Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 4, 2019 - Louder with Crowder

01:18:15

#557 7 WORDS YOU CAN’T SAY ON YOUTUBE! | Eric Cochran Guests | Louder with Crowder

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hey there, I know you don't want to see me yet, so before we get to the intro, I want to thank you all for your overwhelming support, especially these last few months.
	Some of you have been asking about your mugs.
	Okay, I want you to know the vendor expects all Mug Club orders that have been placed before August 26th to go out this week.
	All of the remaining orders, they should be going out by October 9th.
	So, hold me to that.
	I really hope we meet it.
	We just had a ton of orders, and since these are hand-painted, hand-etched, I know some of you have been waiting a long time.
	I really appreciate it.
	And for those of you who have not yet joined up at MugClub, lightoffcutter.com slash MugClub, we need you more than ever.
	I think you can see this right now, this recent data that came out from YouTube.
	We have been most affected by the recent algorithm.
	Look at that!
	More than Al Jazeera!
	We'll talk about it more.
	There's some stuff behind the scenes that I can't necessarily talk about.
	Final note!
	The Halloween Spooktacular!
	For those who don't yet know, it's October 31st at Texas A&M University.
	The tickets are going fast, but there is going to be an overflow room with Pantelis, half-Asian Bill Richman will be there, an after-party.
	Bring your mugs, bring your costumes, and we're gonna have some giveaways.
	Again, go to lodworthcrowder.com slash tour.
	We really appreciate the support.
	Enjoy the show.
	Now, throughout my years, I've come to realize there are seven words you cannot ever, ever say on YouTube.
	Now, no one ever tells you what these words are.
	You have to say them out loud for YouTube to cancel you.
	Because it's YouTube's ever-changing list.
	Same words, two years later, a different list.
	And these words, retard, chink, tranny, faggot, fag, fig, and Mexicans.
	Yes, today, those are the words.
	Retard, chink, tranny, faggot, fag, fig, and Mexican.
	And Mexican doesn't even belong on that list.
	It's a benign word.
	A descriptor, really.
	How else do we refer to them?
	Sir, he's one of those members from down south.
	Honduran?
	Uh, no.
	Salvadorian?
	No.
	Colombian?
	Argentinian?
	Peruvian?
	Chilean?
	Brazilian?
	He's Mexican.
	Cancel.
	Just like that.
	These words.
	Retard, chink, tranny, faggot, fag, fig, and Mexican.
	Now the problem with these words is that words change.
	Notice, I didn't say the N word.
	Why?
	Because everyone here knows which word that is.
	Not one member in the audience right now is thinking, noob I, no.
	Because the n-word has only ever been one word with one meaning.
	But not retard, chink, tranny, faggot, fag, fig, and Mexican.
	Every one of those cancel-worthy words in today's culture, which we can't say now, at some point meant something else.
	Tranny!
	Well, that's a scary cancer-worthy word for today's backyard mechanic.
	Well, your starter's fine, your alternator works, but there seems to be a leak in your T-word.
	Mainly the T-word gasket where its dick used to be.
	Chink!
	Now, granted, that would seem self-explanatory, until you realize again that it's a word with multiple meanings.
	Captain, I found the C-word in their armor!
	No, not cunt.
	I wouldn't find that in an armor.
	Thus I suppose she's a female knight, but then we'd have to add another word to the list!
	See, because these words, they also change depending who's using them or who is hearing them.
	They can't just hurt on their own, they're just words.
	But you can use that c-word on YouTube, you can use that c-word provided that it's not the previously aforementioned c-word, and that said person using this given c-word is a woman, and that they're referring to the current president's wife.
	You see.
	Words change.
	Chink was a common word.
	A benign word, it was used in cultural idioms.
	To make it a hate word because a jackass said something racist is to give that racist power.
	And it convolutes the meaning of the word.
	Now you have people who mistakenly believe it to be the original meaning of that word.
	Captain, we found a Chinese American in their armor.
	Do you hear that?
	That's the sound of a protest starting.
	Now please note that the Asian Americans themselves are always notably absent from these protests.
	They'll let the other social justice warriors distract you while they simply take over your economy and skilled labor employment opportunities.
	No, they don't make protest signs.
	They're too busy making money.
	Seems they found your them in your armor.
	Retard, chink, tranny, faggot, fag, fig, and Mexican.
	Now, faggot, or fag, these are the new F-words.
	If you say those, you're immediately cancelled on YouTube.
	Primarily because it's moderated entirely by F-words.
	No, no, not fuck.
	That's the old F-word.
	You can say fuck all you want on YouTube, provided that it is not referring to, in a derogatory manner, the performative actions of an aforementioned F-word.
	And here, we run into another problem.
	Because these words, they were co-opted, these F-words too.
	They too, throughout history, have had different meanings to different peoples.
	A fag!
	A faggot!
	Well, are we talking about a bundle of sticks, a lazy old lady, or George Michael in a California rest stop?
	I was performing in London, a man outside the venue asked for a cigarette.
	He was put before a human rights tribunal!
	Your honor, my client merely asked the man in question for an F-word.
	Do you mean to say that your client was soliciting prostitution?
	No, your honor, he just wanted a cigarette.
	He's not an F-word.
	Yeah, you can't see none of that.
	Before I move on to anything else, there was a film with twin babysitters who were black-haired bodybuilders with a kid from Three Ninjas.
	House Party.
	No, you're making cultural differences.
	I'll be okay if Gerald says something.
	I'll smack him.
	I will shove bamboo wood chips up your thumbs.
	Okay, listen.
	Eric Cochran is on the show.
	You might be saying, hey, who's that?
	He is the whistleblower who works with Project Veritas, came out from Pinterest, and he has some more info on some of the new big tech issues going on, which we're putting on our game face.
	Question of the day before I move on to who's here.
	Let me ask you this.
	Who do you think is the most dishonest Democrat in office at present?
	You know what?
	It can be media personalities, but let's go with politicians for today.
	Too many.
	Is it congressmanship?
	Hint.
	Audio wave.
	You'll like this because he's all into fiction, you know, because he's affected on stuff.
	He's like, I only read fiction.
	I only read the books.
	I don't see the movies.
	This is called foreshadowing.
	It's a literary technique.
	We'll be talking about congressman Schiff.
	What?
	Do you think it's congressman Schiff, or can you come up with someone else who lies more?
	More blatantly, publicly, repeatedly.
	We have my half-Asian lawyer Bill Richman is here.
	Thank you, sir, for being here.
	Quarter black hair.
	Show me your hood pass.
	What's up, dawg?
	And G. Morgan Jr.
	He's tapering off painkillers.
	What's the wine of the day?
	It's tough coming down from that.
	Chateau Saint-Michel artist series.
	Wow.
	It's fantastic.
	Speaking of comedowns, I meant you.
	I'm not even sure what that means.
	We do have a lot to get to.
	But first, here's a sleeveless lesbian getting a flu shot.
	Aw.
	Well, there you go.
	It actually works.
	Tubular.
	He skateboarded in there, too.
	Hey, do you want a glass of orange juice or a cookie?
	He's like, no, I'm just full of energy on my own!
	Did you see Yang showing him up?
	No, what did Yang do?
	He did the same thing.
	Oh, I thought Yang had stuck the needle in his neck.
	And then raised more cash than God.
	And counted it really quickly.
	You know what I'm talking about.
	Kicking things off.
	You're gonna be talking about Schiff.
	It's a slow news week outside of Ukraine, and let's be honest, we don't have any more info than you do, so I don't care that much.
	Important story, Hillary Clinton.
	Said in an interview recently that Donald Trump knows he's, quote, an illegitimate president.
	So if she says it, this comes from HuffPo.
	You know it's trustworthy.
	She went on to add that his guilty conscience over being illegitimate was the main reason he is so obsessed with her.
	Keep in mind, Democrats have been pushing this idea of Trump not being a legitimate president.
	You know, this is the first time they've been trying to completely undermine the office that I've seen in my lifetime.
	I know he lost the popular vote, but he won well over the 270 electoral college votes needed to win.
	As far as him being obsessed with Hillary Clinton, Okay, she may have a point.
	In your face!
	I kicked your ass!
	In your face!
	I won the states!
	In your face!
	You broken bitch!
	In your face!
	You should have hit Wisconsin.
	Serenade him.
	Ah, I love it.
	He doesn't want to work in anything processed or sold or sell anything that's been bought, sold, or processed.
	That's tough.
	Didn't even watch Say Anything?
	No.
	OK.
	I'm not so much a John Cusack fan, but I am a Joan Cusack aficionado.
	I know every nook and cranny.
	Oh, that's disgusting.
	Oh, stop it.
	Speaking of ours, you stop it.
	No.
	Just because she's not traditionally beautiful.
	At all.
	And by traditional, I mean beautiful.
	Speaking of our president, a new book came out.
	I like her!
	going to come on the show. That claims... I like her. He wanted a border wall stocked with quote
	snakes and alligators. It comes from a mediaite. The book quotes an anonymous source who explained
	that Donald Trump wanted a reinforced border wall. The wall would include barbed wire, snakes,
	and alligators to dissuade the Mexicans from illegally crossing the border as well as a
	water-filled moat to stop the blacks. Also in the news...
