November 9, 2021 episode dissects Alex Jones’ misinformation: he weaponizes a CNN headline about immunosuppressed patients to attack vaccines, falsely claims Gavin Newsom’s illness stems from Moderna, and ties the Travis Scott concert to "demonic sacrifices" using medieval black magic tropes. Jones also promotes Dr. Stella Immanuel’s unproven hydroxychloroquine/ivermectin push via a website promo code, blurring conspiracy with profit. His narratives—from blood rituals to LGBTQ polls as pedophilia cover-ups—reveal a pattern of exploiting fear while dismissing facts, cementing his role as a purveyor of fringe theories with no accountability. [Automatically generated summary]
So one thing here is that Alex is correct about this headline.
It does say, quote, three shots and one booster later.
This man has little protection against COVID-19.
However, Alex is misrepresenting the contents of the story.
This is about a guy who had a kidney transplant in 2019 and has to be on immunosuppressant drugs for the rest of his life.
The article is about how he does not have antibodies despite getting vaccinated, which then serves as a launching pad to discuss how many moderate to severely immunocompromised people are having difficulty with creating antibodies.
This is really shitty, but it's also not totally surprising since this is the case with many vaccines.
In fact, it's one of the really strong rebuttals to the whole anti-vax argument about how, like, if you're vaccinated, why do you care if I am or not?
And that's really weird because this headline works for Alex if he lies about the content.
But if he actually engaged with the body of the text at all, he's actually covering a story that's pro-universal vaccination.
I wonder if headline writers, the editors and the people who put those leads up there, I wonder if they have a real awareness of how much damage they individually can do.
I think that's more what I'm thinking of: is like, yes, I understand that according to these certain neutral ethics, you're good, but we don't live there.
Yeah, and I see this conversation come up periodically on Twitter and on social media, the idea that these mainstream media outlets and big media entities, they really need to have somebody who understands disinformation on the payroll to sort of play defense.
Because if you did, you could be like, you know, you know what's going to happen with this headline.
And I also think that there's also a pretty solid argument to be made that if you did play that bit of defense, the enterprising people on the right would, or in Alex's media sphere, would just find a way to still make the same disinformation.
And I have no clue what it would even mean for a pill to be based on ivermectin, but the general claim Alex is referring to here is just, it was in a meme that went around on social media.
People were claiming that the Pfizer pill is just repackaged ivermectin, and he went as far as to call it Pfizermectin.
Coming up next hour, we have the investigative journalist Don, very respected, also scientist, major inventor, who has sources confirming to him that Newsom is partially paralyzed with Guillain Barret.
And that is why he has not been seen now in 12 days.
And counting, he took the Moderna shot 14 days ago.
Also, this guy is not an investigative reporter at all.
We'll find that out later.
But also, this is pretty bad timing for this scoop to drop because Gavin Newsom made an appearance at a vaccine clinic on Wednesday, the day after this episode was recorded, and he was standing up, walking, and looking very healthy.
He even took questions, and a reporter asked about the rumors that he had an adverse reaction to the vaccine, and that an anonymous source had said that he had.
And Gavin Newsom replied, quote, yeah, well, that's made up.
I had absolutely no impact whatsoever from the COVID shot, nor from the original or the booster.
I don't take glee in how fallen Governor Newsom is, but I hope and pray that God works his miracles here and the Lord works mysterious ways and that Newsom either be spared but repent and come out and admit the truth or if he needs to die as an example to others about how deadly these shots are, that would be a blessing to save children in California as young as five, next it'll be newborns.
They're already saying it.
When they're trying to quote, make take it to go to the park or go to the mall or go get a hamburger or go to the doctor or go to school.
I mean, they're giving our children an experimental deadly shot.
And so I hope if it's God's will that Governor Newsom dies so that children will be saved.
I mean, because, I mean, I don't want him to die.
But I'm saying if he needs to die to reverse this in California before our children die, Mash, which already happened in the trials, they suppressed it, then yeah, I mean, he's an adult.
I always like it when Alex does something like that, where he's like back and forth all over the place, but the clip starts with, let me be absolutely clear.
So according to Johns Hopkins, quote, Bell's palsy is an unexplained episode of facial muscle weakness or paralysis.
Conversely, Guillain Beret is a full-body autoimmune condition where the body's immune system attacks its nerves.
Sometimes Bell's palsy can accompany Guillain Beret, but only an idiot would try to say that they're the same condition with different names, which is why Alex just said that, because he's a fucking idiot.
Well, we had Dr. McCullough in studio with us last Friday, and he knocked it out of the park, a true leader.
