Know More News - Adam Green - The Nefarious Assault on the West | Know More News LIVE w/ Mark Collett

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 22, 2021 - Know More News - Adam Green

01:57:38

The Nefarious Assault on the West | Know More News LIVE w/ Mark Collett

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome, ladies and gentlemen.
	Adam Green here with no more news dot org.
	Thank you all for joining me.
	Today is Thursday, April 22nd, 2021, and I've got some news I'd like to discuss and share with you guys today.
	Joining me to discuss the fall of Western man.
	I have political activist and commentator, over in England, Mr. Mark Collette.
	Thanks for being here again, Mark.
	Oh, it's always a pleasure to join you, Adam.
	It is always fun to come on your channel.
	We always have a lot of good things to discuss, and I always enjoy hosting you on my channel.
	Although I will never be hosting you on YouTube again.
	Not because I dislike you, but because just a few minutes ago, YouTube have terminated my channel.
	I've had that uh YouTube account for decades.
	The channel has been active hosting videos since 2016.
	I have never had um well, actually, at the current time of writing, I didn't have a single strike on the channel, but they have just terminated it and said repeated severe violations of their guidelines.
	Uh absolute rubbish.
	They've just taken it down.
	In fact, I've not even posted any political videos there for the best part of a year, but it is now gone.
	So I am only to be found now on Odyssey and BitChute.
	I don't know if you've still got your YouTube channel, but most people have um they're they're long gone for most people.
	I don't know by some miracle I'd held on, was just doing my sort of more normie friendly community building stuff there, but that is now over.
	So the end of an era, but uh how many subs did you have there?
	How many what did you make it up to?
	At Peak, I had um just under 99,000.
	They never let me tick over to 100,000.
	Didn't get your uh your your uh plaque on the wall, I guess, huh?
	Me neither.
	No, no, no.
	They never let me have that.
	I was gaining around a thousand subs a week, and then it got up to just under 99,000, and then it stopped dead.
	It was like somebody had put a block there and hit the glass ceiling, and there was no way they were letting Mark Collett um get his plaque.
	Not that I was particularly bothered.
	If I'd have got the plaque, it would have been um just for my amusement, really.
	I'd have been amused that I'd got it, but it would have just ended up going on a shelf, gathering dust, or it you know, maybe even put back in the box it came in.
	It would have been uh something that would have just been clutter and may have gone may have gone on eBay or something or given away at some sort of meeting at some point uh in an auction, but it it wouldn't have really been any use for me.
	But I'm pretty sure that um if they hadn't been messing with me, I would have had over a hundred thousand because you don't go from a thousand subs a week every week, and then it just it just stopping like that.
	It was uh it was pretty blatant.
	No, yeah, that happened to everybody.
	Used to be if you did good work, you you would grow, you would have viral videos, but they completely shut all that off for basically everybody no questions about it.
	That the last time I had you on, you were just banned from it was right after you were banned from Twitter as well.
	You had like sixty something thousand followers there as well.
	Yeah, sixty thousand.
	I think you must be bringing me the bad look, Adam.
	Every time you schedule me for a show, I get banned for something on the day or the day before the show.
	So don't start a conspiracy now, Mark.
	But it's it's a really weird thing because despite not posting new political content there for a long time, despite only posting my gaming streams, the movie reviews, um, and other such content.
	Do you know the really strange thing, Adam?
	I was still getting thousands and thousands of views a day on old archive videos.
	I was still getting so many kind messages from people who were discovering my work.
	I was still getting people um say, wow, I've just found your channel, I've just binged on you know, three or four hours of your old videos, where do you make new videos?
	How come you stop making I've not stopped making them on Bit Shoot, I'm on Odyssey, and I think they just must have seen the fact that despite everything they did, I was still very much alive.
	I was still very much kicking and I was still bringing in viewers, even though they'd done everything they could to stop me.
	So the final the final act for them was well, just ban him, just get rid of him, and that was it.
	And I'm sure that this will be followed by a wave of other people, because they go down the list and eventually uh all will be on there is um makeup tutorials by uh people who are allegedly pedophiles.
	I know, yeah.
	Uh so where can people find you now?
	What are the best places?
	Like it's uh for you is Telegram and Odyssey, I'm guessing, Bit Shoot.
	Telegram, Gab, they're my um two places for sort of uh Twitter style content.
	Then I don't have anything that's sort of Facebook or Instagram style content.
	I've just gone there all together.
	But the other places you can get me are um BitChute and Odyssey.
	I was also uh denied a subscribestar account.
	I'm one of only three people that I know of that subscribe that have set up subscribestar accounts and had them closed.
	Uh myself, Greg Johnson and Blair Cotter, we were all um denied.
	I've never tried a Patreon.
	Um but yeah, the best places are uh the aforementioned.
	I really like Odyssey.
	I really like BitChute, big supporters of both of those platforms, and I really like Gabin Telegram, so you can find me there.
	Uh the first time I had you on, back when I used to have a YouTube channel, was right after you had a debate with uh this this uh man here, uh Joseph from the Israel advocacy movement, and uh you debated him and four other Jews, one on five.
	You wrecked him so bad that they pulled down the video.
	It's still archive places you can find it.
	But uh and then I had you on right after that.
	We got to discuss it.
	I wanted to share this with you.
	So he was uh grilling Duvid here, who's been on my channel a couple times for some debates.
	I've I've debated uh a handful of Jews, not just Duvid, and I believe I'm basically undefeated, in my opinion, in my chat's opinion.
	But uh anyway, so he's grilling Duvid for some of his answers and for him uh associating with with me, and listen to what he says here.
	The context that Adam Green you this guy's in England, or maybe he's in Israel, but he's from England, and uh he's like one of the biggest Hasborough uh propagandist for Israel online.
	One of the biggest.
	I don't want to flatter him too big too much.
	But he flattered me here, so here you go.
	The context that Adam Green has been there, the key person that I've watched.
	Adam Green is probably one of the biggest, and you see mate on the internet, and he goes biggest person exposing Jewish supremacy in the Zionist agenda on the internet.
	Thank you, Joseph.
	I'm honored that you're watching my videos and listen to what else he says.
	It gets even better here.
	I've gone to great lengths to read the Jewish text.
	Yeah, that's right.
	I know you consider that a crime, Joseph.
	Great lengths to read the Jewish texts, and he must have read thousands and thousands of thousands of pages of our books, and he'll find one quote and take that one quote and say, Is this authentic?
	Yeah, it actually is from whichever buddy's reading, and then he'll present that as if that's a Jewish position, which it usually is completely out.
	So you like that?
	I read all their books.
	I find one quote, I've got hundreds of quotes, and hundreds of clips of rabbis validating that they believe these things today.
	And then he goes, and he says that's what Judaism teaches.
	Well, it's the religion.
	If it's the Zohar and the Talmud and the Torah, that's the religion.
	Anyway, I want to debate him as well.
	I just debated the other day, by the way, one of his yeshiva teachers.
	He lives in the West Bank, and he was one of the guys that you debated as well in that debate.
	He was one of the five.
	Anyway, just wanted to share that about our our uh little friend Joseph here, who just made a pretty pretty uh low life hit piece on uh Philosoph cat philosophy cat.
	Who isn't even talking scandalous?
	Yeah, hasn't he like trying to dox her and smear her when she hasn't even been like talking about Jews at all?
	It's just really a low ball move.
	She said Yeah, even Jews were upset with him for about that.
	Alright, so let's see, are we getting to this yet?
	No, before we get here, I just want to ask you, Mark, you you wrote the book how many years ago, The Fall of the Western Man.
	Um when It was released I think in the first week of 2017, I believe.
	But it was written between I think twenty it was written I think twenty fifteen, twenty sixteen time.
	Um so yeah, good six five, six years ago it was actually written and completed and originally released in 2017.
	So given that you wrote the book about the fall of the West six years ago, five years ago, what do you think about like the last you know year or two that's transpired with BLM and George Floyd and this this whole trial that just went down and just like the uh the situation, the state of America and uh and England for your case.
	Well, first I'm gonna talk a bit about the George Floyd case.
	George Floyd wasn't about Derek Chauvin, it was nothing about to do with Derek Chauvin.
	Derek Chauvin was the avatar of whiteness.
	He was the man on trial, but it wasn't him who was really on trial, it was white America that was on trial.
	Don't think this was about one officer doing something wrong.
	It's never about one man when it's white person being accused of racism.
	Something you've always got to remember with the way our enemies deal with things, is that black people are a community, they're a group, people of colour, they're a community or a group, unless one of them does something wrong.
	Now, if one of them does something wrong, that person is an individual.
	That person is an individual.
	Now white people are viewed the other way around.
	White people are not a group, they are just a loose collection of individuals, unless one of them does something wrong, and if one of them does something wrong, then they are representative of all white people.
	Now notice the hypocrisy then.
	Black people, Muslims, they are a group, they're a community, they're an ethnicity.
	Unless they do something wrong, then that's an individual, and they must be viewed as an individual.
	White people the opposite way around.
	We are um absolutely just a group of individuals, should only ever see ourselves as individuals, should never ever collectivise unless we do something wrong, at which point we are representative of the whole group.
	Derek Chauvin was on trial, but it was whiteness in America, it was white people as a whole on trial.
	And it was one of those lose-lose situations for people of European descent in America, because if Derek Chauvin had been found not guilty, if he'd been acquitted, no, I believe he wasn't guilty, I believe he should have been acquitted.
	Uh George Floyd was three times over the fatal dose dose of fentanyl.
	He clearly had a heart attack.
	Um Chauvin was leaning on his or kneeling on the back of his neck, was not kneeling on his throat.
	There's a huge difference between throat and neck.
	He was trying to restrain him.
	I've watched all the videos.
	George Floyd was a massive guy.
	He was six foot something, total monster.
	If he's freaking out and going mad in your patrol car, you have to get him out and you have to restrain him before he trashes it or attacks you.
	Uh unfortunately, Derek Chauvin was the officer chose to carry out the restraint, and that's why he was up in the dock.
	But you've got to remember it was a mixed-race group of officers in charge of the arrest.
	But it's only him who's got the blame.
	It's it's Whitey who's got the blame, and that one white man is representative of all white people.
	So if he'd have been acquitted, what would you have had?
	You'd have had Maxine Waters, you'd have had the Democrats, you'd have had the media, you'd have had BLM, you'd have had anarchist groups, you would have had Marxist groups.
	They would have torn America apart.
	There would have been rioting for weeks or months, and white people would have been attacked, white people would have been beaten in the streets, their homes would have been burnt, their businesses would have been burnt.
	It would have been um it would have been like something out of a horror film.
	The amount of violence, it'd have been like something out of the film like the purge.
	It would have just been constant wall-to-wall violence for months, anti-white violent.
	I think BLM, I'm sorry to interrupt.
	I think BLM deep down, part of them wanted it them uh to hit him to be not guilty, so that they could go, you know, say, oh, look at this systemic racism and we gotta burn it all down.
	They're saying they want to burn it all down regardless, basically, of the clip clips I was playing yesterday.
	It's a lose-lose situation because with him being found guilty, okay, it doesn't give them the right to riot, but what it does give is what we've seen um over the last couple of days with Biden.
	Now I just want to read this out.
