Louder with Crowder's episode argues that left-wing rhetoric incites violence, citing one attack every seven weeks since July 2024. The host condemns Marxist ideology, mocks climate hypocrisy regarding China's coal use versus US regulations, and critiques the "Second Nature" documentary for promoting transgender ideology based on animal behavior. Ultimately, the discussion frames these cultural shifts as a coordinated effort to undermine American values and rationality through divisive language and failed environmental narratives. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Picard Crossing Your Ideas00:03:51
This is begun.
Crossing light years.
Energize.
Crossing light.
Mix.
Wait.
Energize, energize, and Captain's control.
Don't do it, John.
On the side, Commander Riker.
Captain's control, we honor, honor, and.
A better track to be.
This is Picard, crossing your ideas.
This is Picard, John.
Look at the garden.
This is Picard, crossing your ideas.
Energize, crossing your ideas.
This is Picard, crossing your ideas.
This is Picard, John.
Look at the garden.
This is Picard, crossing your ideas.
Energize, crossing your light.
Can you
hear that tool, man.
America Great Daily00:04:25
How about that one?
Welcome to the lineup live here on Rumble.
Each show rolls into the next live all day.
You don't need to change that channel, open a new tab.
YouTube is pretty much dead as far as live streaming.
Rumble did it figuratively.
We're going to be talking about that today the less violent rhetoric, how they are doubling down on it now.
And they're both doubling down and denying, which is weird.
Let me be really clear about this.
The reason that there have been left wing, leftist violent attacks, one every seven weeks, Every seven weeks, we haven't gone seven weeks without one since the first attempted assassination of Donald Trump is because of the rhetoric of the left.
And these people, these crazy people, these psychopaths believe that they will be the savior to democracy.
It's really straightforward.
So we're going to make the case for that.
Let's remove all doubt.
Lee Zeldin shut down that, uh, De Rosa, what's the name of the old witch lady with the purple?
Anyway, it's a lot of fun.
And Ann Hathaway hates skinny people because she's still trying to, like, make fat pride a thing.
But, uh, it's not a thing, Ozempic, so it's done now.
So that's kind of funny.
We have a 7 plus 1 on that.
And Elliot Page, I still refer to Elliot as Ellen because I can, made a movie about gay animals.
Toolman said that he couldn't hear me in the morning.
That, like, why are you whispering?
And I always speak.
You guys let me know if this is whispering.
I think this is a normal level.
ASML.
You're also being amplified.
So from now on, I'll talk like this.
All right.
On with the show.
You.
Puzzle.
Foundation Daily.
All the daily vitamins and minerals you need, check.
Clinical ingredients, check if they're clinically effective doses, check and lab tested so you know that what's on the label is exactly what you need.
Foundation, fill in the gaps, fill in the gaps that you might be missing.
Go to foundationdaily.com today, subscribe, and save 40% for life.
Help!
Help!
president again.
He's going to make America great again.
Today we celebrate our Independence Day.
Click Rumble Premium and join now for $99 annually or $9.99 a month to get the entirely ad free experience and an ever expanding roster of content, creators, and free speech.
Gosh.
Because if we talk like this, he also can't hear us.
This is the worst ASMR I've ever heard.
I have canker sores.
I'm glad you're using your mic during the show.
It's a fun day.
Yes, it's an abusive work environment.
Captain Morgan, CEO, how are you?
Fantastic.
Couture Plus One Fashion00:09:48
Can we keep making fun of Tim and not me?
Yeah, you know what, man?
I don't like making a judgment call.
Admonish him right off the bat.
That is not your place.
You're welcome, Tim.
You dictate how Steven runs the show?
Come on, dude.
I'm nervous.
I just.
I tell you what, you're the big Hitler.
Mm hmm.
What?
Big Hitler.
You're big Hitler.
You heard him.
Hitler's bad, too.
Yeah, there's little Hitler and then there's big Hitler.
Yeah.
What?
There's bad in this circumstance.
That's exactly what you are.
You're big Hitler.
You're snuffle up a Hitler.
Imagine like a seven foot Hitler.
That's you.
This turned.
Goebbels the grouch.
I was trying to take like 10% of the stuff off of Tim, not 150%.
You're the cookie, Mengele.
All right.
Somebody called David.
Friday, May 1st.
Bricktown Comedy Club in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, not underscore Firestine on X. Josh Firestine, how are you doing?
Great, great.
I'm excited to make fun of Gerald some more.
Yeah, it's a good time.
And you're not a Hitler.
No, I'm not.
No.
I'm not even a happy one.
No, no.
You're the only one who's dressed as Hitler in this room.
How am I dressed like Hitler?
I'm wearing a fishing shirt I got on an emergency one time.
He also fished.
Breaking K Fob admonished Tool Man.
Breaking K Fob Tool.
He.
Gerald admonished.
Noodles, you know.
They don't know.
They don't know breaking K Fob.
Yeah, you don't break K Fob.
What's that?
Oh.
Oh.
I don't get it.
There is no happy Hitler in the studio.
Happy Hitler is its own entity.
All right.
Yes.
Speaking of, I don't know, Hitler.
I don't know how to transition here.
Yeah, I figured that one out.
Anne Hathaway.
Okay.
Any transition?
Yeah.
So she was given this press tour for the Devil Wears Prada 2, and she decided that she wanted a certain type of model.
When you think Prada, you think fashion, couture.
Yeah.
Remember, like, do you guys remember this?
Fat Pride was a thing a while ago.
For those of you who are new here, you may not know, because, like, Ozempic came out and all the Fat Pride representatives are gone now.
Amy Schumer, Rebel Wilson, pretty much everybody.
Well, Lena Dunham's still out there chowing down.
That's true.
She's still showing her face all the time.
Well, that's because she has nothing else to offer.
She can't do anything else other than be gross.
So, well, I guess I kind of just revealed it to you.
It's not really a hint.
Anne Hathaway wants more fatties.
It's better when you see so many different types of bodies.
Not all the time.
That brings us to this week's Entertainment Minute.
And yes, I just let you, this is to clear the palate.
It's going to be a little silly.
It was a little intense yesterday.
To be clear, we've never just made fun of someone for just like, hey, you're fat.
But when people advocate for fat pride, when people advocate that all bodies are healthy and all bodies are equally beautiful, of course, we will, you know, we'll stand on the side of all medical data, literature, science.
And when they're disingenuous, zero chance Ann Hathaway would be interested in this.
Well, I don't know.
Well, I mean, maybe a 2% chance.
I can't be charming.
If she had to choose between you.
Or the big Hitler, she'd probably cheat you.
Yeah, you don't know that.
I don't know.
They like the bad boys.
Yeah.
Don't you know it?
Wow, you're so big.
Apparently, I was the good guy, though.
