Today, Dan and Jordan record their first episode in the new studio. Unfortunately, it's a present day episode where Alex is trying to defend RFK Jr, and in the process engages in some intensely racist commentary about Chinese people.
My bright spot, Jordan, is this is the maiden voyage, the first time we are recording in It's true!
So, who knows what...
Fucking nonsense is gonna happen.
You may notice, I have no idea actually how it's gonna come out, but I live fairly close to a train, and so you may hear periodically the train going by.
Yeah, and then that's like a reflection of how many people of our generation aren't having children, and so they can relate to this childless adult world, you know?
And I think it's interesting, but also there's like 40 of them.
For every action is an opposite and equal reaction.
Each successive week and month and year gets more intense.
This really is a quickening or a cascade of many singularities towards the great singularity, the return of our Lord and Savior Christ Jesus.
Well...
RFK Jr. has come out and talked about something we talked about two and a half years ago.
Major scientific institutions in Europe, the United States, India, Australia, and Japan, of all places, they have a lot of great scientists there, looked at the COVID-19 virus and said it's been made in a lab.
I mean, they said three and a half years ago the Indians first scanned it.
It's a prestigious biomedical university where they have a multi-billion dollar gene editing reader computer.
And they said, this is man-made.
This is five viruses.
We know who made it.
And this is what it's been designed to do.
And then they got billions of research funding threatened.
And that is a testament to how little it matters that RFK said that.
Anybody who has any idea who RFK Jr. is probably already thinks this is something he believes, or at very least, it's an idea that he's susceptible to, given all of his other completely insane conspiracy beliefs.
This isn't news at all, really.
It's what you should expect from people like RFK Jr.
Everyone should be up to speed on him by this point.
There's no excuses.
Possibly the thing that's more interesting in the news about RFK is that he said, quote, quote, there's an argument that it's ethnically targeted.
COVID-19 is targeted to attack Caucasians and black people.
The people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese.
This is kind of an idea that isn't really new to our ears since Alex has been saying shit like this for years, which is why it amused me that the New York Times headline about this was, quote, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. airs bigoted new COVID conspiracy theory about Jews and Chinese.
This isn't a new theory.
It's just being said by a different person.
Yeah.
And here's the point.
I say this to the media.
It's far past time to stop covering RFK Jr.
You can't handle it, and it's going to be Trump all over again.
Any viability RFK Jr. may have as a candidate is solely the result of people in the media deciding they want to cover him to point out the obviously horrific and offensive things he says, and it's going to backfire.
Case in point, why this is no good, the Times thinks that this is a new conspiracy theory about COVID, but it's not.
It's just one that's spread by people they're accustomed to.
Yeah.
the media just needs to realize that even though he's pretending to run for president kennedy belongs in that same basket ignore his dumb ass yeah yeah I mean, why?
And I think that, you know, there's a robust debate that can be had about what's the extent that you should go, like, sort of guide your behaviors by not amplifying negative voices in a way that's kind of neutral.
I mean, the simplest issue that I am having, right, is once you start saying, oh, it affects specifically white people and black people and not blank and blank.
So, RFK Jr. was actually called on this claim, and in response, he angrily tweeted out a study he said backed him up.
However, the study did no such thing.
Here's how the Times put it.
Quote, Kennedy also linked to a scientific paper that he said showed the structure of the COVID-19 virus made Black and Caucasian people more susceptible and, quote, ethnic Chinese, Finns, and Ashkenazi Jews were less receptive.
But the study he linked to, published in July 2020, early in the pandemic and before effective treatments had emerged, made no reference to Chinese people as less receptive to the virus, nor did it speak of targeting the virus.
It's said one particular receptor for the virus appeared not to be present in Amish and Ashkenazi Jews.
What happened here is that Kennedy got caught talking shit, talking that good conspiracy shit that riles up his normal audience.
And then when he was called on it, he tried to whip out a study to silence the criticism.
That works really well when you're dealing with the normal audience that he's accustomed to, full of conspiracy minded people with anti-vax zealotry ideas.
Just being able to pull something out that has the appearance of supporting your claim is enough.
Yeah.
unidentified
But that's not enough when the people you're trying to.
Yeah, I mean, the people that you normally please with that, you're giving them something that they're not going to look into because they already like you.
They just appreciate it if you come with a little bit more than nothing.
