Today, Dan and Jordan look at a confusing stretch in the present day of the Alex Jones Show. In this installment, Alex repeatedly refuses to dignify the story about him in the New York Times, comes out as at least semi pro-orgy, and announces a very bizarre plan for a publicity stunt.
I really find that to be such a nuisance, especially that middle ground where it's too short to put behind an ear and too long to not keep out of the eye.
My hair's just super disagreeable to begin with.
Anyway, I'll probably just keep buzzing my head for a bit.
A podcast where I don't know a lot about Moose, but I do know a bit about Alex Jones.
I figured what we would do today is continue a little bit in the present day, because I felt like there was stuff that was going on that felt a little unresolved.
Like, I didn't...
You know, at the end of our last episode, Alex was really freaking out about something.
And it definitely appeared to be that New York Times story that had come out that same day.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I like this show, I'd like to support what these gents do, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show.
And that makes sense because a lot of people listen at offices and things like that.
I've heard enough of that kind of feedback, and I also have experienced a little bit of it myself in terms of the workflow, that I think that that's a much better schedule.
And I only chose Tuesday-Thursday because it seemed like it was spread out.
I had no marriage to those dates or anything like that.
So we'll have episodes on Monday and Wednesday.
And then the other thing that that adds, I realize, and this is not a backdooring of trying to get back to three episodes.
And that possibility is much better than having the Tuesday-Thursday where it's like, well, if something happens at the end of the week that's critical to talk about.
I'm not one to make accusations on that, because his behaviors that we could pinpoint as his drunk behaviors, like yelling at that woman, cupcake on the street, talking about pissing on a tree, stumbling, staggering, slurring words, and drinking on air.
Those I have not seen during this time.
So I believe that.
However, he's saying that I'm going to get down to business and really take care of shit.
Because the buckling down and actually getting to these news stories would require actual meat and substance.
And he knows that there's nothing past headlines.
He knows that if he talks about any of these stories without just ranting about the devil, if he takes more than a minute or two on any of these stories, it immediately falls apart.
So he knows he can't buckle down, but he also recognizes that is what I should be doing.
So you start every episode like, this is the time, I'm going to actually get down to it.
So Alex is covering a story about Vladimir Putin expressing some comments in a meeting that was taking place with the Russian Council for Interethnic Relations.
Putin said, quote, you see the word mother cannot be replaced.
Turns out maybe it can.
They've replaced it in some countries with parent number one and parent number two.
I hope that never happens here.
For one, not even the people who encourage the usage of terms like parent number one or two, they're not trying to force people to stop saying mother and father.
It's more of an effort to societally recognize that not all families fit the same quote-unquote traditional definitions that have been considered the norm for so long.
For instance, on school forms, it makes sense to have parent number one and two, since a child's parents may not be one mother and one father, and in terms of that form, the language does nothing to diminish one's fatherhood or motherhood.
Yeah, it's easy stuff, really.
I think that Putin's thinking about this is a little bit lame, at least the way it's being expressed, but I think it's even lamer how this article that I read about it on RT ends.
The article was written by Nebosa Melek, who's credited as a senior writer, but this last paragraph reads more like a fucking Facebook post.
Quote, While Western quote-unquote human rights groups may be girding their loins to condemn Putin's remarks as yet another example of oppression in Russia, they should hold their horses before cashing those lobbying checks.
In the meeting, he also talked about welcoming and accepting immigrants, condemnation of ignorance and extremism, and support for Russia's indigenous peoples who live in better conditions and in far larger numbers than Native Americans, it should be said.
That would complicate the virtue signaling morality plays that pay their bills, though, so we shouldn't hold our breath.
It's hard to tell, because a bit of the article is presented kind of as a news piece about these comments that Putin said in this meeting, but it also could have been more of an editorial.
So Alex's complaint about this seems to come from a place of admiring Putin standing up to the PC police who are completely out of control and they wish to minimize language in order to control the population.
But that's an absurd notion.
I can sincerely believe that that's what Putin's doing.
Considering that the Kremlin banned swearing in, quote, books, films, music, theater, and popular blogs back in 2014, which was to, quote, if you quote from an article in The Guardian, a, quote, attempt to cleanse the Russian language in order to ensure its purity.
Just imagine for a second how Alex would feel about the U.S. federal government banning swearing in the arts.
It would be absurd, his unhinged reaction to that.
Also, there's a law in the books called Article 280.1 in Russia, which makes it a crime to make statements denying the territorial integrity of Russia, which is a pretty serious impediment to opposition organizing.
In 2015 to 2016, in that year, 15 people were charged under this act, eight of whom opposed the annexation of Crimea.
You can see how this sort of law should be a pretty huge red flag for someone like Alex, who has this kind of nationalist states' rights mentality that Alex does.
And yet, I've never heard this come up as an example of Russia's crackdown on speech.
None of this is ever...
unidentified
It's just, hey, he said the same sort of shit I say about how they're trying to ban the word mother.
Yeah, in case you are unaware out there listening, one of Alex's ex-employees wrote an article.
For the New York Times called, I Worked for Alex Jones, I Regret It.
And he discussed his time there, and Alex was presented as a really abusive employer.
And one of the main takeaways that everybody had about it was his discussion of a time that he was sent to cover a community, a Muslim community called Islamberg.
in the Northeast, and he didn't get the story that Alex would have wanted, and so they manufactured a story out of it.
And so that's kind of the thing that I think people take as the most important piece of that.
Well, I think that, you know, people give a lot more.
I worked there.
This is my personal experience with it.
