Dan Friesen and Jordan Holmes dissect Alex Jones' March 25, 2026 broadcast, highlighting his contradictory predictions on Trump's Iran war strategy and financial distress marked by unpaid rent. They critique the sale of Faraday backpacks against 5G threats and analyze Melania Trump's introduction of the humanoid robot Plato as a transhumanist takeover linked to Klaus Schwab. The hosts further examine Carrie Prejean Bowler's controversial testimony before the Religious Liberty Commission regarding the IHRA definition and Christian Zionism, while noting Alex's dismissal of anti-Semitic graffiti targeting a sheriff. Ultimately, the episode exposes the chaotic convergence of conspiracy theories, political maneuvering, and technological anxieties defining the current media landscape. [Automatically generated summary]
I was not allowed to go to Christmas Lake because on the trail there, it's a gated community, and there's a guardhouse with a Santa outside telling you no foreigners, no weirdos, no pedestrian traffic.
That is a metaphor for something about how they view American culture and the way that it absorbs any kind of holiday and turns it into some sort of prison guard, essentially.
Well, it's their four forefathers, really, that in the postal service that have done all that.
The one thing I've noticed, I've talked to some people, and one of the things that I've noticed is there's a weird response that people have to being asked, what's it like to be around like this to live here?
There are Santas everywhere.
Like all of the poles in the street are like painted like candy canes.
Every store is named after fucking Santa.
The streets are named after reindeer.
It's crazy.
And there's an incredulousness.
There's a, eh, you get used to it.
It's followed by a but the Christmas music gets old, you know?
And I think that that touches on like the more sincere feeling that I'm picking up on this town.
There's a denial about how weird this is and how not right it is.
And the people who have to grow up living in Santa Claus.
Well, I really hate to say I told you so, but I did.
It's Wednesday, March 25th, 2026.
I'm your host, Alex Jones, coming to you from deep in the heart of Texas, broadcasting worldwide.
And everything that I warned about and that I predicted and then I said would happen when Trump and Israel attacked Iran is now happening exactly as I said.
Now, some of my predictions are really amazing, and I'm the only one to make them and they're whole in one.
Just very proud of them.
A lot of research, a lot of prayer, a lot of dedication to make a lot of my predictions.
This one was absolutely the easiest prediction ever to make.
I guess you can say that Alex predicted that it would probably go bad if Trump attacked Iran, but this is window dressing over the larger problem.
One of the major premises of the argument for supporting Trump was that the globalists were going to attack Iran to start World War III.
And the implication of that argument is that Alex is predicting that Trump would not attack Iran.
It's easy to predict that Trump attacking Iran wouldn't go well, so no one's getting any points for that.
But it's important to understand that we only have to try to predict how attacking Iran is going to go because Alex got the last very major prediction wrong.
He's patting himself on the back for this prediction, but part of why he's doing that is to distract people from noticing that it's actually a giant blow to his credibility that this conversation's even happening.
So this is all great that Alex is doing, but you can tell by how he's talking, even in this supposedly fired up clip, that he desperately wants to believe that there's still some way to continue supporting Trump.
If he stops fucking that beehive, then Alex, he thinks things can go back to normal, but that's delusional.
By Alex's own words and standards, Trump has flagrantly violated the Constitution and launched illegal wars.
He's not only disqualified for being our leader, but he probably needs to be tried for treason.
Alex is complaining there about how everyone calls him a fear monger or whatever, but that's really just a reflection of how his entire ecosystem and everyone he's arguing with, they're just idiots.
I think the right-wing political space has been so overtaken by Twitter and weird opportunists that it's basically disconnected from the real world entirely.
He's right to be upset and frustrated about the bottom-of-the-barrel commentators he's arguing with online, but he should recognize that he started that and he inspired probably 90% of them, employed some of them, elevated all of them.
Yeah, it does, it does bring to the question of like, I don't want to be conspiratorial, but it feels like whenever I look around, I'm seeing nobody being stoked, right?
But he's still there, so somebody has to be stoked.
Somebody has to be real happy with the job that he's doing.
Otherwise, I feel like we're in like old-timey volcano tribe area where it's like, oh, the leader of the tribe is not doing so well.
And it's like, hey, surprise, God said we need to throw the leader of the tribe in the volcano.
The thing that people are like, oh, this would cause.
So, right.
Naturally, you know, you don't like your bad leader, but you don't overthrow him because that would cause too much chaos.
