Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 10, 2021 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:31:52

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #151

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Logitech Theatre for the 10th of June 2021.
	I'm joined by Josh.
	Hello.
	And today we're going to be talking about how President Harris has endorsed President Trump, which I wasn't expecting, but okay.
	Also that the communists have decided to endorse the England football team taking the knee, so that kind of destroys the England football team, saying it's just a symbol about racism when you're being endorsed by the communists, but okay.
	And also Keir Starmer has decided to endorse...
	Trans self-ID. So if you say you're a woman in Britain, in Labour's Britain, then you're a woman.
	That's enough.
	We've got a whole podcast of endorsements today.
	Yeah, everything's about endorsements today.
	Okay, fine.
	But they're all like wacko endorsements, except maybe the communist one, which makes sense, because at least they're just saying it out loud now.
	Yes, taking the knee is about socialism.
	Anyway, a couple of things first.
	So first, for the Gold Team members who send the videos, please keep it to 30 seconds, because we're getting quite a lot of them, and it's becoming kind of a difficulty there.
	So they've been asked by their team, please keep them 30 seconds, otherwise problems.
	But hopefully that's fine.
	Anyway, things coming up.
	So this is all the premium content we have on Lotuses.com.
	In case people haven't seen something on here, go and check it out, especially if you're signed up.
	I mean, you're paying for it.
	Go and enjoy it.
	And we have some good stuff coming up.
	So you, tomorrow...
	Is it tomorrow or today, actually?
	You'll be interviewing Ji-Yoon Park.
	That'll be this afternoon, yeah.
	This afternoon.
	So that's the conservative candidate who came from North Korea as a defector and then ran as a conservative candidate for council elections and sadly lost, which is really irritating.
	It's a shame, but it wasn't a seat where Labour were clearly ahead, like it's a safe Labour seat.
	Fantastic on her, and she seems fantastic, so I look forward to the interview.
	We'll be putting that up afterwards.
	Also, there's the new video, which is done, it's rendered, it should be up at 3 o'clock today, which is Carl's, you know, the direct videos that he does.
	They'll be on the lotuseaters.com, words there, our YouTube channel, and on lotuseaters.com, the website, obviously, about Grimes' communist utopia.
	This is Elon Musk's missus trying to propose that if we have AI sort out all the factories and all the distribution, then there'll be no scarcity, and that'll be a communist utopia.
	Except, when you actually think about it, living in that world sounds awful, because there's nothing to strive for.
	But anyway.
	It's so far in the distant future, I don't even see why people are worried about that either.
	Wow, it's just, it's not even desirable, so why even, anyway.
	So go and check that out at 3 o'clock after this, and also, as I mentioned, go and check out the good stuff on loaders.com and the interview with GM Park after we're done.
	So first thing first.
	President Kamala Harris.
	I'm going to call her President Kamala Harris because Joe Biden doesn't seem to remember if he's president or not.
	He said it himself the other day when he was addressing the troops, and he keeps saying President Harris himself.
	So, whatever.
	Going to call her President Kamala Harris.
	So, she's decided to endorse President Trump and his position on immigration.
	Based?
	I mean, finally.
	I mean, everyone knew it was true that Trump's position is the correct position, which is, if you want to come, apply legally.
	If you don't, sod off.
	Get lost.
	You have no right to be here.
	And this is summed up in the memes around President Trump's entire presidency, if you can get the first image up here.
	I mean, this is his campaign promise.
	And the messaging he gave out to literally everyone around the globe, which is if you come to the border and you don't want to go through the big old gates, the big shining gates in the middle of the wall, then no, you're not coming in.
	Which, yeah, correct messaging.
	I mean, it's the kind of thing you use to keep illegal immigrants who have no right to your country and are just turning up and saying, I want it, away, because they have no right to it.
	In a sane world, this would be completely uncontroversial.
	Well, funnily enough, I mean, as I mentioned, Kamala Harris has now endorsed this.
	So, just to go over President Trump's history, so the statistics on immigration are not fully there, but if you go to the Homeland Security website on legal immigration, these people get green cards.
	You can see between 2016 and 2019, the most recent year for which we have data, you have immigration down 12.8%.
	So, I mean, yeah, I mean, that's a campaign promise.
	Put immigration down, he did, by 12.8% at least on the legal side.
	So, good.
	good and that's with the attitude of don't come which is the attitude you want if you want less migration however of course president trump is not without failure on this issue and it would be incorrect to say that he is so if we go to the next one this is the the act he tried to pass the raise act the reforming american immigration for strong employment act and there was some good stuff in here like the bills i'm just reading the wikipedia list of it but i can't imagine it's The bill seeks to reduce levels of legal immigration to the United States by 50% by halving the number of green cards issued.
	The bill would also dramatically reduce family-based immigration pathways, impose a cap of 50,000 refugee emissions per year, and end the visa diversity lottery.
	Do you know about that?
	No, I don't.
	Sorry, it's like, if you wanted a visa, they would have a lottery to determine which countries people would get this from, and it's like, why would you do that?
	The Obama administration were like, yeah, because it increases diversity, we can have people from all over the world, and it's like...
	Yeah, but that doesn't matter.
	You want the best people.
	Not just, you come from X country.
	Anyway.
	So, it also says that it would eliminate the current demand-driven model of employment-based migration and replace it with a point system.
	As in, what we've just done in the UK. Try and lower migration.
	Well, unskilled migration, let's say.
	Because the points are, you have to be educated, you have to earn this much money, blah blah blah blah blah.
	And then if you've got enough points, yeah, you can come.
	You can apply.
	So, that's great.
	It didn't pass.
	So, he proposed this.
	That was wonderful, but it didn't pass.
	So, that's why the diversity lottery is still there.
	Why he was not able to halve the Gombrough Greek cards to 50% of what they were.
	Which is a shame, but that's that.
	But, of course, I mean, this isn't his main policy on immigration.
	We all know what the main policy was.
	Build a wall.
	And he did build a wall.
	So, it's not incorrect to say that he did.
	And he's quite impressive, actually.
	Yeah, so if you scroll down to the first graph here that the BBC have, so you can see here there are 15 miles of new built walls, so where there was absolutely nothing, there was now 50 miles of the upgraded wall.
	157 miles under pre-construction, 350 under improvement, and 221 miles of new and improved under construction.
	So, most of it being improvement of the already existing fencing.
	So, I mean, I've seen some of the documentaries where it's just a pathetic fence, and it's like, okay, improve that.
	And then there's a bunch more of stuff that's on the construction, pre-construction, and 50 miles of new construction.
	There's also the five miles, which was set up in El Paso in private land, thanks to a GoFundMe campaign, which I just find really funny.
	I love it.
	I love Americans that do this.
	What, like a privately funded border?
	Yeah, literally.
	They had some private land, and they were like, yeah, we'll just build a border.
	Yeah, okay.
	And then they crowdfunded it on GoFundMe and then did it.
	So, fantastic.
	Anyway, there's also a graph in there which shows the number of captures of the border, so migrants who are trying to get in, and it has like Obama and Trump and whatnot, and all their different numbers for what they caught.
	I like how it's like fishing or something.
	It's the next one after this one, John.
	So you can see that Obama in his eight years, 35,000 people detained in eight years, and yet Trump in four years, 40,000 people detained.
	I mean, you can see who's trying to stop people illegally crossing the border there.
	So, I mean, good job.
	Like, this is his position.
	He did a good job in these aspects.
	You can criticize him on some of these things, you know, not getting that big bill passed.
	But he certainly did affect things.
	And if you go to the numbers for what we have now, which is now that he's gone, which is the next link, which is just that there's been a massive rise, as we've mentioned before, of people trying to enter illegally.
	You can see the blue bar there.
	That's the newest numbers for this year since Joe Biden got in charge.
	And as you can see by the composition of demographics, it's overwhelmingly single adults.
	It is not children and their mothers.
	So it's a similar situation to what we have in the UK where it's mainly just chances, isn't it?
	It's single men...
	Looking to make money.
	Same in Greece, same in Morocco.
	Come on, it's the same globally, really.
	We've never had this huge problem with migration before.
	It's really a new thing, looking at it.
	The fact that there's so many single men trying to cross from areas where there are no wars.
	Well, it's obviously because we weren't enforcing our borders properly.
	They realise that they actually have a chance of getting in just by taking a chance and trying to cross anyway.
	That's exactly right.
	And this is about the whole thing.
	You know, signals are important.
	Donald Trump gives us signals.
	Do not come.
	It's lower.
	Biden gets in, says, come, please come.
	Donald Trump's a racist for not allowing you to illegal against the country.
	And they do.
	I mean, as mentioned, people went down there and interviewed them.
	And I wanted to mention the Danish parliament, because the Danish parliament's been doing this game for a little while.
	And I think it's hilarious.
	They've also apparently been listening to our podcast, which I'll mention in a minute.
	So this is the Danish parliament approves a plan five years ago to seize assets from refugees.
	Under the new Danish law, police will be allowed to search asylum seekers on arrival to the country and confiscate any non-essential items worth more than 10,000 krona, so 1,000 pounds, that have no sentimental value to the owner.
	Wait, why are they doing that?
	So if you turn up with a bunch of gold, they're like, okay, you're going to cost us a lot of money being a refugee.
	Because remember, this is in 2016, when even the European Union said half of the people who got there weren't refugees.
	They had no more right to be in Europe than anyone else.
	And therefore, if you just turn up and you're just some single guy who's got a bunch of money on you, it's like, right, we're going to take that.
	Which is not really what they wanted to do, because this never really got enforced beyond a few people, and that was the purpose.
	It was to send a signal across Europe, because remember there's no borders, so the refugees can wander around anywhere.
	Stay in Germany.
	Go to Sweden.
	We don't care.
	Don't come here, because we know your chances.
	And it worked.
	So if you go to the next link here, this is just a graph, and you can see the number of asylum applications after 2016 plummeting.
	That is a huge decrease.
	Yeah, I mean, just evaporating overnight, because the Danish were like, yeah, if you come here, we're racist.
	Like, that was essentially it.
	It's like, yeah, okay, fine, just call us names, we don't care.
	But we know you guys are chances, so why are we caring about people's feelings on this?
	It's the reality that matters.
	So, if you go to the next link here, they've decided to go even further, because I guess they're really sick of this stuff.
	So they've passed a new law, so it says, Denmark passes law to process asylum seekers outside Europe.
	Denmark on Thursday passed a law enabling it to process asylum seekers outside Europe passed with 70 lawmakers in favour with 24 against.
	So this would allow Denmark to move refugees from Danish soil to asylum centres in a partner country outside of the European Union and then have their cases reviewed there.
	They don't even need the asylum seekers to be in the country to assess their application.
	No, I mean, this was a joke we made up.