	As soon as he was found guilty, what did you have?
	You had Biden um popping up, and I'm gonna read this out.
	He says, Systemic racism is a stain on our nation's soul.
	Biden says George Floyd's killing revealed the knee on the neck of of justice for black Americans.
	So what have you got here?
	Okay, the guy was found guilty, uh, but it's all white people, it's systemic racism has been exposed.
	So it might not really it might not end in the kind of riots that BLM probably wanted it to end in, but it will end now in more anti-white policy, more anti-white hatred, just anti-whitism at every single level of the American establishment.
	And this will be pushed relentlessly.
	I know you weren't a big Trump fan, but since Trump has been booted from office, I believe he won that election.
	I believe he's uh been fraudulently taken out of the White House.
	Biden is being put in there like a puppet.
	He's obviously completely incompetent, he obviously can barely hold himself together, he can't even walk up a flight of stairs, he can't string a sentence together, he's completely useless.
	But since he's got in, he has put his foot down on the anti-white accelerator, and now we are moving at light speed towards whites becoming an ethnic minority and open anti-white hatred being displayed in every sense, not just by rioters and looters, but by every establishment body.
	We've seen uh the most racist policies America's ever seen.
	We've seen farmers being granted massive uh bursaries just because they're not white.
	We've seen certain cities handing out massive checks to people of colour.
	All of these things are hugely discriminatory, and they will only continue and continue and continue.
	Dehumanizing, discriminatory and dehumanizing.
	Sorry to interrupt again, but the dehumanization is such an important point to emphasize, yeah.
	And and ultimately, white people will be judged as a collective based on every negative, but any positive white people contributed, or any positive that what white people will be allowed to be credited with going forward, those positives will be credited to individuals, not to the group.
	This is a massive, massive problem.
	And I just want to throw this out there.
	All those people now who are centrists, all these absolute um cowards, uh, people who sit on the fence, people who are saying, oh, well, you know, I'm an individualist, I believe in the individual rights, we'll only defeat this if we all embrace individualism.
	These people are part of the problem.
	They are as much of your enemy as people like Biden as people like BLM, because they're the people telling the remaining whites that the only way they can fight back is by standing alone.
	The only way we can fight back is by standing together.
	The only way we can fight back is by coming together as a group.
	The only way we can fight back is clustering together to weather the storm as a group that displays the same sort of in-group preference that all the people display who want us gone.
	Yeah, definitely.
	If you have two groups, one that is uh collectivized and cohesive and like uh together, and another's is individualistic and and uh atomized, then definitely you know who's gonna have the advantage.
	I like your point about they really do.
	Anytimes there's like a there's a a white cop shooting, it's always like it's automatically because of racism, and then it's all white people are at fault, like you said, it's collective punishment, and also for white people, they have like we're supposed to be uh guilty for things that we that had happened hundreds and hundreds of years ago.
	It's just like uh we're the only ones that can be racist, and and everybody else is allowed to hate us because like we're the epitome of all evil, and uh, and they're saying that you're a supremacist if you don't want to get replaced in European countries by a barber specter.
	And it in they're always through uh thrown around this is what I wanted to share with you and get to next here.
	This is just wild, Mark, and you're on a perfect day that I got you scheduled here to talk about this.
	So this is the just tweeted out American Jewish Congress, another one of the many Jewish groups out there.
	Do you think it's acceptable for elected officials to use the Gab platform?
	Eighty-two percent say yes, eight thousand votes.
	Who are they to try to tell Congress what social media platforms they can use?
	How about that for a question?
	Well, again, we're going to see increasing attacks on any platform that uh that that basically stands for free speech.
	So, Gab, and again, let's let's have some context here.
	We were told that Twitter was a business.
	Twitter is a private enterprise.
	Twitter is a corporation that are that's in the hands of um private individuals, and because of that, they can do what they want.
	No government should be able to intervene.
	And if you don't like their terms and uh a service, well, tough.
	Go build your own Twitter.
	Ha ha ha ha.
	Go make if you don't like this platform, go make your own platform.
	Ha ha ha ha.
	How many times have we heard that?
	So Andrew Torba said, Fine, I'll make my own platform.
	I'm gonna create my own platform.
	It's gonna be called Gab, and it's going to be ruled by the rule of law, which is First Amendment rights with no right to incitement, no right to um incite violence, no right to incite terrorism, um, no right to threaten people, but First Amendment rights for free speech.
	Simple and very, very effective.
	So as soon as he created this, all of these big companies and all of these individuals who said, you know what, if you don't like Twitter, create your own platform, ha ha ha.
	What did they do?
	Well, instantly they tried to de-platform him, they tried to mess with his servers, they messed with his payment processors.
	They did everything they could to take Gab down.
	So it wasn't a matter of create your own platform.
	This is a f this is a free world.
	Create your own platform.
	This is the land of opportunity.
	This is the American dream.
	It's all about freedom, freedom of association, freedom of speech.
	You're free to create your own alternative.
	You're not free to create anything.
	You're free to get kicked off Twitter for opening your mouth, then you're free to have everything you build torn down by big tech companies and uh tyrannical uh globo homo Marxist leading lunatics, and then once everything you've done has been attacked or torn down, you will then be torn to pieces by the controlled media and by these so-called advocacy groups that we're talking of now.
	There is no freedom.
	There is no freedom of association, and they're doing everything they can to stamp out freedom of speech.
	What we are seeing here is um possibly the most well, the most unbelievable abuse of power that um we've probably ever seen in history.
	You you know, we talk about what went on in the SOVA area, we talk about the gulags, we talk about people being encouraged to snitch on their neighbours, we talk about all these things, and these things are very important to talk about.
	These things are are very pertinent, they're very important.
	But when you actually look at what's happening now, what's happening now is happening on a much, much greater level, and it's happening with a much much greater degree of surveillance, which is um far, far more far reaching than ever before.
	I mean, in the Soviet Union, people spied on one another, and I know that people are being encouraged to spy on each other now with the COVID lockdown, but now you have the eye in the sky watching you everywhere you go, you have CCTV in shops on the street, you have it everywhere you go.
	You are tracked with your smartphone, you have to sign in, you have to verify yourself everywhere you go, you've got track and trace.
	Everything you're doing is being watched.
	And when you're taken down from a platform, you're placed on a watch list, so you're taken down from every other platform, and all these platforms aren't independent, they collude.
	So if you go from Facebook, you go from Instagram.
	If you go from Instagram, you go from Facebook.
	If they take you down off YouTube, they get rid of your Google account, which means you can't sign into Reddit, which means you can't sign in here and there, and ultimately, we are live living in a digital age.
	They are spying on us every step of the way, and when they de-platform you, they effectively don't just take you off one platform, but they take you off them all, and this really is a digital depersoning.
	But because we live in a digital age, unfortunately, um being depersoned means you lose everything, you lose your whole inf.
	I'm just waiting for them to take down my Steam account and say, well, you can't have your games.
	I'm I'm wondering when I go to log into um my Warzone account to find out I'm not allowed to play Warzone anymore.
	You know, pretty soon That'll be the last draw.
	Yeah, pretty soon, pretty soon.
	Do you know what we're gonna have?
	We'll have our DVD collection, we'll have our old Super Nintendo games that they can't do anything about.
	Um, but we kick we'll be kicked off every uh marketplace, every store.
	We won't be able to use any social networks, we won't be used to use any services where you need to sign in and identify yourself.
	We will be legacy people.
	We will only be able to use legacy media and we will be legacy people.
	And if these COVID lunatics get their way, we won't be getting vaccine passports because we won't be getting vaccinated, so we won't be able to travel, we won't be able to go into stores, we won't be able to get into bars, we won't be able to go into restaurants.
	We will be this new underclass who are essentially social pariahs, both in the real world and in the digital space.
	Well, yeah, you just gotta hate yourself and serve the chosen ones, otherwise you can't buy or sell.
	That's pretty much the the mark of the beast with uh Israel's dominated technocracy, basically.
	Look, here's a new story since you mentioned surveillance that uh uh surveillance that I wanted to cover today.
	This is April 21st out yesterday.
	The pol the US Postal Service is running a quote covert operation program that monitors American social media posts.
	How about that?
	The Goldo Post Office.
	Analysts trawl through social media sites to look for what the document describes as quote inflammatory postings and then sharing that information across government agencies.
	That's what's been going on with our tax dollars.
	Telegram, parlor, homeland security, fusion centers.
	It's so ridiculous.
	And the uh technocracy.
	I had a s oh, here we go.
	Billionaire Paul Singer to set up tech research institute in Israel.
	Just uh American Zionist Israel first or that we're we're supposed to be happy that they're building it all these Israeli tech companies are coming over here and all of our companies are going setting up shop over there.
	They're gonna rule the world via the internet information age.
	And one other thing I wanted to show, might as well on surveillance, pressure mounts on Homeland Security to stop using the clear view AI facial recognition.
	This is a Zionist Chabad Lubovich connected company, facial recognition company that scans all of the internet in tracks and databases everybody's faces, and they're using it on January 6th.
	They're starting up.
	The ADL is bragging that they're start uh Pelosi is leading a 9-11 style commission to probe January 6.
	Gonna be a total um kangaroo court, I guess, kangaroo investigation.
	Hit job.
	Um, what was I gonna say?
	Oh, yeah, the back to this I've got to say about please, yes, please.
	Go ahead.
	Right.
	I don't condone terrorism, I don't condone violence, but let's look at American history for a short period of time.
	I don't either.
	No violence at all whatsoever.
	I have studied um the revolutionary communist movements of the 1960s.
	Now, what was one of the most notorious tactics?
	In fact, you should get this straight away.
	If you would say there was one tactic that revolutionary communist groups in the 1960s used to um influence people, to scare businesses, to hold the government to ransom.
	What was it?
	I'm sorry.
	One tactic.
	W one tactic to to to do what again?
	I I don't know, tell me.
	I'll answer the question.
	I'll just answer the question.
	I missed it, I wasn't following.
	Sorry.
	They did sit-ins, they did sit-ins.
	If you look back to the 1960s, the most used form of militant activity by uh Marxists, by communists, by uh revolutionaries, by anti-whites.
	It was the sit-in.
	Sit-ins, read um Sololinski's rules for radicals.
	He talked about sit-ins as if um sit-ins were such a regular occurrence.
	They were they were almost boring by the end of the the sixties.
	You know, communists storming into a business, storming into a university, storming into a college, storming into a government building and sitting in.
	And sit ins became almost part of um the American zeitgeist of the uh American political landscape became part of America.
	They became normal, so normal, in fact, that certain large capitalist corporations installed their own sit-in rooms so that when protesters were sitting in, they could direct the protesters to special rooms where there were dedicated toilets, there were places with water fountains, where there were soft cushions so that uh protesters could have a nap, because these things were happening so often that big corporations were like, we have to do something because they're disrupting business.
	So we'll build a sit-in room every time we build a new a new centre, and that sit-in room can be used for people who want to protest if they want to protest against us.
	This was part of the American landscape.
	And this was something that was celebrated, celebrated by the media, celebrated by the establishment.
	I'm sure if you peaceful protests find Pelosi Yeah, yeah, you would find you would find Pelosi celebrating these sit ins.
	And these sit inside.
	AOC just did one.
	AOC did one recently.
