All Episodes
March 8, 2020 - Know More News - Adam Green
02:38:06
BLOODSPORTS DEBATE! Christopher Jon Bjerknes vs. Dennis Wise | The Truth About Hitler?
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen.
Adam Green here with no more news dot org.
Today is Sunday, March 8th, 2020, and joining me for a highly anticipated and requested debate.
It is Sunday, March 8th, 2020.
I have author Christopher John Björkness and documentary filmmaker Dennis Wise to discuss their differing views on history's most infamous figure, the Fuhrer of Germany, Adolf Hitler.
This is the greatest debate never had.
And we're going to talk about history's most controversial or taboo figure to talk about.
It's obviously incredibly taboo topic, controversial, sensitive issue.
But we are going to exercise our rights of freedom of speech as Americans to question history, to investigate history and to debate It's not a thought crime to debate what we believe.
And to even debate this issue of World War II, Hitler and the Holocaust could get us thrown in prison in many European countries.
And certainly banned from YouTube.
That's why we are streaming exclusively on D Live, and it will be archived to BitChute.
And it should be an extremely interesting discussion.
I'm looking forward to it personally.
First, a little backstory on what brought us here today.
I did, about six months ago, I did a video with author Christopher John Bjorkness titled, the video was titled Adolf Hitler, Bolshevik and Zionist with Christopher John Bjorkness.
And more recently, I did a video, Was Adolf Hitler a Zionist stooge?
These are based off of Christopher John Bjorkness'books, his new trilogy, Adolf Hitler, Bolshevik and Zionist volumes one through three, communists, World War One and Zionism, as well as his previous book, Premonitions of the Holocaust.
And to say uh uh it would be an understatement that this created quite a lot of uh ignited a firestorm of uh people responding, and there's tons of comments, a good portion of them angry or strongly disagreeing.
I've gotten emails, there's been videos and articles responding to Björkness's um views that Hitler was a Zionist Bolshevik controlled opposition, and that the Holocaust was essentially a giant ritual fulfilling prophecy and orchestrated by um high-level Zionists.
And uh so I said in the videos that we were gonna be respond uh responding and having debates, and as promised, here we are.
Um I hope to have more.
I love debates.
Um a huge fan of debates.
That's how I figure out what's true, is to see opposing views discussed.
Like gentlemen, I've actually got a debate this week uh Thursday with an InfoWars employee on the Ralph Retort.
I hope everybody tunes into that on the 12th.
And um Bjorkness wanted to start a debate with this, these books and this information.
We purposely made the titles provocative and wanted to uh discuss the uh these issues.
Um so we're gonna be responding to uh critics of his theories, and I got tons of requests to have.
I I looked to find the best uh I was thinking of the best people I could have to challenge and and and question Björkness's views.
I got tons of requests for Dennis Wise, documentary filmmaker Dennis Wise.
Um people You've probably seen in comments everywhere.
Watch the greatest story never told.
It's the documentary he made about World War II.
Let me show uh go to that.
Adolf Hitler, the greatest story never told in 2013.
It's almost six hours, and it's I'll talk more about it later here in a second.
So we we I got Dennis on, and you guys can let me know in the comments uh if you have suggestions on uh other people you like to see after this um have a debate.
And uh Dennis Wiseman is an independent documentary filmmaker.
He created uh produced the greatest story never told, The New World Order, Communism by the Back Door, and The Secret Masonic Victory of World War II.
So he is here, and um greatest story never told is probably the most uh shared, talked about documentaries about this issue from the revisionist perspective.
So I think Dennis is going to be a great person to have this conversation with.
Um he's essentially gonna be uh taking the standpoint from the conventional revisionist uh point of view.
And Christopher John Bjorkness, and I'm almost done with the intro introducing these guys, and we're gonna get to it.
And Christopher John Bjorkness is author of over a dozen books, including Manufacture and Sale of St. Einstein, Racial Zionism, The Jewish Genocide of the Armenian Christians, Putin's Reign of Terror, and the books we will be discussing today, Adolf Hitler, Zionist and Bolshevik, parts one through three, and premonitions of the Holocaust.
Now I don't I don't claim to be an expert on World War II and this stuff, but my guests today are strong in their convictions.
Uh like the audience, uh and everyone, I'm just a true seeker.
I'm trying to figure out the truth like everyone else, which is why we're here today.
I used to believe that the you know what you're taught in school, the mainstream media traditional, um Victor's history narrative of uh the Great Wars, and then I discovered uh revisionism and that alternative view,
and then now Bjorkness's theories are uh a whole new aspect, and Björkness's work exposing Jewish supremacy and prophecy and Judaism is I I really respect he's uh he's uh amazing at that.
So he's got some compelling info.
I want to see if it can stand up to the scrutiny.
So out of the spirit of debate and truth, we are all here to get to the bottom of this.
Thank you, both gentlemen, for joining me.
Chris and Dennis Wise.
Thank you, Adam.
Thank you, Dennis.
And yourself, yeah.
So I wanted to begin just by uh starting with the the more conventional traditional revisionism that uh that Dennis probably aligns with more.
So uh Dennis, could you please give us like your macro summary, like brief overview of what you think uh World War II was and who Hitler was.
And and the Holocaust as well.
Well, uh thanks for the introduction, Adam.
Uh good to be here.
What I will say is uh uh I mean it's a show people not only was Adolf Hitler a great one of the greatest men who ever lived.
Uh not with just documentary evidence, but the only way I believe where truth is defined, that is in his actions, and not just his actions.
All these great uh people from history.
If you study their actions, that's the defining moment of truth.
So there's been a big cover up.
Uh I've discovered in the three documentaries since World War II.
Uh a great effort to stop people from actually investigating uh Hitler straight after the war had ended, where they came out with uh things like Ross Channel, probably one of the most genius pieces of uh uh manipulation that I could think of because immediately it would stop people from investigating.
And it did so for uh for many, many years, and until I did the documentary, which was probably uh at the beginning thoughts of admission impossible.
People soon realized after watching that documentary that he was not the man painted, but one of the greatest men of all of all time.
And why was he uh I don't understand how uh claiming that Hitler was a Rothschild, and I don't think there's real strong evidence of that myself, prevented an investigation unless you're referring to the investigations that the Nazis themselves made into Hitler's background.
For example, David Irving uh pointed out that when they started to investigate Hitler's background, he banned all the newspapers from doing so.
Hitler himself banned it, and all the files were put into a panzer schrank, a safe and marked the highest level of state secret.
So it was the Nazis who prevented the investigation of Hitler's background, and I failed to understand how calling Hitler a Rothschild would have prevented it after the war.
Well, I'm talking about after the war, uh, when the Nazis were totally defeated, and they brought out this Rothschild's myth, or that Hitler was a Jew myth.
In fact, we could be here all day with all the myths that have been claimed uh since the war ended.
But that particular myth would stop people from investigating because they would just turn around and say, Oh, it's just another shill.
Uh and and there was a wall there, which people passed, but which people are you referring to who were investigating because everyday people.
Everyday people.
Where have you seen this phenomena take place?
Can you give any evidence of it?
I don't I don't I don't think the mainstream media puts out the idea that Hitler was a Rothschild agent or he was controlled in new uh controlled opposition.
No, but there's many videos on on YouTube probably still up today, which which claim that the National Socialists were pagans, that uh Hitler was a Jew, uh, you know, uh his his his mother uh had an affair with the Rothschild, she works as a maid, all these things, you know, just to muddy the water.
So there's more than that.
There's there's there's plenty of other uh examples of uh Hitler being demonized.
Well, first you're presuming that there is no basis for making any such allegations.
There isn't.
And uh Bridget Heyman in her book Hitler's Vienna gives lots of the research that was put into it and the fact that Hitler tried to suppress all that research.
So it was Hitler who was trying to suppress the research, and the internet is a comparatively new phenomenon.
And I don't recall seeing in the history of the late 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, and early 90s any effort to prevent investigations into Hitler's background based on the idea that he was a Rothschild.
So we surely know that the CIA came out with their own uh assumption of what Hitler was and put that out.
Yes, I don't see how that prevented any investigation into his background.
Who was prevented from investigating his background ever, other than by Hitler himself?
Every everyday public after the war, in the years after the war.
How were they prevented from doing it?
I don't I don't see the mechanism in place that you're implying existed to prevent people from investigating Hitler's background.
Because if you were convinced that Hitler is a Rothschild, you were not going to bother investigating.
And people were convinced.
A lot of people convinced the Jew.
I when I started talking about that, my experience was that the vast majority of people had never heard any such thing.
Well, there's been enough uh writings on it and videos on the on the actual subject.
And I don't know if Hitler has been the most demonized of all people in history.
And that was just part of it.
Oh, I completely agree with that.
And I think that was part of the plan.
He is the Haman figure, the figure of Esau to be attacked by Jacob, to be tricked into hating Jacob to use that as an excuse for Jacob to destroy Esau.
That was the plan from the beginning.
So we're in agreement with that.
You know, well, well, that's fine, whatever Jacob wants to do, but I'm here to talk about Adolf Hitler, and Adolf Hitler was the only person that I could think of, apart from the Catholic Church, that destroyed Freemasonry.
A Freemason was central.
That's also false.
Hitler's uh leading economic advisor was Helmar Schacht, who was a leading Freemason.
So are you saying he was the one who created the destruction of the German economy?
Are you saying the lodges weren't closed down throughout Europe?
I'm sorry, I I couldn't understand what you said.
Were the lodges closed throughout Europe?
Of course, they were closed by Stalin, too.
It was a communist practice to close the Freemason lodges, and Hitler followed that communist practice.
Well, Mussolini closed down the Freemasons.
Mussolini was also a socialist, the biggest socialist in Italy.
He changed his ways.
He changed his ways because of his Jewish girlfriend, Margarita Sarfali.
So you said again, that's not fair, Dennis.
That's ridiculous.
Listen, this is what you perpetrate.
What I'm saying to you is he closed down Freemasonry.
And Franco closed down Freemason.
I'm telling you, the leading figure of the German economic recovery was a high-ranking Freemason.
You haven't addressed that historic fact.
Well, just whether it's an IRA Freemason or not, you guys have got a lunch to go to.
And yes, they don't know about the hidden lodges.
You don't know about the army.
Up to 200,000 Freemasons were put to death in Germany.
And that was all part of the plan.
The communists did the same thing.
Once they're in power, they kill those people who know how they got into power, so there can be no counter-revolution.
It's exactly what anybody would do.
It was anti-what difference does it make whether he got rid of Freemasonry or not?
And he did not.
Helmar Schacht, and you will not address this point, was a leading Freemason and organized with the Jewish bankers the recovery of the German economy.
Oh, I can talk about Jewish bankers all right.
We can go down that role.
Hold on, guys, hold on.
Um you guys jumped right into the debate with just that's fine, you know.
We uh no problem.
But I wanted to, you know, first I was gonna have uh Dennis uh give his kind of overview of how what how he thought World War II went down, and then I was gonna give Chris the opportunity to give uh his his view and then and then allow Dennis to uh explain what he thinks is is wrong with it, or or ask Chris questions.
So um Dennis, were were you finished um explaining what you think happened in World War II and and after in the Holocaust?
Uh are you ready to hear uh Bjorkness's over?
Well, can I just say uh that uh Adolf Hitler was not when he was 17, and this is when he discovered what the Jews were all about.
And he opened up the eyes of the German people.
And without opening up the eyes of the German people, even today, we would be unaware of what the Jews are all about.
It was Adolf Hitler who brought all this to the fore.
And the reason why World War II came about, because they wanted to shut him up.
Okay.
Chris, my response to that is I agree that Adolf Hitler said many very true things about the Jews, and he was coached to do so by the German military.
He did not do so because he started at age 17 hating the Jews and became an expert on it.
He was trained by the Reichswehr to become a propagandist for the German military, an anti-Bolshevik propagandist, and he attended courses and was ordered to give speeches against the Jews and take over the German workers' party from Anton Drexler and become dictator over Germany.
Now, the reason that they had to rail against the Jews and had to rail against the Jews with the truth is in order to fulfill Theodore Herzl's Zionist plan, which compelled the uh Zionists to form anti-Semitic governments in Europe to chase the Jews down to Palestine because the Jews refused to go to Palestine even after World War II and the Belfort Declaration.
Herzl stated in 1896 that he would utilize anti-Semitic governments to create a transfer of a Jewish population and Jewish wealth to Palestine, and Hitler fulfilled that plan in the transfer agreement.
So it was planned before Hitler had any anti-Semitic feelings.
And Hitler did not arrive at his anti-Semitism in the way that you are following the traditional history.
He was ordered into it by the German military after he had been captured as a bodyguard for the communist Eugene Levine and turned on his communist fellows and was ordered by the intelligence department of the army to instigate an anti-Semitic campaign.
So you're misrepresenting the known documented history of how Hitler entered and became a demagogue putting out this anti-Semitic information, which in most instances was absolutely true.
I agree with you.
And how old was Hitler when he first got this indoctrination?
That's a good question.
It was uh in 1919, whatever age that puts him at.
Yeah, but before he won his medals or after, after.
After.
Okay.
It was after he was captured working for the communists in the Bavarian Soviet Republic and became an informant against the communists, and then Captain Karl Meyer was ordered by General Ludendorff to make have Hitler infiltrate the German workers' party.
And he was given a series of training courses by Gottfried Fader and many other people from Tula Society and other anti-Semites who trained Hitler on these issues and told him what to say.
And then the Reichswehr provided him with a covert clack, an audience that would applaud for him and make it appear that he had popular support.
And Captain Meyer was given Reichswehr funds to buy free beer and sausages for all the people who would attend.
So this idea that he arose out of his own will is a myth that you are forwarding, which is contrary to known facts.
Well, it's not a myth that even during the war, Adolf Hitler was vocal about the Jews back home.
We were mainly Jews in them days, were disrupted the war effort.
I don't think anybody coached him on that.
He actually won six medals, one being the top one, first class iron cross.
So when he came back into Germany, he was well versed on the Jews.
As I said, you know, from the uh the Ratchets in Main Kamp when he was 17, uh, explaining when he first went to Austria, never saw anything really out ontoward.
But as soon as uh it was learned about the Jews, informed about it, he could see Jews everywhere.
It was recommended to get those medals.
He was comrades with all the Jews in his unit.
And mythology has been built up to try to make it appear that he was an innate anti-Semite so that they can pursue this ethos.
And he wasn't built up in the UK that he was studying Marx in those years, and wrote in Mein Kampf about how he had been heavily studying Marx and stated and Wagner and others that the whole of National Socialism was based on Marxism.
