Know More News - Adam Green - Steven Meyer and Discovery Institute Intelligent Design Apologist Propaganda | KMN Aired: 2026-05-02 Duration: 02:54:43 === World War III Flare-Up (02:41) === [00:02:24] The enemies of Khalisrael will gather to attack Yushalayim at the end of days and they will be annihilated as part of the wars of Goigumagog, which are also discussed by the Novi Yecheska and the Novi Zechariah. [00:02:37] Goigumagog is that Asaph will convene on Yushalayim to attack the Arabs. [00:02:46] And they'll both basically destroy each other. [00:02:49] And after doing that, Khalisrael will reign supreme. [00:02:53] Now it's not hard to see how one day there could be a battle between Between the West and the Muslim world, right? [00:02:59] That's not a hard thing to imagine, right? [00:03:02] It's basically the stage is set. [00:03:06] It's only a matter of someone pressing the button. [00:03:09] What they ought to do is evacuate up there on the hill and get a great big missile and blow that wicked Dome of the Rock plumb off of the spot where it's standing right now so we can get that third temple rebuilt and usher in the coming of Jesus. [00:03:30] population, two-thirds will disappear. [00:03:32] And when we say that, we mean everyone, even amongst us. [00:04:07] Basically, the world has now chosen sides. [00:04:10] Those that will worship the machinations of men and those that will bow down to the Creator. [00:04:17] And so let the calling begin. [00:04:20] The world needs a cleaning. [00:04:23] If the President of the United States will be Donald Trump, then you know it's a matter of weeks until there will be a revolution in the world. [00:04:33] You know the type. [00:04:36] When you have one Trump on one side of the world and another, Trump on the other side, meaning Putin, two Trumps in the same stage, I don't see how we can prevent a Gogumagog. [00:04:50] It's just a matter of time. [00:04:51] If I were the president, I would inform the threatening country, in this case Iran, that if you do anything to harm this person, we are going to blow your largest cities and the country itself to smithereens. === Nuclear Strike on Israel (03:09) === [00:05:06] We're going to blow it to smithereens. [00:05:34] So what is going to actually happen is that I think there's going to be a flare-up. [00:05:38] Whether Iran's going to shoot who knows how many missiles. [00:05:41] I don't know exactly, but there's going to be a flare-up. [00:05:44] And the Israelis are going to attack back. [00:05:46] And Hashem is going to make a miracle. [00:05:47] Just like we left in the sea. [00:05:49] And God, like, literally, he created this, we call it the cloud dome. [00:05:54] He created this cloud and took all of their missiles. [00:05:56] He's gonna protect us and it'll be clear to the whole world every single human in the world that God is standing up for the Jewish people. [00:06:03] It'll be clear that moment that the Jewish people are protected by God and it will be clear once and for all that the Jewish people are the chosen. [00:06:10] So the point is that Zachariah says that this war initially, is going to destroy two-thirds of the population. [00:06:16] So you have eight billion people in the world right off the bat. [00:06:19] Six billion. [00:06:20] A gun it's a two-third of the world will die. [00:06:23] If you have seven billion, today you are talking 4.5 billion. [00:06:25] People will die 4.5 billion. [00:06:27] How does it happen? [00:06:27] Only with atomic war? [00:06:29] You know there are prophets that say the world will come to an end in the Middle East. [00:06:34] you know that, right? [00:06:36] America. [00:07:59] will fall. [00:08:00] There is no two ways about it. [00:08:02] It's just a matter of when. [00:08:03] World War III will begin in the Middle East. [00:08:06] World War III nuclear. [00:08:08] Nuclear warhead will begin in the Middle East. [00:08:10] And you know when the nuclear war happens? [00:08:12] When Israel gets struck by the next superpower. === Yeshua Marches Down Babylon (03:47) === [00:08:15] And more than likely it will be China and Russia. [00:08:18] More than likely. [00:08:20] Accompanied by Iran and North Korea. [00:08:26] But the main players are China, backed up by Russia. [00:08:30] Because the brain behind China is Russia. [00:08:32] Israel will be striked, and that will be nuclear warhead, the beginning of it. [00:08:37] Everybody will press the button. [00:08:52] King Selassie was Jesus in blackface, hiding from Babylon. [00:09:05] Never knew he didn't die on the cross, he escaped to Jamaica. [00:09:15] On 420, Yeshua smokes the herbal chalice and curses Hitler's birthday. [00:09:28] Christ is gonna get high, high, high, high in Hyperborea. [00:09:33] Yeshua is gonna march, march, march down Babylon. [00:09:39] Yeshua was a Rasta. [00:09:42] His eyes are blue and he's not a Jew. [00:09:45] Yeshua was a Rasta. [00:09:48] He's as blonde as the Lebanese Ashish's moth. [00:09:51] Yeshua was a Rasta. [00:09:54] His pure iron DNA is the most potent strain the world has ever seen. [00:10:03] Christ gonna get high high, high High, like Maboria. [00:10:10] Yeshua gonna march march, march Down Babylon, Yeshua was a Rasta. [00:10:18] He smokes cross-shaped joints every day, Yeshua was a Rasta. [00:10:23] He's not brown like hash, he's white like the 80 diamond He would smoke coca on a donkey and teach from the Torah Like a true hyperborean Rasta man Christ gonna get high, High, high High, in Hyperborea, Yeshua gonna mash my. [00:10:53] His eyes are blue and he's not a Jew. [00:10:56] Yeshua was a Rasta. [00:10:59] He's as blonde as the Lebanese. [00:11:01] As she spoke, Yeshua was a Rasta. [00:11:05] His fury and DNA is the most potent striving the world has ever seen. [00:11:21] Yes, you are gonna march, march, march Down Babylon Yes, go up, water rasta High night of Borea, water rasta Down Babylon I like Paporia, Water Rasta. [00:11:48] I like Paporia, Water Rasta. [00:11:54] Down Babylon. === Social Media Algorithm Truth (02:30) === [00:12:03] Welcome, ladies and gentlemen. [00:12:05] Adam Green here with No More News. [00:12:08] Huge Friday show today, May 1st. [00:12:16] May the force be with you for the beginning of May. [00:12:22] We're going to be doing an intelligent design debunk investigation in this guy from the Discovery Institute, Stephen Mayer, that's been boosted on all the big podcasts and MAGA rights. [00:12:36] Platforms recently like Daily Wire, Prager, you now Piers Morgan play some of his clips, play the debunk on him by Professor Dave, get into the intelligent design or creationism debate. [00:12:52] But we got some other stuff too a couple clips I want to cover. [00:12:55] The end of InfoWars, InfoWars has been shut down. [00:13:00] Ben Shapiro speaking at Chabad talking about wanting censorship on X. [00:13:06] So we got a bunch of stuff to. [00:13:08] Cover. [00:13:08] I did a late night live stream over on the Gnostic Informant on YouTube, three hours long, going over a bunch of rabbi videos with Neil from Gnostic Informants. [00:13:20] Now, Gnostic Informant, go check that out if you didn't see it. [00:13:23] Leave a comment, leave a like. [00:13:25] Follow no more. [00:13:26] Here was the promo the promo I cut that Jed follow no more news, read the Jesus Deception, and may the force be with you. [00:13:36] Follow no more news, read the Jesus Deception. [00:13:39] And may the force be with you. [00:13:42] Let's go. [00:13:42] Follow no more. [00:13:43] Let's go. [00:13:44] Okay, let's hear a bit of truth. [00:13:45] There's certainly a lot of truth to the idea that left wing teachers are indoctrinating kids into a viewpoint on the world that does cross paths into what causes the symptom that is Jew hatred. [00:13:57] I think that's for sure true. [00:13:58] Honestly, I think that the bigger danger when I look at young people right now is social media. [00:14:01] Social media is a cesspool. [00:14:03] I mean, if you spent any time on X at all over the course of the last couple of years, it is unusable. [00:14:08] Truly unusable. [00:14:09] I mean, just a vile. [00:14:11] Stream of trash. [00:14:13] And I think that was true of TikTok as well. [00:14:16] I mean, what do we do? [00:14:18] I mean, I think that you only do what you can. [00:14:22] I don't control the algorithms. [00:14:24] Hopefully, somebody who's more responsible now will help control the algorithms. [00:14:27] I'm glad that TikTok was taken away from China. [00:14:29] I'm not sure how much algorithmic control is given to the new owners. [00:14:32] That's sort of the big question. === Social Media Cesspool Danger (14:37) === [00:14:33] I think that Elon should obviously boot the bots from his algorithm because I think a lot of this is foreign bot driven. [00:14:41] Frankly. [00:14:42] And I think the algorithm creates extraordinary virality. [00:14:44] Yes, there's money being used, 100%. [00:14:47] Extraordinary virality is being driven for unknown accounts. [00:14:51] You can see it in your recommendations. [00:14:52] I remember at one point I actually reached out to Elon's people directly about this. [00:14:55] So, yes. [00:14:57] Reached out to Elon directly about censoring and changing the algorithm to suppress anti Israel, anti Jewish sentiment? [00:15:06] I agree with you that young people are being faced with a plethora of bad information. [00:15:11] And you need to come to the Daily Wire to get all the good, true information from me and all my Catholic friends. [00:15:18] In Iran, how do you envision. [00:15:20] I'd like to shift over to the Persian Gulf, to Iran, to President Trump's actions or inaction. [00:15:28] In Iran, how do you envision. [00:15:30] Inaction? [00:15:30] He hasn't done enough. [00:15:32] They're still not satisfied. [00:15:34] Inaction. [00:15:36] Dude, how are they going to rewrite this history book? [00:15:38] Trump betrayed Israel and didn't destroy Iran for them. [00:15:43] Or understand President Trump holding off a strike on our weapons systems? [00:15:47] So there's sort of the optimistic vision in my view, and then there is the pessimistic vision in my view, and I have no idea which one of these is correct because I don't think necessarily the president knows which one he's going to do yet. [00:15:57] The president goes with his gut, typically. [00:16:00] I think the president's gut so far has been pretty excellent when it comes to Middle Eastern politics, but it's possible that he goes away, that I would prefer that he not go. [00:16:08] Obviously, the buildup takes time. [00:16:09] There were not the sort of resources necessary to launch the kind of long lasting strikes on IRGC facilities and ballistic missile bases and military leadership necessary to actually destabilize the regime. [00:16:23] And so it takes a while to actually sail gigantic ships halfway around the world and place them in the Mediterranean or in the Persian Gulf. [00:16:28] And so there are still ships that are on their way right now. [00:16:31] The amount of resources that have been mobilized to the region is extraordinary. [00:16:34] I mean, you're talking about hundreds of American fighter jets. [00:16:37] You are talking about multiple aircraft carriers. [00:16:40] You're talking about an enormous arsenal that has been assembled. [00:16:44] Now, whether the president actually decides to pull the trigger on it is really the question. [00:16:48] I think it will be a disaster if he does not. [00:16:50] I know that he's being told by a lot of people that it will be a disaster if he does, that something terrible will happen. [00:16:55] These are exactly the same people who suggested World War III, literally the same exact people who said World War III would break out if he flew. [00:17:02] 1v2 over one site and hit it with some. [00:17:05] Oh, how dare anybody be worried about World War III with war with Iran, who's allied with Russia and China? [00:17:11] How dare? [00:17:13] How dare? [00:17:13] We only see all your rabbis, like these Chabadniks, talking about war with Iran and Edom and it's a Gog and Magog. [00:17:20] Oh, no. [00:17:22] Oh, no. [00:17:22] They think it could lead to World War III. [00:17:25] Like, have you heard the Chabad rabbis? [00:17:29] Crazy. [00:17:30] Crazy for him to be like that. [00:17:31] It does. [00:17:32] Something terrible will happen. [00:17:33] These are exactly the same people who suggested World War III. [00:17:35] Literally the same exact people. [00:17:37] These are all the people that are obsessed with Edom being destroyed, by the way. [00:17:41] Don't worry about World War III, Goy. [00:17:42] Just let Trump bomb Iran all we want. [00:17:47] PowerChat.live slash no more news. [00:17:49] You guys know what to do. [00:17:50] Comment right on the stream. [00:17:51] Every dollar helps. [00:17:52] Can't do it without you. [00:17:53] We are turned on now. [00:17:55] I missed one at the end of the stream yesterday. [00:17:57] I'm going to get that played also. [00:18:02] Click it was Garrett. [00:18:05] Garrett's gonna love this one. [00:18:07] Where you at, Garrett? [00:18:10] Hello, Ben Shapirovoice. [00:18:15] Garrett sent $5 even if tag was good reasoning, which it isn't. [00:18:19] Couldn't you use it for any deity? [00:18:21] Yeah. [00:18:21] How is it exclusive to Yahweh? [00:18:23] It's not. [00:18:23] Brahmi logic is based in Odin, so Odin is real. [00:18:26] Yeah, dude. [00:18:27] Transcendentals are proven right by Thor and Odin, bro. [00:18:31] Wotan and the Allfather and the Skyfather is where we get our transcendentals, bro. [00:18:35] Prove me wrong. [00:18:36] How do you know that? [00:18:38] We're grounded, bro. [00:18:39] You're incoherent. [00:18:41] Thank you. [00:18:41] I hope Garrett watches this one because this is his favorite topic intelligent design. [00:18:47] He better be here. [00:18:49] He said World War III would break out if he flew 1B2 over one site and hit it with some bombs. [00:18:55] And of course, none of that happened. [00:18:56] It wasn't World War III, it was actually a very successful military strike. [00:19:00] The question for the president he doesn't like long lasting military actions. [00:19:03] He likes decisive military actions that don't cost a lot of blood and treasure, hopefully, no blood. [00:19:09] And minimal treasure. [00:19:10] And so the question is the realism of the operation, what he thinks he can get done. [00:19:14] The reason I say that it will be disastrous is not only because it will embolden the Iranian government, which, again, let's just be clear about what happened here. [00:19:21] The Iranian government had gigantic millions wide protests in the streets. [00:19:26] And the President of the United States put out a public statement saying that the people should stay in the streets and that help was on the way. [00:19:32] And the people did stay out in the streets, and probably tens of thousands of them were murdered. [00:19:36] And so if the President does nothing about that, and he comes away with some sort of half assed agreement, That very much looks like the JCPOA, but maybe slightly stronger, then Iran will read that as weakness, and they should read that as weakness because it is weakness. [00:19:49] And I don't think Iran will be the only country that reads that as weakness, by the way. [00:19:52] I think that if the president backs off of this without real commitments on ballistic missiles, on funding of terrorism, and on complete denuclearization, I think that the chances that China makes a move on Taiwan are extraordinarily strong inside the next three years. [00:20:11] Oh, Trump better do whatever he wants, or else everybody's going to think we're so weak. [00:20:14] Yeah, and they think we're weak because we do whatever Israel and Netanyahu wants. [00:20:19] Starmer announces that the United Kingdom will. [00:20:22] Parisia, thank you, buddy. [00:20:24] $5 on Rumble. [00:20:25] Watching on Kick today to try and get those. [00:20:27] What are we at? [00:20:28] Five viewers on Kick? [00:20:29] To pay my no small hat fee. [00:20:31] Appreciate your work. [00:20:32] Have a great weekend with the family man. [00:20:35] Thank you. [00:20:36] Thank you. [00:20:37] Parish of time. [00:20:38] You have a good time too. [00:20:40] You're a family man, aren't you? [00:20:41] Don't you got some kids? [00:20:44] Okay. [00:20:44] Starmer says that he's going to introduce new anti Semitism laws to strengthen national protection. [00:20:52] What nation? [00:20:52] Israel? [00:20:53] Against what the government describes as imminent threats. [00:20:56] He says Iran is engaged in campaign, blah, blah, blah. [00:20:58] We'll just listen. [00:20:59] that they want to harm British Jews. [00:21:02] We will strengthen the visible police presence in our Jewish communities. [00:21:07] We will increase our investment in those Jewish security services. [00:21:12] We will introduce much stronger powers to shut down charities that promote anti-Semitic extremism. [00:21:20] We will prevent hate preachers from entering our country, bar them from our campuses, our streets, our communities. [00:21:30] Work with our justice system to speed up sentencing on anti Semitic attacks. [00:21:35] So there is a stronger deterrence factor as we do with riots. [00:21:42] And we need stronger powers to tackle the malign threat posed by states like. [00:21:49] Didn't Mark Collette's friend Sam Melia go to jail for a few years because of stickers? [00:21:57] Because of some like pro white stickers? [00:22:00] The speech restrictions are already so strong in the UK, it's ominous thinking how much worse they're going to get. [00:22:08] Iran, because we know for a fact that they didn't think about this issue and anti Semitism when they were bringing in tons of Muslim migrants into the UK. [00:22:21] Or maybe they were. [00:22:23] And like in Australia, they'll use the Muslim attacks on Jews to go after nationalist groups. [00:22:33] British Jews, which is why we will fast track the necessary legislation. [00:22:39] Hate preacher. [00:22:41] Anonymous. [00:22:42] Yahshua was a Rasta. [00:22:45] I love that song. [00:22:46] I saw a comment in the live chat. [00:22:48] They're like, I sing this in the shower. [00:22:50] It's been stuck in my head. [00:22:52] Evan Williams with the number one hit. [00:22:55] Top reggae song. [00:22:57] His eyes were blue and he's not a Jew. [00:22:59] Yahshua was a Rasta. [00:23:03] My favorite line that makes me laugh every time still is teach the Torah like a true Hyperborean Rastamon. [00:23:12] The truth is, while we can and we will bring the full power of the state to bear on this, this is about society every bit as much as it is about security. [00:23:33] The full power of the state against the anti Semitism and the hate preachers. [00:23:41] Calling it out. [00:23:44] The Christian Church of England's going to really crack down on all of it. [00:23:49] Do we need to go play the African woman dancing at the ceremony for the Archbishop of Canterbury? [00:23:56] But if you are marching with people wearing pictures of paragliders without calling it out, you are venerating the murder of Jews. [00:24:08] If you stand alongside people who say globalize the Intifada, you are calling for terrorism. [00:24:16] That sounds like 1984, huh? [00:24:18] The full power of the state will come. [00:24:20] It sounds totally 1984. [00:24:22] And people who use that phrase should be prosecuted. [00:24:28] Which phrase? [00:24:29] Racism. [00:24:30] Extreme. [00:24:31] Thank you, Trey. [00:24:33] Happy Beltane to all who celebrate. [00:24:36] Fire emoji. [00:24:37] Black flap emoji. [00:24:39] Oh, that's. [00:24:39] I saw Henrik did a show about Beltane. [00:24:42] Some fire holiday. [00:24:45] Thank you, Trey, especially for all the clips and the posting. [00:24:48] You are a legend. [00:24:53] Racism. [00:24:55] But if you are marching with people wearing pictures of paragliders without calling it out, you are venerating the murder of Jews. [00:25:07] If you stand alongside people. [00:25:09] So, what? [00:25:09] Are you going to ban the IDF sweatshirts? [00:25:13] Is that.? [00:25:16] Side people who say globalize the intifada. [00:25:19] Globalize the intifada. [00:25:20] You're calling for terrorism against Jews. [00:25:25] And people who use that phrase should be prosecuted. [00:25:30] It is racism. [00:25:31] Extreme