	You could say these protests were peaceful, but you could also say they were highly disruptive.
	Large groups of people storming into a business, chanting and stopping people answering phones and doing things like that.
	Was that peaceful?
	Well, it wasn't explicitly violent, but it wasn't peaceful in the terms of standing outside with placards, not disrupting people.
	At the very least, these were disruptive.
	Now, what you saw in that um when basically those protesters went to the Capitol building.
	That was what the left have been doing for decades.
	That was what the left did throughout the whole of the 1960s and the 1970s.
	That was a standard tactic for protesting against the Vietnam War, protesting against perceived racism, disrupting businesses, disrupting the government.
	And when the left did it was fine.
	The first time a group of patriots does it, they're talking about it as if it was 9-11.
	They're talking about it as if it was the unibomber.
	They're talking about it as if it was the greatest terrorist act to ever happen.
	This is total nonsense.
	But what makes it even worse is the people branding the Trump supporters terrorists, all support groups like the Black Panthers, they all support BLM, and people connected to BLM and the Black Panthers bombed, bombed and invaded that same building with guns.
	The Black Panthers stormed the Capitol building with guns, and the Black Panthers are celebrated by the Democrats.
	And also, there was a Jewish woman who was part of several communist terrorist groups, and one of those was responsible for the bombing of the Capitol building.
	She now sits on the fundraising board for BLM.
	None of that is a problem to Democrats.
	But a group of rowdy patriots running with flags, take selfies and put their feet on Pelosi's desk, and these people are reacting as if it's 9-11.
	You can see again, this is about hypocrisy, this is about being anti-white, and this is about manipulating the narrative.
	So the terrorists aren't Muslims blowing places up.
	The terrorists aren't Marxists bombing the Capitol.
	The terrorists aren't black militants marching down the street in military uniform with uh Kalashnikovs and other semi-automatic rifles.
	The terrorists are people with flags who took selfies in the Capitol building.
	This is a complete nonsense.
	But it and it should be an insult to our intelligence, because people with a brain, people who can see, people who can hear, people who can read, people who can process information can see this is garbage.
	But unfortunately, people who can see here and process information are becoming fewer and fewer.
	People who aren't plugged into the matrix are becoming fewer and fewer.
	The people like me, you, uh, the people who listen to your show, the people who listen to my show.
	But the vast majority of people are just sat there nodding like complete idiots, as this narrative is weaved into the fabric of American history as the greatest terrorist occurrence to happen on American soil.
	It's absolutely absurd.
	It's definitely been blown out of proportion.
	And I think it was I honestly think it was a setup, and and the whole thing was engineered by Zionists like the Jericho March, and there was a bunch of Israelis there, it's even been reported, and all Zionist Trump supporters, QAnon supporters, info wars types.
	So they're trying to scapegoat and blame all white people when when uh that's not the key.
	You can make the same case that it was all Zionist engineered as well.
	And they were pushing and being getting in scuffles and breaking windows, but then uh also in places they were let in and they uh remove the barriers, open the doors, and they were staying in between on the carpet in in between the uh the ropes,
	and uh oh, they lied about the officer dying as well, too, even though they knew that he died from health complications the next day and not not like uh murdered on the day of January 6th.
	And now these are the most dangerous people, like you know, ever.
	Meanwhile, they're completely uh censored, banned, getting labeled domestic terrorists, and it's just so obvious who's in control.
	This is something so disturbing now that I want to show you.
	This this was only the first this isn't the big part here, this poll.
	This is what I wanted to cover.
	To learn more about Gab, oh, and by the way, I was gonna play this about Gab back to Gab.
	This is what the uh free speech on Gab the Texas governoric platforms like tries to kick off kick out Gab from Texas.
	Anti-Semitic platforms like Gab have no place in Texas, and certainly do not represent Texas values.
	What does represent Texas values is legislation like this by Representative King and Representative Coleman that fights anti-Semitism in Texas.
	No free speech social media sites, if they're gonna allow any anti-Semitism.
	People like him, people like him are worms.
	I mean, did you look at the stupid looks on their faces?
	They are just absolute shabos gois, absolute uh I mean, look at him.
	I mean, what's going on?
	What what goes through their heads when they put on the little hat and start you know pushing their face into that wall?
	I mean, that's a total act of submission.
	Basically, now if you are if you are um an American, if you're an American politician, or even a Western pol a Western politician, you have to go to the wall, don't you?
	You have to go to that wall.
	You have to put on the hat, and you have to make your sacrifice.
	You have to basically show your submission.
	I mean, look at him.
	Look at him.
	That that's not a leader.
	That's not a that's not a leader, that's not a good man, that's a slave.
	He's he's praying, he's praying to foreign soil.
	Yeah.
	If if if I'll tell you this now, if a Texas representative went to Russia and went to the Kremlin and leant against a wall on the Kremlin like that, with um, you know, uh a little Russian ceremonial hat or a Russian ceremonial jacket on, praying to the praying to the Kremlin, and then um Putin walked around the corner and shook his hands.
	The American media would be up in arms, but this this is totally normal, guys.
	This is totally normal.
	This is absolutely above board.
	This guy isn't bought and sold, he's not in the hands of a foreign power.
	No, no, this is this is what this is what the media want you to believe is free will.
	This isn't free will.
	This man's a slave, this man's a traitor to his nation, he's an absolute disgrace.
	And if he has the goal to call himself a Christian, he isn't a Christian, because a Christian wouldn't behave like this.
	A Christian, people who understand the teachings of the Bible would not behave like this.
	This man is an utter disgrace.
	And if if you're a Texan and you're listening to this, what we're saying now, never vote for this man.
	Never vote for this man, never support him.
	He will lead your state, he will lead your people, he will lead your family to destruction, and he would burn everything good about America.
	He would lay way to anything wholesome in America to please his masters.
	And you can see from that act of submission exactly who his masters are.
	We've got so many of our politicians going over and and bowing to foreign soil.
	They're literally it's like a Judeo-Christian temple cult is running our country, and they're trying to make us the bad ones for pointing it out and for having a problem with it.
	And and this is how they control our politicians.
	Through the lobbies, through the religion.
	And uh, so now this is the American Jewish Congress's report that they just put out on Gab, you see.
	Ninety days of white supremacist radicalization.
	Literally, most of this is about Q and On, which is I've exposed as have uh possibly being Kabbalistic, Zionist disinformation psyop.
	And uh I mean I've done hours and hours of videos exposing it.
	If uh you can go check my channel and see it.
	So I saw something in here.
	Oh, and then Marjorie Taylor Green.
	She's on like every page in this.
	Like she's the big anti-Semitic white supremacist threat in the country.
	Like she just had the uh Anglo-Saxon caucus that they started and collapsed right there.
	That's pretty pathetic and embarrassing.
	Everybody else gets a caucus, but uh people from uh English descent.
	What do you think about that?
	Well, this is classic rubbish.
	This is it.
	I I've seen this before so many times.
	You the first time I became really aware of this kind of anti-whiteness was when I was at university.
	Now, when I went to university, you went to you were meant to be making friends in your first week.
	It's called Freshers Week.
	You go there, you're a fresher, you're um encouraged to join societies and groups where you'll meet new people, you'll make new friends, these people will help you through your time at university, and it encourages you to get involved.
	So you're not just sat in your room uh with your game console or reading your books or feeling lonely.
	You get involved with things, and you're told you need to get involved because the more things you get involved with, the more things you can put on your CV as you know, good things you did at uni.
	So you walk around the Freshers Fair, and what did I say?
	There was the Afro-Caribbean Society, there was what's called JSOC, which is short for the Jewish society, there is the Muslim society, there was the pro-Palestinian society, there was uh the Hindu society, there was the Buddhist society, and you went round and there's Thousands of Jewish societies and institutions.
	There's there's so many of them, and when they've got to hold the record.
	I walked around.
	Do you know what?
	I went to university in England.
	There wasn't a single society at that university for the English.
	There was nothing for the English, there was nothing for the British, there was nothing for the indigenous people.
	And around this time, I remember in uh another student union somewhere in the country, somebody started or attempted to set up the English society or the British, something for something for people, the indigenous people.
	It was shut down.
	Absolutely mercilessly.
	Those people who trying to set it up were called racists, uh, they were they were investigated, and this is just ramped up and rammed up since that time, and that was when I was 18.
	So that was back in um I think 1999, so a lot long time ago now, you know, before the turn of the century, but this was happening on campuses back then, and now it's happening everywhere.
	It's happening everywhere.
	And if you say, Well, actually, I'm proud of my Anglo-Saxon traditions, that's it.
	You're done, you're finished, you're out, and everyone will act as if you've walked into the room, dropped your trousers, and gone to the toilet on the table.
	And really, all you're saying is we just want to be able to celebrate our traditions like everyone else, but you're treated like you've committed the filthiest and most abhorrent act ever imaginable.
	This is the kind of madness we're facing.
	And once you pull all these strings together, once you follow all of the threads, it is quite clear.
	Everything is pushing for anti-whiteness.
	But something I have to say at this point, Adam, and I've got to compliment you for this.
	There's no one in the world, I've never seen anyone in the world have so many tabs open at the same time.
	You must have the most the most you must have more tabs open there than I've ever seen on that window.
	That is truly impressive, my friend.
	I'm not sure how you keep I'm not sure how that's a lot.
	It's funny because I don't know if you've been looking at the chat, but they're saying that I've been buffering, I've just been trying to close a bunch, but it's I it's probably not not the tabs.
	I I have sixty-four gigabyte memory and uh and a good chip, so it it usually works with all these tabs.
	Sometimes I even have more, but um what was I gonna say?
	Oh it's the memory I have, double the memory I have.
	It's interesting that like the word caucus i is in Caucasian, but you they missed out on the Caucasian caucus.
	That's like the one caucus you're not allowed to have.
	And uh but the thing is, though, is that the whole thing is about Marjorie Taylor Green and she's a Zionist.
	She tweeted out in support when Trump said he's moving the embassy to Jerusalem.
	She is friends with Laura Loomer.
	She supports Israel.
	She just did a tour with ultra Orthodox groups it's through their uh uh uh synagogues.
	Like, and then this is who is like this big white supremacist radical threat, mar QAnon believing Congresswoman.
	Ridiculous.
	But the the worst part of what I saw in all of this, this is one of the slides on the page now, okay?
	American Jewish Congress.
	This is this is had me all morning I was thinking about this and wanting to talk to you about this.
	The new white supremacist politics, why white supremacy is anti-Semitic and a threat to the Jewish community.
	It says here, definition of white supremacists, and this is according to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, apparently, October 2020.
	Look at this.
	The definition of not just a white supremacist, but a white supremacist extremist now.
	A group or individual who facilitates or engages in acts of in law unlawful violence directed at the federal government, ethnic minorities, or Jewish persons in support of their belief that Caucasians are intellectually and morally superior to other races, and or their deception that the government is controlled by Jewish persons.
	What do you think of that, Mark?
	I think with all of this, it's a matter of essentially defining decent honest people who want to speak the truth about things that aren't um conspiracy theories but are potentially conspiracies against our people and brand them as terrorists.
	Now, there is a movement here to call people terrorists.
	And this is very, very interesting because when you actually look at what a terrorist is becoming, and I was saying this to somebody the other day.
