Today, Dan and Jordan check out an "Emergency Saturday Broadcast" Alex put out this weekend. In this installment, Alex appears to be trying to declare victory over Covid restrictions, while also lying about storms, and once again taking Bill Maher's show too seriously. Citations
We're a couple dudes like to sit around, worship the altar of Selene, and talk a little bit about the goings-on in the life of Austin, Texas' own Alex Jones.
Yeah, it's gotten to the point where even like InfoWars is at that very strange point where they're like, all right, you could come on Owen's show, but you're not going in the metadata.
And we have got an incredible news alert for you today.
Three huge stories.
First off, it's now official.
All over the world.
Whether you are in Europe or Canada or the United States or the UK, all four of the places in the world are announcing an end to the mask and the checkpoints and the vaccine passport systems on your phones and moves for forced inoculation.
Just a week ago, they were saying we have to start forced inoculations in Europe door-to-door on February 1st.
But suddenly...
All these different government institutions, all the different medical systems, the CDC here in the United States, the National Health Service in the UK, they all came out simultaneously from Ireland to the United States and said, you know what, we're just ending.
And if you pay attention to the way he operates with his narratives, this, I think, is a huge indication that he's looking for an off-ramp from the COVID hysteria and all those associated storylines that have dominated the show for the last two years.
I'm going to attempt to lay out the picture of what I mean by this, and I'm going to start by addressing the reality and falsity of the news that Alex is covering.
Mostly, this has to do with Boris Johnson announcing that England had reached a peak in terms of Omicron and that COVID-related restrictions were going to be eased.
So Alex is reporting this as the NHS giving this advice, and there's a lot of messiness surrounding that.
Matthew Taylor, the CEO of the NHS Confederation, the organization that represents the health care entities that provide services for the NHS, said, quote, the NHS is under significant pressure.
Even with restrictions and many people going further to protect themselves and others, the number in hospital with covid is high and the numbers are only going down very slowly.
High numbers of covid patients and staff off sick has the inevitable effect on the work the health service can do, including the urgent task of making inroads into the treatment backlog and getting back to performance, key performance targets.
In addition, Taylor encouraged people to continue wearing masks, getting tested regularly, In addition, the British Medical Association was quoted by The Guardian as saying this decision was, quote, Also, Susan Hopkins, the chief medical advisor to the UK Health Security Agency, quote, urged the public to take our personal behavior seriously and use face coverings when in crowded places among strangers.
There are many, many cautious voices in the UK medical community, and there are also many commentators who, like yourself, are pretty convinced that Boris Johnson's move is a calculated political one, which is designed to save his position while putting the public at risk.
Okay, so you're just telling me that for the past week, people within his own party have been calling for him to resign, and then suddenly and conveniently, he does the thing that other people might want that could cause a lot of controversy, taking eyes away from that.
Yeah, the conservative parties in the UK wanted these restrictions lifted, and he's giving that concession because they have been calling for him to resign.
Like, the conservative MP Christian Wakeford had defected to labor, and David Davis, a former Brexit guy, essentially equated Johnson to Neville Chamberlain.
The reason that the move of lifting COVID restrictions is kind of the move that Johnson needed to make to win his party back was because, like you said, he was in trouble because he had BYOB parties.
You know, you just look at these people and they were like, you know, I think the French aristocracy were right on and I don't think anything negative ever happened to them, so let's just do the same shit.
As an op-ed in The Guardian points out, it's fairly safe to say that this is a decision that's based on politics, not science, because Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland are all keeping many of the restrictions in place, like requiring masks in public transit and in retail settings.
A similar dynamic is in effect in Ireland, where many settings are no longer requiring masks, but a mandate will still exist on public transit and in retail settings.
They're going to ease their restrictions in the hospitality sector, and pubs are going to be allowed to be open past 9pm again, so there are some moves that they're making, but also some restrictions that are staying in place.
Here in the United States, the Supreme Court ruled that Biden's vaccine or test mandate for businesses wasn't going to stand, but that it was still appropriate in healthcare settings.
In terms of what restrictions exist, the CDC doesn't really set any of that.