Christopher, are you saying anybody who's who suffered who uh learns about Marx is a communist?
I'm saying that anyone who studies Marx intensively should be suspected as being a communist, and it was proven that he was a very important thing.
Oh, you're claiming you're claiming.
Less interrupting.
I'm just trying to make one point when you're talking, try to make one point and then allow a uh a response if it's if uh but you know, well, the point being all this talk about to be lectured when when he was already on that on that button during World War I and spoke about it vocally.
You know, kind of, you know, I can't say more than that.
He must have been learned in the trenches.
He served as an elected official for the communist government after World War One.
It was a spot.
How could he have been this vicious anti-Semite you're describing him as honored Kurt Eisner, the socialist Jew who overthrew Bavaria and threw out the monarchy and be this terrible anti-Semite and then be re-elected to serve Ernst Tuller,
a known communist, and then become a bodyguard for Eugen Levin, a Leninist communist, a pervert, perverse Jew who held orgies in the streets and was in regular contact with Lenin and Hitler was his bodyguard.
So how source is that source was the source for that?
For that is Douglas Reed, who was told by someone close to Ernst Würm that he was uh bodyguard for um for Oregon Levin.
In terms of Kurt Eisner, we have film of him marching in Kurt Eisner's funeral parade, wearing a red armband to honor communism and a black armband to mourn Kurt Eisner's death.
And we have a photograph of it from Hoffman, his uh private photographer.
Okay.
Well, let me just say for uh before I say anything else, although you call calling an anti-Semite.
He did have people working for him, we were part Jewish.
In fact, who was one of the people who said to the BSS was trying to be Jewish when it was.
And it was also a leader of the soldiers' councils in the Bavarian Soviet Republic and was a known communist and was one of the most far-off people in all of Bavaria.
I thought we were going to say one point at a time.
now.
Well, I'm just answering your question.
Hold on, guys.
Hold on.
Let's back up.
Let's start I I still wanted Björkness to get out.
For people that haven't read his books or seen the other video, I want him just to give a brief overview of what he thinks uh the Great Wars and Hitler and the Holocaust was.
If we could do that.
Okay.
And then you guys could have all the back and forth, and I'll just interrupt with a question or a point here and there.
So World War I was essentially a massive socialist revolution to unseat the monarchies of Europe so that the Jews could implement communist empires to replace them.
It was also instigated to destroy the Ottoman Empire so that the Jews could take Palestine from the Ottoman Empire.
Following World War I, the Jews, the masses of Jews in Europe refused to emigrate to Palestine.
Herzl advocated in a book he wrote in 1895 that the governments of Europe should become anti-Semitic and force the Jews to move down to Europe.
Now they immediately started that process in the Reichswehr when Captain Karl Meyer was ordered by General Ludendorff, who slaughtered millions of people in World War I, and who was against the monarchy,
and who together with Hitler led the Beer Hall putsch, not to unseat the Jews, but to prevent uh Carr, Losov, and Schleicher from reinstating the Bavarian monarchy.
That's what the Beer Hall putsch was all about.
And these socialist communists, Ludendorff, Meyer, and Hitler, uh, insinuated their way into Anton Drexler's German workers' party and made it the national socialist, as in communist German workers' party.
And there was a man named Ernst Ehrensperger, who published a uh very well-read pamphlet that was reprinted in several newspapers calling Hitler a traitor, and saying that Hitler was working for the Jews and was taking over Anton Drexler's party,
and there was big money behind him, and he was doing this so that he could become dictator over Germany, and that he would serve as a puppet of the Jewish bankers to subvert the anti-Semitic movement and make it serve communism and Zionism.
And that's exactly what happened.
And that pamphlet was published in 1920.
And just from a more uh higher perspective, Chris, like what was World War I, World War II, and the Holocaust, you know, like how it fulfills prophecy and it was orchestrated by the Zionists.
In the Gematria of Leviticus, it states that the Jews would be restored to Palestine in the year 1948, less six million Jews.
So for 2500 years, they have had a plan to put the Jews into Palestine in the year 1948.
Now, I don't believe it's a coincidence that that Adolf Hitler brought that about.
I think he was put in power to bring that about.
And another Jew, uh famous rabbi in Hungary in 1812 predicted that the Jews would be restored and their Messiah would arrive in 1948, based on the fact that Adam's name is composed of three letters, ADM, which represent the period from Adam to David and then from David to the Mashiach, the Messiah.
And the period from Adam to David was half of the period from Adam to 1948 when the Mashiach would arrive.
So we know for a fact that centuries, in fact, thousands of years ago, this plan was set into motion.
And Adolf Hitler was put into power, and he was a communist, and he was put into power in order to instigate a war with the Soviet Union that would grind up Eastern Europe and weaken the Western allies and make the Western allies allies of the Soviet Union so that the Soviet Union could expand across Eastern Europe and into Germany,
which it did, and he was put into power to uh fulfill the terrorizing of the Jews so that the Jews could atone for their sins and no lesser figures than chief Sephardic rabbi of Israel, Ovadia Yosef said exactly that, and the Messiah of the Jews, Menachemendel Schneyerson said exactly that, that the Holocaust was the work of God to have the Jews atone for their sins so that God would permit them to return to Israel.
And Hitler accomplished all of that.
Now, if Hitler was the greatest man in history, why is it that he decimated 50 million people and destroyed Germany?
How can he call that a great man?
He didn't.
And I'll tell you why.
Okay, Chris, Chris, you can respond with the Nero, let Dennis respond.
Right.
This war wasn't a political war.
This has been going on since the French Revolution.
Every revolution since this is a world revolution, which the Jews thought of different contributors.
Let him finish, Chris.
Right.
So this war really was between Freemasonry and the Catholic Church with uh international Jewry combined.
So this went through through centuries.
And uh in World War One, that was the Versailles Treaty was actually a Masonic celebration of what they thought then was a destruction of the Catholic Church.
Because the only two organizations which ever fought Freemasonry was the Catholic Church was the Nazis.
Now, you're saying that your reasons why Hitler came to power.
The fact is he only came to power because of the Vatican.
As soon as Hitler uh was elected you, because that's all we wanted.
That's not that's not what his books don't say that, though.
And in his books don't let me talk, let me talk about it.
I'm telling him, I'm telling him the church.
Dennis, you're making a voice.
I address them one at a time, please.
You've you you've said you said why that was.
You haven't contributed to the power that I thought.
Okay, both of you.
Stop, stop, stop, stop.
Dennis, Dennis, I'm gonna mute you.
Hitler came to power.
Dennis, please stop.
Please stop.
We've got to keep it.
Well, we still can meet.
I know, I know.
Well, that's why you gotta let me talk.
Uh, first of all, I just want to clarify that Björkness's books don't say that it was the Vatican that brought Hitler to power.
Hold on, let me finish.
And and also his books, he doesn't, he doesn't promote the idea that Hitler was a Rothschild or that he was Jewish as his evidence.
That's that's not what his focus is.
I never said okay.
I know I'm just I'm just clarifying because I got a lot of comments about that.
I've seen that a lot, and you kind of you you touched on that a bit, but please continue.
Make the point you were making and then and then allow uh Chris to respond.
Okay, well, that's after after World War I, when the Pope was bunged from Versailles.
That was a victory for Freemasonry.
The final they thought the final victory.
Uh all of Europe, all of Europe was under the rot' of Freemasonry.
Uh Hitler came to power, the Rat Concordat was signed immediately, which means we talked beforehand.
Well, what was signed immediately?
The Reich Concordat, where the Vatican where the Vatican left the uh political decisions to to Germany.
And they actually told the center faction in Germany to vote for Hitler after the Reichstag fire to make him dictator.
And then they shut down that center party because he'd been infiltrated in the Weimar Republic.
So the Catholic Church has actually got Hitler into power.
And when you look at the end of World War II, where on Chris, hold on, hold on.
When you look at the end of World War II, when thousands hundreds of thousands of national socialists were being gunned and chased down by the communists, it was the Catholic Church which ran the rat lines to get them out of Europe.
Okay.
And even funded them in 1946 to the tune of 200 million.
So you're you're you're saying that you do believe that the Catholic Church helped bring Hitler to power.
Yeah.
You're saying you believe that go ahead and respond then, Chris.
Hitler's port, the source.
It's true that the Catholic Church was involved with the rat line.
On that point, I agree with him.
Why though?
Why?
What reasonable to have?
Uh probably to hide some of their own secrets, and probably they were ordered to by the Jesuits who were involved with the Jews to get these uh crypto Jews over to um South America so that can I let him let him finish?
Let him finish.
You guys gotta let each other finish their points.
Sorry.
Martin Warman and several of the other top Nazis were Soviet spies, and they were set up to uh help rebuild the German economy after World War II was over.
It was all part of the plan that they would create this east-west conflict centered in Germany, so that these top Nazis were smuggled out of Europe so that they could uh organize and orchestrate those plans which began long before the war ended to reconstruct Germany after the war.
That's the historical facts of why these people were smuggled out.
Now, may I address the hundred other points you made without allowing me to respond?
It was that the Nazis referred to the Nazi revolution as a world revolution.
They said it would be a socialist revolution, that it differed from Marxism only on the point that it was national as opposed to international, but that it was a socialist revolution which would condition the nations to socialism.
And once all the nations had been conditioned to socialism, then they could be conditioned to become international.
In terms of the Catholic Church putting Hitler into power, that's absolute nonsense.
It was a Jewish banker from the Jewish banking house of Stein in Cologne named Kurt von Schroeder who extorted Paul Hindenburg with threats that he would be put under charges of corruption by the chancellorship if he did not make Hitler Chancellor in 1933.
So it was the Jewish bankers, and this is well documented history, who made Hitler Chancellor in 1933.
Sure.
Okay.
First of all, you say that it's the Nazis what called it a world revolution.
When Eugene Levine, the son, the son of the communist leader, actually talks in a documentary explaining that when his father was shot by uh uh Irish war, he actually shouted out long live the world revolution.
Everybody knows that the Jews are doing a world revolution.
But the Union joined that world revolution.
Well, it wasn't the Nazis.
I'm not excusing the fact that the Communists called it a world revolution.
I'm enlightening you to the fact that the Nazis called it themselves.
You're not enlightening me at all.
All you're doing is interrupting me.
What I'm saying to you is once that Reich Concordat was that once that right, this is fact.
Once that Reich Concordat was signed, this is in the book, Hitler's Pope, which isn't actually uh you know, pro-Nazi.
In Hitler's Pope, it goes into great details to say that that Concordat was signed, in essence, what that made was Hitler defender of Europe against Bolshevism, because the Catholic Church knew at some stage that Bolsheviks were going to invade.
So Hitler then, piece by piece, by 1941, whether you like it or not, by 1941, he took all Europe back.
All of Europe was back under under Christian leaders from the Rothschilds.
The only reason that people don't know about it is because in the West it's been covered up that Stalin was going to invade Europe.
Instead, Hitler preempted Stalin, went into the Soviet Union with a Christian coalition of countries.
All the leaders of Europe after 1941 were all Christian and all placed there by Hitler.
And even in the in the Spanish Revolution, Spain would have fallen if Hitler and Mussolini hadn't gone to their aid.
Well the fact is that they went into the Soviet Union, and because they were eventually defeated, it never came.
No, it's true.
Well, you refute something.
You can go on your uh little little rants too.
Just try to try to like take notes of the best of the points he's making.
But by the way, your source at the beginning is a guy who actually uh was debut for saying that the Germans took 500 babies into a Kiev Stadium and played football.
I have no idea what you're referring to.
Douglas, whatever he was called, your source.
Douglas Reed.
Yes.
What did what did Douglas Reed do?
He wrote about how the Germans in Kiev took over the stadium and took 500 babies and played football in that stadium with Jewish 500 Jewish babies.
Which was ridiculous not long after.
Have you heard of that, Chris?
I've never heard of that.
Well, you I'll do a fact check in a second on Douglas Reed and playing football with babies.
500 babies, okay.
Um I just want to make it point out that one thing.
And even if it's true, how does that negate the voluminous work that Douglas Reed did exposing the Zionists?
Yeah, have you read Douglas Reed's books, Controversy of Zion?
I did a fact check on him, and he's a figure of fun.
Okay, all right.
All right, these are personal attacks this man is making on people without refuting any of the factual evidence I'm I'm putting forward.
So this is not a debate.
Well, do you agree to a good 500 babies?
Kickstrap stadium.
I'll show that up.
Okay, here.
Look it up.
This is the guy you quoted.
Read 500 babies.
Douglas Reed, control F. Well, they call him virulently anti-Semitic, by the way, too.
Okay, 500.
Reed cited a story.
Okay, criticism.
Noted that Reed was one of the first anti-Semitic writers to deny Hitler's extermination of the Jews.
Okay, so he's a Holocaust denier.
Uh George Orwell compared, dismissing or Orwell noted Reed dis dismissed the Nazis' persecution of German Jews and even the pogroms as just propaganda.
Reed cited a story in the Daily Herald about Germans in football clothes, playing football with 500 Jewish babies in a football stadium near Kiev.
This story had been.
So he was refuting it.
He cited a story.
He was refuting it as war propaganda.
Yeah, yeah.
The man is putting out propaganda and nonsense and trying to scapegoat the Catholic Church for what the Jews did to themselves.
And I just wanted to make a point.
Um, something that you said earlier, uh, Dennis, and then I'll let you guys continue.
You you said that without uh Hitler that like Europe or the world wouldn't know about the Jews and that he woke everybody up to the Jews.
I I I really dispute that.
I I think since him the world has been silenced about Jews, and they've catapulted to the top of dominating the world according to all their prophecies and got everything they wanted.
Um like, you know, in Germany there was Martin Luther that they say inspired the Nazis with Jews and their lies and his uh Protestant Reformation anti-Semitism, you know, quote unquote anti-Semitism.
And then also I wanted to mention that uh you said the Treaty of Versailles was a Masonic ritual, which I don't doubt it at all, but I also celebration, yeah.
I also wanted to add that the the Jews believe and and Christian Zionists believe that the Nuremberg trials were actually a purm ritual.
And even the Treaty of Versailles, it's complete nonsense that it was a Freemasonic ritual.
The treaty of the child's organized thing.
Hold on, hold on, Dennis.
Let him let him try to refute it.
Let him Let him refute the point.
The Versailles Treaty was roundly criticized as being a Jewish meeting.
Almost everyone there was a Jew.
You're trying to scapegoat the Freemasons for what the Jews did.
And the Treaty of Versailles are true.
And I finished.
