Today, Dan and Jordan check back in on the present day to see what Alex is up to. In this installment, Alex interviews a weirdo Australian MP, does an infomercial he swears isn't an infomercial, and says "baby" more times than you'd expect. Citations
We are going to be talking about November 30th, 2021 Blackjack.
And some people may have noticed that we had two 2003 episodes, our last two episodes.
Something came up, everything was okay, but we had two episodes that we had pre-recorded, and so that's why there was some stuff going on in the world, and maybe...
Like, you know, Tucker said that Alex is a great journalist, and we don't seem to know, it's because we recorded those before any of that stuff happened.
So there's a lot of nonsense and some chicanery going on in this episode.
Well, mark down your calendar of Monday, November 29th, 2021, for the date that Joe Biden announced publicly that he is holding 350 million Americans hostage.
The COVID-19 is an unsolvable problem designed to transfer all power and control to a select group of multinational big pharma corporations owned and controlled by three banking families.
And everywhere, I see people on the street, I see people even on mainline news.
Saying, wait a minute, way more people died in 2021 of COVID than died in 2020, and way more people are dying, period.
Last year, the life expectancy was the same.
74 years for a man, 76 for a woman.
Now it's dropped two years for men and two years for women.
Just this year, the average has dropped two years.
It is true that the preliminary numbers are showing that there were more deaths in the U.S. in 2021 than there were in 2020.
And while that might seem like an argument against vaccines on the surface, it's actually the opposite.
And unfortunately, it's not all that surprising considering the way things have gone.
The explanation is super simple.
Vaccination rates are not high enough, and that is being combined with people going back to pre-COVID behavior patterns at the same time that the Delta variant was going around to being more highly transmissible.
As it's summed up in the New York Times, quote, Many Americans are behaving as though COVID-19 is now a manageable endemic disease rather than a crisis, a transition that will happen eventually but has not happened yet.
This is leading to wider spread, and there are significant gaps in immunity in the public, and that's led to deaths.
One of the most important aspects to resolving this problem is the U.S. not having under 60% vaccination rates in the population, but with voices like Alex being taken seriously at all, it doesn't seem like we're going to get there anytime soon.
As for the life expectancy thing, Alex is operating off imprecise information.
We don't have the numbers yet on 2021 for this kind of thing, but the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics announced in July that average life expectancy dropped approximately 1.5 years between 2019 and 2020.
It's not two years for men and women.
It's 1.8 years for men and 1.2 years for women, averaging out to 1.5.
A lot of this does have to do with COVID deaths and honestly when we have numbers for 2021 it's possible that the number might be even worse.
Also, I have no idea what Alex is talking about with the various actuaries nonsense, but if he does know about the three banking families that own everything and are taking over, I think he has a duty to be more specific about that.
And I think he just threw out the three banking families because it's sort of like a hat tip to the old school conspiracy folks who might be listening.
You love me talking about bloodlines and banking families.
How you doing out there, old school fans?
So there's some statistics that are going around, also having to do with future predictions about lifespan that are pretty troubling.
If you didn't listen to Alex's show regularly, it'd probably come off strange to hear him citing the population of soccer players as an index group for heart attacks.
But this is one of his big COVID vaccine narratives.
According to some of his weirdo guests, there's a 66 times increase in the heart attacks among soccer players, and this is due to them being vaccinated and the vaccine causing these heart attacks.
There have been a number of heart attacks among soccer players in the last year, but the problem is that what Alex and his guests are doing is preying on the audience's ignorance of some counterintuitive data sets.
For instance, let me read you this headline from The Guardian.
Quote, More young footballers dying of heart problems than thought, FA study finds.
It could seem like this would tend to back up Alex's theory, but in fact, that article was published in August 2018, before COVID and even before the vaccines existed.
Hmm, there's this LA Times article from 2012 titled, quote, The Frightening Frequency of Heart Attacks in Soccer.
There was a 2015 article from the New York Post titled, quote, Belgium's Young Soccer Players Dropping Dead of Heart Attacks.
The point here is that the issue of heart problems and soccer players has been something that experts have looked at and have been dealing with for years, long before COVID became an issue.
A lot of the articles I read discuss the imperfect nature of preemptive heart screening, particularly for younger soccer players, as a contributing factor to the higher-than-expected levels of cardiac issues.
