All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 28, 2024 - Know More News - Adam Green
01:53:20
Post Christmas Jesus Wars | Know More News w/ Adam Green
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
What's up, guys?
Adam Green here with no more news.
Thank you all for joining me today, Friday, December 27, 2024, almost the end of the year, the new year.
This is the post-Christmas Jesus Wars Edition show.
There's a whole lot of Twitter back and forth about did Jesus exist?
Did he not exist?
Was he a Jew?
Was he not a Jew?
And a whole lot more on that front.
We're going to have a whole bunch of Jesus Wars, a debunking of Dr. Amin Hillman.
Probably we'll get to today as well.
Candace Owens under attack from the Babylon B. That's where we're going to start.
Or actually, before we get there, I want to play a Christmas message that Trump and Melania gave, I believe, a year or two ago to lead us in.
Let's get the audio turned on here.
The president and I want to wish every American a very Merry Christmas.
During the sacred season, Christians celebrate the greatest miracle in human history.
More than 2,000.
Assuming that Jewish fairy tales are history, problem number one.
Christians celebrate the greatest miracle in human history.
More than 2,000 years ago.
That's totally real, of course, right?
Totally real, totally historical.
That God was born from a virgin.
God sent his only begotten son to be with us.
An angel announced the birth of our Lord and Savior to humble shepherds.
He said, I bring you good news that will cause great joy for all of the people.
The leader of the free world, as they usually call the president of the United States, affirming all of these Jewish fairy tales about virgin births and Jewish messiahs.
It's such a joke.
It's such a clown world.
Today, in the town of David, a Savior has been born to you.
Our Jewish Savior.
You will find a baby wrapped in clothes and lying in a manger.
At Christmas, we thank God for sending us his son to bring peace to our souls and joy.
Thank you for bringing peace to our souls and killing yourself as your son so we could atone for the way you made us and we don't go to hell to the world during this wonderful time of year.
We also give thanks for the brave and selfless Americans who keep us safe.
We are forever grateful for the men and women of law enforcement and the heroes of the United States military.
In this holy season, we thank God for his infinite love and we pray that the light of his glory will forever shine on this magnificent land.
On behalf of Melania and the entire Trump family, we wish you a very Merry Christmas and a happy new year.
Just in Trump this year was saying, nobody says Merry Christmas anymore.
Everybody hates Jesus.
We need more Jesus worship and Jewish fairy tales in America.
All we hear every Christmas.
It's really wild.
Our biggest holiday and our modern dating system is about to be the new year 2025 of the year of our Lord in the year of our Lord.
So our dating system, modern dating system, only as of about 500 years ago, the Gregorian calendar, we used to be on the Julian calendar.
Our modern dating system and our biggest holiday are all based on a mythical Jewish character who was invented to theologically conquer the world.
Doesn't anyone notice this?
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
Does anybody else feel like it's taking crazy pills?
That a mythical deception, a fabricated prophecy fulfillment, fictional narrative.
Our whole dating system is based on it, and our biggest holiday is supposedly based on it.
Although Cain Pogan, it was pagan before that.
Doesn't anyone notice this?
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
Anybody else notice how Judaized and kosher this is, the president of the United States?
Oh, the Virgin was born to save our souls from the Jewish boogeyman.
It's just wild.
Here's your average MAGA American on Christmas.
Dear Lord Baby Jesus, or as our brothers to the south call you, hey, Zeus, we thank you so much for this bountiful harvest of dominoes, KFC, and the always delicious Taco Bell.
I just want to take time to say thank you for my family.
Little baby Jesus.
Beautiful, handsome, striking sons.
Walker, this is Texas Ranger.
Talladega Knights.
Or TR, as we call them.
And of course, my red-hot smoking wife, Carly.
Also, I want to thank you for my best friend and teammate, Cal Not.
My wife's father, Chip.
Baby Jesus.
It smells the baby Jesus.
Heal him and his horrible leg.
And it smells terrible, and the dogs are always bothering with it.
Dear tiny infant Jesus.
Hey, you know, sweetie, Jesus did grow up.
You don't always have to call him baby.
It's a bit odd and off-putting to pray to a baby.
Look, I like the Christmas Jesus best, and I'm saying grace.
When you say grace, you can say it to grown-up Jesus or teenage Jesus or bearded Jesus or whoever you want.
You know what I want?
I want you to do this grace good so that God will let us win tomorrow.
Your tiny Jesus.
Your golden fleece diapers with your tiny little fat, balled-up fist Paul.
He was a man.
He had a beard.
Look, I like the baby version the best.
Do you hear me?
I win the races and I get the money.
Ricky, finish the damn grace.
I like to picture Jesus in a tuxedo t-shirt because it says, like, I want to be formal, but I'm here to party too.
Because I like to party.
So I like my Jesus to party.
I like to picture Jesus as a ninja fighting off evil samurai.
I like to think of Jesus like with giant eagles' wings and singing lead vocals.
Leonard Skynyrd with like an angel band.
And I'm in the front row and I'm hammered.
Hammered drunk.
Why don't you just shut up?
Yes, ma'am.
I'm done spending an obscene amount of time.
So funny.
So we're all celebrating our greatest holiday with baby Jesus.
Baby Jesus.
I like to, I like my Jesus to party.
I like my Jesus, a Christmas Santa Claus Jesus.
Just like running through the battlefield wearing a Santa hat in a camo vest.
That's my favorite Jesus.
Yeah, Jesus is whoever you want him to be, basically, right?
That's why every supposed historical Jesus, every scholar disagrees on who the historical Jesus was.
It's one of the big problems with historical Jesus studies.
When Christianity first started immediately, there was a diverse range of different Christian sects.
And Paul even writes about it.
The New Testament writes about it.
There's people who have other spirits that claim to speak for Jesus.
Because it was a mystical, revelatory type of meme and not based on a historical figure.
And I was going to say, oh, yeah.
And then remember in my last stream, my pre-Christmas Eve stream, when I was in my Euro trip last year, I went in the big Christian cathedral and they had dioramas.
There was an exhibit of nativity scenes from Christians around the world.
So you had your Japanese Jesus, your Mexican Jesus, your African black Jesus.
All your different Jesuses.
The Jewish Messiah for all.
He rules the world.
The King of Israel.
It's like all in our songs, our religion.
The Jewish Messiah of Israel ruling the world.
And we got a Zionist account here, 66,000 likes.
Says, it's rare for Christmas and Hanukkah to start on the same day.
It has happened only five times since the 1900s.
In this beautiful, unique moment, let us celebrate the unity of Jews and Christians.
Merry Christmas and happy Hanukkah, 66,000.
A whole lot of that Judeo-Christian celebration going on together.
And the Christians want to get mad and like be anti-Hanuka.
Jesus celebrated Hanukkah.
Jesus celebrated the just like he celebrated all the Jewish holidays because if in the character in the mythological story, but the first Christians that were Jews definitely were celebrating Hanukkah and Passover and following Jewish law and adhering to the commandments in the mitzvahs and keeping kosher and circumcising on the eighth day like Jesus did.
But verse festival of lights in the New Testament.
All these Christians, if Jesus were real, he would have been celebrating Hanukkah.
Why wouldn't all Christians celebrate Hanukkah?
Are they not celebrating the Jews and their Maccabean revolt against the Greeks and the pagans that ultimately led to God's plan?
It's John 10, 22.
The feast of the dedication.
I don't know why I called it the...
Festival of lights.
The feast of the dedication took place at Jerusalem.
It was winter.
And Jesus was walking in the temple courts.
Yo, Indomitably Bass for 50 says, happy 2025 to you and your family, Adam.
Keep awakening people to the deception of Zion.
You got my word.
I will promise to do that.
100%.
66,000 likes for the unity.
The original Jesus movement versus the Gentile church.
This is totally real.
Totally real.
Nothing mythical about this.
So when they met together, they asked him, Lord, are you at this time going to restore the kingdom to Israel?
Lord, are you at this time going to restore the kingdom to Israel?
He said to them, It is not for you to know the times or dates the Father has set by his own authority.
But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on you.
Comes on you.
The Holy Spirit comes on you.
You get some power.
Okay.
In Jerusalem.
And in all Judea.
And Samaria.
And to the ends of the earth.
After he said this, he was taken up before their very eyes.
And it happened just like this.
Just like the Bible said.
Floated away in the sky.
And a cloud hid him from their sight.
He's coming back in the clouds, too.
To be clear.
Do you believe that innocent children were killed by Israelites on the command?
Now we got Seth Dillon from the Babylon B. He says, when you claim to follow Christ but hate.
Oh, this is in response to this comment.
Patriot Muffy saying Jesus was not a Jew.
The Jews framed Jesus that he claimed to be the king of the Jews to have him killed by the Romans on blasphemy charges.
The Romans would never kill him for blasphemy.
The Jews are Satan children, or are Satan children if you read the Bible.
I'm sure one sect of Jews calling another sect Satanic doesn't make one sect not Jewish.
Is that not obvious?
If one sect of Jews doesn't believe that the Rebbe is the Messiah, does that mean they're not Jewish?
Does the faction instead Chabad Lubavitch that doesn't believe that their Rebbe who died is the Messiah, does that make them not Jewish?