Aren't they synonymous?
Aren't they basically synonymous?
No, they are not.
It was attended and led by Jews, not by Freemasons.
It was not a Freemasonic ritual.
It was a setup for World War II.
And immediately after it took place, the press around the world said that this treaty would inevitably lead to World War II.
Ross Chelsea was a Freemason and he organized Bersani.
This is nonsense.
Hold on, Chris, Chris, Chris.
Dennis, is uh wouldn't you agree?
I just watched your documentary, Kabbalah and the Occult, and and it it's it's basically controls Freemasonry.
Wouldn't you say?
Yeah, the Jews Freemason.
The Jews control the Freemasonry, and it was a Freemasonic ritual, it's basically a Jewish ritual, right?
Correct.
Okay.
But the Freemasons do not control the Jews.
It is the Jews who control the Freemasons.
This is exactly I think we're all in agreement on that.
Then what's his point?
In what sense was Versailles a Freemasonic ritual?
Versailles was a treaty to break up Germany to punish Germany and to set up reparations.
So that the Jewish bankers could reap tremendous profits off the debt that Germany had to pay.
And so they could punish Germany horribly.
The bankers were Freemasons.
The Jewish bankers were Freemasons.
Primarily was a Freemason.
I believe Stalin was a Freemason.
That's a lie.
You're making things up.
Stalin was Stalin was a Freemason.
No, I said I believe that Stalin was a Freemason.
I'll tell you why.
I'll tell you why.
Well, did this.
By their own rules, you cannot sit down in a room with Roosevelt 33 degree, Churchill 33 degree, and Stalin, Stalin walks in that room.
You cannot sit down and talk war secrets with two Masonic leaders.
He has to be a Freemason.
Otherwise, you don't get in the building.
By their own rules.
Pointless discussion.
Yes, Lenin was also a Freemason.
Kerensky was a Freemason.
Kerensky's father was Lenin's uh teacher.
Yes, the Freemasons were involved.
Ludendorff was a Freemason.
Freemaster, two of the Jews.
Jean-Mar Schacht, who you refused to address, was a Freemaster.
Led the recovery of the Nazi economy.
So it was a Freemasonic plot to recover.
Just like the Russian Revolution.
Why don't you address that, sir?
Just like the Russian Revolution was.
Because in World War II, the bankers not only controlled the UK, France, and the US, they also control the Soviet Union.
Will you are shocked?
Hold on, hold on, hold on, hold on.
The Russian Revolution, the bankers control the Soviet Union.
Dennis, let's not move to the Russian revolution yet.
Address the point that Chris asked.
Pointing out the Freemasons in the West combined with the communists in the East, combined to fight the Christian Europe.
Okay.
For the New World Order.
Okay.
Kyle Hitler, what a bunch of bullshit.
This man is a propagandist trying to distract from the facts of history.
Of course, I don't know.
Let's we we uh you know, one side Chris believes that there's uh Nazi Bolsheviks propagandists, and there's people that think that that that uh Chris is uh Mossad shill pushing Jewish propaganda, which I disagree with.
I don't think this is Jewish propaganda at all.
You never see this promoted in the mainstream anywhere.
That they'll the Jews will be even more mad about Bjorkness's interpretation than Dennis's.
Would you agree with that, Dennis?
No.
You you don't think you don't think that the Zionists will be more mad?
Europe rallied around Hitler because of what he taught his own people, not just Germany, but the rest of Europe all rallied around him to fight this evil of Bolshevism, which was controlled by the bankers in America.
So when you're looking at Katin, uh Roosevelt and Churchill are saying, oh, Stalin didn't do it.
Now you know why they said Stalin didn't do it.
Because they're all in it together.
And Chris just believes Hitler was in it together too.
Lenin said himself the best way to uh control the opposition is to lead it.
Well, that I mean they have their would you agree that they have their villains and their heroes?
Hold on, hold on, hold on.
Hitler did not create Christian Europe.
Hold on.
I'm trying to talk.
It's a myth that the bankers fund both sides.
It's an easy getter card.
They didn't fund uh in Libya Gaddafi to use Gaddafi's money to take him down.
Well, I didn't say that they always fund both sides of everything.
It's a fact they funded Hitler and it's a fact that they put Lenin in powerful.
In fact, he proved it to you.
Can I finish a sentence?
No, no, no, no.
Sir, can I finish the sentence?
The bankers, you're saying the bankers funded Hitler, right?
If you go if you go to the speech, if you go to the speech of a holy war declared on Germany in 1933 by Samuel Ultenmeyer, he actually states in his speech, he has a goal of the bankers for sending money to Germany.
Not just to Hitler.
They've been sending money all through the Weimar Republic, even when the last two years they couldn't pay any funds back.
They still sent the money.
And when Hitler came to power and said, I'm not paying no reparations, they still sent some money.
And the reason they sent the money was because when you take out a loan with the bank, that day comes and that loan calls in.
When that day would have come in, it would have looked to the world that the bankers had every right to go into Germany, break it up and sell it off.
That was a dog's dog.
You're misrepresenting what Untermeyer said.
Untermeyer said that that was the excuse that the bankers gave, is that they wanted to recover the reparations money.
Hey, let him talk, Dennis.
He's had like a good 45 seconds.
You gotta allow a response.
Sure.
You're misrepresenting what Untermeyer said.
Untermeyer said that what he said.
Dennis, come on.
This is nonsense.
I'm not gonna disgrace myself.
Ridiculous propaganda.
You gotta let him finish, Dennis.
But both of you allowed.
He talks over me at China.
I'll quote him.
Okay.
Hold on.
Go ahead, quote him.
That's the best way to resolve this.
Revolting as it is, it would be an interesting study in psychology to analyze the motives, other than the fear and carriers that have prompted Jewish bankers to lend money to Germany as they're doing.
It is in part their money that is being used by the Hitler regime in its reckless wicked campaign of propaganda to make the world anti-Semitic.
With that money, they have invaded Great Britain, the United States, and other countries where they established newspapers, subsidized agents, and otherwise spending untold millions is for their infamous creed.
The suggestion that that money towards paying the honest debts on its debts that they are repudiated is answered only by contemptuous steers and silence.
that's exactly what i was happy to go to that ever increasing tuesday the everlasting disgrace of the jewish bankers who are helping to finance it on the reasons who are doing nothing effective to check it what he's saying is that the second one to germany doesn't know why Well the fact is they were sending money to Germany because they couldn't pay the loans off the.
He said it was met with contemptuous sneers.
In other words, it was bullshit.
He was calling out their bullshit.
I don't like it at all.
Okay, all right, hold on, guys.
Let's uh let's dial it back a bit.
Um if we could start maybe on uh another uh subject here.
Um Dennis, have you seen the but the more recent video that I did with Björkness?
No.
Excuse me?
No.
Okay, you didn't see it.
And and you haven't uh you haven't gotten any of his books, right?
No.
Okay.
Um I was gonna ask you.
You're an ignoramus.
You misrepresented issue after issue.
You lied about Douglas Reed, you lied about Samuel Untermeyer.
You don't know what the hell you're talking about.
Of course, yeah.
Okay, hold on, hold on.
Uh so Dennis, um, I was gonna ask you, like it, you know, if you saw it, like what was something that you saw that like you had a question in your head, like how could this be possible if you know Hitler if uh what Chris is saying is is right.
I could what be possible?
Uh Well, if you watch the videos, I don't know, like how he says that uh What is your point of contention with my views is what he's asking?
Yes.
My point of contention is a ridiculous statement.
I don't think there was a communist.
Okay.
But it's all grouped 20 billion.
Hold on.
Hold on.
Let me just address that.
It how could you say it's ridiculous if you haven't read his book that's like you know, hundreds of footnotes and hundreds of pages where he lays out the evidence and his arguments for it?
Because he preempted Stalin to go into the Soviet Union with another six Christian nations to take down Bolshevism.
That's why I say it.
But that's the that's not answering the question though.
You if you say something's ridiculous, but you don't even know like what he's saying, like have you heard of this Kurt Eisner and he's given different reasons for that war.
I'm saying that every revolution from Mexico to Spain to even the German attempts at the German one, they were all revolutions stemming from the French Revolution, which is backed by jury and Freemasonry.
That's by where I'm coming from.
And the Nazi revolution was just another in that series.
Of course it was, yeah.
Oh, so it's the one exception.
It's the war that got Israel at more than they've ever wanted.
They won the war, that's why.
Um are you aware?
May I say something?
Yeah, go ahead, Chris.
Are you aware of the fact that Hitler's and Guring?
Guring himself opposed Operation Barbarossa, and that Hitler was in the ideal position to have the Soviet Union as an ally because the West would never dare attack a Germany combined with the Soviet Union.
Are you also aware that Stalin knew had foreknowledge of Operation Barbarossa and did absolutely nothing to resist it?
That's why the breakdown is it.
I'm sorry, what did you say?
And that's why I had a breakdown.
That's why he had a breakdown?
Who had a breakdown?
Stalin had a breakdown.
Are you denying that it is a historical fact documented by German spies in Japan that Stalin had foreknowledge and knew the precise date that Operation Barbarossa would commence and did absolutely nothing to resist it?
Are you aware of the fact the Soviet Union had intelligence from the German military throughout the war, including radio transmissions from Hitler's secretary?
I'm saying can I finish?
I'm saying that after Chutchill was defeated in Europe.
He ran to Roosevelt.
Roosevelt couldn't supply it.
You guys are not addressing each other's points.
That's what I'm saying.
I know what this is.
Excuse me.
Not even Germans knew about that invasion.
He had to keep it secret.
He said himself the only thing he had was surprised.
And when they invaded the Soviet Union, they were all there.
Millions of them captured that first week.
And the West still deny it today.
If you look at the memoirs of Vladimir Brezhnev, he tells us Stalin we're going to invade.
You're saying Hitler knew that Stalin was going to invade?
Yes.
Okay, Chris, do you have a response?
That great man saved all of Europe because Stalin would have gone straight to the course.
You're saying Hitler saved Europe?
Yes.
By by preemptive Stalin.
That's why the bankers deny it and the West education system.
They will have nothing to do with that.
Because they know if if Stalin invades, all Europe falls.
Are you there, Chris?
Chris.
I think we might have lost Chris.
Are we still streaming?
Chris, are you on mute?
Chris, are you on mute?
Hmm.
Chris, are you there?
Let me see what happened here.
I didn't hear it like doo doo.
Usually you hear if somebody drops off.
I resent being called at Graves, by the way.
Here's a question I have while uh while we see uh what's going on with Chris is we know that the six million number was being circulated and and talked about by many people, right?
Yeah.
So doesn't that make you think that they had this whole Holocaust narrative plan beforehand?
I showed in the Great Story never told them.
There were only about six million way back in the 1800s.
This is this is some kind of Jewish ritual.
This six million keeps cropping up everywhere, even though it's been proven since then that you know the full total, what they said after the war, Auschwitz was dropped by six million.
I am not dignifying this clown with responding while he talks over me.
This is asigned.
This man is a fool, he's lying, he will not acknowledge that he got anything wrong even after it's proven to him.
So this is not a debate.
This is a clown show that I don't want to participate in.
Okay, well, let's just say let's just go another 30 minutes.
We have 2,000 people in the chat.
They this is important information.
Let's just go another 30 minutes.
I've still got some questions.
Tell me if I'm allowed to speak without interruption.
And you set a timer because I'm going on and on as well.
I acknowledge that.
Okay, all right.
Some kind of way of limiting this to one point at a time.
Okay, please.
Please, Dennis, both of you uh the audience doesn't like it when you talk over each other.
Pl please finish one point and keep it to one point and allow a back and forth response.
So uh Chris, while while uh you you dropped off there, we were talking about the six million gomatria number and how uh can you talk about why you think that's proof that the whole thing was orchestrated as a as a big ritual?
Well, the six million figure, as Dennis Hedesheimer pointed out, was uh bantered about for decades before the Holocaust took place, even before Herzl came up with the idea of the transfer agreement.
So it was obviously a very important figure to the Jews, and they required it.
Now, how could they have this figure or claim this figure unless they put someone like Hitler into power to fulfill their 2500-year-old prophecy which called for six million to perish so that the Jews would return?
That's my point.
I just I just said the same thing, but this this six million figure has been quoted for long before World War II.
It seems to be some kind of Jewish ritual, six million, even though the ISW figures were dropped after the Ernst uh Zungel trial, they still say six million died.
Okay, so do you do you understand the the uh the implications of that?
That they needed a anti-Semitic government to come in and fulfill the their Judaic role of a homin Esau figure to persecute them and make them atone, they're willing to sacrifice their own so that they can return to their land.
You don't see what they needed, what they needed was somebody strong enough to stand up against them and galvanize Europe to fight the Bolsheviks.
And he did such a great job of it, right?
Kill 20 million of them.
Killed 20 million Russians.
Now, do you realize that he was able to get himself into power by condemning the Jews for killing 30 million Russians?
I've already told you everybody was going to power with the Vatican when the Vatican told the center party in Germany to vote him in.
And they voted him in, then they shut it down.
I've told you everybody.
Okay.
I'm sustained.
I told you already.
So you told me nothing, I already knew.
You know nothing, sir.
Oh, yeah.
In his propaganda, said that he wanted to fight Bolshevism because Bolshevism had killed 30 million Russians.
So how was he consistent in preserving Russian life by condemning the Slavs and killing 20 million Slavs?
Probably more like 30 million himself.
How does that uh vengeance?
It was at war with the Soviet Union Russians by slaughtering 30 million more.
Because he was at war with them.
He was at war with them because he made war on them in an unprovoked attack with a country that he had a non-aggression.
So Leonard Brezhnev is a liar then.
I'm sorry?
Who's a liar?
Leonard Brezhnev, a future president of the Soviet Union, who in his memoirs says Stalin was about to invade.
You're quoting, you're quoting a premier of the Soviet Union as evidence of the what happened in the Soviet Union?
That's foolish.
Yeah, that's like hit that's like Putin's laws, similar to Putin's laws now that you go to prison if you question their role or it's Europe is they all know about the invasion.
It's only in the West where they deny it.
And they do not deny it, because if it comes out that Hitler stopped a Stalin invasion of Europe, he's a hero.
Hitler did not stop a Stalin invasion of Europe.
Hitler expanded Stalin all the way to Eastern Germany.
Are you out of your mind?
Preempted Stalin.
He did not report Stalin.
Stalin knew exactly the day that Hitler would attack.
Would you address that issue?
You are saying that.
I'm saying to you that he kept it secret, Hitler, because he actually said the only thing going for it was surprise.