It feels like overthrowing this guy would be like, oh, finally, we can all just like close our eyes, pretend the last 10 years didn't happen, and then we have fucking regular roads again.
Like, this is not complicated.
This guy is the problem.
There's no situation that is more chaotic without him.
So this is a direct result of Alex's career and influence.
Those influencers and talk show hosts are all idiots who no one should take seriously, but a lot of them were elevated by formally being associated with InfoWars.
And even the ones who weren't greatly benefited from Alex blurring the lines between what news and commentary even was.
Like, what's the difference between sincere criticism and emotional outburst?
Alex gets abused in the comments of every post he makes because he created an environment where that was normal.
He hired Owen Schroer, the cuck destroyer, because he liked how he was mean at protests.
He constantly elevated and pretended to respect deeply abusive people and trolls when he thought that there was an upside in it for him.
That was the easiest route he had to attract attention, so that's what he did.
And now that's the bet he's made for himself.
The end of his career is going to be filled with people that should be giving him a hero's send-off, yelling dumb shit at him on social media, and it's well deserved.
Everyone should be like building, like baking him a cake.
And now they came out after Trump officially offers a 30-day ceasefire.
And the Iranians said, screw you.
We're going to keep the Strait of Hormuz blocked.
And now the news articles start within hours of that breaking last night.
Oh, we have sent troops and now they're going to invade and take all those islands that are like Japanese controlled islands in the march towards Japan in World War II.
And then even more troops on the shore on the other side with all their weapons.
And then we're going to be in close to them.
Remember that song?
You guys ought to pull it up.
In 1814, we took a little trip along with Colonel Jackson down the mighty Mississippi.
Took a little bacon and we took a little beans and we whooped the body British in the town of New Orleans.
And then it's got the quote in there.
He actually said this.
Andrew Jackson, when he was just a general, they're in the our second war with England.
He says, don't shoot till you see the lights of their eyes.
Because the British would start shooting at 300, 400 yards away.
And that's, I, you know, it's, it's interesting for Alex, who has such an appreciation for and a deep love and respect for American Americana and war history and the Revolutionary War, to attribute this to Andrew Jackson is very strange.
Like, listen, the lore is obviously unfair to Andrew Jackson, because the only way to be fair to Andrew Jackson is to call him a genocide or genocidal monster.
But this is unfair to the lore.
Andrew Jackson doesn't need to have said that.
Andrew Jackson did so much more cool shit.
Andrew Jackson beat up a guy who tried to assassinate him.
I'm just saying that once we've introduced monarchism, once we've introduced monarchism at the possible funeral of a man, then I think I think this is okay as a diverging point for me a little bit because after Alex left, they did talk a fair amount about how disrespected they felt and how bummed out they were that Alex showed up drunk.
And so I think that they can be monarchists over here and Alex can still pretend Jackson stuff over here.
Nazi shit is way more popular than his bland bullshit in the right-wing media ecosystem.
So it appears on first glance that he would benefit from leaning more into that.
But there's a problem, and that is that he's a known quantity and he has a ton of baggage.
For years, he's had to pretend that he's not a Nazi and that he hates Nazis as much as he hates commies.
So if he tried to make too overt of a pivot 30 years into his career, he looks like an idiot.
The hardline Nazis would say, I told you so, and he would become a low-power figure in that space.
At the same time, whatever audience he has that likes to pretend they're not bigots would take Alex coming out like that as a slap in the face, and he'd lose them.
He'd be cucked by the Nazis and abandoned by the normies.
Ultimately, Alex does not stand to gain any popularity by going full Nazi because of this dynamic, which is why he just positions himself as a guy who hangs out with and really seems to respect the avant-garde Nazis in his media environment.
By buddying up with the guys who yell Heil Hitler and interviewing them as respectable experts, Alex gets the best of both worlds, where he can skim some attention off the Nazis who are really popular and maintain this illusion of plausible deniability to keep the old country folks buying the supplements.
And this, I honestly think, is probably the only choice Alex has.
And again, it's his own fault.
So when he's saying, I could be way cooler and more popular by doing that, so I really don't think he could, even if it is cooler.
I mean, if he could in this world, right, where he does it, humbles himself and is like, I lost all these people, and then hungrily tries to rebuild an audience with his new point of view that he's earned every second of it.
But he doesn't have those jobs, and he doesn't have the will, and he's not that good.
So obviously, when he says that the truth makes you successful, right?