	Oh my gosh. Robert De Niro...
	They have trouble swimming.
	Oh, is that why?
	That's like half Asian Bill Richmond.
	You guys don't need to learn how to swim.
	You're so buoyant.
	You're like the baby on the Nirvana cover.
	No, we'll just hire all the ladies.
	I think it was sinking.
	I really do.
	To drive our boats.
	I know the feeling.
	Also in the news, Robert De Niro appeared on CNN's Reliable Sources this week.
	I hate using that name.
	Brian Stealth did a show.
	And for those who missed it, this is how it went down.
	A lot of c**ses in the view.
	F**k them.
	Okay, well you know, this is cable.
	Sorry.
	So it's not an FCC violation.
	Sorry.
	But it is still a Sunday morning.
	Yeah.
	It's Robert De Niro, okay?
	When you have Robert De Niro on your show, you should expect Robert De Niro.
	that people are in church and so Sunday morning's not when you say that? I don't know. I have no
	idea. I thought Sunday morning, I thought he meant Sunday mornings were busy at the local
	porta potties. It's, it's listen, it's Robert De Niro, okay?
	When you have Robert De Niro on your show, you should expect Robert De Niro. And people don't
	know this, they didn't see, the interview only got worse. But it is still a Sunday
	morning.
	Let's fit in a break.
	I'm sorry.
	I'm sorry.
	Oh, it's Oh, it's a family show.
	Okay, not now.
	Okay, go take a soul cycle.
	You're fat.
	Let's squeeze in a commercial.
	Dumpty dumpty put this fat back together.
	You're not fooling anyone.
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	It seems like you should have expected that.
	I am zero parts.
	Surprise.
	I shouldn't say zero parts.
	Surprise.
	Nine parts.
	Not surprised.
	One part joyous.
	Big At least he called him out!
	Switching to science, because we talk about science on this show.
	Researchers, they're now claiming that when they told people eating less red meat was a good idea, it may have been horrible advice.
	Yes!
	It comes from the New York Times.
	The new report claims there's no evidence to support the belief that eating less pork and beef is healthier for you, while critics claim this research quote, erodes public trust in the scientific community.
	This is coming, of course, from the vegan lobbyists, people who don't like hearing this.
	The scientific community, by the way, is at odds over this new info,
	with staunch advocates right now arguing vigorously from both sides to defend their position.
	But if red meat were driving cancer and you reduce red meat and you see no effect on cancer,
	that is a pretty strong indication that red meat does not cause cancer.
	How dare you?
	Oh, I'm convinced.
	It's hard to accept the truth.
	One on the scoreboard for Greta Thunberg.
	Absolutely.
	Look, I am thrilled about this, right?
	Because they think that we don't trust them already, and it's because they do stuff like this.
	They're right.
	We don't.
	Oh, I thought you were saying you were thrilled that Greta clearly slam dunked that debate.
	Greta was excellent.
	Just a 10 out of 10.
	She was on her A-game.
	I was bypassing Greta.
	Hiring her at the law firm.
	It's done.
	The offer's extended.
	She was bringing the heat, unlike Rudy at Notre Dame.
	20-20!
	Oh, come on!
	She got in the biggest argument pre-show we've ever gotten into because of that.
	Nobody's ever gonna know.
	Nobody except for the people we recorded it for.
	If you're not a member of our club, you'll see that up there on Mug Club.
	For some reason, Gerald supports the idea that Rudy deserved to play, even though he didn't get a second.
	And I have more points.
	Okay, stop it, Gerald.
	It's enough.
	I know you're tapering off of Norco, but come on now.
	It's difficult!
	Okay, in 2020 news, presidential candidate Kamala Harris said this week that Twitter should suspend President Trump's account.
	She said the privilege of using words in that way should probably be taken from him.
	Expert advice, considering Kamala Harris has a long and storied history of taking people's rights away.
	It's usually the people who can't swim.
	Remember the moats?
	Is it the alligators?
	Cowards!
	Gerald doesn't get it.
	No, Gerald doesn't get it.
	I miss Gerald B. Gerald B at least was like, you know what?
	He was very stoic.
	Gerald B would say, you know what?
	I don't have to get it.
	Maybe this one's not for me.
	He'd let it slide and move on.
	But I'll go with it.
	Gerald A has to be like this.
	Like, no.
	He's that face I would see in the audience who was laughing until I said the one thing he didn't like.
	He's like, uh-uh.
	No, no.
	Let's go, honey.
	We're leaving.
	No.
	Time to go.
	Can't be here.
	No, two drink minimum, not for this.
	I didn't get two Arnold Palmers to hear you insult my sweetheart.
	Switching to the art scene.
	Please switch.
	I'd like to silence right there.
	Because we're a very cultured program here, the art scene.
	Someone, but we're going to be talking about Schiff in a little bit.
	And of course, we have Eric Rodman.
	Thank God.
	But this is important.
	The art scene.
	This is what shapes culture.
	Someone just bought a painting of Channing Tatum's scrotum.
	So it's described as a very realistic portrait of the Hollywood Titan, and it sold for over $6,000.
	Initial reports implied that it was actually a nude painting.
	It turns out it was just a picture of Tatum on the red carpet with 21 Jump Street co-star Jonah Hill.
	What are you laughing about?
	For people on audio, that makes no sense.
	The thing that's remarkable about that, can we bring that back up?
	Is that he still looks very much like Jonah Hill.
	I still don't know what you're talking about.
	That's just a photo of Jonah Hill.
	It's very much.
	It's just a rough night for a poor guy.
	Not anything different than the reality.
	You hit a point there, G Morgan Jr.
	No, no.
	Look, I'm a fan of art just like everybody else, but really?
	Seriously, getting down to the person that spent $6,000 on that?
	How is that something that you want to have?
	It's an idiot tax.
	I don't understand.
	Art aficionados, they usually say that.
	I'm a fan of art like anybody else, right?
	Which means I'm not a fan of art, pretty much.
	What do you think of this Monet?
	Well, probably just as much as the next guy.
	Come on!
	Yeah, fan.
	Look at it.
	Who spends $6,000 for a shot of any scrotum out there?
	That brings us right now actually to a new segment of Loud Earth Crackers Entertainment Minute.
	$18.
	Oh.
	🎵 That was needlessly long.
	It was.
	I liked it.
	I was half expecting Mario Lopez to show up.
	I don't know why.
	I don't think he has a job anymore since he had the gall to suggest that giving four-year-olds puberty blockers might not be good parenting.
	Sorry, Mario!
	We have a job for you here.
	Just kidding, we don't.
	I don't know what you can do other than A.C.
	Slater and talk about things that don't matter.
	The band Metallica in entertainment news.
	The band Metallica has cancelled upcoming tour dates.
	You hear about this?
	They cancelled upcoming tour dates.
	James Hetfield can spend some time in rehab, it came out.
	He reportedly suffers from a crippling addiction to making shitty music.
	You suck.
	You are a terrible person.
	Metallica's awesome.
	Metallica is great.
	Actress Linda Firth.
	Boo!
	That's the sound of Metallica album sales plummeting.
	Boo!
	There are plummeting.
	Gene Morgan Jr.
	doesn't understand that he has the power to manipulate markets.
	He's like a Wall Street speculator in the opposite way.
	Boo!
	Hey, I like Metallica, and it tanks.
	I don't know what happened.
	It was, Bill!
	I don't know what happened here!
	We were on the Billboard 100, yeah!
	And then Bill was right there!
	Gerald just shows up.
	Bill was there, too!
	Do you like Metallica?
	I don't know what you're talking about.
	Actress Linda Porter, actor Rob Garrison, and restaurateur Carl Ruiz, I believe is his name.
	They all died last week, tragically.
	You know, they say that celebrities die in threes.
	Evidently, the same goes for people who've never heard of.
	Legendary singer José José, that's his name, nothing like a walking stereotype.
	José José, he died at age 71, and the cause of death is listed as, quote, L. heart attack-o.
	Finally, singer Ricky Martin and husband Juan Yosef are expecting their fourth child together.
	Fourth, yeah.
	Wonderful.
	Ricky Martin says he impregnated the surrogate by closing his eyes and picturing a hot, hairy ass ****.
	That's it for this week's Entertainment Minute!
	You should have seen half-Asian lawyer Bill Richmond.
	He made Rodney Dangerfield eyes at the last minute.
	It was actually just exactly like that.
	That's actually very good.
	I actually pulled my... Yeah, I did that as well.
	Steam release.
	I would love to see an Asian Rodney Dangerfield.
	That'd be pretty funny.
	I'll gain weight!
	More ways.
	Finally, before we get to Schiff, President Trump told the press this week that the White House is, quote, trying to find out who the whistleblower is.
	A lot of people know this.
	Some people, of course, are viewing this as a thinly veiled threat against the anonymous accuser.
	A source in the White House has actually said that the president is heading up a new investigation himself, even going as far as making some phone calls.
	Hello, Whistle Warehouse.