The very clear evidence you can get by just watching his show.
And I understand why.
Because you now have someone who's like, what about this?
Sure.
And there's one thing that I thought that I want to express this, and it didn't come to me until later.
And that is that no matter what I might feel about that article and how a lot of it isn't really stuff that you can act on, you know, because there's a lot that you can just dismiss.
Alex could just dismiss as like, well, that's not true.
Whatever I might feel about it, there's an overarching positive to it that I don't think we pointed out.
There's a possibility that there are many former InfoWars employees that would like to come out and talk about their experience at the company, but they've been too afraid to, based on the NDAs that Alex allegedly has people sign.
If Josh Owens has the guts to come forward, and the result is that nothing bad happens to him, that could have the effect of emboldening others to speak out.
And then the stories of what work is like at Infowars could be more than subjective telling of tales.
There could be people like, yes, I can back up that that did happen.
I was there when that happened.
Now you've got corroborating stories.
And if that's the result, the destruction of the illusion that Alex can keep people silent, then I think that this could do a lot of good.
I think that that's a positive that maybe we didn't pay attention to on the last episode.
And possibly one of the reasons why Alex would be...
Pretty upset about it.
If there's a puncturing of his ability to have control over things, that would be very threatening.
As for the stuff about Alex hunting with a handgun that's in the article, that's cruel.
And it's a betrayal of Alex's supposed responsible gun use narratives.
But it's also something that you just have to take Josh's word for.
Plus, if Alex's audience heard that he hunted bison with inappropriate weapons, I don't think they'd care at all.
Which is why this is the safe subject for Alex to create a straw man of the article out of.
It's just like, oh yeah, they can't handle hunting.
And then, let me just tell listeners, if I sounded distracted towards the end of the broadcast yesterday, we're working on big stories that are confirmed that there are white mans going around.
Picking people up all over the United States, but also black SUVs.
And we've solved the mystery of what's causing this panic across the country.
And let me just leave it like this.
We were out last night at 10 o 'clock at night sneaking around in the bushes in Austin, Texas.
So this is a little complicated, so I'm going to try my level best to lay this out for you.
Alex has been pushing a narrative for a couple days now about how there are people in white vans who are driving around the street snatching people up.
Now, it apparently has evolved into involving black SUVs as well, and at this rate, Alex will be telling people to fear all cars by January.
There's two basic elements to this narrative.
The first is a story that Alex reported from Zero Hedge back on December 4th with the headline, quote, Baltimore mayor warns of body-snatching white vans targeting young girls to sell their organs.
In an interview with WBAL-TV 11, Mayor Young said, quote, we're getting reports of somebody in a white van trying to snatch up young girls for human trafficking and for selling body parts.
His only reference and citation for this was posts on Facebook, though he said it was, quote, something that our police officers are aware of because it's been reported.
This was immediately refuted by the Baltimore Police Department's official spokesperson, who clarified that the police were aware of these random Facebook posts, but were explicit that they have not received any reports of actual incidents of snatching.
The FBI doubled down and said that there was nothing to this, but they would be willing and happy to investigate any such reports that would be made if they're ever made.
This is an urban legend that's been naively repeated by a major city's mayor, and thus given a level of credibility that it does not merit.
However, this sort of thing has a self-fulfilling nature.
An internet hoax, an urban legend, it starts circulating on social media, which then enters people's consciousness.
People exposed to this hoax are now living with a heightened suspicion of white vans, and as such, they experience encounters with them differently than they would have previously.
If they see a van parked in a residential street, previously it wouldn't have even registered in their mind.
But now, with the kernel of this paranoia in there, it becomes a deeply suspicious sight.
Because maybe there's kids walking around this residential neighborhood.
That's why that van is there, obviously.
This heightened suspicion, which might prompt them to post their own story to Facebook to add to the urban legend, or even call the police, thereby leaving a paper trail that seemingly justifies the urban legend with official documentation.
This phenomenon happens more than you'd like, because people are susceptible.
The only one I remember is that apparently if you are passing a car with its lights off and you flash your lights at it, then it's going to turn around and fucking kill you.
So this is more or less the process that took place on Facebook regarding white vans, particularly in Baltimore through November 2019.
That started to escalate quite a bit.
And now here we are.
Oxygen reported on the possibility that this has already led to one murder in Memphis, Tennessee, where a man named Nazario Garcia, who drives a white work van, was killed by the two sons of a woman who had hours earlier posted on Facebook about a guy in a white van trying to abduct her.
It's unclear if there was an attempted abduction underlying this, but police have been clear that there's no evidence that Garcia had interacted with this woman previously earlier in the day or anything.
It's unclear if this was all related, but it seems like a distinct possibility.
And if this white van paranoia is at the root of this killing, it really highlights the danger that these sorts of mass paranoias carry with them.
If you create enough of a fever pitch of people thinking that folks driving around in white vans are sex trafficking kidnappers, It's not unlikely that a certain number of innocent people who drive white vans could get hurt.
France 24 reported back in March of an outbreak of white van abduction-related hysteria, which resulted in what they described as, quote, near lynchings.
Urban legends were circulating on Snapchat, WhatsApp, and Facebook, all surrounding the idea that white vans were going around kidnapping people.
There was no truth to these rumors, but that didn't stop gangs of vigilantes from attacking camps of Roma people in northeast Paris, setting their vans on fire and terrorizing families.
These sorts of mass hysterias are profoundly dangerous, and when they express themselves, people seem to have a troubling tendency to direct their aggression towards vulnerable and alienated classes of people.
