Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 20, 2016 - Louder with Crowder

01:52:31

FULL FINAL PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE (With Crowder Commentary)

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Glad to be with you.
	We really have to do that music for the other streams.
	Presidential live stream.
	The rules for the game for those who consume alcoholic beverages to make this more palatable are up at Facebook or I think they're on the YouTube link.
	We want to thank our sponsors this evening, AR15.com.
	Great message board if you need any tips or want to talk with people.
	Hey, ARFcom.
	Thanks for watching.
	Are into firearms.
	That could be talked about tonight.
	And of course, one of our actual sponsors, we've done some commercials, but preparewithcr.com.
	There is a promotional gift going on right now, $99, 30-day emergency food kit shipped free.
	Preparewithcr.com, $99.
	Set it and forget it.
	Tonight, third debate, winner take all.
	Think so?
	I think so.
	Winner take all.
	If you could tweet me at scrowder, and maybe tweet him at notgayjirred, I'd like to make sure that we have some ground rules here.
	In the primary debate, we all agreed that Fox Business, Chris Wallace, did the best job.
	So I know after debates, if someone does well or doesn't do well, they'll blame the moderator.
	So I want to make sure, do we agree going in that we expect this to probably be more substantive and Chris Wallace to do a good job?
	Tweet me.
	I'll see that.
	That'll give me an idea as to where you line up.
	I think so.
	I think this debate could be borderline boring, and I think it's a better environment sometimes for Hillary.
	I think Trump won the first debate.
	Sorry, I think Hillary won the first debate.
	I think Trump won the second one.
	I think by a little bit of a wider margin, if you look at the scientific polls, Hillary won the first debate.
	I think Trump, the first 20 minutes of the first debate, that's the best Trump we've seen.
	And I think we need to see that, a little more of that tonight.
	What do you think, Jared?
	What does he need to do?
	I think so.
	I think he needs to come out hard.
	I think he needs to...
	Heart or hard?
	Hard.
	Have you even started consuming?
	No, not yet.
	I should get started.
	Real quick, before we get into it, people who are watching along the live stream, we have the rules for the game.
	Anytime Trump says frankly, you have them up on your screen.
	Anytime Trump says frankly, tremendous, trust me, honestly, truthfully, excuse me, let me tell you China or Mexico, or anytime he interrupts Take a drink, and any time he uses the word rigged, or he induced alcohol poisoning, if he sniffs, drink water.
	We don't want any deaths on our hands.
	So drink some water every time he sniffles.
	Hillary, any time she says Donald, coughs, laughs inaudibly, plays the sexist card, mentions hot sauce.
	Yes.
	What commits RBF? Resting bitch face.
	Oh, resting bitch face.
	Commits resting bitch face.
	I forgot about that.
	Or the moderator interrupts on her behalf.
	Drink every time she does a shoulder drink.
	If you're the new ones here.
	Or she tries to make up a new catchphrase.
	Kill yourself.
	Yes.
	So what do you think Drum needs to do?
	Since you started this late, you only have a couple minutes.
	I think he needs to take...
	I talk to Trump people on Twitter and they all say, no, man, the WikiLeaks are enough, man, the James O'Keefe stuff was enough, their voter fraud and all those kind of videos.
	I don't think it's enough because I don't think any of those things are attached enough to...
	To Hillary.
	I think if Trump come out tonight and marry those problems to Hillary, make her the symbol of those things, it will help him.
	It won't win.
	No.
	It's enough.
	But I think it's something he needs to do tonight.
	I think Donald Trump needs to turn this...
	By the way, my soundboard isn't working, so I don't know if you don't have the sound on or what.
	There we go.
	Oh, do we got it?
	There we go.
	Trump needs to turn it back on Hillary.
	Her strategy has been to pull herself out of the limelight, give him as much of a stage as possible, let the controversies mount and sort of backdoor in.
	I do think this week has been proof positive that the media is absolutely in the tank for Hillary.
	No mention of WikiLeaks whatsoever.
	No mention of the James O'Keefe videos.
	I think this is the most clear example.
	I mean, they've always been in it to win this for the DNC. They just aren't even trying to hide it anymore with Hillary and Trump.
	This is nothing new.
	They're just going, alright, you know what?
	Yeah, this is where we are.
	It's 2016.
	So I do think that this week has been proof positive.
	The media, particularly CNN, particularly anyone really not named Fox News, and some people on Fox News, they want Hillary to win.
	I think Chris Wallace will do a good job.
	Most of the tweets are saying they expect him to do a good job.
	Let's hear what he has to say and stay with us.
	...between the two presidential nominees.
	Raise your hands.
	Wow.
	Okay.
	Those are the undecided people?
	What is this?
	I'm not sure what they're doing here.
	What just happened?
	Is that us or is that them?
	That's them.
	They're doing weird stuff.
	That's them.
	That's the stream.
	Yeah.
	Justin Gidhart says all he has is pumpkin beer and he hates pumpkin beer.
	That's a horrible place to be.
	That's a horrible place to be.
	Some people said the feed looks a little bit grainy.
	It's going to be a long debate with those rules, says Jesse Levick.
	I don't think so.
	I think it's going to be a good debate.
	By the way, keep Jared accountable, not gay Jared accountable, because last time he didn't drink when he was supposed to drink.
	He shirked the rules.
	Are we still waiting on a stream to come up?
	We're still waiting for it.
	I'm not sure what they're doing with this stream, so...
	I don't think...
	That was ABC. I don't think they're allowed to...
	Is this Fox News, Fox Business?
	It's Fox News, right?
	That's cable, so it wouldn't be on the ABC stream, not good, Jared.
	Let's see what we got here.
	That would be public.
	I don't think it's public.
	Oh, they just went...
	I just found the Fox one.
	They just went up with it.
	They just went up with a stream at Fox?
	Yep.
	Leave it to Fox to get scooped by another channel on their own stream.
	Their own stream is usually later than other people's.
	Do we have the stream going?
	Yeah, but it's just playing through an ad, though.
	Oh, gosh.
	We don't want to support those ads.
	By the way, we'll be live streaming election night with a full guest list.
	I think we have Shapiro, Gavin...
	Anthony Cumia, Dean Cain, Courtney, Brodigan, Gerald.
	The list goes on and on.
	So election night will be giving you updates on the electoral.
	Also, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump will join us themselves.
	Oh, wow.
	On election night.
	Let's hear this.
	Oh, look, it's Mr.
	Catfish, Shep Smith.
	Did you know he came out as gay?
	Really?
	To which the entire world said...
	Oh, my gosh.
	Yeah, we knew.
	Oh, Shep.
	Yeah.
	That's where you have to fake it.
	Like, really?
	Oh, my gosh.
	Oh, you did such a good job at covering it.
	It's daytime Emmys.
	They're paying off.
	All right.
	He looks like a catfish.
	He does.
	Like, you'd expect that at the end of your line in Lake Michigan.
	Yeah.
	It's a river monster.
	So this will be Secretary Clinton's first chance to respond to these new releases.
	The moderator tonight we're proud to announce is our own Fox News Sunday anchor Chris Wallace.
	I think he does a good job.
	He is the first Fox News journalist ever to moderate a general election presidential debate.
	Shannon Bream will watch along with us and she's live in Washington.
	Hi, Shannon.
	Hi, Chef.
	Well, as viewers of this Fox station know, if they've watched Fox News Sunday, Chris is going to push both of these candidates to give substantive answers on very important issues tonight.
	He's got a very ambitious agenda.
	Now on to our on-location.
	And right before every shot, it used to be Roger Ailes doing this.
	Oh, it went off.
	We're live.
	He's a cartoon character, and an anvil would drop on him.
	Alright, so they're still talking about this stuff.
	So, that's what I think is going to happen.
	We'll have a lot to talk about tomorrow.
	Ben Shapiro, Collin Noir, Courtney on tomorrow's live stream.
	You know, we'll talk about it tomorrow.
	I noticed a disturbing trend with election signs when I was up in northern Michigan.
	Some trends there that might surprise some people.
	I do think it's important here.
	Donald Trump needs a knockout win.
	And listen, he's got the media going against him on this.
	Is he Teflon, though?
	Here's the truth.
	Hillary's lead is not that huge, given the amount of controversy that surrounded Donald Trump and people coming forward.
	It really hasn't stuck.
	I think they've desensitized a lot of people to it.
	Yes.
	So if he has a good performance, that lead is not insurmountable.
	Here's what I think.
	I think a Donald Trump win is far more likely than the media thinks.
	And I think it's far less likely than his hardcore supporters think.
	You know, the betting odds have it at 85 or 87-13.
	I'd probably say it's a 65-35 for Hillary, just in a mathematical possibility.
	Are they coming on?
	Is Shep coming in?
	Shep is just talking.
	Shep loves to hear himself talking.
	He does.
	What was that?
	17 seconds.
	Okay, here comes Chris Wallace, the only man at Fox News who did not sleep with Megyn Kelly.
	Go.
	I'm Chris Wallace of Fox News.
	I think he talks that way at the dinner table.
	I welcome you to the third and final of the 2016 presidential debates between Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Donald J. Trump.
	This debate is sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates.
	You know all the Trump fans are going, yeah, he's a middle initial, yeah!
	I don't know if they like it.
	Hillary's still going to call him Donald.
	She's not going to give him the J. She's not going to give him the last name.
	For the record, I decided the topics and the questions in each topic.
	None of those questions has been shared with the commission or the two candidates.
	The audience here in the hall has promised to remain silent.
	No cheers, boos, or other interruptions, so we and you can focus on what the candidates have to say.
	What?
	No noise except right now, as we welcome the Democratic nominee for President Secretary Clinton and the Republican nominee for President Mr.
	Trump.
	We have to cycle through this, so please hold your claps to a minimum.
	No fun, please.
	No fun, stop that.
	Betting pool, how long before the shirt comes off?
	You said that when Hillary was on.
	Keep him accountable.
	There we go.
	Secretary Clinton, Mr.
	Trump, welcome.
	Let's get right to it.
	The first topic is the Supreme Court.
	You both talked briefly about the court in the last debate, but I want to drill down on this because the next president will almost certainly have at least one appointment and likely or possibly two or three appointments, which means that you will in effect determine the balance of the court for what could be the next quarter century.
	First of all, where...
	Breaking news is Clarence Thomas' brakes just went out in his car.
	And secondly, what's your view on how the Constitution should be interpreted?
	Do the founders' words mean what they say, or is it a living document...
	That's a good first question.
	If this is a substantive debate...
	Trump needs to show a contrast in worldview between him and Hillary.
	That's what he needs for undecided Republicans who aren't on board yet.
	Thank you very much, Chris, and thanks to UNLV for hosting us.
	You know, I think when we talk about the Supreme Court, it really raises the central issue in this election, namely, what kind of country are we going to be?
	What kind of opportunities will we provide for our citizens?
	What kind of rights will Americans have?
	And I'm a bitch.
	Stop it.
	The wealthy like you.
	Why do I always do this?
	That will...
	Just stop pretending like you're not incredibly wealthy on our dime.
	That's one thing I do appreciate about Donald Trump.
	I'm rich.
	Screw you.
	Good.
	I don't care.
	Citizens United was because of you!
	You wanted to stop the documentary about you!
	People don't understand Citizens United at all.
	Of course she's against Citizens United.
	It was about a damning documentary on her!
	I have major disagreements with my opponent about these issues and others that will be before the Supreme Court.
	That's scary.
	But I feel that at this point in our country's history, it is important that we not reverse marriage equality, that we not reverse Roe v.
	Wade, that we stand up against Citizens United, we stand up for the rights of people in the workplace, and we ensure that we can still blame terrorism on their YouTube videos.
	That's how I see the court, and the kind of people that I would be looking to We're good to go.
	And confirm the nominee that President Obama has sent to them.
	That's the way the Constitution fundamentally should operate.
	The President nominates and then the Senate advises and consents or not.
	But they go forward with the process.
	Or not.
