May 13, 2021 - Know More News - Adam Green
01:52
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| Their explanation on what caused the complete destruction of the towers does not exist. | |
| Within more than 10,000 pages filled with technical data of relative importance, in a footnote on page 82 of the NIST report, we read. | |
| The focus of the investigation was on the sequence of events from the instant of aircraft impact to the initiation of collapse for each tower. | |
| For brevity of this report, the sequence is referred to as the probable collapse sequence, although it does not actually include the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached and collapse became inevitable. | |
| With the simple word inevitable, NIST purports to have explained the total destruction of 80,000 tons of a perfectly healthy steel structure upon itself. | |
| The next three experiments are real-world examples intended to see if, indeed, as NIST simply assumed, a collapse would be inevitable. | |
| Will the collapse of these structures continue to accelerate? | |
| And is collapse really inevitable. | |
| Based on these three real-world examples, an accelerated straight-down collapse of the structure certainly is not inevitable. | |
| The area below the damage zone where the planes flew in and where the fire was, that area below that, those 80 or 90 stories, 80,000 tons of structural steel was not damaged in any way. | |
| Yet you stood there and watched it destroy itself, wiping out floor by floor all 287 structural columns as if they didn't exist underneath the damage zone. | |
| When a well-known debunking website wrote to NIST, asking for a clarification on the sequence of the collapses, it received a similar answer. | |
| NIST did not describe the specific sequence of events after global collapse initiated. |
Export Selection