	When I was a child, you'd watch films like Day of the Jackal, and the terrorists would be men who boarded planes with submachine guns, took hostages, demanded uh uh financial compensation, and then they would demand that the plane was fueled, they'd fly to Beirut, and they'd get off with their money as um successful terrorists.
	That was a that was a terrorist, and it was pretty clearly defined that terrorists were people who pushed for um either money, political power, influence, the release of prisoners, etc., using violence, using often quite extreme violence as well, not just um not just a slap, not just uh a bit of a fist fight, but extreme violence.
	They'd often take hor hostages, they'd blow things up, they'd hijack airplanes.
	That was a terrorist.
	Now, what is a terrorist by modern definition?
	A terrorist by modern definition is simply somebody who doesn't agree with the current political status quo and publishes something online stating that they don't agree with the political status quo.
	So if you are um somebody who simply doesn't agree with the political status quo, then you're a terrorist sympathizer.
	However, if you're somebody who doesn't agree with the political status quo and you tweet about it, you're then a terrorist.
	And terrorism over the last, as I said, 20, 25 years, has completely changed.
	It's changed from being actual terrorism to being something that covers all manner of thought and speech crimes.
	It's an absolute nonsense.
	But terrorist, or the term terrorist and the term extremist, is woven now into our society.
	So they have they have basically indoctrinated the public with the idea that the big threat to our freedom, the big threat to Western democracy, the big threat to our nation is terrorism, it's extremism.
	And then they have slowly over time redefined what terrorism and extremism are to cover basically any form of political dissent.
	You're absolutely right.
	And uh I just played this clip yesterday.
	Have you happened to see this one yet?
	This guy Amy Horowitz in the in uh at the George Floyd rally the other day.
	No, no, no.
	Okay, we're gonna have to play this whole thing for you, but I I want to go back to where we were, but just to show you, he asked them uh how much what percent of the country is white supremacist, he asked.
	listen to what she says.
	Our white supremacists say most of the country.
	I can't give you a number, but like majority of the country.
	So they believe the m most of the country.
	Basically, if you're white and you're just not like prostrating yourselves and worshipping Marxist uh Black Lives Matter agenda, you are a white supremacist of these people.
	They believe anybody that voted for Trump is a white supremacist.
	It's this really is what they're indoctrinating people to believe.
	And then it that also that we shouldn't have free speech and that we should be violently attacked and stuff as well.
	They they just like conflate and play these like word games and and semantics.
	It's it's sophisticated their assault on us.
	Very insidious.
	I'll play that whole thing for you in a second, but I just wanted to go back to uh where we were at here because we're not finished with it.
	Did I interrupt you?
	Were you were you still saying something?
	You on mute?
	No, no, I was listening to what you were saying, and I was um sort of nodding along to what you were saying about the woman and about the way they are trying to you see uh I mean I know what I know what's gonna come of this.
	Ultimately, every single person who has any love for their people or their country and is white is going to be grounded as an extremist or a would-be terrorist, and this is going to justify sending people to what are essentially re-education camps.
	And these re-education camps, they won't be forced, they will be um it'll be your choice whether you go.
	But if you don't go and you don't get re-educated and you don't pass their silly little tests and you don't jump through their hoops, again, it'll be like the COVID stuff.
	You'll be deep personed, you'll lose your rights, you will no longer be a functioning person, like with COVID, you won't be able to go into a bar or a restaurant if you don't have the vaccine passport.
	Um if you are somebody that doesn't go to a race re education seminar or doesn't bow their head to um these uh race czars who are going to tell us how we have to think and what we and that we we should analyze um our daily activities to find out whether we've been committing microaggressions.
	If you don't bow to all of this, you will be branded an extremist, and then you will be limited where you can work, you'll be limited where uh you can go.
	You'll be limited uh whether you maybe even whether you can look after your own children.
	It they will take it to the nth degree, and they will start they will start defining child abuse as uh being around people who have extremist beliefs.
	They will push this in every way.
	I and I believe eventually if you are a free thinker, you won't be even allowed to raise children.
	That's that's how bad it will get.
	And the worst thing about this is there will be conservatives, there will be these individualists who will cheer all of this on just so they can sit on the fence and uh keep keep taking their paycheck.
	Collect their shekels, yeah.
	Okay, this is what gets me about this now, okay?
	White supremacist extremists, according to Homeland Security.
	Individual who engages in of unlawful violence directed at federal government, okay, that's any terrorist does that basically.
	Uh ethnic minorities or Jewish persons.
	Well, uh how how are Jewish people not included in ethnic minorities?
	Why do they have to separate themselves out?
	In support of their belief that Caucasians are intellectually and morally superior to other races.
	Okay.
	I find this hilarious considering that Judaism and Jews believe that they're chosen by God, that they have are morally superior with their Torah, their law.
	Oh a functioning person.
	Oh, D life started playing all of a sudden.
	They they believe that uh it is their destiny to heal the world by being a a light unto the nations, the moral example to lead the nations.
	They believe that they need to teach the Gentiles the Noahide laws to teach them morals and have them follow a moral code.
	They believe uh intellectually, how many times have we heard about the Ashkenazi IQ and about how at the same time the ADL will say, Oh, well, you're just jealous of our success.
	You know, we've got all the Nobel prizes and blah blah blah blah blah.
	They're the supremacist, and they're listing things that they do.
	They uh the top rabbis believe that Gentiles are only on the planet to serve them.
	This is what their texts teach.
	They believe top rabbis say that they've got divine souls, whereas we are the unholy uh shards, the Kellypa, the darkness, the unclean, the the evil, the satanic.
	And then they're gonna lecture us about supremacy.
	I don't believe in a religion where I think I'm chosen from all the nations to rule the world and be a light unto the nations.
	I don't believe stuff like that.
	Do I think that your people European people have done well in the world?
	Of course.
	Am I allowed to be proud of my ancestry?
	Of course.
	Do I think other cultures are uh amazing in a lot of ways?
	Of course.
	I love the travel, you go around, see other food, other cultures, other history, other customs.
	I think it's beautiful.
	I don't hate or want to rule over other people.
	That is all that they do.
	And in what's funny, Mark, is like in my comments, I I will get some quote unquote white supremacists.
	And you know what they are?
	They're white people that are Christian identity and think they're the actual chosen Jews.
	It's the same chosenite mentality.
	So they're just mirroring the beliefs of the rabbis.
	So it's just what what's your take on this?
	Morally and uh what is it?
	Intellectually and morally superior to it.
	I've never met in nationalism, I have never met anyone that um at our events or who is actually a genuine nationalist that I've met in person who's a white supremacist.
	I haven't actually met anyone like that.
	I have never met anyone who wants to put the boot on the neck of other races.
	Nationalists that I know want a diverse world.
	Not diverse nations, but a diverse world, a world where every different race, every different ethnicity has their own place and takes their destiny in their own hands.
	Do you know I actually have people write to me from the Indian subcontinent, I have people writing to me from Africa, I have people write to me from um the Far East, I have people who write to me from South America from the Middle East.
	You know, I've even had um the odd uh Israeli write to me after watching my videos, and I've had people all over the world saying, I agree with you, Mark, and I want the same for my people.
	I don't think you're painted as the bad guy when you really just want for white people what every other racial or ethnic group wants for themselves, and many do have.
	Why are you painted as the bad guy?
	You see, I'm not a supremacist.
	I don't want black people to be wiped out.
	I don't want um Orientals to be wiped out, I don't want people on the Indian subcontinent to suffer or be wiped out, I don't want people in the Middle East to be wiped out.
	I want them all to have their own nations, live by their own laws, take their destiny into their hands, and I want the same for my people.
	That isn't supremacy, that is peaceful separation.
	That's an avoidance of the strife and s and struggles created by multiculturalism.
	And multiculturalism wasn't a system invented to enrich us, it was a system invented to destroy us.
	And the people who are being brought here with the intention of replacing white people, they're not our enemies, they're not really the bad guys.
	They're just tools in the globalist game, the globalists.
	Cannon fodder.
	Now, when you when you talk about supremacy, I have seen Jewish supremacists.
	I have seen rabbis talking about the supremacy of the Jewish people.
	I have seen um Israelis in general talking about Israel as a chosen land for the chosen people.
	I don't think the British or the English or Europeans are chosen people.
	I think we're the greatest people, and I love my people the most because they're my people, just as I assume that Nigerians love Nigerians the most, and the Japanese will love the Japanese the most, and the Japanese will think their culture's the best because it's theirs.
	And I'm pretty sure that Nigerians will think um their culture is the best, and they will feel at home around their people and their traditions, as the Japanese feel at home around their people and their traditions.
	I feel at home around my people and my traditions, and I love them.
	But just because I think my people are the best and I hold them in high regard and I want to preserve them, doesn't mean I want any harm to others.
	I certainly don't want to see my people rule and reign over others.
	And here's a really interesting thing.
	People often attack um white people and they often attack nationalists for being colonialists.
	I'm not a colonialist.
	I don't think the British Empire was a good thing.
	I think the British Empire was a bad thing.
	Do you know what I think the British Empire was?
	I think the British Empire was a brutal, brutal, capitalist uh monopoly that ultimately had had its boot on the neck of hard-working British people for years.
	British people were exploited by the British Empire, and when the British Empire exploited British People as much as they could, they went elsewhere in the world and exploited other people.
	And then when they'd caused when they'd taken as much as they could elsewhere in the world, the British Empire then collapsed, and they brought all people back to Britain.
	And the same people destroying the British people now, with the same people running the British Empire, were the same people exploiting British children, with the same people forcing British families into workhouses.
	I have been against the global elite for my entire life.
	And if I had lived in other times, I would have been against the global elite then.
	Because the global elite haven't ever done good things for the British people.
	They haven't done good things for people overseas.
	They have essentially ran the world for their own benefit and for uh basically unfettered profit.
	Now I still believe that colonial powers tended to give more to the countries they colonized than they ever took.
	I think that the colonial powers gave more to Africa than they took from Africa.
	But if I had been in charge of Britain, I would never have pursued the empire, and I would have never pursued colonialism, because in the long term it has done more damage, especially to the British people, than it's done good.
	What what did I gotta I gotta uh ask you?
	What did Europeans bring Africa that was better than slavery?
	Like you just said.
	What did they bring them that that makes up for slavery?
	Well, they didn't bring slavery to Africa.
	Europeans aren't the progenitors of the slave trade, not by a long shot.
	When the Europeans arrived in Africa, there was already a a thriving slave trade.
	If you look at where modern day Ghana is, that was the Ashanti Empire.
	The Ashanti Empire was an African Empire based on the slave trade.
	The Ashanti Empire uh basically conquered other African tribes and sold the conquered tribesmen to both Arabs, Jewish and white slave traders.
	White people were involved in the slave trade, but the slave trade predated European nations.
	The slave trade is as old as humanity itself.
	In fact, the only people across the world who have actually ever opposed slavery as a collective are white people.
	There is still slavery in Israel, there is still slavery in Africa, there is still slavery in the Far East.
	The only nations there isn't slavery today is white nations.
	We were people who turned our back on slavery.
	But when we did go to Africa, we took with us a written language, we took with us medical advancement, we took with us agriculture, we took with us clean running water, we took with us cures to horrible diseases that killed thousands of these people or tens of thousands, maybe even millions every year.
