Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 16, 2021 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:30:07

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #155

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Logosetters for the 16th of June 2021.
	I am joined by Josh.
	Hello.
	And today we're going to be talking about how Jon Stewart decided to state the obvious on American television, which kind of BTFO'd everyone else in the late night sphere.
	Well, so Seattle Democrats have decided to endorse the Joker, I guess, by threatening to blow up a school bus until their demands are met.
	That's not actually what happened.
	But that's how I read it.
	It was like Democrats threatened to blow up a school bus.
	It's not the Democratic Party either.
	Yeah, well, it's one of their candidates, so...
	We'll get onto that.
	No, she's endorsed by a senator, so I'm going to say the whole thing, why not?
	Also, Woke Dick is under fire for corruption, and I mean bad corruption as well, like some serious stuff, so good calls there.
	I mean, we might actually get rid of her for once, if Priti Patel has the balls to do it.
	But without further ado, I just wanted to mention some new stuff we have.
	So this is a new article we have on notices.com from Ian Miles Chung about the unique role men play as soldiers.
	Because you know what an interesting thing about Israeli military forces?
	You know they have conscription for women.
	Of course, yeah.
	And yet they serve less months than the men.
	And also they're allowed to leave.
	There's no requirement.
	There's an exemption you can use.
	I didn't actually know that.
	I can't remember who sent me that.
	I think it might have been Hannah Gal or someone.
	I think it was Will Nolan.
	Which actually brings us on to the next thing, which is the Will Nolan interview.
	So Will Nolan, the guy from Eton, who was kicked out for saying that men are men, women are women, masculinity comes from being a man.
	Wow, controversial.
	Yeah, we did an interview with him and it's done, it's edited.
	We'll have it up as soon as possible.
	Might be able to do it by tonight if we're lucky, if not tomorrow probably.
	So that's good news.
	And also the...
	I'm going to get her name wrong.
	Jiyeon Park.
	Jiyeon Park.
	The North Korean defector who is running a conservative councillor.
	That should be done soon as well.
	Yeah, that's an interview that I did.
	It was really interesting, really good.
	Definitely suggest you check that out.
	But I think it's still being edited at the minute, yeah.
	Yeah, but I just wanted to mention it because we have loads of good content coming up.
	But without further ado, because this might take a while.
	So, Jon Stewart.
	Jon Stewart decided to say the unsayable on...
	What is it?
	Colbert's show?
	I think it was.
	And it kind of...
	I don't know.
	It's an amazing moment because you can see the depth of difference in what late night comedy was under Jon Stewart and what it is now.
	This festering carcass that shouldn't really exist.
	But the thing he said was that there's the Wuhan lab for coronaviruses in Wuhan.
	And yeah, coronavirus has broken out of Wuhan.
	Two and two together.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	So this is a theory that's been floating around for a while, that the virus came from the lab that's studying coronaviruses.
	And of course, it was shot down immensely.
	So the first thing we have here is just Tucker Carlson.
	You may remember this interview going viral at the time, which is Tucker Carlson had this lady on, and she claimed that there was evidence that it came from the lab.
	So let's play the first clip of her...
	This virus, COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 virus, actually is not from nature.
	It is a man-made virus created in the lab based on the China military discovered and owned the very unique bat coronavirus, which cannot affect people, but after the modification becomes a very harmful virus at now.
	So this was in 2020.
	She came out and said, I think, that they took a virus from nature, and then modified it in the lab, and then it's been accidentally or deliberately released, and that's what's happened.
	And what was the response?
	Well, remember the response?
	This is a baseless conspiracy theory.
	How can people claim this?
	So this is one of these fact-checkers.
	Fact-checkers.
	Does a new study give evidence that coronavirus was made in a lab?
	Fact checked by some guy.
	Claim COVID-19 was not from nature.
	It was created in a lab in Wuhan.
	The Chinese government intentionally unleashed it on the world.
	Truthful rating?
	False.
	Just false.
	No truth to it whatsoever.
	How can they categorically deny it when we still don't know to this day where it came from?
	With certainty, at least.
	I mean, this really does show you the purpose of fact-checkers.
	They are not there to check the facts.
	It's to keep people in line.
	You don't want to go off the...
	It's to parrot the consensus.
	Well, yeah, that's...
	A piece of consensus, and someone comes along and criticises it, and says, I think I've got evidence that shows contrary.
	And then you say to that person, you're wrong, because the consensus is X. Consensus might be wrong.
	I mean, this is how science works.
	You come along and you break the consensus, and then things advance.
	But no, fact-checkers are there just to keep the consensus in line, and therefore, as you say, keep people in line.
	Because how dare you disagree?
	It's just embarrassing.
	But the next one here is also political facts.
	Exactly the same thing.
	So, oh no, sorry, I have a Washington Post article here, which is them doing the same thing.
	Scientists said claims about China creating the coronavirus misleading.
	They went viral anyway.
	So again, trying to stamp out this lady for daring to say it.
	And the next link is PolitoFact doing exactly that.
	So, fact check.
	Todd Carlson guest airs debunked conspiracy theory that COVID-19 was created in a lab.
	Debunked.
	It's been debunked.
	Yeah, of course.
	We already know this now, apparently.
	Yeah, but then you can see there the little editor's note.
	When this fact check was written, first published, Plutofact sources included researchers who asserted that SARS-CoV-19 could not have been manipulated.
	Yeah, funny that.
	Funny how it's not a fact, because it's just an opinion.
	The assertion is now more widely disputed.
	For that reason, we're removing this fact check from our database and pending a more thorough review.
	Yeah, that's why fact checkers are bad.
	There is no way you can say this is definitely the fact, especially on something as contentious of where did X virus come from?
	Well, journalists' interpretations of science are generally appalling at the best of times.
	It's very rare to get a journalist cover science in a way that is actually reflective of how a scientist would look at it.
	So even in what they're trying to do in the first place, let alone how they've actually done it, I think you're giving a little bit too much credit to the people here that are being journalists.
	Wow.
	I would say the people who work at places like Political Fact and other places come across more as activists because they'll selectively want to cover.
	So the next link here is the BBC. So this is back in 2020 as well.
	I love Google's features for this.
	I just typed in the month period back in the start of the pandemic for this.
	Just see what the narrative was at the time to get it.
	And I love how you can just find treasure troves.
	So they say in here, coronavirus, US and China trade conspiracy theories.
	First, so the claim that the virus was man-made has now been pushed by numerous conspiracy groups on Facebook, obscure Twitter accounts, and has even found its way onto primetime Russian state TV. Because if the Russians believe it, then it must be wrong.
	I guess.
	There's no argument there.
	It's just, there are conspiracy groups on Facebook, there are obscure Twitter accounts, and also Russian state TV. Isn't our state media covering it?
	Yeah.
	So they're discrediting themselves as well.
	The state British TV station here, BBC, reporting that state Russian TV is a lie, which, hmm, okay.
	Funny how being state media makes you invalid.
	BBC. So they say in here, claims by elements of the Chinese government and media about the U.S. being a possible origin of the virus prompted a response from U.S. President Donald Trump, who referred to COVID-19 as the Chinese virus.
	I just wanted to mention that because I completely forgot about that, stupidly, because, you know, these things go on the radar, but I forgot that the reason he ended up calling it the Chinese virus and the China virus was because the Chinese tried to claim that it came from the U.S., which...
	Yeah, no one's believing that.
	Like, it came from Wuhan.
	I remember they also said that it came from a sewer underneath Madrid or somewhere in Spain in, like, October of 2019.
	It's like, yeah, okay.
	Okay.
	What, and people from Wuhan were hiding down there?
	Apparently so.
	I mean, you can make the argument that the Americans were funding research in the Wuhan lab and that's how the Americans are involved, but don't want to talk about that, I guess.
	But also, notice how these fact-checkers just determine, you know, don't determine that that's...
	You don't need a fact-checker to determine that's nonsense.
	You don't need some fact-checker to come along and tell you that the virus didn't come from the US. Everyone knows.
	It's just stupid to suggest.
	But that's not the only conspiracy theorist involved in all this.
	So we've got the next one.
	This is The Guardian.
	And you can see Peter Daszak wrote this article.
	Ah, the arch-villain behind it all.
	Yeah, the chap who has got links to the lab and has been on the committee looking for where the virus came from.
	Definitely not the lab.
	Definitely not the lab.
	Because that would conflict with his own interests.
	And yeah, he wrote this article.
	Ignore the conspiracy theorists.
	Scientists know COVID-19 wasn't created in a lab.
	I mean, it's just amazing, isn't it?
	Like, the propagandist is writing the propaganda outlets.
	Like...
	It's like Xi Jinping writing a Guardian article talking about how there's no genocide in China.
	I mean, it's just unbelievable.
	The guy in charge of this situation and has been caught, as has been mentioned, sending emails to Fauci, thanking him for sidelining the idea that it came from the lab, and also wrote the Lancet article in which he tried to cover up his own interests in there, saying, don't put our logo on it, we're not going to put a name to it, but we want you to publish it.
	Right.
	So, the nutjob himself is the one writing this.
	So he says in here, One thing I wanted to mention, which we started with before we did this, which is conspiracy theories.
	Everything the CCP does is a conspiracy.
	That's true.
	By definition.
	The Chinese Communist Party is currently in a conspiracy to exterminate the people of Xinjiang.
	They're carrying out a conspiracy there.
	Between them, they're like, yeah, we need to get rid of their culture, we need to essentially culturally genocide them, and make it more Sinos, Sinosization of the area.
	And that's a conspiracy.
	Yeah, when we were actually talking about doing this podcast beforehand, we were saying that pretty much everything that the Chinese government does operates under the basis of conspiracy.
	So to criticise a theory about the Chinese government being involved and say, oh, it's a conspiracy theory, it makes it ridiculous because that's what they do.
	That's what they're in the business of doing.
	Like, no F, Sherlock.
	Like, everything they do is a conspiracy against the Chinese people.
	I mean, that's the point of Communist parties, but okay.
	It's just something that gets thrown under the radar.
	But then we get to John Stewart.
	So John Stewart came out and just blew everyone out of the water here.
	And you can see this tweet from Tom Elliott, who's a guy I like.
	He does a lot of cutting of what's on terrestrial TV in America.
	So John Stewart hilariously mocks the theory COVID didn't originate in the Chinese lab.
	So let's play the first clip, which is the longest clip I've seen on this.