In France, it was the Roma.
In our satanic panic of the 80s, it was largely the LGBTQ community.
It remains to be seen how far this current American white van paranoia Alex is trying to stoke is going to go and who will be hurt.
But it is clear that if it does progress, someone will get hurt.
Yeah, that's pretty disappointing to have sort of what would be the equivalent of like grandma fear chain emails being repeated by the mayor of Baltimore.
So the other thing Alex is working in here to build this narrative is that recent release of the FBI documents about the Finders, the suspicious group from the 80s, or as I call it, the satanic panic we thought had ended.
That situation is a big kettle of fish, and it might be something I'll get into at a later date, but for now, suffice it to say, Alex has not read those FBI documents, and he just knows that the story involves two suspicious men who drove a van.
I don't believe Alex was creeping around in the bushes last night trying to catch van snatchers.
And honestly, if I had to guess, he's just seen all the hoax Facebook posts and is reporting them as hard news.
And it would be far from the first time he's ever done that.
And where he takes the bigger part will take up a bit more later in the episode.
But he gets distracted because this guy named Donald Tusk, who used to be the head of the European Council, tweeted a picture of himself putting a finger gun up to Trump's back.
I mean, okay, so let's say Bernie Sanders does become president, and there's an overwhelming Democratic majority in the Congress, and we pack the courts, and we do everything that the liberal dream would always want to be.
But what you're not taking into account is Alex's version of leaving me out to dry is part and parcel of it is that Trump is selling us out to China, which is the end of all civilization.
I mean, it is a major part of it, though, is that a large number of his supporters are happy with a crumbling country just so long as somebody finally tells everybody to shut the fuck up that they don't like.
And these leftists calling in when I've criticized Trump and thinking, oh, a chink is in the armor.
And, oh, you really backed him before, though.
You're bad.
You'll never atone for yourself.
They're all into this fake moral justification, how they're the moral authority and how you go to them like they're the high priest to get your moral absolution.
I piss on you.
The only God I've got is God.
God speaks to me through my conscience every millisecond.
That whole mythology of I'm being targeted because I'm right is such a dangerous mentality.
It could be because you're very wrong.
Yeah.
Sure, yeah, absolutely.
You could say that the evil bad guys are targeting you because you're too close to the truth, but it's equally likely that just people are saying, hey, you're being a piece of shit.
Totally possible.
It's that same thing as that Gandhi quote that people trot out.
It's like, the first people make fun of you.
The evolution is like, they mock you and then eventually you're right.
And then you find out they've set it up in Austin.
They don't call it UN Refugee Center.
But it's the same groups running these.
And the cover for it is the giant homeless problem when the mayor said, hey, if you're in San Francisco, if you're in L.A., if you're in Portland, if you're in Kansas City, if you're in New York, if you're anywhere, we've got the most free stuff, and we're buying old hotels, big ones, and refurbishing them for you, and you get free money, free everything, and we're building warehouses with your own apartments.
So I don't care about Alex's dumb xenophobic bullshit about refugees and immigrants.
He's discredited himself a hundred times over on that front, so I can't even find the energy to respond to his attempts to make humanitarianism look like devilry.
The story he's telling is the evolution of a larger narrative that we talked about a while back, where he's been yelling about how they're putting microchips in people experiencing homelessness.
We already discussed the reasoning for this and the reality of that proposal, so it would be a waste to go over all that all over again.
I mostly pulled up this clip because Alex is just making things up.
CBS Austin ran a story in March which covered the stats put out by a number of homelessness advocacy groups, and in the past year there was a 5% increase in homelessness.
It's entirely possible that the number has risen since that point, but we don't know that, and we won't until the beginning of January 2020, when the advocacy groups do their annual information gathering.
Put simply, Alex is just making up the idea that the number of people experiencing homelessness has tripled in Austin.
There's literally no way for him to back up that number, and if called on it, he would probably just appeal to ideas of seeing more people on the street, and meaningless subjective things like that.
He's not making this number up to better serve these people who are in need.
So the issue here is what Alex is putting forth is the UN has set up these refugee centers and stuff along through Central and South America, and they're trying to build them in Austin as well under the cover of a homeless...
So when you see Bill Ayers and all of them and it comes out in court, they had a plan to put 50 million Americans in re-education camps and kill 25 million.
Remember that clip?
We'll play it at the start of the next segment.
That came out in court.
That's always been the plan, but they don't call them FEMA camps.
They don't call it a communist takeover.
They overthrow Trump.
They kill Trump.
They stage a bunch of false flags to blame right-wingers.
They say we're terrorists.
They arrest a bunch of the leadership, thousands at first.
At first, though, if you don't complain, they won't turn your bank account off.
But that's just because they haven't gotten to you next.
You're like, oh, don't take my bank account.
I support the Roundup.
And you'll have to announce that Trump deserved to be shot.
Alex Jones deserved to be arrested or killed.
He fought back.
They'll say...
And this is how they, and they're testing it, and they're doing it.
And Soros is spending billions a quarter on this right now.
He still gets State Department money.
And we've confirmed they've got paramilitary in every town.
They've got their people prepared.
They've got warehouses ready.
They've got the food ready.
For in the first wave of a collapse that they're trying to trigger, that Trump's fighting, that's why he keeps trying to stabilize the economy, because they were already supposed to implode it.
That's why his main thing is just stabilize that constantly and go around cheerleading.
And pumping up the stock market, even though it's all fiat, because he knows their plan was imploded.
And they admit that was their plan.
So now you see why Trump's so desperate and fighting so hard.
