Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 7, 2021 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:33:08

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #148

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Ears for the 7th of June 2021.
	I'm joined by Carl.
	Sorry, I didn't think that.
	And today we're going to be going through some, you know, we're going to be throwing, yeah, butchered that.
	Tough weekend, was it?
	Yeah, sorry.
	I went drinking.
	Bad, bad food.
	Talk about that another time.
	So we're going to be going through the Yale insane racist who decided to platform and telling everyone that she fantasizes about shooting white people and getting away with it.
	Yeah.
	Not even getting away with it, but we'll get into it in a minute.
	Also, the Among Us Mosques book that's come out, which is...
	I haven't read the full thing, but I've seen all the reviews, and it's causing quite a stir among the leftists upset that he daresay that Islam in the UK isn't perfect.
	And also that a Scottish woman faces one year in prison for saying that women are women.
	No, no, no.
	It's way worse than that.
	She faces a year in prison for supporting the suffragettes.
	You're kidding me.
	No, I'm not.
	But we'll get to it.
	We'll get to it.
	Oh, boy.
	Anyway, so a few things first.
	So the premium stuff that's come out.
	So we have the Alex Jones Was Right podcast.
	That's premium on lotuses.com.
	That should be up at 3 p.m.
	So go and check that out after the podcast today.
	Turns out quite a lot.
	And turns out not very funny things either.
	Like some quite depressing things like harvesting babies for their organs.
	U.S. government.
	And yeah, that's true.
	Yeah, that's an actual thing that happened that Alex Jones was right about, and I think he deserves the credit for at least saying it.
	I mean, it was true.
	Yeah.
	Sorry.
	Sick.
	Anyway, something that's more of a pick-me-up is definitely the next thing here.
	So this is the Plant the Trees video, which you did, which is a piece to camera about civilizational responsibility.
	Yeah.
	I think that we need to start thinking in the more sort of long view of the world and our place in it, and in relation to the other civilizations of the world around us.
	And so, yeah, you can go watch that and check it out.
	I think I did an alright job.
	Yeah, it was fun to edit as well.
	Anyway, so let's get into it.
	Tell me about this insane racist.
	Yeah, so this comes because it wasn't leaked.
	This is an audio recording, a very, very poor quality audio recording of an online Zoom meeting presentation from a lady called Aruna Kil'Anani.
	So she's, I believe, Indian, but American and Americanized.
	And she gave this talk called The Psychopathic Problem of the White Mind.
	And this was given at this Yale, you know, a Yale platform via the internet, and she wanted it released.
	In fact, she went on her TikTok and was like, they're suppressing me for not releasing this talk.
	She's a TikTok, she's got 12,000 followers, but she's, as she says, a doctor, a forensic psychiatrist and psychoanalyst.
	With expertise in violence and racism.
	And in this talk, I'm not going to use any clips from it because the quality is insanely bad.
	And I just don't want to put you through it.
	But we've got the quotes, so we'll go through those in a second.
	Hang on, so they put this up and then Yale tried to put it down?
	No, Yale only released it internally.
	And she went on TikTok and was complaining that they're suppressing her free speech.
	And they're silencing her.
	And it's like...
	Okay, then I suppose it can be put public.
	And Barry Weiss hosted it on her Substack page.
	And I'm amazed that she thought this was a good idea, because she sounds like a lunatic.
	She sounds honestly like some...
	It sounds kind of Ted Bundy-ish, to be honest.
	It sounds kind of like an actual serial killer and the fantasies they have about their victims.
	That's what she sounds like.
	And so they were like, well, okay, I mean, I guess this can go public if that's what you want, but we disavow this.
	So Yale actually disavowed this, but we'll get into it.
	So...
	Just using the New York Times reporting here.
	The talk is titled The Psychopathic Problem of the White Mind.
	Again, highly ironic title.
	And it was presented to the School of Medicine's Child Study Center as part of Grand Rounds, a weekly forum for faculty and staff members and others affiliated with Yale to learn about various aspects of mental health.
	She is a private psychiatrist.
	She runs a private practice, and she was invited to come and speak there.
	She isn't affiliated with Yale.
	She works in New York.
	But she...
	She has just these amazing quotes.
	And I say amazing to be amazed at.
	Not that they're good.
	They're obviously terrible.
	And it's just mad though.
	So she described a psychological dynamic that is on PTSD repeat.
	In which people of colour patiently explain racism to white people who deny their attacks.
	When people of colour become angry, white people use that anger as confirmation that we're crazy or have emotional problems.
	So she was at a therapy session with a white therapist, trying to explain to the white therapist that the white therapist was racist.
	And the therapist is like, right, I think there might be something wrong with you.
	And she's like, that's your racism talking.
	She recalled a white therapist telling her in psychoanalysis that she was psychotic whenever she expressed anger at racism, and that she had spent years unpacking her racism to her, even though she was the one being charged for the sessions.
	So she's paying to see a therapist, and the therapist is like, right, okay, I think you might be psychotic.
	I think you might have a few problems.
	She's like, you're a racist.
	I will explain your racism to you.
	And she's like, but I'm paying for this to explain racism to her.
	And it's like, yes.
	But you are psychotic.
	Anyway.
	I think the medical professional might be right.
	Yeah.
	Well, I mean, the thing is, she's a medical professional, too.
	That's the thing.
	So, Dr.
	Kilanani said, This is the cost of talking to white people at all.
	The cost of your own life as they suck you dry.
	Stereotyping there.
	I mean, come on.
	We're not all vampires.
	Alex Jones will point out some of us who are vampires, but they're in the US government.
	But she literally says, there are no good apples out there.
	White people make my blood boil.
	So all white people are evil, they suck you dry, and there are no good apples.
	Sniffles.
	She's about to say we all work in banking or something as well.
	No, she genuinely hates white people.
	She says, then, she systematically white-ghosted most of my white friends, which I assume is different somehow to black-ghosting.
	You know, you ghost someone, you just ignore them.
	Ignore them.
	Yeah, exactly.
	But she did that to all of her white friends.
	And she got rid of a couple of white BIPOCs that snuck in my crew, too.
	Do you know what a BIPOC is?
	Is that like...
	Black, indigenous, or person of colour?
	That's like BAME for America.
	I saw the green part of starting using BBIPOC. I don't know what the extra B stands for.
	No, no, black, brown, maybe?
	Who knows?
	But this acronym means black and indigenous people and people of colour.
	How are they white?
	How are they white?
	That's the question, isn't it?
	The answer, of course, must be philosophically white, as in they have the whiteness they support, even though they've got the wrong colour skin, which apparently is something that matters here.
	In the same way white supremacists will say, you're a Jew, even though you're not Jewish.
	Yeah, yeah, basically.
	But she says this, At Yale.
	Conference to understand, you know, mental health or whatever it was, from psychologists and psychiatrists.
	I mean, that is clan's position.
	You'll hear clan members talk like that.
	I mean, I can see why her therapist was like, I think you have psychosis.
	Because that's a weird power fantasy about just murdering white people because they're white.
	And it's a favour to society.
	It's a favour to society.
	I mean, that's literally Hitler's view on the Jews.
	Yeah.
	We've arrived at that.
	It's literally Mao's view of the landlords.
	We've arrived at this.
	Yeah, the clan hanging black guys.
	Yeah, this is what her worldview is.
	She carries on saying, of course, don't bother trying to talk to white people because it's, quote, a waste of our breath.
	We are asking a demented, violent predator who thinks they are a saint or a superhero to accept responsibility.
	It ain't going to happen.
	They have five holes in their brain.
	The projection is off the charts, of course.
	Unmeasurable.
	She's literally saying, you violent, demented predators, I want to shoot you all and I won't feel bad about it, I'll have done society a service.
	Hmm...
	Hmm.
	Big think on the psychosis aspect here.
	What's the five holes in your brain thing?
	Oh, I have no idea.
	Is it like the three dimples on your skull, or she's going to put five holes in my brain?
	Well, that's the question, but I mean, she's not exactly composmentous, is she?
	She seems to have lost her train of thought at some point.
	But she says, yeah, it's impossible to talk to white people about race because we're talking to psychopaths.
	And I'll cock your head when I kill you.
	Yeah, exactly.
	I'll wipe the blood off and spring away, spring my step, feeling like I've done a service to society.
	You're the psychopath, is her opinion.
	So I listened to the whole interview, the whole speech that she gave, and it's basically just this, over and over and over.
	Her talking about how she hates white people, how she finds them insufferable, how they are oppressing her, how...
	And she speaks as if she's black as well, which is amusing.
	She takes on the black racial problems of America as her own.
	It's like, you're from India.
	What are you doing?
	But yes, there are other parts where she complains that are white patients in her practice, because she is a psychiatrist.
	So she has white patients that she has to talk to.
	You can only imagine how that goes, right?
	But the thing is, she hates them, right?
	She doesn't feel the same way about them as she does about abstract white peoples, and she doesn't want to put a bullet in the head, apparently, which I thank off small mercies.
	But she hates them because the white patients in her practice, when...
	I mean, this, you know, happening in very left-wing circles.
	When they're saying, well, I feel bullied by allegations of racism, it kind of drives her a bit mad.
	Because she's like, well, you oppressive white people have been oppressing the non-whites since day one.
	And so you claiming you're being bullied by allegations of racism is affecting your mental health.
	Makes you an even worse person than I thought you were five minutes ago.
	In my mind, she's in the practice, like, wearing African garb with BLM singles.
	Well, I assume she's got her shrine to George Floyd and all that.
	But, yeah, so she is...
	She's mad, frankly.
	And so she, after this, claims that she was misquoted.
	It's like, I listened to the entire hour.
	She has not been misquoted.
	They've just taken...
	And it's not even very far into the speech where she starts saying about how she wants to shoot white people and wipe their blood off without any guilt.
	I was misquoted.
	I want to hang them.
	Well, that's the thing.
	She didn't say that, but she was a lot more direct.
	But no, she wasn't misquoted at all.
	She says that her words have been taken out of context to control the narrative, and the lecture had used provocation as a tool for real engagement.
	Hmm.
	I mean, it was certainly provocative, and it's given a lot of engagement, so was it even taken out of context by your standard?
	You know, by your standard, it seems that you've done the right thing.
	But again, it just comes down to her screeching she hates white people and wants to abolish whiteness.
	This is what it all comes down to.
	She says, too much of the discourse on race is dry, bland regurgitation of new vocabulary words with no work in the unconscious, and if you want to hit the unconscious, you have to feel real negative feelings.
	Let's revel in the negativity, shall we?
	I just want to mention, if she was doing this in the UK, and it was the reverse, obviously...
	Well, this would be a hate crime.
	It wouldn't just be that.
	She'd be under surveillance at the state.
	Well, I mean, she sounds like a terrorist.
	She says, My speaking metaphorically about my own anger was a method for people to reflect on negative feelings, to normalise negative feelings, because if you don't, it will turn into violent action.
