Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 25, 2021 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:31:12

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #96

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen.
	Welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters for Thursday, the 25th of March 2021.
	I'm John McCallum.
	And before we begin, we have a couple of announcements.
	The Ethical Knowledge Premium Podcast will be up at three o'clock this afternoon.
	Very proud of the work we've done on that.
	And this will be the cutting edge Of Brave New World analysis when next week we do the book club on Brave New World.
	We also have the Gold Tier members Zoom call tomorrow.
	So 4 o'clock tomorrow afternoon.
	We'll put the link out on the website.
	And you can join us and just come and have a chat with us, which is going to be hanging out for an hour and just chilling with you guys.
	So that'll be fun.
	Anyway, in the meantime, how's Britain falling apart today?
	Oh, multiple ways.
	But in this particular way...
	We're going to focus on the boats for this one.
	I'd love to talk about what's going on with Mohammed right now.
	It's just trending on Twitter, but we'll save that for tomorrow.
	That'll be much better.
	Anyway, so there's been this long-standing problem in the UK of boats coming over from France, in which you carry migrants who are coming here illegally, almost entirely men, which is no surprise.
	And if we could just show the first one here.
	So I'm sorry about the video being weird again.
	I don't know what's wrong with that.
	But this is a guy called ActivePatriot who's just constantly posting, and I keep getting sent this guy's stuff from people, where it's just like, oh look, this was on the 23rd two days ago, 27 people just turned up on boat, and we just picked them up and took them in.
	And this is every single day, it's not just like a one time off thing.
	There is some interesting back and forth between the staff now and the asylum seekers, so if we can get the next one up, this is kind of funny.
	We're not going to play it, but you should go and listen to it.
	It's just the staff getting angry with the migrants of being a bunch of D-heads.
	And then he shouts back at the migrant, you don't have to come.
	You can't go back to France.
	It's like...
	Okay.
	Good.
	It's good that the staff know what's up.
	This is just a complete joke.
	And if these people are being ungrateful to you, just, okay, yeah, go back to France then.
	You don't need to be here.
	And then this is yesterday, the next one here.
	Just to make the point, this is being posted literally every single day.
	This is another video from this guy.
	67 people yesterday.
	Just 67 people.
	Just turning up on a boat.
	Totally normal.
	I don't know why they couldn't come by the legal routes.
	I don't know why the Navy can't just turn them around and land them back on French shores.
	I don't really understand it either.
	I keep getting told there's a whole host of legal problems with stuff like that because of international agreements on refugees and maritime law and stuff.
	And I don't even pretend to understand it.
	So I'm just going to accept that there is.
	Yeah, I'm sure there is.
	No problem there.
	Because Priti Patel doesn't give off any signs that she wouldn't like to do that.
	Yeah.
	We'll go through some of the stuff she's been proposing in private.
	I mean, for all the criticism of her, I don't really get the sense that she's in favour of this sort of thing.
	She seems to want to stop it, but either doesn't have the power politically or legally.
	So there's also the point there, if you can go back, just for the numbers, so we can get a view of this.
	So if you'd scroll up.
	There's 109,000 asylum applications waiting on decision in the UK, with 42,000 failed asylum seekers who have not been deported.
	I'm assuming he's taking that number from the people who have been given the notice that you are a fake asylum seeker, you are clearly lying to us, you are clearly not in danger, please leave, and we don't seem to have a mechanism for actually getting rid of that many people.
	So I think the percentage is like 6% or something of people who get given orders to leave are actually documented as leaving.
	The rest of them, we just don't know.
	They're either somewhere in Britain or maybe they left if we're lucky.
	Unreal.
	It's just the absolute state of it.
	So Priti Patel has been proposing some stuff to try and counter this for a long time.
	The latest one came out and I just wanted to read through the Guardian's view on Priti Patel's asylum proposals first.
	So they describe it as incoherent, unworkable and inhumane because of course they do.
	This is a globalist outlet who just wants more and more immigration for the sake of it.
	Sounds great.
	When can we enforce it?
	Yeah.
	I love some of the, just the wording they put it here, though.
	They're trying to describe what she's proposing as terrible.
	How the hell could she do this?
	And we'll say what she's proposing in a minute, but I want to big up how terrible this is.
	Over a year into the pandemic, you might feel the government has had enough on its plate, yet it is cynically manufacturing another crisis.
	What?
	Manufacturing it.
	Oh, yeah.
	At the expense of vulnerable people who have arrived here seeking refuge.
	Vulnerable, misogynistic Muslim migrants from Syria who undoubtedly agree with the Prophet Muhammad's prescriptions against women and that they should be given half of the inheritance of a man.
	What the hell are you defending these men for?
	But they're manufacturing this crisis.
	It's like, what, are they paying for the boats?
	Are they the criminal gang secretly?
	The Conservative Party is running those boats?
	I mean, it's a big, plain, like, Blue Anon-level conspiracy there, but whatever.
	And then they continue on here.
	Priti Patel's claim that the system is, quote, collapsing under the burden of demand is nonsensical.
	The number of asylum applications in the country last year was well below its 2002 peak.
	Right, so there was a massive crisis in 2002.
	Twice as bad as it is now.
	Right, gotcha, Guardian.
	Thank you for telling us.
	Four out of five refugees globally have fled to neighbouring countries.
	Yes.
	As if that's a point?
	That's right, they should.
	That's what you'd expect?
	Like, they go to the neighbouring country that has a similar culture and language, and that's how this should work, and when the war is over they go home?
	Not just that, that's how the international convention works.
	You go to the nearest safe country and stay there.
	And then you're a refugee there, and then if you go anywhere else, you're a migrant.
	And somehow you end up in France, crossing the channel to Britain, and it's like, hang on, hang on, hang on.
	You're not taking this very seriously, are you?
	Yeah.
	So they mention Turkey hosts 3.6 million people, and therefore this shows us to be, I don't know, inconsiderate or something.
	Like, we're burgeoning under asylum applications while Turkey has 3.6 million.
	Yeah, Turkey borders a war zone, and has actually partially invaded Syria at this point.
	Yeah.
	So, I mean, I don't know why that's a dunk.
	And then they make another dunk.
	How many have the Arab states taken, just out of interest?
	Let's not look at that.
	Yeah, let's not look at that.
	There are Gulf allies.
	Why would we criticize?
	criticize them it's important that france takes loads though as for mr mrs patel to snipe that the eu countries must be part of the solution which is rich when germany has a refugee population of 1.1 million compared to the uk's 133 000 look if germany is stupid enough to destroy their own country that's not our fault nor is it something we should follow nobody asked merkel to take a I think 1.1 million is a very low estimate as well.
	I think it's going to be over 2 million.
	But nobody asked Germany to take all these?
	Angela Merkel was like, oh, Mama Merkel are here to save you.
	Come in, come in, and we will redistribute you around Europe.
	Because there's the point made there.
	Greece, France, and Spain have also accepted far more asylum seekers.
	And the correct point you make is they don't stay there.
	No one stays in Greece.
	Like, there was the funniest part of the whole migrant crisis.
	Portugal were the only country that responded to Merkel's call for redistribution of migrants and said, yes, we will take more, because they got paid for every single migrant they took.
	So they took truckloads of them, flew them all over to Lisbon, and then they got absolutely no benefits from the government at all.
	And they all just left Portugal and went to Spain or France or Germany.
	Based Portugal.
	So Portugal was like, yeah, just send more, just send more.
	Guys, we're going to treat you like everyone else.
	You're getting nothing from the government.
	No Gibbs.
	And then they all just left.
	It was like, it's that simple.
	But I guess no one learned that point.
	Starting to like the way the Portuguese do things.
	Portuguese-based.
	Yeah.
	But the stupid point here of just like, well, Germany has destroyed its country.
	Why isn't Britain?
	Thanks, Guardian.
	That's a really compelling argument.
	Well, it's exactly the position I'd expect the Guardian to adopt, to be honest.
	Yeah.
	They also claim here that people with a valid claim have no legal obligation to register in the first place they reach, and may have good reason to want to live elsewhere.
	I don't care.
	So they have no legal obligation, which is what they're arguing.
	So very legalistically in international agreements, you don't have to.
	And it's like, and they may have a reason to live elsewhere.
	Okay.
	But do they have a right to live elsewhere?
	We would like to live in your country, please.
	Yeah, well, the answer's no.
	Like, the Austro-Goths don't get to live in Rome, bye-bye.
	Yeah, bye-bye, yeah, exactly.
	But that's the thing, it's like, who has a right to live on English soil except, you know, the English?
	And then expanding to the British here, obviously, because that's the proper thing.
	Maybe even the Welsh.
	Do the British have a right to all Russian soil?
	Yes.
	This is the core of imperialism.
	But it's like, it all belongs to us.
	I mean, that's the argument from the migrants.
	It's like, yeah, I may have just run away from Iran, a country that's not at war.
	That is the biggest group of those who are crossing in boats, by the way.
	But I'm entitled to live in England and also to get English money.
	It's like...
	I don't think you are, buddy.
	I don't really see how you're making that argument, to be honest.
	Iranian imperialism.
	We now conquer Britain.
	That's like, well, no.
	No, we put away with that argument.
	Otherwise, I guess we'll set up the Anglo-Iranian oil company again and go back in.
	I guess we can.
	But yeah, there is no right.
	They're just talking S. So then there's the plans from Priti Patel, and there are some criticisms of her plans, and I'm not trying to big them up or anything.
	I just want to describe them as well as I can.
	Is the criticism that they're not harsh enough.
	The criticism is that they're not harsh enough from the people who want her to take a harsher stance, which is unsurprising.
	But I don't know what she can and can't do.
	The insides of government are a mess compared to what anyone would want them to be.
	So apparently previously she had come up with plans, or a number of these, that she wanted to set up a base in the Ascension Islands or St Helena.
	She even proposed one in Gibraltar, to which the Gibraltar government turned around and said, a house here costs a million pounds.
	There's no land where you're going to put them.
	So...
	So then there was that, and then she proposed bringing in water cannons to put on the, what is it, like the border force, so they could fire water cannons at the migrants to make them go back to France, which, that's the thing, I'm just like, well, if her and her team are proposing these sorts of things, I don't have any reason to believe that she's, I don't know, lying or anything.
	I mean, you are in the ocean, you don't even need to bring the water with you.
	Just put a pipe down in there, put an engine out, psh!
	If we can go to the graph with the number of asylum seekers, so it should be up a little bit, John.