Another factor is that soccer is one of the more strenuous sports you can play where your cardio is really challenged.
So if you have an underlying hereditary heart condition, for example, playing soccer is something that has the possibility of exacerbating that condition or even bringing on cardiac arrest.
Every country they go to, it's just people kicking soccer balls around.
Non-stop soccer balls.
Alex and his weirdo friends probably know about this history of the sort of correlation of soccer players and heart attacks or the relationship between those two things.
I think they probably know about it and are pretending they don't so they can use the instances of recent heart-related issues among soccer players to fuel COVID vaccine conspiracies.
Along with the COVID, this unsolvable problem the globalists have created, there's another big catchphrase that's running through this episode, and that is, all right, look, we got Biden.
And you're going to see more and more people from the power structure, and believe it, she's part of it, coming out against this because people are now figuring out, hey, if we don't stop this, we're all dead.
I had the Washington Post call me this morning, some Pulitzer Prize winner, trying to sugar me up, you know, oh, I like you, oh, we're friends.
And I said, listen, I looked up your name, I know you're a Pulitzer Prize winner, and I know you've got kids.
And I said, this system coming in is going to ruin their future.
So I said, you just keep working for Jeff Bezos, and I'm not talking to you, but just know this, you've cursed your children.
You don't just think in their official documents they talk about 80-90% reduction.
And that they're not actually planning to get rid of almost everybody.
In fact, some of their public statements by top New World Order high priest and transhumanist movement is that there will be one super entity left and that's it.
No one else allowed.
It might want to absorb you, but that's it.
And they're all battling to be that one God.
It's totally Luciferian.
It's Garden of Eden all over again.
And that's where you are.
People like Laura Logan, I don't even know if she has children, but I bet she does, talking like that.
Look at your children in one hand, and look at the New World Order and Fauci and being on TV and being with the establishment and thinking you're part of the winning team.
You know in your heart it's a lie.
You know in your bones it's a fraud.
You know in your guts that you want to fight it!
And you want to resist it!
Just like water wants to come downhill.
It's inexorable.
Go with your instincts and your spirit.
Go with who you are.
Say, I'm going to fight evil.
I'm not going to submit.
I'm going to stand up against this satanic AI takeover.
And I'm going to really become who I really am in this struggle.
And that's why God put us in this position.
Not a simulation, but a real third-dimensional expression of our spiritual power.
We exist in all dimensions, in all time, in all space.
Yeah, I mean, I got distracted whenever he said this is Garden of Eden all over again, immediately following there are these corporations fighting to become gods.
So then in my head, I was like, wait, what part of the Garden of Eden myth is battle being done by multiple different entities in the Garden of Eden?
So Alex, he's mad about Klaus Schwab, obviously, because he's the, you know, I think he's really ascended to be one of the main villains, whereas George Soros was really a main villain.
Years ago, and now he's kind of fallen out of favor.
What pleasure to be together again and to design the future.
We are here to develop the great narrative, a story for the future.
In order to shape the future, you have first to imagine the future, you have to design the future, and then you have to execute.
Here, I think the next two days, we will look how we imagine, how we decide, how we execute the great narratives, how we define the story of our world for the future.
And there he is with corporate and governmental world leaders all together.
Saying we're coming out with microchips for your body.
You'll own nothing.
You'll like it.
You'll have nothing.
But he'll have everything.
And they just sit up with a straight face through Big Pharma, release this weapon, control the censorship, rolling it all out and packaging it in political correctness, making all the CEOs basically non-white.
So if you criticize Twitter censoring, oh, you're against Indians.
Surely, if that was the topic of conversation that happened at this summit, and there's obviously video Schwab and everyone else's speech is very easily accessible.
I mean, Alex played a clip.
He should have no problem playing these comments instead of mostly innocuous comments from Schwab that he did play.
He doesn't play those clips because they don't exist.
I find that to be a really disgusting idea, this notion that non-white people are put in those roles in order to make it so if you criticize their censorship activities, oh, you're racist.
That really is offensive in many ways.
First of all, it takes away the deservingness of any non-white person who's getting into a CEO role.
Obviously, you're going to have to be kind of suspicious.
Is this just being done as a mask for something?
That's the kind of idea.
that Alex is trying to put into people's minds.
Right, right.
And really, Alex has been censored by a lot of platforms.
