All Episodes
June 21, 2023 - Knowledge Fight
01:12:33
#820: Tucker, The Man And His Twitter- Episode 2

Today, Dan and Jordan explore the very bizarre second episode of Tucker Carlson's Twitter show.  This installment sorta revolves around cultural taboos, and Tucker spends a lot of time complaining about how society doesn't like white supremacists enough.

Participants
Main voices
d
dan friesen
37:28
j
jordan holmes
20:05
t
tucker carlson
10:25
Appearances
Clips
a
alex jones
00:11
j
joe biden
00:15
p
pastor david manning
00:02
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
I'm sick of them posing as if they're the good guys, saying we are the bad guys.
Knowledge fight.
Dan and Jordan, knowledge fight.
I need, I need money.
Andy and Pam.
alex jones
Andy, Andy.
unidentified
Stop it.
Andy in Kansas.
alex jones
Andy in Kansas.
unidentified
It's time to pray.
Andy in Kansas, you're on the air.
Thanks for holding us.
Hello, Alex.
I'm a first-time caller.
I'm a huge fan.
I love your room.
Knowledge Fight.
KnowledgeFight.com.
I love you.
Hey, everybody.
dan friesen
Welcome back to Knowledge Fight.
I'm Dan.
unidentified
I'm Jordan.
dan friesen
I forgot who I was for a second.
We're a couple dudes that like to sit around, worship at the altar of Selene, and talk a little bit about Alex Jones.
jordan holmes
Oh, indeed we are, Dan.
dan friesen
Jordan.
Jordan.
jordan holmes
Quick question for you.
dan friesen
What's your bright spot today, buddy?
Why don't you go first?
jordan holmes
My bright spot, Dan, is over the weekend I spent Father's Day with my family, my father specifically, as you might expect.
We had a fantastic time.
There was some barbecuing.
There was some smoking of ribs.
Love it.
There was plenty of talk.
My brother, he's trying to build a deck or something, not completely finished, and instead of stairs, he wound up with a ramp.
Which, my wife slipped and fell down.
So it's a little bit of a mixed bright spot and dark spot because she really hurt herself.
Oh man, it hurts so bad.
dan friesen
I'm very sorry to hear that.
jordan holmes
Yeah, and I got a huge bruise on my hand because I fell immediately after her.
dan friesen
You are so codependent.
jordan holmes
Oh, no, no, no.
dan friesen
She fell and then you had to fall.
No, no, no.
jordan holmes
It was even worse.
It was comical insofar as she fell outside and then when I went to check on her, because I didn't see any of it happen, I went to check on her and they were like, what happened?
She fell and I went, what?
And then fell the exact same way.
Exact same way.
dan friesen
It's basically the story of Everest.
jordan holmes
It was a cartoon.
It really was.
Absolutely.
dan friesen
Oh, man.
Was there more talk or more meat?
jordan holmes
There was more smoked meat.
There was plenty.
They have a membership that shall not be named that gives you large quantities of stuff.
So, yeah.
They made way too much.
dan friesen
Awesome.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
How about you?
jordan holmes
What's your right spot?
dan friesen
Well, we just got a package.
jordan holmes
Indeed, we did.
unidentified
Zip.
dan friesen
Zip in the mailbag.
And this is so cool.
We got this from Dave up in Northern Ontario.
Sent the...
McDonald's glasses from Batman Forever.
The set of the four glasses with Batman, Robin, Two-Face, and Riddler.
jordan holmes
And they are, I don't even know what pristine condition would be for McDonald's glasses, but these are in mint condition.
dan friesen
I'm certain that, like, we have to have talked about it at some point on the show.
jordan holmes
I guarantee we've talked about it.
dan friesen
But I can't for the life of me remember when.
But I do, I'm like, I had these.
Maybe not the whole set.
But I had some of them when I was a kid.
jordan holmes
Oh no, we opened the package.
dan friesen
To the point.
It's such a child memory.
These are so much smaller than I remember them being.
jordan holmes
I remember them being huge!
I thought they were mugs!
unidentified
Like the size of a stein!
dan friesen
So there's also a letter along here that I unfortunately found right after I hit play.
jordan holmes
That's why there was also much of me talking straight.
dan friesen
And so I don't know if it explains when we talked about it, but also just a fantastic cartoon that has been drawn of us here.
jordan holmes
Oh yeah, it's a nice comic strip.
dan friesen
A comic strip, yeah, not a cartoon.
I guess that's motion.
unidentified
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
dan friesen
Wow.
unidentified
Thank you, Dave.
jordan holmes
I have many lines, but most of them are essentially, I'm Jordan.
That's well done.
Thank you so much.
dan friesen
Our past is coming back to haunt us.
jordan holmes
I mean, honestly, this may be something.
I think I almost remember us talking about this, like, ten years ago, drinking at, like, 4 a.m., yelling at each other about how great Batman Forever cups were.
dan friesen
And there was somebody who just overheard us.
jordan holmes
Yeah, absolutely.
dan friesen
Someone at that bar that you took me to where they were playing bingo.
jordan holmes
Yes!
unidentified
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
dan friesen
Like, they knew what was coming, and they recorded our conversation.
unidentified
Right, right, right.
jordan holmes
Right near Fullerton, yeah.
dan friesen
Yeah.
So, Jordan, today we have an episode to go over.
jordan holmes
Oh, indeed we do.
dan friesen
With that, our last episode, the past, and today we're going to be talking about Tucker's second episode of his Twitter show.
And part of the reason we've got to record these in advance a little bit, because this week I'm working on some housing stuff.
So, you know, got to knock this out a little bit to give me, you know, free up a little bit of time.
jordan holmes
You're moving on up!
To the east side.
Well, I mean, northeast-ish.
dan friesen
Hey, don't dox me, man.
But yeah, so I have a bit of that business to take care of and stuff, and it's always a hassle.
And it will probably be for a little bit, but we'll get to the other side of it and hopefully be able to buffer it with some episodes here and there.
We've talked about the present day for a fucking week and a half.
jordan holmes
I mean, what I appreciate most about this is that this is us saying that we're going to need to take some time off, so you're only going to get three episodes this week.
dan friesen
Yeah.
And they'll be from the past or Tucker's, which is what maybe we would have been doing anyway.
Self-consciousness is a terrible, terrible thing.
jordan holmes
You're going to enjoy your time here.
dan friesen
No, not really.
jordan holmes
No, I doubt it.
dan friesen
You'll get something.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
So before we get down to business on Tucker's episode two, Taboo Boogaloo.
jordan holmes
Okay.
dan friesen
I don't know.
I'm trying to give it a title.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
For the episode itself.
jordan holmes
Sure, sure.
dan friesen
I'm sticking with Tucker Man and his Twitter.
Even though I've never seen Tucker Man and his Dream.
I know it's a movie.
unidentified
I don't know what it's about.
jordan holmes
Tucker's Twit...
Twits...
Tucker.
dan friesen
No.
jordan holmes
Can't do it.
dan friesen
Tucker the man in his Twitter is about as good as I think I'm going to do.
jordan holmes
Yeah, I think that's not too bad.
dan friesen
And I'm a fan of bad titles, as is evidenced in all the things we've ever done.
jordan holmes
Darius Tucker's...
dan friesen
Letter crime.
jordan holmes
Tucker and the Blowfish.
I think that's what we're going to go with.
dan friesen
It's too late now.
jordan holmes
Ah, shoot.
dan friesen
But it's not too late to say hello to some new wonks.
jordan holmes
Oh, that's a great idea.
dan friesen
So first, two guys, one hammer.
Thank you so much.
You are now a policy wonk.
unidentified
I'm a policy wonk.
jordan holmes
Thank you very much!
dan friesen
Next, Quimby in Colorado is still waiting for Dan to sing Tarzan Boy in AJ's voice.
Thank you so much.
You are now a policy wonk.
unidentified
I'm a policy wonk.
jordan holmes
Thank you very much!
unidentified
Jungle lights, I'm far away from nowhere.
On my own, like Tarzan Boy.
jordan holmes
Beautiful.
unidentified
Light night and sleep, I pray across the bar, the monkey business, on a Sunday afternoon.
Sing it.
jordan holmes
Praise.
Sing it.
Okay.
dan friesen
Next, thank you so much to Jan and Dorden.
You are now a policy wonk.
unidentified
I'm a policy wonk.
jordan holmes
Thank you very much!
dan friesen
Thank you.
Next, Halcyon, the beautiful unicorn.
Thank you so much.
You are now a policy wonk.
unidentified
I'm a policy wonk.
jordan holmes
Thank you very much!
dan friesen
And Dan DeGrandpre.
Thank you so much.