They give recommendations, and then the actual decisions are mostly a state-by-state thing, and various states are taking wildly different approaches, so I have no idea how to even address Alex's claim that the United States dropped a blanket.
So as of January 20th, the CDC's website still recommends everyone over two years old should wear masks, that people should get vaccinated and maintain distance when possible.
The same state-by-state dynamic is also true in Canada.
They have national rules.
For example, non-citizens who aren't vaccinated are only able to enter the country under certain circumstances.
That's a national...
As for the various provinces, a lot of them are actually extending COVID precautionary rules.
For instance, on January 17th, British Columbia's health ministry announced that they would extend the COVID order, quote, that will keep gyms and fitness centers closed and limit gatherings at events and restaurants.
Masks are still required in almost all public settings.
Meanwhile, Ontario is easing restrictions gradually with businesses like restaurants and theaters being able to open at 50% capacity beginning January 31st, then gradually heading back to normal over a matter of months.
At the same time, Quebec has decided to not lift any restrictions.
The point here is that different places make different decisions.
Alex has singled in on the news from England and decided to characterize the entire world based on the probably very foolish and self-preservation-based decision made by Boris Johnson.
There's a good chance that will play to his audience, so he's safe there, but it's dumb.
Putting aside the real world for a second, it's critical to understand the move that Alex is making with his narrative and how he's able to pull it off.
Alex has built up the image of completely draconian COVID tyranny, not only as something that's coming, but something that's already here.
The checkpoints, the door-to-door forced vaccinations, it's all happening.
This was very sensationalized as a version of the world, and engaging with reality this way serves two important functions for Alex.
First, it keeps his audience in a state of almost hypnotic and impotent fear, where the only solution available is to support Alex so he can save you.
Secondly, he knows that none of these things were ever going to actually happen.
There weren't going to be door-to-door forced vaccinations, so it really serves as a perfect horror scenario that he'll eventually get to take credit for stopping.
You get the first hints of this from this claim at the end of the clip where Alex is saying that all of these countries mysteriously simultaneously made these announcements, which is obviously meant to imply that they were acting in concert in reaction to something, which is going to be claimed to be the mass awakening that Alex has helped happen, of course.
But if you look at the actual state of things and the actions of the various countries that he's referencing, what he's saying isn't real at all.
It dangles by the thread of Boris Johnson's decision, who until very recently Alex has been calling a globalist traitor who pretended to be a patriot in order to get elected, then turned on the people.
So when I say that this is what he's going to present as what is the reason that all these countries are doing this, that's spelled out in this next clip.
Is it because the deaths are way down in 2022 and 2021?
No, they're actually way up from the first big year of the pandemic before we had the vaccine.
Is it because the bureaucrats just want to give us our freedoms back?
No, that's not it either.
It's because they know all over the world such firm, powerful opposition has formed.
At the governmental, corporate, and private individual level that there was a massive tide of resistance that they wouldn't be able to stop.
A huge tide of peaceful resistance.
The majority of conservative Tories and of Liberal Labor Party members in the UK last week came to Boris Johnson and said, we can outvote you with a supermajority.
And he had to back down.
And the same thing is now happening in Canada.
The same thing is now happening here in the United States.
I think this is a strange move for Alex, honestly.
I don't know how he's gonna explain it when there are still COVID restrictions down the road.
Like, if all these government figures are so scared of the powerful awakening he's helped inspire, it seems like it would be impossible for him to explain them reimposing COVID measures in the future should that be necessary.
That seems to me like an indication of a desire on Alex's part, though, to change the status quo of his coverage, but I don't know if it's gonna play.
It does seem like there's something that is underwriting this.
I mean, the thing about it is that it feels like he's trying to take that early path.
Because right now, what we're seeing...
To me, is a complete abdication of responsibility from all the people who could be taking it, right?
So at this point, they're all saying that we are simply giving up to the mathematics of human behavior rather than any kind of intervention to change the results.
So Alex is maybe right of just saying, like, if they're going to say that everything's fucking fine, then...