	Yeah, so this is the example that the Guardian were arguing here.
	So this is a long-time graph for people listening, showing the number of asylum seekers per year.
	And you can see there are spikes for the conflict in Somalia and Sri Lanka, and then another spike for 2002 that they referenced as the peak with conflicts in Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, and Yugoslavia.
	And then there's the Syrian conflict, and it's going back up now for the last 10 years.
	And that's the complaint from people arguing about asylum.
	It's like, well...
	It's been going up for 10 years.
	You guys need to get a hold of this.
	But also, most of these people from Yugoslavia, Somalia, Iraq, whatnot, they wouldn't have come into the UK from dinghies on the boats over the Channel.
	No.
	They have not fled throughout all of Europe and then suddenly ended up there.
	I'm not old enough to remember it, but I imagine that wasn't the case.
	Otherwise, I think there'll be something in the history books about this, but seemingly not.
	So I imagine they applied through the legal proceedings like everyone else in the time period, which just the Guardian doesn't care about because that's not the problem here for them.
	So they say in here that the rules will be, anyone coming via proposed new official routes, such as the recent Syrian resettlement scheme, taking people from camps in, say, Turkey or Syria or wherever it is, who they've checked, they like them, they say, right, you are a legitimate refugee, they get far-tracked to a permanent life in the UK. So they are sent from there to the UK. I don't like that, to be honest, a permanent life in the UK. Surely you should be sent back to Syria once the war is over, which it seems to be.
	Yeah, I was going to say, I thought it was over.
	That part, it just seems nonsensical to me.
	But that's the caveat of like, okay, anyone coming legally through the official routes, we will allow.
	But apparently it's very hard, so that's one thing.
	And then anyone coming through the illegal routes, so coming over in little boats or just running through lorries...
	Will be sent to a safe country they pass through, and those that they can't eject, so those that get here and they can't send it to a country, they will never get a permanent residence and will have repeated attempts to remove them every year that follows.
	So if you come here illegally, we will just try and get rid of you every single year by sending you back to one of the safe countries you came through, or the safe country that you come from, because you are a liar, you're not a legitimate asylum seeker, which is totally true for the most of them by the looks of it.
	And if a country has migrants who have come here illegally, and then we say to that country, hey, here's a bunch of your citizens back, and they say, no thank you, then we will apparently suspend visas with that country.
	Not really.
	Which is interesting, because I can't remember.
	I think it might be like the third or fourth largest group of people who are coming here are Pakistani, coming here illegally.
	So they're traveling through Europe or getting a flight over to the middle of Europe and then coming over or something.
	So it's like, well, if we turn around to the Pakistani government and say, here's a bunch of your citizens, and the Pakistani government says, we don't want to take them back, okay, no more visas to Pakistan, I guess.
	And it's just like...
	I really hope they do that, because that would solve a lot of our problems, especially with what's going on in that school right now.
	But we'll save that for tomorrow.
	Sorry, I'm excited about that.
	So then there's the question here, which is, okay, we can look at asylum seekers, we can look at migration and whatnot and all this stuff, but we're specifically focusing on the reports of boats.
	So if you can scroll down to the second graph on here, so past this one, this shows just for this time period, and then the, la la, sorry, a little further down.
	That's not looking good though, is it?
	Yeah, here we go.
	This is the graph for best understanding, I think.
	So it shows you every single year the arrivals coming over by small boats.
	You can see the first year there, blue 2018.
	Practically nothing slowly got up for the winter years.
	And then ever since, every single year, it's expanding exponentially.
	Green is 2020.
	You can see how many that is in September.
	Yeah.
	This is when we last covered it, I think, on the podcast.
	It was like September or October or something, in which it was exploding and people were making a big fuss about it.
	And it never stopped.
	It went down for the winter because the sea's rougher.
	And now it's started up again as the seas get calmer.
	And you can see the numbers already double what they were last year.
	So we'd be expecting double in the summer months as well.
	So this problem isn't going away.
	In fact, it is getting worse every single month.
	And I hope her stuff is able to get rid of some of them, but the opposition on this is not great.
	So there's the conservative side of this.
	I don't really trust them.
	I've got my doubts that they'll be able to do the right thing here or be able to enact what they want.
	But at least they're not Labour.
	I guess that's the one caveat out of this.
	So Labour MPs in response to her proposing this are outraged.
	So this is Richard Bergden.
	Priti Patel's statement on refugees was one of the vialist statements I've heard in Parliament.
	Good.
	What, that they should go home because they're not legitimate?
	People seeking asylum have fled war, torture and rape.
	Then why can't they prove it on their asylum application?
	Why do they keep coming from countries that are not at war?
	They don't seem to have any evidence of torture or rape.
	I mean, that's a damning indictment of France.
	LAUGHTER Richard, the continent's bad, but it's not that bad, buddy.
	People fleeing France have fled war torture and rape.
	Man, living as a French citizen must be tough.
	I'm sure they can hold out.
	They're the ones doing the war torture and rape.
	What are you talking about?
	Poor Syrians who are stuck in France.
	Yeah.
	So then there's another Labour MP, Zahra Sultana, part of the mentally challenged squad, who tried to make this whole thing as an attack on capitalism instead, which was weird in this video.
	Yeah, but literally everything that Zahra Sultana says is an attack on capitalism.
	It's really bizarre.
	She posted on Instagram the other day that, oh, the COVID lockdowns are hurting everyone.
	This is what capitalism does to you.
	And it's like, what?
	What?
	I mean, absolute brain, like cave brain, you know, like, what are you saying?
	The government interfering in the economy.
	That's capitalism.
	It's like, yeah, yeah, okay.
	Smooth brain idiot.
	Just unreal.
	Refugees arrive in Britain seeking sanctuary and safety.
	Yeah, but Britain's a racist country, isn't it, Zara?
	Britain's a white supremacist country, isn't it?
	That's what I was told.
	This is how it was advertised by Labour.
	Why are you asking these non-white people to come?
	Oh no, they did become white recently, didn't they?
	Oh yeah, I suppose the Syrians are white.
	So they're part of the white supremacy now.
	Zara, the Syrians are racists!
	Why do we want more Nazis in the country?
	But then it's not just her, there's a, not Labour MP, but MP Jeremy Corbyn as well, trying to sit through all this.
	Did he not get accepted back into Labour?
	I think he's still out.
	I think he's in his, like, parliamentary Labour Party.
	Is it like his constituency part?
	But he's not in the parliamentary part.
	So he's not a Labour MP, but he is a member of Labour, and it's like, and he's an MP. He is also a public embarrassment, so if I were running it in Labour, I'd probably do the same.
	Absolute mess.
	The government once again attacking people who can't answer back to distract from its catalogue of failures from poverty to the pandemic.
	It's like just trying to shift it again.
	I love how he's accusing them of trying to run away from an issue.
	When he's talking about migration issues, he's like, yeah, but what about the pandemic and poverty?
	It's just so transparently stupid.
	But the state of public debate isn't much better.
	So I have a clip, which we just listened to on the way when we were coming in from listening to talk radio.
	And my God, the absolute state of it.
	I didn't realize France was as bad as you're saying, but apparently it really, really is.
	Hey, man, I'm the one who's been, you know, raising the alarm on the absolute state of France for many years now.
	It's not fit for poor refugees, man.
	The leftist activists are in agreement, so they agree that France is literally unlivable.
	Predatory gangs of Frenchmen roaming the countryside looking for poor refugees to rape, murder, and wage war on.
	That's why Paris isn't Paris anymore, because the French citizens have just devolved into it.
	Because the French have done this.
	Yeah, so let's play the clip.
	Someone fleeing the coast of France isn't desperate.
	They may have been desperate when they left Syria or Afghanistan or elsewhere.
	Once they've got as far as France, they're no longer unsafe and they're no longer desperate.
	In which case, what's the justification?
	Well, as we have discussed before, Julia, safety is subjective.
	And to take a recent, you know, pretty horrifying example, clapping at night is clearly safer for men than it is for women.
	And likewise...
	I don't think it's just that that probably is true, actually, but let that go.
	Likewise, countries in Europe may be safe for white, wealthy European people who go on holiday there, but they may not be as safe for a traumatised or trafficked woman or child who has been fleeing a situation in their home country.
	So France is unsafe?
	Come on.
	So I like Julia's just batting her down there.
	It's like, oh, come on, stop being stupid.
	But even then, okay, so for a trafficked woman or child, I mean, I would agree, but where were they?
	Because we saw the people going off the boats and they were like 20-something men.
	But all those 20-something men.
	I mean, when you walk around a first-world country like France, I'm sorry, no, it's a third-world s-hole, apparently, according to all the leftist activists.
	I mean, so terrible that it is as bad as living in Syria, by the sounds of it.
	I mean, living in the Syrian civil war is as bad as living in modern-day France.
	I mean, why do they think that Britain's any better?
	Why do they think that Britain's any better?
	They don't think Britain's any better.
	They're all going to be killed by racist police who just hate women as well, I guess.
	Sorry, I'm going to autoplay.
	Joe Biden, stop interrupting.
	It's not your time yet.
	What for death?
	I've come for you, Joe.
	Don't get me wrong, I agree with the assessment of France, but I don't agree with the solution for the migrants.
	Which is to bring them to the racist hellhole that is in Britain.
	And we're diseased as well, of course.
	Horribly diseased.
	But I just can't get over it.
	The opposition argument to this is so weak and pathetic and limp-wristed that I don't really understand what's stopping the Consolos.
	I mean, I try to give them leeway on the facts that I don't know what it is like to be the Home Secretary, of course.
	I don't know what legal proceedings you can and cannot do.
	But why are they not campaigning on this, at least?
	Don't we have a navy?
	I mean, can't we just blockade the English Channel?
	No.
	Why?
	Because it's an act of war.
	What, against migrants?
	No, against the French.
	Okay.
	They act like that's unusual.
	Like, oh, there's some precedence.
	That's not the point I'm trying to make, which is just like, okay, there might be a million legal reasons why Priti Patel has to tiptoe and be, you know, have problems here and there.
	And I'm willing to give her leeway on those sort of things because that's reasonable.
	But what about campaigning?
	Why is this not a message you guys have pumping out?
	Why are you guys not the ones bigging this up, being like, we need the power to get rid of these laws to do this.
	This is something we need to campaign on.
	Great question.
	Which is, I mean, an ultimate win.
	Because, I mean, look at the opposition you've got here, who are just arguing that France is so terrible that no one can live there for more than 24 hours, by the sounds of it.