	And although I don't agree with colonialism, you can't argue that Africans didn't benefit from it in some ways.
	And you also have to say this, Adam, let's be completely fair with ourselves.
	If we were being absolutely honest, and if African Americans were being absolutely honest, would African Americans genuinely, if they could go back in time and stop their ancestors being taken to America?
	No.
	Of course they wouldn't.
	Every African American alive today is a beneficiary of the slave trade, not a victim of it.
	They are far better off for living in America than they ever would have been if their ancestors had remained in Africa.
	That is unarguable.
	If Africa was a better place to live than America, and if Africans were better off than African Americans, then African Americans would be scrambling to get into Africa, and Africans wouldn't be scrambling to get to America.
	But Africans are scrambling to get to America, and African Americans are certainly not scrambling to get to Africa.
	African Americans that are alive today are beneficiaries of the slave trade, not victims of it.
	So I also oh, and uh speaking of slavery, uh the the god of Israel, Yahweh, endorses slavery, and the Talmud endorses uh slavery with the story of Noah and and Ham.
	And uh you know, when you were talking about the uh the nations for for different people, you know, like it it's one thing when there's natural organic, you know, uh l integration on like border cities or just certain areas, but it when there's an obvious documented,
	engineered nefarious plan to basically destroy us, we've got clips of rabbis saying it it fulfills their prophecies and it's a good thing, and barberspectors and all of these Jewish organizations pushing this and vilifying and censoring anybody that that uh talks about it or resists it and notices it.
	It's a completely different issue.
	If if it was the other way around, they would be screaming night and day.
	In fact, they are screaming night and day.
	That's why it's a uh it's a cry out in pain as they strike you.
	But here's the other part of this that really gets under my skin now.
	It says or so, or their perception that the government is controlled by Jewish persons.
	So now if you believe that Jews have a lot of influence in our government, you are a white supremacist.
	This is what they're saying.
	Noticing Jewish power somehow makes you a supremacist, which everybody you know thinks that you're basically a uh, you know, you want to rule over other people and you hate every other uh ethnicity.
	Do you see how dangerous this is?
	Believing that Jews have power means you're a white supremacist.
	That's their definition.
	That's what you're trying to tell me.
	Well, this is this is this is amazing because generally speaking, it's liberals and cultural Marxists who help propagate these definitions, these uh new laws in the West, that these anti-free speech um laws that we're talking about.
	They help brand people, supremacists, they help brand people, uh racists, they help brand people, terrorists.
	But what we actually have here is quite an interesting dynamic because when you talk about discrimination, you usually talk about um a power structure, and that power structure is those with power discriminate against those without power.
	Those who can discriminate are ones who hold power.
	Yep.
	Those who um are being discriminated against or those who have no institutional power and thus can't fight back against that discrimination.
	Agreed?
	Absolutely.
	When we talk about Jewish power or Zionist power, we are not talking about people who have no power.
	We are not discriminating because we can't discriminate against those people.
	We are talking about the most powerful, the most financially successful, the people who have the most control over the media, the people who hold disproportionate sway within governments and uh uh elected and non-elected bodies.
	This is not an issue of demo just discrimination.
	This is not an issue of people putting their foot on the heads of people beneath them.
	This is an issue of people at a lower tier of society in a lower structure of society saying, look, there are people above us, there are people who hold this disproportionate power, and they are doing things that are not in our best interest.
	This is not discrimination, this is not um this is not striking down.
	This is people pointing out that those in the most uh the largest positions of power are using that power in an anti-white way, and then pointing out that disproportionately there are a large number of Jewish individuals in those positions of power.
	This is not something that could in any way structurally be described as discrimination, because it is certainly not treating these people as if they're less than us, it is not locking them out of power, it is us pointing out that they have too much power.
	Yeah.
	I know.
	It's it's such common sense, and and then like every time that like like how they censor you if you say that they're censoring the internet or that they're controlling the internet.
	No, you can't say that.
	You're banned.
	Like, okay, that's you just validated what I'm saying.
	So this is the same thing that I've been seeing, the way that they're trying to define white supremacy as noticing Jewish power.
	So point so recognizing, studying and talking about Jewish supremacist belief that they're chosen by God, destined to rule the world, all this kind of stuff.
	They're their religion that I've proven it many have proven for you know thousands of years have known.
	And you notice this, and now you're a terrorist, basically.
	So this is house res 41 rejecting white nationalism and white supremacy.
	It was agreed to in the house, it stopped there, but I just want you to read what they define this now.
	It says a white nationalist Is as follows to be white nationalists is to be pro-white.
	You can't even be pro what you are if you're white.
	The domestic white nationalist movement seeks to promote honor and defend the white race.
	Not even allowed to defend yourself, otherwise you're a supremacist.
	Are Jews supremacists when they want to defend themselves?
	Are Jews uh anti-white when they talk about white supremacy?
	If we're supremacists for talking about Jewish supremacy, why is it not the other way around?
	It's always double standards with them.
	And then here's the kicker.
	Here's the worst part again.
	They believe the white race is under attack from Jewish interests that dominate the government, referred to as Zionist occupied government or Zag, the media banking and the entertainment industries and act to the detriment of the white race.
	White nationalists view multiculturalism, diversity, and illegal immigration as direct assaults on the white race and race mixing as akin to white genocide.
	This is Congress.gov, by the way.
	The thing here is let me let me leave that on the screen because I want to, I want to I want to uh refer to this.
	If somebody said to be a black nationalist is to be pro-black, the domestic black nationalist movement seeks to def to promote honor and defend those of African descent, would anyone care?
	That would be seen and that would be promoted as something that was honorable, something that was good.
	What they are saying here is that to simply be pro our own culture, to simply love our own people, to simply be invested in our own ethnic interest.
	For us to have in-group preference is a crime.
	For white people to identify as white people in a positive manner is a crime.
	The only and this this is wonderful that this has come up the way it is, because it dovetails with what we said at the very beginning.
	The only time that white people are allowed to identify as white people is when they are um acknowledging in inverted commas crimes of white people as a whole.
	When white people can think of themselves as a group when they are attributing negatives to their group, but they cannot think of themselves as a group and attribute a posit a positive to that group.
	This is an absolute scandal.
	Can you imagine somebody saying, well, if a Jewish group seeks to promote honor and defend Jews, that's a crime.
	No, no, no.
	They would be called heroes, they would be called defenders of the Jewish people.
	That there'd be congressmen looking to put statues or monuments up to that group for defending themselves.
	Amazon Prime would be making a uh um some kind of series about that Jewish group torturing Nazis and defending poor Jews.
	Steven Spielberg would be making the feature film.
	But if it's white people doing that, we are demons, we are devils.
	These hypocrisies run so incredibly deep, and they run from the very top of society to the very bottom.
	And again, the narrative is that we are ones with the power, that we are the ones with the power.
	We're not the ones with the power.
	If we were the ones with the power, if society was full of systemic racism, if society was run by white supremacists who were always trying to give white men and white women the leg up, these laws wouldn't be being passed.
	These laws are being passed because white people have no power.
	These laws are being passed because there is a group of people who have all the power, and that group of people are anti-white.
	Jews that are being passed, the laws that are being passed that defend and protect Jews from any form of criticism are being passed by Jews.
	And that tells you who holds the power.
	There needs to be no further investigation.
	That tells you everything you need to know.
	It says here's an issue.
	Yeah, the anti-Semitism definition that they're trying to push worldwide says that it's anti-Semitism.
	The definition is to say that they control media banking or any societal institution.
	We're we're not allowed to talk about their power over anything.
	The people in power are passing laws that we can't talk about their power.
	The people in charge are a supremacist tribal cult that is incredibly hostile to us, that believes in their end times prophecies that we are meant to be destroyed and that we are the epitome of evil.
	Their texts.
	Mark, I don't know if you watched that video yet, The Destruction of the Gentiles, but they it literally says to eradicate Esau, and there's rabbis all over the internet saying Esau is America.
	They need to cut off the seed of Amalek.
	Amalek is their biblical archenemy that they must destroy in the end times, blot out the memory that Amalek existed.
	And I get banned everywhere for showing you straight from the Toha Tohar, the Zohar in the Talmud, where it says these things.
	It's psychopathic.
	Yeah.
	But I I've got to also point out, isn't it amazing that in groups like the Tommy Robinson movement, there are Jews who are given massive platforms, people like Aviemeni.
	Now Avi Yemeni and Tommy Robinson love to go through the Quran and point out parts of the Quran which preach hatred against other groups.
	Fair enough.
	They produce books like Muhammad's Quran exposing what's in the Quran, which you can find on Amazon.
	And all of this is supported by different Jews.
	There are Jews in Israel, there are Jews here in the West that support the expose of other religious groups and the criticism of other religious and ethnic groups.
	But there is one religious and ethnic group you cannot criticize.
	If you were to sit down with Tommy Robinson and say, look, Tommy, I support your quest to tell us what's in the Quran and what Muslims are reading, because some of it is clearly anti-Western and anti-white.
	But could you please support our quest to expose what's in the Torah?
	He'd say no and walk away straight away.
	And again, you see this double standard, and this double standard is rooted in a power structure, and you can tell who is at the top of this power structure.
	And we talk about this all the time.
	I was speaking in front of a group the other week doing a presentation about ethnonationalism.
	And somebody said to me, You oppose um kosher and halal slaughter, don't you?
	And I say, Yes, I oppose them both.
	They're both the same thing.
	They both cause undue suffering to animals.
	We're a nation of animal lover lovers.
	I would ban all religious slaughter.
	I would ban halal and kosher.
	And this person said to me, Well, we shouldn't ban kosher, though.
	What?
	But it's the same thing.
	And he said, Oh, but kosher's done on a smaller scale, and uh we shouldn't be discriminatory towards the Jews, and they do it with a sharper knife, and I I believe they care for the animals more before they every excuse in the book to as to why kosher and halal are different.
	And again, it tells you everything you need to know about the power structures in the West.
	You can criticize Muslims to a certain degree.
	You can criticize the black community to a certain degree.
	You can criticize whites in any way imaginable.
	But if you talk about Jews, or if you talk about Jewish scriptures, or if you expose Jewish practices like kosher or that horrific practice where they take chickens by their legs and beat them to death in the street, you're called a monster.
	And I'm telling you again, if there was any other ethnic group that basically took live chickens and beat them to death in the street by holding their legs and literally beating them to death in the street, that group would be attacked by animal rights activists.
	There would be animal rights activists queuing up to fight those people, to dox those people, to ruin their businesses, to expose them.
	Again, Jews are allowed to do this and people turn a blind eye.
	This tells you about the power structures.
	And it's not racist to say this is not hateful.
	We are talking about creating a level playing field, a level playing field where any group can be rightfully criticized, and that people who seek the truth are allowed to seek it and are allowed to espouse their opinions.
	We you know, generations of white men fought and died to ensure that the West remained a place where freedom of speech and freedom of association were held up as virtues, and both of those things are being destroyed.
	And the people who are being discriminated against the most are people like yourself, people like me, people like Dr. David Duke.
	Anyone who speaks Out against the power structures we have discussed tonight.