Just like an indigenous person from Mexico or Guatemala, if you test their genetics, it's Chinese.
That's where they came from thousands and thousands of years ago.
It's a genetic, complete match, Chinese.
They don't really teach that in school, though, but that's a mainline thing in biosciences.
Spaniards are Germanic and Gaulish until they got invaded and held for several hundred years by the North African Moors, who were a mix of African and Arabic.
So that's why you see the change in the Spanish there.
So, ethnic studies are very interesting.
Not in the leftist ethnic studies, but actually the historical ethnic studies and then bio-weapons.
But the idea that people have a lot of mixed heritage and, like, over time, over generations, over centuries, people have, you know...
Went from countries to other countries.
There's been flow of populations.
And so there are not discrete and very separate group A, group B, group C. And essentially what Alex is saying, if you just ignore the specifics, is exactly why race-specific bioweapons are stupid.
Well, as Dick Cheney wrote in 2000 in Rebuilding America's Defenses for the Project of the American Century document, got wide circulation, look it up for yourself.
He said the U.S. government must legitimize the use of race-specific bioweapons.
So, RFK Jr. talked about how this is a...
He just stated what the papers say.
And now we're hearing he's an anti-Semite.
Absolutely preposterous.
Of course, he supports the state of Israel, just like Trump, whole nine yards.
Some would say he's just too pro-Israel.
And I make that point, just to point out that he is definitely not against the Jews.
So we've talked about this a hundred times, but to reiterate, Dick Cheney didn't write Rebuilding America's Defenses.
He isn't even listed as a participant in the project that culminated in that document's writing.
Fun fact though, Scooter Libby was a participant, so maybe Alex should ask why Trump pardoned him while he was in office.
In the document, they write in the future, quote, advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.
This wasn't saying that it would be a political useful tool for us to use and that we should do it.
This was part of a list of potential threats that they were arguing that the U.S. defense is needed to be up to facing.
Alex is lying about this document because it makes his job easier.
We've been over this a whole bunch.
Also...
It's not something Alex would really ever grasp, but he's being a bit anti-Semitic himself here by equating support for Jewish people with support for Israel.
Like, they're the exact same thing.
They are not the same thing.
And defending someone against charges of being anti-Semitic by saying they support Israel doesn't really make sense fully.
If you can make a weapon that targets both black people and white people as a race-specific bioweapon, does that not suggest that there is no difference between black people and white people, whereas there is a difference between black people, white people, and Jews and Asians?
There's actually two quotes here from one interview jammed together, which they were both in response to different questions, so they don't belong together.
The part about Americans burdening the planet more than 20 people from Babylonia.
I'm just going to leave that alone because the other part is more interesting.
I'm going to read out Alex's quote, and then I'm going to read you Cousteau's quote, and I want you to pay attention to very specific changes in wording that have been made that affect how you would interpret these words.
So here's Alex's version.
Quote, This is a terrible thing to say.
In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people a day.
It's a horrible thing to say, but it's just as bad not to say it.
Here's what Cousteau actually said.
Quote, It's terrible to have to say this.
World population must be stabilized, and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day.
This is so horrible to contemplate that we shouldn't even say it.
But the general situation in which we are involved is lamentable.
There are two major changes that Alex's quote makes that change the point being made.
The first is distilling Cousteau's sentence down to, in order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people a day.
By doing that, you're able to make the sentiment appear far more prescriptive than it is meant to be.
Alex's version sounds much more like a statement of what needs to be done and what Cousteau wants to be done than the actual spoken words.
The second change is inaccurately paraphrasing Cousteau down to, it's horrible to say this, but just as bad not to say it.
The underlying meaning of this is that Cousteau is advocating for killing hundreds of thousands of people a day, and that this is the thing we all know needs to be done.
It's the elephant in the room, but no one's saying it.
Cousteau's like the M&M of exterminating people.
He has the balls to say it in front of y'all, and he doesn't have to be false and sugarcoat.
Oh, boy.
He's saying that this is a solution to a real problem that is, quote, The real world problem is severe and in order to drive home the scale of the issue Cousteau uses this imagery but includes the caveat essentially saying that this is not actually a solution.
Alex is probably not making these alterations to the quote himself, and he definitely isn't getting this directly from the UNESCO interview, because that's where I got the real version from.