racism. [00:25:32] Racism. [00:25:34] But if you are. [00:25:36] Isn't intifada just mean like rise up or something? [00:25:40] Like, are we going to. [00:25:41] Are we criminalizing any of the mottos or phrases of the Israelis? [00:25:46] It's all just completely one sided to suppress the Palestinians who are like the complete underdogs in this war. [00:25:56] Complete coverage. [00:25:58] Marching with people wearing pit. [00:26:02] All right. [00:26:03] Let's do InfoWars a little bit. [00:26:05] InfoWars is final. [00:26:07] But he's locked his account. [00:26:08] Final broadcast. [00:26:09] At the same time. [00:26:10] No, this is the Onion guy covetching that they're, I guess the court made InfoWars close, but that it hasn't been sold to The Onion. [00:26:20] You guys know that, right? [00:26:20] The Onion's trying to buy InfoWars and turn it into a parody of itself. [00:26:26] But he's locked up his ex account at the same time. [00:26:29] Here's a clip of him freaking out. [00:26:31] Here it is. [00:26:31] Now, we received a. [00:26:35] This motherfucker, Alex Jones, somehow worked his way into the Texas Third Court of Appeals. [00:26:45] These rats preventing, but postponed. [00:26:47] Is this supposed to be like the new InfoWars or is this like the Onion show? [00:26:51] And RT is boosting the Alex Jones? [00:26:54] Until another judgment can come in or something. [00:26:57] This was on track to happen. [00:26:59] Temporarily, I'll say it's been temporarily derailed. [00:27:03] We're committed to moving forward. [00:27:04] We're already talking about what that looks like. [00:27:06] The short answer is Infores will be ours. [00:27:10] There's nothing you can't stop this movement. [00:27:12] People's accounts are not. [00:27:13] We have him writing and producing and starring in shows about slave ships where you rape children to death and bury them in the backyard. [00:27:21] And how he pledges allegiance to Satan. [00:27:23] He's obsessed with that. [00:27:24] It's not even funny. [00:27:25] Yeah, but it's the onion. [00:27:27] Are they doing some bit or a joke or satire? [00:27:31] Come on. [00:27:32] That's funny. [00:27:33] He's into this. [00:27:35] I didn't say he actually rapes kids. [00:27:36] I just say he's into this. [00:27:38] He hides it behind it in comedy. [00:27:39] He's a big censor that runs around censoring people. [00:27:42] And then he's now trying to threaten me hey, dude, billion and a half dollar fake judgment. [00:27:45] I mean, get your own rigged trial. [00:27:47] I'm sure you'll be the victim up there, and we'll show all your TV shows with kids devastating on adults and people eating feces. [00:27:56] Oh, are you saying he's a satanic demon that smells like sulfur? [00:28:01] Damn, bro. [00:28:02] What happened to boys' head here? [00:28:06] Did you get in a bar fight or something? [00:28:09] Amalek, are you in the chat? [00:28:10] Do you see that? [00:28:12] Does he say what that is? [00:28:13] He's got one hell of a. [00:28:16] Anyway, I want to watch this. [00:28:18] Sam Leeper breaks down Dan McClellan's The Bible Says So book, questioning its assumptions. [00:28:24] That looks good too, but let's get into our. [00:28:27] I don't know. [00:28:28] Should we do some Christian apologetics first? [00:28:31] No, no. [00:28:32] We'll do evolution and save that for later. [00:28:34] This is an evolution show. [00:28:36] Okay, so this guy, Stephen Mayer, who I've been talking about, has already. [00:28:40] I covered him in the last few shows. [00:28:42] He's just all of a sudden everywhere. [00:28:44] All of the kosher right is promoting this intelligent design, evolution denying Christian apologist. [00:28:52] And if you deny evolution, you're basically a Jewish propagandist in my eye because all the people denying evolution, almost every single one of them is doing it because they believe in Genesis and the creationism story from Adam and Eve. [00:29:07] So that's why Prager U and Shabbos Kestenbaum's promoting this guy. === Promoting Evolution Denier (03:22) === [00:29:11] That's why Michael Knowles and the Daily Wire's promoting this guy. [00:29:15] If I search his name on YouTube, we'd probably see a bunch of other places that he's been on recently. [00:29:20] Huge boost for this evolution denying. [00:29:23] And five dollars on Christian propagandists. [00:29:25] It is unbelievable almost to see InfoWars no longer in operation. [00:29:29] Yeah. [00:29:29] It's safe to say many people who got into dissident politics had their starting point with their introduction to Alex Jones. [00:29:36] Me included. [00:29:37] Me included. [00:29:39] And, you know, it is, I do think it's unfair. [00:29:43] I think, okay, he lied about the Sandy Hook families somewhat. [00:29:48] Like, okay, give them two million each, give them five million each. [00:29:51] But, like, to have it be a billion dollar judgment was clearly Democrats trying to get InfoWars shut down for. [00:29:57] Political reasons. [00:29:58] And it's not even going to get him shut down. [00:30:00] He's already streaming on a new network today. [00:30:03] So it's all just dumb. [00:30:08] It's dumb. [00:30:11] But on the positive, Alex Jones doesn't get to be an incredibly filthy, rich, disinfo gatekeeper, Jesus shill. [00:30:22] So that's kind of a W. [00:30:24] Now, I guess I heard him say he's like, he's going to live in a modest house and they're garnishing his wages. [00:30:29] And so he's not living like a. [00:30:32] Balling out like he was. [00:30:35] But I think, I don't know if the punishment matches the crime, to be fair. [00:30:42] How many other people have lied like crazy about stuff like that and nothing ever happened to him at all? [00:30:48] So, and then it's hilarious Alex Jones sucking up to Trump forever and then Trump not doing anything to help him with his case and then throwing him under the bus and saying, You bankrupt, low IQ nut job, you deserved it. [00:31:06] So, anyway, Michael Knowles from Daily Wire promoting this guy again. [00:31:12] I just did a search for him for Stephen Meyer. [00:31:15] Let's see where else he's been recently. [00:31:20] Oh, he was on Joe Rogan a year ago. [00:31:21] I'm going to save that for later and see some of that slop. [00:31:24] I'm sure Joe Rogan believed all of that crap. [00:31:30] Hold on, save to watch later. [00:31:33] All right. [00:31:35] When evolution hits a dead end, his video, he's got 100,000. [00:31:40] Followers on YouTube. [00:31:43] We're going to watch the debunk. [00:31:49] Professor Dave has a whole. [00:31:53] No, I didn't do the reaction to Sam yet, Amalek. [00:31:55] I was asking, though, what's up with the shiner on his head? [00:31:58] Did he get in a bar fight? [00:32:00] Looks like somebody broke a beer bottle and hit him over the head with it. [00:32:04] Professor Dave has a whole playlist on exposing the Discovery Institute, a Christian propaganda, intelligent design. [00:32:15] He's got ones on all of their top shills. [00:32:18] Stephen Meyer is the second one. [00:32:20] So we're going to watch some of that. [00:32:22] But let's see some of his latest highlights here from Piers Morgan that are all out today. [00:32:29] Hold on. [00:32:30] Did I close the wrong one? [00:32:32] No, that's Michael Nose. === Debunking Intelligent Design (15:19) === [00:32:33] Okay, here we go. [00:32:33] First person. [00:32:34] Who have I spoken to from Richard Dor. [00:32:36] It always, for me, I was raised a Catholic. [00:32:40] I remain a Catholic. [00:32:42] I've never had any doubt that there is a God. [00:32:44] But then my kind of scientific brain, if you like, is. [00:32:48] Just computing the reality that if we are this tiny pinprick in the universe and there are gazillions of galaxies and all these things, the idea that, A, we're the only people that exist in the whole thing is preposterous, I think. [00:33:02] There obviously must be other stuff out there. [00:33:04] But secondly, no scientist, no atheist, nobody I've ever spoken to, from Richard Dawkins to anybody else, to Ricky Gervais, to whoever it may be, to Professor Stephen Hawking, no one could ever explain to me what was there before nothing. [00:33:21] And because the human brain. [00:33:23] What are you talking about? [00:33:24] They always explain that. [00:33:27] It wasn't nothing. [00:33:29] Before the Big Bang, there was nothing at all. [00:33:32] Nobody says that. [00:33:34] Oh, man. [00:33:35] Already off to a bad start. [00:33:36] Question. [00:33:37] To me, self evidently, there must be something more powerful than a human brain, a greater entity than a human brain that could, at the very least, answer that question or clear up that quandary because we can't do it. [00:33:52] Our brains can't answer that question. [00:33:56] Well, it's. [00:33:58] Maybe there's infinite big bangs. [00:34:01] Maybe the other side of every black hole is what we think of as a big bang. [00:34:07] Maybe we think there's a big bang because it looks like the universe is expanding away from us in all directions, but maybe we're in a black hole pulling away from some other space and time fabric. [00:34:20] Maybe the universe is a black hole machine and there's been infinite eternal black holes and big bangs and contractions and expansions. [00:34:30] Nobody claims there was just nothing and all of a sudden everything appeared out of nothing. [00:34:35] That's the straw man, cartoonish thing that Christians say. [00:34:41] Galaxy grifting. [00:34:42] Yeah, galaxy mocking. [00:34:44] It goes back to that very fundamental philosophical question why is there something rather than nothing? [00:34:49] And the answer that the materialist scientists gave for a very long time was that there has always been something, something material, something physical. [00:34:59] There you go. [00:35:00] You got it right. [00:35:00] The assumption was that the universe, the physical universe, was eternal and self existent and therefore did not need an external creator because it had always been here. [00:35:10] Alas, beginning about a century ago with discoveries in observational astronomy and then subsequent developments in theoretical physics and then more discoveries in observational astronomy, we've discovered that the universe itself, as best we can tell from these multiple lines of evidence and inquiry, definitely had a beginning. [00:35:31] And that raises that fundamental question. [00:35:33] Question all over again because we can no longer say the universe is the eternal self existent thing in the way that theists have long affirmed that God is the eternal self existent thing. [00:35:42] Instead, the universe had a beginning and therefore requires some sort of external cause or creator. [00:35:47] What proof is he talking about? [00:35:49] He just says, Oh, there's been so many new discoveries proving it had a beginning. [00:35:53] How come I haven't heard of these? [00:35:54] Has anybody heard of these proofs that it had to have had a beginning? [00:36:00] And to say that that's like a definitive, now we know it had a beginning, wrong. [00:36:06] Your interesting interview with Richard Dawkins responding to the conversation that you and I had before. [00:36:13] And Dawkins said, Well, because time itself began, we can't really talk about what came before the beginning of the universe. [00:36:20] Well, okay, fair enough. [00:36:22] But that doesn't make the causal question go away. [00:36:25] What caused the universe to come into existence? [00:36:28] What could have caused time itself to come into existence? [00:36:30] Well, clearly, the kind of cause you would need, what would need to be postulated to explain the origin of matter, space, time, and energy, is something that is. [00:36:41] I don't know if this is his Wi Fi or my wife. [00:36:46] I think it's his. [00:36:48] Oh, so in order to explain the cause that doesn't need a cause, you have to make something imaginary and supernatural to be that cause. [00:36:59] Like, let's say, Yahweh. [00:37:01] Funny how that works. [00:37:03] Create a rule and then make an exception to the rule to answer the rule that doesn't answer anything. [00:37:08] Got it. [00:37:10] Available candidates. [00:37:11] It turns out that the God hypothesis. [00:37:14] Provides, in my view and that of many scientists and philosophers, the best explanation. [00:37:18] The first mover, uncaused cause. [00:37:21] Thank you, Zorinder Edam. [00:37:22] Intelligent design is little more than agenda driven justifications for wishful appanic thinking about the nature of our universe. [00:37:30] It's just Bible creationism, you know, with a secular name. [00:37:34] That's what intelligent design is. [00:37:36] I'm glad Zorinder Edam appreciates the science stream, nerd stream, nerd maxing. [00:37:42] One of the three big discoveries that we look at. [00:37:45] I'm sure a bunch of Christians or haters are going to be like, we didn't come from no monkeys. [00:37:50] Maybe you're a monkey, but I didn't come from no monkey. [00:37:54] This was almost the thumbnail for evolution today. [00:37:57] I don't believe none of those scientists. [00:37:59] I believe in the Bible. [00:38:00] I trust whatever the Bible says. [00:38:02] None of them high priests of science. [00:38:06] You believe God or Neil deGrasse Tyson? [00:38:10] This is Goya Maxing. [00:38:11] This is me on the weekends, actually. [00:38:16] Guys, like that? [00:38:19] We didn't come from no monkeys. [00:38:23] We came from God. [00:38:25] In the film, it's the discovery of the beginning of everything and why that is bringing back consideration of what we call the God hypothesis. [00:38:34] My hypothesis, like the Bible. [00:38:38] Skilled in this kind of thing is. [00:38:40] What are we looking at here? [00:38:41] I mean, for those who are not as skilled in this kind of thing as you are, what are we looking at? [00:38:47] Molecular biologists will kind of start to wax lyrical. [00:38:50] And describe the interior workings of the cell as something like an automated factory run by digital code, in which the code is processed by little nano machines and it's automated to a degree that it's just mind blowing. [00:39:04] The God hypothesis provides, in my view, and that of many scientists and philosophers. [00:39:08] Dude, God hypothesis is the name of his book. [00:39:11] So every time he's saying that, he's just trying to plug his grift book, his Bible book masquerading as science. [00:39:18] The best explanation of the origin of the universe. [00:39:23] Oh, that was short. [00:39:25] Oh, the cell is, first of all, this is a very highly evolved eukaryotic cell of humans. [00:39:34] The first cells and bacteria and single cells and RNA, protocells were way simpler than this. [00:39:40] And these Christians just go, evolution couldn't do that. [00:39:44] It's so many, so small and so complex. [00:39:48] God must have done it. [00:39:50] Like, what do they think of when they say that? [00:39:52] They think God in a laboratory up in heaven. [00:39:55] With goggles on and a white lab coat and like some tweezers and some vials and different chemicals and potions. [00:40:03] And he's like, Bippity boppity boo, here's a cell for you and you. [00:40:09] Bippity boppity boo, abracadabra, the cell is alive like Frankenstein. [00:40:13] Boom. [00:40:17] Adam believes in biology, dude. [00:40:20] They got to him. [00:40:21] Adam got the call and says that the Jewish creation story isn't real. [00:40:29] Well, I think that on a personal level, what is the kind of unfulfilled eureka moment for you that you dream about happening in your lifetime? [00:40:40] A discovery. [00:40:41] What is the thing that would be most exciting to you? [00:40:45] Well, I think the thing that first gave me a eureka and which just absolutely has fascinated me for now nearly 40 years shackled Zionist culture. [00:40:55] I got into a fist fight myself last Monday. [00:40:58] Dude, why are you fighting so much, dude? [00:41:05] The first rule of e Crusader Christianity never admit Jesus is Jewish. [00:41:14] Pretty much. [00:41:17] Never admit that you're gay for Jesus. [00:41:19] What happens in Fight Club is the values that were being made in molecular biology. [00:41:26] We gotta make an AI of. [00:41:28] Jesus holding the soap like the Fight Club poster and say Jesus Club. [00:41:32] $5 God is in a laboratory in heaven. [00:41:35] I used math to fly a rocket up there with a dinosaur. [00:41:39] Yeah. [00:41:41] God is such a designer up there in heaven, putting us together like a potato head, like Tinker Toys, like little transformers. [00:41:53] He's just like, okay, we'll throw some arms there, two arms, butt right next to the vagina. [00:41:59] Great. [00:42:00] Let's give them some back pain. [00:42:01] Let's need everybody to need glasses. [00:42:04] Let's have them, their teeth fall out after a few decades. [00:42:08] Hmm, what else can we do here, God? [00:42:10] I don't know. [00:42:12] Ingrown hairs, how about that? [00:42:14] Perfect. [00:42:15] Cancer, yes. [00:42:18] What else did God do? [00:42:20] Most species to ever exist go extinct. [00:42:23] Perfect. [00:42:26] Yeah, he's the perfect designer, but then when we point out all the flaws in the design or how the design. Messes up with genetic mutations and disease, fallen world, fallen world. [00:42:37] Cope. [00:42:37] It's like God knows it's like the cope of free will. [00:42:40] He knows everything. [00:42:41] He predicts the future, prophecies. [00:42:43] He knows what you're going to do before you do it. [00:42:45] He knows everything of all time. [00:42:47] But then it's, but you have free will. [00:42:50] It's always with the copes. [00:42:55] Yeah. [00:42:56] He's like, God, let's make a small portion of them gay. [00:43:01] Perfect. [00:43:01] Let's also make that illegal. [00:43:03] Perfect. [00:43:05] Hey, let's have most women die in childbirth until modern medicine. [00:43:08] Genius. [00:43:11] Headaches. [00:43:12] Yes, many people have terrible headaches. [00:43:14] Perfect. [00:43:14] Well, that's because of Adam and even the snake. [00:43:16] Obviously, headaches. [00:43:17] Headaches are from Satan. [00:43:21] Flat feet, orthopedic shoes. [00:43:24] Yeah. [00:43:26] Nearly 40 years is the discoveries that were being made in molecular biology that started in the 1950s and 60s with Watson and Crick elucidating first the structure of the DNA molecule, and then Francis Crick five years later realizing that along the spine of the DNA molecule, there are chemical subunits that are functioning like alphabetic characters in a written text. [00:43:53] Or, like digital characters in a section of machine code. [00:43:56] In fact, one of the great physicists at the time, George Gamow, looked carefully at the Watson and Crick model and realized that these so called. [00:44:06] Yeah, yeah. [00:44:07] Make people only be able to drink. [00:44:08] Thank you, Viril Vision. [00:44:10] Make them only be able to drink fresh water, not salt water. [00:44:14] That'll kill them. [00:44:15] And then make most of the world be salt water. [00:44:18] Perfect. [00:44:19] Tons of water on Earth, make it all salt. [00:44:22] Perfect. [00:44:22] Can't drink it. [00:44:26] Genius. [00:44:26] Pieces that contain the information were functioning like a digital bit string. [00:44:32] And so the information revolution came into biology in the late 1950s and 60s. [00:44:38] And since then, Jordan Dare sent $5. [00:44:40] Oh, Adam, you just don't understand his grand plan for our suffering. [00:44:44] There's really a goal in the end. [00:44:45] You don't understand. [00:44:48] Hey, God, can we get one tube for breathing, one for eating, just in case they ever choke on something? [00:44:53] Like they don't, you know. [00:44:56] You know, they can't breathe. [00:44:58] They choke to death. [00:44:59] Nah, just give them one hole. [00:45:02] Let them choke to death. [00:45:04] Hey, how about two hearts? [00:45:06] If one heart goes bad, like the other one can make up for it? [00:45:09] No, just one. [00:45:11] Heart attacks, blood clots, an extra penis. [00:45:18] Yeah, two penises could have been cool, right? [00:45:21] Why not two? [00:45:24] Stronger bond. [00:45:26] Two penises, two vaginas. [00:45:29] Think of the possibilities. [00:45:33] Better for breeding, two girls at one time. [00:45:37] God didn't think of that. [00:45:38] Biology in the late 1950s and 60s. [00:45:41] And since