	Secretary Clinton, thank you.
	I think not.
	This is Trump's same question.
	Where do you want to see the court take the country and how do you believe the Constitution should be interpreted?
	Well, first of all, it's great to be with you, and thank you, everybody.
	The Supreme Court, it's what it's all about.
	Our country is so, so, just so imperative that we have the right justice.
	Ooh, he sounds like he might be sick.
	Something happened recently where Justice Ginsburg made some very, very inappropriate statements toward me and toward a tremendous number of people, many, many millions of people that I represent.
	Who did?
	Hillary?
	She was forced to apologize.
	Okay, now he's going personal.
	What does that have to do with the Supreme Court?
	Come on.
	That should never, ever have been made.
	We need a Supreme Court that, in my opinion, is going to uphold the Second Amendment and all amendments, but the Second Amendment, which is under absolute siege.
	I believe if my opponent should win this race, which I truly don't think will happen.
	We will have a Second Amendment, which will be a very, very small replica of what it is right now.
	But I feel that it's absolutely important that we uphold because of the fact that it is under such trauma.
	I think Donald mistakes being professional with bringing the energy down a little bit.
	And that's where he struggles.
	People want him to be Donald.
	They just want him to be Donald, lasered in on a point.
	Yes.
	They will be protecting the Second Amendment.
	They are great scholars in all cases, and they're people of...
	He knows he has to win some votes here.
	The Second Amendment.
	He knows that's the biggest winning issue, and it's the biggest issue that could turn blue-dog Democrats away from Hillary, hunters and gun owners.
	I believe that's very, very important.
	I don't think we should have...
	Justices appointed that decide what they want to hear.
	It's all about the Constitution of, and so important, the Constitution the way it was meant to be.
	And those are the people that I will appoint.
	Mr.
	Trump, thank you.
	We now have about 10 minutes for an open discussion.
	I like his answer more than Hillary, but he needs to get a little more focused on them.
	Bring up the energy, focus on them a little more.
	...end up changing the existing law of the land.
	First is one that you mentioned, Mr.
	Trump, and that is guns.
	Secretary Clinton, you said last year, and let me quote, the Supreme Court is wrong.
	On the Second Amendment.
	And now, in fact, in the 2008 Heller case, the court ruled that there is a constitutional right to bear arms, but a right that is reasonably limited.
	Those were the words of the judge, Antonin Scalia, who wrote the decision.
	Except she supports the Australia buyback, which is a mandatory buyback.
	Well, first of all, I support the Second Amendment.
	No, you don't.
	No, you don't.
	Every time she lies, drink, drink.
	That deserves several chugs.
	I represented upstate New York.
	I understand and respect the tradition of...
	That's another lie!
	Drink!
	That's another lie!
	That's another lie!
	Drink!
	Drink!
	That's another lie!
	Drink!
	That's another lie!
	Drink!
	That's another lie!
	That's another lie!
	Drink!
	Drink!
	That's another lie!
	Drink!
	Again!
	And so when I think about what we need to do, we have 33,000 people here to die from guns.
	I think we need comprehensive background checks.
	We need to close the online loophole, close the gun show loophole.
	There's other matters that I think are sensible, that are the kind of reforms that would make a difference, that are not in any way conflicting with the Second Amendment.
	You mentioned the Heller decision, and what I was saying that you referenced, Chris, was that I disagreed with the way the court applied the Second Amendment in that case.
	I'm not a part of your body count, bitch!
	...was to protect toddlers from guns.
	And so they wanted people with guns to safely store them.
	Toddlers from guns.
	And the court didn't accept that recent revelation.
	But they've accepted many others.
	So I see no conflict between...
	Saving people's lives and defending the Second Amendment.
	Let me bring Mr.
	Trump in here.
	The bipartisan open debate coalition got millions of votes on questions to ask here.
	And this was, in fact, one of the top questions that they got.
	How will you ensure the Second Amendment is protected?
	You just heard Secretary Clinton's answer.
	Does she persuade you that while you may disagree on regulation, that in fact she supports a Second Amendment right to bear arms?
	Well, the D.C. versus Heller decision was very strongly, and she was extremely angry about it.
	I watched.
	She was very, very angry.
	Justice Scalia was so involved, and it was a well-crafted decision.
	But Hillary was extremely upset, extremely angry, and people that believe in the Second Amendment and believe in it very strongly...
	We're very upset with what she had to say.
	Well, I was upset because, unfortunately, dozens of toddlers injure themselves, even kill people with guns, because, unfortunately, not everyone who has loaded guns in their homes takes a free precaution.
	But there's no guess that I respect the Second Amendment that I also believe there's an individual right to bear arms.
	Maybe we're weeding out future Hillary's.
	That is not in conflict with sensible, common-sense regulations.
	Look, I understand that Donald's been strongly supported by the NRA. The gun lobby's on his side.
	They're running millions of dollars of ads against me.
	And I regret that, because what I would like to see is for people to come together and say, of course we're going...
	I don't know, she's going to need to keep up the beers tonight.
	But we're going to do it in a way that tries to save some of these 33,000 lives that we lose every year.
	Most of whom are toddlers and propeller caps.
	Because, in fact, you oppose any limits on assault weapons, any limits on high-capacity magazines you support.
	Here's where Chris Wallace is using the gun control terminology and doesn't realize it.
	Well, let me just tell you, before we go any further, in Chicago, which has the toughest gun laws in the United States, probably you could say by far, they have more gun violence than any other city.
	So we have the toughest laws, and you have tremendous gun violence.
	I am a very strong supporter of the Second Amendment, and I am, I don't know if Hillary was saying it in a sarcastic manner, but I'm very proud to have the endorsement Of the NRA, and it's the earliest endorsement they've ever given to anybody who ran for president.
	So I'm very honored by all of that.
	We are going to appoint justices.
	This is the best way to help the Second Amendment.
	We are going to appoint justices that will feel very strongly about the Second Amendment, that will not do damage to the Second Amendment.
	Well, let's pick up on another issue which divides you, and the justices that whoever ends up winning this election appoints could have a dramatic effect there, and that's the issue of abortion.
	Mr.
	Trump, you're pro-life.
	But I want to ask you specifically.
	Do you want the court, including the justices that you will name, to overturn Roe v.
	Wade, which includes, in fact, states...
	It's not going to be overturned.
	This is a loaded question.
	If that would happen because I am pro-life and I will be appointing pro-life judges, I would think that that will go back to the individual states.
	But I'm asking you specifically, would you like to...
	If they overturned it, it'll go back to the states.
	But what I'm asking you, sir, is, do you want to see the court overturned?
	You just said you want to see the court protect the Second Amendment.
	Do you want to see the court overturned?
	Well, if we put another two or perhaps three justices on, that's really what's going to be...
	that will happen.
	And that'll happen automatically, in my opinion, because I am putting pro-life justices on the court.
	I will say this, it will go back to the states, and the states will then make a determination.
	That seems a little bit like a hatchet job on Trump.
	I strongly support the debate which guarantees a constitutional right to a woman to make the most intimate most.
	Oh, all of a sudden, the broad's about constitutional rights!
	Before, what about the Second Amendment?
	Now there are toddlers going goo-goo-ga-ga, bing-bang-blow!
	But now all of a sudden, when it comes to sticking forceps up your hoo-ha and dragging a baby out for the dumpster fire for Thursday, she's all about the Constitution!
	By the way, the stringent laws from these states, like abortions, are no longer legal after 22 weeks.
	Have you seen a 22-week-old baby?
	Yeah.
	These aren't crazy right-wing laws like you see in places like Texas.
	Just be clear, when she says crazy laws, people are thinking they're going to toss you in jail for having an abortion?
	No, it's when a baby is essentially viable where it could be taken out of the womb, almost.
	We don't want abortion.
	Which is overwhelmingly supported even by abortionists, by the way.
	Indeed, he said women should be punished.
	That there should be some form of punishment for women who obtain abortions.
	And I could just not be more opposed to that kind of thinking.
	I'm going to give you a chance to respond, but I want to ask you, Secretary Clinton, I want to explore how far you believe the right to abortion goes.
	You have been quoted as saying that the fetus has no constitutional rights.
	You also voted against a ban on late-term partial birth abortions.
	Why?
	Because Roe v.
	Wade very clearly sets out that there can be regulations on abortion so long as the life and the health of the mother are taken into account.
	And when I voted as a senator, I did not think that that was the case.
	The kinds of cases that fall at the end of pregnancy are often the most heartbreaking, painful decisions for families to make.
	I have met with women who toward the end of their pregnancy get the worst news one could get that their health is in jeopardy if they...
	I hate so much about the things that you choose to be.
	Are we feeling sympathetic now for women who kill their baby at 24 weeks?
	What cosmic bunny hole did I fall into?
	This is supposed to be an...
	Aw, shucks moment for a woman who's jamming scissors up her baby's head at 24 weeks.
	Am I missing something?
	Tweet me, that's Crowder.
	Am I? It's not just me, right?
	No.
	No.
	You can take the baby and rip the baby out of the womb of the mother just prior to the birth of the baby.
	Now, you can say that that's okay, and Hillary can say that that's okay, but it's not okay with me.
	Because based on what she's saying and based on where she's going and where she's going, you can say what I'm talking about in the ninth month.
	In the final day, and that's not accepted.
	Good answer.
	Well, that is not what happens in these cases.
	And using that kind of...
	Scare rhetoric is just terribly unfortunate.
	Appreciate that.
	You should meet with some of the women that I've met with, women I've known over the course of my life.
	This is one of the worst possible choices that any woman and her family has to make.
	And I do not believe the government should be making it.
	You know, I've had the great honor of traveling across the world on behalf of our country.
	I've been to countries where governments either forced women to have abortions like they used to do in China...
	The first women to bear children, like they used to do in Romania.
	And I can tell you, the government has no business in the decisions that women make with their families, in accordance with their faith, with medical advice.
	And I will stand up for that.
	What if we just let...
	All right.
	Just briefly, I want to move on.
	The toddlers perform abortions with guns.
	Doing what I just said, doing that as late as one or two or three or four days prior to birth, nobody has that.
	All right.
	Let's move on to the subject of immigration.
	There is almost no issue that separates the two of you more than the issue of immigration.
	Actually, there are a lot of issues that separate the two of you.
	Mr.
	Trump, you want to build a wall.
	Secretary Clinton, you have offered no specific plan for how you want to secure our southern border.
	Mr.
	Trump, you are calling for major deportations.
	Secretary Clinton, you say that within your first 100 days as president, you're going to offer a package.
	That includes a pathway to citizenship.
	The question really is, why are you right and your opponent wrong?
	Mr.
	Trump, you go first in this segment.
	You have two minutes.
	Well, first of all, she wants to give amnesty, which is a disaster and very unfair to all of the people that waited in line for many, many years.
	We need strong borders.
	In the audience tonight, we have four mothers of, I mean, these are unbelievable people that I've gotten to know over a period of years.
	Children have been killed, brutally killed, by people that came into the country illegally.
	You have thousands of mothers and fathers and relatives all over the country.
	They're coming in illegally.
	Drugs are pouring in through the border.
	We have no country if we have no border.
	Hillary wants to give amnesty.
	She wants to have open borders.
	The border secure, as you know, the Border Patrol agents, 16,500-plus ICE last week, endorsed me.
	First time they've ever endorsed a candidate.
	It means their job is tougher.
	But they know what's going on.
	They know it better than anybody.
	They want strong borders.
	They feel we have to have strong borders.
	I was up in New Hampshire the other day.
	This is good rhetoric.
	The biggest complaint they have.
	But he needs to give the plan.
	All of the problems going on in the world.
	A lot of people, when I ask them, even Republicans, they don't feel like they have a good purchase on his plans yet.
	It would serve him well to do that tonight.
	It's poisoning the blood of their youth and plenty of other people.
	We have to have strong borders.
	We have to keep the drugs out of our country.
	Right now, we're getting the drugs.
	They're getting the cash.