	I think we owe a great debt of gratitude to science.
	Science has, in many ways, helped ease the suffering of this pandemic.
	which was more than likely caused by science.
	So, and that's kind of...
	No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. Listen, listen.
	It's coffee.
	I wouldn't do that to you.
	I wouldn't do that to you.
	What do you mean by that?
	Do you mean, like, there's a chance that this was created in a lab, there's an investigation?
	A chance?
	If there's evidence, I'd love to hear it.
	There's a novel respiratory coronavirus overtaking Wuhan, China.
	What do we do?
	Oh, you know who we could ask?
	The Wuhan novel respiratory coronavirus lab.
	The disease is the same name as the lab.
	That's just a little too weird, don't you think?
	And then they ask those scientists, they're like, how did this...
	So wait a minute, you work at the Wuhan Respiratory Coronavirus Lab.
	How did this happen?
	And they're like, a pangolin kissed a turtle.
	And you're like, no.
	The name of your lab, if you look at the name, look at the name.
	Can I, let me see your business card.
	Show me your business card.
	Oh, I work at the coronavirus lab in Wuhan.
	Oh, because there's a coronavirus loose in Wuhan.
	How did that happen?
	Maybe a bat flew into the cloaca of a turkey and...
	Then it sneezed into my chili, and now we all have coronavirus.
	Okay, okay.
	Wait a second.
	What about this?
	What about this?
	Listen to this.
	Wait a second.
	All right.
	John.
	Oh, my God.
	Oh, my God.
	There's been an outbreak of chocolatey goodness near Hershey, Pennsylvania.
	What do you think happened?
	Like, oh, I don't know.
	Maybe a steam shovel mated with a cocoa bean.
	Or it's the...
	Chocolate Factory!
	Maybe that's it.
	That could be.
	By the way, I gave them all tuberculosis.
	That could very well be.
	And Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins at NIH have said, like, it should definitely be investigated.
	Don't stop with the logic and people and things.
	The name of the disease.
	Wait a second.
	He's on the building.
	Wait a second.
	But it could be possible, you could be right, it could be possible that they have the lab in Wuhan to study the novel coronavirus diseases because in Wuhan there are a lot of novel coronavirus diseases because of the bat population there.
	I understand.
	It's a local specialty and it's the only place to find bats.
	You won't find bats anywhere else.
	Oh wait, Austin, Texas has thousands of them that fly out of a cave every night.
	Every night it does.
	Is there a coronavirus in Austin coronavirus?
	No, it doesn't seem to be an Austin coronavirus.
	The only coronavirus we have is in Wuhan.
	Yes.
	Where they have a lab called...
	What's the lab called again, Stephen?
	The Wuhan novel coronavirus lab.
	I believe that's the case.
	And how long have you worked for Senator Ron Johnson?
	Let me tell you something.
	Let me tell you something about Ron Johnson.
	This is not a conspiracy.
	Here's the thing about science.
	You could be right.
	You could be right.
	That was great.
	That was fantastic.
	But one of the things I wanted to know is just look how, like, scared Stephen Colbert looks and all that.
	Like, it's weird, because you can see just the level of difference.
	Like, Jon Stewart, I mean, a lot of people give him, you know, problems for, you know, giving Hillary a softball time when he was running the show and whatnot.
	But, in short, there are valid criticisms.
	But you notice the difference there.
	The fact that Jon Stewart comes there with comedy first.
	Like, he's there to have a laugh.
	I mean, the whole premise there, the way he's acting, all the rest of it.
	Whereas Stephen Colbert comes there like he's some kind of activist journalist, where he's like, no, no, no, let me argue the case, like he's having a debate or something.
	And he looks really scared that how dare John Stewart come out and point out the freaking obvious, which is the novel coronavirus from Wuhan where the coronavirus lab is.
	Yeah, it was pretty obvious to anyone even before any of the research was conducted.
	The investigation is still ongoing now, isn't it, into the origin of coronavirus, so...
	It's not like it's going to find anything now anyway, even if it was that.
	Sure, but I just mean the comedy side of that, like the show side.
	You can also see the difference in just pure talent.
	Like late night hosts, I know they're a meme.
	I know they're literally the NPC meme at this point.
	But my god, whenever Jon Stewart comes off for just three minutes to do a skit, he's a million times better.
	He's a million times more interesting than all of them combined.
	That's how far and low they've sunk into just being political actors that are not interesting as comedians at all.
	That's one of the things I just love about that clip.
	But the political point and the point you're making about the research is, of course, valid as well.
	So if we go to the next one, Batwoman has responded to this.
	Batwoman?
	Yeah, Batwoman.
	That's her nickname.
	So this is the lady in charge of the Wuhan lab who's been dubbed Batwoman for her involvement in all this.
	So she says, Yeah.
	has been dismissed too harshly.
	Now, one of the things I find interesting is they mentioned that, you know, the lab theory has dirt on it because President Trump was involved.
	Great, then you weren't looking for the truth.
	You were looking for...
	President Trump said it, therefore it's wrong.
	But also the fact that they say there's no evidence.
	No evidence whatsoever.
	So then they go on to mention the evidence.
	So some scientists say Dr. Xi conducted risky experiments with bat coronaviruses in the lab that were not safe enough.
	Others want clarity on reports, citing American intelligence, suggesting that there were early infections of COVID-19 among several employees of the Wuhan Institute of Biology.
	So as mentioned previously, some of them got sick really early on with the symptoms of coronavirus.
	Yeah, I remember that.
	And their employees at the lab.
	yeah.
	So I love that.
	There's no evidence.
	But also, here's the evidence.
	From the American intel.
	It's like, right.
	Okay.
	Really.
	So, they asked her her opinion on this, and for some reason she gave an interview.
	So she says, How on earth can I offer up evidence for something where there is no evidence?
	She said.
	Her voice rising in anger during the brief, unscheduled conversation.
	Quote, I don't know how the world has come to this.
	Constantly pouring filth on an innocent scientist.
	No one's even claiming that you did this deliberately.
	Well, some people might be claiming that you're doing it deliberately.
	But most people are claiming it's just a mistake.
	Yeah.
	It's just that, you know, things happen.
	As has happened in what, like 2004 and whatnot with the Chinese as well?
	Mm-hmm.
	I mean, of course there's an argument that China is the only country that has grown throughout the coronavirus crisis in that that's what people point to it being a deliberate thing.
	But I think the likelihood is that even China wouldn't want to, you know, have to close everything down.
	Right.
	Ruin their reputation at a critical moment, which they're about to overtake the United States.
	But anyway, I just love how, well, what do you need to do here, Dr.
	Xi?
	Well, you prove how your employees got sick with the same symptoms before anyone else.
	I mean, that would do it.
	Also, you could allow the UN team that's investigating all this access to the lab with no CCP interference.
	But you can't do that because you're in charge of the CCP. They were held out of actually getting into China for two weeks before they even were allowed in, even though they'd already done the quarantining beforehand.
	They did an additional...
	Cleanup.
	Let's just call it what it is.
	So she denounced the suspicions as baseless, including the allegations that several of her colleagues may have been ill before the outbreak emerged.
	I suppose you would, wouldn't you?
	The speculation boils down to one central question.
	Did Dr. Xi's lab hold any source of the new coronavirus before the pandemic erupted?
	Dr. Xi's answer is an empathetic no.
	But China's refusal to allow independent investigation into her lab or share data into its research makes this difficult to validate Dr. Xi's.
	Xi's claims.
	Yeah, no S. I mean, the person here, who's the head of the lab, and therefore on the international stage, is the face of the country in this regard.
	I mean, the CCP must have been breathing down her neck her entire life since this started.
	And she's saying there's absolutely no evidence.
	Yeah, do you guys remember, what is it, like, you watch the Chernobyl series?
	No, I haven't.
	I've heard about it.
	You really should, but there's a section there in which they reference.
	The main guy in charge of the investigation and the cleanup, Professor Legatsov, goes to Austria to give evidence, and the Soviet Union, of course, tells him, shut up, say it was the operator's fault, tell them the Soviet Union didn't do nothing, and he does.
	And he says that the main problem is the operators, not the structural problems within the Soviet Union, and of course, the place itself.
	That's exactly what she's doing here, I think.
	She's saying there's absolutely no evidence, there is no way the CCP have not, you know, harassed her, probably got 124 hours surveillance, and that sort of thing, because why wouldn't you if you're the CCP? Yeah, you've got no reason to trust what the CCP says about anything, so I don't know why anyone would take this at face value.
	But also the next link here, just demonstrating because I don't know if someone isn't getting that point.
	They have re-education camps, so who cares what they say?
	Like, literally, who cares what the Chinese say on anything ever?
	Because these people are engaging in this sort of thing and still deny that it's happening.
	This is just an image of a latest report that's come out in Xinjiang in which you can see these Taha blocks, except that all of them have bars on the windows because they're made to hold prisoners for re-education.
	And you can hear them chanting and whatnot in the clip.
	But yeah, the other thing I wanted to mention was Rory's doing an investigation into this.
	He's doing an investigative report of the compilation of all the evidence of it coming from the lab or it coming from nature.
	And I've given it a read-through, and it's fantastic.
	But it's not done yet, so it will be done soon.
	We'll plug it when it happens.
	But one of the things that's interesting is the evidence is at a point now where you can't say, you know, for certainty it came from the lab, but probably with just the little bits of evidence that keep coming up and the amount of people that have engaged in a cover-up here.
	It's astounding.
	The levels.
	I mean, Peter Daszak being one of the worst offenders.
	Dr.
	Fauci being implicitly dragged into that through his emails with Daszak, in which he says that Daszak's thanking him for coming out and saying it definitely didn't come from the lab, even though there's no evidence of it not coming from the lab.
	He just made that up because he wanted to cover his own hide.
	And then there's the stuff in which Dazak's organization were emailing the Lancet, or however you say it, the journal, to get them to publicly say, we stand with all scientists condemning that it came from the lab, based on what evidence, none.
	There is, of course, also the director of the World Health Organization has links to China from his previous political career in Ethiopia.
	I think he had a relationship with China and it seems like he was able to keep the international community out of Wuhan while this was all going on initially to actually investigate and was kind of downplaying the significance which allowed it to get to this point in the first place.
	But this episode of the whole narrative, of it being complete conspiracy theory, nothing burger, and it's like, actually all the evidence shows that you guys have been covering up, and it probably is the case, then, yeah, I really think this is going to be something down in history, or at least should be.