They don't have an answer for that.
They don't.
It's obviously a Jewish sect.
Seth Dylan writes from the Babylon B, when you claim to follow Christ but hate Jews, you experience some serious cognitive dissidence.
That's for damn sure.
One way to resolve it is by denying that Jesus was Jewish.
That's the cope.
That's the cognitive dissidence.
And Christians, 15,000 likes on this.
You're just going to be continuously dunked on and look embarrassing, and you're never going to win with these talking points.
That Jesus was not a Jew cope is going nowhere.
Seth Dylan says, you get some serious cognitive dissonance with these competing claims.
There was no such thing as a Jew when Jesus lived, and the Jews killed Jesus.
Do you not get that?
I said the same thing.
When you make the argument that Jews, the word Jew didn't exist, so Jesus wasn't a Jew, although it calls him the Jew, and it's the same Greek word for the Jews killed Jesus, and Jesus is the king of the Jews.
So if Jesus wasn't Jewish, then the Jews weren't Jewish.
It's kind of like Revelation 3.9, how it says, they say they're Jews, but not.
Like, I thought it was the Jews killed Jesus, and the Jews are the devil's children.
So now you're saying that they're not and they're good, and it's only the fake Jews.
In that verse, they're literally like letting Jews off the hook, saying it's the fake Jews.
They say they're Jews, but not.
They're not the real base Jews.
They're giving Jews a bad name.
It's like how they say the Jews rejected Jesus as their Jewish Messiah, but then say he's not Jewish.
The Jews can't reject him as their Messiah if he's not Jewish and the Jewish Messiah.
So these talking points are non-starters.
They're embarrassing and they only accumulate.
There's this Jesus wasn't Jewish.
The Jews aren't the real Jews.
They worship the devil.
All of it is beating around the bush and circling the wagons.
Not even beating around the bush.
Just circling the wagons.
It's just running cover.
Yeah, they're not Jews.
We're the real Jews.
We're the real chosen people.
So they deny Jesus was a Jew, but he was a Jew, and the Bible explicitly says so.
And all logic entails it.
So was Paul, the authors of all the books of the New Testament, except Luke and Acts.
Maybe we don't really even know who wrote Luke and Acts.
We're Jews.
Jews, but that's like the official story for most Christians, believe.
It's all written by Jews besides Luke Acts.
Jews played a role in Christ's crucifixion and the founding of the Christian church, exalting Christ as Lord and Savior, focusing on the former to the exclusion of the latter is done solely for the purpose of vilification.
It's pure hatred for people loved by God.
Paul would have repudiated this in the harshest terms possible.
Babylon B was going after Candace at the Babylon B staff meeting trying to figure out how to respond to Candace Owens, a bunch of rabbis, Babylon B. They're mostly Christians.
They're making AI photos with Grok of her in tunnels with a prayer shawl and a Yamaka or as a Maccabean warrior with her Israeli flag and menorah and a tornado apparently behind her as well.
So they're trolling Candace.
This was the big troll.
40,000 likes.
Candace Owens, horrified to learn Christmas was started by birth of a Jew.
So you're just a joke.
You're the butt of the joke.
They're laughing at you.
All you're doing is running cover.
You worship a Jew.
You're not opposition to Jews when you worship a Jew.
It's controlled opposition.
And then they're not sending their best.
What is the top response?
1.2,000 likes.
Kim Iverson, who's getting community noted and owned.
You see, the Christian anti-Semitism just looks like mentally ill, like cognitive distance coping, you know, demons.
So most people perceive these people.
Kim Iverson writes, this is funny, but actually, Jesus wasn't a Jew, contrary to popular belief.
The idea he was a Jew only came around after the Holocaust.
Look it up.
She just tweeted this again.
She tweeted this to me months ago.
I covered her.
She said the same thing, that nobody thought Jesus was a Jew until the Holocaust is complete nonsense.
It's been translated into English, King James Bible.
Since then, it was calling Jesus a Jew, born king of the Jews.
The Samaritan woman calls him a Jew.
And all the church fathers also never said he's not a Jew.
Can't find any church father saying Jesus wasn't Jewish.
So she's just completely, I don't know, she heard this on some TikTok or a meme or something.
I think she's willfully ignorant or lying on purpose.
I think it could be.
And then I saw her post like, maybe Jesus didn't even exist.
So she's all over the place.
I don't know if she's just farming for engagement and controversy or what, but she says the idea he was only a Jew came around after the Holocaust.
Look it up.
Okay, I did, and it's not true.
He was what we call today a Christian.
No, he wasn't.
He never called himself a Christian in the Bible.
I don't even think the term Christian is even barely in the Bible.
Maybe only in Acts, I think it is.
He wasn't a Christian because Christianity is based on him dying.
So technically, he could not have been a Christian.
Was he saved by the death of himself?
Does he have faith that he died for his sins?
No.
He was the character, all his first followers, the apostles, were Torah believers.
They believed the Torah.
They were Judeans.
It's Judaism.
Christ was not a Christian.
Christianity is a sect of Judaism.
At least she at least admits that.
That believes the Messiah, Jesus, already showed up.
No lies detected there.
It's an apocalyptic, messianic Jewish sect.
Jesus and his followers from before his birth believed he was the Messiah.
Jesus and his followers from before his birth believed he was.
How could his followers believe he's the Messiah before he was born?
What kind of nonsense is this?
Look at this sentence.
Jesus and his followers from before his birth believed he was the Messiah.
So Jesus' followers, who didn't know who he was until he interrupted their fishing, believed he was the Messiah before he was born?
Okay, lunatic much, making them automatically not Jews as we understand the term today.
We're not saying they're exactly like the Jews today.
They were exactly like Jews at that time.
One sect of Judaism at that time.
And of course, she gets community noted and she says Jesus was Jew by birth, heritage, and practice.
He called himself a Jew.
So did Paul.
So did Paul.
And then she says she doubles down and she says, I will debate this with anyone, anytime, except you never have.
You've been making this claim online.
Where is the debate on Jesus existing?
Where is the debate on him being Jewish?
She throws out this challenge that she'll debate this with anyone, anytime.
And there's all these people.
I saw apostate prophet inspiring philosophy.
So these apologists, these media guys who I don't really necessarily like at all, they're all challenging her.
She won't do it.
Volka Spirit.
It's funny when they get slammed by the community notes.
Yeah, community notes for the win.
So she says she'll debate this with anyone anytime except all the people that step up and challenge her, even people with large followings, she has ignored.
Jesus wasn't a Jew by today's definition of Jew, despite the common belief that he was.
Nobody's claiming that he was wearing a yarmulke and believing in the Talmud when the Talmud didn't exist.
That's not the argument.
Modern-day Jews aren't ancient Jews by that same standard if there's slight differences.
It's a Jewish sect and they're all Jews.
It's like she's just trying to create these semantics to do the false distinction.
I don't care if he's not exactly like modern Jews today.
That's not even what we're arguing.
He was a Jew as Jews were defined at that time.
Still makes him Jewish for his era.
It's like, of course, if you have an anachronistic view of this, you could play semantics.
Rather than just blanket believing what you've been told, actually think about it.
Oh, nobody else has actually thought about it, Kim Iverson.
You're the only one that's thought about it, apparently, since you're such a biblical scholar.
First, define what makes a person a Jew.
Go ahead, give a clear definition.
I would love to hear it since blah, blah, blah.
Jews can't even clearly tell you once a Jew is somebody that's descended from Jewish bloodline and practices Judaism.
Or even if they don't practice Judaism, go ahead, give a clear definition.
I would love to hear it.
There you go.
I just gave a definition.
There's lots of people that have defined it before.
Once you come up with a clear definition, tell me exactly how Jesus qualifies.
A descendant from King David, the king of Judah, making him Judean, regardless if he's born 100 miles away.
She says, you cannot use Joseph's lineage because Joseph wasn't actually his dad.
Well, then why did the New Testament give Jesus' genealogy in Matthew and Luke to King David through his dad?
That's not an us problem.
That's a Bible problem.
It's not our fault.
It doesn't make any sense.
Mary was from Galilee and not from Judea, and her lineage is assumed, not known.
Keep this in mind.
It doesn't say what lineage she's from, but they claim Levi.
Keep this in mind.
Also, keep in mind the Bible you read is a modern translation of the actual ancient text, and the actual texts do not use the word Jew.
The original texts don't use the word Jesus either.
They don't use any English words because it's in another language.
It's in Greek.
This is the dumbest argument I've ever seen.
Jesus wasn't a Jew because the word Jew didn't exist.
Yeah, it's an English word.
How retarded are you to regurgitate these retarded arguments?
So by that standard, if in Greek, they use the same word for Jew all throughout.
Iudeus, Iudean.
The same root.
So I guess there's no Jews today because the word Jew didn't exist in the Bible.
So the Jews didn't kill Jesus because Jews didn't exist, applying that logic.
The actual texts do not use the word Jew.
In fact, the word Jew didn't even exist during Jesus' lifetime.
So with this knowledge, first define what makes one a Jew and go from there.
See how tedious this is?
And tiresome?
Syrian girl says, how can he be a Jew when Jews don't believe Jesus is Messiah?