And he said, listen, who I respect the most, who really is on the ball like no other, is Steve Kirsch.
I said, absolutely.
I've been trying to get him on.
I guess I wasn't asking the right way.
So he got us his contact info and he's here.
And we're very, very thankful because he's really been organizing the top minds out there and has been fighting this incredible rollout of tyranny that we've been witnessing.
And after that, he turned his focus to philanthropy.
And early in the COVID epidemic, he started an organization called COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund, which sought to provide funding to research that was going into existing already approved drugs that could be effective in fighting COVID, which honestly is a great thing to do because no one was doing it back then.
And the possibility of what you could find is really important.
Yeah, no, the problem with you saying something like that is now that I know he's on InfoWars, my eyes narrow into a very horrifying, like, how is this anti-abortion somehow?
Like, it's that kind of level of, I don't trust these people.
Boulware found that there was no benefit to taking the drug, but Kirsch didn't accept the results and the interpretation of the research, and things fell apart from there.
As the pandemic has gone on, he's shifted from promoting infective drugs to being convinced that everyone's trying to conspire against these ineffective drugs that he's decided are effective, like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.
And this is predictably spiraled out of control into basically a strong anti-vax position.
According to a write-up in technology review, quote, in May, all 12 members of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund Scientific Advisory Board resigned, citing Kirsch's alarming, dangerous claims and erratic behavior.
Most of the scientific community has lost its patience for him, and the only real role he has left to play is the hero to the anti-vax community.
And that's reached the point where he's going on Infowars to talk about how vaccines are evil and Gavin Newsome may be paralyzed.
The desperation is a little bit depressing, but it is what it is.
Also, I'm curious if Alex knows that one of the other medications that he's pushing as like a potential COVID treatment is Luvox, which is an antidepressant.
And I'm pretty sure Alex would be against that.
Even if it was effective against COVID, and that it would help him not have vaccines for everybody, but it also is one of the antidepressants that he hates.
Also, I wonder if Alex is going to ask this dude about the company that he founded in 2011 called OneID.
It seems like Alex, you know, he's so obsessed with the idea that the globalists want to create digital IDs for everyone that they can use to implement a social credit score.
So it would be important to ask this guy, Steve, about how he founded a company that's building an ID system that could be conceivably seen as the backbone for such a globalist scheme.
I would be curious if he wants to ask about that.
I'm going to predict it doesn't come up when Alex has no idea.
But, you know, when you look at all of what's happened in terms of you did your investigations, I did my investigations, and they were all consistent with someone who is vaccinated.
Inquiring minds want to know is your face paralyzed.
So if you're keeping score, when Gavin Newsom finally appears in public, if half of his face is paralyzed, then he was injured by the vaccine and he was in hiding.
This is a really fun game that's being played where no matter what ends up happening, Steve gets to pretend that his prediction came true.
Here's some free advice.
If someone is pretending to have great insight and information, but they also make a prediction that boils down to a situation where both A and not A gets to be claimed as a win for them, don't listen to them.
They're idiots.
Also, it's important to acknowledge that Newsom wasn't missing or in hiding.
He just canceled his scheduled appearance at the UN Climate Summit on pretty short notice.
Even before he gave a press conference at the vaccine clinic on that Wednesday, he was photographed at Ivy Getty's very subtle and restrained wedding on November 7th, two days before this episode we're listening to was recorded.
Even beyond that, he claimed that he canceled his trip because he has young children and felt really guilty about the idea that both of them, both him and his wife, would be taking this trip to Scotland during Halloween, so his kids would end up missing out on trick-or-treating.
This was actually an easier decision for him because he was only given a three-minute speaking slot at that summit, which is kind of hard to justify a trip around the world for when his deputy could just go.
And for the level of nothing you're going to do, that's just, I mean, okay.
So here's what it is.
All right.
You can go to COP26, you can give your three-minute speech, and you have some nice food, or you can go to the wedding of modern royalty, fuck around, say.
And an article that I was reading made a good point, and that is that, like, in the past, when there have been Republican administrations, it had been more important for, let's say, the California governor to be like sort of a voice for opposition against climate policy that was being taken on by the GOP.
But now that Biden is president, that role is less important.
And so him showing up there didn't really matter as much as it might have in other years.
And so like the question too comes into like, so he's had less public appearances, but you know why?
Because he had a giant empty space because he was scheduled to be in Scotland.
This kills over 800 people per million vaccinated.
And so it ends up being over 150,000 deaths.
And we have eight different ways that we go and look at that to show that there are over 150,000 people that have actually been killed by this vaccine.