	It should be documented.
	God, it's awful.
	Awful, I don't really know what to say.
	But yeah, let's go on to the Dems, blowing up school buses.
	Well, they didn't actually succeed, thankfully, which is nice.
	So, I recently wrote an article about this candidate for a local council in Seattle, and you might think, well, why is this important?
	Because it shows that the calibre of person that gets democratic support today and...
	This is the person, Ubak's guard here, who is looking to get a position in Kings County Council in Washington State, which encompasses part of Seattle.
	And in 2010, she boarded a morningly school bus to Chinook Middle School, and she demanded that the driver inform his dispatch that a national security incident was going on.
	So, can you imagine what her motivation for doing this might be?
	She wanted a free bus ride?
	I don't know No, she began actually berating the children on the bus, the middle school children, so I think to us that means 11 to 13, something like that, that kind of age group.
	I don't know how it works, our school system's a bit different.
	But she was berating these children for the United States' relationship with Somalia, because of course these children were responsible for that.
	I'm sure they definitely know where Somalia is and can point to it on a map.
	Of course, it being on the Horn of Africa on the East Coast.
	And yeah, so she was abusing the children.
	And apparently the subsequent court documents, because of course, she got arrested for this later on, but don't spoil it too much.
	Apparently, more than one student reported her saying Americans were bad people.
	So she was just abusing these kids on a school bus.
	And then both the kids and the driver told her, understandably, just to chill out.
	Just like, why have you got on this school bus?
	And started insulting the children and telling me to radio in a national security threat.
	And then she kind of replied to this with, you need to calm yourselves down because I could have a bomb.
	Look at how loose my clothes are.
	You know, I think it's actually a criminal offence at this point in the UK to say that, you know, you look like a Muslim, you must have a bomb or something like that.
	Because, you know, they'd be classed as Islamophobic and all the rest of it.
	And she's just saying, yeah, I could have a bomb.
	Look at me.
	My loose clothes.
	Presumably, because I mean, I saw from that image she wears the hijab and all the rest of it.
	She's probably abiding by, what is it, modesty rules and therefore clothes are loose.
	That's okay.
	She's doing it to herself voluntarily here.
	I'm a Muslim, I could be a bomb.
	That's not what I was saying, ma'am, but please get off the bus.
	So, in the actual subsequent court case, the deputy prosecutor, Gretchen Holmgren, said that when the students attempted to escape out of the back of the bus, she called them cowards and told them they were responsible if something happened to their classmates.
	Cowards come to paradise with me!
	So yeah, she said she might have a bomb, and then when the kids tried to escape out the back of the bus through the emergency exit, she was shouting at them, calling them cowards.
	I mean, who wouldn't do that?
	Who doesn't want to die for the glory of Somalia?
	Yeah.
	So apparently, according to the court documents, several students actually believed she was carrying some kind of weapons and feared for their lives.
	As you would.
	Yeah, if a crazy woman comes onto your bus and demands all sorts of things...
	I've got a bomb, US troops need to leave Somalia.
	I mean, this has happened more than once, let's be honest.
	Yeah, so eventually she was arrested and she said to the arresting officer that she was prepared to die, but she didn't actually have any weapons whatsoever.
	Yeah.
	What did she die for?
	She's not even screaming Allahu Akbar for the caliphate or something, for Somalia, a country that doesn't even really exist at this point.
	From her perspective, all she really achieved there was she berated some children about America's relationship with Somalia.
	That was the only thing she could have really got out of it, but of course they probably had no idea what she was on about.
	So, unfortunately, she only ended up with a misdemeanour, which is ridiculous.
	So, didn't spend any jail time, I don't think.
	She just got a misdemeanour, which is a gross miscarriage of justice in and of itself.
	I think if she did that in the UK, she'd be in prison for like 15, 20 years, I imagine.
	Depends on our identities, doesn't it?
	Hmm, well...
	I think being a black Muslim is very central to her, as we will see later on.
	So she did an interview with Seattle Weekly and she mentions that she'd previously been hospitalised for a mental health condition, which I mean, I can certainly believe after that, whilst she was on her way to visit Somalia, where she was originally from. whilst she was on her way to visit Somalia, where
	And then in a subsequent more recent interview, when she was talking about getting elected, she said that she was actually criminalised for her mental health issues, not for what she did, of course, but because she was mentally ill.
	She says, it means being a brand new mother and going through postpartum depression and then actually having a mental breakdown and being criminalised for that instead of getting mental health support that I needed.
	Hang on, I don't even agree that criminalising the mentally ill is genuinely a bad thing in certain circumstances, in that sense.
	Because, I mean, like, gun rides in the United States.
	You can't have a gun if you're mentally ill.
	Like, it's a perfectly reasonable thing to do.
	That's obviously a good limitation on the Second Amendment there, where you don't want- So she's like, I'm being criminalised for my being mentally ill.
	Good?
	Like, you're really mentally ill?
	Trying to bomb kids on a bus?
	Yeah, if you're threatening children on a school bus for apparently no reason, like, they tried to get at her motivation and she didn't really...
	Well, they're American, Americans are in Somalia.
	Yeah, it's a school bus as well, of all things.
	Terrible.
	But anyway, when she was actually talking about her motivation, she says, I'm thinking in my head, what can I say or do that will get you taken to jail instead of a mental institute?
	So that goes against what she said in the previous interview, where she's just like, I'm being criminalised for my mental health problems.
	And then in the actual court documents, sorry, where that quote was from, she says, yeah, I actually wanted to be arrested and sent to prison rather than being You know, sent to a mental institute, which is absurd.
	So she's obviously lying and fabricating the story to make herself seem more sympathetic.
	But what's more annoying is that she currently holds a position as the Equitable Development Division Director in the City of Seattle's Office of Planning and Community Development.
	And...
	Sorry, I'll say that again.
	What was the job title?
	It's a really long job title.
	The Equitable Development Division Director in the City of Seattle's Office of Planning and Community Development.
	Did someone just make that up?
	Like, did she keep coming in and giving people letters about how I want a job?
	Someone just made it up?
	Well, she's currently on a salary of $130,000 a year.
	God, she can't be that annoying.
	Yeah, well, apparently she is, because she's on ridiculous money, and even worse is she actually describes her, like...
	Approach to this position as being a bureaucrativist.
	So she's obviously a bureaucrat, but she's not being bipartisan.
	Over a hundred grand, yeah.
	Over a hundred grand.
	To just...
	I mean, if a taxpayer's money, I presume.
	To waste time.
	Jesus Christ.
	So this is something that's a bit of an aside, but it's just too ridiculous not to mention.
	So in this interview that we're looking at, she says, my oldest son is in the ninth grade and he has never had one teacher who looks like him.
	A lot of times in those 10 years he's been in school and he's the only black child in the class.
	So she's complaining that...
	I mean, we can black up the white ones if it'll make you feel better, but I'm not sure how everyone else will feel about it.
	Yeah, so she's complaining about...
	Wait, what do you want us to do?
	Like, the other kids in there are white.
	Like, I've got to bring a shoe polish.
	Yeah, that's better.
	The world's got better from doing that, hasn't it?
	As if that's also the important part, that she's not like, yeah, we want the best teachers.
	It's just like, yeah.
	Well, the teachers that my son's had, they've not been black enough.
	They've all been white devils.
	Hate it.
	So...
	One of the main things here that is important is if it was just some crazy candidate who didn't stand a chance, then it wouldn't really be newsworthy.
	But, well, I mean, it is quite interesting.
	I mean, still endorsed by the Dems, but she's going to get the place?
	The endorsement is from the Democratic Senator Rebecca Saldana, who is the senator for Washington, or one of them.
	And she says that in the promotional material, as we can see here, I will follow UBAX anywhere, hopefully not onto a school bus.
	All the way to Somalia to teach those devils the problem.
	So she says, Uvax is talented, courageous, no-nonsense leader.
	No-nonsense, that's true.
	Yeah, I can believe it.
	We need to ensure our country centres on black health.
	Wealth and economic opportunities.
	We will increase black health proportionally by bombing white kids.
	She's been integral in shaping policy to address equitable transportation investments, designing communities, blah, blah, blah.
	She's just talking about how she's been reallocating money on racial lines, pretty much.
	But I love that.
	You know, I mean, it's the endless bane of socialists.
	I mean, Thatcher did it greatly.
	She was like, you know, this is the gap between the poor and the rich, right?
	Socialists will be happy when it's here.
	That's what they want to do.
	So if it's between, I don't know, like black kids and white kids, they have better transportation.
	She's like, yeah, if I bomb the buses...
	Yeah, there we go.
	Everything's better now.
	So, it gets funnier.
	Equitable transport distribution.
	How do you do it?
	I bomb the buses.
	Don't think she's put that in a manifesto.
	Although, if she does come out with a manifesto, I might be a bit worried.
	But yeah, so the Seattle mayor, this Ubacks lady has criticised the mayor for being a dictator.
	And let's actually look at what policies the so-called dictatorial Seattle mayor has imposed.
	I mean...
	She's formed an equity task force, which has so far allocated 30 million to communities of colour.
	And this is the person who she's criticising for, you know, not being...
	Well, that's not a dictator.
	That's just racism.
	That's why she's engaging in.
	It doesn't make her a dictator.
	Yeah, but the person I'm talking about here isn't criticising her for the equity thing.
	She's saying she's not doing enough.
	Yeah.
	She's too right-wing, this equitable mayor.
	Jesus, I mean, if you're on a salary above 100,000, you'd think your life would be so easy.
	Yeah, I'm amazed that she's got...
	Especially when you're doing nothing.
	It's not a difficult job, whatever the hell she's doing.
	I don't even need to know.
	You know by the title there's a nothing burger.
	Well, you say that, but she wrote an open letter to the city of Seattle, which is basically just her complaining about how difficult her job is and complaining about the mayor and stuff like that.
	So I've got some great quotes here.
	So her and one of her colleagues are just whinging about how difficult their job is in an open letter.
	So...
	She says, we're done being women of colour bearing a disproportionate emotional labour burden in our civilisation's collective reckoning with our midlife, or is it end of life, crisis.
	Fine, then you're fired, we'll hire some white people, and then we don't have to put that burden on people of colour anymore.
	That's true, yeah.
	There you go, there's your solution.
	And she says, we can tell you more about all of these things in due time.