	Yes, hi, I'm calling to find out the identity of the filthy whistleblower.
	Okay, frankly, I've been told you could help me.
	What kind of whistle you want?
	No, no, I'm trying to find the whistleblower.
	Okay, I need to know who bought the whistle.
	Okay, how much he bought it for, and if that whistle was at any time had blown.
	Yeah, you want to buy a whistle?
	Okay, frankly, listen, because you're not listening, You call yourself a salesman?
	I have reason to believe you sold a whistle to someone with a strong intention, frankly, to blow it.
	Now who was that?
	Oh! Robert Mota? Corruption.
	It's the international language.
	It knows no boundaries.
	Hey, who was last week's trivia contest winner there?
	It is Noir Vala.
	Noir Vala.
	Careful out, careful out.
	They are a furry, so.
	Oh, jeez.
	Wow.
	Well, that's perverse.
	Answering that I painted Muhammad using menstruation is Bob Ross, so we're going to send him a wonderful gift card.
	Nice.
	Alright, is everyone ready to move on to Adam Schiff?
	Yes.
	Let's do it.
	We'll talk a little bit about the Ukraine.
	You know, we had a segment yesterday on the Ukraine deal.
	It was all formatted, and I appreciate you giving me some time to just sort of rant about why I think Donald Trump is the right man for this job at this point in time.
	In fact, we don't have a whole lot more info than other people do, but I think at The Blaze TV, they're actually doing a whole live show tonight, Glenn Beck, right after this for those who are watching on The Blaze.
	Those watching on YouTube, you'll have to sign up, covering from pillar to post the Ukraine scandal.
	So let's focus on Adam Schiff.
	He's in the news for his involvement with the scandal.
	Now, here's the thing.
	It turns out, for people who don't know, that Schiff knew about the whistleblower complaint before it was filed, and his team actually advised the whistleblower on how to proceed.
	And President Trump, this is why he's just the best president ever.
	I mean, I don't mean he's kind of better, like, if you put him, like, well, okay, where do you rank him above, like, McKinley or people who don't matter?
	No, no.
	George Washington is a distant second.
	He's the president we need.
	He was asked about it and responded like this at a press conference yesterday.
	There is a report that came out just before you and President Ninister walked out here that the whistleblower met with the staff.
	Oh, I love that question.
	It shows that shit is a fraud.
	I love that question.
	Thank you, John.
	He's so bitchy.
	Thank you, Jenna.
	Thank you.
	I love you, John.
	You're my favorite.
	And when I say favorite, I mean not.
	Okay?
	That was a solid response.
	He was just ready.
	He was ready with the paper.
	He was holding up his paper!
	For people who are listening to the audio version, as soon as the question is asked, he's just like, got it!
	And holds up his paper like he has the cheat sheet.
	Like the guy in White Squall who gets kicked off the boat before it goes down the Hudson and can't reach his wife.
	It's a very sad film.
	Good film.
	So here's the thing.
	President Trump is right.
	Not only did Schiff secretly communicate with the whistleblower, he lied about it!
	Which brings us to this week's What a Piece of Schiff!
	Took hours to change it over to shift.
	It was crazy.
	It's a whole paradigm shift.
	I think we have a clip.
	It's not a super long clip, but I think it provides context.
	Not only did he communicate, he lied about the whistleblower in communicating with him.
	We have not spoken directly with the whistleblower.
	We would like to.
	There you have it.
	Straight from the dick's mouth.
	Really?
	That's interesting.
	I guess it's more of a glands penis at that point, if you're talking about a mouth.
	It's more of a Clydesdale.
	It has a mane.
	So, Shift, by the way, here's something important to note.
	The more you unpeel the layers to this onion, the more enraged you will find yourself.
	He was mirroring, actually, the whistleblower's talking points on Twitter over a month ago to give a false sense of corroboration, right?
	Because people see it and go, well, hold on a second.
	Well, this sounds like what that Schiff character said.
	Keep in mind, the whistleblower doesn't have any firsthand knowledge of the event, right?
	It's just, oh, someone said that Donald Trump did something.
	Somebody said something.
	Then he went to Schiff, and Schiff turned around and corroborated it preemptively.
	What is he corroborating?
	The complaint!
	They didn't have any... There was no first-hand knowledge of it in the first place!
	Oh my gosh.
	Someone said something!
	I'm gonna go on Twitter, and I'm gonna lay the foundation that this happened, that someone said something, and then you'll come out, and then I'll tell them that I didn't talk with you about it.
	Also, I might kill myself.
	There's a strong chance.
	By the way, is first-hand information important in legal circles?
	No, only if you want to be morally and justifiably right.
	I'm just making sure.
	I'm not a lawyer.
	It depends what mark you're trying to hit there, like being honest or a shitbag.
	I feel like the standards that the left are using legally is Vinny and my cousin Vinny before he improved, before the Redemptions.
	But your honor, my clients didn't do anything.
	They thought they were getting a can of tuna fish.
	Only that's what they're doing and they think they're going to win this.
	Yeah, it's very clear that his idea of how we're going to go about it.
	But imagine, he would have gotten away with it, right?
	I mean, if he would have done a little bit better, he could have gotten away with looking prescient, having found this information, and instead he's caught red-handed.
	I can do it too.
	Shift, shut the clerk!
	Schiff shut the clerk.
	So here's another example.
	Schiff, he claimed that Trump tried to get dirt from the Ukraine, right, on his political opponents.
	That's kind of the crux of this, right?
	Well, here's something else.
	If we're talking, and I don't want to do the whataboutism, because I don't think this is a whataboutism.
	I don't think there's a direct comparison.
	I think that what Schiff has done is far, far worse.
	Let me explain.
	And I have videographic evidence.
	Take that, young Turks!
	Just Google it!
	How about you do it?
	I don't understand that the young Turks cement the, these people, they don't even provide sources.
	They're like, Google it.
	Well, isn't that your, I don't know, job?
	Yeah, you know.
	It's not like if you go into a restaurant, I'll have the chicken cordon bleu.
	You cook it!
	Sounds reasonable.
	Why are you here?
	I'll just zero money.
	So Schiff himself tried to get, tried to procure, I'm trying to use more official terms.
	Oh, there you go.
	Nude pictures of President Trump from the Ukrainians.
	But here's the thing.
	The Ukrainians turned out to be Russian pranksters.
	They were comedians and they pulled the wool over his eyes.
	Okay, and what's the nature of the compromise?
	Bye!
	Well, there were pictures of naked Trump.
	When they were in Ukraine, we got their conversation by the phone, where they discussed those compromising materials.
	We are ready to provide it to FBI.
	So we will try to work with the FBI to figure out, along with your staff, how we can obtain copies of those.
	Of course we will provide you all our copies of all our materials.
	Okay, first off, I guess we'll just ignore the raging homoerotic undertones.
	They tried to come after Ben Shapiro because he said no one has described Brett Kavanaugh's penis, which is kind of a trend now with rapists.
	It happened with Michael Jackson, it happened with Bill Cosby.
	Right there, did you hear Schiff?
	He's like, well, can you send me the photo negatives?
	I like the photo negative because it reminds me of when I would try and scramble the satellite signal when I was a kid and I couldn't actually afford it and my parents were in the next room.
	It is amazing to me he was trying to find nude pictures!
	And by the way, nude pictures, that's not even a scandal!
	That's not illegal, it's just embarrassing!
	Especially with this president, do you think he would actually care?
	He's like, that's the best body!
	Come on, look at that!
	I think President Trump would care.
	He wouldn't care.
	Come on.
	I don't know.
	He would turn it on.
	By the way, hit the notification bell.
	Join Mug Club if you haven't already.
	$99 annually, $6.99 for students, veteran, active military, and just check the page.
	We do a new segment every single day because, as you've seen.
	Do it.
	Do it.
	Visual Art Villageman, you know.
	Yes, no, stop talking about it.
	It's hard out here for a content creator.
	It would be easier if I were a pimp.
	Their channels, yes, they're on the recommended feed.
	How to backhand a bitch!
	Trending.
	That would work better.
	But then if we talk about Schiff, I don't know why we get throttled.
	Maybe we should just be backhanding Schiff.
	Here's another example here why I think he's absolutely just a stunning, I mean it's a skill as to how piece of s*** he is.
	Remember when the text of the FBI agents, was it Page and Stroke they were releasing?
	Yeah.
	So we had direct evidence of FBI agents saying that they wouldn't let Trump get elected because they had quote insurance policies in case he did.
	Alright.
	That's not scary.
	Schiff responded that the FBI heavily favored Trump over Clinton.
	Here you go.
	They were very selective in what they released.
	There were multiple reports last year that the FBI was heavily predisposed against Hillary Clinton and in favor of Donald Trump.
	You know, and here's the thing, he's not necessarily wrong depending on who's working there at the FBI.
	I think we all assume there can be bias because people, human beings have biases, right?
	But when Trump does that, when he says, ah, Kobe's a hacker, Mueller, listen, this is a witch hunt, they try to accuse him of obstruction for doing exactly what Schiff is doing there.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Well, and he has big trust issues with the establishment around him, and you wonder why.
