Today, Dan and Jordan go slightly off the beaten path to explore a recent appearance Alex made on Louder With Crowder, primarily to see how Alex spins his giant defamation judgment in a different venue than his home field. Unfortunately, that involves Steven Crowder.
Sit down and talk to Mark and Liz and, you know, I think there's an argument that could be made that we could have put that all out on Monday or something.
So I never really wanted to cover Steven Crowder, and we won't generally, but Alex was on his show to whine about the Connecticut verdict, so I felt like it was important for us to see how Alex was dealing with that whole situation when he's in a new environment.
InfoWars broadcasts are primarily for the initiated, whereas something like going on Crowder is hopefully roping in new people for him.
So there's one thing that immediately jumped out to me watching this show, and that was that the show is very dumb.
Like, it's transparently dumb.
Arguments are based on false points, and the humor is painful.
The thing you have to realize when you watch this is that it's kind of supposed to be dumb.
The audience of the show is, as Steven Crowder has tweeted about before, it's at least half of the audience is under 16. So this show is aimed at children.
And I haven't been able to confirm that figure in any way, but he said it and I have no reason to doubt it.
One of the reasons I've avoided doing too much about Crowder up till this point is that he has a lot of his content behind paywalls.
For instance, the last time Alex was on for his weird, performatively masculine cigar club session, the first part of it was public, but then the rest of it that you'd actually want to watch is not.
We may be coming to a point where I stop over-respecting these ding-dongs intellectual property, but I don't think I'm quite there yet.
Steven Crowder is repugnant.
He's a horrible person, and his career has been a shameful series of horrible embarrassments that he's been able to parlay into having a very successful YouTube talk show that appeals to kids with sophomoric racist jokes and sophomoric anti-LGBTQ jokes.
I don't want to do too deep a dive on his trajectory, but here's a summation of his career path.
He tried to be a stand-up comedian, but he sucked at it, so he went to a right-wing agitator grift, catching the attention of Fox News.
When he got punched in the face by a union protester who he was harassing.
This rose his stature, and he began making his own content, most notably a segment called Change My Mind, where he would show up at a college campus and sit at a table waiting for college students on their way to class to join him for a spirited debate.
The college student was, of course, unprepared and probably late for class, and Steve could edit the videos however he wanted, so the series was a big hit.
It kind of falls into the same vein as Mark Dice's Man on the Street segments where he bothers drunk people on the boardwalk and then tries to make a political point out of it.
As his profile has grown, Steven has made a habit out of being a pile of shit, doing half-cooked segments based on deeply racist and anti-LGBTQ talking points that are easily debunkable and not persuasive at all.
Well, they're not persuasive at all to adults, I should say.
They all might be very convincing to a child who are...
In essence, his show is about taking extreme right-wing views and dangerous right-wing ideologues and laundering them so they can be enjoyed and accepted by high schoolers.
Basically, I think he's one of the worst folks in this space, but also, I don't know what our show can really add to that conversation.
If YouTube cared at all about the safety of the children and teens who use the platform, he would have been kicked off long ago.
And that's really, I think, probably the solution here, if they want to do something about it.
He can't really do that much damage if he's just limited to being on Glenn Beck's Blaze network.
And here, kids, first I'm going to transfer into Popstar, and then we're going to find out exactly how the Great Replacement Theory really works, kids, with this happy song.
But this whole episode is more or less about rationalizing Alex's verdict and complaining about it, and it's titled, Exclusive Interview with Alex Jones!
This Means War!
Exclamation point.
So to get a sense of the temperature, I wanted to start at the beginning and see the tone we're working with, although you will find out that I did not.
Hey, if I sound windy, that's because I've been running around here.
We've been testing, making sure that everything works.
We have, look, Alex Jones on the show today, and I would appreciate, look, I know...
Many of you have different opinions.
Let me just give you a little bit of a rundown here.
I was not an Alex Jones fan for a very long time.
I made it known.
I had criticized him here on this show, and I still have criticisms of him.
