Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 15, 2021 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:29:38

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #111

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Logosieters for the 15th of April 2021.
	I'm joined by Carl and just a few announcements before we get into what we're going to be talking about.
	But first thing here I wanted to mention was the petition we've been plugging, which I'm going to continue to plug until it is where it needs to be.
	So if we can refresh just so we can see the number of So if you haven't signed, sign.
	If you know a group that would appreciate it, share it to them to sign.
	And if you know a content creator who has a large British audience, send it to them to plug as well.
	So it's at 7,400 signatures.
	This was seven signatures two days ago.
	So we're doing well.
	Thank you, everyone, for signing.
	Doing a great job.
	And one of the other things I wanted to mention is that the Free Speech Union actually now has this in their manifesto, which they're putting for the local elections.
	So Free Speech Unions, good guys.
	If you can get a point four in here, they reference it, and they say that they want to help out parties which do this.
	So they mentioned that they want to get rid of Section 127, Part 2 of the Communication Section 1003, Which makes it a criminal offence to communicate anything that is, quote, grossly offensive.
	So, good, good, good guys, the Free Speech Union.
	Glad that the petition's getting where it needs to be, but we'd like to see it at 10,000 pretty soon, and then we'll get to 100,000 for the parliamentary debate.
	So, that's that out of the way, and just wanted to mention we have a new article on notices.com that is premium.
	This is from John Tangney.
	Tangney.
	Tangney.
	Sorry, I'm bad with words.
	Tangney.
	I'm not going to try.
	Dr.
	John Tangney.
	Calendara, whoever you are.
	No, it's not that hard.
	Well, there is a GH, but anyway.
	So, this is some of the premium content we have on there.
	We have loads of premium content for people who haven't signed up, but if you have, go check the new one out.
	And if you haven't, if John could just scroll down so we can see the amount there.
	We've done loads of stuff.
	We've got guest articles from loads of people, James Dellingpole, We have Helen Dale who came on, did an interview with you as well.
	She also writes for us sometimes.
	That was a really great interview as well.
	Yeah.
	I loved springing the sort of traditional moral attack on her to see, like from the traditionalist perspective, to see how she'd react to it.
	And I swear to God, the sort of like glow on her face when I started being like, no, it's proper that they should be doing this.
	You could see she was loving it.
	You could see she was loving it.
	Yes, exactly.
	It's something that's vacant from conversations.
	Yeah, it's how the conservatives should be arguing on a moral level and they're not.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, clearly it resonated with her, which was great.
	So go check that out.
	Apart from that, let's get right into the news.
	Well, actually, no.
	Before we do, right, we're going to be recording a new premium podcast today, right?
	This is something I've wanted to do, which is a critical analysis of Bigfoot.
	And I know it sounds stupid, right?
	But it's really fascinating because it's...
	One of those phenomenon that is so widespread, you can't really just ignore it.
	It's like the UFO phenomenon, you know?
	It's like there are so many people who are talking about this.
	It's, you know, we may as well analyze, like, what the deal with it is.
	But the thing is, there's so much to it, we're not going to be able to get it done in one podcast, so we're going to have to make it at least a two-parter.
	Possibly a three-parter, because there's absolutely loads.
	But, begin by saying, I don't believe in Bigfoot.
	That's the thing.
	I just find it a really interesting subject because it's like, ooh, it's taboo or verboten or something.
	But it's so silly.
	There's nothing scary about it.
	Yeah, so I'm probably going to be taking the position of the Bigfoot deniers.
	I guess so, but I'm not even going to be the advocate for it.
	That's the thing.
	But anyway, we'll record that later.
	It'll be up later.
	Yeah, I look forward to that.
	That's got to be a laugh.
	Yeah, it's going to be great.
	Otherwise, let's get right into the news.
	Yes.
	So the first thing I want to mention was Project Veritas did another leak.
	They mentioned yesterday they were going to do another leak on CNN. Previously, they'd shown that he admitted that CNN was just propaganda, which is not great for CNN. To have that public.
	They hadn't said anything yet, which is interesting as well.
	Because this was like the number one story that was trending.
	You saw Fox News covered it.
	Majorly, of course, because it's their competitor.
	And they've released a second part.
	I assume they have more parts to come out.
	In fact, there is a third part at least, which he says.
	So the second part here.
	What was interesting is that they actually managed to find out how Project Veritas does this as well.
	Because you notice it's always a nice young girl who seems to get this out of people.
	And they mention apparently she found him on Tinder.
	So literally...
	So he thought he was getting some, and James O'Keefe turns up.
	Like, to catch a Predator style.
	I'm assuming she worked for Project Veritas, had the camera, but the Daily Mail reported that they met on Tinder, like she found him on Tinder, and then, you know, oh yeah, let's meet up, and then just recorded him.
	So he was ironically there on a date.
	Yeah, that seems to be the case.
	And then eventually James O'Keefe interferes and is like, hey, why don't you take a seat?
	So anyway.
	Before we go on, I'm not surprised in any way, shape or form they haven't addressed this.
	I mean, what are they going to say?
	Hi, yeah, well, our technical director said, yeah, we're a bunch of propagandists and we are the ones responsible for getting Trump out.
	What do you say to that?
	Like, what's the response?
	Well...
	There's two moral responses.
	You could just say, all right, yeah, we're a partisan outlet, blah, blah, blah, and we've made that clear and try and, you know, pretend that you've always made it clear, which you clearly haven't.
	Yeah, that'll destroy the reputation as if it's any good anyway.
	But I mean, that's one damage control method.
	I mean, but saying nothing, I mean, I don't know if that's a correct method either.
	But anyway, I just wanted to show this meme because I saw it somewhere else.
	But it turns out this is entirely true.
	This is entirely how Project Veritas gets you.
	Two, three jinx on the bar, and you're done.
	Yeah.
	Anyway, so one of the other things we mentioned is yesterday the chap who's been...
	Is it Catfish?
	Is that the right term for this?
	Yeah, I think so.
	So he mentioned that they ran a smear campaign against someone called Matt Gaetz, a Republican.
	We had no idea who he is, nothing to do with anything.
	But he was being unjustly attacked in the words of the CNN director because he's a Republican and that's a threat to the Democrats.
	And he's a very hardcore Republican apparently.
	Well, from the perspective of a Democrat, anything actually conservative is hardcore Republican, right?
	So him being in opposition to their worldview was enough for them to be like, right, we have to kill him because our opposition needs to be entirely right now.
	So this is how they thought patrol conservative movements.
	But the allegation, really, from people who have been watching the podcast and leaving us comments to tell us about this, who have been following the Matt Gaetz case, have said basically he's an effective conservative.
	He can put the Republican case forward stridently and in...
	Direct opposition to the left-wing case in order to refute it, and therefore they're screaming, pulling their hair out, and be like, right, we've got to get rid of this guy.
	Which explains why Politico described Matt Gaetz's victim as, quote, a former minor.
	As in, formerly a child.
	But I mean, apparently they went on some cruise or something, and she was 18 when she went.
	So it's like, right, so she was an adult when she was in contact with him.
	But she previously had been a child.
	She had previously been a child?
	Right.
	Matt Gaetz, confirmed villain.
	Yeah, that's a pretty weird accusation.
	Aren't you, like, former child labor, then?
	I suppose so, yeah.
	I mean, I am as well, I guess.
	Well, you're a former child boss, I suppose.
	I suppose so, yeah.
	Okay.
	Anyway, so, I mean, we don't know that much about the guy, but that seems to be...
	No, but the story seems to be ridiculous.
	Yeah, it does seem to be nonsense.
	But he has made a response to this, so we can get the next link up, which is just him.
	So there's some CNN journal here following him, trying to ask him questions, not getting anything as typical.
	And then in response, you can see Matt Gaetz above here, just responds with, you refuse to answer my questions about Project Veritas video, wherein your colleague details your network's plot to attack me because I'm effective at blocking the Democrat agenda.
	Hashtag expose CNN. That's excellent.
	Now that shows what the value of Project Veritas really is.
	Because when the media are coming up and like, oh, have you got anything to say about this thing?
	They say, well, have you got anything to say about admitting to be propagandists?
	What are they going to do?
	Exactly.
	Then you've disarmed them and you're pushing them back.
	You're finally going on the attack.
	This is excellent.
	This is what Republicans need to do.
	Yeah, and it's not just that they're a bit biased or something.
	They have openly admitted here they're going after him unjustly because they hate him because his politics is wrong.
	Because they work for the Democrats.
	Yeah, that's their viewpoint.
	I mean, they're saying this, so it's good to see Matt Gaetz pushing back on that.
	So good for him, because he also got a lot of likes out of this and a lot of support, because it looks open-shot.
	I mean, he's caught on camera saying, we unjustly go after these guys.
	He gave us a full admission.
	I don't know what more we need.
	Yeah, so let's go on with the new footage.
	So clip one is just them talking about the COVID death toll.
	So you'll remember CNN throughout Trump's presidency.
	They had a counter.
	The counter of how many are dead.
	And him talking about that this is just propaganda, which, surprise, let's play.
	We know.
	It's fear.
	Like, fear really grabs numbers.
	It really does.
	The happiest days in news, people, I would imagine, turn it off when they go to the camera.
	They don't see glue to it.
	Unless there's something that's uniting them, like the Moonlight or something like that.
	Fear is the thing that keeps you too big, I can imagine.
	What's the scariest thing?
	Sad news doesn't do well with ratings.
	If you can get someone in passion, that does really well with ratings.
	Sad news, back to back to back, doesn't do really well unless it affects them directly.
	COVID, gangbusters with ratings, right?
	Which is why we constantly have a death toll on the side, which I have a major problem with, that we're tallying how many people die every day.
	Because I'd even look at it and be like, let's make it higher.
	Why isn't it high enough today?
	It would make our point better if it was higher.
	And I'm like, what am I rallying for?
	That's a problem that we're doing.
	I mean, it helps with ratings.
	Of course, yeah.
	I have a job.
	Sure, I'm happy about that.
	Who gets to decide how long that stays on?
	I've been in the room many times where My director tells me, take it down.
	And I take it down.
	And then we get a phone call.
	The bat phone rings in the back.
	Literally a red phone.
	Like this special red phone ring.
	And they pick it up.
	And this producer picks it up.
	And you hear...
	And every so often they put it on speaker.
	And it's like the head of the network being like...
	There's nothing that you're doing right now that makes me want to stick.
	Put the numbers back up because that's the most enticing thing that we have.
	So put it back up.
	So things like that are constantly talked about.