So, red carpet interview Ann Hathaway, because she decided she's not unlikable enough, decided to make this statement.
I've been a plus size model and size inclusivity advocate for 15 years, and I have to say a huge thank you for insisting that there was diversity in this.
Movie in that runway show.
Why was that important to you?
Well, because I had seen that there were a lot of traditionally sized models in our movie.
Traditionally sized.
And I just know that it's a good movie for everyone.
And so I thought that it would be wonderful.
And we also know in the last few years that the fashion industry can take a more inclusive approach to beauty standards.
And I think that we're all kind of happier when it's like that, when everybody feels included.
So I just went up to the producers and said, hey, do you think that we could.
Was it a bad movie?
And they looked up and they said, I'm so embarrassed.
We didn't notice.
And of course, and within like two hours, suddenly there were more girls there.
And I just, yeah, it just made me happy.
No, there weren't more girls.
You just miscounted.
Yeah, the volume was up.
Yeah.
This is the thing it's so disingenuous.
Like, yeah, how expensive is that dress?
How many people worked on your makeup and hair?
How many nutritionists and personal trainers?
And by the way, there's nothing wrong with that.
And I understand, of course, there are multiple sizes that can be within the bounds of health.
The good news is that men don't have the unrealistic standards.
That you think we do.
Men rate women on a very healthy bell curve when you look at the statistics.
Women do not.
They have unrealistic expectations.
And they're disingenuous about this thing.
Yeah, everyone is like, there's no difference.
It's all.
And they do everything they can to put their best foot forward.
There's nothing wrong with that.
Let's just be honest about it.
Also, it's okay.
The world of high fashion isn't for everybody.
It's not for me.
It's not for all of us guys here who are like, but guess what?
I don't lament it.
I don't care.
There are other things that I can do.
Not all things.
Are meant for all people.
And you may not know this, but they have been trying to push the fat pride, the body positivity in high end couture for a very long time, and none of it has worked.
Which brings us to this week's Fat Couture brand, Seven Plus One.
You forgot, Sivan in the chamber.
Seven Plus One Fat Couture brands you may not have heard of.
No.
Number seven.
You know what, Josh Fireston?
You do the honors.
Number seven, Fat Couture.
I actually modeled for these guys.
It didn't work out, but Abercrombie and Lunch.
Yes, that was well.
Yeah.
And get your denim and sandwiches.
Yeah, he's happy.
Seven plus one, Fat Couture brands.
Number six, Kenneth Coldcuts.
Kenneth Coldcuts.
Oh, sorry.
He's going to need more material for that jacket.
Seven plus one.
Got a window with those nipples.
High end fashion couture.
I don't know what all those words mean, so I'm combining them.
I had friends in the family, they were all overweight, and no joke, they walked out of the nutty professor because they took offense to it.
I'm like, that is an admission.
You shouldn't tell anybody that.
At least they walked.
Hey, fun fact the Washington Post did a study.
Turns out women have stinkier farts.
Really?
Yeah, men have more fart.
They have more gas, but the smell is stinkier from the woman.
That's not for me.
It's from the Washington Post.
I don't know that I believe that.
It's the Washington Post.
They never lie.
Seven plus one fat couture brands.
Number two, Josh.
Versace's Puffs.
Versace's Puffs.
Oh.
And the number one, high end, fat couture brand, Balenciaga.
God, I'm having a heart attack.
And the plus one, Jimmy doesn't chew.
That's been this week's 7 plus 1.
Oh, God.
You'll forgot Sivan in the chamber.
You have to chew your.
Food.
We didn't let that last one breathe enough.
No, that's why I just wanted, you know, people, it's one of them, what you call Easter eggs for the fat cabbage eggs.
Go back and pause it like it's the whole nine yards.
You know what's silly?
Is that whenever we sit down to write a seven plus one, if it's fat themed, we all laugh more.
We're children.
Yeah.
We're just sitting there like, ah, Bart Jacobs.
I put a sandwich in his hand.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
He does look like he's eating cold cuts.
Yeah.
And it took hours.
No one else even tries.
11 a.m. weekdays.
We do this every day.
So, fashion design, look, let's be clear, they take huge risks, which makes them, I understand it, like they get to determine their models.
It makes them pretty vulnerable.
Thankfully, there's a way you can control your financial vulnerability.
Rumble Wallet, keep your crypto safe even when you are at your most vulnerable.
Hey, how'd you get in here?
Go!
Stop recording me!
He's doing it for social.
Go to wallet.rumble.com to download the Rumble Wallet today.
No banks, no fees, no middlemen, just your money and now your crypto in one secure, easy to use place.
Get started today.
Threat To Democracy Warfare00:15:43
And you know what?
I know that many of you are going to critique my body because that's how it goes.
I'm fine with it.
You had great boobs.
It was fun.
Yeah, I pulled them off.
By the way, it was needlessly complicated that shoot where you guys put fake mermaid boobs on me and then put some kind of bizarre foam of hydrogen peroxide and brewer's yeast and then soap bubbles.
I'm like, why didn't we just use the soap bubbles?
Why do we need all of these layers?
Why?
We could have.
No.
I mean, we had the opportunity to do that.
We had the opportunity to put some stinky stuff on you.
I smelled like week old fries for, I don't know, about a day.
You sound delicious.
That's the only way I can describe it with the hydrogen peroxide and the yeast.
All right.
Look, we talked about this yesterday, and yesterday we were primarily dealing with the Marxist right because we're at a time in this country where it should be a COVID like situation.
And by that, I mean people waking up and seeing the left for what they are.
And in this instance, that should be the left's violent rhetoric, their violent worldview inherently, and the results therein, which we have seen.
Instead, the goalposts keep getting shifted, and people are talking about impeaching Donald Trump.
There's a direct line to the left's rhetoric.
The left's calls to action, the left knowingly lying, the labels they apply, and acts of violence.
Since President Trump's first, well, the assassination attempt against him, I don't want to say his first assassination attempt.
No.
2024, July, there has been at least one high profile leftist political attack every seven weeks.
Let me put a finer point on this.
Here's why.
Because these people, whether it's Cole Thomas Allen, Or whether it's Luigi Mangione, whether it's take your pick, they believe that they are going to be the savior to democracy.
They believe that democracy is teetering on the edge of extinction.
They believe that that is due to Donald Trump and they believe that they will save it.
Why?
Because that's what the left tells them.
This isn't one person out of context, for example, saying target these districts to vote them out.
This isn't one person saying fight like hell.
Remember that where they said that was violent rhetoric?
This is Person after person after person of note or in a position of authority, referring to President Trump and many of his supporters and his administration as fascists, murderers, rapists, pedophiles, Nazis, all of these.
So, what do you do with Nazis?
We've talked about that.