	Well, yeah, it sounds like you're going to know, don't you?
	Christ.
	But it's hard to believe she doesn't want to engage in violent action, though.
	You know, this sounds like very post hoc rationalization of what she said, because the way she's delivering it is performative.
	You know, she's enjoying, you know, indulging in this dark fantasy about murdering white people.
	And so now she's got to be like, well, hang on a second, hang on a second.
	This is just a way of normalizing negative feelings.
	But we're not allowed to normalize negative feelings because that was categorized as hate.
	You know, there are lots of people, the white people you have to treat who have got negative feelings about being called racist.
	You're like, no, that's not going to be normalized.
	What's going to be normalized is my desire to shoot you in the face.
	Like, what?
	You know, like, this is, it's not me that's her, you know, she's mad.
	But the thing about this, the thing about this, and this is the bit that, uh, Speaks to the structural problem of places like Yale.
	Dr.
	Kilinani noted that her lecture had initially been well received.
	After she gave it, several attendees praised her comments on the online feed.
	One woman who identified herself as a Yale psychologist called it, quote, absolutely brilliant.
	Yale psychologist.
	Shoot white people in the head.
	Absolutely brilliant.
	Like all the people internally that's shared with were in awe.
	Yep.
	A man said, I feel very shook in a good way.
	A black woman thanked Dr.
	Kilinani for giving voice to us as people of colour and what we go through all the time.
	So they're all fantasising about killing all the white kids at school?
	I suppose we can take that as the natural inference of what they're supporting here.
	But why are the staff of the Yale psychology wing lunatic, genocidal racists?
	I think that is the real question that we have to ask.
	Why is it that they appreciate a woman sharing in emotional, graphic, emotional detail her explicit fantasies about killing white people?
	Why do they revel in this?
	But anyway, in the speech, she talks about how it's critical race theory that allows her to see through this lens, and that this informs all of her analysis on the subject, which is no surprise whatsoever.
	And she's presented by the person who's hosting her as operating in the Socratic tradition, Which is now where critical race theory is trying to hide itself from the obvious evil that it is.
	It's trying to be like, oh no, I'm just following the thoughts of Socrates.
	No, you're not.
	Not even slightly.
	But what's really funny is that the Yale School of Medicine...
	I had to put out a statement about this, obviously.
	And they were like, hmm.
	School leaders added a disclaimer to the video to emphasize that the ideas expressed by the speaker conflict with the core values of the Yale School of Medicine.
	Unlike the psychology department, who fully endorsed this court.
	But yeah, if we get to the next one for Newsweek, she had to push them to release this talk to the public, because Yale was just like, this is awful, what are you doing?
	And of course, this was then made public.
	There's a statement that they sent to Newsweek, which I find very interesting, that several faculty members expressed concern to the Yale School of Medicine's Office of Academic and Professional Development and the Office of Diversity and Inclusion about the content of the talk.
	She sounds like a terrorist, that's why.
	The School of Medicine leaders reviewed the recording of the talk and found the tone and content antithetical to the values of the school.
	So you shouldn't shoot white people and then wipe their blood off and then bounce away with a springy step?
	According to Yale?
	I'm glad we got an answer on that.
	We're not pro-white genocide, in case you're wondering.
	We just have speakers who are pro-white genocide.
	The psychology department is, but the English department, not so much.
	Just expressly reveling in it as well.
	It's mad.
	So in deciding whether to post the video...
	Don't worry guys, it's just on university campuses.
	It's just on university campuses.
	It's just your children watching this.
	In deciding whether to post the video, we weighed our grave concern about the extreme hostility, imagery of violence and profanity expressed by the speaker against our commitment to freedom of expression.
	Ah yes.
	Ah yes, you're big on defending freedom of expression, aren't you?
	Of course you are.
	Like, Ben Shapiro wants to come to campus and say that women are women.
	Oh, deplatformed.
	But I want to kill white people because they're white and I can't stand them.
	And I feel glorious about doing it.
	That's pretty cool.
	We have a commitment to free speech, you see?
	And it's mad.
	And so they say, we ultimately decided to post a video with access limited to those who could have attended the talk, the members of the Yale community, which makes you wonder what other things they talk about in their private Yale community, doesn't it?
	To emphasize that the ideas expressed by the speaker conflict with the core values of Yale School of Medicine, we added the disclaimer.
	This video contains profanity and imagery of violence.
	Yale School of Medicine expects the members of our community to speak respectfully to one another and avoid the use of profanity as a matter of professionalism and acknowledge our common humanity, which is literally the opposite of what the point of that lecture was.
	They're complaining about the profanity used, not the calls to violence and terrorism.
	I mean, genocide there, in fact.
	Well, yeah.
	I mean, that they're not so bothered about, I guess.
	But she said the F word.
	I mean, come on.
	Have some standards.
	Well, no.
	But also the acknowledgement of a common humanity.
	That's a very interesting point.
	And the reason they added that is because the whole lecture is about dehumanizing white people.
	White people are evil.
	They are psychopathic.
	They can't be reasoned with.
	And it would be a pleasure to shoot them.
	Is what she says all in this thing.
	And then they add at the end, Yale School of Medicine, and again, Yale School of Medicine, when you get to the point where you have to put out these kinds of statements, you might want to consider that maybe you're on the wrong path.
	Yale School of Medicine does not condone imagery of violence or racism against any group.
	Interesting.
	So they've admitted she's being a racist to white people, which undermines all of the redefinition of the word racism.
	Well, you know, you can never be racist to white people.
	Well, Yale think you can.
	And when you get to the point where you're glorying in the idea of murdering them without any kind of compassion or recourse or any guilt...
	In fact, with glee.
	...with glee, that kind of looks like racism against white people.
	So it's interesting how the Yale School of Medicine have come to this conclusion...
	I want to go over that point you mentioned earlier about the shared humanity as well, not to miss it at all, which is that, as you point out, if you dehumanize whites as not part of humanity, our shared humanity is ours, as in the non-whites.
	And then the white people, they're not part of humanity.
	That's their position.
	Yeah, and of course Aruna Kilinani, which is an interesting name now I've thought about it.
	Kilinani.
	Yeah, she of course has expressed no regret for this.
	And so thankfully at least the intellectual dark web are still out there doing things and they of course have lots of objections to the things that she said.
	So Nicholas Christakis, do you remember him?
	I remember the name, yeah.
	He was a Yale professor who was the one who was being berated by a bunch of students in the middle of the campus.
	Oh, about the Halloween costumes?
	About the Halloween costumes.
	Why did you accept the possession?
	Yeah, exactly.
	That one.
	He's turned into an activist against wokeism now, thank God.
	As if you could do anything else.
	Yeah, exactly.
	The racism expressed by Dr.
	Irina Kilinani in the Grand Rounds at Yale, just released by Barry Weiss and Katie Perzog, was deeply worrisome and counterproductive.
	Of course, as an invitee, she's free to speak on campus, but her views must be sadly rejected.
	And then Gadsad adds, Dear Aruno Kilinani, if I'm not mistaken, you are the presenter of a talk in question.
	If I'm a Lebanese Jew, do I suffer from the psychopathy of the white mind, or do I possess the noble architecture of a brown mind?
	I love Gadsad so much.
	He's so funny.
	I'm keeping my fingers crossed that it's brown.
	Gadsad does not...
	I love it.
	He doesn't respect any of these people, and he's going to completely twist it around.
	I love it.
	But Jordan Peterson was just like, read it and weep.
	Grand rounds.
	Psychiatrist Yale.
	Say no more.
	I mean, this is directly in his wheelhouse as well, so he must be looking at this going, she's mental.
	And then we've got a couple of just random Twitter people saying, Great comment, that um i wonder how fairly you graded your white students considering your violent fancies that you hold towards them you should be immediately stripped of your position of power and investigated
	but i have to wonder because um might be a little bit insensitive but she's indian right So she's not black.
	Of Indian descent, no, she's not black.
	Exactly, right.
	And looking at her, I mean, she's not that brown either.
	So I have to wonder what position in Indian org chart, I don't know what the term is.
	The cast.
	Yeah, the cast system there.
	And then I wonder how she feels about Indian treatment of Africans in general.
	And then where does she come into all this?
	I mean, does she also get a bullet in the head at the end of all this?
	Well, all the white people are gone, presumably.
	That just keeps going.
	Then, yeah, the snake keeps eating his own tail.
	But yeah, so that's the current, latest, sorry, catastrophic public relations disaster that Yale University is having.
	Again, Nicholas Christakis, he's a professor at Yale.
	He's experienced this in 2017, and in 2021, now we've got to the point where it's not just, that's a racist Halloween costume, now it's, we need to shoot white people in the head.
	That's where they've got to.
	I was going to say, it's the latest call for white genocide out of academia.
	Yeah.
	I mean, you remember, what is it, All I Want for Christmas is white genocide?
	Yeah, the, uh, yes, his, um, George Siccarillo Ma.
	Yeah.
	Where he's at, All I Want for Christmas is white genocide.
	He was a professor at a university, um, I can't remember which one off the top of my head.
	It wasn't Yale, though.
	It's just that it keeps coming out, and I'm just like, yep, that's where critical race theory is going to lead you.
	Yeah, but all of this is a product of critical race theory.
	She says so in the speech that she gave, in the psychopathy of the white mind or whatever it was.
	She says explicitly, this is a product of critical race theory, and there we go.
	I do go and wonder because I see, what is it?
	I think it's the Minds Mythicist guys or whatever.
	They keep reposting clips of academics.
	Follow Mythicist Milwaukee on any social media platform they use.
	They're great guys, doing a great job, and they're just...
	Really, really decent chaps.
	And they are the ones that are bringing this to my attention.
	I probably wouldn't have found a lot of this.
	Because they actually are spending the time through these hour-long lectures where there's a bunch of them in a Zoom call saying the most extreme radical stuff.
	No one else seems to be doing it.
	So big props to them.
	They're doing it in high schools and stuff.
	Oh yeah.
	You see them all having their Zoom calls and they're like, yeah, so we're going to push it in the high schools.
	Yeah, it's mad.
	Not even sure.
	How much investigating in a school do you have to do before you even send your kids there these days?
	Quite a lot.
	Anyway, so let's go to the next thing.
	So there's a new book that's come out called Among the Mosques, a journey across Muslim Britain by a British Muslim who's gone over British mosques and has then written his experiences about the whole thing.
	And it's caused quite a stir.
	Well, his name's Ed Hussein, I see.
	Yeah, so he's upset the leftists, let's say.
	So, I mean, essentially the book, as listed here, is Islam is the Vastest Grown Religion in the UK. So how's Islam in the UK doing?
	Not great.
	Not great for the people of Britain.
	For Islam itself, different question, but...
	Yeah.
	So the next thing here is just a sort of summation of this.
	I assume the interviewer met up with him and spoke about this, or is he reviewing the book here?
	I'm not entirely sure.
	But he says, So just to be clear, this is Tony Blair's fault.