Back then, there was the summer of rage coming, and they were going to crash the economy, and that was going to lead to people going into FEMA camps and all that.
But now Alex is far more obsessed with false flags.
Certainly.
Like, he was.
To an extent back in 2009.
But after the Boston bombing and after Sandy Hook, it went pretty wild.
I legitimately have no idea what Alex is talking about, but if I know anything from my years of listening to him, when he says he has a big scoop coming next week, it means that scoop is not real and it's never coming.
The only other possibility is that something does end up coming, but it's a huge letdown and nowhere near what Alex is claiming it is.
And honestly, I don't know what the big conspiracy is here.
KVUE, the local Austin news channel, reported back on November 14th about the city council granting unanimous approval for the city to repurpose an old hotel to be converted into a homeless shelter.
If I had to guess, someone who works at Infowars read the story about this and realized that the name of the hotel they're planning to use was public.
The KVUE article clearly says that it's the roadway in and even gives the location of it.
It's the easiest thing in the world for Alex to send someone down there at night to get footage of the building in disrepair because it's an unused hotel.
And part of what the city council was voting on was appropriation of funds to renovate the hotel.
I would predict Alex went down there and got some shots of the place looking like a disaster area.
I don't really see what the other play is here because the story is a zero based on everything I can tell.
The one area for manipulating optics is gaining footage of the pre-renovation building and pretending that it's the condition it'll be in once it's up and running.
But we'll see.
It's also entirely possible that nothing ever materializes.
It's possible nothing materializes and this is yet another instance of Alex bringing up something he has in his possession that will definitely sink his enemies.
That mysteriously is forgotten about within a few days.
This has shades of that time Jerome Corsi had a dead man switch for some bombshell Seth Rich info that was going to get him killed that definitely never happened.
I had this situation on my hands where I was like, alright, I want to check in and see, because I figured eventually he'd have to talk about the New York Times article in some specific.
And so I was like, okay, I feel like that's at least something that we should cover.
I think his response to it might be kind of interesting.
Vegas, you notice they would never tell you what happened, and they just said don't ask questions, and then they had all the witnesses and people saying no.
There were people getting shot inside hotels two miles away, and they showed shot-out windows, and people saying, yeah, the dead bodies were laying on the ground here, and there were men running around screaming in Arabic.
Yeah, there were terror attacks all over the town.
You notice Trump basically invaded Saudi Arabia, arrested half the royal house, and executed a bunch of them?
I mean, you know the U.S. invaded Saudi Arabia, right?
That's why Trump's big buddies with Saudi Arabia now, because he arrested, again, half the top princes.
A bunch of them got their throats slit.
I'm not really supporting what happened, but for Vegas, they got on their feet and tortured, and a bunch of them killed.
Those little UN re-education camp bases that they're just getting ready for the collapse of the U.S. And that's the bureaucracy that if they collapse the U.S. is going to use COG to not just remove Trump, but the civil unrest that comes out of it to bring in a permanent...
Martial law.
So, every day, I probably don't cover ten articles.
The Las Vegas shooting was not a series of terrorist attacks.
Although a lot of really sloppy conspiracy theorists have made a bunch of very flimsy and ultimately debunk claims about the shooting, attempting to make that very argument.
Alex has had a lot of these people on to disseminate their bullshit.
People like Shepard Amblis, who contends that there were helicopters shooting on the crowd at that music festival.
And I've reviewed that evidence and find it lacking.
I've looked into a lot of this stuff, and a fair amount of it is just completely unfounded.
Another chunk of it is based on pretty easily explained quirks of science, like how acoustics work, and can make it appear that there are multiple sources of gunfire, when in reality, you just hear different sounding shots.
It's the result of echoes.
Another segment is people misunderstanding or misrepresenting erroneous immediate reports or police scanners, and the rest of it is just the lingering remnant from people creating outright hoaxes intentionally in the aftermath of a tragedy, which Alex never really looked into and has since incorporated into his view of what was real.
I know I've heard Alex say that there was a Saudi Arabian element to the attack before, but the part about Trump invading Saudi Arabia as a response is kind of new.
If Alex had any principles, this imaginary action should absolutely make it impossible for him to support Trump.
If what Alex is saying was true, then Trump would have clandestinely and without the approval of Congress carried out a violent action against a sovereign foreign power with the goal of regime change.
This is something Trump would have to have been doing secretly, which Alex should be against, seeing as this would be a conspiracy that has enormous geopolitical ramifications, and we can see the results that have come from it.
From the gigantic weapon sales, to the turning a blind eye to the murder of Jamal Khashoggi, to Trump vetoing a resolution that would have ended our support for Saudi Arabia's actions in Yemen.
Alex always says you could judge a tree by its fruit, and if that's the fruit of Trump's imaginary coup in Saudi Arabia, that tree is not good.
I don't really care to take all that stuff seriously.
However, there's one important feature that I think this clip highlights really well, and that Alex Jones seems to be way less interested in sniffing out conspiracies and yelling about them if he feels like he's a part of them.
He gets to act like he's in the know about this secret Trump invasion of Saudi Arabia, so he's not concerned, really, about how that action would be counter to literally everything he stands for.
Alex is not more specific about this conspiracy theory, but he apparently believes that some older woman named Elizabeth wrote the piece in the New York Times and then put his former employee Josh Owens' name on it, which is wild.
Part of this is probably his way of getting out of having to publicly show that he has no control over his past employees.
If he attributes this article to this other person, then it's not Josh Owens saying these things, and therefore he hasn't broken his NDA, so there's nothing Alex can really do about it.