He's been kicked off a lot of them.
Daniel Eck is a white man, and he's the CEO of Spotify, who kicked Alex off.
Mark Zuckerberg is the CEO of Facebook.
He's a white man.
When Alex was kicked off Stitcher, their CEO is Eric Dane, who's another white man.
Alex was kicked off LinkedIn, and their CEO is Ryan Roslansky, another white man.
So there's plenty of these instances of people who have put the kibosh on Alex's ability to use their platforms.
We've got Biden coming out and saying, hey, don't worry, no lockdowns, because the new normal is you're going to take whatever shots we want to give you.
You're going to always wear your mask from now on, all right?
That's the new normal.
And the media's like, oh, how nice of him.
Oh, the new normal is you've got to take shots and wear a mask forever.
Wow.
That's the good cop.
The bad cop?
Fauci's like, no, new lockdowns are needed.
And third, boosters must be mandatory.
And I just talked to Biden.
He agrees.
He's going to announce it next year.
Fauci gave an interview saying that.
Oh, they'll be mandatory by next year.
And newborn babies.
In the first quarter, we'll get the shots.
I'm a nice man.
I'm a good man.
I'm going to help your children.
And when we societally allow the mass murder and maiming of our children now happening, God will curse us and remove even more of God's protection.
I really hope that all those cool skeptic bro types who decided all of a sudden that Alex has been right all along, I hope they're excited to realize that what they've actually done is sign off on a right-wing Christian fundamentalist extremist.
It's fun to be iconoclastic and pretend that you're in some kind of a noble opposition group against power structures, but honestly, it's really impressive how Alex has managed to scam these people into thinking that's what he's doing.
For instance, how would someone like Joe Rogan or Tim Dillon respond to someone who wasn't Alex saying that they needed to be concerned about these vaccines because if you let kids get vaccinated, then the devil will have free reign to come and make mischief in the world.
So I have a little bit of a sneaking suspicion about what's going on here with this interview with the Australian MP George Christensen.
I think he knows exactly what he's doing.
He's making some sensational ass comments about how the COVID response in Australia is like.
Nazi Germany or Stalin.
And I think he knows what he's doing with that and showing up in places like Infowars.
He's been in office since 2010.
He has a long history of being a bit of a dick, but the swing he's taking now is a bit larger.
At first, I had a tough time figuring out what was going on, but in the course of reading up on the situation, I read in a few news stories that Christensen has already announced that he's retiring from his position as MP at the next election.
He has absolutely nothing to lose from a political perspective and everything to gain from making a name for himself in the reactionary-ass right-wing media sphere.
Ever since he announced his pending retirement earlier this year, George has been ramping up his efforts to create online revenue streams, like creating this Substack newsletter, as well as using Telegram to nurture a Telegram-type fanbase.
Along with that, he was asking his political party, the Liberal National Party, to disendorse him so he could keep a little bit over $105,000.
In like a severance thing.
A writer named Cam Wilson noticed that around this time, too, Christensen was getting pretty heavily involved in using his newsletter to make book recommendations to his followers.
However, this wasn't just like, hey, you should read this book.
It was also Christensen using Amazon's affiliate marketing program to make a cut off the books that people bought through his links in his newsletter.
This kind of action has been seen as a bit shady for a sitting politician to be engaged in, and it feels like a strong indication that he's trying to make a move into the arena of monetizing the following he has from being a bombastic politician.
Right, right, right.
The picture of what he's up to seems pretty clear to me, like actually being engaged in politics right now is...
nightmare sucks thanks to the opportunistic politicians and media figures embracing conspiracy theories as a marketing tool yeah and now he's using getting out of government so you can keep using that marketing tool without the you know the Expectation that he clean up the mess.
What they're all doing, this is essentially the gold rush.
Like, they're all in the fucking east going, like, there's no point in staying in Washington or government anymore, so let's head to them hills of tricking dum-dums into paying for shit they don't need.
Also, I don't want to get too deeply into this because it seems really weird, but Christensen also apparently has the nickname The Member from Manila.
In official circles, because an investigation revealed that between 2014 and 2018, he'd taken at least 28 trips to the Philippines, spending approximately 300 days there.
And some people have seen that as quite suspicious.
They don't like to hear people getting up and standing up for freedom and going against the lockdown, mask up, pro-vaccine mandate orthodoxy that's out there.