So he had to galvanized all these nations to invade the Soviet Union with nobody knowing.
Not even the Germans knew on the morning.
But Chris is saying, hold on, Dennis.
Chris.
Colin knew.
It's a documented historical fact.
Yeah, he's saying that it's Stalin knew.
Not that Hitler told all the Germans.
No, I'm saying to you, he didn't tell the German, he didn't tell anybody.
It's the only way you could take them by surprise.
And this clan is telling me that Stalin knew.
Well, all of a sudden he takes millions, millions of Soviet prisoners in that first week, and then heads on to take down Stalin who goes into a coma, practically.
And he not only did that, he basically is uh annihilated the Soviet Air Force.
And then what did he do?
He charged all the way to Smolensk on the way to Moscow and stopped.
just as he stopped at dunkirk and allowed the british to escape to england and he was stopped by the way the troops and he went towards leningrad and kiev Hold on, guys, hold on, hold on.
Let him let him finish.
The weather stopped him.
It's historical fact.
The worst winter for a decade, if not more.
Okay, the wet the winter is what what made him lose.
That's what you're saying.
No, it stopped him.
Stopped him.
That's a lie.
No, no, no, no, no, no.
You're you're full of you're wrong.
Dennis, Dennis.
Can I finish or I'm hanging up and I'm not coming back?
Stop calling me a liar.
Goodbye.
Dennis.
I'm curious.
Um, where where um like did you base your greatest story never told on a book or a couple books?
Where did where did you get the info for that?
Well, see the Germans trying to unfreeze one of the tanks outside of Moscow.
It was documentary footage.
Uh say that again.
I heard documentary footage.
Documentary footage the Germans were at the gates of Moscow, the weather had uh frozen everything up.
It was the worst winter on record.
Okay, I I see.
You're talking about just that point.
I'm asking just like in general.
Was there like a book or a couple books where you got most of the information of the history for the greatest story never told?
I'll let all the sources at the end, yeah.
Um, what what are some of them?
That's what I'm asking.
Like, what was there like did maybe David Irving's book or something?
I I use David David Irving.
I used several people.
Caroline Yeager, a few people who who devised Hitler.
The world is working.
Yeah, the the world is working up to uh uh the true story of World War II, and this is why people like Christopher are spinning more and more stories to try and deflect.
It's really that simple.
Well, you know, you say people like Christopher, but it's really there's there's not too many people out there that are saying this.
I know um Hollywood does.
Hollywood says that Hitler was controlled by Zionists?
Hollywood brings out the Jewish Hollywood just to demonize him.
I know they demonize him, but Chris addressed that point.
But Hollywood does not say what Bjorkness says, which is that the Zionists orchestrated.
Would you agree that that would anger them more if everybody was believing that Hitler was actually in the Holocaust were actually all the doing of Zionists?
Wouldn't that make them more mad than just Hitler was fighting them and lost?
It's just another way of demonizing Hitler.
It's another way of moving the walls.
Just like saying it's a Rothschild, just like saying, you know, his mother was uh, you know, uh through Rothschild and Adolf Hitler as a bass being there.
The same thing.
Been going on for years.
CIA haven't doing it for decades.
And Hollywood just perpetrated the demonized demonization, whichever angle they come from.
Well, here here here, listen to this.
In my view, like I've I've seen your documentary over the years, I've seen Last Europia, I I've seen or Europa, the last battle.
I've I know about this stuff.
When I heard Bjorkness's theories, I was intrigued, and I wanted to just see if there was uh truth to it.
So that's why I I looked into it.
It didn't make me it didn't make me like not just completely dismiss your documentary immediately or other information immediately, but I just was open-minded and wanted to see both sides.
Well, what I'm saying, though, there's a lot of people who know the truth about World War II who admire Adolf Hitler.
The money was for letting his nation realize what the threat was, who the threat was, and that he galvanized all of Europe to fight this threat of Bolshevism of Freemasonry.
And when you say now, or what he says now, that he was really working for the other side, that's just a demonizing just the same as any anything can come up with.
It's ridiculous.
Well, I wish Chris stayed on the line to uh address that.
Well, you know, he called me a liar and I'm still here.
Yeah, I wish uh you know he was angry about uh the interrupting.
It's uh it's hard to do.
I'll have to get a timer or something and just go like you know, 30 seconds stop and just have people agree to that because everybody thank you for watching.
That was uh Christopher John Bjorkness and producer of The Greatest Story Never Told.
New World Order, Communism by Back Door, and the Secret Masonic Victory of World War II.
Are aren't you working on another uh documentary as well, Dennis?
What's up, Adam?
Oh, you're back.
I'm back, but I'm not gonna discuss with this man because he won't let me speak.
Okay, well, well, we just talked about uh uh uh that we should allow 30 seconds and and stop.
So I I think the audience would probably like to uh we already arrived at that arrangement and he continued to interrupt me.
So he that's another lie.
He called me a clarinet of light, I'll join Julia.
Well, just still, you know, whatever they say, allow him to finish the point and keep it to one point and allow a response.
I can't stand by calling me a clerical liar.
I don't know.
I am a call when he was interrupting me.
He was interrupting me when I was stating facts about the fact that at Smolensk there was a halt order in the summer, and then he split his troops up to Leningrad and to Kiev, and he um terrorized the Ukrainian people who had treated the Nazis as liberators instead of taking Moscow.
And it was only later that he re-amassed his forces to go into Moscow, and he waited until the winter to do that and failed to provide his troops with winter clothing.
Now, those are the historical facts, and that proves that what Mr. Wise has said, let him finish proves it in your eyes.
He was finishing his point.
You can't you can't interrupt him midpoint.
He kind of saying he's putting it.
Okay, okay, all right.
Chris, uh or uh Dennis, can you respond to that about Hitler uh allowing them, not giving them coats?
The whole strategy of the German army was a blitzkrieg.
Hitler didn't know that this this winter was going to come earlier.
He, you know, he can't predict the weather.
Okay.
That was the most vicious winter ignorant decades.
It was a bad winter.
Here let's go back to the point we were just talking about, Dennis.
Hold on, Chris.
Stopped in the summer and then regrouped to attack as winter was approaching.
And I agree with you, the whole strategy was Blitzkrieg.
So why was he continually issuing these halt orders as he did at Dunkirk when he had the chance to conquer the British completely?
He didn't.
Hitler never wanted war.
He never wanted war.
He didn't want war with England.
He didn't want war.
He didn't want war on the Bolsheviks.
Not with England.
With the Bolsheviks.
I'm saying with England.
He never wanted war with them.
So he put the interests of the English ahead of the interests of the German people.
He offered a peace a peace proposal immediately after Dunder, Dunkirk.
In fact, you're for 22.
And not one reply from Churchill.
He after he allowed the British to uh have the British expedition can be.
Let him finish.
He didn't allow him anything.
This is ridiculous, Adam.
This is not a debate.
Okay, let's let here.
Chris, I want I want you to respond to a point that Dennis made when you dropped off there, and that was that he thinks that this theories like yours that you're that you're promoting right now, um, are just to suppress Hitler and him revitalizing opposition to communism and uh and Jewry.
So what does he want?
Does he want the Soviet Union to expand even further and Israel to take over uh Greater Israel as happened after Hitler?
Is that what Dennis wants?
It's not what Dennis wants.
What's happened has happened.
After World War II, one great empire has fallen, and another great empire is now taken over.
So whether you know you believe in right and left, there is no right and left now.
All it is is right and left of the Jews, which is why somebody like Trump and Putin are on one side and people like Clinton and Hollywood are on another side.
They're just debating what government to rule the new world order with, whether it be communism or something different.
And Trump and Putin don't want communism.
But whatever happens, that war decided ours the whole world to be ruled by the Jews.
Okay, okay, hold on.
You made a point there.
Hold on, Chris, hold on, Chris.
Chris, hold on.
Hold on.
Hold on.
Hold on, guys.
Hold on.
You you just said that Putin doesn't want communism.
I want to hear Chris respond to that.
Putin is a career KGB man.
The KGB has a reputation that once you're in it, you're never out of it.
Putin was director of the FSB, and he said that the greatest tragedy in history was the fall of the Soviet Union.
Now, in terms of the uh defeat of one empire by another, both Goebbels and Hitler said that it didn't matter whether the Russians won or the Germans won, because either way, socialism would win.
And at the end of the war, Hitler and Goebbels and Eichmann said that the Eastern power had been the greater power, and therefore nature had taken its natural course, and it was just that the German people be annihilated.
Can I answer that?
Yes.
And I want to add before you respond that they also viewed the Germans as amalek and as Hamen, and they are obligated by God to destroy them, and they wanted to genocide the Germans, and they did it, basically.
Go ahead and respond.
This old theory about socialism, that wasn't national socialism, was nothing to do with Marxist socialism.
In fact, there were two deadly enemies.
So when he's saying like that, whoever won it didn't really matter, of course it would have mattered.
Because we stopped interrupted.
I thought he had finished.
I'm sorry.
So what I'm saying is like that after the war, today, this is the reason why today we're getting all this communism seeping into our laws.
We can't talk about this, can't talk about that.
All the the sexual things like transgenderism and the gay movement, the civil rig movements are all communist movements, uh Jewish movements.
So at the end of the day, that would not have happened if Hitler would have won.
Okay, go ahead, Chris.
Hitler would have won if he had simply allowed his generals to win.
And he lost the war by issuing these halt orders and abandoning his blitzkrieg policies.
So it was quite obvious that Hitler was self-defeating, and that is further proven by the fact that the whole Nazi hierarchy, right up to Hitler's secretary, Martin Bormann, were Soviet spies and were transmitting the military plans of the Germans to the Soviets.
Among this group was the Rhoda Capella, which was uh ingrained in Goring's Luftwaffe, and Göring um attended the wedding of the head of the Rhodocapella and gave away the bride at his wedding.
Now Hermann Göring was raised by a Jewish millionaire who slept with Göring's mother and fathered Göring's brother.
Okay.
Dennis?
Yeah, well, we go back to this sleeping with the Jews again of an Abbaschal, which is ridiculous words.
He wasn't talking about Hitler being a Rothschild, he was talking about the.
No, I was talking about Goring.
Yeah.
Same thing.
So explain to me uh who was this Jewish man I'm referring to?
Are you familiar with this history at all?
What I'm familiar with.
Are you familiar with the history?
Two empires clashed.
No, no, no, no, no.
Address his direct point.
I don't agree with direct points.
The whole reasonable point.
What is my direct point, Dennis?
You're saying that Hitler was and all the nuts, the Nazis were on the side of the communists secretly.
And then he's asking you if you're familiar with the source who's talking about it.
That a Jew named Hermann von Eppenstein, whom Hermann Göring was named after by his mother, because his mother was sleeping with this man while his father slept in the guest house, fathered Hermann Göring's brother Albert Gering, who rescued Jews and stood between the Nazis and the Jews, and that Albert Gering looked exactly like Hermann von Eppenstein.
So you said he said you're ignorant.
Why don't you just familiar?
Well, Dennis, if if you said you're not familiar with the source and and where Björkness is uh sort uh citing this from, then technically you you don't know about it.
Well, he's he's pulling the hands outside.
No, it's not.
He's he's telling you what the source is.
You just said that this is this is his own conclusions that he's brought to the table, which hasn't been.
He said that early on.
Okay, it's from the right.
Let me let me back it up.
Hold on.
A point you made earlier, and Chris tried to try to uh respond, but we we moved topics.
That was that you said that socialism and communism are opposed to each other.
No, Chris, it isn't it communists and capitalism are opposed to each other, and socialism is kind of like a stepping stone in the middle.
Capitalism funds communism.
Absolutely.
That's what Marx said that socialism is the gateway to communism.
And remember, remember, can I finish, please?
Yes.
I was not finished.
The Soviet Union was the union of Soviet socialist republics.
Communism never took place.
The Soviet Union was the socialist step towards communism.
And the only difference that the Nazis made from the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics was that they were promoting a nationalist movement instead of an internationalist movement.
But they said that that was the proper way to lead towards the international socialist movement.
Okay, okay, hold on.
And I want to and I want to add something there, and then get let Dennis respond.
Didn't Goebbels and Hitler have have critics that they were Bolsheviks early on in their careers?
And then also if there was always these rumors going on even back then, does that really prove that they're not true, or just that they were already getting accused of that early on, and possibly it is true?
Otto Strasser directly accused Hitler of answer.
That was directed back to Chris.
And just a short response, Chris.
Yes, it was well known, and they were called beefsteak Nazis because they wore brown shirts on the outside but were red communists at heart.
And Otto Strasser uh publicly declared that Hitler was working for the Bavarian Soviet Republic and mocked him by saying, where was the soldier in the streets of Bavaria when we were fighting against the communists?
Okay, go ahead.
Go ahead, Dennis.
Your response.
I'm saying national socialism isn't Marxist socialism.
They're sworn enemies.
It's just a simple fact.
Simple fact.
Simple fact.
That's what Hitler said in his speeches and in his his book, his books.
Yeah.
No, Hitler said that he would welcome the communists into the national socialist movement because the communists, unlike the capitalists, had the true spirit.
Didn't well that Sans and killing everybody, wouldn't it?
Didn't didn't the socialists in the market and the communists have more associations than with the West?
Well, first of all, it's false to presume that the communists were communists.
Communism is a historical stage which had not occurred yet.
The Bolsheviks were republic.
They said outrageous statements.
If you say the Bolsheviks were communists, how?
Tell me.
How were the Bolsheviks not?
I just did tell you.
Because they established the Soviet Socialist Republic, not the Soviet communist republic.
Communism was an ideal phase that was to occur after the historical development of socialism washed away capitalism and created the means of production which would allow for communism is internationalism.
Unless that invading more or less soon as they got in power.
Poland was one of them.
Adam, it's kind of ridiculous for me to speak to this man who doesn't know what he's talking about.
Well, well, let's just keep seeing the issues in the audience and the other thing.
If you want to talk about internationalism, you just said that Hitler led an international coalition to attack the Soviet Union.
So Hitler was an internationalist and forced into that.
He couldn't wait for Stalin to embed Europe.
Whether he would have forced him to it or not, he did it.
He was an inner actor.
Why does he have to do it?
He was forced into it.
Otherwise, all Europe.
Didn't Hitler have the Sykes Pax uh Pikes Agreement with the with the Soviet Union?
And that didn't they agree to split Poland or something like that also?
Yeah, but I'm not talking about that era of Poland.
I'm talking about 1920.
When the when the you know the international communists invaded Poland.
Okay.