It's just the globalists attacking him.
Another element is that Alex probably feels hurt by his former employee betraying him like this.
The dude worked at Infowars for four years, so you gotta think you know the guy.
Alex wouldn't want to show that kind of weakness when it comes to the optics of him being too mad about it might look weak, and I don't think he really wants to show that.
So, Alex thinks that Elizabeth Williamson wrote this story.
She's a writer for the New York Times, and she's written many stories about Alex in the past, so he's probably pretty fixated on her.
Williams didn't write that story.
Josh Owens did.
But that reality is pretty hard to accept.
So this is the way Alex is deciding to play it, which kind of bums me out.
One of the ways Alex is using this completely made-up narrative that Williamson wrote the article is to say that she's some kind of New York high-rise living elite who's never been to the real America where people hunt and they eat meat.
Leaving aside that she was born in Chicago, went to Marquette, which is in Milwaukee and doesn't live in New York, this is just stupid pandering to some kind of folksy notion of Americana.
You can't take with this elite New Yorker who may as well be an alien to real Americans like us.
Seriously, you can't take it seriously.
That's basically the message.
It's also pointless.
Like, honestly, how many Alex Jones listeners do you think actually read the Times?
I mean, they probably at least read the headlines, so if they're scrolling through whatever news feed that it is they've got, they'll get one headline of Alex Jones is a giant fucking dumb liar.
You can't get into the house before the woman's pulled your clothes off.
Because it's so instinctive to be out with the sound of the bugs picking vegetables with a man.
It's so peaceful the women melt, ladies and gentlemen.
But see, all these people that have lived in these cities, they literally think I'm a serial killer because I shoot animals at 600 and 800 yards and then I eat them.
Just like I go out in the garden and pick squash, and I go in and I cook it, and I peel those potatoes.
And not just that, but most of the people who write for the New York Times can't afford anything, let alone the people who are New York elites who write for the New York Times probably agree with Alex more than not.
Even in the New York Times, this big fake piece that I'm not going to even dignify by talking about, something I had to go remember and talk to people, so that was true, that we were interviewing somebody dying of cancer, and I said, give him a big check when you go interview him.
I feel bad for him.
And the New York Times said, He must have been trying to impress his reporter that he was moral.
What the hell?
I give to all sorts of charity and never really talk about it.
But I had more money, more so.
I funded all sorts of groups and organizations covertly.
That doesn't sound good.
But to them, they would never write a big check to somebody dying of cancer.
To be clear, in the article, Josh Owens says, quote, Once when I went to interview a frequent guest of Jones's, I was sent with a check to cover a potentially life-saving cancer treatment.
During the time frame that Owens worked there, it's pretty safe to say that there is only one frequent guest who sounds a lot like that, and that is Larry Nichols.
So that would raise the question of whether or not there was a time during Josh's employment when someone from Infowars would have been in Arkansas to interview Larry in person.
The answer to that question is yes.
In 2015, Alex released the New Clinton Chronicles, which was basically just Larry rambling a bunch of bullshit about Hillary being a witch.
Witches.
It is professionally shot, and it was done through Infowars.
It was never released as an actual DVD or anything, so really it only existed on YouTube.
That makes it damn near impossible to track down any credits for it.
As such, I can't prove definitively that this was the time when Owens delivered a check to one of Alex's frequent guests, but I'd be very comfortable in assuming that that's the most likely situation.
So probably that.
And Alex was like, yeah, it was just someone who we were interviewing who wanted to help him out, but you evil people would never do something like that.
Kind of feels more like Alex is paying for Larry's interview.
Even more that he knows that it's from Wolf of Wall Street, because that suggests to me that he probably watched or saw Wolf of Wall Street close to that event, and then decided to do it.
I just think it's funny when someone whose worldview is almost entirely based on science fiction movies and books accuses the globalists of using, always using movies.
Well, because what happens is Alex has an interview with former MLB player Aubrey Huff.
Because Aubrey Huff posted a video where he was, or I guess it was maybe a picture, where he was out at a shooting range with his kids, and he said, I gotta teach them how to use a gun in case Bernie wins.
In the middle of that, Alex gets a call from a woman in Florida who claims to work in the homeless population, and she has also heard of somebody getting a chip.
And so this turns Alex into going deep in that direction.
Now, Alex has already revealed that on Tuesday, he's going to break his big news, this bombshell that'll destroy the globalists.
I thought, you know how to come on today, cover all this, show a bunch of stuff, and then open phones up, because I bet it's happening in other areas, to get more contacts, and then people can actually videotape, and the big one's going to be cutting the chip out of somebody's arm at a doctor's office.
Because no one will care if I show the facility and admitting they're doing it.
People are going to want to see that chip come out.
And we're having to get involved with HIPAA forms and everything else right now, okay?
But that's what we're going for, is the chip being cut out on TV with a doctor here next week, okay?
Because like P.T. Barnum said, man, and so does Shakespeare, the whole world's a stage.
Anyway, she meets a couple who then disappear for six to eight weeks.
When she meets back up with the dude from this couple, it turns out that he was arrested for trespassing.
And in the process of being booked, he's offered to be part of a program where people who experience homelessness would be given implantable chips that would contain all of their relevant medical records, identification, etc.
Anyway, we talked about this on a past episode.
And it makes a lot of sense for people who are living with housing vulnerability.
To explore that kind of an option.
They often have no secure place to keep important documents, and that can be the difference between progressing towards stability and being trapped in a never-ending cycle of consistently having to get new copies of necessary documents, which really gums up the works.