	It's most likely Jeff Zuckerberg fault.
	Jeff Zuckerberg, the head of our CNN, he makes the call.
	Is that like the head of the network with the red bat phone?
	That's wild.
	That is a wild series of revelations.
	We are literally fear-mongers who wish to emotionally incite the public so they stay glued to our networks so we make money and that's literally what we're paid to do.
	And if we're not doing it effectively enough, Jeff Zucker has a bat phone, a red emergency phone that he brings up and yells down at the producer saying, no, make it scarier.
	Yep.
	That is...
	I mean, the most uncharitable interpretations of media is always essentially something like that.
	It's always like, oh yeah, but that...
	That's the mythos of how bad they can be.
	Yeah.
	And they're just saying, yes, we are that.
	We are exactly that.
	One of the things I find interesting about that mission as well is the idea that CNN's really, really boring.
	It's just awful to the point that the head's like, yeah, at least put the numbers up so something interesting's happening because the rest of what we produce is just trash.
	But the fact that all of the incentives are sat here for him to sit there going, God, I wish those COVID deaths would go up.
	And then he's even like, you know, what am I doing?
	So, yeah, what are you doing?
	I'm literally the meme out of those TV shows where it's like, you know, you have the headline.
	What's that show where he puts the glasses on?
	It just says, fear, be afraid.
	Oh, they live.
	Yeah, CNN are literally saying, we are that.
	You've got to watch They Live, man.
	It's great.
	There's too many movies I've got to watch.
	But this is just an example, if we can get the sandwich up, just to demonstrate what we're talking about in case people aren't American or haven't seen this.
	So you can see on the side there, there's Trump giving some speech or another, and then they just put the death toll up there to be like, look how many people are dead!
	Look how many cases there are!
	And one of the things you'll notice is there's no context.
	Like, total number of cases, total number of deaths.
	Well, what does that mean at all?
	Like, how on earth am I meant to understand these numbers?
	Why not just have a rolling death counter anyway?
	But just also, how many have recovered?
	How many are today?
	We don't need to know that.
	So on and so forth.
	There's nothing there.
	I mean, even in the UK, I think it's like a telegraph, or it doesn't really do this because they're considered more conservative, whereas The Guardian, being left-wing, pushes the same thing.
	They have the everyday front page, here's the numbers.
	But at least for them, they provide the context of, here's the graph of where it's going, here's how bad it is, blah, blah, blah.
	CNN didn't even do that.
	They just showed you a million people with cases, 100,000 dead, with no context.
	Left-wing media, we're here to fearmonger.
	Yeah, and he gets asked about exactly this point.
	Why don't you show the number who have recovered?
	Or at least, you know, try and provide some context.
	Balance it out.
	And his response is, well, that's not good for CNN. Which is just another open admission.
	Probably true, I mean...
	Let's play the next clip in which he says exactly this.
	Why don't you guys at CNN show the recovery rates on the death tolls, at least?
	The recovery rates?
	Oh, um...
	Who's had it and then...
	Uncovered.
	Uncovered.
	Because that's not scary.
	I would imagine that's why they don't do it.
	Yeah.
	That's my favorite.
	If it bleeds, it leads.
	If it bleeds, it leads.
	I like that.
	I think no one ever says those things out loud, but it's obvious based on the amount of stories that we do.
	So just, we don't provide that context because it wouldn't help our propaganda purposes.
	Like, we are here to say that the president has failed and blah, blah, blah.
	And if we provide the data that shows that it's, you know, this number of people have recovered or blah, blah, blah, or any other context, then that wouldn't really work for us, so we're not interested.
	And one of the things that's interesting about this is it goes into a story that was during Trump's presidency, sorry, after Trump's presidency, in which there was this horrible rumor that the folks at CNN were being...
	had got in they suddenly got rid of the death tracker because people weren't noticing as much and this is some article like fact check did cnn remove the tracker and they're like no of course not they still kept it there lying right wing yet again and the lying right wing as they list is people like ted cruz if we could take cruz in which he's trying to point this out he's He's like, ah, weird.
	Miraculously, COVID is cured.
	A very instant the networks called the race for Biden, the number of deads, that little tracker there, that graphic, is suddenly gone.
	And people responded by being, haha, Ted Cruz, you're such a liar.
	Namely, Oliver Darcy, if we can get him up, in which he's saying this is false.
	What you're tweeting is false.
	CNN has, for a while now, used the COVID tracker when discussing, wait for it, COVID. Bull.
	We know this is bull.
	We've got an admission now that is not...
	No, no, no.
	We only took it away and we have it on just COVID stories now.
	Like, no.
	We have an admission from your technical director that, no, we use this as a propaganda method to try and harm the president.
	Yeah.
	This is not some...
	But this was up just during their general coverage.
	It wasn't because just on the COVID. Zucker would call the phone and say, this is boring.
	Put the numbers up.
	Yeah.
	Doesn't mean that anything on the screen had anything to do with COVID. Put the numbers up because it hurts the president.
	Like, that's what we want.
	Don't provide any context because that would help the president.
	You know, people would think that it's not as bad as it is.
	And this is why you get such misinformation in the public.
	I mean, we've done this before.
	When you get the graphs of how old people think the average people die, what's the percentage chance of death per decade.
	And people just get everything wrong.
	The Democrat voters happen to think that it's something like 50% death rate and things like this.
	And so, what are you talking about?
	The only way you could get that opinion is if people are just actively misleading you.
	Like CNN, who just openly admit this.
	There's also a tweet below this in which Oliver Darcy tries to mock Ted Cruz saying, note how Ted Cruz should know by now that this is false, and yet his tweet remains up.
	Well, Oliver Darcy, now that we know that you are literally treating BS and you knew it, why are your tweets still up?
	Come on, get rid of them.
	Correct them.
	Put some context there.
	Do a little fact check.
	Yeah, no.
	Not going to happen.
	So, he also goes on to say in the clip, in Secret Video, in which he says that there's no such thing as unbiased news.
	And this is, I don't know, it's presented as Project Veritas as a gotcha.
	I don't really get it as a gotcha.
	Because, like, there is no such thing as unbiased news, in my opinion.
	It's only because they try to frame themselves as being the neutral, centrist, objective...
	CNN does.
	...new source, yeah.
	And they're not.
	And that's of note, I would say, but I think already it's sort of...
	I mean, generally, whenever academics do any kind of studies on media and media bias, CNN is almost always categorized as left-wing, partisan.
	Yeah.
	And yet they have this opinion that, no, we're centrist, just the facts.
	No, you are left-wing partisans.
	That's okay.
	Well, it's not okay, but like...
	It's not unusual that there are left-wing partisans in the media.
	It's pretty unremarkable.
	That's why they keep getting mocked.
	They have that advert back in the day of, this is an apple.
	People might say that it's an orange, but no, it's an apple, blah, blah, blah.
	And now it's like, hmm, let's talk about transgenderism.
	People just scream it's a woman.
	I wonder what happens then, CNN. It's become an orange, hasn't it?
	An apple is any fruit that identifies as an apple.
	Yeah, it's...
	I'm not going to get into it.
	This pantomime horse is a horse.
	The next clip we have is him saying something that I've wondered for a while.
	So you might notice that some of your favourite commenters, regardless of who they are, will go on TV once.
	And then they're never invited back.
	They don't turn up.
	Whereas there are certain people who are just awful and yet keep getting invited on mainstream TV in the UK, US, internationally.
	And they just keep coming back and you wonder, who's booking these people?
	Why would they book them?
	It's because they're midwits.
	It's because they're morons.
	That's why they keep getting booked.
	And your favorite people don't keep getting booked.
	And he admits this.
	Let's play.
	You ever watch...
	We have to sit down and watch it together for me to, like, point out some things.
	Listen to the way they ask questions.
	Because they're not actually asking questions.
	Any reporter on CNN. What they're actually doing is they're telling the person what to say.
	It's an art form of it.
	Like that?
	There's an art form to it.
	But it would be like...
	The accident thing you just saw, right?
	Like, one of the reporters would be like...
	So then, you know, that...
	Man clearly went through the intersection, slamming into this car or whatever it was.
	And it really is unfortunate that our infrastructure of...
	Traffic lights and what not is falling apart in the city.
	How do you feel about the traffic lights and the infrastructure?
	We've led them to talk about how we want them to talk about it.
	It's always like leading them in a direction before they even open their mouth.
	And the only people that we will let on the air For the most part, are people that have a proven track record of taking the bait.
	amazing right yeah and this is this is such a dunk internationally on just the people who keep appearing on mainstream media uh my most favorite being here i just typed in some of the people who people complain about so owen jones ash shaker and femi for example keep getting invited on tv shows on mainstream all the time i mean even when they're extremely radical i mean ash shaker being the literal communist here owen jones being a hardcore socialist and whatnot and yet they just get invited on as if this is normal and everything And this is why.
	Because they are midwits.
	They don't have anything clever.
	They will fall for the bait.
	They will take the leading question and follow where it has been pointed.
	Yeah, whereas many of, well, my personal favorites, so I mean like Milo, for example, when he used to go on media, he would go on there once and then disappear.
	And you, for example, I must say, like you go on there a couple of times and then, ah, no more callbacks, not interested.
	I mean, Jordan Peterson as well, I know he's done loads of them, but how he went, he came over, he did Kathy Griffin and whatnot, and then they were just like, let's not invite him back.
	Let's move on.
	Let's never talk to that man again because he utterly destroys us.
	And why you get people like Richard Spencer who get invited on CNN regularly.
	CNN contributor Richard Spencer.
	Like CNN are literally saying, he's a dumbass that we keep inviting on because he takes the bait.
	And the same with all the leftists they have on all the time.
	I mean, they're literally insulting your intelligence when they have repeat gigs for you.
	I mean, amazing.
	I could have rather just accepting that.
	But the last thing he mentions here, James O'Keefe, he says that there's a part three that will be coming out, I assume, today, in which he says it will be, quote, CNN's roadmap to reality of what they want you to believe.
	So him laying that out, which I look forward to seeing and I'm sure we'll cover it.
	It's amazing.
	I imagine it will be.
	And again, I mean, God bless James O'Keefe and Project Veritas doing the Lord's work of actually getting these people to expose themselves in public.
	Love it.
	Yeah.
	Love it.
	And one thing I find really amusing about it is just how open and blabby they are when they think they're on this date.
	Because the thing is, Arthur, there have been lots of Project Veritas stings continually rising up the ranks.
	So is it next going to be Jeff Zucker, who sat down on a Tinder date, getting like, yeah, well, I'm actually a Machiavellian genius who's puppeteering America into a giant civil war.