I guess so, but I still think that even if there are massive irresponsibilities going on in terms of many state governments, in terms of their response and taking care of the public...
Even Alex's freedom-loving Texas state government released data this past week that showed that, quote, unvaccinated Texans are 16 times more likely to die from COVID-related illnesses than fully vaccinated Texans.
And that's Texas!
This week, the CDC released a finding that unvaccinated people over 65 and older were 49 times more likely to be hospitalized than people over 65 who had gotten the booster.
Unvaccinated people aged 50 to 64 are 44 times more likely to be hospitalized than vaccinated people in the same age range.
When you include all people over the age of 18, hospitalization rates were 16 times higher in the unvaccinated cohort than in the vaccinated.
Alex can claim these are fake headlines all he wants, but the data is bearing out that you are far more likely to end up hospitalized or dead if you're unvaccinated, regardless of what age group you're in.
They gaslit us with the corporate media, and they lied to us at every level, and they used the local health departments to lie.
But the lie has now failed.
This is a very historic moment.
We have crossed a political Rubicon here.
Now, they claimed they'd get rid of the restrictions a year ago, but I said they'd bring them back.
That's because when they know the opposition, builds to a point where it could defeat them, they back off, so we go back to sleep, then they bring the restrictions back again.
And I'm predicting here they're going to do it again, but not right away.
This is a fun story, but it's all just based on things Alex is imagining.
There's no indication that I can see that any restrictions or guidance has been enacted or lifted because of fear about being defeated by Alex's awakened army.
In fact, I would suggest that the only people who seem to have molded their behavior on a fear of people like Alex are the politicians who are doing exactly what Alex wants them to do.
People like DeSantis and Rand Paul, people who know where their bread is buttered.
see that they need to cater to this extreme anti-vax voting bloc or else they have no future in politics.
And then I guess there's Boris Johnson, who was less afraid of the power of the anti-vax truth movement as he was afraid of losing his seat in government because he got caught having parties while the public was sacrificing for the public good.
The situation with Boris looks close enough to what Alex needs it to look like in order for him to write a compelling story about it, so that's what he's doing.
The whole world is mysteriously simultaneously dropping COVID restrictions because they're worried about Alex's truth movement being too successful and toppling the entire globalist system.
It's so stupid, but it's the closest thing to an off-ramp I think Alex has seen in a long time, and I don't fault him for taking it.
Yeah.
This notion that they eased up the restrictions in the past when they were in danger and then tightened them up when the Patriots got complacent doesn't really make sense, considering that for the last two years, consistently and incessantly, anti-vax assholes have been yelling about real and imagined public health measures at rallies, school board meetings, city council meetings, and of course on Alex and Rogan's shows.
There was no time when the anti-vax assholes got complacent.
It's been a constant barrage this entire time.
And the idea that these COVID restrictions are being just dropped simultaneously, Alex has England, and that's about it.
The rest of the countries he named don't even actually support the argument.
And even then...
There are a ton of countries in the world that he's just ignoring and pretending don't exist.
So there's an index on the Financial Times.
It's prepared by Oxford, researchers at Oxford.
And it's a stringency index of government measures.
they are launching door-to-door vaccination campaigns in order to make the shots available to anybody who wants them.
It also came out this week that many Albanians were no longer allowed to enter Kosovo, as they had enacted new rules where you needed to have proof of getting the booster or current PCR test across the border.
This weekend, Kosovo enacted new rules regarding entry, and they also set a curfew and restricted restaurant hours to needing to be closed by 9pm.
Also in their new rules, All employees of public institutions, central and local public enterprises...
Private businesses, organizations, as well as other entities must possess one of the following in order to be allowed to enter the work premises.
They need to have proof of vaccination or proof that they have a contraindication that makes them exempt from vaccination.
Also, masks are required all over the place.
Also this last week, Belize put in a new rule that people who wanted to enter the country would need to purchase travel insurance to help offset the COVID costs for treatment and lodging expenses for people who need to quarantine.
Alex should consider this a major move, but he seems to not care, at least partially because this story doesn't fit his current narrative about this suspicious drop of all COVID restrictions.