You are now a policy wonk.
unidentified
I'm a policy wonk.
jordan holmes
Thank you very much!
dan friesen
And we got a technocrat in the mix, Jordan.
So thank you so much to Candy and Ansys.
You are now a technocrat.
unidentified
I'm a policy wonk.
Four stars.
Go home to your mother and tell her you're brilliant.
pastor david manning
Someone sodomite sent me a bucket of poop.
unidentified
Daddy Shark.
alex jones
Jar Jar Binks has a Caribbean black accent.
unidentified
He's a loser little titty baby.
dan friesen
I don't want to hate black people.
alex jones
I renounce Jesus Christ!
dan friesen
I realize that the lyric isn't night and sleep, it's hide and seek.
unidentified
Ooh.
dan friesen
I don't know what, I panicked, cold reading this request, trying to remember the lyrics to Tarzan Boy.
jordan holmes
I think you're okay.
I think people will probably not notice.
dan friesen
That song, man, that's a banger.
unidentified
Yeah.
Mm-hmm.
dan friesen
I'll stand by it.
jordan holmes
Okay, okay.
dan friesen
It's better than its appearance in Ninja Turtles.
jordan holmes
Sure.
dan friesen
And it's better than, it's used as a Jungle Boy wrestler at AEW.
It's his theme song.
unidentified
Okay.
dan friesen
Better than that.
jordan holmes
Okay.
dan friesen
Better than all of it.
jordan holmes
Better than all of that.
dan friesen
Yep.
jordan holmes
Okay.
dan friesen
So, from what I can tell, Tucker doesn't give names to his Twitter shows, and so you kind of just jump in and you're like...
I wonder what this asshole's going to talk about today.
jordan holmes
Okay, so it is just a man who turns the camera on and then shouts for ten minutes and then stops.
dan friesen
But it's written.
You can tell it's written.
jordan holmes
Right, right, right.
dan friesen
Because there's a path that you're supposed to be going along.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
But you never know what you're going to get.
jordan holmes
Okay.
dan friesen
It's really, it's like a box of C's candies.
Except those are labeled, I think.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
My mom and my grandma and my aunt.
I think that's the full list.
They loved C's Candies.
They're always around on holidays and stuff.
I recently found that you can order bespoke boxes of C's Candies.
You can specify which ones you want in it.
jordan holmes
I'm like, this is perfect.
I feel like that's almost in defiance of the process.
dan friesen
And thank God it is.
jordan holmes
That's wrong.
You're supposed to buy a box of chocolates that goes half uneaten.
dan friesen
No, no, no, no.
jordan holmes
You should have little bits of things that have holes in them where you go, oh, this is gross.
dan friesen
I'm probably going to order a box of C's candies because I can control it now.
jordan holmes
See, that's the problem.
Now you don't have to work for it.
The kids, these...
These days are weak!
dan friesen
That is not the subject of today's Tucker monologue.
But maybe you can suss out what he's talking about.
tucker carlson
Hey, it's Tucker Carlson.
Let's say you wanted to control a country.
jordan holmes
Hi, Tucker!
tucker carlson
How would you start?
We'd want to make sure you had the complete obedience of everybody inside your borders who was authorized to use deadly force.
You would start with the military and then federal law enforcement and move your way down ultimately to agencies like the IRS.
Controlling the guns would be a top priority for you if you ever wanted to go dictatorial, if you wanted to be baby doc.
But let's say you had deeper ambitions.
Let's say you wanted the power not simply to control people's behavior, but to control How they think, not just their bodies, but their minds, as a god would.
In that case, you need to take charge of the society's taboos.
A taboo is something that by popular consensus is not allowed.
A taboo may not be illegal, but it doesn't need to be.
Over time, social prohibitions are more powerful and more enduring than laws.
Societies are defined by what they will not permit, as are famously religions.
Muslims don't eat pork, neither do Orthodox Jews.
Traditional Christians oppose extramarital sex, the Amish avoid electricity, and so on.
dan friesen
So this is an interesting suggestion as a way to start out an episode.
jordan holmes
Ah, okay.
dan friesen
Yeah?
jordan holmes
You're struggling.
I'm already frustrated.
unidentified
Uh-huh.
jordan holmes
Why?
Because I reject his premise.
dan friesen
Okay.
jordan holmes
I mean, let's say you want to control a country.
All right?
Gain a monopoly over the most important resource.
dan friesen
Well, yeah, I mean, I think that...
Or, conversely...
Create a weather machine.
jordan holmes
Well, I mean, there's that, or like, you know...
dan friesen
There's a lot of supervillain plans you could come up with.
jordan holmes
No, I'm talking about like the Saudis being complete control of oil.
Then you will have control of that country, and not just that country, but you will have control of many other countries as well that are dependent on that resource.
dan friesen
Or at least heavy sway, yes.
jordan holmes
Yeah, I'm talking about hydraulic despotism, Dan.
If you want to take control of a country, I'm going to tell you a little bit about a book called Dune, alright?
Oh boy.
Now, if you've got the melange, the spice must flow!
dan friesen
Who is the worm?
jordan holmes
Oh, do you mean Leto 2?
God Emperor of Doom?
dan friesen
Dennis Rodman.
Oh, okay.
unidentified
So...
dan friesen
I think that you're right in a sense.
You know, like that is a very effective way to hold sway over a country's policy and what have you.
Yeah, yeah, no.
jordan holmes
I think he's making a false equivalence.
dan friesen
I think so.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
But I also think that, you know, you wouldn't be able to have total control, I think almost in any scenario.
Even if you owned all the police and all the military and controlled all of cultural taboos, I don't think you'd be able to have complete control over people's thoughts and minds.
unidentified
No.
dan friesen
But I kind of do got to give it up to him a little bit that I think that social norms and cultural, if you want to call it taboos, are things that lead often to law.
Things like the...
You know, changing opinions surrounding civil rights led to codification of the Civil Rights Act.
unidentified
Sure.
dan friesen
You know, things, it flowed in that direction.
And so you could kind of argue that, you know, cultural opinions have more of a powerful effect, you know?
jordan holmes
Um, I mean, I suppose, I think that's a question for whether or not we are, I mean, how about we ask it this way?
Are we governed, or do we govern ourselves, is the question.
Do you know what I mean?
So, if we govern ourselves, then cultural opinions are laws.
You know, if we are governed, then laws are laws, and cultural opinions are really kind of our own business.
dan friesen
But now, if it's possible to force cultural norms and taboos on people, then you're back to being governed.
jordan holmes
There you go.
dan friesen
But, yeah.
And that...
This is circular.
jordan holmes
Exactly.
dan friesen
A little bit.
jordan holmes
That's the problem with it, is because they come from each other.
They create each other.
You know, the laws create the cultural taboos, the cultural taboos create the laws, and so on.
dan friesen
Yeah, and different cultures have different cultural taboos, you know, within different countries, different places.
And people being in conversation with each other often affect those cultural taboos.
I think it's all fluid and constantly ever-changing.
Indeed.
But also, it's worth noting that Tucker is saying at the end of that clip, it says a lot about what he thinks religions are.
jordan holmes
Yeah, I know, right?
dan friesen
Just, like, different sets of things you can't do.
jordan holmes
Muslims don't do pork.
Christians don't have sex.
Everybody doesn't like electricity.
Like, what are you talking about?
dan friesen
I think it's supposed to be about, like, a connection to the divine.
Oh, no, it's just rules.
unidentified
No, no, no.
jordan holmes
It's rules, Dan.
It's things that you can't do that I can do.
And definitely that list of things that Muslims, Christians, everybody does, there's definitely no examples of people in those religions constantly doing those things.
In fact, more frequently than not.
dan friesen
Sure.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
So, we're gonna, you know, talking up here, we have the setup.
That cultural taboos are more important than law.
jordan holmes
Sure.
Whoever controls those.
I'm going to go with...
dan friesen
As go the taboos, go the...
jordan holmes
I'm going to throw this out there.
dan friesen
Uh-huh.
jordan holmes
I think it's going to be the libs who are causing the problem.
dan friesen
Oh.
jordan holmes
Maybe.
dan friesen
And also, he does get into some discussion of child abuse and stuff.
Of course.
So if you're a bit sensitive about those topics, you might want to give it a...
Give this a pass, because he's going to talk about that for a little bit.
jordan holmes
You don't need Tucker in your life.
dan friesen
No, you're better off without him.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
tucker carlson
American society isn't overtly religious, but it's governed by taboos, and it always has been.
What's interesting is how fast our taboos are changing.
This is not happening organically.
What we're allowed to dislike is being dictated to us from above, sometimes by force.
Until fairly recently?
attack people on the basis of their race.
That was the main lesson Until fairly recently?
of the Second World War, we were told, again and again.
The one thing we learned from the Nazis is that it's dangerous to reduce human That made sense, but apparently we no longer believe it.