	You know, on the uh the uh Islam Tommy Robinson versus like uh Judaism aspect, you know, I've I've listened to it, I haven't read the Quran, but I I listened to an audio book written by a Zionist uh Jew Robert Spencer, and and I didn't hear anything in there even remotely in the same ballpark, like the atrocious uh despicable things I've seen rabbis and and their texts say.
	And uh the fact that it there's so many Jews out there that will criticize Islam, criticize Christianity, but then you want to be where are all the big people criticizing Judaism?
	You're not allowed, you're labeled an anti-Semite, you get deplatformed everywhere.
	And it's just so obviously here.
	I think here in the UK, it's definitely fair to say that we have experienced um horrific, horrific crimes at the hands of Muslims.
	I mean, the Muslim community here in the UK have uh operated and covered up the grooming of hundreds of thousands of uh white British girls.
	There have been horrific crimes against young white men, there have been um horrific racist attacks, there's been an immense amount of discrimination aimed at the white community by Muslims.
	And I do applaud people for pointing that out, but we must point out all attacks on white people.
	You can't just say, well, we're gonna talk about this group of people who do horrible things to white people, but we're not gonna talk about this other group of people.
	And I am also aware that for a large part um many of the problems from the Islamic community do stem from Sunni Muslims rather than Shi'ite Muslims.
	I am aware that groups like ISIS, groups like Al Qaeda are um tied to the Sunni Muslims, not the Shi'ite Muslims.
	So I am aware that there is a divide between the two.
	But I do believe that there is a great hypocrisy that so-called truth seekers who want to expose the truth about one religion want to cover up the truth about the other or another.
	And that is something that we have to talk about.
	And that's something that I'm proud of that I talk about, and I think the people who are covering up the truth, they should be ashamed of their actions.
	And when you see Jewish rabbis online, multiple of them and from the Zohar celebrating and saying that it's prophecy and that that uh Islam is the broom of the Jews to wipe away Christianity in the West when they believe that there needs to be end times wars with Gog and Magog, Christianity and Islam, or the story of their patriarchs with Ishmael and Esau uh going to war with each other.
	It it just and then you know they're they're creating wars, havoc in these countries, and then their barberspectors are bringing them into European countries, and uh it it's they go, you're just gonna have to accept it.
	It's multiculturalism.
	You wouldn't survive without it.
	But then they do the exact opposite for them, and then they attack anybody that points it out.
	Jones will uh Alex Jones will talk about the ChaiComs non-stop, but but oh, if you mention Zionism, you're uh you're an anti-Semite, basically, and they don't have any power.
	It's just it it's the same story.
	Everybody everybody knows the taboo.
	Look, if it was the Chinese, if it was the Chinese that were really in control of America, if it was the Chinese who were really in control of the West, then Alex Jones wouldn't be able to speak about them.
	Alex Jones can speak about the Chinese because they are people that don't have any power.
	You can tell how much power a group have by the amount you're allowed to talk about them.
	You can say whatever you want about white people because white people have no power.
	You can say quite a lot about black people, because uh black people uh you can say a lot about them, but not everything about them, because they have a little power and they're protected to a certain degree.
	You can say a certain amount about Muslims, but again, you have to draw the line at a certain point, because those people have a little power.
	You can say basically nothing about the Jews because those people have a lot of power.
	And Alex Jones and his ilk keep going on about Chinese communists because they are free to talk about Chinese communists as much as they want, because they have no power in the West.
	The Chinese Communist Party is not the group trying to get rid of white people.
	Chinese communists aren't interested in ethnically cleansing white people.
	In fact, I should imagine that Chinese communists, if you asked people in the Chinese Communist Party, whether um they thought it was odd what was happening to white people in America, they would probably be scratching their heads as to why um white Americans were being taught to hate themselves when at the moment in China,
	the Han Chinese are being told repeatedly that they are superior and that they should love themselves, love their nation, embrace their culture and live moral good lives, partake in the social credit system and do everything they can to be good decent members of their society.
	They would be thinking what's going on in America is mad.
	And you can tell that the Chinese think what's going on in America is mad, because every time a Hollywood movie goes to China, the Chinese censors take out as much of the degeneracy as they can so that Chinese uh youths don't end up like American youths.
	Yeah, I know a lot of other countries know who who's uh ruling us over here.
	Uh okay, here's another story I'd like to uh talk with you about here, Mark.
	This is uh Oliver Darcy from CNN says, in remarks about the delivered about to be delivered at the World Federation of Advertisers, ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt is set to highlight how Tucker Carlson backed the quote great replacement theory and point out to companies that though through their advertising muscle, they can help hold Fox accountable.
	So Mr. Greenblatt, the guy that we're not allowed to talk about controlling the media, going to go lecture and threaten the world federation of advertisers to basically deperson Tucker Carlson because he mentioned this agenda.
	What do you think of that?
	I think again it tells you about the power, doesn't it?
	Tucker Carlson has started to talk about great replacement theory.
	Well, firstly, great replacement theory isn't a theory, it's a fact.
	Um, professors at Oxford University have said white people will be a minority in Britain by 2066 if current demographic trends continue.
	If you look at um censuses from the last uh 20, 30 years, you can see that the population pyramid in the UK is changing dramatically.
	Demographics are changing.
	White people in the UK are having fewer babies, they are an aging population, and when you look at um many parts of the UK, the majority of newborns are people who are are children who are not white British.
	You can see that white people are going to become a minority in the UK, and that is speeding up that trend is speeding along.
	And that makes it not a theory.
	It's not a theory, it's a fact.
	White people are going to become a minority in America.
	That is also a fact.
	If you Google white minority in America, you will find um dozens and dozens of gushing articles in the mainstream press telling you why this is a good thing.
	What people like Greenblatt are bothered about is not that Tucker Carlson is talking about replacement theory, is that Tucker Carlson is saying that the great replacement is a bad thing.
	If Tucker Carlson was on CNN and was talking about white people becoming a minority and was celebrating this, Greenblatt wouldn't care.
	This isn't an issue about conspiracy theories anymore.
	The left have already acknowledged white people will become a minority.
	There was a guarding article from a few years ago called The Last Days of a White World, how white people will soon become a minority in every Western nation.
	There are numerous articles where the left crow about this.
	There are numerous YouTube videos where commentators on the left say white people are going to be a minority, and they celebrate this.
	The important thing is not that Greenblatt is trying to stop Tucker talking about this.
	Greenblatt wouldn't care if Tucker was talking about it and celebrating it.
	Greenblatt only cares that Tucker is talking about it and he is opposed to it.
	And that is the important thing.
	You can talk about replacement if you celebrate it, you can't talk about it if you oppose it.
	And he is furious that somebody in the mainstream is talking about it And not in a favorable light.
	I can tell you now, if Tucker tomorrow changed his story, if he changed his perspective and started saying whites will be a minority, but we should celebrate it and embrace it.
	Greenblatt would drop all this, smile and walk away.
	And that tells you everything you need to know.
	It tells you who has the power.
	It tells you who has the influence, and it tells you what their interests are.
	Greenblatt wants white people to be a minority, and he wants to silence anyone that opposes white people becoming a minority.
	And that's why he's going after Tucker.
	Mark, I I just want to ask you, maybe you could clarify for the chat.
	There's uh a few people uh your comment about China not having any power.
	Uh they're saying how much does the C C P pay you to shill.
	I'm I'm sure you mean obviously China has a lot of power, the world superpower.
	You mean influence in America to censor critics is nowhere compared to the Jewish lobbies, is what you mean, right?
	Of course that's obviously what I mean.
	Obviously, China is one of the three world superpowers.
	China has power, but China isn't there on Twitter shutting people up.
	China hasn't just got Alex Jones deplatformed for saying it's the ChaiComs.
	But a certain group have got us kicked off YouTube and have got us deplatformed for talking about them.
	Alex Jones only ever faced deplatforming when he started talking about real world activity and started supporting anti-immigration standpoints, and that was because that offended people like Greenblatt, people who are pushing for the great replacement.
	You could see that when Alex Jones and several other um people who often have wackier conspiracy ideas started to support Trump and started getting on the build the wall, stop the migrant thing, that is when they got deplatformed, and they were deplatformed.
	I've followed in InfoWars a long time.
	Jones has always been uh had a had the same stance on immigration.
	I I think it's more due to the Sandy Hook lawsuit and and just his over the top like carnival barking type of stuff, you know, like uh Hillary and Obama or sulfur and demons and in all the media and and also I think they you the the system used him as like the f to move the Overton window to start just rolling out mass censorship, similar to QAnon as well.
	That that's my take.
	Possibly, but I I did see that when a number of people, Stephen Molyneux included, when Stephen Molyneux, he was the darling of YouTube at one point.
	Stefan, you you couldn't go a day without having a Stephen Molyneux video recommended to you on YouTube at one point, then all of a sudden free domain radio disappeared when he started talking about immigration replacement, and he also started supporting Trump.
	I think there's definitely a correlation with them moving away from um their traditional fodder into sort of an anti-immigration, potentially anti-replacement stance.
	But what I'm saying about um Alex Jones's stance on the Chicoms, if you set up a a Twitter account tomorrow, and you called it the Chicom Noticer, and all you did was point out stuff about the Chinese Communist Party that would survive.
	There was a Twitter account called the Noticer, and all it did was screen cap um powerful Jewish thinkers or Jewish influencers saying anti-white things, and that was pulled down from Twitter instantly, and everyone who's tried to repeat that kind of account has gone.
	And I believe that China obviously are a world superpower, but they don't have the influence in America or over America that Alex Jones and other people like him say they do.
	Alex Jones points out that China are the big boogeyman because it's a safe bet for him to do that.
	It's not a difficult call for him to do that.
	That's clearly what I'm saying.
	I'm not saying China have no power at all.
	That would be like saying Russia have no power at all.
	Russia are a powerful country, but they don't have any influence over the American establishment or the American media.
	They're not the people deplatforming uh um, you know, American nationalists or white people acting for their own interests in America.
	It's simple.
	That's obviously what I mean.
	I'm not I'm not a shill for China.
	Right, right.
	No, I know you're not.
	I was just saying this.
	Do you want to say something actually controversial?
	I can tell you now, I think white people would be better off ruled over by Ch by the Chinese than they would be ruled over by Israelis.
	I would take Chinese rule over Israeli rule any day of the week.
	I've never thought about that.
	I guess we'll we'll ask the chat.
	Would you, if you had to choose bullet to your head, would you rather be ruled over by the Chicoms or Zog?
	Or uh, you know, there's a lot of people out there that like to uh say it's all the Jesuits as well.
	I notice that that's something that uh you know you don't get on put on list and you don't get articles written about you uh when you do that.
	And in regards to this Tucker ADL at the advertising, and we're gonna wrap it up here in just a minute, Mark.
	Uh, I know I told you an hour and a half.
	Um, this is a great way to prove white supremacy is a major threat, and Jews don't wield immense power and control over the media when the ADL goes and pressures the world advertising what is it federation of advertisers to ban the guy that mentioned the ADL's immigration policy.
	And and I wanted to share this too.
	I just found this.
	Remember um these leaked slides about the ADL working with PayPal.
	Right?
	It says here, um, what do they prevent prevent?
	What do they censor basically?
	Um where where do we have here the way Oh, white advocacy.
	So to to just advocate for what you are.