I was excited to hear him get into these eight different ways, but he doesn't really.
Every single thing that he discusses about sort of trying to substantiate this stuff is based on misrepresentations of VARES data, which is useless to begin with when you're trying to draw conclusions about causality and that kind of stuff.
Even, I mean, I even up the number to, if you think less than 500 people were killed by these vaccines in America, I will bet you easily $10 million, whatever, to, you know, let's have a bet.
But look, nobody really thinks that's true because nobody's taking my bet.
I'm sure people on Twitter have taken it and proven him wrong.
He's ignored it.
But I also think that, like, okay, this is not a good way to determine whether or not people disagree with you because people might think you're a shithead and just not want to engage.
So there's a very interesting bone of contention about the entire vaccine program between Steve and Alex.
And actually, this should be a deal breaker.
And Alex shouldn't be talking to this guy because he fundamentally disagrees with the baseline premise that Alex has that this is a global depopulation plan.
Right.
Steve does not believe that.
And because Alex wants to retain some kind of a rapport with him, because this guy's really popular in the anti-vex community, Alex has to kind of be like, well, you know, it's just a theory that it's a depopulation.
So Alex, apparently, when he's talking to somebody that he doesn't really want to fight with, he wants to retain the relationship.
The idea that the globalists have a depopulation plan is a matter of some speculation, as opposed to something that's been documented and Alex has been proven.
He's proved it for 20 fucking years.
And it's a plan that dates back to the age of the devil.
You know, in the UK, the numbers are that if you're age 40, for example, that after several months, I think it's like six months, vaccine efficacy goes negative to like 104%, which means that you're twice as likely to get COVID if you've been vaccinated.
So that's just Steve reporting that fake, misrepresented bullshit.
It was an article in the Expose that Greg Reese did a video about.
We talked about it in episode 609.
And then you hear Alex just trying to connect it to the headline that he's not even talked about the body of the article from the beginning, his main story of the day.
I think that anybody who repeats that narrative about the UK stuff is just like, well, you're gone.
I think what I find the most disgusting about it is how you can misremember the lies told about an article so much that when you repeat them to Alex, it is almost as if you were referencing a completely different story, making people feel like, oh, you're backing it up with different research.
Despite it being the same research, you're just so bad at remembering, you don't even bother getting right.
And I was bringing up the D-Dimer test I know that 60-plus percent of people on test in the U.S., Canada, and Europe.
It's between 61 and 65, depending on the test I've seen, of people's patients.
They said, hey, let's go ahead and do a D-dimer, then give me the shot, do another D-dimer, and they find, in a very simple form of trial, that 60-plus percent show they have blood clots after.
And the thing is that even if he did produce data that reflected what he claimed, it still wouldn't mean anything conclusive.
Hoff claims that he's done D-dimer tests on people who recently got the COVID vaccine and that 62% of them had elevated D-dimer levels.
As his argument goes, the elevated D-dimer levels are evidence of blood clots.
However, according to a fact check in Reuters, quote, D-dimer is a blood protein released when a blood clot begins to dissolve or break down.
When the D-dimer level is high, it can be because of a clot, but there are other possible causes, including pregnancy, cigarette smoking, inflammation, or advanced age.
I do think that all of those people who say that there are possible, like there are multiple possible causes for the same result, they're obviously insane.
They're probably not.
Because if there's one result, then there's only one cause.
You can't have different causes come to the same result.
So even if Hoff had a perfectly collected set of data that showed elevated D-dimer levels in these people, it still wouldn't prove that there was a high rate of blood clots among them.
He'd still have so much more work to do before he could reach anything close to a conclusion, but you wouldn't get that impression if you just watched his viral video.
It's pretty emphatic about reaching a conclusion.
So it seems like what happened here is that Alex just watched that or saw a meme based on that video, and he decided to do literally no further work on the subject, and he just chose to report this as definitive because he's a lazy fucking liar.
Also, I just checked Twitter and Steve's account is still up.
Maybe he got his account locked for posting some ridiculously false shit, but he didn't get kicked off.
That's just him exaggerating his victimhood and being excited about it.
And then Alex is pretending it's related to him coming on his show so he can exaggerate his own victimhood.
So this is an amazing slip of the tongue on Alex's part.
Probably unintentional, but still quite funny.
They're discussing how the CEO of Pfizer has said that people who put out misinformation about COVID and COVID vaccination, they're criminals because they've caused so much death.
And I like that quote you had about the Pfizer CEO saying anybody spreading misinformation about this vaccine should be, that criminal charges should be brought against them.