	Yep, 100%.
	There is no one else you can put the blame on for this.
	He's the one who began the mass immigration program in the UK, and as someone who grew up on a British colony in Germany, this is what he's describing when he says it's cut off from Western life.
	He is describing colonies.
	I also kind of hate that his multiculturalism is a noble aim.
	It's not.
	No, not really.
	Never was.
	Multiculturalism is just, there's one culture here, one culture there, one culture there, and they're all separate.
	I mean, the British Empire was multicultural by this definition.
	It's just nonsense.
	It's imperial.
	Yeah, anyway, so the interview in here.
	The green and white minaret of the Makazi Mosque towers over the surrounding sandstone buildings of the area named after Yorkshire industrialist Thomas Saville.
	Today, it is almost exclusively Muslims who live among in its terraced back-to-back streets.
	According to the most recent census results in 2011, so that's kind of our date now, only 48 of the 4,033 people living here were designated as white British.
	So the English out of all of these people in this area, 48 of them are English.
	So it's probably less than 1% in 2011.
	It's been 10 years now.
	So zero, maybe?
	Well, I look forward to the new census.
	Saviltown is the first port of call for the writer and academic Ed Hussein in his new book Among the Mosques, A Journey Across Muslim Britain, in which he investigates to the extent which Muslim communities are becoming separated from the rest of Britain.
	The 46-year-old, who has previously worked as an advisor to Gordon Brown's government and Tony Blair after he left office, travelled the UK visiting some of the almost 2,000 mosques in the UK. Between the age of 16 and 21, he was attracted to a hardline version of the religion he says he encountered both at his local college in Tower Hamlets and an East London mosque where he worshipped.
	So he used to be a full-on Islamist.
	And how did he become a full-on Islamist?
	From living in Britain.
	Radicalised in Tower Hamlets in East London.
	Yeah.
	He says he became increasingly radicalised and travelled across the Muslim world, living in Saudi Arabia and Syria.
	In 2003, while studying Damascus, a friend blew himself up in a terrorist attack in Israel.
	So Ed has since become a liberal, after going through that whirlwind, and then has come back to evaluate how is Islam doing in the UK. And yeah, it's full of people like he used to be.
	People who are getting radicalised.
	And a completely cut off from Britain.
	Right.
	According to his book, within a decade, based on ONS census of the 2001-2011 projections, several areas in Bradford, Blackburn, Birmingham, Leicester, Slough, Luton, and some London boroughs will become Muslim-majority by 2050.
	Interesting.
	No, no, there will be Muslim majority.
	By 2050, meanwhile, the Muslim population of Britain is estimated to be 13 million.
	So, interesting how he's allowed to say that, but when anyone else says it, it gets shut down.
	The statistics just project this.
	Yeah, it's just data.
	Yeah.
	Hussein's mission is to delve into the heart of those communities, however, left him profoundly depressed.
	In areas such as Saviltown, he fears something he calls a quiet caliphate is slowly taking shape.
	A separate world from the rest of society, one beholden to different rules, education, identity and laws.
	It is a problem, he argues, successive governments have refused to properly acknowledge.
	And I just want to be clear, right, the reason this bothers me is because, like I said, I grew up on a colony, right?
	The English, the British colonies in Germany were exactly that.
	They were beholden different rules, they had different education, different identity and different laws.
	We were not subject to the German government.
	You were subject to the British government?
	Yes.
	It was British territory.
	Yeah, this is not a sanctioned military base, these are just towns in England.
	Yeah, the reason we were there is because the Germans had lost a war.
	Tony Blair.
	yeah so he says here we can't allow for borders to emerge in our own country walk around parts of walthamstone or tower hamlets the physical walls may not be there but you feel them as though you're in parts of pakistan india or bangladesh i mean interesting how he's allowed to talk like this If we go to the next link, I just want to plug the premium podcast we did on demographic trends, fact versus fiction here.
	And I just find it interesting how he's able to just say this, and there's no problems.
	Like, this area is like being in Bangladesh.
	This area is like being in Pakistan.
	John Cleese says it.
	Demographic trends mean this is going to happen.
	But when someone calls up Keir Starmer in LBC and says something like that...
	Got to shut down.
	No, but it's definitely, like, it's just the reality of what's going on in these areas, and there's no point denying it.
	So we go back to the article.
	It continues.
	As we walk through the streets of Samal Town, he points out even the charity shops are devoted to the ummah, or Muslim community.
	For anyone who's not aware, that would be like seeing charity shops that were dedicated to Christendom.
	Umma means Christendom for Muslims.
	The Christians only.
	So, in this case, Muslims only.
	Muslim community with a generation growing up here utterly detached from British culture and values.
	Multiculturalism, he says, was a noble aim that has gone wrong.
	He makes the point that in places like Saviltown, the multi bit is entirely missing.
	I'm not sure it is.
	I'm not sure I agree.
	Oh, I don't think it was a noble goal at all.
	No, I also don't agree that this isn't an example of multiculturalism exactly as...
	Like, you've got your multiculturalism.
	You've got, you know, at first, an area which is entirely Pakistani, let's say, in the case of Southampton, with British people and maybe some Indians or something, and slowly, it's gone.
	It doesn't exist anymore.
	It's not coming back either.
	I don't even agree it was a noble goal because this implies that Tony Blair was right in theory, which I don't think he was right in theory.
	I think that countries should have a national monoculture that integrates all of the people within it into it.
	People find a place where they can be represented in the mainstream of society.
	I mean, this is now government policy opposite.
	Tony Blair's admitted this failed.
	David Cameron said this failed.
	Angela Merkel said this failed.
	Angela Merkel said it's failed.
	Not only has it just failed, it is not desirable, is their conclusion.
	And that's why it's government policy, at least in theory, not to continue this, and yet goes on.
	During his visit, Hussein challenged a cleric why there were no women in the mosque, and he writes in his book that he was simply told, there can be no discussion of there being women in the mosque.
	This would be a temptation for many.
	Temptation of what?
	I'm sure that they were just dressing in really slutty ways.
	Yeah, you know, Muslim women.
	They just walk around in mini skirts that show their underwear or something.
	They just...
	damnation of his own flock there yeah to back up this point he was recommended various literature available in some of the bookshops outside hussein shows me extracts from such one book guidance for muslim wife according to the book quote when a muslim woman leaves her home without her husband's consent then all the angels of the skies and the entire universe curse her and for this act until she returns home and quote
	when a husband calls his wife at night to have relations with her and she refuses without valid reason she is cursed throughout the night by angels Right.
	Okay, so just saying that doesn't sound very progressive to me, feminists.
	I mean, if you were looking for a really good example of misogyny and coercion, I would say that's it.
	It's systematically misogynistic, in fact, I think you could say.
	But then what do I know, you know?
	English towns, women shouldn't be able to leave their homes, otherwise they'd be cursed.
	If you refuse sex with your wife, with your husband, if you're just not in the mood, you get cursed by angels all night.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Perfectly liberal world.
	Mohammed Sadiq Khan, the ringleader of the July 2005 London tube bombings which killed 52 people, planned the attack from his terrorist home in Dewsbury.
	In 2015, Tala Asmal, the 17-year-old from Saviltown, became Britain's youngest suicide bomber for ISIL after he blew himself up in Iraq.
	His best friend, Hassan Mushi, was also from the area and had travelled with him.
	In 2008, Hassan's older brother, Mohammed Mushi...
	I mean, that's the thing.
	It is really deep.
	Like, this stuff doesn't not have consequences.
	It's not just, oh, silly people who won't let their wives out.
	Like, no.
	This breeds the Islamist terrorism that we have.
	Yeah.
	This is exactly where it comes from.
	Segregation is the seam that runs through Hassan's book.
	In nearby Bradford, he met Muslim parents who forbid their children from taking part in drama and theatre, viewing them as corrupting influence.
	In Blackburn, he heard stories of white and Asian youth attacking one another if they strayed into each other's neighbourhood.
	I've seen plenty of videos of that happening.
	But also, I love the Taliban mentality there.
	You shall not engage in plays because it's corrupting.
	If you act in a play, you're corrupting the youth.
	Good.
	Then there is, of course, Batley, just a few miles down from Dewsbury, where a teacher was forced into hiding by death threats after showing a cartoon of the Prophet Muhammad in a classroom.
	And again, I mean, you see how this all ties in.
	I mean, all these different stories you do on occasion, they all come from the same problem here, which is if you create a colony that is entirely cut off from Britain, it's not going to have British values.
	Yeah, and the thing is, as well, it's one thing having, like, an sort of ethnic colony as well...
	If a bunch of Irish people come over, okay, they don't have a holy book and a guiding teleology to their lives that is set down dogmatically 1,400 years ago by a warlord.
	I mean, it's Catholicism, but it's still not that different.
	Yeah, but it's very ideological.
	It's very ideological.
	Yeah, also Islam is not just another faith.
	It's not just another belief system.
	No, no, no.
	It stands out in juxtaposition to all other belief systems.
	Well, it's a political belief system.
	Because it's political.
	Yeah.
	So he says, Ed, I have friends who are playwrights who refuse to write anything about Muslims because they're terrified of being killed.
	We can't live in a country where we are fearful of expressing a view, opinion, or art.
	Something within us is dying, and that's what I fear.
	Yeah, happened a long time ago.
	Some of the mosques he visited, notably in Belfast and Edinburgh, he encountered the peaceful, more open version of Islam, which he hopes can displace what has been allowed to take root.
	Here, women and men mingle together, though they pray in separate rooms, and wear Western clothes instead of Islamic dress.
	The Belfast mosque he visits is run by women, and they told him that they are tolerant of gay rights.
	So, I mean, that's amazing there.
	I mean, step one, though, like wearing Western clothes.
	I mean, don't underestimate that.
	They can speak to the Bradford Muslims and see what they think about that.
	Yeah, that's one of the things he notes later on, which is the difference between Pakistanis and Arabs and so forth.
	There is a big difference.
	But the wearing Western clothes thing, I really want to focus on that because I think it's one of the things that is most stark when you go to a Muslim area and everyone's dressed for the hills of Pakistan.
	It's like, just stop.
	No.
	This is not a symbol of integration.
	It's a symbol of exclusion.
	It's a deliberate symbol of rejection of the native culture.
	And of course there are many British Muslims whom for local mosque is not such an all-consuming part of their lives as it is in Saviltown.
	Hussein is soon to move with his wife and two daughters to Washington where he is a professor at Georgetown University and describes his book as a love letter and warning to Britain before he departs.
	And it sure is.
	But it's another one of these situations where someone's going off to the States and sort of looking back at Britain and being like, that's effed.
	It's completely screwed.
	And for him, it's full of colonies from Pakistan that are segregated off on the lines of religion, especially.
	Extremist, though.
	Because, I mean, people don't understand what the difference is between the strains of Islam are.
	And Pakistan's major strain of Islam is Diabandi.
	Half of all British mosques are Diabandi.