	We're getting rid of drugs!
	I can buy them with a Bitcoin!
	I want to build the wall.
	We need the wall.
	The border patrol, ICE, they all want the wall.
	What's Aleppo?
	I think that one more time.
	I missed the grab on that one.
	What is Aleppo?
	Oh, God!
	That's going to be a sound bite.
	Well, as he was talking, I was thinking about a young girl I met here in Las Vegas, Carla, who was very worried that her parents might be deported because she was born in this country, but they were not.
	They work hard.
	They do everything they can to give her a good life.
	And you're right.
	I don't want to rip families apart.
	I don't want to be sending parents away from children.
	I don't want to see the deportation force that Donald has talked about in action in our country.
	We have 11 million undocumented people.
	They have 4 million American citizen children.
	15 million people.
	He said as recently as a few weeks ago in Phoenix that Yes!
	It means you would have to have a massive law enforcement presence where law enforcement officers were going school to school, home to home, business to business, rounding up people who are undocumented.
	And we would then have to put them on trains, on buses to get them out of our country.
	You know, you could put them on those railroad pumps.
	Make them work their way out.
	Or the same buses used to funnel in voters.
	I think it's an idea that would rip our country.
	Just give him the round trip on the Greyhound in Ohio, sweetheart.
	She has so much makeup on tonight, you wouldn't know she had lips if not for more makeup.
	Anybody who should be deported, we should deport them.
	It would just be like when you blur a face on YouTube in a hidden camera video.
	He went to Mexico.
	He had a meeting with the Mexican president.
	Didn't even raise it.
	He choked.
	And then got into a Twitter war because the Mexican president said, we're not paying for that wall.
	So I think we are both a nation of immigrants and we are a nation of laws and that we can act accordingly.
	And that's why I'm introducing comprehensive immigration reform within the first hundred days with a path to citizenship.
	Thank you, Secretary Clinton.
	I want to follow up.
	I think I should respond to that.
	First of all, I had a very good meeting with the President of Mexico.
	Very nice man.
	We will be doing very much better with Mexico on trade deals, believe me.
	He said no.
	The NAFTA deal signed by her husband is one of the worst deals ever made of any kind, signed by anybody.
	It's a disaster.
	Hillary Clinton wanted the wall.
	Hillary Clinton fought for the wall in 2006 or thereabouts.
	She was on the wall with Jon Snow.
	Oh, look at that smile from her!
	Look at that!
	That's East Ledger Joker!
	Look at that!
	Drink to it, drink to it, just do it.
	I voted for border security, and there are some...
	There are some limited places where that was appropriate.
	There also is necessarily going to be new technology and how best to deploy that.
	But it is clear when you look at what Donald has been posing.
	He started his campaign bashing immigrants, calling Mexican immigrants rapists and criminals and drug dealers.
	If he gets pissed enough, she's going to toss out some bait.
	Watch for it.
	It's a matter of does he bite on it.
	What I am also arguing is that bringing undocumented immigrants out from the shadows, putting them into the formal economy, will be good because then employers can't exploit them and undercut Americans' wages.
	And Donald knows a lot about this.
	He used undocumented labor to build the Trump Tower.
	I don't care if they do well.
	I really don't.
	They're criminals.
	He basically said what a lot of employers do.
	You complain, I'll get you deported.
	I want to get everybody out of the shadows, get the economy working, and not let employers like Donald exploit undocumented workers, which hurts them but also hurts American workers.
	No, it doesn't.
	President Obama has moved millions of people out.
	Nobody knows about it.
	Nobody talks about it.
	But under Obama, millions of people have been moved out of this country.
	They've been deported.
	She doesn't want to say that, but that's what's happened, and that's what's happened big league.
	As far as moving these people out and moving, we either have a country or we don't.
	We're a country of loss.
	We either have a border or we don't.
	Now, you can come back in and you can become a citizen, but it's very unfair.
	We have millions of people.
	That did it the right way.
	They're on line.
	They're waiting.
	We're going to speed up the process, bigly, because it's very inefficient.
	But they're on line and they're waiting to become citizens.
	Very unfair that somebody runs across the border, becomes a citizen.
	Under her plan, you have open borders.
	You would have a disaster on trade and you will have a disaster with your open borders.
	But what she doesn't say is that President Obama has deported millions and millions of people just the way it is.
	All right.
	Boom.
	Turn down for what?
	That is a great miscarriage.
	Turn down for what?
	Secure borders, but we will also have reform.
	And this used to be a bipartisan issue.
	Ronald Reagan was the last president to sign immigration reform, and George W. Bush supported it as well.
	Secretary Clinton, I want to...
	Yes, the problem is George W. Bush wasn't a horrendous bitch.
	In a speech you gave to a Brazilian bank for which you were paid $225,000, we've learned from the WikiLeaks that you said this, I want to quote.
	My dream is a hemispheric common market with open trade and open borders.
	So that's the question.
	Interrupting Trump's drink.
	Well, if you went on to read the rest of the sentence, I was talking about energy.
	You know, we trade more energy with our neighbors than we trade with the rest of the world combined.
	And I do want us to have an electric grid, an energy system that crosses borders.
	I think that would be a great benefit to us.
	But you are very clearly quoting from WikiLeaks, and what's really important about WikiLeaks is that the Russian government has engaged in espionage against Americans.
	They have hacked American websites, American accounts of private people, of institutions.
	Then they have given that information to WikiLeaks for the purpose of putting it on the Internet.
	This has come from the highest levels of the Russian government.
	Look, she's looking down.
	She's uncomfortable.
	She probably can't pronounce the Russian names, that's why.
	17 of our intelligence agencies have confirmed to influence our election.
	So I actually think the most important question...
	You mean like Qatar and all your other donors influenced the election?
	Finally, will Donald Trump...
	Clock boy.
	She's got a bead of sweat under her nose?
	Oh, that's a booger.
	Did you see that?
	A little bead of sweat?
	It's like snot running down her nose.
	She has snot running down her nose.
	It's alien blood.
	She's a reptilian.
	She's looking down.
	She's reading.
	She's rattled here.
	Get in there, Rock!
	...off the fact that she wants open borders, okay?
	Yes.
	How did we get up to Putin?
	Boom.
	Good for Trump.
	Good for Trump.
	Good.
	Good.
	Trump.
	Because we could, this is going to end up.
	We wanted to see, buddy.
	Keep it quiet.
	So for the candidates and for the American people.
	Shut up, Chris Wallace.
	She wants open borders.
	People are going to pour into our country.
	People are going to come in from Syria.
	She wants 550% more people than Barack Obama.
	And he has thousands and thousands of people that have no idea where they come from.
	And you see, we are going to stop radical Islamic terrorism in this country.
	Amity of good to be a gangster.
	Gangsta.
	A real gangsta ass nigga plays his cards right.
	A real gangsta ass nigga never runs his f***ing mouth.
	Cause real gangsta ass niggas don't start fights.
	If we got along well, that would be good.
	If Russia and the United States got along well and went after ISIS, that would be good.
	He has no respect for her.
	He has no respect for our president.
	And I'll tell you what, we're in very serious trouble because we have a country with tremendous numbers of nuclear warheads, 1,800, by the way, where they expanded and we didn't, 1,800 nuclear warheads, and she's playing chicken.
	Look, from everything I see, has no respect for this person.
	Well, that's because he'd rather have a puppet as president of the United States.
	It's pretty clear you won't admit that the Russians have engaged in cyber attacks against the United States of America, that you encouraged espionage against our people.
	That you are willing to spout the Putin line, sign up for his wish list, break up NATO, do whatever he wants to do, and that you continue to get help from him because he has a very clear favor in this race.
	She's looking down.
	I think that this is such an unprecedented situation.
	We've never had a foreign government trying to interfere in our election.
	She's repeating herself and running out the clock.
	17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military, who have all concluded that these espionaged attacks, these cyber attacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin, and they are designed to influence our election.
	She's looking down.
	I find that deeply disturbing.
	She has no idea whether it's Russia, China, or anybody else.
	She has no idea.
	Hillary, you have no idea.
	Do you doubt?
	Our country has no idea.
	He'd rather believe Vladimir Putin than the military and civilian intelligence professionals who are sworn to protect us.
	I find that just absolutely right.
	She doesn't like Putin because Putin has outsmarted her at every step of the way.
	Excuse me.
	Putin has assaulted her in Syria.
	I do get to ask some questions.
	She has lipstick on her teeth.
	Or it's the blood of small children.
	The top national security officials of this country do believe that Russia has been behind these hacks.
	Even if you don't know for sure whether they are, do you condemn any interference by Russia in the American election?
	By Russia or anybody else?
	You condemn their interference?
	Of course I condemn.
	Of course I can.
	I don't know Putin.
	I have no idea.
	I never met Putin.
	This is not my best friend, but if the United States got along with Russia, wouldn't be so bad.
	Let me tell you, Putin has outsmarted her and Obama at every single step of the way.
	Whether it's Syria, you name it.
	People were mad because we were critical of him when he was doing poorly.
	It's because we know what Hillary is.
	You only discipline a child you care about.
	We wanted to see Trump improve.
	He's improved.
	They've allowed us to do this.
	They create warheads, and we can't.
	The Russians can't believe it.
	She has been outsmarted by Putin, and all you have to do is look at the Middle East.
	They've taken over.
	We've spent $6 trillion.
	They've taken over the Middle East.
	She has been outsmarted and outplayed worse than anybody I've ever seen in any government whatsoever.
	We're a long way away from immigration, but I'm going to let you finish this topic.
	You've got about 45 seconds.
	And she always will be.
	All right.
	I find it ironic that he's raising nuclear weapons.
	This is a person who has been very cavalier and casual about the use of nuclear weapons.
	He's advocated more countries getting them, Japan, Korea, even Saudi Arabia.
	He said, well, if we have them, why don't we use them, which I think is terrifying.
	But here's the deal.
	The bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order...
	It must be followed.
	There's about four minutes between the order being given and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so.
	And that's why ten people who have had that awesome responsibility have come out and in an unprecedented way said they would not trust Donald Trump with the nuclear codes or to have his finger on the nuclear button.
	I have 200 generals and admirals, 21 congressional Medal of Honor recipients.
	As far as Japan and other countries, we are being ripped off by everybody in the world.
	We're defending other countries.
	We are spending a fortune doing it.
	They have the bargain of the century.
	All I said is, we have to renegotiate these agreements because our country cannot afford to defend Saudi Arabia, Japan, Germany, South Korea, and many other places.
	We cannot continue to afford it.
	I don't want to defend Japan either.
	She took that as saying, nuclear weapons.
	Look, she's been proven to be a liar on so many different ways.
	This is just another lie.
	Well, I'm just quoting you.
	There's no quote.
	You're not going to find a quote from me.
	Interrupt.
	Trump interrupting.
	Competition in Asia, you said, you know, go ahead, enjoy yourselves, folks.
	That kind of language.
	And defend yourself.
	I didn't say nuclear.
	And defend yourself.
	The United States has kept the peace through our alliances.
	Donald wants to tear up our alliances.
	I think it makes the world safer, and frankly, it makes the United States safer.
	I would work with our allies in Asia, in Europe, in the Middle East, and elsewhere.
	I think we've got to.
	That's the only way we're going to be able to keep the peace.
	No, we are going to move on to the next topic, which is the economy.
	And I hope we handle that as well as we did immigration.
	You also have very different ideas about how to get the economy growing faster.
	Secretary Clinton, in your plan, government plays a big role.
	You see more government spending or entitlement.
	Thank you, Diesel.
	Mr.
	Trump, you want to get government out with lower taxes and less regulation.
	We're going to drill down into this a little bit more.
	But in this overview, please explain to me why you believe that your plan will create more jobs and growth for this country and your opponent's plan will not.
	In this round, you go for a Secretary Clinton.
	I think when the middle class thrives, America thrives.
	And so my plan is based on growing the economy, giving middle class families many more opportunities.