Anyway, this woman calls in, and it's completely freaking Alex out, because he hasn't even broken his big news that he was planning to break on Tuesday.
But that's ridiculous, because I've already heard him talk about this back in October.
Even at that point, that wasn't news.
Other mainstream media outlets have been discussing this proposal for months, even a year, before Alex even caught wind of it.
The bottom line is what they're talking about has this kernel of truth to it.
And as much as there is a plan that's being discussed and being worked on, it's all bullshit when it's being combined with this FEMA camp fantasy and all the globalist nonsense, though, which Alex is doing.
I should also say that I don't find this caller to be someone who strikes me as being a good source.
Here's a clip of her talking to Alex that I think is full of red flags.
unidentified
Can you imagine being a liberal for 30 years, okay?
Being a liberal for 30 years and then having one of your homeless say to you, Hello?
30 years a liberal, and then one of my homeless say they got microchipped, and I was listening to Alex Jones, which all three of those make perfect sense in the same sentence.
Either the liberal past that she's describing is being manufactured to give her story more credibility.
As if to say, you can take it from me.
I was part of a group that hates you and even I think you're right.
Or she's just delusional.
You just can't have a, you know, there's no kind of liberal principles you can hold, and then you tune into Infowars and think, hey, these people are really swinging me.
Well, I thought before you even played this that we were leaning more towards a situation where it's like the letters that the veterans get and the guy's like...
Well, I haven't gotten one, but I haven't checked the mail recently.
Or the other guy's like, I heard someone got one.
I thought that she was going to be like, I worked with the homeless and I heard that somebody...
No, he got an offer to get this as opposed to doing 60 days in jail for the trespassing.
Almost like drug court.
It's an option that you can take being involved in this program.
And I don't know if that's true.
That's just what she's saying.
So it's still even second hand to her.
So a lot of this is being driven by a video that made the rounds at the end of November.
Beginning of December area.
It was posted on YouTube by a channel called Beard Brand.
In the video, a barber is giving a nice haircut and beard trim to a man living with homelessness who apparently had helped the shop out with some cleaning, like the windows and stuff.
The video itself is meant to be a heartwarming thing where you see the difference that little things like a haircut or the human interaction with the barber can have.
It is really kind of moving to see the end of the video.
Like how much different this guy appears at the beginning.
Like haggard and kind of like disheveled.
And then he gets this really great haircut.
You can see his face lighting up more.
It's nice.
So at the beginning of the video, getting the haircut says that there's a plan he heard about trying to put a device on people to house their important documents.
And he's even expressing it as, like, this is not a bad idea.
So naturally, Alex sees this as an accidental slip-up admission of the grand conspiracy.
Proof in plain sight.
There's nothing secret and nefarious about the MyPASS program that's being discussed in Austin.
Shit's been really public, and I can find articles going back to at least April of last year covering the launch of the plan and how they were working with the people.
And with blockchain technology, in order to try and navigate some of the larger data privacy issues that something like this would bring up.
We talked about this on a past episode, so I don't want to belabor it, but it's worth recognizing that this is a real thing that's being lied about.
And the real-world function of what Alex is fighting...
Is the development of a program that could give people experiencing homelessness greater access to the tools they need to manage their lives?
Alex covered this story weeks ago, as if it was breaking news, even though it had been public and covered for over a year by other publications.
But then he let it drop.
That was good enough for him, just to touch on the story so he could come back to it if he needed it.
But I think he knew there was no legs to the story and it is what it was.
But then this Beardbrand video came out and it went really viral.
It raked in millions of views, with it currently being at about 6.5 million on YouTube.
There's a clear demonstration that the public was interested in this story, so Alex reprioritized it.
I can't see any other reason for his increased focus on this narrative.
There's no other news other than what he'd already lied about back in October, and nothing that the man in the Beardbrand video said adds anything more to the story.
All that happened was that there was a video that got millions of views, and Alex realized that maybe this would be a story he could take ownership of and get some of that attention for himself.
From his perspective, that makes total sense.
He's just chasing down...
Whatever scraps.
And trying to build it into something.
So, that's all here.
There's a viral video of a guy getting a haircut that mentions this program has been publicly discussed and isn't a secret to anybody.
And Alex is turning it into, I'm going to cut a chip out of somebody on Tuesday.
If the deep state was going to try to have an economic implosion and martial law, which they admit they want, and a civil war, a controlled civil war, out of which America will never come back...
Imagine the planning and the money and the infrastructure that will go into that.
And then imagine the cover stories for the different pieces of the program.
And I have reverse engineered the whole damn thing.
Sure.
And I can hold it in my brain and I could write out the basic skeleton of it on even maybe 20 pieces of paper.
Like, Alex is sitting up here and going on about how he's figured out the entire globalist plan, and he can hold it in his head and maybe write it out in 20 pages, but he can't seem to just explain it in clear, concise language that doesn't end up turning into a pointless rant of time filler about the devil.
If Alex indeed does have this entire globalist plan figured out, then he has a responsibility to put it out for the people.
If he can write it out, this skeleton, in 20 pages, then he needs to sit his ass down and write it out.
Getting through that 20 pages shouldn't take more than half of one of his daily shows.
He writes it all out.
Like, teach a class, dick.
There's literally no excuse for him not to do that.
Just take one day.
Who cares?
The world keeps on moving.
You'll miss your ability to rant about Putin saying mothers are being outlawed.
Take that day.
Do your business.
Get down to business.
Get really specific.
Cite things clearly.