	Yeah, half of all British mosques are Diabandi.
	And Diabandi's school of Islam was founded I think it was the 19th century to oppose the British Empire.
	So it's a fundamentally anti-British version of Islam.
	It's highly strict, and it's the same version of Islam that the Taliban use.
	So it's not like some soft-hearted version that you'll find.
	In the Arab world, incidentally, actually, there's a lot more flexibility there.
	But no, it's very dogmatic.
	So I got blasted with this.
	So he went on LBC to talk about this with a guy talking about the whole women not being able to leave the houses and mosques and whatnot.
	So if we can play the first clip, this is just him talking to some guy about this.
	East London Mosque, the major one in Whitechapel, where they have separate entrances, separate exits, separate facilities entirely.
	But they do join the main congregational prayers.
	Why do they need separate entrances?
	It's just to create that barrier between them.
	So then the men are respected and the women are respected.
	I do understand that, you know, the men, it's just to lower their gazes, to respect the individual...
	Hang on a minute.
	I don't think when Christian men go into a church that they're leering at the women that are going in the church with them.
	I've never understood this argument.
	We would never know that what someone's intention on the inside would be, though, would it?
	I mean, if you present 10,000 people in front of you, you don't know whose intention is what on the inside.
	Yes, for all their worship, you know, for worshipping purposes, for good causes, in a peaceful environment.
	But someone's inside may not represent what's on the outside, and that's the most important part of the Islamic faith.
	It's more of the inside, what they feel and they believe.
	So what?
	Whatever you feel on the inside, Muhammad, is between you and God.
	And we know at the time of the Prophet Muhammad that women were welcome in the mosque.
	We know that the Prophet's wife Aisha led a battle after him.
	We know that many of his wives are very lippy towards him.
	And, you know, we've just got to get beyond all of this stuff.
	I mean, you know, in Mecca, what's interesting is men and women are there going around the Kaaba together and women and men enter the mosque together.
	So, I mean, if they can do it in Mecca, surely we can do it here.
	And why is it that, you know, we as Muslim men, you know, work together, study together with women side by side, but suddenly when we go to the house of God, the house of God, forgive me, that we're much more aroused and horny.
	I mean, that's what we're basically saying, aren't we?
	He's just like, what's wrong with you?
	Like, why can you not control your horniness when you go to mosque?
	Well, you know why?
	Because they've never had to learn this kind of self-discipline.
	Instead, the burden of that is put on the women instead.
	And that's just a common feature of Islam.
	But that is exactly the same reason as the SJWs have about racism and racists.
	That's why they're afraid of racists being under every corner, because you can't tell.
	But this is the image I want to get up here, which is essentially this argument.
	I've actually had this put to me by a lady I met in university from Saudi, who was nuts.
	And this is it here.
	So they've got an image of a lollipop that's uncovered with ants all over it, and a lollipop that's covered with no ants on it.
	And then someone's saying, when they wonder why sisters cover, that's why.
	Are you literally calling Muslim men insect rapists or something?
	Well, they're saying that they have no self-control.
	They see a woman with her hair out, and they're like, yep, gotta have sex with that now.
	Yeah, but that is honestly a very deep theme in Islamic civilisation.
	Where self-control lies is actually now with the women rather than the men.
	I mean, I think there is actually a way of looking at it as kind of like a male supremacist view.
	But it's weird for the male supremacist to say that they're a bunch of rapists.
	I mean, what a put-down of yourself, surely.
	Sure.
	But if you've never been told that you should control yourself, the women have to control themselves because they're the temptation.
	You're offloading all of this responsibility onto other people.
	That's how they say it.
	I don't understand how people think this is some kind of god, you're like, this is a massive pretend among yourselves.
	So anyway, so hashtag among the mosques is about no-go areas, is the next link here, in which he's saying it's not about no-go areas, but there are real issues to be talked about which are complex.
	And this is because of an article from the Daily Mail.
	So if you go to the next one, this is just a definition of no-go areas from Wikipedia, in case you need one.
	So a no-go area or no-go zone is a neighbourhood or other geographic area that might be Where some or all outsiders are either physically prevented from entering or can only enter at risk.
	And if you're thinking of areas where people are saying plays, you can't do them because they're corrupting the youth.
	The sort of thing that Tim Pool was escorted out of when he visited Sweden.
	Yeah, places where culturally women can't leave the home without their male's permission.
	Culturally where Al-Qaeda didn't do nothing.
	White and Asian youths are attacking each other on sight for being in the wrong neighbourhood.
	And women can't be around men.
	Do you think there's a risk to being in such a zone?
	Would you call that a no-go zone then?
	I don't know if you were born wrong.
	But it seems to be that, yeah, if white and Asian youth are attacking each other on sight, that would seem like a no-go zone for the different groups.
	So the Daily Mail article does exactly this, and they demonstrate that, well, they title their stuff.
	British towns are no-go areas for white people.
	Muslim authors' study of mosques reveals children attacked for being white.
	Parents making families live under Taliban-like rules and women who can't leave their home without permission.
	And they back up everything they say with this guy's research.
	So they're not wrong.
	Like, surprise, actually, from the Daily Mail.
	But they give you an example of a conversation.
	So they say, 18 and 19 year olds.
	My lad is only 12.
	They battered him in broad daylight.
	For what?
	I asked.
	They don't look happy with my questions, and they both go quiet.
	For being white, he says, slowly and deliberately.
	Wrong area.
	No, I'm unable to stop myself.
	Yes, yes, he says.
	You get into Blackburn, mate.
	You go to certain areas of Blackburn.
	They're no-go zones, no-go areas, says the larger man.
	I still can't believe them.
	Look, this is what the media guys say, but how can that be true?
	Yes, yes, it is true.
	There are no-go areas in Blackburn, mate.
	Yes.
	I'm shocked.
	How can there be no-go areas?
	So what will happen, I ask?
	If we go down to Wally Range, like him, me and I, and we're guaranteed to get jumped.
	We won't walk out of it.
	We won't walk to the other end of the street.
	So that's the conversation he has in the book, and he lists, like, there's some guy who's had his kids beaten up multiple times for going down the wrong street.
	And who's mad for daring to claim this?
	With the evidence of the conversation.
	You can see here in the Daily Mail slammed for article claiming there are no-go areas for white people.
	Thank you, Islamo-leftists.
	Thank you for your valiant defence of the racial beating of English children.
	So if you scroll down, there's just a whole bunch of these and I want to go through some of them because you can see the hoes mad.
	Keep going.
	There's like Twitter posts you want to get to.
	Yeah.
	So here we go.
	James Wong waits.
	The Daily Mail claiming Edinburgh and Cardiff are no-go areas for white people.
	No, didn't say that.
	So Blackburn, you didn't read anything.
	Thanks for the lie, James.
	So have you got the next one?
	Hannah Rose Woods, all verified people, verified checkmarts, absolutely cannot cope with the Daily Mail's conviction that Disbrie is a no-go area for white people.
	Some parts of it, apparently, Hannah, deal with it.
	No, Blackburn, he said, in the article.
	So, again, just not reading anything.
	David Scott, of all the rich multicultural areas of Manchester, they tried to suppress that was a no-white area.
	The Daily Mail opt for Disbrie.
	Disbrie!
	Nope.
	Blackburn.
	Again.
	You didn't read any of it.
	Like, you guys don't engage at all with the stuff.
	You go to the next one.
	Just liars.
	It just keeps going.
	And they're, like, so proud of, like, oh, getting dunked on the Daily Mail here.
	We all know that Daily Mail love being hateful, but this is ridiculous.
	Disbury is an affluent.
	Very, very white area of Manchester.
	So why are you bringing it up?
	Because we're talking about the literal racial ghettos that exist in Blackburn.
	So that's the example being given for a no-go zone.
	I mean, he's saying there are other problems in areas like Disbury and so on and so forth with the certain mosques there, but that's not the example given, and just the leftist response is just, ha-ha, how can they say that this place is a no-go zone?
	They didn't.
	Outright racism from the Daily Mail.
	I'll thank you, Mr.
	I Don't Bake Cakes on Twitter.
	Appreciate you calling this racism.
	I'm sure the kid who's being beaten for being white is just being like, well, thank God I'm not a racist.
	So if you go to the next link, this is just the local mosque, which is bloody huge in Blackburn.
	This is the one that's teaching radical nonsense.
	If you go to the next link, this is just the street they're talking about.
	I went down here on Google Earth and it's just...
	Summer Welfare Trust.
	Yeah, there's just loads of Muslim shops.
	Every shop is named Mecca Foods or Lahore or something or whatever and so on and so forth.
	Al Hussein.
	If you go to the next link, this is just the biggest hoe who is mad.
	Ash Shaka.
	There aren't any Muslim no-go areas in the UK. Only places that the Daily Mail are confident that its readership would feel uncomfortable in because there are too many brown people walking around.
	Okay, say it to one of the victims, Ash.
	You absolute liar.
	You just Islamo-leftist subversive.
	That's what you are.
	You're literally dealing with evidence, people saying to him, yeah, this has happened.
	But no, Ash Sarkar somehow knows better.
	No, she's lying.
	She's lying because she's in favour of this.
	And as we covered, in fact, in the premium podcast, we have lots of her statements where she's cheering on the immigration into Britain.
	Her exact words were, we're winning, lads.
	Don't trust her.
	If you go to the next one, I just want to mention as well, she did a 60 Minutes interview in which she defined cancel culture.
	She defined it as an important tool of social justice, you know, when it doesn't exist.
	Well, mob rule is an important tool of social justice.
	Thanks, Ash.
	I love it.
	When they're being caught out, it doesn't exist.
	When they want to use it, it's an important tool.
	Yep.
	I just put the definition from John Stuart Hillmer.
	A social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression.
	Though not usually upheld by such extreme penalty, it leaves fewer means of escape, penetrating much more deeply into the details of life and enslaving the soul itself.
	Totally right from John Stuart Hillmer.
	I mean, that was him talking about what he described as a social tyranny or whatever.
	But that is what cancer culture is.
	It is social tyranny.
	And she responded to Constantine Kissin calling her out on this.
	We go to the next one.
	So she says, put it this way.
	I asked the guy interviewing me to define cancel culture, which he did.
	I then asked him to give me an example of it happening according to his own definition, which he couldn't, even calling out to his producer for help.
	And what's interesting is, if you go to the next one, she's agreed to go on trigonometry and discuss with Constantine about exactly this topic, defying cancel culture.
	And I'm looking forward to it.
	Yeah, that'll be very interesting.
	I'd also love to ask her about Blackburn, what she makes of the...
	I mean, like, the Muslim guy here.
	Like, he's gone up and down the country to 10 mosques.
	Sorry, yeah, I think it's about 10 mosques.
	As Sarkar sat in her apartment in London, she hasn't gone anywhere.
	And she's got...
	He used to be a radical himself.
	He's not coming from nowhere.
	Yeah.
