Today, Dan and Jordan go on a time-traveling adventure to gather some more information about the day back in 2010 when Alex supposedly first covered the "Operation Lockstep" document. In this installment, Alex says "hanky panky" twice, and a painfully transparent SEO scam is hatched.
My Bright Spot Day, I was going through my iTunes listening to some music the other day.
And Natalie Alford popped up, and I haven't thought about her in, or not, I haven't thought about her, but we haven't spoken since the old cupcake days.
No, we're back in the past, because on our last episode on Monday, I teased at the end that I was going to try We're good to try and find where Alex made that prediction.
This just confirms everything else we've already researched.
A Rockefeller study envisions future dictatorship controlled by elite, millions being killed, mandatory quarantines, checkpoints, the end of the family.
Everything that's in the other documents, but this dovetails with all the other Rockefeller Foundation documents about the GMO food to sterilize you and force vaccines and the hell we're already living in that's just going to continue to intensify until we take our governments back from these eugenics madmen.
But that story is up on PrisonPlanet.com.
The question is, will you have the courage to really do the research yourself?
Because I don't want you to just sit here and hear me make these claims.
These people are so arrogant that they write policy papers, so many of them, that they're producing these policy papers and reports and white papers so fast that you could never read them all.
It is an open conspiracy against you and your family.
I pray to God, I pray to my Heavenly Father Jesus Christ every night to give me strength and the will to be able to face this harm and to give me the strength to carry on because I know why a lot of you don't want to look at this information and just want to You're not going to be able to go to the ballgames anymore.
You're not going to be able to just go out and get drunk with your friends.
You're not going to be able to just go out and enjoy yourself all the time.
The only chance we've got of beating this scientific dictatorship...
This creeping death that takes its time to incrementally enslave you.
We've got to get past the artificial stigma that the controlled corporate media has been putting out for decades ahead of their unveiling of planetary dictatorship.
They all talk about how we need a police state to carry this out.
So when I heard that video, the first thing that stuck out to me was the quick cuts.
That seemed strange to me, and it made me suspect that Alex in 2010 might not have been talking about exactly what he wants people in 2021 to think he was talking about.
The second thing that caught my ear was how vague and almost formulaic this coverage of the Rockefeller document was back in 2010.
Was this really as deep as Alex got into the document that supposedly demonstrates and outlines the globalists' evil plans?
Is this in any way believable?
That if he considered this document to be anything even close to that, that he wasn't able to find a clip of him that has more oomph than what we just heard?
This was apparently a video that shocked the world.
This is supposed to be Alex dropping the mic and proving that he was always on the operation lockstep tip.
And thus, you should totally listen to him about everything he's saying now, because it's all going to come true in the future.
That's the underlying argument that's being made by this video, and it felt dishonest to me.
Surprise.
I wanted to understand the larger context, so I went back to this, and let me spoil this a little bit.
My suspicions were not unfounded.
To give some background about what was going on around this time, if you're listening to Alex's show, the only real-world actual headline is that the Deepwater Horizon oil spill was ongoing.
And BP had announced the day prior to this episode that they had successfully capped the spill, which represented significant progress towards resolving the whole situation.
That would be the CDC when they made a plan for how to deal with a pandemic that wasn't really important until, say, a certain time period whenever it was ignored, and hopefully, yeah.
But the other thing that I think is super weird about that clip is the way that Alex seems to be willing to give BP the benefit of the doubt about whether or not they'd sealed the leak.
I was here in the office last night when Aaron Dykes and I were doing research for the full-spectrum dominance eugenics film that we are working on that deals with chemtrails and other issues.
And we have come across so much more information than our awareness of the Globalist Master Plan is growing exponentially.
Don't think that you ever know everything.
The more we learn, the more horrified we get to discover that things are far worse than we originally thought.
So I sent the Rockefeller Foundation document over to Paul Watson.
He wrote a story about it this morning.
And just everything we talk about here, the magnitude is off the chart.
I mean, I'm not even worthy to be bringing you information this powerful.
And I hope that you pay attention to what we cover here minute by minute.
Because I've had chills since last night.
This just confirms everything else we've already researched.