	Isn't that amusing?
	Nothing will happen.
	Yeah.
	I'll let BLM kill a thousand children before I let CNN die.
	Is that going to be his position?
	But that's the thing.
	They're just so open about the things that they're saying.
	It's like, right, okay.
	Amazing.
	How many times do you guys have to be caught on camera and exposed by Project Veritas before you're like, look, don't talk to anyone.
	Just do not talk to anyone about any of this because we look terrible.
	And it's probably James O'Keefe in a mask.
	LAUGHTER Anyway, yeah, doing the Lord's work.
	Right, so we're going to talk about a very original hot take now.
	Social justice is very racist.
	Not exactly revelatory, is it?
	Not a terribly interesting subject.
	And normally I don't really care for the left of the real racist arguments anyway, because they're incredibly passé, and the left is just like, yes, we hate white people.
	Well, everyone, really.
	Yeah, everyone who's not us at this point.
	But there are some moments where it's just like jaw-droppingly racist.
	And institutionally so, and they just mask off moments from people who are paid to be racist.
	And sometimes it's just worth exploring it just to remind ourselves just how bad this ideology can be.
	And this is the example I want to cover today.
	So Idris Elba is a famous black British actor.
	He's...
	Very well respected as an actor.
	He's won lots of awards.
	He is not David Lammy, as in, you know, he doesn't reference the fact that he's black unnecessarily.
	He is Idris Elba, the actor.
	And that's how people know and love him.
	And he's in lots of famous films and lots of TV shows.
	And so, one day, the BBC's diversity chief came around and was like, yeah, he doesn't feel black to me.
	It's like, hmm.
	Hmm.
	What does she mean by that?
	Yeah, that's a good question, because, I mean, he's so obviously a black man.
	Why would we even discuss this?
	Is she saying the characters he played?
	Wow.
	We'll get into it.
	So Idris Elba portrays a gruff and dogged detective called John Luther in...
	BBC's drama, an award-winning drama called Luthor.
	Now, I've never watched it because I don't watch TV, so I couldn't tell you anything about it, but it seems that people genuinely like it.
	It's been going for five seasons.
	It's won awards.
	It seems to be a popular series.
	He seems to be a popular actor, right?
	And this was a woman called...
	What was her name?
	I can't find her first name now.
	Wayland, her surname is, but can we scroll up a bit so I can get her?
	Miranda Wayland.
	She's the BBC's...
	Diversity director, diversity chief.
	And she said that the crime drama was an example of a series that was only superficially diverse.
	She says, when it first came out, everyone loved the fact that Idris Elba was in there.
	A really strong black character lead.
	Capitalized black, by the way.
	She said at some MIT PV conference, according to the Times.
	We all fell in love with him.
	Who didn't, right?
	But after you got into about the second series, you kind of got like, okay, he doesn't have any black friends.
	He doesn't eat any Caribbean food.
	This doesn't feel authentic.
	So Idris Elba is no longer an authentically black person because he apparently on the TV show doesn't have any black friends and he doesn't eat Caribbean food.
	So basically she thinks he would feel more authentically black if he, I don't know, had a slice of watermelon and possibly a fried chicken.
	What a weird argument.
	It's a really racist argument.
	It's like really unbelievably racist.
	Look, you don't fit my conception of a black Caribbean stereotype.
	Therefore, you're not authentically black.
	You ain't black.
	Get that bone through your nose.
	Like, that's what she's saying.
	How dare you wear a suit?
	Do you understand?
	You look like a white man right now.
	That's literally the point where she is at the BBC's Director of Diversity.
	What the hell is it?
	It's so awful.
	It's just so awful that I had to cover this, right?
	And she added that casting more black actors was only part of the answer.
	It's about making sure everything around them, their environment, their culture, their set, is absolutely reflective.
	Reflective of what?
	Black people.
	But not black people as in how anyone would use it, as in people who have black skin.
	Normal, just people going around.
	What she thinks a black person is.
	Which has some pretty negative characteristics, it seems.
	If you were to make up the sort of stereotype that she has in her head, you'd be called a racist.
	I mean, what are we putting on the walls here?
	You know, like...
	You can't have white friends.
	You can't eat food that I don't like.
	He's not even wearing a leopard skin.
	You know, like, what are we saying?
	Oh, man.
	He's not dancing around a fire and praying to a volcano god.
	This guy isn't authentically black.
	He's the BBC's head of diversity and inclusion.
	Yeah, it's unbelievable, right?
	Especially as Idris Elba grew up in London.
	What was she expecting him to be like, culturally?
	If not, like, you know, a Brit...
	It's like, yeah, but you're not acting...
	I can't even say that.
	It's also the point there of, like, if that's what defines you as a black man, like, if you have loads of black friends and you eat Caribbean food, you black.
	That's all it takes.
	I had Caribbean food earlier this week.
	It was lovely.
	You're more black than him, I suppose.
	That's how it works.
	Okay, brother.
	But that's the thing, right?
	So the fact that it's capital B black I think is important here because the capitalization makes it effectively the same.
	It's a proper noun.
	It's the same as either a name or an ethnic group.
	And so what she's doing is attaching all sorts of cultural baggage to this capital B black.
	And this is going to be a crossover of like black Caribbean and American black culture.
	That is being merged into what I think she views as black.
	But the thing is, the character of Luther was not actually written as a black character.
	It was written by a white author called Neil Cross.
	And so the character of Luther, this is actually a kind of progressive black wash that they've done.
	Now, I'm sure that when...
	Because Luther isn't like a new series or anything, so I'm sure when it started, it was like 10, 15 years ago, something like that.
	And it would have been like, right, okay, we don't care about colour.
	Let's just choose a good actor to be the lead character of this series.
	And Idris Elba's a good actor, therefore, why not?
	Who cares?
	You know, it doesn't matter.
	It doesn't, you know, the fact that he was white wasn't an integral part of the book, I presume.
	And so who cares, right?
	But now, the wokists have come to the point where it's like, well, yeah, but blackwashing is really inauthentic.
	It's like, you wanted this.
	You were always going on about diversity and representation.
	It's like, yeah, but now we don't.
	Now that's not the thing, right?
	But the thing is, Neil Cross was just like, well, I have no knowledge or expertise or right to tackle in some way the experience of being a black man in modern Britain.
	It would have been an act of extreme, tremendous arrogance for me to try and write a black character.
	We would have ended up with a slightly embarrassed, ignorant, middle-class white writer's idea of a black character.
	And so he's pretty woke as well, and that's essentially her point.
	She's like, Idris Elba shouldn't have been playing this character because he's black.
	That's where she's arrived at.
	And I just want to say, I totally disavow this position.
	Diversity and inclusion, folks.
	We've reached peak inclusion.
	Get out, because you're black.
	Yeah, peak inclusion.
	Segregation, because you're black.
	Oh, man.
	There's no point normally being like, yeah, the progressives are racist, but this is just so racist.
	So anyway...
	The BBC apparently responded to their own diversity officer saying we are actually...
	What, by agreeing with her or disagreeing?
	No, no, no, by disagreeing, saying, well, actually, we're tremendously proud of Luther.
	It began in 2010.
	So you can see back in 2010, if you can remember the cultural zeitgeist, it was, we don't care about race.
	And it was like, okay, great.
	You know, I don't care about race either.
	But now it's everything is racial and stay in your lane.
	You know, whiteys on one side, darkys on another, and...
	Yeah, I mean, this is the cultural appropriation gang.
	The culture shall never mix.
	It shall remain culturally pure.
	Yeah, exactly.
	We don't want any miscegenation around here, thank you very much.
	I was just watching TV. It was pretty good.
	Anyway, yeah, so this is awful.
	And, of course, the BBC pledged £100 million of our pounds to making Black Lives Matter-friendly, diverse and inclusive television.
	LAUGHTER That's what they're calling it, aren't they?
	I guess.
	Which they're going to segregate out people into their racial group, which they determine that's inclusive.
	Well, Idris Elba gets chucked in the garbage.
	He's like, sorry, Idris, you're not black enough.
	Man.
	So anyway, this is not a new phenomenon.
	It's not unique to the BBC. There was an example of this that happened in Canada recently from the Afro-Canadian Caribbean Association, where the same ideology is at play.
	So, you know, just regular black woman here was just like, hey, if you're giving out government funding to non-profits to do whatever interesting cultural things we're going to do, we'll take some of that money.
	And they were like, no, you're not nearly black enough.
	So the government was giving up money on the basis that you were a black-led organization?
	Yeah.
	Which I can't oppose.
	I can give you the criteria for that, if you like.
	Oh, Jesus, what was it?
	The criteria is that your organization has to be two-thirds of the board members and senior leadership identifying as black.
	There we go.
	I hate the future.
	This is horrible.
	Yeah, it is.
	But it also implies that if the company's leadership is two-thirds white, then it's considered white-led.
	Isn't that nice?
	How do they define black and white?
	Well, that's a good question.
	It's self-identification.
	So, if a group of Chinese guys want to take a bunch of money out of the government, they could just say we're all black.
	I'm just saying maybe Idris Elba should consider identifying as black.
	Because, I mean, maybe he won't get canned by the BBC for Black Lives Matter.
	Anyway, this lady, whose name is Evelyn Miri, objected to this because she had applied for money and they'd said, no, you're not black enough.
	And she was just like, what?
	What do I need to do?
	Take a DNA test?
	Essentially, information provided did not meet this eligibility criteria or was insufficient to clearly demonstrate the organization is led and governed by people who identify as black.
	I mean, we saw the picture of her.
	She's in charge of the organization.
	It's not black enough, I guess.
	And so she's like, you can't say a group isn't black enough because the Ontario Black History Society is well known to be made up of black membership primarily.
	So there must be some disconnect somewhere.
	You can't reject them on one thing.
	You can't send one thing out and reject them on another.
	It's like, well, that's where you're wrong.
	I'm a progressive.
	I mean, you would have thought that the disconnect and the problem here would be handing out government money on the basis of race.
	Oh no, that's fine.
	Just need to prove you're black.
	I don't know how many drops of blood we require, but taking those tests.
	But this has funded 90 projects so far with $7 million of Canadian people's money.
	So anyway, going back to the BBC. Let's have a look at who was the out-and-out racist, Miranda Wayland, who is the head of creative diversity.
	Now, the only bio I could find of her was from a conference, the Children's Media Conference, that was sponsored in part by the BBC, ICB, and various others.
	So it was a big official thing.
	And they give us a bio of her here.