	I mean, there's just roving gangs, just hunting down anyone who is in the streets.
	The get-wielding Frenchmen.
	You know?
	I don't know what's going on there, but that's the opposition here, which is just so laughable.
	I mean, how is this not the easiest win you've ever been handed to you?
	And yet, nothing.
	I'm waiting for Jeremy Corbyn to come out and go, well, Syrians are allergic to garlic, you see.
	They're all vampires.
	Basically, yeah.
	But I just don't get it.
	I mean, the only thing we did see out of Preeti Patel recently trying to campaign on this was the worst thing she could have possibly said, which is she was proud to resettle, what was it, 20,000 Syrian refugees?
	Yeah.
	It's like, why are you proud of that?
	Why are you appealing to the left-wing narrative here?
	What a weird thing.
	You're pretty...
	So the first thing that the Conservative government should do is poll the public.
	And when you come back as 70% of the public want the migrants deported because France is a safe country, quote-unquote, then you just go, we're going to deport every single goddamn migrant because they shouldn't be here.
	End of story.
	Every person across the channel shouldn't be here.
	End of story.
	Popular position with the public, I'm sure.
	That's what I get at.
	I don't know what the legal part is to get rid of them, but at least why not campaign on it?
	Why not ask for the powers to do it?
	Create legislation!
	You're the government!
	Not only are you the government, there's no EU stopping you anymore.
	So the entire blame lies with you as well for not campaigning.
	And not only that, you have a massive majority in the parliament.
	So if you get a popular position which is, we're going to deport illegal immigrants, I mean, literally the only people on the other side of that are labour activists.
	Like, hardcore Labour activists.
	Hardcore Labour activists.
	Labour voters don't like this.
	Labour voters don't like illegal immigrants.
	You say, look, every one of them that comes illegally over the channel, we're just going to deport back, and here's the legislation we've created to do this, then make it happen.
	I don't get it, but that's the state of where we are, which is, over the summer, that's going to explode, along with probably more Black Lives Matter violence as well.
	So, that's the day in Britain collapsing.
	Insufferable.
	Yeah, let's go to the United States.
	Yeah, so today in how the United States is collapsing, the Democrats have launched an all-out war on the Republicans, and I think it's worth documenting.
	So hello, our American friends to whom the country is being stolen from you.
	I hope you're enjoying how things are going.
	The first thing they're doing is gaying up the army.
	I don't think I'm understating that.
	The US Department of Defense has issued a memorandum for the Senior Pentagon Leadership, Commanders of Combatant Commands and DOD Field Activity Directors to promote and protect the human rights of LGBTQI plus persons, quote, around the world.
	That's right.
	You're charged with protecting gay rights in Pakistan.
	Have you seen the Onion video about gays in the military?
	No.
	Right, so everyone has to look this up.
	There's an Onion piece from like years ago when the gays were trying to get into the military and they called some army colonel on and they're like, Colonel, why can we not have gays in the army?
	And he's like, look, gays are just too precious.
	We can't risk them.
	We can't send our gays in.
	And then they say, what about the don't ask, don't tell policy?
	Well, we knew some gays would get through, but if we learned that they were on the front lines, it would harm our commanders seriously.
	So we just don't ask and don't tell.
	God bless those gays on the front line.
	And then he ends the video with like, God bless America, God bless our gays.
	I mean, now it's not just America's gays.
	Global gays.
	Yeah.
	Global gays are too special to be left.
	Iran's gays must be protected, you have to understand.
	It's the policy of the Department of Defense to pursue an end to violence and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or sex characteristics.
	And the DOD will lead by example in the cause of advancing the human rights of LGBTQI plus persons around the world.
	How special.
	They are committed to strengthening existing efforts to combat the criminalization by a foreign government of LGBTQI plus people and conduct and expand efforts to combat discrimination.
	So, I mean, it literally, like, it's actually, I think, going to end up in an invasion of some country because they discriminate against gays.
	Gays are too precious.
	They're too precious, mate.
	You've got to understand.
	Like, we the West have a duty to overthrow the Iranian government because of what they do to gays.
	There's a part in the video as well where the interviewer's like, well, how many men is worth one gay?
	And he goes, seven.
	They're going to expand ongoing efforts to ensure that regular engagement with governments, civil society, citizens, and the private sector to promote the respect for human rights of LGBTQI plus persons and combat discrimination, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	And this, of course, comes after Biden issued an executive order to ensure that everyone in the military is now transgender.
	It's the loony left on the march, so if we go to the next one, it doesn't end there, of course.
	This is not loony left enough for two senators, Tammy Duckworth and Maisie Horino, who say they will vote against all Biden nominees who are not racial minorities.
	And they will only vote for a white nominee if the nominee is LGBTQ. Literally, we hate white people.
	Vote Democrat.
	Yes.
	I mean, what else can you call that?
	I mean, those are senators as well, so what does that bring in?
	They only have 50 senators.
	So that means they can't pass anything without these people's approval.
	But literally, rebels in his own party against white people.
	That's how absolutely infected with social justice the Democrats are at this point.
	Jesus Christ.
	Yeah, so anyway, moving on.
	Biden's in trouble for stopping the construction of the border wall.
	He obviously put a stop to the wall on his first day because why wouldn't you be the person who creates a migrant crisis?
	The Congress had approved $1.4 billion to build the border wall.
	Biden had stopped it and the Government Accountability Office has initiated an inquiry into whether the President broke any laws by freezing the funds.
	Because, of course, Congress is supposed to control the power of the purse.
	He's not going to get found guilty of anything because strings will be pulled.
	Because Biden, frankly, is just a puppet.
	And we can see that Biden's a puppet because Kamala has been placed in charge of the crisis that he created.
	Harris is apparently going to lead the efforts to deal with Mexico and the Northern Triangle.
	She looks like she's about to assassinate him, doesn't she?
	In that picture.
	She's being put in charge of domestic policy, and soon she'll be in charge of foreign policy decisions, and then she'll be in charge of military decisions, and then Joe can take a nap.
	Well, I mean, he's basically already at that point.
	He goes sleeping with the fishes, you know?
	Yeah, she does look like she's waiting for the poison to work, doesn't she?
	Anyway, so she's going to be dealing with this, and it's a very important task, we are told, which is fair, and the question is, well, who's responsible for the 100,000 migrants that are turning up every month at America's borders?
	And the answer is, of course, Joe Biden himself.
	And we know this because we did a segment about this in a previous podcast, where the migrants themselves just said, Joe told us we could come.
	Is that okay?
	Great.
	Yeah, I mean, I've seen a clip from, I think it was a guy in Venezuela who was showing Spanish CNN, so the version they transmit south, was them just taking quotes from Joe Biden and saying, Joe Biden says that he's going to relax the border walls and blah, blah, blah, blah.
	Like, hour after hour, the same story.
	Yeah.
	Basically, the message from CNN, come to America.
	and it's because it's biden's policy it was on his website he's been saying it repeatedly he stopped the construction of the border wall and so 100 000 a month have arrived and that number's probably going to increase uh it's not been good news really because photos and footage from the border turned out that in fact biden's putting kids in cages in exactly the same way that trump and obama was doing apparently footage from the donna facility in the facility at donna texas was released by axios and project
	veritas showed migrant juveniles living in cramped pods laying on the floor wrapped in foil blankets Images highlight the Biden administration's struggle to mitigate the influx of illegal immigrants that Biden has caused.
	But the point is, we say that Biden has caused these things, and that is ascribing agency to Joe Biden, where I don't believe much really exists anymore.
	I mean, like, Biden's probably struggling to contain his own agency over his bowel movements at this point.
	He's definitely struggling with his agency of climbing up stairs.
	And so it's unsurprising that a memo was put around by a top White House communications team member that apparently said this.
	Please be sure to reference the current administration as the Biden-Harris administration, which is the first time this has happened.
	Because obviously it's always the Trump administration, the Obama administration, the Clinton administration.
	It's not the Clinton, whatever, vice president administration.
	And so that's really, really weird.
	Really weird that Joe Biden is essentially kind of sunsetting himself from his own presidential administration and sending Kamala Harris to do all the dirty work for him.
	Again, like, the pictures of her looking like she's waiting for the poison to work is weird and, I think, prescient.
	But anyway, this obviously follows on from the other day's gaffe, where Biden was like, yeah, so now when President Harris and I took a virtual tour of the vaccination center in Arizona, he didn't even correct himself.
	So it's like, right, so Biden's calling her President Harris.
	It's the Biden-Harris administration.
	This isn't the first time either.
	And she's going to go and clean up his mess.
	And it's not the first time.
	But the previous times, he corrected himself.
	That's the thing.
	This time, he didn't correct himself.
	So, right, okay.
	Just someone put this guy in a nursing home away from Andrew Cuomo.
	Not one of those nursing homes.
	I'm sure the nursing homes in Delaware are much nicer.
	Not Monster.
	Yeah, Christ.
	Yeah.
	But there was an amazing clip of Biden signing an executive order and then not really knowing what's going on afterwards.
	And, I mean, I don't think we're overstating it to say that he is clearly a man with early onset, well, not even early onset, just Alzheimer's.
	Let's watch the clip.
	So thank you, Mr.
	President, for your confidence.
	Thank you.
	Now we're going to get down to business here.
	And, Ron, who am I turning this over to?
	Well, thank you very much, Mr.
	President.
	I think it's time for our friends in the press to leave now.
	Thank you.
	Thank you very much.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Thank you very much.
	Thank you.
	Thank you guys.
	The vacant stare of a man who has absolutely no idea what's going on around him.
	That's what that looks like to me.
	Who am I turning this over to?
	Yeah, I'm going to sign...
	It's time to press the leave now.
	Yeah, I'm going to sign this over.
	Oh God, get them out of here.
	This looks really bad.
	It looks like Joe Biden is an ancient empty suit, a puppet for the Kamala Harris administration and the...
	I suppose we could just call it the deep state that surrounds him and her.
	He's clearly not in charge of what his administration is doing.
	It's clearly other people, and he's just agreed to become the front man for it.
	Apparently, later on today, in fact, there will be Biden's first press conference.
	So we're three months into Biden's administration.
	He hasn't given a press conference yet, which is weird.
	Probably because it's going to be deeply embarrassing.
	It'll be live, wouldn't it?
	Exactly.
	It's going to be live.
	He's going to have to take questions that he presumably won't be prepared for.
	And he's going to have to give answers off the cuff.
	And so this is going to be deeply embarrassing.