Punishing people based on their skin color is not only permitted in modern America, it is mandatory.
Throughout business and government and higher education, as long as the victims are white.
At one time, that would have been unimaginable.
jordan holmes
Okay.
If there's one thing we learned from the Nazis, please let it be anything but just that.
There should be...
I'm not saying that that's not an important thing that we should have learned from the Nazis.
dan friesen
I think we should have learned it elsewhere.
jordan holmes
I think we should have been there way before.
dan friesen
Yeah, that's a real weird articulation of a thought.
jordan holmes
The way that that man thinks.
And here's why it's even more disconcerting to me than with Alex.
With Alex, it's chaotic, you know, flying through the brain sphere.
Who knows where it's going to land on the Plinko board, right?
It could go anywhere.
Oh, we got $500 this time, you know, that kind of thing.
Tucker had to have sat down and organized his thoughts.
Into this.
dan friesen
Yeah.
And in theory, in collaboration.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
With writers or, you know, whatever.
It's the difference between, like, you know, you see somebody who's just winging a stand-up set.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
And, like, maybe things go off the rails a little bit.
It doesn't really reflect that poorly on you if it wasn't all that funny.
You know, maybe you win some, you lose some when you're just making it up on the spot.
jordan holmes
Yeah, you're going for it.
dan friesen
But if you wrote something down.
jordan holmes
That hurts.
dan friesen
It's a reflection of your effort.
jordan holmes
Exactly.
You can value yourself by how much work you put into the words you wrote down.
And this is...
dan friesen
That 50 seconds was interesting.
jordan holmes
It says so much.
dan friesen
Until recently, you couldn't...
You know, be racist.
jordan holmes
I mean, yeah, there's so many, like, little things.
I want to dive into each collection of three words in a row and be like, can you unpack a mind that thinks this makes sense?
dan friesen
Well, because you also have, like, even at the beginning, the introduction of the premise that he's saying I disagree with, which is that, like, things are being forced from top down telling you what you can or can't like and dislike.
It's like, I get it.
jordan holmes
Sometimes by force.
dan friesen
I get it.
You want to hate certain groups.
You can.
We're just going to criticize you for it.
unidentified
Right.
dan friesen
It's legal.
jordan holmes
We're going to be mean to you for your meanness.
dan friesen
You're a dick and we're going to be a dick to you.
jordan holmes
You're an asshole.
Yeah.
I don't know what to tell you.
These are the things that happen when you're a piece of shit.
dan friesen
That's not dictated from on high.
jordan holmes
No.
You are being responded to.
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
And I think that he's just trotting out an old...
Sort of affirmative action type complaint there.
jordan holmes
I do appreciate that he's already, like, you know, when we were talking about euphemisms and how that's kind of messed with our ability to understand what people actually mean?
In the same way, Tucker has found such a strident and, like, arrogant way to whine like a little baby.
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
You know, like, just like, uh, wah, wah, wah.
dan friesen
That's why you worked with a bow tie.
I hate to keep going back to that.
jordan holmes
It makes sense.
It really does.
He has a very cherubic, I'm a whiny baby, but you can take me seriously, I guess?
I don't know.
dan friesen
Someone takes me seriously, but I am a cherubic little baby.
jordan holmes
You're a little baby!
He's a little whiny baby.
dan friesen
I also jumped the gun with my content warning.
It's coming a little bit later.
So we got these norms.
They're creeping.
tucker carlson
At one time, that would have been unimaginable.
So are the current behavior of our politicians.
As recently as the 1992 presidential campaign, adultery was considered disqualifying for anyone seeking higher office.
Bill Clinton was very nearly derailed in the financial primary by his affair with Jennifer Flowers.
Clinton went to elaborate lengths to lie about the relationship because he had no choice.
But he was the last presidential candidate who had to meet this standard.
By 2008, it was obvious to anybody who was paying attention that Barack Obama had a strange and highly creepy personal life.
Nobody ever asked him about it.
By that point, a leader's behavior within his own marriage, the core relationship of his life, have been declared irrelevant.
It was Barack Obama's business, not yours.
unidentified
What?
dan friesen
Obama had a strange and creepy personal life?
jordan holmes
I guess.
dan friesen
And no one asked about it?
jordan holmes
No one ever asked a thing about Obama's personal life.
unidentified
What are you talking about?
jordan holmes
I'm telling you this right now.
Anything about Obama's personal life.
dan friesen
No one ever demanded multiple versions of his birth certificate.
jordan holmes
Who would have asked for it?
unidentified
Nobody.
jordan holmes
Nobody even thought to ask those questions back then.
dan friesen
Nobody made documentaries claiming that his dad wasn't his dad.
jordan holmes
We were so young back then.
We didn't know to ask these follow-up questions, Dan.
We just saw him and we went, oh, we believe you.
How could we have been so foolish and naive, Dan?
dan friesen
I mean...
jordan holmes
Oh my god!
Dan?
dan friesen
Ridiculous.
jordan holmes
Dan?
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
Infidelity.
Yeah.
Was verboten amongst all politicians in the United States.
dan friesen
I guess it was in the sense that you just didn't talk about it.
jordan holmes
You didn't talk about it.
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
And it was in the sense that they didn't report on it out of being nice to you.
dan friesen
Right.
So actually the cultural norm is we just didn't talk about that shit.
jordan holmes
Protect people from the consequences of their actions.
dan friesen
Yeah, and so maybe if you wanted to say that.
jordan holmes
Yeah, that I think is what he wants.
dan friesen
Yeah, we didn't hold our leaders to any kind of personal life standards.
So it's actually a little bit different.
But also, hey ding dong.
Weren't you the guy who was super into Trump?
jordan holmes
I mean, I don't, right?
dan friesen
So, come on.
Get off that high horse.
jordan holmes
Furthermore, we had a president named Jack Kennedy, my friend.
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
We had a president who did the fucking.
dan friesen
He did, he did.
jordan holmes
And he had a bad back.
And he still went for it.
That's how fucking crazy you have to be to be president.
dan friesen
He was committed.
jordan holmes
He was.
He was down for it.
dan friesen
Yep.
So here's where things get messy.
Our taboos, they're falling apart.
unidentified
Sure.
dan friesen
Everyone is just, you know, going along with everything or something.
jordan holmes
What decade are we in?
tucker carlson
One by one, with increasing speed, our old taboos have been struck down.
Those that remain have lost their moral force.
Stealing.
Flaunting your wealth.
jordan holmes
I'm sorry?
tucker carlson
Taking marijuana on the street.
Shameless public hypocrisy.
Taking other people's money for not working.
jordan holmes
Are you fucking with me?
tucker carlson
All of these things used to be considered unacceptable in America.
jordan holmes
Are you fucking with me?
tucker carlson
Not anymore.
So it probably shouldn't surprise us that the greatest taboo of all is teetering on the edge of acceptability.
Child molestation.
A generation ago, talking to someone else's children about sex was widely considered grounds for a thrashing.
Touching them sexually was effectively a death penalty offense.
dan friesen
What is happening?
jordan holmes
I think he's fucking with me.
dan friesen
He might be.
jordan holmes
He's personally fucking with me.
He literally just said, flaunting your wealth and taking money for not doing work.
dan friesen
That's bananas.
I have a point I want to make about that list that he had there.
Because there's a lot going on in there.
jordan holmes
There is a lot.
dan friesen
But if you look at that list, he has six examples of these norms.
And two don't really fit the mold.
That I would categorize these in.
jordan holmes
Right.
dan friesen
Shameless public hypocrisy isn't really a taboo, because shameless hypocrites just pretend that they aren't shameless hypocrites, and their audiences don't care.
unidentified
Exactly.
dan friesen
This has probably always been the case.
We're just inundated with so much more media now, and social media ends up giving rise to many more invasions of people's privacy, which allows you to see their hypocrisy.
jordan holmes
Yeah, I mean, you figure you're in the Acropolis, and there's probably a bunch of assholes yelling stuff at you all day.
dan friesen
Yeah, sure.
Or, like, you know, Walter Cronkite.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
What was he up to?
Lord knows.
jordan holmes
He could have been anywhere.
dan friesen
So the other one that doesn't really fit is Striking Women.
I think, generally speaking, most people still feel pretty negatively towards hitting women.
Personally, I'm not a fan of anyone getting struck, but what Tucker is talking about here is assault.
I don't think anyone's making that better.
jordan holmes
I don't recall that being a taboo that we were concerned about.
We were always like, yes, the law says don't hit.
I mean, when I was a kid, it was don't hit.
dan friesen
Right, and I think what he's talking about is, like, domestic violence, maybe.
Or no, actually, if I had to guess, I'm gonna bet that...