But we're at a point right now, and we'll be talking about this today, we'll be showing you a montage of the end zone dance from not only the elites in Hollywood, not only the elites in media, but the elites in government.
Real quick, this is like a clip of Jimmy Kimmel making a joke, and the government officials are Jen Psaki tweeted something.
She's not even the press secretary anymore, and Alex made a big target out of her for a while.
I would not be surprised if she received quite a bit of harassment due to Alex's actions that probably wouldn't be legally actionable since she's a public figure and all that.
But yeah, they're making a bit of a mountain out of more.
Regardless of where you line up, there's an inflection point right now in this country.
And the reason that we're having Alex Jones on, and we've had him on, is because I hate seeing people being belittled This couldn't be further from the truth.
I think that it would be far more meaningful for him to express what his misgivings are and what his criticisms are of Alex to the audience in a neutral environment where they could take those criticisms in and then decide like, huh, is that something I'm actually really concerned about, too?
Well, one of my criticisms, maybe it's he lies all the time.
You know, when you have someone like Alex Jones, who if you've watched his career, and I do consider him a friend now, I will say this on a personal level.
He's been around, from what I know of him, he's a good man, a flawed man.
He's talked about it here on air.
To me, it's refreshing when he's on air.
He was on air on Ash Wednesday and said, you know, maybe I drank a little too much and, you know, I have it.
He'll tell you about his flaws.
But for a man who...
Speaks publicly for hours, hours on end, and then misspeaks or gets something wrong, and then apologizes, and then is punished anyway.
And then the government jumps in.
People, well, I guess former press secretary, but current members of the government and entities who are backed by the government, be it banks, be it big tech organizations.
Deciding to put you in stocks in the town square, the message is really loud.
If you make a mistake, not only is there a double standard, which we'll talk about, if you have a belief that other people find to be offensive, and of course that's a sliding scale, we know that we've gone further and further down the trail here, look behind you, there's a slippery slope.
I feel like the stocks would have been a more effective response to Alex than what is happening right now.
If we had actually been like, at the very beginning, like, hey, you've...
You done fucked up.
You misspoke.
And maybe that's what happened.
Maybe you misspoke, but guess what?
You fucked up, so you go in the stocks for a week, and then everybody hits you with tomatoes and shit, and then we'll see if it's a misspeaking if you do it again.
He says, quote, I'm not saying that mistakes weren't made across the board, which tells me very clearly that he understands that actions Alex and his lawyers made during the discovery process led to the default.
Stephen's just trying to hand wave that away and encourage this adolescent audience from giving any validity to people who would tell them that the default was very much earned.
He's basically doing PR work for Alex here.
And it's ridiculous.
If you have the awareness that mistakes were made on both sides, hey, let's talk about what those mistakes were that Alex made.
Because it's going to be a mountain of them.
It's going to be enough to very clearly justify...
Yeah, I mean, it is, you know, we talked about it with Liz just a little bit, but that idea of, like, when Alex is in the courtroom not allowed to do Alex shit...
You are at a point in this country where you are paying taxes to fund the theft of food from the mouths of your kids.
All under the guise of, ah, First Amendment only protects the government stopping you from saying something.
That's all it does.
It prevents the government from stopping you.
Okay.
By that same token.
Shouldn't J.P. Morgan, shouldn't J.P. Chase, whatever their abbreviation is, these things are all these giant conglomerates, if they're backed by our tax dollars, if they're guaranteed, if they've received hundreds of billions of dollars, and if you adjust for inflation the last few months, hundreds of trezillion dollars in taxpayer dollars, are they allowed to deny you your fundamental constitutional rights?
I don't know if the banking industry taking government money means that they're bound by all the rules the government entities are, but if we were to nationalize the banks, then you'd have a good argument here that they should have to follow the same guidelines of the government.
I think what we're seeing is what happens to people when they're allowed to speak by themselves with no disagreement, and they aren't capable of disagreeing with themselves.
Do you know what I mean?