I'm all for that.
I mean, that would mean that the Surgeon General, that Rochelle Walensky and Anthony Fauci would go to jail.
I'm, you know, I think that's I'm good with that, right?
And so if, you know, if that's something that might be difficult, I would advise maybe you might want to skip the rest of this episode because Alex is pretty gross.
I wasn't sure about this some of the weekend, but now I saw the advertisements they ran front page of the Houston Chronicle and what was said.
So I don't know if the artist Travis Scott or Drake were involved, probably weren't, but the organizers certainly use classically satanic portal to hell iconography and demonic invocations that are classic Satanism.
Yeah, I think that this is a really disgraceful angle to take on this because, you know, there's obviously failings that happened on a structural level between the security folks.
There were, you know, corners cut in terms of the venue and the putting on of the show.
And those are things that could probably be solved by greater regulation, greater oversight.
And in order to not have that conversation, Alex is turning this into a demonic sacrifice thing.
And that's really pathetic and disrespectful to the people who died.
I'm going to play all this like in order of the things that Alex says because I want you to understand how disorienting it is sometimes to listen to his show.
So he's talking about this Travis Scott concert, and then he jumps onto a completely different topic.
One of the things is that the umbrella is larger than, you know, there's more, I guess, nuanced understanding of different identities and different attractions and such.
And then the other thing is that there's a greater acceptance in society.
So more people are not afraid of, you know, people don't have to hide their sort of identity and their reality as much as maybe they had to in the past.
I would even say, I would even go so far as to say that the rising rates of self-reporting are probably due to people no longer hunting them as he literally literally did.
We didn't know because people were unable to live publicly and openly.
Yeah.
And, you know, I think that that is probably a better explanation than advertising having a grand gay conspiracy in order to make straight people hunted so their kids will be taken away.
I mean, the only way to look at those numbers of like, oh, look, there's a rising number of people saying this is to recontextualize the past and think, look at the sheer number of people who were forced to live bullshit.
And also, and also this 39% number, I'm not totally sure.
I wasn't able to, I didn't dig deep enough to find the actual study, but I saw the Daily Mail article that Alex is working off of, and there were some red flags around like where this study came from.
And so I think I'm a little bit suspicious of that number.
Anyway, now that we've been incredibly bigoted, homophobic, transphobic all across the board, let's jump back to Alex blowing hard about rituals on how Travis Scott concert was a demonic ritual.
Every culture throughout human recorded history has engaged in rituals because rituals are archetypes, are powerful symbols that unlock areas of our minds and compartmentalized instincts of our ancestors.
That's why geese or butterflies or hummingbirds know how to fly three, four, five thousand miles to a place they've never been to make a nest because it's in their genetics.
It's in their instincts.
It's programmed in.
And so when you see a big event like happened this weekend in Houston with more than 10 people dead, hundreds and hundreds wounded and trampled, you ask, how does this happen?
And then you see the big portal and the big crystal ball and the big hands above it.
And I said on Saturday, put it in a special broadcast that this probably wasn't consciously a satanic ritual.
Well, I have to reverse myself on that because now I've had time to study it.
You can look at this isolated and say, okay, they didn't mean it.
Well, whoever set it up and designed it was definitely in on it.
And Travis Scott does go up on the cherry picker out over the crowd and is pointing down all weird and singing strange while people are flopping around having convulsions and dying.
In the old black magic text, and then the stuff that's literally from the Middle Ages that goes back to Solomon's Temple and back to Egypt, and they believe in all this, and they believe you need blood for power.
You need to pay coins to these spirits, to these aliens, to these entities of dead children and/or virgins.
I mean, they'll take anybody getting killed, but they really are going to give you a lot of power.
They want children.
And that's what this is: is a bunch of demon creatures coming down and grabbing people's children and taking them to hell.
No, but on his own show, he talks fairly regularly about believing that these rituals do work and they are demons that are being fed by the blood of children and virgins.
Actually, I guess the rebuttal to that or the answer to my problem is Alex would just say that the globalists have done secretly way more sacrifices than all the rest of these.
There has not been a time in my life whenever we have not been in the book of Revelations and the Mark of the Beast has not been on the tip of everyone's tongue.
Yeah, I'm a little bit disappointed to hear this because for the last 20 years, I've been operating under the assumption that UPC symbols were the mark of the beast.
See, now I've always been a bigger fan because of the social security number being the mark of the beast, because if you're undocumented, then you can still buy stuff, though.
Alex is promoting all of these ineffective cures and simultaneously has a promo code on Stella Emmanuel's website for people to buy said ineffective cures.