He probably just saw a meme somewhere, like, someone reworded this quote to make it more useful for dumb-dumb conspiracy theorists to use for their bullshit, and he thought, eh, who cares about the real source?
Yeah, because Cousteau is essentially saying, like, You got us to a point so bad that a reasonable person would have to stop and say, we'd have to do this.
And that's unthinkable.
So, fuck you.
Now we gotta solve the problem because we can't do that, obviously.
RFK Jr., climate change is being used to control us through fear and is not dealing with real environmental problems, but is a giant Ponzi scheme by central banks across the world to bring in total surveillance and control and end industrial societies and consolidate power and wealth in the hands of a few.
Yep, yep, totally true.
So, I want to say he's totally defected over to our side?
So if the globalists know that you know that they never go that far, and that's how you can kind of tell a real patriot from somebody who's coming in to play games, then they would say that far.
They would go that far in order to blend in better with the patriots, because they know what you know is a litmus test.
He says, I didn't cut this clip, but he says that like, oh, years back he tried to get RFK Jr. on the show and they said, no, your show's too controversial.
In my 29 years on air, to study something called race-specific bioweapons.
So the Vice President of the United States wrote a paper in September of 2000.
Here it is on screen for you.
Anybody can type this in and find it.
It's a project for New American Century, a neocon CFR Bilderberg Group think tank.
Rebuilding America's Defense's Strategy, Forces, and Resources for a New Century.
Now, in this, they said a terror attack that kills on League with the level of deaths in Pearl Harbor, which was 3,000.
9-11 was 3,000, one year later.
Would be ideal to launch Pax Americana.
They also, it's a long report, but we just printed one page for you.
This is page 60. And it says, an advanced form of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.
And it goes on to say that this is what we may need to use against foreign enemies because they're getting so sophisticated.
So, I just showed you Dick Cheney.
You may have heard of him.
See, when the news calls me a white supremacist, notice they don't show a clip of anything like that because they're lying.
When I tell you Dick Cheney said that, 20 minutes ago I went, you know what, better print it, better show it.
So you can sense in that pause that he had that Alex read the quote from the document and then he was asking himself, like, is that it?
He's built this up in his mind to such a degree that he's probably a bit surprised to go back and look and be like, that's all there is here, oh no.
That's why he had to make up the part about the document saying that we need to use race-specific bioweapons against other countries, because they're too sophisticated.
Just a little trick here that you can almost always rely on.
When Alex is reading something and then says it goes on to say, whatever he says next is completely made up.
What's happening is that he's realized that he can't use a source the way he needs to in order to make his narrative work, so he's having to improvise and just make up bullshit.
It says, yeah, the studies show that it's, there needs to be more research on this, but that it specifically targets Anglos and Africans more.
And notice I was politically correct right there, and I'm going to stop doing it because it's no insult to call black people Negroes.
It's like they say calling a homosexual a homosexual is an insult.
It's heterosexual homosexual.
It's Caucasoid or Anglo.
I mean, it just means, like in Spanish...
Negro just means black, folks.
It has nothing to do with being mean to black people.
The point is, people don't care about killing blacks with bio-weapons.
Just don't call them the N-word.
And now they're moving to say that all those words are bad.
And again, that just shows how, oh, we've taken all your rights for cutting your kids' genitals off, but don't use the scientific name for black people.
I'm imagining if you and your grandfather and your grandfather's grandfather have lived in this stupid fucking country, you don't like somebody calling you an African.
So this, like, also, I feel like what's going on here is that Alex is trying to sound smart And throw some stuff around to justify some of his racist beliefs.
And that's because the only thing a racist likes more than claiming that they're not racist is insisting that their racism is based on empirical facts.
This is an editorial covering a paper put out by the Cambridge Center for the Study of Existential Risk, which says that a weapon that targets a particular genomic profile is a potential danger in the future.
But it's not something that exists now, and this doesn't really help support Alex or RFK in any of their arguments, but the headline kind of works for Alex, so there you go.
I mean, it's not really possible, because you can't...
If you are going to make it, you would have to make it in such a way that it cannot mutate whatsoever, and it must always remain exactly the same, and that's just not possible.
The funniest part of it is that a race-specific bioweapon would affect people of all races almost identically because we're all related to each other in some fashion.
It's just literally him faking a source while trying to make an argument.
This is a paper in the Iranian Journal of Public Health.
And again, Alex should read the sources he presents on air.