When looking outside, we know that that's demonstrably false, right?
So he's lying.
But because he's a liar and lying has made him successful, then by nature of saying what makes you successful, then he is in fact saying that doing what I do is what makes you successful.
See, to me, this is the fruits, or this is the root of our book, Alex Jones and Philosophy, where we do a Matrix and Philosophy-like book about what is honesty?
Truth tends to make you successful in life and prosper and not blow the planet up.
Everybody that wants to blow up Israel needs to understand that they're not going to go anywhere without taking us all down with them, which people then say, oh, God, you're siding with them.
What I'm siding with reality?
Just like I said about the Iranians.
I'm not with them.
The Moolahs?
The damn assessments say lower than an 8%, 9% chance maybe they fall.
And then you probably get something worse.
That's why Eric Prince, before the war, Morris said, don't do it and said the same thing.
I told the neocons and I told the administration, do not do this because they're going to block the freaking straight-over moose.
The neocons go, oh, it's okay.
Saudi Arabia has a pipeline.
They're going to do 25% of it.
They already have that at max capacity.
And the Iranians can blow that up next and said they're about to.
So I know how to play chess, folks.
Not checkers.
And I'm telling you, just like in the 1980s movie that was based on Rand Corporation War Games, War Games, the only way to win the game is not to play.
A strange game.
The only way to win is not to play.
That's all I'm saying.
I'm just trying to be sane here.
I'm not a secret Muslim, not a secret Nazi.
I'm just an American that's smart and informed.
And I'm telling all you people, you're fucking crazy.
I don't like it when I agree with a statement, but then when the reasons are given post-statement, I am supposed to continue agreeing with that statement.
I don't like that.
Yes, you are all fucking crazy.
Agreed.
Wholeheartedly.
The reasons for which are varied and diverse, but they are not the ones that Alex believes in.
So I think that, you know, we talked about this a little bit earlier, this weird kind of vibe that there is, like, he's saying this stuff, and it's pretty negative, and it's demonstrably negative, but he still wants to keep this connection to Trump, and it makes him sound stupid.
And listen, I want to cover all the great stuff Trump's doing, and I will later.
But we lose all that if this continues with this Iran thing just on the economy alone.
I'll explain.
I know you already know most of you, but other people need to get this through their brains because you don't have to hear me predict it.
Now it's here.
And if you want to be eating dog food and have the Democrats get back in and bring back the carbon taxes and cut off the economy and have a literal planned austerity make you port of control, you feudalism, hell, then just continue to support the neocons and the Israel First Lobby because above them is the Rothschilds and the central banks that want Trump to derail his plan that was an excellent economic plan and destroyed the old globalist order.
Now, the question is, is the new global order going to come in, going to be based on sovereignty and freedom and unilaterally working with countries?
And it was that way the first six months.
He was making all the right moves.
And the globals were like, we're done.
Now, oh, no.
Now America is the big new world order globalist thing and is going to try to bring back the neocons, new world order, new world order.
They're going to bring back the new world order, new world order, old world, new or He needs to gain some precision with terms, I think, if we're going to get anywhere.
scales yeah it's just that the there's and it's not irrational to like look at the hard choice and be like this is a bad i don't want to make this choice right Which is why it needs to happen without your input.
It's why it needs to happen without you getting to talk to yourself a little bit and be like, hey, you know what?
So Alex is framing this as a situation where his disappointment comes from Trump doing all this bad stuff because he's also doing all this good stuff.
And that's relatable.
Most politicians exist in that gray area, which would be a good name for a show.
But the truth is that his frustration comes from a different place.
Alex is furious that Trump is acting in a way that makes it impossible for Alex to gaslight his audience into blind acceptance of his actions.
He's crossed so many red lines for Alex that it's comical to hear him say that there's so much good stuff that Trump is doing because the bad stuff is that severe.
The image Alex is trying to strike is that there's close to a balance between the good and bad that Trump is doing, which is crazy.
By Alex's own words, Trump is gambling with our lives, probably illegally going to start a world war and constantly lying about it.
These are supposed to be big deal breakers for Alex, so when he's forced to play this game where the scales are teetering on the edge, it reveals that those aren't that big of deal breakers as he's always wanted us to think.
Trump is doing racist and pro-business stuff, which Alex likes.
He's also being a warmonger and pursuing a foreign policy that Alex has explicitly based his career on opposing while violating the Constitution a bunch and covering up the Epstein stuff.