	Imagine if there was white groups banning Jewish groups who do Jewish advocacy.
	But no, it's the other way around.
	We have the ADL is working with this group with uh PayPal, you know, almost a monopoly uh payment service online, and anti-immigration as well.
	So you have to be pro ADL's immigration agenda, otherwise you will be banned from PayPal.
	That's the level of control they have.
	Advertisers, banking, media, and to talk about it makes us a white supremacist to notice their power when they're the the obvious supremacists.
	The interesting thing about the anti-defamation league is they never actually stand against defamation, do they?
	They never actually stand against any form of defamation.
	They exist to defame other people.
	It's uh it's an ironic name, isn't it?
	Because they are really the defamation league, because all they do is try to deplatform and uh drag people through the mud and ruin the lives of anyone that points out any uncomfortable truth about you know Israeli power or Jewish power.
	It's the same with a Southern Poverty Law Center.
	They don't actually stand against um Southern poverty, they stand against white people, they stand against white people having any um power within America.
	All of these groups can be summed up simply.
	They are anti-white groups who work as hard as they can to silence anybody or any group that speaks out in the defense of people of European descent.
	Christianity too is their target.
	And you know, just back to this.
	I forgot there was one other point I wanted to make here on Congress.gov, their their bill rejecting white nationalism and white supremacy, just noticing Zog and their power over all these things, and uh and you are a white supremacist, according to them.
	This at the end here, that race mixing as akin to white genocide.
	Literally, Judaism and Jews all the time are against.
	I mean, they some of them do assimilate and and uh uh marry outside of the tribe, but this is such a common thing in Jewish circles that they have to marry in the tribe, otherwise they will disappear.
	This is what they're always talking about, but yet white people aren't allowed to do it.
	Or not the I mean, it's just a it's just like a biological fact, you know, genetic fact that you will disappear if you if uh there's mass race mixing.
	They know this.
	This is why they brag that they've lasted for so Long is because they follow these practices.
	That's what uh Kevin McDonald writes about that sum in culture critique.
	Just an inversion.
	Everything they're doing is an inversion.
	Everything that they're doing, they're trying to make it illegal for us to say that they're doing.
	But again, that's a mark of true power, isn't it?
	They have the power to do as they please, and then they have the power to stop us talking about them doing as they please.
	That shows everything that lays it all out.
	It lays it bare what's actually going on.
	And we're getting to a point now where it's not just, as you've so rightfully said tonight, it's not just us pointing out what they are doing that can get us into trouble.
	But if we simply stand up and hold up our hand to stop us being struck, to stop us being beaten, holding up a hand in self-defense, holding up a hand and saying, please don't beat white people, please don't attack us, please don't defame us, please don't drag us through the mud, please don't try and for foist white guilt upon us.
	Simply defending yourself on the grounds that you are white and you think you have a right to exist, that is now something that is being classed as extremism.
	And that is very, very worrying.
	It and I've said this many times, and it's become something that I've said again and again and again.
	I've said we are not becoming second class citizens.
	We're not becoming second class citizens.
	What we are becoming is a hated minority.
	The status of second class citizens would be something that will be far far more favorable than what we will end up as.
	What we will end up as as a group is something that is so low down the totem pole, that is so despised that is so ill treated, it will make the position of uh a slave look preferable.
	Because at least slaves will look after to a certain degree because they had value for their masters.
	We will have no value for anyone, and we will be treated as completely valueless.
	Yeah, like with uh uh almost what's the term, uh like genetic guilt or something, like ancestral guilt, you know, uh evil because of the color of our skin, uh just for being born how we are.
	That's that's where it it's getting at, right?
	We have APEC now here pressuring Congress, uh Congress just voted to uh here it is full security assistance to Israel ensures our ally can defend itself by itself.
	So helping them, giving them all the assistance they want is them defending themselves.
	That that's how twisted their mind is.
	Give us billions in weapons, and then we're defending ourselves.
	It's crazy.
	Tell Congress stand with Israel, no cuts and no new conditions on assistance to Israel.
	They want their shekels, no questions asked, unconditional support, they anything less is unacceptable.
	Three hundred and thirty hand us the money, give us the guns, give us the rockets, give us the aeroplanes, send us your soldiers, then we can defend ourselves.
	It's yeah.
	It's basically it's a mockery.
	The the amount of money that that the amount of money that is given to Israel by America is is unreal.
	And again, isn't it funny?
	Russia, again, is a country that has virtually no influence within America.
	If a congressman was too much, I disagree with that.
	If if if one congressman was go was to go to Russia and to be seen shaking hands with a Russian official or shaking hands with Vladimir Putin, it would be all over the news.
	It would be an absolute scandal, and it would be people would be talking about Russian influence in America.
	Yet here, openly, you have Jewish advocates, you have lobbying groups, you have APAC, you have all of these congressmen, all of these elective officials going to Israel, and nobody is talking about Israel's influence on America.
	There is no foreign country in the world that has in fact, I'm gonna go a step further.
	Americans have Less influence on America than Israel.
	Israel has more influence on American politics than Americans.
	That's uh that's a strong case.
	I do disagree about Russia's influence in America.
	I think they they wage it uh covertly in it with intelligence and uh and propaganda, but I get the point that you're making about the double standard, and you know, there has been politicians that have gone to Russia, like uh Bernie Sanders goes to the Soviet Union, Biden would visit, uh Trump went and visited the Soviet Union decades ago as well.
	But they they uh well they did say Trump was working with Putin, but then to to write do a cartoon with Putin and Netanyahu, you know, that's an anti-Semitic trope and and shouldn't be allowed.
	But here American Jewish Committee says the US Israel relationship is too important to be politicized.
	So just it shouldn't even be up for political debate, shouldn't even be questioned.
	This is the type of thing that they're trying to to push on everybody.
	All right, I think we're gonna have to read uh the super chats and wrap it up here, Mark uh pressure mounts.
	Okay, we've covered that one.
	We covered the postal service.
	Oh, last one for you.
	Here we go.
	Be perfect for Mark.
	Do you see this story yet?
	This is 17 hours ago.
	BBC News, church polls.
	You did church told it must destroy the church, they're gonna completely destroy the church.
	This absolute madman.
	I mean, look at that, look at him.
	I can tell you, looking in his eyes, look at his face.
	That is not the face of someone who is a representative of God.
	You can see in his face.
	Look at that face.
	That is something out of a horror film.
	That that the look on his face, he's a demon.
	That man will bring anti-white, vile, anti-Christian doctrine into the church, and the church will be destroyed with from within by that man.
	And does he look, does he look like a humble man of the people?
	Does he look like a man who uh follows the teachings of the Bible?
	I don't believe so.
	I believe he is a Marxist, I believe he's an anti-white, and I believe he's in that position because he is working against the church and he's working against white people.
	Well, let me uh let me back up and read the headline here for people that might have missed it.
	Church told it must short list ethnic minorities for senior posts.
	So it it's you know, the uh time and time again, they do this in stages.
	First, it's oh, you know, you we need to have some representation in in your thing, and then it's oh, we need to have uh uh have the same amount, and then pretty sure soon it's oh, we need to take over, and if you if you're against that, you're a supremacist.
	They it's like they do it in stages, and and I'm trying to find it, but this is actual of a verse in Obadiah and uh uh Edom.
	If it comes up, maybe it will.
	It says the people that you bring in that will take your bread will turn against you.
	Something along those lines.
	I can't find it now.
	I'll put it in when I post it on Odyssey and Bit Shoot.
	I'll put it on the flash it on the screen right now.
	You can just take my word for it.
	Any other thoughts uh on this?
	Uh it's like for senior posts.
	Do they explain what is one of 47 recommendations?
	This is just anti-racism task force.
	Yeah, and and this is another thing.
	I remember at one point, if you were um not a racist, that was enough.
	The the whole thing was you couldn't be racist.
	So if you weren't racist, that was enough.
	But now, not being a racist isn't good enough, is it?
	You have to be an anti-racist.
	And pretty soon, you know, you'll have to be an anti-white.
	That's what he's bringing in.
	That's what this um Marxist, anti-Christian, anti-white is bringing into the church.
	The church is being completely captured by people who hate whites and who hate Christians.
	They will destroy every single bit of tradition and morality in the church, turning it into a satanic parody of what it once was.
	I mean, it it's not very complicated to connect the dots now.
	They say basically all white people are racist, all of them are white privilege, should have white guilt, and uh to and then they say that we're gonna have an anti racist task force.
	So connect the dots, follow their argument to the logical conclusion.
	This is an anti-white task force.
	That's basically what they want to have less white people in the church.
	And then once it's you know, once they lose a little bit of power, they're gonna be more brazen and they're gonna say, Oh, actually, we should be running all of it, basically.
	That's how it goes.
	And and it again, this goes to their to their religion.
	It says it will happen in stages, and they will do it secretly, wage war on Amalek secretly.
	Also using everybody else against us too, w trying to get, oh, all the uh anti-Asian attacks, oh, that's the white people's fault.
	Oh, all the BLM and Antifa violence, oh, that's actually white supremacists out causing mayhem in the streets.
	Alright, let's read these super chats and get you out of here, Mark.
	I appreciate you so much for taking the time and and chatting with me today.
	Uh, given the things that I wanted to talk about.
	Let's see here.
	Can you can you hang on a minute while I jam through these super chats?
	There's not too many.
	No, of course, if there's any questions for me, I'm happy to stick around and answer them.
	I've really enjoyed it.
	You know how much I enjoy coming on your show.
	Working with you, Adam is always a pleasure.
	It's a highlight.
	And I think we've covered we've covered a lot of things, including how many amazing tabs you have open at once.
	Very important, serious things, too.
	That you get a lot of heat for for talking about.
	But here we go.
	Okay, we have uh DB Cooper says Amalekites rise up.
	Yes, uh Davy Crocco, three month substreak.
	Uh Lord Aragon says, Hey all, hello.
	Bob Renab with the Diamond says, Goys, I mean boys.
	Nice to see y'all together.
	Reed Cornwell says, yeah, uh this is like my maybe sixth or seventh show with Mark.
	I I always enjoy our conversations.
	Uh D B Cooper, Adam, you need to get more merch in your stores.
	Yes, I should have bought more shirts.
	I bought fifty shirts the other day, and they're basically all gone already.
	Um US Department of Winning with the Diamond, thank you, Sir Askalot.
	Great stuff, Adam and Mark.
	Multiple tab disorder.
	Yeah, I'm a little OCD ADD with my tabs, I know.
	Uh Gaelic Nord Kula, thank you.
	Shlomo Steinberg, thank you.
	You're my greatest fan.
	Norse nature, real Semitic, okay.
	Real Semitic blood.
	My daughter loves Japanese culture.
	Fine by me.
	Okay, yeah.
	I've been craving sushi lately.
	Uh oh, I oh, that's Japanese though, not China.
	You know, you know what's think about it, like the communists, you know who's basically propped up communism in China, and Israel works closely with China, so it's almost a false dichotomy choosing which one.
	They're working together against us, is what's actually going on.
	Now that I thought about that question a little bit.
	Um Jews help each other to get into positions of power.
	No, they would never do that.
	That's just a trope.
	Uh don't you thank you for what you have done, don't stop, says King Schlag.