All the first believers in Jesus, nobody was waiting for a Messiah.
There were no Gentile messianic expectations.
It was only Jews that were waiting for a Messiah.
All the first people to believe in Jesus as a Messiah were Jews, Syrian girl.
And Jesus believed Jesus is the Messiah.
Oh, I see what she's saying.
Because Jesus believed he himself was the Messiah, that makes him not a Jew.
Then why does it say that you want to argue in Revelation that it says they're Jews, but they're not because they didn't believe in Jesus?
They were Jews that believed in Jesus.
So, you're saying they're not real Jews because they don't believe in Jesus, but the Jews also are the ones that reject Jesus?
You're all over the place.
The reason it doesn't make any logical sense is because it's nonsense.
It's exhausting to see all these copes.
And it's every day on Twitter.
The people that spew him too never give it up.
No matter how many times they're corrected, no matter how much evidence is provided for them, they still keep regurgitating these delusional copes.
The word Jew didn't exist.
Well, then I guess there's no such thing as Jews if the word didn't exist.
Yeah, don't hold your breath for the big Kim Iverson is Jesus Jewish debate.
*Burps*
And there's Hebrews 7:14.
It is evident that our Lord was descended from Judah, making him Judean by blood.
John 4:9, so the Samaritan woman said to him, How is that you, though you are a Jew, are asking me for a drink?
It wasn't, there weren't, it's either Jew or Gentile.
Was he a Jew or was he a Gentile?
Because it was only Jews that were circumcising on the eighth day according to Jewish law.
Gentiles were not doing that.
Everybody must be busy still over the holiday weekend.
I notice everybody's streams are a little low.
We got about half the viewers we normally have.
Probably should have streamed last night.
Thursday night would have been better than a Friday afternoon, but whatever.
No big deal.
And then they just laugh and make it makes critics of Jews look silly and illogical.
Like this Zionist Avi Yemeni says they're not sending their best laugh out loud, 5,000 likes.
So they're getting ratioed all over, handing the Jews easy W's, making anti-Semites look ridiculous.
You think you're ever going to have a movement that just denies Jesus as Jewish?
They can't convince 99.999% of all Christians in the world.
They're never going to win with a whole platform based on flimsy, easily disprovable copes.
So this girl said Jesus never existed.
And some Catholic, some Catholic says, this guy doesn't exist.
Shares a meme.
Literally the most documented person ever.
Literally not.
That's like saying Batman and Superman that's had thousands of comic books and movies and action figures is more documented than some Joe Schmo that doesn't have much of an internet footprint.
Primordial Chaos says, Oriental woman Kim Iverson also blames the West for Zionist actions.
That's a good point.
She's a huge Russia shill, huge Putin shill.
No wonder she's promoting the Christian identity copes.
Good point, Primordial.
Thank you for helping me remember that connection.
So Jesus is not the most documented person ever.
You'll hear Christian apologetics all the time use this argument.
They'll say, oh, well, if you deny Jesus existed, then you got to deny every historical figure existed.
No, you don't.
They'll go, oh, there's more evidence for Jesus than Julius Caesar or Alexander the Great.
completely wrong.
So, Historicity evidence debunked.
Nobody contemporary, no contemporary of Jesus' time wrote about Jesus.
They'll say, oh, Josephus and Tacitus, Pliny the Younger, those are all, they were all born after Jesus supposedly died.
That's not an eyewitness.
They're not confirmation.
They're after the gospels and the spread of Jesus.
The earlier you go in Christianity, the more mythical and less biographical details there is.
It's not the most, this is the claims that they say are total bullshit.
Not the most documented person ever.
A bunch of stories about a mythical character, sure.
And let's also not forget that it was the Christians that were largely in charge of preserving or not preserving much of the ancient text as they had a monopoly on power for thousands or for hundreds of years.
Yeah, there's no sculptures or paintings of Jesus, not even a description of Jesus anywhere in the Bible.
We've got statues of all types of Roman emperors made at the time by sculptors.
There's no coins with Jesus on them from his time like we have for other figures.
So mind you, when Christians say stuff like this, they are flat out lying to themselves.
And it gets, it's a comforting lie.
And the Christians don't question it because it's their confirmation bias.
178,000 likes for the lie that he's the most documented person ever.
And then look, this one got 239,000 likes.
They say bragging about how well documented he is, then depicting him incorrectly is genuinely hilarious.
Are you saying he's depicted incorrectly because he's got light brown hair and looks European and not Jewish?
Is that what you're referring to here, dude?
Brandon with 200,000 followers?
Are you saying he needs to look black or more Jewish?
The one made closest to his death.
That's not true at all.
Those depictions of Jesus aren't till much later.
This is what he looked like on this total forgery.
Exactly.
Exactly.
Let's play.
So Jeremiah Knight, who is an apologist and Bible teacher, what he has to say about Jesus, he says, the historical evidence for Jesus Christ is so abundant that denying it requires deliberate disregard of the facts.
So abundant.
Let's hear this abundance.
It's not only found in the pages of the Bible, written by anonymous, unscholarly, uncritical, obviously mythological fictional accounts, not by eyewitnesses, written decades after the fact that contradict one another.
Don't cite any of their sources, written by evangelists with the intent To convert people, but it's abundant evidence.
You can't deny the gospels.
It's such a joke.
The Christians just lie their asses off.
They lie to themselves.
They lie to everybody else.
Yeah, Primordial says, the problem isn't the world thinks our Savior is a Jewish rabbi.
It's that he's depicted as white.
That's the problem, right?
Yeah, you need to make him Jewish.
Everybody's got to know they worship a Jew.
And he says, so not only is it in the Bible, but also most of the Bible is written by Paul, who never knew a historical Jesus and says explicitly and argues adamantly that he only learned about him not from any man, but from reading scripture and having his mystical revelations.
Not to mention James, Peter, Hebrews, book of Hebrews, all don't describe a historical figure or give any proof of a real historical figure.
We should make a branching cope tree for their arguments.
We have some, our guys have made memes that have all of their major copes on them.
I bet you, I think Seethruard all made one.
I could look up for one of his copes.
At See-Thru It, let's see any of these words.
We'll just say cope.
Let's see.
A whole lot of coping going along, so that one comes a lot.
Okay, I'm not seeing it.
But he's made good memes with all of the copes on him with the retard Jesus face.
What's this one?
Huh.
Cool.
This will be good because I'm going to play the clip of this guy later.
Okay, I'm not finding the cope.
If anybody has the cope meme, share it to me.
Tag me right now.
I'll look for it.
But we already have a meme with all the copes.
They're good.
So he says, take Tacitus, the Roman historian, in his annals, book 15, written around 116 AD.
116 minus 33.
83 years after the Son of God walked the earth and did all these miracles.
You're telling me, because Josephus is an interpolation that Christians added in later.
Probably Eusebius' 5th century, I'm sorry, 4th century.
So 83 years later, nobody wrote about the Son of God walking the earth outside of the Bible for 83 years.
And they're citing this as if it's rock-solid, abundant, undeniable proof.
Not even born.
Everybody that lived with Jesus was dead by this time.
Anybody that would have known Jesus was dead at this time.
He doesn't say, Tacitus doesn't say he looked it up and found a record.
He doesn't cite a source, although his source might have been Pliny the Younger, I've heard theorized.
He doesn't say, he doesn't prove that a historical Jesus existed or give any argument that it was a real person.
He just has a brief mention about what Christians believe.
Paul's letters all were written before this.
The gospels were likely all written before this.
Christianity was already spreading around the area when he wrote this.
He could have just interviewed some Christian.
And the Christian told him about Jesus and he just copied what that Christian said.
Did that Christian know Jesus?
That's it.
This is the best they have, Josephus and Tacitus.
The Christians will try, and sometimes even secular scholars will try to say, oh, we know he's real.
You can't deny it because of Josephus and Tacitus.
And they'll say it and give us this argument as if we don't know it and we have not addressed it a million times.
Okay, we know.
Now address our counter arguments to that.
Go.
Steel Man it.
They can't do it.
So Tacitus references Jesus in 116 AD, 83 years after the fact, Tacitus was not a Christian, yet his testimony aligns with the biblical account of Christ's death.
Yeah, because he got it from the mythical story in the Gospels.
Isn't this amazing that they could sit up here and say it's so abundant?
If you deny it, you're denying the facts, Tacitus.
Mike dropped Tacitus.
Forget about it.
When you actually look into it, the evidence is underwhelming and terrible.
His partial stance confirms the event, not as legend, but as history.
No, it doesn't.
No, it doesn't.
He said he didn't look it up in the Roman vaults and find the proof of this.
A bunch of Christians or a bunch of Jews were all saying this.
He just assumed he just took them for their word.
He didn't know that there wasn't actually a person.
Then there's Josephus, the Jewish historian, who in Antiquities of the Jews mentions Jesus.
And some argue over the exact wording.
Yeah, most scholars agree that it was interpolated.
Some scholars will say, oh, there was something there and they only added to it.
Others argue, and I think the best argument is that it was completely inserted.
There was no mention about Jesus.
And again, it's only a short, brief mention.
And he's born after Jesus died.
Josephus wasn't a believer, but he couldn't deny the figure of Jesus who had such a profound impact on his own time.