If we're supposed to believe that Alex is so conflicted about how Trump is doing so much good stuff and he hates that Trump is doing this bad stuff, then it stands to reason that he values these two sides fairly evenly.
But if you take this a step further, Alex doesn't even really care about those things that are supposed to be in the negative column.
He just hates that he can't deny them anymore.
Trump is getting into like huge public fights with Marjorie Taylor Greene over Epstein, and Alex made it clear that his problem was that if Trump wanted to do a cover-up, he needed to shut up and let the media surrogates handle it.
And that's at the core of his frustration.
Trump isn't letting Alex do what Alex thinks is his job.
And this is because Alex never had a job or a constructive purpose to begin with.
He's a one-sided media surrogate whose boss doesn't give a shit about him and doesn't need him.
They all jumped onto the Trump wagon because he was a huge attention magnet and it boosted their ratings.
So why the fuck would Trump ever think he needs them?
They need him.
Alex is pissed off because he can't accept how bad the stuff he knows Trump has done really is and he can't deny it either.
He has to give lip service to the reality that's in front of him and then act as if none of it's true.
Your talk recognizes reality and your actions do not.
In the past, he just didn't have to accept reality.
He could make his own.
But because of the choices that he's made and the circumstances he's in, that luxury just doesn't exist anymore.
The problem with their whole ecosystem is that it is based around lies.
All of the people inside it are liars.
But in order to have a functioning ecosystem, somebody has to trust somebody somewhere.
But since they're all liars, they wind up lying to themselves to think that they can trust somebody like Trump because they've created this lie fiction in their head where they're actually partners with Trump and he's on their team.
His interests somehow dovetail with your interests as opposed to everything that we know about him.
Well, if you put all of those, if all of those clips average, let's say a minute long, just for the sake of simplicity, doesn't that put it in like two and a half hours of stuff?
So he just like would play the clip and then punch in and say something about a Furby or something.
You know, he'd just do a little or even if he doesn't want to be on video, he could just do like pop-up video kind of like he plays the clips and then a blip, like a little factoid pops up on the screen.
Well, he does smoke weed once a year, no, just to test the potency.
So Big Lee's got this backpack.
Great.
Alex is selling it and it really sounds like they're giving away the store because like there's so much shit they're putting in this backpack and it's at like one-fifth of what they claim is the market value of the Faraday backpack.
I mean, I find that to be such an interesting solution to the problem of like, well, technically, I guess I have all kinds of legal authority, but I don't know what shit this guy's going to get up to if I try and exercise it.
What I can do is nothing.
And if I do nothing, maybe the problem will just go away.
And that seems to be a novel strategy to these people.
Couldn't quite get the feel for his footing for the transphobic shit he was supposed to say about the Macrons.
So I think that, for the most part, it's not the best use of time to get overly invested in the partners of public figures, unless their career or personal history illustrates an obvious conflict of interest for the person in office.
Otherwise, it just seems kind of unfair and petty.
Being the president is a public position, but it's also just a job.
You're fulfilling a role, and the spouse of the president wasn't elected into a position.
They just weren't a problem for the public in terms of voting for their spouse.
Obviously, some people are better than others, and some could be more inspiring than others, but the worst first spouse isn't really that much different than a mediocre one.
So I don't want to overanalyze Melania.
That being said, Alex has spent countless hours of his show yelling about Michelle Obama, Joe Biden, and Hillary Clinton, so his track record would indicate that he has serious concern about the first lady and what they do with their time.
In just the past month or so, Melania has released a documentary on Jeff Bezos' platform Amazon, which was directed by noted sexual harasser and guy who was creepily photographed with Jeffrey Epstein, Brett Ratner.
Now she's doing an event at the White House where she introduces a humanoid robot that's supposed to replace teachers of the future.
This was a supposed, it was supposed to be an education summit, but it seems like it turned into a PR opportunity for the robotics company that made this unit called Figure.
In her speech, Melania said, quote, very soon, artificial intelligence will move from our mobile phones to humanoids that deliver utility.
Imagine a humanoid educator named Plato.
Access to the classical studies is now instantaneous.
Literature, science, art, philosophy, mathematics, and history.
Humanity's entire corpus of information is available in the comfort of your home.
So Figure is a company that's owned by Brett Adcock, who literally said, quote, as these robots join the workforce, everywhere from factories to farmland, the cost of labor will decrease until it becomes equivalent to the price of renting a robot, facilitating a long-term holistic solution to costs.