Like, when I have a thought that's that dumb, another part of my brain will be like...
Don't say that out loud.
And then I'll be like, why shouldn't I say that out loud?
And it'll have a really good point, and I'll be like, good call.
I, okay, teleporter, give it to me, and I just tackle people whenever they say dumb shit.
Like, I become, I don't have, I'm not a superhero, I don't solve problems, I will just show up immediately after Steven Crowder says something insane like that, tackle him, and then teleport away.
And then Baltimore, December 3rd, because we couldn't find a venue in D.C. Sorry, you have to go to the shithole that is Baltimore, but hey, at least it's not Haiti.
Or D.C. Yeah, or D.C. No, Baltimore's worse than D.C. Is it?
Associate with Haiti, Baltimore, and D.C. What do you think is there, like, when they open their mind's eye to see things that they associate with Baltimore, D.C., and Haiti?
And then the second thing that's awesome is right when he comes out the gate, Alex flatters Steven with like, that's a great shirt, but then also establishes himself as an alpha by saying, I'm going to steal your shirt.
It is interesting the way he both tries to acknowledge that he's not going to win the steamroll competition, and at the same time try and establish dominance on his own show by saying, I'm going to let you steamroll me, Alex.
No one can win a steamrolling competition against the bullhorn trainer that is Alex.
Alex Jones, the bullhorn expert.
So, Stephen, the reason that he wants to pretend to be a host in some ways is because he knows who Alex is, he knows how he communicates, and he also knows that without guidance, Alex is going to say just whatever the fuck he wants, and it's not going to be a useful interview for him.
And so I want to lead this right now because I think this is pivotal.
And we've done several multi-hour long shows.
But for some reason, this gets lost.
And I want you to correct me if I have this wrong.
So in 2017...
As an example.
Because the narrative is, Sandy Hook, you tormented the parents, you called them out by name, and you continually harassed them.
From what I understand, and I have some quotes here in front of me, and I want you to tell me if I'm misquoting you, you admitted you were wrong, and you apologized.
And I think that's key, because I still want to go after you anyway.
So 2017, you talked about an epiphany you had on Father's Day.
You said, forgive me, on Father's Day, I want to reach out to the parents of the slain children at the horrible tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut, and give you my sincere condolences.
Okay, you also said, I'd also like to reach out to any of the parents who lost a child at Newtown to invite them to contact me to open a dialogue because I think it's really essential we do that instead of letting the mainstream media misrepresent things and really try and drive this nation apart.
And then in 2019, in a deposition, you said, and I myself...
I have almost like a form of psychosis in the past where I basically thought everything was staged, even though I've now learned a lot of times things aren't staged.
And I'm not saying this to embarrass you, Alex.
I'm saying it because you were clear in that you had a change of heart or you believed that you were wrong or you believed you made a mistake, which I think is admirable.
And I think the fact that they want to browbeat you after that is what is so scary.
Steven sure does seem to be ignoring the fact that in Alex's video that was titled His Final Statement on Sandy Hook, he literally said, quote, If children were lost in Sandy Hook, my heart goes out to each and every one of those parents and the people who say they're parents that I see on the news.
The only problem is, I've seen a lot of soap operas, and I've seen actors before, and I know when I'm watching a movie and when I'm watching something real.
That was in late 2016.
Alex only said the things that Stephen's reading because of the Megyn Kelly interview that was about to come out.
Alex knew it was going to come out around Father's Day and Neil Heslin was going to be interviewed in it, so he was trying to get ahead of any controversy.
He was also still repeating the basic conspiracy theories about the shooting at this point, just holding back some things that he thought could be legally actionable.
Stephen's also ignoring that after this point, Owen Schroyer did his video about how Neil Heslin couldn't have held his son after the shooting, and Alex reported on that, which in many ways really does undo any goodwill that he might want to pretend he has from his feigned apology.
Stephen's also ignoring that in October 2017, Alex said, quote, it's as phony as a $3 bill, with CNN doing fake newscasts and blue screens.