	Nice name.
	I bet they are happy they have Jewish mothers.
	I don't know who they're talking about there.
	Either of you read the International Jew.
	Have you read uh Ford's book?
	I've seen excerpts, but I haven't read the whole thing.
	Mark.
	You're on me mute, Mark.
	No, I haven't.
	I've not I I haven't read that.
	No.
	I've heard excerpts from it.
	Um, if you want to uh educate yourself, try David Duke's Jewish supremacy, David Duke's My Awakening, and Dr. Kevin McDonald's culture of critique, they are the books I would recommend if you were educating yourself about um uh Jewish power.
	Duke has a book, Jewish Jewish supremacy.
	You have you when do you when do you do you know when he wrote that?
	I'm I'm curious to see if the there's anything in there that I've missed.
	Um but it's something um it's definitely worth a read.
	He he's also got the secret behind communism, and that's very, very good as well.
	Uh that exposes the level of um Jewish power within the Bolshevik government and how so many mass murderers uh within the Bolshevik government essentially escape any kind of um historical uh investigation at all.
	You've got people who killed you know millions of millions of white Christians or ordered the deaths of millions of millions of white Christians, and none of them are household names at all, uh, despite the fact uh that they were basically brutal mass murderers.
	You know, if if there was if there was um a white man that ordered the death of um those sort of quantities of people of another ethnic group, they'd be talked about forever.
	Yeah, uh Keganovich, I think is is one of the names that that was involved with uh the gulags and the mass killings.
	Gengritch Yacoba.
	But I definitely believe that you should that anyone, anybody who is interested in these kind of topics, you can't go wrong with those books.
	Um, and obviously I work you know quite a lot with um with uh Dr. David Duke, he's a dear friend of mine, and I think that you know he's done so much for this movement, he's done so much to you know to popularize many of the things we speak about,
	and I genuinely think that um reading his books is really good, and not only that, but uh my awakening is free on archive.org, so do check that out because it's the audio book, and you can literally just sit there and listen your way through it, and honestly, it is it is more than it is more than worth um you know a listen, especially as it's free.
	Uh, I really enjoyed it in audio form.
	That's a kind endorsement.
	I I'm a big reader.
	I I just did my taxes uh the other day.
	I I spent over 500 on books and and had many donated to me.
	I'm I'm always reading.
	Okay, a couple more super chats here.
	Uh at least we at least here we get honest conversation.
	Uh I love you, Adam, says Ray Roy.
	Uh, how long do you think the Zionist nightmare is going to last?
	That's a good question, Mark.
	Uh, how do you are we gonna see uh what's the world gonna look like in ten years?
	Are we gonna be able to uh turn this around at all?
	Or are are we uh are we already in check, mate?
	What do you think?
	Everything moves in cycles, my friend.
	Everything moves in cycles, and one of the oldest European fairy tales is the tale of the Phoenix, and the Phoenix doesn't rise in good times, the Phoenix rises in the bad times, the phoenix's eggs do not hatch in times of plenty,
	they do not hatch when uh the weather is cool or temperate, they hatch in the flames, they hatch in a time of despair where everything is uh being destroyed.
	And I think that's a fairy tale that tells us a lot about the European spirit, that often there are cycles, and cycles end in a collapse, they end in fire, but out of that fire, something new and beautiful is born, something hard, something strong comes out of that fire, is forged in those flames, and then goes on to create something new.
	The new life is the baby Phoenix rising from the fire.
	And I believe that that is the case with Europeans.
	Every time we've seen great European civilizations rise, they have been subverted from within and they've fallen, they've ended in fire.
	But out of that fire, strong people have emerged and started something new, and the cycle completes, and maybe we're somewhere in that cycle.
	Maybe the cycle is inevitable, maybe we are fighting against inevitability.
	But I will give you a quote by a great and inspirational man, Hans Rudel, he was a stucca pilot, and he said, only he is lost who gives himself up for lost.
	And I think that's uh a great quote to ruminate on, because there's so many people out there who are blackpilled, there are so many people out there who don't think it's worth fighting, who think that it it's time to give up, who think there's nothing we can do.
	But even if we are just playing our part in this great cycle, uh that we you know, maybe can't influence as much as we like to.
	We must play our part.
	We must continue to fight.
	And I believe in the bottom of my heart that however this ends, European people will persevere, we will survive, we will start Again.
	We did it when Greece collapsed.
	We did it when ancient Egypt collapsed.
	We did it when Rome collapsed.
	You know, we are now seeing the collapse of the British Empire.
	We've seen the rise of the American Empire, and we will see the fall of the American Empire.
	But just as when all other great empires fell, white people persevered, and we're still here to this day.
	And I believe we will still be here in the future, because inside us runs the blood of the people who created the greatest civilizations known to man, the people who brought art, poetry, great invention.
	Those people aren't going to go quietly into the night.
	And as long as there are people fighting, as long as there are people who haven't given up hope, there is still a way forward.
	I'm not always so optimistic, but that doesn't mean that I'm not uh fighting as hard as I can for for the future.
	Uh a couple more here.
	Mark, look into Orthodox Christian Church.
	What do you think of that?
	I have a friend, a very close friend of mine who um appeal appears on uh my streams, he does the gaming streams with me.
	He's um he's a Christian, and he believes that Christianity can only work when it is in a white positive sphere, when it's in an ethnocentric sphere.
	It's basically about loving your neighbour, but your neighbour is a part of your family, and your family is your race.
	Um That's that was the original Jewish context of that verse is love your fellow Jew, your neighbor is your fellow Jew, a stranger is a Gentile.
	Well, he says that you're you know, your neighbor is your fellow Christian and Christians should look after each other, and he believes that's also tied to race.
	He believes that Christianity, in its current expression, that we know it as, I.e.
	the hymns, St. Paul's Cathedral, the art, the ceremony, that is unique because it is tied to the European people.
	If Christianity had developed in Africa, it would be completely different to what Christianity is as we know it.
	Um I can't speak for him completely, but I do find what he says is compelling, and he's a very good man, and I believe that if people take strength from orthodoxy or Christianity, you know, good.
	We need to take we need to take um strength from these things, especially in such difficult times.
	Uh Ray Roy says, Adam, come visit me in Lebanon, baby kissy face.
	And I can tell from the uh the icon profile pick that it looks like a Lebanese princess, so that's very flattering.
	Uh Golden Donut, should I leave the USA for the Caribbean other?
	I do you have a comment on that?
	Or just that's the last question.
	I think if you're leaving, I think if you're leaving a white nation, best to go to somewhere where you can make a white home, and where you can also, once you've made a white home, you can also crucially ensure that you can warn the people in your new white home to uh essentially not um accept the multiculturalism that destroyed your previous home.
	I think that's um that's a very important thing to remember.
	Do you foresee some type of future where where whites in in Europe or Europeans are so uh dehumanized and the the propaganda in the media and the demographic uh intentional demographic shifts where there's gonna have to be some type of like white refugees trying to flee to find some kind of safe haven?
	Sounds like a uh dystopian film a little bit, but the there may well be.
	I think I I've been to places in eastern Europe, I've been to cities like Riga, and they're absolutely beautiful, and I can imagine that if people were looking for a way out, they could go to Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia.
	There are places where people can go and can eke out a good existence.
	But if you are running, here is my advice for anyone thinking of running.
	And this is very important.
	I have seen people running for my whole life.
	I've seen people escaping the multicultural nightmare.
	We call it white flight here in Britain.
	People escaped London to go to Essex, and then when the problems came to Essex, they escaped to go to um Norfolk.
	And when it gets to Norfolk, they think, oh, well, I might move up to Scotland or to Wales, and they keep running.
	And the problem is with these people who run, they run, and then when they get to their new safe space, it's almost like they pretend the problems they ran from never existed.
	They wipe the trauma from their mind and just get on with life.
	My advice to anyone running is when you run, and when you get to your destination, never forget what you ran from.
	Never forget why you ran.
	Never forget the horrors you left behind.
	Keep them in the front of your mind and ensure that you campaign on a daily basis to make sure that the place you run to never becomes like the place you ran from.
	You know, um I hear never forget, and that sounds like the Jews talking about uh the Holocaust in America, and and that is that is what motivates them to be so uh so determined and relentless and and ambitious and like uh you know fighting anti-Semitism so strong.
	Maybe it maybe once it gets a little worse, people will actually start uh fighting against the anti European, anti-white Christian Esau, Amalek agenda.
	Definitely shouldn't be forgotten.
	All right, Mark, let's get you out of here.
	I'm I apologize going half an hour over with one.
	Please yes, please.
	Yes.
	Where can people find you?
	Last words, go ahead.
	Yeah, I gave you a quote earlier from a man that I regard as a great man, Hans Rudel, um, the stucco pilot, and that was only he is lost who gives up for lost.
	And now I'm going to give you a quote from a communist, Marxist, somebody that I don't respect, that I don't admire.
	But I do admire the sentiment of his words, and I do admire this quote.
	This quote is from Bertold Brecht.
	He who fights can lose.
	He who doesn't fight has already lost.
	And I leave you with that, because there are many people out there who are busy saying that they're not going to fight, that we've already lost, so they they want to hide away from it, they want to just sit and watch the collapse and enjoy the ruin coming.
	No.
	No.
	That's not the way forward.
	If you fight, if you battle for our survival, the chance might be slim.
	It might only be a slim chance that we win.
	But every extra person that gets on board, every extra person that gets involved in the fight, every person that puts their hand to the wheel increases the size of that chance.
	If ten more people tonight decide to get involved in some form of white advocacy, that increases our chance of survival by a little bit.
	If a hundred people decide to get involved in white advocacy, that increases our chance, well a little bit more.
	If tonight this went viral and a million people decided to get involved in white advocacy because of what we've spoken about, that would increase our chance a lot.
	And what I'm saying is, our future is in our hands, but the fact is we have to fight for it.
	And defeatism will defeat us.
	We have to remain positive, and we have to remain willing to fight for our future.
	If we want a future, we have to fight for it, we have to campaign for it, and we have to spread the truth.
	Don't take the black pill, don't accept defeat, keep your chin up, guys.
	We are a special group of people.
	We have done wonderful things, and we deserve our place on this planet.
	Have a great evening.
	Thank you for having me on, Adam.
	It's been an absolute pleasure.
	Never go hope, guys, never give up hope.
	Always, always keep fighting.
	Thank you, Mark.
	Inspiring final words, and and where's the best put a couple places for people to find you?
	And I'll have the links in the description below when I post it on.
	If you're not finding me on Telegram, please follow me on Odyssey and Bit Shoot.
	I've lost my YouTube today.
	It would mean a great deal to me if I woke up in the morning and had a few thousand extra people following me on Odyssey following me on Bit Shoot would mean a lot to me.
	Thank you so much for having me.
	The audience you've all been wonderful.
	I've had a lovely time.
	I know we've gone over by a good 37 minutes, but it's been very much worth it.
	I've really really enjoyed it.
	Awesome.
	All right.
	Hang on a second I'm gonna close it out and uh and we'll have to talk again soon.
	Uh everybody no more news dot org mark's links will all be below in the description bit shoot, Odyssey, uh newsletter, support, contact it's all there.
	Appreciate for all the support everybody watching and I will see you guys all again very soon.

▲