A place that Alex has routinely said is the seat of the New World Order because of Angela Merkel.
On January 7th, Germany announced that it would now be requiring proof of a negative COVID test or proof of having got the booster for people to enter restaurants.
The rules also continue to policy restricting people who have not been vaccinated from attending gatherings.
Let's stay in Europe, where Italy just tightened their rules about where you will need a green pass to enter.
It was announced on January 20th to take effect in February and last until the end of March, and you'll need a green pass to go to a hairdresser.
Let's go a little bit towards the east, and we'll find Turkmenistan.
Just put some new restrictions in place on January 16th, which included, quote, stepping up enforcement of mask wearing restrictions on businesses and something Alex should be deeply concerned about.
One of the new rules says, quote, doctors, nurses and medical students are to be assigned to control points on highways at the boundaries between regional centers and districts to carry out enhancements.
So there's other examples, but I think the point is clear.
Alex's worldview is very narrow and predominantly just involves countries that he thinks are white.
There's a ton of varying responses to COVID in different countries because these different countries are facing different outbreak patterns.
The extent of his engagement with the world is to skim this story about Boris Johnson, make up a fun story about it, and then use that story to characterize the situation in the entire world.
The globalists are super afraid of Alex's buddy, so they're loosening up the COVID restrictions, except for all the places that they aren't loosening restrictions.
And they're actually adding new ones, which Alex will just ignore.
Yep.
unidentified
The larger point is that nothing Alex is saying is in any way connected to reality.
He's predicting that they're loosening up restrictions now, only to reimpose them later.
Because I think he probably realizes on some level that based on the anti-vex fervor and complete irresponsibility our public officials are showing, there's probably going to be another crisis before this is all over.
Yeah.
unidentified
This is him laying the groundwork so if things get out of control again, partially thanks to the bullshit he's spreading, he'll be able to pretend that he called it in advance and that the new public health minister...
It's a little bit like predicting a financial crash after 2008, and you watched all that stuff happen, and then they were like, what if we did nothing about it?
And you're like, okay, well, eventually it's going to happen again.
In the same way of like, hey, you know there's mutations of COVID.
Like, you know, if you don't do anything about it, they'll probably continue doing that.
Predicting another mutation is not a difficult thing to do.
But in general, the globalists have enough of the public that want to have vaccine passports now and want to have social credit scores and who want to be tracked that they have now the 20-30% they need.
To beta test the social credit score, work out the kinks, and get it ready for the next plandemic.
And that's what Bill Gates has been saying.
He's been saying, okay, this plandemic's ending, but a new one's coming soon when another super virus pops up.
And he and Leonardo DiCaprio and all of them tell you, it's coming out of the jungles because the world's too hot.
You're going to die of a new super virus because you eat too many hamburgers.
Or you have a car.
or you have heating and air conditioning.
It's voodoo.
No, they're cooking this garbage up in labs So I think one of the most telling dynamics that really indicates to me that Alex is knowingly full of shit about pretty much everything he talks about is this selective ability to understand that things are interconnected.
For instance, when it comes to bringing up his conspiracies...
Everything is connected.
People in far-flung industries, in different countries, living at different periods of time, they're all working together for this same goal.
Even more to the point, he understands that trends can have an impact on other trends.
For instance, economies in the developing world worsening can have the impact of negative effects on the supply chain, and ultimately, that can then affect our economy.
Alex gets this kind of interconnectedness.
However, when it comes to the relationship between deforestation and disease he pretends to not understand what people are talking about.
There are animals in the quote jungles to use his term that we aren't in contact with and when their habitats are destroyed some of them may migrate into where humans live and some of these animals may carry diseases we've never encountered before and we may be super susceptible to.
This is a pretty simple to understand dynamic and it's pretty well understood how climate change and the destruction of natural environments like forests is closely associated with disease.
This isn't even taking into consideration the dynamic where like Flesh-eating bacteria can only survive in warmer waters, so as the temperature of the ocean's increasing, your chance of encountering it when you go for a swim is going up.
I don't believe that Alex would be capable of understanding interconnectedness in one instance and not in the other.