	We were joking about, like, what if you just paid Senegal a bunch of money?
	Yeah, I remember us talking about this.
	Just, like, paying a country to keep hold of the refugees while you kind of figure things out.
	Yeah, geographically so far away, it's like, well, if you're a chancer, you know there's no point coming to Britain because you'll be sent to Senegal.
	And the Danish parliament were listening to the podcast like, yeah, that's a good idea.
	And they've done it.
	They have actually passed this into law.
	So they're now able to send all the migrants to Senegal for processing.
	Is that actually where they're sending them, or is that just an example?
	It's third countries outside of the European Union.
	So in my mind, I'm just like, right, you're going to pick some African country.
	That's what you're going to do.
	Because that's what you would do.
	And if they make it back again, that's so impressive.
	You've got to grant them...
	Fair enough.
	But the government spokesman is not cutting hairs with this.
	he responded to an inquest from Reuters saying if you apply for asylum in Denmark you know that you will be sent back to a country outside Europe and therefore we hope that people will stop seeking asylum in Denmark I mean this is what's so tragic about the whole thing because there are genuine refugees who are in need because they are fleeing a country that will kill them if they go back and And then there are just these people you find at the Moroccan border or in Calais and whatnot who are just taking the mickey.
	They're not genuine.
	And that's exactly what he's speaking to there, I imagine.
	He's not saying all refugees are blah blah blah if you actually sat him down and asked him what about this guy who's fleeing from Russia who killed if he went back.
	He'd be like, yeah, fair enough.
	But that's not what Europe has dealt with.
	As the European Union has said themselves, 50% of those who came to Europe during 2016 had no more right to be in Europe than anyone else.
	Not refugees.
	Just migrants who decided, Gibbs gives me access to your country.
	Genuine asylum seekers don't actually have any cause to worry then, surely, because these policies wouldn't really affect them.
	Because they can assume that, okay, if I'm actually an asylum seeker, then sure, I might be moved elsewhere, but I'll still probably get asylum afterwards.
	If you've got a good asylum claim, yeah.
	I mean, there are thousands of people who claim asylum in Europe and the United States every year and get it.
	It is not some unbelievable process in which, you know, we just deny everyone.
	No, it's an actual process looking for real people over the chances who turn up in Calais.
	I mean, this is pretty easy to do in the United States as well, because they could just say, okay, if you're trying to cross the border in Mexico, you can just stay in Mexico while we process your asylum claim.
	And they're like, oh, actually, you don't need asylum from Mexico.
	It's not Hellworld, but I mean...
	Well, there are cartels and stuff.
	It's not nice.
	But it's not Syrian civil war.
	Like, there's no ISIS. So...
	That's the thing.
	Like, war?
	Okay.
	Fleeing cartels?
	That gets a bit broad.
	I mean, then do we argue that any place that has a criminal gang, is that enough to say that you can claim asylum?
	It gets tricky.
	Well, in Mexico, I can kind of understand that, you know, there are cartels that go around and just slaughter an entire village.
	And if you're from that village, you've got nowhere else to go.
	You can't go home again.
	Well, then you can go to the embassy in Mexico City, can't you?
	I suppose so, yeah.
	Anyway, the point, of course, is the signals.
	I mean, Denmark's not massively serious about this, evidenced by the fact that they only applied the seizing of assets to a few applications.
	Just to get the message out, don't come here, because we know you guys are chances in 2016, as the European Union said, and it worked.
	So Kamala Harris has decided to do the same thing, really, which is to endorse the position of Donald Trump.
	So thanks to Memeology 101, who I got this video from, which is just demonstrating her flip on this.
	So the first video is her saying that Donald Trump is horrible because he says, go back where you came from.
	It's his message.
	Let's play.
	Let's be clear.
	Let's be clear.
	This is a nation founded by immigrants.
	Unless, you know, your history is of your ancestors being kidnapped and brought over on a slave ship, unless you are Native American, your people are immigrants.
	And the idea that we have a President of the United States that on this issue has vilified a whole group of people, we have always presented ourselves as being a nation of strength with strong arms, that when people are fleeing harm, we will embrace them.
	But look at what has happened with this administration.
	There are children who are fleeing murder capitals of the world.
	Let's be clear about this.
	Imagine a mother who makes a decision to pay a coyote to transport her child across the entire country of Mexico, facing unknown peril.
	She does that because she believes for that child to stay where they are is worse.
	But what does this president do?
	He virtually looks at those children and says, go back to where you came from.
	I mean, we've seen the statistics.
	That's an exception from the rule.
	The rule is single adults, as the data shows.
	But I also just want to address the point there that everyone who comes to America is an immigrant.
	If you are there currently as a person who was born and raised in the United States, you're not an immigrant.
	You're an indigenous American.
	I'm sorry, you can't come from anywhere else.
	You have to be indigenous.
	But if you go back all the way to the settlers, they're colonizers.
	I mean, this is leftist stock rhetoric.
	You colonize the country.
	Then they can't be immigrants, can they?
	Unless we're defining that all immigrants are now colonizers, leftists.
	So, I mean, pick one.
	Anyway.
	But, of course, she's flipped on this and now endorses Donald Trump.
	So, let's play the next clip.
	And I want to emphasize that the goal of our work is to help Guatemalans find hope at home.
	At the same time, I want to be clear to folks in this region who are thinking about making that dangerous trek to the United States-Mexico border.
	Do not come.
	Do not come.
	The United States will continue to enforce our laws and secure our border.
	There are legal methods by which migration can and should occur.
	But we, as one of our priorities, will discourage illegal migration.
	And I believe if you come to our border, you will be turned back.
	How could you do this?
	Donald Trump would say, go back to where you come from, and then you're like, yeah, if you come here, you'll be turned back.
	Because that's the proper position to be.
	Everyone knew it.
	Everyone knew it from day one.
	Donald Trump was right.
	The right thing to do is if you come to the border, right, apply through the legal means.
	If you don't, sod off.
	Like, because we know you're not being legitimate, because otherwise you'd apply it through the legal means.
	It is not an impossible process.
	Thousands of people are successful every single year.
	You, just jumping on the border and saying, Gibbs, access to country.
	No.
	No.
	And it infuriates me how, you know, before the campaign talked to Americans, Donald Trump's saying, come back when you came from.
	And now she's talking to foreigners in Guatemala.
	She's like, yeah, we will turn you back.
	Do not come.
	Yeah, it's amazing the change of tune, isn't it?
	What's this, like a year or two afterwards?
	I mean, it's getting into the seat of power, isn't it?
	And realising that, yeah, all this socialist nonsense in which no borders, no borders at USA at all.
	No, it's just nonsense.
	Everyone knows it.
	Everyone knew it from day one.
	And the fact that this gets a minute's tolerance among left-wing circles is embarrassing.
	And I love how she's being sort of clawed over for this from leftists as well.
	Like, no, how could you say this?
	And it's like...
	Yeah, because it's true.
	We all know it's true.
	Stop playing around.
	But of course, she then was saying that to foreigners in Guatemala.
	And then the American press were there, so MSNBC, and decided to interview her about how she could say something so horrible.
	So this is the interview here.
	If we go to the next clip, we can see her being asked about the border wall and why she's not been there.
	The question has come up, and you heard it here, and you'll hear it again, I'm sure.
	It's why not visit the border?
	Why not see what Americans are seeing in this crisis?
	Well, we are going to the border.
	We have to deal with what's happening at the border.
	There's no question about that.
	That's not a debatable point.
	But we have to understand that there's a reason people are arriving at our border.
	And ask, what is that reason?
	And then identify the problem so we can fix it.
	Do you have any plans to visit the border?
	I'm here in Guatemala today at some point.
	We are going to the border.
	We've been to the border.
	So this whole thing about the border, we've been to the border.
	We've been to the border.
	You haven't been to the border.
	And I haven't been to Europe.
	I don't understand the point that you're making.
	I'm not discounting the importance of the border.
	Well, I mention it because I know Republicans have certainly come at you on this, but Democratic Congressman Cuellar, as a border district, has said to you and the president, come.
	You need to see this.
	I care about what's happening at the border.
	I'm in Guatemala because my focus is dealing with the root causes of migration.
	I mean, just one answer.
	Like, why don't you go to the border?
	I have been.
	You haven't.
	Yeah, but I haven't been to Europe either.
	What does that even mean?
	I don't know.
	I don't even know what the argument is that she's trying to make, except just deflection, surely.
	She's trying to kind of deflect it as if to say, like, oh, I've had my people go to the border, but I haven't been there, but I don't want to look bad.
	Then go there.
	Like, go there and figure out the issue.
	I mean, that's, you know, Caesar's never actually visited the front lines or something.
	That's essentially what he's saying there.
	But you'll notice how that's when she's talking to MSNBC in Guatemala, when she was talking to the Guatemalans, different tone.
	And she says, oh no, I'm focusing on the roots of migration.
	I'm not being a hypocrite because I'm not saying what Donald Trump was saying.
	You literally said the same thing.
	What does, if you come to the border, you'll be turned away mean?
	I mean, that's exactly what you criticized him for, saying, if you come, Donald Trump is saying, we'll send you back.
	And then you say, if you come to the border, we'll send you back.
	Like, right, that's the same thing.
	And that has nothing to do with the root causes of migration.
	I'm just focusing on that.
	No.
	You know the root causes in this case are the permissiveness of people like you in the United States to send the message to say, if you come, you will be accepted.
	That's the root cause.
	And you know it.
	And that's why you said, if you come to the border, we will send you back.
	You didn't have some speech in there being like, oh, Guatemalans, please, please rejoice.
	We will send you $3 billion for employment opportunities to stay in Guatemala, also where there is no conflict.
	So, I don't even know.
	It's just obvious lies.
	It's just obvious lies.
	She knows that the Donald Trump position was the right position, which is why she said it to the foreigners, but when she talks to the Americans, she can't do that.
	She has to continue with the leftist lie.
	Sorry, it really feeds me.
	It's just unbelievable how someone can ask like this.
	And I know you could argue that there are the cartels in Mexico.
	Sure, absolutely.
	In which case, proper channels.
	But also, Guatemala, not Mexico.
	And there's no conflict in Guatemala.
	Just look on a conflict map.
	There doesn't seem to be one.
	In which case, if you then go to Mexico, you're actually putting yourself in harm's way.
	So, I don't know what that's about.
	Also, there is a US embassy in Guatemala.
	You don't have to go to Mexico to apply.
	You can go into Guatemala and apply.
	there are means to do these things other than jumping on the border fence.
	That's how it doesn't get to me.
	Like the same with the guys in Calais who were just like, yeah, I want to go to Britain, so I'm going to get in a dinghy and get halfway and get picked up by the taxi service.
	There's the border force.
	It's like, you could just go to the British embassy.