That what he's trying to signal to is trans women in fighting sports.
jordan holmes
I think it has to be something like that.
dan friesen
That has to be what it's a signifier for.
But society still is quite against...
jordan holmes
It's something that they would know a reference to that we do not because we're not that...
dan friesen
That's the closest I can get with some of their talking points.
But still, the point remains, it doesn't really fit the mold of the rest of these.
Because the other ones that he listed, they fall into a particular category that you could call things that society decided to look down upon because they were associated with marginal groups, mostly the poor.
Stealing has never been taboo in this country as long as you're rich.
Corporate theft and wage theft have been the order of the day for generations, and if anything, the prevailing attitude towards the rich people who did the stealing was of aspiring to be like them.
The people who were stigmatized because of stealing were the people who had to steal to survive.
That was the taboo.
Needing to steal.
Flaunting your wealth has also never been taboo so long as you're rich.
It's only taboo to flaunt your wealth or to be perceived to be if you're a member of a group that society...
Consider the example of, like, the editorials about millennials needing to stop buying avocado toast.
If you aren't rich, showing any signs of affluence would typically cause accusations of irresponsibility or even make people suspicious.
Like Master P said on More to Life from Da Last Dawn, The feds follow me like I'm slinging crack, wasting tax dollars because I'm young, rich, famous, and black.
The ghetto's got me crazy.
jordan holmes
Yeah, no, I mean, that is an entirely appropriate use of that reference.
dan friesen
People society expects to be rich can buy castles, but for people society expects to be poor, you must be a criminal if you're driving a nice car.
Smoking weed on the street has also probably only been taboo because of the history of how propaganda about the drug was used to malign black and Hispanic populations, and the criminalization of it was a driving force of a drug war that needlessly destroyed countless lives.
Smoking tobacco on the street isn't taboo, and yet you're theoretically causing harm to the people around you.
Caffeine is no less of a drug, and you can drink coffee on the street.
unidentified
Yep.
dan friesen
Marijuana was seen as the drug of the lower classes, dangerous classes, not like the aristocratic cocaine, and that legacy lived on through that taboo.
jordan holmes
Yeah, in the same way that crack is not cocaine, and yet, and yet.
dan friesen
Taking other people's money for not working is Tucker's way of saying accepting social assistance.
Again, this is only an issue when you're poor.
If you need help and accept that help, you take on a stigma.
When you're a big corporation or a rich asshole and you profit from subsidies or government largesse, you don't take on any of that stigma.
If you're a landowner who takes a paycheck from the government for not using your land to grow crops like a friend of mine from my childhood's dad did, you don't get scolded for taking other people's money for not working.
Society doesn't have a taboo against taking public money for not working.
It has a taboo against being in a position where you need help.
And stigmatizing that.
jordan holmes
Yeah, I mean, Tucker is guilty of all of those simultaneously.
And most especially the taking money for not working thing.
He's still getting paid by Fox News!
dan friesen
Well, maybe.
We'll see on that one.
jordan holmes
I know, but that's fucking spitting in your face.
Taking money for not working.
unidentified
In theory.
jordan holmes
Yeah, that's, come on.
dan friesen
Come on!
But largely, that list is just a mess.
Four of the examples are really only things that are conditionally taboo, and the other two things are hitting women and being a hypocrite.
No one really cares if someone's a hypocrite, and hitting women's still very much not.
The other four are examples of things where it's becoming less stigmatized to be in a marginalized class and to do the thing that rich people have been doing all along.
The issue with the way Tucker is using this list is that he tries to transpose this diminishing of these taboos onto the idea that child molestation is a taboo that's falling.
This is ridiculous and pretty offensive on its face.
The argument fails in a bunch of ways, but what's important here is to track the argument that Tucker is making and how it flows.
Here he's set up an establishing point, which is that society's taboos are eroding their moral force, and that means that child molestation will soon lose its status as unacceptable as.
Sure.
That's sort of the...
The base which this house is going to be built on.
unidentified
Right.
dan friesen
And by the way, when I said house right there, I want to point this out.
I knew that house was Holmes.
Sherlock Holmes.
Oh my God.
I understood that.
jordan holmes
Oh my God.
dan friesen
I've gotten some feedback on this.
jordan holmes
I don't need this.
dan friesen
My disagreement was with who was Watson.
unidentified
I get it.
dan friesen
I understand Wilson's name is close to Watson.
jordan holmes
I get it.
dan friesen
All right.
unidentified
Okay.
dan friesen
So you probably will have no ability to predict where this train of argumentation leads.
Because it's...
I mean...
Serpentine comes to mind.
jordan holmes
I'm gonna go with...
I want to say this is going to somehow be something to do with TV.
unidentified
Hmm.
dan friesen
Not really.
jordan holmes
Okay.
Dang.
dan friesen
No.
But here we go.
tucker carlson
When Jeffrey Dahmer was bludgeoned to death in the bathroom of a Wisconsin prison in 1994, the Milwaukee district attorney had to caution the public not to turn Dahmer's killer into a folk hero.
Jeffrey Dahmer had molested and murdered children.
People felt justified in celebrating his death.
25 years later, that standard had changed dramatically in the state of Wisconsin, as in the rest of the country.
In the summer of 2020, during the BLM riots in Kenosha, 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse defended his life from a convicted child molester called Joseph Rosenbaum.
Rosenbaum was trying to kill Rittenhouse, so Rittenhouse shot him in self-defense.
But it was Joseph Rosenbaum whom the media cast as the victim of the story.
Kyle Rittenhouse, meanwhile, an underage boy fending off violence from a child molester, was denounced as the villain.
Ultimately, he was indicted for murder.
One of the things that this tells us...
jordan holmes
I did not see that coming.
dan friesen
Right?
jordan holmes
I was not expecting for- Listen, we've heard them associate child molestation with literally everybody at this point.
I still was not expecting them to somehow be like, see, Rittenhouse is not a murderer.
That was just out of my mind.
That's out of my mind.
I did not see that coming.
dan friesen
I guess his complaint is that people didn't celebrate the death of one of the guys that he killed.
jordan holmes
I suppose.
What?
What are we doing?
dan friesen
So, Tucker conveniently leaves off there that Rittenhouse was acquitted of that charge, and that he's made a bunch of money off his killings and has generally faced minimal consequences.
jordan holmes
No!
dan friesen
Before we get into any of that clip, let's keep track of this argument.
In this section, Tucker is trying to provide evidence for his conclusion that child molestation is no longer taboo.
The evidence is that people wanted to make Jeffrey Dahmer's killer a folk hero, and people were mad at Kyle Rittenhouse.
That's not good evidence.
For one thing, Dahmer did a whole lot more than molest children.
He ate them.
jordan holmes
He did eat people.
Eating people is a bit of a...
I would argue that's a bigger taboo than most.
dan friesen
Yeah.
He was killed in prison, and it's always a good policy for officials to not condone murders taking place in custody for human rights issues, among other things.
Plus, you have to remember that anyone who would be in jail at the same place as Jeffrey Dahmer probably isn't a great person to uphold as a folk hero, since they almost certainly would be a murderer themselves prior to the murder of Dahmer.
jordan holmes
Oh, come on!
dan friesen
The person who killed Dahmer may have killed him because of his crimes, but he also killed another inmate at the same time, so it might have just been...
violent flare-up that we're attributing to Dahmer's crimes so that we can have narrative satisfaction of feeling like Dahmer got what he deserved.
Yeah.
unidentified
The other guy this inmate killed was just in jail for killing his wife, so who knows?
jordan holmes
Right, right, right, right.
Big gap.
dan friesen
Yeah.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
The situation doesn't really track well to this, and Tucker's argument really only works if you assume that Dahmer was killed in jail because of his crimes, and that Rittenhouse killed Rosenbaum because of his past crimes.
Otherwise the crimes become kind of superfluous.
only one way of looking at this, which I think is what Tucker is doing.
There's one other way, which is to say that you can post hoc justify any violence committed against someone if their past is bad enough.
Yeah.
unidentified
Joseph Rosenbaum had done This is absurd.
jordan holmes
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
No, I mean, because here's his argument, though, and I'm going to personalize it, and it might seem extreme, but if I shot and killed Tucker, right, and then he's dead, I murdered him, but what if we find out that Tucker had molested a kid in the past?
Then I'm fine.
I'm a hero.
dan friesen
According to the way that he's...
jordan holmes
Yeah, and I don't have to know this.
I do not have to know this in advance whatsoever.
If I go and murder somebody, doesn't matter.
As long as I think in their past, or even if I don't care.
As long as we find out later in their past, then I'm a hero.
dan friesen
Well, the thing is, the veneer of self-defense and stuff comes into it too, so you'd have to somehow have Tucker coming at you.