Stephen's also ignoring that Alex has said that he thinks Sandy Hook probably was fake at least twice on air while the trials have been ongoing, including once in the last two weeks.
It's all good and fun to create these straw man versions of what Alex actually did and the reason he's facing consequences, but it's not real.
Stephen knows it's not real, but Alex's existence is pretty helpful for his brand, so we pretend this.
And, you know, the people who are watching Stephen's show probably don't have any interest in debunking this nonsense that he's feeding them.
I could never prove this, but I think that there's a vested interest in being willfully ignorant among a lot of people like Stephen.
Because if he had to cope with, or cope's the wrong word, if he had to accept publicly that he was aware of the depositions and the things that were in it, he would then be responsible for rationalizing and justifying those things.
And he couldn't do that.
He would have to be like, whoa, Alex, you fucked up real bad.
No, it is fascinating because these fucking pieces of shit who are trying to avoid defending Alex or avoid, you know, wading into having to defend Alex's actual behavior, if they were on the jury, they'd be like, yeah, this guy's gotta fucking go.
You know, like, without the ability to avoid acknowledging what is actually happening, without the ability to deny it when you are forced to look it directly into the eye every day for five fucking weeks, Yeah.
There is no deniability from Barnes whatsoever because, honestly, Barnes was probably looking at that billion-dollar judgment and going, man, I wish I had been a competent enough lawyer for them to hire me so I could have sued.
Alex is saying that he thought it might be fake on the day of the shooting on his show.
James Tracy, the professor that he's talking about, was first on Infowars on January 18th, 2013.
Not year later, not years later.
Wolfgang Halbig didn't show up until later, that is fair.
And he's the school safety officer that Alex is referencing.
But Alex is completely ignoring Steve Pachenik.
Steve was coming on Alex's show saying no one died at the school within March 2013 when he was pretending to be a reporter on the scene in the DMZ.
Alex's timeline is all screwed up because he's just conveying his well-rehearsed self-defense version of events.
Steven is a shitty interviewer and he has no interest in calling Alex out, so this timeline will stand and be presented to his giant impressionable audience as gospel, and it's just not true.
If he had any interest in pursuing the truth, he would have...
Familiarized himself with these things and pointed out the many points at which Alex's story diverges from reality.
No, no, but they'll say that you were saying because you saw this, and there were other people, there were other professors, there were other conspiracy theorists, some of whom turned out to not be credible, and then you didn't have them on your show anymore.
You did say maybe this is staged, and just again, to be clear, you afterwards said, no, it was not staged.
This is a load of shit, and honestly, I think if they needed to find the worst stuff Alex has said, this is definitely up there, but they could have come up with a much broader campaign for Hillary to use.
Throw in some of his dehumanizing racism, his violent misogyny and homophobia, his incitement of violence towards Muslims.
Alex has got a deep bench of horrible things Hillary could have attacked if that was the game that she was trying to play.
Also, Steven knows damn well that Alex didn't think that maybe the shooting was staged.
Alex literally said multiple times that the shooting was totally fake with actors.
Steven is softening that reality so it's easier for his audience to give Alex a pass and rationalize his actions.
He's selling his audience on Alex.
It's a concerted effort and it's done by obscuring reality.
I feel like the right move here, if you're a piece of shit like Crowder or one of these other guys, is to fucking stab Alex in the back and then carve up his audience.
Like, I don't understand why you're even trying this bullshit.
There's Infowars stuff and there's a load of bullshit.
Steven, I don't think it's in his best interest necessarily to be hooked with Glenn Beck with the Blaze stuff, but maybe there's some good money there.
But in terms of if you want some of Alex's audience and that stuff, and he wants to create more of a space, that would be the thing you'd do.
We started seeing that some of the folks that were claiming it was staged had gone even crazier and were now dysregulating and showing that indeed they had put out things that were wrong.
I was not the Sandy Hook guy.
It didn't put me on the map.
I barely ever covered it.
But Hillary blows it up, makes it a cause celeb for Democrats.