What do you do with actual Nazis?
You kill them.
I have no problem with that.
I have no problem with the Allies killing Nazis, those who were actually sending people to concentration camps, just like I have no problem with.
Allies or anyone killing communists.
I get it.
That's how you have to deal with them.
You have a huge portion of people who believe that about half of the voting population, and certainly this administration.
In case you are still wondering as to, well, is there a direct path?
Here you go.
Here's a super cut.
I don't think we need to say more, but we will.
Do you think Donald Trump is a fascist?
Yes, I do.
The former president, a rapist, Donald Trump speaks about immigrants with the same rhetoric.
That Hitler did.
Donald Trump's modern day Gestapo is scooping folks up off the streets.
Nazis.
If your friends are concerned with authoritarianism, they should be concerned with the occupant of the White House right now.
Donald Trump raping children.
Donald Trump threatening to kill children.
You don't care that the president might be a pedophile.
He is a dictator.
The president is a racist.
Kissing the ring of the wannabe dictator.
He is a confected, convicted fella.
As aspiring presidential dictators go, he is simply in a class by himself.
I believe we're on the path.
That Nazi Germany went down under Hitler.
And I say that as a political science and history major.
He has built a whole presidency on race.
A racist, abusive coward who could permanently damage the fabric of our society.
Like, in the core of his being, he's a racist.
He's a con man.
The last time the Alien Enemies Act was invoked, it was used to detain and deport German, Japanese, Italian immigrants during World War II.
Now, I know the left will defend that and say, ah, it's just a language barrier.
No.
I would argue we don't need language barriers from our congresswomen.
That's a good point, also.
I mean, call me crazy and old fashioned.
Yeah, also, we don't need that much inbreeding.
Now, yeah, we don't need it.
Keep in mind, so you just heard it Nazi, fascist, dictator, I believe autocrat was used, if not in that montage, it certainly has been rapist, murderer, felon, danger to democracy, Now, compare that to the fact that we were actually banned before an election stream because the worst thing that I said about Kamala Harris was that she was dumb.
And I believe that she was a whore, rightfully so, who slept her way into office.
So, compare all the rhetoric of the left that is allowed to go on completely unfettered to this was a bannable offense.
I've referred to Kamala Harris as a lying whore, but to be clear, it's only because she's lied and she had sex with people for political gain.
So, by definition, but I That's not encouraging any type of assassination.
We all know many lying whores.
Some of them are very nice people once you sort of cafeteria compartmentalize out the lying whoredom.
It's true.
I knew a tremendous lying whore in college.
Not intimately.
No.
She was tremendous?
Yes.
She was very nice.
She was a lying whore.
You just didn't want to rely on her because she would lie and do whore things.
Yeah.
Now, here's the thing we have, okay, multiple assassination attempts, and obviously we've seen successful assassinations.
I use that term, I hate to use that term, but assassinations that were carried out.
We saw that with Charlie Kirk.
We've had to deal with this for a very long time.
The latest one was just charged finally with attempted assassination.
That was in pretty much record time.
He thought he would go down in history as a savior to democracy.
Instead, he got this photo shoot.
That's about all he got.
How embarrassing.
You wanted to assassinate the president, you end up looking like you're from Chipotle.
Do they have him in a space camp blanket?
I mean, they're trying to keep him warm, I guess.
I don't know.
Yeah, they stripped him of his clothes, I believe, because he had weapons and stuff, and then they kept him warm and covered.
So.
Stupid.
But here's the thing.
I also understand.
I understand why he thought that.
If I was him, I would think, yeah, the left is going to have my back.
They believe that this is a Nazi.
This is a fascist.
They believe this person's a threat to democracy.
They'll be grateful for me taking away that threat to democracy.
He saw the chicks line up for Luigi Mangione.
He thought, this is how I'm going to get liberated.
It doesn't exactly apply across the board.
Hello, conjugal visits.
And you let me know.
If you get in their mindset, it makes sense.
It makes sense with the kind of warped logic that they have.
This is not a Logical leap that we have to make.
You can comment below.
We'll be talking about this quite a bit.
And Caroline Levitt addressed this trend at yesterday's presser.
Nobody in recent years has faced more bullets and more violence than President Trump.
This political violence stems from a systemic demonization of him and his supporters by commentators, yes, by elected members of the Democrat Party, and even some in the media.
This hateful, inconstant, and violent rhetoric directed at President Trump day after day after day for 11 years has helped to legitimize this violence and bring us to this dark moment.
Those who constantly falsely label and slander the president as a fascist, as a threat to democracy, and compare him to Hitler to score political points are fueling this kind of violence.
The left wing cult of hatred against the president and all of those who support him and work for him has gotten multiple people hurt and killed.
Yeah, and by the way, at least four attempts that we know of on President Trump's life, there's been at least one high profile leftist political attack at large every seven weeks since the first attempt.
Yeah.
And this is the totality of it.
What she's talking about is the repetition of this.
It's not some one off claim by AOC or Bernie or somebody else just trying to score political points or try to get more votes.
It's over and over and over by everybody in the media, in the Democratic establishment, just being echoed over and over again.
Of course, it starts to sink into people and go, well, this must be true.
Everybody is saying it.
Right.
Not once, a hundred times.
It's not a happenstance.
It is the playbook.
Yeah.
It is the playbook.
If they can't make you out to be an idiot, like they did with George W. Bush or, you know, they did with Dan Quayle, they kind of did that with Ronald Reagan, then they make you out to be evil.
Yeah.
And I have consistently said whether someone is an idiot, Kamala Harris, or you might say evil, that they're sharp.
It's just Marxism.
It's Marxism.
And I believe that it is an evil ideology.
I believe that it has leftists under their spell.
They don't know that they're doing evil, but I believe that the theft of people's personal property through the use of force, not to mention transitioning children and the Holocaust that we have seen in babies, I do believe that it's an evil ideology.
I don't shy away from that.
There's a difference between discussing those differences and saying these.
People, this person is a threat to democracy uniquely.
Let's go to some more examples here of people doubling down because they have to answer for it now.
That's good, but they don't answer for it.
Hakeem Jeffries, he answered this question well, political, you know, it's all bad, right?
The rhetoric is bad, full stop, but and then does it.
What are you advising your members to do about rhetoric right now that you can criticize the president without facing geocriticism?
Political violence in any form directed at anyone, whether that's the right, the left, or the center, is unacceptable.
Period.
Full stop.
Got it.
The notion.
Oh, here he goes.
Any of us are concerned with so called criticism from these phony Republicans as it relates to anything that has been said, certainly as it relates to the comment related to maximum warfare everywhere, all the time, in connection with the redistricting battle that Republicans launched.
I stand by it.
You can continue to criticize me for it.