	I want us to have the biggest jobs program since World War II, jobs in infrastructure and advanced manufacturing.
	I think we can compete with high-wage countries, and I believe we should.
	new jobs and clean energy, not only to fight climate change, which is a serious problem, but to create new opportunities and new businesses.
	I want us to do more to help small business.
	That's where two-thirds of the new jobs are going to come from.
	I want us to raise the national minimum wage because people who live in poverty should not, who work full-time should not still be in poverty.
	And I sure do want to make sure women get equal pay for the work we do.
	I feel strongly that we have to have an education system that starts with preschool. - Through bottom bunts. - And goes through college.
	That's why I want more technical education in high schools and in community colleges.
	You can't do any of that!
	Well, that's like a portrait of Hillary and Huma.
	It's like when the escalators broke.
	You don't know how the hell to use it.
	That was gold.
	Families making less than $125,000.
	You will not get a tuition bill from a public college or university if the plan that I worked on with Bernie Sanders is enacted.
	And we're going to work hard to make sure that it is.
	Because we are going to go where the money is.
	Most of the gains in the last years since the Great Recession have gone to the very top.
	So we are going to have the wealthy pay their fair share.
	We're going to have corporations...
	Well, they pay half.
	that has been analyzed by independent experts, which said that it could produce 10 million new jobs.
	By contrast, Donald's plan has been analyzed to include it might lose 3.5 million jobs.
	Why?
	Because his whole plan is to cut taxes, to give the biggest tax breaks ever to the wealthy and to corporations, adding $20 trillion to our debt and causing the kind of dislocation Hillary wants open borders and to weaken the standing of American businesses with higher corporate tax rates.
	Do you have an idea how devastating that would be to an American economy?
	I'm not pro-protectionism.
	I'm not anti-free trade like Trump.
	I would like to see it occur fairly, but I'm the opposite of where he is on trade.
	But Hillary wants open borders and to put the American economy, American businesses, at a distinct disadvantage toward taxes.
	It's already the highest corporate tax rate in the industrialized world.
	Her tax plan is a disaster.
	And she can say all she wants about college tuition.
	And I'm a big proponent.
	We're going to do a lot of things for college tuition, but the rest of the public is going to be paying for it.
	We will have a massive, massive tax increase under Hillary Clinton's plan.
	But I'd like to start off where we left, because when I said Japan and Germany, and I'm not to single them out, but South Korea, these are very rich, powerful countries.
	Saudi Arabia, nothing but money.
	We protect Saudi Arabia.
	Why aren't they paying?
	She immediately, when she heard this, I questioned it.
	And I questioned NATO. Why aren't the NATO questioned?
	Why aren't they paying?
	Because they weren't paying.
	Since I did this, this was a year ago, all of a sudden they're paying.
	And I've been given a lot of credit for it.
	All of a sudden they're starting to pay up.
	They have to pay up.
	We're protecting people.
	They have to pay up.
	And I'm a big fan of NATO. But they have to pay up.
	He's not a big fan of NATO. We love our allies.
	We think our allies are great.
	Well, it's awfully hard to get them to pay up when you have somebody saying, we think how great they are.
	We have to tell Japan in a very nice way.
	We have to tell Germany, all of these countries, South Korea.
	We have to say, you have to help us out.
	We have, during his regime, during President Obama's regime, we've doubled our national debt.
	We're up to $20 trillion.
	Do you think this is enough of a performance to change the election?
	So my plan was to renegotiate trade deals.
	We're going to have a lot of free trade.
	We're going to have free trade.
	More free trade than we have.
	We have horrible deals.
	Our jobs are being taken out by the deal that her husband signed, NAFTA, one of the worst deals ever.
	And you have to keep in mind, this doesn't really help him so much in Pennsylvania, where they want higher corporate tax rates.
	Do you think there's anything to be gained by this being in Holmes, Brown, Arizona?
	It's in Nevada.
	Nevada?
	Oh, that's right.
	He's losing Nevada.
	Then we're going to terminate NAFTA and we're going to create new deals.
	We're going to have trade.
	But we're going to terminate it.
	We're going to make a great trade deal.
	And if we can't, we're going to go a separate way.
	See, let me tell you what.
	This means something to me if it gives specifics.
	I don't want to do away with NAFTA and become a protectionist.
	You can't say that you're against raising a minimum wage, but you're for tariffs or taxes on things incoming.
	If we eliminate NAFTA and he proposes a free trade agreement that's fair, I'm on board.
	I'm not on board with punishing businesses like Ford to go to Mexico.
	The fact is, he's going to advocate for the largest tax cuts we've ever seen.
	Three times more than the tax cuts under the Bush administration.
	I have said repeatedly throughout this campaign, I will not raise taxes on anyone making $250,000 or less.
	I also will not add a penny to the debt.
	I have costed out what I'm going to do.
	He will, through his massive tax cuts, add $20 trillion to the debt.
	Well, he mentioned the debt.
	We know how to get control of the debt.
	When my husband was president, we went from a $300 billion deficit to a $200 billion surplus, and we were actually on the path to eliminating the national debt.
	When President Obama came into office, he inherited the worst economic disaster since the Great Depression.
	He has cut the deficit by two-thirds.
	So yes, one of the ways you go after the debt, one of the ways you create jobs is by investing.
	So I do have investments, investments in new jobs, investments in education, skill training, and the opportunities for people to get ahead and stay ahead.
	That's the kind of approach that will work.
	Cutting taxes on the wealthy, we've tried that.
	It has not worked the way that...
	Shut up, Secretary.
	I want to pursue your plan, because in many ways it is similar to the Obama stimulus plan in 2009, which has led to the slowest GDP growth since 1949.
	Correct.
	Thank you, sir.
	You told me in July when we spoke that the problem is that President Obama didn't get to do enough in what he was trying to do with his stimulus.
	So is your plan basically even more of the Obama stimulus?
	Well, it's a combination, Chris.
	And let me say that when you inherit the level of economic catastrophe that President Obama inherited, It was a real touch-and-go situation.
	I was in the Senate before I became Secretary of State.
	I've never seen people as physically distraught as the Bush administration team was because of what was happening to the economy.
	I personally believe that the steps that President Obama took saved the economy.
	He doesn't get the credit he deserves for taking some very hard positions.
	But it was a terrible recession.
	So now we've dug ourselves out of it.
	We're standing, but we're not yet running.
	So what I am proposing is that we invest from the middle out and the ground up.
	Not the top-down.
	That is not going to work.
	No one wants to see your top-down, Hillary.
	That's why what I put forward doesn't add any to the debt.
	But it is the kind of approach that will enable more people to take those new jobs, higher-paying jobs.
	We're beginning to see some increase in incomes, and we certainly have had a long string of increasing jobs.
	We've got to do more to get the whole economy moving, and that's what I believe I will be able to do.
	Mr.
	Trump, even conservative economists who have looked at your plan say that the numbers don't add up.
	that your idea, and you've talked about 25 million jobs created, 4% growth is unrealistic.
	By the way, it's not sponsored by...
	And they say, you talk a lot about blowing the energy industry.
	They say with oil prices...
	They don't sponsor us, but they're helping us get through this.
	So I just left some high representatives of India They're growing at 8%.
	China is growing at 7%, and that for them is a catastrophically low number.
	We are growing.
	Our last report came out, and it's right around the 1% level, and I think it's going down.
	Last week, as you know, at the end of last week, they came out with an anemic jobs report, a terrible jobs report.
	In fact, I said, is that the last jobs report before the election?
	Because if it is, I should win easily.
	It was so bad.
	The report was so bad.
	The report was so bad.
	Our country is stagnant.
	We've lost our jobs.
	We've lost our businesses.
	Look at Hillary.
	She knows it's getting hot here.
	You know what this means?
	It's third beer time.
	Our product is pouring in from China, pouring in from Vietnam, pouring in from all over the world.
	I've visited so many communities.
	This has been such an incredible education for me, Chris.
	I've gotten to know so many.
	I've developed so many friends over the last year.
	And they cry when they see what's happened.
	I passed factories that were thriving 20, 25 years ago, and because of the bill that her husband signed and she blessed 100 percent, It is just horrible what's happened to these people in these communities.
	Now, she can say that her husband did well, but boy, did they suffer as NAFTA kicked in, because it didn't really kick in very much, but it kicked in after they left.
	Boy, did they suffer.
	That was one of the worst things that's ever been signed by a country.
	Now she wants to sign Trans-Pacific Partnership, and she wants it.
	She lied when she said she didn't call it the gold standard in one of the debates.
	She totally lied.
	She did call it the gold standard, and they actually failed.
	Okay.
	And they said I was right.
	I want to give you a chance to briefly speak to that, and then I want to pivot to one second.
	I want to talk about Bernie's taking dust.
	Go ahead.
	Briefly.
	Well, first, let me say, number one, when I saw the final agreement for TPP, I said I was against it.
	It didn't meet my test.
	I've had the same test.
	Does it create jobs, raise incomes, and That's because you've never employed anybody, You frigid bitch.
	And, you know, one of the biggest problems we have with China is the illegal dumping of steel into our markets.
	I have fought against that as a senator.
	I've stood up against it as secretary of state.
	Donald has bought Chinese steel and aluminum.
	In fact, the Trump hotel right here in Las Vegas was made with Chinese steel.
	So he goes around with crocodile tears about how terrible it is.
	But he has given jobs to Chinese steel workers, not American steel workers.
	Trump?
	That's the kind of approach that is just not going to work.
	We're going to pull the country together.
	We're going to have trade agreements that we enforce.
	That's why I'm going to have a trade prosecutor for the first time in history.
	And we're going to enforce those agreements.
	And we're going to look for businesses to help us by buying American products.
	I ask a simple question.
	She's been doing this for 30 years.
	Why the hell didn't you do it over the last 15, 20 years?
	You were very much involved.
	Excuse me.
	My turn.
	You were very much involved in every aspect of this country.
	Very much.
	And you do have experience.
	This is a strong point for him.
	The one thing you have over me is experience, but it's bad experience.
	Good for him to go with this.
	What you've done has turned out badly.
	For 30 years, you've been in a position to help.
	And if you say that I use steel or I use something else...
	I make it impossible for me to do that.
	I wouldn't mind.
	The problem is you talk, but you don't get anything done, Hillary.
	You don't.
	Just like when you ran the State Department, $6 billion was missing.
	How do you miss $6 billion?
	You ran the State Department, $6 billion was either stolen, they don't know.
	It's gone.
	$6 billion.
	If you become president, this country is going to be in some mess.
	Believe me.
	Well, first of all, what he just said about the State Department is not only untrue, it's been debunked numerous times.
	Two drinks.
	You have to take two.
	I just took two.
	I think it's really an important issue.
	He raised the 30 years of experience.
	Let me just talk briefly about that.
	You know, back in the 1970s, I worked for the Children's Defense Fund, and I was taking on discrimination against African-American kids in schools.
	I am now.
	He was getting...
	Here's something I will say here.
	She's going personal more than he is.
	That's a first.
	I do notice that.
	He's talked about policy, trade, economy.
	He didn't rent to black kids.
	That said, he makes it really easy.
	Yeah, it's true.
	You can't say, let's go back to the issues, we've been tweeting about Miss Universal Night.
	But this is the first time she's done it.
	Yes.
	Give me a second.
	When I was in the Situation Room monitoring the raid that brought Osama Bin Laden to justice, he was hosting the Celebrity Apprentice.
	So I'm happy to compare my 30 years of experience, what I've done for this country, trying to help every way I could, especially kids and families, get ahead and stay ahead with your 30 years, and I'll let the American people make that decision.
	Well, I think I did a much better job.
	I built a massive company, a great company, some of the greatest assets anywhere in the world, worth many, many billions of dollars.
	I started with a $1 million loan.
	I agree with that.
	It's a $1 million loan.
	But I built a phenomenal company.
	And if we could run our country the way I've run my company, we would have a country.
	He looks like Stephen Hawking.
	He would even be proud of it.