	Like we haven't cut diplomatic ties with the French.
	Like you can go down there and write down your application.
	Anyway.
	Also just if this other standard she's trying to do where she says, oh, I'm focusing on the root causes migration.
	which is like Guatemala is poorer than the United States That's why they're coming.
	Hmm.
	Maybe.
	How are you going to fix that, though?
	How is that even an argument?
	Like, if X country is poorer than the United States, we need to give them money, because otherwise they might migrate here.
	It's like, right, almost every country on Earth is poorer than the United States.
	Britain is poorer than the United States.
	In which case, I'm looking forward to my check, Kamala, to stop me from migrating to the US. It's like, no, that's not what stops people.
	What stops people is enforcement of the border and saying, if you try, you're not going to succeed.
	It's the same with laws.
	You've got to deter them there.
	But there have been some good memes out of that.
	I can't remember all the memes, especially with Kamala Harris there talking about coming.
	But the funny meme I've seen from the Republicans is this lady here, she went down to the border with a cardboard cutout of Kamala Harris and then stuck it in the border looking at the border.
	Yeah.
	I don't know.
	I just like the political theater of the whole thing.
	It's just like Republican.
	Here's her.
	She's never been to the border.
	Here's a cardboard cutout.
	Places it there.
	It's like, there you go.
	And then she walks off.
	Anyway.
	But yeah, Kamala Harris endorsing Donald Trump.
	Based, but way too late.
	And it's also nice to see that Donald Trump only ever shines brighter in the distance, doesn't he?
	Yeah, and wasn't he also recently kind of vindicated from, was it the police clearing the church?
	I know they were accusing him.
	That's the one, yeah.
	They were accusing him of clearing away the protesters for a photo op, but then he was cleared of that.
	That was yesterday, wasn't it, I think?
	So there's even more stuff that Donald Trump has been vindicated on.
	It's having a good week.
	Yeah, it is indeed.
	But it's all too...
	I mean, that's the thing in my mind, where it's just like...
	The lies that were told during the campaign that are so obviously lies, and then there's no real comeuppance, because the real comeuppance would be him as president, wouldn't it?
	Anyway, let's go on for something.
	A little more White Bill.
	Sure.
	So, some communists have endorsed Garris Southgate, who is the England football coach.
	And you might be thinking, well, why is this important?
	Well, of course, football being the national sport in the UK... And a key aspect of our culture.
	And I think it needs to be defended, even though, you know, I don't necessarily follow football too closely.
	things like the European Cup where we are currently competing in at the minute which is where the taking the knee controversy has kind of come to fruition this this stuff is stuff that even people who don't watch football watch
	I mean I watch that and the World Cup normally but other than that I don't really engage in football so it's it's a huge thing where it engages lots of people and brings them together and the whole taking the knee thing is clearly dividing people when normally this would be something that would bring the country together in support of our team so if we'd like to have a look at this next video this is of Ireland versus Hungary the The booing has continued.
	I know you did cover it only two days ago, but there have been lots of different developments.
	Is the video playing?
	But the views of the fans was clearly audible.
	I love the whole game as well.
	I'm pretty sure it's like the anthony races.
	Yep, there's that.
	And then there's lots as much as we move it.
	Based Hungarians, well done.
	Irish cucks, taking the knee.
	Taking the knee from Marxism, showing their respects for the Holy God.
	So, I'd like to talk about Gareth Southgate a bit more, the England coach.
	He was a former defender and midfielder, seemingly turned left winger now.
	Sorry, that's a cheap joke.
	You look so disapproving.
	Hey, I haven't taken the knee, it's alright.
	So he used to play for Crystal Palace, Aston Villa and Middlesbrough and he's been the manager of England since 2016.
	So if we move on to his recent statement, this is the Novara Media coverage who, you know...
	Well, the first thing is that we are collectively really disappointed that it happened.
	I think you have to put yourself in the shoes of a young England player about to represent his country.
	Because we're all trying to support MOVE for equality, MOVE for supporting our own teammates, some of the experiences they have been through in their lives.
	Some people decide to boo.
	I think those people should put themselves in the shoes of those young players and how that must feel.
	And if that was their children, if they're old enough to have children, how would they feel about their kids being in that sort of situation?
	The most important thing for our players is to know that we are totally united on it.
	We're totally committed to supporting each other, supporting the team.
	We feel that, more than ever, determined to take the knee through this tournament.
	We accept that there might be an adverse reaction, and we're just going to ignore that and move forward.
	I think the players are sick of talking about the consequences of should they, shouldn't they.
	They've had enough, really.
	Now, that to me was exactly right.
	You're saying they're doing it in solidarity with victims of racism, including racism experienced by the players themselves.
	And you're saying it's something the whole team believes in.
	It's non-negotiable.
	I'm not here...
	To, you know, listen to and weigh up the arguments.
	We've had this conversation within the team.
	We're all agreed.
	We'll be taking the knee.
	And if that boils your piss, so be it.
	Get lost, you liar.
	I'm sorry, but we're all in agreement and that's why it's non-negotiable.
	You can't be non-negotiable if everyone's in agreement here.
	I bet right now that in 10 years or something, someone will be writing a book, just like this about the Nazi salute thing, being like, yeah, I never wanted to do it, but there was too much pressure.
	I couldn't say no because I'm a white football player and if I didn't take the knee, I would end up being fired.
	And we all know that's true.
	Absolutely, yeah.
	There have been numerous footballers now who have said, I don't agree with this, or the base guy who was just looking to BLM, they're a bunch of socialists not doing this.
	Don't worry, it will get on to the people who've kind of disavowed them in football.
	It's awful.
	I can't stand the idea of him being like, oh no, everyone's in agreement here.
	Yeah, just like everyone was in agreement about doing the Nazis salute in 38.
	Son off.
	So if we, you know, they were saying, oh, it's not a political thing.
	If we go on to the next video, they actually, Navarra Media discuss Black Lives Matter and Marxism, and they're just like, yeah, they are Marxist.
	Yeah, I think it's interesting.
	And, you know, that video of Gareth Southgate, he's really quite emotional about it.
	And what I get the sense of is that he wasn't quite prepared for this level of backlash and hostility.
	And that's because, you know, I've said this before, but I think that the Black Lives Matter movement at large at the moment was built and is still built on quite an unstable coalition.
	Because you have people who just think, you know, I don't want my teammates to, you know, throw in bananas and I don't want the audiences to be making chip noises like they've done with some black football players.
	And then you do have Marxists.
	You do absolutely have Marxists.
	You do have people who view anti-racism as the work of undoing racial capitalism.
	And so when it comes to whether or not, you know, people should embrace, you know, Marxism or not, you know, I'm all for people embracing Marxism and his ideologies.
	He does acknowledge that there is a Marxist element and a more hardcore wing who are obviously the ones who are in control of the organisation.
	It operates as a charitable organisation, doesn't it?
	And they're the ones controlling the power, money and influence.
	And this is the important thing that I think people are missing out on.
	They're just like, well, it's just a movement against racism, whereas...
	It really isn't.
	I mean, if you're against racism, you've got to be against Black Lives Matter because, of course, you look at things like the destruction of America in 2020.
	Even if that isn't enough to put you off, just what they did...
	They're a race socialist organisation.
	Yeah.
	They believe in racial socialism.
	Mm-hmm.
	Racial inequality.
	You know, inequality of wealth and whatnot.
	That's a communist value, not a liberal value.
	Liberal values are freedom, not inequality, like the football guy was saying there.
	But the other thing that gets me is just like, okay, there was a mate of mine who said to me, you know what they should start chanting?
	Stand up if you're against racism.
	It's like, just stand up if you're against racism at the players who are kneeling, and then just watch them squirm.
	Because, I mean, it works on both levels.
	Not only makes them stop taking the knee, but also BLM is a racist organization, in which case standing up means you will stop endorsing BLM. And also the idea that you can't deal with racism without doing this.
	There have been a million things to get with racism out of football right up until this point that have all worked.
	I mean, like in England, you don't have people throwing bananas at players or things like this, like the racists in Russia do, for example.
	It happens in Italy as well sometimes.
	Yeah, so you've got that stuff elsewhere, but in England this is not the case, this is not a racist country, blah blah blah, in which case this isn't to do with that and you know it.
	And that's why the communists are endorsing it.
	Absolutely.
	And I just think that you can just look at all of the things that Black Lives Matter endorse and you can say, okay, you can be against racism, but supporting Black Lives Matter by taking the knee, defunding the police has literally resulted in people being murdered at a higher rate in the United States.
	This is a key message.
	You had Black Lives Matter activists in the UK saying, we want to defund the police and...
	You can say, well, that's going to result in people being murdered.
	So that's all the justification you really need to say, well, no.
	So I'd like to look at Rio Ferdinand's tweet to Nigel Farage.
	So Rio Ferdinand, if you don't know, is a former English defender, used to play for Manchester United, and now he's a...
	Like a TV pundit.
	He talks about the matches before and after.
	So he's saying, Farage up above was saying how Gareth Southgate was wrong.
	He says he's out of touch with the England fans.
	They have a right to boo players when they take the knee for Marxist BLM. Let's keep politics out of football this summer, which is...
	Pretty uncontroversial.
	He just says, we don't want politics in football, which I think is the position of most fans who are booing them.
	And then Ria Ferdinand says, if you listen to what Gareth and the players have said numerous times recently, you would know that taking the knee has nothing to do with politics.
	People like you are part of the problem, Nige.
	Liar.
	Exactly.
	Liar.
	They're so obviously political.
	Defund the police is one of their key chants.
	If that's not political, I don't know what is.
	But also just the idea that the players could take the Nazi salute to fight racism.
	No, then that's not political because they've said it's against racism.
	Yeah, you don't get to define what is and isn't political because it's outside of you.
	It's just against racism, boys.
	That's why I've got it on the shirt now.
	It's like, no, no, it's communism.
	Don't try and sell me BS. So, in response to Rio Ferdinand, Henry Bolton replied, saying, what utter rubbish, what they say demonstrates a total and idealistic naivety as to what the Black Lives Matter movement, which started off, on the whole, taking the knee thing, is about, sorry, its agenda is indisputably political, keep politics out of sport.
	And then he replied, Rio that is, while you and all others booing are way more offended with players taking the knee than you are with actual racism and injustice, you are the problem.
	Which he didn't say.
	I mean, it's just deflecting.
	Henry Botton didn't write racism-based, taking the knee cringe.
	No, he just said, taking the knee Marxist, don't do it.
	And you're like, yeah, you're endorsing racism there.
	Idiot.
	Absolute dishonest idiot.
	It's so frustrating to see these people.
	I remember watching Rio Ferdinand play for England when I was growing up, and it's kind of heartbreaking to see that they're turning against the fans and the sport itself in driving a wedge between people and trying to divide them, and this is a perfect example of...