I don't give a damn about your criticism.
Where's Blade when you need him?
Figuratively.
See, that's a joke.
They actually engage.
Maximum warfare.
We compare that in the montage you just saw to fight like hell.
Because I know people say, well, both sides do it.
No, no, they don't.
Because we ran you a montage of plenty of people on the left saying fight like hell.
It's an expression that's used, it's a colloquialism.
People know that fight like hell doesn't mean physically fight or go assault somebody, especially in the context that it was used, especially when he said, make your voices peacefully and patriotically heard.
Compare this rhetoric to fight like hell because that was one of the reasons for impeachment.
And so, what do they do?
They espouse these, these, uh, this evil rhetoric.
That's really the only way to say it.
Maximum warfare is too violent for a Call of Duty title.
Yeah, exactly.
Like, ah, let's call it like modern warfare or something, not like maximum warfare.
That's going to make kids into shooters.
We're going to go with minimum effective dose of warfare.
Reasonable use of warfare.
And then when they're called on it, they either do what Hakeem Jeffries did.
Now he's an idiot.
So is AOC.
They just play dumb.
Like, what?
I don't know.
Fascist, Nazi, rapist, murder.
What?
What did I say?
I don't know.
Did I say that?
What do you see to the White House and the President doing at a very critical moment?
Democrats' rhetoric in the aftermath of the Senate.
To what specifically?
I mean, they've been saying that your rhetoric from Democrats is causing extremists.
Presumably.
What?
Nah.
Yeah, I mean, I would be interested in them actually saying what.
Exactly, is inciting that.
We will.
Yeah, don't worry.
When you have people committing crimes in office, we have an obligation to say that someone is committing a crime in office.
Like insider trading?
Includes the President of the United States.
Trying to use an opportunity to escape any accountability for any actions is just not a responsible course of action.
Liar whore, liar whore, and you know it.
No.
Fair.
And people will be more offended at that.
First off, use an opportunity.
If it's the fourth time that someone tries to take your life and gets close, Are you really using an opportunity or is it an appropriate time to maybe point out a pattern?
Like these people who are professional victims, to use it.
Like, you know, no one was, the left doesn't care until you're actually dead.
I've had this.
You can go watch Change My Minds where people have thrown things at me, whether it could be concrete milkshake, could be chocolate, vanilla, acid.
I've talked about it.
One guy stole a homeless man's pencil case, like a lunchbox, and whipped it at me.
And the lady sitting there goes, You're fine.
You didn't get hurt.
Oh, so I have to be hemorrhaging?
For it to matter?
Also, there's a homeless guy that no one cares about.
Yeah, exactly right.
Lost his lunch.
What the hell?
Lost his Crayolas.
Probably went on a killing spree because of it.
Also, I have to disagree.
They don't care when you die.
It's you're fine, you're fine, you're fine.
You deserved it.
Right.
You know what?
That's a very good point.
That's true for most of them.
And I'll tell you what, she said, if someone were to point me to it.
Well, good news is this is a show that gives you all the references every single day.
Check the link in the description, 11 a.m. Eastern, when we stream weekdays.
Here you go, AOC.
Remember these, bitch?
The United States is running concentration camps on our southern border.
And that is exactly what they are.
They are concentration camps.
I want to talk to the people that are concerned enough with humanity to say that we should not, that never again means something.
The vast majority of incidents of domestic terror come from white nationalism.
And that we are really truly facing an environment of fascism.
Donald Trump is also very old and a racist and a neo Nazi.
I don't care what Elon Musk is doing behind a presidential seal.
In this country, we hate Nazis.
Let me make myself clear.
I don't celebrate rapists.
So, no, I'm not going to the inauguration tomorrow.
And if Donald Trump wants to find the rapists and criminals in this country, he needs to look in a mirror today.
It's not about progressive, it's not moderate, it's not liberal.
This is about do you understand the assignment of fighting fascism right now?
I would not say that assassinating a young mother of three in the street is part of ISIS mandate.
Did I say that?
That's not rhetoric that might lead to violence, is it?
Like, what's the sentence for rapists and genocide?
Oh, it's the death penalty?
Maybe that was imprudent.
Supreme Court Glyphosate Policies00:15:02
She made a good point.
We should get rid of the gas chambers on the southern border.
Yes.
Yeah.
The ones that she didn't see because she took a photo op looking into a parking lot.
Yeah, those ones.
At least she didn't have the fake handcuffs that time.
There's no accountability for the left.
Why?
Marxists don't believe in it.
They don't believe in it.
The ends are always, they always justify the means.
That's the case.
Why?
Because you're the oppressor.
Why?
Because white Christians, well, now you become Christian nationalists, domestic terrorists, men, okay, rapists, Republican, Nazis, concentration.
If you're detaining people who are here illegally, concentration camps.
They just change the words and they never take accountability.
And this is why places like New York get exactly what they deserve.
That's why I don't spend that much time on Mamdani or people like AOC because, hey, you want them?
You get them.
Let's have a calci check in.
Is she going to run for Senate in 2028?
There's a 53% chance.
Oh.
Guess you didn't learn your lesson, New York.
Enjoy.
I got to say, I'd rather her run for Senate than run for the White House.
I'd rather her run for president.
She'd get destroyed.
Another lady getting destroyed in that election, dude.
Yeah.
Do you think the left will?
And, and, shut up.
Her voice is so annoying, dude.
Yeah, it'll be really, if she does that, it'll be really fun to see when she switches into her fake Bronx voice where she didn't grow up, back to her very nice, privileged, wealthy suburban voice.
Everything about these people is just disingenuous.
They don't believe what they're saying.
They don't believe there are concentration camps on the southern border.
They don't believe that Donald Trump is an actual Nazi.
They wouldn't be saying these things.
No.
They want power.
If they did believe it, they would be taking action and actually physically fighting, which some people are believing.
And if you believe that your opposition are actual Nazis, you tend to lay low because they tend to kill you.
Yeah.
You're saying an awful lot for this country to be run by Nazis.
Yeah.
You wouldn't be saying anything.
By the way, she said if somebody has committed a crime in government, it's our job to say it.
No, it's actually not your job to say it.
It's somebody's job to prosecute it and prove it.
Right.
You guys never do that.
You don't do the proving part of this process.
You don't need to.
When somebody's committed a crime.
And by the way, what crime has he committed for you to call him a Nazi or a fascist?
I don't understand which crime would lead to that outcome.
Right.
You're just throwing all this stuff together and hoping.
You guys know you don't have the balls to take up arms and go solve the problem that you're describing.
You're just hoping stochastic terrorism.
We talked about it yesterday.
You're hoping somebody else does.
Let me tell you this.