They use it to bring back all the gun control and now attacks on free speech and to attack Trump.
So if this is all an elaborate plot Hillary launched to attack Trump and then Trump won, it seems like it really wouldn't do anything to continue attacking Alex.
The goal would have been to use Alex's toxicity to sway the electorate away from Trump, and once Trump has won, that's about it in terms of voters.
It just doesn't make sense.
Unless you're just desperate to defend yourself using bullshit fantasy world nonsense.
These people are constantly screaming about how some people should die because they changed their pronouns, and yet somehow they're going to try and pretend that pronouns cannot refer to people.
So, Alex tries to explain, and Stephen really wants him to explain this, because it's kind of an important point, that he fully complied with Discovery.
Well, I do have a question that's important here, because people will say, well, the reason you weren't allowed to defend yourself is it was a default judgment, and they say, because you didn't provide the evidence, right, that was requested in Discovery.
Give me very specifics, not just all.
You did provide and hand over a lot of evidence.
What did you hand over?
Because they did have financials.
They did have, certainly in the Texas trial, they did have access to financials.
They did have access to certain traffic metrics.
When I was watching the trial, they would say, well, actually, they didn't hand over, for example, the Alexa reportings as opposed to the Google Analytics reportings.
What kind of evidence, when you were asked to hand over, just give me some examples of what you did hand over.
Did you hand over financial documents as it related to the company?
All right, let me answer that question, and then I want to get into people saying, oh, this is just for Alex Jones.
In Texas, they claimed that because we did so much discovery, and they would have each person that they were deposing give them more discovery, so they'd say, oh, out of the 200,000 emails you gave us in Texas, In one of the discovery batches you gave us, there was one extra email that wasn't in this batch.
Little weird gotcha games.
And then in Connecticut, the judge kept saying, give me the Google Analytics.
Well, we hardly ever even used Google Analytics, hardly ever even looked at it.
So we explained to the judge, ma 'am.
It's a search box for the back end of Google, and a lot of you have to pay for it.
We've never paid for it.
We've barely ever used it, but we searched for Google Analytics and found one writer and one other person in the group that had looked at Google Analytics and said, oh, look how much traffic we're getting a few times.
So we gave them what we had in our system about Google Analytics.
Take Alexa, same thing.
They said, give us the Alexa.
Well, Stephen, I want you to give me the Google.
And then you say, okay, what do you want me to search in Google?
Also, some of those instances of Google Analytics were like, look how much traffic we're getting from this Sandy Hook article.
So maybe Alex shouldn't use that as an example.
If Stephen really wanted to be prepared to ask this question and respond appropriately to Alex's answer, he should have read the order for the default judgment.
It spells everything out.
There were requests for production that Alex never even responded to.
There were requests to produce people for depositions that were ignored.
Alex repeatedly sent completely unprepared people to depositions as corporate representatives.
And that's just the surface.
Yeah.
unidentified
Alex did turn over big batches of documents, but he had a habit of doing that just before hearings about his failure to turn over documents so he could avoid consequences while overwhelming the plaintiffs with tons of unrelated shit.
Even these tranches weren't satisfactory to what he was obligated to turn over, though, and it didn't really help him.
Yeah.
unidentified
In the judgment, they even discuss how they tried to resolve the problem through fines and sanctions, but it was clear that it had no effect on Alex's abuse of the discovery process.
It's so hard because the real, the truth of it is like that all of him being like, I'm not allowed to say I'm innocent.
I'm not allowed to say I'm all this stuff.
And it's like, that's your fault, and the reason that you weren't allowed to say it is because if you did, sooner or later, you would have to go to jail.
We're being nice to you by keeping you...
This is like you going bowling with rails.
That's the point here, is because you are going to be a gutter ball and then go to jail.
And now the Secretary of State of Texas is talking about we may have to go after Alex Jones because he caused threats on election officials.
They have no statements.
They don't have me saying be violent.
I didn't even probably ever even talk about the Texas election other than saying I don't think Beto, you know, was as close as he said he was to Ted Cruz.