Hitler had nothing to do with stopping the internationalist communist invasion of Poland.
The Polish people did.
And Hitler said punished them for it.
Can I finish a sentence without being...
Because you're choosing me as well.
You're insane.
Dennis, you've got to let him finish his points, though.
No matter what he says, just let him finish the point and then respond.
I never said Germany stopped the Russia, the Bolsheviks from invaded Poland.
Get that one right.
So you're just saying that they did invade Poland in the 20th century.
No, I'm saying the next he had to preemptively invade that.
He's saying it was socialists.
And in 1939, the international socialist Nazi government invaded Poland too.
So what's the difference?
Because he has to invade because he was being threatened of invasion himself.
That's a lie.
He was not being threatened.
That's not a lie at all, it's a fact.
Where's the fact from?
The fact in 1939, which is what I said, I wasn't talking about Operation Barbarossa in 1941.
I was talking about the invasion of Poland by the Nazis at the same time Stalin invaded Poland.
So Hitler helped Stalin to again invade Poland.
So Hitler expanded the Soviet Empire not only into Poland, but he allowed Stalin.
Can I finish?
He allowed Stalin Baltic nations.
The reason that he he gave half of Poland to Stalin was because at that time the German minorities in Poland were facing pogroms and murders.
And he has to invade, but if he invaded, it was frightened of the fact that France and Britain would declare war.
But he thought that if he could evade with Stalin Bedanus, well, nobody would declare war.
Chris?
They did declare war on him, but not on Stalin for a reason.
Because the banks ruled the Soviet Union.
The Baltic nations were historic German territories by the uh the Volksdeutsche were throughout Memo, and all of the historic areas of the Baltics were filled with Volksdeutsche Germans.
And he allowed Stalin to come in there and eventually mass murder millions of them.
And he did that under no threat whatsoever.
He in the German minority.
And I finish.
He saved the German minority Poland.
Adam, this is ridiculous.
It's not ridiculous.
A fact.
They were being murdered.
And you know they were.
The people were not being murdered in significant numbers that would justify the invasion of Poland.
Let me ask you.
Let me ask you a question, okay?
Let me ask a question.
The real issue involved in that was not murders of Germans in Poland.
That's a bunch of BS.
The real issue was the Danzig corridor so that the Germans could obtain access to East.
That was one reason.
The main reason he has to eventually eventually was because of the killings.
Okay, I got a question.
Hitler declaring war on America, Britain, and the Soviet Union.
Do you think he didn't declare war on?
He only declared war on the USA.
Okay, well, still, while he was already at war with the Soviet Union in Britain, doesn't that seem I I've heard that described as like a suicide mission along with uh the invasion of the Soviet Union.
Can we talk about that a bit?
Yes, we did on that.
Otherwise, Stalin, Stalin's army of six million, whatever it were, would have overrun Europe.
Okay, Chris.
Hitler declared war on the United States of America, even though America had not declared war on Germany, because the Japanese attacked America in an unprovoked aggressive attack on Pearl Harbor.
And Hitler claimed that he had a treaty with the Japanese, which forced him to do so, but the treaty specified that there would be no need to join in any aggressive war of the combatants.
So Hitler had no obligation whatsoever to declare war on America.
In addition to that, the Japanese, at the same time that Hitler was being forced back into retreat by the Soviets, refused to attack the Soviet Union.
So the Japanese were not an ally of the Germans and had betrayed the Germans to the Soviets because the Japanese, instead of attacking America, should have attacked the Soviets, and then the Nazis and the Imperial Japanese could have forced Stalin into a two-front war.
The reason they didn't attack the Soviet Union is because of the war with the U.S. Because Schiff funded both of them, right?
Schiff funded the Bolshevik Revolution and the Japanese to take on the Tsar.
What I'm saying is, hold on, everybody stop.
Stop.
Both of you stop.
What are you telling?
Stop, Dennis.
He's just fault.
You're saying I think Dennis.
So Chris, you're saying what I just said is wrong?
That Jacob Schiff didn't No, what Dennis said is wrong.
Dennis said that they didn't attack the Soviet Union because they were involved with a war with America.
That's not true.
They had a non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union prior to attacking America.
And that's why they felt emboldened to attack America because they knew that if they attacked America, the Soviet Union would not attack them.
And that was a great boom to Stalin to be able to crush the Nazi forces because he was not forced to face a true front war against Germany and Japan.
So Hitler, knowing that, knowing that the Japanese had entered into a non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union, still betrayed The German people to Japanese interests, just as he betrayed the German people to British interests.
He allowed the British to escape to Dunkirk.
He declared war on America, knowing after the first world war that America's interests into the war led to the defeat of Germany, and inevitably ensured his own defeat.
And all this happened exactly at the time.
Momentum of the war shifted to the Soviet Union and they began to chase the Nazis back all the way to Berlin.
The reason, the reason why Japan attacked America, which was made so much easier for them by Roosevelt, was the fact that the oil embargo on Japan would have stopped their war with China.
Their war against communism.
And they signed an agreement with Germany to fight communism.
But they couldn't find both.
Let them finish, Chris.
I'm saying that the Japanese was fighting China to stop communist spreading in Southeast Asia.
Without oil, it would have grown to a halt.
And Roosevelt put the pressure on them, knowing full well that they wouldn't accept the terms.
And so Japan attacked America, but the ships were left there to be attacked anyway.
There's enough documented evidence to put Roosevelt on trial for being a traitor.
The point being it was the only way that he could get in the war.
And rather than put all the resources into the Pacific, he then started making plans to help Stalin in Europe.
Japan did not attack China to halt communism spreading in uh that's complete nonsense.
It is true that uh Japan attacked the U.S. because of oil issues and many other issues and wanted to chase it, it was mostly because of their racial arrogance.
They thought they would have an easy time defeating the Americans.
And they attacked because they knew they had a non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union.
Now, if they were trying to stop communism from spreading, they should have been fighting the Soviet Union together with Hitler.
So what you're saying makes absolutely no sense and does not.
Makes a lot of sense because of what about America?
When you're fighting America as well, it makes a lot of sense not to fight the Soviet Union as well.
So why didn't Japan attack the Soviet Union?
Because the Japanese is anti-communist, they should have attacked the Soviet Union, not America.
They wouldn't know if it wasn't for Roosevelt.
Put the oil embargo on them.
Would have, could have, should have.
Why didn't they?
Because they have to fight America.
Do you know how big America is?
They didn't have to fight America.
America wasn't at war with Japan.
No, they would put an embargo on them.
They would have had no way else to fight China.
Why did they have to fight China?
Why were the Imperial Japanese...
Because they wanted to stop communism.
There was no communism in China.
What are you talking about?
Communism came to China in like the mid-50s, right?
48, I think it was.
48?
There were communist forces before that in China.
There were minor communist forces.
I don't see any minor there, I think.
They wanted to stop communism.
They didn't fight a communist government when they attacked China.
Aren't you aware of that?
No, we shared that moment, remember.
If they were fighting communists, they shouldn't have attacked America.
They should have attacked the Soviet Union.
They had to attack America.
Instead, they had a non-aggression pact.
Deprived of oil.
They had been fighting the Soviet Union, that's true, but they entered into a non-aggression pact at the exact moment to set up Stalin to wage a major offensive against Germany.
That Japan betrayed Germany by allowing Stalin to move his troops from the east to the west to fight Germany.
And even as Japan had entered into that betrayal of Germany, Hitler declared a war on America to support Japan.
So he was ensuring his own defeat and propping up Stalin.
So what was Japan supposed to do with it if he had no oil?
But it's well, if they attack America, they had Japan should have had to do.
I'm telling you what.
Let me answer.
Japan attacked America and ended up getting nuked for it, basically.
So it didn't help them with their oil.
No, well, that's the high side.
What I'm saying to you is what would you have done with no oil?
Let's talk about what's talk about the point.
America was putting a squeeze on Japan, which would have left them without oil.
They would have got oil somewhere else, probably.
People go around embargoes.
They had other types of industrial resources, and they could have gotten oil from the Nazis had they helped the Nazis to defeat the Soviet Union.
And they took over Romania and they were flooded with oil at one point, too.
The point was that it was desperately essential to defeat the Soviet Union if you're trying to defeat international communism, which you alleged was Japan's goal.
So why can I finish?
I've just told you why, because in oil.
He didn't attack the Soviet Union because they had no oil.
They were engaged in a war with the Soviet Union.
If they had no oil, how could they fight the United States?
They were fighting China.
If they had no oil, how could they attack the United States?
Well, they would have had no oil.
That's why they attacked the United States.
If they had no oil.
I think I think we could talk about a more interesting topic than the Japanese oil, to be honest, guys.
You want to change uh change gears here a bit?
The Japanese set up the Germans for failure by allowing Stalin to move his troops from the east to the west to attack Germany.
That's when the major offensive came and it became uh an option for Stalin only because the Japanese allowed that to happen.
And after that happened, Hitler betrayed the German people and supported the Japanese by declaring war on America.
And David, can you stop?
David Irving quoted Hitler.
Hitler as saying I will never declare war.
And the only time he did it was to betray the German people by declaring war on America and enabling America to supply the Soviet Union with all the resources it needed to drive Hitler back to Berlin.
He explained why he declared war, which was censored in America.
The Americans were already in the war, covertly anyway.
There were German ships getting taken back to America, prisoners put in jail.
Already.
This is without even official war.
Roosevelt wanted to be in the United States.
They did support America was supporting the Soviet Union and the British in the war before.
Of course they were.
America was not wanting to fight a war against Germany, especially not after the Japanese had attacked the United States of America.
America did not want to do a World War I redux.
America was hell-bent on defeating Japan as quickly as possible.
And forced America to send forces eventually into Europe to fight Germany.
He's going on.
And he's lying.
What was a lie?
Refute it, friend.
The population of America didn't want a war in Europe.
Roosevelt wanted a war.
And Hitler gave the silver platter.
The American war and Lindsay's war.
He even instigated the Polish campaign.
He was behind France and Britain, giving them a bank check.
Roosevelt wanted to be in that war.
It came out to the streets where he said America's border is on the Rhine.
Or to bring the American people into the war.
The only way that they could bring the American people into the war in Europe was to have Hitler declare war, and that's exactly what Hitler did.
Already in the war.
He completely betrayed the German.
Are you saying, are you saying if Hitler hadn't declared war, then America would have just attacked Japan and not Germany?
Are you really saying that?
Of course.
and they deserve him for.
Thought was so naive.
Naive.
Why don't we talk about uh was there a point that that that you wanted to get to, either one of you?
On a different issue?
Yeah, the point is it's farcical to say that Hitler was the greatest man in history when he killed 50 million people, destroyed Germany, and allowed Stalin to take over all of Eastern Europe and allowed the Jews to steal the land of Palestine from the Palestinians.
I'd say he's the most horrific figure in history for doing that.
Not my point.
You had a war to fire.
And he was the closest of anybody to try checking them down.
He almost did take them down.
If it were for America, he would have took them down.
Yeah, and he declared war on America, so America could take it.
He explains why he declared war in America.
America been in that war covertly anyway.
Roosevelt said ships, it's war zones, hoping that the Germans would fire on them.
And what did he gain to the Soviet Union?
Please explain what he gained by declaring war.
Ain't no option.
Because once they were in the war.
I'm just telling you.
Once Japan and America got involved in a war, that was Roosevelt's backdoor to the war in Europe.
Simple.
It doesn't take rocket science.
You're not answering my question.
Did Hitler give Germany by declaring war on America?
Explained the reasons why.
Yeah, but what advantage did it give them?
Like people say it was a suicide mission to declare war on all the superpowers.
Listen, what difference is it if you declared war or not?
Answer my question.
I'm asking you.
You're saying Adolf Hitler was the greatest man in history.
So what this great man achieved by declaring war on America.
Let him ask the question, Dennis.
Let him ask the question.
I'm asking him a question.
Okay, what's your question then?
I'm saying what difference is it made if Hitler declared war or not?
If he attacked America without declaring war, what difference would it make?
Surprise.
That's the uh um we could be in the war.
Dennis, you've said that before.
Let him respond.
As stating it was foolish and an art and an archaic old-time arcane process to declare war.
It was much better to launch surprise attacks.
And he said he would never declare war.
And the one and only time he declared war was to one and only time you believe in is waiting for your favorite that was unprovoked, and he had no and betrayed the German people by doing it.
And you cannot provoke at all that gave him.
Not a supervolt gave him.
That wasn't unprovoked.
America was supposed to be neutral.
Just sending arms to arms to Britain and to Russia.
Well, wasn't America funding Hitler too?
Like with the Bush family and Ford and all IBM.
Rumors.
Those are all rumors?
Rumors.
This man is nonsensical.
He knows nothing.
I've told you the banks were saying to Germany.
I want to shift shift gears, all right, guys.
Chris, I want you to give uh just like a very brief um overview of how the assimilation and the atonement and um wanting anti-Semitism and then and then allow uh Dennis to ask his question or respond, okay.
Okay, yeah, from the 1890s onward, Jews were becoming heavily assimilated in Germany, the United States, and then after the Bolshevik revolution, they be started to become heavily assimilated in the Soviet Union through a process called red assimilation because the Jews ran the Soviet Union,
they started to become integrated into society, and the Zionists feared that this would cause the dissolution of the Jewish race, and the Jewish race would disappear through German assimilation of the wealthy Jews and through the red assimilation of the communists.
So they were forced, because they uh much wanted communism to be successful to create an anti-Semitic communism, which became National Socialist Germany, so that they could both expand the Soviet Union and force the Jews to not assimilate with Gentiles.
And the Nuremberg laws, according to Julia Streicher, were based on mosaic law, which absolutely forbid Jews to marry and interbreed with non-Jews, and the Nuremberg laws were embraced by the Zionists and were celebrated by the Zionists because they ended the process of assimilation.
The other aspect of your question was to obtain atonement.
The Jews believed that their Messiah could not, would not, and had not arrived because the Jews had not atoned for their sins of assimilating, marrying foreign wives, and worshipping foreign gods, so that they had to be punished.
And the figure that they needed to obtain that atonement so that they could steal the land of Palestine from the Palestinians was six million, and Hitler gave it to them.
It wasn't true, but they put forward the myth that that had occurred.
Dennis?
God, you don't have to go on.
Says that much, you forget what he says.
Well, he he said the first point is assimilation.
The Jews in Germany and in Europe, especially under communism and Bolshevism were assimilating, and the Zionists hated that because they need anti-Semitism to perpetuate their religion and their race.
So they wanted anti-Semitism.