then, it has absolutely changed our understanding of the nature of life. [00:45:46] One for each hand. [00:45:47] You're right. [00:45:47] Seriously. [00:45:48] You're maximizing productivity. [00:45:50] Four arms. [00:45:51] That could have been cool too. [00:45:54] Octopuses have multiple hearts. [00:45:56] Well, I guess God loves them more than us. [00:45:58] Life imposed a fundamental challenge to the origin of life. [00:46:03] Studies as well. [00:46:05] In the 19th century, around the time of Darwin, his great bulldog, Thomas Henry Huxley, said the cell is a simple homogeneous globule of undifferentiated protoplasm. [00:46:16] And when scientists thought that the cell was a simple enclosure of jello like that, it was pretty easy to imagine how, with one or two simple chemical reactions, that protoplasmic substance that was, they thought, the essence of life might have come into existence in a completely undirected way. [00:46:34] But as we've learned more and more about the interior. [00:46:37] Well, the first cell that came into existence probably was very simple, like they were thinking. [00:46:43] Oh, they didn't have microscopes when they first invented that. [00:46:46] They didn't know about cells and how complex they were. [00:46:48] So, like, evolution's not true. [00:46:50] As if cellular biologists don't believe in evolution or something. [00:46:55] The workings of the cell. [00:46:57] And there's much more to discover. [00:46:59] And that would be some of the eureka things that I'd hope to learn about in the future. [00:47:05] But we've now learned that the cell is. [00:47:07] Not only does it contain digital information, it's that digital information is part of a complex information storage, transmission, and processing system that rivals, in fact, exceeds anything we've developed in our own high tech. [00:47:22] So, God is a coder, I guess. [00:47:25] Evolution couldn't create a genetic code, only God could do that. [00:47:31] What's your proof that evolution isn't real? [00:47:34] DNA? [00:47:36] Really? [00:47:39] I'm pretty sure they've done, scientists have done like coding showing how a simple code with mutations could develop into very complex genetic code through simulations on computers. === Fossil Record Hypothesis (17:00) === [00:47:53] Good point. [00:47:55] Yeah. [00:47:57] Hey, God, regrowing limbs. [00:48:02] We can heal our skin if we get hurt. [00:48:04] Why not regrow limbs? [00:48:05] That would be nice. [00:48:08] Digital computing world. [00:48:10] A couple years ago, our friend opposite Professor Dawkins said that he was knocked sideways with wonder at the miniaturized intricacy of the data processing system inside the living cell. [00:48:26] Now, that's not the kind of thing that you would expect to arise by undirected chemical processes. [00:48:31] And in fact, there is an impasse in what's called origin of life research today, precisely because no one can explain how you get from. [00:48:38] Look, so I searched evolution of DNA computer simulation, and again, I found this guy. [00:48:43] On with Eric Metaxas, the other big Zionist Christian. [00:48:48] The RNA origin of life. [00:48:50] That looks good. [00:48:51] We could watch that maybe too. [00:48:53] Professor Dave's going to rip this guy to pieces. [00:48:54] He always does. [00:48:55] The whole system for processing it. [00:48:59] So weak. [00:49:01] No wonder it's got nine likes. [00:49:05] Christians don't care though. [00:49:07] They just go, oh, he's a scientist with a suit on and a tie and he debunks Christianity or he debunks evolution. [00:49:14] I believe him. [00:49:16] Let's see, Professor Daves. [00:49:19] Of intelligent design hiding behind a thin veneer of legitimacy. [00:49:24] What's he all about? [00:49:25] Meyer is one of the co founders of the DI and currently serves as program director for its Center for Science and Culture. [00:49:33] As a co founder, he was intimately involved in the creation of the so called Wedge document, an internal document that was leaked to the internet in 1999 and explicitly states their religious agenda with words and pictures, as they chose to put Michelangelo's creation of Adam right on the cover. [00:49:51] Subtle. [00:49:52] That's right. [00:49:53] The seriously all about science and totally not about religion institute is, surprise, surprise, religiously motivated by their own secret words. [00:50:03] Yeah, religiously motivated, biased bullshit is all they are. [00:50:07] Not to be, you cannot, they lose the credibility when they're religious trying to prove science stuff. [00:50:15] Yojana says two butts for when you need to poop extra fast. [00:50:22] That could work, I guess. [00:50:25] Document is horse manure right from the first sentence, which is a lie about Western civilization being built upon humans being created in God's image, and then a list of things they want to give religion credit for, which quite honestly have only been possible once religion loosened its grip on humanity. [00:50:41] There is the typical tripe about how, without fear of a vengeful God, we would all be savage murderers, stealing and raping 24 7, failing to mention all of the genocides that have been performed in the name of one God or another. [00:50:53] Yeah, this is so Christian propaganda. [00:50:55] At the end of page one. [00:50:57] On the next page, there are only two governing goals listed for the DI. [00:51:01] The first is to defeat scientific materialism, that idiotic buzzword we deconstructed in part one. [00:51:07] And the other is to replace materialistic explanations with a theistic understanding. [00:51:13] In other words, see, their goals are not like to find out the truth about evolution and follow science wherever it goes. [00:51:20] It's to defeat scientific materialism and its destructive moral, cultural, and political legacy. [00:51:26] See, this is just total. [00:51:28] These guys are Christian frauds. [00:51:31] That's what this is. [00:51:34] Crazy. [00:51:35] It's to replace science with God. [00:51:37] The last of these 20 year goals is to see design theory penetrate our religious, cultural, moral, and political life. [00:51:46] It can't be made any clearer than this religion everywhere, including government. [00:51:51] Anyone who is convinced that the DI does not have a religious and political agenda is a sucker. [00:51:58] Their pathetic attempt at damage control as a result of this leak was to craft a response. [00:52:02] Oh, it was leaked! [00:52:03] That it was an internal document that was leaked. [00:52:06] That makes it even funnier. [00:52:08] Oh, they're such frauds. [00:52:09] Edge document. [00:52:10] So what? [00:52:11] So what? [00:52:12] An insolent teenager who got caught pulling the fire alarm. [00:52:15] This response basically consists of the DI acting shocked and appalled by people making claims that the document says things that it factually says. [00:52:24] For example, right in the second paragraph, one group claimed that the document supplied evidence of a frightening 20 year master plan to have religion control not only science, but also everyday life, laws, and education. [00:52:38] Oh my, wherever would anyone get that wild idea? [00:52:41] I'll spare you the details of the 18 pages of desperate backpedaling, but it's linked below in a laugh riot, especially the parts where they pretend materialism is responsible for all the heinous acts that have historically been the exclusive domain of religion. [00:52:56] Oh, sweet irony. [00:52:58] Anyway, as we elucidated in part one, the immediate goal of Meyer and the rest of the DI is to get religion taught in schools. [00:53:04] This was formally attempted in the Kitzmiller v. Dover debacle of 2005 in Pennsylvania. [00:53:10] This was their first direct attempt to fulfill their agenda, and they failed miserably as the The court ruled that intelligent design is religion, not science, and the mandate was deemed unconstitutional. [00:53:21] While they won't formally admit that they want religion taught in science class, even though it's clear as day, they certainly won't admit to being motivated by a shift toward theocracy and a reunification of church and state. [00:53:32] Their response to the wedge leak says they can't believe they have to say it, but they don't want that nasty, nasty theocracy. [00:53:40] Honest! [00:53:41] But this too is a hollow claim. [00:53:43] We can see that by Meyer's own admission, most of their funding comes in the way of enormous donations from wealthy. [00:53:48] Christian fundamentalists, who in their own words want to see the total integration of biblical law into our lives and who abide by the infallibility of the scripture, these are the types the DI answers to churchy McMoneybags. [00:54:05] If the Christian equivalent of Sharia law is what they want to get for their money, you have to wonder why they're giving it to them. [00:54:13] Professor Dave, who is this money merchant promoting the Genesis Torah story supposed to look like? [00:54:21] Dave. [00:54:25] Looking a little tropey there, Dave. [00:54:28] Just kidding. [00:54:33] Save time creating content and generate a high quality. [00:54:36] Hmm? [00:54:38] So, with everyone up to speed on precisely what the DI really is, let's dig into Meyer and his pseudoscience. [00:54:44] What's his background? [00:54:45] With a bachelor's in physics and earth science, as well as a master's and PhD from Cambridge in philosophy of science, one might presume that he has a firm grasp on the scientific process. [00:54:56] But alas, his allegiance is not to science, as is evidenced by his primary output, his books, the medium of choice for those who are allergic to peer review. [00:55:06] Signature in the Cell attempts to argue that the structure of the cell points to intelligent design. [00:55:11] Darwin's Doubt says the same regarding the Cambrian explosion. [00:55:15] And most recently, Return of the God hypothesis recycles old talking points and rounds out the trifecta of trash. [00:55:22] With so much rubbish to address, I'll be. [00:55:24] Because of this guy and James True and that book, It's got Christians everywhere going like, yeah, the scientists are saying evolution's done now. [00:55:33] Yeah, that all the more it's being overturned. [00:55:36] Tucker Carlson saying that. [00:55:38] I was watching, listening to Christian talk radio the other day, and some Christian preacher was on there and said that. [00:55:46] There's such fraud. [00:55:47] Focusing on just two of his most favorite arguments and demonstrating that they constitute a deliberate attempt to misrepresent science. [00:55:55] I'll be staying away from arguments regarding the origin of life since I already covered that very neatly in my response to James Tour. [00:56:01] Again, if any fans of the DI haven't seen that content, I implore you to finally check those out when you're ready, as they're quite thorough. [00:56:09] But for now, let's move on to the fossil record, since it's something all of the DI folks seem to be having a little trouble with. [00:56:16] Here's a snippet from Stephen Meyer Takes on Darwin's Tree. [00:56:21] Because what we see in the fossil record, in particular, when we're looking at major innovations in biological form and structure, is the abrupt appearance of such major innovations where. [00:56:33] I think he's got one suit jacket. [00:56:35] He wears this same plaid blue suit jacket in every interview I've seen. [00:56:41] I guess I'm surprised that Jesus Schilling wouldn't be doing better than this. [00:56:45] In each case, those new biological forms are lacking any discernible connection to similar forms in the lower sedimentary strata. [00:56:57] So you get an abrupt appearance of a new form of life, usually persisting through the fossil record with some slight variation, but the basic form remaining static. [00:57:06] Over long periods of time, and then either the form going extinct or persisting right up to the present. [00:57:12] We don't see the gradual morphing of form from one major type of organism to another that is described by Darwin's tree of life and predicted on the basis of the action of his mechanism of natural selection and random variationslash mutation. [00:57:28] Okay, so this quite nicely sets up the main strategy of folks like Meyer. [00:57:33] Biologists say that evolution involves gradual change. [00:57:36] So, we should see the gradual change everywhere in the fossil record, and we totally don't at all. [00:57:42] So, evolution didn't happen. [00:57:43] This is a blatant denial of what is contained in the fossil record, coupled with the hope that the viewer will not lift a finger to check and just take his word for it. [00:57:52] There are countless examples of slow, gradual morphological change in the fossil record from fish to tetrapods, from amphibians to reptiles to birds, from land mammals back to sea mammals like whales and dolphins. [00:58:07] From early hominids to humans, as we discussed in part one, and countless others, one could fill up an entire semester of undergraduate studies. [00:58:16] Debunked. [00:58:17] Oh, that's funny, too, because I just pulled up this thing. [00:58:19] The same guy, James True, Tour, who is also a huge Bible thumper, Jesus brain, goes on Tucker Carlson and lies and says, There's no transitional fossils. [00:58:36] They just gaslight. [00:58:37] Just completely. [00:58:39] All right, so you can see these small permutations, but what you never see, never see, are what is called body plan changes. [00:58:49] Body plan changes. [00:58:50] And this encompasses many things. [00:58:54] But you see, these genetic networks would have to change. [00:58:59] So, a body plan change would be an invertebrate, something that does not have a spine, going to a vertebrae, something that has a spine. [00:59:06] Something like a worm going into something that has a spine. [00:59:11] You never, ever see that. [00:59:13] You never see. [00:59:14] Now, I bet you anything we could find every different stage of the formation of it. [00:59:20] I bet you we can still find species that have like. [00:59:25] Proto spines. [00:59:26] And also, like vertebrae evolved so long ago in the family tree. [00:59:33] I'm sure you could still find, I'll look it up right now. [00:59:38] How did the spine evolve? [00:59:39] Show an animal where the spine is like in a halfway development, partial development, like maybe still a sort of a spine, but not fully bone with all the vertebrae. [00:59:50] There are hypotheses where people will see fossils and they'll say, oh, this must have been a precursor to this. [00:59:57] They will never see the transformative thing. [01:00:00] That is. [01:00:01] Well, that would be it. [01:00:02] If it's the precursor, that's the transformative thing. [01:00:05] It's not just Jim Tour, the creationist, saying this. [01:00:08] And the problem with. [01:00:10] To be clear, the fossil record does not support the theory of evolution. [01:00:14] I saw David Berlinski, David Galernder, and Stephen Meyer interviewed by Peter Robinson on Uncommon Knowledge. [01:00:19] They said that math shows that complex life could not have arrived through natural selection and random mutations. [01:00:26] Yeah, they're just wrong and lying. [01:00:29] That's all it is. [01:00:31] Before the spine, there was a notochord. [01:00:35] Earliest ancestors of vertebrates were simple chordates. [01:00:39] Instead of a spine, they had a notochord, a flexible rod running along the body. [01:00:46] And this was in like early fish. [01:00:49] It provided support, but was soft and bendable. [01:00:52] Muscles could push against it for swimming. [01:00:54] You still see it today in animals like the lancelot, exactly like I said. [01:00:59] We'll still be able to see in species today that transit, just like eyes, the evolution of the eye. [01:01:04] You can still see in all these different other species, organisms, different stages of eye evolution. [01:01:21] At least as you're defining. [01:01:23] He's saying, oh, nobody knows they have a hypothesis, but it's not proven. [01:01:27] It seems to me like they've got it pretty well figured out. [01:01:33] Well, yes, it does not support body plan changes. [01:01:37] There are small permutations like the ones that I have just told you, but you will not see body plan changes. [01:01:42] In any fossil record that we've found. [01:01:45] The only thing that you will see is people will hypothesize over that fossil. [01:01:49] They'll see a fossil here and a fossil here, and they'll say, oh, And then they'll see a fossil here. [01:01:55] This must have been the transition to this. [01:01:58] And they'll hypothesize with that. [01:01:59] But it doesn't have to be the transition. [01:02:01] This is strictly a hypothesis. [01:02:04] And so we don't see that in the fossil record. [01:02:07] Where do we see God saying, Bibbidi Bobbidi Boo, Adam and Eve too? [01:02:12] Where do you see that? [01:02:14] They always do this. [01:02:15] Where do you see it? [01:02:15] You can't see it. [01:02:17] Prove seeing it. [01:02:19] It's like you can't prove something that happened hundreds of millions of years ago. [01:02:24] Where's your proof of Genesis being real? [01:02:27] Where's your proof of Adam and Eve? [01:02:28] Where's your proof that any supernatural figure ever just manifested like a Marvel movie out of thin air? [01:02:38] All these things, all these animals. [01:02:41] Many people don't see that in the fossil record. [01:02:43] Some people say we absolutely see that. [01:02:49] Discussing and categorizing these specimens to pretend they don't exist is science denial, plain and simple. [01:02:56] Of course, we do not have specimens for every single species that has ever existed because of how fossilization works. [01:03:03] It's a relatively rare occurrence. [01:03:04] Some short-lived species may have never been fossilized, and there are undoubtedly plenty of fossils that we have not yet found or may ever find. [01:03:12] Two facts which Meyer himself summarizes with the term the artifact hypothesis without bothering to acknowledge the validity of these two limitations, choosing instead to lie about something called the Duchantou shale, which contains organisms we will discuss a bit later. [01:03:27] But with the overarching lie well understood, let's dig into some of the more specific claims and compare them to the scientific literature to show how they are clearly false. [01:03:38] When asked for examples of organisms showing up very suddenly in the fossil record, he said this Don't upload your videos to YouTube. [01:03:46] Womp, womp, womp. [01:03:48] We will live stream it to YouTube. [01:03:51] There are many examples of the abrupt appearance of new forms of animal and plant life in the fossil record. [01:03:59] I wrote a book about one of the greatest of those events called the Cambrian Explosion, which is an event about 520 to 530 million years ago where the first animal forms arose abruptly in the fossil record with no discernible connection to similar forms in the lower Precambrian strata. [01:04:17] It's really dramatic. [01:04:19] So he may chalk this up to a misspeak, but he clearly said that the first animal forms appeared in the Cambrian Explosion. [01:04:27] This is objectively wrong, not just according to science, but even Meyer's own work. [01:04:33] He points out in chapter four of 2013's Darwin's Doubt that sponges and the mollusk like Kimberella are known from Ediacaran strong. [01:04:41] Thank you, Archie. [01:04:42] Well, aware that animal life got a bomb from Kaczynski and says that Jews invented the West. [01:04:46] The learner annoys me. [01:04:48] I don't know who any of those people are, but sounds dumb. === Life Predates Cambrian Explosion (15:34) === [01:04:54] Life predates the Cambrian explosion. [01:04:56] This event was a diversification of animal life, not its origin. [01:05:01] Second, claiming that the Cambrian explosion lasted from 530 to 520 million years ago is wrong too, which he doesn't even clearly state as a range rather than an approximate singular date to deliberately maximize confusion. [01:05:15] According to the 2011 paper, The Cambrian Conundrum Early Divergence and Later Ecological Success in the Early History of Animals, we read as follows The earliest skeletal fossils occur in the latest Ediacaran, but the first appearance of an array of