So this is the absolute next-level garbage and propaganda.
Overhead shot.
I want to show people this.
Texas Secretary of State, Alex Jones unleashed hell on our election people.
That's the hill.
Here's another one.
Republican Texas election chief blasts nuts, peddling 2020 conspiracy theories, zooms in on Alex Jones.
They want to scare everybody else and get a bunch of other lawyers to file lawsuits, to come after all the conservatives and all the nationalists and all the patriots.
And I really appreciate you letting me get that out there because it's so frustrating to be kind of only have my show that has a big audience, but it's compartmentalized because of censorship.
It's very hard to actually get the truth out there.
You and I have had conversations, obviously, off air, where, you know, I would say, I wouldn't say call you the net, but I've said, I don't agree with this.
I don't like that.
Remember, I told you, I remember early on the show saying, I don't like that you sometimes stir up infighting with conservatives.
I remember you saying, you know what?
I used to do that more, and I've decided the left is a more important enemy.
We've had very strong disagreements.
I felt compelled to have you on because some of the biggest figures in our movement, who, by the way, agreed with all of some of your quote-unquote conspiracy theories that I thought were incorrect, they didn't have you on.
Also, Stephen, you have to understand, a lot of those other conservative outlets are really busy running damage control for Tucker's Kanye West interview at the moment.
A lot of them just don't have the juice to throw Alex into the mix and try and deal with that.
It is weird that Alex hasn't been on Rogan, though.
Like, I wonder if Joe watched some of the trial and realized that Alex lied to his face about what he said about Sandy Hook.
That would be fun if, like, Joe started to get the picture that Alex is using him and Yeah, if Joe watched the trial, it would be really hard to come away from it.
I am way more scared about the direction the country's going in if they admit this is a formula for everybody.
I mean, while the right wing laughs some of them and says, "Oh, it's just Alex Jones," they're on every channel saying, "We're coming after everybody now with this model." And they've even got the Republican Secretary of State.
In Texas, saying we want to come after Republicans that question election fraud.
Give me a break.
So you have the rhinos, the neocons, the rabid left, allied together against the populist uprising of nationalist Americans who are peacefully trying to take our country back.
So I'm way more concerned about nuclear war.
I'm way more concerned about financial collapse.
I mean, here's a good point, Stephen.
Quite frankly, the way inflation's going, the way it accelerates towards Weimar Republic or Zimbabwe, in 10 years, There's such inflation, a billion dollars will be like a thousand dollars.
I mean, at the current rate we're at here, so no.
No, I'm not scared.
I am disgusted.
And I really feel proud of myself because I've told the truth about this.
I've said what I was wrong.
They have created this whole synthetic identity for me.
The straw man.
And then they sat there and had to lie to a jury and suppress the truth and tell them I was guilty and rigged this kangaroo court so I myself can hold my head tall.
But I am in general very concerned for my children, for the country, and the future because of the rabid acceleration into total and complete corruption.
I mean, if I've read everything correctly, I feel like there's a difference between radical, out-of-control inflation and all of these businesses being like, ooh, they're talking about inflation, we can charge an extra two bucks.
Not that you just have kind of this faith in that that's going to happen, but what are you guys arguing if you can reveal that to us on how it's going to be overturned?
Either America's gone and completely done, or in Texas and in Connecticut, if I have the money for the appeals, that's why they want to bankrupt us right now, because they are so scared that if there's any justice left...
At the Texas or the Connecticut Supreme Court or the U.S. Supreme Court, they've got to overturn this because the deep state, the ambulance chaser brigade are openly saying they're coming after everyone with this, just like when I got censored.
In a very real way, this is an apolitical case for lawyers and judges and everything, because they all have a vested interest in this being at least the bottom.
All of them would prefer to have firm guardrails so we don't have to go through another, this judge has waited three years to default judgment because we just have never seen this shit before.
So it helps if we have a baseline here of like, guess what?