Not true.
He never says he knew him.
If it was authentic, he's just reporting what the Christians believed.
You cannot deny Jesus existed because Josephus.
It's bullshit.
Bullshit.
Dicota Melatomobotomy says, great stream as always.
Thank you.
I mean, we're always exposing the Jesus deception.
I can't.
It's like this is the holiday for the Jesus deception, basically, the Jesus wars that are unfolding around Christmas.
Pliny the Younger, governor of Bithynia, wrote a letter around 112 AD.
Again, so long after 112 AD, 80 years after the fact, he wrote a letter to Trajan describing how Christians in his province would meet before dawn to sing hymns to Christ as God.
Nobody is denying that Christians existed at this time.
Proof of Christians, it does nothing to prove that a Jesus existed.
Yeah, He's the son of God.
He can do all the miracles in the world, but nobody made a sculpture of him.
Nobody has a physical description of him besides the Lentilis letter that's a 15th century forgery.
No paintings, no sculptures.
He didn't write anything, and nobody at the time wrote anything.
And we got Josephus, Christians meddling and tampering with it to forge passages in there.
Hello?
So look at this.
Pliny was so fast.
So Pliny in that letter, by the way, says that he's like the highest lawyer, top government official in all of Rome, and he writes to Trajan that he barely even knows who Christians were, which proves that Jesus had not had such a profound impact in early second century or late first century.
Because if you read what Pliny the Younger actually said, he didn't say, oh, he learned about Jesus and stories of Jesus from his dad.
No.
Yeah, Primordial says, proof of Christian Jewish spin-off cult existing doesn't equal Jesus existing.
Exactly.
Look at how he describes what Pliny writes.
Before Dawn, Pliny wasn't fascinated by religion or seeking to validate a faith.
He was simply reporting on what he witnessed.
He witnessed that Christians were singing songs is not proof that Jesus existed.
Christians treating Jesus as divine.
These early accounts, early accounts, 80 years later is an early account.
That's like two generations 2,000 years ago.
Two generations go by.
The destruction of the temple in Jerusalem goes by.
These early accounts show a testimony to Jesus that came from beyond the faith with no vested interest in promoting Christianity.
The Talmud, though far from favorable, doesn't question the existence of Jesus.
No, it just describes it and places Jesus in a different time, giving him a different story.
Jesus Ben Stada and Jesus Pantera.
And again, I read the whole book.
The Jesus the Jews never knew, showing that the stories that are mentioned of Jesus in the Talmud are not proof that a Jesus existed.
The Talmud was compiled like 100 to 500 AD when Christianity already existed.
Mentions of Jesus in the Talmud are polemics in response to what Christians believed.
They're not proof of a historical Jesus.
The Talmud doesn't say, yeah, we remember that guy and this and this and this.
And riddle me this also, in the Talmud and Total Theshu, it has Jesus being stoned and hung on a tree according to Jewish law.
Christians will want to cite, oh, even Bart Ehrman says, Bart Ehrman says all we can know about a historical Jesus is that he was crucified by the Romans because that's a Roman death sentence.
A Roman punishment was crucifixion.
So if the Romans really killed Jesus, why would the Talmud say that the Jews did it according to their Jewish law?
Doesn't even match up with the account.
And you guys, they take credit for it, countering, contradicting what the gospels say.
So is the gospel wrong or are they wrong?
So that's the problem with the Talmud.
Okay, Acts, that's written late.
And, okay, let's see this.
Then we can't forget the apostolic fathers like Ignatius of Antioch and Clement of Rome.
Oh, my God.
If you read Carrier's book on the historicity of Jesus, he gets into what Ignatius of Antioch and Clement of Rome in 1 Clement writes.
And they're not giving any proof of a historical Jesus.
They believe in a cosmic Jesus.
The star narrative in the Ignatius of Antioch has Jesus as the star.
It doesn't match what's in Matthew at all.
Read Carrier's book.
I think I posted before his clips from the Audible of him talking about Clement of Rome and Ignatius of Antioch.
I'm writing about Ignatius of Antioch and Clement of Rome in my book as proof that it began as a celestial cosmic Jesus.
Again, wrong.
Every paragraph is just blatantly wrong.
And let's not ignore the Acts of the Apostles, which is fictional.
A living, breathing testimony written by Luke that's intertwined with verifiable places.
Oh, if they mixed history, historical places in with the fictional story.
Oh, that never happens.
I guess Jerusalem existed, so everything in the Bible is true because Jerusalem existed.
Verifiable places.
Real events and communities still following the same Jesus in the early first century.
All of these pieces of historical writing, far from harmonizing with modern speculation, that's what Acts was, was trying to harmonize the Jewish divides between Peter and James and Paul, or at least give an account of how it began.
And not to mention, they believe Luke wrote Acts.
The same author that wrote Luke wrote Acts.
But Luke is not an eyewitness account of Jesus.
Not reporting historical things that he eyewitnessed because it's copying Matthew, which copied Mark, which is obviously beginning to end allegorical fiction based on prophecy, weaved in with pagan motifs.
Odin says, hope you had a great Yule.
Another cope they'll use is the devil magically hid all the evidence of Christ and it was permitted to test people if they'd still believe.
I know.
In John, it talks about doubting Thomas.
Thomas is not a character in the synoptic gospels.
He's only briefly mentioned as a disciple.
But in John, doubting Thomas teaches that it's a virtue to have faith without seeing, without seeing that Jesus resurrected and poking him in his wound.
You're supposed to have faith without having evidence.
That's the virtue.
It's believed that that's a polemic against the gospel of Thomas, which was an early Christian Gnostic text, as they say it, that doesn't have biographical details of our earthly preacher, Jesus, also supports the mythical Jesus theory.
Hmm.
Let's see, what's this one say?
Watch the collapse says 80% of men in a war are just targets.
10% shouldn't be there at all.
9% on average.
1% are true warriors.
Fuck these coping albatrosses weighing down the real opposition.
Love you, man.
Hope the holiday was great for your family.
Keep up the good fight.
It only takes a spark to start a burnt offering.
Funny.
Thank you.
Watch the collapse.
I had a great Christmas.
No complaints.
Maybe my favorite Christmas ever, actually.
So far.
Being intellectually retarded is peak Christian virtue.
I know.
Having faith in the absence of evidence.
It teaches you it's a virtue to believe in things that you have not seen.
Because they needed everybody to believe in a historical Jesus and nobody saw one, basically.
Despite the passage, to deny him isn't just to deny scripture, it is to deny the very foundation of history itself.
Bullshit.
You're denying history if you deny him.
No.
Give me a break.
Jesus Christ is not a character from fables or mere religious teachings.
No, it's exactly what he is.
He is the figure that shaped the world as we know it.
You can shape the world and be a mythological figure.
As long as people believe you existed, it doesn't even really matter if he existed or not.
It could still shape the world, and I don't deny that.
History built on a lie.
That's right.
Acknowledged by the enemies of Christianity 80 years later, respected by secular historians.
You mean like Bart Ehrman and crypto Christians that got all their higher education at theological seminaries that write that the best book they have for a historical Jesus is Bart Ehrman.
It's the Christian's favorite person to cite.
I've read it and poked holes all throughout it.
Richard Carrier destroys his arguments in this book.
It's not peer-reviewed.
It's the best they got, and it's trash.
Carrier debunks the hell out of it.
And PhD Raphael Letaster has a whole PhD dissertation debunking Bart Ehrman's book.
I've read it.
I've read Ehrman's book, Carriers, Prices, Letasters.
And then the Christians come to me and they go, but Bart Ehrman says.
The appeal to Bart Ehrman fallacy.
And declared the Son of God, respected by secular historians and declared the Son of God by millions across the centuries.
The weight of historical testimony cannot be ignored.
Historical testimony.
Dude, there's no eyewitness testimony of Jesus.
James, the supposed brother of Jesus, go read the book of James in the New Testament.
He doesn't call himself or identify himself with the brother of Jesus or give any indication he was a brother of Jesus or knew Jesus as a preacher on earth at all.
The silence is deafening.
deafening Wendell, some Christian, another Christian apologist, pastor, says fact, the historical evidence for the existence of Jesus Christ is overwhelming.
6,000 likes.
Total inversion of reality.
The evidence, fact, the historical evidence for the existence of Jesus is extremely underwhelming.
Anybody that actually reads the latest material on Jesus' mythicism can see that it's incredibly underwhelming and terrible.
The worst kind of evidence and so little of it.
In fact, the evidence that it's all a myth is what's overwhelming.
Way more evidence that it began whole cloth myth and developed later to be euhemerized with biographical historical details.
Wow.
Okay.
Tradcath gets 100,000 likes for saying Jesus definitely existed.
Right.
Oops.
Let's see this.
Oh, this is so funny.
One of the top comments.
Look at this.
This is what we're dealing with.
And you can't.
In Myth Vision stream today goes over Mark being fake and gay and edited forgery as even more proof that Christians have been coping and lying for literally 1,500 years.
Yeah, I'll have to check that out.
Yeah, Mark is complete fiction.
And David Fitzgerald's Mything in Action, he goes all through Mark, basically.