	For now, we're taking some time off to reclaim our mental health.
	So she's just sent an open letter, just like, yeah, I don't want to do my job.
	I can tell you more about it, but I just need some time off.
	I love how the idea of her doing this very difficult job is what caused the mental health crisis of trying to...
	I think that actually came after.
	So she got the job after she threatened to blow up the bus, which is even worse.
	Okay.
	The people in the city were like, hmm, that's the kind of people we need.
	So yeah.
	You're a doer, kid.
	Well, she has convictions and she goes out and she lets them be known.
	She doesn't spend her time in meetings, she bombs buses.
	But you banks.
	So, she makes repeated mention of trauma and healing, which make my skin crawl when I hear that.
	It's just like, there's so much trauma in this political system, what we need is healing.
	Sounds like she's going to put some crystals on you and make you feel better.
	Have you ever delivered $100,000 a year for doing nothing?
	I mean, that's got to give you some trauma.
	Some guilt, surely.
	I know.
	I mean, the fact that she came to America from Somalia, now she's on a six-figure salary, she's really hard done by.
	For doing nothing.
	Nothing.
	So, she says, this is, of course, she is a senior bureaucrat in Seattle.
	There's an ongoing joke about the Seattle process, the notion that when you bring too many people together, we don't get anything done.
	And she says, F that.
	She doesn't censor herself in the...
	Open letter to the City of Seattle for this elected position.
	It's not bringing together too many people that makes us slow.
	It's bringing together so much trauma that it gets us trapped in gridlock.
	And time and time again we have seen women and people of colour step up inside the institutions to massage at the knots.
	So yeah, it's people of colour that are, you know, removing all the tensions here, is it?
	Really?
	LAUGHTER Hmm.
	Does she end this open letter if I don't get my demands on a bombing of the bus?
	It's so absurd.
	I find the Batman.
	So, on her website, she goes on to say, this is a quote about herself, My multi-complex, multi-dimensional, hyphenated identity makes me unapologetically black, unapologetically Muslim, unapologetically Somali, and unapologetically American.
	So, what an interesting way to actually look at yourself.
	I do nothing, but I have identities.
	Great.
	Hyphenated identity as well.
	What does that even mean?
	Just altogether.
	I am defined by my hyphens.
	But it's not even like, oh, I'm just one thing.
	You know, it's like hyphen, so it's all of the things.
	Don't worry, she's got all the box ticked.
	Does she do any work?
	No.
	Does she help anyone while she bombs some buses?
	She didn't actually bomb, she just threatened to bomb.
	That apparently makes all the difference.
	Alhamdulillah.
	Although I've been kind of shirking then, I suppose, if that's a manifesto pledge.
	I don't think it's that kind of manifesto.
	Well, I don't know, Democrats.
	So supposedly she has also got a good record, or a bad record probably, in equity.
	So she says in the last five years she has directly moved over £35 million to Seattle's most marginalised communities and poised to move another £16 million in 2021 to Seattle.
	Another 20 million into her pocket.
	I'm sorry.
	These people just sound like such hucksters even when they're trying to advertise themselves.
	She's like, I've directly moved $35 million to our marginalized communities.
	Such as me!
	My apps!
	So, um...
	You actually look at her kind of electoral platform and she outlines her key principles here.
	And I'm just, I don't really have the time to go through in much detail, but they are caring and sacredness and regeneration, cooperation, ecological and social wellbeing and deep democracy.
	Sounds a bit sexual, but...
	I know!
	But I love the idea of the Republicans.
	They're against caring and sacredness.
	They hate regeneration.
	Yes, I'm the candidate for the good things, and my opponents are the ones for the bad things.
	But my point of bringing this up is that this is what gets Democratic Senator endorsement now.
	This is ridiculous.
	This is all you have to do.
	Yeah.
	Threaten a bomb, one bus.
	LAUGHTER Have the right identities and you literally do whatever the hell you want.
	I mean, if she came out tomorrow and was just like, I'm going to kill some kids or something, would that harm her candidacy at this point?
	Be a vote winner, probably.
	Depends which kind of kid she threatens, I guess.
	Yeah, so...
	Don't worry, she's threatening the oppressors, therefore.
	If you're in Seattle, obviously, don't vote for this person.
	And this highlights why you should get involved in your local politics, because you might get someone like this...
	If you think you're running for candid seat, don't threaten to bomb a bus.
	That was a joke.
	Just want to make that clear.
	I know it's worked for this lady, but it shouldn't be the standard.
	I know it's the standard for the Democrats.
	It's not the standard for decent people, though.
	Jesus Christ.
	Fuck me.
	I do really love the idea.
	Someone needs to photoshop her with the Joker's smile and everything.
	Someone listening, please make that.
	For every time I don't get the Batman, I'm going to bomb a bus.
	Vote Democrat.
	That's a new campaign slogan.
	To be honest, after the summer of anarchy, which party would the Joker be a member of?
	The Democrat.
	Anyway.
	Anyway, sorry.
	Yeah, I've just got to scroll.
	So, last story we have is Cressida Dick.
	So, Dick.
	Dick needs to go.
	Because she's really done goofed.
	And she has done goofed for a long time, as we've documented with her extreme wokeness.
	The fact she uses it as an endless smoke screen.
	I don't know if she really believes in it.
	I'm probably going to say yes, given her actions.
	But the fact that she had officers taking the knee, the fact that she brings in endlessly trying to legalise racial discrimination...
	Against whites, sexual discrimination against men, so on and so forth.
	She did that for hiring purposes.
	To give her credit, though, she did arrest all those feminists in the Sarah Everard vigil when they just joined in, even though her friends and family were like, no, you don't know her, why are you doing this?
	And they were all like, she was a woman and she was killed by a police officer and then...
	Cressida Dick just sends in the police.
	COVID laws are COVID laws.
	Who cares about the optics?
	We're going to send in loads of police officers mourning a vigil of a woman murdered by a police.
	But not when it's BLM. That's the thing.
	She was correct to implement the law in that case because the law is the law.
	I hate the law.
	It shouldn't have never been in place.
	People should have been able to do it the hell that we want.
	But you can't apply it unequally, as the example of BLM. There's a lockdown.
	BLM protests in London.
	Police didn't just start arresting them like they do against the anti-lockdown protests.
	Whatever.
	So this is the story here from the BBC. Daniel Morgan met police accused of form of corruption in report.
	So, they say the Metropolitan Police was institutionally corrupt in the way it concealed or denied its failings over the unsolved murder of Daniel Morgan, the report has found.
	Private investigator Mr Morgan was attacked with an axe in a car park of a pub in South East London 1987, a long time ago.
	But you'll see where Cress the Dick comes into this.
	The report said that there were several theories as to why Mr Morgan was killed.
	Among them, he was on the verge of revealing links between corrupt police officers and organised criminals.
	He had mentioned to friends that he had been offered £250,000 by a Sunday newspaper for his expose on how he got this information.
	Police officers in South East London were allegedly making money by selling information, and moonlighting security guards were concerned.
	Were...
	Sorry, security guards were concerned he was about to expose them.
	However, the report claims that this motive was never taken seriously or investigated.
	Why is it bad that they were moonlighting as security guards?
	I didn't understand that kind of...
	Could be a conflict of interest.
	I mean, if there's a link there, I imagine.
	But I'm not a police officer, so I don't know.
	They also say that Mr. Morgan had worked as a bailiff the day before his murder and he served a court summons on a man who had previously had convictions for violent offences.
	From the beginning, these accusations, the accusations against police officers were involved and found with the murder, and that corruption by police officers played a part in protecting these murderers from being brought to justice.
	The crime scene was not searched and was left unguarded, and they didn't sort for the right suspects.
	Serving and retired police officers told the panel that some officers who tried to report wrongdoing by other police officers had been ostracized, transferred to a different unit, encouraged to resign, or face disciplinary proceedings.
	So I mean proper corruption.
	Proper corrupt situation.
	The entire Met systemically looked like there was a police officer involved in the murder or a private investigator because he was about to expose it.
	And the Met, who is in charge of finding out whodunit, probably one of their own, covered up.
	They were just suddenly massively incompetent and couldn't put off the crime scene in the correct way.
	They suddenly couldn't find the suspects that they needed to, as you might do for another case, because everyone knows why.
	Anyway, so Dick.
	So that's where she comes into it.
	She had denied access to the data.
	She was part of this cover-up by dragging her feet and making sure that people can get the data that they need.
	Of the panel in this report, they also make one recommendation I just found funny.
	The panel recommended that police officers should be required to declare membership of organizations like the Freemasons when they join the service, and that protection should be put in place for police whistleblowers.
	What does that have to do with anything?
	I have no idea.
	I don't know.
	Was he a Freemason?
	The guy who died?
	Was there anyone who was alleged to have killed a Freemason?
	It doesn't really say.
	But I just find that funny.
	Because we have a system in the UK in which the Freemasons is a semi-secret organisation.
	They have secrets.
	It's not a secret organisation.
	It's public.
	But they have their own secrets.
	They don't want you to know.
	And one of the weird things is, even within security services, you don't have to declare it here.
	Because apparently the security service infiltrated them.
	And they found they were really boring.
	They're not important.
	That's the worst conclusion ever.
	You're too boring to watch.
	Like, we joined this group, they thought they might be terrorists, and they're really dull.
	Anyway, so despite five police inquiries into an inquest, no one has been convicted over the fathers of two...
	Sorry, the father of two deaths, with Metropolitan Police previously admitting corruption had hampered the original murder investigation.
	Reports said Met were, quote,"...concealing or denying failings for the sake of organization's public image is dishonesty on the part of the organization for reputational benefit and constitutes a form of institutional corruption." I mean, pretty goddamn damning.
	I mean, you've had a public inquiry into this, and they found your entire organization is corrupt, top to bottom, you at the top, you know, woke dick, she's the one who has mentioned this as being part of the cover-up.
	Really bad.
	Really, really bad.
	So, if we go to the next link, this is the Guardian rolling on this.
	So, there are six key findings, and they go into more detail about how Dick is involved.
	The panel complained about the then-assistant Commissioner Dick's initial refusal to provide access to Holmes' police investigation database, vital for reviewing the previous failed inquiries, and limiting access to the most sensitive information.
	So initially, she didn't want them having anything.
	They didn't want them having any information.
	Why?
	You know.
	Documents were not made available at the panel's secure premises, and they were only accessible at a location involving considerable travel time.