	Ugh.
	So, Nigel Farage replied again, just saying that they're all naive, which I think is fair enough, that they're saying it's not political, but of course it is.
	I mean, who are you really going to convince with this?
	Everyone knows it's political.
	Everyone's heard the defund the police thing.
	They've seen what's happened in the United States.
	And, yeah, Nigel says, Rio, Southgate, and the players are naive.
	They are being used as pawns in a game to divide us, keep politics out of sport.
	I love it.
	I just keep chatting.
	Keep politics out of sport.
	Keep politics out of sport.
	I mean, I don't care about sport.
	That's all.
	But I have hobbies.
	I don't have some politics out of there.
	Same with like 40k and whatnot.
	You have the feminists selling out and being like, yeah, what about female space marines?
	No, get out.
	Sit off.
	I don't care about your political views.
	Like, there's the hobby.
	Leave it alone.
	I mean, we couldn't be more interested in politics doing what we do, but then if even we want politics out of things, then there's got to be some kind of limiting principle.
	There has to be non-political raps, and hobbies are them.
	And when you have these political crusaders turning up, inserting it into the hobby, no, no.
	You're trying to take over the thing and turn it into a realm of your politics, and you have to gatekeep away from that.
	So, Prime Minister Boris Johnson has also kind of weighed in in his characteristically spineless way.
	He says he supported their right to take the knee, but to his credit, he also didn't condemn the booing, which is the unfortunate standard we have to judge Boris Johnson against, considering how he's been recently.
	What did he specifically say on their right to take the knee?
	He just said he supported their right to take the knee, but he didn't actually support them doing it per se.
	Yeah, you have the right to be Marxist, but he should have supported the booing and be like, yeah, but Marxism is cringe.
	Don't mention that.
	He also said when dealing with racism, he prefers actions to gestures, which sounds like it's straight from a communist's mouth, which is kind of concerning for a conservative prime minister that he is taking action...
	Although, to be fair, he kind of characterises it with the race report and things like that.
	To me, so I imagine he's assuming, talking about, like, if there's a player who's saying the M-word or something to all the other players or something like that, then you can argue, like, then that's actually a thing.
	But you guys just sitting around and being like, yeah, racism is bad, isn't it?
	Like, it does nothing.
	It does absolutely nothing.
	Absolutely, yeah.
	It's just virtue signaling at the end of the day.
	So, to kind of make things seem a bit better, unlike Boris Johnson, there have been senior ministers who have come out and said they will not take the knee.
	So, Priti Patel, for example, the Home Secretary, Foreign Minister Dominic Raab, and Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden have all said categorically that they will not take the knee.
	Which is reassuring, I suppose.
	Oliver Dowden I'm kind of surprised about because he did the online harms bill which basically ends internet privacy and allows expansion of hate crime legislation.
	So he's not a conservative.
	So essentially this is a list of MPs who are like, yeah, I'm not a Marxist.
	But it's unfortunately relatively small.
	So even the Football Association, the overarching organisation, said that it was disappointing that Boris Johnson didn't condemn the booing.
	So even the overarching organisation is weighing in, which is just ridiculous, really.
	Why are these organisations getting political?
	It's annoying.
	Anyway, moving on to more positive things.
	Former England player John Barnes has also condemned this sort of thing.
	He says that football cannot solve racism.
	Society can, councils can, governments can, depending on what your interpretation of racism is.
	Governments can solve racism.
	Yeah, okay.
	I mean, we already have laws against it to the point that anyone who posts anything even offensive online goes to jail and racism isn't solved.
	But okay, I mean, what do we need to do?
	Just start murdering people in the streets who show any kinds of white privilege and then racism solved?
	I mean, how far do you want to go with this?
	It's already criminal.
	You get jail sentences for it.
	He's a professional footballer.
	You're not going to expect the best political commentary.
	Yeah, but still, I mean, it's something so stupid.
	I know, it is dumb.
	Like, governments can solve racism.
	Oh, boy.
	Or if we just make it illegal.
	It's already illegal, mate.
	This is meant to be the thing that's meant to cheer you up.
	It's just dumb.
	But yeah, when he was speaking about black footballers potentially getting statues, this is for some reason something that people are discussing.
	He said, I'd much rather give up this honour for us to deal with problems of knife crime, jobs, housing, education for young black kids rather than giving me or footballers or black managers an opportunity to raise themselves to the upper echelons of society while neglecting 90% of people.
	So we'd rather deal with actual problems instead of...
	Yeah.
	And this is what it should look like.
	This kind of activism.
	If you want to help the black community, you want to be doing stuff like this.
	Not taking the knee.
	Because it doesn't solve anything.
	In fact, it makes things worse because it makes people annoyed with you for showing your fealty to a Marxist organisation.
	So, you can see some of the reactions to this were, as you can imagine, pretty horrific.
	So, if we look at some of these comments, lots of people calling him an effing coon, which isn't exactly very nice.
	I mean, that's the progressives there.
	I call them a racial slur because I'm a progressive.
	I mean, that's what's going on here.
	Anyone who goes against the narrative, this is what you get.
	So no wonder these people are kind of falling in.
	Of course, Palestinian flag there as well, as John is pointing out.
	That's right.
	Surprise, surprise.
	So, on a more positive note, the football club Brentford have announced that they're going to stop taking the knee.
	They say that they feel gestures against discrimination no longer require...
	Taking the knee, I suppose.
	And they say, we believe that we can use our time and energies to promote racial equality in other ways.
	You shouldn't.
	Racial equality.
	What on earth does that mean?
	Not the best, but at least...
	We should be fighting for racial freedom or racial tolerance, something like that, right?
	In which people are free to go about their business as they see fit, and people shouldn't judge each other on the basis of their skin tone.
	Absolutely.
	Not equality.
	Communist standard.
	So, Queen's Park Rangers as well have announced that they're not going to take the knee.
	Middlesbrough, which ironically is Gareth Southgate's former club, have also announced that they're not going to do so anymore.
	And also, Crystal Palace winger Wilfried Zaha, who is a person of colour, to use their terminology, said taking the knee gesture was degrading, which it definitely is.
	It's not wrong.
	You're bending down.
	It's like a show of inferiority to something, isn't it?
	Taking the knee.
	This is why you take the knee to the Queen and God only.
	Yeah, and doing it to a bunch of Marxists who burnt down half of America.
	Why would you want to be subservient to these people?
	You shouldn't give them any respect.
	You should be chastising them, telling them that they are communist scum, and that would be that.
	Thanks.
	So, you're going to talk about Keir Starmer and the Labour Party, and we always seem to be insulting the Labour Party every time on the podcast.
	Not that that's a complaint.
	To be honest, the Labour Party do it to themselves.
	Every week they've done something really stupid, all decided to shoot themselves in the head again, because, I don't know, it's their favourite hobby, I guess.
	Just like, yeah, look at the time, it's five o'clock.
	Just every week with these people.
	But the most recent one is, of course, one of the worst ones, in my opinion.
	Because I'm just going to say, like, Kirsten is essentially just endorsing prison rape at this point.
	And you might think I'm being over-exaggerating with that point, but I'll prove to you I'm not.
	So, Keir Starmer has decided to endorse self-ID. So if you say you're a man or a woman, that's it.
	That should be the law.
	That's his opinion.
	That's what he thinks the Labour government should do if they ever become one.
	Let's hope they shan't.
	So this is in response, of course, to the fact that Keir Starmer is dropping in the polls like a stone, along with the rest of the Labour Party.
	So if you scroll down here, this is just the polling for parliamentary intentions.
	Across the UK, you can see Labour getting absolutely destroyed there.
	Just falling and falling and falling, rightfully.
	They should be lower though.
	Rookie numbers should be in the 20s.
	But if we go to the next one here, so you remember we were talking about Pink News yesterday.
	Pink News decided to make a new pride flag and also decide that anyone who wants to transition, if they say they're a man, then they should be allowed into male spaces and vice versa.
	Or if you say you're a woman, into female spaces such as female prisons or female refuges or changing rooms and so on and so forth.
	And so he came out and defended them, especially after this terrible interview they gave about all this.
	And this is him in a video for them, which is like five minutes long, something ridiculous, in which he just waffles on and on.
	But here's the fundamentals of it being he endorsing self-ID. Let's play this.
	The values of equality, of justice and of fairness are so important to me.
	Trans people are one of the most discriminated against groups in our society.
	And those who pioneered LGBT rights too often find NHS and social care services are not inclusive and don't fit their needs.
	Labour knows how much work there is to do.
	We will always stand as an ally with the LGBT plus community in the fight for true equality.
	We're campaigning to ensure conversion therapy is banned once and for all.
	And we're committed to updating the GRA to introduce self-declaration for trans people.
	Firstly, just what a failure of a speaker.
	I feel like I'm falling asleep listening to him.
	It's really insincere.
	There's nothing there that makes you want to engage.
	But also the music.
	Yeah, I was just about to say, it's like an advert on the TV. It's like they're celebrating it or something.
	And he's like, yeah, trans people are the most oppressed people in the UK. Yeah.
	I don't know who chose that.
	The people who make these videos are idiots.
	Well, it's pink news after all.
	Yeah, so he says equality, justice and fairness is his values.
	You'll notice how those are separate because they're not consistent.
	You can't have all of them at the same time.
	You can't have fairness and equality there.
	It doesn't work.
	You can't be free and equal.
	You know, inequality is the result of freedom.
	So if you want to be free, you have to have inequality.
	Equality is a false god.
	So he also says that the NHS is not being inclusive enough to trans needs.
	I agree with him on this, because the NHS has organisations like Tavistock, who insist on going as fast as possible for cutting off your genitals, which is not inclusive to people's needs.
	That's not the place you should be going instantly.
	So, right on that, but for the wrong reasons.
	He also says that Labour will fight for true equality.
	Well, it's thanks to the Equality Act 2010, passed by Labour, that we have all these problems.
	That we are in such a quagmire of a mess.
	And we have open discrimination against whites, men, and heterosexuals, as we have previously documented.
	I mean, there are people who've gone for the police force, and then the police have had to apologise, or had to go to court and then lose on the fact that they were discriminating against white people, men, and heterosexual applicants for jobs.
	That's thanks to you.
	That's thanks to the Equality Act.
	So to say this is not true equality?
	Okay.
	I dread to think what true equality feels like.
	But...
	The Soviet Union, I'd imagine.
	Yeah, so he says that he wants to introduce self-identification, and of course the absolute fruitcakes of Mermaids have endorsed this, so this is Mermaids' account here.
	Self-ID has existed in countries around the world, including Ireland, for years.
	There is no evidence it has any negative impact on cisgender women.
	None.
	Full stop.
	Right.
	Okay.