But I know that when, okay, they've got their pound of flesh, they've demonized me, they've brought back up Sandy Hook, they've made a bunch of money for their charities, they got $73 million from Remington.
The year of the divorce with my ex-wife, six years ago, thank God it was the Trump era.
For the first time ever, we had all this extra money right when she divorces me.
It goes through the process, and the court made me pay her close to $10 million to, quote, buy her out of the company because I'd been married to her for 13 years.
So the one year God came through, the one year that I, because usually I make about a million, $2 million a year, but honest with my audience, and after all the bills and stuff and legal crap, it's gone.
I want to say something here that's important because I see you...
And we all struggle with this, right?
Where you're saying, because I know that people think that sounds like a lot of money, and it's sad that you even have to say, no, you don't do this just for the money, but you absolutely deserve to earn a living if you have millions of people who are listening and the amount of work that you put into it.
I understand it.
This is what I do here as well.
Conservatives are the only ones, surprisingly, the people who support free enterprise where we feel like, because our audience is largely working class, you want to say, look, look, don't get mad at me because I make this money.
Because of the huge difference between one year making $12 million and a several hundred million dollar judgment.
So I can explain that dynamic a little better than Steven.
He and Alex do this song and dance because they know that they're fucking over their audience.
They have to rationalize the money they make because it's an insane amount, and they earn it by exploiting their audience's fear and anger and monetizing that while putting vulnerable people in harm's way.
He has no idea the subject that he's even covering.
There's no work that goes into this other than riffing dumb jokes.
They know that they don't do shit.
And whether it's conscious or not, that's another question about whether or not that's why they have to rationalize this.
But they have to pretend not to care about money or else they run the risk of being way too obvious about how they sell things.
And then before you know it, they're just a racist QVC.
Fallon and Colbert make money, and I'm not sure how much, but they don't get on their show every night and try to rationalize it because they actually put on a show.
They're entertainers doing a job, not just complaining about how they're so persecuted.
And this has nothing to do with political alignment.
Do you think Jeff Foxworthy or Larry the Cable Guy or Ron White has to rationalize that they make millions of dollars?
They don't, because their talent makes it obvious why they make that much money.
For con men like Alex and Steven, it's different.
And that's why they do have to do this, like, oh, hey, look, it's $100 million that I make, but it's no big deal.
And not to jump too far from what you're saying, but Owen and Alex and other people in depositions have been very clear about, we don't really do any preparation.
Because if they admitted that they did work, it would show malice.
And this is the most important point I'm going to make here, and I've got a few documents if I can show them to you that are really important that tie this all together.
This is a major project for six years, two years before they sued me and now the last four, with literally hundreds of articles a week, sometimes thousands.
Every major news channel from HBO to PBS to Fox even attacking me over Sandy Hook and building it up into this giant controversy when I was not the Sandy Hook man to set the precedent with the Alex Jones precedent to shut everybody else down.
Now let's talk about this being the biggest defamation judgment in U.S. history by an order of at least 10 magnitude.
They're setting a precedent to steal your rights, not just your rights to listen to what you want to listen to and make your own decisions.
They're literally setting this up to come after the general public.
An FBI agent that I never saw, never covered, never said his name until he sued me.
He admitted it on the stand, was given $90 million because some people on the The more I think about it, the more I appreciate the 10 guilty men should be free instead of one.
Also, I guess if Steven wants to be such a stickler about saying people's names, which isn't necessary to prove intentional infliction of emotional distress, then he should support Alex paying Robbie Parker $120 million.
Sometimes I'm a little bit obnoxious because I'm trying to get through it all.
Like here today, and I really appreciate Steven and the crew being so gracious so I can have a place to tell the truth, and I appreciate your courage because you do get attacked for having me on.
And just that this is our rights being taken.
This is a Hollywood production.
I'm not saying Sandy Hook didn't have it.
I'm saying the production of what I supposedly did and how big it became.
You know, this huge event.
I'm not the Sandy Hook guy.