	The panel blamed foot-dragging by the Met for a length of time it took to complete the inquiry from its inception since 2013.
	So this is going on for like seven years, and the Met have been dragging the police.
	Specifically her.
	She's involved in this.
	The terms of reference agreed by May indicated that the panel would complete its work within a year, but it complained that the Met only made its final documents available in March 2021.
	So they had March till May to review all the police documents that they had kept from them right up until the end because they didn't want them.
	So it seems like they deliberately withheld them to the point where...
	They could still be said that they released them, but at a point where it's inconvenient for the people reviewing it all.
	In every possible step, they've tried to make it as inconvenient as possible to investigate their failings because they know they're corrupt, and a woke dick is at the top of it.
	She's the commissioner these days with the entire thing, and she is also directly involved in this as being the one who did not want to hand over the information.
	Awful.
	I mean, really awful.
	So the response to this is, as you might imagine, pretty universal condemnation of Woke Dick and the fact that she needs to go.
	So Richard Tice here from the Reform UK now.
	Shocking report of past and current institutional corruption in the Met Police, including obfuscation by Cressida Dick.
	Yet again, just denial by the Met.
	No resignations, no accountability.
	Priti Patel must force change of leadership.
	So there are two people in charge of getting written up.
	Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, or Home Secretary, Priti Patel.
	Sadiq Khan, woke, Priti Patel, not so.
	There's only hope in one of them here.
	We could always just start a campaign on Twitter, just everyone sending messages to Sadiq Khan saying, dick out, Sadiq.
	Dick out, dick out, dick out.
	But this isn't just, you know, you would expect this from, you know, not to be crude, but the politics of it.
	I mean, woke dick is woke.
	And Richard Tyson, you know, us and all the rest of it, want rid of her for that reason alone.
	But I mean, this is awful.
	So even left-wing MPs are calling her out on this.
	So if we go to the next one, this is Belle.
	I don't even say her last name.
	But she says, The report into the murder of Daniel Morgan has found evidence of institutional corruption in the Met, whose first objective was to, quote, protect itself.
	Cressa Dick has serious questions to answer.
	This is a woke Labour MP.
	She's not on the side of the right ever.
	Well, she's not on the side of the police, I imagine, either.
	So I think it might be a free opportunity for them to criticise the police.
	But I mean, being institutionally corrupt and covering up what is presumably a police officer, a murdering novel police officer who was investigating corruption.
	Oh yeah, the actual case itself is awful.
	I mean, it's not partisan, that's the thing.
	Like, fundamentally, it should not be partisan for anyone.
	Because everyone fundamentally has to rely on the police.
	That is the thing you have to rely on.
	I don't think anyone's in favour of corruption other than the people actually involved in it.
	You'd be surprised, I suppose.
	So we go to the next one here.
	So this is some guy who just is blowing off the whole thing.
	So David here, he's a leftist, so he says, I for one am confident that strong action will be taken against Crested the Dick for trying to impede publication of the Daniel Morgan Report by the Home Secretary who tried to impede publication of the Daniel Morgan Report.
	Do you really have to make this partisan?
	This is more important than that, but okay.
	Whatever.
	So we're going to the next one.
	This is Politics For All reporting that Sadiq Khan has already said that he has full confidence in the Met Police Commissioner, Cressler Dick.
	So Woke Khan has full confidence in Woke Dick because, yeah, what were you expecting?
	Like, he's fallen in line there.
	So we go to the next one.
	This is the Guardian article on this.
	And they say, don't bet on Cressler Dick resigning over Daniel Morgan findings.
	And they say in here, I haven't seen the evidence that Priti Patel has said that.
	All I've got is this quote from The Guardian.
	When you Google their names, it doesn't come up.
	So, I don't know if that's true or not.
	is the guardian so i'm suspicious uh dick had previously survived what many thought would be an end to her career she was commanding a position in 2005 when officers shot an innocent man dead having mistaken jean child's de mrs french names for being a terrorist her career was not over and promotions would follow so i mean and then they list a whole bunch of other scandals she's been involved in in which should be a career ending for most people But that's the power of wokeness, isn't it?
	I mean, you can literally shoot an innocent man dead and then get away with it.
	You can be involved in numerous other scandals and just get away with it.
	Just politically, there is no cut down on her there.
	Power of corruption.
	Yeah, well, I mean, wokeness is corruption in my opinion.
	Like, I think the people promoting her and the fact that she's still in her position, it comes down to her ideological position.
	I mean, take Sadiq Khan backing her like that.
	Yeah, well, the only reason I'm familiar with her at all is because of all of the controversies, and there have been so many calls for her to resign.
	Obviously, the fact that the head of the Met is now a household name, I mean, for people who don't know, the Metropolitan Police is just for London.
	And outside of London, no one should really care that much.
	Obviously care about the corruption, but...
	They're the main police force.
	Yeah.
	So there's a reason, but the most reason she's known outside of London is, of course, because of the woke stuff.
	I mean, the nonsense that comes out of her mouth in which, like, the other week, she was saying that she needs powers from the Home Secretary to do what?
	Racially discriminate against men and whites.
	Because there are too many men and whites in the police force.
	Right.
	Right, okay.
	You're a nutjob.
	You're an absolute nutjob.
	But the fact that she sticks around, I just don't get it.
	Because of course, as mentioned, there's Khan, who can get rid of her, and Priti Patel, who can get rid of her.
	Khan is going to fall in line.
	Priti Patel, I don't know why she wouldn't just kick her out as soon as possible, unless she's playing the long game here, and wants London to look like a cesspit whilst it's ruled by Labour.
	So if we go to the next thing here, this is the BBC reporting on this.
	And this is just a timeline thing, so I had to get a couple of notes out of this.
	You won't be able to scroll through it, John, because of the way it's formatted.
	But it says, I got the quotes from Priti Patel.
	She also says it's important to find out how the corruption occurred.
	So, quote, over the three decades, there is absolutely more to do here.
	We cannot shy away from asking some difficult questions.
	I have today written to the Commissioner, Cressida Dick, to see her response and the report itself.
	She said that when she gets Cressida Dick's response, she will then go to Parliament and give that response.
	But that hasn't happened yet, so I guess we're waiting on her response on this.
	I mean, she and her organisation is institutionally corrupt from top to bottom.
	I mean, her, being one of the people mentioned in the corruption, is the person leading the organisation.
	Big...
	And it's not small at all.
	So the last thing here is, in case Priti Patel is going to take the probably correct thing to do, get rid of her, there are some candidates.
	There's a pretty good candidate as well.
	Is there really?
	Yeah, the guy from Manchester Police.
	So, fed up with...
	Sorry, public fed up with Virtue Signaling Police Officers, new Manchester Chief Constable says...
	That's fantastic.
	He is right, yeah.
	In 2020, Greater Manchester Police was taken into special measures because they had missed one in five crimes that were reported.
	They were just not documented at all.
	I mean, not to mention with the grooming gang scandal and all the rest of it, they're kind of an embarrassment.
	I mean, they're as much of an embarrassment as the Met, to be honest, but anyway, also with the woke stuff.
	So he says in here, True.
	I mean, there is no reason to organize yourselves around Black Lives Matter.
	That's what he's referencing at BLM. They want to defund them in the first place.
	Why would they ever want to align themselves with people who want to see an end to their own career?
	I mean, it's like Christians kneeling for Islam.
	I mean, what an organization.
	All gays for Palestine.
	What are you doing?
	It doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
	Just self-loathing manifest there.
	Yeah, I suppose so.
	He continues, and his quotes are absolutely fantastic.
	When asked if he would take the knee while in uniform, he said, No, I absolutely would not.
	I would probably kneel before the Queen, God, and Mrs.
	Watson.
	That's it.
	Bravo.
	A fantastic response there.
	I'm pretty sure that's similar to what Viktor Orban said recently.
	Like, Hungarians only kneel before there seem to be wife, God and their country, or something along those lines.
	Well, I mean, the Queen is our country, so...
	That's true.
	So he continues, quote, I do not think that things like taking the knee, demonstrating that you have a commonality of you with the protesters that you're policing, is compatible with the standards of service that people require of their police.
	True.
	Identified the problem correctly.
	When you kneel for protesters, what are you saying there, police force?
	You're saying, we agree with the protesters.
	In which case, your impartiality is garbage.
	Your organization is now garbage.
	Everything should be destroyed in that case.
	Because then you're not an impartial police force.
	That is what you are meant to be.
	He continues, Britain's top officer, Dame Crest the Dick, he met the police chief commissioner, told officers not to take the knee for protests for safety reasons.
	Lie.
	Like, we know why that happened.
	They took the knee after the BLM riots in London, and then a message was sent around saying, don't do that, it makes us look really bad.
	Like, because you're exposing what we are, which is a bunch of woke activists rather than police officers in a lot of cases.
	So he continues, quote, And I personally just don't think that they have a place in policing.
	True.
	That is 100% correct.
	It's demoralising to see the police just like, yeah, we're supporting activist groups now.
	Because you want them to be neutral.
	You don't want them to be giving special dispensation to certain groups, even if they are in the mainstream.
	It's just not the done thing.
	Also, I think he's totally right about the social media accounts.
	I mean, I don't know if he's speaking of individual officers there or the whole thing in general.
	But the whole thing in general, I would say the trade-off is not worth it for the police.
	The embarrassment that comes from some of their posts saying that offensive things should be illegal or that we're watching boys like 1984 kind of thing.
	Or harassing people on Twitter and then getting sued for it.
	Like the, what is it, the LGBT network that retweeted some guy who had criticized them and then was like, oh, give my love to Caroline.
	He didn't name Caroline.
	Caroline was his wife.
	They'd looked up his name on the internal database to threaten him over the internet.
	That's awful.
	I didn't know about that.
	Yeah.
	What is it?
	CrimeBodge.
	Go and check out his channel for stuff like that.
	But it really isn't good, the police being on Twitter and whatnot.
	I mean, again, you can't even report crime to them on there.
	But he finishes off with this quote here.
	So, I think it's past the high watermark.
	The public are getting a little bit fed up of virtue signalling police officers when they'd really rather we just locked up burglars.
	Yeah.
	You're there to go after the criminals.
	The bad guys.
	The guys who rob people, beat people up in the streets, and so on and so forth.
	Not people who post something offensive or to sit around with your knee on the floor.
	This is not what people want from the police force.
	It's not why we pay taxes.