	How can they categorically say that?
	They can't.
	They're liars.
	This really irritated me because we have the rapist names.
	Like, we have them.
	There is no cis woman who's ever been harmed by self-ID. Say that to the women who've been raped.
	I'm sorry.
	It's just so, so...
	Ignorant of the situation.
	I mean, willfully ignorant, in my opinion.
	They're just being deceitful.
	There's no way they don't know at this point.
	So, if we go to the next link here, I mean, this is it.
	Trans inmate jailed in Wakefield prison for sex offences.
	So this was someone who was a man and had raped two women outside, was a danger to children and women, as described from the judge, engaging in noncery as well, and was sent to prison for this, male prison, and then was like, nah, I'm a woman.
	So Self-ID demanded that we put that person in the female prison.
	You know what they didn't film at prison?
	Sexually assaulted the inmates.
	But no, there's no evidence that it's ever harmed cisgender women.
	Except the inmates who have been sexually assaulted, I suppose.
	So, it's saying here that she was given a life sentence for all of this.
	So if we go to the next link, this is just ergo trans prisons.
	This is why the first UK transgender prison unit to open was set up.
	For exactly this purpose.
	Not just segregating them from the general population.
	This isn't bigotry or transphobia or any other...
	No.
	You can't put male rapists in with female inmates.
	And to say that there's been no evidence of any cis woman who's ever been harmed by all of this...
	They are lying scum.
	I'm sorry.
	That's just a horrible, horrible thing to say.
	There is no way they don't know.
	They knowingly are lying to people about this.
	And they know that there are serious consequences.
	It's...
	Anyway...
	So Keir Starmer endorsing self-ID. Freudian slip there.
	Daily Stormer is probably a new name to dance to Daily.
	But the fact that he is endorsing self-ID, that is why I say he is endorsing rape there.
	That is what he's doing.
	He is someone who's coming along and saying, hey, I endorse the fact that if you're a male rapist, you should be able to go to a female prison.
	Right.
	And what do you think they're going to do in the female prison?
	They are in prison for raping women.
	Vote Labour.
	Vote for that.
	God.
	So the public hate this, in case you're wondering.
	So this is people retweeting that and just doing like the YouGov polls.
	I mean YouGov as well, not even like polling of the United Kingdom in total.
	And you can see that people think that a person should or should not be able to obtain a doctor's approval to change their legal gender.
	63% are yes.
	And again, doctor's approval, not just because I feel like it.
	Because that's not good enough.
	That's just not good enough.
	As example by the male rapists in female prisons.
	I mean, I don't know why you have to have an argument beyond that point.
	It's just like, right, okay.
	Male rapists, put in female prison, sexually assault the inmates.
	We're done.
	We're done with the conversation about staff ID. I don't care what your opinion is on, like, oh, I should be able to go to a certain bathroom or a changing room.
	No, no, no, no.
	Come on, there are serious issues here.
	And you're just saying, oh, no, it's just simplistic or whatever.
	Lies.
	So the TERFs also hate this.
	Apparently there are loads of TERFs in Labour still.
	And I saw them, like, cutting up their cards and whatnot and posting it.
	Good for them.
	Why are you guys in there?
	Leave.
	This party is ruined.
	Like, from the bottom up, all of it is trash.
	There is no saving it.
	Leave the Labour Party, for Christ's sake.
	So this is someone here saying, bye Keir Starmer, foolish move, hashtag Labour losing women.
	And hashtag Labour losing women was trending all day.
	So if we go to the next one, this is just if you look up the hashtag, you can see loads of tweets of people being like, you guys are absolutely nuts.
	I'm not sticking around for stuff like that.
	I don't know what this tweet is.
	I just put the hashtag in.
	No, I mean, like, if you scroll, John, just to show the number of tweets, I don't really have an interest in this particular tweeter.
	But the fact that it, like, I love this one here, actually, which is, I think I ordered too much, but then I saw Keir Starmer's statement about self-ID, and he's got these suffragette colours of a bunch of ribbons, because women are women, not trans women are women.
	As the women weren't weashed as well.
	Yeah, the people being arrested for saying that women would be silent.
	But anyway, so there was that.
	And then, of course, the leftists also aren't happy with him because how dare he not purge the TERFs?
	That's the real thing.
	You remember Rosie Duffield, the TERF MP for Canterbury?
	Vaguely.
	Yeah, so she's a Labour MP for Canterbury.
	She's trash.
	Get rid of her.
	If you live in Canterbury, don't go for her.
	She's awful.
	But the only redeeming feature she has is that she is a TERF. She is on the opinion that women are women.
	Which, yeah, controversial.
	So you can see some verified checkmark, he, him, and the bio, saying, this means nothing whilst Rosie Duffield still has the whip.
	So, leftists calling for purges, nothing changes.
	But just like, if you don't purge everyone who disagrees with us, then you're not really supporting trans rights.
	And I suppose so.
	I suppose so.
	Fine, go on.
	Purge more.
	Purge more.
	I'm sure that'll be great for your powerful movement.
	I hate to bring a quote from Obama in, but didn't he recently say that the progressive left has become a circular firing squad recently?
	This is the perfect example of it.
	What year is Obama?
	Is this 2012?
	This has been going on for a decade now.
	He's only just noticed.
	He's like, hang on, I think there might be something a bit wrong.
	You don't say.
	But there's Brainlit's one and all about this, and I'll just verify checkmarts.
	There are loads of them, so there's just someone commenting underneath Rosie Duffield.
	Palestinian flag as well, of course.
	We'll go to the next one, there's just someone else also just like Rosie Duffield, ring a bell to get a starmer here because, oh god, this dreadful woman has the opinion that women are women and is still in the Labour Party.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	She's garbage though, so get rid of her.
	But also, just tough.
	I can't get over the number of people I saw ripping up their Labour membership cards and whatnot over this.
	I'm just like, why are you people still there?
	I mean, for multiple years now, we've seen under Corbyn them decide that women aren't women.
	Well, this isn't new.
	It's just the most new thing of the leader himself endorsing the position that if you say you're a woman, that's it.
	That's all you need.
	Head on to the prison, you lad.
	Anyway.
	So, in case you're wondering, I guess this is him trying to improve his polling.
	I don't know who with, because his polling is still going down further and further.
	Not just the party, but Starmer himself, as we show here.
	So, Starmer's ratings fall further now at the same levels as Corbyn.
	14 months in.
	Just one in five Britons are satisfied with the job the Labour leader is doing.
	Britons more likely to think Boris Johnson, 45%, and Andy Burnham, 37%, have what it takes to be a good MP than Starmer, 24%.
	It's PM, not MP. Although, I'm sure Starmer isn't a good MP either.
	But just, yeah, I mean, absolutely in the toilet.
	I mean, in the same position that Corbyn was in, for Christ's sake.
	That's quite a failure for Starmer, really, isn't it?
	Because when you showed their polling, six months ago, there was at least some degree of competition.
	I think the Conservatives were just marginally ahead.
	Yeah.
	But, I mean, he could have used that to his advantage, that popularity at the time.
	But it's just plummeted now.
	And it's not just some vaccine boom.
	I bet there are so many, like, Labourites who are like, no, it's just because of the vaccine.
	We'll bounce back.
	No, you won't.
	No, you won't.
	You don't deserve to bounce back.
	You deserve to be in the toilet.
	And that's where you go.
	So the fact that Starmer is now where Corbyn was, I love it.
	But let's get lower.
	Keep going lower.
	I want to see the Labour Party extinguished from British politics for all time.
	I never want to see them come back.
	Anyway, so there's more on this as well, which is, so we've got the next link here.
	This is a survey saying, plurality of British voters would support replacing Keir Starmer as a leader of the Labour Party.
	So 37% of the public think Labour Party should change its leader now, compared to 28% who think it should not.
	So the majority of the British public are also just like, yeah, this goes trash, get rid of them.
	It's not even just of the Labour membership and whatnot.
	Everyone is in agreement that this guy is worthless.
	They say they want to replace him with Andy Burnham here.
	Is that really much better?
	Who cares about Andy Burnham's opinions on anything?
	If he comes up tomorrow and he's like, yeah, I'm a TERF, women are women, so on and so forth, it doesn't matter.
	He's still in the same stupid quagmire the entire party is, because there's a party of hundreds of thousands of people.
	I mean, hundreds of thousands of just SJWs.
	I mean, you watch the party conference, these people clap any old SJW nonsense, and if someone comes up and says something sensible, silence.
	Not interested.
	So, I mean, that's the thing.
	There is no saving it.
	Turfs, leave.
	Leave.
	I don't care what party you go to afterwards, although the only one that believes women are women is currently the Conservatives and UKIP and Reform, I guess, and Heritage as well, but...
	That's your choices.
	If you want anything that believes in biology, those are the choices.
	Labour, not one of them.
	Let it die.
	Let it fall into obscurity.
	I love bashing the Labour Party.
	It's becoming a weekly thing at this point.
	They're just so good at creating ammunition for us.
	I'm going to endorse prison rape.
	Yeah, okay, that's going to help.
	Anyway, let's go for the video comments.
	G'day, guys.
	First things first, my weekly Callum troll.
	Now, for what's actually serious, I reckon that the current state of Islam is the end point of feminism.
	Your thoughts?
	Huh.
	I mean, with how misogynistic the intersectionals are, I mean, maybe.
	I mean, maybe we'll get there.
	But, I mean, they also can't oppose Islam in any aspect, because, of course, it's the religion of the Browns, in their view.
	It's obviously not.
	It's a religion.
	It doesn't have a skin tone.
	But in progressive land, it's untouchable.
	So, I mean, how can they argue against it?
	It just reminds me of the Islam is right about women thing, where it makes people's heads explode.
	They don't know which side to take.
	But the progressives don't know either.
	I mean, remember, we had the first battle of Islam versus leftism in, what was it, the BBC Women's Hour, because it was the Women's Hour radio, and the host asked the new progressive...
	Muslim Council of Britain leader, why are there no female imams?
	And the feminists lost that argument.
	Like, the response universally from the left wing was, how dare you ask this?
	It's a very insensitive question.
	You don't understand theology, blah blah blah, instead of supporting her.
	Which, if they'd done this to Christianity, of course the entire left would back her and be like, yes, we need more female priests.
	But in the question of Islam, no, not to be touched.
	So, I mean, even if it doesn't lead you to that point eventually, they're going to lose the battle.
	Islamo-leftism will end with Islam.
	The leftism will be punished.
	Did you know socialism is haram?
	Anyway, let's go to the next one.
	Hey, Carl and Callum.
	With it being an election next year here in South Australia, I've decided that it's time to get re-involved with politics in the States, so I'm going to get back involved with the I'm a Conservative Party, so let's see how well we can do it, trying to convince them to be a little bit more based and red-peeled about a few things, because I have a feeling they don't really understand stuff, at least from what I've talked about with them in the past.