If I believe that there are actual concentration camps in the United States, meaning people are being put in internment camps and executed in the context that she used it, if I believe that there are actual concentration camps, if I believed that an actual national socialist party like the Nazis committing a genocide.
Had attained power in the United States and they were killing American citizens in record numbers, I would take up arms and I would engage in violence in the streets.
I absolutely would.
I would protect my neighbors.
I would.
I'm so looking forward to January 2029 when someone else was sworn in the office and they go, Good job, guys.
We defeated fascism.
Yeah.
When he relinquished power like a regular president.
Yeah.
No matter the last time.
Exactly.
Like he did last time.
When he thought the election was stolen from him, he was like, All right, fine, I'll still leave.
We did it, guys.
Fought it and we won.
Yeah.
That's how you beat Nazis and fascists is through the electoral process.
They usually let that happen, don't they?
Exactly.
All right.
Let's go.
Speaking of a crime, Lee Zeldin with this Congresswoman, Rosa DeLoro.
I don't remember Lee Zeldin having this level of, I don't give a crap anymore.
I don't remember him being this intense, but this was an exchange regarding climate change and regarding his role at the EPA, where she was not only out of her depth, but she appears like the demented old, tries to be cool grandma that she is.
And they might need to lock Lee Zeldin away for.
Murder, figuratively.
I'm shocked because the science tells us that climate change is real and accelerating.
And really, the effects, the impact of climate change are real.
When climate.
Rosa delirious.
flooding our streets, poisoning our air.
Looks like Dama Edna.
How can the EPA justify abandoning that duty to protect Americans to appease polluters and to protect the road?
Following the law, Section 202 of the Clean Air Act, where does it say anything about fighting global climate change?
Loper Bright, Supreme Court case, you're familiar with it?
No, maybe I'm a shopper.
Let me ask you.
But that's really important.
As a member of Congress, Loper Bright says that we as an agency don't have the authority to get creative if Section 202 of the Clean Air Act.
No, but you don't have, excuse me, you do not have the right to say climate change does not exist, that it's a hoax, and that's where this administration.
I understand you're upset that you don't know what Loper Bright is.
You know what the major policies doctrine is?
I'm upset because.
You know what the major policies doctrine is?
You're a member of Congress.
You should know.
Well, you're.
I'd like to put some paint cans in her hand because I could shake a couple of tones right now.
I'm not sure about knowing the two biggest landmark Supreme Court cases of the last year in regards to your question.
You are very defensive about changing your.
It's a live look at my HOA meetings.
Do you want me to tell you what the two biggest Supreme Court cases are of the last few years?
Michigan versus EPA?
Whoa.
West Virginia.
So, halt for the second and wait for the question.
Halt.
And answer the question.
Well, I answered your question.
Oh, you didn't.
And you didn't like my answer because you don't know what Loperbrite is.
Because you don't know what the major policies doctrine is.
Because you're asking me about Section 202 of the Clean Air Act and you don't read it.
You don't know what it says.
By the way, if you're an old lady with liver spotted hands, this is not a good choice.
Yeah, this is.
Get off my bidet.
Yeah, this looks like you're not from this neighborhood.
Yeah.
You're not supposed to.
That's my yard.
Your curtains aren't the right color.
Can we get HOA?
That brings us to this week's installment of Climate Claims.
Needlessly dramatic, but then again, so is the left's rhetoric.
No, it's not.
So is Rosa DeLaura.
Chairman, could you stop him from talking?
I just love how he just cites a Supreme Court case.
She's like, whoa!
What is the Supreme Court?
Is that like a sour cream and tomatoes on it?
I was not told that we would be discussing stuff to climate change.
And we'll go through the claims, the truth, and we'll provide you the references as we do every weekday, 11 a.m. Eastern.
By the way, thank you for the raid, good sir.
We'll be sending you on, if you're not a Rumble Premium member, to Haley.
Corona effort.
So here's the claim.
Let's break this down.
The EPA is harming the people by not.
Just play it.
The budget proposal reads like a climate change deniers manifesto.
When climate change is flooding our streets, poisoning our air, driving up health care and disaster costs, how can the EPA justify abandoning that duty to protect Americans to appease polluters under the false flag of economic growth?
Wow.
Driving up healthcare costs.
Now, do obesity.
Yeah, soda on snap.
How's that driving up the healthcare costs?
They don't actually believe what they say.
They're Marxists.
It's all about, all right, this person is in power at this point.
They must be wrong.
Let's pick this new pet product.
I will say, at least she practices what she preaches, as seen with her using zero carbon emission transportation to work.
So that's good.
I am grateful.
I will say.
At least she's following the law.
Like Bernie, she kind of believes it.
And it would seem like she's being super eco friendly at first glance.
But the reality is.
She has no choice.
She was arrested for a DUI last Halloween.
Now, a little childish and stupid.
Then again, so's that broad.
Here's the truth, okay?
The Trump administration is following the law, with which she is clearly not familiar, by reigning in the EPA.
There is no law that authorizes the EPA to combat global climate change.
And by the way, even if they were permitted or authorized, which they're not, they wouldn't be able to do a damn thing.
Thing about it anyway.
Have you seen coal usage?
Look at China on the graph.
I don't have it here, but I'm sure you can take my word for it.
And here's the thing a lot of other leftists have flagrantly disregarded the law.
So you've had them expand the EPA using what's been known as the Chevron defense.
That's what he's actually citing there.
So, the Supreme Court case in 2024 was Loper Bright Enterprises versus Raimondo.
It overturned the Chevron defense, which was used by leftists, and it allowed federal agencies to exploit vague laws, loopholes, to expand their power to say, yeah, the EPA.
Which is meant to regulate emissions so that you're not coughing if you live in a city.
They should be able to hire Greta Thunberg as an ambassador to advocate for some international policy that we couldn't affect even if we tried.
Right.
And basically, that's what he asked her.
Do you know about this case?
Yes.
Because it is directly relevant to your question because you're asking me to do something that goes against the Supreme Court.
And what she's really saying is you're not, the thing that you wrote, even though it's in line with the Supreme Court, isn't the way that I would, I don't like it.
And so you're bad.
My mood ring doesn't know what to do.
It is so fun to watch lawmakers learn about new laws that I know.
That they should know about.
Yes, Noodles.
I was just going to say, we're going to get to it in a minute, but you brought up the coal graph, so we'll.
Oh, there you go.
Look at China.
China is an asshole.
And they're doing really lots of coal.
Yep, lots of coal.
Here's the next claim that she makes in there.
We wanted to break this down because it's great, it's entertaining, but more importantly, he's right.
She says that the Trump administration, you know, to be fair, she didn't say Nazi, rapist, murderer, pedophile, whatever it is.
Hey, there you go.
But they're harming the environment, they're killing Gaia.