	So I look forward to watching this, to be honest.
	Because if there's one thing that I enjoy watching, it's the Democrats failing at whatever it is they're doing.
	But anyway, none of this is the important stuff, right?
	The important stuff is stuff like this.
	The Voting Reform Act, HR1, which has been styled by the Democrats, as reported on notices.com, as the For the People Act.
	And it's a comprehensive voting, elections, and ethics bill that was passed in the House of Representatives on the 3rd of March and is going to the next House.
	But the thing about this, this is essentially the guarantee of future fortification of elections, which is very interesting, right?
	So the bill includes many reforms, such as the requirement for the state chief election officials to establish an automatic voter registration system entailing the procurement of citizens' information from government databases and agencies, such as the DMV and places like that, and federal agencies, including the Department of Defense and Social Security Administration.
	So that in itself is a staggering centralization of power.
	It's not even constitutional.
	No, probably not.
	It's probably...
	I mean, I don't know, but it's ridiculous, right?
	And even if it is technically constitutional, the point is, should there be this kind of centralization of government in the nation in which the separation of the branches of government is a point of pride and a point of the proper working of the system?
	The answer is probably no, right?
	The answer is probably no.
	If you don't want to register to vote, you shouldn't be forced by the government to register to vote, unlike Australia, where you do...
	Even if it's possible in the letter of the law, this certainly isn't in the spirit of the law, the law here being the constitution.
	Of course, there's going to be the introduction of automatic voter registration, because the thing is, right, the Democrats, I think, they've worked out, look, there are loads of people out there who don't vote and aren't interested in voting, and that means that we can have them down as Democrat voters.
	The ability for voters to register on the same day and vote without having to provide ID, of course.
	Because why not?
	Register on the same day and vote without ID. But they're all going to be automatically registered anyway, so what's the point in that?
	That's not a problem.
	No one's ever going to be able to do fraud with that kind of thing.
	No, don't be silly, right?
	Who hasn't turned up?
	Oh, that person.
	Of course.
	Oh, I'm that person.
	Of course.
	There's going to be a requirement for political action committees to disclose their donors, which is interesting.
	I don't know why they've got that in there.
	But the requirement for presidential candidates to disclose their tax returns.
	Okay.
	The legislation will also enable citizens to vote by mail without providing an excuse and will force states to count ballots that arrive by mail as late as 10 days after an election.
	What are the odds of all of this giving another sort of 2020 result?
	You know, isn't this just really interesting how the fortification of elections is going to become an established part of American politics now?
	We just don't know the result for ten more days.
	Sorry, you'll find out after we've printed out ballots.
	Democrats framed H.R.1 as key legislation that's aimed at increasing access to the polls and preventing corruption, because I suppose they can't even choke on their own irony.
	Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said the bill would restore people's faith in government, in that government works for the public interest and the people's interest, not the special interests.
	Nancy, shut up.
	No one believes you, at all, ever, in any way, shape or form.
	We know you're lying, right?
	Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer...
	It's going to be a good one.
	Yes, I'm sure that's what you think it will do.
	Biden has released a statement saying, I look forward to working with Congress to refine and advance this important bill.
	I mean, how else would you have won?
	And I look forward to signing it into law after it's passed through the legislative process, which it's going through now.
	It went through the House of Representatives, and it's passed through the Senate, and it only just passed with 10 votes in the House of Representatives.
	Mitch McConnell has described it as a power grab.
	We already had record turnouts, so this is not to drive up turnout.
	Turnout's already driven up.
	It's to take over the Federal Election Commission so it can be a prosecutor.
	It is to provide public funding for elections.
	It's to provide same-day registration, which I just looked at the survey that said something like 81% of American people are concerned about something like that, leading to voter fraud.
	Oh, I don't think you need to be concerned about the thing that's already happening.
	It's about eliminating voter ID at the polls, which American people support 72 to 25.
	Where's the evidence for that?
	Come on, cite your source for that poll.
	I want to see it.
	There's no way 72% of the American public oppose voter ID. I think...
	What, 72% of the American public opposing voter ID? Yeah.
	I think that's probably true.
	No, I'm probably thinking of it the wrong way around.
	But I would like to see the source on that too.
	It also mandates what is called ballot harvesting, which is going around and picking up ballots of other people.
	And when this is explained to them, they oppose that 83 to 16.
	So it's...
	I'm sorry, voter ID support 72%.
	72% support voter ID and 83% are opposed to ballot harvesting that is going to be made legal by the Democrats' latest initiative.
	So this is essentially the Democrats changing the system as they always try to change the system because the system is the problem.
	It gets in the way of their brave new world.
	And this is them putting the fortification procedures into place so forever onwards the United States will have fortified elections.
	And interestingly you're always going to have democratic presidents from now on.
	I don't know why you guys love the Democrats so much but you just keep voting in overwhelming numbers for the Democrats and that will never ever stop no matter how you vote in your elections.
	It's really interesting isn't it?
	Mark Weaver, an Ohio-based election law attorney, warned HR1 is an attempt to use the Democrats' slim majority to unlevel the playing field and take away the rights of roughly half the votes in the country.
	Well, that's...
	Probably true.
	Republican strategist Jay Williams said this would be devastating for Republicans if passed, which it probably will be.
	It will also allow the government to make the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, the 51st and 52nd states, handing the Democrats four more Senate seats.
	So that's really interesting.
	Mitch McConnell concluded that these folks, the Democrats, are not interested in compromise.
	Well done for finally realizing that.
	They're interested in passing all of their bills to remake America in spite of the mandate they did not get last year as rapidly as possible.
	Maybe, Mitch, if you had spoken up when Trump was like, hey guys, I think there might be something a bit suspicious about this election.
	Maybe we need an investigation.
	Instead, you went and carried on as normal, didn't you, Mitch?
	Maybe if you'd spoken up when it was relevant and not after the fact, when they can now fortify every election from here on out...
	This would have mattered.
	But it doesn't matter now, so let's carry on.
	The Ninth Circuit Court has ruled that the Americans have got no right to carry guns.
	Hopefully this is going to go to the Supreme Court and get knocked down.
	But this comes from a Hawaii case where the judges had basically ruled that, yeah, no, apparently you may own a gun, but you may not carry a gun.
	And they say, Yeah, right.
	The right to keep and bear arms?
	The actual bearing of the arms is outside of the scope of the Second Amendment?
	You can only bear them within your own household.
	Don't give me this nonsense.
	That's obviously not right.
	So, I mean, I'm sure the Supreme Court will knock this down, but, like, either way, it's ridiculous.
	Thankfully, one of the judges was absolutely outraged.
	Judge O. Scanlane stated that the majority holds that while the Second Amendment may guarantee the right to keep a firearm and self-defense in one's home, Obviously.
	Why would I have a gun if I wasn't allowed to walk around with it?
	What would be the point?
	But of course, this is hot on the heels of the Boulder, Colorado shooting, where a white man decided to shoot another bunch of white people.
	And Biden didn't...
	Clearly an anti-white attack.
	Clearly an anti-white attack.
	Why do white people keep doing this to other white people?
	But Biden wasted no time condemning both white people and guns.
	He...
	It's not true.
	He didn't condemn the white people this time.
	He called for a nationwide ban on assault weapons.
	Not really sure what that means.
	Any weapon used to assault someone?
	I mean, what does he think a weapon is?
	Weapons are for assaulting.
	I remember he did give a speech when he was Obama's VP talking about the fact that you shouldn't need to own any kind of rifle or anything like this.
	You should just buy a shotgun.
	And if someone does break into your house, just fire the shotgun in the air twice and that'll do it.
	It's like...
	Job's done then, I suppose.
	But it's a really stupid argument.
	It's just like, certain kinds of guns shouldn't be accepted because I think that they're more deadly.
	I don't know if that's good enough because then why can you not just say the argument of, well, Joe, you don't need that shotgun, do you?
	You just need a musket.
	Yeah, but Joe, the reason I've got a gun is because it's deadly.
	I want the most deadly gun.
	Because if someone breaks into my house, I want to make sure that they're solved.
	Cole's got the minigun at the...
	Yeah, well, basically.
	I mean, well, I don't know the intention of this person who's breaking into my house.
	So I want the most effective means of neutralizing that person because they might be here to kill me and my family.
	I mean, I think there's a perfectly reasonable position to hold, frankly.
	And this is coming from someone who lives in a country where it's illegal to defend yourself.
	While we're waiting on more information on the shooter, his motive, and the weapons that he used, the guns, magazines, Joe doesn't even have the information when he's making the statement.
	I don't need to wait another minute, let alone another hour, to take common sense steps that will save lives in future.
	Thanks, Joe.
	So he wants to ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, of course.
	And this is on the heels of...
	Again, they're coming for everything that you have.
	They want to completely remake the United States into something that is not the United States.
	This is really interesting on this next one.
	The Biden administration has urged the Supreme Court to allow police to enter homes and seize guns without a warrant.
	Now, that seems like...
	I mean, you are literally overturning I mean, literally 500 years, in fact, more, probably about 700 years of English legal development at that point.
	So the agents of the king in the 15th century were not allowed to enter into a communist home without a communist permission or without a warrant, right?
	This was a huge innovation in the rights of the individual under what was at the time, of course, a monarchy.
	And this was what we built our constitutional democracies upon.
	The idea that the state actually is restricted from taking action against its own citizens.
	And the Biden administration is like, yeah, but have we considered that I'm in charge now and I want those guns?
	Because I really want those guns, right?
	So this is based on a spat, a domestic spat between an old husband and wife over a coffee mug, right?
	They have this argument and the police are called and the police seize the guns of the man, despite the fact that he has no history of violence or self-harm or anything like this.
	And when the police seize the guns, they didn't claim it was because of an emergency or to prevent imminent danger because there was none, apparently.
	The officers argued that their actions were a form of community caretaking, which is a narrow exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement, apparently.
	And so this has meant the First Circuit Court has sided with law enforcement and said that the officer must act as a master of all emergencies.
	I was like, okay, but does that mean just taking someone's guns while he's not in the house?
	Because that's what happened.
	The guy left.
	How long could they seize the guns for?
	Was there a time limit?
	No, just...
	Well, none given, as far as I'm aware.
	But the point is, they've just been like, okay, he's not here.
	We're just going to take his guns then.
	Why?
	Why?
	It doesn't make any sense.
	No.
