	Yeah, I saw...
	There was an article.
	I should have had it for this.
	Where they were saying, well, I mean, you know, it was literally the reverse of the people dying of the thing.
	But I can't remember off the top of my head.
	Anyway...
	Omar says, if the state can mandate health options, when are they going to make being fat illegal?
	Gained another £20?
	I'm afraid you're now a Tier 3 citizen.
	No food until after you've run 14 miles from which you'll receive your lean ration.
	Why not?
	What's stopping it?
	If they've opened the gate to this, that's where they'll end up.
	Save the NHS, don't you know.
	Yeah, exactly.
	You've got to save the NHS. You've got to do your part for the whole NHS. Britain wouldn't exist without you, no.
	Edward says, So my faith in my fellow Londoners has increased oddly enough.
	Sadiq Khan stated that Transport for London would continue to have masks.
	However, upon my trip to see the Thomas Beckett exhibition, I saw half my fellow assistants didn't wear a mask.
	I joined them swiftly.
	I highly recommend the exhibition, just for the medieval art on display, if nothing else.
	Thomas Beckett being, what, the chap who got killed by Henry II, I think it was, when someone rid me of this meddlesome priest?
	Ah, Khan number, exactly.
	I think it might have been.
	But, you know, I went on the Underground last week after Sadiq Khan and didn't wear a mask.
	Got some dirty looks from some of the mask-wearing sheep.
	Too bad?
	I went to visit my parents on the weekend, down where they live.
	No one cares because of the rule, and why would you?
	Which is interesting.
	But on the train, when I got back, I went to the university city to get on the train.
	And just everyone...
	I got so many evils from people on that train.
	I was just like, what?
	What do you want?
	It's not the rules anymore.
	Suck it.
	Anyway, Tiber says...
	Excuse me.
	In the same vein, it's more profitable for a pharmaceutical company to create a treatment rather than a cure.
	It's in the interest of COVID-related groups for it never to go away.
	Yes, and it's a massive industry.
	Kevin says, so you can be double vaccinated and get in even if you haven't been tested and therefore could be positive but proving you a negative is not good enough.
	Yeah, that's fair.
	It's incoherent.
	Absolutely incoherent.
	James says, "Even if the vaccines are not as effective as we've been told, we may soon approach a point where most of those that would have died have died in the previous waves, despite all the tyranny that has been enacted to prevent them.
	As for those with natural immunity, negative tests, and people at very low personal risk of any sort of health effects being sidelined, it really makes me suspicious of the motive behind pushing vaccines.
	There's only so many times I can attribute this to incompetency over malice." What are they, like seven new billionaires that have become billionaires because of vaccine sales?
	Probably.
	I mean, when you're literally mandating everyone in the country has to have one, and you've spent billions on this stuff, of course it's created vaccine billionaires.
	Nine new billionaires.
	Nine vaccine billionaires have been created for this.
	Not about the money, though, folks, for sure.
	Honestly.
	Heathcliff says, if you look at the ONS data and add up the positive tests, you find that 25 to 30 million UK citizens have had COVID. So that's 25 million who have had it and 47 million who have been vaccinated for an estimated adult population of 53 million.
	That would be in England, I think.
	There's no one left to catch it.
	That's the point, isn't it?
	Anyway, Archibald says, I'm proud of my fellow citizens for once.
	The government isn't going to back down on the new law, but it's getting more and more tolerable.
	By the way, Carl, you should try artichoke with a vinaigrette.
	I'm sure your son will love it too.
	Dubious.
	Chris says...
	What's that dubious?
	It sounds like some French food that I'm being...
	Someone's trying to force me into eating.
	This is French subversion.
	Yeah.
	I'm not having it.
	It's probably full of carbs.
	What about snails?
	Yes.
	They're actually pretty good.
	They were.
	They were.
	Just covered in garlic.
	Yeah.
	Chewy garlic things.
	Chris says, two proposals for the vaccinated population.
	First, in order to promote vaccines, the unvaccinated gets to choose one pharmaceutical product that everyone must take.
	It can't be a bad idea to force everyone to take the same medication.
	And second, all unvaccinated people will get vaccinated if the vax population agrees to vote Republican in the next election.
	Are you more afraid of the virus or Republicans?
	Yeah, neither of those are going to happen, I'm afraid.
	Right, do you want to read a couple out?
	Because I've got to refresh my page for some reason.
	Whereabouts were you?
	Just in the comments at the bottom.
	I know, but which section?
	The fascism bit.
	Right, okay.
	So Archibald, Chris Wolfe.
	So two proposals for the vaccinated population.
	First, in order to promote vaccinations, the unvaccinated get to choose one pharmaceutical product that everyone must take.
	Yeah, I just read that.
	Okay, sorry.
	Catastrophic regression threshold as a guy shy of 30 whose only health issue is being overweight.
	Open brackets working on it.
	Good boy.
	It's infuriating to be constantly bombarded with get the jab or you'll die from practically everyone I know, family included.
	None of those who have done any research into the issue besides what the news tells them.
	Yeah, I would recommend if you're getting bombarded with this, just show people the death rates for age groups and also the data for like Gibraltar, for example.
	We've got 99% vaccinated, still increasing cases.
	It's like, right, you've got to look at the data here and just tell me whether or not it's worth it for me.
	Doctors, one of the earliest and most numerous joiners of the Nazi Party.
	Their profession gives them an authoritarian bent, and they should not be trusted to lead.
	Journalists sensationalise everything on instinct, so love a bit of fear.
	We're currently being ruled by an unholy alliance of doctors and journalists, both in and out of government.
	Not just doctors, either.
	Scientists.
	The communist scientists of the SAGE group seem to be the ones who are pulling Boris's strings, as far as I can tell.