It has consumed Australia.
There is few in the political leadership landscape that actually are standing up.
For true freedom at the moment, they talk about giving us back our freedom if we do certain things.
Well, when they give us back our freedom, that's actually not freedom.
I'm not positive what true freedom means, but honestly, it just kind of sounds like a fun, meaningless buzzword sort of thing that gets thrown around on shows like these.
Also, it's really, really fucking funny for me to hear this guy say that there's very few people that are standing up for true freedom within the government knowing that he's retiring from his position as MP at the next election.
If he actually believed there was a shortage of people standing up for freedom against tyranny within the government, wouldn't the last thing he would think of doing be to voluntarily leave and have one less advocate for true freedom in the government?
That seems nonsense.
It seems like his ideas that he's expressing run counter to his actions.
Either that...
Or he thinks that having a substack and going on shows like Infowars, that's a more effective way to influence Australian government policy than to be actively involved in Australian governmental policy.
Well, I mean, you know, it's like, if you're the leader of a group of freedom fighters, you know, trying to get true freedom for all the people and not just the people in government, then naturally what you do is you say, There aren't enough people around me, so I quit.
Where state governments mainly are dividing the nation up between those who are jabbed and those who aren't jabbed.
They're restricting us from jobs.
In the state of Victoria, you cannot hold a decent job unless you are vaccinated right now.
They're sacking people for not being vaccinated.
They're restricting people in my home state of Queensland from all sorts of social life, cafes, restaurants, art galleries, museums, sporting events, if you're not vaccinated.
So we truly are going to have a form of medical approach.
This is cute and all, but it's also pretty stupid.
For instance, George says that you can't hold a decent job in Victoria unless you're vaccinated, and that's just not true.
In early November, Victoria announced a mandate that workers in many fields will be required to be vaccinated, quote, if they want to do their jobs on site rather than working remotely.
That's a little different than the exaggeration that George is employing.
As for the situation in Queensland, there's a broad vaccine mandate where many businesses and venues will require proof of vaccines to enter.
Specifically, though, as was reported in The Australian, quote, the mandate does not apply to essential services such as supermarkets, retail stores, public transit, places of worship, and funerals.
This is not something like apartheid, partially because it's a choice.
Apartheid was a system of racial discrimination where the people who were subjected to it were oppressed because of an immutable characteristic, the color of their skin.
In this case, not getting vaccinated is a choice, and that choice comes with some potential benefits and some drawbacks.
not getting vaccinated allows you to be super combative and pretend that you have some kind of a bizarre moral high ground as it relates to freedom which for someone like George is almost certainly a benefit and a marketing tool ...
it.
unidentified
Conversely, a drawback of that decision is that you may not be welcome in many public spaces until the pandemic enters the lesser endemic phase.
Because your decision to not get vaccinated puts people around you in those spaces at a greater risk of contracting COVID, including the other unvaccinated people who would be there around you.
The reality of the situation surrounding vaccine requirements to enter certain venues has no actual similarity to apartheid, but that word is evoked because all right-thinking people are offended by the historical reality of South African apartheid.
Alex, however, is not a right-thinking person, and it's really weird because he's...
So there's also, I think, a valid conversation they can have about medical apartheid, but it would revolve around how many parts of the world don't have access to vaccines, even if their public wants them.
From an article in the New York Times, quote, Worldwide, about 76% of shots that have gone into arms have been administered in high and upper middle income countries, according to the Our World in Data project at the University of Oxford.
Only.5% of doses have been administered in low-income countries.
So I think that there's an argument you could make in terms of that.
One thing that I think would stop it, Alex, is that we have...
Something in Australia called the Australian Immunisation Register, which is actually owned by the federal government that's supplying all of the data to say who's vaccinated or not.
Now, our Prime Minister, you're right, he's got up and he said that we're not in favour of mandatory vaccinations.
And he sort of tried to hint to the state governments that he doesn't want them to do this.
But there's a way we could end it and end it overnight, and that is simply by pulling the data.
If no state government, it's not just state governments too, Alex, it's private corporations.
There's private corporations that are right now treating their workers like slaves, like chattel, and saying that we demand if you're going to work for us that you've got to be double vaccinated.