	But this has given police elbow room to take the appropriate action, and the opposition to this warned that extending the community caretaking exception to homes would be anathema to the Fourth Amendment because it would grant police a blank check to intrude upon the home of any individual, which it would, because what's the limiting principle here?
	Why shouldn't they do this?
	And the Biden administration glossed over these concerns, and in their amicus brief to the High Court, called on the justices to uphold the First Circuit's ruling, noting that the ultimate touchstone of the Fourth Amendment is reasonableness.
	And if the Justice Department argued that warrants should not be presumptively required when a government official's action is objectively grounded in a non-investigatory public interest such as health or safety.
	As in, if they just say, well this is for the public interest, this is for health and safety, we're coming in and we're taking your guns, then the Biden administration wants that to be fine.
	So there's an argument about if you're attending a house and you want to go into the house, you need a warrant, usually, right?
	But if you know that there's a murderer in there or there's something that's about to be dangerous, therefore it's okay to enter anyway without a warrant, because then you've got the justification of imminent harm.
	But there's nothing here for that.
	Let's just rob the guy.
	And Biden's administration is just like, yeah, we probably should be able to just rob people.
	Here's a blank check.
	It's very expensive.
	They just took hundreds of dollars off of them.
	Probably thousands.
	But either way, they've just disarmed a citizen who they had no right to disarm.
	And now the Biden administration is like, yeah, good.
	Next, we'd like to disarm more citizens, even though, again, we don't have any legitimacy for doing this.
	So, I mean, we don't know how that's going to fall in the end, but it's just part of a much larger pattern of behavior from the Biden administration, which is to turn America into Germany, into a European country, where the people don't really have rights, and rights are constructed by the state, rather than being natural, and therefore your right to self-defense has been taken away from you.
	Yeah, exactly.
	All of these things are not yours, in fact.
	They're other people's.
	If your rights come from the state, what happens when the state changes and now they don't agree that that's a right?
	Well, the police are now allowed to enter your house and take your guns without your consent.
	Yeah.
	Then you didn't have that right to begin with.
	In which case, they can't come from the state.
	They have to come from somewhere else.
	It's pretty bad, man.
	Yeah, that's not good.
	What the Biden-Harris administration is doing is absolutely despicable, frankly.
	I honestly am amazed the Republicans in America are letting this go.
	I really hate the term common-sense gun reform as well, because I really want to just add it to everything they say.
	Like, you know when they're proposing racial discrimination?
	Common-sense racial discrimination.
	LAUGHTER Yeah, okay, then we'll vote for it, I guess.
	What was the thing they did recently?
	We have quite a few in the UK of just like, white people shouldn't be able to apply for this, or white people shouldn't be able to do that.
	White people shouldn't be promoted as appointees.
	Common sense.
	It's common sense racial discrimination.
	Yeah.
	I mean, they could apply it to absolutely anything.
	Since we've segued onto the subject of racial discrimination, I thought we'd end on a slightly more cheery note.
	And this is a chap called Elie Mistal, who seems to hate white people and wrote in The Nation, which is a publication that seems to hate white people, about how he is not ready to reenter white society, which I guess kind of sucks.
	So basically, he's sad that the pandemic is waning, that he's had his vaccines, that he's actually going to be forced to go back to work and leave the house again.
	And that's bad because that means he has to speak to other white people and not other white people, speak to white people.
	They might have to hold their hand or shake hands or something.
	They might bump into one in the street.
	I mean, look at the way he phrases this.
	As the pandemic wanes, I have to leave the safety of my whiteness-free castle.
	And I know that racism is going to come roaring back into my daily life.
	I hate doing the...
	Well, imagine if it was the other way around.
	But just imagine if this was a white guy writing in a white nationalist publication.
	It was like, as the pandemic wanes, I have to leave the safety of my blackness-free castle.
	And I know that N-words are going to come roaring back into my daily life.
	I bet there is actually an article right now where it's like, no, the pandemic's over, I've got to go back to work with the Darkies or something like that.
	Yeah, probably.
	XXX, you know, Stormer 25 or something.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And this guy is a verified checkmark on Twitter, and the Daily Stormer are not allowed in polite society.
	Personally, I'd rather if both of them were exiled from polite society, but instead it's us, who are not even on either side, who are exiled from polite society.
	So there we go.
	He says, I've said here and elsewhere, and of course you have, that one of the principal benefits of the pandemic is how I've been able to exclude racism and whiteness generally from my day-to-day life.
	I haven't had to see any whiteies, you see.
	By getting rid of all the white people, I no longer experience racism.
	Hmm.
	Okay.
	Over the past year, I have, of course, still had to interact with white people on Zoom or watch them on television and worry about when they would succeed in re-electing a white supremacist president.
	I have had to see them, but at least I don't have to listen to them in the same room.
	But white people aren't in my face all of the time.
	I can more or less only deal with whiteness when I want to.
	Their cops aren't hunting their cops as if the cops are just the agents of white people and no black person has ever wanted a cop around when something's been happening or something like this.
	There's the white cops and the black cops.
	Yeah, the white cops aren't hunting me when I drive through my neighborhood.
	Like, it's the fucking Hunger Games or something.
	What are we talking about here?
	The cops, it's like deliverance.
	They're just hunting him through the woods as, oh, thank God that's over for the duration of the pandemic.
	The hang-ups aren't bothering me or threatening me when I'm trying to do some shopping.
	Okay, so just translate that first paragraph.
	Mate, everyone else just shopping.
	What are you doing?
	Yeah.
	He's living in a racial nightmare.
	Like when he's walking around with a car, he's like, oh, God.
	Everyone else is just like, oh, no.
	Exactly, right?
	And so translation is just, I don't like white people and rather live in a society without them.
	And of course, there are options for that.
	But Elie doesn't explore any of these because they would involve admitting that he doesn't want to live in Africa.
	That's because I haven't been driving or shopping in person.
	White people haven't improved.
	I've just been able to limit my exposure to them.
	I've turned my house into Wakanda, a technically advanced, globally isolated home base from where I can pick and choose and how often I interact with white people.
	Right, so you've created an ethnostate that has extremely strong border controls and keeps out certain undesirable races.
	God, it sounds like some kook the FBI would find.
	Or he's just like starting a race war with him and his son or something.
	One man's race war.
	Yeah.
	I swear, isn't that like a Chris Morris movie or something?
	Probably.
	That's why I had to go through this.
	But yeah, it's white people who are the problem, and the problem isn't in your head.
	To be clear, it's not that most or even many of my interactions with white people are bad.
	It's that I'm able to choose when to expose myself to interactions with potentially bad white people.
	Well, hang on a second.
	So, not even most or many of his interactions with white people are bad.
	And, I mean, you're not even saying any, really.
	It's the potentially bad white people.
	So, that's just...
	I mean, what's a potentially bad white person?
	But again, like, the problem seems to be in your own head, mate.
	Like, you seem to be walking around in a delusional race-based...
	I don't have arguments with white people.
	They seem perfectly nice, but I just hate them.
	That choice is a privilege I've never really had until this past year.
	Going out into white society for me was a bit like being a beekeeper to go and get honey.
	I know what I'm doing.
	If I put on the right protection and blow enough smoke, most of the bees will leave me alone.
	And the ones who don't, don't really cause me that much pain.
	But I've got to put on the suit and the hat and the mesh and carry the smoke machine and be careful every time I want some goddamn honey.
	This year...
	Isn't this like stage three of the UN stages of genocide?
	I mean, dehumanization of white people, comparing them to insects or rodents.
	So...
	What I don't get is like, okay, so, I mean, what's he describing here?
	Is he describing the facade of politeness that he has to put on?
	Because how do you want to act?
	Like, what do you want your interactions with people to be like?
	You know, if being polite is like...
	He wants to spit in the faces of white people, but he has to not do that.
	It's like putting on a beekeeping suit.
	I have to keep myself to myself.
	Yeah, oh God, one of them said good afternoon to me as I walked past him.
	It was awful.
	Dirty white!
	Yeah!
	The people at this target, white!
	So anyway, I get the feeling that he just has a problem with white people.
	And the thing is, conversely though, I also get the feeling that white people don't think about him at all.
	I don't think a single white person thinks about anything that this person says.
	It's been a revelation, but it can't last.
	With the vaccination comes re-entry into the larger society.
	I've been the default skin colour in my personal life for a year, but I think you're the default skin colour in your personal life all the time.
	What does that mean default?
	What, like, there's different skins he can wear?
	Like he's playing CSGO or something?
	I mean, maybe, but I think what he's talking about is, like, when he goes to the shop and gets a plaster, it's brown rather than white.
	Or the plaster is, like, a pinkish colour.
	And so he's like, God, I'm no longer the default skin colour.
	What?
	This is the way they think.
	But I'll be thrust into the world again where I'm treated like an other, where white people feel empowered to just walk around like they own the place.
	Dude, this is clearly about you and not white people.
	White people are just going about their daily lives, and I'm sure that every other race of people is just going about their daily lives, and you're just like, God, they think they own the place!
	A weekend trip to CVS, which I believe is a pharmacy, showed me that I'm not ready.
	I'm not ready to go back to accepting that in a diverse and pluralistic society, some white people are allowed to just impose their implicit biases on the world, and the rest of us have to suck it up.
	What do you think happened to him at this pharmacy?
	Jesus, what happened to the CVS? Yeah.
	Like, did you walk in and you just started hearing the cashier shouting racial epithets?
	Well, I'll tell you.
	I'll tell you.
	This is a tragic story, and I want some Fs in the chat as you're hearing this.
	I was idling in the parking lot near the door when another car pulled up, stopped right in front of the store, and rolled down the window.
	an older white woman shouted towards the door is this where you get the vaccines there was only one person standing outside of the cbs a young black woman who looked to me to be no older than 16 the black teenager ignored the woman but the white lady insisted i said is this where you get the vaccines at this point the teenager did this elaborate pantomime of looking behind her very clear she must not be talking to me a person just standing outside messing with my phone move this apparently really pissed off the old white woman who then yelled at the top of her voice
	is this where you get the vaccines by this point a small traffic jam had piled up behind her and car started honking she yelped in disgust the service and drove off so the white woman thought that the kid worked at the pharmacy and the kid didn't And that's it.
	That's the racism.
	How did he survive?
	Well, he didn't.
	Barely.
	If I'd been on my game, if I remembered my beekeeper suit, I'd have rolled down my window and spoke up on behalf of the teenager.
	Why didn't the teenagers say I don't work here?
	I generally try to ignore bias directed at me, but I can't abide bias directed at young people.