	Well, that's good news.
	That's good to hear it.
	Good for you for getting involved as well.
	And that is fundamentally what matters.
	I would encourage anyone who feels downtrodden by the, you know, I'm a conservatives to essentially join and slowly red pill the local area.
	Because you're radicalising them into reality.
	I mean, if they believe that you can just become a woman by saying it, conservatives...
	You can't radicalise someone into reality.
	That is, like, the centre point.
	No, but if they're living in non-reality, okay, come on.
	You need to go and live in reality there.
	And yeah, good luck to you.
	I think it's really important to get involved and actually do stuff because otherwise you're going to be watching things unfold and just despairing, feeling powerless when you don't actually do anything about it.
	But it'll make you feel a lot better.
	That you're being able to make a difference, at least where you live, which is probably the most important place for you to do it in the first place.
	Well, not just that, but also nationally.
	I mean, like in the UK, for example, we can't vote for our leaders.
	We don't vote for the PM. It's the party leader who becomes the PM, whoever wins the most seats, right?
	So how does that happen?
	Well, you have to be a member of the party to vote for the leader.
	So if you're a member of the Conservative Party, you've got a lot more power than your average voter because you'd actually vote for whoever's going to be the leader there.
	So, what is the Conservative Party, 100,000 members or something?
	I'm not sure.
	Yeah, but the swing for leader is not much, so if you manage to organise in that way, yeah, I mean, you can do these things.
	It's not just, you know, like, this podcast isn't going to be able to do it on its own.
	Wow.
	It's got to be a mass thing of organisation.
	Give us a while, we might be able to.
	But that's the point.
	If you can organise around that sort of thing, then you can get stuff done, which is what I love about seeing in the United States with the Trump movement.
	They've done it.
	They've won that argument.
	The Republican Party is the Trump Party now.
	Done.
	You know, the rhinos just bleed them out.
	But in the UK and Australia, more work to be done.
	Does anyone else remember the start of the coronavirus?
	The government response was, oh...
	Every country was just like, ignore Donald Trump, go hug a Chinese person.
	It'll stop the spread and it'll stop hate.
	And it's a case of, oh, that really, really helps, didn't it?
	No, it didn't.
	You idiots.
	And so at this point, I'm convinced if some zombie plague happened, they'd fucking airdrop zombies into cities.
	I didn't really get the last bit there, but...
	If there was, like, a zombie apocalypse, they would just airdrop the zombies into a city, that's what you said.
	Yeah, Nancy Pelosi probably would.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Ugh, I hate you guys for making me do this, but as a matter of principle, I must defend the films that don't suck.
	Moana is one I know you have liked, Carl.
	So here's some other ones.
	Inception, Interstellar, 1917, Dunkirk, Mad Max Fury Road, Legend, and last but not least, Ford vs.
	Ferrari, chaps.
	Not Fast and Furious.
	Ford vs.
	Ferrari.
	There you go, there's a few.
	I've seen all of those films, except the Ford vs Ferrari one, and they are good films.
	I haven't seen them all, but I agree.
	I don't know, what's Moana?
	I don't know.
	Actually, I haven't seen that one either.
	Oh, sorry.
	Carl's not here, so let's give it to the next one.
	Hey guys, how's it going?
	I had an idea.
	I want to run by you.
	What if you could swap your plus one vote for a minus one vote?
	I think that actually better represents people's political opinions.
	Anyone but Labour.
	Anyone but the Tories.
	I think it's a good idea.
	That's quite a good idea, actually.
	Just, yeah.
	I don't really care who's in power, but not these people.
	Yeah, I mean...
	I don't know.
	Is there an argument against that?
	I mean, I've got...
	I mean, if everyone voted against Labour, then you'd just get the Green Party, which is just even worse.
	No, but I mean, if you actually like the Conservatives, then you'd vote for them.
	But if you're in a situation where...
	I mean, in a lot of places with constituency vote in the UK as well, you might not even get a Conservative candidate.
	I mean, because you have the association in your constituency...
	We'll raise a candidate up and they've got to pay the money and they're campaigning and all the rest of it.
	So sometimes when you get places where there just is no candidate for the party you like, in which case, what are you meant to do?
	I mean, they say you're meant to spoil the banner, but that's sort of a waste of time.
	Being able to do minus one would actually be pretty cool.
	It'd be interesting to see if there's a constituency where it's just minus for all of the candidates.
	That's not a bad idea.
	I mean, people put it in the chat if there's a counter-argument to that, but that seems like a good idea to me.
	But I'd love to see a pilot scheme trying it out somewhere, just see what happens.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	Also, cool suit of armour.
	Go to the next one.
	So, what you're saying is, Dave Cullen was right about everything.
	Right, okay.
	So, debunking the narrative.
	I didn't get to read all of them.
	I didn't get it.
	I didn't get a chance to read all the titles there, so if there was a point there with the titles, I didn't get to.
	I can read them on here.
	Prison Planet?
	Commuting Forever, Responding to WHO Global Response Pledge.
	I don't actually know anything about those topics, so I don't really know what to say.
	Sorry.
	Go to the next one.
	My response to Ayn Rand's critique is that while it is true that we have desires and impulses and whatever we do necessarily satisfies some of them, we as humans select between them.
	We choose which ones to intentionally strengthen or weaken.
	While the rational egoist or Randian would choose which impulses to strengthen based on the maximization of one's own happiness, the Christian or virtue ethicist would select on the basis of other criteria, and thus could not be appropriately accused of living a purely selfish life, because that is not what we are optimizing our desires and satisfactions for.
	Yeah, true.
	I mean, I don't know if you know about this, but we and Carl were talking about it.
	So if there's an individual who does good, because then you get pleasure out of doing the good, then is that advice in and of itself?
	You know, you're like the holy of now priests who think that, you know, I live such a pure life and it's clearly about vanity for them, which then it's also advice.
	Yeah, I think although it is good to pursue things that provide you meaning, the Randian view of pursuing happiness I think is unsustainable because you need to think of happiness in its neurochemical form where Where it increases, there is a deficit, therefore it's not a sustainable thing.
	Because if you have really high levels of serotonin and dopamine in your brain, which makes you feel good, then eventually there's going to be a deficit where it was lower than it was initially.
	So you want to raise the point of equilibrium rather than...
	You want to reach that point of balance in all things rather than happiness.
	But that's a bit of Eastern philosophy, maybe.
	Okay.
	Anyway, let's go to the comments.
	So, two number nines, number nine large, says Kamala Harris is the embodiment of diversity hire.
	True.
	She just travels around saying, I'm a female person of colour, and anyone who asks her if she's actually doing anything, she just joker laughs with psycho babbles.
	Yeah.
	I don't know what it is with her laugh as well.
	It is really weird.
	Like, I don't know who's worse.
	Her or Hillary Clinton on that front.
	She just laughs for no reason as well.
	Like, she'd be like, yeah, some children died.
	Ha ha ha!
	It's like, why are you laughing then?
	I don't know if we featured it before, but I remember the BBC when they did a thing trying to explain to British people who is Kamala Harris.
	They literally had a picture of her, and then circles, and it just ticked the box, and then the words came out, and it was literally, person of colour, woman.
	I was like, right, okay, so we're literally box ticking now, are we, BBC? That's entirely what she's about, which, yeah, at least the BBC says that.
	So, Dan Arthur, I quite enjoy the fact that Guatemala goes from their land is being destroyed by natural disasters, they have a right to be in America, to sod off discount Mexicans, borders are borders, simple as, purely because they were based about the election and trolled her at the airport.
	Yeah, I did see there were a bunch of people who went down with, like, Trump was, uh, Trump won signs to her motorcade, to, to, to, to, I didn't know that.
	I love the idea that that is what made her do it.
	It's just like, whatever, discount Mexicans.
	Like, it will turn you back.
	So, Carbohydrate Crusader.
	I hate how Kamala Harris speaks.
	She sounds like the ultimate Giga Karen of the free world.
	True.
	Shake a silver.
	Remain in Mexico was actually a policy Trump implemented for processing migrants, as well as using Guatemala as a safe third country.
	Biden immediately ended this policy, obviously.
	They need their underpaid and dubiously legal serf class.
	True.
	I didn't know he actually used it as a policy for Guatemala.
	I know he had a point in which he was saying stay in Mexico, but I thought that was under the auspices of you could transfer COVID and then that was the reason being used.
	Of course, no one actually cares about that.
	It was just about stay in Mexico.
	But if he did, then yeah, cool.
	I mean, you can stay there.
	And if you don't want to, fine, I'll fly you to Guatemala.
	Now what?
	Yeah, but I want to go to the United States.
	Yeah, too bad.
	You'd have a right.
	Just go through the legal means.
	It's not much to ask.
	In fact, it's the bare minimum to ask.
	But okay.
	Michael, long name.
	When you're so progressive, you make the loop back to the position of Donald Trump.
	I don't think it's that.
	I mean, the progressive position would be to just get rid of the border and to encourage as many people to come as possible.
	Biden and Harris have done the latter.
	They've given out the signals of please come, and people did, en masse.
	But I don't think the Donald Trump position is the progressive position.
	I think it's just the local position of saying, no, we have rules.
	Well, the rules, you know, they're standards.
	Northamptian Night.
	Have you heard that the Guatemala public told Kamala Harris to get lost and sort her own country out?
	Base Guatemalans.
	Also, that Kamala tried to butter up the press with cookies in her own image.
	What?
	Just duck-duck-go Kamala cookies.
	John, can you look that up?
	Kamala cookies.
	I want to see, is she handing out cookies with her face?
	Her own face on, probably.
	God.
	I can see this happening.
	I don't know what the point in buttering up the...
	Oh no.
	That's not good.
	That doesn't even look like I'd want to eat it.
	I never imagined this level of narcissism the title of the article was.
	So for people listening, it's like a cookie made...
	Spot on!
	It looks just like her.
	Kind of like her, except her face is completely blank.
	They've just gotten rid of every...
	Her eyes aren't there, her nose, there's no mouth.
	It's just a blank face.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	It's only important that she's a woman of colour.
	Nothing else matters.
	Well, yeah, I mean, maybe it's 4D chess from the bakery that made this.
	They're just like, well, she's a thirsty hire, so who cares?
	Oh, boy.
	Yeah, that's awesome.
	Thanks for telling us.
	I don't know why she'd need to bribe the press, though.
	I mean, you say the press fawn over them, because they're all Democrats.
	So, Matthew Wilson.
	Come to America.
	Don't come to America.
	Double think.
	The act of believing two contradictory beliefs to be true at the same time without questioning or displaying doubt.
	Yeah.
