In this installment, Dan and Jordan discuss the time in 2003 when Alex and Joe Rogan went out for sushi and decided to record it so future generations could learn about how weed is cool and how Alex is a known liar. (Apologies about some static in the beginning of the episode)
My wife has purchased me new shoes because, I don't know if you recall, but about a week and a half ago, I was outside for the 20 minutes when a flash flood happened.
So, an under-discussed aspect of Alex's career, and something we've touched on a little bit but never really gotten too much into, is his association with an outfit called Sacred Cow Productions.
This was a company that started with Bill Hicks and his producing partner, Kevin Booth.
Through Sacred Cow, Booth distributed a ton of Hicks' content, including posthumously.
And then after Hicks had died, it took on the shape of a collective of presumably like-minded artists.
Kevin and Bill had met Alex while they were filming a documentary about Waco, and in 2000, before his rise to prominence with 9-11 conspiracies, their company put out the Best of Alex Jones VHS collection.
Then, in 2001, they released Joe Rogan's first comedy special, Live from the Belly of the Beast.
This special is the one that features a cameo from Alex, and it includes the video where Alex and Joe put on bush masks, and they dick around at the Texas Capitol, which seems to be the only positive memory that Joe has of Alex that he can call to mind to justify why they're friends.
I don't think that there's a grand conspiracy here.
But we all need to recognize how incredibly weird it is that 25 years ago, a dipshit from Local Access TV in Austin and the guy from News Radio were part of the same media collective, and now they're two of the most prominent media figures that have supported and cheer-led Donald Trump's elections in 2016 and 2024, respectively.
I don't know if that means anything, but it's fucking crazy.
Also, Sacred Cow Productions offers a collection of videos and CDs that you can get from various performers like Rogan, Alex, and Doug Stanhope.
If you go through their collection of stuff, it's like Bill Hicks, Doug Stanhope, Alex, Rogan, and then some tapes called No Bra at Mardi Gras.
The reason why it was made illegal in the first place is because they came up with a method of producing pulp from hemp that was much more efficient.
The way they used to do it, back when hemp was a viable crop and it was used.
It was by farmers all across the country.
When they made paper out of it, when they made clothing out of it, it was all collected by slaves.
And it was all processed by slaves.
But that's not very cost-effective when slavery became illegal.
So hemp died off and cotton took hold.
Now in the 1930s, in the cover of Popular Science magazine, they had an article that said hemp, the new billion-dollar crop.
And they were talking about how this new, I think it was called a decorticator, I forget what it's called, but it was a new machine that they had.
That made it much more efficient to process the pulp.
And they were going to make superior paper products, superior cloth.
It was also when DuPont came up with the chemical composition for nylon, absolutely.
Now, what they did was, William Randolph Hearst, not only did he own newspapers, he also owned paper plants, where he made paper.
And if hemp is a superior paper and everyone's using hemp, he would have had to transfer all of his lumber yards and all of his paper plants to processing hemp.
So what Joe is expressing here is very interesting, because a lot of it's true, but some of it is also a strong argument against Alex's fundamental worldview.
It's absolutely correct that the war on drugs and the criminalization of weed were political and specifically racist developments in our country.
Nixon's domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman laid it out quite explicitly in an interview he did with Harper's in 1994.
The Nixon campaign in 1968 and the White House after that had two enemies, the anti-war left and black people.
You understand what I'm saying.
We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and the blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities.
We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, A great deal of the hysteria around drugs comes down to this type of exploitation, like how the 1875 anti-opium laws in San Francisco were largely a covert effort at attacking the growing Chinese immigrant population there.
It's actually pretty funny to think about how much of the stuff we see about fentanyl is rooted in this same motivation, and how deeply Joe is invested in creating propaganda around that issue that really is the modern-day equivalent to all those reefer madness films he rightfully mocked in this 2003 rant.
He's become the thing he always knew was stupid.
This whole part about hemp being a magic product and threatening William Randolph Hearst's paper factories, that's a little bit less historically based, but it might be Joe trying to come up with a larger financial explanation for why certain actions in history were taken as a way to absolve the past of being so damn racist.
Hemp is a versatile crop, and even though Joe overstates how it could replace so many other markets, it did get an unfair shake in terms of the whole market.
A lot of that is due less to Hearst's machinations, and it has more to do with the history of industrial hemp production in the United States.