	Well, there's your first mistake.
	They deserve it.
	Pre-COVID, I'd have been ready with some witsism, which both answered the lady's question and made clear that I disapproved of her haranguing a young person.
	She just wants to know whether the vaccine's available there, for God's sake.
	Just say, I don't know.
	Yeah, just say, I don't know.
	Or yes or no.
	I think it probably was where they get the vaccine as well.
	He says, but I've been living in my white, free, castle-free...
	God, just a white, free castle.
	A black man's home is his castle, Callum.
	Just like any of the Stormer articles talking about, oh man, the last pandemic has been due free or something.
	I mean, that's literally, I bet there is one, talking about exactly this.
	There probably is.
	I never look at the Daily Stormer.
	Whether I was supposed to speak up and what my children would think if they saw me getting in a shouting match with an old white lady.
	By the time I'd figured out what to say and how to say it, the moment had passed.
	And then everyone clapped, I assume.
	And then I was left with the other side effect of racism that people don't always see.
	How How have we got to racism here?
	The doddering old lady who thinks that one of the kids standing outside the store works at the store.
	Like, who hasn't that happened to?
	I've been walking around shops when some old person's like, do you know where this is?
	I'm like, oh, sorry, I don't work here.
	It's embarrassing.
	It's kind of awkward.
	It's like, oh, sorry, I thought you did.
	It's clearly because they're a race car.
	Yeah, it's clearly because they're racist.
	You know, who's this not happened to at some point when they're young, especially?
	Because it's young people stacking shelves a lot of the time because, you know, it's a part-time job that requires no skills.
	You know, like, anyway, it's about race, though.
	Talk about racial effect.
	Did I fail to show solidarity with this young black stranger?
	Yeah, I'm sure that's it.
	Sorry, what were you meant to do?
	Like, smash the window and be like, Wakanda forever or something?
	This girl's on her phone looking at Tinder or something, and some black guy's just...
	The black nationalist is like, Black Pride!
	Yeah, just yells Wakanda forever from me to shut the car, so what?
	Okay.
	Was I part of the permissive culture that allowed this white lady to exist?
	I don't know.
	What are your options, man?
	Pull out a knife.
	What?
	White lady exists, this guy.
	Did I miss a teachable moment that could have showed my children how to stand up to people?
	Stand up to her for what?
	When someone asks you where something is, you tell them to go to hell.
	I'll teach you where the vaccines are.
	It's been a year since somebody else's racism made me feel like I failed.
	What are you talking about?
	What racism, right?
	And the next line is, a lot of white people have no idea what I'm talking about.
	I think a lot of black people have no idea what the fuck you're doing about me.
	It's not just the white people.
	Guilty as charged, though.
	I know because I posted this story on Twitter, and the responses from some of the white people were just so typical.
	Just a bunch of recentering of the experience of the white lady shouting questions.
	Why didn't the young woman just answer the lady's question?
	Good question.
	What was wrong with asking other people for help?
	Another great question.
	Not in my neighbourhood.
	You pull your own bootstraps up around here, says the Conservative writing for the nation.
	I suppose if you're part of the majority culture and aren't regularly confused for an employee, the white lady's question seems innocuous.
	No, you can easily...
	Even if you're white, be mistaken, especially if you're a young person, for staff working at a store.
	That happens to all races, you fucking bigots.
	Oh, anyway.
	Multiple white people brought up the experience of wearing a Hawaiian shirt at Trader Joe's and being mistaken for staff.
	Oh, look, it turns out it does happen to other white people.
	To white people, sorry.
	As if wearing the distinctive outfit of a chain store employee is the same as wearing distinctive black skin out of any old store.
	She was 16.
	What are you talking about?
	Oh, God.
	Young people have jobs, right?
	I know that's hard to understand.
	Look, for those who still don't get it, the first issue is that the white woman was not asking for help.
	She felt entitled to it.
	Yeah, well this is a boomer problem, okay?
	Boomers, when talking to young people, feel entitled to their help and time.
	Well, it's also kind of community.
	They expect people to help each other, unlike your neighbourhood, apparently.
	Sorry, I've built Castle Wakanda, where no white people are allowed in.
	Why would I think about your communal standards?
	But even if you just go to a rural area in England, for example, that's mostly older people, they'll talk to each other and try and help out each other with, where's this or where's that?
	You would never get that in London, because no one talks to each other.
	No, no.
	She didn't say, excuse me, young lady, would you happen to know where I can get a vaccine?
	That's just etiquette 101.
	That's how I would ask an actual employee in uniform and everything.
	It's like, okay, but that seems like whiteness.
	That seems like you're describing what could be described by other black activists as whiteness.
	Politeness and courtesy.
	I mean, I'm sure I could find a dozen articles that say exactly that.
	The second issue is the assumption by white people that black people were put on this earth to serve them is a very real and annoying thing that happens in society.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	The white lady was rolled up and she's like, ah, there's a slave.
	What?
	That's what happened there.
	Yeah, exactly.
	That's right, you think of slaves.
	No, no, just thought the young girl worked at the shop.
	Just wanted to get my vaccine.
	Every black person I know has some story when a white person assumed there was staff at a business they were shopping at.
	Yeah, and no white person has a similar story.
	It's an unconscious bias, and if I'm being generous, I'll assume that most white people don't know they're doing it most of the time.
	Yes, that's what an unconscious bias is.
	All of them don't know they're doing it if it's an unconscious bias.
	You absolute genius.
	It's these little bits of racial bias that I could really do without.
	It's not that I can't overcome any of it.
	It's that I resent having to do so.
	I despair of going back to a world where the slings of arrows of outrageous white people are part of my day.
	I mean, there are literally entire countries where there are zero white people.
	There are entire countries where it's just black people.
	And yet.
	I'll shake off the rust eventually.
	A year from now, when I go to pick up my wife from CVS, I'll be ready for white ladies like the one in the parking lot.
	I'll tell her a version of what I always tell white people in the suburbs who demand directions like my name is Waze.
	I don't know what that means.
	No, sorry, the whatever you're looking for isn't here.
	You'll have to try the one in Harlem, 1619 Martin Luther King Boulevard, just a few blocks away from Marcus Garvey Park.
	Good luck.
	And the white person in doubt is like, thanks very much, and then get lost.
	Because they're actually not anti-segregationists.
	Waze is a GPS app, is it right?
	Thanks for letting me know.
	And so this got some attention on the Twatter, as you might imagine, and so Ellie posted a response to this on Twitter.
	There are white people who think I wrote the story about how black people aren't here to only serve white people as a service to white people.
	And thus I am inviting white to criticism of my own damn experiences, which just takes like some effing nerve, man.
	Dude, what is wrong with you?
	I mean, you really just seem to hate white people.
	You just...
	Like, it's your profession at this point, isn't it?
	If you read and learned a little something, I'm happy for you.
	And if you read it and learned nothing, I'm sorry for you.
	But it's not really about you.
	Not every goddamn thing is about you.
	No, that's right.
	Everything's about you, isn't it, Ellie?
	That's what this is.
	This is nothing to do with the woman who was just trying to get her vaccine.
	This is about you and your paranoia about white people and your castle Wakanda that they're threatening to invade.
	And that's Joe Biden's America, by the way.
	I turned it into a post because a lot of non-white people are feeling what I'm feeling, and I have the unique opportunity and responsibility to give voice to that.
	I'm the hero of black people.
	Anyway, I've written...
	Your cape's in the mail.
	I believe they want to put up a statue of you.
	Anyway, I've written two stories since then about law stuff, because as most people know, my social media is actually a guerrilla marketing campaign to get people to accept substantive due process.
	Okay.
	In the meantime, I'm starting Dad O'Clock.
	And he retweeted a few other people, and one of them is a Twitter user we featured before who goes by the name of AngryBlackLady.
	Okay.
	Do you not remember her?
	No.
	Well, we have featured tweets by AngryBlackLady before.
	This is an excellent thread, talking about this piece.
	Anyone who felt the same kind of way about Ellie's article in The Nation yesterday about having dreading to go back out into the world and deal with white people again needs to read this thread, so presumably it was forwarded to Hamza Youssef.
	I saw a lot of people at Nellie's mentions being complete asshats.
	Well, if you fall to pieces every time you go out in public, maybe you should just stay home, Snowflake.
	It's not about falling to pieces.
	It's the exact opposite.
	It's about stealing oneself.
	Armour.
	Imagine having to steal yourself every time you walk out of the house just because you don't know who the good white people are.
	God.
	Why do you live in a country with white people in it?
	Like, why do it?
	I wouldn't do this if...
	But honestly, if I was a massive racist, and I hated, I don't know, Chinese people, and I was in China, writing articles about how my castle Wakanda was free of Chinese people, and every time, oh no, now I have to go outside and meet a Chinese person, I think it would be totally reasonable to say, why don't you just move to another country?
	Why there aren't Chinese people?
	We don't have to deal with them.
	Why is that not an acceptable response to that?
	But anyway, she goes on and on and on, but we'll stop there because...
	I love how she has in her bio the real racist tweet.
	Yes.
	Do you not remember it?
	No, I don't remember that.
	Oh, well, yeah, in her bio she calls herself the real racist, which I believe because...
	I mean, literally.
	I mean, what's amazing about this as well is you might be thinking, why don't people just report this for obvious racial hatred on Twitter.
	Because Twitter supports this.
	Twitter has made a statement in which they say that all hatred against whites on Twitter is permitted on the platform because white people have not suffered historical injustice.
	And it's like, okay then.
	I mean, the Daily Stormer has a similar policy of exactly the same thing in reverse.
	It's just what it is.
	I bet the Daily Stormer deplatforms pedo content, though, doesn't it?
	They probably do do that.
	Goddamn Daily Stormer.
	What a bunch of Nazis.
	Literally morally above Twitter.
	Jesus Christ.
	You've got the same policy on race just in reverse so there's morally neutral ground there but Daily Stormer probably gets rid of pedos.
	I mean it's so bizarre.
	Honestly I feel like I'm watching like two different kinds of spider having a fight in a jar or something when I was a kid.
	You know, you go into the garden, you catch insects and stuff, and now two spiders are fighting, and I'm like, oh god, they're both awful.
	But anyway, let's watch the video comments.
	So on my way to a job interview, I'm hoping to get out the delay of time, which has been way too long in my opinion.
	I started to wonder on a question I asked you previously.
	What are the ideological equivalent to the Autobot and Decepticon causes in your opinion?
	You said you would answer it and still haven't seen anything, so you might want to do that maybe?