	So she's the head of creative diversity at the BBC. And in...
	In this role, she is responsible for overseeing the overall on-air, on-screen diversity and inclusion strategies across output, supporting commissioning teams and independent suppliers to drive change and increase representation and ensure the BBC delivers against its strategic goals and public purpose.
	So her job is to increase diversity by essentially exercising out the not black enough ones.
	She provides specialised knowledge and expertise on diversity-related matters, plans and develops and implements effective interventions related to on-air talent portrayal.
	As in, she literally goes, he ain't black enough.
	She's watching the TV. She's watching and going, is he black enough?
	No, he's not Asian enough.
	She gets paid to do this.
	She gets probably like 100k a year.
	And you have to pay for a TV licence in this country, so she's getting paid with taxpayers' money to do this.
	I pay my TV licence because my wife does it, and so I've paid some of her salary.
	I don't pay the TV license, so thank God.
	Wise.
	But anyway, she previously...
	In fact, I'll finish that.
	So, on-air talent portrayal, commissioning guidelines, diverse audience panels.
	So when you see the audience for, like, you know, question time or anything like that, the reason it's so diverse is because she's been overseeing it.
	So even if it's, I don't know, let's just say, somewhere in Cornwall, question time.
	Good luck diversifying that.
	And it's, you know, the area's 99% white or whatever, just hypothetical.
	She comes in and is like, nah, not enough diversity.
	Then start mandating that there are different groups brought in.
	I guess you must.
	But anyway, yeah.
	The whole point is to further strengthen a culture of diversity and inclusion, making sure that everyone has their own individual water fountain.
	But that's where this is going.
	Previously, she had held the role of interim head of diversity and inclusion and diversity lead for radio and education, as well as at BBC Studios, the BBC's commercial production arm that creates world-class programmings.
	And before the BBC, she worked at ITV for nine years.
	She was a social partnership executive, but before that, she was the diversity and inclusion manager there, playing an integral role in defining ITV's diversity strategy, increasing on- and off-screen representation, and implementing highly effective initiatives that enable the business to remain competitive, inclusive, and accessible to all.
	I bet, though, if we're asked, I bet the BBC and ITV are both institutionally racist institutions.
	I bet they would say that themselves.
	I bet they would say it themselves.
	She received a special recognition award at the Asian Media Awards recently for her contribution and dedication to diversity and inclusion within the media industry.
	Literally, her whole professional career is pointing out who's black and who's not.
	She gets awards for this.
	And she's won awards for it.
	If I have to hear the term diversity and inclusion again, I'm putting a gun in my mouth.
	Literally paid to be a racist.
	Paid to say Idris El-Brent Black.
	Idris Elba did have a response to this, which was nice.
	He put this out on his Instagram.
	He just said, he posted a quote on Instagram, which was his own, saying, So he is essentially summarizing...
	The argument against the regressive left and justifying why they're called the regressive left because they seem to be really goddamn regressive and they seem to actually want to go back to the sort of days of Jim Crow segregation and racism only with them being the ones being paid at the top this time instead of white people.
	Yeah, I mean, this is not the only example, as you've mentioned.
	We've seen multiple examples of, like, university students demanding that sort of thing in the UK and the US, in which you want, you know, black-only spaces that are separate but equal to the other spaces.
	It's like, oh, God, you know nothing, do you?
	God, and that's the thing.
	Like, it's not anything new, to point this out.
	This was just such an abominable way that she appears to view, like, what it is to be a black person in the West and in Britain and just the way...
	He was treated about this.
	I've got absolutely no animus against Idris Elba.
	Who would?
	Why would you?
	Literally only the racists care about this.
	The only criticism I've ever given of Idris Elba is that he played the gunslinger in the Dark Tower movie.
	But that wasn't his fault.
	It was the fact that the people making the Dark Tower movie weren't Adhering to the story, because the problem with the Dark Tower movie is it's written by Stephen King, who's an American who has views on race.
	And one of the characters, called Odetta or Susanna at some point, she's a disabled black woman who has multiple personality disorders.
	And one of the personalities is a very racist, resentful black woman who hates white people.
	And the gunslinger, Roland, the main character, he is a white man, and that is important in her view of him.
	And so for the characters to have the interactions they have, it actually requires the gunslinger that Idris Elba played to be a white man.
	I mean, that's the place of a valid argument of this person needs to be that race and that race.
	because that's how that makes sense.
	Exactly.
	You wouldn't have Django Unchained where Django is white.
	You can't tell that story if that's the case.
	But the thing is, that's not his fault.
	That's the fault of the directors and the casters and the people who are not being faithful to the story, because they weren't faithful to the story.
	And it's a really great story as well.
	For anyone, The Dark Tower, it's really, really great.
	But that's not a criticism of him, you know?
	That's a criticism of the people making the film.
	So, like, it's just sorry, dude.
	I'm sorry that you're too black, but not black enough.
	Goddamn with the BBC. I love the comments as well, like Idris Elba, white, says the BBC. That's literally her position!
	If he just was eating that fried chicken with a bone through his nose, he'd have been fine, but no, white, get out.
	Jesus Christ.
	It's so awful.
	Anyway...
	Speaking of racism...
	What the left done now...
	Yeah, literally.
	So, this is a story I want to talk about, so I want to talk about America's racism problem, because I mean, of all the silliness that happens in the world, of course there is serious racism in the world that is horrible and plagues the United States to an extent that is unchallenged.
	But enough about the Democrats.
	Nowhere outside of the United States is as bad as the United States.
	I mean, literally no country on Earth is as bad as the United States.
	I mean, you can't even go to school in the United States without having racial abuse thrown at you if you have brown skin.
	And this is evidenced by a protest that took place in the United States at the Albany College.
	In which there was racist graffiti that was draped over some dorm walls.
	And this is horrible.
	So the college put out a thousand dollar bounty on anyone with information of who was responsible for these racist actions.
	And they would be seeking criminal charges against those involved.
	Sentible thing to do.
	I mean, how much of a race problem there is in the United States.
	I'd catch races for $1,000 per head.
	Yeah.
	So they gave a quote that if they are Albion College students who made this graffiti, they will also immediately be subject to student conduct process, including the potential for suspension or expulsion.
	And, you know, fair enough.
	If there's such a problem among your student base, you've got to do that thing.
	So this isn't just the only thing here.
	If we can scroll to the next link, you can see some of the students here.
	so you can see them protesting there's quite a lot of them quite a lot of them very upset about this racist graffiti that is anti-semitic and racist apparently now oh wow so it's been upgraded and then the next one here if we can load it up this is just a video of you can see the students marching for racial justice against the horrible person who did this graffiti I tell you I hope they catch that person That person's going to be in some serious trouble.
	Yeah, I mean, look how many people they've upset.
	Yep, the entire campus, practically.
	This is just like the civil rights movement.
	It is unbelievable how you can't even just go to a college without being racially abused.
	So when we find that individual who drew that graffiti, I think we should tar and feather them.
	Yeah, so this went on for three days, apparently.
	Possibly some kind of lynching for a racist, right?
	No.
	So, day three.
	This is day three in which they continue to protest.
	We get the next link up.
	They weren't taking this lying down.
	So, you know, students were not happy about this.
	I mean, it's absolutely awful.
	And, you know, I agree that it's not nice.
	So if we can get the next image up, so you can see the students' demands.
	So the students made several demands in which they demanded different things from the college.
	So they demanded an increase in diversity in Albion College professors, an increase in minority history that needed to be celebrated, glorified, and acknowledged, and an increase in network opportunities for minority students, increased campus involvement with community to bridge the divide between college and the surrounding community.
	I don't know how any of these things are meant to help with racist graffiti.
	I mean, you need more brown-skinned professors.
	Did they think that some of the white professors did the graffiti?
	I presume they did.
	That's how bad racism is in the United States.
	I mean, even professors getting into it.
	As you can see here, this is Albion College making a statement publicly, saying, we stand with the black students of Albion College.
	Keep that in mind.
	They stand with the black students of the college.
	They do.
	So the messages that were in there were pretty horrible.
	I mean, they have things in here like, die, N-word, please.
	White lives matter, let's kill all the N-words on campus.
	Albion is racist.
	We do exist.
	KKK. We do exist, signed, the KKK. So the first two, I mean, I would take seriously.
	The next one, a bit weird.
	But, you know, okay.
	Hang on, hang on.
	If you're some dramatic white supremacist organisation, persuading people that you exist by claiming it seems like a strange tactic.
	They're in a rush, I presume.
	So they wrote down, apparently, KKK white power, and then a Jewish star with 666 in the middle of it.
	Okay, yeah.
	Okay.
	Not the usual things that they do, but...
	Sounds a bit Nation of Islam to me.
	Yeah, bad news.
	They found the guy.
	Turned out to be a black student.
	This is not the first time, is it?
	No.
	But I just love that Albion College, we stand with our black students.
	Yeah, it turns out the black student is the one who made the racist graffiti that caused all of this.
	That's how prevalent racism is in the United States.
	The black student did this, presumably for attention.
	So it was a hoax.
	But we exist, KKK signed the black student.
	Why would he do this?
	Why would he want the KKK to exist?
	Why does he need this to be a part of his mythos?
	I don't know.
	But let's move on, because maybe this is a one-off.
	This is a one-off, right?
	Didn't happen, right?
	Okay, well, happens in other places as well.
	We load this one up.
	Someone puts a message saying, hope you and your people die like George Floyd.
	It wasn't Uncle Ruckus, was it?
	Yeah.
	So someone in this other college, in Minnesota of all places as well, made an Instagram account targeting black students.
	I mean, come on, okay, maybe that last one was a hoax, but this one, this one, yeah, it was a hoax.
	So we go to the next one, yeah, it was a hoax.
	It was a black student.
	God, I remember back in 2016 when these first started happening, there was one, I can't even remember which college it was, one of those huge college protests about racism and things like that, and someone from the college library started tweeting about how they were going to bomb the place or something like that because they were going to kill all the black people, and the security cameras revealed it was a black girl.
	Yeah.
	So, okay, college racism.
	I mean, you poll millennials, their views on racism.
	They're not exactly 80-year-olds who live through segregation and have, you know, older opinions.
	Not fans, yeah.
	Yeah, not really common.
	So, okay, right, that seems to be a problem there.
	Actually, it seems to be students doing this to get attention or to revel up political interests.
	I mean, it doesn't give you details of the two individuals in these both cases who...
	the organizations that immediately got involved from the images were Black Lives Matter groups on campus as to whether or not they were members of said Black Lives Matter group.