	Daily Ask, I think it's more that they know that one of them is true and the other one is the lie they tell themselves.
	Henry Ashman.
	The Harris government is really showing just how easy it is to be in opposition.
	Promising the earth for free from a magic money tree is essentially your words mean nothing.
	Yeah, that's all they did.
	I like how everyone's calling it the Harris government now, or President Harris.
	I think it's the right thing to do.
	Because if Joe Biden's going to keep saying it, for starters, and also the fact that the White House itself says the White House position is not the Joe Biden position, Joe Biden's position doesn't matter.
	I mean, screw it.
	Just call it President Harris.
	Just see how long it takes before he resigns, I guess.
	It's not going to be long, is it, really?
	I mean, what are we going to do?
	I mean, if Trump started doing this, it would probably be like, yeah, President Harris, that's the point.
	Or like, oh, President Harris has done this, you know.
	I think it would drive him nuts.
	It's not even been a year yet, has it?
	Biden's already being sidelined, more or less.
	It's very strange how quickly it's happened.
	Anyway, so he says, I'm not sure if it's good that the Dems are getting chewed out in the media or not.
	The message is not, quote, look, shit's complicated, yo.
	It's, quote, look, the Dems are traitors to their promises.
	Burn it all down, comrades.
	Maybe.
	Maybe, yeah.
	I mean, for the leftists who are complaining, being like, oh, look, they're just Trump.
	Let's just go for socialism and burn everything down.
	That's true.
	But, I mean, the correct thing is just to enforce the law and arrest those people.
	But, I don't know.
	I'm hoping the message is getting through to the normies.
	Because, I mean, getting through to socialists, don't waste your time.
	It's like arguing with brick wall.
	But to the normies who are thinking, oh yeah, Trump, he did some bad things on the border or something, and then seeing President Harris do the same things, surely that's going to get through to them in their head, which is actually not.
	There is the right way to do this, and Trump was right.
	There is some benefit, though, to having the far left.
	They're going back against their promises and getting them frothing at the mouth because the more they become alienated with the Democratic Party, the less likely they are to vote for it and the more likely they are to distance themselves from it, which means that it weakens the Democrats.
	Sure.
	If AOC and the Socialist Democrat group left...
	The squad.
	Not just the squad, but the acronym for the Socialist Group of Democrats.
	Traitors.
	Yeah, that works.
	If they all left, I mean, what would be left of the Democratic Party?
	I mean, if there was a Socialist Party that took up 15% of the vote and then there's Democrats on, like, 30 or something, like...
	Yeah, if they split the vote...
	What would be the point of them?
	I mean, literally just careerist politicians.
	Who cares?
	Peter says, Yeah, true.
	Luke says, Yeah, I think that's probably true.
	Politicians still haven't figured that out.
	Because you see it way too often.
	And I know they used to be able to get away with it, but you can't do that now.
	The internet exists, boys.
	Thon Way.
	Well, to be completely fair, Guatemala, Honduras, Salvador, etc.
	have some serious mob cartel problems themselves too.
	They are the original Banana Republics, if I recall correctly.
	You do, I think.
	Also, a history of some rather distasteful US meddling.
	True.
	I'm still 100% for the wool and legal immigration.
	It's just me reacting to Callum's comparison to Mexico's cartel problems.
	Sure.
	I mean, you can argue that they have problems, but what country doesn't have problems?
	Well, I mean, the cartels in South America are particularly bad.
	Well, the cartels in Mexico are listed as an active conflict, and then you can argue, well, it's a serious deal.
	But if it's Guatemala and whatnot, it's not listed as a serious deal, and then, well, what?
	I mean, what standard do you say that there's so much going on that you ought to just forget the border, let people in, keep them safe from the horrors on the other side, which I'm not convinced Mexico is that bad, in my opinion.
	Because, I mean, what the standard for that, in my mind, is Syrian civil war territory, in which you've got groups like ISIS, who are just barbarians, and not to mention you've got an oppressive government that's just slaughtering people, or an active war zone.
	I mean, it doesn't have to necessarily be that bad with the groups, but if it's an active war zone, fair enough.
	I mean, people have got to flee from the front lines.
	But there is not an act of war.
	I'm sorry.
	There are safe places to go that are not the United States.
	So I just don't buy it.
	Anyway, but also, yeah, I mean, the Banana Republic thing is the US is bad, but if we're accepting that if you did something wrong to a country, we deserve your entire population, I'm not sure that's going to turn out either.
	So Brad Dillon says, new border law for the US, if you cross the border illegally, you will be sent home and put on a blacklist for a lifetime ban.
	You'll never be able to legally immigrate or step foot on US soil again.
	If you want to get really based, also have it apply to all the family members too.
	You will see illegal immigration drop off in a fortnight.
	Yeah.
	Or they would just not bring any ID with them, and then they would just be able to get away with making up their name.
	Well, thanks to the miracles of science, biometric checks.
	That's a fair point.
	Yeah, and then you just document them.
	We'll give you a number.
	There you go.
	That doesn't look bad, does it?
	Look, you're the one who threw your ID in the sea.
	Like, we've got the videos.
	You know, they're posted on TikTok.
	You're saying it like it's me.
	No, but you see them moaning about this.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	I'm sure people have seen it, but there are TikTok videos of migrants, particularly in the Calais border crossing, who are in the boat, and they film themselves all smiling and celebrating, like, yeah, we're going to get there.
	And then they film themselves with their ID and then throwing it into the sea.
	I remember us talking about it on Friday, was it, when I was last on the podcast, when I covered the migrant crossings and stuff.
	It's so annoying.
	They want to lie to the authorities.
	They know that if they actually show them the idea, they'll be like, you're a chancer, so off.
	But no, I'm from Syria.
	Do you speak Arabic?
	Habibi.
	Do you want me to read some of these?
	Sure, if you want to go from Joseph Woodland.
	Sure.
	On the England team kneeling, imagine what would happen if one player refused to kneel.
	Massive fan endorsement, media lynching, but let's be real, sports teams are completely based on merit anyways, right?
	Right?
	Yeah, I think it would probably actually help people.
	Although they wouldn't get along well with their own team, probably, it would get them a lot of support from the fans, wouldn't it?
	Because they're the ones booing, and I don't think everyone who's watching football is endorsing Black Lives Matter, that's for sure.
	So I don't think it would damage them nearly as much as they might think.
	But it's not like the clubs or the FA or anyone involved cares about the fans, let's be honest.
	Yeah, well...
	I've seen people comparing this to the UEFA Super League thing that was tried, and people coming out being like, yeah, you're not in the interests of the fans as the defence.
	I was like, yeah, but none of you are in the interests of the fans anyway.
	It's all about money at the end of the day.
	It's embarrassing to see the FA and whatnot be like, yeah, that's bad for the fans, but also take the knee.
	Everyone loves this.
	No, they don't.
	Chris Bird, I'll be happy to support their fight for equality just as soon as their footballers are earning £8.91 per hour.
	Yeah, come on, let's start at home.
	Equality starts at home, chaps.
	Yeah, they make ridiculous money, don't they?
	So, don't really feel too bad.
	It's like, oh, they've said bad words, but also, I'm going to drive home in my Maserati.
	No, if you're going to endorse socialism, live by your principles.
	Take the minimum wage.
	That's going to be their wage.
	Any England players that are watching, you can donate your car to me.
	I would quite like a nice sports car.
	What a good model.
	If you take a knee at a football game, you're on minimum wage from now on.
	See how many of them take the knee.
	Luke Robinson taking the knee for the holy god Karl Marx and his prophet George Floyd.
	I mean, that is actually a position of Nancy Pelosi.
	That's true, yeah.
	Dan Arthur, the Hungarian arm point reminds me of something the base Polish team did during their England-Poland friendly.
	While England took the knee, the Polish made a mark of respect, and thanks to the English for fighting for them during the World War II shows where our priorities are.
	Yeah, that's so much better.
	Well done, Poland.
	Everything about Poland always sounds base.
	It does, yeah.
	Henry Ashman, I wonder if the fans should start chanting, kick it out, alongside the booing or the UEFA no to racism slogan.
	That would really help with the optics, and it's not saying we're all racist, and it's BLM is political BS. Just think in my head, like, you know the organisations stand up to racism as well?
	I mean, that's why I'm like, the co-opting of the word stand up if you hate racism, as a chant, works so well.
	It's like, what are you doing?
	You're taking a knee for racism.
	LAUGHTER They need to just be chanting, you're commies and we know you are.
	That one worked too.
	Adam Ponce of Eternia.
	The FA knew that taking the knee was controversial when the fans were first let back in, at least at the end of the previous season they booed.
	The FA, PFA then decided to have a vote on whether or not to continue.
	They deliberately asked the players rather than the fans as they get the results they wanted.
	Yeah, I did hear about that, and it's not really surprising.
	They're just going for the PR, aren't they?
	They don't want to damage their reputation so they can make more money, but they're alienating the people who actually care about the sport in which they're involved, which is just stupid.
	Reputation according to who?
	They won't damage their reputation.
	Well, it's for the same reasons as all the woke companies, isn't it?
	Exactly.
	It's not the reputation of the people, it's the representation of the cathedral.
	The cathedral might not like them.
	Yeah, exactly.
	So, Justin B. The problem is, quite a few people don't realise that BLM is political.
	They only listen to progressives and legacy media who keep telling them that it isn't political.
	Also, it may be better to not use their terms when talking about the movement, say BLM, and not read it out in full.
	It will help uninitiated learn the difference.
	Yeah, I mentioned this previously.
	If I'm breaking that rule, then, you know, everyone's imperfect.
	But I think it's a good thing, especially for conservatives, because I see Boris Johnson keep saying the term Black Lives Matter, and I was just like, this is just a goal.
	Just use the term BLM. I mean, especially when you're talking about them as an organization, saying Black Lives Matter believe X, Y, and Z, it's much more difficult to get through to someone's head, I think, than saying BLM believe X, Y, Z, because then you can just point to the organization, point to what's on their website.
	You know, we want to get rid of the nuclear family.
	What's that got to do with racism?
	I'm just going to start calling them disgusting race socialists from now on.
	That's also an option, but I don't think Boris is going to do that one.
	You need to vote me PM. That's what needs to happen.
	Northamptonian night.
	Don't forget, kneeling has always been a gesture of submission, so the England team have surrendered any morals they had.
	That's exactly the point I made earlier, that it's submissive and you're submitting to evil racist Marxists.
	So do not do that.
	Sam Fletcher, we want female space marines.
	Funny thing, thanks to one particularly depraved individual, there are canon female space marines.
	Look up the...
	Oh, that is not pronounceable.
	Damon...
	Is that right?
	What was the name of the guy saying?
	Sam Fletcher.
	It should hammer home that the grim and dark parts of 40k NY equality isn't a primary ethical value in the 41st millennium.