Over time, humans could leave the loop altogether as robots become capable of building other robots, driving prices down even more.
During COVID, one of Alex's big catchphrases was about how the globalists see the public based on their use of the term inessential workers.
Klaus Schwab wants you to stay home because he doesn't think you're essential.
This is a deceptively important point, which is that the Trump administration is not just like what they're doing, it's not just a slap in the face of where Alex is supposed to stand in terms of launching a war with Iran.
He should view their actions as deeply anti-human and part of a transhumanist takeover.
He should think they're doing the work of the devil.
Melania is introducing like they made a big PR blitz out of like it's the first humanoid to appear at the White House.
Like they're you're these people do want to replace labor.
I think we've got a lot of good ideas and I'm willing to share them with the United States government if they're willing to let me take over completely and solve things via volcano-based solution process.
That guy, it's amazing that you're allowed to say things like that, right?
I mean, I know we were all against bullying when we were younger, but I didn't know we didn't know that it was going to turn out like this, right?
Like a guy can say words like that out loud without anybody beating the shit out of him.
Well, it's like, okay, yeah, it sounds pretty good when you're saying you're going to drive down cost until you understand that that cost, what you're translating, is you getting paid.
So Carrie Prejan was a pageant model who won Miss California in 2009 and then came in second place for Miss USA.
Before I get into any of this, I just want to say that I hate it all and that the world of pageants, particularly this scene, which was incidentally owned by Donald Trump at the time, is very ugly.
So Pregene, she believed that she was the frontrunner to win Miss USA 2009, but she was asked a question about gay marriage by notably gay celebrity judge Perez Hilton.
The fact that Perez Hilton was one of the people who was asking questions at this thing should give you a sense of how classy it was.
He was, if you've forgotten, a blogger who got famous for making sensational claims about celebrities and photoshopping cum onto their pictures.
So Billy Bush was the host of this event, who would go on to be immortalized as the guy who Trump was talking to when he said that grab him by the pussy stuff.
So this was almost like a weird inflection point for so many threads that go into the future.
Anyway, she said that it was great that in America you can choose, like gay people had rights and stuff, but she believed that marriage was between a man and a woman.
And she's been very clear that she thinks that this answer lost her the title.
Perez Hilton has also said that this lost her the crown, but he's a shit-talking troll, so it's hard to know if this is sincere or him kind of just rubbing it in.
After she came in second, she was a darling with the conservative press who were looking for figures that they could prop up to prove the Christians were under attack.
And who better fit that bill than a beauty queen who came in second after giving a mildly uninspired answer to a question about gay marriage?
The coming in second part of this victim story kind of bothers me.
I get making that kind of argument if you were the frontrunner and then you came in 40th, but in a pageant setting, I'm guessing there's not too much distance between first, second, and third.
If you came in second, you still almost won.
Like, they didn't turn against you that hard.
So from here, things got ugly, and I don't want to get into it too much, but she got in trouble for public appearances that weren't in line with her contract with Miss America, or Miss USA, excuse me, and there were some lawsuits.
These lawsuits stemmed from things like partially nude pictures of her being released, which wasn't in line with the public image that the pageant wanted to maintain.
The pageant was, if you've forgotten, owned by Donald Trump.
So basically, she'd signed a contract with him and was in violation of it.
The problem wasn't really the gay marriage comments.
It was the way she acted after the pageant, which was not profiting the pageant itself.
Miss USA is a business, and the women who compete in it are the products, and she wasn't following through with what they needed from her.
So to put it in a nutshell, Pre-Jean's contract with Miss USA was terminated after racy photos of her came out, and after the pageant learned that she was publishing a book that they believed they had the rights to put out.
Like they were being cut out of her book deal and they wanted the money for it.
A lot of it is money and image and like, you know, mostly money.
She argued that she was the victim of religious discrimination because of the gay marriage answer and the right-wing media enabled her and just cheered her on.
She sued the pageant and in the course of that suit, a homemade sex tape of Pre-John when she was 17 was uncovered that was, quote, too racy for TMZ to post, which I think might just mean illegal.
Yeah, after that revelation, the two parties reached a quick settlement that let Pre-John release her book, and it dropped all the counterclaims made by Miss USA, which doesn't really look that great when we know what we know about Trump now.
It looks real gross.
So I disagree with all the shit that Prejohn stands for as a political figure, but she got dealt a very bad hand by how she was treated by the pageants and by the gossip media in the late 2000s.