	And yeah, Priti Patel.
	Get rid of Dick.
	If you're looking for a candidate, Mr.
	Watson.
	Put Mr.
	Watson in charge.
	That's it, really.
	Let's go to the video comments.
	Sure.
	Morning, guys.
	Yes, I was the person that was asking about when I should marry my white girlfriend.
	I only got it partially answered.
	The other part of my question was, what are a few features that men should look for when they're about to marry someone?
	Thank you.
	I always get these video questions when Carl's not here.
	Yeah, I'm not married.
	And I've never been married, yeah.
	Don't worry, I'll message the Pope now.
	What features should a man look for in a woman?
	He is going to marry...
	He's going to think that I'm sending these because I'm getting married.
	I don't even have a girlfriend, so I don't know how it's working, but...
	I mean, if I was to guess, I mean, probably fidelity and whatnot.
	I mean, just making sure they're a solid person.
	I mean, they'll rush into it and find out that they're awful.
	Sorry, John?
	Motherly traits.
	Motherly traits.
	Yeah, that's true.
	That's true.
	I mean, if you're going to have kids with them, that's what you want.
	Make sure you enjoy spending time with them.
	I think that's probably a part of it as well.
	All right, let's go to the next...
	No point in getting advice from me anyway.
	Let's go to the next video.
	Admittedly, I keep coming back to these video comments on the Friday podcast because I find them so fascinating after, well, the responses to it's more morally wrong to lie to God.
	And this is not even a take that I even considered because I sometimes don't always think things through, but this is far better than my take.
	Conceptionally, sorry, I'm reading the take, but no, it's gone now.
	I didn't get a chance to read all that because it was long and a few seconds, but...
	I'm glad you're enjoying the discussions.
	I'm an atheist, so I don't believe in lying to God.
	No, no, no, but me and Carl are atheists as well.
	We're having this discussion.
	If God is real and all the rest of it, blah, blah, blah, blah, is lying to him as bad as killing someone?
	Or is it worse, or is it less worse?
	I would say it'd be less worse, because killing someone obviously is a really bad thing, whereas lying to God, if he's as omnipotent as he is made out to be, then he'd already know you're lying, so the damage would be far less.
	Yeah, but also God made you kill that guy, so...
	Well, why would he do that?
	Surely for a reason, to see if you'd lie to him, I guess.
	What kind of scenario would that ever happen?
	Well, no, this happens in the Bible.
	I killed someone, God made me do it.
	I think in the Bible it's made out that he didn't make him do it.
	Like, what is it, his brother kills his other brother because he gave him some meat, you know, he gave meat to God or whatever, and the other guy gave him, I don't know, weenabix or something.
	And God liked the meat better, so then he was like, yeah, your stuff is better, and then the guy who gave him Weedabix killed the guy who gave him meat.
	Don't ever make me read the Bible, it's gonna be bad.
	Like, my version of it.
	But then you have to wonder, surely he made him kill the guy, so it doesn't matter anyway.
	I feel like we're getting off topic.
	Let's go to the next video.
	Afternoon, chaps.
	I saw a bunch of ads got pulled on GB News, and I'm wondering to myself, why on earth anyone is heeding the words of a bunch of autistic screeching retards on Twitter who likely don't even buy your products, by the way, and listening to their outrage as a form of branding advice?
	I'm just one person noticing these trends.
	I can't imagine if you're a business executive whose job it is to pay attention to them, that you don't notice them either.
	I don't know if there's something pernicious going on, but I don't believe these executives are this stupid.
	I would say they're not stupid.
	They are part of the wokest.
	I was listening to Jordan Peterson the other day.
	He made the point of just like, a kid on a college campus doesn't stay a kid on the college campus forever.
	They're 20 now.
	10 years, they'll be 30.
	20 years, they'll be 40.
	Where will they be then?
	They've been taking their ideology with them.
	And you look at Copperberg, for example.
	That was the GB News example.
	And they have the racial pride flag in their logo.
	People who run that account were once college kids.
	And they're now there.
	So, when they pull their funding, I don't think it's them thinking as good capitalists and figuring out how to make money.
	I think these organisations and these companies really have just been dragged down into pure ideology.
	And hopefully they get broke.
	There's certainly an element of it where it could just be PR. I'm a bit more...
	I don't know whether it's more cynical or more optimistic, but...
	I just think that a lot of it is just for show.
	It's just like, yeah, we're kind of virtue signaling.
	Buy our products.
	We like the LGBT community.
	Obviously, there's some degree of infiltration, but you can see the difference between the social media accounts in the UK versus in Saudi Arabia with the pride flag.
	Of course, but that's just because they'll get completely banned from Saudi.
	But the heads of these companies are smart.
	They know they don't want to get banned from Saudi.
	I mean, take Woke as an example.
	Like the head of, what is it, Western Distribution or whatever.
	I mean, she's a head of, what was it, GLAAD, the extremist organization that wants you to cut off your penis and call yourself a woman.
	So, I mean, these people are genuine believers.
	So...
	I'm always amazed that left-wingers get, like, senior positions in companies, because you'd think that being that way inclined, you'd be a bit unhinged, and it would be like, ooh, we don't want to work with that person, sort of thing.
	I mean, honestly, if I was a CEO, I'd just be like, anyone who is a wokest is just fired on the basis that you're bad for business.
	Like, if I put you in a position to try and make money, you'll screw the money up the wall for your own purposes of politics, so there's no point putting you there.
	I mean, Milton Friedman put this really well, which is like, if you take an executive from a company, a director or whatever the heck it is, the guy who runs the place for the shareholders, and he spends a bunch of money instead of not making money, but instead on his issues of the day that he likes, he's just stolen from not only the shareholders in not raising their share price from making money, He's stolen from the employees in the fact that their wages have not gone up because they've not made money.
	He's also stolen from the customers from the fact that their products haven't gone down in price instead because they haven't made money.
	These people are thieves.
	Don't put them anywhere near your company.
	Fire them if you can.
	Absolutely.
	Yeah, I don't agree that it's...
	I've forgotten the chap's name.
	Israeli's view that it's just PR. I think they are genuine believers.
	I want you guys to say the phrase, I am here to abolish Carl Benjamin-ness.
	Now, that doesn't actually mean anything insulting to Carl Benjamin the individual.
	No, the sociological definition of the term is I'm against evil, so if Carl is unwilling to say that, he's obviously pro-evil.
	No, he's obviously not going to say it, because the term is meant to degrade and insult him, even if people want to lie and say otherwise.
	That's how I feel about the term whiteness in critical race theory.
	Yeah.
	100% right.
	100% right.
	I haven't got anything to add.
	That's a great way of putting it.
	I adjusted the volume, hopefully it's enough.
	The video on news discourses that I recommended is titled Hegel, Wokeness, and the Dialectical Faith of Leftism.
	I'll try and summarize.
	The thesis is the religion of the left.
	From Marx today, it's based on Friedrich Hegel's dialectic.
	His philosophy posits that there is an end to history with a perfected state, that it has brought about the criticism of what exists.
	Hegel spoke in terms of philosophy, and Marx made it more materialist.
	Then, once communism clearly failed in the 20th century, I didn't follow any of that, sorry.
	He was talking about a thing on New Discourses about Hegel, and he was talking about how Marx changed, and that was it.
	It was kind of difficult to hear again, unfortunately.
	Sorry, mate.
	I don't know what to say.
	Are we out of any comments?
	I believe so.
	Okay.
	Do you want to read the comments on the website?
	Yeah, sure.
	George Happ, I may have become too cynical, but mainstream comedians joking about lab leaks is just controlling the narrative.
	Isn't it funny how China murdered millions of people around the world and destroyed economies?
	It's akin to Time Magazine admitting to election fortification.
	Do you guys think this admittance of hypocrisy is done to infuriate freedom-minded people who were saying the truth for years, maybe even bait them in order to isolate them again?
	We're going to be optimistic.
	I'm going to say that the whole thing was banned because it was allied with Trump, as the New York Times said that it was.
	And that's why it was verboten.
	And now that, you know, orange man bad is gone.
	It's being investigated?
	That's just what it is?
	Yeah.
	I know that might sound simplistic, but I mean, come on, we're dealing with progressives.
	They're very simplistic people.
	Yeah.
	Well, they explicitly said, well, we didn't believe it because Trump said it.
	They said that concretely.
	So...
	That would be my hopeful view of it.
	I hope it's not too deep.
	I do agree with that as well, actually.
	Chad Kuala, how long before all the people who owe their careers to Jon Stewart start denouncing him as an enemy of progress?
	Honestly, I wouldn't put anything past him at this point.
	Oh, I look forward to that day.
	It's going to be like game again as well, isn't it?
	All of them all at once are going to say it.
	John Oliver.
	Yeah, John Oliver and Colbert and all of them doing it at once.
	Like, no, he's a racist.
	He was cute.
	I want to see Jon Stewart and Donald Trump.
	That should be the campaign.
	Give it a pass.
	Belly pass number.
	Colin D, Jon Stewart is now a hero for stating what became obvious 12 months ago, the fact that modern leftists dislike him today is so telling.
	Yeah, it's also telling how far modern leftists have fallen, isn't it?
	Like, well, leftists have always been fallen.
	The Democratic Party and the fact that the mainstream Democrat world, like, you look back at Jon Stewart and he's always been left Democrat, but he's been good.
	I still look back at some of his episodes that he did when he was running The Daily Show, and it's fun, it's enjoyable, it's interesting.
	And now, none of them are.
	I think, in terms of late-night show hosts...
	It's the fact that he was able to state the bleeding obvious, and it was fine, and it was funny, whereas they couldn't state the bleeding obvious, could they?
	Because then they'd have to come up with a million blood-dent studies that show it, and it doesn't...
	No, I'm allowed to say this, please, oh, Democratic Party, don't kick me out.
	Well, good comedy lies in not stating the obvious.
	If you just say something that people expect you to say, then it's not going to be funny.
	Well, except when the obvious is bad.
	Omar Awad.
	Jon Stewart definitely took the funny when he divorced from MSM. If only he had also taken full custody of the children, common sense and liberal values.
	Lately the bunk had to be re-bunked so much that we might as well take any conspiracies at face value and you'd be more likely to be correct than if you believe the fact checkers.
	Yeah, I saw Vicky's been calling them, what was it, prophecies at this point?
	Sorry?
	Spoilers!
	Yeah, conspiracy theories are just spoilers.