Because it's not a study or even a research paper.
This is a letter to the editor.
The grammar is terrible, and it doesn't even demonstrate or prove anything.
This wouldn't fly as a source for like a junior high paper, and yet here Alex is passing it off to his audience because the headline has the appearance of supporting the narrative that he makes money selling them.
Should Alex really believe this based on how much he hates the Chinese government?
This accusation came from foreign ministry spokesperson Wang Winben, who only said this because a day prior, U.S. Secretary of State Anthony Blinken had criticized the Chinese government for their repression of Uyghurs and Tibetans.
This isn't evidence of anything, and that is the sum of Alex's evidence.
If Alex cared at all or took any of this seriously, he would do a better job.
He doesn't care at all, and this is just a pageant meant to instill fear in the audience, particularly the white audience.
If he really thought any of this meant anything, he would have spent even a single minute preparing for this show instead of having his intern print out anything he can find on Google with a headline that sounds good, even if the body of the article directly contradicts the point that Alex is trying to make.
The intent in rattling off headlines like this is to deflect from how little evidence Alex actually has.
Because we played these one at a time, but, you know, if you're listening live, it's a da-da-da-da-da-da.
But in these major studies, for some reason, Chinese, not just even the other Asians, they get a little less, but Chinese are some of the most homogeneous, is the word.
Other people would call it inbred.
People are homogeneous in white people in West Virginia coal towns and stuff, because they're marrying their sister.
And I'm saying, I mean, that's just a fact.
And it causes genetic problems, schizophrenia, mental illness, you name it.
So, royalty is interbred.
That's why they're so crazy.
Now, the Egyptian royalty was completely insane because they would interbreed.
And you see the Rothschilds giving speeches about, yes, I've been interbreeding with our family for 400 years.
But you're not supposed to do that now.
Yeah, because it creates lunatics.
And so much of the lunatic behavior we see in the world is from inbred groups.
I mean, I'm fairly certain that I've read that all of that, not all of it, but much of the idea of the effects is overblown and kind of socially created to just make sure you don't do this shit, you know?
Yeah, you know, it just doesn't seem to make sense anymore whenever one part of the world points at another part and goes, oh, you're doing something weird.
The point is, they did pull one of the studies here.
Significant impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on race, ethnic, diversities, and U.S. mortality.
There's a bunch of these.
And this is a big public interest social health research deal.
A bunch of colleges and professors crushed the data.
Finally, the pandemic shifted radical ethnic mortality differentials in favor of white people, narrowing the Hispanic advantage and widening the black disadvantage.
And so whites and blacks got sick.
Hispanics not as sick because they've got Chinese genetics.
Alex says that it's a public interest in social health study because the first line of this article is, quote, public interest in social and health inequalities is increasing.
He just picked out a few words and threw them out, but then realized that he couldn't say inequalities.
Then he read the last sentence of the first paragraph.
Quote, Finally, the pandemic shifted racial and ethnic mortality differentials in favor of white people, narrowing the Hispanic advantage and widening the black disadvantage.
That line makes no sense out of context.
What does the paper mean by advantage or disadvantage?
That makes no sense unless you've read the rest of it or have context.
So this is speaking in terms of relative life expectancy, and Alex's summation of what he just read is not even supported by the text.
Even if you just take the thing that he said on air, you can't conclude that white and black people were hurt the most and Hispanics were all right, probably because they're secretly all Chinese.
The sentence Alex read said that the pandemic shifted mortality differentials, quote, in favor of white people.
Put succinctly, the Hispanic population had a slight advantage over the white population in terms of life expectancy, but the pandemic narrowed that advantage because the Hispanic population was hit disproportionately hard by COVID and COVID deaths, which shouldn't be the case if anything Alex is saying were true.
This very paper that Alex is citing says, quote, recent findings show that COVID-19 death rates were highest in the Hispanic population.
This is another case where the source that Alex presents contradicts what he's saying, but it has a useful headline, and his audience just lets him make shit up so it doesn't matter.
He's providing the very article that says he's wrong, and yet his listeners will still buy into the charade that he knows anything or does any preparation.
If he did, like, even just read the sources he provides, he would know this paper doesn't suggest that race differences account for the disparity in pandemic life expectancy drops.
Social factors played the largest role, according to this paper.