	Please?
	I'm afraid I still haven't re-watched Transformers.
	I've been too busy to do it, but I will at some point watch Transformers.
	I doubt there's too much in the way of ideological depth to it.
	I'm expecting just Autobots good, Decepticons bad, from when I remember when I was a kid.
	I've never watched the cartoons.
	I've never watched the movie.
	Sam Wickwickwick and all that stuff.
	I don't really remember them having much of a different philosophy.
	Autobots are humans good.
	The Autobots were like, yeah, we should exist with the humans and the Decepticons were like, nah.
	Death to humans.
	Machines rule.
	Wakanda forever.
	Sick of dealing with humans.
	Should we go to the next one?
	Afternoon all, I wanted to ask to what extent do you think we should be seeking to amplify our voices if we want British politics to shift liberal again?
	For example, recent YouGov surveys on Labour's Covid response, policing and our blessed monarchy had only 1,700, 1,600 and 1,200 responses respectively, meaning the audience of this podcast alone could easily have fortified their results.
	Do you think we're missing a trick by not attempting to use perception of current reality to influence actual future reality, or are these systems already fortified to only produce results desired by those running them?
	That is actually a really great point.
	And one of the things that people could do if they feel like being an armchair activist and making a difference, it's small but it will make a difference, is go and sign up to YouGov and just fill out every survey they give you in the most based way possible.
	And when they start getting their surveys back, we polled a thousand people, and it turns out that 95% of them want to sink the boats that are coming across the channel.
	Like, I mean, it might start having an effect on policy, that's all I'm saying.
	So yeah, it's definitely something that we could be thinking about doing, is just make sure that you get involved.
	I mean, they want to hear from people, it's self-selected, so feel free to go and fill out these forms and these surveys.
	And make sure that your voice is heard.
	I mean, you're a citizen, you've got every right to do it.
	And it would be funny if them come back and be like, Jesus Christ, Britain's been taken over.
	I mean, this is the easy thing.
	So there's...
	Voting is nice, but one thing I have learned, especially with British politics, the real power comes in being a party member as well.
	It's like having party membership of one or both of the parties, because there's no way they can actually find out if you're a member of both.
	This is why a bunch of Tories signed up to being a Labour member when Jeremy Corbyn was in, so they could vote more Jeremy Corbyn, so the Labour Party would screw itself.
	That's a bit of power you can take easily and then you just have one extra vote above every other citizen and then filling out the surveys is another way of doing it.
	Feel free to go and get involved because there's no reason not to at the end of the day.
	You may as well go and make as much of a mess of their political environment as you can because they're making a mess of the country.
	It doesn't take much effort either.
	It's probably quite funny if you get something done as well.
	Let's go for the next one.
	Hello, Lotus Eaters.
	As a man of great photography aspirations, whose work can be found on Instagram at sweetdangerzack, that's Z-A-C-K, I would like to ask each of you which is your favorite historical photograph and why.
	Mine is the one commonly referred to as Tank Man because of its breathtaking depiction of a man at the moment of him essentially choosing to sacrifice his own life for something greater than himself.
	What about you?
	I don't know.
	There's a lot of images I've saved over the years, but I can't think of a single one that I would say is the best or my most favorite.
	The most recent one that I saved that I thought was of interest would probably be the thing I told you about, the 55 Days in Peking.
	And there's the delegation of the Americans, the British, the French, and so on and so forth, all down the lines of the Japanese, all standing on one side together.
	And there's a great photograph of all the different men.
	They've all chosen their best to stand up in a big line.
	And it's in color as well.
	It's an amazing photo.
	Mine's Nigel Farage in the EU Parliament laughing at the Germans after Brexit referendum.
	There are some great photos of Farage.
	The full-on enjoyment of the moment was, I really like that.
	You're not laughing now, are you?
	It's like, no, they're not.
	So yeah, I don't really have that many historical photos I'm aware of, though, to be honest.
	You're not really interested in sort of, like, modern history.
	Not really.
	You're in the ancient history, so there are no photos.
	Medieval.
	Still no photos.
	No, obviously not.
	That's probably why it's interesting.
	If I could see what it was really like, I'd probably be like, oh god, it's so mundane.
	But because it's not, it's very exciting.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Carl, in a previous video, you spoke of your fondness for woodworking, so I wanted to share with you how woodworking, for me, actually embodies what's good about American conservatism.
	This is my workshop.
	I built it in my backyard with some help from my dad.
	Inside, I built things using tools and materials purchased from others, thanks to capitalism, often while listening to your podcast.
	While I'm in here, I'm on my own.
	It's one of the last places I can go where no one will tell me what to say or think.
	In here, I own my failures and take pride in my successes.
	In here, there are no guarantees of happiness or success but rather the freedom to pursue it.
	And to me, that's what conservatism is all about.
	That's a fantastic advert.
	It's like watching one of those Facebook videos, you know?
	Yeah, I mean, honestly, dude, we've got that video, right?
	Can we put that out on just the website or something?
	Because that's a great video.
	I mean, that is exactly what is appealing about it as well.
	All these videos that keep going across, and it's not just woodwork either, it's metalwork and all this, but it's just some dude in a shop just doing something on his own.
	And look, I've made a beautiful thing, and that exactly exemplifies why...
	The thing appeals to me because it's like suddenly I don't have screaming kids everywhere or my wife nagging me.
	Suddenly I'm just doing something on my own, something productive, and I'm enjoying it.
	And that's just a five-minute fancy in my head, and then I've got to carry on with my life.
	Oh, God, that sounds so good.
	That is really appealing to me.
	And I would make nothing but rubbish as well.
	I've got no particular talent, but that guy looked like he could actually make something good.
	But, man, that is so good.
	Anyway, Nicholas Malson says, hi folks.
	Oh, we've got another one, have we?
	Sorry.
	Behold it is I, Captain Doombeard.
	When I was young, my racial education was Dr.
	King's I Have a Dream speech, that others should be judged not by their incidental characteristics, but by their actual character.
	You can look at leftist publications like The Root, Vox, Slate and even New York Times and CNN. And when they address topics of race, you can easily replace white or whiteness with any other racial category.
	And you immediately have a racist screed that could have been written by an actual Nazi.
	I think Dr.
	King is a good cultural touchstone.
	If we defined his viewpoint as center or default, then I'd be perfectly happy.
	How the hell do we drag the leftists back to I Have a Dream?
	I don't think we can.
	I mean, I totally agree with his opinion there.
	I thought that was the centrist touchstone, that, like, everyone agreed, like, we're not going to be like, you're bad because of your race.
	I mean, obviously the guy who wrote for The Nation doesn't agree, but, like, there's more, is there?
	Okay, well, let's carry on.
	No, I wanted to...
	Okay, yeah, but I mean, I thought that was the centrist, and that, like, who can't commit to that, apart from radical leftists and the Stormfront guys?
	Yeah, that's totally true.
	I also just wanted to say, does that guy do voice acting?
	Because he really should.
	That's good for the next one.
	Hi, Carl and Callum.
	My phone's being an absolute boomer.
	Anyway, look up ESG numbers through World Economic Forum.
	It's like the Chinese social credit system, except for it's for America and Europe.
	Looks quite fun.
	Capital F fun, that is.
	If there's one thing I'm looking forward to, it's the social credit score.
	I'm sure I'm going to do really well on that.
	ESG tools.
	So for determining how good of a boy your employee is?
	Oh, maybe I do need those.
	God, no.
	Callum, you're...
	No, but you wouldn't be working for keto dadism.
	They'd be working for other metrics.
	I'm sure I'll be able to set the metrics.
	I'll give them an email and see if we can get this up.
	Exactly.
	God, your utopia sounds awful.
	Let's go for the next one.
	Hey guys, what a week it has been.
	While I've been busy dealing with important things like flooding that's going on across the country, the politicians and media in Australia, and especially the r slash Australia subreddit, which provides a good example of what's going on, has been screaming constantly about rape in parliament, misogyny in the government, men are evil, teach men not to rape.
	Which has honestly been absolutely insane.
	One of the suggestions that came out from a high-level police official was to have an app to record consent.
	It was loudly ridiculed, with one of the main complaints being that consent can be withdrawn partway through the act.
	So, if we can't use an app, and we can't trust people to be adults, what's the solution?
	Do we need to have everyone involved bring a lawyer and a video camera?
	Or maybe those guys over at MeekTail have a point.
	Late opening up for discussion.
	Cheers.
	I think that we actually beseech the Almighty Lord for increased amounts of flooding, so we don't have to be alive to have to discuss this anymore.
	I love the idea that everyone's knee-deep in water in the Parliament, and the feminists are like, yeah, but misogyny.
	Do we not have anything to worry about here?
	Have we not got a problem, a real problem at this point?
	But what I love about this is like, yeah, but consent could be withdrawn halfway through the act.
	It's like, yes, it could.
	So the app doesn't work.
	That's true.
	So what are you saying?
	Well, what we're saying is it's not actually possible to finally end rape.
	It's just not possible.
	Like, at some point, someone will commit a crime that is called rape.
	Shock.
	You literally can't end crime.
	Yeah.
	It is a thing that will exist.
	We tried making it illegal, but it didn't work.
	We tried passing a law.
	Yeah.
	Don't know what else can be done.
	Yeah, but the ab, yeah, but I mean, all of this is just unworkable feminist idealism.
	Your floods aren't going to work either, because one of the funniest things is the Green Party.
	They don't float, do they?
	No, well, they're full of two kinds of people, aren't they?
	They're full of the people who are massively obsessed with climate change and believe the world's going to end very soon.
	And socialists.
	And then they're full of these socialist types who are endlessly talking about pronouns.
	And yet, why are they there?
	Like, you have the green people who think the world's going to end, and they're like, why are we talking about pronouns?
	And it just carries on.
	So, I mean, even if there are floods, the pronouns debate still will happen.
	We don't want to misgender each other if we're in the middle of the apocalypse.
	I mean, that's the worst time to do it, let's be honest.
	Nicholas Malson says, Wow, well, you can see where your problem is there.
	You should have come across in a dinghy and demanded something like we owed you it.
	Then you would have been given everything you wanted, you would have had millions of people in an activist party called the Labour Party, and everyone would have been at your feet.
	Instead, he says, I've been paying taxes, working hard and treating others with mutual respect.
	What a bloody idiot!
	Why'd you do that?
	You don't have to do that.
	You get put up in a hotel, permanently, if you just go around disrespecting the flag.