But Rockefeller study envisions future dictatorship controlled by elite.
Millions being killed, mandatory quarantines, checkpoints, the end of the family, everything that's in the other documents.
But this dovetails with all the other Rockefeller Foundation documents about the GMO food to sterilize you and the forced vaccines and the hell we're already living in that's just going to continue to intensify until we take our governments back from these eugenics madmen.
Alex is just reading off a headline from an article that Paul Joseph Watson wrote, and everything that in the present day Alex is trying to pass off as his prediction is actually just him reading from Paul's outrageously bad opinion piece.
That line, quote, global pandemics that kill millions, mandatory quarantines, checkpoints, biometric ID cards, and a world of top-down government control that's in Alex's sizzle reel in the present, that's just the first line of Paul's article.
So if anything, Alex should be saying that Paul predicted all the stuff that's happening now, and Alex read it and then took credit for it.
And that being said, Paul's article is not a prediction of anything.
It's just the same kind of trash coverage of this Rockefeller document that we've seen 11 years later, just happening in 2010 and being quickly forgotten, even by the people who pushed it as a conspiracy.
The article lays out that this is a scenario.
It admits that, that this is a scenario that's being depicted in the document titled Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.
And Paul even notes that it's one of four scenarios that are included in the document.
Okay.
unidentified
He then describes the scenario titled Lockstep in exhaustive detail, ignoring the other scenarios or the point of the story.
"The Rockefeller study is not a warning against preventing the kind of tyranny contained in the scenario from unfolding.
It's a blueprint for how globalists want to exploit global crises like bioterror attacks and pandemics in order to completely destroy society and rebuild it under a new world order in their image.
It's crystal clear from reading the lockstep scenario that the oppressive society portrayed in the study is not presented as an admonishment of how governments would cynically seize upon a pandemic to set up a police state and empower themselves as dictators.
A ringing endorsement that this approach would be the correct thing to do.
These conclusions are not sensible to arrive at from reading the document, unless you went into it with those conclusions already in mind, and you were just looking for anything you could find to justify your narratives.
That entire blurb that I read you there from Paul's article, it's completely dismissible by just reminding yourself that everything he's saying is his opinion.
It's not fact, and it's not even coherent analysis.
The real tell here is how...
Completely ignoring the other three scenarios in the document.
How come the conspiracy isn't that the globalists are secretly trying to reveal that they're trying to usher in a world depicted by the clever together scenario, where, quote, pharmaceutical giants release thousands of drug compounds shown to be effective against diseases like malaria to the public domain as part of an open innovation agenda.
They also opened their archives of research and development on neglected diseases deemed not commercially viable, offering seed funding to scientists who wanted to carry the research forward.
This scenario isn't used or even mentioned because it doesn't depict the kind of vibe that Alex has spent his career making his audience scared about.
The four scenarios in this document are equally likely, as is a completely different future that wasn't captured by the two-variable exercise of this study.
But the only one that matters to Infowars is the one that paints the dystopian hellscape they make money by convincing listeners Well, it's in the other...
And I've got all the government reports admitting that the births, year by year, they're studying that human DNA is being damaged at a level never before seen.
We are being mutated.
And many of us that are able to even think and operate today, our children, their children, and the children after them are going to be deformed monsters who are literally drooling basket cases.
But of course, that will never even get to that point.
They plan to exterminate all of us long before then.
It's just an absolute fact.
And why do we have to sit here and fight with each other?
You know, this is like, this reminds me of the Heaven's Gate cult now, just on account of like, I'm worried that we, like that argument, sure, we don't want them to kill all of us.
There are so many of these reports that Aaron Dykes, only aided by coffee, many days will not sleep and I have to make him go home after two days of being up here.
This is somebody I hired right out of the University of Texas five years ago who didn't really believe in what I was doing, who didn't really buy what I was saying and kind of laughed when I hired him.
These people are so arrogant that they write policy papers, so many of them, that they're producing these policy papers and reports and white papers so fast.
If there are, in fact, warehouses full of the proof of Alex's conspiracy theories, then I would suggest he start by producing one piece of that proof, because everything he's pointed to so far in my experience has been bullshit.