This is a silly interview for Alex to be doing, especially considering that her claim to fame and the inciting incident of her religious persecution story is about when she was fired by Trump's pageant.
I don't, one, I don't want to take a side on anybody because all of their whole thing, all of that is more just like a society fucked up.
Like everything about her life is a result of a weird fucked up society.
Not necessarily.
Like, you know, it's like RFK.
She should be crazy.
She should be crazy.
If you were raised in pageantry, you're crazy.
And it's a shock if you're fine.
And everybody should be applauded if they're just okay.
So, yeah, there's no point in time in this lady's life where she hasn't been controlled or exploited by somebody who is making money off of her for stuff she cannot control or do.
And you have this pageant circuit that you've been a part of that is trying to make money off you and use you in the way that they need.
And then you have this predatory, fucking awful media embodied by someone like Perez Hilton that also is trying to like take you down a bit in order to make their money.
And you have the right-wing media that really wants gay marriage not to exist.
And they're using you as like a thing to further their goals and their money streams.
It's just, you can't possibly like, I don't know, you can't, I don't think there's a way to assert your own independence in that situation.
You're being fucked by too many really strong influences that are all trying to use you.
You are just a person, which no matter how great and smart and powerful you are as a person, you're going up against a hundred years of learning how to fuck people over like you.
I never thought in a million years that I would serve on a religious liberty commission.
And as soon as I talk about a foreign country that I have no interest in at all, I have no allegiance to at all.
This is a foreign government.
And as soon as I mention their name, all of a sudden I'm removed from this commission simply because I'm not a Zionist.
And I asked the people on that commission who were testifying that day, I said, is anti-Zionism anti-Semitism?
I want to be very clear on the terms here, which I have every right to do as a commissioner.
I want to define the terms.
I'm not just going to go along with this if they're claiming that if I say the Jews killed Jesus, that that's considered hate speech.
I have a big problem with that because that is a historic fact.
That is a fact of history.
And so if we're now deeming certain parts of the New Testament as hate speech, every Christian should be upset about that.
Every American should be upset about that.
And I want to know where is this going to lead?
The new IHRA definition on anti-Semitism, you can go and read it.
I mean, this is dangerous.
This is dangerous for free speech.
So what's going to happen?
Are you going to start, are they going to start arresting people?
We're going to start putting people in jail, taking away their First Amendment rights simply because we say something to criticize Israel or the Jewish people?
We're not allowed.
Is that a sin to criticize the Jewish people?
I would really like to know.
Is that considered hateful because I'm criticizing a foreign government that is committing a genocide in Gaza and I have a duty as a Christian to speak out against that?
This is insane and we must be pushing back against this.
See, this is why Carrie probably isn't suited to handle a subject like this.
It's great that she has a strong opposition to the government of Israel committing a genocide in Gaza, but what exactly does that have to do with whether or not Jews were responsible for killing Jesus?
In her mind, all this stuff is wrapped up and intertwined in a way that makes dealing with the real world almost impossible.
Also, the last like 10, 15 seconds of that clip made me think like Alex is probably eating.
She feels like she had to fill space and vamp because Alex wasn't there.
So Carrie was put on this religious liberty committee created by Trump, which honestly should have been her first clue that this wasn't a serious thing.
Her second clue should have come when she realized who else was on this committee.
The chair of that group is Dan Patrick, a former talk show host and lieutenant governor of Texas.
The vice chairman is Ben Carson, who has some interesting ideas about pyramids.
Then you've got Billy Graham's son, Dr. Phil, and Paula White Kane.
She should have walked into that room, seen the collection of clowns and frauds that Trump chose, and realized that this really has nothing to do with religious liberty and that scam-based Christians were heavily overrepresented in that group.
She might have some serious actual convictions.
She might not.
But no matter what, it's very sad to hear someone who is appointed to Trump's Religious Liberty Committee whining about how it wasn't serious enough.
So they start talking about some news, and there's one news story that has to do with a sheriff who's upset that someone took pictures of him and put stars of David on his face.
With governors and legislators and sheriffs saying, you criticize Jews, we're going to arrest you.
Now, they don't tell you when you dig in, but they'll finally have a warrant or they'll get you for something else, but they go and arrest you for putting a star of David on the sheriff.
It's really wild to hear Alex have that kind of take.
He's saying that people who have had their signs defaced in a clear attempt to single them out as a target for anti-Semitic harassment should just move on.