This seems to me like a pathetic display of willful misrepresentation in order to misinform the audience.
Also, I love Bill Gates, Leonardo DiCaprio, and all of them.
And Beto and AOC and all the Hollywood trash, like the before-mentioned DiCaprio, are telling you that it's imminent that almost all of us will die by 2030.
William Shatner gets off the space pod a few months ago.
He says, too bad everyone will be dead on the surface soon, but it's our fault, right?
They have let all these people in on the depopulation agenda.
Hell, they've let the public in on it.
They've got Wall Street Journal and New York Times headlines about looking forward to the end of humanity because we're a curse.
That's not a fair representation of what Shatner said.
When he got back from space, he said, quote, I was overwhelmed with the experience, with the sensation of looking at death and looking at life, and this, you know, what has become cliche of how we need to take care of the planet.
But it's so fragile.
People say, oh, it's fragile.
No, no, no.
There's this little tiny blue skin that is 50 miles wide, and we pollute it, and it's our means of living.
So, I mean, I think that's a mischaracterization on Alex's part.
Also, that op-ed titled Looking Forward to the End of Humanity wasn't about how we're a curse and need to go.
That's a fun misrepresentation Alex can make because he only engages with headlines, and he likes to pretend that looking forward in this case...
It's like how a kid looks forward to a birthday party as opposed to looking forward in terms of thinking about things in the future.
The article itself is really mostly about how if the ability to download your brain into a robot does come around, something like that, there's a really good chance that it's only going to be available to people in the upper echelons of society, and that's a nightmare.
The last line of the piece is, quote, A transhuman future in which mortality is optional may sound like paradise, but if it comes sooner for some of us than for others, it could prove to be a dystopia.
This is an almost two-year-old op-ed Alex only knows the headline of that he's using to argue that the globalists are planning to wipe out the population.
It is just embarrassing.
As for the people saying that we're going to be dead by 2030, that was just people like AOC and Beto commenting on the 2018 IPCC report.
And it wasn't so much them saying that everyone's going to die.
For instance, AOC's comments were taken out of context.
She was pointing out how the younger generation see governmental inaction.
Quote, The world is going to end in 12 years if we don't address climate change, and your biggest issue is how are we going to pay for it?
You see what the context is.
The only person I consistently see going on and on about how everyone's about to die is Alex Jones.
When he's in a decent mood, it's just the people who got vaccinated, they're gonna be dead in the next few years, and he's very sorry to have to report this news.
If you read the Rockefeller and Bill Gates documents, they plan to have the first phase of the lockdown go for four years, then pull it off for a little while, then bring it back.
But this time, after two years, they're having to back off because, again, it formed so much opposition that it could actually bring down their whole system.
So they're backing off now because, again...
They think that that will make opposition go away, and then they can move at us with the next weapon, which I believe will be a staged cyber attack with a major power outage worldwide.
So as for Alex's prediction of a cyber attack, that seems like a decent, almost cautious pick for him.
There is a pretty high likelihood of something happening that he could portray as a cyber false flag, so his odds of getting to portray himself as a prophet for just making a bland middle-of-the-road prediction are pretty good here.
Cyber threats are always growing, and the way people are engaging with NFTs and that sort of thing these days leave the door wide open for something to happen on that front that could wipe out a ton of money, which Alex could call a cyber false flag.
And if they actually needed a well-maintained power grid, then some super rich person would just voluntarily pay for it out of the goodness of their hearts.
So Alex called that power crisis a cyber false flag.
This is the kind of standards he's going to need to claim that he's right about this prediction.
It's almost a non-existent, it's like a limbo bar that's at the top of a doorway.
It's very easy to make it under that bar.
There are really serious winter storms that have been happening and are predicted through the weekend in places like North and South Carolina.
Much of South Texas is under a winter storm warning.
The point is that there are a number of places that aren't necessarily known for their tough winter weather that are looking at some challenges, and it may just be that another city loses power temporarily due to a snowstorm.
Alex's cyber false flag prediction is an attempt to get ahead of that possibility so he can Yeah.