	But she's a literal communist and she's an Islamist leftist.
	She's just lying.
	This is all lies.
	All lies.
	Do not trust her.
	Yeah, so let's talk about the current state of Scotland and women's rights activism.
	This is just...
	I'm going to front load this a bit while we wait for John to get ready.
	Honestly, after that previous segment, which I find more sombre, to be honest, this one is moderately amusing because of the ridiculousness of it.
	However, the problem that we have is that this isn't our country, and this is what's really happening.
	And so...
	I guess we'll begin.
	You see that tweet?
	That's apparently Scottish for shut up.
	What's the censored bit there?
	Well, that's the thing.
	Something hates women?
	So, spotted at River City Studios Dumbarton because women weren't weeshed and then something hates women, right?
	So scroll down a little bit so we can see the picture there, John.
	For anyone who can't tell, right, this is a ribbon that appears to have been tied to a tree.
	The colours are specifically the colours of the suffragette movement.
	So that looks to me like someone supporting the suffragettes by putting up a suffragette ribbon on a tree.
	And she's tweeted out going, women won't be quiet.
	So I wouldn't have thought that was worthy of being persecuted.
	But apparently, Marion Miller, 50 from Airdrie, was charged under the Communications Act for six tweets published in 2019.
	That being one of them.
	She faces up six months in prison.
	So not a year.
	Sorry, I thought it was a year in prison.
	Six months.
	The message is investigated by officers.
	She'll do it again.
	Are understood to include a retweeted photograph of a bow of ribbons in the green and white-purple colours of the suffragettes tied around a tree outside the Glasgow studio where the BBC soap opera was shot.
	Persecuted for being a suffragette.
	Boy, I love progressivism.
	The biggest misogynist out there turned out to be the progressives.
	I mean, if someone was going to put women in their place, it turned out it was going to be the progressive government of Scotland.
	And Tony Blair's laws.
	This was the 2003 Communications Act, of course.
	Section 127 that got her in trouble.
	Again, we're going to get on to repealing that because we definitely need to.
	But anyway, so she was persecuted for tweeting out a picture, literally by the British government.
	Scottish government.
	You tweeted out a picture of the suffragettes.
	Well, not even a picture of suffragettes, just a picture of a ribbon.
	Women know your place.
	Yeah, women know your place, right?
	You know, Scottish government.
	So it is believed a complaint was made to the police because they suggested the ribbons represented a noose.
	What?
	Can we get that picture back up, John?
	Do you know what the SNP's logo is?
	It's a ribbon.
	It's a ribbon like that.
	Yeah.
	A noose.
	And on Pride Day, they actually redid it with the colours as well.
	Bloody hell.
	SNP, that's subversive.
	And they had the black and brown stripes in there as well.
	So the SNP is literally advocating for the lynching of black and brown people.
	And homosexuals.
	By this standard, at the very least.
	Which I assume is the lynching of suffragettes?
	I mean, I don't know.
	I mean, this is a crime.
	I can report on the SNP. Why not?
	Yeah, definitely.
	But this is mad.
	This is just absolute madness.
	To suggest that this is a noose.
	I mean, that's just, that's obviously not a noose.
	It's a ribbon.
	And it's a suffragette ribbon.
	It's like, oh, look, we're for women's rights.
	And it's like, oh, you want to lynch blacks?
	What?
	Like, this is like, this is like calling, what was it that was called antisemitic the other day?
	If you're not in favour of transgenderism, you're an anti-Semite.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Like, you are the same as an anti-Semite.
	Yeah.
	This is just insane.
	I mean, like, go back four years, and we were like, this stuff in the universities is pretty nutty, and here we are, woman facing six months in prison, for this.
	for posting this on Twitter.
	She didn't put the noose up, you know.
	She didn't do that.
	This ribbon, you know, it's mad, absolutely mad.
	It's not even strong enough to hang Jeffrey Epstein.
	No, exactly.
	But the police got involved.
	She was arrested.
	She's out on bail at the moment.
	She had to be bailed over this, right?
	It was a bail set out, you know.
	Oh, no, I didn't say.
	But pale and visibly shaken, the mother of six and most from Cotebridge Police Station after the interview of almost two hours to be greeted by applause and cheers from a group of supporters, many wearing a T-shirt that she's got women, won't weeshed.
	What's weeshed?
	It's Scottish for shout-out, right?
	Shut up.
	Right, okay.
	Weird Scottishisms.
	But she says, in a statement, she quoted the novelist Salman Rushdie.
	Nobody has the right not to be offended.
	That right doesn't exist in any declaration I've ever read.
	Police and politicians appear to have lost sight of this.
	So, she's arrived at the Sargon position from 2016.
	You have no right to be offended.
	I've been saying this for years, and now the feminists, the gender-critical feminists, have got to adopt my position, because otherwise, what are they arguing?
	You have no right not to be offended.
	Yeah, exactly.
	But also, I would argue you do have a right to be offended as well.
	What if I want to see something like this?
	Of course I've got a right to be offended.
	But we don't.
	Like, I want to see stuff like this noose.
	I want to see the noose.
	But no, I can't.
	It's blurred.
	You know, all the photos are blurred.
	I sent John the SNP noose as well, because I think we'll get a kick out of that.
	Yeah, anyway.
	Women won't shut up, she said, or weeshed.
	These charges are a fundamental attack on our human rights.
	That's correct.
	We still have a right to free thought and the ability to speak our minds.
	Well, actually, you don't.
	Actually, you don't.
	And you've just found out that you don't, because you've been arrested by the police for posting this photo to social media.
	You don't have the right.
	And, of course, in Scotland, you absolutely don't have the right to even have these thoughts at the dinner table.
	Now, thanks to Hamza Youssef, the massive racist who has decided that he needs to be patrolling your thoughts even at the dinner table.
	But, yeah, I mean, I've got to say, by the same standard, I mean, that looks like a noose.
	That looks a lot more like a noose than what Marian Miller had So we've got the SNP logo on screen with the Pride colours in there and the black and brown stripe, which certainly looks like a hate crime for me, boys.
	I think the Scottish police deserve to know.
	Yeah.
	Miller herself was a former member of the SNP, and she's been heavily involved in debates about the reforms of the Gender Recognition Act and Scotland's hate crime bill, because she's going to be criminalised for her gender-essentialist view that a woman is an adult human female.
	That's what this has all come down to.
	This is what all of this is about, right?
	Naturally, her tweet was taken down for violating Twitter's rules on what is and is not a noose, I guess.
	But yeah, so this is pretty mad.
	Hang on, so Twitter sided with the Scottish police of vice and virtue?
	Yes, of course it did.
	I don't know why I expect them different.
	Yeah, why would you expect different?
	They're an American company.
	Of course they do.
	They don't care about the First Amendment.
	That's not for you.
	Suffragettes.
	Under the bus.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Suffragettes.
	Sorry, under the bus.
	But anyway, the reaction from the social justice warrior types has been hostile, with Post characterizing Miller and her supporters as TERFs.
	A report was made to the police after a Twitter user who was identified as a PhD student in Coventry published a picture of a gun and tweeted making a nice list of TERFs tweeting at women won't weeshed because she needs target practice, as in threatening to shoot the TERFs.
	Picture of a gun, I want to shoot TERFs, and Twitter were like, okay, we will remove that PhD student from Coventry.
	Madness.
	Always the academics.
	Absolutely madness.
	But obviously, she's being massively targeted online.
	She did have a crowdfunder up for her own legal defense, but that was removed by GoFundMe for some reason.
	For supporting women's rights.
	I am a suffragette, and GoFundMe are, like, not on our platform, you know?
	Presumably they followed up with Repeal the 19th.
	I don't know.
	Where are we going with this GoFundMe?
	Have the Saudis brought them out or something?
	Yeah, exactly.
	Just as a resident misogynist, I think women should have the right to vote.
	Raise money on GoFundMe?
	Yeah, and raise money for their own legal defence.
	When being obviously wrongfully accused by the state, I mean, I don't know why.
	I have to be the guy to say that, but I guess someone has to.
	Women, they actually do have rights.
	It's okay.
	They should have rights.
	And GoFundMe need to recognize this.
	Just like the Scottish police.
	But anyway, so Andrew Doyle tweeted out about this.
	A woman faces two years in prison for tweets.
	Apparently it's only six months, but one was a photo of a suffragette ribbon that was deemed threatening because it supposedly resembled a noose.
	So how do we go about repealing these laws that criminalize free expression?
	And of course, the answer is...
	The petition against Section 127.
	I sent this over to Andrew, so hopefully...
	You're wondering about the difference in the prosecution.
	It is two years maximum under Section 127.
	Right, but she's only been threatened with six months.
	We actually have a worse blasphemy law than Kuwait, for example.
	Wow, okay.
	Well, I mean, we don't want the suffragettes getting away with it, do we?
	I don't think Kuwait actually criminalises suffragettes yet.
	I don't think they can protest, but they can speak.
	Do women have the right to vote in Kuwait?
	I think they have the right to vote for, like, chamber or something, but it doesn't matter anyway, because it's a monarchy.
	Right, yeah, exactly.
	But, yeah, anyway, so, you know, if we want the suffragettes to be able to do their activism without being criminalised by the state, we need to repeal Section 127 of the Communications Act of 2003.
	We've got 16,000 signatures, which is, I guess, a good start.
	And it got us a response from the government, which was like, hmm, yes, we do need to expand the Communications Act of 2003, which is not good.
	So what we need to do is get that up to 100,000 signatures to save the suffragettes from the Scottish government, because there's nothing else we can do, apparently.
	Apparently, social media is not going to help them.
	It's literally the meme of Gimli and Legolas.
	You're stood there with the feminist being like, Never thought we'd be on the same side, but...
	Yeah, exactly.
	I mean, I didn't think we would.
	But at the end of the day, as a free speech extremist, don't think that women should go to jail for supporting women's rights.
	That's a weird thing.
	I never thought I'd say.
	Down far, right?
	You can't keep getting away with it.
	I know!
	But I'm just thinking back to 2014 or something, and I was like, yeah, these feminists like Jermaine Greer are all a bit nuts.
	And now it's like, look, we shouldn't criminalise these feminists.
	They are nuts, but they don't need to go to jail for what they're doing.
	Just come on.
	At least I've remained consistent to my principles.
	You know, there's no getting around it.
	But yeah, so help us get this to 100 grand.
	Seriously, it really has to happen.
	100,000.
	How do we go about repealing these laws?
	Well, the only stage that I can see that we've got next is to get the debate in Parliament.
	Because then at least, theoretically, someone in Parliament might be like, so women's rights, are we still on board with that?
	I think we are.
	You know, are we still on board with that?
	Absolutely.
	I have actually spoken to a fair number of MPs who agree with us on this, at least privately.
	I've spoken to Andrea Ledson, personally.
	She agreed with me on this.
	This needs to go.
	Steve Baker, he agreed with me on this.
	Philip Davis, as well, has said that this is nonsense.