Well, you know, these corporations need to know that we no longer live in an era where private outfits can actually tell their employees what they can and can't do with their bodies.
Also, I have some really bad news for George about what corporations can do, at least in America.
I'm not sure about Australian labor relationships, but there are so many things that you can do with your body that can totally get you fired here.
Like, if you have tattoos, you can be fired for that.
You can be fired for having piercings that your boss doesn't like.
You can be fired for having an unconventional hairstyle that the boss is uncomfortable with.
There's a bunch of situations where you can actually be fired because you smell bad.
We're so far away from living in a world where the choices that you make with your own body are protected from being used by employers to fire you or to not hire you.
But there's another irony.
Alex absolutely cannot advocate for better protection for employees.
That's essentially a violation of one of his big principles, the freedom of association, where employment is a voluntary agreement on both sides.
This is just incoherent as an ideology.
Like, employers obviously should be able to hire or not hire you based on whether you got a vaccine.
Our guests have agreed to stay with us for the rest of the hour, and that's good, because I have a lot of questions about what's happening in Australia, like a roundup of the Aborigines.
I've seen reports in the regional governments admitting, well, we're going to...
Fly by plane because the helicopters can't get there.
It's 800 miles away.
But we're going to go make sure they're all inoculated when none of them are even around civilization.
It's just wild and images of them being loaded in paddy wagons and driven away.
So, in an August 2021 article in the New York Times, a couple of really important points are raised about the vulnerability of the Aboriginal communities in Australia.
The Indigenous population only has an approximately 15% vaccination rate, and in New South Wales, quote, most of the area's 98 coronavirus cases are among Indigenous people.
There is a particularly serious issue here because among indigenous populations, there's often a higher prevalence of chronic health conditions, which would put people at a greater risk of severe cases and death if they got COVID.
The article includes this paragraph.
Quote, the Darawa Elders Group, an association of Aboriginal elders in Walgate, said in a statement, quote, many of our elders and others in Walgate experience health and social issues that make them vulnerable to contracting COVID-19.
The impact on our community could be devastating.
In their full statement, their first urgent request was for more trained nurses to administer vaccines.
Indigenous Australians aren't being rounded up, and if Alex were forced to cite a source on this, he would stammer and then he would just try and change the subject.
Yeah.
unidentified
There was an article in The Guardian, actually, from late November that included a comment from the Aboriginal Medical Services Alliance of the Northern Territory who said this was all nonsense.
The Northern Territory's chief minister chimed in, quote hello to all the conspiracy theorists overseas watching this please get a life *laughs* Well, that's one way to do it.
This was in response to how, quote, From Binjari and Rockhole were being forcibly removed from their homes and taken to enforced quarantine in Howard Springs.
And people, including children, were being forcibly vaccinated.
The Aboriginal Medical Service Alliance of Northern Territory and the Northern Territory's chief minister have chimed in and been like, go fuck yourself.
Interestingly, though, also this past August, the Australian government announced that they would be paying approximately $280 million in reparations to survivors of the period between 1910 and 1970, where indigenous children were rounded up and taken from their homes.
From a Washington Post article about this announcement, quote, an official inquiry is estimated as many as one in three indigenous children were forcibly removed from their families nationwide and taken to schools.
So I want him to have the floor here for this segment to really give us his message to the tyrants, but also his message to...
The patriots, who could be liberal, could be conservative, could be gay, could be straight, could be black, could be white, could be old, could be young, could be Asian.
It doesn't matter.
But I only care about the street life.
What is his message to the world?
Because millions of people are watching right now, and hopefully others will take the archive of this and share it to millions more.
Because the tyrants cannot stand this information coming out.
They cannot stand leaders like George Christensen standing up and saying, we need civil disobedience.
I haven't seen any other members of parliament have that much courage in a place where they are arresting and basically disappearing people to these quarantine camps.
They're trying to roll out this total takeover to set the precedent.
Also, at the end of that clip, it really interested me the way Alex is phrasing this.
I would love for him to try and explain in any kind of a coherent fashion how something happening in Australia could possibly serve as a precedent for U.S. laws.
We have entirely different constitutions and different organizational structures of government.
The idea is really, really stupid, but Alex says it all the time.
Like, it's an idea that's so dumb that it often goes in one of my ears and out the other.
So Alex, one of the things that he's primarily focused on in this interview and that he really wants to nail down is about the idea of there being camps that people are going to be taken to.