	Despite this, I fear that I'm not welcome here, but returning to my home country is not an option because there's no future with the way the government treats it.
	Do I deserve to be deported?
	No.
	Obviously not.
	Anyone who comes here legally and pays their taxes, works hard and integrates and becomes a good citizen should not be deported.
	Those people who arrived on a dinghy illegally who don't seem to have any particular concern or care for the country probably should be.
	Literally service guarantees citizenship.
	No service guarantees deportation.
	Yes.
	That old guy says the solution to dinghy armadas is long ships and long bows.
	Well, I mean, we've probably got some cogs in museums somewhere.
	Daniel Williamson should put the fakes in a massive man cannon and shoot them back over the channel.
	Probably don't have the budget for that.
	Orson Welles says, Yeah, it's also short-sightedness beyond reason.
	They don't think about this.
	They have a view of an asylum seeker, which is a very progressive person from Syria for some reason, and his family, and they just want to come over to support LGBT rights.
	Just like every other Afghani.
	Just like every other Afghani.
	Oh, man.
	It's like the Afghan police literally keep boys as child sex slaves.
	Like, the police do that in the country.
	And what do you think they do to gays?
	Like, what do you think the average person's like, you know?
	Yeah, what do you think they do to gays?
	Or women?
	You know, it's...
	I mean, to get to the point that even the police, they're meant to be morally people in society engaging in slaving and raping.
	Yeah.
	But...
	But the refugees, the refugees...
	They'll be as woke as anyone.
	They're all very progressive catered the sensor says the sovereignty of a nation is sacred the violation of which is a violation unto its citizens if this violation is perpetrated by an outside forces an act of war.
	So what is it called when it's perpetrated by an inside force treason?
	Stephen knizik says watching all these migrant boats one is asked to lead to ask a philosophical question.
	If either the Kaiser or the Führer had shipped Germans across the North Sea as these migrants were being shipped, what international agreements would have stopped them in the 1920s and 1930s?
	And should the UK maybe rethink those international appeasements?
	Good question.
	Can't answer it.
	Ignacio says, I didn't want this to be the case, but let's press the button and then...
	We must save the world's international gaze.
	Yeah, well, I guess that's the job.
	Bring back the British Empire.
	Whoa.
	It was probably better than the alternative.
	I'm going to have to show you that Onion video afterwards.
	It's gold.
	Damn those raging Frenchmen waving their stale baguettes at them poor frightened refugees.
	Let's keep them fed up and send them back with even more stale breadsticks to start the new invasion on the frogs, like any good Englishman would.
	I think we should have a keto-friendly invasion force of France.
	We should just return to using iron like we used to.
	Awesome Wells.
	Yeah, because she's a liar.
	That's why.
	The term liar is habitual to the Labour Party, and you're exactly right.
	They're We're good to go.
	We were prevented from going to help due to multiple reasons to do with the inheritance system in France and travel ban.
	They have now custodians who look after the assets.
	The house and all of our family history photos' memories have been destroyed slash sold and burnt in the courtyard of her home because illegal immigrants have kept breaking in and squatting there.
	French officials don't care and not much can be done.
	Ironically, Google Maps did a bit of timestamp magic where you can see the road because it was in such a state.
	France is lost.
	So it is an S-hole, but it is an S-hole for the French.
	Well, I can see why the migrants are trying to leave now then.
	Well, it's not an S-hole for them.
	Well, I mean, don't get me wrong, it probably doesn't sound very good.
	Well, if you could just break into any old woman's house, steal her stuff, I mean, it's pretty good.
	Well, it's the meme, isn't it?
	It's the little cartoon strip.
	It's like, I want change.
	Smash, smash, smash.
	I didn't want this.
	You know, it's like, well...
	Arman says, as a first-generation immigrant myself, I find it pretty imperialistic of the left's ideology around immigration.
	Most immigrants I know, I'm in New York, hate not being in their culture.
	They would love to be back in their cultures, if only for a lack of financial opportunities.
	I and other happy to integrate kind of immigrants are exceptions, not the rule in my experience, but the left just keeps viewing the rest of the world as an s-hole themselves and imagine themselves the saviour of these poor people of the rest of the world, which is why Joe Biden is about to turn all of these countries gay.
	What all while blatantly contradict themselves with claims that the West is the worst, most oppressive culture as per usual is a stunning and brave example of the left reflecting.
	Yeah.
	Such a good point as well.
	We had treaties with the Soviet Union to take people.
	There was an ability to move, in some cases, if you could get the permission from the Soviets, obviously.
	But the people you would take would be anti-Soviet.
	They're the ones leaving.
	But we wouldn't have treaties with the Soviet Union to take millions upon millions of communists to come into the country.
	Why would we?
	Imagine the Nazis were like, yeah, so do you want to take a few million Nazi Germans as immigrants?
	And give them voting rights?
	No.
	Hmm.
	Armen says, it's always so surprising to me whenever the gun control is being thrust upon us, there seems to be a convenient mass shooting or two right after the Democrats propose a bill.
	Interesting.
	No, no, no.
	In their defense, there's a shooting and then they jump in on it.
	So there's a lot of shootings in the US because it's a big place and there's a lot of guns.
	I mean, you'll see Andy Ngo right now tweeting a bunch of the faces of people who engage in mass shootings.
	It's convenient that the mass shooters at this particular moment happen to be white by the statistics.
	And by the legal standard of what a Syrian is.
	Yeah, so I guess you can go check out Andy Ngo's Twitter feed for that, for the images of the faces and realize what a white man is, which apparently includes everyone.
	Pretty much, yeah.
	I mean, you know.
	All of Asia, all of the Middle East, all of North Africa, most of Polynesia, all of North and South America.
	Asia?
	All of Asia, isn't it?
	Yeah, all of Asia is white.
	All of Asia is white.
	Democrats 2020.
	Just anything below the Sahara Desert is not white.
	That's the only thing left.
	On the African continent, that's it.
	What about in the Americas?
	What about South Americans?
	South Americans are white.
	George Zimmerman.
	Oh, good point.
	Yeah, okay.
	Bart No Name says, gays are too precious, the actual clip.
	Do we have the clip?
	I don't know.
	I don't know what the clip is.
	Oh, are we talking about the onion thing?
	I'll send you it.
	Go on then.
	Well, okay.
	It's only two minutes.
	Let's watch it.
	Watch it, it's two minutes long.
	With military recruitment down and the need for soldiers greater than ever, some say it's time for the military to change its policy of barring homosexuals from some say it's time for the military to change its policy Well, joining us today from the Pentagon is General Robert McBrayer.
	Thank you for coming.
	My pleasure, Brandon.
	General, the military has been easing restrictions on enlistment in almost every area, on criminals, older veterans, even those with serious medical conditions.
	Why not gays?
	Gay people are different, Brandon.
	Under no circumstances can we put America's homosexuals in danger.
	But homosexuals themselves are demanding the right to serve their country in a time of war.
	The gays of America are the only group left untouched by war.
	They're special, pure and rare, like a gleaming diamond or a snow-white colt.
	We must protect them.
	Has this always been the goal?
	It has been the solemn oath of every man in uniform to lay down his life, In defense of America's precious, precious homosexuals.
	How many soldiers lives is the life of one gay man worth?
	Seven.
	General, tell us about the don't ask, don't tell policy, which many see as discriminatory.
	The reason we instituted that policy was because we knew we would never be able to keep out all the gays.
	To know that any of them managed to enlist and put themselves in harm's way, It would break our hearts.
	All of the top commanders know.
	We love them too much.
	So you're saying that the military's entire purpose is to fight so that homosexuals don't have to?
	Nor should their fragile psyches be subjected to the horrible sights that occur on the battlefield.
	Their pure minds should be reserved for thoughts of man-on-man or woman-on-woman romance.
	Well, thank you for clarifying this very sensitive issue for our viewers, General McBrayer.
	My pleasure.
	God bless America and her gays.
	Amazing.
	Joe Biden's administration, except now the gays are all the gays.
	Pirate Skeleton says, I was in the military US Coast Guard.
	God bless them.
	I was in the US military, the Coast Guard, and during the in-processing evaluation before you can get even sworn in, you can get rejected for any reason that could indicate that you can't get the job done, including mental illness.
	I'm sure there aren't any executive orders that can undermine that.
	Ryan Redacted, Biden looks borderline frightened in his eyes when the media starts shouting their questions after signing that order.
	Yeah, he does, doesn't he?
	He just looks like, you know, oh God, where am I? Who are these people?
	Why am I being attacked?
	But thank God that his carer, Kamala Harris, is there to take care of him.
	You only have one day to elect a president under the Constitution.
	This bill is illegal.
	Well...
	I don't think that's going to stop them.
	Christian S says, the federal voter grab cannot survive constitutional scrutiny as the Constitution reserves how elections are done to the state legislatures.
	All the red states will reject this and not comply.
	HR1 is so obviously corrupt it won't have the support.
	Yeah, but I mean, support's a very malleable term, isn't it?
	You know, you'll be like, oh, we all object.
	It's like, yeah, but for some reason, this is the most popular bill ever.
	You didn't get any votes.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Most popular bill ever.
	It's just weird how everyone voted for this bill, apart from the people who...
	400 billion.
	A million people vote for us.
	Yeah, exactly.
	That's weird.
	What is it about Joe Biden the American people love so much?
	Dave Carr says, how racist and ill-informed for that white person to assume that black person has a job.
	Well, that's Eli's, Ellie's, sorry, position on this.
	Rose says, how can people live like that?
	Obsessed with race and believing all white people are out to get them.
	It's awful, these people need help.
	Yes, it is awful, and these people do need help.
	But unfortunately, they're fully encouraged to believe by the rest of their Twitter mob and their own jobs, writing for places like The Nation.
	In fact, all white people are evil and they need to build Castle Wakanda.
	Like...
	Anyway, Dylan says, I was wearing a green t-shirt when I went to Asda the other day, and someone asked me where she could find rice, and I noticed she was a racism, so I kicked her out of the shop and everyone cheered.
	Bravo!
	Anyway, thanks for watching, folks.
	If you want more from us, the Premium Podcast of the Ethical Knowledge, the Full Up to the Thick Concepts one, will be up at 3pm.
	Of course, you can sign up and get access to all of our Premium content, and the Brave New World review will be coming next week, I believe.
	Hopefully, fingers crossed.
	In the meantime, there's loads of other great free content on Lizzy.com, and so we'll catch you tomorrow at the same time.

▲