John P. Holdren's eco-science book doesn't advocate sterilizing people through adding stuff to the water.
This Rockefeller document doesn't lay out a master plan to bring in a dictatorship through a pandemic.
The Club of Rome's publications don't prove that they made up climate change.
Every single specific I've ever heard Alex mention doesn't say what he claims it does.
There is a warehouse.
It's just a warehouse that's full of books and publications that Alex has never read or can't understand, and he's just using them as props to justify and support his flimsy facade of dumb theories.
I pray to my Heavenly Father, Jesus Christ, every night to give me the strength and the will to be able to face this harm and to give me the strength to carry on because I know why a lot of you don't want to look at this information and just want to comment on the YouTube videos or on message boards that I'm a liar.
I know why.
Because it's scary.
You're not going to be able to go to the ballgames anymore.
You're not going to be able to just go out and get drunk with your friends.
You're not going to be able to just go out and enjoy yourself all the time.
Alex is saying that we won't be able to go to ball games or get drunk with our friends at the bar, and that's exactly like what happened because of coronavirus safety measures.
The intention of this clip is to give the audience that impression, that Alex is predicting social lockdown, which, if you haven't forgotten, is kind of the title of this video.
Sure.
So there's a huge problem, though, and there's a slight edit that whoever made this clip did that changes the entire meaning of Alex's words.
I pray to my Heavenly Father Jesus Christ every night to give me the strength and the will to be able to face this horror and to give me the strength to carry on because I know why a lot of you don't want to look at this information and just want to comment on the YouTube videos or on message boards and I'm a liar.
I know why.
Because it's scary.
And if you admit this to yourself, You're not going to be able to go to the ballgames anymore.
You're not going to be able to just go out and get drunk with your friends.
You're not going to be able to just go out and enjoy yourself all the time and not spend some of your energy on resisting this.
The cutting out of those words completely alters the point of what Alex is saying, and it makes those images of not being able to go to the ballgame or bars anymore, you know, it makes, when you cut it out, it seems like they're independent thoughts from everything else that he's saying, as opposed to the then part of an if-then statement.
This is intensely dishonest, and whoever edited this clip together took those words out because they knew that in their original form, they don't really work to make Alex sound like he made an amazing prediction.
But if you chop them off, it looks like he might have been on to something.
Using this cheesy score and making selective edits like this the person who put this together is able to transform something pretty meaningless and standard from Alex's show into something that looks like a fairly specific prediction about stuff that would happen a decade later.
So the reason for this is because it's a food-grade anti-foaming agent, which prevents the oil from bubbling up and burning employees.
Anyone who's worked in fast food knows that getting that oil on you is no joke.
And with the high incidence of younger employees at places like McDonald's, It's really important as a safety measure to do what you can to limit the possibility of people getting oil all over themselves.
Alex can't prove that this chemical is dangerous to people.
And actually, interestingly, in 2018, MLive reported that, quote, scientists at Yokohama National University in Japan say that a chemical added to the oil to cook McDonald's french fries could help cure baldness in humans.
That's right.
Some early stage testing has shown that dimethylpolysiloxane was used to, quote, aid the growth of black hair on the back and scalp of mice.
Of course, because people are kind of dumb, after this news broke, these Japanese scientists had to come out and clarify that eating McDonald's fries would not help you grow back hair.
He'll say something like, McDonald's puts silicone in their food, and then do nothing more to examine the claim or help his audience understand what it even means.
If you just listen to Alex, you'd be, you know, it'd be equally easy to conclude that McDonald's is using this chemical in the oil as an anti-foaming agent, as it would be to believe that their Big Macs are half breast implant.
So one of the things I think is pretty interesting about going back to this time frame is when Alex says he's gonna go to calls, a lot of the time he does.
So this first caller brings up that, like, hey, you know, Finding out about all this stuff, about the evil folks who run the world and all that, kind of makes it tough for me to be happy.
Alex does not seem concerned.
unidentified
You hit on a talking point that not a lot of times people will bring up.
And what you had mentioned this morning, earlier, before I got through to talk to you, was about how, once you obtain this information and the truth...