Well, he could be unarmed, because Rosenbaum was unarmed.
jordan holmes
Exactly.
So there could be that.
No, what his past was, I can recontextualize him even looking at me as something by way of saying that, oh, see, the way that Tucker looked at me reminded me of the way he looked at the kid that he molested 20 years ago, so it's totally fine that I shot him.
dan friesen
I mean, it's a mess, and even if you accept this argument that, like, Rittenhouse was shooting him in self-defense, it's a little bit...
I'm going to say a lot of a bit of a dramatic overstatement to say that he was defending his life or describing Rittenhouse as, quote, an underage boy fending off violence from a child molester.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
That's ridiculous.
jordan holmes
Yeah, that's absurd.
dan friesen
Yeah.
Tucker is intentionally distorting the situation in order to suit his premise that child molestation is no longer taboo.
Because society thinks it's not cool to kill an unarmed person at a protest and that people deserve moral consideration regardless of past crimes, that means that the powers that be are fine with child molesters.
Yeah, I mean...
jordan holmes
I will say that it is hard to imagine this type of insanity, right?
Compared to what we've been doing for so long.
This is a weird, weird type of insanity.
dan friesen
Yeah, it's not to say that it's more insane.
jordan holmes
No, no, no, no.
dan friesen
But it's different.
jordan holmes
It's a flavor of insanity that I think is easy to maybe let go unnoticed because it seems so much more innocuous.
I think in language and delivery.
dan friesen
Yeah, a lot of the aesthetics of it.
jordan holmes
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
dan friesen
You can kind of ignore...
jordan holmes
Superficially, it seems like a TV broadcast like you would otherwise see.
And so that can kind of hypnotize you into avoiding that these are completely unrelated, insane connections.
dan friesen
Yes.
jordan holmes
Like, these are unrelated.
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
I mean, it's benonkers.
dan friesen
The messaging is absurd and dangerous.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
And then what is being said doesn't track.
jordan holmes
No.
I mean, it's crazy.
dan friesen
It is.
jordan holmes
It is crazy.
dan friesen
So he has another reason here.
unidentified
Okay.
tucker carlson
One of the things that this tells us is that people who run our country no longer see child molesters as the worst among us.
Why?
It's never been more obvious than it was yesterday when the Wall Street Journal ran a long expose about kiddie porn on Instagram.
Instagram, the journal found, quote, Okay, so it's meta.
and connects them to content sellers.
jordan holmes
So it's a private corporation.
tucker carlson
In one instance, the paper discovered that Instagram was recommending the phrase incest toddlers Right, private corporation.
By the way, no one at Instagram denied that any of this had happened.
Nor did Mark Zuckerberg, who controls the company.
The journal story was accurate.
It was all pretty shocking.
But not as shocking as what happened next, which was effectively nothing at all.
dan friesen
So we talked about this story when Alex covered it, but now we're seeing some of the concrete topical overlaps between Alex and the most important man in the world.
As we follow this argument, Tucker is now asserting that the powers that be don't view child molesters as the worst of the worst because the Wall Street Journal reported on this Instagram stuff and nothing was done.
But that's not entirely true.
In the wake of this revelation, Meta set up a specific task force to address this and provide more human-based moderation, as well as blocking certain search terms and hashtags.
That's definitely not enough, and it's probably a fundamental problem with social media sites as a whole.
They're so large and so many users with only so much moderation capability that people who want to do horrific shit will probably continue to find ways to get around those rules.
Even if that is the case, that's Yeah.
We'll see.
I don't know how much faith we can have in that as a private company.
Yeah.
unidentified
And because...
dan friesen
Too restrictive of a way to...
Let's say, for instance, they wanted to try and cut down on all this stuff by requiring a social security number, like Twitter did with the verification or something.
That is going to cut down on your user base, which cuts into your overhead.
So trying to fully safeguard this stuff, things that they could do...
Unfortunately, run into their bottom line.
So they'll do things that'll try to help, and ideally, hopefully, will help.
But as long as the motivation and their primary reason to exist is financial, they can never really actually solve the problem.
jordan holmes
Yes, you have understood exactly why capitalism is an issue.
Market forces determined that there will be this child exploitation material on Instagram.
dan friesen
Or at least it'll always be, like, a real risk.
jordan holmes
Well, I mean, it will be there.
Yeah.
I mean, Market Forks is determined.
That's what we've decided is an acceptable way to describe things.
dan friesen
And it's, um, yeah, it's bad, but I don't think that this means anything about prevailing social attitudes towards it.
jordan holmes
I mean, honestly, if he would like to have a conversation about that...
And changing the idea of a structure that allows this implicitly, in fact encourages it in many forms, then we can talk about that.
But I don't think that he really wants to dismantle the entirety of the economic system.
But that's just me.
dan friesen
Well, I mean, I look forward to you and Tucker sitting down with Rogan and debating this out.
jordan holmes
I think it'll be interesting to see if he wants to dismantle the entire state.
dan friesen
Yeah.
So here we take another bit of a pivot.
Like, you can see this is moving all over the place.
And here's, this was jarring.
tucker carlson
Of course, everybody at Instagram, in fact, everyone everywhere in authority, will still claim to think that child molestation is bad.
But the tone has changed unmistakably.
When they say it's bad, they mean it in a kind of abstract way.
Bad like a civil war in Central Africa is bad.
You wouldn't prefer it, but there are reasons it happens.
unidentified
What?
tucker carlson
persons, because honestly, who can judge?
These people are a sexual minority, so pause before you attack them.
And in any case, it's not like pedophiles are barging into the Capitol building to sit in Nancy Pelosi's chair or asking uncomfortable questions about the last election.
dan friesen
What is happening?
unidentified
What?
dan friesen
So here's where you start to see Tucker getting to kind of maybe what he actually has feelings about.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
This is about extreme right-wingers being the new child molesters in terms of being the worst people in society.
This is exactly the argument you would expect from someone who takes the abuse and exploitation of children very seriously.
Most people aren't into the use of the term minor attracted person, and one of the higher profile people who have promoted its use got a lot of shit over it.
That was Dr. Alan Walker of Old Dominion University, who was put on administrative leave and then resigned due to the fallout.
There is a conversation that people have surrounding harm reduction that says that there's a difference between someone who's attracted to underage persons and doesn't act on it, and someone who does act on it.
There's a sign of that discussion that contends that you can't really control who you're attracted to so someone doesn't choose that attraction but they can choose to act or not.
This school of thought argues that people who choose not to act on that attraction should be treated differently than those who offend and that by doing so it might be possible to minimize the harm that's actually done in the real world.
Part of that different treatment may be something like coming up with a different term.
I'm not sure where I come down on this necessarily because I haven't done enough looking into it to feel confident either way, but I do know that there's a very concerted effort on the part of the right-wing media to use terms like minor attracted person to argue that society is trying to mainstream child exploitation and that it's being adopted by the LGBTQ plus community.
This is obviously just a means to target, marginalize, and slander the LGBTQ plus community.
That's the use that Tucker has for it in this narrative, and it's entirely disconnected from any desire to minimize harm that's done to children.
Yeah.
unidentified
The pivot to talking about the 2020 election deniers and January 6 rioters is incredibly forced, because it has to be.
dan friesen
This is kind of the destination that Tucker was aiming towards, and he didn't really have a sensible path, so he had to go...
jordan holmes
I mean, I don't know if I have anything more to say about the specifics of what Tucker said than that...
If Tucker, a professed Christian, says to me that pausing and thinking before hating is a bad idea, I hope he reads a book.
Because there's this really famous thing about where it's like, hey, before you hate somebody with violence and kill them, stop and pause for a second.
I've heard that before.
I'm just saying.
dan friesen
It rings a vague bell in my head.
jordan holmes
It's familiar in some way, and for him to denigrate that as a thought process so viciously seems kind of indicative of something.
dan friesen
Yeah.
So here's where we're, like, rolling down the hill, and this is where you trip and start going, you know.
jordan holmes
Uh-oh, now we're going too fast.
unidentified
Oh, no.
jordan holmes
Oh, no, no, no.
Now we're Chris Farley in Black Sheep.
unidentified
Yes.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
tucker carlson
And in any case, it's not like pedophiles are barging into the Capitol building to sit in Nancy Pelosi's chair.
We're asking uncomfortable questions about the last election.
For miscreants like that, no punishment is too harsh.
So far this month, the FBI's Washington field office has issued 11 press releases.
10 out of 11 have been about January 6th.
Keep in mind that January 6th happened more than two and a half years ago.
That's practically a forever ago!
They've got much more important things to do, like finding white supremacists.
White supremacists are America's new child molesters.
We've got zero tolerance for white supremacists because no one threatens the life of this country more than they do.