There was some domestic production, but it was largely propped up by tariffs on importing bast fibers from other countries.
That tariff was dropped in 1872, and that had a crushing effect on the U.S. hemp production.
So you could just get other shit from other countries at the same or lesser price.
But in the later 1800s and into the early 1900s, a huge opportunity arose with the invention of the self-binding harvester.
Now farmers needed shitloads of high-quality twine to use in their binding machines, and hemp was perfect for that.
This led to the United States Department of Agriculture exploring ways to build up the production of American hemp.
There was promise, and there was some breeding of strains that was really showing a lot of potential, but then the Great Depression came and really shifted everyone's priorities about land usage, and hemp became not really as important anymore.
Imported, cheaper, possibly lower-quality fibers were fine in this context, and the bottom more or less fell out of the building of the industrial hemp base.
There were attempts at making hemp a wider-grown crop, but the timing was just really bad for it.
It never really made a comeback before the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937 was imposed, and racist attitudes and stigma toward weed rubbed off on hemp.
It didn't help that DuPont had developed nylon in the late 30s, but Joe doesn't have a basis for claiming that efforts to prop up big nylon were behind the diminishing of hemp.
The Popular Science article that Joe is referencing is actually from Popular Mechanics, and it's about the promise of a new machine that he got the name right.
It was the Decorticator.
This machine solved the problem of hemp being far more labor-intensive to process than other fibers that are comparable.
But it wasn't a miracle solution.
Even this article that Joe is referencing says, The machine cannot be operated profitably unless there's enough acreage within driving range, and farmers cannot find a profitable market unless there's machinery to handle the crop.
This headline that Joe remembers is from an article that's discussing the potential gains that could come from industrial hemp production replacing our reliance on foreign fibers.
And even in that body of the article, they discuss how it's not a sure thing.
This machine did not live up to the promises that were imagined.
The bigger picture here is that a belief that DuPont and Hearst not liking hemp leading to hemp being crushed despite it being a miracle crop requires a belief that the free market doesn't exist.
That might be okay for Joe in 2003, but not Alex.
He can't possibly...
Incorporate this into his strong defense of laissez-faire, capitalist kind of attitudes.
Joe has to defend his food from Kevin Booth, who's trying to eat his sashimi.
I'm going to leave aside Alex's statistics because they're made up, but I want to follow the train of thought that he's putting forth.
If something doesn't hurt anyone, there shouldn't be a law against it, so drugs should be legal.
Further, the prohibition of drugs has made drugs more expensive and turned them into a huge illegal market, which leads to most of the crime in the country.
If that prohibition wasn't there, then the drugs would be legal.
That crime wouldn't exist.
I wanted to bring focus to this because it's a great example of some shit that Alex never believed.
He always supported the opposite position on, but he was smart enough to know early in his career that the only way he wasn't going to be written off as just another fucking Limbaugh was to have positions like this that appeal to a more left-leaning audience.
This is, like, really savvy on his part, the presenting himself this way.
But I think Joe is the one who's more bringing that part up.
Alex is saying that the prohibition leads to crime.
There's a less racism-based justification for why the war on drugs is bad.
But yeah, I think that you can, you know, the never-Trump Republicans have an outsized coolness to them in a lot of people's minds because they have one right opinion.
So Joe needs to clarify what his position is here, because it makes a big difference.
Does he believe that you can only be punished if you drive on heroin and it leads to a crash?
Or does he believe that society understands that driving on heroin is dangerous, so it has the right to place prohibitions on doing it, to the point where even if you don't crash and hurt someone, you should be arrested if you're caught driving on heroin?
This is an important distinction, since one just has the belief in consequences being given for actual harm done.
The other involves a belief that the state has a responsibility to protect its people from very obvious potential harms, like someone driving on heroin.
If he believes the prior, then he shouldn't believe that driving on heroin matters.
It's just illegal to hurt someone in a car crash.
If he believes the latter, then his view isn't really all that libertarian at all.
And I don't think they care to parse this.
Also, if you watch the video of this, Alex does not give a single shit about what Joe is saying, and the two of them really don't feel like they're that close at all.
I love when somebody is like, well, these things are obvious.
If you do this, you do this.
And they don't recognize that if you follow that train of logic through the interconnectedness of all things that we might consider hurt, quote unquote, then you're going to get literally our current justice system.
Beyond the obvious discomfort Joe has with being involved with Alex's character, on some level, he has to know that Alex hates what he's saying.