The whole story comes from prophecy.
And it's not prophecy fulfilled.
Prophecy was the inspiration and the source material for the Jesus fictional narrative.
First verse, literally, as the prophet said, blah, blah, blah.
Way more evidence that it began as a myth.
If it walks like a myth, it talks like a myth.
It's a myth.
And look at this.
Oh, yeah.
Letaster in his book, his PhD dissertation called Questioning the Historical Jesus, or maybe it's questioning the historicity of Jesus.
I can't remember exactly.
But Raphael Letaster, PhD dissertation, says you can't even have an honest, get a good, honest, good faith debate with a Christian about historical Jesus.
It should be a debate only for people that aren't believing Christians because they can never overcome the fact that he never existed.
For me or for any atheist, any secular scholar, it's no skin off of our back if it Began.
If I thought there was evidence that there was some historical figure it was based on, I would have no problem saying that.
It still wouldn't make Christianity real if some guy actually existed and they just exaggerated and mythologized and legends grew around him.
It wouldn't mean Christianity was real by any means.
But for them, they have to have the historical Jesus.
We don't have to have a completely fictional Jesus, but the Christian has to have the historical Jesus.
And I think a lot of secular scholars also have to have a historical Jesus because if the truth comes to light that there was no historical Jesus at all and it's completely fabricated, people are going to ask who fabricated him and why.
And those answers are very easy to find and straightforward and clear what the motive and the intent was.
So keeping Christianity afloat.
If all the top scholars started saying Jesus never existed and it's a lie that he existed.
Do you think Israel wants that?
Do you think Israel wants to take a huge hit with all the Christian Zionist supporters around the world?
The Muslims definitely don't want it.
They depend on Jesus, the Christians.
So we have the whole Abrahamic paradigm, the biggest religions in the world that have dominated for 1,700 years.
All these institutions, the status, protecting this status quo, protecting the big lie.
The most influential figure in all of history.
Our time is based on his birth.
Our greatest holidays are celebrating his birth.
And he never existed, and he was made up by Jews to theologically conquer the Goyam.
Can you see why this conspiracy they don't want brought to light?
And this is why you can't really have a good faith debate on Jesus with Christians because you get comments like this.
So, yeah, Jesus is so overwhelming that he existed.
Yep, along with the historical evidence of the flood and everything afterward, too.
I don't see how anyone could read and learn about it and still deny the existence of Christ and say the Bible is full of made-up stories or even look in the mirror and deny the existence of God.
Yeah, how can anybody read Noah's Ark and not know that it's a made-up story?
Okay.
Christian proves Jesus existed.
Irrefutable evidence from Sam Shimone, who's the new popular Christian apologist.
Before I even saw this, I guess what he was going to say.
He uses the same things they always say.
Oh, there's more proof for Jesus than other historical figures.
No, again, not true.
Not even close to true.
Carrier has a section, a chapter on his book about that, too, addressing that argument.
And then he says, so he does that lie that there's more evidence for Jesus than other historical figures, not true, and appeal to Bart Ehrman.
That's the best they can come up with.
Oh, their token secular scholar who was a Christian into his adult life that went to theological seminaries to be a Christian apologist and a pastor, that his mentors were believing Christians, that's made a whole lucrative career on selling you who the historical Jesus really was, who's scared to debate Richard Carrier.
Yeah, Liam says, talking about Christians isn't proof that he existed.
I know.
I know.
It's so obvious.
And they hold this up like it's their Trump card.
How do we know Jesus even existed?
Oh, yeah.
Oh, boy.
Do you have people asking that question?
All right.
Well, ridicule.
People even ask that.
People doubt this.
People doubt that this is a myth that a Jews would ever invent a Messiah.
People ask that.
Let me laugh to begin.
See, this fake confidence.
How do we know Jesus even existed?
Oh, yeah.
Oh, boy.
Do you have people asking that question?
All right.
Well, stop asking that question.
Or we'll ridicule you.
We'll call you a conspiracy theorist.
There's another meme.
They'll say, oh, you denying Jesus is like denying the Holocaust.
Denying Jesus is like denying believing in young earth creationism or flat earth.
Those are the type of non-arguments, ad hominem arguments you get from these apologists.
Yeah, crybully Jew tactics.
Funny.
John Garadas for 21 says 2100.
Thank you, John.
Your support means so much, John.
Wouldn't be able to do it without you.
Says, Elon just called Whites dumb, and when you go to Oshwitz in Israel and they still support you, how else can you call them?
Also, I think this heartwarming mix of Rabbi Ms. Rachi wasn't aired on No More News.
All right, I got it saved, John.
Thank you.
Yeah, I may cover all the Elon stuff in another stream, but that's what everybody's talking about.
The India stuff.
So it's covered.
It's handled.
What everybody isn't talking about is the Jesus question, the real JQ, the JP, the Jesus problem.
How do we know Jesus even existed?
Oh, yeah.
Oh, boy.
Do you have people asking that question?
All right.
Well, I'm laughing because if you're talking about antiquity, if you're going to question this just, we have more sources on the life of Jesus than pretty much for any figure of that time.
More sources like Paul, who never knew him, Hebrews, that isn't a source for a historical Jesus.
It speaks of a cosmic Jesus.
Peter and Jude and James, no evidence of a historical Jesus existing.
And then not till the gospels, decades after the fact, based on these earlier letters and epistles.
Pretty much for any figure of that time.
See, you can't believe any figure.
Yes, you can.
There's no miraculous stories of John the Baptist.
He's mentioned by Josephus.
Anybody Josephus mentions besides the interpolation of Jesus, there's more evidence for.
Like Caesar crossing the Rubicon, Julius Caesar, all of these Roman characters we have statues of.
They're on coins.
None of that for Jesus at all.
This is the irrefutable evidence from the top Christian apologists, and he's spewing pure bullshit.
Ancient figures with extensive evidence.
Julius Caesar wrote extensively about his campaigns.
His life was chronicled by contemporaries like Cicero and then later historians.
And also, it's like a bunch of stories.
Okay, we have Mark, which is obviously fictional and not proof of historical Jesus.
And then Matthew copies and expands on Mark.
That's not an additional source.
Luke copies from Matthew and Mark.
You see this?
Those aren't, and then you go, Josephus and Tacitus.
Those are after the Gospels.
They're not independent attestations.
They're replying, them having knowledge that Christians existed is not evidence that it began with a historical Jesus.
Having lots of, this is what they say in the case for Christ, too, the documentary and the book.
They go, there's thousands of manuscripts about Jesus.
These are from hundreds of years after Jesus supposedly lived.
It's like saying there's thousands of copies of Harry Potter, so he must have existed.
Gonna call Jesus' existence into question, then pretty much call virtually every character of the first century's existence into question.
So are we saying there's more evidence for Jesus than Josephus?
We have all the writings of Josephus.
We have others commenting on Josephus.
There's more evidence for Josephus than Jesus by far.
Alexander the Great, too, another one founding all these cities, leading the Greeks into battle.
You know, these events in history that were reported on on all sides and reported by actual scholars and documentarians and historians that are actually trying to report history and are citing their sources and show skepticism and critical analysis.
The gospels are pure fiction, pure religious propaganda, not written at all as if from like a critical scholar.
So wrong again.
Evidence we have for, let's say, the Caesars or whoever it is comes from sources that are hundreds of years after the reported events.
No, there's statues, there's statues in Italy at the Vatican.
So many sculptures of their emperors from that time period.
No sculptures of Jesus, no coins of Jesus, no, no any archaeological evidence of Jesus at all whatsoever.
No eyewitness descriptions of him in the Bible.
Look at these goi behind him like, yep, yep, he's right.
Yep, we worship the Jewish God.
Want to be consistent, then deny all of these historical characters, and then I would respect you more.
But don't choose to reject Jesus' historicity when he had.
So you can't deny an obvious magical figure.
You have to deny all the people that ever existed that we know about.
That's right.
And they're standing behind him like, that's right.
More documents supporting his historicity than we have for figures at that time.
So you say, well, yeah, I don't think maybe Augustus Caesar existed.
And these characters like the emperor, that you can't fake an emperor like that at that time.
You could fake some backwater preacher that got crucified.
You could fake that and be able to scam people on it, and people would believe it.
Now, I respect you being consistent.
But why is it conveniently, when it comes to Jesus, the best attested historical figure of that period, you question his existence, but not the others whose historicity is based on far less reliable sources.
Any documentation of ancient figures like the emperors of Rome are actual reliable sources.
That's the reliability of the sources.
I'm glad he mentioned that.
To pretend like the gospels in Paul's letters in the New Testament are reliable sources, but not all of the historians writing about Roman history and Greek history.
Those are reliable.
Yours aren't reliable.
And you know, you know, you're bad when you have this whole lie.
This is his best evidence for a Jesus, by the way.
This lie and then appeal to Bart Ehrman.
Whose historicity is based on far less reliable sources?
Don't take my word for it.
Mark Berman, schools Reiper Christ as an atheist showing we know Jesus existed.
And one of the best attested facts of that period is he was killed by crucifixion.
So cool, the Lord is like.
And Ehrman's, and mind you, I've actually read Ehrman's book.
Christians all the time will go, even Bart Ehrman believes.