	When stuff like that comes out and FBI agents say things like that, that's not just a casual text, right?
	That's not just casual conversation.
	Of course he's not going to trust, and those are the people in charge of investigating him, are you kidding me?
	You wouldn't trust people like that, so of course you would go out and say these things and try to defend yourself in the press.
	I wouldn't trust Schiff with a pair of safety scissors.
	No.
	He'd find a way.
	So Schiff, by the way, he's also another example.
	He'd find a way.
	You'd come back and go, this is remarkable!
	I'm not even mad.
	Little Schiff!
	Amazing.
	How did you destroy everything?
	It's what I do!
	I'm a piece of shit!
	Here's another example.
	Schiff, he's known, this is something people don't know, he's known, it's kind of his raison d'être for leaking repeatedly private info to the press and then lying about it.
	CNN is running quotes from noon on about my testimony.
	Testimony?
	Does he have a cold?
	My testimony.
	What's going on in there?
	Since he's never met a camera he didn't love, I would bet a lot of money that it was him.
	Alright, you heard, you got the point.
	You want to respond?
	Sure, he's been making this claim all along.
	Just to be precise, yes or no, did you leak any of the information from his testimony?
	No, I don't leak.
	Well, first off, how do you get caught flat-footed by Wolf lowest score ever on Celebrity Jeopardy Blitzer?
	And I will say this, with this specific clip, maybe we cannot prove that he's lying, But he's still a piece of s**t!
	That's the key takeaway.
	And he's going to say, trust me.
	And here's something else I would love to... I defer to half-Asian lawyer Bill Richman on this.
	During the Mueller investigation, Schiff, he repeatedly claimed that he had seen beyond circumstantial evidence that Trump had colluded with Russia, even after Mueller ruled that there was no evidence of collusion.
	People say, Hey, the report didn't say no collusion.
	Well, hold on a second.
	It just says there's no evidence of it.
	You can say that about anything.
	Someone who gets off for any crime.
	Well, the fact that he wasn't convicted of shoplifting doesn't mean that he didn't do it, but there's no evidence.
	So he's not guilty of it.
	That's how society works.
	Correct?
	Absolutely.
	We have a legal system, and if there is no evidence, and you are not convicted, it means you didn't commit the crime in the eyes of the law, right?
	That's exactly why we have the system, is to be able to call balls and strikes, make it done, and then move along.
	And here, what I find hilarious is the example that he has, beyond circumstantial evidence.
	It's like the Beyond Meat Impossible Burger, right?
	It's like, no, it's not actually meat, and this is not actually evidence.
	You actually have to have something, and when he's asked repeatedly and repeatedly and repeatedly, he dances around.
	Well, we didn't actually talk to him, and we didn't actually get direct evidence, but if you put together the different inferences and lies, then it's a story.
	Yes.
	Here's what's important.
	If you put together different inferences, accusations, and of course, keeping in the front of your mind at all times that I am a piece of shit, I think you will come to see this issue in a new light.
	Here's actually a clip of him doing just that.
	All you have right now is a circumstantial case.
	Actually, no, Chuck.
	I can tell you that the case is more than that.
	And I can't go into the particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now.
	So, again, I think... So you have seen direct evidence of collusion?
	I don't want to go into specifics, but I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial.
	As I've said along, there's plenty of evidence of collusion and corrupt commingling of work between the Trump campaign and the Russians.
	Good lord.
	I mean, by the way, lest you think we're editing him out of context, He never did provide specifics.
	He didn't in that interview, and you're waiting for it?
	Don't hold your breath!
	Google it!
	What does it mean when he's saying more than circumstantial?
	Explain for people who don't know what circumstantial evidence means.
	We throw that around a lot.
	Yeah, so indirect evidence.
	I mean, circumstantial evidence can be things that create an inference of what the actual thing may be.
	So, for example, if you have, you know, you want to say someone committed fraud.
	To be able to prove fraud, you have to prove that they intended to deceive you.
	And a lot of the times, you can't read someone's mind.
	And unless they say, I intended to defraud you, that would be direct evidence.
	You have to have circumstantial evidence, like they knew the truth, but they told you a false statement anyways.
	Here, when you say you have circumstantial evidence, you should be able to describe that circumstantial evidence.
	If you have beyond circumstantial evidence, you definitely can explain what it is.
	But yet, when he was asked, do you have direct evidence, which is the only thing beyond circumstantial evidence, There's no in-between, there's no like circumstantial, middle-stantial, piece of shit, shift-stantial.
	I mean, yeah, there is shift-stantial, but that's like somehow hitting two keys on a piano at the same time and getting a note in between that's nobody's note.
	I mean, it's not there.
	It's not the thing.
	It's nothing.
	Like if you've got the piano analogy.
	He had to, right?
	Nothing like perpetuating the original stereotype.
	Well look, I think we're going to look back on this as one of the worst political hatchet
	jobs in the United States.
	He Chinese!
	I hate that part.
	I really do.
	I think we will.
	I think we'll look back on this and go, oh my gosh, when people came out and said that I don't think Donald Trump is going to accept the election results, right?
	The Democrats said that.
	And then it goes against them.
	And now they're thinking, oh, no, it's Russia collusion.
	We've got to throw everything at him.
	I'm serious.
	This is bad for the country.
	It doesn't matter what side you are on.
	Because now we have the next person doing the exact same thing.
	So what happens when the next person gets in the office that's a liberal or a Democrat?
	Do you think some Republicans wouldn't do that?
	Somebody wouldn't say, well, you did it to Donald Trump.
	The pendulum just keeps swinging further and further.
	So you have to calm this crap down.
	I mean, I don't see any Republicans on the horizon.
	I don't really either.
	Lindsey Graham, I mean, he's kind of he's kind of slimy.
	He's a little bit greasy.
	He's not shitty.
	I agree.
	I don't think the Republicans would step to that quickly.
	But if you open the door to it, you can take a president out by doing that.
	I've grown tired of your commentary, because this clip I've been waiting for.
	A lot of people haven't seen this.
	It only trended for two hours on Twitter.
	And it was gone.
	And then it was gone.
	This is, in my opinion, as bad as it gets.
	It's as bad as anything I've ever seen in the political arena.
	When people talk about the right and the left are dividing us, I go, no, no, no, hold on a second.
	Let's not do the equivalency here because have you seen Shitty Schiff?
	He made up an entire dialogue of Trump's phone call with the Ukrainian president.
	I want you to see him doing this here, presenting this as though it was fact.
	He expresses his interest in meeting with the president and says his country wants to acquire more weapons from us to defend itself.
	And what is the president's response?
	Well, it reads like a classic organized crime shakedown.
	I hear what you want.
	I have a favor I want from you.
	None of this happened.
	And I'm gonna say this only seven times, so you better listen good.
	I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand?
	Lots of it.
	Now I know some of you are asking, because I get it, it's difficult today in our polarized society to know, okay, who's exaggerating, where are you stretching, because everyone does, especially for comedy, we do that.
	So you're wondering what percentage of that, if we were to put a number on it, is accurate.
	Zero.
	Nothing.
	None of that ever happened.
	And here's something that's so dishonest, too, when you watch.
	He's reading it, and at one point he looks up and looks back down and goes, though, as though he missed a word that he's reading from an official transcript.
	He tried to clearly imply that this was an official transcript.
	And then when he was called on it, this was his response, that it was parody.
	My summary of the president's call was meant to be at least part in parody.
	What a piece of s**t!
	What a piece of s**t!
	Think about that!
	You know, when Donald Trump talked about people got all upset because he would talk about changing libel laws, right, and this was really just to try and get media to stand down, we weren't happy about it.
	How is that not slander?
	Yeah, right.
	Think about that for a second.
	He read it as though it's a transcript, and he tried to get all high and mighty, saying, oh, if people didn't understand it's parody, that's a whole new problem.
	Implying, like, because Donald Trump says such crazy stuff that you thought it was real when I made up stuff that Donald Trump said that was crazy that never really happened, but I told you he said crazy stuff, and so you tend to believe that this crazy stuff is crazy stuff he would say, but I'm just a piece of shit.
	You gotta give him credit, though, for how well he sells the Reading Act, right?
	Oh my gosh!
	The looking down, the pauses, the keeping it going.
	I mean, for anyone, I mean, the first time I saw that clip, I thought to myself, I'm gonna Google it!
	And look, and you go look it up, and you're like, wait, I don't actually see any of these words.
	Wait, he's totally lying!
	No, no, no, well, wait, I did see two of them.
	There was two thus in there that he actually got right.
	Yes, that's true.
	There was also a similar number of vowels.
	I'm just lying, he's a piece of shit.
	It wasn't even close!
	Nothing.
	He didn't even stumble across truth accidentally.
	It is remarkable to me that this was allowed to go.
	I think that is worthy of being forcibly removed from office.
	I really do.
	To me, that's just a person.
	I don't mean violently.
	No.
	I mean this guy should be forced to resign in absolute shame.
	I can't think of anything that would personify fake news more than reading from a fake Transcript and by the way, the reason he's doing that is because he knows that most people who are not hyper Lee engaged Unlike the people in this room are often people who are watching this show or reading in the comment section He knows I'm gonna walk by the TV screen see this and go.