	So I want to see them in the Parliament, at least.
	If not, the tough MPs, because there are a bunch of them.
	And I want to see Liz Truss in the doc being like, women are women.
	Women have vaginas.
	She literally said it on LBC. Yes, women have vaginas.
	Oh, thank God someone said it.
	But yeah, the deadline for this is October.
	This expires in October.
	So I would very much appreciate it if you would tweet this at all of your favorite content creators and ask them to promote it, because we really need to start moving on this.
	16,000 signatures is a good start, but this is not...
	It's been something we've been able to get too many signatures on for some reason, because this is the official government petition page.
	So this is something the government is committed to.
	They're forced to do this.
	If we can get to 100k, so we really need to.
	Otherwise, women are going to go to jail.
	Feminists are going to go to jail.
	And you know I don't want that.
	So come on.
	Come on, guys.
	We need to get those rookie numbers up.
	Should we get a video comment?
	Let's go for it.
	Before I change my mind...
	Seriously, it's hard not making jokes.
	Just a quick question.
	Are you going to be doing any reporting down here on G7, around St Ives?
	I think things are going to get pretty interesting, as I think there's going to be tensions between locals and protesters who are all coming from that country.
	Thanks.
	I haven't heard anything about it.
	Do you know anything about it?
	No.
	G7 meeting.
	I assume it's St.
	Ives for some reason.
	Okay.
	I wonder what the whole symbolism involved in that is.
	Why St.
	Ives?
	I did see the...
	What was it?
	Macron's going over and he's going to be whining about fish at it.
	But I don't really follow the G meetings ever.
	No.
	Because I'm not that interested in them.
	I mean, they probably are very important, but I'm just a normie.
	Are they, though?
	Like, isn't it just the world leaders get together and then they get to bitch at each other?
	Yeah, but I don't really like the idea of world leaders getting together and bitch about things.
	Well, at least they're not in the Parliament.
	Well, yeah, I guess.
	It gives us a saving grace.
	It's like when they go on holiday, it's like, yeah, the country's safer, don't worry about it.
	Well, yeah, nothing catastrophic will happen for a couple of weeks.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Good afternoon.
	Good eyes over at the Lotus Eaters.
	My thing for you today is...
	Why should we call these people who are promoting critical theory, Communists?
	They're not.
	We should call them Nazis.
	Here's your input.
	God save the Queen.
	Long live Britain.
	The sun has not yet set.
	Rule Britannia forevermore.
	Yeah, that is based, but don't think crazy.
	Well, you know, physically the sun did never set on the British Empire, it still hasn't.
	Technically.
	But we seem to be clinging to a past glory there that doesn't really hold up on paper, in real life even.
	Well, the sun hasn't set, that's all I'm saying.
	Physically, true.
	Physically, true.
	The thing is, they are actually communists.
	That's the thing.
	They were actual communists.
	So they're Nazis, to be honest.
	They're also socialists.
	We'll go into the Nazis' revision of Marxism that got them to Nazism at some point.
	But they are actually communists.
	They come out of...
	Various critical law studies, which were all a bunch of leftists who got together, various shades and flavours of Marxist and syndicalist and all this sort of stuff.
	And they were like, hey, we can racialise this.
	And then the white ones got kicked out, and that's how critical race theory was born.
	Because they were like, yeah, you can racialise this, but you're all white, which means you're all oppressing us brown critical race theorists, which means you need to go, and we're taking over.
	And that was the beginning of it.
	But the way I see this is, like, you've got the Marxists who are doing socialism on the lines of, like, the workers and Workers International and all that.
	And then you have the fascists who come along are also socialists and want to socialize the nation.
	Yeah.
	And then you have the Nazis who come along and want to socialize around the race.
	Yeah.
	So they want to do the German race, the Aryan race.
	Yeah, they don't separate the race from the nation.
	And then you've got the intersectionalists who turn up afterwards and are like, all of you are stupid for picking different ones.
	We can do all at once.
	No, we can do...
	We can also do it along gender lines.
	We can also do it along, like, sexuality lines.
	That's a great way of describing it, actually.
	But that's how I see the left wing of politics.
	Like, there are all these different strands of socialism.
	Race socialism, worker socialism, national socialism, all that stuff.
	And then you've got the intersectionals who are like, that would just do them all at once, you know, for every different group.
	This is why I think that anyone who wants to consider, if right-wing means conservative, some sort of traditionalist or something like that, then something that's divorced from what is essentially sort of enlightened politics, then none of this has anything to do with conservatism.
	I mean, the far right, in my mind, is Saudi Arabia.
	Like, it is this monarchy that's just God and King, where it's, you know, that's it.
	Like, it does not involve socialising the people of the nation or anything like this.
	It's got nothing to do with, you know, fascism, socialism, anything like that.
	None of it.
	Yeah, strangely enough, the far right, not socialism.
	Like, it's monarchy and extreme religiosity, in my mind, anyway.
	Now that I know that you're just doing it for the memes, I know that you're not as silly as I thought you were being, but it's a case of, like, every form of media, even Warhammer, is getting subverted in the West and already has been subverted.
	Like, are you going to torture and subject your child to the punishment of watching something from the West?
	Or are you going to think, okay, here's the last airbender, and now...
	I'm not letting them watch this folk cartoon.
	Here, have My Hero Academia.
	Like, what are you gonna do?
	I'm gonna make them watch things from the 90s.
	You're just going to never tell your kid anything about anything after the 90s?
	Well, yeah.
	No, it's not that.
	They're just not allowed to be exposed to media made by millennials.
	Because media made by millennials is awful.
	And it's kind of the millennials' fault.
	Like, the lack of sincerity in millennial media is disgusting, and I hate it.
	Especially when they're trying to create, like, kids' cartoons.
	Like, you can't create an ironic kids' cartoon because kids don't understand irony.
	And so what you're actually doing is kind of destroying their ability to be sincere, and it's actually really pernicious and kind of evil, actually.
	It's really disgusting, because your kids need sincerity, right?
	A six-year-old needs sincerity.
	They don't understand irony, and if you are ironically promoting a vice, something that's evil, then they'll accept that as being a good, and that's wrong.
	And honestly, there are going to be loads of millennials in like 10 or 15 years when they've got their own kids and they realize what they've done to their own kids by like warping their brains like this.
	I think they'll really be regretful about what they've done because it's awful.
	It's absolutely awful and it's totally irresponsible and it's supremely selfish.
	That's the thing.
	It's supremely selfish because they're like, yeah, but I wouldn't want to watch this.
	No, but you're not the child you're making it for.
	You dunce, right?
	And they say, yeah, but I want to put some subversive irony in and You're 25, you shouldn't be wanting to watch three-year-olds' cartoons.
	Exactly, but because you're an adult child who never grew up, because you were never, you know, forced into being an adult, it means that you are now subverting a generation of children who don't know any better.
	And the parents don't know, because they're just like, well, put the cartoons on, they assume it's going to be like, you know, cartoons that they saw when they were growing up.
	Where it's like, you know, here's the sort of standard Western moral structures that are just embedded into He-Man, Thundercats, all that sort of thing.
	You know, do the right thing, tell the truth, you know, be a good person.
	But these are all subverted in millennial cartoons.
	And I see it all the time and I hate it.
	But it's just really irresponsible.
	And it's built on the millennial presupposition that they would have watched the same cartoons as the millennials.
	The millennials don't understand how privileged they are to be able to be doing this subversive stuff because they themselves watched the 90s and 80s cartoons when they were kids.
	So they got the benefits of, like, a healthy sort of media environment, and now they're not passing that along.
	Deeply, deeply irresponsible.
	I can't stand it.
	And the millennials are going to have hell to pay when the children they have demented realize what's been done to them by the millennials.
	When this happens, hell to pay.
	I'm trying to think of a counter-argument.
	I've seen J-Reg talk about this, where it's like, well, do you not get multiple labels of irony?
	But then everything just becomes kind of esoteric and weird anyway.
	You see him talking about meta-meta-meta-irony, and it's just like, right, okay, I don't even know.
	No, you need direct sincerity in children's cartoons.
	And if you're a millennial who has been involved in the production of a children's cartoon that is not sincere and is layered in irony in this way, you're a bad person.
	You have sinned.
	No, you are a bad person, and you've hurt children.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Alright, let us argue about moderation, and moderation specifically.
	If your goal is to eat far less sugar, but you lack the self-control to eat less with, one solution is to have no sugar to consume.
	After all, you cannot eat what you do not have.
	Yeah, I know, a big brain idea.
	In a similar vein, you rarely cure alcoholism by offering a man yet another pint of beer.
	Instead, a far better way to help him overcome his addiction is for him to learn how to live without it.
	It is a solution as old as the human civilization itself.
	It requires no thinking at all, ban the cause and you remove the effect.
	It doesn't always work, but usually, maybe.
	And if you turn your gaze towards the great Middle Eastern religions, and what they say about masturbation and homosexuality, well...
	Perhaps your romantic perception of those ancient times might be forever shattered.
	Give it a thought.
	People are perverts.
	I didn't quite get the last bit there.
	Well, I mean, not wrong.
	You know, if you ban the cause, you ban the effect.
	The question is, can you ban certain causes?
	And the answer is no.
	But on his point about sugar and things like this, like temptations for yourself, he's not wrong.
	I mean, if I had my way, I wouldn't have had any sugar in the house, especially in the first six months of me starting the keto diet, because it was really tough to resist.
	But the point, though, is that you have to want it.
	If you want to eat the sugar, just go and eat it because you're not doing the diet.
	You're not doing it right.
	You don't want the end fact.
	If you're sat there going, oh, I really want that sugar.
	No, you really want to lose weight.
	Do you or don't you?
	And if you don't really want to lose weight and you want to eat the sugar, then just go and eat it.
	You loser.
	You failure.
	You are not in the right mindset.
	It's not going to work for you.
	Go and get fatter.
	Go and hate yourself more.
	And then when finally you've had enough and you look in the mirror and go, right, this just can't go on, then you're ready to do the diet.
	Until then, just don't even try.
	Go for the next one.
	Good one.
	That was perfect.
	Oh, man, I love this community.
	Anyway, so this is the pre-translation video.
	So after this clip, you have the chance to say the...
	Wonderful phrase I said.
	You maybe have to censor a word, but I believe in you.
	Come on, Callum.
	You can do this.
	And here's the translation.
	Get out of my country, you communist devil.
	If I see you again, I will beat you down.
	That's it.
	And if you wonder why I look like a sweaty bear, that's probably because I've been bicycling a lot.
	I love this.
	You see this?
	I love it.
	Have a wonderful day, guys.
	It's gorgeous in the background, though.
	It'd be hard not to buy a bicycle around Norway if you were there, wouldn't it?
	Oh, yeah.
	On Friday, he gave us a phrase in Norwegian and gave me homework to translate.
	I didn't because I was working and drinking.
	But I remember the word communist out of there, at least.