Plates, spines, shells, and other skeletal elements of bilaterian affinity begins during the early Cambrian Fortunian stage, 541 to around 530 MA, where MA stands for mega anim. [01:05:45] We was fishing shit. [01:05:47] Yeah, we are fishing shit. [01:05:51] No, you're right. [01:05:54] And this probably doesn't really, you know, he's forced to lie. [01:05:57] Yeah, we was fish. [01:05:59] We was definitely fish. [01:06:01] You don't see the resemblance? [01:06:04] You don't see the resemblance, guys? [01:06:10] Get the ears. [01:06:12] You don't see the resemblance? [01:06:13] We were fish. [01:06:16] For sure. [01:06:18] Deal with it. [01:06:24] Reading further Although many new groups have been described over the past decade, the pattern of diversification of both body fossils and trace fossils has remained largely robust. [01:06:35] A recompilation of the first occurrence of all metazoan phyla. [01:06:38] Classes and stem classes of equivalent morphologic disparity show their first occurrences in the latest Ediacaran by 555 MA, with a dramatic rise over about 25 million years in the first several stages of the Cambrian and continuing into the Ordovician. [01:06:57] So, the Cambrian explosion itself is just the rapid appearance of bilaterian phyla in the early Cambrian, but this is already at least 25, not 10 million years, lasting from 555 to 530 million years ago. [01:07:12] Given that this study was published before Meyer's book and well before this 2021 video, he is either ignoring this information or unaware of it, neither of which looks good for someone posing as an expert. [01:07:23] Beyond this, more recent research has changed this picture substantially. [01:07:28] A 2018 paper titled, and it's like, okay, he's like, oh, the Cambrian explosion. [01:07:34] Oh, no, there's no life forms before that. [01:07:37] They all appeared out of nowhere. [01:07:38] Like, what do you think? [01:07:38] God, like, used his magic wand and said, okay, take simple cells and make them. [01:07:44] Divide up into a million different things. [01:07:47] Is that what he thinks happened? [01:07:49] Is that the alternate theory? [01:07:50] Is that the alternate hypothesis? [01:07:53] The Cambrian explosion argues that the Cambrian encompassed two separate radiations one of stem lineages from 542 to 513 million years ago, and one of crown lineages extending from 513 million to the start of the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event about 485 million years ago. [01:08:12] We will elaborate on what we just said in a moment, but we should first quickly summarize the dishonesty. [01:08:17] In how ID proponents portray the Cambrian explosion, they exploit the suddenness that is implied by its name in order to pretend that enormous numbers of species showed up in an unimaginably short period of time, allowing the uneducated viewer to presume that this means almost instantaneous, as though they emerged from a puff of divine smoke. [01:08:38] Yeah, actually, we can now see that we are talking about around 70 million years. [01:08:44] Although relatively brief for geologic timescales, hence the colorful name, for biological organisms, this is quite a long time. [01:08:52] Plenty long enough for the impressive diversification to take place, and the intense evolutionary pressure of many animal forms suddenly in direct competition for resources. [01:09:02] Now, let's get back to the previous point regarding lineages to further highlight Meyer's dishonesty. [01:09:08] We need to define some terminology. [01:09:10] Meyer is fond of saying that various animal phyla appeared in the Cambrian without predecessors, but what is a phylum in the first place? [01:09:17] Meyer defines the term phylum in Chapter 2 of Darwin's Doubt as the highest or widest categories of biological classification in the animal kingdom. [01:09:26] With each exhibiting a unique architecture, organizational blueprint, or structural body plan. [01:09:33] While that sounds fine at face value, the 2000 paper, a critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the Bilaterian phyla, points out why this definition is problematic. [01:09:43] You see, it's at this point where the average e crusader goes, Professor Dave is a gay Jew and he loves trannies, and I believe the Christian guy that has the suit on. [01:09:54] That's probably how it goes for most Christians watching that. [01:10:00] Professor Dave is like a Redditor, and I trust the Christian guy that's on Prager U and Daily Wire. [01:10:07] Are characterized by particular types of body plan features which putative superphyletic groupings do not possess, thus, seem to be based on an artifact of how we classify groups of animals. [01:10:18] If such superphyletic features were readily identifiable, the larger grouping would itself probably be called a phylum, as it would be what might have a better effect on Christians? [01:10:30] More persuasive is just something like this. [01:10:32] If evolution isn't real, explain this. [01:10:37] Monkey? [01:10:39] Monkey man? [01:10:40] More man? [01:10:41] Less monkey? [01:10:44] Modern human. [01:10:45] Checkmate Christians. [01:10:51] Checkmate. [01:10:57] Recognized to be phylogenetically unified. [01:11:00] As the level at which this ignorance of relationships becomes important is likely to vary between groups, the cladists support criticism that phyla and other such ranks should be positively discouraged on the grounds that they. [01:11:13] Imagine not seeing how small incremental changes could make this possible. [01:11:19] Yeah, the Abrahamics don't want to see it. [01:11:25] 200 million years, 100 million years, 75, 50 million, modern man. [01:11:33] Fabio. [01:11:36] The evolution. [01:11:38] We didn't come from no monkeys, man. [01:11:43] Maybe you came from, maybe your granddaddy was a monkey, but not mine. [01:11:48] Mine was Noah. [01:11:52] They engender spurious comparisons between members of the same rank, seems to be valid. [01:11:58] Nobody actually knows where their clothing comes from. [01:12:01] Homo Hashemitis? [01:12:04] That's funny. [01:12:06] So, to simplify, we are saying that phyla, like other taxonomic ranks, are largely arbitrary. [01:12:12] So, we should concern ourselves less with whether or not some animals fall into a particular phylum and more with whether the features they possess are explicable under evolution. [01:12:22] As we will see, this is definitely the case. [01:12:24] This paper also defines. [01:12:26] I love how, like, the genius of God, he's like, humans, my favorite people, humans, the only ones with souls. [01:12:33] He's like, what else does the world need? [01:12:35] Hmm. [01:12:36] Mosquitoes. [01:12:37] Let's. [01:12:37] Let's have some little flying things that bite you and make you itch and spread disease and suck your blood. [01:12:42] Thanks, God. [01:12:43] Thanks, God, for mosquitoes. [01:12:45] God bless God's mosquitoes and parasites and bacteria, viruses. [01:12:56] Thank you, God. [01:12:58] Plan as a set of features plesiomorphically shared by extant taxa in a monophyletic clade. [01:13:05] That word plesiomorphically just refers to traits that are shared by all the members of a group but are not unique to that group. [01:13:12] So while this adds objectivity to our definition, It also means we can't necessarily equate a phylum with a particular group of organisms that share a body plan. [01:13:21] For example, insects share a body plan that is a modified version of the common arthropod body plan. [01:13:27] All of the features shared by arthropods. [01:13:30] Just remember, Adam, evolution can happen in both sudden leaps and gradual changes. [01:13:35] Environment and genetic mutation can work in a sort of nonlinear way. [01:13:40] Yeah, some species have been the same way for a long, long time, like alligators or sharks. [01:13:47] But. [01:13:50] It all has to do with environment and so many different factors, but you're right, it is not. [01:14:04] This brings us to two other terms we need to be familiar with before proceeding those being crown and stem. [01:14:10] This paper defines both. [01:14:12] The crown group of a phylum consists of the. [01:14:14] This is so technical. [01:14:19] Plausibly interpreted as another. [01:14:21] It's a very technical argument. [01:14:22] The last of the soft bodied and organic. [01:14:25] Oh my God, he's talking about the bodies forever. [01:14:29] The first flowering plants. [01:14:31] The first flowering plants come into the fossil record, an event that's now known as the big bloom, the biological big bloom. [01:14:40] And then another striking event occurs in the Eocene period where you get the first mammals, where there are between 15 and 17 new orders of mammals that come suddenly into the fossil record, again, with no discernible connection. [01:14:53] To similar creatures in the lower strata beneath the Eocene. [01:14:57] Every single. [01:14:58] So, what are you trying to say? [01:14:59] God, like, dropped down, God sent some fallen angels from heaven with new mammals? [01:15:04] What is he even arguing here? [01:15:06] What is this? [01:15:07] What are all these claims supposed to even prove? [01:15:10] And then in the fossil record, there's a bunch of mammals and they don't match previous things before that in the other fossil record. [01:15:16] So, where do you think they came from? [01:15:21] God's like, hmm, some animals that I created are going extinct. [01:15:24] Let me send some new ones down there. [01:15:27] Let me get back in the lab and tinker around and make some more advanced species now and just make it look like evolution while he hides and does nothing. [01:15:38] Is flat out wrong. [01:15:39] Let's take them one by one. [01:15:41] First, the great Ordovician biodiversification event, or GOBI, was Johann. [01:15:51] Bowie? [01:15:52] I wonder what he said there. [01:15:54] Hold on, I'll talk. [01:15:56] Bullshit. [01:15:59] Bullshit. [01:16:00] Yeah. [01:16:02] It's still censored that bullshit. [01:16:03] You didn't spell it right, and it still censored it. [01:16:06] If you want a good laugh, look up the Crocoduck. [01:16:09] I remember that. [01:16:12] Crocoduck. [01:16:13] Yeah, yeah. [01:16:14] I got some funny ones here, actually. [01:16:16] Look, evolution is real and biblical. [01:16:19] Creationism is ridiculous. [01:16:22] I mean, can you not see incrementally with small mutations building up over time? [01:16:30] Can you not see how this is possible? [01:16:32] This is a natural explanation, no magic required, fits with what we can observe and prove. [01:16:40] But no, no, no, no. [01:16:41] It makes way more sense that God just created all the diversity and complexity, you know, with a snap of fingers, with magic. [01:16:52] And then I'm reading the replies from Christians on that post. [01:16:58] When was the last time you see monkey turn to human and fish turn to monkey? [01:17:03] You yourself have no evidence except your imaginary mind. [01:17:07] This retard thinks that evolution means that a fish is going to turn directly into a monkey. [01:17:16] Or that a human's gonna turn into a fish. [01:17:20] Yeah, bro. [01:17:21] Yeah, bro, it's just your imagination. [01:17:23] So, why aren't new evolutions walking out of the sea every now and day? [01:17:29] No, it's impossible that people are really this stupid. [01:17:32] Or monkeys evolving into something, or humans evolving in whatever they want to evolve in water world feet? [01:17:41] Laughing emoji. [01:17:45] If evolution is true, what will happen to humans? [01:17:48] Will humans become ants or what? [01:17:55] How sad is this? [01:17:56] A failed education system. [01:17:59] It's because of Discovery Institute and Bible thumpers. [01:18:05] It's partly to blame for this. [01:18:07] What is this? [01:18:08] A school for ants? [01:18:11] What are humans going to evolve into ants? [01:18:17] Dude doesn't see some human female birth out a whole bunch of little fire ants out of her womb. [01:18:27] So he thinks evolution is fake. [01:18:32] Crazy. [01:18:35] You think you descend from a tadpole? [01:18:38] Yeah, bro, my grandpa was a tadpole. [01:18:41] Good one. [01:18:42] Marine fauna that would be common throughout the remainder of the Paleozoic era. [01:18:47] Gobi occurred in two phases. [01:18:49] Animal diversity increased somewhat in the early Ordovician, followed by a sharp increase in the middle Ordovician. [01:18:56] The benefactors of Gobi include, among others, stromatoporoid sponges, corals, brachiopods, echinoderms, and this is very technical. [01:19:09] I thought it was going to be more like his James True video, where he's just like. [01:19:16] Dunking on them left and right. [01:19:18] A million years ago, such as Herarosaurus, Eoraptor, and Saturnalia. [01:19:24] Again, no sign of any intelligent design, just slow and gradual change. [01:19:29] Turtles have a good fossil record as well. [01:19:31] The evolution of the turtle's unique morphology is exquisitely documented in transitional fossils such as Unodosaurus, Papa Shellies, Odonto Shellies, and Proganochellies. [01:19:43] What? [01:19:44] Look at that little proto. [01:19:47] proto turtle. [01:19:53] Next, at present. [01:19:54] But there's no. [01:19:55] I see online every day no transitional fossils. [01:19:59] Oh, yeah, where are all the transitional fossils? [01:20:02] Just like, well, if you actually knew anything, you'd know that they've got all types of them. [01:20:08] Earliest known bird is Archaeopteryx from the late Jurassic, but this isn't even the oldest feathered dinosaur. [01:20:15] Xautingia, Ankyornis, and Aurornis predate Archaeopteryx and show evidence of feathers. [01:20:22] Like the evolution of flight in insects, the evolution of flight in birds involved a lot of mergers. === Transitional Forms Explained (03:18) === [01:20:28] Hi, I'm Kirk Cameron, and my partner Ray Comfort and I. Come to you tonight not as molecular biologists or as rocket scientists. [01:20:36] If you dare eat him, send $5. [01:20:37] I see comments on your rumble stream, such as if we came from fish and apes, why are there still fish and apes? [01:20:43] Not sure if serious, but divergent species can coexist and compete and both survive. [01:20:48] I'm pretty sure they were being sarcastic. [01:20:53] They were joking along with like the bad question showing people don't understand. [01:20:58] They were joking. [01:21:00] But simply as an author and an actor, and we. [01:21:02] Yeah. [01:21:03] How do you think turtles evolved? [01:21:06] Well, with the ooze, like in Ninja Turtles. [01:21:09] This is so good. [01:21:10] We're not scientists or know anything about science at all. [01:21:13] I'm an actor and he's a Christian preacher, but we're going to tell you let's explain to you about Krakow Duck. [01:21:19] Not as psychologists or as rocket scientists, but simply as an author and an actor, and we want to do two things that fly in the face of convention. [01:21:28] One, we'd like to show you that the existence of God can be proven 100% absolutely without the use of faith. [01:21:37] And secondly, as a former atheist myself, An evolutionist. [01:21:41] I want to pull back the curtain and show that the number one reason many people do not believe in God is not because of a lack of evidence, but because of a theory that many scientists today consider to be a fairy tale for grown ups. [01:21:55] Oh, many scientists today. [01:21:57] Dude, I would love to see the percentage of scientists that doubt evolution. [01:22:05] Other disciples satanic cover up. [01:22:07] Science has never found a genuine transitional form that is one kind of animal crossing over into another kind. [01:22:15] Either living or in the fossil record. [01:22:16] And there's supposed to be billions of them. [01:22:20] Now, what I'm about to show you does not exist. [01:22:23] These were actually created by our graphic artists. [01:22:26] But I want you to keep your eye out for this because this is what evolutionists have been searching for for hundreds of years. [01:22:32] Let's see a Doogie Houser. [01:22:34] Show us Doogie Houser. [01:22:35] This is Doogie Houser, right? [01:22:37] If you find one of these, you could become rich and famous. [01:22:39] So here's some transitional forms. [01:22:43] This is called the crocodile. [01:22:44] Can you see this? [01:22:46] God, what a numb nut. [01:22:49] All right, let's try another one. [01:22:51] He's like, you can't be serious. [01:22:54] Half bull, half frog, or of course. [01:22:58] Wow, what an embarrassment. [01:23:02] That is crazy, crazy work. [01:23:06] Used to make flight easier. [01:23:08] Oh, Neil Patrick Harris. [01:23:09] Okay, they look the same. [01:23:10] Sorry, close enough. [01:23:12] I was way off. [01:23:17] Haven't done that one for a while, huh? [01:23:19] Uh oh. [01:23:21] I love that soundbite. [01:23:22] It's been a while. [01:23:23] I forget my soundbite. [01:23:24] My voice is way off. [01:23:26] Feathers were accepted from insulating feathers. [01:23:29] By the way, if you want to make a creationist's head explode, inform them that scales and feathers are made of the same protein, keratin, simply in different arrangements, and that a single point mutation in certain chickens causes them to grow feathers where scales should be. === Computer Code and Organs (15:12) === [01:23:46] Moving on, the first marine reptiles refers to ichthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, and placodonts. [01:23:53] All of whom evolved in the early Triassic. [01:23:56] Yet again, we have fossils documenting these transitions. [01:23:59] Though ichthyosaurs are fully aquatic, paleontologists have found early Triassic sauropsids that are related to them but do not display such extreme specializations, including the Hupasuchians and Cartorhynchus. [01:24:13] Plesiosaurs have semi aquatic relatives, like nothosaurs and pachypleurosaurs, and there are even transitional placodonts known, such as Palatodonta. [01:24:26] Okay, this is just getting. [01:24:30] Okay, we get it. [01:24:32] This guy's just saying a bunch of stuff that's wrong. [01:24:35] Okay, let's do computer code. [01:24:36] And that approach is the Darwinian mechanism lacks the creative power to generate the large scale, what are called morphological innovations, the big changes in form that arise in the fossil record. [01:24:48] That raises the question well, what could produce those new forms of life? [01:24:53] And what we know from biology is that whenever you see new forms of life arising, you also have to have new information. [01:25:00] It's very much like in our computer world. [01:25:02] If you want to give your computer a new function, you have to provide code, you have to provide Information in the form of software. [01:25:11] And something very similar is true in life. [01:25:13] If you want to build a new form of animal life, you have to have new organs and tissues. [01:25:17] But new organs and tissues require new dedicated proteins to service those organs and tissues. [01:25:23] For example, many of the animals that came into the fossil record in the Cambrian period had a gut. [01:25:31] But guts require digestive enzymes, and digestive enzymes are proteins, and proteins are built in accord with the instructions stored on the DNA molecule. [01:25:41] So, as you see these explosions of form in the Cambrian period or other periods in the history of life, what you're also seeing, therefore, is explosions of biological information. [01:25:51] Biological form requires biological information, genetic information, and other forms of information. [01:25:57] And that raises the question where did that information come from? [01:26:01] Now, what we know from mutations, which is the basis of all scientific reasoning about the past, is that information, especially in a digital form, always comes from. [01:26:12] An intelligent source, whether we're talking about a paragraph in a book or a section of software or a hieroglyphic inscription or even information embedded in a radio signal. [01:26:24] Whenever we see information and we trace it back to its ultimate source, we inevitably find a mind, not a material process. [01:26:31] Well, if the mutation selection mechanism is not capable of generating the amount of information necessary to build new forms of life, then a better explanation is actually intelligent design. [01:26:44] That a mind played