Don't go off into pointless rants about nothing and the devil.
Just lay out the picture that you claim to see so crystal clearly and everything's proven.
Yeah, I mean, that's all that's going on, though, really, is just like the making a rationalization for why he's not doing the thing that his show is supposed to be.
It's just like, I can hold it all in my head, and that's why I just end up riffing about all this stuff.
I could give you all the information, but how about you give me the information and I'll move some blocks around and I'll give you different information.
trigger a civil war saying right wingers blew stuff up when trump gets removed they're going to truck bomb and mass shoot and say we did it when they remove trump use that for a total clamp down the economy is going to implode and then there's going to be homeless running around crazy everywhere what all they got to do is have the chinese who supply 90 of the opiates cut those off for about a month Step four.
And it's going to look like a zombie apocalypse.
They've got UN vehicles, hundreds of NGOs running around getting emergency centers ready.
The cover story is it's for the homeless explosion.
Again, I have to stress that none of this is in his film Endgame, which is another version of a totally proven crystal clear vision of what the globalists plan for their endgame.
All this stuff about the Chinese cutting off the fentanyl.
Okay, but they're a decade behind, so when he made Endgame, he didn't realize that they were going to have to update their stuff as, you know, it's like a PlayStation update.
There are these elements of it that are much more...
Because the FEMA camp stuff was so central to the older days.
And having a lot of that really re-emerge as there's this over-complicated scenario that is going to take place if Alex isn't successful.
And then it all leads to the predetermined destination of Alex being dragged off to a camp.
It is much more reminiscent of that.
But the problem is that he's been goofing off and doing dumb Trump bullshit for the last four years, so those muscles are not as good as they used to be.
He's not good at doing that anymore.
He ends up weaving in this unnecessary homeless population plot that has nothing to do with anything.
That did probably put a wrench in him focusing too much on that.
But it's weird, because it's sort of bubbling back up at the same time that he said Trump's committing treason, and then a couple days later said, I'm 100% on board.
But because they're talking about this and how bad things are for their patriot community or whatever, Alex gets back into that headspace of like, I think it's time to start killing people.
I mean, it is incoherent, but it's intentionally so.
He doesn't want to have us.
In the same way that he's like, I understand crystal clear all the things the globalists are doing, but I won't sit down and just...
Fucking teach a class on it.
It's the same thing.
He wants you to be like, we're in a war, we're being attacked, but I won't do anything offensively, but giving every justification for why whatever you might do is actually defensive, and you probably didn't do it anyway.
It was a globalist false flagging and trying to make us look bad.
Same thing.
Try and keep people in this weird state where you don't know what he's saying.
But what Larry is saying is the same thing he's always been saying.
Which is that these people in Congress are too cowardly to do anything because they need to keep their jobs because when the trouble starts, they become dukes and duchesses.
If Larry wanted to have a higher number on our border, then he should have gone with Mexico.
But even there, there's only 30. The UN does not have troops in the way that Larry is making the audience think.
They have peacekeeping forces that are stationed in countries around the world, with more being in countries that have greater unrest and less in relatively stable countries.
A lot of what they're there for is monitoring, not actually engaging.
They're there also to assist the country's existing power structures.
Currently, there aren't even 250,000 UN peacekeeping troops in the entire world.
I'm sure he imagines that it's like a full prison with an entire army in it, but he must be forgetting that Obama kept trying to close the detention center, and that led to there only being 40 people there currently.
And honestly, if these imaginary UN troops are planning anything, I would say finishing the job of shutting down Guantanamo, which Trump has refused to do, that's not the worst thing they could do.
He sews stories in various places, coming through various mouthpieces to create the illusion of a reality behind his stories.
There's not 250,000 UN troops in Cuba, but you'll see the story being reported in multiple dumb-dumb right-wing media outlets because he made it up and told all of them.
He comes from the days of the old school, when you'd plant stories in different tabloids, and that helps to reinforce what you put in this one is backed by this one.
He comes from the 90s of propaganda.
He's doing that, but it's so easy to trace now.
Anyway.
This is kind of how I know all these people are fucking liars and they know it.
Larry Nichols has been wrong about pretty much everything he's ever said.
He's been a terrible repeatedly discredited source for information since the 90s to the present day.
He said Obama was going to suspend the 2016 election so he could remain president, then declare America a Muslim nation to make himself the king of Islam, and he was being abetted by Congress because they'd all get to become dukes and duchesses when he made his move.
And yet, every time he comes out with some completely unsourced, clearly made-up bullshit, these hosts eat it up and treat him like he's got a Hall of Fame batting average.
They know what they're doing.
They know he's full of shit, but they just like the kind of shit he slings.
So to sum this up, this is all not true.
It's just another hoax that Larry has come up with because he's a bored psychopath.
Well, when we talked to him, I believe what he would fall back on is, you can believe what you want to believe, and I'll believe what I want to believe, and mine happens to be true.
And I can tell you, the people in Kauai, the people in areas of the Pacific, the people in places like Tasmania, These are the people, like the globalists, who have fled to their redoubts.
New Zealand, where they were supposed to already have their robot fortresses, automated security, so they don't need security.
That's BS.
You know, the guy that comes to do maintenance on their underground bunker is going to dump chlorine bleach down it.
And I'm not happy about any of this, but all these globalists are dead.
They're all deader than doornails as soon as this kicks off.
And then we're going to hunt down the ones that are left in their rat holes by we, the people that are left.
I mean, they are dead.
They are dead, dead, dead.
If they try any of this, if they don't back off 100%, then it's all over.