It's all good to believe in human potential and resent the drudgery of wage slavery, but Joe is going a bit further than that.
He's saying that like family vacations and recreational sports leagues are meaningless, which Alex should see as an attack on the family unit.
Joe is saying that like having kids work in your job and being satisfied by that means that there's something wrong with you that would probably be solved by smoking a joint and expanding your mind.
On a fundamental level, this is counter to Alex's belief system.
But Joe is one of the only celebrities who will hang out with Alex in 2003, so he just lets it stand and say that Joe's making great points.
I mean, it is because what this is, what he is representing, is not what he thinks he's representing.
He thinks he's representing a principled stance, and what he's really representing is an existence that defines itself in opposition to whatever it perceives the Yes.
The whole idea that the Commission for Presidential Debates is a privately funded institution, so that means the people that are debating on television, that are running for president, that debate is being funded by the very people who will benefit from only certain people being in office.
So I feel like Joe might not really be all that interested in the clear solution to these two problems anymore, which would be abolishing the Electoral College and public financing of political campaigns.
In this election cycle, he arguably made millions of dollars in campaign contributions to Trump by having him and Vance on his show, and he's buddied up with Elon, who gave Trump hundreds of millions of dollars for the election.
Whatever concern he's expressing about the Commission for Presidential Debates being a private company, that's not part of his politics anymore at all.
The Commission on Presidential Debates, it started in 1987.
And prior to that, the presidential debates were sponsored by the...
Mm-hmm.
Mm-hmm.
It was originally run by co-chairs, who were respectively the heads of the Democratic and Republican parties.
It was never meant to include third-party candidates, and the coordination between the two parties, it actually led to the League of Women Voters putting out a press release in 1988, saying, Wow, it's a good thing things have gotten a lot better since then.
Sure.
So the H.W. Bush and Dukakis campaigns had agreed to a bunch of demands that they would make of the league, including the right to choose who could ask questions and the, quote, composition of the audience.
The league said fuck off, and since then the Commission on Presidential Debates has sponsored the events until 2024 when Biden and Trump decided that they didn't want to play along with the CPD, and now it's probably dead in the water.
It's kind of bullshit that third-party candidates aren't really included, but the CPD themselves makes a fairly decent point about it in their About page on their website.
Quote, They just kind of get to arbitrarily decide who's a leading candidate, but they're also right.
Political campaigns are a lot about appearances, so you don't want to look like a loser debating someone who's polling at 6% when you're like at 45. They make it clear that, quote, the CPD's debates are not intended to serve as a springboard for a candidate with only scant public support.
They didn't change their standards to 15% because of Ross Perot.
They just formalized that as a polling threshold in 2000, justified by an argument that this was the threshold that the League of Women Voters used previously.
Before 2000, they didn't let people in who polled over 5%.
And if you go to their website, you can find a long list of the people who were on their advisory panel for the pre-2000 debates and the process they followed.
A lot of discussion about what makes a leading candidate, who is relevant, who could conceivably win, and matters in terms of the public conversation.
Yeah, and I think that if you have too loose of standards, you're gonna fuck around and end up with, like, David Duke making a decent case for why he deserves to be on that stage.
He's wrong about a lot, and he accepts easy answers for hard questions, but at least it feels like he has momentum heading in the right direction, which it doesn't feel like anymore.
I should remind you that Joe had Trump and Vance on his podcast for softball interviews and has made a practice of helping launder the reputations of billionaires who gave vast sums of money to Trump's campaign.
Whereas once Joe thought that this excessive money in politics was an unsolvable problem that could only be solved by a meteor hitting the earth.
Now he's stupid rich and he's friends with a bunch of the people who profit from continuing that unsolvable problem.
So Joe is discussing his views on how to fix our totally fucked up society, and he thinks everyone needs to do a bunch of DMT, wealth needs to be redistributed, we need to institute eugenic policies, and insecure men need to...
taught how to let go so they don't become conservative sure Alex should throw a swing at him after something like that but his brand is so fragile in 2003 and the whole i'm not a conservative like you think that is so important to alex having any relevance so he has to hear joe say shit that's heretical to him and he responds by asking about arnold schwarzenegger's run for governor yep
Apparently Joe doesn't know that Alex was one of the largest opponents of Arnold's campaign, and I'm sure that Alex was hoping for a different answer or an ability to throw to commercial.