So the thing about the Rockefeller document saying that four years of lockdown is coming, that's completely made up.
And what this lie is meant to do is convince the listeners that the actions taken by Alex and the anti-vex community were not only righteous, but they were also super effective.
That's an attempt to, one, claim victory, and two, solidify the argument that if public health measures are raised again, then this kind of ridiculous response is exactly what everybody needs to do because it worked this time.
Alex and his buddies were able to defeat the globalists in two years, whereas the globalists' plan was four.
It's obviously so effective.
Also while I'm on the subject, how weak are these globalists?
If their plan is to either imprison the entire world or kill everyone off and they're doing it because they're beholden to literal Satan, how does it make sense that they would back off because Alex and his friends were whiny for a long time?
And that's because this is just a made-up story that Alex is telling based on Boris Johnson making a callous political decision to save his own ass from getting thrown out for having BYOB parties.
Now here's another short clip from the Bill Maher show, the full clips on Infowars.com, showing a liberal New York Times columnist coming out and calling the COVID tyranny a catastrophic moral crime, and that it was all a fraud.
So also, I'm never gonna care about what people on Bill Maher's show say, and I can't figure out why Alex likes to pretend that that show is meaningful.
If I had to guess, I would say it's because the show is, like, it's really intentionally iconoclastic, and it's not, you know, it's supposed to involve comedy, sort of.
I was just like, I had a terrible flash when you said Tom Kenny, not because of anything about him, but because now I have to go through my mental Rolodex of like, have I heard something bad?
Yeah, it was a lonely place to be 23 months ago, being the first to expose this.
And it's been a rough process throughout it, but I knew that Infowars acts as the information warfare shock troops of truth.
And it's our job to tell the hard facts up front when it's not popular and the public isn't informed.
Because if we don't...
Lay out these hard facts.
Nobody else is going to do it.
And that's why all of you watching, all of you viewing this transmission, need to understand how valuable InfoWars is and how valuable you've been in the last two years fighting with us and all the things you've done to spread our articles and spread our videos and to share so many other great Patriots information and Joe Rogan coming out against it and Tucker Carlson coming out against it.
Though it took them about a year to get going once they saw the facts they did.
One of the things I thought was particularly interesting about this is this doesn't sound like somebody who thinks they're going to be gone in a month or two.
This seems like somebody who's preparing for some narratives.
Also, if you kind of cut through the facade in that last clip, what Alex is saying here is that he saved the world by standing in the gap and forcing out the truth until it became acceptable for other people to join him, like Tucker and Joe Rogan, who were apparently too cowardly to do so previously.
Alex is pretending that he saved the world, but nothing in the world has actually changed, other than Boris Johnson's decision and Barry Weiss went on Bill Maher's show and talked shit.
That's all that's behind Alex's navel-gazing about how he's a hero because he was into the anti-vax shit before it was cool.
The materials that Alex uses to make his argument in this video are lies about statistics, lies about the lockstep document, some comments Barry Weiss made, made-up fantasies about Boris Johnson, a video of Robert Kennedy Jr., A story about Aaron Rodgers.
Alex is making all this shit up about this Rockefeller document, and it's so funny.
He even got the year wrong this time.
You can hear in this clip, though, the way that Alex tries to play noncommittal with this shit.
Like, you're frustrated by it.
He's claiming this big victory, but then when, you know, when nothing actually happens, he runs the risk of his listeners being like, hey, you said the globalists are backing off.
That's why he needs to add this reminder that there's a good chance that nothing is gonna happen and things are still gonna be bad.
You could fire everybody at the Justice Department.
It wouldn't fix our problems.
You could change all the judges around.
But unless we become aware of the globalists and the big corporations and how they're manipulating our countries off against each other, we'll never fix it.
We've got to take our cities, our counties, our states back, our nations back.
We've got to take our corporations back.
We've got to take our lives back.
And then we have a chance of beating this peacefully by a global awakening.
The globalists want all sorts of regional conflicts and fights and civil wars to, again, further destabilize and crash confidence in systems because they want the nation states to go down all at once, basically, to bring in their new global corporate governance.
unidentified
And that's why they're racing to get their social credit score vaccine passport out.