Here's Joe Biden once again making that very clear last month.
dan friesen
So Tucker should have waited a few days because there's so many more press releases about convictions and guilty pleas and arrests for January 6th defendants.
He could have bumped that number up to at least 24. You can see a bit of the form of the narrative that's taking shape here.
Society doesn't hate pedophiles enough anymore because people who stormed the Capitol are being arrested and charged.
The FBI isn't taking child abuse seriously because they're focused on white supremacists.
Obviously, this is stupid on its face because people can care about two things at the same time.
I'm not sure what Tucker would want the FBI's Washington office to do.
Would he be satisfied if some of those Instagram users were arrested also?
Or does this require Zuckerberg getting indicted?
I don't know what would be the condition wherein he'd be like, alright, this complaint has been satisfied.
jordan holmes
This is like, this is...
Like, I feel like we're in 1867, and Lincoln's been dead a couple of years, and Andrew Johns is like, come on!
Come on, what are we doing with the Reconstruction?
Slavery was forever ago!
Ah, we move on!
Everybody, come on, stop blaming slave owners for all this.
Oh, there's a problem.
What, are they as bad as pedophiles?
What do they own, slave children?
Oh, shit, oh, fuck, I mean, no, everybody move on!
dan friesen
What's the slavery equivalent of, like, how do you paraphrase it or sort of dress it up the same way as, just wanted to sit at Nancy Pelosi's desk?
jordan holmes
Yes, yeah, absolutely.
It's a big deal.
We wanted to have people do stuff for them without payment.
It's like they were just asking people for favors all the time without their ability to say no!
dan friesen
They were just aggressively opposed to the minimum wage.
jordan holmes
They were worried about everybody's housing situation, so they had to make sure they kept him in the same place!
dan friesen
Sure.
jordan holmes
At all times!
dan friesen
You can also tell here that Tucker's a shithead, because he's using an arbitrary cutoff date that allows him to make this argument.
A bunch of J6 resolutions happened at the same time, but if you look just a little harder, you'll find a press release about an arrest that happened on May 10th that very well may have been someone who's using Instagram to distribute child exploitation material.
It was probably a different app, but the And Tucker should go and check out the press releases from the other FBI field offices.
Or maybe I should just play some dumbass games like him and complain that three out of the three press releases from the Las Vegas office this month have been about child exploitation arrests.
Suspiciously, no January 6th arrests in Las Vegas.
jordan holmes
That actually is kind of suspicious.
I bet there are some people hanging out!
dan friesen
As if there's one field office.
jordan holmes
Oh, man.
No, this is a very small country.
unidentified
What an asshole.
dan friesen
It's just such dumb shit he's trying to pass off.
jordan holmes
It is.
I mean...
It's a testament to the ability to sell.
You know?
Like, this is a sell kind of...
You know, like, if my material's weak on stage, I gotta sell it, you know?
It's like, if I want to get my laughs and I don't have the strongest stuff, I have to perform way, way harder.
And he has got nothing.
dan friesen
Let me give you another stand-up metaphor.
unidentified
Sure.
dan friesen
This is not like someone selling really hard.
This is like...
Somebody who isn't really great at stand-up who's coming in and getting a headlining spot because they're on a show.
unidentified
Right, right, right.
dan friesen
Or something like that.
jordan holmes
So you're saying it's Dustin Diamond.
dan friesen
I think Tucker Carlson is the Dustin Diamond.
He actually did.
unidentified
That's true.
dan friesen
I remember when Piven came and headlined The Last Factory.
That's what I'm thinking of.
jordan holmes
One of my early friends actually opened for him on the road for a long, long time.
He would go to casinos, buddy!
dan friesen
That could not have been pleasant.
jordan holmes
Nothing like a good Dustin Diamond casino gig.
Yeah, no fun.
It turned out great.
Oh, no.
dan friesen
So now we've gotten to white supremacy.
We've shifted over to that.
And he introduces this Biden clip.
tucker carlson
Here's Joe Biden once again making that very clear last month.
joe biden
To stand up against the poison of white supremacy as I did my inaugural address to a single out as the most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland is white supremacy.
unidentified
Thank you.
joe biden
And I'm not saying this because I'm at a black HBCU.
unidentified
I say wherever I go.
jordan holmes
That seems redundant.
tucker carlson
Pardon the feedback, but you heard the point.
White supremacy is the most dangerous threat to the American homeland.
Joe Biden just told us that.
It's more dangerous than the threat of nuclear war with Russia.
It's more dangerous than the threat of the Mexican drug cartels, who've already killed hundreds of thousands of Americans and are now in control of swaths of our southwestern states.
jordan holmes
Are they coming for the government?
tucker carlson
White supremacy is that bad, Joe Biden says.
In fact, it's worse.
jordan holmes
Is the cartel coming for the government?
tucker carlson
What is it?
That's the question.
Can anyone in authority actually define white supremacy?
unidentified
Yes!
tucker carlson
What is it?
Is white supremacy liking white people too much?
If so, that's to put those of us with white children in a pretty tough spot.
unidentified
Sure.
tucker carlson
Or is white supremacy something much more obviously bad, like trying to expel all non-whites from America and creating some kind of ethnostate?
If that's Joe Biden's definition, what exactly is the scope of this threat?
How many people are currently working on this American white ethnostate project?
jordan holmes
Oh my god, so many.
tucker carlson
Our guess is not very many and precisely zero.
But we can't say for sure because no one has showed us the numbers.
dan friesen
How did we get here?
jordan holmes
Tucker, you are working on it now!
This is you working on it!
dan friesen
So white supremacy is probably a bigger real-world issue than nuclear war with Russia, seeing as that seems pretty unlikely, whereas white supremacy is something that definitely exists.
It also seems like a bigger problem than these drug cartels that apparently control large swaths of the country and have killed hundreds of thousands of Americans.
I'm guessing Tucker means that these deaths happen because...
Not through murders, but he's vague enough that the image is terrifying.
jordan holmes
It does seem that way.
dan friesen
And as to the question of defining white supremacy and white nationalism, Tucker should just ask his staff.
They definitely know.
He could ask his old buddy and former head writer Blake Neff, who had to resign after his racist message board posts were revealed, including some weird instances where things posted on the forum mirrored things that would show up on Tucker's show.
The former editor of his site, The Daily Caller, named Scott Greer, got busted posting racist articles.
for Richard Spencer's outlet under a pen name.
They used to publish the writing of Jason Kessler, one of the organizers of the Unite the Right rally.
I think if Tucker is looking for some clarity on exactly what white nationalists and racists want and are about, he has access to a lot more primary sources than most people.
We've certainly gone far afield from what seemed like the top of this piece, which was the erosion of taboos in America leading to child molestation being normalized as evidenced by people being mad at Kyle Rittenhouse on the fact that there have been more January 6th related FBI press releases this month.
This is a pretty poorly constructed monologue, I have to say.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
Yeah.
dan friesen
I never really watched his TV show, so I don't really know if this is better or worse.
jordan holmes
Yeah, yeah.
What are we doing?
dan friesen
I might have to watch some of his shows to see if, like, the standard has gone far down.
But if it was this bad when it was on TV...
jordan holmes
I don't know what people think.
dan friesen
Holy shit.
jordan holmes
I mean...
How about this?
How about this?
Maybe.
Maybe you're telling on yourself a little bit based upon who you want to be compared to.
Do you know what I'm saying?
Like, maybe if I say something like, hey, listen, I'm an asshole, but I'm not as bad as somebody who fucking takes all day at the self-checkout line with 50 items, right?
Kind of have an idea of where I place myself in society.
You know, if you say, well, at least I'm not a pedophile.
I think you're kind of saying a lot.
I think you're kind of saying a lot more than maybe you think you're saying.
dan friesen
But he doesn't consider himself to be a part of the group that is labeled white supremacists.
unidentified
Yeah, yeah.
dan friesen
White nationalists.
jordan holmes
I think he does.
I think he does.
I think he's presenting he doesn't.
dan friesen
I think through his actions he reveals that maybe he thinks he does.
jordan holmes
Fair enough.
dan friesen
But he would not present things that way.
jordan holmes
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Not good.
dan friesen
No, this is a ride.
jordan holmes
This is insane.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
So the issue here that he's coming to is, you know, got this white nationalist, white supremacist terms that Biden's throwing around, but we don't have any definitions for these things.
We need definitions for crimes.
tucker carlson
How many people are currently working on this American white ethnostate project?
And what are the chances they're going to pull it off?
Our guess is not very many and precisely zero.
But we can't say for sure because no one has showed us the numbers.
These are not rhetorical questions.
When the president of the United States describes something as the worst possible crime Americans can commit, you have a right to know what that crime is.
You used to have that right.
Under our pre-revolutionary legal code before George Floyd, questions were easy to answer.