This administration, however, is running the playbook on making the problem worse, focusing on policies that are handouts to the fossil fuel companies, like reversing the 2009 greenhouse gas endangerment finding, rolling back fuel emission standards for motor vehicles, and reducing methane leak monitoring requirements.
Okay, well, that last one's obvious.
Here's the truth.
This administration, actually, their EPA has a lot of wins.
And I wouldn't just say protecting the environment, but protecting sort of your quality of air.
Now, what she says rolling back carbon emission standards.
Things like cars requiring, because of overreaching government in the past, that button that you hate, that auto shut off button, that idle button that, by the way, puts a bunch of wear and tear on your car, a bunch of things that were added that you didn't ask for because some bureaucrat decided that it might affect the temperature rising 0.3 degrees over the next 100 years if you believe it.
Rolled back things like that so that whole Hopefully, you can have more affordable vehicles, or at least your commute doesn't have to be so annoying.
The winds that they have are ones of actual significance.
For example, tackling the Tijuana sewage crisis that was directly affecting San Diego.
They removed lead from drinking water.
They cleaned up the PCB soil contamination that was going on.
There's been a lot of restoring of the Great Lakes.
Stuff that the left complains about, and the right says, you know what?
Okay, there's something to be said for this.
But now they just say, yeah, but you're not, but you still, you don't have all the cars that we wanted.
And Lee Zeldin, by the way, reminded DeLoro of this was just funny.
Not to drink the weed killer glyphosate?
Glyphosate?
Here.
You want to make the claim that we're just giving up on the work of the Enforcement and Compliance Office?
Glyphosate.
Is that your question?
If your cup is full of glyphosate, I'm telling you as the administrator of EPA, don't drink it.
Thank you so much for agreeing to what we need to do.
I don't know what the question was.
You're holding up a cup saying glyphosate.
Don't drink it, don't inject it.
That is so embarrassing.
Or do?
What?
I don't know.
Whoa.
In case you guys are wondering, if you, if a volley starts, you know, and you attack, okay, and then they parry and they counter, a good comeback is never, what?
Whoa.
With no follow up.
Just let you know.
You don't need to be overly concerned with optics, but it's a bad one.
Glyphosate.
I'm going to use that against you.
Don't drink it.
Glyphosate.
Here's the next claim.
And this is just what they do if you say, well, hold on a second, I just don't believe this is the appropriate role of this department, or I don't believe it's the appropriate role of government, or I don't believe, for example, that some international climate summit to which people travel in a private jet is going to solve this problem, they say, well, you're just a science denier, science denier, science denier.
You deny climate change, period.
No, but you don't have, excuse me, you do not have the right to say climate change does not exist, that it's a hoax, and that's where this administration is coming from.
So here's the truth.
He does have the right to say that.
He never did say that.
Here's Zeldin acknowledging climate change, but clarifying that it's the alarmism he doesn't agree with.
Right here.
Do you agree with President elect Trump that climate change is a hoax?
Well, first off, Senator, it was great to meet with you as well.
I believe that climate change is real, as I told you.
As far as President Trump goes, The context that I have heard him speak about it was with a criticism of policies that have been enacted because of climate change.
And I think he's concerned about the economic costs of some policies where there's a debate and a difference of opinion between parties.
I would respectfully disagree with you.
Now, when the left, here's the whatever the left says, it's nuanced.
That means they don't know what they're talking about and they're about to lie to you.
In my experience, often, and I've seen this too as an employer, but also in debates, if someone gives an overly complicated answer or an overly complicated solution to a relatively, let's say, straightforward problem or a question, it usually means they don't know what they're doing.
Or they're trying to present it as overly complicated in the hopes that you don't understand what they're saying and they can claim that they know more than you.
That right there was a very reasonable answer.
By the way, it's the answer that most Americans share, or many certainly.
Ice Age Jimmy Kimmel00:09:26
Yeah, okay, climate changes and maybe humans are contributing to it.
That's a lot of Americans.
As to whether it's going to be catastrophic and as to whether these policies will make a difference, I don't think so.
That's an entirely reasonable position.
They label that as you don't believe in science.
And if you want to talk about myths, I mean, we can go through, and we'll do this tomorrow.
In Inconvenient Truth, I had to watch that.
That was curriculum when I was in school.
A British High Court ruled nine significant errors, and Al Gore has now come out with a new prediction.
Let me ask you this we're going to cover this tomorrow because it's important.
And by the way, the public perception has shifted on climate change, rightfully so.
When you think Al Gore at Inconvenient Truth, did you see that film?
Okay.
Pause it if you're not watching this live.
I want you to think in your mind what kind of predictions did he make?
Right?
Back then, it was global warming, climate change wasn't the only term used.
Okay, global warming, inconvenient truth.
Picture his predictions.
Okay, comment below.
All right, so what would you think his new prediction is?
Would you have guessed new ice age?
What?
Because that's where he is now.
Well, he already grifted through all the hot stuff.
Yeah.
All the warming business.
He's already, well, I already exhausted all those news.
Matter of fact, I remember back then when he was talking about how the earth was going to be this hellscape and people going, well, didn't a lot of scientists predict an ice age?
As a matter of fact, there was a whole documentary.
And I think Leonard Nimoy actually narrated it.
And they go, oh, that's a Reddit.
That was never actually mainstream.
Well, here they are now, a new ice age.
How do you guys not get it right ever?
How do you not even get it close?
Like, it's not, hey, we think that Florida won't be here by the year, whatever it was, 2014 or Cape Cod.
They made a bunch of predictions that never came true.
And then it turns out that it's a year late.
It's, we're not going to have crops because it's going to be sweltering hell.
Did I say that?
I meant ice age.
Fuck.
I don't know how they get there, but they just keep trying.
And people keep buying it.
People just keep lapping it up because they're like, yeah, of course, climate change, climate denier.
Well, it's the same thing I was talking about earlier with the whole fascist thing.
In 2029, they're going to go, look, we beat fascism.
That's what they do with this.
They go, yeah, of course, there's more polar bears than ever because we made that movie.
We made people aware.
And that's why we're heroes.
We helped the largest killing machine that nature has ever devised on land survive.
We saved the earth so much, now it's going in reverse direction.
And there's going to be an ice age.
Yes, I don't understand how anyone can genuinely.
Let's say that you believe climate change is real, humans are the sole or primary contributor to it.
This is a real question.
And you believe it's going to have catastrophic results.
Okay, I don't go along with the catastrophic results, just to be clear.
And I don't even know that humans are the primary contributor, let alone soul.
I think we are a contributor.
I think we are one of many contributors.
That's where I line up.
And you may say that that means I deny climate change.
Okay, fine.
But let's assume you accept all of those.
Why would you trust the left to handle it?
If you had someone inspect your house, say, you know what, we have to come in, you're going to need a $20,000 termite treatment.