This clip is such a great representation of how nothing Alex says means anything, or even has internal consistency.
He's simultaneously saying that replacing every member in Congress and every judge wouldn't fix anything in terms of the country's problems, but somehow the solution is a bizarrely vague...
Like, what is he talking about?
Like, what does this mean?
It makes no sense, unless you understand taking back our cities and states is something that's done outside of the electoral process.
Alex also says that the globalists are racing to get their social credit score in place by way of vaccine passports, but this whole report was predicated on the idea that because of the massive pushback that Alex has helped foster, all of these countries were simultaneously dropping all COVID restrictions and backing off.
Alex's extemporaneous speech is full of contradictions because details and reality honestly just don't matter to him.
He's basically just trying to fuck with the listener's feelings at this point.
The only real point he's making is, once again, trying to make sure that no one blames him for any possible right-wing anti-vax terrorism in the future.
Right, right.
Alex knows that the level of tension is rising to a point where more attacks on vaccination providers...
It's not out of the question, and he doesn't want to be in trouble when that does happen or could happen, and he wants to be able to profit off them.
I wonder if at the Infowars office they have, like, not March Madness, but, like, almost a tontine, you know, of, like, which of these people is going to go to jail and whomever is the last one, you know, gets all the money.
Billions of dollars of anti-tank missiles, anti-aircraft missiles, you name it, being delivered and being put on the U.S. State Department Twitter website.
Masses of U.S. and NATO troops forming all around the borders with Ukraine while telling you that Russia is imminently about to invade Ukraine.
The reason Russia's building troops up is they see the buildup of the West.
Russia doesn't have a history since the early 1980s of invading any country.
Well, the globalists always invert and project what they're doing.
They have the history.
They have the motive.
They've matched the troops first.
So I would look for them.
To attack Russian forces so that when Russian forces defend themselves, they'll claim it's a false flag.
Or to attack Ukrainian forces and to say that Russia did it and that a major war is launched and now you have Biden's 2022 midterm election plan to get Americans unified behind a proxy war with Russia.
But if you pay attention there, Alex is essentially convinced himself and is preaching to the audience that no matter what happens, Russia is the victim.
If Russia attacks, it was because the globalists secretly attacked them first to provoke the attack.
Maybe the globalists will attack Ukrainian forces to blame it on Russia, but no matter what, if hostilities break out, Alex is already determined that the globalists will have pulled a false flag based on nothing except his imaginary track record of the globalists pulling false flags.
And let's be clear, Alex's track record of accusing the globalists of pulling false flags is horrific.
He's constantly wrong about pretty much everything he calls a false flag, and I'm only saying pretty much because there's some situations where it's still unclear exactly what happened, and I'm just not going to make a determination on it.
Literally everything that happens, or Alex imagines is going to happen, is a globalist false flag, and then it never actually is.
It's all in his head, and it's a way for him to preserve his worldview when reality is constantly proving him wrong.
And this is my frustration a year ago at this time.
Almost a year ago.
Six days before, a giant Blue Northern...
Polar Vortex was going to be coming down.
The National Weather Survey, NOAA, told Texas, you're going to have serious freezing temperatures and you better get your power output up because people are going to double and triple their power usage and it's going to cause your system to go down.
The state of Texas, four days before the blizzard hit, sent messages to...
The Biden administration in early February and said, we need authorization to turn up our gas plants and our coal plants because the solar plants and the windmills will not deliver enough power even if there wasn't a storm.
The federal government refused the emergency authorization under law.
You've got to get authorization and pay millions a day in fines, or you go to prison.
This is a completely made-up story about what happened to cause the storm to be so bad and the power outages so severe last year, and it's painfully obvious why Alex has come up with this piece of fiction to explain things.
The problem was largely based on the fact that Texas' power grid was separate from the national grids because they wanted to evade federal regulation and oversight.
Since their power is supplied and operated by deregulated private entities, They naturally did things to maximize their profits, and that meant cutting corners in things like weather protections for stuff like ice storms, which are uncommon in Texas.