a role in the origin of those new forms of life. [01:26:48] And that's consistent with everything we know about the cause and effect structure of the world. [01:26:52] Okay, so he does this all the time. [01:26:54] Computers use code, and humans created that code, so all codes have a creator. [01:27:00] This talking point is on every ID bingo card. [01:27:03] This is Kent Hovind level tripe. [01:27:06] Someone created this cup I'm using, so everything was created. [01:27:09] It's mind bogglingly stupid and a dishonest talking point. [01:27:13] To get more specific, he complains about digestive organs requiring digestive enzymes. [01:27:18] Without bothering to make the obvious conclusion that the enzymes can predate the organ, and also that rudimentary organs complexify over time. [01:27:27] He's trying to pretend science is suggesting that something like the human stomach appeared out of nowhere millions of years ago, which is ridiculous. [01:27:35] But to get to the heart of the matter, Meyer is a complete dumpster fire when it comes to the concept of information. [01:27:41] We know from our experience that information always arises from an intelligent source. [01:27:48] Whether we're looking at a hieroglyphic inscription or a paragraph in a book, Or information in a section of software code, or even information embedded in a radio signal. [01:27:57] Whatever we see in this. [01:27:58] This is the nonsense that we just saw from Ray Comfort. [01:28:02] If you see a painting, a painting has a painter. [01:28:07] A building has an architect. [01:28:11] As if you can't differentiate between things that are made by people and things that aren't made by people. [01:28:21] If man can't build a cell, Then, how can some invisible God build a cell? [01:28:29] Can Christians ever explain that? [01:28:32] And we trace it back to its source, it always comes to a mind, not an undirected material process. [01:28:38] He wants the viewer to believe that information is a material substance that needs to be forged by intelligence rather than what it really is a pattern or sequence of items. [01:28:49] If nucleotides polymerize to form a nucleic acid and that sequence acts as a template for the synthesis of another molecule, it's information. [01:28:58] It's just a word we use to describe something that exists, and it has zero implications toward intelligence. [01:29:05] Let's watch him milk this computer analogy some more. [01:29:08] What happens if you introduce a few random changes to the computer code? [01:29:12] You'll likely mess it up, right? [01:29:15] Though it might still work if you don't make too many changes. [01:29:18] But if you make a couple changes that'll slightly alter it. [01:29:23] And hey, maybe one of the computer codes alters it. [01:29:26] Most of the alters make it crash so it doesn't work, but one of the. [01:29:31] Millions of mutations actually make your banner on your website look a little better. [01:29:38] And you get more clicks. [01:29:40] And then that passes on again and more clicks. [01:29:43] And then it adds to it again. [01:29:45] That's the way it works already debunked. [01:29:46] Random changes, your program will stop functioning altogether. [01:29:49] Yeah. [01:29:50] I see people in the chat that think this guy's got it down. [01:29:56] I guess you're on board with Dennis Prager and all the rabbis then, and Adam and Eve. [01:30:03] You certainly can't keep doing this and expect some cool new program to pop out. [01:30:08] There is so much wrong here. [01:30:10] First, he insists upon an excessive accumulation of random changes to the code, which is not how biology works nor how software works. [01:30:19] He ignores both natural selection and principles of coding. [01:30:23] Not that it matters for biology, but when programmers allow programs to make changes to their own code, also known as self modifying code, with feedback mechanisms in place, we do. [01:30:36] Distinguishing artificial versus natural phenomena. [01:30:39] For example, in search for ET or ancient civilization. [01:30:43] Gotta distinguish the difference. [01:30:45] Not get what Meyer says. [01:30:47] We instead see a kind of evolution in action with a gradual improvement in performance and efficiency, similar to biological evolution. [01:30:55] But more importantly, in terms of DNA, again, no one is proposing that there are loads and loads of random changes occurring very rapidly in one organism. [01:31:05] That would be the equivalent of someone getting blasted by huge amounts of radiation. [01:31:10] Like a Chernobyl event, and sustaining a ridiculous amount of mutations. [01:31:15] Guess what? [01:31:15] That person would certainly develop loads of tumors and die. [01:31:19] That's perfectly analogous to his program that has its code changed randomly and dramatically such that it doesn't work anymore. [01:31:26] That's not how evolution works. [01:31:28] Mutations crop up slowly and are selected for from one organism to the next. [01:31:34] Each organism must be viable for any mutations to proliferate to the next generation. [01:31:39] Evolution is not just mutations, it's mutations. [01:31:43] And natural selection. [01:31:44] When we want to engineer enzymes to perform a novel activity, the best strategy is to speed up nature. [01:31:51] We use random mutagenesis and select the best mutant. [01:31:55] Run the cycle 10 times, each time picking the best mutant, and you get a highly efficient enzyme. [01:32:00] It's evolution in vitro, not design. [01:32:03] Similarly, if you let a program change its code with a feedback mechanism in place analogous to natural selection, the code will improve. [01:32:11] This concept is not just an analogy, but actually direct. [01:32:15] Relevant to the concept of evolution by natural selection. [01:32:19] Stevie, do you think we can drop this computer code thing anytime soon? [01:32:23] If you're a computer programmer, you know that if you start randomly changing the sections of functional code, you're going to degrade that code long before you ever come up with a new program or operating system. [01:32:36] Okay, buddy. [01:32:37] Unfortunately for Meyer, it gets much worse than this. [01:32:40] He frequently makes the claim that mutations cause degradation. [01:32:44] Do you guys understand that? [01:32:45] Like, if you have a computer code, say you have a thousand different computers all with a computer code. [01:32:52] And then each one of them, you do a small mutation to the code. [01:32:56] Many of those computers are going to crash and the code won't work anymore. [01:33:00] And then those don't pass on that code. [01:33:03] But the few computers that got a mutation that it still allowed them to be viable in the code, the program to run, some of them might even run a little bit better. [01:33:15] That's the one that gets better. [01:33:17] That passes on to all the other computers. [01:33:19] And then you keep that process going. [01:33:22] The fact that he's. [01:33:23] Either he's dumb and doesn't understand this, or he's purposely lying about it to trick people. [01:33:29] Good stuff. [01:33:30] It is minutiae, yeah, but it's picking up a little bit here with the computer code part. [01:33:36] Of information. [01:33:38] Mutations degrade information. [01:33:41] Yeah. [01:33:42] They fundamentally misunderstand the randomness and selection process by the environment. [01:33:48] Minds generate information, and therefore, mind provides a better explanation for the origin of information than the Darwinian mechanism. [01:33:56] This is one of my favorite sentences Meyer has ever said because it demonstrates what an unbelievable moron he is. [01:34:04] Mutations degrade information is a meaningless sentence that can serve no purpose other than to capitalize on the complete and total ignorance of his viewers toward what DNA is and how gene expression works. [01:34:18] For people who don't know what any of these words mean, their personal connotation with the word mutation will probably be a vat of toxic green. [01:34:27] Good point. [01:34:28] It's not that we are like computers, it's that computers are like us. [01:34:33] And coding is just like a natural phenomenon in the universe. [01:34:42] Good one. [01:34:44] Bad, nasty mutation ooze that dissolves. [01:34:47] I know, I was thinking of that too, Ja. [01:34:49] AI evolved itself this way with machine learning. [01:34:54] Each replication of itself is slightly better than the last. [01:34:57] Now, just wait a thousand years. [01:34:59] Exactly. [01:35:00] Wait until they have, I think it's AGI or something like that, whatever it's called. [01:35:05] Once the AI programs are able to edit themselves and then get better in each new generation, watch that AI evolve itself. [01:35:17] Kittens and all of their information. [01:35:19] In reality, to anyone who remembers their ninth grade biology, mutations are simply changes in the nucleotide sequence of a gene. [01:35:27] For those who are a bit rusty, I have a very short. [01:35:29] And very clear tutorial on transcription and translation in my biochemistry series. [01:35:35] But in short, a gene is transcribed to generate an mRNA, which is then translated to produce a protein. [01:35:42] And any change in the sequence found in the gene may result in a change in a particular amino acid in the protein. [01:35:49] A different sequence of nucleotides yielding a different sequence of amino acids. [01:35:54] That's it. [01:35:55] For the organism, some mutations are bad, the vast majority are neutral, and improved function by random mutation is observed in viral and bacteria. [01:36:03] Bacterial evolution every single day, both in culture and in vivo. [01:36:07] So he would be wrong even if he was talking about cellular function, but he isn't. [01:36:12] He said information, again, as though referring to some nebulous magical entity that is separate from the DNA itself. [01:36:20] Mutations simply change the information, they don't degrade it. [01:36:25] And Meyer is profoundly stupid for having said so. [01:36:28] He pulls this crap all the time. [01:36:31] Unless the chemical letters in the DNA text are sequenced properly, a protein molecule will not form. [01:36:39] Nope. [01:36:39] And you see, Prager U promotes this guy and this bullshit because they want you to be Noahides. [01:36:44] To be Noahides, you got to believe in Noah. [01:36:46] In Genesis, in Adam and Eve. [01:36:49] Simple as that. [01:36:52] The resulting mRNA has a start codon, the sequence can be literally anything, and the corresponding protein will be produced. [01:37:00] Astounding. [01:37:01] In all codes and languages, there are vastly more ways of arranging. [01:37:04] Zorn Dare Edom sent $5. [01:37:06] A good analogy for mutation for lay people is the telephone game. [01:37:10] Yeah. [01:37:13] Characters. [01:37:14] Every bit it changes a little bit, passes down the line. [01:37:17] That will generate meaningful sequences. [01:37:19] And this applies to DNA. [01:37:21] Remember, natural selection only selects sequences that random mutations generate. [01:37:27] Yet, experiments have established that DNA sequences capable of making stable proteins are extremely rare and thus really hard to stumble on randomly. [01:37:38] Even more astounding, he claims sequences that it's rare for somebody to win the lottery, but people win lotteries all the time. [01:37:48] Dude, how is this guy supposed to be some super science expert, writes all these books, goes on all these huge platforms? [01:37:54] Paraded around like some science genius expert, and I'm me with my like low college level, uh, you know, science courses, am able to debunk this guy like with ease. [01:38:07] How is that possible? [01:38:11] Produce stable proteins are extremely rare when, in actuality, literally any sequence would produce a protein that is perfectly stable. [01:38:20] There is nothing inherently unstable about proteins, again, as long as there is a start codon present in the resulting mRNA. [01:38:28] So that translation can begin, the rest of the sequence is irrelevant. [01:38:33] Every possible three letter sequence is a codon that corresponds to an amino acid. [01:38:39] So, no matter what the sequence, a protein will be produced. [01:38:43] And proteins don't just fall apart for no reason, no matter what the sequence of amino acids. [01:38:48] So, any sequence will result in a stable protein. [01:38:53] This so few stable proteins thing is an even dumber lie than the lie he meant to tell. === Genome Duplication Functions (04:40) === [01:38:59] Which is that very few proteins have biological function. [01:39:03] This is obviously what he meant because this is what he goes on to talk about. [01:39:13] How rare? [01:39:17] Correct. [01:39:21] Of course, Axe is just another DI clown, so it's not a surprise that this is who he references. [01:39:28] It's also not a surprise that they are both profoundly wrong. [01:39:32] This is just another example of the wow, big, scary numbers game that ID proponents play. [01:39:38] First, when insisting that 10 to the 77 proteins would not have any function, he is pretending that he made all of these proteins and tested their functionality. [01:39:48] He has no idea what functionality all those sequences would produce. [01:39:52] Many new sequences could have any number of other functions. [01:39:57] What they mean to say is that all those other proteins would not have this particular function held by the protein in question, which is also unbelievably wrong. [01:40:07] If a protein, such as an enzyme, has a particular sequence, they would have you believe that this is the only sequence that would result in this function. [01:40:15] That's ridiculous. [01:40:17] There are hundreds of amino acid residues in a protein, and most of them could be many different amino acids. [01:40:24] Anyone who thinks switching one random leucine to isoleucine would result in a non functional protein is an idiot. [01:40:32] A dramatic change from a hydrophobic to hydrophilic residue, for example, might change the folding pattern slightly, and this may or may not change binding affinity. [01:40:41] Which could become worse or better. [01:40:43] But many of the 20 amino acids, or the idea that changes requiring multiple coordinated mutations, it almost never happens. [01:40:51] But unfortunately, the science just isn't there. [01:40:55] In general, given enough time, separate populations develop their own mutations, and this ultimately leads to reproductive isolation, also known as speciation. [01:41:04] This can occur over long stretches of time, or in some cases, a single generation, depending on the organism. [01:41:11] Plants, for instance, often speciate by whole genome duplication. [01:41:15] Or polyploidy, but this has also been observed in some animals. [01:41:19] For example, the marbled crayfish Procamberus virginalis speciated from its ancestral species, Procamberus phalax, in the 1990s due to a whole genome duplication. [01:41:32] That we have physically observed speciation events is another dirty secret that many creationists don't like to acknowledge. [01:41:40] At first. [01:41:40] Yeah, good point on the junk DNA thing. [01:41:43] It's like if an Apple engineer gave you a. [01:41:50] A coded program operating system, and it had all of this millions of lines of code that just did nothing. [01:42:01] You'd be like, what the hell is this? [01:42:02] You're taking up all my RAM, all my memory, all my storage. [01:42:06] What's the deal? [01:42:07] What's with all this code? [01:42:09] See, the junk code, a lot of it is like a byproduct of the messy process of natural evolution. [01:42:19] Another showing that it's not the same as. [01:42:26] Having a human engineer, a human coder, a divine, intelligent coder wouldn't have all of this messy code, wouldn't have all these mutations causing, you know, genetic mutations in people that are bad. [01:42:43] Sister species are very similar to each other, differing only slightly in genetics, morphology, and perhaps behavior. [01:42:50] But over the course of generations, these differences become more and more pronounced. [01:42:55] For instance, compare the genomes of closely related species within a genus. [01:42:59] Or multiple genera within a family. [01:43:02] What is apparent is the exception of existing genes for new functions rather than the whole involved in. [01:43:08] Don't rush cherry dark chocolate. [01:43:12] That's that. [01:43:13] Ooh, you guys ready for some dark chocolate? [01:43:15] How much information does a promoter region have? [01:43:17] That commercial made me a dart chocolate. [01:43:19] Or an enhancer region. [01:43:21] We can't quantify how much genetic information is needed to go from a fin to an arm, but we can calculate how many mutations have evidently occurred. [01:43:31] It is for this reason that biologists talk about specific genes and genetic regions instead of vaguely gesturing at information. === Meyer's Invalid Logic (04:00) === [01:43:40] The word is intentionally used in this manner to muddy the conversation. [01:43:45] So that concludes a thorough assessment of Meyer's two biggest talking points the fossil record and genetics. [01:43:52] To summarize, we can see that when it comes to these topics, Meyer has only one strategy. [01:43:57] He puts forward some premise that is really just a lie about science, and from that he draws the conclusion God did it. [01:44:04] There are two huge problems with this. [01:44:06] First, again, the premise is always false. [01:44:10] He's just lying. [01:44:11] He's lying about the duration and nature of the Cambrian explosion. [01:44:15] He's lying about the lack of transitional fossils. [01:44:18] He's lying about basic freshman year undergraduate level genetics concepts. [01:44:23] The premise is always false. [01:44:25] Furthermore, the logic he uses to get to his conclusion is also invalid. [01:44:30] Even if his premise were correct and he was actually citing some unexplained phenomenon, to conclude God did it is not scientific. [01:44:38] Ever. [01:44:39] End of story. [01:44:40] We don't know things and we seek to figure them out. [01:44:43] That is done through scientific research, not pontification that is motivated by a specific desired theological conclusion. [01:44:51] As an alleged philosopher of science, it is astounding that Meyer does not grasp this. [01:44:57] It is also astounding how many ways these DI folks can dress up the God of the gaps in different costumes to fill not just temporary gaps in human knowledge, but gaps in their own personal knowledge. [01:45:10] Which could quickly be rectified by learning about existing science. [01:45:14] But in the end, that is truly the only God they have. [01:45:17] The pathetic, impotent God that Meyer so desperately fights and lies for. [01:45:22] The one who can't seem to figure out exactly what it is he wants to create and when. [01:45:27] Having to step in every few million years to make some new stuff from scratch. [01:45:32] Yeah, that's what I was saying. [01:45:34] That's his argument. [01:45:34] He's like, oh, all these new mammals came from nowhere. [01:45:37] All these new Cambrian bacteria and fish and shit all just popped up out of nowhere. [01:45:44] So, what is it? [01:45:44] God, this you think God is just making stuff up as he goes? [01:45:50] He's like, Well, how about we throw in some mosquitoes and tigers? [01:45:56] That's funny. [01:45:57] Manufacture a mechanism by which the diversification happens on its own. [01:46:02] This is what makes Meyer yet another apologist hack, just like the rest of them. [01:46:07] To a lay person, does he sound like he knows what he's talking about? [01:46:11] Yes. [01:46:12] Does he sound like a reasonable, grounded person? [01:46:15] Yes. [01:46:16] Does he sound sincere in his convictions? [01:46:18] Yes. [01:46:19] Is he actually any of those things? [01:46:21] Not even a little bit. [01:46:23] It's a facade, a costume he wears for those who only need a friendly tone and a message they want to hear, but have no desire to actually learn a thing about science. [01:46:34] He is fully aware of all the research he contradicts in his content. [01:46:38] His career is centered around it. [01:46:41] One could therefore say that Meyer is slightly more sophisticated than some apologists, in that while some of his lies are