And a lot of people questioning why are so many of these facilities being built.
They told us at first it was only going to be for incoming arrivals if they have to be quarantined for seven days.
I mean, the question is, why the hell do they look like high-security prisons?
The second thing is we're seeing now that they're actually not being used for the purposes of incoming arrivals.
What they're being used for is to, in the cases of the Northern Territory, where a lot of Aboriginal people are, Round up anyone who tests positive and to put them in there.
Well, I've got to tell you, for me, it's going to be like, you know, over my dead body.
If I test positive and they want to come and get me, they're going to have to brutally rip me out of my own home.
And there's probably a lot of freedom-loving people in Australia that would be of the same view that we're not going to go willingly into some quarantine camp.
So there's two quarantine facilities in the Northern Territories.
There's the Center for National Resilience and the Alice Springs Quarantine Facility.
Australians who are returning to the country into the airport in Darwin, whether they're vaccinated or not, are required to go to one of these centers for 14 days.
They offer flexible payment plans, and there's some amenities.
In May, Robin Dixon wrote an op-ed about her experience staying at the Center for National Resilience in the Washington Post, and the experience sounds nothing like what George is describing.
But it is the populations of former wealthy, open Western societies that are under attack because our free nations, despite their problems, they're free, compared to the globalist plan, are not compatible with their system.
And people are going to see us being free.
And they're going to see free market capitalism working, and they're going to see the success, and they're not going to want to be part of Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates' new world order.
And that's why they are devaluing our currency right now.
That's why they're devaluing our morals.
That's why they're undermining us and trying to break our will.
I'll tell you a trick.
Instead of letting them break your will, take every challenge.
As if it's wind in your sails.
Enjoy the persecution and enjoy the pain.
And you will become stronger than you could ever imagine.
It doesn't mean you're perfect.
It doesn't mean you're a masochist.
It doesn't mean at certain levels you don't dislike it.
But by letting yourself know that it's pain you've got to go through to protect the children, it will actually become pleasure.
And once you have engaged in that alchemy, And once people have attacked you and lied about you and you forgive them as Christ said, it absolutely devastates them.
And they don't know what to do.
It heaps hot burning coals upon them as Christ said.
And you don't even want to do that to them.
But when you transcend them, when they no longer have the power over you, it's beautiful.
And I've been a very angry person.
I've hated the globalists.
And I've repented and I've worked on that.
And I have to tell you that in just the last few years, my stress level, despite all these attacks, has gone way down because I've learned to forgive my enemies.
It doesn't mean I don't prosecute them.
It doesn't mean that I don't go after them.
It doesn't mean that I don't attack them for what they're doing to stop them.
We're not going to win this by pulling people's heads off.
We're going to win this by standing up against evil and being an example to others.
Quite frankly, in many cases, being Christ-like, letting them destroy us and crush us and slice us up and hurt us as men.
And women can step into that office as well.
But it's really men's jobs to fight evil.
Evil should be hiding under the rocks.
It should be scared to even come out at 3 a.m.
Instead, it's everywhere pissing and crapping on us and laughing and reveling in what it's doing because good people have stopped standing up against it.
Okay, look, most of the time I get in here and I cover like three stacks out of 20, but today I really need to at least hit on some of these other stacks because they're really important, and a lot of it's today's news.
Some of it's news I didn't get to from yesterday is really revealing.
I think this is evidence of why there should never be a media conglomerate, and all media should be your own boss, because fuck every news show if you can at least once a day go, crank it up, baby!
Man, I feel like if a really weirdo church had just taught him how to hit his back with a cat of nine tails when he was like eight, we would all have been saved so much trouble.
Like, if you just want to flagellate, fucking, it's been going around and on!
So there was a Forbes headline that was, quote, yes, the vaccine changes your DNA a tiny bit.
That's a good thing.
Naturally, this got some backlash, so the author had the headline changed to add clarity to it, and it was updated to, quote, COVID vaccines don't alter your DNA.
They help choose cells to strengthen your immune response.
The author Steve Salzberg tried to explain his point, telling Reuters, quote, Some of your immune cells multiply in large numbers to fight off the infection.
Some of those cells stay around, which is what gives you immunity.
The technical point I was trying to explain was that those cells have slightly different DNA from all your other cells.