	But they're not the only ones.
	There is another case which I found amazing.
	And this is all within the span of a month as well, to keep in mind, like all of this.
	The next one is a guy who got himself arrested because he kept calling the police.
	And it says here to multiple times to create a, quote, George Floyd incident.
	This is amazing.
	So he wanted to become the next George Floyd, which is a weird thing to want to become.
	I mean, a dead man, except maybe that's not what's on his mind.
	So they'll give you the details here.
	So there's this chap, Taman Levitt.
	So Taman called 911 on February 22nd, identifying himself as Stacey Williams.
	According to the incident report, it notes, quote, it sounded like a male speaking at a higher pitch to simulate that of a female voice.
	He called up the police and was like, hello, I'm Stacey Williams, come and catch me days ago, try to kill me!
	And the police were like, alright, it's a bit weird.
	Let's go check it out.
	So they turned up, they met Mr.
	Levitt, who here was describing himself when he was in the female voice as holding a handgun, and he was wearing a red bandana, and they turned up, and no, he didn't have a gun.
	They searched him.
	They didn't even have a gun on him.
	So the cops kind of weirded out about all this, so they just kind of left, because they were like, why is this guy calling up in a female voice?
	Yeah.
	This is so dumb.
	It's so dumb.
	It's so stupid.
	What happens?
	Well, I really want police brutality to happen to me, actually.
	I want to be the next George Floyd because his face is everywhere and nobody cares about me whatsoever.
	What a thing.
	So he also said that he described himself as like a 16, 17-year-old thug who had a pistol.
	And then when they told him he was not, they were just like, okay, this guy's just a freak.
	And the police just left.
	So he didn't get what he wanted, presumably.
	And then the next day...
	He didn't get martyred for Black Lives Matter by the cops.
	We're sorry, we can't do that.
	Yeah, the next day, Leva accused Everton police of racial profiling because he was black.
	No, we did it because we're misogynists and we thought you were a woman.
	He was like, mate, you literally called us up in a stupid voice and told us to come get you.
	And you're like, no, no, no, I didn't call you.
	You guys just saw me because I'm black and tried to search me for a gun.
	No.
	I didn't call you.
	Stacey Williams called you.
	They checked the call from Stacey Williams and they found where it was from and it was his phone.
	An idiot!
	They checked his phone and he was the one who left the voicemail.
	They called him up and all the rest of it.
	This is what houred him.
	Turns out it wasn't the first time, either.
	He'd been routinely doing this.
	So in December 2020, Lev also reportedly pretended to be Eric Johnson and called himself into the cops.
	And as a result, they've arrested him for wasting police time for multiply calling up the cops to get himself arrested and presumably killed.
	I don't even know.
	He ends up having to get a restraining order from the police.
	Please stop harassing the police.
	They're not going to martyr you.
	God.
	I'm going to call up the police and then accuse them of racial profiling me.
	How are you going to do it, bro?
	I'm going to call them on my mobile and be like, hello!
	Stupid!
	This is so dumb!
	But he's not the only one!
	I mean, like we saw with the Prass 2, it's a black student writing down literally racist critique.
	Some black guy is writing down, let's kill all the N-words, and it's like, guys, look, racism.
	Racism's happening on campus.
	Well, this is like the students at Pimlico Academy writing, there's no black in the Union Jack on the wall.
	It's like, what are you doing?
	But I mean, in that instance, I think they're actually too stupid.
	They have no idea.
	I think in this instance they're too stupid.
	They're too ignorant.
	They don't know the history of that phrase.
	But I think in the other instances, I mean, let's kill the N. I think he knows what that meant.
	And he was doing it, obviously, just for attention.
	And in this one, I mean, calling up me like, Stacy Williams!
	I think he knew what he was doing in that instance as well.
	At least there's a thug here!
	Come and kill him!
	Sorry for laughing so much, but it's just so stupid.
	All three of these instances happen within a month of each other.
	And of course, the context being that, you know, the George Floyd trial's on, the BLM's at the height of its membership, shall we say, and it's one thing to get more and more of these stories.
	So people are just like, yeah, I want to be the next one.
	I want to be cool.
	I want to do this.
	And they're failing quite badly because they're all morons.
	They're not very convincing as women by the sounds of it.
	The reason I'm covering this is just because, number one, it's funny.
	Dude, the only out this guy has got is literally to transition now.
	I mean, listen, my name is Lisa Williams, alright?
	How dare you!
	I was making the call, please don't send me to jail.
	Yeah.
	Oh, man.
	That's the only way he can recover his dignity from this, is to legit chop his penis off.
	You know, that's kind of the offer you get in Iran.
	Progressive Shariat demands.
	Oh god, this whole segment is just going to be us laughing.
	But in Iran, if homosexuality, of course, in Islamic countries, like Iran, is banned.
	But if actually, nah, I was a woman the whole time, then you're not engaging in homosexuality.
	So the offer is death or transition to a woman.
	And similarly, the offer for this guy is prison or become a woman, I guess.
	I'm literally having visions of a KKK meeting where everyone's turning up in their hoods and everyone's like, yeah, white power, white power.
	And then there's a strong gust of wind that rips all their hoods off and it's just all black guys.
	Like, what?
	I was catfishing you.
	Yeah, exactly.
	The entire KKK is black.
	Shit.
	Oh, man.
	Like, every group listed on the Southern Pulse would all send us a hate map.
	You know, we've been joking about the Bigfoot thing, for example.
	Like, there's a bunch of really hench NFL players running around in bear suits.
	Bodybuilders are out in the wilderness in their bear suits, yeah.
	The equivalent is there's just a load of black guys who have started to set up all the Atomwaffen divisions.
	I don't know about it, but...
	But this is symptomatic of a problem in the United States, particularly.
	And it's something Douglas Murray has listed for.
	So this is just a quote from Stranger Death of Europe, which is a great book everyone should read to explain, especially to understand the problems if you're a foreigner from Europe, to understand the absolute mess we got ourselves into.
	So he mentions in here, when it comes to anti-fascism in most of Western Europe, there would appear to be now a problem with supply and demand.
	The problem, the demand for fascists vastly outstrips the actual supply.
	Yeah.
	I mean, otherwise, why is this black guy calling up the cops and saying, I'm Stacey Williams, please help me?
	Why is the black guy making racist graffiti in which he says the KKK exists?
	We exist.
	Sign the KKK. Go on a march then.
	Prove you do and go on a march.
	Why is it not just one college within the space of a month?
	It's two colleges?
	I mean, the other college being in Minnesota.
	And there are historic examples of this going back for the last at least five, six years.
	But there is a huge rise, it seems, in the last month or two if people just do the dumbest things on the planet.
	Unreal.
	But that's that.
	I don't really have anything else to say about it, but I just wanted to list that and read through it, because, God, that was funny.
	God, it's ridiculous.
	Everything's so goddamn ridiculous.
	Please save me.
	Oh, bye.
	Okay, let's go to the comments.
	Oh, hello there, fellow daddists.
	I've noticed this trend where everybody seems to be making stuff and posting it online and showing it off.
	A lot of nice stuff, by the way.
	But I'm not really that much cut out for woodwork.
	So I'm going to do something related to my job.
	I'm going to make a cake.
	Specifically chocolate.
	So, one last method before I begin and send, of course, the video, the finished project in the next few days.
	Down with the keto dictatorship.
	Banned.
	I don't know.
	I endorse that message.
	Hi guys, I'm going for my first haircut in eight months on Saturday and I think we can all agree it's needed.
	However, that's not my question.
	My question is, I am maybe going on a BBC Scotland debate thing for people under 30 to ask politicians questions.
	What do you think my question should be?
	I'm going to ask, I think, something about the new hate speech law against white people and against lockdown.
	So yeah, thanks.
	Oh, that's good.
	What do you reckon you should go for?
	I know what I'd go for, but, I mean, that's me.
	What would you go for?
	I would probably actually ask them about the civil service and that list we have of jobs that the government offers with barriers to entry to white people who apply.
	I'd just ask, how is this allowed, or do you stand by this?
	Is this not in contravention to some rules we already have?
	Yeah, does a white child born in 2020, in the next 20 years when he can apply for this job, does he deserve to be discriminated against?
	I mean, what's he done wrong?
	I mean, tell me what that individual has done wrong.
	I mean, individualize him, because they're going to go for all the white race has been oppressive.
	Yeah, yeah.
	That kid, that kid born in 2020.
	What?
	What has he done wrong?
	But that's me.
	I'd probably badger them with that.
	Otherwise, with hate speech and stuff, I'd love to badger him with section 127.
	I did try that on Jacob Rees-Marc when he came to my university.
	He copped out, which I'm not happy about.
	Very critical of Jake for that.
	What would you ask?
	I'd ask them to define woman.
	To find a woman.
	Yeah, that'll be fun.
	Depends who the guy he gets to ask, I suppose.
	Yeah, I suppose so.
	But I love watching the politicians trying to identify what a woman is.
	In the progressive era, shapeless, formless, timeless beings.
	It's like, oh, okay.
	Because what will be irritating is if he says, oh, can you please define a woman?
	They say, oh, a woman's anyone who wants to be a woman, and everyone claps and moves on.
	So, I mean, you've got to set up the question.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Set it up in a certain way.
	So it's like, look, if you define anything as being self-referential, then you never reach the end of the definition, and therefore...
	You've emptied that word of all content.
	So if you say a woman is anyone who defines themselves as a woman or identifies as a woman, what you're saying is a woman is actually nothing, and so you've abolished the category of woman linguistically there.
	Is this acceptable to you or not?
	Sorry, I've got to say the joke, but I've just got a crude version in my head in which you just say, so Hamza Yusuf, when you're chugging down on six inches of cock, is that a woman or not?
	Just...
	Sorry.
	Unnecessarily vulgar.
	Let's carry on.
	I find that it works best when you take it to the most vulgar place because it's like, oh, come on.
	This is obvious nonsense.
	Why are we doing this?
	But otherwise, I would just say record it on your phone, the audio or whatever, because if you ask something inconvenient and then they just cut it, that's horrible and you should be able to expose them if they do.
	This feminine penis, white.
	Anyway, let's go to the next question.
	Hello, my name is Steve Stevens.
	I'm the one who created the government petition.
	Thank you for putting it out there and also thank you for telling me about the spelling mistakes.
	Unfortunately, not much I could do about that now.
	I would like to say thank you for the brilliant work you're doing, really enjoying the content.
	I would also like to take this moment to shill my TikTok as at steve.stevens or just stevestevens on TikTok.
	Great.