Like, how would he feel if Christian public figures were having crosses graffitied over their faces?
Would he think that was no big deal, or would he see it as a very obvious anti-Christian message that someone was trying to send?
For Alex to think that this kind of argument is going to land, he has to think that his audience is full of anti-Semites or idiots.
Like they have to be so fucking stupid in your mind if this is like, oh, yeah, you're a public figure.
I want to add about the Christian Zionists in this country.
Pete Hegseth, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Lindsey Graham, who say if you don't bless Israel, you will be cursed, ultimately, is what they're saying.
This is a theological discussion that I think is very important.
We are occupied in this country, not only by a foreign government, but we are also occupied by this Zionist ideology, this dispensational ideology, which has hijacked our nation.
And so this idea, Alex, I'm sure you know about this.
They believe in the rebuilding of the temple in Jerusalem.
They think that Israel has a separate, there's a dual covenant between the church, you know, Christians and the Jewish people.
And so they need the dome of the rock torn down.
They need us to go to war with the Muslims in order for the rebuilding of the third temple in Jerusalem.
And the most anti-Christian thing about it is that they're going to bring in animal sacrifices again, Alex.
This is anti-Christianity.
And it's time we as Christians speak out and reclaim our faith because it's been hijacked by Ted Cruz who say those who bless B.B. Netanyahu's bomb will be blessed.
That is insane.
That is evil.
It is heretical.
And we must call out this dispensational heretical theology.
So let's imagine that Carrie actually does believe that the way that some of the Christian Zionists view the relationship between God and Israel to be heretical.
I'm not sure what I think about her real beliefs, but she isn't giving me any reason to doubt her sincerity in this interview, other than the fact that it's happening on InfoWars, which is at least disqualified.
I bring this up because I noticed something, which is that Alex never tells people like Carrie about how God talks to him and sends him on missions.
He never tells his guests like Carrie about the downloads of prophecy he's been given or how he always knows what time it is in the middle of the night.
I strongly suspect that's because he has good reason to believe that if he did show her that side of himself, she would rightly think that he's crazy and promoting heresy.
The only reason that this conversation can happen is likely because she doesn't listen to Alex's show and doesn't know who he presents himself to be.
And everyone can feel okay as long as that KFAB is maintained and kept up.
I thought it was wild how there was a re like the last, I think the last 2016 episode we did involved a guy who was yelling about Schofield dispensationalism.
And now here in the present day, Carrie is on complaining about dispensationalism.
It's like it's not something that comes up all the time.
It's just a weird piece of tissue that's connecting.
So we have one last clip because the rest of the show is Alex believing he's simulcasting with the Hodge twins, who are a couple of twins who loved Trump.
And they were the people who were, I believe, instrumental in getting Big Lee set up with Alex through Chase.
I believe that Chase maybe found out about them because the Bigley was working with the Hodge twins.
And then he...
I don't know all the details, but I understand that that's how...
I think that's what they are, they're inadvertently describing what the real stakes for them are.
It's not like, oh, I like for them, even it's not even gas prices or the cost of food or anything.
They're insulated from the true damages that can be fucking wreaked upon people who don't have just enough to squeak over that line.
So, what really matters to them about all of this is if Trump wins, then at least we get to continue liking Trump because, well, I admit I'm eating crow.
Well, and I think that what it comes down to more than anything is that they underneath the surface, they all understand that, that they're on Trump's team.
And if he succeeds, then there's the proximity to power that will be maintained.
And that's a familiar game that they've been playing for like the last decade.
I think people like, you know, people who are in the spaces that are like the Hodge twins, who are more ready to break away from Trump and be like, nah, not into this guy.
I think that even they would rather like Trump succeed and them be able to be like, oh, yeah, look, hey, things were bad for a little bit, but we're back on this, you know, hey, everything's worked out.
Because I think that that's easier and it's clearly been more profitable.
I mean, the hard choice for them is fairly obvious, right?
Like, if you want to say we're in an electoral republic or anything like that, your only real consequence that you can apply to your elected officials is to unelect them.
If that's the case, then the hard choice is to say, we have to vote for not Republicans or not vote.
That is what has to be done.
And none of them want to say that.
That's really scary.
That removes all Lesser of Two Evils arguments, period.
But there are certain situations where if you just kind of floated it, maybe we could have done a little bit of punch-up and you wouldn't wind up at Santa Claus.