Basically, how much it does change your outlook on how you value your life.
unidentified
And then, I can honestly say it, my life hasn't been the same.
And sometimes, I might even be asking for some advice here, buddy, but sometimes it's really hard to find some balance and to try to even maintain a reasonable amount of what, by God, given right by the Constitution.
What's interesting is 10 years ago, you know, I've been married for almost nine, but, you know, 10 years ago, even six, seven years ago, I would still see a beautiful woman in a grocery store and lust.
I would still, you know, have a lot of flesh.
And now, almost all of that is burned away.
I mean, I'm attracted to my wife, but still, my drive states are fully survival, warn people, deal with this, you know, protect my children.
You were talking about what people look at as important these days, and when I crack open my Yahoo page, which is my homepage, they have this thing called Trending Now, and you'll see stuff like Lindsay Lohan, American Idol, Raw Wrestling, Dancing with the Stars.
And then the sixth thing, at the end of the very last article, guess what it was?
Yeah, you know, the internet, like, the way that he described that, that reminds me so much of the way that Douglas Adams described the Babelfish, where he's like, finally, everyone in the universe was able to communicate with each other.
And that caused more and bloodier wars than ever in the past, you know?
Well, I don't know if the internet is bad, but it does definitely, at very least, expose some parts of our behaviors and our patterns that maybe we wouldn't have been aware of otherwise.
It's fine to say that the BP oil spill is maybe a larger story for more people, but it's ridiculous to complain about the public paying attention to those stories.
So Alex lays out his supposed problem, which is caused by some vague idea about how the algorithm searches work, and then the solution is that everybody needs to search for the Obama deception to push that movie to the top of all search engines.
This makes no sense, but it feels like it does to Alex's audience because they've been trained to equate promoting Infowars with engaging in activism.
They've been conditioned to believe that it's possible that if the Obama deception gets seen by millions more people, maybe it'll have an impact on getting people to pay more attention to oil spills and less to celebrity gossip.
The sleight of hand you see in this clip is phenomenal, and it really represents the bleak underbelly of what Alex's world is always about.
The only solutions that are ever really offered are those that directly profit Alex.
The solution to the collapsing economy is to buy gold from Alex's sponsor, Ted Anderson.
The solution to the coming societal collapse is to buy survival food from Alex's sponsor, My Patriot Supply.
The solution to COVID-19 and every other health condition is just to use Alex's supplements.
The solution to people not paying enough attention to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill apparently is to try and trick search engines into thinking Alex's movie is more popular than...
actually is so it's fooled into recommending it to more people yeah that sounds correct it's evil and looking back on this it's painfully transparent to see what alex is very bad but i do have a hard time not recognizing that it is a great marketing strategy oh yeah i also enjoyed that as alex was talking like as soon as he said the obama deception the first time you rolled your eyes and just shook your head.
It's a long time, so we're not going to listen to a ton more clips of it, because he does jump off to another topic, and that is that Pearl Harbor was a false flag.
We've talked a bit about his Pearl Harbor conspiracies in the past, but I just wanted to play that just to represent that he spends a while on that topic.
Now, he goes back to calls, because he has made his point that everyone needs to get to typing in their search engines.
Maybe if it's 3 a.m. at a bar and I don't want to go home, if somebody starts with, I'm Angel Eyes because I think I can see, I'm like, I'm Angel Eyes.
So, Chandra Levy's aunt is named Linda Zamsky, and the interview that she gave back in 2001 and her statement about her niece's disappearance were widely reported at the time in every outlet you can imagine.
It would be the easiest thing in the world for this caller to have just Googled Chandra Levy's aunt and found articles explaining this, which kind of illustrates, you know, these articles that will illustrate where his memory has failed him.
The aunt didn't say that Chandra had said that there was something big that was going to happen in America, as Angel Eyes is reporting to Alex.
According to the Washington Post, quote, I'm planning on packing my bags in the next week or ten days.
Heading home for a while.
Don't know what I'm going to do this summer.
And I really have some big news or something important to tell.
Call me.