	Oh my god.
	I can't believe our president did that, right?
	I can't believe he said that and they're not going to see the aside where he says it was clearly parody Just like you don't see the slander.
	You don't see the libel You do see it sorry that occurs on the front page and then the apology the retraction is issued two weeks later on page eight Yeah.
	He knew exactly what he was doing.
	And by the way, just to go into the Ukraine thing a little bit, Democrats, they've repeatedly reached out to foreign countries, including Ukraine, for dirt on Trump.
	So at worst, at the absolute worst, Schiff is just accusing Trump of what he has done himself.
	Only Donald Trump hasn't done it.
	His accusations are false.
	The favor that Trump asked for was investigating foreign meddling in a U.S.
	election, specifically in regards to a company called CrowdStrike.
	Not Biden, as Schiff was trying.
	I don't want to say Schiff suggests.
	Right.
	Schiff didn't suggest it.
	It's not a suggesting.
	It's a direct statement.
	But it's not even a direct statement because it wasn't a real statement!
	What Schiff's saying is actually true.
	It wasn't that Schiff suggested that these things were happening.
	He made express statements intended to deceive the public about what was said.
	That is fraud.
	Right there.
	That's what it is.
	It's not what he said happened isn't true, but it is true that Schiff... It's like the inception of s***.
	Yes, exactly.
	And by the way, I thought we cared a whole hell of a lot about fair elections, Russian meddling in our elections.
	We have to get to the bottom of that.
	That was the entire thing we heard from day one of his campaign.
	Now he asks about it happening in Ukraine.
	And we're like, oh, you can't ask a foreign government that!
	Right.
	And to be fair, later on in the call, it was mentioned that, you know, Biden shut down this prosecutor, the investigation of the company his son worked for.
	It was it was a minor point.
	Here's what is pretty important to me to Schiff and the whistleblower, who, by the way, got no firsthand knowledge.
	Would that be considered circumstantial?
	Not having first-hand knowledge?
	I mean, it depends, but mostly that's considered circumstantial because if you don't... I mean, there's rules.
	Hearsay.
	There's a reason why you don't take out-of-court statements and use them for the truth because you can't actually test the boundaries of what's true or not true.
	You can't testify, right?
	If it's, I heard XYZ say this fact and we're gonna take that fact as true, how are you gonna test it?
	Right.
	Now, an eyewitness testimony isn't considered verifiable proof, so someone saying, I heard someone say that Donald Trump did this, would seem to me, I don't know, I'm a simpleton, even less reliable.
	Well, I mean, at some point you have to accept evidence, right?
	So, if you were to say, okay, hey, look at this piece of paper, is the piece of paper fake?
	Well, you have to go through certain standards to be able to get even written evidence in.
	So, written evidence is only as verifiable as any other piece of evidence, but the further you get away from Yes, thank God.
	And here's something that I think is important, right?
	true and it's a spectrum, the more likely it is that you would never even be able
	to use it in court. And saying I heard someone else say some other fact that
	they observed but no one else saw, we have no other corroboration, is a line
	too far for every Western civilization. Yes, thank God. And here's something that I
	think is important, right? There's a lot that we don't know and that's why we try
	not to just offer nothing more than conjecture because maybe some more
	info could come out.
	People who stand firmly on their opinions when there's not enough info, sometimes they don't really age very well.
	But I do think it's important to look at what we do know and compare it with what they've said that is verifiably false.
	For example, we know for sure that that was not a transcript and then he said it was parody.
	We know for sure that Schiff said Donald Trump was withholding military aid unless they investigated, or sorry, fired the prosecutor.
	That's what they said.
	But here's, if you understand it, Trump never threatened that at all.
	It wasn't even mentioned.
	The Ukraine officials did not know about the change in military foreign aid until a month after the call.
	So, again, you can't know everything, but you can know what they've said that is false, and you can know certain facets of the story that are true.
	The things that we know to be true, they've already proactively lied about.
	That's important for people to think of.
	That's important for people to point out.
	And I don't want to get into the minutiae of it because, like I said, Glenn Beck has
	a special to Blaze TV, a whole thing about the Ukraine live after this.
	Is there anything else you guys want to say about it?
	You know, the thing is to me, they know exactly what they're doing.
	I don't want to ascribe ulterior motives.
	We've always tried to do that on this show.
	Or if we do change my mind, or when we actually have debates like we've had on the show with
	politicians, with professors, with people who are worthy adversaries, I always try to
	assume that they are being sincere.
	But this is an exception.
	I don't even want to say it's a radical exception.
	He went up there and lied, and read from a transcript that didn't exist.
	And when he was called on it, said, well, you know what?
	That was meant to be parody.
	What did you think it was?
	Well, you know what?
	I think most people thought it was what you intended it to be, which was a lie that you wanted to be accepted wholesale as truth.
	I didn't say this with Hillary.
	People are like, in fact, she needs to be put in jail.
	I never jumped on that train.
	I don't like Nancy Pelosi.
	It's crazy to me that she's a reasonable one in the party.
	When you have AOC, Schiff, Bernie Sanders, Pelosi, you're like, well, you know what, I guess I went over for Thanksgiving dinner.
	Is she the turkey?
	Jeez, that's terrible.
	Well, look, you know, put yourself in a... I'm offended, sir.
	It's the one from Christmas Vacation.
	How dare you!
	It is interesting to think of what would be the rules if, imagine, a Republican had made up a transcript.
	Imagine if a conservative had gone up there and said, oh, well, actually, I'm just going to go ahead and fake this evidence because apparently this isn't the House of Representatives.
	It's the laughing factory.
	I mean, that's why we're up here?
	We're doing parodies now?
	That's the thing we do in these hearings?
	I get it.
	There's room for funny questions and jokes.
	There's no room for faking evidence.
	And at the very least, the House needs to consider, or the Senate, or whoever has the ability to do that, whether within the party or outside the party, to censure that kind of behavior.
	Just say you don't agree with faking evidence.
	And if you want to come out and say something to do something right to restore trust in
	our system, it's police your own.
	And this is an example where the Democrats need to put their money where their mouth
	is.
	I think that's a good point.
	They want to put our money where their mouth is.
	Well, that's true.
	It's not their money necessarily.
	But put yourself on a jury hearing some of this stuff and Schiff gets up on the stand
	and they play that and they're attacking.
	He has no credibility left.
	They play stuff like that.
	They play the things that we've played, the clips where he's obviously been lying, the things where he's trying to get nude pictures.
	Most people don't know.
	No, I know, but put that up there and then put the evidence that you have.
	It is a blowout.
	There is no court in America that would believe him and not believe the evidence.
	And yet, in public opinion, He's still out there saying this stuff.
	Well, let's picture if Donald Trump went up, right?
	We're talking about what would happen if a Republican did it.
	Okay, let's do this little walk it through this exercise here.
	And here I have Peter Schiff mirroring what the whistleblower was going to say about them on Twitter, even though there was no first-hand knowledge.
	And Schiff knew there was no first-hand knowledge.
	He said he was going to go out and lie and fabricate a transcript for the world to see.
	They would say, can you believe this president is lying?
	He needs to be removed from office.
	Only he'd be telling the truth.
	Yeah, exactly.
	With video evidence.
	That is how insane this has become.
	It's not whataboutism.
	It is far worse-ism as it relates to Piece of Schiff, Adam Schiff.
	And actually, we have to get going to Eric Cochran, whistleblower from Big Tech, but we're actually getting word, apparently, the altercation continues at CNN.
	Oh.
	You tell me it's a f***ing family show, huh?
	You invited me.
	You invited me, huh, motherf***er?
	Who the f*** do you think you're fooling, huh?
	Huh?
	So by the pool of your mind Let us begin our quest
	To find the Dino sound you
	Mug.
	I get so lost.
	Club times.
	In your face.
	I beat your ass.
	In your face.
	Another b**** in the dirt.
	In your face.
	I stomped you down.
	In your face.
	Stupid b****.
	Join Mug Club or all our musical parodies will be as bad as President Trump's.
	This is a direct threat.
	What's your home defense plan?
	Bye.
	When it comes to safety, there's no substitute for a quality firearm.
	And if you're a gun owner, there's no replacement for Firearms Legal Protection.
	Firearms Legal Protection provides lawful gun owners an uncapped legal defense program, 24-7 emergency hotline, access to a network of over 2,500 experienced attorneys, legal education on firearm laws in your state via our mobile app, and plans to protect you every step of the way if you are involved in a self-defense incident.
	Visit firearmslegal.com slash LWC today.
	I'm here today at the climate change... Keep the carbon in the soil!
	Hey, hey, yep, that's it, now go!
	You are knocking at the gates of hell, my friend.
	I am an 18 year old transsexual male.
	Female to male.
	Well I appreciate you clarifying that because I would have been horribly confused.
	So a boy is at his house, he's taking a nap.
	And he's awakened by some sounds from the room next door.
	When I see people where, you know, it's 4th of July, and you see American flag, American flag, American flag, and then, without fail, if there was a rainbow flag, there was no American flag.