	Well, thanks for setting up the petition.
	Yeah.
	And again, it's not entirely his fault with spelling mistakes.
	A parliamentary committee looks over every petition, but they didn't catch them either, so don't feel too bad.
	Let's go for the next comment.
	One that's particularly applicable today.
	It's called The Principle of Mayhem.
	It's going to take me a couple of days to go through it all, but at the end of it, I think you'll figure out why I thought it would be fun to share.
	Okay.
	I don't quite understand how that was.
	I was enjoying the memes, though.
	Yeah.
	I'm down for a Mormon jihad, man, to be honest.
	Mormon jihad?
	Oh, yeah.
	The Mormons have got some kooky beliefs, but, yeah.
	The alternatives.
	Yeah, well, who doesn't?
	At this point, we're defining whether Idris Elba is black or not.
	It's like, okay, we can just go for the Mormon jihad.
	Okay.
	Do we have more comments?
	This is CNN breaking news.
	The United States Navy's fourth fleet is deployed off the southeastern seaboard of the U.S. after last night's sudden Godzilla attack.
	A time of relative peace shattered when the massive Titan, once thought to be a hero to humanity, made landfall in Pensacola, Florida.
	While the damage was largely contained to the U.S. headquarters of Apex Cybernetics...
	So for people listening, it's that.
	And then he plays Stop Asian Hate, hashtag StopCNN.
	Excellent.
	I love the people who make the comments.
	Yeah, they're amazing.
	There's so much more effort than we put into the podcast.
	I'm joking.
	We work really hard on the podcast.
	Anyway, so comments.
	White Hot Peppers.
	Hey, dude.
	The age-old tactic of using women to get information out of sad, lonely men to get the truth out.
	The fact that feminists, leftists, don't see how much control women have over men throughout time is just testament to how clueless and undesirable they are.
	God, that was brutal.
	Listen, you ugly hags.
	We know that you don't understand why men do everything we say, but that's because you're foul.
	Us nice women are able to get things done.
	I mean, just...
	No lies detected, but basically everything men have done to improve life has been for their wives slash women as they desire.
	Hilarious that Project Veritas uses Tinder to get these depraved, disgusting men.
	That's a great point.
	That's a great point.
	Good job, Project Veritas, undercover women for doing God's work and acting interested in these slime figures.
	Much respect, 10 burgers.
	Yeah, this is Camille Palia's point as well.
	She was like, well, look, if civilization had been left up to women, we'd still be living in grass huts.
	I was like, oof.
	All right, Camille.
	Just calm down.
	They're already dead.
	T.F. Full Spark.
	Project Veritas are basically the watchers who watch the watchmen.
	Noble men and women of all of them.
	I'm also struggling to see who's more racist, the SJWs or the KKK.
	Well, it turns out, actually, the SJWs and the KKK have now harmonized into exactly the same group.
	So...
	I'd say by the SJW's definition, remember, it's prejudice plus power.
	Well, who's got power?
	The KKK? No.
	A bunch of weirdos in the forest.
	That's why they've adopted the KKK position.
	Or the SJWs who pretty much own half of all institutions among the West.
	I mean, these guys, if that's how it works, prejudice plus power...
	SJWs are off the charts.
	All I'm saying is just next time there's a KKK rally, check under the hoods.
	I want to know.
	I mean, there are loads of really poorly drawn swastikas in graffiti that you see going around.
	And I always know when it's not a Nazi who's done this graffiti because the swastika is like misshapen or backwards.
	Because if there's one thing a Nazi is going to be able to do correctly is draw a swastika.
	Yeah, like communists with a hammer and sickle.
	Exactly.
	Like, you'd have to be an absolute moron of a Nazi not to be able to draw a swastika.
	And so you see all these weird squiggles, and, like, Sarah Silverman's, like, pointing out, like, building markings on the floor, and she's like, look!
	He's like, no, that's a measurement.
	Sarah, you moron I love how Project Veritas is going through the dating apps if this lot were happily married and not single out for a bit on the side it'd be a hell of a lot harder to get to liberal lifestyles being used against liberals to take them down yeah, that's quite amusing the way CNN chap is bragging about those numbers hears himself saying I wish more people were dead than having to walk it back his peak are we the bad guys - Rubbish like this is why people would want something like the BBC, what the BBC should be.
	Don't care about chasing ratings, only care about facts in a straightforward manner.
	Shame it's gone to hell in a handbasket.
	Anyway, you chaps have covered things like the Chauvin-Floyd case.
	It's probably the closest to the gold standard I've seen lately.
	Keep it up.
	Yeah, Rory's been doing an amazing job and Callum's been doing great with the podcast updates as well.
	And we're trying not to take a side on that because we don't care, obviously.
	Yeah.
	But I must say Nelson is an interesting character as a lawyer.
	It's just amazing watching all of my enemies line up on the wrong side of the argument to just get repeatedly punched in the face by just this kind of tubby dude.
	He's just sat there.
	He's just a normal guy.
	You wouldn't look at him twice if you walked past him in the street.
	What's happening?
	Well, I'm actually currently destroying a massive left-wing institution that is the Black Lives Matter George Floyd case.
	For me, it's just more like, you know, there's 12, 14 guys on one side and there's one guy on the other.
	And he's putting up such a fight.
	It's so politically partisan on one side of it.
	I can't stand it.
	Anyway, Alexander says, the reason they still openly talk about these things, even after loads of undercover Veritas pieces, is because they keep getting away with it.
	Doesn't matter that they were exposed.
	Only the right will care about what's said.
	People who need to know this stuff have already been convinced that Project Veritas is nonsense and does out-of-context hit pieces.
	I don't agree.
	Yeah, I don't agree that it's quite that simple.
	Although I think that does have a broad representation that, you know, on the right, Project Veritas is considered credible and CNN isn't.
	And on the left, more people will think of CNN as credible and Project Veritas not.
	But that's not to say there isn't like a sort of fuzzy area in the middle of people who just don't really know.
	And if they see the Project Veritas, they're thinking, oh, CNN are a bit suspicious.
	And their opinions start swinging one way or another.
	So I think it is important.
	It's also that thing of if you've ever had your opinions changed or you didn't have an opinion on something and now you do, well, how did that happen?
	You saw something and this is the kind of thing that does that.
	Yeah.
	At the very least, even if no one saw it, I would want it to exist.
	So I could, like Winston Smith, be like, no, I held the evidence in my hand before the party falsified it.
	I held the evidence.
	That's why Project Veritas is so great.
	So there is an objective reality and the party can't just change history as they choose.
	We are working on the book club for 1984, which is why I happen to be able to fluently just pull that off the top of my head.
	How far into 1984?
	It's quite a thick book, actually, isn't it?
	I don't know how you define it.
	In the audiobook I've got, it's like section one is done.
	Have you got to when Winston has been given Goldstein's manifesto?
	Oh, yeah.
	It's really good.
	It basically gives you Orwell's view of what the future could end up being under an internationalist, socialist regime.
	It's good stuff.
	I'm looking forward to your bit.
	You mentioned, sorry we're going off topic, but you mentioned there was a bit where they're just like, oh, the party did this and this and this, and you were like, yeah, I could just mention by name every SJW that's done that, that, and that.
	Oh, yeah, where they literally falsify history.
	When Ellen Page, Elliot Page, transitioned, suddenly all of the records online, instead of being Ellen Page, they became Elliot Page.
	On the Wikipedia, on the IMDB, you see it changing in real time.
	Someone in the comments, remind me the exact scene, the scenario of this, but there was one point where it was a public debate or something like that that was said on TV, and then the definitions of the words being used were changed in real time.
	I can't remember exactly which one it is.
	Someone leave me a note in the comments to remind me, so I'll put that into the notes.
	So the party doesn't scrub it forever.
	Exactly, yes.
	So the party doesn't scrub it forever.
	And it's just one of those things, just like, you know, it's nice to have the proof.
	But anyway, Tom says, Well, there is definitely an element of that, I think.
	I think they do like to be proud of it to one another.
	Yeah.
	But it's not like it doesn't matter, though.
	No, no.
	Rowan says, did I hear someone ask about context in COOF numbers?
	Why did that make me think of the meme?
	Did I hear someone ask about black crime statistics?
	She didn't even know that was a meme.
	Oh, it's some Australian comedian.
	She keeps going about dad's Google history, but then it was co-opted to be black crime statistics.
	Because I've seen the comedians.
	She's totally unfunny, but as soon as you change the framing, it's brilliant.
	Dad's crime statistics.
	Exactly.
	Anyway, a friend of mine in Canada fired me the world life expectancy website COVID counter.
	Just entered the country at the top of the field and sat back with a bucket of popcorn.
	Kiwis and Aussies might want a few kegs of beer just to see how minuscule their totals truly are.
	Yeah.
	MEP Flyboy says, Veritas is good, but they still need to get past the gatekeepers of the normies.
	The people who miss the forest of the trees.
	In regards to the UK, it will be even more difficult.
	Take the upcoming GB News.
	The snobbery will still be closing the door off to the likes of, say, the Lotus Eater's community.
	Well, that's why we're doing our part.
	We're doing surprisingly well, actually, algorithmically, when we're allowed on YouTube.
	We're doing great on Facebook, and the podcast is doing great numbers.
	Doing good on BitChute.
	Doing good on the website.
	Doing good everywhere, actually.
	So thank you everyone who's watching.
	We really appreciate your patronage.
	Wouldn't be here otherwise.
	Yeah, exactly.
	And so a large number of smaller content creators covering the same story can have the same effect as a couple of large media outlets constantly rolling it.
	So, you know, do your part.
	Make sure that everyone is well aware of Project Veritas showing that CNN admit they're propagandists and want to profit from causing you tremendous amounts of fear and tension in your daily life.
	Especially if you have a parent who watches CNN and is massively worried or has been convinced by that.
	I mean, just send them the clip and be like, well, here's them saying off camera we were lying to you.
	We just want you to be afraid, so we make money.
	Michael Wasser says, You can't be black, you're not eating chicken.
	You can't be Jew, you don't work in banking.
	You can't be a Celt, you're sober.
	About that race report, not finding racists.
	We're looking at the wrong place.
	You need to look at the HR departments.
	Awesome Well says, As a white male with a Caribbean wife, I can confirm that the Jamaican side of my family don't literally live on jerk chicken rice and peas every day in their lives.
	Wait, what?
	They occasionally have, like, sandwiches and things, I imagine.
	Radical.
	They're more into cooking some nice Italian or Chinese or a good roast dinner on a Sunday.