	Bankruptcy.
	When you look at her real record, take a look at Syria.
	Take a look at the migration.
	Take a look at Libya.
	Take a look at Iraq.
	She gave us ISIS because her and Obama gave it this huge vacuum.
	And a small group came out of that huge vacuum because we should have never been in Iraq.
	But once we were there, we should have never got out the way they wanted to get out.
	She gave us ISIS to assure us you are sitting there.
	And what happened is now ISIS is in 32 countries.
	And now I listen to how she's going to get rid of ISIS. She's going to get rid of nobody.
	All right.
	We are going to get to foreign hot spots.
	To be fair, she did eradicate Bill Clinton from the bedroom.
	Next segment is fitness to be president of the United States.
	When she puts her mind to it.
	Mr.
	Trump at the last debate.
	You said your talk about grabbing women was just that talk and that you'd never actually done it.
	And since then, as we all know, nine women have come forward and said that you either booked them or kissed them without their consent.
	Why would so many different women from so many different circumstances over so many different years, why would they all in this last couple of weeks Make up.
	You deny this.
	Why would they all make up these stories?
	And since this is a question for both of you, Secretary Clinton, Mr.
	Trump says what your husband did and that you defended was even worse.
	Mr.
	Trump, you go first.
	First of all, those stories have been largely debunked.
	Those people, I don't know those people.
	I have a feeling how they came.
	I believe it was her campaign that did it.
	Just like if you look at what came out today on the clips, where I was wondering what happened with my rally in Chicago and other rallies where we had such violence.
	She's the one in Obama that caused the violence.
	They hired people, they paid them $1,500, and they're on tape saying, be violent, cause fights, do bad things.
	Democrats are.
	I would say the only way, because those stories are all total false, I have to say that.
	The fact checkers are going to sidestep it and say false.
	Hillary and Obama didn't.
	Members of the DNC did.
	That's a bit of a missed opportunity.
	I didn't see these women.
	These women, the woman on the plane, I think they want either fame or her campaign did it.
	And I think it's her campaign.
	Because what I saw, what they did, which is a criminal act, by the way, where they're telling people to go out and start fistfights and start violence.
	And I'll tell you what, in particular in Chicago...
	People were hurt and people could have been killed in that riot.
	And that was now all on tape, started by her.
	I believe, Chris, that she got these people to step forward.
	If it wasn't, they got their ten minutes of fame.
	But they were all totally, it was all fiction.
	It was lies and it was fiction.
	So those things where you should set up in a way that makes people think it could be but without ever actually saying it.
	The overreach is a little too much.
	And after that, a number of women have come forward saying that's exactly what he did to them.
	Now, what was his response?
	Well, he held a number of big rallies where he said that he could not possibly have done those things to those women because they were not attractive enough for...
	I did not say that.
	I did not say that.
	In fact, he went on to say...
	Sir, her two minutes.
	But did not say that.
	It's her two minutes.
	He went on to say, look at her.
	Drink.
	I don't think so.
	About another woman, he said, that wouldn't be my first choice.
	He attacked the woman reporter writing the story, called her disgusting, as he has called...
	A number of women during this campaign.
	Donald thinks belittling women makes him bigger.
	He goes after their dignity, their self-worth, and I don't think there is a woman anywhere who doesn't know what that feels like.
	So we now know what Donald thinks and what he says and how he acts toward women.
	That's who Donald is.
	I think it's really up to all of us to demonstrate who we are and who our country is.
	And to stand up and...
	It's hard for her to get through this.
	You know she's stumbling.
	She's replacing Bill with Donald.
	How we want to bring our country together.
	It's difficult.
	Where we don't want to have the kind of pitting of people one against the other.
	And she's replacing the New York Times, someone who came forward with interns who are sodomized by my husband.
	And we make our country even greater.
	America is great because America is good.
	And it really is up to all of us to make that true now and in the future, and particularly for our children and our grandchildren.
	Mr.
	Trump, nobody has more respect for women than I do.
	Stop it.
	Nobody has more respect.
	And frankly, those stories have been largely debunked.
	And I really want to just talk about something slightly different.
	She mentions this, which is all fiction, all fictionalized, probably or possibly started by her and her very sleazy campaign.
	But I will tell you, What isn't fictionalized are her emails, where she destroyed 33,000 emails criminally, criminally, after getting a subpoena from the United States Congress.
	What happened to the FBI? I don't know.
	We have a great general, four-star general, today, you read it in all the papers, going to potentially serve five years in jail.
	She should have come out and said that 3,000 emails symbolically for every life lost could have gone violence.
	Symbolism!
	Pass.
	He's going to probably go to jail.
	This is a four-star general.
	And she gets away with it, and she can run for the presidency of the United States?
	He's right.
	That's really what you should be talking about.
	Not fiction, where somebody wants fame or where they come out of her crooked campaign.
	Secretary Clinton.
	Well, every time...
	Donald is pushed on something which is obviously uncomfortable, like what these women are saying.
	He immediately goes to denying responsibility.
	And it's not just about women.
	He never apologizes or says he's sorry for anything.
	So we know what he has said and what he's done to women.
	He used to say that, but now he has to apologize.
	But he also went after a disabled reporter, mocked and mimicked him on national television.
	Oh, I don't remember!
	He went after Mr.
	and Mrs.
	Khan, the parents of a young man who died serving our country, a Gold Star family because of their religion.
	He went after John McCain, a prisoner of war, said he prefers people who aren't captured.
	He went after a federal judge born in Indiana, but who Donald said couldn't be trusted to try the fraud and racketeering case against Trump University because his parents were Mexican.
	So, it's not one thing.
	This is a pattern.
	A pattern of divisiveness, of a very dark and, in many ways, dangerous vision of our country where he incites violence, where he applauds people who are...
	Pushing and pulling and punching at his rallies.
	That is not who America is.
	And I hope that as we move in the last weeks of this campaign, more and more people will understand what's at stake in this election.
	It really does come down to what kind of country we are going to have.
	You know, I'm so sad when she talks about violence at my rallies, and she caused the violence.
	It's on tape.
	The other things are false, but honestly, I'd love to talk about getting rid of ISIS. And I'd love to talk about other things.
	But those other charges, as you know, in this bucket about fitness to be president, there's been a lot of developments over the last 10 days since the last debate.
	I'd like to ask you about them.
	These are questions that the American people have.
	Secretary Clinton.
	Tweet it.
	During your 2009 Senate confirmation hearing, you promised to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest with your dealing with the Clinton Foundation while you were Secretary of State.
	But emails show that donors got special access to you.
	Those seeking grants for Haiti relief were considered separately from non-donors, and some of those donors got...
	Contract, government contracts, taxpayer money.
	Can you really say that you kept your pledge to that Senate committee?
	And why isn't what happened and what went on between you and the Clinton Foundation?
	Why isn't it what Mr.
	Trump calls...
	Everything I did as Secretary of State was in furtherance of...
	Our country's interests and our values.
	The State Department has said that.
	I think that's been proven.
	But I am happy.
	In fact, I am thrilled to talk about the Clinton Foundation because it is a world-renowned charity.
	And I am so proud of the work that it does.
	You know, I could talk for the rest of the debate.
	I know I don't have the time to do that.
	But just briefly, the Clinton Foundation made it possible for 11 million people around the world with HIV-AIDS to afford treatment.
	And that's about half of all the people in the world who are getting treatment.
	In partnership with the American Health Association, we have made environments and schools healthier for kids, including healthier lunches.
	Secretary Clinton, respectfully, this is an open discussion.
	Well, it is an open discussion.
	I understand, and this specific question went to pay for play.
	Do you want to talk about that?
	Well, but there is no evidence, but there is a lot of evidence about the very good work and the high rankings.
	Please let Mr.
	Trump speak.
	It's a criminal enterprise.
	Saudi Arabia giving $25 million.
	Qatar, all of these countries.
	You talk about women and women's rights.
	So, these are people that push gays off buildings.
	These are people that kill women and treat women horribly.
	They push the homos.
	They push those fags off the building.
	Cravely, they're gone.
	Why don't you give back the money that you've taken from certain countries that treat certain groups of people...
	So horribly.
	Why don't you give back the money?
	I think it would be a great gesture.
	Because she takes a tremendous amount of money.
	And you take a look at the people of Haiti.
	I was at a little Haiti the other day in Florida.
	And I want to tell you, they hate the Clintons.
	Because what's happened in Haiti with the Clinton Foundation is a disgrace.
	I would just love Hillary, to be honest one second, and say...
	And everybody knows it.
	I did kind of screw Haiti.
	I did kind of screw Haiti.
	One for you, Trump.
	90%.
	Of all the money that is donated on behalf of programs of people around the world and in our own country.
	I'm very proud of that.
	We have the highest rating from the watchdogs that follow foundations.
	And I'd be happy to compare what we do with the Trump Foundation, which took money from other people and bought a six-foot portrait of Donald.
	I mean, who does that?
	It just was astonishing.
	But when it comes to Haiti, Haiti is the poorest country in our hemisphere.
	The earthquake and the hurricanes, it has devastated Haiti.
	Bill and I have been involved in trying to help Haiti for many years.
	The Clinton Foundation raised $30 million to help Haiti after the catastrophic earthquake and all of the terrible problems the people there had.
	We've done things to help small businesses, agriculture, and so much else.
	And we're going to keep working to help Haiti because it's an important part of the American experience.
	They don't want you to help them anymore.
	I'd like to mention one thing.
	Trump Foundation, small foundation.
	People contribute.
	I contribute.
	The money goes 100%.
	100% goes to different charities, including a lot of military.
	I don't get anything.
	I don't buy boats.
	I don't buy planes.
	What happens?
	Wasn't some of the money used to settle your lawsuit, sir?
	No, we put up the American flag, and that's it.
	They put up the American flag.
	We fought for the right in Palm Beach to put up the American flag.
	Penalty that was imposed by Palm Beach County, and the money came from your foundation.
	And by the way, the money went to Fisher House, where they build houses.
	The money that you're talking about went to Fisher House, where they build houses for veterans and disabled people.
	I want to get into one last...
	But of course, there's no way we can know whether any of that is true, because he hasn't released...
	I don't remember!
	...the first candidate ever to run for president.
	In the last 40-plus years who has not released his tax returns.
	So everything he says about charity or anything else, we can't prove it.
	You can look at our tax returns.
	We've got them all out there.
	But what is really troubling is that we learned in the last debate he has not paid a penny in federal income tax.
	And we were talking about immigrants a few minutes ago, Chris.
	You know, half of all immigrants, undocumented immigrants in our country, actually pay Federal income tax.
	So we have undocumented immigrants in America who are paying more federal income tax than a billionaire.
	I find that just astonishing.
	So let me just tell you very simply, we're entitled, because of the laws that people like her pass, to take massive amounts of depreciation on other charges, and we do it.
	And all of her donors, just about all of them, I know Buffett took hundreds of millions of dollars, Soros, George Soros, took hundreds of millions of dollars.
	Let me just explain.
	All of her donors, most of her You know what you should have done?
	You should have changed the law when you were a United States senator.
	Because your donors and your special interests are doing the same thing as I do, except even more so.
	You should have changed the law, but you won't change the law because you've taken so much money.
	I mean, I sat in my apartment today On a very beautiful hotel down the street known as Trump.
	Made with Chinese steel.
	But I will tell you, I sat there.
	I sat there watching ad after ad after ad.
	False ad.
	All paid for by your friends on Wall Street that gave so much money because they know you're going to protect them.
	And frankly, you should have changed the law.
	If you don't like what I did, you should have changed the law.
	Mr.
	Trump, I want to ask you about one last question in this topic.
	Here's the problem.
	You have been These two only 11 months ago were hanging out at cocktail parties together.
	Don't make any mistake.
	I'm enjoying this show.
	I don't trust any of them.
	Yeah.
	Also, that grin, I would never take Hillary to a comedy club.
	This is ruining for me.
	It was on possibilities.