That's why your house is all lopsided.
They perform it.
Then you find out there are no termites.
They go, oh, sorry, your foundation shifted actually.
It had nothing to do with termites.
And they send you another bill for $20,000 saying they would fix it.
Wouldn't you get a second opinion?
And they say, well, why don't you trust us?
Because you charged me $20,000 for termites that didn't exist.
You said hot healthscape, and now you're saying ice age.
If it's ice age, I'm probably going to go with the people who said an Ice age was more likely than the heat.
And when are we invading China?
Because none of this matters.
The entire world, every single country on the planet, can sign on and do the most draconian restrictions you can possibly think of.
And it won't make one bit of difference if China doesn't change.
Yeah, here's what we'll be invading them coal consumption right there 55% China, 13% India, United States, 4.8%.
Just to be clear, it just doesn't matter.
There's nothing, if every single one of you Started driving electric cars, using one square of toilet paper, carpooling, it would have zero discernible effect.
Do you understand that?
Because China.
And by the way, Kearney in Canada and these global leaders from the left, they say we need to create stronger alliances with China.
That's where they ignore the climate change.
And again, you're going, wait, hold on a second.
How can that be logically consistent?
It's not, they're not trying to be.
They're Marxists.
Economically, the United States is more successful than China, therefore they are the oppressor.
China is the oppressed.
Never mind that China has actual slave labor, even economically, the good guy in comparison to China, not saying perfect, would be the United States.
And then they just ignore it when it comes to emissions, when it comes to pollution.
Why?
Because America bad.
America bad, even though America has far more renewable energy, even though America has far cleaner emission standards, even though America has been far more effective in cleaning up some economic catastrophes, and China doesn't care.
America bad because America is the global leader, therefore we side with China.
That simple.
Are you guys starting to get the picture?
If you're trying to make sense of it any other way, you can't.
And I would gladly, anyone qualified, debate that issue.
The logical consistency of the left.
How the left, for example, can support from the river to the sea while flying an LGBTQ Gestapo flag.
How the left can say that we need to expand the reach of the EPA and give them control over your personal decisions as it relates to climate change while demanding stronger alliances with China.
Whatever it is, how they can demand women's rights and talk about rape culture and say that these Islamic countries are beautiful and all cultures are equal.
The logical consistency of the left.
I don't mean some ex poster with a generic avatar on there.
The logical consistency of the left, there is no other way to make sense of it other than Marxism.
Change my mind.
You guys let me know.
And I'm not going to debate someone who's called for my death.
Just be quiet.
That's my line.
People who call for violence against all political opposition, that's a no.
That's a hard pass.
Why?
Because I don't want them to be around me.
Yeah.
P-p-p-p-pussy.
No, I think that's a very reasonable line to have.
Oh, by the way, when's Greta Thunberg's flotilla arriving in China?
Right, good point.
She hasn't gone there once, has she?
I mean, I don't.
Oh, I like her.
She has the same haircut.
Also, because of genetic mutation, I have a tiny fee.
Oh, we put her in a factory.
Oh, that little boy would be good in a factory.
How dare you?
We change him to.
Chain him to a room, only let him have a piss break every 12 hours.
Thank God for Mark Carney!
Oh, Lee Satan.
It's theater that kills people.
By the way, are you referencing what I pointed at a minute ago?
You and Jimmy Kimmel, someone with the FCC.
Yeah, so it looks like the FCC, at least this is the headline, so maybe our research team, if you guys can tell us what's really going on, it says the FCC is looking at the ABC licenses amidst this kind of kerfuffle with Kimmel.
I don't know if it is because of or if this was already a process that was in motion.
Obviously, if it was in response to his joke, we would be against that.
Yes.
Like, come on.
I understand people don't like.
Jokes sometimes.
He's come out and explain it, but like we have a pretty hard line here.
Yeah.
We wouldn't like that if they did it to us.
No.
Yeah.
No, Jimmy Kimmel is definitely dishonest.
He is not a good faith actor.
We're not fans.
But I will say my interpretation of the joke was that, you know, Donald Trump, President Trump, is much older than Melania.
I think it was distasteful, but I don't think that the guy should lose his ability to perform comedy if people want to watch.
Now, the issue may be quite a bit more complicated than that because it was misrepresented last time with the FCC.
I just forgot the name of the guy who was the FCC chairman who spoke out.
What a lot of people don't understand about this.
Is something like a show with ABC, right?
They have a lot of affiliates.
They're syndicated.
And so these affiliates, in many cases, have to carry Jimmy Kimmel.
It's part of the package that they sort of get, and they post a 0.0 rating.
So if Jimmy Kimmel keeps crapping on the American voting base, right, he's not performing well, say, in Kansas City or in Tulsa.
And these local affiliates, a lot of them are like, we have to get out of this.
We don't want to air this.
We want to be able to air whatever we need to air so we don't post a 0.0 and have to fire everybody.
And then pressure is exerted.
And then, of course, lawyers are involved.
So it's quite a bit more complicated than just FCC wants to pull Jimmy Kimmel.
That's how it was before.
I don't know what's going on right now.
Why don't you care about the little guy?
They should have the right to run a business.
Haven't people talked about the importance of local broadcasting?
Or is that only NPR when it's federally funded?
Brendan Carr.
Brendan Carr.
Yeah.
That's it.
There's so many cars Alan Carr, Jimmy Carr.
Yeah.
So we'll see what happens with that.
Yeah.
Maybe research can kind of help get that to me.
This next thing, now, just so you know.
I was instructed not to watch this.
And you prevented everyone else in this room from seeing it either.
I haven't seen it either, yeah.
Before being on air.
So I have no idea where this segment is going to go.
You know where it's going to go.
It's going to piss you off.
That's where it's going to go.
Yeah, people here really enjoy that.
Mission Impossible Phallus Protocol00:08:23
They enjoy getting a rise out of me.
It's not healthy.
It's not a healthy way to live, but I'm okay with it.
This, so, and in case we have to leave during the middle of a clip, if you are not yet, by the way, a Rumble Premium member, consider clicking that button below.
Rumble Premium is Mug Club.
Mug Club is Rumble Premium.
It's $99 a year.
You get this wonderful hand isheld mug, 100% more show, along with All the content you see ad free.
It's your best one stop shop.
Oh, and by the way, if not, hey, you take a multivitamin, take the best one in the world.
It's the only other company I run, foundationdaily.com.
You get 40% off.
Lab tested, fully transparent, clinical ingredients that are clinically effective at the clinical dosage because so many supplement companies are full of crap.
So, either way, that's how you keep the lights on, and we're not funded by a foreign caliphate.
That's fun.
Next thing Ellen Page.
Point of privilege.
Yes.