blatantly obvious to anyone who got a B or better in ninth grade biology, Some of them do require an investigation of the primary scientific literature, an investigation he knows that not a single member of his target audience will produce. [01:47:02] But that's why I bring the investigation to you, so that we can all conclude together with these two opinions that, like everyone else affiliated with the DI, Meyer is a complete fraud. [01:47:16] And we can now safely cue the desperate response from Meyer and pals, whining in their safe little blogs, shielded from outside commentary. [01:47:26] About what Zionist cuck, real unhappy about the commercial. [01:47:30] That was a crazy one. [01:47:33] Look at her lick that chocolate bar. === Common Ancestor Reality (12:32) === [01:47:40] Yeah, but then where did they evolve? [01:47:45] We are likely to make mistakes. [01:47:47] In a sense, we are AI's god, but we are just imperfect beings. [01:47:53] Now, the universe and evolution and life on Earth looks exactly like it would look if there were no god. [01:47:58] That's the problem. [01:48:00] That's a good thing. [01:48:02] Ask a Christian, ask somebody that doesn't believe in God, what would the world look like if there were no God? [01:48:11] It was a little tedious. [01:48:15] A little tedious, I gotta say. [01:48:22] Here, let's do a little Dawkins palate cleanser with Dawkins. [01:48:32] Preacher and the high priest, our Lord and Savior, Richard Dawkins, my Lord and Savior, my Father. [01:48:42] So, who really was the first person? [01:48:45] And I begin with a slightly paradoxical answer that there never was a first person because every animal, every person ever born belonged to the same species as its parents. [01:48:58] You can take that back as far as you like, and I take it back to 185 million generations ago. [01:49:05] You turn over the page. [01:49:07] And you reveal that your 185 million great grandfather was a fish. [01:49:13] Do we have a picture of a fish here? [01:49:15] It might even be there. [01:49:19] And at first sight, it sounds paradoxical to say that your 185 million great grandfather was a fish, but on the other hand, every single generation on the way back there belonged to the same species as its parents and as its children. [01:49:37] The point is, of course, that the whole process. [01:49:39] Is incredibly gradual, incredibly slow. [01:49:43] It takes millions of years. [01:49:45] We're familiar with this kind of gradual, imperceptible change because we all of us started off as a baby and became a toddler and became a child and became a teenager and became an adult. [01:49:57] And there never was a moment when you could say, Yesterday I was a toddler and now I'm a child, or Yesterday I was a baby and now I'm a toddler. [01:50:05] I'll tell you the exact moment I went from being a boy to a man. [01:50:10] Can anybody guess what it was? [01:50:13] It was one very quick moment, a little premature moment, if I'm being honest, when boy Adam became a man. [01:50:24] Yeah, some are still toddlers, right? [01:50:27] It doesn't happen that way. [01:50:28] It's the same as looking at the hour hand of your watch. [01:50:31] You can't see it move. [01:50:34] But if you wait for an hour and look at it again, you find that it has moved. [01:50:38] And that's like evolution. [01:50:40] So it's a. [01:50:42] Imagine being mad at your hundred millionth grandfather was a fish. [01:50:47] I know. [01:50:47] I think it's really cool to think everybody alive that they're a continuous person passing the baton, a continuous life that's procreated, going back to the very first thing. [01:51:03] Way cooler than some magical sky god going poof, there you are. [01:51:07] Modified our genetics at some point in ancient history. [01:51:10] This is independent of the question of evolution or the nature of life. [01:51:14] Evolution is still real and happening. [01:51:16] Just doesn't exclude alien engineers. [01:51:19] There's no need for an alien engineer to engineer humans. [01:51:23] Evolution could have done that all on its own. [01:51:26] The likelihood of evolution doing that on its own with no outside help is way more than some alien species coming from a different solar system. [01:51:38] Kind of fortunate accident that all the intermediates are extinct, which is why we can divide the living kingdoms into separate species which can't interbreed with each other. [01:51:47] But if all the ancestors were still alive, Then there would be a complete continuum between every creature and every other and every other creature, going back to the common ancestor and then forward again. [01:51:58] And lo and behold, now that we have genetics and can do genetic tests, hey, do you believe ancestry tests are real? [01:52:08] Do you believe parenting genetic tests are real? [01:52:14] Just take that way further. [01:52:15] They can genetically test, they can code the DNA of humans and apes and monkeys and fish and everything. [01:52:22] And they can see, oh, what do you know? [01:52:24] All the similarities match up perfectly with the way they look and the fossil record and how evolution would have worked. [01:52:32] We were creatures, yeah. [01:52:35] True. [01:52:36] And as you go back, every single generation, there never was a Homo erectus parent who gave birth to a Homo sapiens baby. [01:52:46] Always, they would have been classified if a taxonomist had been around at the time as belonging to the same species. [01:52:57] What else do we got here? [01:53:00] No, bro, that's so satanic. [01:53:02] By the way, the last common ancestor. [01:53:03] I love this clip of Zerka. [01:53:05] Dude, it's a satanic deception. [01:53:08] By the way, the last. [01:53:09] They're trying to hide God. [01:53:10] They don't want you to be a good Noahide, Shabbos Goy Noahide, and worship the Jewish God. [01:53:16] So they promote the satanic Freemason Darwin lie of evolution. [01:53:21] By the way, the last common ancestor for the theory of evolution, you know, the ape, is named Lucy, right? [01:53:28] The last common ancestor that we. [01:53:30] So evolution is satanic? [01:53:31] In anthropology, absolutely. [01:53:33] Charles Darwin's a Satanist, right? [01:53:35] Absolutely. [01:53:37] I was a little bit late on that. [01:53:38] I study anthropology in. [01:53:40] College and evolution, I loved it. [01:53:42] It was actually the hardest thing I had to let go of when I came to Christ, but then I really did my research and it's so stupid. [01:53:48] Oh, dude, oh, where'd you do your research, bro? [01:53:50] On TikTok? [01:53:52] Where'd you really do your research, Zerka? [01:53:57] YouTube videos at Prager U with Shabos Kestenbaum? [01:54:03] Yeah, I think Zerka looks like he could be a missing link and stuff like adaptation. [01:54:09] Same with Zerka. [01:54:10] Changing same with Sneako, and mangle has there's millions of intermediate species missing there, never been found just like a wolf. [01:54:20] Uh oh, there's Garrett. [01:54:21] This is for you, Garrett. [01:54:22] Wheels, two axles, an alternator, a hood, a trunk, etc., could form by accident. [01:54:28] Nah, bro, assemble into a car by accident. [01:54:31] Same goes for cells. [01:54:32] No, dude, the first cell is way more simpler, and it's not car parts, it's chemical bonds. [01:54:40] The first cell, way more simple than a car. [01:54:46] That's the problem. [01:54:47] Like when people are like, you can breed dogs with other dogs. [01:54:50] Fucking retard. [01:54:51] But now look at this. [01:54:52] Last common ancestor named Lucy. [01:54:54] Vatican telescope that looks at the stars, the planetarium telescope that no one's allowed to go in. [01:55:00] It's called Lucifer. [01:55:01] They're literally. [01:55:02] Yeah, the light bringer. [01:55:03] The telescope brings light into the lens. [01:55:09] Lucy was because they were listening to the Beatles, Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds, when they found. [01:55:15] The bones of Lucy. [01:55:18] He named it Lucifer. [01:55:19] So, last common ancestor is Lucifer. [01:55:21] Everything ties back to the Bible. [01:55:23] It's actually crazy. [01:55:25] Yeah, and he's also a flat earther. [01:55:29] Zerka's also a flat earther and thinks that space is fake and you can't break through the firmament. [01:55:39] Professor Zhang says evolution is a worldview that promotes the second coming. [01:55:45] What? [01:55:47] Charles Darwin, man is a monkey, okay? [01:55:49] So this is promoting a certain worldview that will help promote the second coming. [01:55:57] Charles Darwin? [01:55:58] Yeah, dude. [01:55:59] Evolution means people believing in evolution means Jesus is going to come. [01:56:03] Good one. [01:56:04] Good one, Zhang. [01:56:09] And you see, and then you get these guys, these e crusaders. [01:56:14] They see these charlatans promoted by Daily Wire and Dennis Prager. [01:56:20] And they go, yeah, the scientists, the guys in the suits with the bow ties say that evolution is fake. [01:56:26] The Bible's real. [01:56:29] Have you ever been to the Vatican? [01:56:32] No. [01:56:32] They have so many things. [01:56:34] The museum thing really is going to be like the two pronged attack to put you into the slave planet. [01:56:38] Evolution. [01:56:42] So, some African could use it to pick his teeth or something. [01:56:45] I guess my angle is we have to defeat the theory of evolution, it has to be defeated. [01:56:51] We cannot let this. [01:56:52] We need to defeat Jewish messianism, actually, Owen. [01:56:56] We need to defeat these Christ brains. [01:57:02] These circumcised brains that believe the Jews were ever chosen by God and they have the power of prophecy. [01:57:08] That's what we need to defeat. [01:57:09] Not science, not the true origins of life on Earth. [01:57:14] No, we need to defeat the Jewish magic. [01:57:17] You're shitting on the greatest discoveries of mankind in lieu of Jewish magic. [01:57:25] Because ultimately, it's like the theory of evolution and the lie of climate change is going to be like the two pronged attack to put you into the slave planet. [01:57:33] It's like those are going to be the two things. [01:57:34] Yeah, bro. [01:57:35] Slave planet. [01:57:36] You're not a slave if you're a Noahide worshiping the king of the Jews on your knees, trembling in fear. [01:57:42] Every knee will bow to your Jewish Messiah and your Jewish God. [01:57:46] That's the slave planet. [01:57:48] How has evolution put you in a slave planet, by the way? [01:57:56] They box you in with. [01:57:58] So you mean nothing. [01:58:00] You're a squirrel turd that evolved. [01:58:01] Squirrel turd. [01:58:02] You mean nothing. [01:58:03] There's nothing divine about you. [01:58:05] You have no connection to the Almighty. [01:58:06] You're just an evolution of a squirrel. [01:58:08] No, we have connection to the Earth. [01:58:11] This idea that, like, oh, nothing matters and life sucks and no reason to live because of evolution is just, it's such a straw man. [01:58:19] Is that the way they think? [01:58:20] Are they the real nihilists? [01:58:22] People that believe in evolution don't think, I'm a squirrel poop. [01:58:28] Life is so meaningless, man. [01:58:30] We're just like blobs of nothingness. [01:58:34] Superstition is anti Aryan. [01:58:36] Yeah. [01:58:38] You're a squirrel fart. [01:58:40] No, dude, you're just Adam and Eve from Genesis in the flood. [01:58:45] God made you from dirt and breathed air into your nostrils. [01:58:49] That's a better story. [01:58:51] Versus, and your existence now is also killing your environment. [01:58:55] So you can't, you know, you need to be in prison, basically. [01:58:58] If you even get the right to exist, your whole life is going to be. [01:59:00] No, you need to die in the end times Armageddon war like God wants. [01:59:04] That's way better. [01:59:04] Ho, and you need to be a slave of the Jewish Messiah for an eternal kingdom. [01:59:08] Is that better? [01:59:10] He rationed out. [01:59:11] So that's kind of why I like that. [01:59:13] Garrett sent $5. [01:59:13] Humans can't even engineer the equivalent of a bacterial flagellum. [01:59:17] It spins at 100,000 revolutions per minute and can reverse on a quarter turn. [01:59:22] Yeah, humans can engineer a bunch of amazing stuff that's way more impressive than that flagellum thing you're talking about. [01:59:30] And so what? [01:59:31] God could do it? [01:59:33] Where's God? [01:59:35] Garrett, so tell me how it happened. [01:59:39] Who made the flagellum? [01:59:40] How did it happen? [01:59:41] Explain it to me. [01:59:43] Did some magical consciousness just like say a magic word? [01:59:47] Did he just close his eyes and meditate and just poof, it popped into existence? [01:59:53] Did he hit the inception soundtrack and just put out his magic wand and all of the chemicals and the cell just magically formed together? [02:00:05] Why do you insist on there having to be some magical force that does it? === Self-Replicating RNA Origins (04:23) === [02:00:13] Any other angle? [02:00:13] I'm like, people need to know you've been lied to about human history. [02:00:16] You've been lied to about the history of the earth. [02:00:18] You've been lied to about the Bible. [02:00:20] And it totally defeats the theory of evolution. [02:00:23] Yeah, dude, it's so defeated. [02:00:24] That we can believe in evolution, though, which they're wrong about. [02:00:27] You don't think so? [02:00:28] You're a creationist? [02:00:29] I believe we're created, also. [02:00:31] I'm 100% a creationist. [02:00:32] Dude, this type of supernatural, anti science, anti intellectual bullshit is just not going to cut it. [02:00:40] Not going to cut it. [02:00:45] RNA origins of life. [02:00:46] Let's check this out. [02:00:48] This looks super weird. [02:00:50] Where does life come from? [02:00:52] This is one of the most important questions humanity has ever posed, and the scientific answer is we don't entirely know. [02:01:00] You might think that cracking DNA's genetic code should have explained life's origins, and it definitely helped. [02:01:06] Thanks to our understanding of DNA, we can map out the history of evolution all the way back to single celled life. [02:01:12] But that's where we're stuck. [02:01:14] The problem is DNA is a great way to store information, but it doesn't do much else. [02:01:19] Cells rely on other molecules like proteins to replicate, grow, and survive. [02:01:25] Proteins, on the other hand, work great as molecular machines to keep cells alive and healthy, but they can't store information or copy themselves. [02:01:32] They need DNA for that. [02:01:35] So we have a chicken and egg problem. [02:01:37] DNA needs proteins to function, and proteins need DNA to exist. [02:01:41] So which came first? [02:01:42] Which molecule made life possible? [02:01:45] Well, there's a third type of molecule that may hold the answer RNA. [02:01:50] Most scientists think that RNA came first because RNA can do two jobs. [02:01:55] Store information, and perform various functions that keep cells alive. [02:02:00] This idea that RNA came first is called the RNA World Hypothesis. [02:02:05] RNA World suggests that billions of years ago, in some primordial soup of molecules, a self replicating RNA formed. [02:02:13] This may have happened in volcanic vents deep on the ocean floor, or perhaps clay clumps brought the necessary chemical building blocks together. [02:02:21] Some scientists have even speculated that early RNAs formed on Mars and hitched a ride on an asteroid to our planet. [02:02:28] One way or another, self replicating RNAs emerged, multiplied, and evolved. [02:02:33] Over millions of years, they developed into a legion of molecular machines. [02:02:37] These might. [02:02:38] And you see, all of these things, a couple chemicals lining up together, is not like how Christians explain it. [02:02:46] Like a cell would be if a tornado hit a junkyard and a Mercedes Benz came apart. [02:02:53] Like, it's not nowhere near that complex. [02:02:58] And that's the bullshit they say. [02:03:00] Proto life forms blossomed and competed. [02:03:02] The best collections of code lived on, and the weaker ones died out. [02:03:07] Survival of the fittest was the name of the game. [02:03:09] This competition for survival eventually led RNAs to evolve the ability to build strong, stable proteins, which excelled at carrying out complex biological processes. [02:03:19] And somewhere along the line, some critical natural chemical bonds. [02:03:27] Chat says magnetism. [02:03:28] I'm not sure if it's magnetism that does the bonds, but. [02:03:32] You guys know how chemical reactions work, chemical bonds work. [02:03:38] Like I said on the show yesterday, look at a bunch of bubbles, the way they connect together and create like a multi bubble that happens on the very small scale of different chemicals. [02:03:49] Mutated into the familiar double helix of DNA. [02:03:53] DNA became a stable archive of genetic information that stored blueprints for the most successful RNA and protein molecules. [02:04:01] Life became more complex over trillions of tiny steps and happy accidents. [02:04:06] And all the while, the RNA lineup grew alongside lengthening genomes of DNA and complex proteins. [02:04:13] And it's all still happening throughout your body. [02:04:16] RNAs have adapted to become the Swiss army knives of our cells. [02:04:21] Today, they can slice, dice, catalyze, build, destroy, code, replicate, and transform. [02:04:27] A remarkable diversity from the simplest of beginnings a single self replicating RNA molecule. [02:04:34] Okay, so there's that. [02:04:35] No magic required. === Light in the Beginning (08:57) === [02:04:36] Or there's the Jewish version. [02:04:38] Should we do the Jewish version to compare? [02:04:40] That sounds good. [02:04:47] They didn't must have. [02:04:50] You haven't proved that it must have. [02:04:52] And to say that it must have, you have to at least suggest where or how it happened. [02:05:01] Let's see the Jewish explanation for the creation of life. [02:05:26] Begin how God created it by hand. [02:05:33] By hand. [02:05:34] Mighty mountains. [02:05:36] You just drew it. [02:05:40] To every leaf on every single tree. [02:05:44] This makes me feel so, Bethel. [02:05:46] It's a story for young and old. [02:05:56] The great star. [02:06:00] What an intro. [02:06:20] I have that book still, I think. [02:06:25] Hold on, I'm gonna go look for it. [02:06:29] I'm standing in front of a public school which had just turned into a refuge for children and their family who had to flee their home without nothing due to the violation of war. [02:06:37] Yo, you guys ready for this? [02:06:39] In the past 24 hours, seven children have been killed. [02:06:43] In the beginning, there was God. [02:06:48] You see, I had the indoctrination too. [02:06:51] Damn it. [02:06:55] My childhood Bible, guys. [02:06:59] There it is. [02:07:01] This is what I was taught when I was a baby. [02:07:05] There it is. [02:07:07] Tell me how the Jewish God made me. [02:07:13] In the beginning, there was God. [02:07:16] The earth was empty. [02:07:17] How funny is that, guys? [02:07:18] This was my book as a kid. [02:07:21] It was time for something to happen. [02:07:25] Let there be light. [02:07:29] I won't be showing this bullshit fairy tales to my kids. [02:07:34] I'm already teaching them about evolution. [02:07:36] Didn't work. [02:07:37] Sorry, God. [02:07:40] I hate you, Dad. [02:07:43] Just kidding. [02:07:45] More like mom. [02:07:47] I shall call the light day and the darkness night. [02:07:54] And so there had been darkness. [02:07:57] And then light. [02:07:58] And that was the world's very first day. [02:08:02] How do we know this? [02:08:04] Because the Jews wrote it down. [02:08:07] I read it in a book. [02:08:08] The next thing to do was to make the sky above in a book. [02:08:12] Fill the sky with clouds. [02:08:18] And that was the second day of the world. [02:08:21] This is globalist propaganda. [02:08:26] Archie sent $5. [02:08:27] I understand Meyer has concluded that a conscious intent is causing complex life to. [02:08:31] Form because it cannot happen exclusively by random mutations with natural selection. [02:08:36] He and his group say that evolution is incomplete, but not wrong. [02:08:40] Interesting. [02:08:40] Well, that would explain how he's