	Based Bulgarian.
	How could anyone listen to Jon Stewart?
	It's beyond me.
	His jokes are always crass and he's the same broken clock right twice a day that Bill Maher is.
	Eh, maybe, but I don't know.
	I still find Jon Stewart quite based on some things, but I mean, you're certainly right that he's not perfect and he does come across a bit Bill Maher-y at times.
	I'm not too familiar with him.
	What, Bill Maher?
	No, I'm familiar with Bill Maher, but not Jon Stewart so much.
	Well, it's just embarrassing with Bill Maher, where it's like, come on, man.
	When he apologised for, what was it, saying, I'm a House N, he was like, oh, Mia Culper, I shouldn't have said this already.
	It was pathetic, because it was like, oh, come on.
	It's you.
	Who cares?
	What are they going to do?
	Take the show away?
	It's not going to happen.
	Maybe.
	Just start a new show.
	Go to Fox News.
	I'll happily have you.
	I would imagine so, but I think he's probably just slowly fading into retirement at this point.
	Duffy B. I never knew that Winston Smith's title, fact-checker, now off to my two-minute hate over the image of Trumpstein.
	Big sniffer is watching.
	That is Winston's job.
	Yanol's Jay Mullock.
	Welcome to Topsy Turby World, known as Clan World, where conspiracies are truth and truth are conspiracies.
	Like we said, it's just kind of irritating to say that conspiracy means bad.
	No, conspiracies exist.
	Conspiracy means China.
	The China theorist.
	Cindy Jay, conspiracy theorist is no longer a slur.
	In today's world, it translates to, you're probably right.
	Yeah.
	MEP Flyboy, there is something in nature that does not mix vinegar and bleach, Democrats and Logic, toasters and bathtubs and communism and virology labs and nuclear power stations as well.
	Heathcliff Flown, John Stewart is funny while the other late night hosts aren't because you can't have comedy without truth.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I think that's true.
	But it's also just...
	I mean, it's the way Jon Stewart comes to things.
	He comes to things with...
	I mean, I think he's explained this before.
	I think Bill O'Reilly was giving him a hard time about the fact, come on, your show is totally political.
	And it is.
	Like, he is making political jokes and he's got a certain point of view and all the rest of it.
	But Jon Stewart fired back with...
	Yeah, sure.
	But, I mean, it's comedy first, politics second.
	And that's just not true of any of the others.
	All of them, it's politics first, comedy second.
	It's why all their jokes suck.
	There's always bad takes.
	It's why I don't even know most of their names.
	I'm just like, I'm not watching this rubbish.
	There's no point.
	What's the worst one?
	Jimmy Kimmel.
	I think Conan's alright.
	He quite often has some good comedians on.
	He gets Bill Burr and McDonald's.
	I really should.
	Yeah, he's alright.
	He doesn't grate on me.
	He seems a bit more genuine than most of the others.
	Okay.
	I mean, that is a low bar.
	Fair point.
	Henry Ashman.
	John Stewart pointing out the Emperor is wandering around with his sausage out is fantastic and should be applauded, but let's not forget that he's only able to get away with it because he's John Stewart.
	If there was some random office worker, he'd be banned from social media for that.
	Worse, if he had the misfortune to be Scottish, he'd be getting a knock on the door from the police in Scotland about those thoughts he's been having.
	Too much to think.
	Yeah, true.
	M1ping, I am the vicar of science.
	To question me is to blaspheme against science itself.
	Dr Fauci, probably.
	I want that on a shirt.
	When I got my master's degree in psychology, I actually had to pray to Anthony Fauci.
	That's terrible, I'm sorry.
	Matthew Hammond, the sad thing about the bus of dead children would be a small fraction of the children lost to abortion each day in the US. How did the left in the US gain the reputation of caring about children?
	I saw a meme this morning.
	I don't know if it's true.
	I should probably just Google it now to make sure.
	But, you know, abortion pill in English or whatever it's called?
	Like, you have a...
	What is it?
	The morning after pill or whatever?
	When you translate it into German, apparently it comes out as anti-baby pillin.
	I can put it in Google Translate now.
	I'll see if it comes out right.
	They're not very euphemistic in Germany, are they?
	No, I mean, it gets to the point, doesn't it?
	Anti-baby pill.
	I mean, if we had that in English, people would probably do less.
	But...
	Student of History, the US relationship with Somalia, aside from Black Hawk Down taking in refugees and sending aid.
	Yeah, I mean, she can't really complain.
	I mean, it's not like the US is waging war there or anything.
	It's just that they're giving them overseas aid.
	So there is nothing to really complain about.
	Ty Buffett, the Democrat candidate, sounds like she was trying to set up a fake hate crime.
	You know she was going to play it up in the media if they called in saying she had a bomb.
	Mental problems, hates America, threatening violence to get her her way.
	Woman, black and Muslim, look out for her presidential run.
	Yeah, she's got all the right traits there.
	Matthew Wilson.
	Trespassing in the Capitol building.
	Six months in maximum security prison and counting.
	No bail.
	Solitary confinement.
	Charged with insurrection.
	Hijacking a bus full of children.
	While Muslim.
	Misdemeanor.
	While Muslim.
	That's actually one of the things.
	Carl sent me a link to a Tucker Carlson segment, which we're going to do tomorrow, which is...
	Tucker Carlson pointing out that quite a lot of the people of the insurrection were feds, and we have the names and the court documents at this point, where the government says they're feds, and the number of people who were bashing down windows is a smaller number.
	So, starting to think, how many of those people were just feds, and then other people followed them in, and now everyone's getting eight years in jail.
	It was an inside job.
	It very well might have been.
	That's the embarrassing thing.
	We've got the documents.
	Every conspiracy is now right, apparently.
	Yeah, well, the capital of insurrection was an inside job.
	Might have actually been true.
	Henry Ashman, the Seattle terrorist, complaining that none of the teachers look like her son.
	Lady, I didn't have a male teacher until I went to secondary school.
	You get used to it.
	Not go to blow up a bus about it.
	Yeah, I don't need to blow up a bus because there's no white people in my school.
	It's fine.
	Yeah, I went through, yeah, as he says, I didn't get a male teacher until much later on.
	It didn't really bother me, to be honest.
	You only stabbed three kids, so...
	I thought you wouldn't bring that up.
	Peter Hinlegen, sorry if I mispronounced that.
	because they don't see faces like theirs it seems like they are the problem absolutely such a lack of empathy is the problem that needs to be addressed you may well end up like uh end up on a bus threatening children yeah like you don't need someone to look like you and this is the frustrating thing with all the talks of political representation it's like i don't care whether my elected representative looks like me as long as they have the same views as me that's all that matters yes it can be pretty but hell not my skin tone
	not my not my sex Doesn't matter.
	Like, that's not important.
	Kelly Badenoch, even baster.
	Even less my skin tone.
	Doesn't matter.
	Like, she's based, that's the point.
	I would have liked an alien if they were based.
	They literally, like, vote Kong, you know, for The Simpsons.
	At least he's based.
	James Hayes, I'm a massive educated engineer and I earn around 25% of Ubox's wage.
	Just knowing that that is giving me trauma, going to politics, kids, the work is easy and the money is astonishing.
	Bonus if you're a non-white female and a religious zealot.
	I mean, we've always made jokes about what is a gender studies and whatnot, what a basic degree, you're not going to get any money with that.
	But then you keep seeing them at the head of departments, getting over 100 grand, and I'm like, damn, I should have taken that gender studies degree.
	Would have been good.
	You would have been poisoned with nonsense, though.
	Yeah, I would have been poisoning society with my job as well, so.
	Chris Randall, I think the left needs to go to Tiger's school of political advertising.
	I don't get that one.
	Tiger Patel, isn't it?
	Oh, Tiger Patel, okay, yeah.
	Yeah.
	Could you imagine?
	She walks on the bus with a suicide fit, filming herself Eye of the Tiger.
	I mean, the bus would empty pretty quickly.
	Oh, boy.
	Herbert Hernandez, words are going to turn into action.
	That woman has already taken extreme actions.
	What happens to her mental state when she's being validated in such disgusting ways?
	She gets elected, that's what.
	It's so depressing that she holds such a senior position.
	In no world should she have a job that pays her that much money.
	John says, but you could infiltrate HR and remove the diversity under the guise of diversity.
	Yeah, smart.
	We also saw it well with the pronouns guy that posted...
	I can't remember what he posted.
	I remember reading some story in which the guy was like, I'm so sick of listening to diversity and inclusion nonsense.
	One day the HR guys came in and were like, everyone's going to write their pronouns.
	And he was like, right, okay, my pronouns are she, her.
	What are you going to do about it?
	And the guy in charge of HR was like, you know, losing his ass over all this.
	He was like, he's not using the right pronouns.
	Why is he doing this?
	So then he complained.
	He was like, well, look, he's saying I'm not using the right pronouns.
	That's very wrong of him.
	So he got disciplined, and then he carried on, and he got fired.
	So, I mean, you can't turn it on its head and kill it that way.
	So if you're taking a gender studies degree, keep going!
	Get to the top and kill it from the top!
	So, Bart No Name, Daniel Morgan and Stephen Lawrence were just a few years apart and a few miles apart.
	Part of the Stephen Lawrence story was that one of the suspects was the son of a friend of a police officer doing the investigation.
	It's not a stretch of the imagination to see that embedded corruption in the Met that was prevalent at the time.
	Yeah, certainly true.
	Absolutely.
	I mean, I'm not old enough to ramble this stuff, but...
	I mean, it is interesting how they spend all their time being woke.
	It's almost...
	Who was it who said this?
	It's like they've got skeletons in the closet, and that's the skeleton in the closet for the mayor, isn't it?
	We'll be covering up.
	Our officers are probably involved in these murders.
	So we'll just endlessly virtue signal about how, yes, we're for diversity.
	F white people.
	I don't know how that strategy works, but...
	But it seems to have worked so far.
	Well...
	Wait, wait, she's still there.
	She's still there.
	Priti Patel, get rid of her.
	Put the Manchester guy in charge.
	She's like a limpet.
	You just can't get rid of her.
	She's just welded on into her office.
	Like, how many scandals is it now?
	At least, like, three or four that I can remember off the top of my head.
	Anyway, never mind.
	Heather Fernandez, protecting rights and locking away criminals.
	What are we, some kind of police force?
	Met.