	We do have Caribbean food from time to time, but mainly at parties or weddings and it's more traditional to do so.
	BBC racist printer go brr.
	He's not eating chicken.
	I don't recognise him as a black man.
	It's so bad.
	It's so bad.
	It's like the black intern starts to eat a sandwich and she's like, white.
	Not even brown bread.
	Edward of Woodstock says, I should have covered the Frank Azaria stuff.
	As well.
	Because he came out and apologized to every Indian.
	And there were loads of Indians in my face.
	I put it on Facebook and there were loads of Indians in the comments going, shut up, Hank.
	I don't want this apology, Hank.
	Because I just replied going, Indians don't want this.
	And there was loads of Indians going, fuck off, Hank.
	So it's just like, yep, didn't win any friends there, did you?
	Dean says, I support the BBC, belittling black cultures.
	That's right, I'm a progressive.
	By the gods, what is wrong with these people?
	They seem to go beyond socialist dogma and straight into racial essentialism, where not only do you need the right colour, you need to act it out.
	Like bullying a black kid for acting white because he studies instead of doing drugs.
	That's exactly where they're at.
	Idris, don't speak with such a nice accent.
	Put a bit of a twang on it, please.
	The in-betweeners in this scene comes to me.
	They're walking into the bathroom with Idris on it.
	You've got any heroin?
	What?
	Unless you've got any fentanyl.
	I'm sorry, no, why would I? God!
	Don't be so rude, Idris!
	It's so bad!
	I just...
	Oh, God.
	So, Christian says, only the progressive left could somehow trash an outstanding actor like Idris Elba.
	He's popular in the States.
	And only in their world can a white liberal accuse an obviously black man of not being black.
	Actually, no, this woman was black herself.
	However, a white man can demand to be treated like a black woman because he, she, it feels like it to their tearful applause.
	Left-wing logic is now collapsing in itself and forming singularity so dense and compact.
	It's created an enormous black hole where logic, intellect, sanity, humanity, and basic math cannot escape.
	Yes, Diane Abbott is leading the forefront.
	Yeah.
	BBC wants their blacks thugging on screen.
	So progressive.
	Callum was right that the white race is consuming all in the minds of the left.
	Now Idris Elba has been tack feared from the black race.
	The only places left are hums of voice white.
	I mean, how am I wrong though?
	All of Europe, literally all of it, white, okay.
	All of Asia.
	Not on my bloody watch.
	All of Asia.
	I'm not accepting the Spaniards, the Italians and Greeks as white.
	I'm just describing the left wing view.
	All of Asia as white, literally all of it.
	I will accept the Asians before I accept the Greeks.
	Including the Middle East.
	And now all including all of North Africa, Southern Africa, West Africa, I think South Africa as well.
	And then, I think, yeah, also because of George Zimmerman, all of South America up to the Mexico border is white.
	Oh yeah, good point.
	I mean, America's white, Canada's white.
	I mean, what's left?
	Argentina?
	I suppose so.
	Henry says, Callum's little lady voice is very Monty Python.
	Yeah, you sound just like Eric Idle.
	I don't know who that is.
	Oh, God!
	You get this all the time.
	Whenever I mention something that happened before you were born, I don't know.
	Whatever, old man.
	Can we get Eric Idle's Monty Python?
	I've watched a lot of Monty Python, so I probably know the guy, I just don't know the name.
	You know the clip where the People's Judea in front are sat there and he's like, I want to be a woman.
	See if we can get that one out.
	Because we're not going to get a copyright strike if we watch it.
	It's so good, and you really do sound like Eric Idle.
	I have seen that.
	Yeah, it sounds like this chap is not the messiah, but he's very definitely a naughty boy.
	Alexander Soberg says, Yeah, I mean, that's the thing.
	America is an important place, whether you like or not.
	But here's the...
	Otter's noses.
	Otter's noses.
	Ocelot's spleens.
	Got any nuts?
	I haven't got any nuts, sorry.
	I've got wren's livers, badger's spleens.
	No, no, no.
	Otter's noses?
	I don't want that Roman rubbish.
	Why don't you sell proper food?
	Proper food?
	Yeah, not those rich imperialist tidbits.
	Oh, don't blame me.
	I didn't ask to sell this stuff.
	All right.
	Dagobah's nose is in.
	I get two.
	Two.
	Thanks, Rich.
	Are you the Judean People's Front?
	F*** off.
	What?
	Judean People's Front.
	We're the People's Front of Judea.
	Judean People's Front.
	They literally predicted on the leftist, didn't they?
	Can I join your group?
	No, piss off.
	I didn't want to sell this stuff.
	It's only a job.
	I hate the Romans as much as anybody.
	Shh, shh.
	Are you sure?
	Oh, dead sure.
	I hate the Romans already.
	Listen, if you wanted to join the PFJ, you'd have to really hate the Romans.
	I do!
	This isn't the part I'm thinking of.
	But it's where Eric Idle's like, I want to be a woman, yeah.
	Why do you want to be a woman?
	I want to have babies.
	You can't have babies.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, but I should have a right to have babies.
	Yeah, it's symbolic of my struggle.
	Symbolic of your struggle against reality.
	Yeah.
	But Eric Idle's the guy on the left there with the covering.
	And you sounded just like him.
	It was great.
	I wanted to mention on that commentary who said it's a million miles away from his Swedish home.
	I do have a friend who went to Stockholm on a trip.
	And he ended up going to some museum, and there was a section where it was literally, what was it, how racist are you?
	And he sent me the image, I have to send it to you.
	And it's just like a museum where you're meant to walk through and learn how racist you are.
	It's like the South Park meme, where it's the Museum of Tolerance, and you just get shouted slurs at you.
	It's just like, oh man.
	And that's Stockholm, so it's not a million miles away.
	Brian says, the demand for racist graffiti exceeds the supply.
	Nothing will ever top the poop swastika.
	Yes, yes!
	There was a swastika made of poo that was in a university dorm.
	Wasn't a Nazi.
	What?
	Oh, come on.
	I know, this was ages ago.
	America's race problems.
	Yeah, yeah, communists have done it.
	Totally normal.
	America's race problem, not enough white racists.
	Natalie says, why am I picturing the George Floyd wannabe calling the police like Bart calls Moe in The Simpsons?
	Basically the same thing.
	My name's Seymour, Seymour Buckskin.
	I stand with Tracy Williams.
	The race grifter cries out in pain when they make racist graffiti.
	Maybe if the student is deemed not black enough like Idris Elba, it's still white supremacy.
	Anyway, Zen Chan.
	Carl, you and your community have said before that you are never ready to be a parent.
	Well, all the converse of that is you're always ready.
	To be a parent.
	And to the effect of becoming a parent changes your mentality and makes you a good person or a parent.
	How does this explain the multitude of genuinely terrible parents that exist?
	Well, that's the point, isn't it?
	It's about your personal character.
	The question of, oh, you need X physical resources or X position to be a parent, that's not really true, to be honest.
	Everyone's essentially in a place where they can have kids.
	But there are people who are terrible people, who are deeply selfish and abusive, and they do make terrible parents.
	But I assume, the presupposition of what I'm saying is, if you're listening to me, you're not the sort of terrible person who will abuse their kids.
	And you are probably just nervous that you think, oh God, is there something I needed to do before I settle down and have a family?
	And the answer is not really.
	You know, just have a job.
	You'll be fine.
	You know.
	I mean, we usually presuppose this as well with, like, you know, don't do it when you're 16 or get a job, settle down, blah, blah, blah.
	But don't look for, like, a perfect moment because there's no single perfect moment.
	And you'll end up 40 years old, unable to conceive, you know...
	Cornish farmhouse wondering how it all came to this.
	Don't get me wrong, your mileage may vary.
	It's not absolute dogmatic statements, but as a general reassuring point, don't worry too much about organization.
	Sugar Supremacist says, That woman's article I read at the end of yesterday's podcast was incredibly depressing.
	Me and my partner are preparing for kids now, a few months off for a deposit on our mortgage.
	And we give ourselves a big window of time to start trying for kids when we get there.
	That's wise.
	We're a generation lied to about our biological limitations, and it's strange to see that veil of delusion still shrouding things like the trans movement, hence the high suicide rate in my opinion.
	Thank you for yesterday's answer.
	Even if it wasn't much help, private nursing may eventually be the answer.
	All the best, lads.
	Thanks for your work.
	Well, thanks, Rose.
	Yeah, sorry we didn't have a better answer to the nursing question yesterday.
	But I think the way you frame this is fantastic.
	The veil of delusion about our biological limitations of which we have been lied to about.
	And I think that's fair.
	I think that's unfortunately part of reality that we have tried to deny and can't.
	And there are lots of examples.
	We didn't cover the woman who froze her eggs.
	We should do an actual segment on it.
	Explore it and stuff like this.
	Look into it properly.
	Anyway, Christopher says, Hi lads, loving the podcast as always.
	Your segment with Katie yesterday really resonated with me.
	As a 30-year-old man in a dead-end desk job who recently ended an eight-year relationship primarily due to lockdowns, the feeling of having invested my best years of life into a future with someone and having nothing to show for it sent me into a downward spiral.
	However, thanks to no small part of the ideas and philosophies you espouse on the show, I've decided to pick myself up and march forward, currently getting myself in shape and saving to get a HEV license to unshackle myself from my desk.
	That's wise.
	That's a good start.
	Although I have some anxiety at the thought of essentially restarting my adult life nearly a decade after I began it.
	Well, unfortunately, this comes down to Rudyard Kipling's if.
	If you can lose all of your earnings on one spin of pitch and toss and pick yourself up from the beginning and never breathe a word about your loss, you're a man, my son.
	Something like that.
	Roughly off the top of my head.
	But the point is...
	I mentioned the podcast.
	My relationship was ended with my ex-girlfriend a little while back.
	We'd been together like five years.
	And I can imagine losing an eight-year relationship in the middle of lockdown.
	I mean, I'm upset about it because I had the same ideas.
	And if you're 30, yeah, it's tougher.
	But at the end of the day, you have no choice but to pick yourself up and carry on moving forward.
	And I think you're doing the right thing.
	I mean...
	Honestly, there have been genuine times in my life where I thought, why don't I have an outdoor job?
	And I can totally understand the desire to unshackle yourself from a desk.
	And I'll tell you what, that segment yesterday, I didn't realise how much it'd resonate with a bunch of people.
	I was reading a load of comments and stuff on the website page and on the comments on the YouTube and Bitshoot, and people seemed to really enjoy that segment.
	It's why people like Stefan Molyneux and why it's so weird that he's so demonised, because his main thing was just talking about egg cartons.