	Not after now.
	Not after now.
	No more.
	I can't speak anyways.
	I want to ask you here on this stage tonight, do you make the same commitment that you will absolutely, sir, that you will absolutely accept the result of this election?
	I will look at it at the time.
	I'm not looking at anything now.
	I'll look at it at the time.
	What I've seen, what I've seen is so bad.
	First of all, the media is so dishonest and so corrupt and the pylon is so amazing.
	The New York Times actually wrote an article about it that they don't even care.
	It's so dishonest, and they've poisoned the minds of the voters.
	It's important enough, though.
	Donald Trump was citing the New York Times against Ted Cruz.
	I think they're going to see it.
	We'll find out on November, but I think they're going to see it.
	But, sir, there's a...
	If you look...
	Excuse me, Chris.
	If you look at your voter rolls, you will see...
	Millions of people that are registered to vote.
	Millions.
	This isn't coming from me.
	This is coming from Pure Reports.
	He needs to be able to prove this because they will fact check this.
	He just put a hard number on it.
	Millions of people that are registered to vote.
	That shouldn't be registered to vote.
	Let me just give you one other thing.
	That doesn't mean that they're fake or fraudulent.
	For example, if you move from Michigan somewhere else for like a daily show, you're no longer supposed to actually be registered to vote there.
	That's included in the number.
	So you need to know the real number.
	And just in that respect, I say it's rigged.
	Because she should never have been allowed to run for the presidency based on what she did with emails and so many other things.
	But sir, there is a tradition in this country.
	He should stay rigged with the media.
	Is the peaceful transition of power and that no matter how hard fought a campaign is, that at the end of the campaign, that the loser concedes to the winner.
	Not saying that you're necessarily going to be the loser or the winner, but that the loser concedes to the winner and that the country comes together in part for the good of the country.
	Are you saying you're not prepared now to commit to that principle?
	What I'm saying is that I will tell you at the time.
	I'll keep you in suspense.
	Well, Chris, let me respond to that because that's horrifying.
	You know, every time Donald thinks things are not going in his direction, he claims whatever it is is rigged against him.
	The FBI conducted a year-long investigation into my emails.
	They concluded there was no case.
	He said the FBI was rigged.
	He lost the Iowa caucus.
	He lost the Wisconsin primary.
	He said the Republican primary was rigged against him.
	Then Trump University gets sued for fraud and racketeering.
	He claims the court system and the federal judge is rigged against him.
	There was even a time when he didn't get an Emmy for his TV program three years in a row, and he started tweeting that the Emmys were rigged.
	I should have gotten it.
	This is a mindset.
	This is how Donald thinks.
	And it's funny, but it's also really troubling.
	That is not the way our democracy works.
	We've been around for 240 years.
	We've had free and fair elections.
	We've accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them.
	And that is what must be expected of anyone standing on a debate stage during a general election.
	You know, President Obama said the other day, when you're whining before the game is even finished, it just shows you're not up to doing the job.
	And let's be clear about what he is saying and what that means.
	He is denigrating.
	He's talking down our democracy.
	And I, for one, am appalled that somebody who is the nominee of one of our two major parties Would take that kind of position.
	I think what the FBI did and what the Department of Justice did, including meeting with her husband, the Attorney General, in the back of an airplane on the tarmac in Arizona, I think it's disgraceful.
	I think it's a disgrace.
	I think we've never had a situation so bad.
	Hold on, folks.
	This doesn't do any good for anyone.
	Let's please continue the debate and let's move on to the subject of foreign hotspots.
	The Iraqi offensive to take back Mosul has begun.
	If they are successful in pushing ISIS out of that city and out of all of Iraq, the question then becomes what happens the day after?
	And that's something that whichever of you ends up, whoever of you ends up as president, is going to have to confront.
	Will you put US troops into that vacuum to make sure that ISIS doesn't come back or isn't replaced by something even worse?
	Secretary Clinton, you go first in this segment.
	You have two minutes.
	Well, I am encouraged that there is an effort led by the Iraqi army supported by Kurdish forces and also given the help and advice from the number of special forces and other Americans on the ground.
	But I will not support putting American soldiers into Iraq as an occupying force.
	I don't think that is in our interest, and I don't think that would be smart to do.
	In fact, I think that would be a big red flag waving for ISIS to reconstitute itself.
	The goal here is to take back Mosul.
	It's going to be a hard fight.
	I've got no illusions about that.
	And then continue to press into Syria to begin to take back and move on Raqqa, which is the ISIS headquarters.
	I am hopeful that the hard work that American military advisors have done will pay off and that we will see a really successful military operation.
	But we know we've got lots of work to do.
	Syria will remain a hotbed of terrorism as long as The Civil War, aided and abetted by the Iranians and the Russians, continue.
	So I have said, look, we need to keep our eye on ISIS. That's why I want to have an intelligence surge that protects us here at home.
	Why we have to go after them from the air, on the ground, online.
	Why we have to make sure here at home we don't let terrorists buy weapons.
	If you're too dangerous to fly, you're too dangerous to buy a gun.
	And I'm going to continue to push for a no-fly zone and safe havens within Syria, not only to help protect the Syrians and prevent the constant outflow of refugees, but to frankly gain some leverage on the Syrian government and the Russians so that perhaps but to frankly gain some leverage on the Syrian government and the Russians so that perhaps we can have the kind of serious negotiation necessary to bring the conflict to an end and Mr. Trump, same question.
	If we are able to push ISIS out of Mosul and out of Iraq, would you be willing to put U.S. troops in there to prevent their return?
	Let me tell you, Mosul's so sad.
	We had Mosul.
	But when she left, when she took everybody out, we lost Mosul.
	Now we're fighting again to get Mosul.
	The problem with Mosul and what they wanted to do is they wanted to get the leaders of ISIS who they felt were in Mosul.
	We're just playing Jeopardy.
	Gary Johnson right now is going to his campaign manager.
	I wouldn't trust Gary Johnson with a game of Family Feud.
	Much less Jeopardy.
	I've been learning about going after Mosul now for about, how long is it, Hillary?
	Three months?
	These people have all left.
	They've all left.
	The element of surprise.
	Douglas MacArthur, George Hatton spinning in their graves when they see the stupidity of our country.
	So we're now fighting for most of them.
	I love how someone just tweeted out, I'm with her, Stephen Crowder.
	They clearly haven't been watching.
	If at any point we objectively say, ah, this isn't a good answer from Trump, you're working for Hillary!
	This isn't the stream for you.
	And they want to look tough.
	They want to look good.
	He violated the red line in the sand.
	We missed it, let me tell you.
	And he made so many mistakes.
	Made all mistakes.
	That's why we have the great migration.
	But she wanted to look good for the election.
	So they're going in.
	But who's going to get muscle, really?
	We'll take Mosul eventually.
	By the way, if you look at what's happening, much tougher than they thought.
	Much, much tougher, much more dangerous, going to be more deaths than they thought.
	But the leaders that we wanted to get are all done.
	Thanks, Melissa Standish.
	Glad you're enjoying the debate.
	So what do we need this for?
	So Mosul is going to be a wonderful thing, and Iran should write us a letter of thank you, just like the really stupid, the stupidest deal of all time.
	A deal that's going to give Iran absolutely nuclear weapons.
	Iran should write us yet another letter saying thank you very much.
	Because Iran, as I said many years ago, Iran is taking over Iraq.
	Something they've wanted to do forever, but we've made it so easy for them.
	So we're now going to take Mosul.
	And you know who's going to be the beneficiary?
	Iran.
	Boy, are they making...
	I mean, they are outsmarting...
	Look, you're not there.
	You might be involved in that decision, but you were there when you took everybody out of Mosul and out of Iraq.
	You shouldn't have been in Iraq, but you did vote for it.
	You shouldn't have been in Iraq, but once you were in Iraq, you should have never left the way.
	The point is, the big winner is going to be Iran.
	Well, you know, once again, Donald is implying that he didn't support the invasion of Iraq.
	Let's talk about how you thought that was a bad deal anyways.
	I said it was a mistake.
	I said that years ago.
	He has consistently denied what is a very clear fact that before the invasion, he supported it.
	And, you know, I just want everybody to go Google it.
	Google Donald Trump Iraq, and you will see the dozens of sources which verify that he was for the invasion of Iraq.
	And you can actually hear the audio of him saying that.
	Now, why does that matter?
	Well, it matters because he has not told the truth about that position.
	I guess he believes it makes him look better now, to contrast with me, because I did vote for it.
	But what's really important here is to understand all the interplay.
	Mosul is a Sunni city.
	Did I miss any drink-worthy offenses?
	Mosul is on the border of Syria.
	And, yes, we do need to go after Baghdadi, just like we went after bin Laden.
	Did you not speak while I was gone?
	We need to get rid of them, get rid of their fighters.
	They're estimated several thousand fighters in Mosul.
	They've been digging underground.
	They've been prepared to defend.
	It's going to be tough fighting, but I think we can take back Mosul and then we can move on into Syria and take back Raqqa.
	This is what we have to do.
	I'm just amazed that he seems to think that the Iraqi government and our allies and everybody else launched the attack on Mosul to help me in this election.
	But that's how Donald thinks, you know?
	He always is looking for some conspiracy.
	Chris, we don't gain anything.
	Iran is taking over Iran.
	Secretary Clinton, it's an open discussion.
	Secretary, please let Mr.
	Trump speak.
	Go ahead.
	You are the one that's unfit.
	You know, WikiLeaks just actually came out.
	John Podesta...
	He said some horrible things about you.
	And boy, was he right.
	He said some beauties.
	And you know, Bernie Sanders, he said you have bad judgment.
	You do.
	And if you think that going into Mosul, after we let the world know we're going in, and all of the people that we really wanted, the leaders, they're all gone.
	If you think that was good, then you do.
	Now, John Podesta said you have terrible instincts.
	Bernie Sanders said you have bad judgment.
	I agree with both.
	Well, you should ask Bernie Sanders who he's supporting for president, and he has said, as he has campaigned for me around the country, you are the most dangerous person to run for president in the modern history of America.
	I think he's right.
	In a sexy nurse outfit in a dungeon.
	That's got enough, America!
	Mr.
	Trump, in the last debate, you were both asking about the situation in the Syrian city of Aleppo.
	I want to follow up on that because...
	That's racist!
	News to me!
	Have you seen it?
	Have you seen it?
	Have you seen what's happened?
	I missed it.
	Okay, so it hasn't fallen.
	Take a look at it.
	Well, there are 40 million people still living there and being slaughtered.
	And they are being slaughtered because of bad decisions.
	If I may just finish here.
	And you also said that Syria and Russia are busy...
	Fighting ISIS. In fact, they have been the ones who've been bombing and shelling eastern Aleppo.
	And they just announced a humanitarian pause, in effect, admitting that they have been bombing and shelling Aleppo.
	Would you like to clear that up?
	Well, Aleppo is a disaster.
	It's a humanitarian nightmare.
	But it has fallen from any standpoint.
	I mean, what do you need?
	A signed document?
	Take a look at Aleppo.
	It is so sad when you see what's happening.
	I know this one.
	He's hitting his head with a Vans off the wall.
	That was my skull, man!
	It's like when you're watching reruns of Jeopardy and you're like, I know this question.
	I know this one.
	He's just much tougher and much smarter.
	Than her and Obama.
	And everyone thought he was gone two years ago, three years ago.
	He aligned with Russia.
	He now also aligned with Iran, who we made very powerful.
	We gave them $150 billion back.
	We give them $1.7 billion in cash.
	I mean, cash.
	Bundles of cash as big as it is.
	I didn't mention that.
	We gave them $1.7 billion.
	Now, they have aligned.
	He has aligned with Russia.
	And with Iran.
	They don't want ISIS, but they have other things because we're backing rebels.
	We don't know who the rebels are.
	We're giving them lots of money, lots of everything.
	We don't know who the rebels are.