like, how could all these things be? [02:08:44] Maybe he just doesn't understand. [02:08:45] Maybe he's purposely trying to not understand it, doing God of the Gaps. [02:08:51] Dude, how funny is it that I was raised on this book and this story, okay? [02:08:58] Is this Jesus, too? [02:09:00] Will this prove? [02:09:01] Prove that I'm a raised Christian. [02:09:03] God separated the water from the dry land. [02:09:05] Yeah, it's about Jesus, too. [02:09:07] No Jew would be raised with this book, with Jesus. [02:09:11] God had all kinds of things to put on the land. [02:09:18] There were rocks and mountains, valleys, deserts, and beaches. [02:09:22] Look at that beard. [02:09:26] White beard. [02:09:28] There were big islands. [02:09:28] Paul and Silas. [02:09:30] And little islands. [02:09:32] There were oceans and seas. [02:09:34] Rivers and lakes. [02:09:38] But there was still more to come on the third day because God wasn't done yet. [02:09:44] It was time to make all the plants. [02:09:51] God made tall trees and short bushes, vines, ferns. [02:09:57] God made the world for you and me. [02:10:00] That's the song I used to sing. [02:10:03] Leaves. [02:10:04] And I remember, I remember like, I'd go like that, have the cartoon books and the workbooks, and it would just be like God made the whales, God made the mountains, God did this, God did that. [02:10:17] And flowers. [02:10:24] God gave all the flowers a different size, color, shape, and smell. [02:10:31] He had a lot of time on his hands. [02:10:32] He's like, let's just hit him with millions of different flowers. [02:10:41] You looking for a car detailer? [02:10:42] Yo, you looking for a detail? [02:10:44] This guy polished up a vintage car. [02:10:46] Yo. [02:10:54] They tried to get me, guys. [02:10:56] In the beginning, God had a plan. [02:11:00] He made the world with His own hand. [02:11:05] Day one, He said, Let there be light. [02:11:10] The darkness ran, and day one. [02:11:12] This is for three year olds. [02:11:14] So, the average intelligence of a Christian? [02:11:16] Oh, yes. [02:11:18] Day one. [02:11:18] Flowers, trees, and grass so green. [02:11:23] Day four, He placed the suns. [02:11:25] That's not the one I was thinking of. [02:11:28] Maybe it's this one. [02:11:29] The creation song. [02:11:30] Viola Kids! [02:11:38] Feel bad for all the kids. [02:11:40] Join Viola and friends as we. [02:11:43] Ours too. [02:11:44] My God made the world in me and you. [02:11:48] And God said. [02:11:50] It is good. [02:11:51] And God said. [02:11:52] It is good. [02:11:54] On day number one, God said, Let there be light. [02:11:58] The darkness ran. [02:11:59] This is the first stage of Jewish. [02:12:01] Propaganda targeting the children, indoctrinating the children. [02:12:05] Christian karaoke night with no more news? [02:12:08] No. [02:12:19] And all the grasses and plants and trees that make seeds and fruits were made on the third day, too. [02:12:31] If you believe it happened like this instead of a natural process, you basically had a Christ brain lobotomy. [02:12:39] On the fourth day, God made a brilliant light in the sky called the sun to light up the day. [02:12:46] So you had plants before the sun? [02:12:50] Plants can't live without the sun. [02:12:52] It's okay, he made it a day later. [02:12:56] We should do an unintelligent design kids cartoon, yeah. [02:13:00] And a silvery one called the moon. [02:13:02] To add some light to the nighttime. [02:13:04] And as a special touch, God made the moon so we could see at nighttime? [02:13:10] Thanks, God. [02:13:13] What about when the moon's not out at night? [02:13:15] You get light at nighttime sometimes. [02:13:24] On the fifth day, God made some creatures. [02:13:27] I always wonder how dumb this going sometimes can be. === Loving God vs Evolution (15:52) === [02:13:33] There were birds. [02:13:45] Jews told me I'm born evil and they are chosen. [02:13:48] I trust them. [02:13:53] God made vomiting birds. [02:13:55] And more birds. [02:14:02] Funny, hold on. [02:14:02] It's reminded me of something. [02:14:04] The bird in the nest. [02:14:05] I was just searching my page for evolution and I found an example that a god would never do, but evolution would certainly do. [02:14:15] Let me find it real quick. [02:14:17] Hold on. [02:14:18] Let's just go over here. [02:14:21] Where's my bird? [02:14:23] Oh my gosh, look at this. [02:14:24] 500 eyewitnesses, zero eyewitnesses. [02:14:27] People, Christians, the lies these Christians will do. [02:14:32] Come on, where's my bird? [02:14:35] Where's my bird? [02:14:36] I tweet about evolution a lot. [02:14:42] Come on, dude. [02:14:43] Bird, There it is. [02:14:49] Behavior like this is something we would expect from evolution, not a Creator God, not an all loving creator God. [02:14:55] Look at what this mother bird does tosses the weakest baby bird out. [02:15:01] And that instinct developed because the survival of the remaining birds increased. [02:15:06] So that behavior was through evolution. [02:15:13] That behavior gave these babies an advantage to pass on and have the gene to be so insensitive and careless and get rid of, sacrifice one of their weaker babies. [02:15:32] See, you gotta go. [02:15:37] See, would all intelligent designing gods design birds to kill their own bird? [02:15:48] Nope. [02:15:49] But if all the birds that did this, if that means it's a slightly better chance of survival of these birds, that trait gets passed on. [02:16:00] Okay. [02:16:01] Base stork eugenics mom maxing. [02:16:02] Exactly. [02:16:05] All loving Bible God would do this? [02:16:07] No. [02:16:09] A heartless female. [02:16:10] Amazing. [02:16:11] Oh, it's because the fall. [02:16:13] Before that, they just ate grass and they didn't do that to their babies. [02:16:20] Okay, you get the point. [02:16:25] Nature doesn't care about your feelings. [02:16:26] Yeah. [02:16:29] Yeah, or the savage. [02:16:31] Nature of so many animals being carnivores, and to survive, they have to eat alive other animals that suffer and feel the pain and the sadness. [02:16:42] Would an all loving God do that, or would the all loving God make everybody vegetarians, or you just get energy from the sun or something in a way where there's less suffering? [02:16:50] All loving God, all intelligent God, all of this suffering of animals eating animals. [02:16:54] What's the Christian cope? [02:16:56] Well, before the fall, lions ate grass. [02:17:02] Okay, these people should not be taken seriously. [02:17:04] They should be mocked, shunned, ostracized, laughed out of power. [02:17:12] And more birds. [02:17:17] Believing in Adam and Eve is on par with believing that storks bring babies, that babies come from storks that bring them to you in a blanket. [02:17:26] Yeah, brutal, ruthless. [02:17:33] Unforgiving nature is. [02:17:36] And in the rivers and oceans and seas and lakes, God made fish. [02:17:51] Garrett said $5. [02:17:52] Anyone who thinks a bacterial flagellum can exist without intelligent design is in denial. [02:17:57] LOL. [02:17:59] Dude, Garrett, you're in denial, bro. [02:18:02] Watch, I'll find you the debunk. [02:18:04] You don't. [02:18:05] Hold on. [02:18:05] If I look on YouTube and ChatGPT, am I going to find a whole bunch of debunks of the bacterial flagellum? [02:18:13] I bet I am. [02:18:15] If I find it and show it to you, will you concede that I'm right, Garrett? [02:18:19] Because I'm looking right now. [02:18:21] And the oceans were full of all sorts of amazing creatures. [02:18:44] He's got his flagellum in a bunch. [02:18:48] Okay, let's skip to Adam and Eve. [02:18:50] Where's Adam and Eve? [02:18:53] Yeah. [02:18:54] Any gardener will do the same thing. [02:18:57] Select the thriving seedlings, call the weak. [02:18:59] It could be argued that this type of eugenics decreases suffering by strengthening the. [02:19:03] Yeah. [02:19:04] P.S., Garrett, wake up. [02:19:06] Yeah, let's do Adam and Eve. [02:19:08] Let's skip to Adam and Eve. [02:19:13] Look, there's the vegetarian lion. [02:19:17] Hanging out with his bee friends. [02:19:21] Dude, I really do need to have a new browser for these videos. [02:19:25] I don't usually watch this many long videos, though. [02:19:28] Now, on this sixth day, a big moment. [02:19:32] Oh, is that how it happened? [02:19:37] So, invisible God just blew some dirt and then just, oh, he disappeared laying down naked. [02:19:45] Yeah, dude, that's plausible. [02:19:54] And that man was called Adam. [02:19:57] Then God blew them. [02:19:58] And then we all came from Adam and Eve and their ancestral sons. [02:20:03] Life. [02:20:04] Right into Adam. [02:20:07] Wow. [02:20:09] Where am I? [02:20:11] Welcome to the world, Adam. [02:20:14] Welcome to the world. [02:20:16] I am God. [02:20:17] Oh. [02:20:17] Look at that. [02:20:18] Don't eat the apple. [02:20:21] Here's the apple, but don't eat it. [02:20:23] To the earth and all their seeds and all their fruits. [02:20:28] I give them to you. [02:20:30] And all the animals. [02:20:33] You have power over them as well. [02:20:36] You rule everything, and the chosen people have power over you. [02:20:42] I'm your Jewish Lord. [02:20:44] The Jews were chosen, and you must bow down to my Messiah. [02:20:49] Use to care for. [02:20:51] You rule over the animals, and the Jews rule over the Goyim. [02:20:58] Mmm. [02:21:05] Ooh, yummy. [02:21:06] Thanks, God. [02:21:11] Go! [02:21:13] Sit. [02:21:13] Err, sit, please. [02:21:17] I love how we already have domesticated dogs. [02:21:22] The wolf evolved really fast in a couple days. [02:21:29] Domesticated dogs already on day one. [02:21:33] Bruh. [02:21:39] God looked over everything and was happy. [02:21:42] And on the seventh day, God rested. [02:21:47] Bruh, it is very good. [02:21:52] My, I am very good. [02:21:54] As if God would be like, fuck, I messed up. [02:21:57] Oh, actually, he goes, it is very good until, oh, it's all bad, so I gotta flood it all and kill everybody. [02:22:03] It was good until I made it bad and then I had to kill everybody for it. [02:22:10] Now, God wanted Adam to live. [02:22:12] It was good. [02:22:13] Let me give him this serpent and Satan in the tree to make it bad and then blame them for it. [02:22:20] Wonderful place that could ever be. [02:22:23] So God planted a beautiful garden for Adam. [02:22:26] So many triggered Christians right now are seething. [02:22:30] You know it. [02:22:33] You know what they're like. [02:22:34] Yeah, I've got faith, dude. [02:22:36] What do you have, you little bitch? [02:22:38] You want to throw down, bro? [02:22:39] Okay, hey, hey, hey, hey. [02:22:41] You want to see what it feels like to talk shit about Christian, dude? [02:22:43] You want to. [02:22:45] I'll kick your heathen ass. [02:22:46] You don't believe my beginner's Bible, dude? [02:22:48] I'll kick your heathen ass. [02:22:51] Stupid evolution science believer. [02:22:54] Could you imagine it already? [02:22:58] The frontal lobe activating, saying fear, fear, fear. [02:23:04] Attack, attack. [02:23:06] To live in, it was called the Garden of Eden. [02:23:11] God made a great river run through. [02:23:13] Showing this to children is like child abuse. [02:23:16] Whoa, dude, flowers bloom real fast. [02:23:29] If there's a god or gods or spirits, they created evolution. [02:23:32] Pantheism and paganism have better explanations for evolution than Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. [02:23:40] Incel Adam. [02:23:43] No, I never fell for this. [02:23:45] This always felt wrong. [02:23:47] I was skeptical as a three year old hearing this story. [02:23:52] I'm like, if God created the earth, who was around to write that down and see it? [02:24:09] Okay, I think I've seen enough. [02:24:15] Even the lions. [02:24:16] He laid down with the lions. [02:24:19] No joke, that's in the book. [02:24:29] Excuse me. [02:24:30] He's like, hey, can you give me a vagina, God? [02:24:34] This gorilla ain't cutting it. [02:24:36] Oh, yoinked. [02:24:37] Adam's first job was to name all the animals. [02:24:42] This new request, just like the Talmud says, like it's quite a job. [02:24:47] I'm going to be as busy as a. [02:24:50] Geez, I sure would like a vagina to stick my wiener in. [02:24:54] God, can you help me with that? [02:24:55] He's like, sure, let me take your rib. [02:24:58] Check out Adam. [02:25:00] Check out Adam with his lion, his vegan lion pet, his pet lion. [02:25:08] Adam fucked that giraffe. [02:25:09] Yeah, probably. [02:25:11] And God's like, that's not good. [02:25:13] Let me make a woman from your rib. [02:25:15] We'll finish it at the rib part. [02:25:17] Garrett sent $5. [02:25:18] You shouldn't call yourself an agnostic. [02:25:21] Agnostic means you don't know. [02:25:23] You think you know. [02:25:24] Clearly a devout atheist. [02:25:26] Which is fine. [02:25:27] Just own it. [02:25:30] You can be agnostic and still be sure that evolution is true. [02:25:35] There could be a God, but then he didn't create life. [02:25:39] Right? [02:25:40] But yeah, I told you. [02:25:44] Agnostic. [02:25:46] Atheist, agnostic leaning because I don't know for sure, for sure, for sure, for sure. [02:25:52] For every living, breathing thing I see. [02:25:58] I sure would like some boobies in the vagina, God. [02:26:05] I love how God didn't think to make Eve at the same time. [02:26:08] It was like, well, first I just made a man, but then I realized, hmm, without a woman, how are we going to have any babies and populate the earth and have Jesus? [02:26:19] Right? [02:26:20] He's like, and then Jesus decided that Adam was lonely, so he needed to make a companion for him to have babies and populate the earth. [02:26:31] Hey, don't go anywhere, Garrett. [02:26:38] We're debunking your bacterial flagellum in a minute here. [02:26:41] Whoa! [02:26:46] No Eve, giraffe will do. [02:26:48] The one so fierce and strong, I shiver and tremble at your ground. [02:26:54] So you, Corey Mailer's uh scientific understanding, the flowing mane. [02:27:00] I give you the kingly name, Rory. [02:27:03] No, that fits you poorly. [02:27:06] Maybe lion is fine for now. [02:27:09] Yeah, dude, the word lion goes back to Adam and Eve totally. [02:27:14] The English word lion, straight from Adam. [02:27:20] All our modern day names for things. [02:27:22] Oh, yeah, it would. [02:27:23] If this was a Hebrew Torah, it would be some Hebrew word for lion. [02:27:30] Then God created goats. [02:27:32] Those flippy, flappy things, I think I'll call them wings. [02:27:36] Creatures they're attached to will be birds. [02:27:40] The redbreast will be robin, ostrich that bigard. [02:27:45] Parrot is the clawed one who repeats all my words. [02:27:53] I'd say your fancy. [02:27:54] Oh my God, where's Eve? [02:28:01] There were many animals to name. [02:28:04] Adam grew very tired of trying to decide what to call each one. [02:28:11] Now, God looked down on Adam sleeping there in the garden, and Adam looked very alone. [02:28:18] Spooning the dog. [02:28:20] Hmm. [02:28:22] And God decided that Adam needed a companion, someone to be with. [02:28:27] He didn't know that from the start. [02:28:28] It's time to make another person. [02:28:31] So, God created woman. [02:28:33] So, are all the animals just males, also? [02:28:36] And he's like, hmm. [02:28:38] This seems like too much of a cock party. [02:28:41] Hmm, I think we need some females to liven up this garden. [02:28:46] Hmm, if this is going to go anywhere, I think I'm going to need some females in some wombs. [02:28:51] James underscore Hendon sent $25. [02:28:54] Toughest debate you've ever had. [02:28:56] Feel like I've watched them all and never seen new lose. [02:29:02] If it's tough, it's just because they're being bad faith and doing like sneaky debate tactics. [02:29:09] Never like I've had a tough debate. [02:29:12] Gotcha on like important, you know, details. [02:29:16] Can't even think of anything. === Irreducible Complexity Debunked (10:20) === [02:29:26] Wow. [02:29:26] Just like a magic. [02:29:30] What? [02:29:32] Hello. [02:29:33] Hello. [02:29:34] I mean, hi. [02:29:36] I mean, ah, shucks. [02:29:40] Where am I? [02:29:43] You're in God's garden, the Garden of Eden. [02:29:46] It's really nice here. [02:29:47] You'll see. [02:29:48] These are my friends. [02:29:49] This is monkey, and this is dog, and this is. [02:29:54] They didn't even talk about the rib. [02:29:56] I guess the rib, they're like, we don't want to make these kids ask any questions. [02:30:00] Don't tell them about the rib part. [02:30:03] Making women from ribs. [02:30:07] That's what Christians have to co sign on to. [02:30:11] Gee, I guess you need a name too, don't you? [02:30:13] How do you. [02:30:14] If I was Adam in the garden and God made me Eve, my first words would be Do I make you horny? [02:30:20] Do I make you horny, baby? [02:30:22] Yes, do I? [02:30:23] You like Eve? [02:30:26] Oh, it's lovely. [02:30:30] Eve, I like it. [02:30:32] And I like this place. [02:30:34] Me too. [02:30:35] You see, God made this garden for me. [02:30:37] I mean, us to live in. [02:30:39] And everything's pretty and you can eat anything you want. [02:30:41] And. [02:30:42] Not quite. [02:30:43] Who was that? [02:30:46] That was God. [02:30:48] Oh, God's the one who made us. [02:30:52] There is one fruit in all the garden that you may not eat. [02:30:56] Talk about a setup job. [02:30:58] It's like he creates these people and then creates the trap for them to fall in and then blames them. [02:31:05] He's getting a chub on. [02:31:07] Yeah. [02:31:08] First thing he said is, Hey, do you think you could touch my thing down here? [02:31:11] I don't know what it's for. [02:31:13] God didn't tell me what this is for, but. [02:31:15] I'm not allowed to touch it, only you can. [02:31:18] Anything else in the garden, but you may not eat the fruit from this tree. [02:31:25] Okay, tree of knowledge of good and evil. [02:31:28] No eating. [02:31:29] Absolutely no eating. [02:31:31] Right. [02:31:32] Anything else in the garden is okay. [02:31:34] How would Adam have guessed the trillions of species within a day? [02:31:37] Yeah. [02:31:37] Species we know now of what people didn't know back then. [02:31:41] Yeah, how many different names and species? [02:31:44] It would take so much longer than a day to name out every species there is. [02:31:49] It's obviously absurd and asinine. [02:31:53] God just wanted to watch them bang. [02:31:56] I know the first porno was God making Eve. [02:31:59] But not that tree. [02:32:01] Definitely not that tree. [02:32:03] Right. [02:32:05] Yeah, Eve was the first honeypot. [02:32:11] All right. [02:32:14] Let's debunk the bacterial flagellum. [02:32:17] Funny how you're like, nobody can answer it. [02:32:19] And all I do is search it, and then there's all of these videos debunking it. [02:32:24] Let's see this guy. [02:32:26] Third thing that was abundantly clear at the trial these great icons of intelligent design, the things that are supposedly un. [02:32:33] Pay attention, Garrett. [02:32:34] They've fallen apart. [02:32:36] Example, specifically taken apart at the trial, the notion that the bacterial flagellum couldn't have been produced by evolution or the blood clotting cascade or the generation of biological information. [02:32:48] I don't have time to talk about all three, but I'm going to show you two of them. [02:32:51] The notion that these complicated biochemical structures couldn't have been produced by evolution has been championed by Michael Behe. [02:32:59] And Behe has an idea that he calls irreducible complexity. [02:33:03] And he says, you can't evolve these things because they're irreducibly complex. [02:33:07] Notice what he says. [02:33:08] An irreducibly complex system can't be produced the way that evolution works by numerous successive slight modifications of a precursor system. [02:33:17] It's going to be the same thing as with humans. [02:33:19] They'll say, like, oh, like Jay Dyer said in the stream yesterday. [02:33:22] He's like, how is it going to work with one eighth of a penis? [02:33:27] If you take away the head, how are you going to make babies? [02:33:30] Like, that's the argument basically on a different scale. [02:33:33] Hey, if you remove the heart, a human won't be able to live. [02:33:37] Irreducible complexity. [02:33:40] It's going to be the same thing. [02:33:42] Any precursor to