But I'm talking about controlling people's behavior.
I'm not talking about conservative in a common sense of the word.
I'm talking about it in a sense of someone who's worried about other people, all these gays trying to have marriages, you know, and someone's saying, oh, you know, how is that Hillary Clinton, how the hell is she, all that kind of crazy shit.
You know, like, if you were to describe that era as the attitude era all across the board, as in, like, it is more about looking like this big than it is about being that, you know?
He's right that our country is completely fucked up because the entire time we've existed, we've tried to be two contradictory things at the same time.
We're slave owners who love freedom.
We lied to ourselves to rationalize some of the awful shit that we were doing, and history is never really fully reckoned with that history.
He's right about not putting the Founding Fathers on some kind of pedestal and about how their words should be scrutinized in the same way that modern figures should be.
They're just as capable of lying as Bush, so it's dumb to take things at face value.
That kind of stuff is all good, and it's nice to hear.
But this conclusion he comes to where you can't trust history and everything is bullshit is so bad.
History is a tool, and just like any other tool, its value is dependent on how you use it.
We don't have a perfect record of everything that's happened from completely objective sources, so the practice of understanding pieces of history involves learning about context and how things fit together and what certain events can tell us about how people interacted with those events in history.
He doesn't believe this.
Joe doesn't believe that.
It's just a cool thing for him to say, for this character to say.
If you really believe that you can't trust anything from history, then you're kind of in a position where anything outside of your subjective experience is entirely unknowable.
So if you're Joe, and you know that periodically Alex will make things up and try to confidently pass them off as true pieces of information that he knows from study, Alex should immediately become someone you don't take seriously.
He's a compulsive liar who has no problem misleading you when it serves his ego to do so.
Who gives a fuck about the supposed vast amount of information he has at his disposal?
Because of his behavior, you can never really know if anything he's saying is true or something he's making up to slip out of an argument that he's losing.
I mean this fairly sincerely.
I don't think that Joe likes Alex very much.
I could believe that Joe has no idea what Alex thinks and has no interest in watching his show to find out.
He's been sold the lie that Alex is some kind of counterculture guy who's above the left-right paradigm.
That's enough for him.
I get the sense that if Joe knew that Alex was a religious zealot who hated gay people and thought he was on a mission from God to fight the literal devil...
I guess they're just these type of people, and you can have those type of people, I guess.
But if somebody's, like, in a conversation with me, and we are having an actual discussion, and then they're just like, you know, Tibetan monks were in with Hitler, I'd be like, why are we doing any of this then?
It sounds like Pop-Out to say that it's too fucked up and there's nothing you can do about it, but I don't want to waste my life trying to fix some shit that I can't fix.
What I do want, I want people to be aware that you can't fix it.
I want people to be aware how crazy life really is.
This is what I tell people all the time.
If you ever think you've got a grip on life, if you ever think you know what the fuck is up, I want you to go outside and I want you to look straight up.
And you realize there's a hundred billion stars in this galaxy.
This is one of hundreds of billions of galaxies in the known universe.
All structure is an illusion.
All society is an illusion.
We are talking monkeys on a rock spinning around in space.
This whole, you know, concept of what's real and what's not real and what you're supposed to do and what you're not supposed to do, it's completely artificial.
So this is a direct affront to all of Alex's beliefs.
We are not monkeys on a rock.
We're created by God and we have obligations to our ancestors to protect the white race or the West, if you prefer to use that term.
Alex should hate Joe.
Like, I think Joe doesn't like Alex that much based on the way they're interacting, but Alex should fucking hate Joe based on the things that he's expressing.
And I suspect that if he didn't host Fear Factor or wasn't willing to be seen in public with Alex, These beliefs that he's expressing would be a huge problem.
Also, when Joe says that thing about secondhand smoke at the end there, I'm pretty sure it's a continuation of an axe that he has to grind with Dennis Leary for stealing material.
Earlier, he tried to make a joke about Leary, and I think this is him trying to play around with Alex, and I don't know if Alex gets it.
So this is a very transparent move on Alex's part to pretend that Joe just brought him some valuable information.
It's a form of flattery, where Alex's value is in digging up the truth, and Joe has made a contribution to that.
Apparently he saw something on the History Channel about some Japanese people burning something as a means of blaming the Chinese.
This is great!
Joe's done some research for him.