	And when and if, and it's not going to happen because you have Russia and you have Iran now, but if they ever did overthrow Assad, you might end up with as bad as Assad is.
	And he's a bad guy.
	But you may very well end up with worse than Assad.
	If she did nothing, we'd be in much better shape.
	And this is what's caused the Great Migration, where she's taken in tens of thousands of Syrian refugees who probably, in many cases, not probably, who are definitely, in many cases, ISIS-aligned.
	And we now have them in our country.
	And wait till you see.
	This is going to be the great Trojan horse.
	And wait till you see what happens in the coming years.
	Thanks a lot for doing a great job.
	Secretary Clinton, you have talked about, and in the last debate, and again today, that you would impose a no-fly zone to try to protect the people of Aleppo and to stop the killing there.
	He's not doing badly, but this isn't enough to convince the people who aren't already on the Trump train.
	Yeah, and it's also not topics that he...
	Gunsberg, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, says, you impose a no-fly zone, chances are you're going to get into a war, his words, with Syria and Russia.
	So the question I have is, if you impose a no-fly zone, first of all, how do you respond to their concerns?
	Secondly, if you impose a no-fly zone and a Russian plane violates that, does President Clinton shoot that plane down?
	Well, Chris, first of all, I think a no-fly zone could save lives and could hasten the end of the conflict.
	I am well aware of the really legitimate concerns that you have expressed from both the President and the General.
	This would not be done just on the first day.
	This would take a lot of negotiation.
	It would also take making it clear to the Russians and the Syrians That our purpose here was to provide safe zones on the ground.
	We've had millions of people leave Syria, and those millions of people inside Syria who've been dislocated.
	So I think we could strike a deal and make it very clear...
	to the Russians and the Syrians that this was something that we believe was in the best interests of the people on the ground in Syria.
	It would help us with our fight against ISIS.
	But I want to respond to what Donald said about refugees.
	Do you notice they're saying ISIS now?
	They've stopped trying to push ISIL. I've always thought Obama was the only one really sticking with that.
	It's like he was left out of the memo.
	No, they all left did.
	And that was the one thing that really bothered me about Fiorina.
	She started using ISIL for a while.
	I never heard that.
	Really?
	Yeah.
	Oh, four-year-old boy!
	She's talking about guns with toddlers.
	Especially if he had a Sig Sauer.
	Internal challenges.
	Also the name of the Bill Clinton tell-all.
	My wife, Beer Winch, didn't like that one.
	Sorry, Dad.
	Dozens of people at the nightclub in Orlando, the Pulse nightclub, was born in Queens, the same place Donald was born.
	So let's be clear about what the threat is and how we are best going to be able to meet it.
	And yes, some of that threat emanates from over in Syria and Iraq, and we've got to keep fighting, and I will defeat ISIS. And some of it is we have to up our game and be much smarter here.
	I want to get into our final segment.
	But I just have to.
	It's so ridiculous.
	She will defeat ISIS. We should have never let ISIS happen in the first place.
	Shut up.
	We need to watch the debate.
	Wait one second.
	They had a ceasefire three weeks ago.
	A ceasefire.
	United States, Russia.
	During the ceasefire, Russia took over vast swatches of land.
	And then they said, we don't want the ceasefire anymore.
	We are so outplayed on missiles, on ceasefires.
	They are outplayed.
	Now, she wasn't there.
	I assume she had nothing to do with it.
	But our country is so outplayed by Putin and Assad and, by the way, and by Iran.
	Nobody can believe how stupid our leadership is.
	Mr.
	Trump, Secretary Clinton, we need to move on to our final segment, and that is the national debt, which has not been discussed until tonight.
	Our national debt is a share of the economy.
	Our GDP is now 77%.
	That's the highest since just after World War II. But the Nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget says, Secretary Clinton, under your plan, To me, this is a pointless segment.
	I watched the debates with McCain and Obama a couple nights ago.
	They both talked on and on and on about how they would reduce all the debt.
	Really 1%, which is what it is now, and if she got in, it'll be less than zero.
	But we're bringing it from 1% up to 4%, and I actually think we can go higher than 4%.
	I think you can go to 5% or 6%.
	And if we do, you don't have to bother asking your question, because we have a tremendous machine.
	We will have created a tremendous economic machine once again.
	To do that, we're taking back jobs.
	We're not going to let our companies be raided by other countries where we lose all our jobs.
	We don't make our product anymore.
	That's not true, though.
	It's very sad.
	It's not true.
	But I'm going to create a kind of a country that we were from the standpoint of industry.
	We used to be there.
	We've given it up.
	We've become very, very sloppy.
	We've had people that are political hacks.
	Making the biggest deals in the world.
	Bigger than companies.
	You take these big companies.
	These trade deals are far bigger than these companies.
	And yet we don't use our great leaders, many of whom back me and many of whom back Hillary, I must say.
	But we don't use those people.
	He's gone from Secretary Clinton to Hillary because she kept saying Donald.
	Tonight it's only Hillary, Hillary, Hillary.
	Was he saying Secretary before?
	No, he said Secretary, good, because I want you to be very happy.
	Remember?
	I do remember that.
	The position, because they made a campaign contribution.
	And they're dealing with China and people that are very much smarter than they are.
	So we have to use our great people.
	But, with that being said, we will create an economic machine, the likes of which we haven't seen in many decades.
	And people, Chris, will again go back to work, and they'll make a lot of money, and we'll have companies that will grow and expand and start from new.
	Secretary Clinton.
	Well, first, when I hear Donald talk like that and know that his slogan is Make America Great Again, I wonder when he thought America was great.
	And before he rushes and says, you know, before you and President Obama were there, I think it's important to recognize that he has been criticizing our government for decades.
	Back in 1987, he took out a $100,000 ad in the New York Times during the time when President Reagan was president and basically said exactly what he just said now, that we were the laughing stock of the world.
	He was criticizing President Reagan.
	This is the way Donald thinks about himself.
	But you hate President Reagan.
	This is what I hate about these debates.
	Neither one of them are in January.
	They're just trying to score points.
	I don't see what the point is, and it is for her.
	I pay for everything I'm proposing.
	I do not add a penny to the national debt.
	I take that very seriously because I do think it's one of the issues we've got to come to grips with.
	So when I talk about how we're going to pay for education, how we're going to invest in infrastructure, how we're going to get the cost of prescription drugs down, and a lot of the other issues that people talk to me about all the time, I've made it very clear.
	We are going where the money is.
	We are going to...
	Ask the wealthy and corporations to pay their fair share.
	And there is no evidence whatsoever that that will slow down or diminish our growth.
	In fact, I think just the opposite.
	We'll have what economists call middle-out growth.
	We've got to get back to rebuilding the middle class, the families of America.
	That's where growth will come from.
	That's why I want to invest in you.
	I want to invest in your family.
	And I think that's the smartest way to grow the economy, to make the economy fairer.
	And we just have a big disagreement about this.
	It may be because of our experiences.
	You know, he started off with his dad as a millionaire.
	I started off with my dad as a small businessman.
	I think it's a difference that affects how we see the world and what we want to do with the economy.
	Thank you, Hillary.
	Could I just respond?
	Well, no.
	Because I did disagree with Ronald Reagan very strongly on trade.
	I disagreed with him.
	We should have been much tougher on trade even then.
	I've been waiting for years.
	Nobody does it right.
	Similar to Trump on trade.
	See the Harley-Davidson AMF days.
	He protected Harley when they sucked.
	And that really bothered me about Reagan because people should have been able to get Hondas and Yamahas for less expensive.
	The biggest driver of our debt is entitlements, which is 60%.
	Of all federal spending.
	Now, the Committee for Responsible Federal Budget has looked at both of your plans, and they say neither of you has a serious plan that is going to solve the fact that Medicare is going to run out of money in the 2020s, Social Security is going to run out of money in the 2030s, and at that time, recipients are going to take huge cuts in their benefits.
	In effect, the final question I want to ask you in this regard is...
	I said this as soon as he said it.
	Let me start with you, Mr.
	Trump.
	Guess what's trending?
	Would President Trump make a deal to save Medicare and Social Security that included...
	What did he say that I said would be considered racist?
	Oh, the, uh, the, uh...
	Bad hombres.
	I'm cutting taxes.
	We're going to grow the economy.
	It's going to grow at a record rate.
	But that's not going to help an entitlement.
	It's going to totally help you.
	And one thing we have to do?
	Repeal and replace the disaster known as Obamacare.
	It's destroying our country.
	It's destroying our businesses, our small business, and our big businesses.
	We have to repeal and replace Obamacare.
	You take a look at the kind of numbers that that will cost us in the year 17.
	It is a disaster if we don't repeal and replace.
	Now, it's probably going to die of its own weight.
	But Obamacare has to go.
	The premiums are going up 60%, 70%, 80%.
	Next year they're going to go up over 100%.
	And I'm really glad that the premiums have started.
	At least the people see what's happening.
	Because she wants to keep Obamacare.
	And she wants to make it even worse.
	And it can't get any worse.
	Bad health care and the most expensive price.
	This is important.
	Because they're both pandering.
	But Hillary is pandering to people who don't pay for health care.
	Donald Trump is pandering to working Americans.
	That's important to know.
	Any working American who pays for healthcare knows that what he just said is true.
	Anyone who expects us, you and I, the taxpayer, to pay for it, wants to support Hillary Clinton.
	That's a pivotal difference.
	Well, Chris, I am on record as saying that we need to put more money into the Social Security Trust Fund.
	That's part of my commitment to raise taxes on the wealthy.
	My Social Security payroll contribution will go up, as will Donald's, assuming he can't figure out how to get out of it.
	But what we want to do is to replenish the Social Security Trust Fund by making sure that we have sufficient resources.
	And that will come from...
	Either raising the cap and or finding other ways to get more money into it.
	I will not cut benefits.
	How do you make a wife beater look so funny?
	I want to enhance benefits for low-income workers and for women who have been disadvantaged by the current Social Security system.
	But what Donald is proposing with these massive tax cuts will result in a $20 trillion additional national debt.
	That will have dire consequences for Social Security and Medicare.
	And I'll say something about the Affordable Care Act, which he wants to repeal.
	The Affordable Care Act extended the solvency of the Medicare trust fund.
	So if he repeals it, our Medicare problem gets worse.
	What we need to do is go after the long-term health care drivers.
	That means that Medicare has been raided, and now they're trying to fill that hole.
	They're trying to plug that hole, that sinking ship, with money from subsidized Obamacare, which, by the way, is a disaster.
	The final time, probably to both of your delight, that you're going to be on the stage together in this campaign.
	I would like to end it on a positive note.
	You had not agreed to closing statements, but it seems to me in a funny way that might make it more interesting because you haven't prepared closing statements.
	So I'd like you each to take it.
	We're going to put a clock up a minute.
	As the final question and the final debate to tell the American people why they should elect you to be the next president, this is another new mini-segment.
	Secretary Clinton, it's your turn to go first.
	Well, I would like to say to everyone watching tonight that I'm reaching out to all Americans, Democrats, Republicans, and Independents, because we need everybody to help make our country what it should be, to grow the economy, to make it fairer, to make it work for everyone.
	We need your talents, your skills, your commitment, your energy, your ambition.
	You know, I've been privileged to see the presidency up close.
	And I know the awesome responsibility of protecting our country and the incredible opportunity of working to try to make life better for all of you.
	I have made the cause of children and families really my life's work.
	That's what my mission will be in the presidency.
	I will stand up for families against powerful interests, against corporations.
	I will do everything that I can to make sure...
	That you have good jobs with rising incomes.
	Make it actual work, sweetheart.
	That your kids have good educations from preschool through college.
	I hope you will give me a chance to serve as your president.
	Secretary Clinton, thank you.
	Mr.
	Trump.
	She's raising the money from the people she wants to control.
	It doesn't work that way.
	But when I started this campaign, I started it very strongly.
	It's called Make America Great Again.
	We're going to make America great.
	We have a depleted military.
	It has to be helped.
	It has to be fixed.