The changes in the DNA of those cells, which occur through a crazily complex process called VDJ recombination, occur before you're vaccinated or infected.
Anyway, the idea that the headline was changed has become a bit of an anti-vex meme, and that's about the depth of a story that Alex is capable of covering, so here we are.
That's just one of those situations where just by virtue of knowing so fucking much, you just have these assumptions that when I'm explaining something to somebody...
They know these very base-level things.
So you're like, I can say, yes, it alters your DNA, because I know a million different ways to contextualize that.
But if somebody's reading me something and I'm like, I don't understand the words in what you're saying, I'm not going to be like, well, then I'm afraid and I believe you.
It's mostly about how the history of mRNA technology being used for vaccines has been fraught with trouble, mostly involving people not wanting to invest in it because it was seen as too expensive and the mRNA was too prone to degrading rapidly.
Thus, most investment went to other projects, and this is a very extensive...
Discussion about innovations that were made and different ways that the technology went from being mostly only something that was considered as viable for research purposes into being something that's more applicable as a medical thing.
Here is the big Wikipedia section, and it says it's under review and about to be deleted because it's racist to say Mao shouldn't have killed 80 million Chinese.
It has to do with some folks on Wikipedia believing that the framing of all of these events as communist mass killings is not necessarily historically accurate, and it lacks a bit of the nuance that should be...
Oh, sure.
Again, Wikipedia, like, it doesn't have a board.
There's no one in charge of it.
It's not like there's a shadowy force here trying to whitewash communism.
This actually does seem like a thing that would be huge in Alex's world, just because if it were to become accepted on Wikipedia to kind of add more nuance to did the communists murder everybody articles, then more people would be like, oh no, it wasn't communism, the economic system.
Yeah, Wikipedia pages generally aren't even considered acceptable sources like for college papers.
But Alex uses them constantly.
So I'm guessing that he thinks that they're gospel to everyone else, which is weird.
Then I don't know how we jumped to the ADL, but somehow we did.
And it was pretty quick.
And look, I don't know if the Wikipedia page is the only thing that Alex has read on the idea of cultural Marxism, but it's definitely an idea that's only promoted by deeply anti-Semitic folks and white nationalists.
Either Alex is completely lying in order to sanitize anti-Semitism for his audience, or he doesn't have any grasp on the topic he's discussing.
If you're a person who printed out a Wikipedia article to put on your desk so you could read it on the radio, then you assume that other media outlets are just like, well, Wikipedia's good enough.
Can you imagine what it's like for all the nice, wonderful Jewish people out there, like Dr. Zelenko and others who I just love, who are great spirits, who then have this weird criminal group saying they represent them, going out attacking and bullying people, and then hiding behind Jews?
It's un-American, it's dangerous, and it's evil.
And it must be stopped.
And I don't say shut them down or arrest them.
I'm saying they must be stopped in silencing us.
They don't want us to really come together under God.
They don't want us coming together, and we're very close to that.
They want to bring us under communism, under AI, and the false unity.
As far as a way to attack Jewish people, I'm not sure if I can understand a more aggressive way to be like, I hate Jewish people than to say, see, Jewish people?
Look at them hiding behind Jewish people.
I gotta get through that wall of Jewish people before I can get to those Jewish people.
All right, I've been trying to get these guys on for a few months, and I'm really glad that Eric Tallman can come on the broadcast because I've gotten hundreds of questions on the street.
And just tons of emails and calls here to the office saying, tell us about satellite phones.
Well, this isn't something that just the military has anymore, and the cost has gone way down on them.
They've got compact models, but I don't have them on to infomercial here.
They're already a sponsor.
I wanted to get them on.
So that we would have an informational video to link up on the site at InfowarsPhone.com so people can find out about satellites, phones, and why they're so important.
You got this Australian dude coming on that seems largely about promoting this sub-stack, which is a revenue stream he's trying to create after getting out of politics.
You have Alex infomercialing with his fucking satellite phone guy.
I think that it's equally possible that Alex thinks that this is a guest who has a reasonable amount of credibility, given that they're a publicly elected official.
And that, like, if I can get a great soundbite of them saying, like, this means war or something like that, that let them talk, because we might be able to use something to make a compilation or something.
I think that Alex would be far more interested in giving wide latitude to someone like him.