	Right.
	It's like, hold on a second.
	You can love your country and suck c***.
	Like, you can be into both.
	None of my latest videos come up in a YouTube search for my name.
	They're that terrified of it.
	I'm looking for Paul Joseph Watson.
	Did you mean to say Senor Wences?
	Sorry!
	I'm fascist!
	Me fascist!
	I am a magician!
	Is he saying ZOOL?
	Yeah, like the god.
	Is that what he's saying?
	I am the gatekeeper, are you the keymaster?
	I am the keymaster, are you the gatekeeper?
	I don't know.
	But you know Rick Moran is completely retired from the industry.
	I was talking with Audio Wade about this.
	I don't know.
	Did his wife pass?
	Was that what it was?
	I think he took time to take care of his kids.
	To take care of his kids.
	Well, that's far less sinister.
	Yeah, he's a great dude.
	I should have led with that.
	All right, our next guest.
	Very glad to have him on the show.
	Now, some of you may be saying, oh, I know the name, but if I'm not mistaken, when he first was revealed publicly, it was in that sort of Dateline blurred face and voice.
	Usually it's a rapist, but he's not.
	Delane set some context here.
	He's a former software engineer and he was a whistleblower who came forward with big tech, which is very relevant to what we're doing.
	By the way, people who are out there who have some tips, VeritasTipsAtProtonMail.com is what this gentleman wanted us to feed you because they're always looking for new info.
	Mr. Eric Cochran, how are you, sir?
	I'm doing well.
	Thank you for having me.
	I am glad to have you.
	And I was just saying, you have those giant headphones that you look like the VR kid from Burger King Kids Club.
	Do you remember Burger King Kids Club?
	Yeah, man.
	Do you remember them, Eric?
	Burger King Kids Club?
	I don't remember this commercial.
	It was a series of commercials.
	At the Burger King Kids Club, it's cool to be a kid.
	And there's like a black guy with the house party hair.
	Yeah, he's got the high top.
	The generically lesbian girl.
	There's the ginger.
	I think he had a wheelchair.
	Was it a wheelchair?
	Yes, the wheelchair.
	And then the white kid, because they couldn't just say, here's a token white kid, he was the tech kid.
	Remember, he had the Walkman.
	Jeffrey!
	What a club.
	And Eric, you are very white, so it suits you perfectly.
	So listen, for people who may not be necessarily super familiar with you, because you weren't really like a personality who spoke on politics or culture, you came into this specifically because of some information that you had in the big tech industry.
	I don't mean to big tech.
	I think we've trademarked that.
	So explain to people kind of your history and how you came to Project Veritas.
	Yeah, so just a few months ago I was just a software engineer at Pinterest and just kind of, you know, working on Android apps, actually, and not too involved in politics.
	And then I was seeing more and more censorship.
	We were talking about misinformation and hate speech.
	And then it got to be much more sinister.
	I would see they actually banned live action secretly on the back end.
	The pro-life group, Zero Hedge, PJ Media, they were banning things about Ben Shapiro, Bible verses, and this was all done in secret.
	So I actually took this to Project Veritas, James O'Keefe's organization, And I said, the public has to know this.
	This is the proof that we're kind of seeing from the outside from these big tech companies.
	And now here's actually the how and the why it's happening.
	Now, why Pinterest, though?
	I don't understand.
	Why Pinterest?
	I mean, I get Google, YouTube at least, and certainly Google at large, Facebook.
	It's sort of the information mainframe for politics.
	But Pinterest, I just sort of think of it as those moms who drink too much, who are like, I'm having one glass of wine for dinner.
	You know, it's like a punch bowl.
	You know, like the old Pogs, the classic Pogs.
	That's always why I pictured Pinterest.
	Why would they have a political... Yeah, I think, you know, that's a really good point about, like, mom's in the middle of the country.
	So it's interesting that, you know, they want to affect that market so much.
	And then, what it really speaks to, the biggest point, is that all the tech ends up like this.
	You know, I actually went to Pinterest because I thought it wasn't Facebook, it wasn't Google, and yet, once it got to be a big enough company, they're all on the same page.
	There's this whole hive mind of big tech, where these tech companies, they're all in Silicon Valley, they all have this same mindset, they all want to, you know, affect the 2020 election, they're so much in an echo chamber, They all are on the same page about wanting to ban Republicans.
	Well, now you said they want to affect the 2020 election.
	I get it.
	For example, there's a big difference.
	We need to delineate here.
	If they feel as though all conservative speech is hate speech, you know, using someone's biological, biologically proper pronouns, if they feel that that's hate speech, I understand how that could sort of dictate their policies or behavior.
	Do you think that's the case?
	Or you think they're specifically setting out to affect the 2020 election?
	And if so, what makes you think the latter?
	Well, so I think there definitely is, like, this entire idea of, like, you know, a lot of conservative, mainstream conservative ideas are hate speech.
	I can speak, like, at Pinterest for the 2020 election, it was interesting.
	There were these documents specifically about protecting candidates like Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren and Beto, protecting them from basically memes and on the image board.
	And they didn't have anything like that for Republicans.
	So it is interesting, you know, I think it's again where they see that they, in their mind, they messed up in the 2016 election.
	They messed up by allowing too much free speech and then it let people get around the media gatekeepers.
	And so I think really there is, they think they're doing the right thing.
	They think that they're protecting the public from these ideas, but ultimately it does affect the 2020 election.
	So they're trying to protect them from memes, but how do they protect Elizabeth Warren from herself?
	Everything she uploads to Instagram, I always have to watch it through my fingers.
	I'm just Elizabeth Warren, drinking a beer, drinking a beer.
	And you're just like, oh, I want to shrink up into my own body cavity and die like that group of people in Superman 2 and float off into space.
	I don't know how they do it.
	The point is, that's not really a question for you so much as me.
	That's not fair to you as a guest, Eric.
	I have my own issues I'm working through.
	Speaking of my own issues, I don't know if you've been following this, but this is another reason I wanted to have you on.
	We've been demonetized entirely on YouTube, despite Susan Wojcicki And YouTube admitting that we haven't violated any policies, right?
	This was kind of acquiescing to the Vox Adpocalypse torch-and-pitchfork mob.
	But more recently, and I don't want to bore the viewers here because they know about this, but I know that maybe you haven't been filled in on all of it, we found that we're blacklisted, shadowbanned from specific search terms.
	So in other words, if you search Steven Crowder changed my mind, doesn't show up for many results.
	If you search Steven Crowder on YouTube, doesn't show up for 70 results.
	And then we found out And this is why I do think there could be some meddling with the 2020 election.
	That if we used a VPN and used an address outside of the United States, the UK or Sweden or Spain, that they showed up entirely.
	It was only blacklisted.
	My name and our primary videos, our videos with the most plays, blacklisted exclusively in the United States.
	We don't have any answers on that yet from YouTube.
	Is that something that surprises you?
	Do you have any answers maybe?
	Can you help me?
	Help me.
	Yeah, so we do know that there are these blacklists inside of Google, and so we can kind of see the anecdotal evidence from the user's side.
	And we saw this at Project Veritas too, where a lot of our videos just won't show up.
	You'd see CNN videos about Project Veritas when you search on YouTube Project Veritas.
	I think the biggest thing people can do to help is, if you're on the inside of YouTube and Google, come to Project Veritas.
	VeritasTipsAtProTimeMail.com.
	We see the evidence from the outside.
	I think now we need to see how they're doing this from the inside.
	Since the Pinterest story, we've actually had two Google whistleblowers.
	uh, come out and and I know like, uh, uh, louder with the crowder was actually on
	one of the google now news feed blacklists, uh, that one of the insiders exposed to
	Yeah, what well I know why yeah I knew it!
	I mean, you know, listen, I'm sorry that you guys are lumped in with this, where we just had Donald Trump playing Peter Gabriel, like you clearly are doing the Lord's work and we just like dressing up like ladies.
	Who, let me ask you this, in your experience, who would typically order these kinds of blacklists?
	And this is just me, sort of.
	It's an opinion.
	It's speculation.
	But it seems to me that if it's blacklisted exclusively in the United States, someone had to do that.
	That's not an algorithm.
	Right.
	So these are typically manual actions.
	I mean, again, we don't know the how in this case specifically.
	But from what we've seen historically, they're very manual operations.
	And the thing is, you have about 90% of people in tech companies are people like me, or at least people who just live and let live.
	They're not super political.
	But then you get like 10% of people who are direct activists.
	And they go in and they advocate for adding people to blacklists, for censoring people in certain regions, and yeah, I mean, there is a lot of sophistication in being able to delineate by region, too, in this case.
	And those people who you say, you know, there's 10% I think you said might be activists, are they in a disproportional amount of positions of power?
	Yeah, so we typically see this in trust and safety teams or some kind of content management teams, right?
	We're not talking about the software engineers, the people, I guess, like I used to be, aren't typically involved.
	We're just trying to make good software.
	But you kind of have people in these misinformation efforts who tend to be these complete activists and who are going to leadership and saying, this stuff is hate speech.