I'm the guy that wrote the number one best-selling book in the world, Reset in the War for the World.
That's why the globalists hate me, is because I'm exposing their corporate worldwide tyranny.
I'm exposing groups like PayPal that are back, by the way, saying, if we don't like what you say, we're going to fine you $2,500.
I'm opposing their authoritarianism.
I'm a populist.
I'm a champion of the people.
And folks can actually hear the real Alex Jones at InfoWars.com, InfoWars.com forward slash show or Band.Viddy.
Go see the real live show.
Go see the archives.
Go see the guests.
Go find out what I'm actually saying instead of little bitty, twisted, edited excerpts that the corporate media puts out.
And understand, the globalists see.
InfoWars is the flag they want to capture.
They're more obsessed with it than anything else out there right now because when the globalists tune in, they get scared because I know what I'm talking about when it comes to the mechanics of the New World Order.
I guess if you boil that down, his one true thing about himself that you need to know is that he's amazing and he's so strong and right and smart that everything bad that happens to him is just the globalists attacking him with fake stories because he's so strong and right and smart.
Listen, I'm more ADHD when I'm totally exhausted, so I've done a lot of interviews, and I was up until 1 o 'clock in the morning, and I apologize.
My brain's gone right now.
So, yes, I realize this is what's coming next.
I realize they want to take me out of the game, and I realize that I'm never going to quit now because they want to silence me because this is a battle of wills.
I know it's the right thing to do.
But I also understand that if I take myself out of the game by being fried or burnt out, they win.
So I am going to, in the next few months, do something I never do.
I'm going to take off a week, a month, starting at the end of this month.
November and December.
I may take off two weeks in December.
I want my listeners to understand why I've got to do it because I've got to rest.
I've got to stop drinking.
I've got to stop smoking.
I've got to go to church to recharge my batteries.
I've got to take my daughter camping.
I've got to go camping and shooting with my son and my other daughters.
And so if you're asking what's happening, I'm gonna recharge my batteries, get back to family, get back to God and come back in 2023 harder than ever.
I don't know what it is, but, like, as I've gotten older, the interest in whether or not something is culture, counterculture, or any of that stuff, it kind of becomes something that maybe has a little bit of, like, an artistic interest to me.
I get what Alex is saying, and again, maybe I'm a square, but I cared a lot more about that when I was 19. I mean, that whole idea of selling out or anything along those lines, who cares?
If you and I right now were at any point in time like, listen man, as we sit here in our fucking hoodies and tennis shoes like, we're the true rebels and not going outside.
I'm just asking because, you know, you talk about how you're hanging out with him, and not only, if not him, you know, he has a bunch of friends who could have you on.
On the courage scale, Stephen Crowder's a 10, Alex Jones is a 10, and Joe Rogan's an 8. And I'll take an eight all day over our enemies that are at a zero.
So, at the end here, this is the last clip we've got, because they've got to go to Mug Club, which is the, like, behind-the-paywall segment, and Alex is like...
Professional people doing top-flight comedy and analysis.
I mean, it's better than the production on, like, these late shows that have giant budgets, 20 times your budget.
People should flood you with support, and more importantly, word of mouth, because I know that's the real currency we all want, is to override the censors and to win the Infowars.
Absolutely.
Everybody should support Steven Crowder, who's got the 500-pound testicles.
Well, Joe's only got 400-pound ones.
I admire Joe's balls, okay?
But, Stephen, yours are bigger and even more juicy.
To them it's a transgressive concept and so the idea of someone saying that would blow their fucking minds into laughter, I get that, but I don't get it.
Well, I get what you're saying, but I think that from a construction standpoint, the joke is the media reports on this interview as Alex likes Stephen's juicy balls.
Right.
The amusing image is the news running that headline.
But one of the things that I found very interesting was that there is probably not that much difference between how he presents himself here and on his show.
In terms of this stuff, I think part of that is because he clearly felt...
Explain to me how a man can insist that he has both apologized and taken responsibility for his behavior and yet still be like, well, the family should get nothing!