They wanted an anti-Semitic movement to pressure and incentivize the Jews to go down to Palestine, and the ones that didn't, they wanted to sacrifice as a burnt offering Holocaust to for their atonement.
And what was it?
The Rebbe said that they were uh reincarnated.
Put it this way.
The Nuremberg laws were no different to the laws of the Catholic Church brought out.
Century four, a couple of centuries before, where they kept the Christians away from the Jews by putting the Jews in the ghettos.
All they were doing was doing the same as what the Catholic Church had done.
Okay, Chris, ghetto.
That's simple.
Talk about the ghettos and how they self-segregated in love the ghettos.
The Alexandrian Jews in the Egyptian Empire segregated themselves into ghettos.
The Jews had a practice of wiring their homes together to form the ghettos.
Dennis's hero Adolf Eichmann said that we didn't have to create the ghettos because the Jews themselves had created the ghettos centuries before.
There's a whole chapter on my book.
There's a long history.
Theodore Herzl said that he wanted to create a world ghetto in Palestine in 1895, long before Hitler ever dreamed of taking over Europe.
The problem is, right?
The whole idea that the Catholic Church created the ghettos is a false history.
It's not a false.
That's the point.
Let them respond there.
The problem is that we're fighting a warrior for two different beliefs.
Right.
I believe, right?
Just like World War One, which it was just a continuation of that war.
When the great old empires of Europe, we're all the monarchs of the Catholic Church was fighting against this free money, Freemason and Talmudic Empire, which was coming, run by the Roschals.
And that was just a continuation.
And since that time, we've seen the demise of Christianity and uh the rise in the the way that communism is now taking over Western Europe.
And Zionism, which is Judaiz Christianity.
I think Chris will agree with all those points.
Chris, can you talk about uh World War I and World War II and how that's set up for Israel?
Can I respond to that briefly?
Because he's trying to pin this on the Catholic Church.
Okay, go ahead.
World War I was fought between three cousins, Kaiser Wilhelm II, Nicholas II in uh in Russia, and uh George V in Great Britain.
It was a battle between pan-Slavism and pan-Germanism.
Uh, both movements were created by Jews primarily in Austria to set up this war because the German Jewish bankers wanted to take over Russia, chase out the Tsar, emancipate the Jews, and then gain access to all the resources of the Russian Empire.
And all this was arranged under the uh Kaiser Wilhelm's administration and before that Bismarck was setting all of this up.
So the idea that it was the Catholic Church and the Christians who were doing all this is nonsense.
It was the monarchies themselves, and they were interrelated who set up World War I and started World War II.
So why was the Palton for Versailles?
Versailles was a Jewish operation to set up World War II.
Whose side?
What'd you say?
Whose side?
Whose side?
Who said?
Is that what you're saying?
I missed the first part of what you said.
Who said it?
Or I'm saying that the Pope was not allowed to go to the Versailles Peace Treaty.
He was under house arrest.
Right.
So what I'm saying is, he's saying to me, it's got nothing to do with the Catholic Church.
And why would it ban him?
Well, perhaps the Catholic Church wanted a voice at Versailles to keep the Jews from doing what they were going to do.
I dare say, but leading the church.
And I don't know about what you're saying.
I don't find you a credible source, and I had never heard that.
Well, I find your sources a little bit incredible.
What I'm saying is Versailles, it wasn't the fact we're all told that the leaders of uh the victorious nations took along the Jewish advisors.
When in fact 170 Jews went to Versailles and took along the Stooges.
That's what I'm saying.
I agree completely with that.
Before you said it was Freemasons.
Now you've got Freemasons.
Ross Shab were a Freemason.
What do you think all the Boer war was?
That was all about Freemasonry.
The whole British Empire is about Freemasonry.
If uh we had uh, say Eskimos who had a little club they called Iggy Iggy, would we say that the Eskimos are iggyiggies in instead of primarily Eskimos?
Well we'd say if the easiest way to infiltrate other countries is by setting up lodges, which the top hierarchy are well aware of, then so be it.
But Germany were wise to it, Spain was wise to it, and so was Italy.
And so was Japan.
And so was Stalin.
Yes, maybe because it ended at war so it upset him when he took back a train load from Berlin of all Masonic gatherings, what Germany gathered from all over Europe, somewhat upset him because suddenly he wasn't playing ball.
So you're saying Stalin was a good guy too, huh?
No, I'm not saying he's a good guy at all.
Not one bit.
What I'm saying is he must have seen somebody didn't like and realized that what the situation was, to much to the point that in 1950, the Americans bombed his bases.
Because he wasn't playing ball.
He had Eastern Europe, but the bankers were making no money whatsoever.
And the Jews actually poisoned him.
So I hope uh the audience realizes that this guy is celebrating Putin, Stalin.
I'm not celebrating them at all.
Three words in your mouth.
And uh it should be obvious to anyone with any kind of sense that these three guys are communists who were destroyed.
Stalin masses.
Stalin turned out.
All right, all right, guys.
All right.
Don't put words in my mouth.
Okay, so so you you're not supporting Stalin?
No, I never have to.
You never have to?
I never have done.
You never have done.
Okay.
So he doesn't support Stalin.
Well why why were you saying that, Chris?
Well, what's he saying?
He's saying that Stalin did these great things.
I'm saying Stalin turned at some point towards the end of the war.
So you so you do you're talking about Stalin in the purges of the Jews and that he was turning against the purged the Jews after that.
Chris, do you have a response to that?
Of course I have a response to that.
Again, it was to end red assimilation and to set up what eventually took place in the 70s when all the Jews were allowed to leave the Soviet Union when the Christians were not, so that they could go to Israel and uh build up the new nation of Israel.
That's why Stalin did all that.
And to claim that he was anti-Semitic and turned on them is absolute nonsense.
And uh why are we not fooled?
Let him finish sentence because his wife was Luxarkonovich, the mass murderer of the Ukrainian people's sister.
And you say he's he's not.
Well, carry on.
You do talk rubbish.
You're saying he's anti-Semitic laws for the death penalty.
Yeah, Stalin has.
I don't know what the hell he's talking about.
No, I do.
Stalin it was illegal to be anti-Semitic and Stalin Soviet Union.
Yes, they were also actually the Pravda, all about it.
Of course.
Stalin.
Oh, of course, yes.
Now all of a sudden, of course.
Well, what do you mean?
That's that's not a good thing to have laws that death penalty for anti-Semitism.
What I'm saying is he turned on the Jews at the end as well.
Because he somewhat upset him.
He weren't playing balls with the Allies anymore.
The Allies were pissed, because he had Eastern Europe.
You're saying that Stalin had laws where it's death penalty for anti-Semitism.
That's a horrible thing, though.
It's not a good thing.
How is that turning on the Jews?
How is that turning on the Jews?
He turned on the Jews at the end.
He had anti-Semitic laws in the beginning when he first took over.
All those laws were put in place by Lenin and Trotsky.
Yeah, of course.
They were still there with Stalin.
And Stalin didn't actually Brab's appraising him.
He can't criticize the Jews.
But at the end of the war, he turned on the Jews.
And they eventually punched it.
Turn on the Jews by having a Jewish wife.
How did he turn on the Jews by keeping Lazar Kaganovich as primary advisor, though?
He's asking the question, Dennis.
Yeah, well, I'm telling him he fell out with the Allies.
He must have seen some, I don't know.
He took a train load of uh Masonic stuff back to uh Moscow.
Uh and if he saw some of what he weren't supposed to see, which is pretty obviously one of them, then something turned him.
And suddenly he wasn't playing ball game anymore.
Can you address my question, please?
How did he turn on the Jews by keeping Lazar Kaganovich and marrying Lazar Kaganovich's sister Rosa in power the whole way to the end?
How is it?
He didn't turn on the Jews.
Are you saying he didn't turn on the Jews then at the end?
Is that what you're saying?
He had farcical shows and purges of the Jews.
And I can't say that he's in the turn on the Jews.
The Soviet Union could eventually allow the Jews to escape the Soviet Union into Palestine and steal Palestine from the Palestinian people.
Okay, you explained that, Chris.
Dennis, um, how would it be?
That's another aspect to it.
They wanted to create the Soviet Union as if they were an ally of the uh Muslim people so that the U.S. would then be obliged to arm Israel as an ally against the spread of communism through the United States.
America's US anyway.
They decided the policy.
Vigil London.
They can't just snap their fingers and make it happen.
They need pretext to convince the American people that these things are justified.
Yeah, but look at their indental.
Let's back up a second, because we didn't we didn't hammer down a point.
Okay, Dennis said that Stalin was purging the Jews and turning on the Jews.
Um what does that mean?
He turned on a few government officials.
And if they were all Jews, wouldn't it be inevitable that whoever you would purg would be a Jew?
That's absolutely not true.
Yeah, okay.
Response, Dennis.
He turned on the Freemasons as well.
This is silly, Adam.
No, it's not silly at all.
So if you think Stalin turned on the Freemasons and the Jews, you you do see him in a positive light.
No, because I I don't see that as possible at all.
I just see that Stalin seeing the allies of what they are.
Backstabbing double talking murderers.
Well, not may not support Stalin at all.
You know, Chris, you just mentioned Operation SIG with the whole arming the Arabs and having America support Israel.
Can can you talk in and then Dennis mentioned Catholics supporting the the Hitler, but they kind of try to deny that now, but then the Jews are always trying to implicate the Catholic Church, and that that kind of ties in with Perestroika deception and Operation Sig that uh I forget the guy's name now, but can you touch on that a bit and see if we we can follow that thread a tad?
Well, maybe eventually I'll publish a volume four while I'll talk about what happened after the war and how Bormann and uh Gestapo Müller and Hitler escaped the Fuhrer bunker over to the Soviet Union, and then uh a couple of them went over to South America to help arrange the economic recovery after the war.
This was all set up to create the Cold War and to pit the West against the East for an endless struggle, and that was also utilized to arm up uh Israel and make Israel a firm ally, supposedly of the U.S. against the encroaching Soviet Union, even though Israel was all founded by Bolshevik Jews who were deeply embedded in Russia.
So yes, it was all a trap.
And the reason I suspect the Catholic Church was helping with that was because they had the means to do so.
Dennis, I'm sure Dennis, you have a response about Hitler escaping, correct?
Well, you look at the states of Christianity today, you'll look at what's happening since Vatican II.
There is no Catholic Church today.
Christianity's weakest ever, and that's all because of the end of World War II.
It was defeated.
60 odd million Christians were dead across the fields of Europe, and two million uh German women, Christian women were raped.
And Israel got their state.
World War II started.
Yeah, because they won that war.
They wouldn't have got that state of Germany won't he.
But you're saying that World War II.
But World War II started in September of 1939 when Hitler launched an unprovoked attack on Poland.
It wasn't provoked at all.
And I have documents to prove it.
Well, we kind of we argued that a little bit.
I don't know.
Does the chat think that actually behind all of that?
What?
Roosevelt was behind all of that.
All Hitler wanted was to end that Raside Treaty, which was in effect, they stabbed over almost a million Germans to bring them to the table to sign that treaty.
A million Germans stabbed.
Because it was a death warrant to Germany.
At least 750,000 Germans starved to death.
It was vicious.
That's during the war.
Another million.
That's World War I. That's World War I. Thank you.
Thank you.
Yeah, I do want to add that I mean we have like some common common agreements here, like at the highest level.
There's just a disagreement on the leadership of Germany at this specific time.
And the reason for the war.
Yeah, and the reason.
Well, well, I I mean, I think we both agree that World War I and World War II were both orchestrated, and basically, look what's happened ever since.
Look how well it turned out post-war for Israel.
Now their position in the world and their dominance, and it's like all according to prophecy, essentially.
Well, they won that war, but if you hadn't won the war, there would be no Israel today.
There'll be no communism today.
There'll be no transgenderism today.
There'll be nothing on that.
Can we talk a little bit about the transfer agreement?
We got five more minutes and it's two hours, but we didn't even touch on the transfer agreement and the Zionist collusion like at all.
The reason for the transfer agreement, which was only revealed in the mid-1980s by Adrian Black, whose parents disowned him for actually showing the world that the Jews didn't actually Germany.
We had the shirts on the back.
And they then came up with a story that they made that Hitler was in with it.
All Hitler wanted to do was get rid of an alien force in his country.
Nobody else in the world will accept them.
And the only peaceful means getting all these Jews, as many Jews as he could out of Germany, was via the Zionists.
And at the time they had a blockade on him, and they come to an agreement that ease the blockade off him, if they can check these Jews, and he even had their money transferred down to down to uh Palestine.
We can set up the banks so they could sell the goods in Germany, and when they got there, they got their money.
Okay.
The Jews never ever were the victims.
Got it, yes.
That's your take.
And Chris, I want to get yours, but I just wanted to add that Edmund Black also said that he has even more information of the collaboration between the Nazis and the Zionists that he hasn't put out because of the blowback he got.
But Chris, your thoughts on transfer agreement.
It is false to claim that the transfer agreement was unknown until Edwin Black's book.
There were many numerous major histories, most major histories mentioned it.
The transfer agreement was simply the fulfillment of Theodore Herzl's book, The Jewish State in Search of a Solution to the Jewish problem.
And it fulfilled that book to the letter.
Theodore Herzl said provided the plan for the entire thing, including the figure of Adolf Hitler as an anti-Semitic government to sponsor it.
So it was planned prior to Hitler and Hitler was put in power to fulfill it.
Hitler was not forced into it, which is a absurd notion.
Who said he were forced?
Who said he was forced?
Coerced with the boycott?
No, I said it was the only peaceful means of getting rid of an alien race from his country.
It wasn't forced.
In fact, Soldman said no.
Let him finish, Chris, and then you can ask.
No other country would accept him.
So he has to get rid of them, and the only way he could get rid of them peacefully was by going to this agreement.
Nobody denies they have an agreement with the Zionists.
What's twisted after is the fact that the Jews didn't want this norm particularly?
They wanted the Jews leaving Germany without the shirts on the back.
Playing the victim as usual.
Okay.
How do you respond to the fact that the entire plan was put in writing and publicly disseminated in 1896, including the idea that an anti-Semitic government would be the sponsor of it?
Well, use your say of that.
I need to see evidence of it.
Then you haven't read Herzl's book and you don't know what you're talking about.
No, you you haven't studied the reasons for Hitler getting rid of the Jews, so you don't know what you're talking about.
I have studied the reasons for Hitler getting rid of the Jews.
Really?
Really?
I just told you the reasons.
He was fulfilling Theodore Herzl's book.