Alex either knows about what Joe is talking about, or else this reveals that Alex is a complete fraud.
This is in reference to the Mukden incident from 1931, where the Japanese government attempted to blow up a train to blame the Chinese to justify an invasion.
They fucked it up and the explosion wasn't strong enough to blow up the train, and the plot was fairly quickly unraveled.
This is a big deal, and it led to Japan having to leave the League of Nations.
So it's pretty weird to imagine that Alex doesn't know about this.
It strongly feels like Alex has just been completely emasculated by Joe saying that he makes things up when he doesn't know correct information.
So Alex is trying to win him back over with this little pat on the head.
This is what Alex responds to, this sort of affirmation.
And I think he's trying to blind Joe with like, oh my God, you did so good.
When they came to him with Northwoods, and I said it in my film, but it just came out even on Frontline.
And when he came out and said, when they came to him and said, we want to kill U.S. civilians, plan on enemies, we want to hijack jets, we want to close them up in D.C., he said, that's it, I'm abolishing the CIA, we're pulling out of Vietnam, I'm cutting military funding, we're not going to Cuba anymore, and they just freaked.
I mean, they were so radical, they came to him with that plan to kill U.S. citizens.
Where did your instinct go about Alex making things up, Joe?
Because you just accepted that one.
So JFK gave the commencement address at American University on June 10th, 1963, and he was killed on November 22nd, so it wasn't two weeks before.
Alex is doing the old Alex thing, fudging details to be more interesting.
Ironically, if Joe would listen to that speech, he might get some inspiration about the hopelessness he seems to be feeling about politics and life.
Let us examine our attitude toward peace itself.
Too many of us think it's impossible.
Too many think it's unreal.
But that is dangerous, defeatist belief.
It leads to the conclusion that war is inevitable, that mankind is doomed, that we're gripped by forces we cannot control.
We need not accept that view.
Our problems are man-made, therefore they can be solved by man.
And man can be as big as he wants.
No problem of human destiny is beyond human beings.
Man's reason and spirit have often solved the seemingly unsolvable, and we believe they can do it again.
shit up about this Kennedy speech, which is mostly about a desire for peace with the Soviet Union and touching on things of like we can't demonize the people of the Soviet Union.
That is the worst thing we can do is see all of them as our enemies.
But also, it's weird that Joe doesn't have that same, like, history is all bullshit take on Kennedy.
What marijuana does, its gift is, it offers you an enhanced view of the world.
It spreads your consciousness.
It helps you absolve your ego.
It helps you keep your ego in check and actually calm it and give you a more balanced and objective perspective on the world.
It does.
People think marijuana...
Smoking pot made me realize that A lot of these things,
we're just connecting the dots because we're insecure.
And we're not looking at what's really healthy and what really feels good and what's really natural and what really helps you enjoy your life.
We're just doing it because we think that's what we're supposed to do.
And you live a trap.
And weed makes you aware of that, man.
Marijuana makes you very aware of everything around you.
People call it being paranoid.
But it's not paranoia.
Life really does suck that bad for most people.
And when you get high and you get paranoid, what's happening is all the bullshit is stripped away.
The bullshit veneer that most people cover their lives in, just so they can fucking get by, just so they can wake up when that goddamn alarm clock goes off, that shit strips away when you smoke pot.
And you are all of a sudden alone with your thoughts and the reality of the world, the reality of the universe.
And for most people, that's way too much to deal with.
They would rather have alcohol.
They would rather dull it down.
That's one of the reasons why everyone's afraid of marijuana, and that's one of the reasons why marijuana can help everyone.
But I remember being young and thinking, like, this is freeing my mind, man.
This is my medicine.
And it was not.
That was a fun story to tell myself, because I really enjoyed being high, and it gave me a kind of feeling of being deeper, more introspective than the people around me, and maybe that was an illusion.
That's probably the truth that we should bundle all other truths underneath is just like, I know it seems important right now, but you'll probably get over it in five to ten years.
And if you see the way these fucking young teenage, early 20s boys interact around this...
You can see, like, the germ of two directions.
You can see the germ of them being the fucking 4chan assholes who are, like, trying to pretend to be cool in order to create some sort of fake, you know, libertarian freedom.
Like, we can post child porn because we're, you know, that old thing.
And then you also have the people who are like...
Maybe we should think about how this shit works.
And also, here are the things we can do.
You know?
And it's so much like that.