	We need to take care of this.
	And then, of course, they bow to the mob.
	Right.
	I think Corner Black Garrett had a question.
	Eric, do you think it's possible that it might be a single bad actor that's in there that just has the ability to add these search results in there?
	How often are these things monitored?
	Or is it more systemic, I guess?
	I think that's sometimes the case, but I'd say much more often it's systemic.
	I mean, like at Pinterest, we were seeing that where it's really this entire team.
	And these people, again, are all in this echo chamber.
	They're all encouraging each other.
	And pretty much everybody thinks they're doing the right thing.
	They think that they're very high IQ people, and people in the middle of the country just don't know what to think, and they need to take care of hate speech and misinformation, as they deem it so.
	Final question before we go to the web extended.
	Let me ask you this.
	You said that maybe 10% of people are activists, and I do think that people, I mean, is Jack Dorsey, Mark Zuckerberg, Susan Wojcicki, are they all activists?
	Or is it just because they tend to be liberal, but they're not activists?
	Do you think that they're really sort of an empathetic ear to these activists and the activists know that they have a Have you seen other employees who might be leftist liberal in these companies who knew what was going on and thought that it was wrong, regardless of personal politics?
	Yeah, as for like the direct top leadership, I think a lot of them, yeah, they're left-wing, but again, they're not complete activists.
	They just bow to the mob.
	They just bow to their employees who are activists, who are telling them, we're gonna have walkouts if this stuff doesn't stop.
	And they're just kind of in a difficult position in that way.
	And then, yeah, I think there definitely are left-leaning people inside these tech companies.
	I personally, since my stories come out and since the Google stories at Project Veritas now have come out, people I used to work with in the Android community are like, I don't agree with you on the issues that they were censoring, pro-life, conservative issues, but I'm totally against this tech censorship.
	Right.
	I think that's a good point, because a lot of people think the First Amendment only applies, obviously, to government regulation of speech, and it does, but there is a culture of censorship that occurs right now.
	I think people now call it cancel culture, but I think it goes even further than that.
	It goes further than just celebrities and And comedians getting protested when there's a systemic blocking, really, a prevention of people from even having a seat at the table.
	And here's something, I said, no, I said it was the last question, I wanna go to the web extended, but you said they bow to the mob.
	This is something that's important to me because a lot of people on the left, and you'll see the Young Turks say this, they say, well, Big Turk, they just go where the money is.
	But the truth is the money isn't with the outrage mob.
	Most people aren't on board with that.
	So why do you think it is that big tech companies are willing to forego some profit in many instances
	to appease them?
	Because that's a very new shift for businesses.
	I think it's true.
	I think that there's some things, I mean, certainly to a lot of these middle manager
	or upper executives, there are things more important than money to them.
	They can always get a new job.
	They're already making lots of money, but they really view their mission
	as directors for the culture.
	Yeah, that makes sense.
	It's effectively practiced secularism as a religion.
	All right, listen, we're going to go to WebExtended, but where's the best place for people to send the tips to get involved?
	Because we've had some people send us stuff and we don't really know what to do with it.
	It's a comedy show.
	So where should people send it for you?
	Yeah, if you're on the inside of a big tech company or any media institution or you want to go undercover with Project Veritas, projectveritas.com slash brave.
	Send your tips to VeritasTips at ProtonMail.com.
	We'll protect your anonymity and security.
	They will have you go undercover, and you don't even have to go in Trudeau blackface.
	Web Extended, for those who are Mug Club, will go to that.
	For the rest of you, wait for the close.
	Or don't.
	Bimbo, bimbo.
	My name is Mr. Susan.
	You must choose, and now it is time for you to do the choosin'.
	I am Mr. T.
	Mr. Trump, why have you, interest you in buying whistles?
	Okay, I told you, whistle dragon, listen.
	I am only interested in the individual who purchased and proceeded to frankly blow the whistle.
	No, no, Mr. Trump, okay, I think you're changing your mind when you hear what I have here for you.
	No, no, no, okay, don't listen to it.
	I'll take six.
	So here at this show, we joke around quite a bit because we like to have a laugh.
	Name that reference for those who don't.
	I think you should know that one.
	But if you use your firearm in self-defense, for most people that's not funny and most gun owners don't ever actually think about what happens when they've reached that point until it's too late.
	What do you say when the police arrive?
	More importantly, what do you not say?
	You don't want to be on Worldstar that day.
	Can I say that?
	Well, I don't care.
	I already made it in.
	That's where firearms legal protection comes in.
	They're the leader in prepaid self-defense protection plans.
	for your firearm.
	They're designed specifically to protect you and your family, and listen, they have the balls to support this show.
	Just like Walther, we are incredibly grateful, and they offer so much help to you and your family, from paying bills, to bail bond, to helping you get your firearm back, even helping you get your home cleaned up after you use it in your house in self-defense.
	So for some exclusive pricing, some discounts, you can go to, not lotterworthcreditor.com, you go to firearmslegal.com slash lwc.
	I'm so used to plugging my own stuff Because most sponsors won't touch me.
	Thanks, Firearms Legal!
	Firearmslegal.com slash LWC.
	I have it, everyone here has it.
	it really is worth doing for a nominal fee.
	I'm going to be doing a video on how to get a good start on a new game.
	Never even broke character.
	When did this become sexy?
	When was this the... I don't know.
	Do we know where that comes from?
	Is there some historical context?
	You're the historian here.
	What is this?
	Has anyone ever seen this?
	It's like a lemon rub thing?
	Ooh.
	Does she do that?
	Ooh.
	Looks like she is in heat.
	I don't understand it.
	I don't get it.
	I mean, I understand breasts.
	I understand naked people.
	Okay, yeah, that turns me on.
	But this?
	Maybe she looks like a... I also don't understand this.
	When people are like, this guy is hot, and they do this.
	Has anyone ever been sexually attracted and they actually get, like, temperature hot?
	Physically warm?
	I don't know.
	Don't ask me.
	Maybe it happens.
	Maybe that's the fleshing that occurs during coitus?
	I don't know.
	We should ask Jordan Peters.
	That's the answer.
	Women wear a rouge because it symbolizes the flushing that occurs during sexual intercourse with all the variables and facets.
	Thank you so much to Eric Cochran.
	Web Extended where we get into some stuff that we cannot talk about on YouTube for those who are Mud Club members.
	And for those who are not, please do join.
	We're also going to have a whole episode of Jokes We Cannot Tell on YouTube next week.
	Pretty soon.
	A couple of things I wanted to talk about here, and I know that sometimes these are meant to be inspirational, and then I fail miserably, because I'm just in an angry place, and that happens.
	But this is what I was thinking about today, because I heard this, I don't know, some self-help guru was on the radio.
	I'm lying, not radio, it was some podcast, it was a commercial.
	Who listens to radio anymore?
	Nobody.
	I feel like if radio were a book today, you'd have to go...
	Like in the page master, you know?
	There's still people there.
	I don't understand it.
	I don't get it.
	But not really.
	It was a podcast.
	And you hear this a lot.
	We're always told to love ourselves.
	Love yourself.
	You're told to be kind to yourself.
	And I've heard that my whole life.
	I know you've heard that or some iteration of that your whole life.
	And it would always upset me.
	And I guess in part because I don't know what it means, or at least I don't know what it's meant to convey, or why it's something that needs to play a role in our discourse.
	I don't think it's helpful.
	Let me preface this.
	Of course you should appreciate your life, and of course you should respect your body, your mind, the blessings that have been bestowed upon you, your abilities, and that means taking care of them.
	And I suppose that means being kind to yourself.
	I understand that.
	And yes, okay, your life is a gift.
	Before I go negative here, and then I'm going to turn it back around.
	So just let this big tugboat get pulled to shore.
	It's going to be up, down, and then up again.
	So yes, your life is a gift.
	You should love it.
	You should love yourself.
	And that's why I've talked repeatedly about finding what it is.
	At which you're excellent, what your purpose is, and creating a plan to maximize your fullest capabilities.
	And as always, it comes with making a plan and repetitions, repetitions, repetitions.
	I've talked about that.
	It's getting the reps in, getting the reps in.
	No one gets great at anything without getting the reps in, getting the reps in.
	Even someone who has a natural talent, it's about a plan, discipline, repetitions.
	Go back to previous episodes.
	You can't search them on YouTube, but try and find them somewhere.
	You can find them on Mug Club, on The Blaze, and you'll see what I'm talking about.
	That is something I've repeated ad nauseum.
	Maybe I'll put it in a book someday.
	I don't know.
	You let me know if you want a book.
	Probably not.
	I just don't want to write a book because I don't use them.
	I don't want you to have to, in three years, go... Do it.
	This was a bestseller back in the day, and then I'm dead from, you know, overdosing on opiates because I got into Gerald's stash when he was tapering off.
	I've never touched him.
	Yes, I have.
	So.
	That went on a real weird tangent.
	Let's replace the cocaine rumor with hardcore heroin.
	But I want to talk about something a little less comfortable, but equally important today, okay?
	Loving yourself doesn't mean that you love everything about yourself.
	Only a fool would feel that way.