The article goes on to say, quote, Zamski said yesterday she did not know what Levy was referring to, but added that the 24-year-old did not seem upset.
According to Zamski, She was Chandra's confidant about her relationship with then-Representative Gary Condit, so taken in its proper context, as delivered by Zamski, you could use this comment to speculate that maybe Chandra had some news about a change in her relationship with Condit, but that's not the context that Angel Eyes is bringing this information to Alex in.
He's saying that the news that Chandra had for her aunt was something big was going to happen in America, which seems to be him implying that she had foreknowledge about 9-11.
I've seen this conspiracy floated online before, so it's not like a completely new idea to me, but it's one idea that kind of relies on connecting random dots and misinterpreting and misrepresenting Zamsky's comments.
It's kind of shocking to me, honestly, that...
Alex would hear this and kind of not know what the guy is talking about.
So if I understand correctly, if Alex announces that he is going to run for mayor of Austin, within whatever length of time you must be a resident in order to vote.
Also, as a cross-eyed American, I resent him saying people go cross-eyed, taking in all the information that you do, because he doesn't take in any information.
One time I got talked into filing for state rep and I dropped out in a week because I was getting so much support and it freaked me out and I was reading the rules.
They've written the rules where you can't follow the law and get elected legally in the campaign rules.
That way they can selectively enforce against you.
At this point, and I don't really ever intend to run for political office.
If you've been living in a city where there's fraudulent elections for 10 years and there's nothing real and all the leadership, you can't vote them out because it's all...
I mean, BP is not even in the top ten on Google and Yahoo trends.
Millions of people every day go to the front pages of these sites.
They look at what the top stories are.
You're able to drive it to the top.
If you put the term, the Obama deception, the Obama deception, just go into Google and type the Obama deception in.
Hit enter.
It'll bring up the results.
Back out again.
Put your cursor on it.
Click it so it's a new search and just keep re-entering it at least 15 times.
It'll take you a couple minutes.
You don't have to type it in each time.
After you type it in, you hit search.
Then you put your cursor in there, click it so it thinks it's a new search, or change one letter, erase the N, put an N back on it, but it's easier just to, guys, show them.
I mean, you really just got summed it up when you were yelling over his last clip, which is, if BP should be the number one trend, why are you doing this?
Alex is doing this because he wants more traffic and more money to come into his business, but he also knows that admitting that would look really bad.
He wants the outcome, but he doesn't want to have to ask for it, so he pretends that his motives are noble, and that he's actually incensed that Lindsay Lohan is getting more attention than the oil spill.
For those people who sit down at the computer five or six times a day just to check their stuff and then they get up and leave, they're probably not going to think about doing the search for you.
There are, however, really, really simple to use add-ons for just about any browser out there that can automatically do searches for them or refresh current searches that they have.
Yeah, like Google will ask you, hey, do you want us to give you updates on this term?
unidentified
Yeah, that and extensions.
Just for example, Google has one, and I use it for this exact purpose, called Reload Every.
No, that's Firefox.
Firefox has one called Reload Every, and it can set up a refresh for you randomly or every one second or ten seconds or ten minutes or however often you want it to search for you.
If you're, like, sort of expert on the economy and the radio show host and the guy who syndicates the radio show who also runs a gold company are all intertwined in a bizarre business relationship.
When I'm on Sunday, 4 to 6 p.m., I'm going to cover this in more detail.
I'm going to produce a special video this weekend for viral release.
It'll be out by tomorrow.
It's going to deal with eugenics, where I'm going to show you a bunch of food and their labels and the different poisons that are in them.
But a key study that Aaron Dykes found, Rockefeller study, envisions food.
A future dictatorship controlled by the elite, and it gets into controlling food, through the environment, total control, martial law, millions dead, mandatory quarantines, checkpoints, biometric IDs to travel, to live.
Read what these monsters are planning for you.
And it's the same thing in hundreds of globalist documents like eco-science.
And at that trend, I've learned to be able to gauge YouTube, it probably would have had another million views in a week or so.
Because it was the number one search term.
People did a great job getting that out there.
But more importantly...
In the last few months, if you search the term Barack Obama or Obama or President Obama, not the number three link.