For instance, when they explain the worst effect on the Hispanic population thusly, quote, The paper says,
quote, Yeah.
may have been disproportionately likely to continue working due to their lower ability to access unemployment benefits, e.g.
because of no residence permit for non-U.S.
citizens or limited access to information on benefits for non-English speakers.
Alex, Alex didn't read this article, and if he did...
He wouldn't agree with it.
But because he's a lazy liar, he's fine using it to defend his bullshit, entirely comfortable in the awareness that his audience will never go read his sources and find out what a big lying fraud he is.
So it's not really capturing all of the scholarship about COVID.
It was a little early.
It discusses how it's been found that polymorphisms and ACE2 receptors that were prevalent in African and African-American populations were associated with cardiovascular and pulmonary conditions, higher incidences of that.
Sure.
unidentified
And how polymorphisms like this could, quote, offer potential explanations for differential genetic susceptibility to COVID-19 as well as for risk factors.
It is shit that, like, we have so many brilliant scientists who can figure out polymorphic receptors and shit like that, but we can't just be like, hey, when you cram a bunch of poor people into small spaces, they're going to spread the disease amongst themselves faster than if they're in...
Look, I don't just believe the Russians, and they lie sometimes.
They put Russian operatives on our show, because we have Russian reporters on.
We've had Iranian reporters, Japanese reporters, British reporters, French reporters, Brazilian reporters, Mexican reporters, Canadian reporters, Scottish reporters, Irish reporters.
You've seen them all here.
South African reporters, Nigerian reporters, we've had them all.
And we, right before the Russia invasion, had Russian media people on like, no, we are not invading.
This is American lies.
And meanwhile, the Russian troops were all masked about to go in.
They were tasked to put the disinfo out so the Russians wouldn't get caught and blown up by all the NATO weapons, which they did.
And I'm just looking at the guy going, so you're not invading?
No, Mr. Jones, no.
And I'm like, well, why do we see troops passing here?
Sorry, the connection is breaking up.
We need to say bye-bye now.
So, I don't just mindlessly believe the Russians either.
The past is just so malleable to him that he creates in his head what he wishes had been the behavior that he displayed.
And then he's like, yeah, I had Russian disinformation people coming on the show and they're saying they weren't going to invade and I didn't believe that shit.
And so I just make that point that my job is so easy.
It's not try to think, what are people going to think of this?
What's the effect politically going to be?
When you do that, you infect your mind with a bunch of questions of politics and what sounds right.
When you just go with what you believe is accurate from deep research and commitment to the truth, you almost always get an incredibly good answer that's insanely accurate.
I mean, back then, hell, 27 years ago, I might drink two beers a week, so it's probably iced tea.
And I'm sitting there, and I just, like, all of a sudden, like, felt this presence in the room.
They're, like, mopping up about to close in 30 minutes.
Nobody was in there.
And I just sat there for about an hour, and as soon as I was ready to leave, they opened the door and locked it, and I walked out.
And it was just like, this is the whole rest of your life here, son.
You ready to do this?
It's all going to happen.
I saw everything.
It was wild, too.
And, like, God shaded the individuals, the personalities, the people.
I wasn't shown who it would be or what happened, but it was like, And you're going to do this, and you're going to get persecuted, but it's going to explode.
And then all these people are going to wake up, and it's going to have this giant effect.
And then it's going to build towards that understanding before the Antichrist takes over and enslaves people for a few years and kills billions of people.
But then out of that, Satan winning in the third quarter is the best way to humanly describe it.
It was way more advanced than that.
Then out of the work you've done and others do now to plant the seeds, That great tyranny of the devil will be like sunlight and rain on the seeds, and there'll be this giant harvest, the biggest ever, that will bring down Satan's empire.
So it's like when LeBron was on the Cavs, and he was down 3-1 in the Champions to the Golden State Warriors, because they always win the third quarter.
You know, they were famously winners of the third quarter.
Man, I think, like, we gotta get, like, 5150, this guy.
I just think, you know, we keep coming back to it, but, like...
He either suffers from pretty severe delusions, or he's presenting himself as someone who has these delusions of grandeur about his cosmic importance in order to defraud people.
Even if Alex said that that was a feeling that he had, I'd be like, yeah, you know, that's great.
It's not healthy to think that you had a vision from God over a chicken fried steak and iced tea that told you the rest of your future and that you would be instrumental, integral, in fact, in conquering the devil.