You can see it all.
As it's about to happen.
And you can see that what happens for them, especially, was like the way they interacted with the powers that be around them.
Because it was so negative.
Because everything that they got was so bullshit.
They instinctively, just without even thinking about it, just go straight for the 4chan version.
They just barrel towards it like absolute insane lunatics.
The new Victory Act says one marijuana, cigarette, or any other type of anything that's even controlled, even pills, you're talking 20 to 90 in prison.
What?
Yeah, any drug possession.
They haven't passed it yet, they're trying to.
Any drug possession, 20 to 90, it's an act of terrorism.
And manufacturing anything, including growing marijuana, is a, quote, weapon of mass destruction because it, quote, hurts masses of people.
But given the amount of time that elapsed, the thing that Alex just said, the fact that this is supposed to be Joe Rogan's interview, you know, that's why Kevin Booth is there in LA.
Yeah, but they didn't get all this on camera for some reason.
The guy was rolling camera, forgot to press record or whatever, but this guy's standing there pointing up at the sky, and he starts talking in tongues.
I do a joke about it in my act because it's so ridiculous.
It was like a bad scene in a bad movie.
I was at the airport and I was getting my sneaker scanned and the guy was asking me all these dumb Fear Factor questions and I was being really polite because I was carrying weed and I was getting a little nervous.
Anyway, he scanned my sneakers for bombs and he was telling me how much he likes Fear Factor and there was a dude in line that had a turban on him.
And I looked at the guy with the turban, and he looked me in the eye, we made eye contact, and then he just walked right through while I was being scanned.
So there's something really fascinating that's going on in this dynamic where Joe's the one who's supposed to be getting interviewed and Alex is trying to take over this interview.
And at the same time, Kevin Booth is the one who's directing this documentary, and Alex is clearly trying to direct this interview.
I just said, I can't even believe this is happening.
I said, this is so funny.
Here's a guy, he's dressed like a fucking genie.
And I'm being scanned.
They're scanning my sneakers.
I do a joke.
I say, the tips of his shoes curl up in a circle and they're scanning me.
Check him.
I want to know what goofy shit he believes.
I mean, he's wearing an outfit.
And, you know, religious freedom, the whole idea of religious freedom to me is...
All religions are retarded.
Every single one of them.
Anything where a person tells you they know what's going on and they can help you and they're going to give you the secret knowledge, it's all bullshit.
It's all cult.
I don't care if it's been around for as long as Scientology or it's been around as long as Islam or Christianity.
It's all ridiculous.
So when I see someone wearing an outfit, I know that's a zealot.
That's a guy who's really deep, deep into whatever crazy bullshit and I would like them to talk to him.
Well, I know that whenever we flew into Los Angeles, there was a guy getting on a plane to come here who had a turban that you could hide 10 pounds of C4 in.
I mean, a giant brown turban.
But they were very busy searching old World War II vets in wheelchairs.
What I'm trying to say is these companies have no interest in making you healthy.
They have an interest in giving you something that makes you feel better that they can get money from you for.
It's a business.
They sell you something.
Hold on, sorry.
If they wanted you to be healthy, they would give you advice.
They wanted you to be healthy.
Pharmaceutical companies would say, listen, man, you don't need Zoloft.
What you really need to do is have a life that doesn't suck.
The reason why you're so depressed is because you work this fucking terrible job where you sit in a cubicle all day and you stare at a computer and you file paperwork for some big company.
You get home, you're tired, your feet hurt, and what are you going to do?
you're gonna watch television, you're gonna talk to your wife, who you've been involved in this fucking crazy, monogamous relationship with for 20 years, where you have no desire to have sex with her anymore, and you don't even communicate, because most of your life you spend away from each other, you don't have any vested, you don't have any shared interests, so what do you do?
Well, you get depressed, you get bummed out, your life seems pointless and hopeless, you're 40, you're dying, so what are they gonna do?
They're gonna give you a pill, you're gonna feel better.
Well, what they really need to tell you is, So, I mean, there's obviously the fundamental misunderstanding of...
The problem with the past is I no longer know how much information anyone was privy to at any given point in time, nor what information, nor do I have like a bar by which that information should be judged, or like a 5 out of 10 kind of scale, because once the internet took over, that renders like, that changes the way I think about everything.
Like, now I have access to all information.
So there is a certain amount of responsibility of just being basic competence.