	We have the greatest people on earth in our military.
	We don't take care of our veterans.
	We take care of illegal immigrants, people that come into the country illegally better than we take care of our vets.
	That can't happen.
	Our policemen and women are disrespected.
	We need law enforcement.
	We need justice too.
	Our inner cities are a disaster.
	You get shot walking to the store.
	They have no education.
	They have no jobs.
	I will do more for African-Americans and Latinos than she can ever do in ten lifetimes.
	All she's done is talk to the African-Americans and to the Latinos.
	But they get the vote, and then they come back.
	They say, we'll see you in four years.
	We are going to make America strong again, and we are going to make America great again, and it has to start now.
	We cannot take four more years of Barack Obama, and that's what you get when you get her.
	Thank you both.
	Secretary Clinton, hold on just a moment, folks.
	Secretary Clinton, Mr.
	Trump, I want to thank you both for participating in all three of these debates.
	That brings to an end this year's debate sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates.
	We want to thank the University of Nevada, Las Vegas and its students for having us.
	Now the decision is up to you.
	While millions have already voted, Election Day, November 8th, is just 20 days away.
	One thing everyone here can agree on, we hope you will go vote.
	It is one of the honors and obligations of living in this great country.
	Thank you, and good night.
	Thank you very much.
	Okay, for people, you should tune in for the debate wrap-up here.
	So this is someone insulting me.
	They said not gay jerks.
	You know you're small.
	Yes.
	Someone said, Not Gay Jared's wife, Peter, is just hanging off his shoulders.
	It looks like it goes straight into his pants.
	And someone said on AR15.com, Head and Shoal said, not gay Jared's dandruff shampoo is just called head.
	Here's the thing.
	I hope people can appreciate it.
	That's fair.
	We both appreciate good insults.
	Yes.
	We really do.
	As long as you show that you tried.
	We constantly get insulted by our biggest fans.
	That's funny.
	That's good writing.
	Part of me wants to hire him as a writer.
	Alright, I'm looking on Twitter.
	What do we take away from this debate?
	Except that not gay Jared can't even take a session 4% Shinerbach.
	I think Trump...
	Someone said this well.
	Trump won the first 30 minutes.
	Hillary probably pulled ahead in that second 30 minutes, and the last 30 was about a draw.
	So, this is interesting, because the first debate, Trump won the first 20, and then definitely got massacred after that.
	The second debate, Trump won by a hair, but it didn't seem to help him enough.
	This one, I would say, I would say Donald Trump won, but not by a huge margin.
	So the question becomes this.
	There are fewer and fewer undecided voters as we get to election day right now.
	That number is less likely to change as more people have made up their minds Not Gay Jared, do you think this performance from Trump...
	Here's the main question.
	The main question is this.
	Hillary is ahead by over seven in the RCP. Do you want to get into the polls being rigged?
	I don't think polls are rigged.
	I really don't.
	I think some of them can be wrong.
	For example, Not Gay Jared wasn't sure.
	He might have answered a poll as undecided, and now he's voting for Trump.
	So I think they can be wrong.
	I don't think they're rigged.
	But if you look at the polls, they have followed...
	The events of, okay, scandal with Donald Trump, women come forward, okay, he plummets.
	Hillary Clinton WikiLeaks, okay.
	So it's been pretty consistent.
	So I don't think that there's as much of a secret Trump voter as people think.
	I think they've accounted for that, especially in the wake of Brexit.
	The question becomes, Jared, Hillary in the RCP average, assuming there isn't some crazy outlier where Trump's actually had 15, as these conspiracy theorists believe.
	Let's say he's behind.
	Was this enough of a performance for Donald Trump to change the course of the election within the last two weeks?
	In short, no.
	No?
	I think it'll give him a few points advantage.
	I think he will...
	I think this was probably his best performance thus far.
	I'd say so.
	I'd say his best performance was the first 20 minutes in the first debate, followed by this overall debate.
	Followed by this overall.
	I think he was at least consistent pretty much throughout this whole debate.
	He had a couple of weaker moments, but I think he was probably his best so far.
	I don't think it's enough to change a whole lot.
	I think it would give him an edge.
	He certainly didn't lose any round tonight, which...
	But that's not enough.
	He didn't need a lot, Luke.
	He needs to gain.
	He needs a big game changer.
	Here's what I need.
	I think the WikiLeaks, all that stuff, I think it's been great.
	It's been fun.
	It's not enough to change the course of the election.
	I think unless there's a bombshell, like a bombshell that rocks the media.
	Like a sex tape of her and Huma.
	Yes.
	Something the media cannot turn a blind eye to for three to four days.
	It just consumes the media.
	Like I said, 20 days, is that what it is to the election?
	I think you need something like that to really have a chance.
	My mom asked, do you think Donald is on Xanax?
	And my dad said, Trump is winning.
	That's the magic of low expectations.
	I think there's some truth there.
	Trump hasn't performed super well in the debates.
	And here's the deal.
	When you have all these other sites that say Trump dominated every debate, well, guess what?
	It rings hollow when in this debate, in the last debate, we said he won by a thin margin.
	I would say this is probably similar to debate number two.
	Yeah, kind of a wash, but I think he had a handful more of strong moments than he did.
	Yes.
	Debate number two, I said 51-49 Trump.
	Yeah.
	I would say debate number three, I might like 60-40 Trump.
	60-40, yeah.
	The first debate, I'd probably put 80-20 Hillary.
	So, is the cumulative effect enough here?
	Now, here's the deal.
	When you read other sites that said the first debate was landslide Trump win because you read a bunch of online non-scientific polls.
	Well, guess what?
	Just remember that.
	They lied to you.
	Whereas now, we're being truthful.
	So, you know when we say we think Donald Trump actually won this?
	I think he won.
	I think he did better.
	I think Hillary Clinton, noticeably, the biggest difference from the other debates, she was the one to go personal first.
	And it's not just what she did do.
	She kept returning to that, too.
	Often, the personal stuff.
	I think she knows that's where she has to gain some ground, because that's all her voter base has been.
	I think that's the biggest grudge.
	I don't see any SJW on Twitter or anybody taking real grievance with Trump's policies.
	Granted, he hasn't made them...
	Super clear.
	He hasn't made them super clear.
	But that's it.
	It's all personal.
	He's a racist.
	He's this.
	He's a sexist.
	He's a misogynist.
	He's a xenophobic.
	I think that's where she's trying to take it tonight, and I don't think it worked as well as I think she was hoping for.
	I think that that tells a story that's more important.
	Not only did she go personal, but that tells a story of an absence of Trump initiating personal attacks.
	Yeah.
	So that means it put her on the offensive in a way that she hasn't been because Donald Trump got personal, so he seemed like a bully, makes it easy for them to say he's a sexist.
	So Hillary got personal first, which has allowed Donald Trump, I think, tonight to talk a little bit more about policy.
	I think the thing we said when we came out here, he needs to turn the attention on Hillary.
	She did some of that herself, but he needs to give people a firm grip, a firm purchase more so on his specific policies.
	I think number one happened.
	I don't think number two happened enough to change the course of the current election.
	However, it was enough of a win that if there is some kind of a bombshell or if he is able to get out in front of the media, he could gain some ground.
	Now, of course, right now, one of the top trends is bad hombres, which shows you the media is going to focus on that.
	They're not going to focus on the Clinton Foundation.
	They're not going to focus on WikiLeaks.
	They're not going to focus on Saudi Arabia.
	They're not going to focus on the illegal donations.
	They're not going to focus on the emails.
	They're going to focus on Donald Trump saying bad hombres.
	Here's the deal.
	Donald Trump, I think talking about having an affair with a married woman, that's bad.
	I don't think saying there are some bad hombres is even remotely offensive.
	I don't think it's even remotely racist.
	I have no problem with it.
	So when you hear me say that, you know I'm being consistent.
	I am zero parts offended.
	And I don't think most Americans are offended.
	So I'll be interested to see what happens with this.
	I think if the media catches on to the bad hombres – I think that could be an example here.
	So watch this in the following days.
	I do think that could be an example of overreach.
	If they go, can you believe he said bad hombres?
	I think a lot of Americans, particularly the undecideds, are going to go, yeah, I've watched the good, the bad, and the ugly.
	That's not racist at all.
	They did it on the pens.
	Yeah.
	It depends.
	And I think they're going to try to repeat that.
	Whipping out the Mexican thing again.
	Whipping out the Mexican thing again.
	But I think bad hombres is actually even less severe.
	It is.
	It is.
	We should make it even more telling.
	Right.
	So I do think this is actually a good thing.
	The fact that they're jumping on bad hombres, I think Solon, HuffPo, Slate, they're going to try and make that a racist gaffe.
	I think most people know that that is inherently untrue.
	And I think most people will reject it.
	So we may be looking at gift horse in the mouth.
	The media may overreach.
	Donald Trump didn't win it by a huge margin, but they're latching on to something, not Machado, Miss Universe.
	They're latching on to something, not grab him by the P word.
	They're latching on to something which is entirely defensible, and most Americans would say, come on, that's not offensive, and they'll reject the politically correct culture.
	So this actually could play into Donald Trump's hands, the bad ombre.
	That's an instance where I would say, Donald, be you.
	Fight back on that.
	Don't apologize.
	Don't move back an inch.
	You needed to apologize for the Billy Bush tape.
	You needed to back off the Machado thing.
	Bad Umbre?
	Go nuclear.
	Scorched earth.
	You're fine.
	That would be my advice to him.
	What do you think?
	I think so.
	I think it's going to be very telling watching the media respond to this.
	It's their last chance seeing these candidates up front in front of the camera.
	Hillary, we know she hides...
	I wish that if there was a bombshell coming, I kind of wish it would have fallen before tonight.
	I wish it would have because I think because she hides, I think it's going to be less obvious to the public.
	I think it's going to become less front and center.
	I think it should have fallen before tonight, but what do I know?
	I think the media, how they respond to those things will be very telling.
	My point is this.
	Trump could use that.
	He could use it.
	With this night, the debate, I don't think the election was changed enough.
	Barring some unforeseen incident, I think Trump probably loses.
	But I'm actually seeing the bad hombres trend right now.
	Mm-hmm.
	That could be a real opportunity.
	They don't know it yet.
	So make sure you guys can fight back on that.
	I think if they overreach, it might make it really easy to catch them with their pants down.
	So I don't think this was enough of a performance from him.
	But I think they're so in an echo chamber where they genuinely think right now that everyone is going to read, Donald Trump said bad hombres.
	That's like the N-word.
	I'm switching my vote.
	I think that changes Republican zero.
	I think it probably changes Democrat zero, because at this point, if you're voting Democrat, you're a social justice warrior.
	You're in the tank for them.
	And I think that actually would turn some independence toward Donald Trump.
	Even Gary Johnson, between tokes and Aleppo, he'll say, well, bad hombre's pretty absurd.
	That's benign.
	Like my tumor from all this pot.
	Potheads right now are saying pot cures cancer.
	So, again, preparewithcr.com, our sponsor.
	$99, 30-day emergency food supplied kit.
	It's good stuff.
	It's good stuff.
	Great price.
	Shipped free.
	Tomorrow on the live stream, we are going to have Ben Shapiro, Kauai Noir from the NRA. Courtney scoffs, and top five movies, classic movies, classic films you couldn't do today.
	They could not make today.
	And we'll be following up and reading some of your tweets regarding the debate live stream.
	Of course, remember, election night will be here.
	Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, and an all-star cast.
	Gavin McInnes, Ben Shapiro, Dean Cain, Courtney, Brodigan.
	So many people, so many surprise guests.
	Think of it like the Dean Martin show, only people won't be drunk.
	Christmas is coming early.
	Except for maybe not Kay Jarrett.
	Spide of the election.
	What a crazy election season.
	Thanks for being with us.
	Lotter with Crowder every Thursday live at 8 p.m.
	Eastern.
	We'll see you there.
	Unless you're racist, you bad embrace.

▲