It'd been like that for a year.
The number one link on the World Wide Web on Google and Yahoo was the Obama deception, and a link to that megaviral video was 6.5 million views and growing.
Well, so when school kids type it in for a school report, college professors, politicians, news people, whatever, you type Obama or President Obama or Barack Obama, and it was the number one link.
It was hacked, and it was taken down off the director channel, and it shows, you know, done by user.
That's what a hack is.
They go in, and once it's deleted...
It's gone.
The 6.5 million views is gone.
All the tens of thousands of websites that are linked to that video, it's a dead link now.
And so, of course, now when you type in Obama, it's the Obama girl or the White House.
It's not our video.
So that's why the establishment did this.
I have no doubt that's an inside job from YouTube or Google, one of their employees.
I mean, this thing was number one.
They were panicking.
And remember, this was the YouTube presidency.
I mean, you go to the White House YouTube site, their videos get like a thousand viewers.
Yeah, as soon as I heard that, my first thought was, uh, what do you want to bet that his plan to deal with this fiasco somehow involves the audience doing more free advertising?
It's like people who get petty over download numbers, you know, or like YouTube views.
Alex and Obama were beefing.
They had the White House YouTube channel, and they weren't getting the same kind of traffic that Alex was getting, so they're like, we gotta take him out.
It still has the original publishing date, it didn't lose its view count, nor did any of the comments disappear.
There's over 200,000 comments on it, so I couldn't go through all of them, but I was able to find some from the time period of around 10 years ago, and none are saying, hey, so glad to see this got put back up or anything.
So two, I was able to find some blogs covering the alleged takedown of this video, and none of them can actually confirm that the video was taken down.
All of them rely entirely on claims that trace back to Alex himself.
I was able to find a forum thread on GameSpot about the claims that the video was taken down as an attempt to silence Alex, and some of the posts are a little interesting.
The Angry Pelican comments, quote, I'm watching that video right now on YouTube.
It's not deleted.
Another user chimed in, quote, I have it on in the background.
That KRS1 guy has a good analogy.
There seems to be a lot of people who are confused that the link that was posted to a supposedly deleted video page is in fact delivering them to a page that began playing a shitty documentary about Obama.
So I believe that this is a continuation of the traffic bomb Alex began on his Friday show, which he's now heightening on Sunday.
I can't say for certain that the video didn't have an error loading or something like that at some point, but there's literally no part of my being that believes that hackers got into a YouTube account and took down the Obama team.
See, when he went to YouTube, the page opened up and it said, you have internet connectivity issues, which clearly means that the YouTube page was taken down.
When you type the name Obama or President Obama or Barack Obama in, it was the number one link on Google and Yahoo.
That was before we had listeners promote the term the Obama deception to make it the number one trend search Friday and Saturday.
A whole bunch of newspapers reported on the film Saturday.
Someone hacked into the director's channel, probably YouTube themselves, and deleted that film, the Obama deception, and my newest film, Police State 4, The Rise of FEMA.
Luckily, we were twittered about it by listeners and were able to call the director who runs the director channel to get him inside there to change the passcode before they took all the videos down.
But the other thing that I want to say, you don't want to take a little time to say this, is that if YouTube had deleted the video, which I don't believe they did, I think they would have been within their rights to do so.
Luckily, one of my webmasters happened to be writing a story about the fact that the Obama deception was getting hundreds of thousands of views a day and was the number one trend being searched.
On major search engines.
So within 15 minutes of it being removed, we were getting Twitter pings telling us it was down.
So I called the director's channel, who we work with, and I said, hey, your site's being hacked.
He drove in from a barbecue he was at, went in within an hour of the starting, and was watching someone live in the interface deleting my films.
Deleting Police Day 4, The Rise of FEMA, and the Obama deception.
And thank God we could change the passcode before it continued.
unidentified
Saw a little guy creeping around inside the YouTube account.
And the destiny of this documentary is now in your hands.
You can do several things.
Number one.
Go find the links on YouTube, Google, and other sites where the video is still posted and send that link out to everyone and tell them this is a censored film.
This is a film that the establishment doesn't want you to see.