I was talking about history being a tool and it being about how you use it.
I think that what Rogan is saying is bad, but within the context of someone talking like this in 2000, the surrounding aspects of it make it less like...
Be involved in relationships where you're actually friends with each other.
This is the thing I've been saying to people.
People get involved in these crazy relationships where they have these predetermined patterns of behavior that they think they have to follow.
You have to see someone, and once you see them, you should only have sex with that one person, and you should be monogamous, and you should stay together, and you know what?
Sometimes you've got to do what the wife wants you to do.
No, you don't!
You don't have to do what the wife wants you to do.
You have to do what you want to do, and you should let her do what she wants to do, and if that doesn't work together, then you shouldn't hang out.
Friends are just friends.
And a male friend and a female friend together are still just friends.
This whole idea of defining it by wife and husband and mother and child, that's all ridiculous.
We're just a bunch of human beings.
We should just enjoy each other's company.
And that's why people are fucking depressed.
That's why pharmaceutical companies have a stranglehold on our culture.
Because they give you something that makes you feel better about a life that sucks.
Pitch a lot of things, pitch a lot of drugs, sell a lot of drugs based on the idea of chemical imbalances.
Now, a lot of people do have an actual chemical imbalance in their brain.
There's a lot of people that are crazy, there's no doubt.
There's a lot of people whose brains don't function very well.
And there is a pill, there's some drugs, there's some tests they can do to find out if this is true.
And they can actually help people.
That's real.
But a lot of people take drugs, take pills that pharmaceutical companies prescribe because their life sucks.
And when your life sucks, you will have a chemical imbalance in your brain, and that's a natural thing.
When you're depressed, if you have a terrible job, you sit in a fucking hospital all day, and you come home, and you're in a loveless marriage, and you have no hobbies, no interests, no passion, and no creative output, your life is going to suck, and you're not going to feel good.
That doesn't mean you need a pill.
That doesn't mean someone should give you a pill, and you take that pill, and all of a sudden, you're happy, and you can deal with this sucky life, and you can walk through it with a smile.
You know what?
If you want to be a drone and you're happy being a drone and you would like someone to just give you a pill so that you can accept that, that is available to you.
But that's not helping anyone.
What you really need to do is get the fuck out of this life that you're living.
We're taught to believe that we're supposed to follow this predetermined pattern of behavior where you live this, you know, you work 50 weeks a year for two weeks off.
You basically, you're a slave.
You give away eight hours of your day.
We say, well, hey, you got those other 16 hours to yourself, but you don't.
You know, if you work eight hours a day, man, you're fucking tired, okay?
In between travel, to and from work, all that.
You cut a couple hours out of there.
You got eating.
You cut a couple hours out of there.
How many hours do you have left?
What do you got, like 10, 12 hours left in your day?
And what are you going to do?
What are you going to do?
You're going to sleep.
You got to sleep for at least 8 or you don't feel good.
What kind of life is that?
It's no life.
If you don't do something that you enjoy doing for a living, you're going to be depressed.
That's a fact.
And being depressed is not...
Because you have a chemical imbalance in your brain.
It's because your brain is responding to a really bad, boring life with no stimulation.
That's what pharmaceutical companies don't want you to hear.
They want you to think that there's something that they could fix in you and just give you a little pill.
But really, the symptoms are just a part of your life being a fucking massive piece of shit.
unidentified
That would have gone a lot better if Alex didn't interrupt me five or six fucking times.
I think that, like, honestly, if I watch this, the way that it's not edited out where Joe is being a real, like, hey, the Alex Jones problem is that he makes shit up.
But he also recognizes that left to his own devices, Joe goes down a bunch of dumb paths that aren't helpful, and he feels a responsibility to keep that on track.
So you're saying he's got something of a Bill Hicks candidate list laying in front of him and he's like, I see Joe Rogan has some Bill Hicks in him, but maybe he's too high.
And I see Alex has some Bill Hicks in him, but he's a piece of shit.
Anyway, I think that this peep behind whatever curtain there is, I think it reveals a ton of that stuff.
And it shows artifice.
It shows...
These people don't really...
They don't like each other.
And it shows that Joe, at least in 2003, was fully aware that Alex is full of shit.
And therefore, should take a greater amount of responsibility in the way that he has actively mainstreamed and whitewashed Alex's career to the point where it is now.
He has a great, conscious, active responsibility in Alex's...