an irreducibly complex system that is missing a part is by definition non functional. [02:33:48] These are multi part systems. [02:33:50] And he's basically telling you that the 30 or 40 proteins that are in here, they all have to be together or there's no function. [02:33:56] And since natural selection does have to work gradually, I agree on that point, it can't produce 20, 25, 26 proteins knowing what will eventually happen because natural selection is blind, which is indeed absolutely true. [02:34:10] So the poster child, For intelligent design, by any standard, it shows up so often, it really could be called the poster child, is in fact the bacterial flagellum. [02:34:18] This was mentioned so often in the trial that the judge, probably from fatigue, got a little sarcastic about it. [02:34:26] One of the attorneys said, Your Honor, when we reconvene, we're going to talk again about the bacterial flagellum. [02:34:31] And the judge at one point said, Oh, goody. [02:34:36] So they had a trial. [02:34:37] It was probably a fight over to teach intelligent design in schools that the Christian groups were doing. [02:34:42] And they apparently debunked this, and that's why they said, no, not allowed in the schools. [02:34:48] The last expert witness for the Board of Education, a biochemist named Scott Minnick from the University of Idaho, was called up to the stands to talk about this. [02:34:58] And since Behe had talked about it, and the lawyers had talked about it, and they argued about it, and I had talked about it, as I'm going to show you here for a second, Minnick got up there, and he said he was going to talk about the bacterial flagellum. [02:35:09] And the judge deadpanned, well, we've heard that before. [02:35:13] And Minnick turned to him, this is the best line of the trial. [02:35:15] Minnick turned to him, And said, You know, Your Honor, I sort of feel like Zha Zha Gabor's fifth husband. [02:35:21] I know what to do, I just don't know how to make it exciting. [02:35:30] And so I take my hat off to Scott. [02:35:32] That was good. [02:35:33] I liked that. [02:35:35] So, what is this argument about? [02:35:37] Here's the argument in very simplified form If you have a complex, multi part biochemical machine composed of many parts, its function, Everyone agrees, can be favored by natural selection. [02:35:49] But the argument is that evolution can't produce them because the individual parts have no function of their own. [02:35:56] That's what irreducible complexity means. [02:35:58] So natural selection can't make this, doesn't have any function. [02:36:01] Can't make that, can't make that. [02:36:03] Therefore, you can't evolve a structure like this. [02:36:05] Now, how does evolution explain something like that? [02:36:08] Well, ever since Darwin, we've had a very good explanation. [02:36:11] And that is these complicated machines, they don't arise from scratch. [02:36:15] They arise from combinations of components that have different functions, functions of their own. [02:36:20] And the components originate with functions of their own as well. [02:36:23] Therefore, natural selection. [02:36:25] Oh, imagine that. [02:36:27] The components that make this motor had other functions on their own. [02:36:33] In earlier stages of evolution, irreducible is false. [02:36:37] Parts have other functions. [02:36:40] A key flaw many flagellum components work perfectly well in simpler systems. [02:36:46] Molecular syringe used by bacteria to inject toxins. [02:36:50] By the way, this is a Michael Behe Discovery Institute. [02:36:54] It's the same Christian Institute that's promoting this Mayer guy, Meyer, and James Tour. [02:37:06] Garrett, you're falling for Christian apologist bullshit. [02:37:09] Is that not clear yet? [02:37:16] Simpler and still useful, so it's not irreducible. [02:37:18] Bing, bing, bing. [02:37:19] Work every step of the way. [02:37:20] Now, that's not evidence, that's just an argument. [02:37:22] But the beauty of this is we can now hold these two ideas up against each other. [02:37:27] And we can say, who's right? [02:37:29] If irreducible complexity is right, then the parts of these machines should be absolutely useless. [02:37:35] But if evolution is right, we should be able to take these machines. [02:37:39] Look at their parts and discover, wow, they do other jobs. [02:37:42] So let's go ahead and do that. [02:37:43] Let's take the bacterial flagellum. [02:37:46] So if we start with the flagellum, here it is, and these drawings name the genes and the proteins in the flagellum, and we say, let's take away a whole bunch of the parts. [02:37:54] How many? [02:37:56] Not one, not five, not ten. [02:37:58] Let's take 40 of its 50 parts away. [02:38:00] Now watch very carefully, because I'm going to do that experiment right there. [02:38:02] There it goes. [02:38:03] The parts are all gone, and I have left 10 parts that span the membrane. [02:38:08] What are left behind are 10 proteins. [02:38:10] In the base of the flagellum. [02:38:12] Now, if irreducible complexity is right, this should be absolutely functionless. [02:38:17] It should have no function. [02:38:18] But if you'll pardon the double negative, what is left behind is not non functional. [02:38:24] What is left behind is the type 3 secretory system, and it is fully functional. [02:38:29] I know most of you in the room are going, of course, the type 3 secretory system. [02:38:35] The type 3 secretory system is a molecular syringe in which some of the nastiest bacteria. On this planet, produce toxic proteins, grab onto one of our cells, and inject those proteins into our cells. [02:38:51] The bacterium that causes bubonic plague works this way. [02:38:53] It's really nasty stuff. [02:38:55] Well, guess what? [02:38:56] The 10 proteins that make up the type 3 secretory system are directly homologous to the 10 proteins in the base of the bacterial flagella. [02:39:04] So it is reducible. [02:39:06] There is no irreducible complexity. [02:39:09] There's a funny term. [02:39:11] It's like the opposite of irreducible complexity. [02:39:14] It's like something about. [02:39:15] Things are way too more complex than they need to be because it's not done by some intelligent designer. [02:39:23] It's. [02:39:25] They don't produce movement. [02:39:27] They're not a flagella. [02:39:28] Maybe chat will know. [02:39:28] Are they functional? [02:39:30] They are fully functional. [02:39:31] So remember that claim. [02:39:33] Any precursor to an irreducibly complex system that is missing a part is by definition non functional. [02:39:40] This guy is missing 40 parts and it is perfectly functional. [02:39:44] What that means, there's no other word for it. === Science War Myth Exposed (07:36) === [02:39:46] Is that that statement is wrong. [02:39:48] Now, that's not an incidental statement. [02:39:50] That is the heart and soul of the intelligent design argument. [02:39:54] And in this case, it turns out to be wrong. [02:39:57] Now, it's even wronger than that because it turns out that not only do these proteins make up the type 3 secretory apparatus, but almost every protein in the bacterial flagellum is strongly homologous to proteins that have other functions elsewhere in the cell. [02:40:14] And what that means is when we look at this wonderful icon of intelligent design, a careful analysis of the flagellum actually matches evolutionary theory, namely, the parts should have functions of their own and not the intelligent design prediction. [02:40:29] And that's simply a fact. [02:40:32] Got it? [02:40:33] They don't know what the fuck they're doing. [02:40:36] Got it? [02:40:37] These Christian apologists don't know what they're talking about, and they're wrong, and they're liars, and they have a religious agenda. [02:40:46] Okay? [02:40:47] Garrett, are you going to concede these Christian apologists are wrong? [02:40:53] Are we going to do that? [02:40:55] Please, Garrett, please. [02:40:57] I'm trying to green pill you on the evolution question. [02:41:03] All right. [02:41:03] Help me, Jesus! [02:41:05] Help me, Jewish God! [02:41:11] All right. [02:41:12] We should wrap it up. [02:41:12] This has been a long show. [02:41:14] Long three hour show. [02:41:16] And we're about to hit. [02:41:18] No, we're 100 away from the goal. [02:41:19] Did God create war? [02:41:21] Why does. [02:41:21] Yeah. [02:41:21] Why did God create war? [02:41:23] Why does God create murder? [02:41:25] Why does God create all the horrific things we see in the news? [02:41:28] School shootings. [02:41:30] Why would God create a mind that acts in that way? [02:41:33] Well, I think the traditional theistic. [02:41:37] Answer to that is the free will defense. [02:41:39] It's not that God created those things, He created free agents, knowing that it was better to create free agents who had the ability to choose and therefore to choose to love Him or not, or love each other or not, than it was to create puppets. [02:41:56] Okay, awful. [02:42:00] Why the thousands of realistic voices to use in your content? [02:42:04] This is so religiously motivated. [02:42:06] Look at the headline of this video from Stephen Meyer. [02:42:09] Why the science war against Christianity was invented. [02:42:14] See, science is not a war against Christianity. [02:42:17] It's a war trying to understand reality. [02:42:22] Christianity has a war against science because it debunks Christianity. [02:42:27] They're projecting here so bad. [02:42:29] Thank you, Grace. [02:42:32] You too, Grace. [02:42:33] Thank you. [02:42:35] May have some big news a new addition to the family. [02:42:38] Not one of my babies, but we may be getting a pet this weekend for the girls. [02:42:44] A kitty cat. [02:42:47] Might be a bad decision. [02:42:50] I'm like, is all of our couches and everything in the house going to get ruined by this cat? [02:42:55] Is the cat going to scratch one of my baby's eyes or scar their face for life? [02:43:01] I'm very worried about this little kitty cat. [02:43:07] Look at this. [02:43:09] Science is a war on Christianity. [02:43:11] Satanic scientists just don't want you to bow down to Jesus. [02:43:16] This guy's trash. [02:43:18] Often called science deniers, right? [02:43:21] We're just science deniers. [02:43:22] Yeah, you are. [02:43:24] When did Christianity and science become something that's at odds or at war with each other? [02:43:29] As soon as Christianity was conceived, it was wrong. [02:43:34] These are books in the late. [02:43:36] Yeah, I got a dog too. [02:43:37] How's the Boston Terrier going to do with the kitty? [02:43:40] 19th century, in which historians at the time recast the history of science as within this warfare model that you referred to. [02:43:48] You see, they're not trying to. [02:43:49] Figure out the truth about science. [02:43:51] They're trying to protect Christianity. [02:43:54] Garrett, that's where bullshit like bacterial flagellum comes from. [02:44:00] Christians protecting their fake Jewish religion. [02:44:03] That's what it comes from. [02:44:07] Day one, dude. [02:44:08] What do you mean, day one? [02:44:12] The cats are going to get along with the dog day one? [02:44:14] I hope. [02:44:15] One book was called The History of the Warfare Between Christianity and Science. [02:44:19] And these were really, yeah, yeah, yeah. [02:44:21] Intelligent design, God makes us with foreskins and goes, hey, you got to get rid of those. [02:44:26] Oopsies, can I get a take back? [02:44:30] Control Alt Z on the foreskins, my bad. [02:44:34] Almost perfect. [02:44:36] Can you just take a little off the top for God? [02:44:42] If science, because if you go back to the founding of modern science in the period that historians call the scientific revolution between, say, 1500 and 1750, even stretching back into the late Catholic Middle Ages, you find that the foundations of modern science. [02:44:58] You're not getting honesty about. [02:45:00] Christian apologetics or Jesus mythicism or evolution or any of these things from biased Christians with the religious agenda. [02:45:12] Science were laid by deeply religious men who believed that what they were doing was actually studying nature for the glory of God. [02:45:21] And they had a watchword during this period of time. [02:45:24] I'm talking about people like Newton and Galileo and Kepler and Robert Boyle. [02:45:30] And they believed that nature was intelligible. [02:45:33] And it could be understood because it had been made by a rational intellect, namely God, who had also imbued rationality in us. [02:45:40] We were made in God's image. [02:45:41] And so we could understand the rationality, the order, and the design that had been built into nature. [02:45:47] That was the founding premise of modern science. [02:45:50] And there were systematic methods of studying nature that developed during this time that reflected that Judeo Christian worldview. [02:45:57] And the concept of nature being a creation, Judeo Christian, that was continued in the will of a creator, was to look at it, to see. [02:46:06] How it was actually put together rather than just doing armchair philosophizing as many of the Greeks did. [02:46:11] So, by the late 19th century shift that came with Darwin. [02:46:16] I love dismissing all Greek philosophy, armchair philosophy. [02:46:20] They weren't like the super based Christian believer scientists, these Greeks. [02:46:24] Freud, and then with the historians recasting the previous history of science, gave us this myth of a warfare between science and Christianity that's persisted with us to this day and is now popularized by the new atheist writers such as Richard Dawkins and Lawrence Krause. [02:46:39] Even Stephen Hawking got into the act a little bit before his death, despite being a great figure within physics. [02:46:44] So, we're battling kind of a myth about this conflict. [02:46:49] And what I've shown in the new book is that the new discoveries that have been made in cosmology, physics, biology about biological and cosmological origins are decisively refuting that myth and showing that just the opposite is true. [02:47:00] We're now returning to the perspective that gave us science in the first place. [02:47:04] Yeah, right. [02:47:05] Beautiful. [02:47:05] Beautiful. [02:47:06] I've been doing this for like seven years. [02:47:08] Oh, beautiful, says the Christian. [02:47:10] Yeah, beautiful. [02:47:11] They're just gaslighting liars. [02:47:13] Let's watch this version too. [02:47:14] This version looks cool. [02:47:18] But it was good. [02:47:22] Lego. === Lucifer and Morning Star (07:20) === [02:47:23] Oh. [02:47:23] Humans like us. [02:47:26] Why are they black? [02:47:27] Him. [02:47:28] He blessed them and gave them every plant and tree to eat. [02:47:33] He told them to fill the earth and look after it. [02:47:37] And then God rested. [02:47:40] He saw all he had created and he saw that it was very warm. [02:47:45] Here is a digital Lincoln. [02:47:48] Thank you for the Lincoln. [02:47:52] In the beginning. [02:47:53] Dude, I could watch these videos all day. [02:47:57] Super book. [02:47:59] One in four older adults have difficulty. [02:48:03] Good. [02:48:04] So the world was good. [02:48:06] It was good until God laid the trap. [02:48:15] It was good until God decided to throw the devil in there to tempt them and know that they would fall. [02:48:21] CBN, this is CBN. [02:48:25] I'll just put it back in. [02:48:27] How you have fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning. [02:48:36] Oh, what? [02:48:37] Dude, Lucifer looks based. [02:48:41] Okay, I. Look at. [02:48:43] Why is Lucifer the blonde hair Chad? [02:48:45] What's going on here? [02:48:52] The sound effects, just like. [02:48:53] Dude, the sound of. [02:48:54] The score is just like I imagined. [02:48:57] Star Wars theme, heavenly fight. [02:49:00] And for that, you shall be banished! [02:49:08] No! [02:49:08] Marry an angel, noooo! [02:49:30] Whoa, why is there a robot? [02:49:38] Help me! [02:49:40] I have the power to reward you beyond your dreams! [02:49:45] This is Sparta! [02:49:47] How you have fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning. [02:49:57] Now go rule Earth! [02:50:00] Now go rule the Illuminati! [02:50:04] How you are cut down to the ground. [02:50:06] You will weaken the nations. [02:50:09] Yet now you are brought down. [02:50:12] You will weaken the nations. [02:50:13] The Goyam will follow you. [02:50:15] To the lowest depths of the pit. [02:50:17] Why did he do this? [02:50:24] He thought he could be like God. [02:50:30] Well, why did God make him that way then? [02:50:34] You a hint! [02:50:35] I'm Gizmo! [02:50:36] Gizmo? [02:50:37] That is perfect. [02:50:39] Hold on. [02:50:45] Where are we now? [02:50:47] Is this still heaven? [02:50:50] We call this Eden. [02:50:55] I am Adam. [02:50:57] And I am called Eve. [02:51:01] Psst! [02:51:01] Why aren't they wearing clothes? [02:51:03] I don't know. [02:51:04] Just deal with it. [02:51:09] Okay, I'm good. [02:51:15] When I was naming the animals God put here for us, I must have missed you. [02:51:19] I'm Chris. [02:51:20] And I'm Joy. [02:51:21] And I'm. [02:51:21] No, no, wait. [02:51:23] I will come up with something. [02:51:24] You are. [02:51:28] I'll give you a hint. [02:51:29] I'm Gizmo. [02:51:30] Gizmo? [02:51:31] That is perfect. [02:51:33] Gizmo it is. [02:51:34] Yes, it is. [02:51:39] Now, what's your. [02:51:40] Here in the art, you and so begins my rage. [02:51:57] And now we have adults today like Tucker and Alex Jones and Joe Rogan, like, dude, we got to read the book of Enoch, man. [02:52:04] There's demons everywhere. [02:52:05] They're fallen angels, Nephilim, secret Satanists. [02:52:11] This Jewish fairy tale. [02:52:14] It's cartoonish that anybody believes this stupid shit. [02:52:18] Denying all reality and genius scientists discovering the true origins of the earth and the universe and life. [02:52:28] And they reject all that. [02:52:31] And arrogantly think, oh no, I believe these Christian and Jewish books. [02:52:37] All right. [02:52:39] That's all we have for today, guys. [02:52:40] I'm going to wrap it up. [02:52:41] I need to go get something to eat. [02:52:43] Thank you for all the donos. [02:52:45] Good support today. [02:52:46] Appreciate you guys for turning out on the Friday stream. [02:52:50] Like, share, subscribe. [02:52:51] You know what to do. [02:52:52] Sign up for the Substack. [02:52:54] We're doing the. [02:52:54] Ooh. [02:52:57] We might have to have a postponed rain. [02:53:00] Yes! [02:53:01] Yes! [02:53:02] Three hour show, Adam. [02:53:03] Let's go. [02:53:06] Thank you so much. [02:53:06] Help me, Jesus! [02:53:07] Oops, wrong one, wrong one. [02:53:10] Thank you so much. [02:53:10] You guys are amazing. [02:53:12] Cat fund, litter box fund. [02:53:17] Yeah, I don't know if we're doing the Sunday thing. [02:53:18] I don't think I'm going to make it back in time, probably. [02:53:21] Sunday is going to be cat day. [02:53:22] I'm not sure I'm going to be able to get back in time for the Zoom call. [02:53:27] So I might have to do that Monday or sometime this week. [02:53:30] Anyway, like, share, subscribe, clip the show. [02:53:34] Spread the link. [02:53:35] Garrett, are we done with bacterial flagellum and intelligent design yet? [02:53:39] Please tell me. [02:53:40] Tell me in the chat E for evolution or G for Genesis? [02:53:44] What do you believe? [02:53:46] E for evolution, G for Genesis. [02:53:50] If you had to choose gun to your head, I want to see it. [02:53:54] And I want to hear your thoughts in the comments as well. [02:53:57] Hail Aryan Chad, Lucifer says, Pearl Vision. [02:54:00] Dude, did they have to make Lucifer look like such a Chad? [02:54:03] It looks like a Targaryen Chad. [02:54:06] All right, all E's love to see it. [02:54:09] Love to see it. [02:54:11] All right. [02:54:11] Where's our Chad? [02:54:13] Chad Lucifer. [02:54:14] Bro. [02:54:18] Sick wings, bro. [02:54:21] I like your wings. [02:54:24] All right, guys. [02:54:25] Have a nice weekend. [02:54:27] Shalom. [02:54:27] Happy Shabbat. [02:54:29] And I will see you guys. [02:54:31] I know. [02:54:31] Toxoplasmosis. [02:54:32] Yeah, I'm worried about the cat. [02:54:36] What is that called? [02:54:37] Cat lady disease. [02:54:40] All right, you guys, take care. [02:54:41] Have a nice weekend, and I will see you soon.