A crime was defined as something that an elected legislator had explicitly banned, usually an act that hurts somebody else.
In America, crimes were described precisely with words in English and then preserved in books, which you could read your What?
unidentified
If you ever wondered whether you were committing a crime, you could just look it up.
tucker carlson
You could know for sure whether you were a criminal.
Now you can't.
Needless to say, that's the point.
The point of the exercise is that you're going to be Uh-huh.
Uh-huh.
You could be accused at any time in everything you have taken from you.
dan friesen
This sounds a lot like Tucker complaining about the idea that being a racist or a white nationalist could be considered a thought crime.
We've already seen him support the idea of punishing people for thought crimes, though, so that's weird.
jordan holmes
Is he broken?
I feel like he got broken somewhere here.
dan friesen
I don't know.
jordan holmes
He was just repeating weird stuff.
dan friesen
Uh-huh.
jordan holmes
I'm just like, you used to be able to look at laws.
dan friesen
Before the revolution of George Floyd.
jordan holmes
Laws used to be elected officials saying no to things.
Things used to be things that had names, and names used to be things that you had.
dan friesen
So I guess, you know, just like being racist and white nationalist, those aren't crimes.
So, you know, there's acts that you'd have to do.
unidentified
Right, right, right.
dan friesen
There are acts that you take that are then crimes, and they can be based on you being...
You know, racist or whatever.
You know, it's the actions that you take.
That's, you know, you can be racist all you want.
The government's not going to stop you from that.
jordan holmes
Right.
dan friesen
It's all nonsense.
Tucker's just painfully feigning ignorance.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
It's absurd.
He knows what Biden was saying.
He's just pretending it's so incomprehensible to make the audience think that the people pointing out racist trends in America, including Tucker's own show, are just making completely baseless and confusing arguments.
Like, it's cute, but it's transparent.
Yeah.
Come on, man.
jordan holmes
Yeah, no, this is like if he was doing this in a conversation without a TV crew, you could just be like, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, stop.
Just stop.
Just, nope.
Stop.
dan friesen
I can't imagine him going about his daily life with this.
Poor level of processing information.
jordan holmes
Yeah, like how could you justify buying something if you...
Oh, right, okay.
So, oh, so it's $5, eh?
That's just because of bullshit.
What are you trying to do?
dan friesen
Right.
Like something is $4.99 and you get caught up in your head about how it's actually $5, but you're trying to trick me with the $4.99.
jordan holmes
Oh, you're stealing a penny from yourself.
That's not a good business strategy.
dan friesen
Next thing you know, you're burning down the store.
jordan holmes
Yeah, exactly.
Yeah, you can't think this...
Poorly.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
So there's these crimes that you don't know.
jordan holmes
But you used to know.
unidentified
You used to know.
jordan holmes
Back in the good old days.
dan friesen
Of a few years ago.
jordan holmes
In the good old days.
Back when you used to know what the crimes were and you could find out.
Dan, do you remember?
Do you remember those years before George Floyd when we used to go around being like, wait, am I going to commit a crime?
I better look it up in the code.
dan friesen
You can't.
I can't now.
Yeah.
jordan holmes
I didn't even know.
dan friesen
And Tucker has an example.
tucker carlson
When no one's willing to define the offense, you can't be sure whether or not you're committing it.
You could be accused at any time in everything you have taken from you.
You live in fear.
Remember this guy?
unidentified
Emmanuel Cafferty was driving near a Black Lives Matter protest in Poway in his SDG&E truck when he says he noticed somebody following him and trying to get his attention.
Later, that person posted a picture of him making what some believed is a white supremacy symbol.
On Twitter, Cafferty says he had no idea about any white power symbols and was just cracking his knuckles outside his window when the picture was taken of him.
Later that day, he says he was notified by SDG&E that he would be suspended pending an investigation, and a few days later, he was fired.
tucker carlson
What that man did was so offensive, as you just saw, that local news had to blur the photograph of his hand.
He was fired from his job.
His life was destroyed for cracking his knuckles.
He didn't know cracking his knuckles was racist in his defense, but then nobody did until the day that poor Emanuel Cafferty was unwise enough to crack them.
When a crime has no definition, anyone can be guilty of it.
It's hard to relax in a country like that.
dan friesen
Relax.
unidentified
You would get a D in elementary school for that kind of shit.
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
That is really bad.
dan friesen
It's pretty...
So the case of Emanuel Cafferty is pretty interesting.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
Most of the basic details that are given here align with what I can find.
You know, he was driving past a protest in his SDG&E truck, and someone took a picture of him flashing what appeared to be an OK sign.
And this picture was posted on Twitter with the SDG&E logo.
Doesn't feel right.
jordan holmes
Yeah, it's not a good...
dan friesen
And they were tagged on Twitter.
So SDG&E suspended him and put him under review, and then he was fired.
jordan holmes
Right.
dan friesen
This seems like a really unfortunate case of people being a little overzealous and calling this guy out, and that's no good.
But I have two points that I want to bring up.
One, this isn't a crime.
Two, I suspect that Cafferty's termination didn't come about because of this tweet.
I obviously have no way of knowing for sure, but if I had to guess, I would assume that in the course of SDG&E's investigation of his employment, they found cause that merited termination.
Here's the basis for my suspicion.
The first point is that there was a massive outcry about this case, and not just from the normal right-wing shithead cancel culture crowd.
The Atlantic wrote about it, and Cafferty was featured on an episode of Monica Lewinsky's series, 15 Minutes of Shame.
The person who tweeted this picture came forward and said that they misinterpreted it, even.
Okay, so everybody...
jordan holmes
Everybody...
Pre-empted Tucker's bullshit by going, hey guys, maybe we went a little bit too far.
dan friesen
Yeah, Monica Lewinsky even did.
jordan holmes
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
So Tucker is scooped by Monica Lewinsky.
dan friesen
Quite, quite a bit.
Another issue that I come to on this claim is that Cafferty, you know, they say Cafferty was just cracking his knuckles in the picture, but this is what it says in the Atlantic article about that day.
Quote, Cafferty told me a few days ago the other driver began to act even more strangely.
He flashed what looked to Cafferty like an okay hand gesture and started cussing him out.
When the light turned green, Cafferty drove off, hoping to put an end to this disconcerting encounter.
But when Cafferty reached another red light, the man, now holding a cell phone camera, was there again.
Do it!
Do it!
He shouted.
Unsure what to do, Cafferty copied the gesture the other driver kept.
So that's what it says in the Atlantic.
On the GoFundMe, his family set up...
jordan holmes
Before you go any further...
Sure.
But continue.
dan friesen
On the GoFundMe that his family set up and in that news article, it says, quote, On June 3rd, a stranger posted a picture of Emanuel Cafferty on social media and falsely accused him of displaying a white power hand gesture in his company truck.
Emmanuel had his arm extended out the window and was merely stretching his fingers, unaware of any such hand gesture.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
There are wildly different accounts of what happened that are coming from him.
jordan holmes
The same guy.
dan friesen
And I don't think that he was doing a white power hand gesture necessarily.
Like, I don't have any reason to think that.
unidentified
Sure.
dan friesen
But something that doesn't match up about...
Like, the details of this.
jordan holmes
You can't tell more than one story in a short period of time on our show.
dan friesen
You can if the details are fairly close.
jordan holmes
Well, that's what I'm saying.
dan friesen
I was cracking my knuckles or just relaxing my fingers.
jordan holmes
Right.
dan friesen
And then also there's the story of I was being harassed by someone who was yelling at me to do an okay sign.
jordan holmes
You can't do that one.
dan friesen
That's so far apart that one's a lie.
jordan holmes
Yeah, once you did the...
Oh, no, no, no.
It was somebody else.
Once you did that, now I'm out.
dan friesen
One of these stories has to be a lie.
jordan holmes
And he's tailing it.
dan friesen
And I don't know what to think about that, but I still don't necessarily think that there's any reason to believe he was, you know, being racist.
jordan holmes
Oh, I mean, I believe he's lying about one thing.
dan friesen
Something.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
So there was a groundswell and near universal desire for him to get his job back, but SDG&E did not go for it.
And then Cafferty filed two lawsuits, one against SDG&E and the other against the guy who tweeted the picture.
unidentified
Sure.
dan friesen
On October 26th of last year, Cafferty himself filed to dismiss the case against the tweeter with prejudice.
meaning that it's not an action he can reintroduce.
His suit against SDG&E for defamation went the exact same route, except that he requested it be dismissed with prejudice on June 1st, 2023, only two weeks ago.
There are some other possibilities of what could be going on.
It's imaginable that Cafferty realized that he would have a very difficult time proving defamation claims, but he may be still intending to pursue an unjust termination case against SDG&E.