	Thank you.
	I'm a brilliant intellectual.
	As am I. The two of us got tired of dealing with troglodytes, so we moved into a bomb shelter so we don't catch the stupid.
	Who's this?
	To stay sharp.
	This is Freedom Tales.
	We pursue the pastime of true intellectuals, debunking YouTube videos.
	We are the debunkers.
	He's great in these impressions, man.
	I'm kind of worried about who he's going to pick next.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Hiya, Pfizer.
	Hi, Ben.
	You got any extra shots?
	Sure, Ben.
	Sleeves up.
	I'm a Pfizer girl in a proven world.
	I'm the classic MRNA tactic.
	95% there's an argument.
	Find no contagion with my vaccinations.
	Come on, Fizer, let's go fight With a fast gun Let's go travel Only in the central Oh, where are we still with Fizer?
	I'll have to do this again for my second shot.
	Oh, I love you, man!
	They're not social distancing.
	They have no masks.
	That was 2008, though.
	Oh, well.
	I happened to know when that parade was.
	How is it you just happened to know?
	It's a good parade.
	Afternoon, chaps.
	I'm currently working on a piece called If Not Colonization, where I pose some hypothetical questions to the progressives regarding economics and history.
	And I know I know progressives knows as much about those topics as much as, say, Isaac Newton knew about dropping acid, but nonetheless.
	I know, Carl, that you and I have both read Why Nations Fail, and I can't help but notice there is a lot of overlap between the Spanish conquistadors and the progressives.
	for the native population, they wish to usurp them, install themselves as the rulers, extract all of the wealth, distribute it amongst themselves, and chastise and maim anyone that doesn't agree with their new form of ethic, which is the progressive playbook to an absolute T.
	You also forgot about the destruction of native literature and traditions, as in we only have four books of the native Aztec and Native American cultures because the Spanish literally burned them all.
	Thank you.
	Thanks, progressives.
	Right, we're on to the normal comments, aren't we?
	Yeah.
	Alex says, now that Carl is back in the office, can he answer the video question from Friday about the low-seater wanting to propose to his girlfriend?
	It's a powerful statement of commitment, and I think you should take it more seriously than you did on Friday.
	He wanted to know the best way and with what words you should do.
	So I messaged you this.
	It was this chap who, he says he's about to wire his white girlfriend.
	He was asking, is there some advice you have on how to do it?
	Oh yeah, I said sincerely.
	Sincerely.
	Yeah.
	Don't do anything ironic.
	Do something sincere.
	Because I think, honestly, that women tend to like sincerity from men.
	That's a good answer.
	So there's no particular, like, one instruction.
	Be creative.
	And, you know, if you want to be traditional, obviously, as John's pointing out, you know, take a knee.
	But do it with sincerity.
	Sorry, BLM have ruined that action for me.
	It's now just a meme as well.
	Yeah.
	Ariel Tolkien says, If you replace all instances and variations of white and white supremacy, in the words of Aruna Kill Whitey Screed, with the Jews and Zionism, you get a real feel of how bad it is.
	Yeah, that's exactly the point.
	That's why she sounds like a Nazi.
	Exactly how the National Socialist talked about the Jews.
	Yeah.
	It's not that you had to be Jewish or have a Jewish bloodline.
	You could still be a Jew because you supported individualism, capitalism, blah, blah, blah.
	White BIPOC. I mean, there's a section of Mein Kampf in which he literally talks about Jews and Judaism as individualism and capitalism, as if you believe in private property and individualism, you're a Jew.
	Yeah.
	I was like, okay, Hitler.
	Okay.
	I mean, that's literally what we should be saying to this woman.
	She's like, yeah, blah, blah, blah, blah, white people.
	Okay, hello.
	James says, so this doctor says she's an expert in violence and racism.
	She actually meant she's an expert in practicing violence and racism.
	At least she's honest.
	Well, in her defense, there's no proof that she's practiced violence.
	She's definitely practiced a lot of racism, but she does...
	She does exhort violence.
	But if a bunch of white guys start going missing in that neighbourhood, I know who it was.
	Oh, I know who I'm going to suspect, anyway.
	Matthew Hammond says, Yeah, well, it's definitely some kind of bifurcation.
	Basically, what it seems to me, from the outside looking in...
	Is that the TERFs were doing, like the traditional gender-critical feminists, were doing quite well up until about 2014-2015, when intersectionality exploded like a boil out of academia and has just completely sullied everything that they've done.
	Not that I agreed with the third wave, or the pre- We also weren't calling for my death because I'm white at the same time.
	Yeah.
	Like, they might be saying stuff like, men are oppressing us, or so on and so forth.
	But at least they weren't like, white men are evil.
	But also, we're going to kill you.
	Like, I don't remember getting to that stage, except maybe the hashtag kill all white men stuff.
	Yeah.
	Although that's the progressives again.
	Again, that's the intersectionals, yeah.
	The TERFs were just men.
	You know, they didn't distinguish...
	Like, believe it or not, they were actually less bigoted than the intersectionals, because they at least weren't a bunch of racists.
	They were just really sexist, and it's like, okay, well...
	I want to make a joke.
	I can't make a joke I want to make.
	Kevin says, she is living proof that lunatics have literally taken over the asylum.
	Well, on the plus side, actually.
	She has at least got Yale to say you can be racist to white people, and we disavow her fantasies about murdering white people in cold blood.
	At least we're still there.
	We're not at the South Africa level in which the university endorses the statement.
	Exactly.
	All of the other professors and colleagues that she was speaking to were all like, oh yeah, this is so stunning and brave.
	But at least the university itself as an institution was like, I don't know about that one.
	There's always next year.
	There is always next year.
	Marcus says, I want to kill people because of the colour of their skin.
	Also her.
	Everyone except me is a racist and psychotic.
	Exactly, exactly.
	Justin says, that lady's opinion on white people has been growing more common.
	It's only natural with the division that's been pushed.
	If you keep telling children they will never succeed due to racism, there's no point in trying.
	They will not try and they will get more racist.
	Add to that the obvious media bias and we will see more people with her views rising.
	Let's hope we can stop the death spiral.
	Yeah, that's absolutely right.
	And it's a natural consequence of spending like a decade thinking, right, white people are exclusively oppressors, they're all racist, they're irredeemable, there's no point talking to them, and they are psychotic, as she says.
	And so now it's just like, why wouldn't I shoot that?
	Why wouldn't I just shoot that person and feel good about it?
	You can see the exact sort of spiral of extremism that she's fallen into.
	And now she's speaking at Yale.
	It's entirely predictable as well.
	Oh, totally.
	If you start dehumanizing whites, men, so-and-so forces evil, where do you think that ends up leading?
	Yeah, dehumanizing is the problem.
	I wish we could stop it, but apparently we can't.
	This psychiatrist is just making me think of Tolkien's sheep get like shepherds and shepherds get like sheep.
	Has this psychiatrist picked up some ideas from her patients?
	How many impressionable patients have been fed her genocidal rhetoric?
	No, she really resented her patients because they were like, I feel bullied by racism, and she's just sat there behind her mind just thinking, I want to shoot you.
	And she's just like, tell me more.
	You know...
	I found it interesting that she didn't think it about her white, I almost said victims.
	Wow.
	Her customers, I guess.
	Because it reminds me of, what is it, Darren Daryl, I can't remember his name, the black guy who went and met with the Klan a bunch of times.
	Oh, yeah.
	Because it's interesting, like the friends he had in the clan, they still would say, yeah, I hate N, I hate black people, so on and so forth.
	But Daryl was my mate.
	Yeah.
	I can't remember his surname offhand.
	I don't know why.
	I think it's Daryl Davis.
	That's it, Daryl Davis, yeah.
	But yeah, he, yeah.
	But that's the point, isn't it?
	Angel Brain says, I'd have loved to just sit and watch Josh's face as he read that article.
	Yeah, I know.
	The revulsion would have been good, wouldn't it?
	Chris says, Jesus, if someone has been diagnosed with psychopath tendencies, this is concerning.
	The psychopath's like, ooh, yikes, you know?
	Israel Hay says, It can't be bargained with, it can't be reasoned with, it doesn't feel pity, remorse or fear, and it absolutely will not stop ever until you are dead.
	Why does she make white people sound like the Terminator?
	That's a great point.
	She's literally described the Terminator.
	I love how they big up white people.
	Essentially, we are gods to these people.
	But we're evil gods, you know?
	I know, but there's something funny about that.
	We're the demiurge of the intersectional worldview, and it's awful because it just justifies everything they want to do.
	It's horrible.
	It really is horrible.
	I imagine how this is how Jews feel about, like, neo-Nazis.
	Oh, absolutely.
	Like, yeah, you guys control the world and all the media and all this.
	Dude's like, I'm just trying to grill.
	No, that's exactly how the Jews must feel.
	I can become a CEO like that, apparently.
	Nick says, I'm starting to think that universities are doing more to indoctrinate young people than educate them.
	I'm starting to think.
	Starting.
	I mean, like, it's...
	Yale University have literally got to disavow a murderous racist fantasy.
	Like, this isn't just like, you know what, guys?
	I think that maybe brown people are being oppressed by white people.
	Like, no, we're way beyond that.
	But anyway, in my politics course at university, I was taught about radical lesbianism, women who chose to be, yeah, political lesbians, women who chose to be lesbians because they believe the patriarchy endorses heterosexuality, which it does, and yes, the person teaching us this was a self-professed Marxist.
	What a surprise.
	The political lesbians I find hilarious, though, because, like, you know, like, imagine being politically gay.
	Like, you're not into men.
	You find women really attractive, but the matriarchy's holding you down, so now you have to take it up the rear.
	For politics.
	That's what political lesbianism is.
	To fight the patriarchy, you've got to start scissoring.
	Okay.
	But I'm into dick.
	Too bad.
	Actually, no.
	Thanks to intersectionalism, you can have a feminine dick.
	I'll solve that question, then.
	Political trans-lesbianism, then?
	Well, yes.
	We've got an update from White Hot Peppers.
	Hey, dude.
	Backing at it again with the Army NGAT annual training, National Guard annual training.
	I'll be here for three weeks.
	Already started off with some BS on day one.
	A one-star general gave some SES speech about how retention being so high he wants to put a stop to that.
	He kept rambling on about how the Army cares so much about us and our elected leaders want to keep our Army family together and will do anything to keep us in the Army.
	Oh yeah, this is sounding interesting, isn't it?
	Cook our food.
	Yeah, cook our food.
	Pay us some time.
	Don't put us against our fellow Americans.
	Maybe would be a good idea.
	But you can see where this has come from.
	There are serious rumblings in the ranks about how they don't...
	Really believe in the legitimacy of Biden?
	It's like, yeah, we better do something about that.
	Go and give him a speech saying we like them.
	Bull.
	They just want bodies for the inevitable war that's happening with China.
	Where we do war preparation drills, more than we've ever done in six years that I've been in.