	Every time.
	Every time.
	It's like, well, Boris wants this, then why?
	Because the sage group have told him to.
	Why is he taking advice from communists?
	Catastrophic regression...
	Not even actual viral scientists.
	No, no, like psychologists and stuff like this.
	It's just a human behaviour.
	Yes.
	Right, right.
	That's not a medical group, then.
	No.
	No, absolutely not.
	Catastrophic regression threshold says, as a guy just shy of 30 whose only health issue is being overweight...
	All right, you read the one.
	Free Will says, given how well the pandemic has worked out for the super rich and super powerful, I begin to wonder if it was actually a lab accident that started all of this.
	Is it just a coincidence that the great reset conspiracy theory emerged just before COVID and Boris and other world leaders constantly using buzzwords like build back better?
	I hope it's just conspiracy theory.
	Events do seem to lend it some credence.
	Moving on.
	Justin says, what they are saying about the unvaccinated being a risk is that because the virus will be in their system for longer, there's more of a chance for the virus to mutate to potentially vaccine-resistant one.
	How could a person who's not been vaccinated create the environment for a vaccine-resistant virus?
	You would have to have been vaccinated, surely.
	Yeah.
	And the fact that we know that the vaccine isn't preventing people from becoming infected with COVID suggests that that might well happen, but not because of the unvaccinated.
	Anyway, yet more desire to eliminate all risk ever and oppress anyone who thinks independently.
	Sure.
	For herd immunity, I think, it's a very variable percentage.
	The generally range from 47% to 80% to be considered herd immunity and where it falls within this range depends on the communicability of the disease and its route of transmission.
	Looking at a very sharp drop-off in recent positive case data would suggest that we've exceeded the herd immunity level required for COVID-19.
	Additionally, since the death toll since April, we can now consider COVID-19.
	Less deadly than the flu, which is incidentally what the data shows.
	In fact, it's one of the least deadly things in Britain at the moment.
	Like not killing the...
	Yeah, heart attacks, cancer, all that sort of stuff.
	That's much, much more of a danger now.
	Omar says...
	German approach to tyrannical enforcement of government policy is spreading across Europe.
	Sounds about right.
	Yep.
	Israeli Crusader says, I have a friend who refuses to vaccinate since she's allergic to the materials in the vaccine.
	Due to common regulations, she's pretty much effed because there are no medical exceptions as far as we know.
	Yeah.
	There are reasons why an individual might not want the vaccine that are to do with their own personal health, that being a good example of it.
	And that doesn't matter.
	Presumably because people are being paid.
	Paul says, if a government effectively mandates the vaccine, then they should be held responsible if anyone has negative effects, such as the young people developing myocarditis and pericarditis because of the vaccine.
	I don't know what they are, but I agree.
	If you've been forced and incentivized and coerced, Then yes.
	Ross said, I emailed my MP Jason McCartney and he has voted yes on all restrictions.
	I've supplied him with evidence-based practice of why these don't work.
	Reference the laws they're breaking.
	He doesn't care because he's a conservative.
	Callum style.
	Anyway, Free Will says, nicely hard work pays off.
	No privilege there when talking about June Sarpong.
	Justin says, Shearn's more than the Prime Minister.
	Wait for the bill to increase all MPs' wages to be before Parliament and passed unanimously.
	Our taxes are being stolen.
	That's correct.
	Also, don't pay your TV license.
	If you want to know what to do with that, go watch CrimeBodge's video on that, CrimeBodge.
	Raoul says, If racism ends, the woke are out of a job.
	The grifter's interest demands more racism, not less.
	That's true.
	LongTalksOnTheNeat says, First governments print money devaluing the currencies of the world, only to burn it by giving it to these critical race theory lunatics.
	Yeah, well, it's the priestly class that gets to get paid to do nothing but be black.
	Just to whine about, oh, did you know my theory about race?
	I don't care what your theory about race is.
	Let me tell you about the problem of white people.
	You are the worst example of the excesses of the BBC. I'm not someone who thinks any of it should exist.
	The entire thing should be abolished.
	But even then, if you wanted to take the position of, oh, why it makes good documentaries about nature or something, it's like, really?
	Is it worth this?
	Is it really worth paying these people $100 million in their budget, and then people like her, a quarter of a million?
	No.
	Absolutely not.
	They complain about starving kids on the streets and ethnic youths who don't have opportunity and Jun Sarpong is there working three days a week, a quarter of a million pounds.
	She's only part-time.
	Part-time, yeah.
	Well, I mean, black unemployment is clearly going well.
	Staggering.
	She can only get a part-time job, Carl.
	Very impressed.
	Northamptonian Knight says, white privilege isn't real, but diversity privilege is.
	Pretty much.
	That's a good standard.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Diversity privilege is definitely something that's happening.
	And we'll go for David saying, something on my mind that's kind of related to the end of episode 181.
	I think that society has kind of went the way of, we shouldn't shame women for sleeping around since men do it and everyone likes sex, whereas I would have rather went the way of shaming men for sleeping around and holding them more responsible.
	I don't think it's cool or attractive to be very promiscuous.
	I'd like to hear your thoughts.
	Thanks.
	Well, I was asked to do a segment, Chewing Out Men, because we did one recently, Chewing Out Women, so we can do that.
	Probably tomorrow.
	So yeah, get ready for some shaming.
	If you've ever simped, you're the problem.
	Anyway.
	Anyway, we're out of time.
	So if you want more from us, we'll be back.
	Well, if you want more from us, go to looses.com.
	Loads of content on there.
	Premium stuff, please sign up, because that's also how we run the show.
	But otherwise, we will be back tomorrow at 1 o'clock.

▲