Have you read his book?
Have you read the books debunking him?
No, okay.
Well, I guess you shouldn't bring that to the table.
And when a Christian wants to cite Bart Ehrman as their authority, I'll say, okay, well, I guess since you're citing him, I'll cite him too.
says the vast majority of all of the New Testament is forgery and mythical.
All right, now we got Mike Winger, another big Christian apologist.
Numerous prophetic passages in the Old Testament show that the Messiah of the Jews will cause the Gentiles to turn and worship the God of Israel.
The whole point of the Messiah is to get the Gentiles to worship the God of Israel.
Consider for a moment how incredibly unlikely this seems historically.
A single descendant of Abraham causing a massive change in the Gentile world, such that they abandon their paganism and polytheism and turn to acknowledge the God of Israel, spiritually cucked.
Theological conquest with the Jewish Messiah, that they, that was the plan that they derived from the prophecies, and they carried out by faking more prophecies, faking the fulfillment of the prophecies.
This is just one of the many prophecies Jesus fulfilled.
An example of it can be found in Psalms 22, which describes the crucifixion in detail hundreds of years ahead of time.
Or they read this and thought, hmm, we believe in this Midrashic celestial Jesus.
And where did they get the idea that he would be crucified?
It's so funny.
Ehrman's argument is that, oh, they would never invent a crucified Messiah.
They would if they were interpreting verses like that as messianic.
Psalms 22, the beginning of Psalms 22, it starts with God, my God, my God, why have you forsaken me?
The words they put into Jesus when he's on the cross.
Psalms 22 was the inspiration that they crafted the Jesus story from.
The Psalms, Isaiah, Zachariah, Daniel, wisdom of Solomon, many others.
Psalm 22, which describes the crucifixion in detail hundreds of years ahead of its time, and then goes on to talk about this event causing Gentiles to worship God.
In Psalms 22, 27, all the ends of the earth shall remember and turn to the Lord, and all the families of the Goyim shall worship before you.
All the Goyim shall be conquered.
Christmas is a great example of The success of Jesus.
Gentiles around the world are here gathered to acknowledge Jesus, the Messiah of Israel, conquered by the God of Israel, as they always intended.
This is funny.
So this new popular, like young liberal guy, anti-Trumper, didn't have such a pleasant Christmas, got kicked out of his house by his brother, who apparently is a MAGA, pro-Trump, MAGA Christian.
Fucking live.
In live walkout, brothers, like, get the hell out.
Get all of your shit and dip.
He ended up kicking me out because he's alt-right, Christian, conservative.
I'm liberal content creator.
It's so funny that this ultra-lefty liberal guy is his brother is a MAGA alt-right guy.
He debated Nick Fuentes.
His brother probably likes Nick Fuentes and hates his own brother.
He called me the Antichrist.
He called me an agent of chaos.
Dehumanizing as fuck.
He said the same shit to me that all those crazy Republican nutbags say in my comment section say on my life.
He even brought up how he thinks that me, Harry Chris Parker, won Trump the election.
Could have helped Trump win.
They see all these leftists.
He talks like a five, too.
All these leftists like that, although Trump has his share of them, too.
It was relationship ending.
I never, ever, ever won a relationship with that man again.
It was absolutely unreal.
I cannot believe that my biological brother that I grew up with would ever do that.
It's unfucking unreal.
Turning against your own family because they don't believe in the same Jewish fairy tales you do.
I came not to bring peace but the sword, to turn household against household and brother against brother and brother and son against father and all of that.
And what do we got?
Your family, your people, your tribe, your nation, Christ coming in between that.
And the Christians will say it's a good thing.
It's a good thing.
We're not supposed to be yoked with the unbelievers.
Then don't call us divisive.
You bow down to our Jewish God or we're going to call you an Antichrist and not talk to you.
Stop being divisive for criticizing that.
But there's he's alt-right Christian conservative.
I'm liberal content creator.
He called me the antichrist.
His brother was like, this was his brother at the Christmas dinner table.
The power of Christ compels you!
Ahem.
Now we got 6.7,000 likes from Renata Michelle.
Hold on.
Dude, is this a joke?
21,000 followers?
This can't be the real picture.
This can't be really who it is, is it?
You can't be Christian and hate Jews.
Jesus was Jewish, as was Paul and most of the apostles.
You see how the Christian anti-Semitism is a non-starter and it's not going anywhere.
You can't get secular people on board.
So most people with common sense and a little bit of intelligence are never going to get on board with you when you killed Jesus.
You killed my savior.
You gave me my savior.
You can't convince any significant Christians to hop on board with your Christian anti-Semitism.
You can't get non-believers to get on board with it.
So where's it going?
You really think you're going to defeat the Jews by worshiping the God of the Jews and blaming them for killing God?
You think that's the way for the only way to defeat the Jews is to the only way to defeat Israel is to worship the Messiah of Israel.
Christ Cuckery is for retards.
I know.
I know.
It's very disheartening.
Are you not entertained?
Are you not entertained?
A Christian account, the archivist says, just got back from mass and I'm even more racist now.
The only thing I could think to pray was for our literal existence.
Went to an Irish Roman Catholic church and the whole place was full of Asians and Filipinos.
Wah, wah.
It's so distracting how badly we are the minorities.
Could barely pay attention to the mass.
I'm sorry if this to I'm sorry to whomever this offends in the Catholic community, but we don't deserve to live like this in our own countries.
Yeah, you go to any Catholic church, it's going to be full of Mexicans.
Catholicism, Christianity is exploding in non-white countries.
It's collapsing in European countries.
And the latter is a good thing.
Less Christians, less Zionism, less Christians, less people under the Judeo spell.
What's the proof for Jesus?
These apologists are like, what's the proof for Jesus?
Well, in a book.
That would have been good for earlier.
Forbidden one.
Also, I forgot to mention forbidden one.
Quote minor Volkish Spirit, Forbidden One, another account that's always digging up some great quotes.
Like this one from Theodore Fritsch says, Christian opponents of the Jews, Christian opponents of the Jews, are like those natives who pretend to be white when they dress in European rags, yet still remain colored people, only that they give away their own kind.
So in other words, Christians, Christians are Christian anti-Semites opposing Jews as Christians are basically traitors and controlled opposition.
And they give away their own kind.
They pretend to be European, but inside they are Jewish, like their Pope says.
Inside every Christian is a Jew.
They're like natives who pretend to be white when they dress in European rags, but they still remain colored people.
You may claim to be white nationalist or pro-European, but you still remain a spiritual Jew, and you will give away your own kind for the king of the Jews.
So nailed it.
Completely nailed it.
E. Michael Jones says, stick to chemistry, Jermar.
Jermar Rudolph, who I believe is a big well-known Holocaust revisionist or World War II revisionist.
E. Michael Jones is taking shots at him saying, stick to chemistry.
So let's hear what Jermar Gurmar has to say about Christianity.
Let's hear.
Of course, E. Michael Jones doesn't refute any of the points he makes.
He just says, stick to chemistry.
How about you stick to washing the feet of black people and being a wannabe chosen person, E. Michael Jones?
How about that?
So let's pull up this video.
I want to see what.
Is it Gurmar Germar?
Jeremy Smith used to say that the Jews aren't the problem.
It's us.
The Jews are such a small minority, except for Israel and maybe New York, that they could never rule and control what we're doing.
But if they're doing it anyway, and a lot of people think they do, they do it because we let them.
And the issue is, I think we need to understand, and it may hurt some of the readers or the listeners.
We need to understand that Christianity is a Jewish sect.
You need to deal with that fact.
Christianity is a Jewish sect.
We were talking about there are 13 million Jews in the world, and I said, no, they are 1.5 billion.
Oh.
Every Christian is a Jew.
Every Christian is a Jew.
Does E. Michael Jones refute any of these points?
He just goes, no, stick to chemistry.
Keep your business out of Christianity.
Stop telling the truth about our cucked religion.
That's what E. Michael Jones sounds like.
So, so far, no lies detected.
13 million Jews in the world.
And I said, no, they are 1.5 billion.
Every Christian is a Jew.
Every Christian is a Jew.
Every Christian is a Christian Zionist if they worship the God of Zion.
Christianity has, by definition, must have by definition, a very positive attitude to Judaism.
Because if you look at the Bible, 80%, 90% of the Bible is the Old Testament.
So when we're talking about Jews, we need to understand that any other Stone Age religion that defines itself by ethnicity has basically been wiped off the earth or face of the earth or has been reduced to insignificance.
You still have some of these tribal religions in remote areas of Asia and Africa and so forth.
They still exist.
The Jewish religion conquered the pagan world.
But they don't get any influence.
Judaism is the one exception, and they have this influence because of the clout they get with Christianity.
If it weren't for Christianity, Judaism would long have been absorbed and reformed and be not there anymore or be something completely different.
Yeah, Christianity has shielded Judaism.
That's not the case.
The undergirding structure that keeps it up is Christianity, the credibility as God's chosen people they get from 1.5 billion people signing up on that idea.
Yep.
Stop affirming their chosen status.
What's real opposition?
Saying they were never chosen or saying that they were once chosen.
Is that not obvious?