You know, I I gotta say I've read the passages from the books of the early Zionists and the early Nazis, and they did have the same mindset when it came with it's impossible for them to assimilate, and the answer.
They both agreed.
First the Herzl and then Zoom.
Come on, let me do this.
Let me finish.
Let me finish.
Come on.
First, the Zionists in Herzl said the solution to the Jewish question is Zionism, is immigration to Palestine.
And then the Nazis got into power and said had the exact same mindset.
It's true.
Not only the whole point was against the Jews.
Is that what you're saying?
Yes, Herzl hated assimilating Jews, and it's in Jewish prophecy and history to sacrifice their own.
Hitler didn't want his race mixing either.
Social Darwinism was popular at that time, and the Nazis had the relevant.
The relevant point is that Theodore Herzl set forward the whole scheme for the transfer agreement in 1896.
The Nazis did not create it.
The Zionists did not create it in the Nazi era.
They created it prior to the Nazi.
And may I before Hitler?
and put hitler in power and then immediately obstructed all the boycotts and all the atrocity propaganda to unseat hitler when he was most vulnerable they propped up the german economy and hitler propped up the zionist economy And Zionism would not have been.
Cleaned up Berlin, everything which declined of the Jews, cleaned up Germany eventually.
Everything that was decadent to the Jews, including the movies, including the books, what were being burnt, were all communist books.
So end of the day, Hitler got rid of them all.
He was happy to get rid of the...
Go to Berlin and look at the cathedral that's in ruins because of Hitler.
Oh, yeah.
And look at the archival photographs of what Berlin looked like at the end.
I was allied bombing, not Hitler.
Yeah.
Attacking civilians.
Attacking civilians.
Yes, attacking civilians.
Hitler never attacks in Warsaw or Rotterdam.
He was heavy bombers against those innocent people and slaughtered them.
He gave that people in Warsaw ample chance to surrender before the bombing started.
And they said no.
Bomb them or didn't he?
He bombed them, but only have to give them a choice.
Well they said no.
So we bombed them.
They were killing Germans.
Hitler attacked Poland.
He went to help them.
But it took him six months of negotiating, which never happened because the Poles wouldn't turn up because of Roosevelt telling Britain and France to give them a blank check.
that's why.
You can check all this out, the significant victory of World War II.
I'll take it with the way out.
That's the Poles' fault.
And it's the Poles' fault that Hitler made a pact with Stalin, which allowed Stalin to all over the country.
It's a bold spot we're trying to make Danzig, a German cultural city, into a Polish city.
And all Germans there have no rights.
I agree with you.
The Nazi regime certainly had a legitimate objection to what the Poles were doing.
I agree with that.
It did not justify creating a pact with Stalin to allow Stalin to take over all the time.
Let him finish, Dennis.
Germans were being he seems to think that the Danzig was good enough for his to invade, which it probably was.
But the fact was the time limit on it, he had to invade six months of negotiating, not getting anywhere, and in that six months, when the first refugees turned up on that border, six months of Germans were being killed.
He had to go in, and the Germans does killed.
How many Germans do you estimate were killed?
And then how many Germans were killed in World War II in total?
Well, that's he's talking hindsight.
I'm not talking hindsight.
When you start a kid that you're going to create a world war.
Which Adolf Hitler anticipated when he said that if Jewry instigates a world war, it'll be the end of Jewry.
So Hitler knew that he was instigating a world war when he attacked Poland, and he had to know millions of Germans risk being killed.
Roosevelt was behind all of that.
I think proved it first.
Pause, guys, pause, guys.
Chris made a point in the in the summarize point was that Hitler knew that doing that in Poland would start a world war.
So he had to have known the implications of how many deaths of his people would be.
He didn't think a border incident would start a world war.
That war was over in what?
Two weeks.
He didn't expect a border incident of invading Poland and inviting Stalin to invade, yeah.
That's he had ample opportunity to be on the right.
Germans were dying.
What's the same?
How many Germans?
How many Germans were dying?
Thousands.
Thousands?
That's nonsense.
It's not nonsense at all.
The refugees were turning up six months before Hitler invaded.
They were all on the border.
How many Poles were killed?
Give me evidence of it.
Well, watch the Masonic victory of World War II.
It's all there.
It's all on that documentary.
All the facts.
This is nonsense, Adam.
You can't watch the documentary now.
So if you could do your best to explain what thousands of Germans were killed in the pogroms.
What polls?
What do you mean they ain't one pole?
Who'd you think won the war?
Germany.
Everything's been covered up.
He's covering up his ignorance by changing subject and saying.
Can you give him a source for where you got the information in your documentary about the pogroms of the Germans in Poland?
I'm saying it's all in the documentary.
If anybody doubts anything that's there, it's all in that documentary.
And which one is that?
Communism.
Okay.
And that's on bit that's on BitChute?
Yes.
You have a bit shoot.
Do you have a personal BitChute channel or just people re-upload you?
No, no, it's a personal country flying.
Okay.
Alright, I I got another question to uh bring it back to where we were.
Um if if we're seeing the six million figure prevalent everywhere, pre pre-Hitler and Nazis, and they're and also even use of the word Holocaust and they hate assimilation and they were calling for an anti-Semitic leader.
World War I, World War II.
Do you do you think is all of this a coincidence how it all transpired so similar to how Herzl laid out?
It's always me.
Whoever, whoever wants to answer.
Of course, the Zionist bankers put Hitler in power to fulfill Herzl's plan, and then Hitler fulfilled it to the letter.
Vatican documents in Hitler's book proves that the Vatican put Hitler in power.
End of that's complete nonsense.
It's not nonsense at that.
It's well known that Kurt von Schroeder leveraged Paul von Hindenburg to appoint Hitler as Chancellor of Germany.
That's how Hitler took back Europe in 1941.
There was no election and the Vatican had no authority whatsoever to make Hitler Chancellor of Germany.
One man did, that was Hindenburg, and he arranged it at a meeting in Kurt von Schroeder, who was of the Stein Jewish banking house.
In his house, there were photographs taken of them meeting there, and that is when it was arranged to make Hitler Chancellor of Germany, and the Vatican had absolutely nothing to do with it.
This man is making things up.
I'm sorry.
Okay, guys.
Well, if you have uh we're over two hours.
I wanted to keep it here.
Um if you guys, you know, we could talk if you guys want to do it again, if you feel like there's uh more that you want to get to, we could talk about that, or people let me know in the chat if um there's other people you would like to see uh discuss these issues.
Um please find me somebody who knows something about history, Adam, who should actually find a way.
Shut your mouth.
Let's be let's let's be respectful.
That's real dignified, ain't it?
Shut your mouth.
Have another beer.
All right, all right, guys.
Let's let's keep it uh keep it keep it nice here.
Um any final last words, Dennis?
Yes before find me a serious historian to debate the facts instead of making things up and scapegoating the Vatican for what Hitler did.
Eck all echo echo.
Echo, echo, echo.
What do you mean by that, Dennis?
Exactly what he said.
I'm asking for the same thing, because he is a liar and an idiot.
Well, what it what is he lied about specifically?
That Hitler was a communist.
Okay, which part about that is a lie, though.
Like, because he he gives reasons why he says that.
He doesn't he doesn't give any reasons at all.
You haven't read his book to know it's like 600 pages, volume one.
No, I'm not likely to read his book.
What I'm saying is that it's uh absolute joke to call Hitler a communist.
Well, I wouldn't expect anybody to believe it if they they haven't even heard out the other side of the argument.
Because Hitler's actions prove different.
Well, uh I I you know not everybody agrees with you.
A lot of people definitely do that.
Is Chris still here say leave?
No one that falls he's here.
I just find it funny to listen to this man rally.
Nothing about communist, then why did he uh stand for election to become the Soviet liaison for it?
Oh yeah.
Well known history.
This man knows nothing.
Explain that history again, Chris.
What it what did Hitler do?
Uh well known, yeah.
Bavarian Soviet Republic, he twice stood for election and won and became the liaison and the propagandist for the Bavarian Soviet Republic, which was aligned with Lenin.
What year was that?
When was that, Chris?
1919.
1919.
Okay.
You your response to that, Dennis.
I'll give you that.
It was a spy looking for communists.
He was a spy looking for what evidence do you have of that?
Spy working for whom?
First answer that.
The army.
Yeah, everybody won six medals for one at first class pancross.
So he was spying for the army.
Are you aware of the fact that the army in Bavaria was then under orders of the Bavarian Soviet Republic?
And if he was spying for the army, then he was spying for the communists.
Hitler was laser because he wanted to be in the government.
Changing it up as you go along.
This is absolutely ridiculous.
Okay, hold on, let's back it up.
Let's back it up.
All right, we're we're wrapping it up here, but I just I didn't get that clear point of what just went down there.
Can we rehash what you just said there?
Was looking for for political political career, but against communism.
He's spying political career, so he's making it up as he goes along.
Hold on.
Let me let me clarify this for the chat, okay?
Just to just to reiterate.
Dennis agrees that Hitler was a spy working for the military in Bavaria, but he would try to infiltrate Bolshevik communist groups.
Expiring Bavaria because the Bavarian administration was communist.
And Chris is saying that's true, but you have to also not say that's true.
This is saying that's farcical because the military that he would have been spying for was a communist military.
That's what I was gonna say, Chris.
I was gonna say it's true he was spying, but the military wasn't a communist.
He was working for them as a liaison and as a propagandist.
Got it.
That's a fact.
So he there is no evidence whatsoever at that time that he was spying for anyone.
So you're saying the German army were communists.
He became a spy after he was caught as a communist when the Fry Corps liberated.
You said the German army were communists.
That's the best one I've heard all day.
Well, then what were the soldiers' councils in the Bavarian Soviet Republic, if not the German military in the Bavarian Soviet Republic defending and fighting against the Fry Corps as the military of the Bavarian Soviet Republic?
Simply answer the question.
The Freikorps whacked them out.
Whacked them out.
That them that Hitler was a part of.
Okay.
Repeat that.
I'm not following this.
Can you rehash what you guys are talking about?
Well.
So let me clear this up for the chat.
Hitler, Dennis believes Hitler was working for the military to infiltrate Bolshevik communist groups.
Chris believes that he was actually working for the Let me finish.
Chris.
No, he said yes, I agree.
Okay.
Chris says that Hitler was working for the military, but they were under communist control and that he was as a liaison and a propagandist.
And then where do we go?
That's a fact.
If this man denies it, he's completely discredited.
But I'll give you all that.
So where did you get that from, Chris?
Uh the books by Thomas Weber, Ian Kershaw.
Uh every major history on Nazism says exactly that.
And that's all true, is it?
Yes.
Yeah.
Now, when you say all, what I said is all true, not what those books say.
Well, what I'm saying is it's a 1945 when they couldn't defend themselves.
You're trying.
Hold on, we're not moving in 45 yet.
We're not moving to 45 right now.
That's a 1945.
No, the truth of that time.
Right documentation and from eyewitnesses, not simply from the books.
The books reiterate that truth because of the archival documentation and the eye witnesses.
So why did they go into Germany and shut Germany for five years and close everything down and sack all the National Socialist teachers and putting their own people?
Five years Germany was closed.
Nobody in, nobody out.
Why?
What when was that?
After the war.
Five years.
After World War II, Germany was closed?
Yes.
Couldn't get in, and you couldn't get out.
Five years.
He changed all the all the checks in the schools.
They even changed Hitler's speeches to make him look more aggressive.
I would love to answer that question.
That's a wonderful question.
Uh Patton revealed exactly why.
Because uh Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin fulfilled Hitler's mission to destroy Germany.
And they split it up amongst themselves.
And then they entered into a process which they called denazification, which was actually Bolshevization.
So they were again expanding communism.
That's why.
Okay, and I want to go back to Hitler created the conditions for it.
What happened?
Say that again, Dennis.
Yeah, after the war.
Yeah.
Five years.
It changed all the tax energy.
Right, yeah.
That's I don't.
Chris doesn't dispute that.
Let's go.
Let's go back to Hitler being a spy after the United States.
I'm answering why.
They wanted to denazzify Germany.
It was part of the denazification process, which Patton rightly identified as the process of spreading communism.
What was spreading communism?
The umganization under General Eisenhower to denazify Germany.
They were spreading communism.
Absolutely.
Yeah, I agree.
I think we agree here.
But I want to go back to this is interesting.
Hitler being a spy and infiltrating or working for the communist government.
So Chris, how was this Bavarian uh government, the Hitler military that Hitler worked for a communist?
Because Dennis disputes that.
He says that that that was laughable.
No, it was the army.
It was the soldiers' councils.
Uh the term Soviet actually means councils, where they would have representatives of the groups meet to make decisions.
That's what the whole Soviet Union was about.
And that's what the Soviet Union created in Bavaria through beginning with Kurt Eisner, then Ernst Holler, then uh Eugene Levinet.
And Hitler was a part of those soldiers' councils.
What I'm saying is that the Reichswehr, the German military, was subsumed by the Bavarian Soviet republic and became its military and fought against the Freikorps.
And Hitler was fighting for the soldiers' councils of.
Can I finish?
He was fascinating.
He was not fighting for the Fry Corps.
He was fighting against the Freikorps as a member of the soldiers' councils of the Bavarian Soviet Republic.
That's why I laugh.
Laugh all the time.
Show some proof.
That's why I laugh.
Who has the last surviving member seen or ever claimed that Hitler Corps?
Okay, all right, hold on, hold on.
The FRAC part explains the greatness of Hitler.
The greatest story never told.
You find any evidence whatsoever that Hitler fought for.
If Hitler fought for the FRI Corps, he would have mentioned my community.
Or said he fought against them.
I'm not saying it.
Gregor Strasser said it.
Whoever said it correctly.
It was never against the front door.
What was Hitler doing when the battles were going on between the soldiers' councils and the Fry Corps?
What I'm saying is that the answer the question.
You tell me that Hitler was a survivor.
You tell me what Hitler was doing when the soldiers are battling the Flag Corps.
Hold on.
Dennis, Dennis, Dennis.
Dennis, you gotta respond to his question.
He's asking you a very straightforward question.
I don't make things up.
He was supporting the Fry Corps' actions, if you like.
Prove it.
How was he supporting them?
In what capacity did support them?
25 of the greatest story ever told.
I listened to the last surviving member of the Fry Corps.
Talk about Hitler.
And then come back up and tell me you're right.
The last surviving member of the National Corps.
He's ducking the question.
He doesn't have an answer.
No one has an answer.
Hitler never revealed what he was doing when the soldier councils were battling the Fry Corps.
That's very well known.
He's ridiculous.
Well, it's not ridiculous at all.