	Rob Allen, the police virtue signalling and social media use doesn't leave the public cold.
	It also leaves most of the frontline police officers cold too.
	Yeah, I've certainly heard the same thing where it's kind of forced down their throats a little bit, whether they like it or not.
	I've heard this from some police officers.
	The best one was actually, I had a long chat with a guy who, we met Voice of Wales in London, good guys, and they had a chat with him.
	I think he's ex-police now.
	He'd worked in London, he'd worked in Wales and whatnot, and he was just utterly dumbfounded with the whole thing.
	He was like, look, when I joined, we were there to catch the bad guys.
	They had to get the criminals, take them off the street, you know, you've been throwing bricks through people's windows or whatever, we're going to take you out, and make the whole place better.
	And we then look at the training, everyone spends all their time thinking about diversity and inclusion and Identities and whatnot.
	I can't imagine the amount of demoralization that must take place for some guy who really wanted to do good and ended up joining the police and it's just not what it should be.
	It's not like they even have an easy time in the UK either.
	Things like in the Met and some police forces up north, they're dealing with stabbings all the time and stuff like that, where it's horrendous, the actual crime scene.
	I've been told by police officers that have been first on the scene to a stabbing, and there's just blood everywhere, and there's someone with the hands inside of their stomach or their ribs or something like that.
	What was everyone's identities on race?
	Yeah, it's just when you actually know about the horrendous side of the job.
	It's like, who cares what skin colour someone is?
	If you're dealing with stabbings, who wants that?
	I suppose it's the same with the American police and shootings.
	So Aaron Watkins says, ah, the Democratic bus bomber.
	Yes, I can't imagine why Americans have become less pro-ethnic replacement over the years.
	Woke police.
	Ah, yes, the other side of the coin.
	Yeah, I don't really get America's...
	They seem to have quite a large Somali population, I just don't get why.
	Because, I mean, not to be rude, but Somalia is an anarchic asshole, and therefore most of the refugees people keep getting are not custom to living in a civilised society.
	Yeah, well, there's a reason that if you were to say Somalia, the first word you would associate with it would be pirate.
	Yes.
	So, it's not got a good international reputation, and I think that's for good reason.
	I'll tell you once, because you know I have a bit of a thing where I want to get the most number of notes for the smallest amount of money.
	I really want to get a briefcase one day filled with just useless money.
	So I looked up the Somali shilling exchange rate, and it was like 33,000 Somalian shillings to one pound.
	I'm like, that's amazing.
	So it's like, how do I get Somali shillings?
	And no one sells them, obviously.
	And me being a retailer, I was like, what if I just look up the Somali bank?
	I found the Somali bank's website, the Central Bank of Somalia, and it was just down, like they had the webpage, they were just like, yeah, we're not operating at the moment because of the civil war.
	If you want to get Somali shillings, please contact your local warlord.
	Did they actually say warlord?
	I was just like, okay, yeah, I suppose I will.
	But what a world!
	Are you going to reach out to some warlord now?
	Give me my shillings.
	I mean, they're worthless to him, I'll take him.
	As long as you don't trade weapons in exchange, I think you'll be alright.
	Alexander Schulberg, I think that's right.
	I'm sorry if it's not.
	Hi Callum, this one is aimed at you.
	You always poke fun at Sweden, yet British police wear pride flags and so does your treasury and all branches of the state.
	Swedes do not.
	I think that should be Swedes.
	Even our so-called feminist government is more base than your precious Boris.
	Build back better, gender neutral, unending lockdown Johnson.
	Love, Alexander.
	You got me there.
	I mean, Sweden...
	I mean, I've never been.
	I really want to go to Sweden.
	I learned a bit of language in college for a laugh.
	And it's one of those things where it looks like from an outsider's perspective that you guys went through hell and have come back on the other side, sort of realizing I'm effed up with the migration crisis and before taking in so many asylum seekers from uncivilized parts of the world.
	I mean, places that are just in pure anarchy.
	And, I mean, just look up the Wikipedia page, grenade attacks in Sweden.
	It's just an endless list of grenade attacks for just...
	Why are there so many grenades in Sweden?
	I don't know, but...
	I mean, just the amount of problems they've had.
	I mean, you even get mocked by Denmark, for Christ's sake, so...
	Well, Denmark's been pretty good recently, haven't they, in the political stuff.
	There's that politician, sorry, the comedian who loves to do a show in which he loves to make fun of Sweden all the time, and the way he does it is they make the camera go black and white, and he gets a recorder and he's like, come in Sweden, come in Sweden, we are launching your message from the free world.
	Like, they're advertising to Sweden, you want freedom?
	Come to Denmark, you don't have to live in that shithole anymore.
	Christopher Ford, question for Josh.
	Okay.
	I'm currently dating a girl whose parents are rather overbearing to the point where they don't want us hanging out in my girlfriend's room without the door being open.
	Mind you, she and I are 20 and 25 years of age respectively.
	I don't understand.
	It is their house.
	I understand that it is their house, sorry.
	But that strikes me as rather infantilising.
	How would you suggest I work to liberate my girlfriend while not jeopardising our relationship with her parents?
	I think time would be the best thing for you there.
	Get them to know that you're a good guy, that they can trust you.
	Hopefully you are also a good guy and that they can trust you as well.
	And then you should hopefully be okay.
	But it's very difficult because if you bring up anything explicitly to them, then it's going to be an immediate red flag to them, I imagine.
	So you've just got to work at it over time slowly.
	That would be what I would do anyway.
	I'd probably pick the easy way.
	I'd just go to my house.
	Screw this.
	Yeah.
	Get our house together.
	No, that's...
	No, but if you go around their house, you've got to keep the door open.
	I'll just go to my house then.
	Don't have to do it there.
	To be fair, if you are in your 20s as well, that's...
	It's pathetic.
	Yeah.
	I mean, maybe you could get her to talk to her parents, just like, come on, what's going on here?
	Like, I'm an adult, why are you overbearing?
	But sex is still banned in this house, this is a Christian household.
	I suppose you could marry her if they're that way, and then done.
	Not really sure that's an easy solution.
	Yeah, it's a difficult one, so sorry I couldn't give any kind of useful advice, but I think just...
	Just the chat.
	Bend the mum over the kitchen counter.
	No!
	My advice is don't listen to the chat.
	Airbnb.
	Airbnb, yeah.
	I mean, just go to his house.
	I assume his parents are normal.
	Andre Mesquita.
	So Cristiano Ronaldo just sunk Woka-Cola stocks after throwing away two bottles of Coke in front of him before a press conference and encouraging people to drink water instead.
	Woka-Cola lost $4 billion in stocks.
	Based.
	I agree.
	Here we go.
	It's on the screen now.
	So I've seen this.
	He like takes it and he's just like, no, drink water.
	Don't drink Coke.
	Like how he looks to the side, just like, can I get away with this?
	Drink water.
	Not Coke.
	I agree.
	I don't really understand.
	Yeah, I agree too.
	Even as the Callum fan over here, I'm not pro...
	I mean, Woka Cola aside...
	Sugar water.
	Sugar water generally, not based.
	It's only good when it's got rum in it.
	Then it's okay.
	When it's a mixer.
	Maybe.
	But I mean, if you can, not Woka Cola.
	Because I'd rather not just fund the extermination of myself.
	If that's okay, Coke.
	Controversial position.
	I just...
	I mean, that's an example I'm talking about, where the people at the top, I mean, you can name them.
	You know, they've got their accounts.
	They honestly believe that they're pumping out.
	They honestly believe it.
	They don't care if they get hit to their stock.
	But I imagine they'll be mad about the hit to the stock from Ronaldo there, but he's funding a good cause.
	Pro-water activism.
	Yeah, hopefully he's listening to the podcast and he's got the message that just, yeah, they're a bunch of racists, so they don't deserve your money.
	So, good guy.
	Anyway.
	We're all out of video comments now.
	Not video comments, regular comments.
	Just looking at the chat then.
	It stops you going bold.
	What?
	Coke?
	No, it doesn't.
	What are we talking about?
	You some kind of Coke sales rep.
	It stops you going bold.
	Why are there Coke sales reps in our chat?
	Get out of here!
	If you pour it on your scalp, it rents boldly.
	Someone suggested a base coder.
	They bring that out.
	Half the price funds a base organisation or something like that.
	That could be a funny marketing strategy, actually.
	Someone get in contact with Pepsi and just be like, yeah.
	No, but that's the thing.
	I mean, say you're...
	I mean, Coke's gone.
	They're dead.
	But, I mean, Pepsi, I haven't seen the top of their business, so I don't know if they're all gone or not.
	But, you know, they did the thing with the Caitlyn Jenner, whatever it was, with the Pepsi to the police, you know, during the riots, which was cringe.
	But if you decide it as a company, we'll make progressive product, and then based product, and, like, a percentage of each sale will go to each thing...
	That's one way of getting around the culture wars, isn't it?
	Just build your own institutions.
	Yeah, I mean, you just put some soy in the progressive one and some testosterone in the base one.
	There you go.
	If you want to, you know, tag us about politics, we have the product for you.
	You know, that'll fund your nonsense and this will fund base things.
	I'd rather not be lectured about politics by drinks.
	I don't think...
	Yeah, but if we're going to be...
	I'd rather be able to buy base coke than just cringe coke.
	I'd rather have neutral drinks that don't talk about politics whatsoever and just care about making money and good products.
	That would be the ideal.
	But you're living in the 90s.
	That's gone.
	It's long gone.
	I'm living in the 90s.
	This doesn't exist anymore.
	Just business.
	Everything is compromised.
	Yes.
	And ironically, yes.
	I mean, why was McDonald's endorsing BLM? I mean, what's that about?
	Anyway.
	Large customer base.
	Anyway, so that's enough from us.
	Thank you for tuning in.
	If you want to check out more from us, as I mentioned, go to Lucy's.com or the YouTube channel and whatnot.
	But we'll be back with Carl tomorrow.
	We're going to be talking about how the Capitol insurrection seems to have been run by the feds.
	That's certainly going to be talked about.
	Also, it turns out it's not a new thing either.
	The guy who directed Four Lions has been saying this for a while.
	Like, the biggest terrorist organization in the US is the FBI, because they just have so many informants that in the number of terrorists, like, they have more informants than the terrorists exist.
	But anyway, we'll do that tomorrow.
	Thank you for tuning in, and we'll see you tomorrow at one o'clock.
	Thank you.

▲