	Next time you're asked, direct them towards that.
	Okay.
	I'm looking over the daemon colourbar.
	I imagine this is chaos.
	Sounds like chaos.
	So I'll give that a watch afterwards.
	I'm afraid this is all lost on me.
	Okay.
	Paulie P. After 1933, all sports associations in Germany had to become political or be disbanded.
	Southgate's stance has disturbing precedents and the players didn't have a choice in the process then either.
	Very true.
	There are parallels there, as we mentioned before.
	Was it the 36 Olympics?
	Yeah, it was the 1938 football game, it was the infamous one.
	So I think it was 35 Germany came to England to play, and in 38 England went to Germany to play, and that was the one where the English team joined in on the basis that it was just a salute, bro.
	Doesn't stand for anything political, bro.
	Should do it when we play Germany next, just to wind them up.
	The German players take the knee.
	Don't worry, you've got your traditions down.
	Yeah.
	Chris W., back in my day, football players only wind about their own imagined injuries.
	Yeah, that's, well, they've got imagined psychological ones as well now.
	Yeah, I just realised the Nazis leave.
	It's kind of like, there's a story from QI in which Stephen mentions, like, what was it, the new Irish government and the new Labour government, and they have the Irish round for some meeting.
	And they decide they're going to put up a picture of Oliver Cromwell to celebrate, like, democracy and stuff.
	And then the Irish walk in and they're like, what the heck is that?
	I mean, essentially, that's the reverse of doing the Nazi salute in front of the German team.
	Be like, yes, don't worry, we've got your traditions, we know you like to do this.
	And they're like, oh, for God's sake.
	Big control.
	Also, how are the players going to oppose it?
	Don't worry, it's not an endorsement of anything.
	It's a salute against racism.
	Remember, it's a Labour salute.
	Yeah.
	We're just kind of recapturing it and reimagining it like the N-word.
	It's being taken back as ownership.
	Oh, God.
	For people who don't know, yesterday we did a section of James O'Brien, in which James O'Brien's opinion was, it doesn't matter what the symbol stands for, if you redefine it, therefore it stands for your redefinition.
	So the players were saying the needs against racism, and everyone else was like, no, this is socialist nonsense.
	And he was like, no, it's just about racism because they've said so.
	So, I mean, I'm just thinking in my head, like, players cook them out, do Nazi salutes, and shout the N-word.
	But as long as they say it's against racism, then it's kosher.
	And then James O'Brien will defend it.
	For sure.
	Anyway.
	Sorry.
	Do you want to read some more comments?
	I think this is for you.
	So, Starmer endorsing prison rape.
	I really want a title of that, but it's not going to get titled that.
	So, if people can self-ID however they want, I'm sure feminists will have no problem admitting that most female rape victims are raped by other females.
	Hmm.
	Yeah, not sure how they're going to feel about that.
	When those convicted of rape are self-ID as female to avoid man jail.
	Yeah.
	I mean, it's just horrible, isn't it?
	Like, the goddamn rapist goes in and they're like, yeah, that's a woman rapist.
	What did he rape her with?
	His female penis.
	Matthew Hammond, does self-ID have limits?
	Could someone identify as a vaccinated transracial transfemale?
	Presumably not.
	You can try.
	That's a funny point he mentions, actually, because if Keir is accepting that if there was a Labour government they would pass a law for self-ID on the basis of Well, garbage, I mean transracialism, we spoke about this a lot of times.
	But if it becomes law, I mean why could you not argue on the basis that no, in British law I am transracial, I am trans 60, I deserve a pension.
	All of the straight white men could identify as lesbian trans black women and then they could be like the ultimate affirmative action.
	You'd never get turned down from a job.
	Like the civil service, 100% upper-class British men.
	How did this happen?
	Don't worry, half of them are trans lesbians.
	So, Natalie Collier, the Labour Party, for the many, not few, also the Labour Party, bends over backwards to change all institutions and society overall in order to pander to less than 1% of the population.
	Yeah, I mean, that's been the premise the whole time.
	Alex Ogle, do my ears deceive me?
	Did Keir Starmer just say the NHS wasn't inclusive enough?
	The Labour leader deriding the NHS is not a good look.
	Yeah.
	In the time of the pandemic as well, Keir.
	Oh, God.
	Bart, no name.
	Self-ID and sex-based rights.
	Funny thing, sex-based rights only exist for women.
	There are no sex-based rights exclusive to men.
	Transphobia, for male to female, is just misandery.
	Proof?
	TERFs are radical feminists.
	You can't get more man-hating than that lot.
	It's an interesting way of putting it, yeah.
	So, Kyle M. Labour for the many and the few.
	Also, Labour, let's advocate for less than 0.5% of the population.
	Wait, why aren't people voting for us?
	Well, don't worry, I'm sure the 0.5% always will.
	Oh, wait.
	It's only like a small percentage of them that even believe in any of this crap.
	I mean, most trans people don't believe in any of this nonsense.
	They're pretty solid on...
	Yeah, I mean...
	I'm not a biological woman.
	That's not happened.
	But...
	There's also the whole thing of the multiple genders, and of course, if you're transitioning, it's from one thing to another.
	Like, the linguistics of it just don't work, even in the way that they use them, if they don't accept that there are two genders.
	Yeah, I mean, that's how you get the transitioning is transphobic.
	How do you want to be a woman?
	I was always a woman.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, I used it because it was used in the person I was quoting.
	But yeah, I shouldn't.
	I should just say woman because that's true.
	Normal woman.
	Not just one woman.
	Woman.
	That's what a woman is.
	There's no need to add prefixes there.
	That's why the socialists have to add a prefix for trans.
	Because it's not just woman.
	HR Slave.
	I'm starting to think Keir Stormfront.
	Yeah, okay.
	Yeah, we'll do that.
	I'm going to do that.
	Just Keir Stormfront.
	That's his name from now on.
	Is actually a conservative plant, sent to destroy the Labour Party with accelerationist tactics.
	Based.
	Every speech he gives just seems to drive the Labour Party further into the dirt.
	God, I want to believe.
	I really want to believe.
	He's my favourite Labour leader now.
	Yeah.
	Luke Robinson's.
	We should allow Labour to put up all their best people as leader without purging any of their madmen in the ranks.
	That way we can watch them all step up and fall from grace.
	They don't have any good people though, right?
	They...
	I mean, can you think of a single Labour MP who is even interesting?
	You're asking a psychologist, so maybe you're the wrong person.
	Interesting for different reasons for you.
	But I mean, like, George Galloway is interesting.
	I just, you know, I disagree with him on a lot of stuff.
	I don't think he's a Labour member anymore, is he?
	No, no, he's in the Workers' Party instead, isn't he?
	I mean, not an organisation I would endorse or join for drinks, typically, but...
	Interesting.
	I watch his stuff.
	He's an interesting guy to listen to.
	He's at least an independent thinker.
	He's not trying to agree with the hive mind on this one.
	But Diane Abba, Ed Miliband, Keir Starmer, the list goes on and on, Labour MPs, and none of them spark anything in you.
	They're just...
	I mean, Diana is interesting, but as a case study in how to be a train wreck of an MP. You don't learn anything really from that.
	Things you already knew that you shouldn't do.
	well you learn how low the bar can be for our elected representatives uh northampton knight how about late how about libra party self-ideas deceased they're almost there General comments.
	Kelly M says, I love coming on here early and seeing how many people are waiting to watch.
	It's nice to know I'm not the only bigot in the village.
	T.F. Allspark.
	From history we get many blades.
	The glorious...
	Oof...
	Oofbert.
	I can't do well with foreign words.
	Viking sword for the uncultured.
	The honourable Gladius.
	The vestile bastard sword.
	Versatile.
	The commanding longsword.
	The noble rapier.
	Rapier.
	Sorry, I'm just correcting everything you say.
	You know, he's just listing a number of swords.
	I'm just going to skip them because I can't say them to you.
	Do you want me to do it?
	The Respectable Saber, the Brawling Cutlass, the Great Claymore, the awesome Zwyhander, as well as the now Weeby Katana.
	Which of these would you call your favourite?
	Get a gun.
	Probably a claim or a zoi hander because it's the most manly of weapons, just a giant two-handed sword.
	Gone.
	That's cheating.
	Spanish guy.
	Hi, gents.
	I'm actually going to move out with my girlfriend, and we have the incredible luck to be able to buy a house.
	I want advice from the Pope of Dadism on what it is like to start living together.
	We've been together for at least seven years, So I am worried that all goes to hell after so long.
	Thanks in advance, guys.
	I will ask the Pope for his heavenly wisdom after this podcast about what it's like to live together and some advice.
	I mean, imagine if you've already been dating for seven years, you're probably pretty used to each other.
	You'll find some stuff, I guess, that will annoy each other when you're living together full-time.
	I'd imagine over the course of seven years, you'd be used to each other's company, so living together might actually be better.
	It might not be that big of a change.
	Anyway, so David, fake last name.
	Glad to catch you guys live.
	I'm back in Blighty for a short while and will be going to my hometown of Reading to get a nice comment video in front of the Black History Wall.
	Except my OnlyFans $30 in the mail.
	Man, if you go to Reading, I mean, how long are you there?
	Because I'm going for drinks on Friday if you're about.
	It'd be nice to meet up with people.
	But yeah, the wall there is...
	I want to make it into a shrine of cringe, if I can.
	I want to spread the word of the Reading Black History Wall, We Was Kangs, and make people aware.
	It's going to be like the Wailing Wall, but for cringe.
	Exactly.
	Just like a place of pilgrimage.
	If a non-leftist ever visits the UK or is around near London, Reading's only 20 minutes on the train.
	And for such a glorious shrine of cringe, it's worth the ticket price.
	I mean, go to Stonehenge.
	I mean, that's a whole mess to try and get there on the coach and whatnot.
	But, you know, 20 minutes, train, go to Reading, see the cringe, get back on the train, go back to London, do whatever the heck you want to do sightseeing.
	Totally worth it.
	Totally worth it.
	Totally endorse it.
	I mean, Reading should set up a Taurus page, and I'll run it for her.
	Just like, look at the cringe.
	Don't know, plenty of it.
	Anyway.
	But otherwise, we're out of time, so we're going to have to end here, but I will ask the Pope of Dadism about moving in for you, chap.
	But as I mentioned, if you want more stuff, at three o'clock, the new direct video will be going up on the lotuseaters.com words YouTube channel, or on lotuses.com, the website.
	And also, we will be doing the interview, so we need to make sure you're ready for that with the North Korean defect.
	Yeah, I'm really looking forward to it.
	Yeah.
	She seems lovely as well.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	Should go well.
	Anyway, otherwise, we'll be back tomorrow at 1 o'clock.
	Thank you.

▲