This is a number one film that was deleted.
And let these censors, these criminals, these 21st century book burners know that every time they attack freedom of speech and creativity and expression that the American people and the people of the world are going to strike back.
Send the links.
to the Obama deception out to everyone you know and go to Google and Yahoo and other major search engines and type in the Obama deception every day when you first log into your computer and let's keep it at the top of the trends chart.
Let's make it the number one search term in the world that it was.
Let's have the Obama deception rise from the ashes like a phoenix carrying the light of liberty and freedom.
It is up to all of you to carry this torch forward.
So you can see how Alex is doing the exact same thing here as he did on Friday, just super heightened.
He's created a fake problem, and he's made it emotionally resonant to the audience, and then he's made sure that they know the only way for them to really fight back is to do more free promotional work for Alex and his websites.
Instead of appealing to the audience's understandable feeling that the oil spill was more important than celebrity news, then co-opting that for his own benefit, this time Alex has made the supposed deleting of his videos into an attack on the audience themselves and freedom.
So, I remember hearing pretty regularly that the reason that Alex was embarking on this was because he was offended that BP was not higher up on the trends, because that's an important story, whereas Lindsay Lohan and Mel Gibson, not important.
Friday and Saturday with the number one search trend in the world, not being Lindsay Lohan or Mel Gibson or BP oil spill.
It was the Obama deception because of all of you out there getting the word out.
And the video that was the top link, and this has been going on for at least a month, when you type in the name Obama and any variation thereof was this film.
It should be the number one over Lindsay Lohan, and the problem with these globalists is they're trying to make it number one over things like Lindsay Lohan and me.
I'm offended by how manipulative it is and how if you were someone who took him seriously, this would be a really tough thing to experience because it's all fake.
But looking at it now, from a 10 years later perspective, it's hard not to laugh at how embarrassingly clear this is.
A charade he's putting on in order to try and game more traffic.
On the level playing field of ideas, I won the Super Bowl.
I kicked their hand in!
I sat up here and didn't visit with my children for months.
I worked seven days a week to make this documentary and fly all over the country and spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to make it, and I gave it to you for free, and I kicked their butt!
They let Obama and the globalists and BP and all of them spew their propaganda on the web, but I can't put my films out.
And they didn't even make up some hanky-panky because every time they file false complaints against me, I just file in federal court.
You know, behind the scenes, I've had to file in federal court no fewer than eight times in the last year and a half to keep that stinking video up for you.
You know, I've had to go in there and file against false copyright claims and tell people, put up or shut up, let's go to court.
I've had to file in federal court so you can see what Barack Obama really is.
I am busting my butt here to bring you this information, and I'm not complaining.
My family and my children in this country are worth it.
I'm not going to be a slave to a bunch of authoritarians, and this is authoritarian tyranny that this country's going into.
And I know you understand that, and you're upset out there as listeners, so I'm going to beg you.
Vice President Biden and intellectual property enforcement coordinator Victoria Espinel gave an order.
And they've got quotes here.
The DMC takedown actions were a direct violation of the First Amendment under prior restraint.
However, explains law professor Wendy Seltzer, because the DMC takedowns are privately administered through ISPs, they have not received constitutional scrutiny despite the high risk of error, Seltzer adds.
So this is the White House now issuing 73,000 takedown orders this week, mainly of blogs critical of Barack Hussein Obama.
So Alex is talking about the blog platform bloggatory here, and there were some initial theories that people were kicking around that the platform was taken down due to DMCA complaints, but that was just purely speculation.
It came out a couple days later that the reason that the server that housed Blogatree kicked it off and thus removed 73,000 or so blogs was that someone was using the server to host an Alcatraz Cata recruitment website, complete with a hit list and instructions on bomb making.
Blogatry was hosted on servers owned by Burst.net, who got contacted by the FBI regarding this terrorism stuff, and they decided to stop working with Blogatry.
Apparently, there had been some past terms of service violations that are unspecified.
So they must have just decided that if they were allowing an Al-Qaeda site to stay up, they may represent too much of a risk to stay on the servers.
I'm not sure in the end what happened with all this, but as of July 21st, 2010...