	They are definitely preparing for something.
	I'm annoyed I didn't tell him.
	If you want people to stay in the military, start being a military, not the university playing whiny babysitting cults.
	But I froze and I'm really kicking myself for not speaking up.
	I'll keep you guys posted.
	Well, don't do anything silly, but that would have been...
	That's a great point, though, because you see so much, though.
	I mean, it's ingrained in the British military, the RAF, so on and so forth.
	We've done leaks on this.
	And you see it coming through in the US now, and it really is insufferable.
	I mean, like making your military into the daycare centres of universities...
	Well, this is a point I made in the Plant the Trees video that we put up this morning.
	This is a military full of mercenaries who are out for themselves.
	And your focusing is, oh, we're here for you.
	It's like, no, you're here for the country.
	That's what this is about.
	This is about you gaining pride through your service and sacrifice.
	But we can't have pride in the country.
	Yeah, but that's very, you know, the Marxist indoctrination wouldn't be very useful, would it?
	Anyway, Paul says, Thanks, Tony.
	It only took 20 years to wreck British culture.
	That's true.
	Nitrocellulose doormat says no-go zones for non-Asians have been around since the 70s in Bradford.
	The council has been tweaking the education and policing since the 1980s to pander the community.
	Regardless of the UK law, senior police officers resigning in protest or what parents at schools think.
	Worst incident I heard of was when a bus left a Catholic school in a largely Asian area and a group of Asian adults threw rocks and bricks at the bus which was full of white children.
	So adults do throw bricks at children because they're the wrong race.
	That's not a no-go zone, so says Ash Sharkar from her flat in London.
	So says the lying communist Islamo-leftist.
	Kyle says, anyone that thinks multiculturalism works needs to be shown the aftermath of the old firm games in Glasgow, and that's just two sects of Christianity.
	Throw Muslims, Jews, and many other religions and cultures into the mix, and it'll be ten times worse.
	Absolutely.
	It's weird though.
	Like, no one says multiculturalism works in the UK anymore.
	I've not seen a politician say it in a long time.
	That's because it's such an obviously untenable position.
	But then why does it carry on?
	Because the Conservatives are unbelievably weak, ideologically adrift, and have no idea what to do next.
	Good answer.
	No, thank you.
	I disagree with you about the covering women being victim-blaming argument you were making.
	You sound like a feminist saying it's wrong to convince women not to go through the dark park alone.
	I knew someone was going to say this.
	The issue is not that covering yourself won't prevent bad apples from doing bad.
	The issue is that women should decide for themselves how they protect themselves and should be informed of what's appropriate or not.
	The problem that we have here is that the argument has been staked out in two very extreme positions.
	Either it's all women's fault or none of it's women's fault.
	Whereas I, being the radical centrist that I am, actually occupy the middle ground where women have things that they can do that protect themselves from potential attackers, and also maybe men should be taught a bit of self-control.
	And under Islamic cultural norms, it seems that that element of self-control is kind of alleviated from the responsibility of the men and placed entirely on the women.
	And I actually really disagree with that, but then I still think women should vote.
	But then exactly the reverse of putting it all on men and saying all men are rapists is also not a solution.
	So I view feminism like, you know, old school.
	When we knew what a man and a woman was, feminism was...
	Long, long ago.
	Yeah, in the before time of 2013, feminism was a female supremacist movement.
	And honestly, I think there is a distinct aspect of Islam that's kind of a male supremacist movement.
	That's one of the reasons I don't like it.
	Because I'm not for supremacy like that.
	Daniel says, I'm convinced mid-century Britain was the peak of civilization.
	They ruled a quarter of the world and were actually pretty okay to their foreign subjects.
	Daniel doesn't have an English name, by the way.
	I just can't pronounce it.
	Their culture has advanced, but also very much a product of its past.
	I don't know what the culture has done that.
	Most are just Americanized sludge.
	And it really angers me to see that such greatness brought so low to argue on TV whether or not women have vaginas.
	Well, in Scotland, they're arguing whether women have rights, and the answer is they don't.
	Like the rest of us, we've all got no rights.
	The answer is that the women who want rights are going to jail.
	Literally Scottish progressive Sharia.
	George says, how very patriarchal of Scotland to persecute women in favour of men in skirts.
	In all honesty, though, how many of these feminists were in favour of misogyny laws and how many stood against what happened to Dankula?
	A certain Joker quote comes to mind.
	Well, that's the thing.
	I don't want to be a massive cynic about it and I don't want to become the Joker quote.
	No, we still think that even though we don't like these people, again, who is Chomsky who made the point most saliently, I think, you know, You care about the rights of your enemy.
	That's what a right is.
	Because you don't have to worry about your own.
	People in your group, obviously you're not going to persecute them.
	It's for the people outside of your group that you have to protect those rights.
	And I would love to sit down and talk to her about the way that men are oppressing women someday.
	But until she's allowed to advocate legally for women's rights, we can't do that.
	So we're going to have to advocate for her right to be able to advocate for her insane position that I could debate her on.
	I mean, I don't know about that lady or, like, Jermaine Greer.
	I know Posey Parker's been pretty solid on this, though.
	Like, she defended, like, Harry, what's-his-name, liking limericks and all that stuff.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Posey's great.
	But anyway, Carbohydrate Crusader.
	Typical Scottish patriarchy going after the poor whammon.
	Scotland is going to turn into an intersectional dogfight to figure out who is the most oppressed.
	My vote goes for the true Celt Humza.
	Student of History says, Scottish feminists, we won't be silenced.
	SNP police.
	Oi, back in the kitsch, lassie.
	I took the challenge perfectly.
	I know!
	It's like, again...
	I'm not going to make any jokes.
	I'm on her side.
	On a real note, figured out after all the rebellions, Scotland would be well acquainted with what a noose looks like.
	Yeah, there's another thing.
	I hate this, like, oh, it's a noose.
	So?
	Do you think black people were the only people hanged throughout history?
	I mean, we've probably all got ancestors who faced the noose at some point.
	Well, with Scotland's sectarian laws, maybe they have referencing hanging Catholics or something like that.
	Oh, maybe, yeah.
	Are there any black people in Scotland?
	Well, five or six.
	But the point is, being hung from a noose is not exclusive to black people.
	It's such a weird American import.
	There are so many people who are hanged in Britain.
	And, you know, often for injustices, like they've insulted the aristocrats.
	That's our preferred method of death as well.
	The British way is to hang you by the neck until dead.
	Yeah.
	And it's just, you don't have a cultural monopoly on hanging Americans.
	You know, I don't know why we, and it's not even the Americans now, but anyway.
	Chad Coala says, if Scots continually elect a party that has a noose as its symbol, what's stopping the UK from yeeting Scotland out of the Union?
	But don't worry, the nooses...
	The noose has got the diversity symbol, so it's all good.
	I mean, it's like the Biden, you know, the A10s are coming in, but they've got BLM on the side.
	The SNP are walking around like, women's rights, not today, and then frops over a noose.
	It's like a rainbow noose.
	Get in the rainbow noose.
	That's right, we're progressives.
	The Scots didn't stand up for Dankula when they had the chance, and now those chickens are coming home to roost.
	That's exactly right.
	That's exactly right.
	Chris says, I'm confused, Carl.
	Is women won't wish a declaration or an observation?
	Well, it's coming from a woman, so...
	I mean, it's definitely both.
	Long Talks on the Neat says, 2020, a pull rope in a garage is mistaken for a noose.
	Yeah, I remember this one.
	I couldn't remember who it was.
	It was in America, though.
	2021, a ribbon in a tree mistaken for a noose.
	Conclusion, easily offended activists don't know what a noose is.
	How do they exactly plan to hang the capitalist by the rope they sold if they don't know what a properly tied noose looks like?
	I'll buy one for $2.59 from the LGBT company that's waving the flag.
	Ignacio says, Carl, I have a problem with your use of the word kuma.
	I know you use it to refer to slobs that do nothing but indulge all day long on material pleasure and do nothing with their life, but I still cannot forget the origin of the term, which was a targeted attempt to make young men ashamed of liking attractive women, be it on video games, comics, fiction, or even reality.
	Using the language of the enemy is giving them victories.
	Well, kind of, but I actually think it's a useful term that's entered the pop culture lexicon that represents a certain kind of millennial wastrel who uses OnlyFans.
	So I actually quite like it.
	Sorry.
	I had no idea it had the origin.
	No, I didn't really know that yet.
	And if it loses that connotation, then it doesn't really have it.
	Yeah.
	It's like the term woke in my mind.
	I can't prove this, but I swear to God that the term woke before the wokest took it on was actually a term used by 4chan neo-Nazis to determine whether or not you'd figure out the Jews from the world.
	They were like, are you woke?
	Yeah, I figured out that you'd become an anti-Semite.
	And then I saw the leftists using this, so I was like, you're kidding me.
	Jeremy Corbyn was like, that's a great idea.
	Exactly.
	From my understanding, that's what happened, but I can't prove except for the archives.
	Yeah.
	Herbert says, Just finished Carl's Plant the Trees, and it reminded me that people of my generation hate the idea of even growing old.
	A woman 27 told me she hopes a disease takes her life by the maximum of 45.
	That's awful, isn't it?
	It's not bad to grow old as someone who's growing old.
	It's not bad.
	You get a better knowledge of what's going on.
	You realize the sort of Patterns of behavior and thought you're trapped in as a young person.
	And there's genuine advantages to being old.
	There are disadvantages, obviously, but like, you know...
	If you self-develop, though.
	If you develop your grace and gravity.
	Self-improve.
	Gravitas, yes.
	But if you don't self-improve and you're just getting older.
	Yeah.
	I'll do another video about, like, women developing grace, because that's something important.
	Men easily develop gravitas, but women don't.
	Anyway.
	Are we out of time?
	Yeah, we are out of time.
	So we're going to have to end today.
	Thank you for tuning in.
	If you want to check more stuff, we have the Was Alex Jones Right podcast up in half an hour at 3pm London time.
	Go and check that out at lotuses.com.
	And if you want something immediately, we have, of course, the Plant the Trees video on YouTube and lotuses.com if you want to check that out.
	And the epochs that went up over them.
	Oh yeah, and the epochs.
	I love this.
	I can't believe we didn't chill it.
	This is us talking about how the Sicilian expedition of Athens, invading, they were putting Sparta on the back foot, and then they're like, great, let's invade Sicily.
	What?
	And so we go through the political machinations and how it all falls apart, and it's a really, really good show.
	I won't spoil it.
	Like, I didn't hear the whole thing, but does this actually come down to just Lamao, YOLO, this is what we do, and then they just go and do it?
	Yeah.
	Actually, the Athenians, one of the arguments is, hey, well, we've got a tradition of going on suicidal adventures in foreign lands, so let's go that way.
	I mean, we have a tradition of reigning France, so let's...
	Exactly.
	That's literally the appeal.
	Anyway, we're going to be back tomorrow, one o'clock.

▲