E. Michael Jones telling him to stick to chemistry.
E. Michael Jones is controlled opposition.
Where's the clip I'm looking for?
I agree that the Torah is the word of God.
I agree that the Jews were God's chosen people.
If the Jews followed the Torah, there would be no problem.
The Jews are in rebellion against the Torah.
They won't criticize the Torah, believes that they're chosen, believes their fake history, believes their God is the one true God.
Does this sound?
He's saying this to a Kabbalah rabbi.
You won't catch me saying to a Kabbalah rabbi that I believe you were once chosen.
No, I say that's insane.
You were never chosen and your prophecies are fake.
I agree that the Torah is the word of God.
I agree that the Jews were God's chosen people.
If the Jews followed the Torah.
Hey, why doesn't E. Michael Jones stick to shilling for a Jewish religion?
It's like we go, stop believing they're chosen.
They go, E. Michael Jones, they were chosen.
Their covenant is real.
You're a spiritual Jew, E. Michael Jones.
And I think that's one of the main reasons why Jews in the Western world have a lot of influence, but they don't have it really in the Islamic countries because they don't have that concept.
They don't have the Old Testament.
They have a completely different narrative.
Islamic religion still has a connection, of course.
They see similarity by origin and concept of God and so forth with Judaism, with a pre-monotheistic religions.
But they have a different way, different approach.
I myself have been raised Christian, Catholic, actually, and I'm still active nowadays.
And I'm still, because of my socialization and my religious life, I'm feeling it myself.
I was raised that way.
The Jews were the chosen people.
And when the 1973 war broke out, I was a boy and I was the vibes from my environment.
Okay, so all of the Christian Nazis constantly attacking me and calling me Jewish.
Are you going to call Mr. Rudolph here a Jew too for saying all the same shit about Christianity that I say?
Are you just going to admit we're both right?
Which way, Western man?
E. Michael Jones?
The Jewish God, Shiller?
The Torah shill promoting the idea that the Jews were ever chosen by God?
Or who the Jews call Amalek, the people that don't believe their Torah and their God.
But everybody in Germany was hoping that the Jews will win and beat up the Arabs, even though that was clearly an aggressive war.
No, the 73 was not.
That was what the Arabs started.
But it was a continuation, of course, of the 68 war, which was an aggression of Israel.
But in any war, things aren't easy, but it was put to the Western nations by Western outlets in a one-sided way.
Of course, Israel is the victim.
They have every right to defend themselves no matter what.
And everyone was cheering them on and hoping for it.
And so was I. And go into church, and you always hear something from the Old Testament, and the Jewish factor is always in there.
That's how they get power by kind of 1.5 billion people and the whole Western world silent.
See, they get their power.
I mean, imagine, think of this, too.
You're an anti-Semitic Christian.
You think Jesus, the Son of God, came to earth and created a religion and it's been completely subverted and hijacked by Jews.
So he's just in a total failure.
The devil's children have conquered Jesus' church that he came to build.
Okay, L?
How incompetent is it?
How much of a failure could it be?
Coming off the idea that they're the chosen people and...
He's recognizing the core of their power is the Jesus deception.
Is Christianity the greatest weapon against the world was Jesus?
Nietzsche said the same thing.
It is the bait of their vengeance.
Then you add to this this, oh, they have been persecuted for 2,000 years with a climax of persecution and the third Reich.
They are the ultimate victim and you can never criticize the victim.
And so this whole thing, I think, has so much influence because I like the way he used that.
The Christians are giving them clout.
Pure Blood for 10 says post-Christian donation.
Check out your XDMs.
Lots of good content.
I will, Pure Blood.
Thank you, bro.
Of the Christian structure of the Western world.
Now, we could analyze how does it look like how much influence and power do Jews have in Japan and in China.
I mean, you don't have the Jews.
Oh, it's almost like Christian countries are exceptionally vulnerable to Jewish influence.
I wonder what could be the cause of that.
Oh, maybe the Jewish religion that they're built on.
Maybe the fact that you believe they were God's chosen people and the people of the book.
It's funny that he mentions Japan because we got E. Michael Jones can give us our answer on why Japan.
Funny, this is so funny.
How much clout, how much influence and power do Jews have in, for instance, in Japan and in China?
They don't have the Christian Western world.
And E. Michael Jones knows why.
From White Pride on Cozy asks, why don't you criticize the Shabbat Jews of Russia and Putin?
This is the wrong clip?
Do you criticize them?
No.
The Jews.
I have talked about Putin coming to power after Boris Yeltsin and Jeffrey Sachs basically created the oligarchs.
I'll find it.
Once Putin came to power, he gave the Jewish oligarchs the choice of it's my way or the highway.
Some of them left and they became the opposition.
Some of them stayed and they decided that they're going to go along with this type of thing.
I'm not denying that they're there.
I'm saying.
And the power and influence got consolidated with the Habotanics.
In Russia in the way that the tail wags the dog in America.
Okay, false equivalency.
We never said that they're as cucked as America or in the same way.
It's different, but still part of it.
This was the clip I meant to play.
Why does Japan not controlled by Jews and influenced by Jews like the Western Christian countries?
Hmm, what could it be?
I had a friend, a priest who was a missionary to Japan.
He said nobody ever converted.
And I was giving a talk once in Washington.
A Japanese reporter came up to me and she said, we'll never become Christian because as soon as we become Christians, the Jews are going to take over our culture.
So I guess that's what you're trying to deal with.
This is fine.
You can have your culture.
I'm a big fan of people having control of their own culture.
But once you stop having children, you've got a serious problem.
You need Jesus or you won't have children.
Japan.
Just a civilization that's been around for thousands of years.
You need Jesus or you won't survive.
So there's your answer.
Maybe you should sit this one out, E. Michael Jones.
But hey, thanks for sharing the video or else I wouldn't have seen this guy.
Another person that sees right through Christianity for the problem, Jewish subversion that it is.
And maybe India, is it different there?
Do they have a more relaxed way of looking at things?
Do they even understand what's going on in the West?
So as irrational as really the politics are with support for Israel and letting the Israel lobby kind of run certain aspects of our foreign affairs and aspects of what is politically acceptable, politically correct, and what's not inside of our societies.
It's like, you know, I don't know because I haven't lived in Asia.
I don't know what their view on it is, if they really comprehend what's going on.
There was one indicator, of course, I remember in the 1990s that a Japanese magazine published a religionist article.
And there was the last issue the magazine ever had.
His name was Marco Polo.
And after they published that article, all major corporations instantly withdraw any advertisement.
And as you know, in the print we have Japan and do they have similar dynamics?
I don't know.
Okay, so E. Michael Jones says you should sit this one out.
Stick to chemistry.
Everything he said in that post was right, E. Michael Jones.
Stick to being controlled opposition to Jews and a shill for the Torah.
Stop promoting the idea that the Jews were ever chosen.
You want all the Goim to bow down to the king of the Jews, just like rabbis do.
You want every knee to bow to the Moshiach, just like the rabbis do, E. Michael Jones.
Glad to see this guy had only 25 likes.
Thank you.
Putin broke the Jew taboo.
Logos is rising.
Merry Christmas.
Shilling for Putin.
I got to see the whole thing that Putin said here.
But I forgot to mention this.
Where was that?
Where was that dude?
The guy I showed earlier, the apologist.
I had a mix from see-through it all.
Jay Dyer and his Orthodox crew.
I think the Sam guy is in this.
What is the problem?
The Messiah.
And that's been happening for the last time.
Okay, never mind.
Worshiping together with the Hebrews.
Worshiping together with the Hebrews.
Bradley Smith used to say that the Jews aren't the problem.
It's us.
The Jews are such a faithful to the Tana.
So in our view, Christianity is thoroughly Jewish and faithful to the Tenah.
So, in our view, the original Hebrew religion is what Orthodoxy is.
We see Orthodoxy.
Okay, we don't need to do all that right now.
Let's see.
Let's do the Putin.
Let's see what Putin said here.
People were asking me what I thought about this.
Find the perfect name right now on Adam.com.
Explore the internet's best collection of domains in our marketplace.
Sorry.
Commercials running.
Mm-mm.
Mmm.
Mmm.
Thank you.
Okay, here we go.
Come on, Putin video.
What's going on here?
Oh, my God.
Watch Putin's harsh attacks on Jews.
What is going on here?
I got a two-minute commercial.
Here it is.
Yes, about that.
Okay, so let's see.
Everybody's like, oh, Putin called out the Jews.
Godless Jews.
Let's hear what he actually says.
A very unique situation because this is a most blatant violation of human rights, of the rights of the believers.
Putin blasts godless Jews.
He says they don't even visit synagogues.
So he's not saying there's any problem with Judaism.
If Jews all went to synagogue and believed in the Talmud, then they'd be good.
Is that what he's that's that's his big criticism of Jews?
Saying that they're not Jewing hard enough, they don't go to synagogue enough.
That's the problem he has with Jews.
Oh, huge W. I thought we were going to see what he actually said translated.
Not this shit.
Putin takes a dangerous step igniting nationalist sentiments.
Are we going to show what he actually said?
Challenge the heart.
His remarks challenge the heart of Russia's Orthodox Church.
What?
They're pro-Jewish?