	That wasn't his main thing.
	Well, it's what I know him for.
	It's just the point.
	He was the only one who I saw in significance.
	I mean, other people talk about it, obviously, but him mainly, where he'd make the point of just, look, the clock ticks.
	And, yeah, it's just true.
	There is no argument.
	Yeah, and I mean, the feminists can say, well, there's a clock for men too.
	Sure, there probably is, but it's a lot slower.
	Doesn't click as fast.
	Yeah.
	Tyler says, my friend is a long-time viewer and recently sent me this, had an email off the Royal Air Force with the sergeant's pronouns in the signature.
	And then in a Zoom meeting with the commanding officers, the opening message contained the statement, we want you to be proud of yourself, your family, your background, your race, your sexuality, your gender identity.
	Oh, God.
	Be proud of your race.
	No, I know.
	Even the military has fully embraced woke, much like our local unnamed building society I'm sure you have friends or family working for.
	Yeah, so we wrote an article about this on Olysses.com with the REF introducing pronouns being mandatory.
	If you can send us that, I mean, get the guy's permission, obviously, but we'll redact anything that would be personal if we can.
	I would love to publish just the, like, yeah, this is real.
	There's people saying this within our armed forces.
	And this just goes on.
	Because I can't get over how that's just a thing in the UK. You can see it coming into the US Army.
	And a lot of people are opposing it.
	But it will carry on.
	No, but the march will go on.
	I don't think they'll be stopping it.
	And it's embarrassing.
	Have a secession of the plebs if you have to.
	Be like, look, we're not going to be sat here and told about racial politics from the commanding officer.
	We're going to go sit outside until you withdraw this.
	Unionize!
	The military, you haven't respected my pronouns.
	That's unreal.
	I'm going to die, sir.
	I've got other things to worry about.
	Hammurabi says, The report yesterday about rainbows being generally unhappy got me thinking, and I wonder how much of it is another case of a push for acceptance completely backfiring.
	We're constantly shown in media as caricatures as the forms of things like drag queens and pride parade, absurdly flamboyant and obscenely promiscuous.
	My hypothesis is that many normal people who happen not to be straight see these frankly disgusting displays, are rightly put off by it, and start to dislike themselves by proxy.
	Personally, I refuse to fully come out in fear of being perceived as some circus freak.
	Do you think I'm on something here?
	Am I just blowing hot air?
	Thanks for your consideration.
	Well, I mean, it's entirely possible that there are lots of gay people who are really disgusted by LGBT activism.
	Douglas Murray talks about that sort of thing.
	That's a very interesting way of putting it.
	You feel like you can't fully come out because of these kind of groups.
	So you don't want to be associated with...
	Their activism is making it worse.
	Yeah.
	I mean, that's something I hadn't actually thought about.
	And you can see it.
	I don't know if we did a segment on it or not, but you could compare the Pride parades in London Pride versus Tokyo Pride, for example.
	Tokyo Pride, people just wearing normal clothes, being normal.
	And then London Pride, people on dog chains.
	I was like, right, okay.
	One of these is helping the cause, one is not.
	I saw one where it was a really fat lesbian in an inflatable bath being pissed on by two men.
	I don't want to see that.
	In the middle of the street?
	Yeah.
	She was naked.
	That's not helping gay acceptance.
	I mean, I wasn't feeling very accepting after watching it, I've got to be honest.
	Anyway, Alexander again says, Yesterday's article about the woman was very foreboding.
	I was constantly bombarded with anti-natalist rhetoric growing up, and many of my friends' parents resent their kids.
	It's only when I started reading dusty old books and hearing your positive experiences with fatherhood did I reconsider.
	Really, it all boiled down to intense indoctrination of hedonism.
	Why have kids when you can party and buy stuff?
	For reference, I'm in my early 20s and got married.
	Love from Sweden.
	Yeah, that's the thing.
	It seems that the boomers are kind of...
	Someone said this to me yesterday.
	the boomers seem to have an obsession with youth, right?
	They have an obsession with youth and beauty and early life.
	And it's like, that's really interesting because I actually don't, you know, I actually, so all my favorite characters were like, you know, sort of grizzled older warrior sort of characters, you know, been a veteran, he's been through the wars, he's got all of these life experience and, you know, all like a Gandalf style figure, you know?
	So it's, yeah.
	Old, wise, competent.
	So the obsession with youth and beauty, I'm just like, you look crap.
	I'm not going to rely on you for anything.
	I don't think you can save the world.
	I don't think you're a hero.
	I think you're vain.
	But it seems to be a kind of boomer thing where they resent growing older.
	I think there is an undercurrent of that.
	And it's not good, you know?
	It's interesting how, like, from my generation and younger, there's a respect for elders in a sort of roundabout way, not in a sort of direct, we respect your experience, because why would you?
	They're boomers.
	Anyway.
	Jacob says, Hi guys, really enjoyed the last segment of the podcast yesterday.
	See what I mean?
	I don't know why this resonated with everyone so much.
	I'm a bit biased.
	The first best thing that happened to me is that I'm married and have kids, and the second best thing is that me and my wife moved over from Poland 13 years ago, and since then we live in St.
	Austin and Cornwall.
	Oh, you literally live where I went to college.
	From an immigrant perspective, it's worth mentioning that people in England are exceptionally polite and friendly comparing to other nations.
	Well, you would say that because you're a British nationalist.
	Yeah, it's been my experience as well.
	The Brits are particularly polite and friendly.
	I went to climb Ben Nevis a few years ago.
	And I don't know why, but I expected to have some Scots say something to me about being English, because I obviously sound English.
	And everyone was just ultra polite and friendly.
	Like, I didn't have, you know, nothing.
	It was just, everyone was really nice.
	And so it was just, oh, thanks very much.
	Shame.
	Yeah.
	So it's slightly disappointing.
	I was expecting racism.
	But interestingly, I dated a girl from Liverpool who, she had worked in Scotland.
	She was like, oh yeah, they're all really racist against the English.
	I was like, yeah, Liverpoolians, English.
	Hmm.
	Yeah, I always knew I didn't like rednecks.
	Dave says, lads, just a thought, maybe do a short video about Section 127 explaining why it should be repealed and link the petition.
	It'd be easier for normies to see through bad laws that on a very surface level seem like a good idea when presented in this video format, and a potentially viral video on the reality of Section 127 could boost signatures greatly.
	Not a bad idea.
	I've done it.
	We'll do it again.
	I made one, I just don't know about the copyright issues.
	Well, we'll look at it and see if we can get up.
	Jack Burton says, Bigfoot is a thick concept.
	Yes.
	The evil scientists are attempting to destroy this thick concept by saying it looks like a guy in a suit.
	He's talking about you, Josh.
	It must be something to do with all the tits.
	Anyway, can't wait for the Bigfoot podcast.
	Yeah, no, I can't wait to do it.
	The thing is, we're not even going to be looking at the pictures of Bigfoot's boobs in the first podcast.
	I know, there's just too much.
	There's too much to go through before we get to Bigfoot boobs.
	But we'll make it at least a two-parter because...
	Honestly, there's loads of stuff to go through.
	So if you're not trying to convince me that Bigfoot exists, what are you trying to convince me of?
	I'm trying to convince myself that all of the people...
	I shouldn't go to Alaska with a gun.
	Yeah, that all of the people throughout history are talking crap, right?
	Because there's this one example of a salmon cannery that was a small, like, 50-man village, company village that was set up in Alaska, literally to...
	So the ships could come in...
	Can the salmon in the place and then ship it off and then sell it, right?
	So it was going to make the company money.
	They were literally being paid to be there, and they all deserted this area because, and this was the uniform story, we are being terrorized by a Bigfoot.
	So this canning town, this company town, dissolved.
	All of the people left because they were like, no, we're being terrorized by a Bigfoot.
	It's already killed two people.
	One of us saw it down at the beach.
	We're not staying here.
	What am I going to be like, no, there is no such thing as Bigfoot.
	Go back there.
	What am I going to say to them?
	They were like, you don't know.
	I saw it on the beach.
	You are just some asshole sat on your chair miles away.
	He's a bear.
	Yeah, exactly.
	But that's the thing.
	They're like, no, I saw it.
	It was not.
	And so what am I going to say?
	What, you sellouts?
	You've been paid to be there.
	You're being paid to make up this myth that didn't exist before you did.
	But that's the thing.
	They lost money by making up this myth and leaving.
	And so it's like, okay, what am I supposed to say?
	You know, and that's the problem.
	Because most of it you could explain away.
	Like, a lot of Bigfoot footage, when they're obviously wearing a suit, is very, very obvious.
	You know, because suits are baggy on them and stuff like that.
	Someone's wearing a ghillie suit.
	Yeah, someone wearing a ghillie suit.
	It's actually quite easy to spot these things.
	But then when you've got giants walking through the woods or something, I mean, if that's a guy in a suit, that's a really big guy in a suit, you know?
	And things like this.
	And so it's the things I can't explain away that I'm just like, right, okay, I need an explanation.
	It doesn't prove it.
	No, it doesn't prove anything.
	But that's the point, isn't it?
	We'll distinguish between evidence and proof when we do the podcast.
	But that's the reason we'll do it.
	It's just really fun as well.
	It's just really funny because there's nothing like, okay, let's say, you know, someone believes Bigfoot exists.
	So what?
	So what?
	There's no government conspiracy there.
	No one's getting overthrown because of the existence of Bigfoot or the non-existence of Bigfoot.
	It's such a weird thing to have stigmatized.
	It's so bizarre.
	No genocides are going to take place as a result.
	Yeah, exactly.
	What bigotry will occur?
	You know, nothing's going to happen.
	Hey, apes.
	Exactly.
	And it's a really interesting thing to put a sort of critical thought towards as well, but we'll talk about it in the podcast.
	So yeah, if you want to watch our Bigfoot coverage, you can sign up to lotuses.com, and we've got loads of other great stuff that actually makes sense as well, so you might want to do that, but if you're looking for a laugh, this would be fun.
	I'm looking forward to doing it.
	Yeah, we'll be doing that in a few minutes.
	So that's us for today.
	We will be back tomorrow at 1 o'clock.
	Not sure what we'll be covering.
	I've still been reading, sorry, watching the George Floyd stuff, but I don't know.
	To be honest, I feel like I might just wait to the end of the defense because it's tomorrow.
	It's only three days.
	Yeah, and then do it on Monday or whatever.
	Otherwise, we'll be back tomorrow, 1 o'clock.
	See you then.

▲