There was an article on CNET about Burst.net's efforts to try to get the data from people's blogs back to them so they could have their blog, but they would not re-host Blogatry.
So the users would just have to find another platform to use.
And I think that to the extent that that was possible, they were saying they were going to find a way to make that happen.
There's no indication that any of these affected blogs were critical of Obama, or if any were, that it had anything to do with these.
They are taking down 73,000 blogs and no one's talking about it, which is why you need to Google the Obama deception right now!
Also, to be clear, that stuff about Biden and Victoria Espinel, that was an unrelated story from June, where there was a discussion about the massive economic costs of copyright infringement.
The Infowars story about the blogs being removed just kind of assumes that the reason that they got taken down was copyright violations.
So the whole angle is that, but it's not true.
And also, you can just tell Alex is like, he doesn't even know how the story on Infowars fits together.
He's just finding bits and pieces of it and reading it.
On Infowars.com, when you click on both the shopping carts, we've got two different shopping carts, whatever your choice is, where you can get four films for $19.95.
I don't even make money on that because I put a free pocket constitution in every order.
Okay, with the cost of the film and everything else, that comes out to less than $5 per film.
So, Alex throws to break really, really passionate.
He's freaking me out a little bit.
But the underlying message here is that the only thing you need to do to break the will of the NWO, to destroy them, is support Alex's stuff and give him free publicity.
You print up an image of Obama as the Joker and you say Google Obama deception and you never stop and you let these Nazi blood-sucking anti-American parasites that want to make you and your family slaves know that we are standing up against them and we are red-blooded and we are not slaves and we are not bowing down to them.
I'm not bowing down.
I'm at the tip of the spear.
I get death threats every day.
And you know what?
I am honored to be who I am.
I'm honored to just be an average person that stood up 15 years ago and said, I'm going to defend the republic.
I'm going to defend the family.
I'm going to defend the Second Amendment.
I'm going to fight against abortion.
I'm going to see what happens when I really take action.
And we have laid waste to the enemy.
If you simply unloose yourselves and become the leaders you are, we will sweep this scum into the gutter.
I just tell you, we're having a big effect, folks.
We're having a big effect.
We're having a big effect.
And now they've gone in and hacked and taken down my film, The Obama Deception.
The one that had the biggest views and was the top link under the name Obama when you searched his name.
You think the White House liked when they searched the name Barack Obama or President Obama or Obama that a video exposing him as a traitorous globalist was the number one link in the last month?
Or the number one search term in the last two days?
Let's not let them stop us.
Let's search the term Fall of the Republic, my newest film on the globalists.
Let's search the term police state for the rise of FEMA that they also erased.
Police state for the rise of FEMA.
Let's search the term Infowars.com.
Let's jam them all into there so we can't be stopped.
Stuart, Antonio, John, Mark, Doug, Jared, we're going to get to all of you.
And I don't know what any of them are, and sure, we're about to take control of the Senate because the Democratic Party is shit, but I'm gonna have to say the only way to stop him is to make him feel bad when he Googles his own name.
This caller is so close to recognizing the dynamic that's happening here.
When Alex asks if he's going to burn the DVDs and send out links and all sorts of free street teamwork for Infowars, the caller says, quote, They're only making us mad to do it more.
So, Alex gets another caller, and this guy is weird.
He seems to be a fan of some financial broadcast, and apparently people on this broadcast have been wanting to have a debate with Alex about something.
And Alex has been ducking him, or something along those lines.
It's pretty unclear.
unidentified
This past Saturday on the webcast from Financial Sense Online, Jim Paplava, who is the proprietor, said that your office hasn't gotten back to him yet.
I do think that there's a possibility that Alex doesn't experience that as plugging or whatever, but taken from an external viewpoint, that's all he's doing.
I might be a little jaded by my time covering Alex, but I will say that my experience of listening to these episodes was that it was about something else altogether.
If he isn't a lying piece of shit, if he is claiming that he predicted this entire thing, then he failed on a level so incomprehensible that I had to listen to four fucking hours of him tell people to Google the Obama deception instead of him warning the free world that we're all about to die!