	Or maybe someone who's watched too many romantic comedies.
	And we see this a lot.
	Why can't you just love me exactly the way I am?
	Well, let me explain.
	It might be tough, but because a good part of you, there's a significant portion of you that sucks.
	Listen, there are parts of yourself that you should hate.
	Everyone out there.
	That's a good thing.
	That's a good thing.
	There are parts of you you should hate.
	And I want to explore it a little bit.
	Let me use myself as an example first.
	Let me plunge into this ice-cold pool so that you don't feel so uncomfortable.
	I don't hate myself.
	But there are things about myself that I absolutely hate.
	There are aspects of my personality that I recognize, that I've worked on my whole life, and I despise.
	I've talked about this before, being a game day player.
	And that's a good thing.
	It's an important quality to learn.
	But it's not a good quality to rely upon.
	And about this, relating to myself, I hate that for some reason, I don't know why I've always been this way, there's a gear that I can only kick into when things go badly.
	When the Vox Adpocalypse happened, that's an example.
	Recently, there have been some pretty stressful situations that have come up with YouTube, more than that.
	But really, that's been a big one.
	We're going back and forth with lawyers.
	It's been tough.
	But I perform at my best with my back against the wall I always have.
	I think it's why I've probably procrastinated my whole life.
	I was a guy who would cram for exams.
	It's why I would almost always wait until I found myself in a position of conflict before really sort of biting down on the mouthpiece and getting to business.
	It maybe just goes to the ADHD personality.
	I don't know.
	But it's not a good thing.
	I hate it about myself.
	I hate that most of the time, I feel tired, I feel exhausted, I have trouble focusing, and then, for some reason, when something goes wrong, some high-pressure situation arises, I can, for some reason, kick into a gear where it almost feels as though I'm not me.
	It sometimes feels like I'm not even the one speaking or acting, but information is traveling through me, and I can't control it.
	It only happens in positions of stress which are not good for me.
	My verbal fluidity is enhanced.
	My short-term memory locks on to where I need it to be.
	I'm focused.
	I'm clear.
	Pain doesn't register the same way.
	I've literally torn ligaments, separated joints, without even realizing it until I'd driven home and the adrenaline died down.
	But here's the thing, being in that pressure cooker is rare.
	At least it should be.
	And there are only so many times that you can redline that engine.
	And sometimes it's very hard to fix, and I haven't been able to fix it.
	I would love to hear from some people out there who are maybe relating to this, who struggle with this.
	If you have any solutions, a part of me talking about this is probably looking for advice just as much as offering any.
	So please, do comment.
	The point is this.
	We're all told that you should love yourself.
	Listen, you should, okay?
	But just like love the sinner, hate the sin, it's okay.
	I'm giving you permission here.
	It's okay for there to be things that you don't like about yourself.
	You know why?
	Here's why.
	Because you're not perfect the way you are.
	That's a very new concept, by the way.
	That you're perfect just the way you are.
	Why?
	Because Pink wrote a song?
	Up until very recently, nearly all societies, and certainly all societies that I can think of since modern Christendom, started with the baseline knowledge, the acceptance of the fact that you are imperfect.
	We're all imperfect.
	But you, specifically, are imperfect.
	Very much so.
	And that the pursuit of perfection is a facet of the human condition.
	But somewhere along the way, More recently, as it relates to human history, maybe because it sells albums or books, I don't know, we decided that it was more important to convince people to love themselves rather than to improve themselves.
	And here's my challenge to you today.
	Don't think of all the things you love about yourself.
	We've done that in the past and there's a time for that.
	I want you to think of the things that you hate about yourself.
	What is it that bothers you?
	What is it that when you look back on your life you're gonna say, or at least maybe you think you'll say, oh man, I wish I didn't do it that way.
	I really wish I'd have taken the time to fix that about myself.
	I want you to take a minute right now and genuinely think about it.
	Think about what that is.
	Then try to chart a course to a solution.
	And with this one I'm facing, I don't know.
	For mine, it's tough.
	I would advise you to start searching, I guess, for information on people who struggle with the problems that are similar.
	You know, just like I've talked about this in the past, if you want to get really good at something, start with trying to emulate the best in the world.
	It's something I don't understand.
	Often you'll see people enter athletics or you'll see people enter into any endeavor.
	Say, well, I'm just going to kind of work and see what happens.
	Well, hold on a second.
	If you don't want to be the best at this, you have no business being in that arena.
	If you're going to emulate someone, Emulate the best at it.
	That should be your starting off point.
	Do the same thing here.
	With your struggles.
	With your hangups.
	Find someone who's had to overcome the same hurdles.
	Someone who's driven through the roadblocks.
	Someone who's done it.
	Seek out an expert.
	Maybe it's a medical professional.
	I don't know.
	Maybe it's a psychiatrist.
	I have no idea.
	In my case, you know, listen, it's difficult.
	I can't really search people who hit fifth gear when they are under pressure and feel chronically exhausted the rest of the time.
	The closest I can find is adrenaline junkie.
	Some people have said that that's what I am, but I don't like heights.
	So I think it's bullshit.
	But I don't know, but it's something that I don't like about myself and something that I've always had to work on.
	And I think if you've listened to the show, you've heard me talk about that before trying to find that third gear.
	I think for a long time, There were maybe three years doing this job where I was working from five in the morning to seven at night.
	Every day.
	Every day.
	And then I'd work like a basic eight hours on Saturday and a few hours on Sunday.
	And I was like a madman.
	I was a crazy person.
	And I was only able to do it because I had to.
	Back then I didn't have the resources, the help I needed.
	We didn't have the infrastructure.
	Go look at episodes of this show, okay?
	Like I said, I'm gonna bring this tugboat to shore, but go look at episodes of this show if the search engine worked on YouTube.
	Again, I feel like I have to repeat this.
	Say 2015 or 2016, okay?
	Every single sketch was me!
	I had to write them all!
	I had to play every different character!
	I had to research every meat segment!
	And since then, sometimes, I will say this, I feel like a shell of my former self.
	And then I have people around me now who are capable of shouldering the burden.
	And you know what?
	And they want to shoulder the burden.
	And I struggle with guilt.
	I hate that about myself.
	I struggle with guilt.
	Sometimes I think, like, ah, man, I should be doing that.
	I shouldn't be putting Quarter Black Garrett in a sketch, all those sketches.
	I should be doing those because that's what I used to do.
	I'm giving him too much work.
	And I don't think you're great at it.
	I love it.
	It's fun.
	You're fantastic at it, but because for so long I had to do it, I didn't have the option of someone like you, I've struggled with this guilt.
	I've struggled with trying to put myself back into this pressure cooker because for some reason it's a... I wake up and I'm able to make things happen, but I don't want to be there.
	It's not a good place to be.
	This isn't humble bragging.
	It's the kind of thing that shaves years off your life.
	And there's no other way for me to turn it on.
	I don't like it about myself.
	Here's why I'm talking about this.
	I think this might help someone out there.
	Someone listening.
	What is it that you hate about yourself?
	Maybe you're relating to this.
	It's something that's out of your control and you don't necessarily know how to go about fixing it.
	It starts with information.
	It starts with the truth.
	Do other people struggle with this?
	Have other people found solutions?
	My goal here when I do these Crowder Closes segments, as they've been branded by the team here, I want We have millions of listeners and viewers, okay?
	Millions.
	And I wake up not feeling exalted by that fact, humbled by it.
	I do not take it granted for a second.
	I want you guys to clearly understand that.
	Believe me, I don't.
	But I want the millions of people who will be watching or listening to this to go out and be better human beings.
	I want you all, yeah, my primary job is to make you laugh.
	I understand that, that's my lane.
	But if I can, I want you all to be better fathers.
	I want you all to be better mothers, better husbands, better wives.
	I want you to be better sons, daughters, disciples.
	I'm not a disciple of me.
	I'm a Christian.
	Being a disciple of Christ, that's, for me, those are the ABCs of me.
	That's the end game.
	But if I haven't served to improve the lives of everyone who watches or listens to this show, and by proxy, improve the lives of everyone you touch, you know, I will have failed.
	And I think an important component to affecting positive change is identifying what it is that
	you just can't stand about yourself.
	It's just as important as recognizing your strengths. Again, what is it in your quiet
	moments? I don't know if you have this, I get this when you can't sleep, your head hits the pillow
	and you actually wince. You ever do that? You go, oh, I can't believe I did that. Oh,
	I can't, I can't believe I said that.
	That came out of my mouth.
	I want you to sit with some quiet time right now.
	Pause it if you have to.
	Put on your meditative music.
	I don't know what it is.
	Maybe you have an app.
	Most people have apps.
	Get into your happy place and then make it very unhappy.
	Make it very unpleasant.
	What do you despise about yourself?
	Can it be fixed?
	Spoiler alert, yeah, it can.
	How can it be fixed?
	That's what you need to figure out.
	Start by finding other people who've struggled with it, who fixed it about themselves, ask for help, then create a plan and fix it.
	Starts with recognizing there are things about yourself that suck, that you should hate and need to change.
	Told you it would be an upper!

▲