They've stood by their decision, though, and I can't find any evidence of other suits being filed, so I'm not sure what...
To really think.
unidentified
Okay.
dan friesen
It's a weird situation.
Like, I don't know of any reason or evidence to suggest that he was making a racist hand gesture when he was photographed, and all indications point to it being really inappropriate that this person tweeted what they did.
Having said that, I don't know enough about this case to say that this is the ultimate reason he got fired.
In the case that it was an employer trying to cover their ass by firing someone, then I would be on Cafferty's side.
In the case that there was grounds for his termination and that thing only came to light because of this incident, I think that sucks and it's bad luck, but I don't know what to do.
jordan holmes
I'll say this.
I wouldn't base an entire moral philosophy around dealing with what happens in this particular situation and then claim that it's all because people hate white people now.
dan friesen
I think that, yeah, the hunt for white supremacists is so extreme that this guy lost his job a couple years ago.
jordan holmes
Right.
Right.
I mean, this is unfortunate.
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
True.
I don't think it's worth upending all of the...
dan friesen
But it also doesn't satisfy the argument that's being made.
jordan holmes
No, absolutely not.
dan friesen
And also, as we're listening to this as part of Tucker's presentation, at the end of the day, this isn't an issue involving a crime at all.
At most, there was an act of defamation by this Twitter poster, which would have been resolved through a lawsuit, which was filed and then voluntarily dismissed with prejudice by Cafferty.
You know, like, there is no crime.
jordan holmes
Yeah, what I find interesting is that a through-line here, and I don't know if this is on purpose or not, but a through-line here is that the government should be more oppressive.
The through-line is that all of these private companies, the powers that be...
Are the ones doing everything and that the government needs to do more to stop them.
dan friesen
Or the government isn't doing enough so everybody else needs to...
jordan holmes
Right.
dan friesen
Like, enact harsh social taboos.
jordan holmes
Exactly.
Yeah, it is very much...
dan friesen
It's almost the definition of regressive.
unidentified
Yeah.
dan friesen
Like, pushing things backwards.
jordan holmes
100%.
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
Yeah, absolutely.
I mean, this is legitimately, like...
Women, they shouldn't be outside.
What are they doing outside?
unidentified
Nah, that's the taboo of seeing a woman outside.
dan friesen
Why did we lose that taboo?
jordan holmes
I am not going to go back to arguing about whether or not women can wear tank tops.
That's not happening.
Okay?
It's not happening.
dan friesen
Give it six months.
jordan holmes
God damn it.
dan friesen
So, we come to the dismount here.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
And Tucker wraps up his argument, his point.
jordan holmes
Uh-huh.
dan friesen
I don't even know what to make of any of this.
jordan holmes
Okay.
tucker carlson
It's hard to relax in a country like that.
The old system was better.
Government operated on the basis of laws, not amorphous moral terror.
Politicians couldn't refuse you of something Fine.
unidentified
The legal code was straightforward.
tucker carlson
Child molestation was a crime.
What?
unidentified
Having unfashionable opinions was not.
tucker carlson
What?
We wrote books since then!
We wrote books since then!
Don't let them rationalize away your intuitive moral sense.
Cling to your taboos like your life depends on them, because it does.
Cherish and protect them like family heirlooms.
That's exactly what they are.
dan friesen
Great news!
What Tucker is describing as the old system is still in place.
Trial molestation is still a crime, and it's still not a crime to have unfashionable opinions, if that's how he wants to describe being a white supremacist.
Further, the government isn't accusing people of anything.
This is coming straight off of him talking about Cafferty, and the government isn't involved in that story at all.
Biden brought up in a speech that white supremacy was a threat to our country, but I assure you he wasn't talking about your private beliefs and microaggressions.
The culmination of this monologue, the go-home message, Seems to be a bit weird.
On the one hand, Tucker is saying that our country should be governed by taboos which grow and evolve with the times.
But simultaneously, he's saying to the audience that they need to hold fast to their taboos as if their life depended on it, steadfastly refusing to change from the innate wisdom about right and wrong that they had from birth.
Those seem to be at odds with each other.
Those messages don't coexist well.
jordan holmes
This is a completely...
I mean, his closing is in complete disagreement with his opening.
dan friesen
Well, and his closing is in complete disagreement with his closing.
jordan holmes
Yeah, yeah.
Yes, yeah, absolutely.
I don't know what he means.
I mean, I think...
dan friesen
I know intuitively what he means.
unidentified
Right, right, right.
jordan holmes
He means you hate people and don't let anybody tell you to stop.
dan friesen
Right.
tucker carlson
Yeah.
jordan holmes
I get what you're saying.
unidentified
Right.
jordan holmes
I'm furious that you have to say it differently because this is excruciatingly bad.
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
Just get to, I hate people.
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
And I should be allowed to.
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
And no one should be mean to me about it.
dan friesen
Right.
jordan holmes
And if people hate me, it's because they're filled with hate.
But I hate because I'm a good person.
dan friesen
Take a page out of the Dennis Leary playbook and just do it.
I'm an asshole.
unidentified
Just do it.
dan friesen
This is exhausting and silly.
jordan holmes
Oh, man.
Think about how much effort you have to put in to trying to justify just being a hateful piece of shit.
And this is what you came out with.
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
Wow.
dan friesen
It's an interesting experience to listen to it, because you know how you were surprised along a lot of the ways the road twisted?
jordan holmes
Wild.
dan friesen
I was as well.
I have an unfair advantage of having heard this before.
jordan holmes
Yeah.
dan friesen
You know, but the first time I heard it, I was like, I can't believe that this is where we're going.
jordan holmes
This is, but Will, I can make neither hide nor hair of it.
Does this make sense to other people and we're crazy?
Like, am I crazy?
dan friesen
I don't know.
I don't think so.
jordan holmes
I feel...
Because honestly, when we started listening to Alex, he makes more sense to me than this does.
Just because it's like, oh yeah, he's...
Do you know what I mean?
He's doing fantasy stuff.
dan friesen
That's familiarity, though.
jordan holmes
Well, yeah, you're right.
dan friesen
Eventually it'll be the same with Tucker if we keep doing this.
jordan holmes
Probably, but it's so...
Jarring!
dan friesen
It is.
And when you say it doesn't make sense, that's not what you mean.
Like, it's not that it doesn't make sense.
The messaging makes sense, and, like, I get the point that he's trying to make, and I get the ways that he's using, like, some poorly designed rhetoric tricks in order to pursue his points.
jordan holmes
Right.
dan friesen
What doesn't make sense is trying to follow the logic that he's using to get to those points.
jordan holmes
I feel like he is speaking a different language that I kind of understand.
I feel like I speak Portuguese and he speaks Spanish.
And I'm like, I get enough to know what you're saying.
I get enough to know what you're saying.
But when you put all those words together, if you were speaking the language correctly...
They don't mean what you say they mean.
You know what I mean?
You have to be using those words to mean different things than what they mean.
dan friesen
Yeah.
And it kind of feels a little bit like, if I could put this into just sort of a logic construction, it kind of comes off as like, if A, then B. Right.
If B, then C. If C, then D. Pickle, therefore ham sandwich.
jordan holmes
Yes.
dan friesen
Like, what?
jordan holmes
Yes.
dan friesen
What are we doing?
jordan holmes
That is a great way of describing it.
You're like, okay, you've given me four completely unrelated things saying that three of them are related to each other, I guess?
And then you've said pickle and sandwich.
dan friesen
Yeah.
jordan holmes
Okay.
dan friesen
All right.
I get it.
jordan holmes
I mean...
dan friesen
You are mad that people don't like white supremacists.
jordan holmes
I think you're more mad that you can't think good.
dan friesen
Maybe episode three will be better.
jordan holmes
Well, I know he's not mad at the crew yet.
dan friesen
No.
Oh, God, I can't wait for his hat-to-throwing episode.
jordan holmes
Oh, that'll be great.
dan friesen
So, I guess we'll be back, and we'll check in on him, see what else Tucker has to offer, see what Alex has to offer, but until then, what a ride.
jordan holmes
What a ride.
dan friesen
We'll be back, but we have a website.
jordan holmes
Indeed we do, it's knowledgefight.com.
dan friesen
Yep, we're also on Twitter.
jordan holmes
We are on Twitter, it's at knowledge underscore fight.
dan friesen
Yep, we'll be back, but until then, I'm Neo, I'm Leo, I'm DZX, Clark, skip, skip, boop.
I wish I remembered the tune to Masterpiece, More to Life.
unidentified
And now here comes the sex robots.
alex jones
Andy in Kansas, you're on the air.
dan friesen
Thanks for holding.
unidentified
Hello, Alex.
I'm a first-time caller.
I'm a huge fan.
I love your work.
Export Selection