There was a big blizzard back in 2011, and it caused a bunch of blackouts, after which it was recommended that precautions be taken in case this happened again, but it's all unregulated.
There wasn't any mechanism to force anybody to take these precautions, so they didn't.
When the 2021 giant winter storm hit, their power sources were ill-equipped to operate in freezing conditions, and this caused the wattage output to go down.
Adding to the problem is the fact that the state's power grid is disconnected from other states, which are on the federal grids, and because of that, it was really hard to redirect power from other operating grids into Texas's grid.
This is a story of the complete failure of Alex's political and institutional ideology.
The power grid was run exactly how he would have wanted it to be, and the natural consequences of that are incidents like last year's Blizzard and power outage that left hundreds dead and caused billions in damages.
Alex is just a coward, and he can't accept that the things he advocates caused this power failure.
So he has to make up a fun story where it's actually the federal government sabotaging Texas by not allowing them to produce energy.
Alex's reporting of this letter here is based on an entire, like it's a total lie.
He was saying that ERCOT had sent a letter to the Department of Energy and they denied their request to be able to produce more power.
Alex failed to report in a piece that he posted last February 20th that Acting Department of Energy Secretary David Huizinga had actually accepted and approved ERCOT's request six days prior on February 14th.
Alex was making shit up back then and he's continuing to now because he's an asshole and he lies about the world in order to make it fit his extremist ideology.
So this is a really false interpretation of this story about Texas pipelines.
Let me give you the breakdown.
This was about a company called Energy Transfer LP having a financial dispute with the company that runs these five power plants, Vista Corp.
They racked up a huge bill from the storm last year, and now Energy Transfer was threatening to cut off the gas to these power plants.
So, Vista appealed to the Railroad Commission to step in and say that they can't do that, particularly during the winter, since that would be dangerous.
By January 20th, two days before Alex's recording this special report, Energy Transfer had withdrawn their threat, which kicks the can down the road a bit.
The financial dispute is still there, but the gas is going to keep flowing.
Anyway, this has nothing to do with the federal government telling people they can't make more energy.
That is completely made up by Alex and has nothing to do with this story.
Because when you go read the article, it's the truth.
And they say, oh, yeah, they're not giving out emergency authorization, and so they're not going to do it.
The feds are ordering it turned off.
It goes on.
The pipeline company, Emergency Transfer LP, which is run by Dallas billionaire Kelly Warren, It says, Luminant needs to pay $21 million in penalties for oversupplying natural gas during the last deadly freeze that knocked off gas pipelines, contributing to power outages that left many Texans in the dark for days when the state was experiencing unusually frigid temperatures.
Then it goes on to say they're not going to pay them again.
So, I'm going to explain it again.
The feds don't let you turn the power on.
21 million, 25 million.
Some days they were paying fines higher than that because they went ahead and operated with the fines.
The 21 million figure that Alex is citing isn't government fines.
It's the amount that Energy Transfer was demanding that Luminant, which is a subsidiary of Vistra, pay if they wanted to continue pumping gas.
It's a debt that they demanded be paid, not a fine from the federal government.
Even as Alex is reading this, you can tell that he's struggling to make this fit his narrative, since it's a company that's run by an oil billionaire who's demanding payment, not the government.
And as he's going through it, you can hear his mind trying to insert words here and there.
I don't understand how he expects that to not be the most embarrassing read imaginable.
Anyway, this is a story that Alex is reporting based entirely on making shit up because the reality of the situation is actually a scathing indictment of capitalism and deregulation.
He can't deal with that, so instead he makes up a fantasy story to report to the audience because it's more fun!
I just have to explain some of this stuff to the left.
There's no helping him.
Just remember, when the power's out, when you're having rolling blackouts, the government has blocked us claiming that anything that has carbon is evil when your very body's made out of carbon.
All right, here's the final report, and I appreciate you all watching.
So, I think that this Saturday report was kind of, you know, there were some points of interest.
I do think that Alex is trying to bail on some of the COVID stuff, or at least declare that victory, in order to move on to scaring people about something else, like this cyber threat, or...