He sparked the controversy at his press conference.
He sparked the controversy at the time of the press conference.
He accused quote ethnic Jews of undermining the Russian Orthodox Church.
So this is in regards he's complaining that Russian Orthodox churches, I guess in NATO countries or something, are being shut down.
The Russian Orthodox Church is KGB-connected spy propaganda outlets.
So I'm not surprised that they would be shut.
There's a war going on.
Are you going to let your adversary's religion operate in all of your countries?
*Music*
His comments about ethnic Jews targeting the Russian Orthodox Church have sparked outrage.
What is the actual quote?
They're not even atheists, Putin said during heated end-of-year press conference.
So I saw this when I read the article.
He says they're godless and they don't go to synagogue, but they're not even atheists.
So what are they?
What is he trying to say here?
There was also a question about the Russian Orthodox Church.
Well, yes, about that.
This is a very unique situation because this is a most blatant violation of human rights, of the rights of the believers.
The church is being taken apart.
It's being completely torn down.
So because they're shutting down some of the Russian Orthodox churches, because they see them as fronts and spy groups and propaganda outlets for Putin and there's a war, he's saying, oh, he's trying to hype up Christian anti-Semitism by saying it's Jews that are shutting down the church.
Trying to play the victim is what he's doing.
And people around the world seem to like to ignore that.
And I think that those who are doing that, they will eventually have their comeuppance.
The people who are tearing our church apart are not even atheists because atheists believe in something.
They believe that there is no God.
That is their faith.
That is what they believe in.
But these people that are attacking the church, they're not atheists.
These are absolutely faithless people, godless people.
You just said an atheist is a godless person.
He says they're not atheists, but then they're godless.
And again, he's just trying to use play victim and attack them because he thinks he can leverage this that they're shutting down Russian Orthodox churches.
Ethnically, many of them are Jews, but you haven't seen them visit any synagogue.
And they don't seem to be Orthodox Christians as well.
They don't go into Christian church.
They are not, of course, the adherents of Islam because they don't go to mosques.
These are people.
So he didn't just single out Jews.
He says they're not Jews.
They're not Christians.
They're not Muslims.
He's basically calling out secular, godless people.
It's funny how the headlines everywhere that it was an attack on Jews, but he literally said Jews, Muslims, and Christians.
Yeah, yeah, the KGB approved Russian Orthodox Church.
The Patriarch Kirill are KGB spies.
Yeah, just like he calls Ukrainian Nazis.
Exactly, Volga Spirit.
The music made it sound like such a big deal.
I know, huh, money music studios that have no tribe, that have no family, they do not value things that we value.
They do not value the things that the Ukrainian people values.
And when they escape, they will go to get a rest somewhere.
I wonder if the question had any mention of Jews or if he just brought that up out of nowhere.
It sounded like he said, yes, some of them are ethnic Jews.
Like, did the question say, like, is it Jews shutting down the church or something like that?
And at some point in the future, the people in Ukraine will remember who did it to them.
And most of Ukrainians have to do something with Orthodox Christianity.
And that will be something that the Ukrainian people will have a say.
Okay, that was it.
So he literally mentioned.
I didn't see them visit any synagogue.
And they don't seem to be Orthodox Christians as well.
Come on.
So E. Michael Jones and all the people are like, oh, the Putin shilling is going out of control.
They're like, see, see, see, he's anti-Jewish.
He's basically calling out Zelensky, saying he's a secular Jew.
He shut down the Russian Orthodox Church.
They're in a war.
You think you're going to let Putin's church be on your land during a war?
When how many have died?
Putin broke the Jew taboo.
Logos is rising.
As if he just singled out Jews.
He said they're not Jews.
They're godless.
They're not Orthodox Christian.
They're not Muslims.
They don't go to mosque.
He's just saying there's secular people shutting down his church.
There, Yo Rich, saying, there's my take on this development.
I said I would cover it on stream.
Here we are.
I saw so many people hyping this as, oh, Putin's so based.
Putin's so base now.
How desperate are you for Putin to be based?
Just as desperate as the Jews are to cry about anti-Semitism, basically.
Now, we'll have to cover this on another stream.
14 minutes of Lee Strobel, Christian propagandist Lee Strobel.
I thought I could disprove Christianity.
He's the one that wrote the case for Christ.
I'll probably show this on another stream.
Look at how cringe this is, though.
This is how I don't think you can make Christianity seem any more gay than this right here.
Listen to this podcast of these two Christian dudes just sitting here being homos for the Lord.
So cool is the Lord.
Is like, what are you doing?
Yeah, he's like, why are you asking me about it?
Like, what I still love is Moses asked.
Right.
Because Moses is like, so what are we doing?
You know, he only wants to do what you're doing.
But God, the Lord is like, I told you what to do.
Yeah, like, I gave you the ability to do this.
Why are you asking?
Their relationship is just.
Dude, look at what Christianity does to people's brains.
These guys are sitting around here laughing about Moses and God being bros.
Not serious people.
Like, we could be talking about serious issues, and there's just how many billions wasting their time with these Jewish fairy tales.
When it goes back to the intimacy, it's so cool, man.
Like, their relationship is just.
Yeah.
When it goes back to the intimacy, like we talked about last episode, where it's like the Lord desires somebody that's mature that he can have those conversations with.
Yes, and it's not like the Lord was mad at Moses.
No.
The Lord needed an intimate, mature conversation with Moses.
Yeah, it's like me sitting here with you.
And he'd be like, well, what are you talking about?
Yeah.
Go do it.
We already talked about this.
That's so cool.
Yeah.
Dude, imagine clipping that and thinking like that's the good short.
That's the one that hits.
Oh, that's the powerful.
And put some gay Christian music behind it.
That'll do it.
All right, that's all we got here.
How much time do we have?
148.
I might have to wrap it.
Let's see here.
Yeah, I'm going to wrap it and pick up probably Sunday or Monday.
I'm going to cover this controversy about the chosen show and Judas being non-biblical, some Christians getting BTFO'd.
This your new Christian leader talking about the Talmud.
These guys regurgitating the Talmud books that don't exist, discrediting opposition.
We got John's rabbi mix.
Who are they really?
Destroy Am.
Actually, we'll probably play one of these right now.
Destroy Amalek, Palantir.
Let's cover the Palantir thing, maybe.
What do you guys want to see?
And the Dr. Amin Hillman.
I'm going to start the show with the Amin Hillman thing next show.
Let's cover the Palantir thing because this is getting to be old news.
And I haven't seen it yet.
So Trump was at the big football game, I think it was, right?
Maybe baseball.
I'm not sure.
Oh, Navy Army game.
And they're right there.
Palantir, the big sponsor with them and Elon and Christian Zionists, Mike Johnson there.
Brought to you by Palantir.
And this is the Palantir commercial they put out a couple weeks ago.
let's not ear rape you guys music So Palantir is Peter Thiel, founded by Peter Thiel.
You sunk my battleship.
This is like the commercial for battleships when I was a kid.
Loud.
Whoa.
Whoa.
This is Gaga Magog commercial.
Whoa.
Drones are taking out all the missiles.
Battles are won before they begin.
Oh, that's very reassuring.
Big trouble.
Okay.
All right, guys.
That is what we have for today.
I will be back again very soon to finish up this show, the Amin Hillman stuff.
And then I have the show probably do maybe one of the first few days of the new year.
I'm going to do the Volkish Spirit thread and Germans on Christianity video.
That should be a good one.
Let me make sure I got all these super chats here.
Thank you.
Albert Alberto Herbert says, no, Adam, he called out the whole Ukrainian government and mentioned them being Jews in general.
Okay, well, that wasn't in the clip that I saw.
So maybe send me a full clip.
So that was Jesus Wars.
The Jesus Wars continue.
Let me know what you guys think in the comments below.
Huge shout out to Pure Blood, John Garadas, Odin, Watch the Collapse, Primordial Chaos, Indomitably Based.
Oh, your friendly neighborhood fascist did a couple comments here.
He says, through your tireless research, you found out that Hitler didn't only want to free his people from financial enslavement, but from spiritual enslavement as well.
Contrary to what the Christian National Socialist copers would have you believe.
This wasn't fringe, but evident at all levels of the Reich.
There were hundreds of NSDAP approved publications that deconstructed the Jewish nature of Christianity.
The SS periodicals, the Hitler Youth Manual, the poetry of Agers, the writings of his mentor, Eckhart, the satire of Stryker, the philosophy of Rosenberg, not Jewish.
Thank you from your courage and integrity.
The blood libel against Germans is pure projection.
And the final hurdle to clear on our path to freedom from the Judeo matrix.
I know The evidence is overwhelming about their view on Christianity.
And all of the people online that are going to love them, but then call us Jews for saying the same shit about Christianity that we do, they're going to need to be dealt with.
And I'm going to try to do it in the video to be the coffin nails on the Christian coping lies.
Anyway, thank you all.
I got a donation on Rumble 2.
I forget the name.
Something dichotomy.
It's not showing up now, but I appreciate that dono too.
I love you all.
Hope you guys have a nice weekend.
And I will see you guys again very soon for another show.
Take care.
Take care.
Sorry.
Sorry for the ear rape.
▲
Export Selection