All right, what did he say in Hitler in what did Hitler say in Mein Kampf that he was doing while those battles were going on?
I'm not I'm not saying that.
I'm saying the Fry Corps.
What are you saying?
I'm saying the last member of the Fry Corps.
I don't care about the last member of the French.
Tell me what Hitler was saying.
If he was facing him, give it a rest.
Okay.
Straightforward question that he that um you want answered, Chris, about the Freikorps.
Or Mein Korp.
You were asking two questions.
I want to hear the question and the response answer.
No interruptions.
It is very famously known that Hitler skipped over that history and did never explain what he was doing when the Freikorps was battling the soldier councils.
And I'm asking this man what Hitler is doing at that time.
Let him finish.
He doesn't know, but he won't admit that he doesn't know.
No, no, you don't know.
You don't know.
No one knows as well as it was.
Well, there you have idiots.
Okay, so no one knows.
And I didn't say I knew.
Okay, so you guys agree that you said he was acting as a spy.
Now you're changing again.
Change it again.
I'm saying that the last survivor.
Friedling von Spawn speaks highly of Hitler.
So it's hard to go speak highly of him if Hitler was against the Freikorps.
Is it?
He could have been completely ignorant of Hitler was doing what Hitler was doing, like everyone else was, because Hitler wouldn't tell people what he was doing.
Yeah, yeah.
And Hitler murdered all the people who really knew on the night of the long knives.
When he killed Gregor Strasser and when he killed Ernst Röhm, who knew what Hitler was doing at that time.
throughout history.
This guy's just babbling at him.
He won't address the facts of the history.
He doesn't know the facts of the history.
Basically, what's long said about Hitler in glowing terms, And you're saying that he was against the Freikorps, which is ridiculous.
Okay, if Hitler was against the Frey Corps...
I'm saying he was against the Frey Corps because he was a member of the Soviet soldiers...
Joe, what are you saying?
He was not against the Frey Corps.
As was his chauffeur, not only a member, but a leader of the Communist Soldiers Council.
Hold on, hold on, hold on.
Okay.
So Chris just uh said that Hitler's chauffeur chauffeur was a member of the Freikorps Communist Council.
Is that what you said?
No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
They're not communists.
The Five Four were fighting against the Bavarian Soviet Republic.
Okay.
Hitler was fighting for the Bavarian Soviet Republic.
He was a member of the soldiers' councils.
He would have been obliged to don the red arm and fight for the soldiers' councils against the Frey Corps.
Either that or he was a coward who hid.
And I've got a member of the Fry Corps here, crazy.
Well, that doesn't mean nothing to you.
Oh, maybe just made that up.
Get out of here.
Hitler was dictator over Germany.
A hell of a lot of people praised him.
That doesn't mean anything.
That means absolutely nothing.
That provides historical.
That provides historical evidence of nothing.
You have not quoted that man and stated where he said what Hitler was doing when the Freikorps was destroying the soldiers' councils of the Bavarian Soviet Republic.
No, you're making it.
Let him upon it.
He talks about Hitler glorious.
Okay.
And you're saying the Fry Corps to the Germany.
Hold on, hold on.
All right.
He was a sycophant sucking up to the dictator of Germany.
What historical evidence does that provide as to what Hitler was doing when the Fry Corps was fighting against the soldiers' councils of the Bavarian Soviet Republic?
Well, you just you just said nobody knows.
So why are you asking me?
Well because you said he was a spy.
Yeah, you said he was a spy.
I said we're spy, yeah.
Provide absolutely no evidence to substantiate that whatsoever, and you fly in the face of all the historical documentation and eyewitnesses.
It's been often called that he was a spy.
He tried to infiltrate Max.
He was a spy after he was caught after the Fry Corps succeeded.
Then he became a spy.
You don't know the history, my friend.
You're a you're full of it.
I'm full of it.
You're saying he was against the Prague Corps.
You are full of it.
And what was he doing acting as an elected liaison?
You said he was against the Pra Corps.
You're full of it.
It's a historical fact, my friend.
No, it's not an historical fact at all.
What's his historical fact is this guy who's the last survivor talking about Hitler.
That's a good thing.
You quote him, you quote him saying that Hitler was a spy for him.
He doesn't say that.
What evidence does he have that Hitler was a spy working?
Who was Hitler working for then?
You said he was working for the army.
The historical fact is the army in the so Bavarian Soviet Republic were the soldiers' councils, and they were part of the communist enterprise.
So you come up with some historical evidence.
Chris, hold on, I want to say, remember, I I mentioned this a minute ago.
Chris um sorted uh cited his sources where he's getting this information, and so Dennis has the the interview with the the member of the group, and Chris has the sources, but Dennis hasn't seen the sources.
What did he say?
You said he said Hitler was a good guy.
What does that have to do anything with the fact that Hitler was a member of the soldiers' councils in the Bavarian Soviet movement?
Because he was sucking up to the dictator of the whole that's your presumption, not my presumption.
But you're not establishing anything which would interest Hitler, you're establishing fabrication.
What fabrication have I established?
I presume.
I presume he thought like that.
Oh, I see.
That's history.
So you know everything in the world, and if you presume it, then it's true.
Adam, this is asinine.
Yeah, I mean, everybody makes makes some presumptions with the information and the sources they have.
But he has no information.
He's just saying that this guy said that Hitler was a good guy, and therefore Hitler could not have been a member of the so Soviet Union.
No, I'm saying it was a lot of Sabin member of the Free Corps.
The Free Corps, which you said Hitler was against, and he's talking glowingly about Hitler, which makes you an idiot.
Okay, let's finish on this last point.
Okay, guys.
Let's finish on the when you when you were off there for a minute, Chris.
Dennis was talking about how basically that national socialism and the movements of Hitler was like uh trying to defend Europe from communism, and that by saying he's controlled opposition, that's like you know, disinfo to kind of stop his his movement in a way.
The the movement uh with you know, I don't know.
Can you can you finish?
There is no movement.
There is no movement.
There are kosher clowns like him trying to pin the blame on the Vatican and other uh disinformation.
It was a Vatican document.
I don't anything on him.
There is no Nazi movement to defeat.
It's a farcical non sequitur based on a false premise.
They're not a good thing.
In fact, what I am doing and what I have been doing for 20 years is exposing the Jewish cabal, including Trump and Putin, back when this clown was supporting both of them as being members of Chabad Lubavitch taking over the world and destroying it.
When did I support Trump was supporting Vladimir?
When did I support Trump?
And I didn't support Putin, by the way.
I give Putin the benefit of the doubt, and the benefit of the doubt was because of the laws that you've got to be able to do.
And in the time you were giving him the best.
Listening here.
Because he was quoting, he was quoting Christian statements.
It was also against all this transgenderism and men getting married.
It was also against Allen.
So was Lenin.
It was a communist policy from the beginning.
From the beginning to them to the Stalin shut the church imposed the Noah Hideous communist nation.
The Bolsheviks shut the churches.
Putin didn't shut any church.
But I'm not saying, like I said, I've given the benefit of the doubt, but I do believe he's too close to Israel.
But the point being, he was saying the right things.
The GB completely took over the Russian Orthodox Church and did not shut the churches.
And Putin is simply carrying forward longstanding practices.
The German kingdoms in the Ukraine.
You have to admit that there is a subset out there of so-called knots bulls who are like uh kind of have.
Yeah, they're communists.
Yeah.
National Bolshevism.
Can you talk, Chris, about how that kind of dialectic was set up back then and still exists today, in your opinion?
Absolutely.
It's exactly the same as National Socialism.
And it was created by Nazis.
National Bolshevism was created by Nazis.
Again, they didn't care whether Germany or Russia won the war because both would perpetuate Bolshevism.
And Vladimir Putin's uh chief political advisor, Alexander Dugan, was spreading this national Bolshevism in the United States as a subversive movement at the same time that the communists were promoting Antifa so that these two people could clash in our streets to provide a pretext to remove our freedom of speech.
And he creates these kosher clowns like uh Mr. Wise to come out here so that we get our rights taken away and they have a right to scream about oh my God, Nazis are emerging again.
The Nazis are emerging again.
We need to they do use the the Nazi archetype as like the ultimate villain, and and it seems like it could be their dialectic with Jacob and Esau that they've that they say in their own words that that's what it is, essentially.
Comments of course it's obvious, it's patently obvious.
That's why you have all these Russian trolls pretending to be Nazis.
There is no one.
Is somebody out to destroy the reputation of Adolf Hitler to his loyal devoted followers?
Are you all five of them?
Oh yeah.
Is it more important to get to the truth or to defend somebody's reputation?
Like, would you be I think I don't know?
Hold on, Dennis.
Let me finish the question.
Let me finish the question.
I'm I'm noticing a lot of kind of uh emotion in a lot of the support for that I see for this.
Very similar to Trump and MAGA, and you know, he's draining the swamp, he's uh standing up for Christianity, kind of glorifying.
I I do see some of that.
And I think I think a lot of people do have some cognitive dissonance when they hear this opposing view coming from Bjorkness that actually he was controlled too, and the whole thing was orchestrated.
Uh a hoax on an even bigger level.
It was the one power alongside the Catholic Church what fought these people, and they want to demonize it.
They want to keep it quiet about World War II being a holy war.
Chris, do you want to demonstrate?
Still killing Christians today.
Chris, do you want to demonize Hitler or is this just your sincere search for the truth?
Of course, he wants to leave it, obviously.
I have no motivation to demonize Hitler.
My motivation is to save the human race from the Jews who are trying to kill us off, and exposing that Hitler was a stooge of these same Jews, blows away their brick bat of the Holocaust because it proves that the Jews did it to themselves.
And I say it because it's true.
It in no way helps the Jewish extreme.
So you believe in the Holy level.
Chris, he's asking if you believe in the Holocaust.
I believe that Jews were rounded up, put into concentration camps in order to answer the question.
Even revisionists don't dispute.
We believe in the Holocaust.
Unless it's simple yes or no.
You have to you have to explain it.
You can't say yes or no, because you have to define what it actually means.
Is a Holocaust way of explaining things, you don't think?
Well, does anybody dispute what I were putting in camps?
You asked me to explain what I believe.
No, I asked you, do you believe Holocaust?
You interrupted me.
Yeah, okay.
Explain the Holocaust.
Explain your views on the Holocaust.
No interruptions.
Go.
As I was saying, the Holocaust was the process Of concentrating the Jews into concentration camps for eventual deportation to Palestine.
That's not a Holocaust.
It's a burnt offering.
I'm asking you, do you believe in the Holocaust?
What do you mean by the people?
If you're asking me, was there a burnt offering?
I would say that the Jews create the propaganda that there was so that they can pretend that they have atoned for their sins.
Do you believe in the Holocaust?
That's his answer.
He just answered you.
No, he didn't.
Yes, he did.
I'm asking him, does he believe six million were gassed by the Germans?
No, I do not buy the Germans.
No, I do not.
I do not believe that on any level.
I do not believe there were massive gassings in the millions of Jews.
There may have been some experimental gassings here and there, but nothing that amounted anywhere near those numbers.
He believes the six million is Gematrio.
And you agree, right?
I think it's been this six million thing is solicited with the Kabala some kind of Jewish mysticism to keep they keep bringing it up.
Right.
It's it's it's religious to them.
Such a sacred number that they won't let anybody question.
It was around before Hitler came to power, meaning they must have known that there was going to be a big war, concentration camps, and the creation of Israel in an attempt of a hollow.
They even call it a ritual.
They call it self-sacrifice.
No.
You got it wrong when you say they know.
They didn't know.
They kept pushing the idea until eventually when they won the war.
They pushed the actual what they call facts, which by those not being allowed to investigate it.
Can't really deny it.
Well, obviously, it has to be denied by a lot of people.
Any response, let's wrap this up.
Two hours and thirty minutes.
I I'm glad we we went a little longer, though.
I thought the discussion was was beneficial all the way through.
I hope the audience thinks so as well.
We still have two thousand.
Okay, you guys ready to wrap it up?
The best way to defeat the Holocaust mythology is to point out the fact that the Jews did the persecution they did to themselves.
Jewish leaders persecuted the Jewish people in order to fulfill their messianic prophecy.
They did it precisely on the schedule that they established 2500 years ago.
And Theodore Herzl created the whole plan for the Nazi movement and the transfer agreement years before Hitler, decades before Hitler came to power, and that is not coincidental.
Hitler was put in power as a stooge to serve the Zionists by the Zionists.
Great closing statement, Dennis.
Well, it's just uh enhanced Hitler even more so because now he's saying it wasn't Hitler who caused any Holocaust, uh, which a lot of people think, you know, Hitler was all right, so what look what he did to the Jews?
And there's an even greater, greater guy than what he was saying.
Well, do you see Dennis how it kind of exonerates the German people in a way and puts and implicates the Zionist even more?
Well, fair enough.
The Germans were responsible for it anyway.
Okay, I see I see where you're coming from with that.
All right.
Okay, guys, let's wrap it up.
Thank you so much for hanging for sticking with it.
I know it's a very contentious issue, but I think this is a debate that we don't have enough of.
It's really they're suppressing this kind of discussion so much.
So I think the courage of you guys to come on and not not only publicly debate an issue, but the most controversial taboo issue out there, essentially.
So my hat's off to the both of you.
Um, real quick before I let you go, just wanted to uh the links will all be in the description where you can find these guys.
CJB books to find Chris's books.
Some of them are on Amazon as well.
Uh the greatest story never told is Dennis's documentary.
And the links will for those will be also uh he's got several others as well.
New World Order Communism by Backdoor.
And the new one you you're working on that you have coming out, Dennis?
Body counts of Churchill.
The the body count of Churchill.
So that should be keep your eyes out for that.
And um and I guess that's all.
Bjerkness's bit shoot as well, his blog Jewish racism.
Uh is that all, guys?
Anything else before we wrap up?
Thank you, Adam.
Find me somebody who knows what they're talking about, and we'll have a real discussion.
Oh, go set your problem.
So you're rolling out.
Okay, well, thanks for being a good sport, Dennis, and and and both of you to Chris as well.
Um, chat, let me know what who you guys want to see debate.
Um, you know, I'm up for these DLive debates.
Well, take advantage of the free speech platform while we have it.
It is a rare commodity these days.
Let me know what you think in the comments.
I'm sure the comments are gonna be explosive.
I predict this video might be top trending on bit shoots.
It could be safe to say if I do a good uh thumbnail and and and headline.
But I'm Adam Green with No More News.
Like, share, subscribe, follow the website, and uh I will see you guys again soon.
Export Selection