So Alex very heavily promoted on this December 6th episode that he was going to break this big news about the microchipping of the homeless population.
And he was planning to have a surgery where they'd remove one from a person on air.
So obviously, I had to check out the show from Tuesday, December 10th.
Well, the serenity of it is juxtaposed with the mad desperation.
It's just very bizarre.
There's a stretch on one of these shows where Alex is trying to claim that the media was reporting that Owen Schroer had yelled about lynching Obama when he disrupted the impeachment hearing.
It's very clear that they were reporting that he disrupted the impeachment hearing and had previously on air said, quote, he belongs in Guantanamo Bay.
I mean, look, I'm not saying this should happen, but Barack Obama, you know, find the tallest tree in a rope.
It would be pointless to put him in Guantanamo Bay, since we already know there's 250 UN troops that would just bust him out.
So Alex is trying to pretend that media is saying that he said these things about Obama when he disrupted, when it's clear that it's bullshit.
Alex's face as he's trying to thread this needle is really sad.
You can see the recognition in his face that there's tape of Owen Troyer saying those things.
You can see him being fully aware that if any of his listeners actually read the articles he's citing in Vanity Fair or Salon, they'll see that Alex is lying about what they're claiming about Owen's disruption of the proceedings.
You can see him flailing.
You can see in his eyes that the gears are moving, but they're fully aware that it doesn't matter if the gears move.
He's spinning plates for no reason.
And the soft falling snow behind him makes the tableau more profoundly depressing.
And that's not even saying anything about how bad the optics are when he's rambling about how you should buy his dumb pills because shopping anywhere else is giving money to Satan while the snow slowly falls.
It's very weird.
So he doesn't get to his big story because there is no big story.
I went back and checked his Saturday, Sunday, and Monday shows to be sure and nope.
No in-studio surgeries.
No big bombshells.
All just hype for nothing.
On the 6th, Alex was saying that they had everything confirmed.
They had all the footage, they had the interviews, they had the documents.
He set a date for the breaking of this big story, and that date came and it fucking went.
He had five days to smooth out the edges, which seemed like it was just a matter, as he was saying, of filling out HIPAA forms.
That doesn't take long.
It couldn't be more obvious what happened here.
Alex thought this kind of a publicity stunt was going to be a good option for him to get attention.
But then Owen Schroyer disrupted the impeachment inquiry, which was a way more potent option for free press.
So he just ran with that and completely forgot that he promised a big reveal of this bobshell that would bring down the fucking globalists.
Or, I don't know, maybe he had to push it back because he couldn't get that HIPAA form sorted out.
We're recording this on Wednesday, so I have no idea if he finally took down the globalists on Wednesday's show.
One day late, I guess we'll have to see.
The note that I want to leave things on here is this.
It's been a long time since I've watched Alex's show.
And he absolutely doesn't look the same as I remember.
It's not about his beard or the weight fluctuations that happen.
In fact, I would say he looks slimmer than I remember.
But he looks crushed.
Even when he's ranting about winning, his eyes are hollow and flat.
His facial gestures come off contrived, and he's constantly looking at the clock, so he knows how long he has until he needs to dismount from his current nonsense, so he'll have time to get an ad in before the commercial breaks.
His anger reads more like frustration now.
His rants about the evil globalists trying to take him down now seem more sincere, but only when he's yelling about how he has to take the trash out, you know, like around the office.
I'm the opposite of wanting to quit doing the show.
I'm wanting to give up.
I may have to quit just because I can't handle caring this much.
And I see everything now and I'm just reaching a point where I just can't do it.
Every little point.
Every article, I think of a thousand other articles.
Every lie they put out, I can pull up a whole system of their lies and know how they sat around in a think tank and how they cooked up the decision.
And then years later, I'll be reading some white paper or government report and hear about a committee meeting and they say exactly what I envisioned word for word in the meetings I knew was going on.
I mean, I've studied them so much and how evil they are that I'm inside their head and they're inside mine and I can't stand it.
Alex hasn't studied these globalists so closely that he's in their heads and can predict their every move.
He hasn't even read any of the articles he claims he can connect with a thousand other articles, and he expects anyone to give him credit for psychic-level scholarship about a secret group that runs the world?
That's childish shit.
Get the fuck out of here with that.
This is just a propagandist who realizes his time is up, and it's a desperate way for him to go out looking good in the case that that happens.
He's no Bill Cooper, so he's not going out like that.
He knows everyone's laughing at David Icke, so he's not going down that path either.
The way he's making it sound here, he's preparing for him to be the one-world government conspiracy version of that 45-year-old who's at the bar talking about his glory days playing high school football.
Now he could have made the NFL.
You can hear resignation, but an insistence that everyone know that even if he gives up, he knows everything, and he could have stopped the globalists.
If only people had bought more of his pills, and he would have been allowed on Facebook.
When the kid was having a tantrum and it was so loud and boisterous and he filled this adult man's body, you're like, ah, this is fun and scary.
And now you see just a very small 12-year-old boy who can't sit still, who is afraid of anything that's different, who can't handle the idea of masculinity being different than his own.
And he's also dealing with the disillusionment of this sort of father figure in Trump who he thought would protect him, who thought he would bring about all of the things that he's going to get me a pony or whatever.
I wouldn't be surprised if this was so reminiscent of when he was 12 and his dad's like, the communists are coming to take over and they're going to kill all of us.
But, man, when you got a show in a situation where he's building this stuff up about the, like, I'm going to cut this out of a guy's arm, and it's just such a bust, I can handle that, too.