It's Ethan now.
Ethan?
It's no longer Elliot?
Oh, you said Ellen.
You said Ellen.
I did say Ellen.
And now she says Elliot.
Oh, what did I say?
She said Ethan.
Oh.
You're thinking Mission Impossible.
Either way, it's not a guy.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I deserve it.
Oh, wait, come on.
You're thinking Mission Impossible, dark gashing.
Not fair.
Mission Impossible, phallus protocol.
My point is stop misgendering.
I misnamed, but I got the right gender.
That's true.
I'm a good person.
Yeah.
That's true.
You are a good person.
I readily admit that I'm not.
Some of you say Elliot, some of you say Ethan.
I just say Ellen.
Why?
Because I feel like it.
So, Ellen Page put out a documentary, and as I understand it, it's called Second Nature, and it's about sodomite animals.
Homosexual behavior in nature is wild.
Oh, it's God.
It's absolutely everywhere.
What are you?
Gay?
Penguins have homosexual sex all the time.
Penguins are pair born with members of the same sex, too.
And don't produce that.
Black swans.
They're not capable of spoken language.
How did you get them to do that?
Did you show them a video of you?
Not only do many species illustrate homosexuality and gender multiplicity, they also illustrate.
Pause.
What was that?
Pause.
Am I supposed to go along with this?
This is one of those things, the funniest.
If we can pull this one time with that Elizabeth Holmes documentary, it's the hardest I ever laughed on air.
They're interviewing people.
Was it Theranos?
They're interviewing people talking about it.
They're talking about working with Elizabeth Holmes.
And then all of a sudden, we're just supposed to be like, oh, yeah, sure.
It's this.
Monstrosity, female to male, quote unquote, transgender.
And he's just thrown in there.
He's like, Yeah, you know, I was the only one who was willing to stick up to her because I wasn't scared.
You're a man.
And we're just supposed to watch it.
Yeah, of course.
Of course, sure.
Yeah, this person.
No, this scientist knows about animals that engage in rectal friction.
Let's just continue.
Yeah.
They also illustrate sex.
They can't do math.
Where females change to become males, for example.
Or males to females.
Biologists now know sexuality is fluid and that all of that is normal.
Shut up.
They put an elephant on the elephant clip.
And we need to know these stories.
Okay.
All right.
Hold on a second.
I see a lot of hands going up in the studio.
Everyone, shut up.
Because I didn't watch this.
I'll tell you the problem with this, okay?
It's sort of an equivalent to the natural fallacy.
Well, animals do this and it's normal.
Now show us where when two male lions get into a fight, it's not just to the death, the male lion who is the victor.
Kills all of the other male lions.
Are they cubs?
Cubs, because they're eliminating the bloodline.
It's normal.
Now show us how dolphins gang rape for fun.
Just because animals do it.
It's just like vegetarians.
They used to do this.
They go, you know, you don't need all that protein.
Look at gorilla.
I'm not a gorilla, Doug.
Dogs are gay.
So we can be gay, too.
Yeah, well, he licks his asshole, too.
I don't think he minds a little gay sex.
I mean, it's just, yeah.
I don't think you.
Yeah.
You have the wrong dog.
If your couch is velour, Forget about it.
That's a wonderland.
So they just do it.
Animals do it.
So, you know, cows only eat grass.
I don't care.
That has nothing to do with me.
They do it to push some diet, they do it to push some social agenda.
And then, in the same breath, they'll go, and we're not animals.
Well, which is it?
I would love to see one of these narrators talking about the monkeys having gay sex.
And then, just in the middle of it, one of the camera guys throws shit in their face and goes, You go, what happened?
Yeah.
I thought it was okay.
What happened to me, too?
You know how male sea otters pick their mates?
I know on BuzzFeed, you're holding hands.
No, he bites her.
That's why he has claws.
That's why he has barbed claws, one of the reasons, the most fun reason, so she can't get away.
He just goes, I don't care about consent.
Is this convincing anybody?
And like the praying mantis, women should be allowed to kill their mate after sex.
Does a praying mantis do that?
I know the Black Widow does that.
The Black Man, the Prey Mantis does something like that.
I was, I was close.
Yeah, I was close.
Prey Mantis 8.
Oh my God.
This, and here's the, and I want to go to you.
This is obviously aimed at children or grown adults who think like children, right?
This is how they propagate.
Oh my god, animals do it?
Well, then I guess it's good.
You're not an animal.
You are not an animal.
You don't resemble them in biology.
Oh, look, my food is gay.
Yeah.
What?
I guess this Salisbury state has committed a hate crime.
I'm gay too now.
What?
Oh my gosh, does it rub off on me?
I'm sure I can dilute it if I put some melted cheese on it.
What, noodles?
She brought up that animals can change their sex in nature.
Yeah, it's not because they're not happy with the fucking body.
That I trapped it.
It's because it's their only option to propagate their species when there is only one sex in their immediate vicinity.
So it's for repopulation purposes.
What animals do that?
Like a seahorse?
There are a few different ones.
Amphibians.
Amphibians.
Yeah, it's not like they go to their amphibious doctor.
Yeah, exactly.
They're like, I'm unhappy.
Can you change my parts?
Dr. Frank Oz?
Do away with my testicles.
It's just like this.
Is this convincing anybody?
This is the level.
Of argumentation, we can expect from the left.
And Elliot Page has been very quick.
Look, Elliot Page, Ellen Page, is a very damaged person, obviously.
You don't do this unless there's something wrong.
And my heart goes out to this person.
My heart doesn't go out to the people who enable that person and know that it's wrong.
This is going to go down as a very, very dark period in human history where we allow children to be mutilated.
And make no mistake, that's what this is about.
This is about getting to the point, like you just saw, let's bring this up David Cross on Bill Maher.
You know, I'm no fan of Bill Maher, but he called him to the mat on that.
A trans kid who was nine and then one who was three.
Just acting like it's normal.
We're supposed to go along with it.
Yeah, yeah, okay, sure.
This is about indoctrinating your children and making sure that it's all declared a fundamental human right.
They're even making the case it's rooted in natural rights because look at nature, animals.
Here's a big difference, too.
The way that conservatives, the way that traditional Christian conservatives especially view the world is we are very different from the animals, we are uniquely set apart from the animals.
Why?
Because we have the ability to rationalize, because we have self awareness, because we are the only species that have these conversations.
I don't care what the sonar with the whales says.
They're not discussing the ethical nature of how to consume or process animals.
We are different.
The left doesn't believe that.
The left believes that you should be reduced to your base animal instinct.
Here are some highlights, again, that I have not seen.
We're going to continue on Rumble Premium because I'm sure we're going to light off a big old mouth cannon and let it rip.
Highlights from the gay animal movie, as I'm calling it.